CIRCULAR guide rated and ranked the salaries for professional members of the Board, General Director, Director, Deputy Director, Deputy Director, Chief Accountant of State firm enforcement of paragraph 3, article 7, Decree No. 205/2004/ND-CP on December 14, 2004 of the Government wage ladder system Payroll and salary allowances regime in State companies, President the Ministry of labor, invalids and Social Affairs-Ministry of finance guide rated the company and the salary for the dedicated members of the Board, General Director, Director, Deputy Director, Deputy Director, Chief Accountant are as follows : i. OBJECT and CONDITIONS RATED the COMPANY 1. Applicable objects: objects are companies founded and operated under the law on State enterprises, including: a) independent State company;
b) member companies (independent accounting and accounting) of State Corporation;
c) parent company of companies operating under the parent company-subsidiary under Decree No. 153/2004/ND-CP dated 9 August 2004 of the Government.
The companies listed above are referred to as the company.
2. Conditions apply: the company has enough 2 following conditions then the rated companies: a) of standard rated companies were President Ministry of labor, invalids and Social Affairs-Ministry of Finance issued under the proposal of the Ministry of industry management (annex No. 1 attached);
b) year rated is not in the list of owned form conversion: (shares, intersection, sale); change management (lease, rent); reorganization (merger, merge, split); dissolution, bankruptcy.
II. HOW The RANKING PROCEDURE, The PROFILE To RANK COMPANY 1. Ranking: the ranking as follows: a base standard) rated in annex No. 1 ranking Guide and in Appendix No. 2 companies made the grade as defined:-for the company has been authorized to decide the ranking within 1 year since this circular effect to implement the plan and the class authority decisions;
-For the company was established but not yet rated when this circular effect must proceed immediately to class and defined the authority decision;
-For established companies then use standard rated competent authority issued the temporary order to the class II or class III and the competent authorities to decide. After 1 year from the date the temporary rank must make the plan official ratings to class.
b) after 3 years (36 months round) from the date of the decision, the company has a responsibility to the company's class and the authority to decide.
For companies rated temporarily, if ranked by class or smaller when folded, the temporary duration of the company's class to be counted from when the interim arrangements.
c) ranking provisions in detail a detail b, the above only applies to companies rated I, II and III.
For the Corporation, the company was deciding Prime rated standard special rated issued decision No. 185/TTg dated 28 March 1996 of the Prime or was the logical sectors, provincial people's Committee decided to rank the Corporation shall be kept were folded.
For the Corporation (including corporate) warrant the standard rated according to decision No 185/TTg mentioned above shall suggest the Prime Minister to review the decision of special rank.
2. procedure, the profile ranking: a) the responsibilities of the company: the base specified in point 1 above, the company implemented the plan and have included dispatch records specified below to send the competent superior bodies decide ranking (industry Manager; The provincial people's Committee; The Board Of the company founded by decision No. 91/TTg dated 7 March 1994 from the Prime Minister's). The case of the company rank I shall report to the competent superior bodies registered with the Ministry of labor, invalids and Social Affairs, the Ministry of finance. Records suggest rated include:-The text of the proposal;
-Scoreboard under the norms ratings (model No. 01); Speaking of actual average use (model No. 03); List of affiliates dependent accounting (4);
-A notarized form and business registration certificate;
-A copy of the financial report 2 years ago and the plan.
Financial statements are established in accordance with decision No 167/2000/QD-BTC dated 25 October 2000 and circular No. 23/2005/TT-BTC dated 30 March 2005 by the Ministry of Finance (if audited, then submit a copy of the audit report).
b) industry Manager, provincial people's Committee, the Board Of the company founded by decision No. 91/TTg dated 7 March 1994 from the Prime Minister's responsibility:-receiving, evaluating and ranking proposals profile decision rated II, III for the company administered within 15 days from the date of the application.
-Reception, had the van (enclosed records) sent the Ministry of labor, invalids and Social Affairs, the Ministry of finance to sign for the company suggested rated I and decision rated after I have written of the Ministry of labor, invalids and Social Affairs, the Ministry of finance about the registration.
-The fourth quarter every year, the aggregate of the Corporation, the company was ranked in the management authority (according to the model No. 5 and no. 6 Samples) and the report of the Ministry of labor, invalids and Social Affairs;
c) Ministry of labor, invalids and Social Affairs and the Ministry of finance is responsible for receiving applications rated I and within a period of 12 months from the date of application must have text sent the Agency suggested.
III. SALARY RANKED AS # 1. Guidelines: Arranged according to salary grades for the dedicated members of the Board, General Director, Director, Deputy Director, Deputy Director, Chief Accountant (company officials) according to the following principles: a) the company rated would then assume the titles according to the salary corresponding to that class under the payroll of the dedicated members of the Board or by the payroll of the Director General, the Director, Deputy Director, Deputy Director, Chief Accountant. When the company class change (upgrade or down) then the salaries also vary;
b) When officials no longer assume the titles under the two aforementioned payroll, pay salary ranked according to new job take, do not reserve the salary by rank has been placed;
c) would decide to appoint the two titles above that level, then the payroll decision classified salary.
2. salary: the salary Arrangements follow the following rules: a) When the company does not change class, officials are entitled to salary ranks with corresponding titles would then hold that wage level.
b) When the company was lifted from the bottom up on the class, officials are entitled to salary ranks with corresponding titles are placed in positions which as a rule are the following:-1 lower in class 1 to class on time, lifting the next wage level calculated from when a decision on class 1 salary arrangements;
-Tier 2 under in class 1 above class, if there is time to hold the lower-class tier 2 under 3 years, lifting the next revision period counted from when the decision classified under class 2 wages;
-Tier 2 under in class tier 2 on, if there is time to hold the lower-class tier 2 from 3 years or more or the wage coefficient under class 2 rank position plus coefficient difference reserve (if any) the higher the wage coefficient of degree 1.
The case management officer has held wages plus coefficient difference reserve (if any) the higher the wage coefficient quadratic on the then transferred into tier 2 on the number system and enjoy the difference computed under a salary reserve moved rank (if any).
c) When the company from lower down on the lower class, officials are entitled to salary ranks with corresponding titles are placed in positions which as a rule are the following:-1 on the classified under class 1, lifting the next revision period counted from when placed on the class bậc1;
-Tier 2 on folded into tier 2 under class.
d) for new management officer is appointed, assume the titles are placed in positions that rank the company as defined as follows:-in 1, if the coefficient of salary before the appointment with or lower than the wage coefficient 1. Lifting time calculated from the salary when salary tier 1. The case difference between coefficient of salary before the appointment and salary coefficient of degree 1 is under 70% about the difference between a wage coefficient of degree 1 and tier 2, the next revision lifting time from when the wage before appointment;
-Classified as tier 2 If the coefficient of salary before the higher salary multiplier appointment 1.
DD) for management officials no longer assume the titles under the two aforementioned payroll then ranked according to wage work, the new position, not the old wage coefficient reserved or moved laterally to new wage equivalent coefficient.
For example, He M, are ranked as tier 2 salaries, class II directors with 6.31 salary (salary ranked position before He folded M professional salary tier 4 major professional ranks with 4.10 salary from December, 1996). In October 2005 he was assigned as head of the M room, the Corporation plans to transfer his salary ranked M as follows: taking his professional salary coefficient M before the salary was ranked the main expert, steps 4 4.10 ratio (provisions in Decree No. 26/CP dated 23 May 1993 of the Government) moved to the new salary ranked number system is 4.99 (specified in Decree No. 205/2004/ND-CP on December 14, 2004 of the Government), time keeping salaries until 4.10 honorifics management service is 8 years 10 months (October 1996 to December 2005), so he was moved into wage rated M turnover in major professional, steps 6 with 5.65 salary and allowance of the Head Office Of the company.
Remaining time not showing up 1 tier anymore (7, 10-6 in/2 steps = 2 years 10 months) are reserved to the full 3 years (36 months), then lift the next add 1 degree, time to hold ranks to raise salaries next time from the date of lifting the wage level.
3. salary Arrangements for officials Of the company: a) in respect of the Corporation, the company was deciding Prime rated; the management of the industry, the provincial people's Committee decided to rank the Corporation before this circular effect, the officials are to take the title and rank in salary would then move to the new salary level horizontal stacking according to the instructions in the aforementioned point 2 salary arrangements;
b) for companies located in the overall approach, switching and operation model of the parent company-subsidiary under Decree No. 153/2004/ND-CP dated 9 August 2004 of the Government, was approved by the Government, the Prime Minister from when this circular in force until the end of 2006 management officer, is temporarily ranked salary as defined in the text of 4532/VPCP-VX on August 12, 2005 of the Office of the Government, in particular:-for the Corporation, independent State companies, subsidiaries, independent accounting officer manages the parent company are assumed, the title would be placed on the corresponding wage with titles that follow the business class had lined up before switch to operate according to the model of the parent company-subsidiary.
-For independent State company, a subsidiary of independent accounting of the premium companies are rated I, if there's enough 3 conditions: the State capital from 100 billion, annual State budget submission from 30 billion and profit of 30 billion or more, the report to the Ministry of industry management The provincial people's Committee, and the Board Of the company founded by decision No. 91/TTg dated 7 March 1994 from the Prime Minister's Office has accompanied the record (a copy of the overall approach switch operates according to the model of the parent company-subsidiary was approved by the Prime Minister; Rank I and financial reports two years ago of adjacent unincorporated parent company's financial statements from its subsidiaries) registered with the Ministry of labor, invalids and Social Affairs to wages for employees governed by the Corporation and the equivalent class prescribed in detail b , point 2 of section III of this circular.
From 2007 onwards the management officials of the aforesaid companies ranked by salary company class under the guidance of the Ministry of labor, invalids and Social Affairs.
IV. EFFECTIVE 1. This circular has the effect after 15 days from the date The report.
Abolish circular No. 17/1998/TTLT-BLDTBXH-BTC dated 31 December 1998 and circular No. 10/2000/TTLT-BLDTBXH-BTC dated 4 April 2000 of the Ministry of labor, invalids and Social Affairs, Ministry of Finance shall guide the ranking of State enterprises.
2. The State enterprise operating under the enterprise law and businesses of different economic components when applied the regulations this circular must comply to the rules of rank and salary arrangements under the provisions of this circular. Private enterprises in the other components do not have to perform the registration procedure with the Ministry of labor, invalids and Social Affairs, the Ministry of finance or the State authorities decided to rank under the provisions of this circular.
In the process, if there is anything stuck, suggest the industry Manager, provincial people's Committee and the Board Of the company founded by decision No. 91/TTg dated 7 March 1994 from the Prime Minister's reflection on the Ministry of labour, invalids and Social Affairs Ministry of finance, research, solve the./.