IT ' S SMART

Evaluation of the project capture value of the Application Assistance Program

and transfer the progress of science and technology to economic development.

The rural and the mountainous region of 2011-2015

______________________

Decision base 1831/QĐ-TTg on October 1, 2010 by the Prime Minister on Appropriation of the Application Assistance Program and the transfer of scientific and technological advances in economic development-rural and mountainous societies 2011-2015;

The Digital Base. 07 /2011/TT-BKHCN June 27, 2011, of the Minister of Science and Technology on the guidance of the management of the Application Assistance Program and the transfer of scientific and technological advances in economic development-rural and mountainous areas of 2011-2015;

The Minister of Science and Technology provides evaluation of the project's project to the Application Assistance Program and the transfer of scientific and technological advances in economic development-rural societies and the mountainous areas of 2011-2015 as follows:

Chapter I

COMMON RULES

What? 1. The tuning range and subject apply

1. This information regulates the evaluation of the management of the management of the Central Group project management and management of the local proxy group management of the Application Support Program and the transfer of scientific progress and technology to economic development-rural society. and the mountainous region of 2011-2015 (later called the Mountain Rural Program).

2. This information applies to the organization, the individual participating in the project of the Mountain Rural Programme; the organization, the other individual is involved.

What? 2. Principles, Assessment of the project collection

1. The principle of evaluating the project collection:

a) Public, transparent, objective, scientific;

b) Follow the provisions of the law.

2. The project collection evaluation of the Mountain Rural Rural Program is done according to the following sequence:

a) Step 1: evaluating the outcome implementation of the project, which is the appraisal and validation of results achieved compared to the content, criteria of the models that have been approved in the project theory; organizational method, management, direction execution of the model; the situation. use funding funding from the budget and to mobilize the response funding to implement the model; economic-social efficiency and the environment of the model; the ability to maintain, develop and multiply the model that has been implemented at the site of the deployment of the model.

Evaluation of the project implementation of the project must be carried out for all projects of the Mountain Rural Programme.

b) Step 2: evaluating the project collection, which is the appraisal and validation of the results achieved compared to the contract implementation of the project (in which the project theory and other related legal documents are a part of the contract) after the end of the contract.

3. The evaluation of the management of the management of the local authorization group is made through the Council of Science and Technology provided by the Provincial Committee of the People, the Central City of the Central Committee to establish or authorize the Department of Science and Technology to establish itself. (later called the Provincial Procurement Council).

4. The management of the management Central team project is carried out through 2 levels as provincial and state-level state levels:

a) the provincial level: in accordance with Article 3 of Article 3;

b) The state level: evaluation of the results of the results of the implementation of the State Level project is implemented through the Scientific and Technology Council established by the Minister of Science and Technology (later called the State Procurement Council).

5. In the course of the 07 days before the evaluation of the course of the study of the Department of Science and Technology where project implementation (for provincial income solutions) and the Mountain Rural Program Office (for State Procurement Solutions) posted on the phone information page. The following information:

a) General information about the project: the presiding agency, the technology transfer agency, the goal, the content and the product of the project;

b) The time, the expected site to conduct the collection.

What? 3. The principle of evaluating the results of the results of the results of the results of the results model

1. The evaluation of the results of the implementation of the model was done through the evaluation organization due to the establishment of the project.

2. The assessment has between 5 and 07 members including the representative of the units: the project presiding authority; the district authority or the township level itself where the implementation of the model; the Department of Science and Technology.

The rating organization has its own organization, the organization and its members, the 1 administrative secretary who helps to serve as the head of the project presiding over the project.

3. In the event that the Organization of the Organizational Assessment has the right to recommend the project presiding over an invitation to represent the technology transfer agency, some departments, the relevant sector and those who have the appropriate expertise to participate in the session of the assessment.

4. The assessment organization is responsible for assessing the pattern results by regulation at paragraph 3 Article 8 of this Information.

What? 4. Board of Provincial Projects

1. The provincial council has between 07 and 09 members, including the department's representatives: the Department of Science and Technology; a number of departments, the relevant sector of the province, the central city of the Central city; some scientists have specialized expertise in accordance with the project's content. The Council has 1 or 02 administrative secretaries who help the staff of the Department of Science and Technology.

2. The presiding body representative, the representative of the technology transfer agency, the project dean, the individuals involved in the implementation and transfer of the technology not to join the Provincial Council.

3. The provincial council is responsible for assessing the expected project of the project under the Regulation 3 Article 9 of this Information.

4. The Mountain Rural Programme Office representative is invited to attend the session of the Council.

What? 5. State-level project evaluation board

1. The State Council has between 09 and 11 members, including the relevant state governing body of the state and local; some scientists have specialized expertise in accordance with the project's content. The Council has 2 administrative secretaries who help the staff of the Ministry of Science and Technology.

2. The presiding officer representative, the representative of the technology transfer agency, the project dean, the individuals involved in the project and the transfer of technology are not joined by the State Council.

3. The State Council is responsible for evaluation of the project obtained by regulation at paragraph 3 Article 10 of this Information.

4. The Ministry of Science and Technology only established the State Council for the projects to be assessed by the Provincial Council "to reach". Projects that have been evaluated by the Provincial Council "do not" will be reviewed by the Ministry of Science and Technology for the current regulations on management of scientific and technological activity and other provisions of the relevant legislation.

5. The representative of the Department of Science and Technology is invited to attend the session of the Council.

What? 6. The working principle of the Board of Evaluating Projects

1. The session of the Board of Evaluation of the grades must have at least two-thirds of the members present, including the Chairman or Vice President and the 02 Commissioners. The chairman of the Council presided over the session; in the case of the Speaker of the Council, the Vice Chairman of the Council chaired the session of the Council.

2. The working process of the Council is implemented by regulations at Annex 3 accompanied by this Information.

What? 7. The organizational deadline for the project evaluation

1. The delay is 15 days before the end of the contract implementation, the presiding agency and the project dean must organize the assessment of the resulting execution of the model. For crop-based models, the evaluation of the results of the execution of the model is conducted shortly after the end of the season, or the delay of 15 days after the end of the season.

2. Slow down 30 days from the date of the contract end, the presiding agency and the project dean must complete the provincial income record and submit to the Department of Science and Technology. The evaluation of the results of the results of the provincial project must be completed within 30 days from the date of receiving the valid experimental evaluation record.

3. Slow 45 days from the first day of the provincial income and the project owner must complete the state income and submit to the Mountain Rural Program Office. The evaluation of a state-level project must be completed within 30 days of the date of receiving a valid state-income record.

Chapter II

PROJECT EVALUATION ORGANIZATION

What? 8. Evaluation of the result model execution

1. A service that evaluated the results of the implementation of a model implementation: report results execution; the application engineering process of the project; the documents are related to the implementation of the model execution.

2. The results report implementing a model must be able to express the following content: results reached over the content, scale of the models that have been approved in the project theory; organizational method, management, model execution direction; the usage situation. the funding of support from the budget and the arms mobiles to implement the model; economic efficiency-social and environment of the model; the ability to maintain, develop and multiply the model and be implemented at the site of the construction of the model.

3. The base reports the results of the model, the resulting evaluation of the results of the discussion model, review and validation according to the content:

a) The level of the content implementation and scale of the model compared to the contract and the project theory;

b) The organizational method, management, direction execution direction;

c) The situation uses the funding of support from the budget and the mobiling costs of the response to the execution of the model;

d) Economic and environmental efficiency of the model;

The ability to maintain, develop and multiply the model.

4. The evaluation results of the assessment are represented by the prescribed pattern at the Appendix 1 attached to this Information.

What? 9. Provincial Project Procurement Evaluation

1. The project dean and the presiding agency perform the project responsible for filing 1 original records and 1 electronic records of records on a PDF optical disc for the Department of Science and Technology, the city.

2. The provincial income evaluation record includes:

a) The Convention proposes to evaluate the provincial income of the project presiding body;

b) The total implementation of the project in accordance with the specified pattern in Annex 2 is provided;

c) The report summares the results of the project execution;

d) Application engineering processes of the project;

Convinced and the contract to implement the project;

e) The documents and products of the project under contract;

g) periodic reports and statements;

h) The receipt of financial or editorial resolution confirmation of the situation using the end of the Mountain Rural Program Office if the last year has not yet to the deadline of the decision (for the management of the Central Group); the Financial Accounting Receip. The border confirms the last year's use of the Department of Science and Technology if the last year has not yet come to the deadline of the decision (for the local proxy group project management); Report mobiles and uses the response funding from the local budget, other sources. (if any);

i) The report of the results assessment implementation of the models;

l) Other related texts.

3. Content evaluation content

a) The degree of content execution, scale, product, and results of technology transfer compared to the contract: implementation of content, volume compared to the contract; assessment of technology transfer operations; the level of internship, the owner of the individual ' s technology, the unit reception. technology;

b) The organizational method, management, direction execution direction;

c) Capacity, efficiency uses the funding of support from the budget and the response of the response funding to the implementation of the project;

d) Economic and environmental efficiency of the project;

The ability to maintain, develop and multiply the outcome of the project.

4. Provincial Council evaluated the results of the project under the criteria and the scale of regulation at Annex 4 accompanied by this Information. The council set the point, qualifying the project under closed ballot methods.

5. The filing of delays over 60 days to 90 days without the consent of the Ministry of Science and Technology (for the management of the governing central group) or of the Department of Science and Technology (for the local authorization group project management) will be minus 10 points; if possible. A 90-day delay to 180 days will be deducted 15 points; if a 180-day delay of 360 days will be minus 20 points by the specified scale at Appendix 4.

The slow-paying case on 360 days will be assessed "unreached".

6. Processing the provincial assessment results

a) For projects rated "not reached", the Provincial Council has a responsibility to review, identify the content, the work done under the right contract as the base for the Department of Science and Technology of the Provincial People's Committee, the Central City of China. It ' s the Ministry of Science and Technology, and it ' s processing.

b) For projects that are evaluated at a "reach" level, for 45 days from the day the Provincial Board of Procurement ended the evaluation, project dean and the project presiding agency was responsible for coordinating with the additional technology transfer agency. complete the profile in accordance with the Council ' s opinion and file 1 of the original profile and and 01 electronic records of the record on a PDF photodisk for the Department of Science and Technology to hold contract liquors on the local proxy group project management and for the Office of the Programme. The mountain rural project is for the management of the Central Committee to organize a state-income.

What? 10. State-level project evaluation

1. The project dean and the presiding officer perform the project responsible for filing 1 of the original records and 1 electronic records of the profile on the PDF photodisk for the Mountain Rural Programme Office.

2. The State Department of Procurement Assessment:

a) The specified documents at paragraph 2 Article 9 of this message;

b) The proposed public evaluation of the state income of the presiding body;

c) The results of the results of the project implementation have been added and completed in accordance with the opinion of the Provincial Council; the presentation, the reception of the Council;

d) The decision to establish the Council and Border Meeting of the Provincial Council.

3. State income assessment Content

The State Department for the evaluation of the provincial income and the results of the provincial income assessment, the State Council assessed the results of the project in accordance with the following content:

a) Evaluation of technology transfer;

b) The level of content execution and scale compared to the contract;

c) The organizational method, management, direction execution of the project;

d) Project finance management;

The specified content at the point of D, 3 Article 9 of this Information.

4. The State Council evaluated the results of the project in accordance with the criteria and the scale of regulation at Annex 5 accompanied by this Information. The council set the point, qualifying the project under closed ballot methods.

5. The filing delays over 45 days to 90 days from the wake of the provincial income assessment will be minus 10 points; if filing delays over 90 days to 180 days will be minus 15 points; if filing slowly over 180 days to 360 days will be minus 20 points under the specified scale at Appendix 5 is attached to this.

The slow-paying case on 360 days will be assessed "unreached".

6. Processing the State Procurement Results

a) For projects that are rated "not achieved", the State Procurement Assessment Council is responsible for review, defining content, work done under the right contract as a base for the Ministry of Science and Technology to review, process.

b) For projects that are evaluated at a "reach" level, for 30 days from the day the State Board ended the session, the project dean and the project presiding agency was responsible for coordinating with the additional technology transfer agency that completed the pool. According to the Council's opinion and sent 1 original records and 1 electronic records of records on a PDF photodisc for the Mountain Rural Programme Office to organize the contract liquing.

c) For projects that are evaluated at a "outstanding" level that will be rewarded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, which supports the broad results of the project ' s results.

Chapter III

THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ORGANIZATION, THE INDIVIDUAL INVOLVED IN THE EVALUATION PROCESS.

What? 11. The responsibility of the presiding agency, project dean and the technology transfer agency of the project.

1. The organization review the results of the results of the implementation of the model and the implementation of the regulations in the process of organizing the correct procurement process at this level.

2. The presiding agency, project dean and technology transfer agency of the project are responsible for facilitally facilitable conditions, providing documentation and answers to the necessary problems related to the project results at the request of the assessment, the Board of Evaluation. obtained and responsible for the authenticity of the document, the information provided.

3. During the course of the evaluation of the project, if the administrative breach in the scientific and technological activities will be processed under the rule of law on administrative sanctology.

4. Case of the presiding body, project dean and the technology transfer agency of the project violation of one of the following points that will be canceled results assessment and classification assessment, handling at the level "do not reach":

a) Records, documents that have forged, non-honest content at severe levels;

b) Serious breach of the principles of financial management on the budget of the project (with the written conclusions of the inspectors, the competent examination);

c) Self-amendment, project content.

5. The presiding agency, project dean and the technology transfer agency of the project self-tolerance the costs arise to complete the project results report at the request of the Board of Acceptance Evaluation of the levels due to the untrue implementation of the content and requirements noted. In the contract.

What? 12. The responsibility of the assessment, the Council and the individual participants evaluated the project collection.

The Organizational Assessment, the Procurement Board, individuals who participate in the evaluation of the project are responsible for adhering to the assessment principle and are responsible for their advice and conduct in the evaluation process.

What? 13. The responsibility of the Department of Science and Technology

1. The organization evaluated the provincial project of projects of the Mountain Rural Rural Programme implemented on the site in accordance with the regulations.

2. Check out, monitor the implementation of the regulations during the organization evaluation process evaluation process.

3. Organization of contract liquors for local proxy group projects management.

What? 14. The responsibility of the Mountain Rural Programme Office

The Mountain Rural Program Office helps the Board to direct the Program and the Minister of Science and Technology perform the tasks:

1. The Organization of State Procurement of Central Group projects managed by the correct regulation.

2. Check out, monitor the implementation of the regulations during the organization evaluation process evaluation process.

3. Guide to organizations, individuals, localities in the implementation of the project acceptance evaluation.

What? 15.

1. This message has been in effect since April 4, 2013. For projects with a deadline to end the contract implementation prior to the time of this Smart, it is valid to be evaluated according to the statute of validity at that time.

2. In the course of execution, if there is difficulty, entanged, recommended units, localities reflect on the Ministry of Science and Technology to study the amendment accordingly.