Advanced Search

RS 941.214 DFJP Order of March 19, 2006 on Automatic Weighing Devices

Original Language Title: RS 941.214 Ordonnance du DFJP du 19 mars 2006 sur les instruments de pesage à fonctionnement automatique

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

941.214

DFJP Order on Automatic Weighing Devices

19 March 2006 (State 1 Er January 2013)

Federal Department of Justice and Police (DFJP),

Having regard to art. 5, para. 2, 8, para. 2, 11, para. 2, 16, para. 2, 17, para. 2, 24, para. 3, and 33 of the order of 15 February 2006 on measuring instruments (Ordinance on measuring instruments) 1 , 2

Stops:

Art. 1 Purpose

This Order fixes:

A.
Requirements for automatic weighing instruments;
B.
The procedures for placing these measuring instruments on the market;
C.
Procedures to maintain the stability of measurement of these measuring instruments.
Art. 2 Scope of application

The following are subject to the provisions of this order:

A.
Automatic-operating-label weighing devices;
B.
Automatic Discontinuous Totalizing Weighing Devices (hopper totalizers);
C.
Automatic Continuous Totalizing Weighing Devices (Tape Weighing);
D.
Automatic-operated railway scales;
E.
Automatic weighing instruments to determine the total weight of on-road vehicles, to the extent that they are installed in a monitored weighing area in which the vehicle speed is controlled.
Art. 3 Units

The following units of mass shall be used for the indications worn on automatic weighing instruments:

A.
Milligram (mg);
B.
Gram (g);
C.
Kilogram (kg);
D.
Tonne (t).
Art. 4 Reference Conditions, Standards Weight

1 For the determination of measurement results when assessing compliance or subsequent verification, the following values are deemed to be reference conditions:

A.

Temperature

20 °

B.

Conventional density of standard weights

8000 kg/m 3 ;

C.

Air density

1.2 kg/m 3 .

2 The standard weights and load parts used for subsequent controls shall not be vitiated by an error greater than one third of the maximum permissible error for the weighing device to be verified for the load in question.

Art. 5 Definitions

For the purposes of this order:

A.
Weighing instrument: A measuring instrument used to determine the mass of a body by using the action of gravity on that body or used to determine other quantities, values, parameters or characteristics related to the mass;
B.
Automatic weighing instrument: A weighing device which determines the mass of a product without the intervention of an operator and according to a predetermined program of automatic process characteristic of the instrument;
C.
Automatic working-label weighing device (tri-label): An automatic weighing device that determines the mass of pre-assembled discrete loads such as prepackages or individual loads of bulk products;
D.
Automatic self-operating control weight: A scooter dividing articles of different masses into several subsets according to the value of the difference between their mass and the nominal sorting point;
E.
Weight label: A scooter for the labelling of the weight of each item;
F.
Weight/price tag: A scooter for the labelling of the weight and price information for each item;
G.
Automatic Discontinuous Totalizing Weighing Device (hopper totalizer): An automatic weighing device which determines the mass of a bulk product by dividing it into discrete loads; the mass of each discrete load is determined sequentially and added; each discrete load is then Issued in bulk;
H.
Automatic Continuous Totalizing Weighing Device (Tape Weighing): An automatic weighing device which continuously determines the mass of a bulk product on a conveyor belt, without a systematic division of the product and without interruption of the movement of the conveyor belt;
I.
Automatic-operated railway scale: An automatic weighing device equipped with a load receiving receiver with rails for the carriage of railway vehicles;
J.
Automatic weighing instruments for on-road vehicles: An automatic weighing device that is used to determine the total mass of on-road vehicles.
Art. 6 Essential requirements

1 Automatic-label weighing devices must meet the essential requirements set out in Schedule 1 of the Measurement Instrument and Schedules 1 and 2 of this Order.

2 Automatic Discontinuous Totalizing Weighing Devices (hopper totalizers) shall meet the essential requirements set out in Schedule 1 of the Ordinance on Measurement Instruments and Schedules 1 and 3 of this Order. Order.

3 Automatic Continuous Totalizing Weighing Devices (Tape Weighing) shall meet the essential requirements set out in Schedule 1 of the Order on Measurement Instruments and Schedules 1 and 4 of this Agreement. Order.

4 Automatic railway rockers shall meet the essential requirements set out in Schedule 1 of the Ordinance on Measuring Instruments and Schedules 1 and 5 of this Order.

5 Automatic weighing instruments for determining the total weight of moving road vehicles shall meet the essential requirements set out in Annex 1 of the Ordinance on Measuring Instruments and Annex 6 of the This order.

Art. 7 Marketing Procedures

The conformity of automatic weighing instruments with the essential requirements referred to in Art. 6 may be evaluated and certified at the manufacturer's choice in accordance with one of the following procedures set out in Schedule 2 of the Ordinance on Measuring Instruments:

A.
For mechanical weighing instruments with automatic operation:
1.
Type examination (module B) completed by the declaration of conformity to the type on the basis of the quality assurance of the manufacturing process (module D),
2.
Type examination (module B) completed by the declaration of conformity to the type on the basis of the quality assurance of the inspection and testing of the finished product (module E),
3.
Type examination (module B) completed by the declaration of conformity to the type on the basis of the product verification (module F),
4.
Declaration of conformity on the basis of quality assurance of the manufacturing process (module D1),
5.
Declaration of conformity on the basis of product verification (F1 module),
6.
Declaration of compliance on the basis of unit verification (module G),
7.
Declaration of conformity on the basis of comprehensive quality assurance and design control (module H1);
B.
For electro-mechanical weighing devices with automatic operation:
1.
Type examination (module B) completed by the declaration of conformity to the type on the basis of the quality assurance of the manufacturing process (module D),
2.
Type examination (module B) completed by the declaration of conformity to the type on the basis of the quality assurance of the inspection and testing of the finished product (module E),
3.
Type examination (module B) completed by the declaration of conformity to the type on the basis of the product verification (module F),
4.
Declaration of compliance on the basis of unit verification (module G),
5.
Declaration of conformity on the basis of comprehensive quality assurance and design control (module H1);
C.
For electronic weighing devices or with automatic operating software:
1.
Type examination (module B) completed by the declaration of conformity to the type on the basis of the quality assurance of the manufacturing process (module D),
2.
Type examination (module B) completed by the declaration of conformity to the type on the basis of the product verification (module F),
3.
Declaration of compliance on the basis of unit verification (module G),
4.
Declaration of conformity on the basis of comprehensive quality assurance and design control (module H1);
D.
For automatic weighing instruments to determine the total weight of on-road vehicles: regular approval and initial verification in accordance with Annex 5 of the Ordinance on Measuring Instruments.
Art. 8 Procedures for maintaining measurement stability

1 Automatic weighing instruments shall be subject to the subsequent verification in accordance with Annex 7, c. 1, of the order on measuring instruments, carried out by the cantonal audit offices.

2 The subsequent verification of the automatic weighing instruments shall take place:

A.
Every six months for weight labels and weight/price tags
B.
Each year for automatic operating-labeller weighing devices, with the exception of the weighing instruments referred to in the whistle. A;
C.
Every two years for:
1.
Automatic Discontinuous Totalizing Weighing Devices (hopper totalizers);
2.
Automatic Continuous Totalizing Weighing Devices (Tape Weighing);
D.
Each year for automatic weighing instruments for on-road vehicles;
E.
Each year for the automatic railway scales.

3 For automatic railway rockers, the user may supplement the subsequent verification by a control procedure according to Annex 7, c. 5 of the Order on Measurement Devices and Schedule 7 to this Order. Thus, the verification period for railway scales can be extended to a maximum of three years.

Art. User obligations

The user assumes the responsibility specified in s. 21, para. 1, of the order on measuring instruments, but also the order:

A.
Ensure compliance with the manufacturer's instructions for the mounting and commissioning of the weighing device;
B.
Maintain the weighing device in good condition and periodically review the parts subject to wear, aging or fouling.
Art. 10 Maximum Tolerable Errors During Controls

The maximum permissible errors applicable in the challenge of results of measures within the meaning of Art. 29, para. 1 of the Ordinance on measuring instruments or in the official control of an instrument of measurement outside the scope of the verification shall be the double of the maximum permissible errors set out in Annexes 2 to 6 to this order.

Art. 11 Repeal of the law in force

The Order of August 15, 1986 on Weighing Devices 1 Is repealed.


1 [RO 1986 2013, 2002 2136, 2004 2119]

Art. 12 Transitional provisions

1 Audited weighing instruments verified prior to the coming into force of this order may continue to be verified at a later date.

2 Automatic weighing instruments approved under the earlier right may still be placed on the market and initially verified according to Annex 5, c. 2, of the order on instruments of measurement for ten years from the coming into force of this order. After the expiry of these ten years, they may still be verified at a later date.

3 Automatic weighing devices placed on the market not verified before the entry into force of this order may still be used without verification for five years after the first entry into service or revision, but No later than 31 December 2011. They may be verified if they meet the requirements of this order.

Art. 13 Entry into force

This Order comes into force on October 30, 2006.

Annex 1

(art. 6, para. 1)

Specific requirements for automatic weighing instruments

1

Nominal Operating Conditions

The manufacturer shall specify the nominal operating conditions of the measuring instruments as follows:
1.1
For the measurement:
The extent of measurement of the instrument in terms of maximum and minimum scopes.
1.2
For the influence sizes of the power supply:
In case of ac power supply: the rated AC power voltage or AC voltage limits.
In the case of dc power supply: the nominal and minimum DC supply voltage, or the DC voltage limits.
1.3
For mechanical and climatic influence sizes:
The minimum temperature range is 30 ° C, unless otherwise specified in Annexes 2 to 5.
The mechanical environment classes provided for in Annex 1, c. 1.3.2, of the Ordinance on Measuring Instruments, does not apply. The manufacturer shall define the mechanical conditions for the use of the instruments which are subjected to a particular mechanical stress, for example the instruments integrated into vehicles.
1.4
For other influence sizes (if applicable):
The operating speed (s).
Characteristics of the product (s) to be weighed.

2

Tolerable Effect of Disturbances-Electromagnetic Environment

The required performance and the critical variation value are indicated in the specific annexes 2, 3, 4, or 5, corresponding to each type of instrument.

3

Adéquation

3.1
Measures shall be provided to limit the effects of inclination, loading and operating speed in such a way that maximum tolerated errors (MTRs) are not exceeded under normal operating conditions.
3.2
Adequate material handling facilities should be provided to enable the device to meet EMT during normal operation.
3.3
Any operator command interface must be clear and efficient.
3.4
The integrity of the display (if any) must be verified by the operator.
3.5
An appropriate zero-setting function should be provided to allow the device to meet EMT during normal operation.
3.6
Any result outside the scope of measurement must be identified as such, when printing is possible.

State 1 Er January 2013

Annex 2

(art. 6, para. 2)

Specific Requirements for Automatic Weighing Weighing Devices

1

Accuracy Classes

1.1
Weighing devices are further divided into primary categories designated by X or Y as indicated by the manufacturer.
1.2
These categories are subdivided into four categories of accuracy:

XI

XII

XIII

XIV; or

Y (I)

Y (II)

Y (a)

Y (b).

2

Category X instruments

2.1
Category X shall apply to the instruments used to verify the prepackaging made in accordance with the provisions of Council Directives 75 /106/EEC of 19 December 1974 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the Volume preconditioning of certain pre-packed liquids 1 Of 20 January 1976 and 76 /211/EEC of the Council concerning the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the mass or volume preconditioning of certain products in prepackages 2 .
2.2
The accuracy classes are supplemented by a factor (x), which quantifies the maximum tolerated deviation as specified in the c. 4.2.
The manufacturer must specify the factor (x), (x) being £ 2 and having the form 1 × 10 K , 2 × 10 K Or 5 × 10 K , where k is an integer negative or equal to zero.

3

Category Y instruments

Category Y applies to all other automatic labeller-labellers.

4

Maximum Tolerable Error (EMT)

4.1
Medium error for weighing instruments of category X or EMT for category Y instruments

Table 1

Net Charge (m) at verification scale (e)

Maximum Tolerable Average Error

Maximum Tolerable Error

XI

Y (I)

XII

Y (II)

XIII

Y (a)

XIV

Y (b)

X

Y

0 < m

£ 50,000

0 < m

£ 5,000

0 < m

£ 500

0 < m

£ 50

± 0.5 e

± 1.0 e

50,000 < m

£ 200,000

5,000 < m

£ 20,000

500 < m

£ 2,000

50 < m

£ 200

± 1.0 e

± 1.5 e

200 000 < m

20,000 < m

£ 100,000

2,000 < m

£ 10,000

200 < m

£ 1,000

± 1.5 e

± 2.0 e

4.2
Standard Deviation
The maximum permissible value for the standard deviation of an instrument of class X (x) is the result of multiplying the factor (x) by the value indicated in Table 2 below.

Table 2

Net Load (m)

Maximum standard deviation for class X (1)

M £ 50 g

0.48 %

50 g <

M £ 100 g

0.24 g

100 g <

M £ 200 g

0.24 %

200 g <

M £ 300 g

0.48 g

300 g <

M £ 500 g

0.16 %

500 g <

M £ 1,000 g

0.8 g

1000 g <

M £ 10,000 g

0.08 %

10,000 g <

M £ 15,000 g

8 g

15,000 g <

M

0.053 %

For Classes XI and XII, x shall be less than 1.

For class XIII, x shall not be greater than 1.

For class XIV, x must be greater than 1.

4.3
Verification scale-simple-scale instruments

Table 3

Accuracy Classes

Verification Echelon

Number of verification steps, n = Max/e

Minimum value

Maximum value

XI

Y (I)

0.001 g £

E

50,000

-

XII

Y (II)

0.001 g £

E £ 0.05 g

100

100,000

0.1 g £

E

5,000

100,000

XIII

Y (a)

0.1 g £

E £ 2 g

100

10,000

5 g £

E

500

10,000

XIV

Y (b)

5 g £

E

100

1,000

4.4
Verification scale-multiple-level instruments

Table 4

Accuracy Classes

Verification Echelon

Number of verification steps, n = Max/e

Minimum value 3 N = Max I /e (i + 1)

Maximum value n = Max I /e I

XI

Y (I)

0.001 g £

E I

50,000

-

XII

Y (II)

0.001 g £

E I £ 0.05 g

100

100,000

0.1 g £

E I

5,000

100,000

XIII

Y (a)

0.1 g £

E I

100

10,000

500

10,000

XIV

Y (b)

5 g £

E I

100

1,000

Where:

I

= 1, 2, ... r

I

= n O Of the partial weighing range

R

= total partial extents

5

Measurement Scope

When specifying the extent of measurement for Class Y devices, the manufacturer shall take into account that the minimum scope shall not be less than:

Class Y (I):

100 e

Class Y (II):

20 e for 0.001 g £ E £ 0.05 g,

And

50 e for 0.1 g £ E

Class Y (a):

20 e

Class Y (b):

10 e

Scales used for sorting, such as postal scales and scales of waste:

5 e

6

Dynamic Tuning

6.1
The dynamic adjustment device shall operate on a load range specified by the manufacturer.
6.2
When the scooter is equipped with a dynamic adjustment device that compensates for the dynamic effects of the moving load, it must be neutralized for operation outside the load range and must be able to be protected.

7

Performance under factors of influence and electromagnetic disturbance

7.1
TRAs due to influence factors are:
7.1.1
For category X instruments:
-
In automatic operation, the values shown in Tables 1 and 2;
-
For non-automatic static weighing, the values shown in Table 1;
7.1.2
For category Y instruments:
-
For each automatic load, the values shown in Table 1;
-
For non-automatic static weighing, the values shown for class X in Table 1.
7.2
The critical change value due to a perturbation is a verification scale interval.
7.3
Temperature Range:
-
For classes XI and Y (I), the minimum range is 5 ° C;
-
For classes XII and Y (II), the minimum range is 15 ° C.

1 OJ L 42, 15.2.1975, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 89 /676/EEC (OJ L 398, 30.12.1989, p. 18).
2 OJ L 46, 21.2.1976, p. 1. Directive as last amended by the EEA Agreement.
3 When i = r, the corresponding column in Table 3 applies, e being replaced by e R .


State 1 Er January 2013

Annex 3

(art. 6, para. 3)

Specific Requirements for Automatic Discontinuous Totalizing Weighing Devices (Hopper totalizers)

1

Accuracy Classes

Weighing devices are divided into four accuracy classes:
0.2 0.5 1 2

2

Maximum Tolerable Error (EMT)

Table 1

Accuracy Class

Totalized Load EMT

0.2

± 0.10 %

0.5

± 0.25 %

1

± 0.50 %

2

± 1.00 %

3

Summation Echelon

The aggregation level (d T ) Must be in scope:
0.01 % Max ≤d T < 0.2 % Max.

4

Tabulated Minimum Load (Ó Min )

Minimum total load (Ó Min ) Must not be less than the load for which the EMT is equal to the aggregation level (d T ), or less than the minimum load specified by the manufacturer.

5

Zero Setting

Devices that do not perform the tare after each unloading must be equipped with a zeroing device. Their automatic operation shall be made impossible if the indication of zero varies from:

-

1 d T

On instruments equipped with an automatic zero-setting device;

-

0.5 d T

On instruments equipped with a semi-automatic or non-automatic zero-setting device.

6

Interface with operator

The adjustments made by the operator and the reset function must be made impossible during automatic operation.

7

Printing

On instruments equipped with a printing device, the reset of the total shall be made impossible until the total is printed. The printing of the total must be done in the event of an interruption of automatic operation.

8

Performance under factors of influence and electromagnetic disturbance

8.1
TRAs due to influence factors are as shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Load (m) in totalization increments (d T )

EMT

0 < m £ 500

± 0.5 d T

500 < m £ 2,000

± 1.0 d T

2,000 < m £ 10,000

± 1.5 d T

8.2
The critical change value due to a disturbance is a totalization step for any weight indication and total memory.

State 1 Er January 2013

Annex 4

(art. 6, para. 4)

Specific Requirements for Automatic Continuous Totalizing Weighing Devices (Tape Weighing)

1

Accuracy Classes

Weighing devices are divided into three classes of accuracy:
0.5 1 2

2

Measurement Scope

2.1
The manufacturer shall specify the extent of measurement, the ratio between the minimum net load on the weighing unit and the maximum range, and the minimum total load.
2.2
The minimum total load (Ó Min ) Must not be less than:
-
800 d for class 0.5;
-
400 d for Class 1;
-
200 d for class 2.
D is the totalization step of the general totalization device.

3

Maximum Tolerable Error (EMT)

Table 1

Accuracy Class

Totalized Load EMT

0.5

± 0.25 %

1

± 0.5 %

2

± 1.0 %

4

Tape Speed

The tape speed must be specified by the manufacturer. For constant-speed banders and variable speed banders with manual control of speed, the speed shall not vary by more than 5 % of the nominal value. The product must not have a speed different from the speed of the tape.

5

General totalizing device

It should not be possible to reset the generalization device to zero.

6

Performance under factors of influence and electromagnetic disturbance

6.1
The EMT due to a factor of influence, for a load not less than to Min , must be 0.7 times the appropriate value given in Table 1, rounded up to the nearest aggregation level (d).
6.2
The critical change value due to a disturbance must be 0.7 times the appropriate value given in Table 1, for a load equal to Min , for the designated class of the weighing on tape, rounded up to the top level (d).

State 1 Er January 2013

Annex 5

(art. 6, para. 5)

Specific requirements for automatic railway scales

1

Accuracy Classes

Weighing devices are divided into four accuracy classes:
0.2 0.5 1 2

2

Maximum Tolerable Error (EMT)

2.1
The TRAs for the movement of a single car or an entire train are the values shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Accuracy Class

EMT

0.2

± 0.1 %

0.5

± 0.25 %

1

± 0.5 %

2

± 1.0 %

2.2
The TRMs for the movement of hooked or unhung cars must be the largest of the following:
-
The value calculated in accordance with Table 1, rounded to the nearest level;
-
The value calculated in accordance with Table 1, rounded to the nearest level, for a weight equal to 35 % of the maximum weight of the car (as shown on the identifying indications);
-
A step (d).
2.3
TRAs for moving a train are the largest of the following:
-
The value calculated in accordance with Table 1, rounded to the nearest level;
-
The value calculated in accordance with Table 1, for the weight of a single car equal to 35 % of the maximum weight of the car (as shown on the identifying indications), multiplied by the number of reference cars (not exceeding 10) of the train and rounded At the nearest level;
-
A step (d) for each carriage of the train, not exceeding 10 d.
2.4
When weighing rail cars, errors of up to 10 % of the weighing results obtained in one or more passages of the train may exceed the EMT indicated in c. 2.2, but shall not exceed twice the EMT.

3

Echelon (d)

The relationship between the accuracy class and the step is as shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Accuracy Class

Echelon (d)

0.2

D £ 50 kg

0.5

D £ 100 kg

1

D £ 200 kg

2

D £ 500 kg

4

Measurement Scope

4.1
The minimum scope shall not be less than 1 t or greater than the result of the division of the minimum weight of the car by the number of partial weighings.
4.2
The minimum weight of the car shall not be less than 50 d.

5

Performance under factors of influence and electromagnetic disturbance

5.1
The TRM due to an influence factor is as shown in Table 3.

Table 3

Load (m) at verification scale (d)

EMT

0 < m £ 500

± 0.5 d

500 < m £ 2,000

± 1.0 d

2,000 < m £ 10,000

± 1.5 d

5.2
The critical variation value due to a disturbance is one step.

State 1 Er January 2013

Annex 6

(art. 6, para. 6)

Specific requirements for automatic weighing instruments to determine the total weight of on-road vehicles

1

Accuracy Classes

Weighing devices are divided into six accuracy classes:
0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10

2

Maximum Tolerated Errors (EMT)

2.1
Weighing in Motion
The EMT for weighing the vehicle shall be the largest of the following:
A.
Value calculated on the basis of Table 1, rounded to the nearest level;
B.
1 d ' The number of weights in the summation in the case of initial verification, 2 d ' The number of weights in totalization in the case of in-service inspection.

Table 1

Accuracy Class

Vehicle weight EMT

0.2

± 0.10 %

0.5

± 0.25 %

1

± 0.50 %

2

± 1.00 %

5

± 2.50 %

10

± 5.00 %

2.2
Static Weigh
Static weighing scales for increasing or decreasing loads should be the appropriate values in Table 2.

Table 2

Accuracy Class

Load (m) in increments

EMT

0.2

0.5

1

0 < m

£ 500

± 0.5 d

500 < m

£ 2000

± 1.0 d

2,000 < m

£ 5000

± 1.5 d

2

5

10

0 < m

£ 50

± 0.5 d

50 < m

£ 200

± 1.0 d

200 < m

£ 1000

± 1.5 d

3

Echelon (d)

For a particular method of weighing in motion and the combination of load receivers, all indicator devices and weight printers on an automatic weighing instrument to determine the total weight of vehicles On-road hauliers must have the same level d.
The ratio between the accuracy class, the value of the step and the maximum vehicle weight expressed in the echelons shall be as specified in Table 3.

Table 3

Accuracy Class

D (kg)

Maximum vehicle weight expressed at the level

Minimum

Maximum

0.2

£ 5

0.5

£ 10

500

5000

1

£ 20

2

£ 50

5

£ 100

50

1000

10

£ 200

The steps of the indicator or printer devices shall be in the form of 1 × 10 K , 2 × 10 K Or 5 × 10 K , where k is a positive or negative integer or zero.

4

Minimum Scope

The minimum scope shall not be less than the load, expressed in increments, specified in Table 4.

Table 4

Accuracy Class

Minimum Scope at the Ranks

0.2 0.5 1

50

2 5 10

10

5

Loads on individual axle or axle group

The loads on individual axles or on group of axles shall not be indicated or printed without associated warning indicating that these results do not arise from the verification of the weighing instrument.

6

Agreement between indicator devices and printers

For the same load, there must be no difference between the weighing results provided by each of these two types of devices having the same level.

7

Nominal Operating Conditions-Temperature Limits

Automatic weighing instruments to determine the total weight of on-motion road vehicles shall comply with the appropriate metrological and technical requirements for ambient temperatures between -10 ° C And +40 ° C. However, for special applications, the limits of the temperature range may differ as long as this range is not less than 30 ° C and is specified on the nameplate.

State 1 Er January 2013

Annex 7

(art. 8, para. 2)

Procedures for maintaining measurement stability for automatic railway scales

Extension of the subsequent audit period

1
If subsequent verifications of an automatic operation scale prove, in two successive verifications, that it complies with the maximum tolerated errors, the Federal Institute of Metrology 1 May grant an extension of the subsequent audit period up to a maximum of three years.
2
The user who benefits from an extended period of verification is required to check the weighing device each year to verify the stability of measurement.
3
The controls must be the subject of minutes to be submitted to the executing agency during the next audit.
4
If a check shows that the weighing instrument no longer complies with the maximum permissible errors, this information must be announced without delay to the implementing body. The weighing instrument shall be adjusted and verified by the implementing body.
5
If the audit period is found to be too long, it may be reduced to a minimum of one year.

1 The designation of the administrative unit has been adapted to 1 Er Jan 2013 under Art. 16 al. 3 of the O of 17 Nov 2004 on Official Publications (RS 170.512.1 ).


State 1 Er January 2013