C A C U A TO R S
Making changes to some legislatures
Acts of Ukraine on the activities of the Supreme Council of Justice
on their alignment to match
of the Constitution of Ukraine
(Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VR), 2012, N 23, pp. 242)

In relation to the adoption of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine
March 11, 2011 Decision N 2-p/ 2011 ( v002p710-11 ) in Case
The Constitution of Ukraine 254k/96-PL )
(constitutionality) of the individual provisions of the Law of Ukraine " On the High Council of
of Justice " 22 /98-PL ) Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Oh, I am. :
1. To make changes to such legislative acts of Ukraine:
(1) Paragraph of the first part of the first article 188-32 of the Code of Ukraine
about administrative offences ( 80731-10 ) (Information
The Supreme Council of the Ukrainian SSR, 1984, appendix to N 51, st. 1122)
In this edition:
" Failure to comply with the legal requirements of the Supreme Justice or member
Supreme Council for Justice to Provide Information, Judicial Affairs (its
(copies), which is completed, a failure to familiarize with the judicial system
the case that is not finished, giving the unknown to false
of information and in the same manner in which the law of the law is not held.
providing information, judicial proceedings (its copies) of the High Council of Justice
or a member of the Supreme Justice Council ";
(2) In the Law of Ukraine "On the Supreme Justice Council" 22 /98-PL )
(Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 1998, N 25, pp. 146;
2010, N 26, pp. 272):
Article 25 is set out in this edition:
" Article 25. The powers of the Supreme Justice Council under consideration
Right
High Justice Council, member of the Supreme Justice Council for the exercise of
His powers may be able to produce and produce the necessary
information from government authorities and local authorities
self-government, their officials, industry executives,
institutions, organizations regardless of the form of ownership and
subordination, citizens or their associations.
Information on the availability of a judge from office
for breaking the oath of office, the fact of the disciplinary misconduct of a judge
The Supreme Court of Ukraine or the Judge of the High Specialized Court,
concerning the violation of requirements for incompatibility by a judge or prosecutor, about
circumstances laid out in complaints of the Supreme Qualification decision
the Commission of Judges of Ukraine, and decision on the influx to
The disciplinary responsibility of prosecutors is checked by a member
Supreme Council of Justice on behalf of the Supreme Council of Justice or the Chairman of the
The Supreme Justice.
Due to the execution of a member of the Supreme Justice Council,
to remove the completed consideration of court cases (copies thereof),
familiarity with the trials that are not completed,
receive explanations from judges or prosecutors, do appropriate
requests, copies, study special cases of judges and prosecutors.
A member of the Supreme Justice Council cannot extract the originals of the court
The cases are not complete.
If the court case is returned to a new consideration or transferred
in the failure of another judge, and the subject of verification is
concerning the actions of the judge, whose proceedings are given
right, the Supreme Justice Council or a member of the Supreme Justice Council may
remove a copy of the material of the case in part that
As a matter of fact, it was considered
The state authority, the local government body, their
officials, executives of businesses, institutions, organizations
regardless of property form and subordination, associations
the person sent by a written request to the Supreme Justice Council or
a member of the Supreme Justice Council, required for ten days from the day
receiving such a request to provide the necessary information and/or judicial
case (copy).
Non-compliance of the legal requirements of the Supreme Justice or member of the Supreme Council
for the sake of justice for the provision of information, of the case (copies thereof),
Which is over, the refusal to familiarize with the case,
Which is not completed, the granting of untrue knowledge is unknown
information, as well as the drawback of the lines set up
part of the sixth of this article, pulling the responsibility,
By law.
A member of the Supreme Justice Council has the right to get acquainted with the materials,
The Supreme Justice ' s approach, taking part in their
figuring and testing, petitions, bring their own
Motives, submit relevant documents ";
part of Article 40 of the first article read:
" Data check for disciplinary misconduct is carried out
to the Supreme Council of Justice or the Chairman of the Supreme Council of Justice
Members of the Supreme Council of Justice by receiving a written explanation
from judge and other persons, extracting court cases (their copies),
consideration of which is finished, and familiarity with the cases,
consideration of which is not finished, receiving other information from the organs
public authority and local governments, their officials,
individuals, executives of businesses, institutions, organizations regardless of
forms of ownership and subordination, citizens or their associations. "
2. This Act will take effect from the day, next in the day
publish.

President of Ukraine V. YASUKOVIC
Um ... Kiev, 3 November 2011
N 4001-VI