(Adopted by Decree No. 148 of 6 January 2013, by the Government of the South Turkmen Republic of 14 December 2012)

In order to enhance oversight of administrative law enforcement decisions and to promote the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, in accordance with the Law on Administrative Punishment of the People's Republic of China, the National People's Republic of China, the Law on Administrative Instruction of the People's Republic of China, the Law on Administrative Enforcement of the People's Republic of China and the regulations on administrative law enforcement in the Province of the Sudan, this approach is being developed in the context of the current city.

Article II refers to major administrative enforcement decisions referred to in this approach to major administrative sanctions decisions, major administrative licence decisions and major administrative enforcement decisions.

Article 3 (Percentage) People's Government and municipal, district (zone) government-owned executive organs (including executive organs with vertical leadership) and organizations authorized by the law, regulations and regulations (hereinafter referred to as executive law enforcement agencies) should be reported to the Government of the city or to the people's government in accordance with the provisions of this approach.

Article IV is specifically responsible for the review of major administrative law enforcement decisions, in the city, in the district (zone) in the Government's rule of law institutions (hereinafter referred to as a review body).

Article 5

(i) The People's Government of the District (zone);

(ii) The suspension of the work;

(iii) Removal of licences or licences;

(iv) A fine imposed on citizens, legal persons or other organizations may be required by law or forfeiture equivalent to that amount.

Article 6. Major administrative licence decisions under this approach refer to the following administrative licences:

(i) Limited exploitation of natural resources, public resource allocation and market access for specific industries that are directly related to public interest require specific rights;

(ii) The enforcement of administrative licences shall be heard by law, regulations and regulations;

(iii) Administrative law enforcement authorities consider the need for hearing and the public interest;

(iv) Harmonization of administrative licences, joint processing and centralization, with the approval of the head of the people's Government, for the extension of the period of time.

Article 7.

(i) The People's Government of the District (zone);

(ii) The auction or the legal treatment of the places, facilities or property seized;

(iii) The forced removal of buildings, constructions, which have a significant impact on the production of citizens, legal persons or other organizations.

Article 8

Article 9. The executive law enforcement body shall, within 15 days of the date of the adoption of a major administrative law enforcement decision, submit a request in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) Major administrative law enforcement decisions taken by the Government of the People's Republic and the executive law enforcement agencies affiliated to the Government of the city, which are sent to the Government of the city;

(ii) Major administrative law enforcement decisions taken by the executive law enforcement agencies affiliated to the Government of the People's Republic (zone) to report to the People's Government of the District (zone);

(iii) Two or more administrative law enforcement organs make major administrative enforcement decisions, which are sent by the host agency in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs I and II of this article.

Article 10, in accordance with the major administrative law enforcement decisions that provide for referrals, shall be taken by a major administrative law enforcement decision to carry out an organ's approach or a district (zone) review body.

A major administrative law enforcement decision should be submitted to a written report, a request note, a major administrative law enforcement decision (by absorption or photocopy) and be attached to electronic texts. Major administrative law enforcement decisions taken by the hearings should also be submitted to the hearings.

Article 11. A description of major administrative law enforcement decisions should contain the following:

(i) Basic facts and the basis for application;

(ii) The qualifications of organs and law enforcement personnel;

(iii) Leadership for approval and collective discussion;

(iv) Other needs clarifications.

A description of major administrative sanctions decisions should also provide for the exercise of discretion.

Article 12. Upon receipt of material from major administrative law enforcement decisions, the review body shall proceed in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) Major administrative enforcement decisions that fall under this approach, which are fully and consistent with the requirements and are registered;

(ii) Major administrative law enforcement decisions that fall under this approach, but the material delivered is incomplete or incompatible with the requirements, the suspension of registration, the notification of the additional or resubmission of the material to be added or resubmitted, and the registration of the requested material;

(iii) Not a major administrative enforcement decision under this approach, or the parties have applied for administrative review or for administrative proceedings, are not registered and informs the organs of the major administrative enforcement decisions, with justification.

Article 13 Review body reviews the legitimacy and appropriateness of registered major administrative law enforcement decisions.

The desk review does not affect the implementation of major administrative law enforcement decisions; during the review period, the parties apply for administrative review or administrative proceedings, which is terminated from the date of administrative review or administrative proceedings.

Article XIV review bodies have the right to receive administrative law enforcement files and other related materials during their review and, if necessary, to investigate the parties. The relevant units and individuals should be assisted and not denied.

Article 15. Significant administrative law enforcement decisions on the filing of reports by the desk review body should be considered to have a violation or misappropriation, and written observations should be made recommending that the time limit should be withdrawn, corrected or redirected by administrative law enforcement decisions.

Article 16 provides that the organs of the major administrative law enforcement decision shall, within 30 days of written observations received from the review body, communicate the results to the review body; the written observations of the review body may be contested by the review body, and the review body shall examine the matter.

The failure of the organs to issue the results was not reported, and the review body was brought to the Government of the people at the current level to make an order to correct or reverse the decision.

Article 17

In the first quarter of each year, the directory of major administrative law enforcement decisions reviewed in the previous year should be made available in the Government's bulletin (Political), the Government website or the media.

Article 18, in violation of this approach, provides that major administrative law enforcement decisions are made in one of the following cases by the municipality or by the People's Government of the District (Sectoral) to communicate their criticisms and deadlines; and that the competent and other responsible persons directly responsible are treated in accordance with the law:

(i) No significant administrative law enforcement decisions are submitted in accordance with the prescribed deadlines and requirements;

(ii) To deny access to major administrative law enforcement files and other related materials by the review body;

(iii) After having received written observations from the review body, late objections do not refer to the outcome review body;

(iv) Not to submit a directory of major administrative law enforcement decisions in accordance with the prescribed deadlines and requirements.

The executive law enforcement authorities affiliated with the Government of the People of Article 19 have taken significant administrative law enforcement decisions to inform the executive law enforcement authorities of the city's Government, which can be implemented in the light of this approach.

Article 20