Advanced Search

Circular 1888/1997/tt-Bkhcn: Guide The Implementation Of Decree No. 57/cp On 31/5/1997 Of Government Regulation On Sanctioning Administrative Violations In The Field Of Measurement And Quality Goods

Original Language Title: Thông tư 1888/1997/TT-BKHCN: Hướng dẫn thi hành Nghị định số 57/CP ngày 31/5/1997 của Chính phủ quy định về xử phạt vi phạm hành chính trong lĩnh vực đo lường và chất lượng hàng hoá

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
Number: 1888 /1997/TT-BKHCN
THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM.
Independence-Freedom-Happiness
Hanoi, November 4, 1997

IT ' S SMART

Resolution of Protocol No. 57 /CP on 31-5-1997 by the Government of Regulation

in terms of administrative violations in the field of measurement and quality of goods

______________________________

On 31 May 1997, the Government issued Protocol No. 57 /CP that regulates administrative violations in the field of Measurement and Quality of goods. The Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment issued this Smart Guide guidelines for the implementation of the Protocol 57 /CP as follows:

1. On Common Regulations

1.1. The administrative trial is a violation of state regulatory regulations on measures of measurement and quality of goods made by organizations, individuals who perform a deliberate or inadvertincident approach without criminal responsibility.

1.2. The organization, the individual stipulated in paragraph 2 Article 2 Protocol No. 57 /CP is understood as follows:

1.2.1. The organization consists of: State Agency, Vietnam Front, member organizations of the Front, economic organization, social organization and armed unit established by the regulation of Vietnamese law, representative office, foreign enterprise, foreign agency, and international law. deliver, the NGO, etc., operates on the territory of Vietnam.

1.2.2. Personal:

The Vietnamese have the ability to behave according to the provisions of the Vietnamese law.

People aged 14 to under the age of 16 were only sentenced to administrative violations in the field of measurement and quality of goods to the offence caused by the intentional and only police charges, fines of up to 50,000; people aged 16 to under 18 must be punished. The administrative breach in the field of measurement and quality of goods with all violations caused by itself, could be imposed on the terms of the administrative breach prescribed at the terms of Protocol No. 57 /CP, when fines for them were questioned. The right to apply a lower penalty for a minor.

A person who has not been able to commit physical damage to physical damage must be compensated by law.

In the case of an unborn child without a payment and compensation, the parent or guardian of the person must submit instead.

Military personnel, reserve personnel, are in the time of training and the people of the civilian security forces if the administrative breach in the field of measurement and quality of goods is being punished as all other citizens.

Foreigners living, working or participating in tourism in the territory of Vietnam have the capacity to behave according to the regulation of Vietnamese law.

1.2.3. For the organization, foreign individuals have violations in the field of measurement and the quality of goods not being executed by Protocol No. 57 /CP in the following circumstances:

In the case of international treaties that Vietnam signed or participated in other regulations;

The case of the Ordinal Law on preferable diplomatic immunity.

1.3. Only those prescribed at Article 17, Article 18, Article 19 of the new 57 /CP Protocol has the right to sanctialize administrative violations in the field of measurement and quality of goods. Other state agencies if administrative violations in the field of measurement and quality of goods are not subject to their jurisdiction, then it must be transferred to the authorities with the authority to sanctialize administrative violations in the field of measurement and substance. The amount of cargo to conduct the breach.

1.3.1. In the absence of a chief executive order of Article 17 of the 57th Protocol, the deputy of those titles has the authority to sanctiate such as the rank of rank.

1.3.2. The case for the rank of primate stipulated in Clause 2, 3 Articles 17 Protocol No. 57 /CP absent or authorized by their written authority, the deputy of such titles has the authority to sanctiate such as the rank of rank.

1.4. The person with the authority to punish the administrative breach in the field of measurement and quality of goods must be based on the nature, level of violation and mitigations, heavy increases to determine the form, penalty level, and other major administrative measures. And the right thing.

1,4.1 mild mitigation in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 of the Administrative breach of the administrative breach:

The organization, the individual violation of the administrative breach prevented the damage of the breach or voluntarily rectify the consequences, compensated damages;

Violations in the emotional state of the spirit caused by other people ' s laws of law;

The violan is a pregnant woman; the elderly; people with disease or disability that limit their cognitive abilities or ability to control their behavior;

The breach due to circumstances is particularly difficult without the circumstances of itself;

The breach is due to the backward level.

1.4.2. The situation is increased in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 of the Administrative breach of the administrative breach:

Organized violations;

Multiple breaches or resins;

Inciting enticing the juvenile, forcing the person to be dependent on matter of matter, the spirit of violation;

Breach in a state of drunk due to alcohol use, beer or other stimulants;

Use of permissions to violation;

Taking advantage of the circumstances of war, natural disasters or other special difficulties of society to violate;

The breach during the time is accepting the penalty of the criminal sentence or is accepting the decision to process the administrative breach;

After the breach has been evocculated, hiding the administrative breach.

1.5. Administrative violation guidelines:

1.5.1. All administrative violations in the field of measurement and quality of goods must be detected in time and must be suspended immediately. The punishment must be carried out quickly, in the process. All the consequences of the administrative breach have to be remedied in accordance with the law. The organization, the individual violation of the administrative breach caused the damage to the property.

1.5.2. A person or an organization at the same time as many acts of administrative breach are punished for each violation. In the case of violations of a person's jurisdiction, a joint trial is made, but must specify a penalty for each behavior. If one of the violations should be treated at a higher level than the authority of his own, transfer the entire file, the court to the higher authority is higher than the trial decision.

1.5.3. Many organizations, individuals, and perform a major breach in the field of measurement and quality of goods, each of which is treated as follows:

It is the case that involves a breach in which each organization is closely related to each other, the individual violation of the breach. The person with the authority to sentence the sentence points to a joint sanctions decision, but must specify the name, address each subject to be punished. If the fines are not to exceed the highest penalty of the penalty bracket, it has been stipulated at the terms of the 57th /CP Protocol for that violation.

The case has a breach of administrative violations in one incident, but between them there is no relation to each other in the execution of the violation, the individual is punished by their own trial decisions. Depending on the properties, the extent of the violation of each object violates the procedure, the prescribed trial stipulated at the terms of the Protocol No. 57 /CP for the person's violation.

1.5.4. The punchline is not divided into a breach of small breaches to punish many times for the appropriate treatment of his or her own.

1.6. The cases are not subject to the administrative breach of measurement and quality of goods:

1.6.1. The end of the penalty.

1.6.2. The administrative violation of the measurement and quality of goods with signs of crime and the authority with the authority to punish the administrative breach of measurement and quality of goods has shifted the case to the authority of the settlement.

1.6.3. The administrative breach in the event of an urgent situation, a surprise event or an offender who is suffering from a mental illness or other ailable diseases, which loses the cognitive ability or ability to control the behavior.

In the event of an urgent situation, the unexpected event was understood to be natural disasters, enemies, and other objectipated objectipated objectipated and objectifully objectiable, objectifying, and objectifying, but not able to overcome.

The case where the offender is suffering from a mental illness or other illnesses that dismay or the ability to control behavior must be confirmed by the medical authority.

1.7. The administrative violations in the field of measurement and the quality of goods prescribed at the Protocol No. 57 /CP coincide with the administrative violations in the field of measurement and the quality of goods prescribed at the Behavioral Sanctions resolutions. Otherwise, the authority of the Inspector of Standards-Measures-Quality is prescribed by regulation at Decree No. 57 /CP.

1.8. For complex violations of the breach, it is difficult to determine whether the administrative breach or sign of criminal charges is exchanged with the Institute of People's Examination of the same level and indicates the decision to be held after a written opinion by the Institute of People's Examination.

Violations in the field of measurement and quality of goods are determined to suspend the investigation or immunity from the criminal task force of the authority to handle the criminal trial under Protocol No. 57 /CP.

It is forbidden to retain criminal cases of criminal charges for administrative processing. The person with the authority to punish the administrative breach required the base on the November 20-TT/LB on 20-11-1990, the Supreme People's Tribunal-the Supreme People's Court-the Ministry of Internal Affairs-the Department of Justice guidelines for a number of types of crime; Digital Intelligence 01-01-TT/LB November 25-1996, the Supreme People's Court of the Supreme People's Court, the Ministry of the Supreme People's Court of Criminal Infringement of Directive 406 -TTg to review violations of criminal liability or administrative punishment.

1.9. In the case of law enforcement of the laws of measure and quality of goods, the execution of the administrative breach applies under the provisions of the Law, which does not sanctialize this decree.

1.10. The period of administrative penalties for violations in the field of measurement and the quality of goods is a year since the date of the administrative violation carried out; the above term is calculated as two years for the administrative breach in the field of production. and the counterfeit goods trade, the export of export goods, imported from the catalog, must check the State of the Quality. In the upper term, if the individual, the organization has new administrative violations or attempts to evade, impede the punishment does not apply the above term.

1.11. The deadline is considered to have been unpunished for a year since the day of the individual, the organization of the execution of the trial has been decided on or from the end of the action to the execution of a penalty without recommitting.

2. On violations of violation, form and penalty level.

Protocol 57 /CP has specifically specified violations of violations, forms, sanctions, and other measures for each violation.

2.1. In terms of sanctions: The main form of punishment is applied independently or may apply additional penalties and other measures.

2.1.1. Main forms of punishment:

Warning of the warning: A warning to a violation of a violation of the charge of the warning and the warning only if the breach is a minor breach, the first, which has a mitigable condition, has not yet caused the consequences.

Fines: Money-free only for the behavior of infraction, the extent to apply the form of fines. The penalty level was specified at the terms of the 57th /CP Protocol. The breach with a mitigable condition may be lower, but not below the lowest level of the penalty. The breach with a heavy increase is likely to be punished to the highest extent of the penalty bracket.

2.1.2. Additional forms of punishment: In addition to the main penalty forms, depending on the nature, level of violation, organization, individual may be applied to additional forms of punishment:

The title of use has a deadline or no deadline for the types of licenses, certificates, other types of paperwork provided by the state authority in the field of measurement and quality of goods and the immediate notification to the agency that granted the permit, the certificate. Okay, pick up. When the license is issued without the right authority or license, the authorities have the authority to proceed immediately, and inform the authorities that the state agency has issued a permit.

Confiscation of the funeral, the vehicle is used to cause administrative violations that the law provides for confiscation.

Temporary suspension of business practices if found can cause safety, sanitation, environment and economics; temporary suspension of production, repair, vehicle testing left with the law of measurement; suspension of the use or delivery of the use of the use of the law. The vehicle traffic is not legal and the packaging packaging is not required for measurement.

The additional form of sanctions on this is not applicable independently, but must apply to the same penalty form in the case of Protocol No. 57 /CP that provides additional penalties.

2.1.3. Other measures: In addition to the main penalty form, the penalty form adds all administrative violations of measurement and quality of goods that may also be forced to apply other measures:

Forced to implement remedied environmental pollution, spread the disease due to the behavior of the administrative breach.

Charges of damages caused by the administrative breach are caused: The compensation is carried out in accordance with the principle of the agreement between the party and the damage. For physical damage valued at 1,000,000 people without self-agreement, the authorities in charge of the penalty are determined, the damages of over 1,000,000 men are settled according to civil proceedings. In the absence of a person who is compensated for damages, it is possible to calculate the damage to the money and see it as a violation of the state fund.

2.2. In terms of the determination of administrative violations in the field of measurement and quality of goods and the treatment level:

The Protocol No. 57 /CP from Article 6 to Article 16 specifies 11 groups of administrative violations in the field of measurement and quality of goods, each with a variety of specific violations. When the sanctions are required to be based on existing law documents, it is relevant to determine the correct behavior.

2.2.1. Violations of measurement in the production of the means of the state must be treated under Article 6 of the 57th /CP Protocol.

2.2.2. Violations of the measurement in the means of measuring the means of the state must be executed under Article 7 of Protocol No. 57 /CP. When applying Section 2 Article 7 Protocol No. 57 /CP needs to note the following points:

Organizations, individuals who have been allowed to produce, or be recognized for testing, or authorized by means of measuring the measure, when conducting a measurement of the same type are not registered at the State Administration for measurement.

Other subjects when the means of repairing the means of a state-designated measure (except for the use of a means of self-care) are registered at the State Administration of Measure.

2.2.3. Violations of the measurement in the means of the measurement of the means of the state are subject to Article 8 of the 57th /CP Protocol.

2.2.4. Violations of the measurement in the use of the means of the state under the control of the State are subject to Article 9 of Protocol No. 57 /CP.

2.2.5. Violations of measurement in the production of the packaging packaging package are prepared under Article 10 Protocol No. 57 /CP.

2.2.6. Violations of the measurement in the sale of goods prepared by quantitative are subject to the Article 11 Protocol No. 57 /CP.

2.2.7. Violations of the regulation of quality standards and quality registrants in the production of goods under the register must register for quality or quality of voluntary registration under Article 12 Protocol No. 57 /CP. When applying Point b, paragraph 1 Article 12 of the Protocol should be noted as changes to the content that registered the quality including changes in the index of quality, about the quality of the packaging, on how to present and content the product labeling.

Changes in the way of presentation and product labeling are different points between the actual label used and the label has been approved by the quality registry. Different points can be:

Change the layout, the color and the style of the label decoration;

Change the size, color and style of the print, of the drawing on the label;

Add or remove label content;

Not fully writable of information that will be added when the product is completed as the production time, the shelf life, the time to use the best product, etc.

2.2.8. Violations of the standard certification in the production of goods are subject to Article 13 of the 57th /CP Protocol. When applying the d Point, paragraph 2, this requires confiscation and cancellation of the mark, the standard stamps, the organization, the individual breach of the suspension, and the promotion of the advertisement. If this administrative breach is severely damaged, the breach is considered a counterfeit product and is treated under Article 15 of the 57th /CP Protocol.

2.2.9. Violations of the quality of goods in the trade are subject to article 14 of the 57th /CP Protocol. When applying This should be noted as follows:

In violation of Clause 1, 2 must suspend traffic and seek appropriate treatment.

Violation of Clause 3 is forced to pay compensation due to the behavior of administrative violations; forced recycling or negation of low-quality goods potentially causing damage to human health, contaminizing the environment, spreading the disease.

2.2.10. Violations in the production, counterfeit goods trade, but not yet to the extent of criminal responsibility, are subject to Article 15 of the 57th /CP Protocol. When applying this to note is that the goods with one of the signs below are considered to be counterfeit:

Goods labeled by counterfeit products, which are identical or similar to the product label of another production facility that have registered quality;

Goods bearing identical or similar goods to the point are likely to make consumers mistaken for the goods brand of another sales facility that has been protected for industrial ownership or have been protected under the International Convention that Vietnam participated in.

The goods bearing the label are not correct with the registered product label with the Standards Agency-Measure-Quality.

The goods are consistent with the Vietnam standard without receiving the Vietnam standard certification and markings. If this violation has a mitigable condition, the penalty is handled by Section 2 Article 13 Protocol No. 57 /CP.

Valuable goods are not correct for its origin, natural nature, name, and use but do not cause human toxicity, environmental pollution.

2.2.11. Violations of the regulation of the State for the Quality of Imported Goods in the export of imported goods under the category must be examined by the State for the Quality of Quality, under Article 16 of the 57th /CP Protocol.

3. In terms of jurisdiction and procedures for administrative violations in the field of measurement and quality of goods

3.1. About the jurisdiction of the punishment:

3.1.1. Inspectors in the Standards-Measures-Measures-Quality of the Ombudworks of the State governing bodies is assigned responsibility for the management of the State on the quality of goods under the Government ' s 86 /CP Protocol; Professional inspectors Standard-Measuring-Quality in the Inspectology of the Department of Science, Technology and the Environment and of the General Department of Standards-Measure-Quality exercise in accordance with regulation at Clause 1 Article 17 Protocol No. 57 /CP.

3.1.2. Chief Inspector General of Standards-Measures-Provincial Quality, Central City of Central (Chief Inspector) exercises the prescribed jurisdiction at Clause 2 Article 17 Protocol No. 57 /CP.

For complex situations, the application of additional punishment, the goods, the burial, the administrative violation, was confiscated or had to be culled over 15,000,000, and the Chief Inspector of the Department of the Department for the Department of Science. I ' m learning, Technology and the Environment (called the Chief Inspector Chief) and, after the guidance of the Chief Inspector, decided to take the punishment.

For violations of criminal penalties on 10. The Council of the United States, the Director of the Department (which corresponds to the Ministry of Government, is responsible for the government's management of goods under the Decree of the Decree of 86 /CP), does the procedure to move the case to the Provincial People's Committee, as Chairman of the Provincial People's Committee. Fine. After the decision was made by the Chairman of the Provincial People's Committee, the Chief Inspector of the Department was responsible for the execution of the execution decision.

3.1.3. Chief Inspector General of Standards-Measures-Quality exercise in accordance with Section 3 Article 17 Decree No. 57 /CP. For complex situations, applying additional penalties that goods, animals, animals, and administrative violations were confiscated or had to be culled on the 25,000,000 people, sent records to the Chief Inspector and after the guidance of the government. The Chief Inspector of the Department makes the decision to be punished.

3.1.4. Chief Inspector of the Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment exercise the right to sanctipate by Section 3 Article 17 Protocol No. 57 /CP for violations in the following circumstances:

Due to the petition of the Standard Inspector-Measure-Quality that the Minister of Science, Technology and the Environment or the Chief Inspector of the decision to establish.

Due to the motion of Chief Inspector General of Standards-Measure-Quality.

According to the instructions of the Prime Minister or of the Minister of Science, Technology and the Environment.

3.1.5. The People's Committee of the Order of the Order of the Executive Order in accordance with provisions of Articles 26, 27, 28 France ordered administrative violations.

3.1.6. Police agencies, Customs, Market Management and other specialized inspection agencies perform a prescribed jurisdiction at Articles 29, 30, 33, 34 France ordered the execution of the administrative breach.

3.1.7. The principle of authoritation of the jurisdiction sanctipated the administrative breach:

The People's Committee has jurisdiction to punish administrative violations in the field of measurement and quality of goods under its local management.

Police agencies, Customs, Market Management and specialized inspection agencies have jurisdiction over administrative violations in the field of measurement and quality of goods belonging to their management subjects.

In the case of administrative violations in the field of measurement and the quality of goods under the jurisdiction of many organs, the treatment of the first receptor.

3.2. The procedure for the execution of the administrative breach and the execution of the decision to punish the administrative breach.

3.2.1. When dealing with the administrative breach in the field of measurement and quality of goods in the form of a warning penalty, it is not a border that can be decided on the spot.

3.2.2. When dealing with the administrative breach in the field of measurement and quality of goods in the form of capital punishment by Protocol No. 57 /CP, the person with the authority to punish the administrative breach of the administrative breach.

The administrative scope of the administrative breach must be dated, month, year, the site of the border; they are the name of the founder; they, the name, address, profession of a violation or a name, address organization violation; date, month, year, site of violation; microcontent. scope; measures to prevent breach of the administrative breach and ensure the execution (if any); the testimony of the offender or representative of the violation organization, if there is a witness, who suffers from damage or representation of the organization, it must be clear to them, name, address. Just, their testimony.

The border must be formed at least two copies; must be compiled by the compiler and the violation of the breach; if there is a witness, the person who is damaged is also required to sign the border; if the witness is a witness, the person is denied. If you sign, you must specify the reason for the record. In the case of a number of papers, the speakers must sign the papers.

The completed border must be given to the individual, the organization in violation of one copy; if the founder of the border does not have the authority to sentence it, then it must be sent to the person with the authority to handle it.

3.2.3. The decision to punish the administrative breach

For a 15-day or 30-day period (if there are more complex situations) since the date of the administrative breach of the administrative breach, the authority has the authority to decide the punishment.

The decision to sanctiate the day, month, year of decision; they, the name, the position of decision-making; they, the name, address, profession of the violitor or the name, address of the violation organization; article, paragraph, the name of the law applied, the punishment form. In addition, the additional forms of sanctions, the handling of the court of mourning, the means; the measure of remediation; the deadline, the execution of the judgment and the signature of the decision-making decision.

In the decision to the penalty must also be specified, if the individual, the organization being executed without voluntary execution, is forced to enforce; the right to complain, where and the time of the complaint.

The decision to execute the penalty takes effect from the date of the sign or may be able to write effective dates and must be sent to the individual, the organization is punished, the body collecting fines for a 3-day period from the date of the trial decision.

Since the date of his decision to be sentenced, the individual, the organization being punished must make a decision to execute the penalty, if it is not acceptable, it is forced to accept it.

The decision was made to decide on the right to be forced and tasked with organizing the operation.

Chief Inspector of the Department, Chief Inspector General of Standards-Measure-Quality, Chief Inspector of the Ministry (the Ministry of Government assigned to administer the State Administration on Commodity Quality by Decree No. 86 /CP) requires the People ' s Police Force. In order to coordinate the organization, the organization of the organization decided to enforce the regulations at Section 3 Article 55, the order of the execution of the administrative breach.

Personally, the organization is forced to take all the costs of organizing the enforcement of the coercve measures.

The decision to pay the money from the 2,000,000 people came up and decided to confiscate the funeral, which was a value of $5,000,000 to be sent directly to the Institute of People's Control.

The decision to punish the administrative violation expires after one year of decision-making; in the case of the individual, the organization is tried to prevent, delay, without applying this time.

4. On the complaint, denounce and resolve the complaint, denounce

4.1. Complaints and resolve complaints:

The procedure, the procedure of complaint and resolution of the complaint decision to punish the administrative breach in the field of measurement and quality of goods performed by regulation at Article 87, 88, and 89 France ordered the execution of the administrative breach.

4.1.1. The person with the authority to decide to punish the administrative breach in the field of measurement and the quality of the goods is responsible for addressing the first complaint against the complaint of the decision to be determined by his decision.

4.1.2. Chief Inspector of the Department, Chief Inspector General of Standards-Measure-Quality, Chief Inspector of the Department of Complaint Resolution for the second time for the complaints decision-making of the inspector general of the same level. The decision to resolve is the final decision.

4.1.3. The Director of the 2nd Complaint Department of Claims against the complaint decides the execution of Chief Inspector of the Department; General Directorate General of Standards-Measures-Quality of resolution of a second complaint to the complaints decision-making of the Chief Justice. Secretary of the Directorate; the Minister of the Ministry of Resolution of the 2nd complaint against the complaints of decision-making of the Chief Inspector of the Bureau, the decision to resolve the decision was the final decision.

4.1.4. The Chairman of the District People's Committee, the county, town, city of the province settled the second complaint against the complaint of the Chairman of the Chairman of the People's Committee, the town, and the town. The decision to resolve is the final decision.

4.1.5. The chairman of the Provincial People's Committee settled the second complaint against the complaint of the Chairman of the District People's Committee, the district, the town, the provincial city. The decision to resolve is the final decision.

4.1.6. The Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment resolved a second complaint against the complaint of the decision of the Chairman of the Provincial People's Committee. If the Chairman of the People's Committee agrees with the decision of the Minister of Science, Technology and the Environment the decision of the Minister of Science, Technology and Environment is the final decision. The President of the People's Committee does not agree with the decision of the Minister of Science, Technology, and the Environment, the Chairman of the People's Committee of the Provincial Affairs of the People's Provincial Committee. The decision of the State Inspector General is the final decision.

4.1.7. If you do not agree to the decision to resolve the first complaint against the decision of the sentence, the complaint may be lodged on the upper level of the person who is executed on the basis of the sentence above or the start of the Administrative Court of the People's Court.

4.2. Denouncing and resolving the report:

4.2.1. The prosecution of the citizens is under Article 23 of the 57th /CP Protocol.

4.2.2. The settlement of the citizen's report followed by paragraph 4 Article 23 Protocol No. 57 /CP.

5. About the organization

5.1. The base of Protocol 57 /CP and This Guide, the ministries, the industry has the capacity to punish the administrative violations in the field of measurement and the quality of goods that need to organize the direction, the cadre guide, staff in the industry, and the right implementation of the regulations. when conducting administrative sanctions; regularly in coordination with the Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment and the ministries, the industry has other functions in organizing the implementation of Protocol No. 57 /CP.

5.2. The General Directorate General of Standards-Measuring-Quality, Chief Inspector of the Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment is responsible for helping the Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment directed, instruct, examine ministries, the Department of Functional Violations of Administrative Infringement. in the field of measurement and quality of goods in the implementation of Protocol No. 57 /CP.

5.3. The Director of the Department of Science, Technology and the Provincial Environment, the Central City of China is responsible for helping the Provincial People ' s Committee, the city in organizing the direction of implementing Protocol No. 57 /CP in the locality; tracking, aggregation of administrative sanctions. By Decree No. 57 /CP to report to the Provincial People's Committee, the Central Committee of the Central Committee and the Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment; in time of proposing to the Ministry of Entanglement.

5.4. The collection and use of administrative violations of the measure of measurement and quality of goods applied according to the 52-TC/CSTC issue dated 12 September 1996 of the Ministry of Finance.

Minister.

(signed)

Perfect.