Advanced Search

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

We are constantly working to improve the site, and to add more laws to our database. If you are receiving value from using our site please consider signing up for a subscription to support the site and to get many additional benefits for you.

Key Benefits:

  • Unlimited Searches
  • Weekly Updates on New Laws
  • Access to 5,345,848 Global Laws from 110 Countries
  • View the Original Law Side-by-Side with the Translation
  • No Ads

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

(You can close this ad by clicking anywhere on the page.)

WAC 388-865-0785: Rights related to antipsychotic medications


Published: 2015

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
Print







WACs > Title 388 > Chapter 388-865 > Section 388-865-0785











388-865-0780    

388-865-0800







Agency filings affecting this section







WAC 388-865-0785









Rights related to antipsychotic medications.









All persons have a right to make an informed decision regarding the use of antipsychotic medication consistent with the provisions of RCW 71.05.215 and 71.05.217. The crisis stabilization unit must develop and maintain a written protocol for the involuntary administration of antipsychotic medications, including the following requirements:
(1) The clinical record must document:
(a) The physician's attempt to obtain informed consent for antipsychotic medication;
(b) The reasons why any antipsychotic medication is administered over the person's objection or lack of consent.
(2) The physician may administer antipsychotic medications over a person's objections or lack of consent only when:
(a) An emergency exists. An emergency exists if:
(i) The person presents an imminent likelihood of serious harm to self or others;
(ii) Medically acceptable alternatives to administration of antipsychotic medications are not available or are unlikely to be successful; and
(iii) In the opinion of the physician, the person's condition constitutes an emergency requiring that treatment be instituted before obtaining a concurring opinion by a second physician.
(b) There is a concurring opinion by a second physician for treatment up to thirty days.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 71.05.020, 71.24.035, and 2007 c 375. WSR 08-14-079, § 388-865-0785, filed 6/26/08, effective 7/27/08.]