(It was considered at the 71st ordinary meeting of the Turkmen Government of 1 March 2013 through Decree No. 143 of 5 March 2013, published as from 1 April 2013)

Article 1 establishes this approach in conjunction with the provisions of relevant legislation such as the Food Security Act of the People's Republic of China and its implementing regulations, the Food Security Monitoring Management Scheme for catering services.

Article 2

Article 3: The IFAS is responsible for the supervision, guidance and specific responsibility for the health inspections of practitioners in the whole municipal meal services industry, the jungle, the rehabilitation area and the desire of the new South, the health inspection of the catering industry in the area of economic development.

In other districts (markets, districts) food drug surveillance management is responsible for the supervision of health inspections by practitioners in the catering services industry in the current administration.

Article IV provides for health-care institutions that apply for the health inspection of catering services practitioners with the following conditions:

(i) The licensing of the medical agency for the operation of the health inspection project or the quality of preventive health inspections;

(ii) The eligibility of legal persons and the independent assumption of civil responsibility;

(iii) Inspections, tests, facilities and sanitation conditions that are adapted to health inspections;

(iv) Professional technicians with a doctor, technicians or corresponding duties;

(v) A well-developed health inspection system;

(vi) The staffing of digital photographs and hard-copy equipment to collect and print on-site photographs for persons seeking health inspection certificates;

(vii) Other conditions under the food medicine control sector.

Article 5 institutions with health inspection conditions should apply to local food drug control surveillance authorities, which are determined by strict examination in accordance with the principles of reasonable and user-friendly inspection by the Food Drugs Monitoring Administration.

The district-level food drug control surveillance management should provide the municipal food medicine surveillance management for 15 days after the establishment of the inspection body. The municipal food medicine surveillance management regularly publishes the list of health-care institutions that are responsible for the health inspection of catering services practitioners.

Article 6. Institutions responsible for health inspections should comply with the following provisions:

(i) To conduct inspections under the prescribed inspection project, to produce a true inspection results and to inform the health inspector's unit within 10 days and the local food drug control oversight authorities;

(ii) “Health screenings for practitioners in catering services” using a harmonized directory of the municipal food medicine surveillance;

(iii) The cost of health inspections based on the fees set by the price sector;

(iv) To receive and cooperate with oversight inspections by the Food Medicine Monitoring Administration;

(v) Other matters under laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 7 practitioners working in catering services should conduct health inspections every year and obtain health certificates for practitioners in the catering services.

The heads of the catering services unit, food security managers, kitchens and support staff, servicers, procurementrs, washing and warehousing personnel should conduct health checks.

The catering service providers should establish and implement a health management system for practitioners, in accordance with article 34 of the People's Republic of China Food Security Act, and establish health files for practitioners.

Article 8

Food drug surveillance authorities, health inspection agencies and catering services enterprises should take confidential measures to health check the information.

Article 9. Health inspection by practitioners shall be conducted in accordance with the following projects:

(i) History of illnesses;

(ii) Hepatitis, spacing;

(iii) skin inspections;

(iv) Besided;

(v) diarrhoea, typhical censorship;

(vi) There are suspicions or other historical history of veterinary communicable diseases within one year, with corresponding laboratory inspections;

(vii) Hepatitis functional inspection found that GoogleV-IgM (a hepatitis), HEV-IgM (e hepatitis).

Article 10 practitioners of catering services conduct a health check every year. In exceptional cases, such as sudden public health incidents, urban food drug surveillance authorities can properly increase health inspections.

Article 11. Health check-ups are not qualified staff and the catering business should adapt it to other jobs that do not affect the safety of dietary goods.

Epidemiological diseases, such as diarrhoea, typhoid, hepatitis A virus, hepatitis E virus, and persons with activities that are harmful to food security, severance or intrusive skin diseases, must not engage in direct access to food.

Article 12. After the healing of patients with the disease as set out in article 11.2 of this approach, health certificates should be reprocessing.

Article 13. The health inspector's objection to the health inspection results can apply for review from the date of 7 days from the receipt of the health inspection. The institutions that have assumed health inspections should be promptly processed and reviewed within 15 days.

Article 14. Health certificates for practitioners of catering services, if left behind, shall be submitted in a timely manner to the licensee. The effectiveness of health certificates is one year.

Article 15 Drinking service practitioners should, in their work, be equipped with a health certificate that brings together a uniform code.

Health inspection certificates must not be altered, forged, modified, sold, rented, transferred and transferred.

Article 16 does not recognize the results of a healthy examination and the confiscation of proceeds of an offence may be punished by a fine of more than three times the proceeds of the offence and up to $300,000.

Article 17 Health inspection bodies have warned against the provisions of article 6, subparagraphs (i), (ii) and (iv), of this approach; serious or non-removable circumstances impose a fine of up to $3000 and remove their eligibility for health inspections.

In violation of article 13 of this approach, the health inspectorate is responsible for the delay in the conclusion of the review, which is made within 10 days and may grant a warning or a fine of up to $500.

Article 19, paragraph 1, of the scheme provides that a medical examination of the whole city code was not accompanied by a medical examination, a warning, a correctional order and a fine of US$ 500.

The treasury, falsification, sale, rent, transfer and transfer of health inspection certificates are punishable by 1000.

Article 20, in violation of article 11 of this approach, provides for the recruitment of non-qualified practitioners, the conversion of the time limit of the person's unit and the fine of €300,000, which causes serious consequences, constitutes a crime and is criminalized by law.

Article 21 violates the catering services units under this approach, which are severely or have a significant impact, and local food medicine surveillance authorities can inform the media.

In article 22, citizens, legal persons or other organizations have found that the body responsible for health inspections is misleading, untrusively checked, and the health inspector's unit does not organize health inspections according to the prescribed regulations and can report to the food drug control oversight management, the food drug surveillance management should be processed in a timely manner and the verification and verification of compliance with the law.

Article 23, Pharmace services practitioners are eligible for health inspections when they are registered in the workplace, and the food drug surveillance management has endorsed their inspection findings in the current year.

Medical practitioners of catering services have been qualified under this approach, and the relevant departments may not require the re-excise of the inspector when they are registered.

Article 24