(Adopted by the 43rd Standing Committee of the People's Government of Western Annai on 4 March 2013, No. 101 of 25 March 2013, by Order No. 101 of the People's Government Order No. 101 of 25 March 2013.

Chapter I General

Article 1, in order to regulate the procedures for the administrative conduct of the executive branch, promote the exercise by the executive branch of its functions under the law, enhance administrative effectiveness, guarantee the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, and establish this provision in the light of the relevant legislation.

Article 2

The organizations entrusted under the law should comply with the provisions when exercising their delegated authority.

The law, legislation and regulations provide otherwise for administrative procedures.

Article 3

The specific implementation of this provision lies with the State's rule of law institutions and sectoral rule of law institutions.

Article IV should be given equal treatment to citizens, legal persons or other organizations.

Article 5 shall be open to citizens, legal persons or other organizations, on the basis, process and results of the exercise of their administrative functions, except for State secret, commercial secret, personal privacy.

Administrative documents, materials and materials concerning the rights obligations of citizens, legal persons or other organizations should be allowed.

Article 6. The executive organs carry out administrative acts that may affect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, and, in addition to the specific circumstances provided for in the law, should be informed before they about the basis and grounds for the conduct of administrative acts and heard their statements and defences.

Article 7. The executive organs shall perform administrative acts and shall comply with the statutory time frame, actively perform their statutory duties, enhance the efficiency of the conduct, facilitate, expedite and quality services for citizens, legal persons or other organizations.

Article 8. Civil, legal or other organizations have the right to participate in the administration in accordance with the law and to make observations and recommendations.

The executive organs should communicate, in appropriate ways, the right to participate and facilitate them.

Article 9. The executive branch may use a variety of measures to achieve administrative purposes and should select measures to undermine the rights and interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations.

Article 10. The executive organs shall act in accordance with the principle of trust, protect the legitimate trust of citizens, legal persons or other organizations for administrative acts.

Chapter II

Article 11. The competence and jurisdiction of the executive organs shall be governed by the relevant provisions of the law, regulations, regulations and departments.

Article 12

(i) With regard to citizenship matters, subject to the jurisdiction of the executive branch of its place of residence; the place of residence is incompatible with the regular residence and is governed by the administrative organs of its regular residence; the place of residence is unknown to the place of residence and is governed by its final residence administration;

(ii) The subject matter of legal or other organizations, subject to the jurisdiction of the executive organs of the main operating place or the location of the main office of the institution;

(iii) With respect to immovable property, subject to the jurisdiction of the administrative organs of the real estate location;

(iv) The administrative affairs referred to in this paragraph are not subject to the jurisdiction of the organ of the act.

Article 13 has jurisdiction over the same administration and is governed by the pre-administered administrative body; it is not possible to distinguish between sequencing and settling by the disputed organs; that consultations are not conceived by their common superior organs; and that there is no common level to resolve them in consultation with their respective superior executive organs.

It is urgent to refrain from taking certain measures that would cause significant damage to the legitimate rights and interests of public or civil, legal and other organizations, and the administrative organs in which administrative matters have occurred should be disposed of as necessary and promptly inform the competent administrative organs.

Article 14.

(i) With regard to the division of competence, a coordinated opinion was made by the competent development management to report on the decisions of the Government of the people at this level;

(ii) With respect to the enforcement of laws, regulations, regulations and regulations, the competent governmental rule of law body provides advice in accordance with the law and reports to the Government of the current people.

Article 15. Citizens, legal persons or other organizations may apply to the executive branch to apply for the designation of jurisdiction to its common superior organs or to the same-level people's governments when they apply for jurisdiction.

In accordance with the designated jurisdiction decision set out in the preceding paragraph, the executive branch shall not object to the decision.

Article 16, after the application of the parties or the commencement of administrative proceedings, found that they had no jurisdiction, should be transferred to the competent administrative body and informed the parties.

The executive organs transferred are of the opinion that they do not have jurisdiction and cannot be transferred, and they should be reported to be appointed by their common executive organs or by the same-level people's governments.

Article 17

In one of the following cases, the executive branch may request assistance from the relevant administrative organs:

(i) The exercise of its mandate alone cannot achieve administrative purposes;

(ii) The factual information required for the conduct of public service cannot be investigated by themselves;

(iii) The instruments, information and information necessary for the conduct of public service are available to other executive organs to collect themselves without difficulties;

(iv) Other situations where administrative assistance should be requested.

The request for administrative assistance should be made in writing, with the exception of the situation.

Article 19 was requested by the executive branch to implement assistance in a timely manner, without justification, without prequalification or refusal of assistance, upon receipt of requests from other organs of administrative assistance. Failure to provide assistance should be informed, in writing, of the reasons.

As a result of the disputed nature of administrative assistance, the requesting authority was ruled by a joint superior body with the requested authority.

Article 20 shall be responsible by the requesting authority for the administrative acts carried out in accordance with the request for assistance; the requested authority assumes responsibility for other administrative acts outside the request during the implementation of administrative assistance.

The costs incurred by the requesting authority for administrative assistance are borne by the requesting authority.

Article 21 Staff members of the executive branch shall exercise their official duties by themselves avoiding:

(i) In relation to the personal stake;

(ii) Relating to the relationship with his wife, the relationship between the rapist, the relationship between the three-generation family, and the interests of the close family.

The preceding paragraph applies to the heads of administrative organs, executive law enforcement officials, case hearings, record-keeping personnel and identification, investigation, audit, translation personnel on the specific issues of the case.

In the exercise of official duties by the staff of the executive branch, there are one of the following cases where the parties may apply for the avoidance:

(i) In the case specified in the previous article, there is no self-evasion;

(ii) There is evidence that there may be any other possible impact on the fair implementation of public services.

The administrative organ shall take a decision within three days and inform the parties orally or in writing. The decision not to be avoided should explain the reasons for the parties' non-consensuality of decisions, which may apply for a review of the administrative organ and the reconsideration of the decision shall be made within three days.

A staff member who has been requested to avoid being excluded shall not be involved in the handling of the case before the administrative organ in which it belongs does not make a decision on the waiver, except for emergency measures.

Article 23 Resistance of the staff of the executive branch is determined by the heads of the executive organs of which they belong.

The heads of executive organs should be informed of the decisions of the executive branch at the superior level or the same level.

Chapter III Administrative processing process

Section I General provisions

Article 24 of this provision refers to specific administrative acts of influence on the rights and obligations of specific citizens, legal persons or other organizations, in accordance with laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 25. Administrative law enforcement officials shall be required to participate in administrative law enforcement training, subject to examinations and obtain administrative law enforcement documents.

Article 26 Law enforcement officials should present their law enforcement documents when performing their duties. Without the presentation of the documents, the parties have the right to refuse.

Article 27 should be made in writing, in addition to the specific provisions of the law or emergency.

Article 28

(i) The administrative organs that are not subject to statutory procedures shall not be removed or altered accordingly;

(ii) Citizens, legal persons or other organizations should fulfil their obligations set out in administrative decisions;

(iii) Individuals, legal persons or other organizations that have not applied for administrative review or administrative proceedings within a statutory period of time, nor have administrative decisions taken, and that the executive organs dealing may take mandatory measures in accordance with the law or apply to the enforcement of the People's Court;

(iv) The executive organs that make administrative decisions are not in compliance with administrative procedures, rendering the rights of citizens, legal persons or other organizations under administrative procedures that cannot be realized and citizens, legal persons or other organizations may seek redress in accordance with the law.

Article 29 dealt with administrative matters in one of the following cases, and the executive organs that were to be administratively or should be required by citizens, legal persons or other organizations:

(i) There is no reason to justify the lack of substantive impact on the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, and the administrative organs may explain the reasons behind;

(ii) The language of the administrative processing decision or the calculation of error;

(iii) The decision on administrative processing has set out the subject matter but has no chapter;

(iv) The administrative processing decision does not contain the date specified;

(v) Removal administrative treatment is more favourable to the relative population and does not undermine the public interest of society;

(vi) Other circumstances that need to be filled.

The addition shall be made by the parties before the expiration of the administrative review or administrative proceedings and shall notify the parties in a timely manner.

The administrative authorities should be able to respond in a timely manner to the administrative processing decisions that are being replicated.

Article 33 allows the executive branch to limit the conditions, burdens or time limits for the effective implementation of the decision.

Article 31 states that, after identifying facts, the executive branch shall communicate to the parties or to the stakeholder(s) the matters to be taken with respect to administrative decisions or other administrative acts and to inform them of their rights and obligations under the law.

Before deciding on administrative treatment or other administrative acts, the executive body should listen carefully to the statements and defences of the parties or the persons of the interest.

Article 33 includes one of the following cases in the administrative process:

(i) The parties, the victims of the relationship and their close relatives have yet to determine whether they participate in the administrative process;

(ii) The loss of the ability of the parties, the stakeholder to take part in the administrative process;

(iii) The termination of a legal or other organization as a party, the human person of the person concerned, and has not yet been determined to be subject to the rights obligations;

(iv) The whereabouts of a natural person who is a party or who has been declared missing;

(v) The parties, the jurists cannot participate in the administrative process because of force majeure;

(vi) The case concerns the application of the law and requires interpretation or recognition by the competent organ;

(vii) The decision on administrative processing needs to be based on the outcome of other cases, while other cases have not been completed;

(viii) Other circumstances requiring suspension of administrative procedures.

The reasons for the suspension of administrative procedures should be eliminated in a timely manner.

The executive branch shall be informed of the parties and the stakeholders involved.

The administrative procedures are terminated in one of the following cases in the administrative processing process:

(i) The death of the parties, the victims, the absence of close relatives or their close relatives to abandon their participation in the administrative process;

(ii) The termination as a party, a legal person or other organization of the human person, whose rights obligations have been waived for participation in administrative procedures;

(iii) Other circumstances where administrative procedures are terminated under laws, regulations and regulations.

As a result of the suspension of administrative procedures in accordance with article 33, paragraph 1, paragraphs 1 (a), 2 and 3 of this provision, the reasons for the suspension of administrative procedures for the sixty-first day have not been removed and the administrative procedures are terminated.

The costs arising from administrative processing procedures are borne by the executive branch, except for expenses incurred by the parties under the law.

The costs incurred by the parties in their own evidence are borne by themselves.

Article XVI provides for the payment of fees by the executive branch to the parties and must receive the receipt of a unified system for the financial sector. Without the receipt of a unified system of the financial sector, the parties have the right to refuse to pay for the costs.

Article 37 makes it difficult for the parties to pay the costs, and may apply to the executive branch for a suspension, reduction or removal.

Section II

Article 338 Procedures for administrative processing are initiated by the executive branch or initiated on the application of citizens, legal persons or other organizations.

The executive branch initiates administrative processing procedures in accordance with its mandate, and the executive law enforcement officers should complete a uniformed procedure for initiating the approval of the approval of the executive heads. The situation is urgent and can be added.

Citizens, legal persons or other organizations believe that their application is in accordance with the statutory conditions, may apply to the executive branch to initiate administrative processing procedures.

Article 39 requires that civil, legal or other organizations apply for the commencement of administrative processing procedures in writing. The application shall document the following matters:

(i) The basic situation of the applicant;

(ii) Matters for application;

(iii) The facts and reasons for the application;

(iv) The applicant's signature or chapter;

(v) Time of application.

In cases where the applicant's written application is difficult or is not required to submit in writing, or in an emergency case, an application may be made orally, and the administrative organ shall make the record and, if the applicant is read out or checked by the applicant, confirm that the contents of the record are not validated by its signature or chapter.

Article 40 Upon receipt by the executive branch of the application of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, it should be registered and returned to the executive branch, plus the chapter of the executive branch. The applicant has the right to request a return from the executive branch and the executive branch shall not reject it. Restitution should contain:

(i) The date, place and receipt of the application by the executive branch;

(ii) List of evidence material received by the executive branch.

Article 40. Applications submitted by the executive branch for the applicant shall be dealt with in accordance with the following circumstances:

(i) The applicant shall be informed of the applicant's failure to initiate administrative processing procedures by law;

(ii) The application shall not be in accordance with the terms of reference of this administrative body, in writing within five days, and shall inform the applicant of the application to the relevant administrative organs;

(iii) The error in the application of the material to be corrected at the present stage should allow the applicant to be corrected at the present stage;

(iv) The submission of material is incomplete or incompatible with the statutory form and should be communicated to the applicant at any time or within five days to the extent that the applicant is required to fill the full content of the process, which is later unnoticed and is admissible from the date of receipt of the request; and that the applicant is not in a position to do so within the time limit as to withdraw the application;

(v) The application is within the purview of this administrative body, the application is fully, in accordance with the statutory form, or the applicant shall receive the applicant's application for the full replenishment of the application in accordance with the requirements of this administrative body.

Section III Investigation

Article 42, the executive body has the right to investigate evidence in accordance with the law in order to ascertain the facts of the case and obtain evidence.

In accordance with the request for administrative treatment, the executive body has the obligation to submit the relevant material of evidence, and the evidence provided by the executive branch should be collected in writing.

The parties have the right to submit an application for the investigation of evidence to the executive branch. The administrative organs decide to reject the applicant's application and should explain the reasons.

Article 43, when an administrative authority investigates, the investigating officer shall not be less than two, and shall present a law enforcement document, indicating identity, indicating that the matter shall be presented before the investigation is initiated.

Article 44 provides that the executive body may carry out investigations in accordance with the law:

(i) To ask the parties or witnesses to listen to the parties' presentations and the defence;

(ii) Accreditation, material, audio-visual or electronic data to the relevant units and individuals;

(iii) Survey tests;

(iv) To sample sampling;

(v) Hearing;

(vi) The designation or commission of a statutory accreditation body or the identification of an expert;

(vii) Sound recordings, videos;

(viii) Other methods of investigation established by law, regulations.

Article 42 quantifies by the executive branch to the relevant units and individuals should be given written receipts indicating items, numbers and sources of evidence or material, and should protect the right of the parties to privacy.

Article 46 conducts a survey by the executive branch and shall notify the parties or their agents in advance. The parties or their agents refuse to do so should invite other persons who have no stake in the case to be witnesses and to indicate the situation in the survey, with the exception of laws, regulations and regulations.

The executive body can use methods such as measurements, photographs, recordings, videos, samplings and interviews with persons present.

The survey should be screened for the time, place, content, presence, verification by law enforcement officials, parties or their agents, witness signature or chapter. The parties or their agents shall object to the record or reject the signature, and shall be indicated by law enforcement officials and witnesses' signatures or by chapter G.

Article 47, when the administrative body conducts inspections of non-public information and goods in specific and specific places, the inspection certificate signed by the head of the executive body should be given to the inspector to demonstrate identity and inform the legal basis for the implementation of the inspection.

Access to inspections in non-public places should be subject to the consent of the owner or the manager, with the exception provided by the law. Forced access to homes, ships, aircraft and equipment should be inspected by an administrative body with compulsory authority. The executive organs that do not have a mandatory inspection are required to carry out mandatory inspections, and should be assisted by a coercive authority.

The physical examination of women should be carried out by female administrative law enforcement officials or doctors.

In carrying out the inspection, a notice should be produced.

Article forty-eighth administrative bodies should be entrusted with the identification of the appropriate qualifications of the expert bodies.

Section IV Evidence

Article 49 must be taken into account before the administrative process is decided.

There is no statutory basis and factual basis for the executive branch to make administrative decisions.

Article 50 investigates, collects evidence that should be lawful, comprehensive, objective and timely, and the evidence collected by the law cannot be used as a basis for administrative processing.

The following evidence materials shall not be used as a basis for administrative treatment:

(i) Serious violations of the collection of legal procedures;

(ii) The legitimate rights and interests of others are violated by means of theft, theft and theft;

(iii) Little, fraud, coercion, violence, etc.;

(iv) There are no other evidence-based photocopy or replication of the evidence not endorsed by the person concerned;

(v) Technically disposed of cannot be carefully justified;

(vi) The testimony provided by witnesses who cannot be correctly expressed;

(vii) Uncertain statutory accreditation procedures outside the People's Republic of China;

(viii) Laws, regulations and regulations shall not be used as other evidence material based on the determination.

Article 52 allows administrative authorities to maintain evidence in accordance with such measures as audio-visual, video and pre-registration, where evidence may be lost or otherwise difficult to obtain.

The executive branch shall, in accordance with its mandate, take evidence-based protection measures to cause losses to the parties and shall be compensated by law or duly compensated.

The parties apply for evidence-based protection measures by the executive branch and must justify and provide security.

Section V

Article 53 states that:

(i) Laws, regulations and regulations stipulate that decisions taken by administrative processing should be held;

(ii) Significant factual disputes need to be resolved and the administrative body considers it necessary to hold hearings;

(iii) The application of the parties, the stakeholders, and the administrative body considers it necessary to hold hearings.

Article 54 should be made public unless it relates to State secret, commercial secret or personal privacy.

Article 55 may apply to citizens, legal persons or other organizations that have legal stakes with the proposed administrative handling decision, or to be notified by the moderator to the hearing.

Each party participating in the hearings or more than five persons shall be elected to participate in the hearings.

There should be a proportion of public representatives to be represented in administrative decisions dealing with major public interest.

Article 56 enjoys the following rights in hearings by the parties and the persons of the interest:

(i) Presentations;

(ii) Evidence and evidence;

(iii) Upon the permission of the moderator, enquire the investigators, witnesses, experts and other relevant personnel;

(iv) Authorize the agent.

The parties, the jurists, should observe the discipline of the hearings.

The moderator of the hearing is appointed by the executive head from among the staff of the body. The moderator and the investigator should be a different body of work and should not be appointed.

The executive branch has an administrative review body or a dedicated administrative reviewer, who may be chaired by a staff member of the administrative review body or a full-time reviewer.

The moderator shall preside over the hearing in a neutral and impartial position.

The moderator exercises the following powers in hearing:

(i) The conduct of hearings;

(ii) In relation to facts or legal questions, the parties or other participants may be asked to provide evidence;

(iii) Authorize the relevant organs to carry out the necessary investigations in accordance with their functions or on the basis of their application;

(iv) To notify witnesses, experts and persons with expertise at the place;

(v) The licensor or other participant;

(vi) In order to avoid delays in the process, the parties or other participants may be prohibited from engaging or repeating statements;

(vii) Removal of persons who seriously impede the normal conduct of the hearings process should be held accountable;

(viii) Determination of the commencement, extension or termination of hearings due to the lack of access by the parties or their transit;

(ix) Suspension of hearings due to force majeure or other reasons that cannot be held for the duration of hearings, in accordance with its mandate or subject to application;

(x) To decide on the duration and venue of the hearings until the date of the hearing is completed;

(xi) Other necessary measures to ensure the smooth conduct of hearings.

In accordance with paragraph 10 above, the moderator decided that the date and venue for the hearing should be communicated to the parties and to the stakeholders.

Article 59 of the hearings is responsible for the record of the hearings and other matters relating to the hearings.

The recorders should make accurate and comprehensive records of the hearings process.

Article sixtieth, the executive branch, the parties, the jurists and other participants may not take undue means of deception, bribery, coercion and manipulation of the outcome of the hearings.

The moderator shall not be in contact with the parties, the stakeholders and other participants.

The outcome of the hearings was not valid and should be reassessed by the unjustifiable means of deception, bribery and coercion. The hearing should be re-elected.

Article 61. The executive body shall notify the parties in writing and the stakeholders before seven hearings are held. It is not possible to send a notice by means of a notice.

The following matters should be documented in the letter:

(i) The name, residence, name, place of a legal person or other organization, place of residence and of its statutory representative or principal holder;

(ii) The time and venue for the hearings; the preparation of hearings should also include the time and venue for the holding of preparatory hearings;

(iii) The name of the moderator, his department and office;

(iv) The main procedure for hearing;

(v) Legal consequences of hearings in absentia;

(vi) The hearing body;

(vii) Other matters to be documented.

Article 62 may change the date of the hearing or the place of the hearing, either in accordance with its mandate or in accordance with the request, but shall be justified.

The administrative body shall modify the date of the hearing or the place of the hearing, in accordance with the preceding article.

At the beginning of the hearing, the moderator checked the name, name and name of the investigators, the parties, the facilitators and the facilitators, asking whether the parties had made a request for a waiver.

The investigating officer read out the administrative handling decisions to be taken by the executive branch, as well as the facts and the applicable law determined by the administrative handling decision. The hearings were held and the facilitators read out the disputed points for the cases collated.

Article 63 quater: Two stages of the investigation and debate.

The investigation phase is conducted in accordance with the following order:

(i) The moderator's announcement of the hearing;

(ii) The recorder ascertains whether the parties, the stakeholders and the investigators are present and declares the content and discipline of the hearings;

(iii) Subject to the permission of the moderator, the investigators, the parties and the stakeholders may speak;

(iv) The investigation, the parties, the stakeholders present evidence and conduct the evidence;

(v) The moderator enquires witnesses, experts;

(vi) Subject to the permission of the moderator, the parties, the facilitators may ask the investigators, witnesses, experts;

(vii) The moderator asked the investigators, the parties and the stakeholders.

The debate is conducted in accordance with the following order:

(i) Statements by investigators;

(ii) Statements by the parties and their agents;

(iii) Statements by stakeholders and their agents;

(iv) Discussions.

The surveyor, the parties, the stakeholder and the stakeholder will present their views on a final basis.

The hearing should be produced. The hearings should contain the following matters:

(i) The name, sector, office of the moderator;

(ii) The name, name, residence of the party, the person of the person concerned;

(iii) The names, sectors, positions of investigators;

(iv) The time, place of the hearing; (v) whether the hearings are open and without the reasons for the public;

(vi) Presentations by parties, stakeholders and evidence submitted to investigate the presentations of the personnel;

(vii) Key elements of witness, identification;

(viii) The parties, the stakeholder declaration and the treatment of the facilitators' objections;

(ix) Other necessary matters.

The parties, the stakeholders, the author of the communication, the material or other material of evidence submitted at the time of the hearings are annexed to the hearings.

The parties, the jurists, who have contested the matter of the hearings, should be presented to the moderator at that time. The moderator shall bring the objection to the record.

The hearings should be made available at the time of the person concerned, with confirmation of non-correct signatures or chapters. The person concerned rejects the signature or chapter of the name, which should be borne in mind.

The parties did not justify their refusal to attend the hearings as a party to waive the right to be heard, to terminate the hearing proceedings and to explain them in the hearings.

The administrative processing decision should be based on hearings.

Article 67, after the hearing, was preceded by the administrative processing decision, which was considered necessary by the executive branch and could be held again.

Decision VI

Article 68 General administrative processing decisions shall be decided by the principal head of the executive body or by the head of the sub-office.

Major administrative processing decisions should be taken by collective discussion.

A decision should be taken on the basis of expert opinions or evaluation of major administrative matters involving economic and social development, the impact of public interest and the professional and technical nature.

Article 69 shall contain the following elements:

(i) Names and issuances of administrative organs;

(ii) The name of the party, sex, age, residence, the name of a legal person or other organization, residence and its legal representative or the name of the principal head;

(iii) Determining the main facts and evidence based;

(iv) Legal basis for decisions;

(v) Treatment of views by administrative organs;

(vi) The parties are not in a way of relief and duration of administrative decisions;

(vii) The executive branch that decides;

(viii) Date of decision;

(ix) Other provisions of laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 76 shall be delivered to the parties by law. Administrative decisions should be taken in a manner other than in writing, and appropriate measures should be taken to inform the parties.

The administrative processing decision shall be effective from delivery.

Article 76 should establish administrative processing files.

Civil, legal or other organizations may be consulted, reproduced or replicated to their relevant administrative processing files, except where the law should be confidential.

Section VII Summary process

In accordance with the laws, regulations, regulations and regulations, the executive body may apply the administrative handling decisions of the summary procedure and apply the provisions of this section.

Article 73 applies to the application of a simple procedure for making decisions on the adverse administration of the parties, and the executive body shall be informed of the views of the parties and may, in accordance with its mandate, use a simple approach to hearing the parties' statements or to the defence.

In writing, the parties made submissions to the executive branch and the executive branch shall not reject them.

Article 76 quater procedures are applicable and administrative decisions can be taken on the ground.

Administrative law enforcement officials should complete the predetermined format, form a number of administrative processing decisions at the time of administrative processing.

The above-mentioned administrative processing decision shall contain the basic situation of the parties, the facts of the determination and the basis, time, place of the decision, the signature or chapter of the law enforcement officials and the public chapter of the executive branch.

When law enforcement officials make administrative decisions at the time, they should be presented to the executive organs.

Article 765 applies to a simple procedure, with the exception of the floor, which shall be subject to administrative management decisions within 10 days of the start of the administrative processing process.

Article 8 Period, period and delivery

Article 76 covers the period designated by the executive branch during the period specified in this provision.

Article 77 provides for a clear period of time for the implementation of administrative treatment, which shall be closed within the statutory period.

Article 78 does not provide for a period of time for administrative processing and for administrative approval of non-administrative licences, and shall be closed by the executive branch at the time specified below:

(i) The matter to be dealt with only by an administrative body, which shall be closed within 20 days of the date of receipt of the application; that it cannot be done within 20 days, with the approval of the head of the executive branch, extends for 20 days and shall communicate the reasons for the extension period to the applicant;

(ii) Matters related to more than two sectors, the executive branch shall be closed within forty-five days from the date of receipt of the application; within forty-five days, cannot be carried out and, with the approval of the head of the Government, shall extend the fifteenth day and shall communicate the reasons for the extension period to the applicant;

(iii) The matter approved by the executive branch of the executive branch after the review by the superior executive branch shall be reviewed by the executive branch within 20 days of the date of receipt;

(iv) The administrative treatment carried out by the executive branch in accordance with its mandate shall be closed within sixty days of the commencement of the proceedings; it cannot be done within sixty days, with the approval of the head of the executive branch, for a period of thirty days and the reasons for the extension shall be communicated to the parties.

The administrative processing decision shall be delivered to the parties within 10 days of the date of the decision.

Article 79 of the executive body makes administrative decisions that require hearings, tenders, auctions, tests, testing, quarantine, identification, expert evaluation and publicity, in accordance with the law, and the time required is not to be calculated within the prescribed period.

Article 810 The parties may apply for a period of ten days after the removal of the obstacles, if they are granted, by the executive branch. The extension period was calculated at the time of written authorization.

Article 81 must be sent back to the instrument by the executive branch, signed by the person who has been sent to the evidence or by the name and by the date of the signing.

The date on which the person was sent to the witness was reached.

The following matters should be documented by the executive branch in the production of a return certificate:

(i) Transmission to organs;

(ii) Persons being sent;

(iii) The name of the instrument;

(iv) Location and date;

(v) The way forward.

Article 82 should be sent to the instrument by the executive branch and be sent directly to the beneficiaries.

Those who have been sent are citizens, who are not here and are contracted by their adult family members.

The person who is a legal person or other organization shall be contracted by the legal representative of a legal person, the principal head of the other organization or the owner of the law and the organization of the person responsible for the receipt.

A person who has been sent may be sent to his or her agent.

The recipients were appointed to receive the harvesters and sent to the recipient.

A person who has been sent to an adult family, a legal person or other organization responsible for the receipt, an agent or a licensor has reached the date on which he or she has signed the certificate.

Article 83 has difficulty directly and can be delegated to other executive organs.

Those who were sent were military personnel and were transmitted by the political organs of their units.

The detainee was imprisoned and transmitted through his head of office.

Those who had been sent had been subjected to mandatory education measures and had been transferred to their compulsory educational institutions.

Article 84 of the Convention, which was sent to or with adult family members who refused to sign the instrument, may invite representatives of the grass-roots organizations or the units of the receiving person to attend to the site indicating that, at the time of delivery of the evidence, the denial of the receipt and date shall be considered to be delivered by the detainee, witness signature or chapter, the deposit of the instrument to remain in the residence of the receiving person; or the deposit of the instrument in the home, including photographs, video records, etc.

Article 82 is directly difficult to send a mail.

The mail was delivered to return the date of receipts indicated in the performance.

Article 86 is unknown or the other manner in which the provisions of this section are applied cannot be sent to the notice. From the date of the issuance of the announcement, it has been deemed to have been sent for sixty days.

The announcements should be delivered for reasons and after the administrative processing volume.

Chapter IV Special administrative procedures

Section I Administrative contracts

Article 87 refers to the administrative contract referred to in this article, which refers to the agreement reached by the executive branch with civil, legal or other organizations for the purpose of administration.

The conclusion of administrative contracts should be guided by competition principles and public principles.

Article 89 should be signed in writing.

Article 90 provides that administrative contracts are subject to approval by other executive organs or are to be conducted in accordance with the law, regulations and regulations, and are subject to the approval or approval of other administrative organs, the executive contract may enter into force.

The performance of administrative contracts will undermine the rights of third parties and shall enter into force with the written consent of third parties.

Article 90 provides the executive authority with the authority to guide and monitor the implementation of administrative contracts, but does not prevent the normal performance of administrative contracts by the parties.

Article 92 of the administrative contract is protected by law and the administrative authority shall not be subject to change or dismissal.

In order to avoid causing significant damage to public interest, the executive branch has the authority to change and terminate administrative contracts within the necessary scope, but should be given in writing:

(i) Changes and termination of administrative contracts;

(ii) Impact on public interest;

(iii) Whether the parties are compensated and justified.

The parties to administrative contracts should strictly comply with their contractual obligations. A party's default caused the loss of the other party and should be held in accordance with the law.

Citizens, legal persons or other organizations are not required to continue to perform administrative contracts, and the executive branch may remove administrative contracts by side, but shall notify the parties in a timely manner and justify them.

Article IX, which establishes and performs administrative contracts, should be strictly governed by the principles of integrity, trust and protection. In order to change objective circumstances, there is a need to modify or terminate administrative contracts, resulting in losses to the parties and the stakeholder, and the executive branch should compensate. It should be compensated for the damage caused by the law of the administrative body or by the fault of the person or the person.

Section II Administrative guidance

Article 9XV provides administrative guidance as described in this Article, which refers to non-mandatory acts by executive organs to induce citizens, legal persons or other organizations to make or refrain from making a certain act on a voluntary basis, within their statutory terms of reference.

Article 96 governs administrative guidance primarily to cases where the executive branch helps the parties to promote their legitimate interests in terms of technology, policy, security and information.

Article 97 implements administrative guidance by the executive branch and should be guided by principles such as suitability, flexibility, voluntary choice and trust protection.

Article 98 has the right of the parties to decide on whether to accept, listen and cooperate with administrative guidance.

In the course of implementing administrative guidance, the executive branch shall not take or adapt to coercive measures to compel the parties to accept administrative guidance and shall not take adverse measures against the parties' refusal to accept, listen and cooperate with administrative guidance.

Article 99

(i) Operational technical guidance and assistance, responses, clarifications;

(ii) Coordination, mediation and good offices;

(iii) To persuade, caution, discourage and persuade;

(iv) Recommendations, signals, reminders, reference views;

(v) Approval, advocacy, advocacy, demonstration, encouragement and incentives;

(vi) Guidance planning, guidance plan;

(vii) Administrative framework, policy guidance;

(viii) Other guidance approaches.

Article 100 provides administrative guidance that may be adopted in writing or may also be used either orally or in other form, but the parties request written form and the executive branch shall not refuse.

In the form of written, the subject, time and place of guidance should be set.

Article 101 should hear the views of the parties and stakeholders, consult experts and professional institutions, implement administrative guidance based on the verification of relevant information and enhance the scientific nature of administrative guidance.

Article 101 bis. The executive organs shall implement major administrative guidance and shall take the publication of drafts, hearings, colloquiums, and seek the views of citizens, legal persons or other organizations.

Article 101 ter. The executive body shall, on the basis of the parties' application, provide it with a comprehensive picture of the relevant elements of administrative guidance, the basis, modalities of achievement and expected results.

Article 101 quater provides that, in the course of administrative guidance, the parties have the right to make statements and observations, and the executive body should record and respond to them.

Section III Administrative mediation

Article 105 states administrative mediation as described in this Article refers to acts of civil disputes between executive organs and citizens, legal persons or other organizations that occur in coordination between citizens, legal persons or other organizations in connection with the exercise of administrative functions, in accordance with the provisions of laws, regulations and normative documents.

Article 101.6 The executive body may carry out administrative mediation on the basis of the application of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, or may initiate administrative mediation.

Administrative mediation should be guided by voluntary, legitimate, impartial and timely principles.

Article 101.7 Mediation by the executive organs of the following administrative disputes:

(i) Individuals, legal persons or other organizations do not apply for administrative review in respect of specific administrative acts and administrative compensation, administrative compensation disputes, etc., for the exercise of administrative discretion by executive organs, by law;

(ii) Individuals, legal persons or other organizations make specific administrative acts and administrative compensation for the exercise of administrative discretion by the executive branch, in accordance with the law, and administrative compensation for administrative proceedings;

(iii) Administrative disputes relating to matters of which citizens, legal persons or other organizations are invited to visit;

(iv) Other administrative disputes brought to the attention of the executive branch and the executive branch.

Article 105 allows the mediation of the executive branch in respect of civil disputes consistent with the following conditions:

(i) Related to the exercise of administrative functions;

(ii) The parties agree on mediation;

(iii) Laws, regulations and regulations do not prohibit sexual provisions.

Article 101 IX, after having received requests for administrative mediation from citizens, legal persons or other organizations, shall be informed by the applicant within five days; the applicant shall receive and organize mediation.

It was not in accordance with conditions or whether a party did not agree to the admissibility of the mediation and justified the applicant.

Article 101 governs and organizes administrative mediation by the executive branch and shall assign staff with certain legal knowledge, policy levels and practical work experience to preside over mediation.

The executive organs should, in accordance with the parties' claims, coordinate the interests and conflicts between the parties, in accordance with the relevant legal provisions, promote mutual tolerance, focus on persuasion, and lead the parties to a mediation agreement.

Administrative mediation should produce a notice.

Administrative mediation should normally be closed within thirty days.

Article 101 Agreed mediation should produce conciliation agreements.

The letter should contain:

(i) The name or name of the party, the name of the legal representative, his/her place;

(ii) The disputed case and the main case;

(iii) The content of the parties' agreements and the results of mediation;

(iv) Administrative mediators, parties' signatures or chapters;

(v) The seals and dates of the executive branch;

(vi) Other matters to be addressed.

The letter of mediation agreement should be made by the parties in their respective jurisdictions and the executive branch retained a request.

The letter of the civil dispute conciliation agreement produced by the executive branch shall enter into force with the approval of the executive body and the signature of the parties or the expression of the chapter, and shall be binding on the mediator and the parties shall be actively performed. In the absence of a mediation agreement, the parties may sue the court on the original dispute.

Following the signing of the administrative dispute conciliation agreement prepared by the executive branch, the administrative review body terminated the proceedings of the administrative review bill; it was other specific contradictory disputes; and other administrative bodies terminated the process accordingly.

The parties may apply to the People's Court for enforcement without the implementation of the administrative review conciliation.

Article 113. The mediation shall end the conciliation by the executive body, which is not agreed or by the parties before the agreement enters into force.

The parties compromised the purpose of reaching mediation, and the acceptance of the disputed facts cannot serve as a basis for their disadvantage in subsequent administrative review decisions or administrative processing decisions.

Section IV

Article 101 states that administrative payments are referred to in this Article, which refers to administrative acts such as pension payments, social insurance payments, minimum living guarantees and other benefits, subsidies received by the executive branch on the basis of the application of the parties.

Article 115 provides for projects, scope and criteria paid by the administration, which are established by law, regulations and normative documents.

The issuance of the administrative payment project shall be established by the registry and the public information system. Each release shall be signed by the parties on the books or by the name.

The accounts payable by the Administration should be delivered annually.

Article 10017, Civil, legal or other organizations have access to administrative payments by means of misappropriation, bribery, and administrative organs should be withdrawn and recovered.

Article 115 of the scope, target, hierarchy, criteria need to change or repeal the corresponding project, which shall be communicated to the parties in advance 30 days.

Changes or the repeal of administrative payments may have a significant negative impact on the lives of the parties, and the executive body should hold hearings.

Section V

Article 101, paragraph 19, provides for administrative planning, which refers to the legally binding design and deployment of administrative organs for the purpose of achieving specific administrative purposes, for external methods, measures and measures to be taken in the future period.

The administrative planning described in this provision does not include planning in the form of normative documents or administrative guidance.

Article 10020 allows the executive branch to prepare a draft plan in accordance with the needs of its official duties. The development of planning involves other executive organs, and the advice of other executive bodies, consultations and coordination should be heard. Administrative planning involves more than two administrative bodies, which can be jointly developed.

Civil, legal or other organizations may propose applications or motions for planning.

Following the preparation of the draft planning by the executive branch, a notice should be issued within the framework of the planned impact, identifying the key elements of the plan, the time taken for the presentation and access, the location, the manner, time and place of opinions or objections by citizens, legal persons or other organizations, as well as the outstanding objections, shall not be considered.

Publication can be carried out on television, newspapers and government websites. The executive body may establish specialized facilities to facilitate access.

The notice period is one month, calculated from the date of the first public release of the executive branch. The time period for stereotype or access is three months and is calculated from the date of the expiration of the bulletin. Except as otherwise provided by law, legislation and regulations.

The range of stakeholders involved in administrative planning is clear, and the executive body can communicate directly to the stakeholders.

The author of article 112 contests the planning and shall be presented within one month of the date of the expiry of the period of time.

After the expiry of the time period of the objection, the executive branch shall decide whether to organize the hearing of the stakeholder and the relevant administrative body, on the basis of an objection.

Article 121 ter. In determining administrative planning, the executive body shall consult, hear expert opinions and provide grounds for the adoption of expert opinions.

Administrative planning shall be made public in the Official Gazette following the adoption of the law. The special interests of specific citizens, legal persons or other organizations will be affected by the entry into force of the plan.

Article 105 entered into force for administrative planning, with significant changes in the legal or factual situation, or as a result of the need for public interest, administrative planning needs to be changed substantively and should be replicated in accordance with the procedure.

The administrative planning needs to be repealed on the basis of the preceding paragraph, with the decision to be repealed by the original formulation body and made public to society.

Chapter V Major administrative decision-making processes

Major administrative decisions referred to in this provision refer to decisions taken by the Government of the urban, district (territorial) people, in accordance with its statutory mandate, on matters that are closely linked to the economic and social development of the region, the breadth of society and the people's interests:

(i) Develop major policy measures for economic and social development and prepare national economic and social development planning, annual plans;

(ii) Develop a variety of overall planning, important regional planning and specific planning;

(iii) Preparation of financial advances and major financial arrangements;

(iv) Research on major government investment projects and the disposal of major State assets;

(v) Develop major measures for resource development, environmental protection, labour employment, social security, population and family planning, education, health, food medicine, residential construction, safe production, transport management;

(vi) Identify and adjust important administrative fees and important commodities, services prices for government pricing;

(vii) Major measures for institutional reform;

(viii) Other important matters requiring government decision-making.

Specific matters of major administrative decision-making are determined by the authorities of the urban, district (territorial) people within the context of the preceding paragraph and made available to society.

Article 101, administrative decision-making is governed by law, scientific decision-making and democratic decision-making.

Article 108 of the Government's principal holder, on behalf of the Government, exercises decision-making power on major administrative matters.

The Government's work sector, the immediate body, the Government of the lower-ranking people and civil, legal or other organizations believe that significant matters require government decision-making.

The Office of the High Contracting Party shall determine or be appointed by the principal authority of the Government in accordance with its statutory authority.

Article 10029, the Government of the city, the district (the district) should establish a sound administrative decision-making advisory mechanism to improve the intellectual and information support system for administrative decision-making.

Government research institutions, rule of law institutions, participation agencies, etc. should provide policy, legal, professional advisory services, etc. for major government administrative decisions.

Article 101 of the Government's principal executive decision-making matters, which are to be carried out by the principal holder's office and initiated the decision-making process.

The executive decision-making recommendations made by the Head of Government are presented to the executive head of the Government to determine whether significant administrative decision-making processes are in place.

The Government's work sector and the Government's main executive decision-making recommendations are reviewed by the Head of Government, and the principal heads of the Government determine whether the decision-making process is conducted.

The decision-making recommendations made by citizens, legal persons or other organizations are consulted by the Executive Office of the Government (rooms) after the review of the relevant sector, after the submission of the first instance opinion, by the Head of the Government, and by the main Government holder.

Article 101 of the decision-making organs should conduct in-depth studies on the proposed decision-making matters, provide a comprehensive and accurate picture of the information required for decision-making and seek the views of the parties in accordance with the scope of the decision-making matters, and form the draft decision-making programme based on a collective discussion of the decision-making body on the basis of the full consultation.

The POE may entrust experts, professional service agencies or other organizations with the corresponding capacity to complete professional work.

More than two options for decision-making should be drawn up for a multi-programme comparative study or more controversial matter.

Following the formation of the draft decision-making programme, the institution of the decision-making process should be referred to the Government's rule of law bodies for the review of legality.

Article 108, paragraph 1, should conduct a social stability, environment, economy and risk assessment of major administrative decision-making programmes, without risk assessment.

A decision-making service should justify the programme's legitimacy and, if necessary, cost-benefit analysis.

Article 103, in addition to non-public matters under the law, shall publish major administrative decision-making programmes to the society and seek public advice. Publication matters include:

(i) Draft major administrative decision-making programmes and their statements;

(ii) Means, modalities and time for public submissions;

(iii) Communications addresses, telephones, faxes and e-mail.

The Office of the High Commissioner for Policy Matters publishes draft major administrative decision-making programmes without less than 20 days.

Following the publication of the draft major administrative decision-making programme, the Office of the Procedural Unit should widely listen to the public's views, inter alia, on the scope and extent of the impact of major administrative decisions on the public.

The scope of public participation and the choice of representatives should ensure that the views of the affected public are equitably expressed.

Article 115 should organize expert or research advisory bodies in the relevant areas to make the necessary, feasibility, scientific evidence of major administrative decision-making programmes.

A decision-making office should classify expert opinions and should be adopted with respect to reasonable opinions; the reasons should be explained.

Article 101 ter. The office of the decision-making authority shall determine or select experts participating in the arguments from the experts involved in major administrative decision-making to ensure the representation and balance of experts participating in the arguments.

Article 103, the Government of the city, the district (the district) shall publish the results of the major administrative decision-making process to society within 20 days of the date of major administrative decisions.

Article 103 Eighteen municipalities, districts (beginals) Governments should conduct inspections of the implementation of major administrative decision-making matters through the follow-up of investigations, studies, etc. The executive organs should fully, in a timely and right manner, implement in accordance with their respective responsibilities. The oversight bodies should enhance oversight of the implementation of major administrative decision-making matters.

The executive body should report in a timely manner on the objective conditions relied upon by major administrative decision-making organs, or whether due to force majeure, part of the decision-making objective or not to be achieved; the executive organs, oversight bodies and civil, legal and other organizations believe that decision-making and its implementation are contrary or inappropriate and can be presented to the policymaking organs. The decision-making organs should carefully study and make decisions on the continuation, cessation, suspension or revision of decision-making based on the facts.

The major administrative decision-making procedures of other administrative organs under article 109 are implemented in accordance with this chapter.

Annex VI

Article 101

Article 101, paragraph 40, provides for “three days”, “five days”, “7 days” during administrative proceedings, which means working days without holidays.

Article 101, paragraph 1.