We are constantly working to improve the site, and to add more laws to our database. If you are receiving value from using our site please consider signing up for a subscription to support the site and to get many additional benefits for you.
Key Benefits:
(You can close this ad by clicking anywhere on the page.)
Key Benefits:
98. Revocation of the Federal Chancellor on the repeal of the word order ", and 2. (a) in the case of one of the participating companies, either jointly, in each case at least over one in each of the hundreds of the share capital or of shares in the proportionate amount of at least EUR 70 000 or b) jointly on all shares In accordance with Section 225c (3) of the Federal Act of 31 March 1965 on public limited liability companies (Stock Corporation Act 1965), BGBl. No. 98 idF BGBl. I n ° 71/2009 by the Constitutional Court
According to Art. 140 (5) and (6) B-VG and in accordance with Section 64 (2) of the Constitutional Court Act 1953, BGBl. No. 85, is made known:
The Constitutional Court, with the recognition of 21 September 2011, G 175 /10-12, delivered to the Federal Chancellor on 2 November 2011, rightly recognized:
| " I. |
The phrase |
|||||||||
", and
2. either
| a) |
in the case of one of the participating companies, either jointly, in each case, in each case, of at least one of the hundreds of the share capital or of shares in the proportionate amount of at least EUR 70 000; or |
|||||||||
| b) |
together shall have all shares for which the conditions of Z 1 are met " |
|||||||||
| § 225c (3) of the Federal Act of 31 March 1965 on public limited liability companies (Stock Corporation Act 1965), Federal Law Gazette (BGBl). No. 98 idF BGBl. I n ° 71/2009, is being repealed as unconstitutional. |
||||||||||
| II. |
Previous legal provisions do not enter into force again. " |
|||||||||
Faymann
