(Conducted from publication No. 116 of the Decree No. 116 of 14 February 2011 by the Government of the People's Republic of Sus State of 27 January 2011)

Chapter I General

Article 1 guarantees the quality of construction work and the safety of the people, in accordance with the laws, regulations and regulations of the People's Republic of China Buildings Act on the Quality Management of Construction works, to develop this approach in conjunction with the current city.

Article II covers activities such as new construction, expansion, alteration and supervision of the quality of construction work within the city's administration.

The construction works described in this approach refer to the installation of construction works, construction works, route pipelines and equipment, and engineering.

Quality management of specialized construction works, such as transport, water, etc., is regulated by laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 3. Construction units, survey units, design units, construction units, and treasury units are responsible for the quality of construction.

The construction map review body, the engineering quality test body are responsible for the findings, testing or identification of the authenticity and accuracy of the report.

Article IV provides the executive authority responsible for the implementation of the integrated oversight management of the quality of construction work in the current city's administration area and for the supervision of the quality of construction work in the Pyang region, the dwindling area, and the treasury area.

The administrative authorities are responsible for the supervision of the quality of construction work in the present administrative area, at the district level, the U X region, the commune, the Sangko State industrial parks, the Sud State (LTTC).

Within their respective responsibilities, the relevant sectors, such as transport, water, are responsible for monitoring the quality of professional construction.

Municipal, district-level municipalities and district-building administrative authorities can be entrusted with the construction quality monitoring body responsible specifically for the construction of quality monitoring of the work.

Chapter II Quality responsibilities and obligations

Article 5. Construction units are the first responsible for the quality of construction work and are responsible for the quality of construction.

The construction units should be mandated by law to conduct a survey, design, construction, treasury, etc., as well as to test the relevant operations of the engineering work undertaken by the inspection body and, in accordance with the law, to identify quality responsibilities.

Article 6. Construction units should identify project managers with the corresponding professional management capacity or commission the institution responsible for the quality management of the works, with clear quality responsibilities.

In accordance with the law, the construction units should be entrusted with the appropriate quality of the work.

Article 7. The construction units shall not express or imply that units and inspection bodies, such as survey, design, construction, treasury, etc., violate the relevant provisions or establish mandatory standards to reduce the quality of construction work.

When construction units enter into contracts with units such as survey, design, construction and inspection, the corresponding reasonable period of work should be determined in accordance with the relevant technical standards and specifications, without compressing the reasonable period of work.

Article 8. Construction units shall be sent to the construction map review body in accordance with the relevant provisions. A review of qualified construction map design documents shall not be subject to unauthorized modifications. It is true that the construction units should entrust the original design units with modifications or, after written consent from the original design cell, other appropriate design units are entrusted with modifications.

The change in the construction map design document involves mandatory provisions relating to public interest, structural security or construction standards, which should be reviewed by the original construction map review body.

Article 9. The construction units shall notify the construction of quality oversight bodies prior to the construction of engineering tests of five working days prior to the completion of the construction work.

Article 10. Surveys, design units should be based on project approval documents, urban and rural planning, enforcement standards for construction and construction of engineering surveys, design of depth requirements, and be responsible for their surveys, design and quality.

Surveys, design documents are not in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph, and the survey, design units should be responsible for changes; resulting in quality of the work, surveying, designating units should be responsible accordingly.

Article 11. The construction map design document developed by the design unit should be synonymous with each other.

The survey, design units, prior to the start-up of the construction work, should describe the survey, design intent and explain the survey, design document to the construction units, construction units or construction units commissioned.

In the course of construction, survey, design units should be responsible for addressing technical issues related to survey and design. For major and complex construction works, the design cell should be deployed to the construction site.

Article 13. Surveys, design units shall be collected and accepted in accordance with the relevant provisions.

Article 14. The construction map review body shall review the following elements of the construction map design document:

(i) In conformity with the mandatory criteria for construction;

(ii) Whether public safety requirements are met;

(iii) Whether the required design depth is met;

(iv) Whether the requirements for energy efficiency are met;

(v) In accordance with the requirements of the survey, design and registration of the personnel and the relevant personnel, whether or not the corresponding maps and signatures are added to the construction map design document in accordance with the provisions;

(vi) Other elements to be reviewed by law, regulations and regulations.

Article 15. After the review of the construction map design document by the construction map review body, the following provisions are addressed:

(i) A review of qualifications, a proposal for a construction map review and review of qualified evidence to the construction unit and a request for the establishment of administrative authorities for the review of the location of the engineering work will be submitted within 5 days of the review of the granting of qualified certificates.

(ii) To recognize that there is no scope of review or that it is not qualified, and that the construction units should be returned and justified in writing.

The construction map review body is qualified to review construction map design documents that are not in compliance with the law, regulations, regulations and regulations and the construction of mandatory standards, causing losses to construction units and assumes the corresponding responsibility under the law.

Article 16 is responsible for the quality of construction work. The construction units should establish a sound quality management system to implement the quality of the construction.

Article 17 The construction units shall test construction materials, construction technology standards and contract terms in accordance with engineering design requirements, construction technology standards and contract agreements, equipment, commodity consolidation and construction key departments, and have written records and exclusive signatures, without testing or testing of qualifications, and shall not be used or entered into the construction process.

Inadequate testing of construction materials, construction components, equipment, commodities, construction units should be informed in a timely manner of the equipment and the construction of quality oversight bodies.

The work performed by the construction unit may be entrusted with the implementation of the engineering quality test body with corresponding qualifications.

Article 18 hidden works were hidden, and the construction units should inform the construction units or construction units that were commissioned by the construction units to test the site and inform the construction of quality oversight bodies.

Article 19 requires that construction units or other relevant units require violations of the relevant provisions or the construction of mandatory standards to reduce the quality of construction works, the construction unit should refuse implementation and inform the construction of quality oversight bodies.

The construction unit shall submit to the construction units, in accordance with the contractual agreement and the relevant provisions, complete construction technical information, quality assurance and use of notes.

Article 21 shall exercise the quality of construction and assume the responsibility for the administration of justice, in accordance with the relevant provisions and technical standards, the design of documents, the construction of contracts and the administration of justice.

The second article should be based on the provision of a stand-alone system for the construction of important parts, processes and hidden works.

In article 23, the PAE has an objection to the quality of construction materials, construction components and equipment used in construction works and has the right to conduct a screening.

For construction units to use construction materials, construction components and equipment that are not in compliance with design requirements or technical standards, the treasury engineers should be stopped; for the end of invalidity, timely notification should be given to construction units and construction quality oversight bodies.

Article 24 does not carry out construction in accordance with the requirements of the review of qualified construction map design documents, construction technical standards and contractual agreements, which should be stopped by the head of the engineer; to end invalidity, the construction units and the construction of quality oversight bodies should be notified in a timely manner.

Article 25 provides that construction units require a breach of the relevant provisions and a mandatory standard of construction and a reduction in the quality of construction work, and the institution should refuse implementation. In order to make the above-mentioned requirements directly to the construction units, the treasury units should be informed in writing of the changes in the construction units; the construction units are not restructured and the construction quality oversight body should be informed in a timely manner.

Article 26 shall conduct engineering tests in a timely manner and sign receipt documents in accordance with the actual construction of the project.

After completion of construction work, the treasury units should carry out the engineering quality assessment.

Article 27 Quality test bodies should have the corresponding qualifications and engage in quality testing activities under the law.

Article 28 Quality test bodies shall not assume work quality testing operations in the name of other testing bodies; other units or individuals shall not be permitted to assume work quality testing operations in the name of this unit.

The engineering quality test body shall not violate the quality test operation of the transfer.

In the process of testing the safety of the construction structure, Article 29 found that the quality of the work was not in accordance with the relevant provisions, technical standards or design requirements and should be communicated to the construction quality oversight body in a timely manner.

When the engineering quality test body conducts on-site testing, it shall be carried out under the witness of the author and the relevant party.

Article 33 The original record of the quality of the work test was lost or could not be identified, and the engineering quality test body should be re-tested or validated in accordance with the provisions.

After the completion of the construction work testing mandate, the engineering quality testing report should be submitted to the mandated units in a timely manner.

When construction works have been completed, units and personnel participating in the receipt should, as a result, be able to make the receipts; the completion of the work was qualified and the completion of the completed inspection documents should be signed in a timely manner.

Chapter III Quality issues and quality accidents

Article 32 provides for a qualitative accident in construction work, and the construction units shall take immediate measures to ensure the safety of the person, prevent the expansion of the accident and report to the administrative authorities in the construction of the engineering area in accordance with established procedures, time frames.

Article 33 provides for a qualitative or qualitative accident in construction work, and the construction unit shall be responsible for renovation or consolidation. The original construction units do not have the corresponding engineering inherent construction capability, and the construction units should entrust the construction of professional units with corresponding qualifications. Repatriation, plus costs and the resulting losses are borne by the responsible party.

The construction units responsible for the return or consolidation of the construction units should be tested for the raw materials. The repatriation or enrichment of the work shall be subject to the relevant provisions.

The construction work required to be renovated or garnered shall not be completed without renovation or consolidation, as well as by renovation or sequestration.

Article 34 provides for quality or quality accidents affecting structural safety, and the original design units should be involved in quality or quality accident analysis, technical treatment programmes or technical processing programmes. Significant changes should be made to the content of the original design document, which should be reviewed through the original construction map review body. The design and inspection costs incurred are borne by the responsible party.

The original design units are not involved in the process, and the construction units may commission other design units with corresponding qualifications.

Article 55 should be involved in the quality of the work or in the handling of quality accidents and be able to stand and conceal the work of the engineering inspection.

The technical treatment programme on quality or quality accidents and the construction archives should be transferred to the City Archives Authority in accordance with the relevant provisions as part of the construction of the engineering archives.

Chapter IV Quality Insurance

Article 37 provides for a quality assurance system for construction. The construction unit assumes responsibility for quality maintenance for construction.

The quality assurance period should be in accordance with the provisions of the law, regulations, regulations and regulations; no provision was made, agreed by the construction unit and the construction unit and made clear in the Work Quality Assurance. The duration of the construction work was calculated from the date of the successful inspection.

Article 338 construction units should assume responsibility for the quality of the house sold.

The quality of the housing of the commodity house will be calculated from the date of delivery of the residence eligible to the buyer. The period of maintenance should be in line with the relevant provisions for the period of maintenance of the commodity home.

The quality insurance period for other housing categories is to be implemented by reference.

Article 39 Construction works have resulted in qualitative defects in the period of maintenance due to survey, design, construction, etc., which are to be repaired by the responsible party; construction units, treasury units, testing institutions are erroneous and accountable under the law.

Article 40 Quality of construction works in terms of coverage and maintenance periods should be informed by the owner or the user in a timely manner. The construction units should be guided by the maintenance programme from within three days from the date of receipt of the notice. In terms of a more technical nature or the quality of structural safety, the construction units should inform the original design units or the appropriate design units to participate in the development of the on-site survey and maintenance programme, with the consent of the owner and the user.

The construction units and maintenance units should arrive on site repairs in a timely manner, following a lack of quality of the security hidden or severely affecting the use of their functions.

Article 40 provides that construction units or insurance units do not fulfil their obligations or delay the performance of their obligations, and the owner or the user may lodge a complaint to the host administrative authority.

Article 42 does not affect the quality of structural safety and public interest, and construction units or units cannot be completed within three months from the date of receipt of the notice, or the same quality defects continue to be used, and the owner may be repaired in accordance with the agreement. Costs are borne by the responsible party.

Article 43 contests the quality of construction work, and the parties may entrust testing or identification with the appropriate qualifications of the testing body or the security accreditation body.

Chapter V

Article 44, in violation of the provisions of this approach, stipulates that the provisions of the law, regulations, regulations and regulations have been penalized.

Article 42

(i) No project manager with a corresponding professional management capacity, as required;

(ii) Where contracts are concluded with units such as survey, design, construction and inspection, the corresponding reasonable period of work is not determined in accordance with the relevant technical standards and specifications;

(iii) The construction map design document modifys mandatory provisions relating to public interest, structural security or construction standards, and does not re-examine qualified start-ups in accordance with the provisions of the construction map review body.

Article 46 Surveys, design units violate the provisions of this approach, which do not participate in the inspection of the relevant stages of the work, or participate in the receipt of the receipt of the receipt of the confirmation, which is correct by the construction of administrative authorities and may impose a fine of up to $20,000.

Article 47 does not carry out a test or test of non-qualified construction at key sections of construction work, as prescribed by the construction of an administrative authority to change the duration of the period of time and to impose a fine of more than 20,000 dollars; in exceptional circumstances, a fine of up to 30,000 dollars.

In violation of this approach, article 48 provides that, after the construction of construction works, there is no real assessment of the quality of the works, which is redirected by the construction of administrative authorities and fines of up to 3,000 dollars.

Article 49 Quality Tests Agency, in violation of this approach, failed to identify the original records of the quality test of the work, which were not re-tested or unconfirmed under the provisions, were reordered by the construction of administrative authorities and could impose a fine of up to 20,000 dollars, in the event of a serious fine of up to 3,000 dollars.

Article 50 builds administrative authorities, constructs engineering quality monitoring bodies and their staff members who perform negligence, abuse of authority, provocative fraud, by their own units or by the superior authorities, and by granting administrative treatment in accordance with the law, which constitutes an offence and hold criminal responsibility under the law.

Annex VI

Article 50 does not apply to the construction of low-scale homes by the turmoil, temporary housing buildings and farmers.

Article 52 is implemented effective 1 April 2011.