Print
The Vermont Statutes Online
Title
09A
:
Uniform Commercial Code
Chapter
009
:
Secured Transactions
§
9-626. Action in which deficiency or surplus is in issue
(a) In an action
arising from a transaction, other than a consumer transaction, in which the
amount of a deficiency or surplus is in issue, the following rules apply:
(1) A secured
party need not prove compliance with the provisions of this part relating to
collection, enforcement, disposition, or acceptance unless the debtor or a
secondary obligor places the secured party's compliance in issue.
(2) If the
secured party's compliance is placed in issue, the secured party has the burden
of establishing that the collection, enforcement, disposition, or acceptance
was conducted in accordance with this part.
(3) Except as
otherwise provided in section 9-628, if a secured party fails to prove that the
collection, enforcement, disposition, or acceptance was conducted in accordance
with the provisions of this part relating to collection, enforcement,
disposition, or acceptance, the liability of a debtor or a secondary obligor
for a deficiency is limited to an amount by which the sum of the secured
obligation, expenses, and attorney's fees exceeds the greater of:
(A) the proceeds
of the collection, enforcement, disposition, or acceptance; or
(B) the amount
of proceeds that would have been realized had the noncomplying secured party
proceeded in accordance with the provisions of this part relating to
collection, enforcement, disposition, or acceptance.
(4) For purposes
of paragraph (3)(B), the amount of proceeds that would have been realized is
equal to the sum of the secured obligation, expenses, and attorney's fees
unless the secured party proves that the amount is less than that sum.
(5) If a
deficiency or surplus is calculated under section 9-615(f), the debtor or
obligor has the burden of establishing that the amount of proceeds of the
disposition is significantly below the range of prices that a complying
disposition to a person other than the secured party, a person related to the
secured party, or a secondary obligor would have brought.
(b) The
limitation of the rules in subsection (a) to transactions other than consumer
transactions is intended to leave to the court the determination of the proper
rules in consumer transactions. The court may not infer from that limitation
the nature of the proper rule in consumer transactions and may continue to
apply established approaches. (Added 1999, No. 106 (Adj. Sess.), § 2, eff. July
1, 2001.)