(Summit 14th Session of the Government of the Youth of 18 December 2012 to consider the adoption of Decree No. 225 of 21 January 2013 by the People's Government Order No. 225 of 21 January 2013, effective 1 March 2013)

Chapter I General

Article I, in order to strengthen and regulate the hidden governance of the production of security accidents, implements the responsibilities of the subject matter of safe production, prevent and reduce production of safe accidents, guarantee the safety of the people's life and property, and develops this approach in line with the provisions of relevant laws, regulations, such as the People's Republic of China Act on Safety of Production.

Article 2 Exclusive governance and oversight management for the production of safe accidents within the city's administration (hereinafter referred to as spoilers) applies.

Article 3 of this approach refers to the occurrence of accidents, which is contrary to the provisions of safety-production laws, regulations, standards, protocols and security production management systems, or the risk of accidents, environmental hazards, human insecurity and management deficiencies due to other factors in production operations.

Article IV of the accident is hidden by a general accident and a major accident. Of these, the risk and governance are less difficult, and it is found that the concealments that can be immediately removed are hidden by a general accident; the greater and unreliable measures to ensure the safe operation and the non-removableness of 15 days should be completely or bureaucratic, or the concealment that the productive units themselves cannot be excluded by external factors is a major accident.

The State, the provincial authorities have also provided for the management of the accidental spectacles.

Article 5 Constraints of accidents persist in the approach of “Security first, prevention of ownership, integrated governance” and the Government's integrated leadership, sector regulation, production units are fully responsible, mass participation in oversight, expert advice guidance.

Article 6. Governments at all levels should strengthen the unity of leadership in the management and supervision of accidents in the current administration area, to coordinate and address critical issues in the identification of governance, and to effectively prevent accidents in production.

Article 7. The Government of the Republic of the People's Safety and Productive Management (hereinafter referred to as the security regulatory sector) implements integrated oversight management of the management of the accident of the production units in this administrative area. Other relevant sectors with the responsibility to oversee the management of safe production (hereinafter referred to as the relevant sector) are governed by the supervision of the management of the investigation of accidents in productive units within their respective responsibilities, in accordance with the provisions of this approach and other relevant legal regulations.

Article 8.

Chapter II

Article 9. The productive business unit shall develop criteria for the identification of accidents that are adapted to jobs, processes, equipment and equipment, in accordance with the self-identification guidance criteria for the production of safe accidents.

Article 10. The productive units should establish a system of governance for the identification of accidents, specifying job requirements and corresponding responsibilities, such as identification, file, reporting, supervision, reporting incentives, financial security and use.

Article 11. The productive units should focus on the weaknesses in the systems of the unit, infrastructure, technical equipment, operating environment, monitoring facilities and the security management organization system, the security management system, the safe production responsibilities regime, on-site management, and on-site management, and carry out accident clearance efforts.

Article 12 Production operators should organize safe production managers, engineering technicians and other relevant personnel, and, if necessary, invite experts to participate in the conduct of accidents that are not fully identifiable or dedicated to the identification process. Mining, construction, metallurgy, ship renovation, ocean fishing, road transport, water transport units and the production, operation, storage units and units with major hazardous sources (hereinafter referred to as the high-risk industrial production units) are organized at least one full or specialization per month, and other production units organize at least one full sequencing or specialization each quarter.

Article 13 Constraints of the general accident identified by the productive units should take immediate measures to be rescinded;

(i) Removal of the use of relevant facilities equipment, cessation of construction, cessation of construction, suspension of the bureau or all suspension of the production industry, in accordance with the need for rehabilitation;

(ii) Organizing expert technical personnel or experts to conduct risk assessments based on relevant standards and approaches, specifying the current state, causes, impacts, and surrounding environmental conditions, adaptability and risk assessment reports;

(iii) Develop governance programmes that clarify the objectives and mandates, methods and concrete measures of governance, the division of responsibility, the security of funds and materials, time-bound and requirements, security measures and emergency scenarios and other related matters;

(iv) Implementation of governance programmes to exclude accidents.

Article 14.

After receipt of reports of major accidents by the security management sector and the relevant sectors, the production units should be urged to exclude accidents and prevent accidents in accordance with the governance programme; and, where necessary, conduct on-site verification and take emergency management measures such as the suspension of the production industry, the establishment of a safety alert mark.

During major accidents hidden governance, key heads of the productive units should be regularly informed of governance reports, ensuring that the financial and material conditions necessary for major accidents hidden governance are addressed in a timely and coordinated manner.

Article 16 provides that the productive business unit should take the corresponding safety precautions in the context of accident hidden governance to prevent accidents.

It is not possible to guarantee security prior to the exclusion or exclusion of the accident, to withdraw from operating personnel from hazardous areas and to disperse or inform other persons that may be endangered, to establish a watchdog marking, to stop the use of the relevant facilities equipment, to stop construction, to stop construction, to the construction of the construction, to the suspension of the bureau or to complete the suspension.

Article 17

An accidental concealment of the governance file should include the identification date, basic circumstances, type of hierarchy, governance, etc., and be properly preserved. General accidents concealed at least one year for the identification of governance files, and major accidents were hidden for at least three years.

Article 18

Other productive units should conduct a quarterly and year-by-year statistical analysis of the incident of this unit and submit statistical analysis to the local security management sector and related sectors by 10 of the first quarter and 15 January, respectively.

Article 19

(i) The productive units shall not be allowed to carry out the production operation, place, equipment delivery kits, rental;

(ii) The production of business projects, places, equipment with multiple contracting units, tenancy units, and the production of business units shall be synchronized, managed and enter into specialized security production management agreements with the contractor's units, the lessee's units, or, in contracting contracts, the lease contracts, the respective management responsibilities for the identification, governance and control of accidents;

(iii) The contractor's unit, the tenant unit responsible for its production activities are slackened to the management of the accident; the concealment of the non-contracted, leased production operation activity, which is governed by the issuing unit, the rental unit, the contractor's unit and the lessee should be synchronized.

Chapter III Oversight management

Article 20, the security regulatory sector and the relevant sectors should establish a monitoring inspection system for the handling of accidents in the area of regulation and organize implementation.

As a result of the discovery of accidents in the productive units, the security management sector and the relevant sectors should be responsible for immediate governance or relocation of the production unit, to track governance in a timely manner and to organize verification based on the need.

Article 21, the security regulation sector and the relevant sectors should establish a system of sound accident reporting, make public reporting methods and ways to receive reports of accidents.

When the security regulatory sector and the relevant sectors receive reports of accidents, it should be immediately organized to verify and locate them; it is found that it is not the terms of reference of the sector and is transferred to the competent department in a timely manner and to record the identification.

Article 22, the security management sector and the relevant sectors should establish a regulatory file for the management of accident-sidents, with the record of known accidents being hidden as a management information.

The security management sector in the area (communes) will provide a monthly inventory of information to the municipal security management sector, and the relevant departments will provide a monthly compilation of information to the top-level sector and the same level of security regulation.

The municipal security management sector should establish a governance information system for all-urban accidents, acceptance, summary, analysis of information on the management of accidents and the timely transmission of the relevant sectors.

Article 23 makes it difficult to exclude the productive units themselves because of the impact of external factors, or involves a wide range of facets, the high degree of governance, the serious consequences of the harm, as well as the significant accident of delays in the production of business units or the denial of governance, the safe regulatory sector or the authorities concerned, the application of the wallary. The oversight management of accident hidden governance involves a wide range of sectors, with the security management sector or the relevant sector reporting to the Government of the people at the current level carrying out the office.

Article 24 units responsible for the management responsibility of the relevant offices of the Office of Oversight Services for major accidents should be issued, including the following:

(i) The underlying circumstances of the accident;

(ii) Types of accidents;

(iii) Legal basis;

(iv) The accident conceals the relevant units of responsibility for governance;

(v) Governance demands and governance deadlines that are hidden by accidents.

Article 25 conceals the major accidents of the Office of the Proclamation and the production of the business unit should be totally or in the Department's suspension; during the governance period there is still a need for the organization of the production of business activities, subject to expert argument or endorsement by the corresponding security evaluation body, and take effective preventive measures to guarantee security.

Article 26 conceals the major accident of the Office of the High Commissioner, and the productive units must complete governance within the specified period. A written extension request for elements such as the reasons for the extension and the time period for the extension should be submitted to the Office of the High Commissioner within 10 days of the expiration of the period of time for objective reasons that cannot be completed within the specified period, and the subsequent extension period with the consent of the supervisory branch.

Article 27, after the conclusion of the major incident of the Office of the High Commissioner, shall organize technical personnel and experts of this unit or commission a corresponding quality security evaluation body to assess governance and form an assessment report containing the following:

(i) The underlying circumstances of the accident, including names and arrivals, types, location, status and causes thereof, and relevant photographs;

(ii) An assessment of the impact of the accident;

(iii) Risk factors, extent, scope of impacts and possible consequences analysis of accidents;

(iv) The effectiveness of governance measures and preventive measures;

(v) Evaluation findings;

(vi) Other relevant elements.

The unit responsible for managing major accidents is designated by the Government, which is responsible for the assessment.

Article 28, after the assessment, is in line with the conditions of safe production, shall submit written written written written written written written written written written requests for recovery of production and excerptation cases to the supervisory departments that issued the “significant accident” directive. Written write-off requests include basic circumstances of the accident, governance programmes, governance effects and assessment reports on governance.

A review of the receipt should be organized within 15 working days after a written written written write-off request was received by the supervisory branch. The review was qualified and the supervisory branch declared to the Government or sector that had decided to make the walls, to process the excerptation proceedings, to resume the normal production operation of the productive units; to review the incompatibility of the receipts and to maintain its governance in accordance with the law; and to continue governance after the completion of the governance process, the supervisory branch had not been able to meet the conditions of safe production and had been brought to the end by law by the Government.

Chapter IV Legal responsibility

Article 33 Acts committed by the productive business unit in violation of the provisions of this approach, which are regulated by laws, regulations, regulations and regulations.

Article 31 states that, in violation of this approach, the productive business unit is one of the following cases, which is warned by the security administration or the relevant sector, the time limit is being changed and fines for the production of the unit amounting to more than 5,000 dollars; and that the production unit is fined by more than 5,000 dollars for the production unit by the principal head of the production unit:

(i) Failure to establish a system of governance that is hidden by a sound accident;

(ii) Failure to carry out daily and comprehensive sequencing or specialization of accidents, as prescribed;

(iii) There is no statistical analysis of the management of the accident, as prescribed, and the provision of the safe regulatory sector and related sectors.

Article 32, in violation of this approach, the productive business unit, in one of the following cases, has been warned by the security administration or the relevant sector, responsibly modified to the period of time and fines for the production of the unit amounted to more than 5,000 yen; the uncorrected fine of more than 100,000 dollars for the productive business unit, with a fine of up to $500,000 for the principal head of the production unit:

(i) The identification of spoilers and the absence of immediate measures to govern them, as prescribed;

(ii) Failure to guarantee security in the course of excluding accidents, in accordance with the provisions for the cessation of the use of the relevant facilities, the cessation of construction, the suspension of the construction, the suspension of the bureau or all suspension of the production industry, or the absence of a risk assessment or the development and implementation of governance programmes;

(iii) No report on the security management sector and related sectors for major accidents, in accordance with the provisions;

(iv) In the course of the accident's hidden governance, there was no corresponding security precautions to prevent accidents.

Article 33, Staff of the Safety Regulatory Service and related departments play a role in neglect, abuse of authority, provocative fraud, by virtue of law by their units or superior authorities; and legal accountability.

Chapter V

Article 34 of this approach is implemented effective 1 March 2013.