(5)
|
Chapter 6 is amended as follows:
(a)
|
the following point 6.0.3 is added:
‘6.0.3.
|
References to third countries in this chapter and where applicable in a separate Commission Decision include other countries and territories to which, in accordance with Article 355 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Title VI of that Treaty does not apply.’;
|
|
(b)
|
point 6.3.1.2 (b) is replaced by the following:
‘(b)
|
the appropriate authority or an EU aviation security validator acting on its behalf shall examine the security programme and then make an on-site verification of the sites specified in order to assess whether the applicant complies with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 and its implementing acts.
Except for the requirements laid down in point 6.2, an examination of the site of the applicant by the relevant customs authority in accordance with Article 14n of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 (1) shall be considered as an on-site verification if it took place not earlier than 3 years before the date on which the applicant seeks approval as a regulated agent. The AEO certificate and the relevant assessment of the customs authorities shall be made available by the applicant for further inspection.
|
|
(c)
|
in point 6.3.1.4, the following paragraph is added:
‘Except for the requirements laid down in point 6.2, an examination of the site of the regulated agent by the relevant customs authority in accordance with Article 14n of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 shall be considered as an on-site verification.’;
|
(d)
|
point 6.3.1.5 is replaced by the following:
‘6.3.1.5.
|
If the appropriate authority is no longer satisfied that the regulated agent complies with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 and its implementing acts, it shall withdraw the status of regulated agent for the specified site(s).
If the entity is no longer a holder of an AEO certificate referred to in point (b) or (c) of Article 14a(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 or if this AEO certificate is suspended due to non-compliance with Article 14k of that Regulation, the appropriate authority shall undertake appropriate action to satisfy itself that the regulated agent complies with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008.
The entity shall inform the appropriate authority of any changes related to its AEO certificate referred to in point (b) or (c) of Article 14a(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93.
Immediately after withdrawal, and in all cases within 24 hours, the appropriate authority shall ensure that the former regulated agent's change of status is indicated in the “Union database on supply chain security”.’;
|
|
(e)
|
the following point 6.3.1.8 is added:
‘6.3.1.8.
|
The appropriate authority shall make available to the customs authority any information related to the status of a regulated agent which could be relevant in respect of holding an AEO certificate as referred to in point (b) or (c) of Article 14a(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93. This shall include the information related to new approvals of regulated agents, withdrawal of the regulated agent status, revalidation and inspections, verification schedules and outcomes of these assessments.
By 1 March 2015 at the latest, the modalities for this exchange of information shall be established between the appropriate authority and the national customs authorities.’;
|
|
(f)
|
point 6.3.2.3 is replaced by the following:
‘6.3.2.3
|
The regulated agent shall ensure that consignments to which not all required security controls have previously been applied are:
(a)
|
screened in accordance with point 6.2; or
|
(b)
|
accepted for storage under the regulated agent's exclusive responsibility, not identifiable as shipment for carriage on an aircraft before selection, and selected autonomously without any intervention of the consignor or any person or entity other than those appointed and trained by the regulated agent for that purpose.
|
Point (b) may only be applied if it is unpredictable for the consignor that the consignment is to be transported by air.’;
|
|
(g)
|
point 6.3.2.6 (e) is replaced by the following:
‘(e)
|
the reason that the security status was issued, stating:
—
|
“KC”, meaning received from known consignor, or
|
—
|
“AC”, meaning received from account consignor, or
|
—
|
“RA”, meaning selected by a regulated agent, or
|
—
|
the means or method of screening used, or
|
—
|
the grounds for exempting the consignment from screening;’;
|
|
|
(h)
|
point 6.4.1.2 is replaced by the following:
‘6.4.1.2.
|
The appropriate authority of each Member State shall define in its national civil aviation security programme as referred to in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 the responsibilities for the implementation of the following procedure on the approval of known consignors:
(a)
|
the applicant shall seek approval from the appropriate authority of the Member State in which its site is located.
The applicant shall be provided with the “Guidance for known consignors” as contained in Attachment 6-B and the “Validation checklist for known consignors” as contained in Attachment 6-C;
|
(b)
|
the appropriate authority, or the EU aviation security validator acting on its behalf, shall make an on-site verification of the sites specified in order to assess whether the applicant complies with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 and its implementing acts.
In order to assess whether the applicant complies with these requirements, the appropriate authority, or the EU aviation security validator acting on its behalf, shall make use of the “Validation checklist for known consignors” as contained in Attachment 6-C. This checklist includes a declaration of commitments which shall be signed by the applicant's legal representative or by the person responsible for security at the site.
Once the validation checklist is completed, the information contained in the checklist shall be handled as classified information.
The signed declaration shall be retained by the appropriate authority concerned or retained by the EU aviation security validator and made available on request to the appropriate authority concerned;
|
(c)
|
an examination of the site of the applicant by the relevant customs authority in accordance with Article 14n of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 shall be considered as an on-site verification if it took place not earlier than 3 years before the date on which the applicant seeks approval as a known consignor. In those cases, the applicant shall complete the information required in Part One of the “Validation checklist for known consignors” as contained in Attachment 6-C and send it to the appropriate authority jointly with the declaration of commitments which shall be signed by the applicant's legal representative or by the person responsible for security at the site.
The AEO certificate and the relevant assessment of the customs authorities shall be made available by the applicant for further inspection.
The signed declaration shall be retained by the appropriate authority concerned or retained by the EU aviation security validator and made available on request to the appropriate authority concerned;
|
(d)
|
if the appropriate authority is satisfied with the information provided under points (a) and (b) or (a) and (c), as applicable, it shall ensure that the necessary details of the consignor are entered into the “Union database on supply chain security” not later than the next working day. When making the database entry the appropriate authority shall give each approved site a unique alphanumeric identifier in the standard format.
If the appropriate authority is not satisfied with the information provided under points (a) and (b) or (a) and (c), as applicable, then the reasons shall promptly be notified to the entity seeking approval as a known consignor;
|
(e)
|
a known consignor shall not be considered as approved until its details are listed in the “Union database on supply chain security”.’;
|
|
|
(i)
|
in point 6.4.1.4, the following paragraph is added:
‘An examination of the site of the known consignor by the relevant customs authority in accordance with Article 14n of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 shall be considered as an on-site verification.’;
|
(j)
|
point 6.4.1.5 is replaced by the following:
‘6.4.1.5
|
If the appropriate authority is no longer satisfied that the known consignor complies with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 and its implementing acts, it shall withdraw the status of known consignor for the specified site(s).
If the entity is no longer a holder of an AEO certificate referred to in point (b) or (c) of Article 14a(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 or if this AEO certificate is suspended due to non-compliance with article 14k of that Regulation, the appropriate authority shall undertake appropriate action to satisfy itself that the known consignor complies with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008.
The entity shall inform the appropriate authority of any changes related to its AEO certificate referred to in point (b) or (c) of Article 14a(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93.
Immediately after withdrawal, and in all cases within 24 hours, the appropriate authority shall ensure that the former known consignor's change of status is indicated in the “Union database on supply chain security”.’;
|
|
(k)
|
the following point 6.4.1.7 is added:
‘6.4.1.7.
|
The appropriate authority shall make available to the customs authority any information related to the status of a known consignor which could be relevant in respect of holding an AEO certificate as referred to in point (b) or (c) of Article 14a(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93. This includes information related to new approvals of known consignors, withdrawal of the known consignor status, revalidation and inspections, verification schedules and outcomes of these assessments.
By 1 March 2015 at the latest, the modalities for this exchange of information shall be established between the appropriate authority and the national customs authorities.’;
|
|
(l)
|
point 6.6.1.1 (c) is replaced by the following:
‘(c)
|
the haulier declaration as contained in Attachment 6-E shall be agreed by the haulier who has entered into the transport agreement with the regulated agent, known consignor or account consignor, unless the haulier is itself approved as a regulated agent.
The signed declaration shall be retained by the regulated agent, known consignor or account consignor on whose behalf the transport is carried out. On request, a copy of the signed declaration shall also be made available to the regulated agent or air carrier receiving the consignment or to the appropriate authority concerned; or’;
|
|
(m)
|
point 6.8.2.3 is replaced by the following:
‘6.8.2.3
|
The appropriate authority may designate an air carrier as ACC3 for a limited period, ending on 30 June 2016 at the latest, in the case where an EU aviation security validation could not take place for objective reasons which are beyond the responsibility of the air carrier. Where such a designation is granted for a period of more than six months, the appropriate authority shall have verified that the air carrier applies an internal security quality assurance programme that is equivalent to EU aviation security validation.’;
|
|
(n)
|
point 6.8.3.1 (c) is replaced by the following:
‘(c)
|
the required security controls have been applied to the consignment by an account consignor under the responsibility of the ACC3 or of an EU aviation security validated regulated agent, the consignment has been protected from unauthorised interference from the time that those security controls were applied and until loading, and it is not carried on a passenger aircraft; or’;
|
|
(o)
|
point 6.8.3.2 is replaced by the following:
‘6.8.3.2.
|
Cargo and mail carried into the Union shall be screened by one of the means and methods listed in point 6.2.1 to a standard sufficient to reasonably ensure that it contains no prohibited articles.’;
|
|
(p)
|
Point 6.8.3.3 (a) is replaced by the following:
‘(a)
|
transfer and transit cargo or mail that screening in accordance with point 6.8.3.2 or security controls have been applied by itself or by an EU aviation security validated entity at the point of origin or elsewhere in the supply chain and such consignments have been protected from unauthorised interference from the time that those security controls were applied and until loading;’;
|
|
(q)
|
in point 6.8.4.1, the introductory sentence is replaced by the following:
‘6.8.4.1.
|
In order to become an EU aviation security validated regulated agent or known consignor, entities located in third countries shall be validated according to one of the following two options and be listed in the database of the ACC3(s) to which they directly deliver cargo or mail for carriage into the Union:’;
|
|
(r)
|
the following points 6.8.4.4 to 6.8.4.6 are added:
‘6.8.4.4.
|
An air cargo or mail entity operating a network of different sites in third countries may obtain a single designation as EU aviation security validated regulated agent covering all sites of the network, provided that:
(a)
|
the relevant aviation security operations of the network, including transport services between sites, are covered by a single security programme or by standardised security programmes; and
|
(b)
|
the implementation of the security programme(s) shall be subject to a single internal security quality assurance programme that is equivalent to EU aviation security validation; and
|
(c)
|
before designation of the network as EU aviation security regulated agent, the following sites of the entity have been subjected to an EU aviation security validation:
(i)
|
the site(s) from which cargo or mail is directly delivered to an ACC3, and
|
(ii)
|
at least two or 20 % of the sites of the network, whichever is the higher, from which cargo or mail is fed to site(s) mentioned in point (i), and
|
(iii)
|
all sites located in third countries listed in Attachment 6-I of the Annex to Commission Decision C(2010) 774.
|
|
In order to maintain EU aviation security validated regulated agent designation for all sites of the network not yet validated until 30 June 2018 at the latest, during every year after the year of designation, at least a further two or 20 %, whichever is the higher, of the sites from which cargo or mail is fed to the site(s) mentioned in point (c)(i) shall be subjected to an EU aviation security validation, until all sites are validated.
An EU aviation security validator shall establish the roadmap listing the order of the locations to be validated each year selected on a random basis. The roadmap shall be established independently from the entity operating the network and may not be changed by that entity. This roadmap shall constitute an integral part of the validation report on the basis of which the network is designated as a third country EU validated regulated agent.
Once it has been subjected to an EU aviation security validation, a site of the network shall be considered as an EU aviation security validated regulated agent in accordance with point 6.8.4.2 (a).
|
6.8.4.5.
|
If the EU aviation security validation of a site of the network referred to in point 6.8.4.4 (c) ii. concludes that the site has failed to comply with the objectives referred to in the checklist in Attachment 6-C2, cargo and mail from that site shall be screened at a site validated in accordance with 6.8.4.2 (a) until an EU aviation security validation confirms compliance with the objectives of the checklist.
|
6.8.4.6.
|
Points 6.8.4.4 to 6.8.4.6 expire on 30 June 2018.’
|
|
|