We are constantly working to improve the site, and to add more laws to our database. If you are receiving value from using our site please consider signing up for a subscription to support the site and to get many additional benefits for you.
Key Benefits:
(You can close this ad by clicking anywhere on the page.)
Key Benefits:
166. Statement by the Federal Chancellor on the ruling of the Constitutional Court that a phrase in Section 607 (12) of the General Social Security Act (idF) of the Budget Accompanying Act 2011 was unconstitutional.
According to Art. 140 (5) and (7) B-VG and in accordance with § 64 (2) and § 65 of the Constitutional Court Act 1953, BGBl. No. 85, is made known:
The Constitutional Court, with the recognition of 25 June 2013, G 3-9/2013-15, G 50 /2013-10, delivered to the Federal Chancellor on 25 July 2013, rightly recognized:
| " I. |
The phrase "if for them a contribution in the amount of 22.8% of the thirty-fold minimum contribution basis according to § 76a (3) per equivalent month is paid under the appropriate application of section 227 (4)" in § 607 (12) of the Federal Law of 9 September 1955 through the General Social Insurance (General Social Insurance Act-ASVG), BGBl. Nr. 189, in the version of the Budgetbegleitgesetz 2011, BGBl. I n ° 111/2010, was unconstitutional until 1 July 2011. |
|||||||||
| II. |
The sequence of words recognized as unconstitutional is no longer applicable in the procedure 10 ObS 20 /13h before the Supreme Court. " |
|||||||||
Faymann
