Key Benefits:
This Order fixes:
The following are subject to the provisions of this order:
The following units of mass shall be used for the indications worn on automatic weighing instruments:
1 For the determination of measurement results when assessing compliance or subsequent verification, the following values are deemed to be reference conditions:
A. |
Temperature |
20 ° |
|
B. |
Conventional density of standard weights |
8000 kg/m 3 ; |
|
C. |
Air density |
1.2 kg/m 3 . |
2 The standard weights and load parts used for subsequent controls shall not be vitiated by an error greater than one third of the maximum permissible error for the weighing device to be verified for the load in question.
For the purposes of this order:
1 Automatic-label weighing devices must meet the essential requirements set out in Schedule 1 of the Measurement Instrument and Schedules 1 and 2 of this Order.
2 Automatic Discontinuous Totalizing Weighing Devices (hopper totalizers) shall meet the essential requirements set out in Schedule 1 of the Ordinance on Measurement Instruments and Schedules 1 and 3 of this Order. Order.
3 Automatic Continuous Totalizing Weighing Devices (Tape Weighing) shall meet the essential requirements set out in Schedule 1 of the Order on Measurement Instruments and Schedules 1 and 4 of this Agreement. Order.
4 Automatic railway rockers shall meet the essential requirements set out in Schedule 1 of the Ordinance on Measuring Instruments and Schedules 1 and 5 of this Order.
5 Automatic weighing instruments for determining the total weight of moving road vehicles shall meet the essential requirements set out in Annex 1 of the Ordinance on Measuring Instruments and Annex 6 of the This order.
The conformity of automatic weighing instruments with the essential requirements referred to in Art. 6 may be evaluated and certified at the manufacturer's choice in accordance with one of the following procedures set out in Schedule 2 of the Ordinance on Measuring Instruments:
1 Automatic weighing instruments shall be subject to the subsequent verification in accordance with Annex 7, c. 1, of the order on measuring instruments, carried out by the cantonal audit offices.
2 The subsequent verification of the automatic weighing instruments shall take place:
3 For automatic railway rockers, the user may supplement the subsequent verification by a control procedure according to Annex 7, c. 5 of the Order on Measurement Devices and Schedule 7 to this Order. Thus, the verification period for railway scales can be extended to a maximum of three years.
The user assumes the responsibility specified in s. 21, para. 1, of the order on measuring instruments, but also the order:
The maximum permissible errors applicable in the challenge of results of measures within the meaning of Art. 29, para. 1 of the Ordinance on measuring instruments or in the official control of an instrument of measurement outside the scope of the verification shall be the double of the maximum permissible errors set out in Annexes 2 to 6 to this order.
The Order of August 15, 1986 on Weighing Devices 1 Is repealed.
1 [RO 1986 2013, 2002 2136, 2004 2119]
1 Audited weighing instruments verified prior to the coming into force of this order may continue to be verified at a later date.
2 Automatic weighing instruments approved under the earlier right may still be placed on the market and initially verified according to Annex 5, c. 2, of the order on instruments of measurement for ten years from the coming into force of this order. After the expiry of these ten years, they may still be verified at a later date.
3 Automatic weighing devices placed on the market not verified before the entry into force of this order may still be used without verification for five years after the first entry into service or revision, but No later than 31 December 2011. They may be verified if they meet the requirements of this order.
This Order comes into force on October 30, 2006.
(art. 6, para. 1)
1 |
Nominal Operating Conditions |
2 |
Tolerable Effect of Disturbances-Electromagnetic Environment |
3 |
Adéquation |
(art. 6, para. 2)
1 |
Accuracy Classes |
XI |
XII |
XIII |
XIV; or |
|
Y (I) |
Y (II) |
Y (a) |
Y (b). |
|
2 |
Category X instruments |
3 |
Category Y instruments |
4 |
Maximum Tolerable Error (EMT) |
Table 1
Net Charge (m) at verification scale (e) |
Maximum Tolerable Average Error |
Maximum Tolerable Error |
||||||||
XI |
Y (I) |
XII |
Y (II) |
XIII |
Y (a) |
XIV |
Y (b) |
X |
Y |
|
0 < m |
£ 50,000 |
0 < m |
£ 5,000 |
0 < m |
£ 500 |
0 < m |
£ 50 |
± 0.5 e |
± 1.0 e |
|
50,000 < m |
£ 200,000 |
5,000 < m |
£ 20,000 |
500 < m |
£ 2,000 |
50 < m |
£ 200 |
± 1.0 e |
± 1.5 e |
|
200 000 < m |
20,000 < m |
£ 100,000 |
2,000 < m |
£ 10,000 |
200 < m |
£ 1,000 |
± 1.5 e |
± 2.0 e |
||
Table 2
Net Load (m) |
Maximum standard deviation for class X (1) |
||
M £ 50 g |
0.48 % |
||
50 g < |
M £ 100 g |
0.24 g |
|
100 g < |
M £ 200 g |
0.24 % |
|
200 g < |
M £ 300 g |
0.48 g |
|
300 g < |
M £ 500 g |
0.16 % |
|
500 g < |
M £ 1,000 g |
0.8 g |
|
1000 g < |
M £ 10,000 g |
0.08 % |
|
10,000 g < |
M £ 15,000 g |
8 g |
|
15,000 g < |
M |
0.053 % |
|
For Classes XI and XII, x shall be less than 1. |
|||
For class XIII, x shall not be greater than 1. |
|||
For class XIV, x must be greater than 1. |
|||
Table 3
Accuracy Classes |
Verification Echelon |
Number of verification steps, n = Max/e |
||||
Minimum value |
Maximum value |
|||||
XI |
Y (I) |
0.001 g £ |
E |
50,000 |
- |
|
XII |
Y (II) |
0.001 g £ |
E £ 0.05 g |
100 |
100,000 |
|
0.1 g £ |
E |
5,000 |
100,000 |
|||
XIII |
Y (a) |
0.1 g £ |
E £ 2 g |
100 |
10,000 |
|
5 g £ |
E |
500 |
10,000 |
|||
XIV |
Y (b) |
5 g £ |
E |
100 |
1,000 |
|
Table 4
Accuracy Classes |
Verification Echelon |
Number of verification steps, n = Max/e |
||||
Minimum value 3 N = Max I /e (i + 1) |
Maximum value n = Max I /e I |
|||||
XI |
Y (I) |
0.001 g £ |
E I |
50,000 |
- |
|
XII |
Y (II) |
0.001 g £ |
E I £ 0.05 g |
100 |
100,000 |
|
0.1 g £ |
E I |
5,000 |
100,000 |
|||
XIII |
Y (a) |
0.1 g £ |
E I |
100 |
10,000 |
|
500 |
10,000 |
|||||
XIV |
Y (b) |
5 g £ |
E I |
100 |
1,000 |
|
Where: |
I |
= 1, 2, ... r |
||||
I |
= n O Of the partial weighing range |
|||||
R |
= total partial extents |
|||||
5 |
Measurement Scope |
Class Y (I): |
100 e |
||
Class Y (II): |
20 e for 0.001 g £ E £ 0.05 g, |
||
And |
50 e for 0.1 g £ E |
||
Class Y (a): |
20 e |
||
Class Y (b): |
10 e |
||
Scales used for sorting, such as postal scales and scales of waste: |
5 e |
6 |
Dynamic Tuning |
7 |
Performance under factors of influence and electromagnetic disturbance |
1 OJ L 42, 15.2.1975, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 89 /676/EEC (OJ L 398, 30.12.1989, p. 18).
2 OJ L 46, 21.2.1976, p. 1. Directive as last amended by the EEA Agreement.
3 When i = r, the corresponding column in Table 3 applies, e being replaced by e R .
(art. 6, para. 3)
1 |
Accuracy Classes |
2 |
Maximum Tolerable Error (EMT) |
Table 1
Accuracy Class |
Totalized Load EMT |
|
0.2 |
± 0.10 % |
|
0.5 |
± 0.25 % |
|
1 |
± 0.50 % |
|
2 |
± 1.00 % |
|
3 |
Summation Echelon |
4 |
Tabulated Minimum Load (Ó Min ) |
5 |
Zero Setting |
- |
1 d T |
On instruments equipped with an automatic zero-setting device; |
|
- |
0.5 d T |
On instruments equipped with a semi-automatic or non-automatic zero-setting device. |
6 |
Interface with operator |
7 |
Printing |
8 |
Performance under factors of influence and electromagnetic disturbance |
Table 2
Load (m) in totalization increments (d T ) |
EMT |
|
0 < m £ 500 |
± 0.5 d T |
|
500 < m £ 2,000 |
± 1.0 d T |
|
2,000 < m £ 10,000 |
± 1.5 d T |
|
(art. 6, para. 4)
1 |
Accuracy Classes |
2 |
Measurement Scope |
3 |
Maximum Tolerable Error (EMT) |
Table 1
Accuracy Class |
Totalized Load EMT |
|
0.5 |
± 0.25 % |
|
1 |
± 0.5 % |
|
2 |
± 1.0 % |
|
4 |
Tape Speed |
5 |
General totalizing device |
6 |
Performance under factors of influence and electromagnetic disturbance |
(art. 6, para. 5)
1 |
Accuracy Classes |
2 |
Maximum Tolerable Error (EMT) |
Table 1
Accuracy Class |
EMT |
|
0.2 |
± 0.1 % |
|
0.5 |
± 0.25 % |
|
1 |
± 0.5 % |
|
2 |
± 1.0 % |
|
3 |
Echelon (d) |
Table 2
Accuracy Class |
Echelon (d) |
|
0.2 |
D £ 50 kg |
|
0.5 |
D £ 100 kg |
|
1 |
D £ 200 kg |
|
2 |
D £ 500 kg |
|
4 |
Measurement Scope |
5 |
Performance under factors of influence and electromagnetic disturbance |
Table 3
Load (m) at verification scale (d) |
EMT |
|
0 < m £ 500 |
± 0.5 d |
|
500 < m £ 2,000 |
± 1.0 d |
|
2,000 < m £ 10,000 |
± 1.5 d |
|
(art. 6, para. 6)
1 |
Accuracy Classes |
2 |
Maximum Tolerated Errors (EMT) |
Table 1
Accuracy Class |
Vehicle weight EMT |
|
0.2 |
± 0.10 % |
|
0.5 |
± 0.25 % |
|
1 |
± 0.50 % |
|
2 |
± 1.00 % |
|
5 |
± 2.50 % |
|
10 |
± 5.00 % |
|
Table 2
Accuracy Class |
Load (m) in increments |
EMT |
||||
0.2 |
0.5 |
1 |
0 < m |
£ 500 |
± 0.5 d |
|
500 < m |
£ 2000 |
± 1.0 d |
||||
2,000 < m |
£ 5000 |
± 1.5 d |
||||
2 |
5 |
10 |
0 < m |
£ 50 |
± 0.5 d |
|
50 < m |
£ 200 |
± 1.0 d |
||||
200 < m |
£ 1000 |
± 1.5 d |
||||
3 |
Echelon (d) |
Table 3
Accuracy Class |
D (kg) |
Maximum vehicle weight expressed at the level |
||
Minimum |
Maximum |
|||
0.2 |
£ 5 |
|||
0.5 |
£ 10 |
500 |
5000 |
|
1 |
£ 20 |
|||
2 |
£ 50 |
|||
5 |
£ 100 |
50 |
1000 |
|
10 |
£ 200 |
|||
4 |
Minimum Scope |
Table 4
Accuracy Class |
Minimum Scope at the Ranks |
|
0.2 0.5 1 |
50 |
|
2 5 10 |
10 |
|
5 |
Loads on individual axle or axle group |
6 |
Agreement between indicator devices and printers |
7 |
Nominal Operating Conditions-Temperature Limits |
(art. 8, para. 2)
Extension of the subsequent audit period |
1 The designation of the administrative unit has been adapted to 1 Er Jan 2013 under Art. 16 al. 3 of the O of 17 Nov 2004 on Official Publications (RS 170.512.1 ).