Advanced Search

Taiyuan Housing Safety Management Measures

Original Language Title: 太原市房屋安全管理办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Home security management approach in the city of au-Prince

(Adopted by the 9th ordinary meeting of the Government of the Faro City on 31 July 2013, No. 83 of the Decree No. 83 of 16 August 2013, published as of 1 October 2013)

Chapter I General

In order to strengthen the management of homes and to guarantee the security of tenure, this approach is based on the provisions of the relevant legislation.

Article 2

Everyone, the user and the owner of the interest shall respect this approach.

Article III of this approach refers to the management activities undertaken to secure the use of housing structures, including the safe use of homes, housing safety identification and hazardous housing governance.

Article IV. Housing security management should be guided by the principle of regular inspections, scientific recognition, prevention of ownership and integration.

Article 5 Governments of municipalities, districts (markets, districts) should strengthen their leadership in the management of housing and organize the coordination of the management of housing in the relevant sectors.

Article 6. Municipal housing management is the competent authority for housing safety management in this city, which can entrust the municipal housing safety management with specific work on housing security management.

The housing management in the district (markets, districts) is responsible for the specific work of the housing security management in the current administration area and is guided by the operation of the municipal housing management.

Relevant sectors such as housing, urban governance, public safety fire, finance, planning, material prices, business and urban care and sanitation should work in coordination with the management of housing in accordance with their respective responsibilities.

Article 7. Municipal, district and territorial management should establish systems for the safe management of homes and enhance oversight of the safety of homes.

Chapter II

Article 8. The owner, the user, shall carry out regular security inspections, timely maintenance of the house, in accordance with the status of house use, and in the aftermath of the rain snow, the summer season and various types of disasters, provide for the safe use of the house.

Article 9. Housing users should ensure the structural safety of homes in accordance with the structure and use of homes designed. In the course of the use, the security hidden or dangerous situation should be identified and all house owners should be informed in a timely manner; there is a serious risk that the house is not informed in a timely manner, and the home users should be processed.

Article 10 prohibits the unauthorized conduct of homeowners, users and associated responsibilities as follows:

(i) Removal of homes to reorganize, columns, and infrastructure;

(ii) The removal of the home's heavy wall or the removal of the walls, the windows etc.;

(iii) More than the housing design criteria and increase the use of homes;

(iv) Instruction or expansion of the holes on the house building;

(v) Reduce the high number of places on the ground for house use;

(vi) The non-performing structure of large buildings such as the dismantling of commercial sites, hotels, meals, theatres, sports sites (bassies);

(vii) Other acts that endanger the security of homes.

Article 11. The owner and the use of the owner shall be required to carry out the provision of Article 10 and shall submit the case to the security management of the house and shall be entrusted with the identification of the housing safety accreditation body. The identification needs are inherent, and the design units of the original house design unit or the corresponding level of qualifications are identified in accordance with the report on the security of the house, which can be renovated after the consolidation.

Article 12, the owner of the person concerned has the right to require security protection measures for all persons at risk, users or other persons responsible.

Citizens, legal persons or other organizations have found that houses and their subsidiary structures are at risk and are entitled to lodge complaints, reports to local housing management or other relevant departments. The relevant sectors should be addressed in a timely manner and responded.

Chapter III

Article 13, paragraph 1, of the present approach, refers to the identification and assessment of whether the level of destruction of the housing structure and the conditions of use endanger the security use.

Article XIV on housing security is the responsibility of a housing safety accreditation body established by law. The findings made by the Housing Safety Identification Body are the basis for and evidence of the security situation in the home.

Article 15. The safety of homes shall be determined in accordance with the following procedures:

(i) To receive the application;

(ii) Initial investigations to map the history and status of homes;

(iii) On-site surveys, testing, recording data and status;

(iv) Monitoring tests and collating technical information;

(v) A comprehensive analysis, characterization, integrated judgement and recommendations for processing;

(vi) A validated instrument for presentation of the property management file.

Article 16 has one of the following conditions after the use of the house, where the owner or the user should apply for the identification of the housing security accreditation body:

(i) To achieve the continued use of the design time limit;

(ii) Public places such as schools, theatres, sports sites, large chambers, meals, etc. have been designed to use 50 per cent of the homes;

(iii) Structuralization or treasury, house dumping, isolation or invalidity, severance and structure;

(iv) Natural disasters or man-made damage to the housing structure, structural strength, stability, and reduced performance;

(v) The destruction of the housing structure caused by changes in the payload due to the expansion, nutrient, refurbishment or use of conditions;

(vi) Other cases requiring accreditation.

In one of the following cases, construction units should apply for identification to the housing safety accreditation body prior to construction work:

(i) Difficulties between the two times the depth of the house;

(ii) In the context of three times the depth of exhumation, the site was exhumed in more than three metres involving the reduction of groundwater houses;

(iii) Construction (construction) within the defence engineering, orbital transport engineering planning area;

(iv) In the construction of explosions, houses within the safe distance from earthquakes required by the Safety of Exposure;

(v) Other constructions may endanger the construction of (construction) material.

The owner and the stakeholders who have been asked for the identification of the house should cooperate.

State-owned mining enterprises should conduct patrols of homes in the mining area and their subsidiaries (constructions) and apply to the housing safety accreditation bodies on a regular basis.

Article 19 provides for housing in the circumstances provided for in article 16 of this scheme, without identification or recognition of conditions that are not in accordance with the security conditions of the home, and shall not be a public activity or a place of operation.

Article 20 shall submit the following information:

(i) A claim for security of tenure;

(ii) Housing ownership certificates, housing rental certificates or other related property certificates;

(iii) The applicant's legal and effective documents;

(iv) Related technical information, such as geological surveys, design, construction, completion, renovation, dressing, alteration and stratification;

(v) Other information required for the safety of homes.

The applicant is not a owner or a person who uses the house and should provide a certificate of commission.

The applicant was unable to provide the information provided in paragraph (iv) of the previous paragraph, which was examined by the identification body on-site.

Article 21, in the area of housing safety recognition should be conducted by more than two professional experts, with special complex identification projects that could involve experts or invite the relevant departments.

Housing safety recognition should be implemented in accordance with national standards.

Article 2

Accreditation body should have a notice of dangerous homes, which are not hazardous houses, and should contain identification processes, conclusions and use of attention in the identification instrument.

Article 23 provides that the housing safety recognition body shall receive the identification fees in accordance with the fees approved by the municipal price authorities.

Chapter IV

Article 24 of this approach refers to dangerous homes, which have already been severely damaged by the structure, or where heavy components have already been hazardous components, may at any time lose structural stability and delivery capacity and do not guarantee the use of safe houses.

Article 25 is validated as hazardous houses and is dealt with in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) Short-term use should be required for the use of homes in accordance with the findings of the identification.

(ii) In line with urban and rural planning requirements, the use of persons should be removed in accordance with the requirements of the identification conclusions and be managed by the owner. The use of dangerous houses removed by the owner can apply for temporary accommodation or public rental housing to the communes of the house, which, after governance, should relocate temporary housing or public rental housing and return on time.

(iii) Hazardous homes that are not in line with urban and rural planning requirements should end their use and dismantle the whole. The relocation does not cause harm in a timely manner, with the responsibility of the property management and owners or users. The Government and the authorities may take coercive measures in accordance with the law, when they are identified as having a significant risk of housing. Reservations belonging to the Government's property are housed in a unified manner by the Government; houses administered by the unit are managed in coordination with units; houses belonging to private property are reimbursed by the Government in accordance with the residual value of the home or in order to compensate for their value.

The housing needs to be dismantled as a whole and the removal may result in adverse consequences, and the management of the property should organize risk assessments in accordance with the provisions.

Article 26 The municipal, district and territorial management should strengthen the inspection of dangerous homes, and include projects for the renovation of old cities or for the rehabilitation of squatters.

All persons who live in hazardous homes should be treated in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State's housing.

Article 28 All persons, users of dangerous homes, should set clear hazard housing signs.

All of the homes should be at a time when they are at risk, and they are at risk, and security measures should be taken.

As a result of the identification of security concealments, but not dangerous homes, all of the homes should in a timely manner exclude security shocks.

The management concerned should proceed in a timely manner when the relevant procedures are required for theft of homes.

Article 33 No advertisements, promotions, brands and levies, such as electricity, communication lines, etc.

The houses that have been established for advertisements, promotions, brands and supplies, communications lines, etc. have been identified as hazardous houses, which have been dismantled and transferred in a timely manner from the date of identification of hazardous homes.

Chapter V Legal responsibility

Article 31, which is identified as dangerous homes by the housing security accreditation body, does not take effective measures to destabilize the homeowners, has no risk or damage, causing loss to others and should be held in accordance with the law.

Article 32, in violation of article 10 of this scheme, the period of time being transferred by the property management to the extent that it is serious and the fine of more than one thousand dollars.

Article 33 violates this approach by engaging in the safe identification of homes and by charging the property management to stop the identification of homes and to impose a fine of one million dollars.

In violation of this approach, housing that is not in accordance with the housing security conditions will be converted to public activity sites or operating places, with the deadline for the management of the property and a fine of up to three million dollars.

Article XV does not carry out statutory responsibilities in the management of housing and its staff toys negligence, favour private fraud, which is governed by law by the relevant administrative organs; constitutes an offence and hold its criminal responsibility under the law.

Annex VI

Article 36 of this city is implemented in a reference to the safety management of all of the land that has been delivered and its subsidiaries.

Article 37 Safety management of military houses, religious homes and property protection buildings is carried out in accordance with the relevant legislation.

Article 338 is implemented effective 1 October 2013.