Advanced Search

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

We are constantly working to improve the site, and to add more laws to our database. If you are receiving value from using our site please consider signing up for a subscription to support the site and to get many additional benefits for you.

Key Benefits:

  • Unlimited Searches
  • Weekly Updates on New Laws
  • Access to 5,345,848 Global Laws from 110 Countries
  • View the Original Law Side-by-Side with the Translation
  • No Ads

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

(You can close this ad by clicking anywhere on the page.)

Statement Of The Constitutional Court That § 55 Para 2 Lit. G, Certain Phrases In § 55 Paragraph 5 And Article 102, Paragraph 1 Lit. H Of The 1959 Water Law Were Unconstitutional

Original Language Title: Ausspruch des Verfassungsgerichtshofes, dass § 55 Abs. 2 lit. g, bestimmte Wortfolgen in § 55 Abs. 5 und § 102 Abs. 1 lit. h des Wasserrechtsgesetzes 1959 verfassungswidrig waren

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

61. Revelation of the Federal Chancellor on the ruling of the Constitutional Court, that Section 55 (2) (g), certain phrases in § 55 (5) and § 102 (1) (lit). h of the Water Rights Act 1959 were unconstitutional

According to Art. 140 (5) B-VG as well as in accordance with Section 64 (2) in conjunction with Section 65 of the Constitutional Court Act 1953, BGBl. No. 85/1953, is made known:

The Constitutional Court, with the recognition of 16 June 2014, G 96 /2013-7, delivered to the Federal Chancellor on 31 July 2014, rightly recognized:

"§ 55 para. 2 lit. g, the word sequences", in the case of the party position (§ 102 para. 1 lit. h) "and" in all administrative procedures under this Federal Act as well as " in § 55 paragraph 5 as well as § 102 (1) lit. h of the Water Rights Act 1959 (WRG 1959), BGBl. No 215/1959 in the version of the BGBl. I n ° 14/2011, were unconstitutional. "

Faymann