Key Benefits:
Original text
(State on 25 February 2015)
The Parties,
Determined to implement the Convention of 13 November 1979 on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution 2 ,
Recognizing that emissions of many persistent organic pollutants are transported across international borders and are deposited in Europe, North America and the Arctic, far from their place of origin, and that the atmosphere is Primary means of transport,
Knowing that persistent organic pollutants are resistant to degradation under natural conditions and have been associated with adverse health and environmental effects,
Concern that persistent organic pollutants are susceptible to bio-magnification in higher trophic levels and may reach concentrations that may affect the state of fauna and flora and health Human beings who are exposed to it,
Recognizing that Arctic ecosystems and, in particular, indigenous peoples, who depend for their livelihoods, fish and Arctic mammals, are particularly threatened by the bio-magnification of organic pollutants Persistent
Awareness of the fact that measures to combat emissions of persistent organic pollutants would also contribute to the protection of the environment and health outside the region of the United Nations Economic Commission For Europe, including the Arctic and international waters,
Resolved to take measures to anticipate, prevent or minimize emissions of persistent organic pollutants, taking into account the application of the precautionary principle approach as defined in Principle 15 of The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development,
Reaffirming that States, in accordance with the United Nations Charter of 26 June 1945 3 And the principles of international law, have the sovereign right to exploit their own resources according to their own environmental and development policies and the duty to ensure that activities carried out within the limits Their jurisdiction or under their control does not cause damage to the environment in other States or in regions outside the national jurisdiction,
Noting the need for global action against persistent organic pollutants and recalling that Agenda 21 envisages in chap. 9 the conclusion of regional agreements to reduce transboundary air pollution on a global scale and, in particular, provides that the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe should benefit other regions of the world His experience,
Recognizing the existence of sub-regional, regional and global laws and regulations, including international instruments, that govern the management of hazardous wastes, their transboundary movements and their elimination, The Basel Convention of 22 March 1989 on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal 4 ,
Whereas the main sources of air pollution that contribute to the accumulation of persistent organic pollutants are the use of certain pesticides, the manufacture and use of certain chemicals and training Unintentional substances during the incineration of waste, combustion and manufacture of metals, as well as from mobile sources,
Knowledge that management techniques and methods are available to reduce emissions of persistent organic pollutants in the atmosphere,
Conscious of the need for a cost-effective regional approach to combating air pollution,
Noting the significant contribution of the private and non-governmental sectors to knowledge of the effects of persistent organic pollutants, alternatives and available pollution control technologies, and their efforts Deploy to help reduce emissions of persistent organic pollutants,
Recognizing that measures taken to reduce emissions of persistent organic pollutants cannot be a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination, or a way of restricting competition and trade International
Taking into account available scientific and technical data on emissions, atmospheric phenomena and health and environmental effects of persistent organic pollutants, as well as on the costs of measures Recognizing the need to continue scientific and technical cooperation in order to better understand these issues,
Taking into account measures concerning persistent organic pollutants already taken by some of the Parties at the national level and/or in accordance with other international conventions,
Agreed to the following:
For the purposes of this Protocol,
"Convention" means the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution, adopted at Geneva on 13 November 1979;
2. "EMEP" means the Cooperative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of the Long-range Transmission of Air Pollutants in Europe;
(3) "Executive Body" means the Executive Body of the Convention, established pursuant to s. 1 of the art. 10 of the Convention;
4. "Commission" means the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe;
5. "Parties" means, unless the context precludes this interpretation, the Parties to this Protocol;
6. The term "geographical area of EMEP" refers to the area defined in subs. 4 of Art. 1 of the Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution on Long-term Financing of the Cooperative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of the Long-range Transmission of Pollutants Atmospheric in Europe 1 (EMEP), adopted at Geneva on 28 September 1984;
7. Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are defined as organic substances that:
8. "Substance" means a single chemical species or several chemical species that constitute a particular group of the fact
9. The term "emission" means the release into the atmosphere of a substance from a point source or diffuse source;
10. A "fixed source" means any building, structure, device, installation or equipment that emits or can emit directly or indirectly in the atmosphere a persistent organic pollutant;
11. "Major stationary source category" means any category of stationary sources referred to in Annex VIII;
12. A "new fixed source" means any fixed source that begins to be constructed or is undertaken to substantially change upon the expiration of a two-year period beginning on the effective date:
The purpose of this Protocol is to combat, reduce or terminate releases, emissions and leakage of persistent organic pollutants.
1. Except as expressly provided for in Art. 4, each Party shall take effective measures to:
2. The provisions of para. (b) from s. 1 above shall take effect in respect of each substance on the date on which the production of that substance is terminated or the date on which its use is terminated, whichever is later.
In the case of substances listed in Annex I, II or III, each Party should develop appropriate strategies for determining the articles still used and the wastes containing these substances, and take appropriate measures for That these wastes and items, when they become waste, are destroyed or disposed of in an environmentally sound manner.
4. For purposes of s. 1-3 above, the interpretation of the terms "waste" and "disposal" and the expression "in an environmentally sound manner" must be consistent with that given in the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements Of hazardous wastes and their disposal.
5. Each Party shall:
6. In the case of domestic combustion plants, the obligations set out in subparagraphs (i) and (iii) of para. (b) from s. 5 above apply to all stationary sources of this category as a whole.
7. Any Party which, after applying para. (b) from s. 5 above, fails to comply with the provisions of para. (a) of that subsection for a substance specified in Schedule III, is exempt from its obligations under para. (a) para. 5 above for this substance.
Each Party shall prepare and maintain emission inventories of the substances listed in Annex III and shall assemble the available information concerning the production and sale of the substances listed in Annexes I and II. To this end, Parties within the geographical scope of EMEP use, at a minimum, the methods and the temporal and spatial resolution specified by the EMEP Executive Body and those outside of EMEP Are based on methodologies developed in the framework of the work plan of the Executive Body. Each Party shall communicate such information in accordance with the provisions of Art. 9 below.
1. Le par. 1 of the art. 3 does not apply in the case of quantities of a substance intended for use in laboratory research or as a reference standard.
2. A Party may grant an exemption from paras. (a) and (c) of s. 1 of the art. 3 for a particular substance, provided that the derogation is not granted or used in a manner contrary to the objectives of this Protocol, and that it is used only for the purposes and conditions set out below:
3. 90 days at the latest after a derogation has been granted under subs. 2 above, each Party shall provide at least the following information to the secretariat:
The secretariat shall communicate to all Parties information received under subs. 3 above.
The Parties shall, in accordance with their laws, regulations and practices, create conditions conducive to the exchange of information and technologies to reduce the production and emissions of persistent organic pollutants and to allow for the To the point of cost-effective alternatives, with a particular emphasis on:
The Parties shall, in accordance with their laws, regulations and practices, promote the dissemination of information to the general public, including individuals who directly use persistent organic pollutants. This may include:
Each Party, not later than six months after the date of entry into force of this Protocol, shall develop strategies, policies and programmes in order to fulfil its obligations under this Protocol.
2. Each Party shall:
3. The Parties may take more stringent measures than those provided for in this Protocol.
The Parties shall encourage research and development, monitoring and cooperation in respect of, inter alia, but not exclusively:
Priority should be given to research on substances that are considered to be the most likely to be proposed for inclusion in accordance with the procedures specified in par. 6 of the art. 14.
1. Subject to its laws to preserve the confidentiality of commercial information:
2. The information to be communicated pursuant to para. (a) para. 1 above will be in accordance with the decision on the submission and content of communications, which the Parties will adopt at a session of the Executive Body. The terms of that decision will be reviewed, as appropriate, to determine any additions to the submission or content of the information to be disclosed.
3. In time prior to each annual session of the Executive Body, EMEP provides information on long-range transport and deposition of persistent organic pollutants.
1. To the sessions of the Executive Body, the Parties, in accordance with the provisions of para. (a) para. 2 of the art. 10 of the Convention, review the information provided by Parties, EMEP and other subsidiary bodies, as well as the reports of the Implementation Committee referred to in art. 11 of this Protocol.
2. At the sessions of the Executive Body, the Parties shall regularly review the progress made in the fulfilment of the obligations set out in this Protocol.
3. At the sessions of the Executive Body, the Parties shall consider the extent to which the obligations set forth in this Protocol are sufficient and effective. For these reviews, account will be taken of the best available scientific information on the effects of persistent organic pollutant deposition, assessments of technological progress, developments in the economic situation and The extent to which the obligations concerning the level of emissions are met. The modalities, methods and timing of such reviews shall be adopted by the Parties at a session of the Executive Body. The first such examination shall be completed no later than three years after the entry into force of this Protocol.
Compliance by each Party with its obligations under this Protocol shall be reviewed periodically. The Implementation Committee established by decision 1997/2 adopted by the Executive Body at its fifteenth session shall conduct such reviews and shall report to the Parties meeting within the Executive Body in accordance with the provisions of the annex to that decision and To any amendment relating thereto.
1. In the event of a dispute between two or more Parties concerning the interpretation or application of this Protocol, the Parties concerned shall endeavour to settle it by negotiation or by any other peaceful means of their choice. The parties to the dispute shall inform the Executive Body of their dispute.
2. When ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to this Protocol, or at any time thereafter, a Party that is not a regional economic integration organization may declare in a written instrument submitted to the Depositary that for Any dispute relating to the interpretation or application of the Protocol, it shall recognize as binding (s) Ipso facto And without special agreement one of the following two means of settlement or both in respect of any Party accepting the same obligation:
A Party which is a regional economic integration organization may make a statement in the same direction with respect to arbitration in accordance with the procedures referred to in para. (b) above.
3. The declaration made pursuant to s. 2 above shall remain in force until such time as it expires in accordance with its own terms or until the expiration of three months from the date on which a written notification of the revocation of that declaration has been filed with The Depositary.
4. The filing of a new declaration, the notification of the revocation of a declaration or the expiry of a declaration shall in no way affect the proceedings before the International Court of Justice or the arbitral tribunal, unless the parties The dispute does not otherwise agree.
5. Except where the parties to a dispute have accepted the same means of settlement under s. 2, if, upon expiry of a period of twelve months from the date on which a Party has notified another Party of the existence of a dispute between the Parties concerned, the Parties concerned have failed to resolve their dispute by means of the By. 1 above, the dispute, at the request of any of the parties to the dispute, shall be submitted to conciliation.
6. For the purposes of s. 5, a conciliation commission is set up. It shall be composed of members appointed, in equal numbers, by each Party concerned or, where the Parties to the conciliation procedure cause common cause, by all those Parties, and a chairperson selected jointly by the members, Designated. The Panel issues a recommendation that the Parties consider in good faith.
The Annexes to this Protocol shall form an integral part of the Protocol. Annexes V and VII are recommended.
1. Any Party may propose amendments to this Protocol.
2. The proposed amendments shall be submitted in writing to the Executive Secretary of the Commission, who shall communicate them to all Parties. The Parties meeting within the Executive Body shall consider the proposed amendments at its next session, provided that the Executive Secretary has transmitted them to the Parties at least ninety days in advance.
Amendments to this Protocol and Annexes I to IV, VI and VIII shall be adopted by consensus by the Parties present at a session of the Executive Body and shall enter into force in respect of the Parties which have accepted them on the ninetieth day Following the date on which two thirds of the Parties have deposited their instrument of acceptance of these amendments with the Depositary. The amendments shall enter into force in respect of any other Party on the ninetieth day following the date on which the said Party has deposited its instrument of acceptance of the amendments.
4. The amendments to Annexes V and VII shall be adopted by consensus by the Parties present at a session of the Executive Body. At the expiration of a period of ninety days from the date on which the Executive Secretary of the Commission has communicated it to all Parties, any amendment to any of those annexes shall take effect in respect of those Parties that have not No notification to the Depositary in accordance with the provisions of subs. 5 below, provided that at least sixteen Parties have not submitted this notification.
5. Any Party that is unable to approve an amendment to Annexes V or VII shall notify the Depositary in writing within ninety days from the date of the communication of its adoption. The Depositary shall without delay inform all Parties of the receipt of such notification. A Party may at any time substitute an acceptance of its earlier notification and, after the deposit of an instrument of acceptance with the Depositary, the amendment to that annex shall take effect in respect of that Party.
6. If this is a proposal to amend Annex I, II or III by adding a substance to this Protocol:
7. Any decision to amend Executive Body decision 1998/2 shall be adopted by consensus by the Parties meeting within the Executive Body and shall take effect 60 days after the date of its adoption.
(1) This Protocol shall be open for signature by the Member States of the Commission and by States with consultative status with the Commission under s. 8 of Economic and Social Council resolution 36 (IV) of 28 March 1947, and regional economic integration organizations constituted by sovereign States members of the Commission, having the competence to negotiate, conclude and implement International agreements in the matters covered by the Protocol, provided that the States and organizations concerned are Parties to the Convention, in Aarhus, Denmark, on 24 and 25 June 1998, and then at United Nations Headquarters in New York until December 21, 1998.
2. In matters falling within their competence, regional economic integration organizations shall exercise their rights in their own right and carry out their responsibilities in accordance with the provisions of this Protocol to their member States. In such cases, the Member States of these organisations shall not be entitled to exercise these rights individually.
(1) This Protocol shall be subject to ratification, acceptance or approval by Signatories.
(2) This Protocol shall be open to the accession of States and organizations which fulfil the conditions set out in s. 1 of the art. 15, effective December 21, 1998.
Instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations, who shall carry out the functions of Depositary.
(1) This Protocol shall enter into force on the ninetieth day after the date of deposit of the sixteenth instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession with the Depositary.
(2) With respect to each State or organization referred to in s. 1 of the art. 15, which ratifies, accepts or approves this Protocol or accedes thereto after the deposit of the sixteenth instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, the Protocol shall enter into force on the ninetieth day after the date of deposit By that Party of its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession.
At any time after the expiration of a period of five years beginning on the date on which this Protocol entered into force in respect of a Party, that Party may denounce the Protocol by written notification addressed to the Depositary. The denunciation shall take effect on the ninetieth day following the date of receipt of its notification by the Depositary, or at any later date specified in the notification of the denunciation.
The original of this Protocol, of which the English, French and Russian texts are equally authentic, shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
In witness whereof, The undersigned, duly authorized, have signed this Protocol.
Dated at Aarhus (Denmark) on 24 June, nine hundred and ninety-eight.
(Suivent signatures)
Except as otherwise provided in this Protocol, this Annex does not apply to the following substances:
Substance |
Enforcement regime |
|
End to |
Conditions |
|
Aldrin CASE: 309-00-2 |
Production Use |
None None |
Chlordane CASE: 57-74-9 |
Production Use |
None None |
Chlordecone CASE: 143-50-0 |
Production Use |
None None |
PTE CASE: 50-29-3 |
Production |
|
Use |
None, except as specified in Annex II. |
|
Dieldrin CASE: 60-57-1 |
Production Use |
None None |
Endrin CASE: 72-20-8 |
Production Use |
None None |
Heptachlor CASE: 76-44-8 |
Production Use |
None None, except for use by authorized personnel to control Solenopsis ants in industrial bypass boxes. Such use shall be re-evaluated under this Protocol no later than two years after the date of entry into force of this instrument. |
Hexabrombiphenyl CASE: 36355-01-8 |
Production Use |
None None |
Hexachlorobenzene CASE: 118-74-1 |
Production |
None, except for production for the purposes of limited use specified in a declaration filed by a country in economic transition at the time of signature or accession. |
Use |
None, except for limited use specified in a declaration filed by a country in transition on the economic level at the time of signature or accession. |
|
Mirex CASE: 2385-85-5 |
Production Use |
None None |
PCB A |
Production |
None, except for economically transition countries that have to terminate production as soon as possible and no later than December 31, 2005, and who have indicated their intention to do so in a declaration filed with their Instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession. |
Use |
None, except as specified in Annex II. |
|
Toxaphene CASE: 8001-35-2 |
Production Use |
None None |
A The Parties agree to re-evaluate under the Protocol before 31 Dec. 2004 the production and use of polychlorinated terphenyls and "ugilec". |
Except as otherwise provided in this Protocol, this Annex does not apply to the following substances:
Substance |
Enforcement regime |
|
Reserved for use below |
Conditions |
|
PTE CASE: 50-29-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
HP CASE: 608-73-1 |
Technical HCH (i.e. HCH composed of a mixture of isomers) can only be used as an intermediate in the chemical industry. |
|
Products in which the gamma isomer of HCH represents at least 99 % (i.e. lindane, CAS: 58-89-9) can only be used for the following purposes: |
All regulated uses of lindane will be re-evaluated under the Protocol no later than two years after the date of entry into force of this instrument. |
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
PCB A |
PCBs used on the date of entry into force or products until 31 December 2005 in accordance with the provisions of Annex I. |
The Parties shall make determined efforts to achieve:
|
A The Parties agree to re-evaluate under the Protocol before 31 Dec. 2004 the production and use of polychlorinated terphenyls and "ugilec". |
Substance |
Reference year |
HAP A |
1990, or any other year between 1985 and 1995 (inclusive), specified by a Party upon ratification, acceptance, approval or accession. |
Dioxins/Furans B |
1990, or any other year between 1985 and 1995 (inclusive), specified by a Party upon ratification, acceptance, approval or accession. |
Hexachlorobenzene |
1990, or any other year between 1985 and 1995 (inclusive), specified by a Party upon ratification, acceptance, approval or accession. |
|
|
B Dioxins and furans (PCDD/PCDF): polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-furans (PCDFs) are tricyclic aromatic compounds composed of two benzene rings bound by two oxygen atoms for PCDDs and one Oxygen atom for PCDFs, whose oxygen atoms can be replaced by a number of chlorine atoms ranging from one to eight. |
A definition of dioxins and furans (PCDD/PCDF) is provided in Annex III to this Protocol.
2. The limit values expressed in ng/m 3 Or mg/m 3 Relate to normal conditions (273.15 K, 101.3 kPa and dry gas).
3. The limit values correspond to normal operation, which includes start and stop operations, unless specific limit values have been set for these situations.
4. Sampling and analysis of samples of all pollutants shall be carried out in accordance with the standards set by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) or by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) or in accordance with the methods of Corresponding reference from Canada or the United States. Pending the development of the CEN or ISO standards, national standards will be applied.
5. For verification purposes, the interpretation of the results of the measures in relation to the limit value must also take into account the imprecision of the measurement method. A limit value is considered to be respected if the result of the measurement, corrected for the imprecision of the applied method, does not exceed this value.
The emissions of the different congeners of PCDD/PCDF are shown in the equivalent of toxicity (ET) in comparison with 2,3,7,8-dibenzoparadioxin tetrachloro (2,3,7,8-TCDD), according to the system proposed by the NATO Committee on the Challenges of Modern society (CDSM) in 1988.
7. The following limit values, corresponding to a concentration of O 2 11 % in combustion gases, apply to the following incineration plants:
Municipal solid waste (incineration of more than 3 t/h)
0.1 ng TEQ/m 3
Solid medical waste (incineration of more than 1 t/h)
0.5 ng TEQ/m 3
Hazardous waste (incineration of more than 1 t/h)
0.2 ng TEQ/m 3
1. The purpose of this Annex is to provide the Parties to the Convention with indications to determine the best available techniques and to enable them to fulfil the obligations set out in par. 5 of the art. 3 of the Protocol. A more complete description of these best available techniques, as well as guidance on them, is provided in a guidance document adopted by the Parties at a session of the Executive Body and can be updated according to By consensus of the Parties meeting within the Executive Body.
2. "Best Available Techniques" (BAT) is the most efficient and advanced stage of development of activities and their modes of exploitation, demonstrating the practical ability of particular techniques to form, in principle, the basis Emission limit values to avoid and, where this proves impossible, to reduce overall emissions and their impact on the environment as a whole:
In order to determine the best available techniques, particular attention should be given, in general or in particular cases, to the factors listed below, taking into account the likely costs and benefits of the measure concerned and Principles of precaution and prevention:
The concept of the best available technique is not intended to prescribe a particular technique or technology, but to take account of the technical characteristics of the facility concerned, its geographical location and the state of the environment At local level.
3. Information on the effectiveness and cost of emission control measures is derived from the documents received and reviewed by the Task Force and the Preparatory Working Group on POPs. Unless otherwise indicated, the techniques mentioned are considered as valid by practical experience.
4. The experience of new installations using low-emission techniques as well as the upgrading of existing installations is constantly increasing so that it will be necessary to develop and modify periodically The guidance document referred to in s. 1 above. The best available techniques for new installations can generally be applied to existing installations, provided that there is a sufficient transition period as well as adaptation measures.
5. The guidance document referred to in para. 1 above describes a number of emission control measures that vary in cost and efficiency. The choice of the measures applicable in each case will depend on a number of factors, including the economic situation, the technological infrastructure and capacity and, possibly, the measures to combat atmospheric pollution already in force. Vigor.
6. The largest POPs from stationary sources are:
The corresponding definitions are provided in Annex III to this Protocol.
PCDD/PCDF emissions originate from thermal processes involving organic matter and chlorine, resulting from incomplete combustion or some chemical reactions. The main stationary sources of PCDD/PCDF are as follows:
8. The major stationary sources of PAH emissions are:
9. Emissions of HCB originate from the same thermal and chemical processes as PCDD/PCDF emissions and the training mechanism is similar. The major sources of HCB emissions are as follows:
1 Updated in accordance with D 2009/3 of 18 Dec. 2009, in force since 13 Dec. 2010, except for Canada and the Czech Republic ( RO 2011 623 ). These two states continue to apply the primitive version (see RO 2003 4425).
The deadlines for applying the limit values and best available techniques are as follows:
1 Repealed by D 2009/3 of 18 Dec. 2009, with effect from 13 Dec. 2010, except for Canada and the Czech Republic ( RO 2011 623 ). These two states continue to apply the primitive version (see RO 2003 4425).
Facilities or parts of facilities used for research and development activities and for the testing of new products are not included in this list. A more detailed description of the categories is provided in Annex V.
Category |
Category Description |
1 |
Incineration, including co-incineration, urban, hazardous or medical waste, or sewage sludge |
2 |
Agglomeration workshops |
3 |
First and Second Amalgamation Production |
4 |
Steel Production |
5 |
Foundries used in the second-merger aluminium industry |
6 |
Combustion of fossil fuels in electric and heating plant boilers and industrial boilers with a thermal power greater than 50 MW Th |
7 |
Combustion in domestic households |
8 |
Wood heating installations with a thermal power of less than 50 MW Th |
9 |
Coke Production |
10 |
Production of anodes |
11 |
Aluminium Production by Soederberg Process |
12 |
Wood preservation facilities, except for Parties where this source category does not contribute substantially to the total volume of PAH emissions (as defined in Annex III) |
States Parties |
Ratification Accession (A) |
Entry into force |
||
Germany |
April 25 |
2002 |
23 October |
2003 |
Austria * |
August 27 |
2002 |
23 October |
2003 |
Belgium |
25 May |
2006 |
August 23 |
2006 |
Bulgaria |
5 December |
2001 |
23 October |
2003 |
Canada |
18 December |
1998 |
23 October |
2003 |
Cyprus |
2 September |
2004 |
1 Er December |
2004 |
Croatia |
September 6 |
2007 |
5 December |
2007 |
Denmark |
July 6 |
2001 |
23 October |
2003 |
Spain * |
February 15 |
2011 |
May 16 |
2011 |
Estonia * |
11 May |
2005 A |
August 9 |
2005 |
Finland * |
3 September |
2002 |
23 October |
2003 |
France |
July 25 |
2003 |
23 October |
2003 |
Hungary |
7 January |
2004 |
April 6 |
2004 |
Iceland |
29 May |
2003 |
23 October |
2003 |
Italy |
20 June |
2006 |
18 September |
2006 |
Latvia |
28 October |
2004 |
26 January |
2005 |
Liechtenstein * |
December 23 |
2003 |
22 March |
2004 |
Lithuania |
June 16 |
2006 |
September 14 |
2006 |
Luxembourg * |
1 Er May |
2000 |
23 October |
2003 |
Macedonia |
1 Er November |
2010 A |
30 January |
2011 |
Moldova |
1 Er October |
2002 |
23 October |
2003 |
Montenegro |
February 9 |
2012 A |
9 May |
2012 |
Norway * |
16 December |
1999 |
23 October |
2003 |
Netherlands * a |
23 June |
2000 |
23 October |
2003 |
Czech Republic |
August 6 |
2002 |
23 October |
2003 |
Romania * |
September 5 |
2003 |
23 October |
2003 |
United Kingdom |
2 September |
2005 |
1 Er December |
2005 |
Serbia * |
26 March |
2012 A |
24 June |
2012 |
Slovakia * |
December 30 |
2002 |
23 October |
2003 |
Slovenia |
15 November |
2005 |
13 February |
2006 |
Sweden |
19 January |
2000 |
23 October |
2003 |
Switzerland |
14 November |
2000 |
23 October |
2003 |
European Union |
April 30 |
2004 |
July 29 |
2004 |
|
||||
A For the Kingdom in Europe. |
1 RO 2003 4423
2 RS 0.814.32
3 RS 0.120
4 RS 0.814.05
5 RO 2003 4425 , 2005 4445, 2008 4139, 2012 2565, 2015 761. A version of the updated scope of application is published on the DFAE website (www.dfae.admin.ch/traites).