(Summit 5th ordinary meeting of the Government of the Blue Sea, 9 May 2013, considered the adoption of Decree No. 97 of 10 May 2013 by the People's Government Order No. 97 of 10 May 2013.

Article 1, in order to enhance administrative effectiveness, enhance the executive and credibility of the executive branch, regulate administrative effectiveness inspections, and develop this approach in line with the National People's Republic of China Administrative Monitoring Act.

Article 2 of this approach refers to activities carried out under the law of the executive inspection body of the executive performance of the mandated responsibilities, effectiveness, effectiveness, effectiveness, etc., by the authorities of the more people at the district level.

Article 3. Governments of more people at the district level should strengthen the leadership of the administrative effectiveness inspection in the current administration area and support the inspection body in its administrative effectiveness inspection.

Article 4 The supervisory authority should guide and monitor the administrative effectiveness inspection of the lower-level inspection body.

In accordance with the arrangements of the people at this level and the supervisory authority at the highest level, the Inspector-General prepares an annual administrative effectiveness inspection workplan, identifies the priorities for administrative inspection and organizes implementation. The administrative effectiveness inspection workplan should be presented to the Government of the people at this level and to the top-level inspection body.

Article 6 monitors carry out administrative effectiveness inspections in accordance with the law without interference by other executives, social groups and individuals.

Article 7. The inspectorate shall establish an administrative effectiveness inspection, administrative oversight and objective review mechanism with the relevant departments.

Article 8. The inspection body should establish a sound administrative effectiveness reporting system. Citizens, legal persons or other organizations have the right to report to the inspectorate on actions that impede the effectiveness of the administration. The inspection bodies should receive reports and be dealt with in accordance with the law; in the case of true reports, the inspection authority should respond to the reporters. Administrative effectiveness complaints are carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Complaints of Administrative Effectiveness in the Blue Sea.

Article 9

(i) The establishment of a robust administrative effectiveness inspection system;

(ii) Examine, investigate matters and conduct affecting administrative effectiveness;

(iii) Organization of administrative effectiveness evaluation;

(iv) To receive administrative performance reports, complaints;

(v) Other responsibilities under laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 10

(i) All branches of the Government and their officials;

(ii) Other personnel appointed by the Government of the people and its departments;

(iii) The people's Government and its leadership at the next level;

(iv) The laws, regulations and regulations governing the administration of public affairs, authorized by the Government of the people and its departments, as well as their personnel in public service;

(v) The Government of the people at this level and its departments are mandated by law to organize and perform public service activities.

The district-level government inspectorate also carries out administrative effectiveness inspections with the civil servants of the Government of the People's Republic (communes) and other personnel appointed by the commune (communes).

Article 11. Administrative effectiveness inspection by the inspectorate of:

(i) Implementation of relevant laws, regulations, regulations and superior decisions, instructions, orders;

(ii) Implementation of scientific, democratic and legal decision-making mechanisms;

(iii) Compliance with administrative procedures and reasonable administrative circumstances;

(iv) Provision of public services;

(v) Dealing social contradictions and responding to emergencies;

(vi) Compliance with disciplinary and operational requirements;

(vii) Other administrative effectiveness matters requiring inspection.

Article 12. The inspection body should establish an administrative effectiveness inspection system.

In carrying out administrative effectiveness inspections, the inspection body responsible for administrative effectiveness inspections should complete the application form for inspection of administrative effectiveness of the inspectorate and report on the approval of the executive inspectorate.

In accordance with the deployment and request of the Government of the people at this level or the superior inspection body, as well as other administrative effectiveness inspections that have a significant impact within this administrative area, the Monitoring Authority's major administrative effectiveness inspection lists should be completed, respectively, to be presented to the Government of the current people and to the supervisory body at the highest level.

In carrying out administrative effectiveness inspections, administrative inspection bodies should organize more than two inspection teams or survey teams. The relevant documents shall be presented at the time of inspection or investigation by the inspector or the investigating officer.

Article 14. The executive inspection body conducts administrative effectiveness inspections, which may invite representatives of the public, members of the coalition, special invite the Ombudsman or the relevant administrative body staff, professional technical personnel to participate in the inspection, investigation.

Article 15. The inspection body may undertake administrative effectiveness inspections, including through comprehensive inspection, specialized inspection, concealment, and evaluation.

The inspection bodies are encouraged to implement administrative effectiveness inspections in an electronic manner and to enhance administrative effectiveness inspection efficiency.

Article 16, when performing its duties, has the right to take the following measures in accordance with the law:

(i) To request the inspector to provide documents, information, financial accounts and other related materials related to administrative effectiveness inspection matters;

(ii) To request the inspector to explain and clarify issues related to administrative effectiveness inspections;

(iii) To collect evidence of relevant administrative effectiveness inspections in the form of photographs, photographs, recordings and replication;

(iv) The subject of an order to cease violations of laws, regulations, superior provisions and administrative disciplines;

(v) Other measures under laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 17 monitors the implementation of administrative effectiveness inspections and should be fully and objectively aware of the situation, collect evidence, listen to the presentations and defences of the inspectorate, identify questions and reasons.

Article 18 monitors the implementation of administrative effectiveness inspections by the inspection bodies should include the following:

(i) The basic situation of the inspectors;

(ii) Administrative effectiveness inspection;

(iii) Issues and causes;

(iv) The responsibility to be assumed by the inspectorate and the relevant legal, regulatory and regulatory basis;

(v) Improve systems and improve work.

Article 19, according to the inspection report, the inspectorate has made a monitoring decision or made a recommendation under the law and sent the subject of inspection in writing.

Important inspection decisions or inspection recommendations should be presented with the consent of the people at the present level and at the highest level.

Article 20 shall be subject to a briefing inspection authority to implement inspection decisions or adopt inspection recommendations within 30 days of receipt of inspection decisions or inspection recommendations.

The subject of inspection is not uniformed or contested by the inspection recommendations and is governed by the relevant national provisions.

Article 21, inspection bodies should conduct inspections of the implementation of inspection decisions and the adoption of inspection recommendations.

The second article, in violation of this approach, provides that one of the following cases is made by the competent organ or the inspectorate to clarify the duration of the period of time, to be rectified and criticized; in the light of the gravity of the circumstances, to give the competent person responsible for direct responsibility and other direct responsibilities to warn, default or be taken over; in the event of a serious nature, to the extent that the competent and other direct responsible personnel have been given up, removed or removed; and to hold criminal responsibility under the law.

(i) The decisions, instructions and orders of the people's Government are ineffective;

(ii) Administrative decisions or administrative management in violation of procedures;

(iii) In violation of the law, the administration of impunity, which undermines the interests of the public;

(iv) Toys negligence, negligence and social contradictions;

(v) The delay in responding to emergencies and the disposal of failures;

(vi) Poor administrative efficiency and delays;

(vii) Non-compliance with disciplinary and operational requirements;

(viii) Other circumstances affecting administrative effectiveness.

Article 23 of the inspector's refusal to cooperate with the inspection body and its staff in the conduct of administrative effectiveness inspections, which is criticized or disposed of by law.

Article 24 Staff of the inspectorate, in the course of administrative effectiveness inspections, abuse of authority, provocative fraud, negligence and secrets, are lawfully disposed of by law, constituting an offence and criminal responsibility by law.

Article 25