(Summit 5th ordinary meeting of the People's Government of Chiang State of 20 February 2012 to consider the adoption of Decree No. 68 of 16 March 2012 No. 68 of the Decree No. 68 of the People's Government of the Grand State of 16 March 2012 for implementation effective 1 May 2012.

Article 1 expedites the establishment of the rule of law government in order to fully advance the administration of the law and, in accordance with the State's notification of the publication of a comprehensive framework for the implementation of the administration of the law (issuing No. 2004]10), the State of State's decision to strengthen the administration of the city's municipalities (State of 2008]17) and the State Department's views on strengthening the building of the rule of law (State of production [2010]33), to develop this approach in the light of the actual provisions of the city.

Article 2, which refers to an administrative examination by the Government of the superior people at the lower level and to a monitoring system for the evaluation and evaluation of the performance of the administrative work of the subordinate sector.

Article 3 applies to the legal administrative conduct within the present municipal administration.

Article IV should be guided by the principles of fairness, openness and transparency, unity of leadership and responsibilities.

Article 5

The executive review of the law may invite the representatives of the General Assembly, members of the political consultation, expert scholars, the media and other interested parties to participate.

Article 6

The communes, district-level municipalities are responsible for the archiplining of the people of the town, the street offices and the sectors of the people's government.

The Government should strengthen the guidance and supervision of the lower-level people's Government's conduct of the executive review under the law.

The superior administration should strengthen the guidance provided by the lower administration sector in the conduct of the legislative administrative conduct.

Article 7. The vertically managed sector is carried out by its superior administration and fully listens to the views of its peer-level people's Government, which is reproduced by the same Government as the executive coordinating body of the law.

The dual-managed sectors are carried out by the same-ranking people's Government and listened fully to the views of their superior administrations, which are reproduced in their superior administration.

Article 8

(i) Organizational leadership in the administration of justice;

(ii) Administrative service effectiveness;

(iii) Science democratic decision-making;

(iv) Institution-building;

(v) Administrative law enforcement;

(vi) Public information of the Government;

(vii) Administrative oversight;

(viii) Other elements requiring the examination.

The system of administrative appraisals is developed separately by the executive review body of the law and is published in the name of the legal administrative appraisal body on behalf of the same-ranking people's government after the review.

Article 9

(i) To use the law as a basic norm for the functioning of the Government, in all its aspects and components;

(ii) Establish leadership, oversight and coordination mechanisms for the sound administration of justice, perform the duties of the first responsible person, develop specific approaches and accompanying measures to advance the administration of the law, implement the legislative and annual tasks, and establish an administrative oversight appraisal system in accordance with the law;

(iii) The establishment of an administrative accountability system, which is responsible for the organization, guidance, supervision and supervision of administrative accountability by government departments, and accountability by the Government in accordance with the delegated authority of the Ministry;

(iv) Establish a well-led leadership and a system of staff in the executive organs to strengthen the legal training and conduct of administrative law enforcement officials, to strengthen the promotion of the law and the rule of law, to create a good environment for the full-fledged law and the right to justice;

(v) Strengthening the institution of the rule of law, adapting institutions, staffing and work tasks to support and promote the role of the Government's rule of law institutions and sectoral rule of law institutions in the implementation of integrated planning, integrated coordination, guidance, oversight and inspection.

Article 10 Basic requirements for the effectiveness of administrative services:

(i) To define and regulate the functions and powers of the executive organs in accordance with the law, to promote separation, political separation, political separation and the legalization of duties, institutions and institutions;

(ii) Improve the financial security mechanisms of the administration of justice, introduce a centralized public financial system, clean-up and regulation of government non-levant revenue, such as administrative fees, and strictly implement the “payments-of-payments” system, and administrative funds are guaranteed in the financial budget, with the introduction of a pool of payments;

(iii) Reform of administrative practices, regulation of administrative licences, reduction of administrative licences (approval) projects, optimization of administrative licences (approval) processes, reduction of administrative licences (approval) components, accelerated e-government construction, expansion of government online office, inter-ministerial information interoperability and resource sharing, establishment of e-monitoring networks, inspection of administrative licences (approval);

(iv) Establish early warning and emergency response mechanisms to continuously improve the scope of emergency preparedness, trigger mechanisms, procedures, time frames, publication, etc., to properly address various types of emergencies.

Article 11. Basic requirements for scientific democratic decision-making:

(i) Improve administrative decision-making rules and regulate administrative decision-making processes;

(ii) Establish and implement systems such as public participation, legitimacy review, collective decision-making;

(iii) Establish a system for the sound assessment of major administrative decision-making and post-implementation assessments, to detect and correct problems in administrative decision-making and to reduce the loss of decision-making;

(iv) Establish a system of accountability for sound administrative decision-making and harmonization of decision-making and decision-making responsibilities.

Article 12 Basic requirements for system-building:

(i) The organization of drafting or developing normative documents should be in accordance with the provisions of the law, legislation and strict compliance with statutory competence and statutory procedures;

(ii) The establishment of a system of sound public participation, expert advice, legitimacy review, collective discussion of decisions, hearings and follow-up notes and publication in the drafting of government regulations, the development of normative documents;

(iii) The establishment and refinement of normative documents, the abolition of work systems and the effective time frame for normative documents, and the regular assessment system.

Article 13 Basic requirements for administrative enforcement:

(i) Reform of the administrative law enforcement system, regulation and implementation of relatively centralized administrative penalties, active promotion of integrated administrative law enforcement pilots, exploration of relatively centralized administrative licences and the establishment of administrative enforcement dispute coordination mechanisms;

(ii) To carry out administrative law enforcement responsibilities under the law, which are lawful, procedurally, accurate and appropriate, and in compliance with legal requirements;

(iii) Execution of an administrative law enforcement subject review system, and administrative law enforcement officers have access to law enforcement and accreditation through training examinations;

(iv) Execution of administrative law enforcement systems, law enforcement, authority, law enforcement, disciplinary standards, procedural steps, specific time frames, methods of oversight, etc. to the community;

(v) The establishment of an administrative law enforcement review system, the inspection records, evidence materials, law enforcement instruments, etc. of administrative sanctions, administrative licences, administrative enforcement activities, etc., should be archived, centralized management and periodic inspections;

(vi) To regulate the discretionary power of administrative law enforcement, to establish and implement a benchmarking system for the freedom of administrative law enforcement;

(vii) In-depth implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities, strict compliance with the law-making basis, separation of law enforcement responsibilities, enforcement responsibility, and implementation of the relevant accompanying system such as accountability.

Article 14.

(i) The public body of the corresponding government and the designated person to be responsible for the public work of the Government;

(ii) Establish a confidential review of the production and content of sound information classifications;

(iii) The establishment of a public examination, social review, annual report, accountability system and the facilitation of access to information by the public;

(iv) Individuals, legal persons or other organizations are governed by law to apply for public matters;

(v) Establish systems such as public operational training for sound government and monitoring of evaluation.

Article 15. Basic requirements for administrative oversight:

(i) Be vigilantly accepting the supervision and advice of the People's Congress and taking seriously the recommendation of the representative of the People's Congress that the Government should report to the People's Congress on its work in accordance with the rules and normative documents submitted by the Standing Committee of the People's Representatives to the General Assembly and report annually to the Standing Committee of the People's Congress on the advancement of the administration of the law;

(ii) To be aware of the democratic oversight of the political consultation, to take the initiative of listening to the views and recommendations of the political consultations and to seriously address the proposals of members of the political consultation;

(iii) Be aware of judicial oversight and the active appearance of cases of administrative proceedings before the People's Court shall be v., the defence, and the self-response of the judgement and decision taken by the People's Court under the law;

(iv) The Government should improve the normative documentation review system by strengthening oversight of the departments of the current people's Government and the Government of the lower-level people to draw administrative practices;

(v) Seriously follow up on the National People's Republic of China's Administrative Review Act and its implementing regulations, and receive, impartially, administrative review cases and seriously correct violations and inappropriate administrative acts;

(vi) Seriously implement the National Compensation Act of the People's Republic of China, improve and strictly implement the administrative compensation system and establish a robust administrative compensation system;

(vii) Establish a robust system of internal oversight at the regular level to enhance oversight of the specific administrative conduct of the subordinate administrative organs;

(viii) Support and cooperate with specialized oversight bodies, such as monitoring, auditing, to carry out monitoring independently of the law and to monitor the oversight decisions of the oversight bodies;

(ix) Improve the system of mass reporting of complaints and the mechanisms for the conduct of investigations, verification, processing and publication of issues reflected in mass inspections, media.

Article 16 shall, in accordance with this approach, establish an annual administrative appraisal programme, in conjunction with the annual legislative priorities and key work objectives of the Government, in accordance with this approach, to specify specific aspects of the conduct of the conduct of the conduct of the conduct of the conduct of the conduct of the conduct of the conduct of the conduct of the conduct of the conduct of the study, the examination of the nuclear standards, the form of the examination and the rules of evaluation.

Article 17 shall be subject to the regular conduct of the conduct of the examination in conjunction with the annual archaeological examination, the combination of the focus of the archaeological examination and the comprehensive archaeological examination, the integration of the internal archaeological examination with external review, the written review with the on-site inspection.

Article 18 The daily archaeological examination is carried out by the relevant files, documents, information, the organization of specialized inspections, on-site inspections, etc., in accordance with the law of administrative nuclear bodies. The daily inspection is based on the assessment of the annual archaeological examination.

The annual evaluation is conducted early in the next year and is carried out by the legislative executive board in accordance with the annual legal administrative appraisal programme. The annual archaeological examination could be carried out through the annual report, the hearing of reports of work, the access to documents, the organization of specialized inspections or abstracts, the organization of external reviews and other methods determined by the executive board.

The external review may take the form of colloquiums, questionnaire surveys, online review and written requests. The external review may be carried out by the self-organization of the executive nuclear body under the law, or by other bodies entrusted to it by the executive board.

In the course of the examination, the object of the examination shall be subject to the annual report of the competent administrative body, as required by the law, and to the record of meetings, documentation, statistical statements, case files, etc., for the advancement of the legal administration.

Article 19, which is divided by the executive review, includes 20 per cent of the external review. The evaluation approach is subject to deduction until it is completed. In accordance with the status of the assessed contributions, it is divided into good terms (more than 90, with 90), good (more than 75, with 75), qualified (60 in excess of 75, with 60), non-qualified (60 sub-Saharans).

Article 20 shall notify the object of the preliminary findings in writing. The object of the examination contests the results of the examination, which may be submitted in writing to the competent administrative nuclear body under the law within seven working days from the date of receipt of the notice. The legal administrative appraisal body shall verify within seven working days of the date of receipt of a written complaint and communicate the verification results in writing to the complaints unit.

Article 21 presents the results of the examination to society in an appropriate manner after the finalization of the present-level people's Government, as part of a report on the same-party committee, the Standing Committee of the People's Representatives of the General Assembly and the Shanghai People's Government.

Article 22 incorporates into the party's leadership and leadership in the implementation of the scientific development evaluation system, which is linked to the punishment of incentives and the dismissal of the Ministry. The units and individuals that have highlighted performance are given incentives in accordance with the relevant national provisions. The results of the examination were not qualified, criticized and criticized for the submission of written changes to the time limit. The results of the change were reviewed by the legislative executive review body.

Article 23 enshrines the facts and misleadings in accordance with the administrative examination of the law, gives criticism, and, in serious circumstances, accountability to the relevant administrative organs and their staff, in accordance with the relevant provisions.

In accordance with the relevant provisions, there is a violation of administrative conduct in accordance with the relevant provisions.

Article 24 Government departments should, in the light of this approach, develop the system of administrative appraisals and indicators under the law, and conduct an examination of their institutions, subordinate bodies, management units and staff.

Article 25 A review of administrative law in the city of Hiroshima effective 1 June 2007 was also repealed.