(Adopted at the 78th ordinary meeting of the People's Government of the city of Hamila on 17 March 2011, No. 231 of 29 April 2011, published as from 1 June 2011)

Article 1 establishes this approach in the light of the provisions of relevant laws, regulations and regulations, such as the People's Republic of China Building Act and the State Department's Quality Management Regulations.

Article 2 provides for new construction, alteration, extension activities in municipal infrastructure works within the city's administration, as well as supervision of the management of public infrastructure works.

Article 3 of this approach refers to the construction of infrastructure works in cities such as roads, bridges, tunnels, water supply and water purification, drainage, heating, fuel, parking greenification, sewage treatment and garbage disposal.

Article IV is responsible for the management of the quality of municipal works across the city, with the responsibility of municipal engineering quality monitoring bodies.

In accordance with the responsibilities of the executive authorities for rural and urban construction, the authorities are responsible for the supervision of the quality of municipal works in the Territory and are responsible for the day-to-day work of the district (commune) municipal engineering quality monitoring body.

Article 5

Article 6. Construction units should carry out corresponding construction tasks to units with corresponding levels of excellence.

Article 7. The construction units should establish and implement quality responsibilities to guarantee the quality of the work; no express or implied that the relevant units participating in the construction of the construction should violate the standard of quality of the work.

Article 8. The construction units shall, prior to receipt of construction permits or start-up reports, review the construction map design document to the urban and rural construction administrative authorities and the corresponding eligible construction map review units; and conduct the registration process for quality supervision of the works.

When construction units conduct registration procedures, the following information should be submitted to the local urban and rural construction administrative authorities:

(i) The establishment, construction, the composition of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution, and the qualifications certificate of the person concerned;

(ii) The technical review of the construction map design document and the instrument of ratification.

The construction units are presented to the full range of information, and the urban and rural construction administrative authorities should be closed within two working days; the information is incomplete and one-time information is available.

Following the completion of the municipal works, construction units should organize the clearance of units such as survey, design, construction and administration, and inform municipal quality oversight bodies of the inspection of the completed inspection.

There is no experience to receive or receive non-qualified municipal works.

Article 10 Within 15 days after the completion of the municipal works, construction units should be brought to the completion of the process by the municipal engineering quality supervisory body and submit the following information:

(i) Quality-qualified documents signed by the engineering completed inspection reports and surveys, design, construction, and custodial units, respectively;

(ii) Authorized and authorized use of documents by the relevant administrative authorities for the work;

(iii) Quality assurance of work signed by construction units;

(iv) Other information provided by law, regulations.

The municipal engineering quality monitoring body shall submit a case within two working days for work that is in compliance with the conditions for the completion of the work reserve, and shall be informed on a one-time basis.

No work has been carried out for the completion of the work reserve and cannot be transferred to fixed assets.

Article 11. The survey unit should undertake a survey mission in accordance with the level of qualifications; conduct a survey of mandatory standards for the construction of work, in accordance with the laws, regulations and engineering standards, which should be in depth to meet the requirements of the construction standards and engineering design and construction; and participate in the engineering base, the organizational structure and the completion of the survey.

Article 12 Design units should assume engineering design tasks in accordance with the level of qualifications; design in accordance with laws, regulations, construction standards, planning licences and survey outcome documents, the quality of the design should be consistent with the requirements of the construction standards and design depth of the project, specifying the length of time for the reasonable use of the work, the base base of the work, the structure of the subject and the completion of the work.

Article 13. The design units shall, for example, be chosen in the design document for construction techniques, materials, components and equipment that may affect the quality and safety of municipal works, specify technical indicators such as technical standards, specifications, morphology, and sexuality, and shall not apply construction technologies, materials, components and equipment that may affect the quality and safety of municipal works as approved by the provision.

Article 14.

Article 15. The institution should establish a sound quality management system, implement a master-of-the-Charge of the project, set up a body of institutions that meet the requirements of the project, with sufficient quantity and expertise.

Article 16 shall monitor the quality of the work in accordance with the provisions of the custodial planning approved by the review, or the Prisons Rules, in the form of a watchdog, trajectory and parallel test, as well as the important sectoral engineering and important sub-projects such as the local base and the subject structure, important work orders, important concealments, and the use of video material.

(b) The construction unit should be informed and reported to the quality oversight body.

Article 17 shall inspect the quality of material, parts and equipment used by the construction and shall not be permitted without inspection or inspection and supervise the restructuring of the construction units; the construction unit refuses to relocate itself and shall be stopped; and to end the invalidity shall notify the construction unit and report to the quality oversight body.

Article 18 shall promptly collate quality inspection information on engineering and material and conceal information on engineering tests. Technical material and management information should guarantee true integrity.

Article 19 The construction unit shall assume the construction mandate at the level of qualifications; works in accordance with the laws, regulations and relevant technical standards, the construction maps approved by the review and the agreed organization of the engineering contract.

Article 20 The construction units shall organize construction after the construction units conduct quality supervision procedures and obtain construction permits.

Article 21, the construction unit should establish and implement the quality management system of the work and establish a project management body that meets the requirements of the construction, which should be in line with the requirements of the project manager, the quality holder, the technical head.

The construction unit should test the quality of materials, components and equipment used in the works in accordance with the relevant provisions, without testing or testing that is not in accordance with the quality standards, and should reject the use of materials, parts and equipment that are not in compliance with the quality standards.

The construction unit should inform the construction units, the treasury units to check the receipts; important sub-projects such as the local base and the subject structure and important sub-engineering, important work orders and critical concealment of engineering tests should be informed of the quality of the work oversight body to the site.

Article 24 should ensure true integrity by documenting, collating, retaining and managing information in a timely manner.

Article 25. Municipal construction units should take immediate measures to prevent the expansion of accidents and report to quality oversight bodies within 12 hours; and in relation to security accidents, the relevant sectors should be reported in accordance with the relevant provisions.

Following the completion of the municipal works, the construction units should submit to the construction units complete engineering reports and complete construction technical information and management information, and provide engineering quality assurance and use of notes.

Article 27 Quality Testing Bodies should undertake testing tasks in accordance with the level of qualifications, in accordance with legal, regulatory and industrial technical standards, protocols providing for the conduct of testing operations, and be responsible for the authenticity and accuracy of data and testing reports.

Article 28 Quality test bodies should communicate the quality, material, structure and equipment of the identified engineering entities in a timely manner to the construction, supervision, construction units and municipal engineering quality monitoring bodies.

The construction map review body should assume the task of constructing and implementing a quality management system, in accordance with the level of qualifications, to be staffed in accordance with job qualifications requirements and professionally structured review personnel.

Article 33 The construction map review body shall conduct a technical review of the construction map design document in accordance with the provisions of the applicable law, regulations and construction of mandatory standards. A review of qualifications should be made available to the construction unit for review of qualifications, review of inadmissibility, non-application of qualified documents and written statements to the construction units or suggestions for amendments.

Article 31 shall prepare the Quality of Engineering Monitoring Programme in accordance with the relevant provisions and the actual circumstances of the work, specify the quality of the works, the quality of the work, preventive and governance measures for the quality of the work, and the important sub-projects such as the base, the structure of the subject, and the supervision requirements of important sub-projects, important work processes, critical hidden works.

Article 32 Quality supervisory bodies should monitor the quality of the responsibility of the engineering entity and the construction of the works by means of inspection and random screening.

In implementing the quality supervision of the engineering entity, the municipal engineering quality oversight body should use advanced technologies to monitor the quality of materials, components and equipment used in the works.

Article 3.13 In performing its oversight functions, the following powers may be exercised:

(i) Access to inspected construction sites;

(ii) To request the inspectorate to provide documentation and information on the quality of municipal works;

(iii) Excise the relevant units of the discovery of the quality of the work;

(iv) Violations by law of laws, regulations and regulations relating to the quality of municipal works;

(v) To inform the quality oversight body on-site inspections, in accordance with the Engineering Quality Monitoring Programme, of the valuable, important work orders and quality control points that are not performed by the competent units to provide technical advice on the quality of the Department's engineering entity. Upon technical recognition of non-compliant quality standards, the responsible units are being corrected; the construction units are advised to require the re-exploitation of the functionality of the works and the time limit for the use.

The following elements should be monitored in the context of the supervision of the municipal engineering quality monitoring body of the completion of the work.

(i) The form of the receiving organization, whether the process is in compliance with the relevant provisions;

(ii) The authenticity and consistency of the information and quality assessment documents provided;

(iii) The quality of the entity concerned the quality of the function of structural safety and impact;

(iv) The test findings of the quality of the work are in compliance with the country's criteria for inspection.

The municipal engineering quality monitoring body shall, within 5 days of the completion of the work, report on the quality of the works to the construction units.

Article XV regulates the quality of work. The maintenance period for public-use construction works, such as bridges, tunnel works and sewerage plants, garbage processing plants, and the subject structure is a reasonable time frame for the design of documents; and other engineering maintenance periods are carried out in accordance with the law, regulations and regulations.

The maintenance period was calculated from the date of the completion of the test. The quality of the work occurred during the maintenance period, with the responsibility of the responsible unit responsible for repairs; over the maintenance period, with the responsibility of the engineering management and conservation units.

Article XVI provides for a quality assurance fund (hereinafter referred to as a payment). The bond was retained by the construction unit at 5 per cent of the construction price.

Prior to the completion of the municipal works, the construction unit shall open a specialized account to the designated bank, which will be secured in accordance with the pre-reservation criteria, and the construction units may also be transferred to the specialized account established by the construction unit one-time in the engineering settlement price.

The municipal engineering quality monitoring body is responsible for the use of the bond, for the return of oversight management, and for the inspection of the implementation of the indemnity when it oversees the completion of the work or the processing of the completion of the work clearance.

Article 338, in the period of quality maintenance, has a qualitative defect in the work, which is performed by the construction unit in compliance with the obligation to repair; the construction unit has not complied with the obligation to perform the maintenance of other units by the construction unit or the municipal engineering quality monitoring body, and the costs incurred are deducted from the bonds.

The construction unit or the municipal engineering quality monitoring body commission other units to be repaired, and the portion of the cost of the excess of the payment is charged by the author to the construction unit.

Quality defects occurred during the maintenance period, and the construction unit contests the responsibility to quality, may apply for the organization of technical validation by the construction unit and the technical identification of non-construction responsibilities, which are still under the responsibility of the construction unit, and the cost of maintenance and technical identification are vested with the construction unit responsible for recovering the quality defector.

Article 39 expires on the quality of the insurance, and the guarantee shall be returned in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) The construction unit was not fully returned to the guaranteed principal and interest.

(ii) The construction unit has returned to the construction unit in full in accordance with the provision for the performance of the maintenance obligations.

(iii) The construction unit does not perform the responsibility for repairs, which is entrusted by the construction unit or the municipal engineering quality monitoring body to other units, deducting the costs incurred in the bond, and the balance sheets and interest return to the construction unit.

Article 40

(i) The payment of municipal engineering packages to survey, design, construction, treasury units that do not have a corresponding hierarchy of qualifications, with a fine of over 500,000 dollars.

(ii) The construction map design document was not reviewed or reviewed in a manner that was not qualified and was self-employed; the absence of a quality supervision of the work performed was performed, with a fine of over 500,000 dollars.

(iii) After the completion of the work, the contract price of the construction contract is less than 4 per cent of the amount of the cost of the works, resulting in the legal liability of the loss.

(iv) After the completion of the work, the completion of the clearance process was not followed by a fine of more than 300,000 dollars.

Article 40 states that, in violation of this approach, no survey mission is carried out according to the level of qualifications and that the administrative authorities in rural and urban areas are responsible for putting an end to the offence, and that the contract-agreed survey fee is more than two times the amount of a fine of the proceeds in conflict with the law, forfeiture of the proceeds of the offence, and that no investigation is carried out in accordance with the mandatory standards of construction of the construction of the construction of the project, the responsibility is corrected, with a fine of more than 300,000 dollars.

Article 42 (1) In violation of this approach, the design cell is one of the following cases, which is rectified by the executive authority responsible for urban and rural development and punished in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) The design mandate was not performed at the level of qualifications, with the design of the contract agreement of more than two times the amount of a fine, with the proceeds of the violation and forfeiture; and the amount of more than 300,000 yen under the investigation outcome.

(ii) The use of technical and material affecting the quality and safety of municipal works resulting in a quality safety accident, with a fine of more than 300,000 dollars.

Article 43, in violation of this approach, provides that one of the following cases is changed by the executive authority responsible for urban and rural development and punished in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) Unless the award of a treasury operation is based on the qualifications of the enterprise, the treasury pay is more than two times the fines agreed upon in the contract; and the proceeds of the offence are confiscated.

(ii) Without the implementation of the project's General Director-General's Office responsible for the management of the institution that is not in line with the requirements of the project, a fine of more than 20,000 dollars.

(iii) No major subsector works and important sub-projects such as the engineering base and the main structure, important work orders, important concealments, are subject to a stand-alone inspection, with a fine of over 50,000 yen.

(iv) Without supervision of changes in construction units that are not in compliance with quality standards, a fine of up to 500,000 yen; in the case of serious circumstances, it is recommended that the issuing authority reduce the level of qualifications or revoke the certificate of qualifications, and remove the eligibility of those responsible and supervisors to carry out activities in the construction of the market in the city for three years.

(v) Authorize the use of unchecked or inspected non-qualified materials, components and equipment with a fine of more than half a million yen; in exceptional circumstances, it is recommended that the issuing authority reduce the level of qualifications or revoke the certificate of qualifications and remove the eligibility of direct responsibilities and supervisors to engage in the construction of the market in the city for three years.

(vi) There is no timely collation of the quality supervision of the engineering and material and the concealment of the material or the preparation of false information, with a fine of over 2,000 dollars.

Article 44 states that, in violation of this approach, the construction unit is one of the following cases, which is being restructured by the administrative authorities in rural and urban areas and punished in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) No construction mandate has been carried out at the level of strength, with a fine of more than one million yen and confiscation of the proceeds of the conflict.

(ii) Major managers such as project heads, heads of quality, technical heads are not required to perform their functions, with a fine of up to $20,000.

(iii) The work does not carry out the quality supervision registration process, and the start-up work, with a fine of more than 3,000 dollars.

(iv) Without construction of the relevant quality technical standards and the construction map design document approved by the review, the cost of the works contract is less than 4 per cent of the cost of the works.

(v) The use of materials, components and equipment that are untested or tested to be incompatible with quality standards, with a fine of more than 200,000 dollars.

(vi) Prior to concealment of work, the construction units, the treasury units are not notified to the inspection of the site or the major sub-engineering and important sub-projects such as the engineering base and the constituent structure, important work sequences and critical concealment of the work test, and the quality of the work is not notified to the engineering oversight body to be concealed, with over 210,000 fines.

(vii) No timely documentation, collation, preservation of technical information and management information, or preparation of false information, with a fine of over 3,000 dollars.

(viii) Without timely measures to prevent the expansion of accidents or the absence of a prescribed report, the removal of the eligibility of direct responsibilities and supervisors in the construction of the market in this city for three years.

Article 42

(i) The inspection report does not accurately result in accidents in the quality of the work, with a fine of more than 20,000 dollars.

(ii) Reports of false testing of materials and works that are not in compliance with quality standards, with more than two times the amount of the contract price of more than two times the fine, with the removal of the eligibility of direct responsibilities and supervisors to carry out business activities in the construction market in the city three years; and in the event of severe circumstances, the recommendation of the issuing authority to reduce the level of qualifications or to cancel the certificate of qualifications.

Article 46 of the construction map review body, in violation of this approach, sets out the technical review of the prequalification documents for the construction map that violates the mandatory standards of construction, which exceeds two times the contract price and excludes the eligibility of direct responsibilities and supervisors to work in the construction of the market in this city for three years; in the case of serious cases, recommends that the issuing authority reduce the level of qualifications or revoke the award of the award.

In violation of this approach, a production enterprise using materials, components and equipment used by municipal works will sell unfettered materials, components and equipment to the procurement unit resulting in accidents in the quality of the work, with a fine of over 2,000 dollars.

Article 48 Eighteenvironmental construction of the executive branch and staff of the municipal engineering quality supervisory bodies are not subject to statutory duties, omissions, abuse of authority, provocative fraud, and are subject to administrative disposition by their units or superior authorities, inspection bodies, in accordance with the law; constitutes an offence, bringing to justice criminal responsibility by the judiciary:

(i) The quality of the subjects responsible for the quality and construction of the engineering entity and the failure to perform oversight obligations, resulting in a quality accident;

(ii) The receipt of information on the registration of construction units for the quality of the work or for the completion of the work clearance request, which is reviewed in compliance with the requirements and do not be completed within the specified time frame;

(iii) A notice of the completion of the work of the construction unit was received and no oversight duties were performed on the inspection site;

(iv) After the completion of the work, the quality oversight report was not presented within the specified time frame;

(v) Other laws, regulations and regulations should be accountable.

Article 49 does not apply to military works, the seizure of risk relief and other temporary facilities.

Monitoring of the quality of professional works, such as water, electricity, communications, is carried out in accordance with the relevant laws, regulations.

Article 50 The Harhama Municipal Government issued the Hara Municipal Quality Monitoring of Public Works, which was issued on 3 September 1989, was also repealed.