Advanced Search

RS 916.161 Order of 12 May 2010 on the release of plant protection products (Phytosanitary Ordinance, OPPh)

Original Language Title: RS 916.161 Ordonnance du 12 mai 2010 sur la mise en circulation des produits phytosanitaires (Ordonnance sur les produits phytosanitaires, OPPh)

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

916.161

Order on the Release of Phytosanitary Products

(Phytosanitary Products Ordinance, OPPh)

May 12, 2010 (State 1 Er February 2016)

The Swiss Federal Council,

Having regard to the Chemical Products Act of 15 December 2000 (LChim) 1 , given art. 148 A , para. 3, 158, para. 2, 159 A , 160, para. 3-5, 161, 164, 168 and 177 of the Agriculture Act of 29 April 1998 (LAgr) 2 , given art. 17 of the Law of 21 March 2003 on Genetic Engineering (LGG) 3 , given art. 29, 29 D , para. 4, and 30 B , para. 1 and 2, let. A, of the Act of 7 October 1983 on the Protection of the Environment (LPE) 4 , having regard to the Federal Act of 6 October 1995 on Technical Barriers to Trade (LETC) 5 ,

Stops:

Chapter 1 General provisions

Art. 1 Purpose and Purpose

1 The purpose of this order is to ensure that phytosanitary products are suitable for the intended use and that they are used in accordance with the requirements, they have no unacceptable side effects on the health of the human being and Animals and the environment. It also aims to ensure a high level of protection of human and animal health and the environment and to improve agricultural production.

2 It regulates, for plant protection products in their commercial form:

A.
Approval;
B.
Release and use;
C.
Control.

3 It lays down the applicable rules:

A.
The approval of active substances, safeners and synergists that the plant protection products contain, or of which they are composed;
B.
Co-formulants.

4 The provisions of this Ordinance are based on the precautionary principle in order to prevent active substances or products placed on the market from affecting human and animal health or the environment.

Art. 2 Scope of application

1 This order shall apply to products in the form in which they are delivered to the user, consisting of active substances, safeners or synergists or containing (phytosanitary products), and intended for use in one of the uses Following:

A.
Protect plants or plant products from all harmful organisms or prevent the action thereof, unless these products are intended to be used primarily for hygiene purposes rather than for the protection of plants or plants Plant products;
B.
To take action on the life processes of plants, e.g. action on their growth, in a way other than that of nutrients;
C.
Ensure the conservation of plant products, provided that these substances or products are not subject to specific provisions concerning preservatives;
D.
Destroy plants or parts of undesirable plants, other than algae, unless the products are applied to the soil or water to protect the plants;
E.
Control or prevent undesirable growth of plants, with the exception of algae, unless the products are applied to the soil or water to protect plants.

2 It applies to substances, including organisms (macro-and micro-organisms), carrying out general or specific action on harmful organisms or on plants, parts of plants or plant products (active substances).

3 It applies to:

A.
Substances or preparations that are added to a phytosanitary product to annihilate or reduce the phytotoxic effects of the phytosanitary product on certain plants (safeners);
B.
Substances or preparations which, although they have little or no activity within the meaning of s. 1, may enhance the activity of the active substance (s) present in a phytosanitary product (synergists);
C.
Substances or preparations which are used or intended for use in a phytosanitary product or an adjuvant, but which are not active substances or safeners or synergists (co-formulants);
D.
Substances or preparations which consist of coformulants or preparations containing one or more co-formulants, in the form in which they are delivered to the user and put into circulation, intended to be mixed by The user with a phytosanitary product and that enhance its efficacy or other pesticide properties (adjuvants).

4 It does not apply to phytosanitary products in transit or intended exclusively for export.

Art. 3 Definitions

1 For the purposes of this order:

A.
Residues : one or more substances present in or on plants or plant products, edible products of animal origin, drinking water or elsewhere in the environment, and constituting the residue of the use of a phytosanitary product, Their metabolites and products resulting from degradation or reaction;
B.
Substances : the chemical elements and their compounds, as they occur naturally or as produced by the industry, including any impurity inevitably resulting from the manufacturing process;
B Bis . 1
Basic substance: Any active substance that meets the requirements of s. 10 A ;
C.
Preparations Mixtures or solutions consisting of two or more substances intended for use as plant protection products or adjuvants;
D. 2
Special Concern: Any substance which is intrinsically capable of causing an adverse effect on humans, animals or the environment and contained or produced in a phytosanitary product at a concentration sufficient to risk causing such an effect; Substances of concern include substances meeting the criteria to be classified as hazardous in accordance with Annex 1, Parts 2 to 5 of Regulation (EC) No O 1272/2008 3 And contained in the phytosanitary product at a concentration that justifies the product being considered dangerous within the meaning of s. 3 of the Regulation (EC) n O 1272/2008;
E.
Plants : live plants and living parts of plants, including fresh fruit and vegetables and seeds;
F.
Plant products : products of vegetable origin not processed or having undergone a simple preparation such as milling, drying or pressure, provided that they are not plants;
G.
Harmful organisms : species, strain or biotype belonging to the animal kingdom or the plant or plant kingdom that is harmful to plants or plant products;
H.
Non-chemical methods : substitution methods for chemical pesticides for plant protection and pest control, based on agronomic techniques such as those referred to in Annex III.1 of Directive 2009 /128/EC 4 Physical, mechanical or biological methods of pest control;
I.
Putting into circulation : detention for sale within Switzerland, including the offer for sale or any other form of sale, for free or for consideration, as well as the sale, distribution and other forms of transfer itself, except for the Return to the previous seller; the importation for the purposes referred to above constitutes a release within the meaning of this order;
J.
Authorization of a phytosanitary product : administrative act by which the approval service authorizes the release of a phytosanitary product;
K.
Producer : any person who makes plant protection products, active substances, safeners, synergists, coformulants or adjuvants, or who subcontracts that manufacture to another person, or any designated person By the manufacturer as its exclusive representative for the purpose of complying with this order;
L.
Letter of access : any original document by which the owner of data protected under this Ordinance agrees to the use of such data, in accordance with the specific terms and conditions, by the approval service for the purpose of The authorization of a phytosanitary product or the approval of an active substance, a synergist or a safener for the benefit of another applicant;
M.
Vulnerable groups : persons requiring special attention in the context of the assessment of acute and chronic health effects of phytosanitary products. These groups include pregnant women and breastfeeding women, unborn children, infants and children, the elderly and workers and people who are highly exposed to pesticides in the long term;
N.
Micro-organisms : any microbiological entity, including bacteria, algae, lower fungi, protozoa, viruses and viroids, cell or non-cellular, capable of replicating or transferring genetic material; cell cultures, Prions and genetic material with biological activity are assimilated;
O. 5
Macro-organisms: Insects, mites and other arthropods and nematodes;
P.
Genetically modified organisms : organizations whose genetic material has been modified within the meaning of s. 5, para. 2 LGG;
Q.
Good plant health practice : practice whereby treatments with plant protection products applied to particular plants or plant products, in accordance with the conditions of their authorised uses, are selected, measured and dispensed in time of To ensure optimum efficiency with the minimum necessary quantity, taking into account local conditions and the possibilities of cultural and biological control;
R.
Good laboratory practice : practice according to the order of 18 May 2005 on good laboratory practice 6 ;
S.
Good experimental practice : practice carried out in accordance with the provisions of guidelines 181 and 152 7 The European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation (EPPO);
T.
Protecting reports : the temporary right of the owner of a trial or study report to prevent the use of the report in the interest of another applicant;
U.
Trials and studies : research or experiments to determine the properties and behaviour of an active substance or plant protection products, to provide for exposure to active substances or their relevant metabolites, to set safety levels in And to define the modalities of a harmless use of plant protection products.
V.
Holder of the authorization : any natural or legal person who has the authorisation of a plant health product;
W.
Business user : any person who uses plant protection products during his or her professional activity, in particular operators, technicians, employers and the self-employed, both in the agricultural sector and in other sectors;
X.
Minor use : the use of a phytosanitary product on plants or plant products:
1.
That are not widely grown, or
2.
Which are widely cultivated in order to meet an exceptional need for plant protection;
Y.
Greenhouse : a plain-foot, static and closed cropping space, the outer envelope of which is generally translucent, allowing for controlled exchange of materials and energy with the environment and preventing the spread of plant protection products in Environment. For the purposes of this order, closed spaces of vegetable production whose outer envelope is not translucent, e.g. for the production of mushrooms or endives, shall also be regarded as greenhouses;
Z.
Post-harvest treatment : treatment of plants or plant products after harvesting in an isolated space where no flow is possible, for example, in a warehouse;
Aa.
Certification service: The federal service which decides on the registration of plant protection products;
Ab.
Advertising : a means of promoting the sale or use of plant protection products (other than the holder of the authorisation, the person marketing the product or their agents) using printed or electronic media;
Ac.
Metabolite : any metabolite or degradation product of an active substance, safener or synergist, which is formed either in an organism or in the environment. A metabolite is considered relevant if it is to be assumed that it has intrinsic properties comparable to those of the parent substance in its biological target activity, that it represents, for organisms, a higher risk The parent substance or a comparable risk, or has certain toxicological properties that are considered unacceptable. Such a metabolite is relevant to the general approval decision or to the definition of risk reduction measures;
Ad.
Impurity : any component other than the pure active substance or a pure variant contained in the technical equipment (derived in particular from the process of manufacture or degradation occurring during storage).

2 In order to properly interpret Regulation (EC) N O 1107/2009 8 To which this order refers, the following equivalencies shall be taken into account:

Expression in Regulation (EC) N O 1107/2009

Expression in this Order

A.
Expressions in German:
Zulassung

Bewilligung

B.
Expressions in French:
Placing on the market

Putting into circulation

Plant protection product

Phytosanitary product


1 Introduced by c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
2 New content according to c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
3 R (CE) n O 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 Dec. 2008 on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67 /548/EEC and 1999 /45/EC and amending R (EC) n O 1907/2006, OJ L353, 31 Dec. 2008, p. 1, as last amended by R (EC) n O 286/2011, OJ L 83, 30.3.2011, p. 1.
4 Directive 2009 /128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 Oct. 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the use of pesticides compatible with sustainable development, in OJ L 309, 24 Nov 2009, p. 71.
5 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
6 RS 813.112.1
7 EPPO standards for the efficacy evaluation of plant protection products, European and mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation , 3 Rd Edition, Paris.
8 R (CE) n O 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 Oct. 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79 /117/EEC and 91 /414/EEC, OJ L 309, 24 Nov 2009, p.1.

Art. 3 A 1 Requirements of the Federal Office of Agriculture when there is a need to act quickly

1 In situations requiring prompt action, the Federal Office for Agriculture (OFAG) may, in agreement with the services concerned, prohibit the importation, placing into circulation and use of phytosanitary products which endanger Human and animal health or that pose a risk to the environment.

2 It may set maximum values for these plant protection products which must not be exceeded. The maximum values are based on international standard values, the maximum values in force in the exporting country or are scientifically based

3 It may fix which plant protection products are to be imported or put into circulation only accompanied by a declaration by the competent authorities of the exporting country or of an accredited service.

4 It sets out what indications the declaration should contain and whether documents should be attached to the statement.

5 Batches for which the documents referred to in para. 4 cannot be presented at the time of importation are turned back or destroyed if they present a risk.


1 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 25 May 2011, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2011 ( RO 2011 2401 ).

Chapter 2 Active substances, basic substances, safeners, synergists and co-formulants 6

Section 1 Criteria and Procedure for the Approval of Active Substances

Art. 4 Criteria

1 An active substance is approved in accordance with Annex 2, c. 1, if it is foreseeable, having regard to the current state of scientific and technical knowledge, that, having regard to the approval criteria set out in the c. 2 and 3 of this Annex, the phytosanitary products containing this active substance comply with the conditions laid down in paras. 3 to 5.

2 The primary purpose of the assessment of the active substance is to determine whether the approval criteria set out in the guidelines are met. 3.6.2 to 3.6.4 and 3.7 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) N O 1107/2009 1 If this is the case, the assessment will continue to determine whether the other approval criteria set out in the s are met. 2 and 3 of Annex 2.

3 Residues of plant protection products, resulting from an application in accordance with good plant protection practices and under realistic conditions of use, satisfy the following conditions:

A.
They have no adverse effect on the health of human beings, including vulnerable groups, or on the health of animals, taking into account the known cumulative and synergistic effects when the scientific assessment methods of these effects, accepted by the The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2 , are available, or on groundwater;
B.
They have no unacceptable effect on the environment.

4 Routine methods for measuring residues that are significant from the point of view of toxicology, ecotoxicology, the environment, or drinking water must exist. Analytical standards should be generally available.

5 A phytosanitary product, under conditions of application in accordance with good plant protection practices and under realistic conditions of use, satisfies the following conditions:

A.
It is suitable for the intended use;
B.
It has no immediate or delayed harmful effect on human health, including for vulnerable groups, or on animal health, directly or through drinking water (taking into account substances resulting from treatment of water), Foodstuffs, feedingstuffs or air, or effects in the workplace or other indirect effects, taking into account the known cumulative and synergistic effects when the scientific methods of assessment of such effects, accepted by EFSA, are available or on groundwater;
C.
It has no unacceptable effect on plants or plant products;
D.
It does not cause unnecessary suffering or pain in vertebrate animals to be combed;
E.
It has no unacceptable effect on the environment, particularly in light of the following, where the scientific evaluation methods of these effects, accepted by EFSA, are available:
1.
Its environmental fate and dissemination, in particular with regard to the contamination of surface waters, including estuarine and coastal waters, groundwater, air and soil, taking into account remote areas of the Place of use, due to long-range transport in the environment,
2.
Its effect on non-target species, particularly on the persistent behaviour of these species,
3.
Its effect on biodiversity and the ecosystem.

6 The requirements of paras. 3 to 5 are assessed according to uniform principles set out in s. 17, para. 5.

7 For the approval of an active substance, the provisions of paras. 1 to 5 shall be deemed to be complied with if it has been established that this is the case for one or more representative uses of at least one phytosanitary product containing this active substance.

8 As far as human health is concerned, no data collected in humans is used for a reduction in safety margins established on the basis of studies or tests carried out on animals.

9 In derogation from para. 1, where, on the basis of documented evidence included in the application, an active substance is required to control a serious plant health hazard which cannot be controlled by other means available, including methods not available This active substance may be approved for a limited period necessary to control this serious hazard, even if it does not meet the criteria set out in the c. 3.6.3, 3.6.4, 3.6.5 or 3.8.2 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) N O 1107/2009 3 Provided that the use of the active substance is the subject of risk mitigation measures in order to minimise the risks to man and the environment. For these substances, the maximum residue levels were established in accordance with the Ordinance of 26 June 1995 on Foreign Substances and Components (OSEC) 4 . This derogation does not apply to active substances which, under Regulation (EC) No O 1272/2008 5 , are or should be classified as category 1 carcinogens, category 2 non-threshold carcinogens, or category 1 toxic agents.


1 See note on art. 3, para. 2.
2 European Food Safety Agency , instituted by R (EC) n O 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down general principles and general requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures for Food safety, OJ L 31, 1 Er Fp. 2002, p. 1, last amended by R CE) n O 596/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009, OJ L 188, 18 Jul. 2009, p. 14.
3 See note on art. 3, para. 2
4 RS 817.021.23
5 See note on art. 3, let. D

Art. 5 List of active substances

1 The Federal Department of Economics, Training and Research (DEFR) 1 Enters a new active substance on the list of approved active substances (Annex 1) when it has been examined as part of an application for authorisation to release a phytosanitary product and meets the criteria referred to Art. 4. 2

2 For active substances, the OFAG may lay down the following conditions and restrictions: 3

A.
The minimum purity of the active substance;
B.
The maximum content of certain impurities and the nature of the impurities;
C.
Restrictions resulting from the assessment of the information referred to in Art. 7 taking into account the agricultural, phytosanitary and environmental conditions, including climatic conditions, considered;
D.
Type of preparation;
E.
The mode and conditions of application;
F.
The provision of additional confirmatory information, where new requirements are established during the assessment process or on the basis of new scientific and technical knowledge;
G.
The designation of categories of users, such as professionals and non-professionals;
H.
The designation of areas where the use of plant protection products, including soil treatment products, containing the active substance may not be registered or in which their use may be registered in certain Special conditions;
I.
The need to impose risk mitigation measures and post-use monitoring;
J.
Any other special condition resulting from the evaluation of the information provided in the context of this Regulation.

3 If an active substance meets one or more of the additional criteria set out in Annex 2, c. 4, the DEFR is listed in Annex 1, Part E, as a substance for consideration of substitution. 4

4 Active substances identified as low-risk active substances under s. 22 of the EC/1107/2009 Regulation 5 Are designated as such in Schedule 1. OFAG may refer to other low-risk active substances:

A.
If it is foreseeable that the phytosanitary products containing these active substances will present only a small risk to human health, animal health and the environment in accordance with Art. 32; and
B.
If these active substances are not to be classified in one of the categories set out in Annex 2, c. 5.

1 The designation of the administrative unit has been adapted to 1 Er Jan 2013 under Art. 16 al. 3 of the O of 17 Nov 2004 on official publications ( RO 2004 4937 ). This mod has been taken into account. Throughout the text.
2 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
3 New content according to the c. I of the O of 25 May 2011, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2011 ( RO 2011 2401 ).
4 New content according to the c. I of O du 28 oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 ( RO 2015 4551 ).
5 See note on art. 3, para. 2.

Art. 6 Request

1 The application for approval or amendment of the conditions for approval of an active substance shall be submitted to the approval service by the producer of the active substance and shall be accompanied by a summary record and a file Established pursuant to s. 7, para. 1 and 2, or a scientific justification for the non-disclosure of certain parts of these files; it must be demonstrated that the active substance meets the criteria for approval established in s. 4. A collective application may be made by an association of producers. Art. 16 is reserved.

2 At the time of application, the person concerned may request, pursuant to s. 52, that certain information, including certain parts of the file, that it physically separates, be treated confidentially.

3 When filing the application, the applicant shall, at the same time, attach a complete list of the tests and studies submitted pursuant to s. 7, para. 2, and a list of applications for the protection of reports under s. 46.

4 The approval service may require the applicant to provide in a defined computer form the list of test reports and studies submitted at the time of the application and the list of test reports and studies for which protection Reports under s. 46 is requested.

Art. 7 Folders

1 The summary folder includes the following items:

A.
Information on one or more representative uses, on a widespread crop, of at least one phytosanitary product containing the active substance, which demonstrates that the criteria for the approval of s. 4 are respected; where the information presented relates to a culture which is not very widespread, a justification for this should be provided;
B.
For each point of the data requirements applicable to active substances, summaries and results of tests and studies, the name of their owner and of the person or institute that carried out the tests and studies;
C.
For each point of the data requirements applicable to the plant health products, the summaries and results of the tests and studies, the name of their owner and of the person or institute that carried out the relevant studies and studies For the assessment of the criteria set out in s. 4, para. 2 to 5, for one or more phytosanitary products that are representative of the uses referred to in the paragraph, having regard to the fact that, in the case referred to in para. 2, the absence of data resulting from the limited number of proposed representative uses of the active substance may result in approval with restrictions;
D.
For each test or study involving the use of vertebrate animals, a justification of the measures taken to avoid animal testing and a repetition of tests on vertebrates;
E.
A checklist attesting that the file referred to in para. 2 is complete given the uses requested;
F.
The reasons why the test reports and studies submitted are necessary for the first approval of the active substance or for the modification of the conditions of its approval;
G.
Where applicable, a copy of an application for a maximum residue limit referred to in s. 7 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 1 Or a justification for the non-disclosure of such information;
H.
An evaluation of all the information presented.

2 The complete file contains the full text of the various test reports and studies relating to all the information referred to in para. 1, let. B and c. It does not contain test reports or studies involving the voluntary administration of the active substance or the plant health product to human beings.

3 The OFAG can define the summary folder structure and the complete folder structure.

4 The data requirements referred to in paras. 1 and 2 shall include the conditions to be fulfilled by the active substances and the plant protection products set out in Annexes 5 and 6. The DEFR can adapt these annexes taking account of international requirements in this field, in particular those of the European Union (EU).

5 The author of the application attached to the file the scientific documentation accessible, validated by the scientific community and published in the last ten years preceding the date of submission of the file, concerning the side effects on the Health, the environment and non-target species of the active substance and its relevant metabolites.


1 R (CE) n O 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 Feb. 2005 concerning the maximum limits for residues of pesticides present in or on food and feed for animals of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91 /414/EEC, OJ L 70, 16 March 2005, P. 1, as last amended by Commission Directive 1097 /2009/EC of 16 November 2009, OJ L 309, 17.11.2009, p. 6

Art. 8 Re-examination of substances approved by the approval service

1 The approval service may review an approved active substance at any time. It takes into account the decision on the need to re-examine an active substance from new scientific and technical knowledge and control data, including when the review of authorisations under Art. 29, para. 1, evidence indicates that the fulfilment of the aims set out in the Ordinance of 28 October 1998 on the protection of waters (OWaters) 1 Cannot be reached by other means. The approval service shall also take account of EU decisions in this field.

2 If the approval service considers, in the light of new scientific and technical knowledge, that there is reason to believe that the substance no longer meets the criteria for approval under s. 4 or additional information required under s. 5, para. 2, let. F, have not been communicated, it shall inform the producer of the active substance and shall give the producer a time limit to allow it to submit its observations.

3 If the approval authority concludes that it is no longer satisfied with the approval criteria set out in s. 4 or additional information required under s. 5, para. 2, let. F, have not been communicated, it proposes to the DEFR to withdraw the approval of the active substance or to the OFAG to amend the conditions and restrictions referred to in s. 5, para. 2.


Art. Re-evaluation of active substances

1 Active substances which enter the composition of one or more authorised plant protection products may be re-evaluated.

2 The DEFR, in agreement with the other departments concerned and after consultation with the interested parties, registers the active substances which need to be reassessed in Annex 10. It takes into account this effect of the EU's re-evaluation programme.

3 The holder of an authorization issued for a phytosanitary product containing an active substance listed in Annex 10 shall file a request for re-evaluation with the OFAG within three months from the date of registration Of the active substance in Annex 10. When the substance is re-evaluated in the EU, the deadline is six months.

4 This application must contain all documents that must be attached to the application for authorisation to release a phytosanitary product containing a new active substance. The considerations and decisions of the EU, insofar as they are available, must be attached to the request.

5 If the situation warrants, the OFAG may leave an additional period of up to six months to complete the file. Where the substance is re-evaluated in the EU, the additional time limit shall be twelve months.

6 Assessment services assess files in accordance with s. 24.

Art. 10 Radiation of active substances

1 DEFR radiates an active substance from Schedule 1:

A.
When it has been entered in Schedule 10 and no request for reassessment has been filed;
B.
Where the documents submitted do not meet the requirements of s. 21 including those in Annex 5;
C.
When the revaluation of the active substance shows that the requirements set out in s. 17 are not fulfilled. The conclusions of the EU reassessment must be taken into account.

2 DEFR may desist from radiating an active substance from Schedule 1 when, for use, there is no alternative to the control of a pest and as long as there is no adverse effect on human health during use Comply with the requirements. The use of this substance is then limited to this use. Approval of the substances concerned is reviewed on a regular basis.

Section 1 A 7 Criteria and Procedure for Approval of Basic Substances

Art. 10 A Core Substances

1 A basic substance is approved if:

A.
It is not a substance of concern;
B.
It is not inherently capable of causing endocrine disrupting effects, neurotoxic effects, or immunotoxic effects;
C.
Its main purpose is not to be used for phytosanitary purposes, but it is nevertheless useful for plant protection, either directly or in a product consisting of the basic substance and a simple diluent and
D.
It has no immediate or delayed adverse effect on human or animal health or an unacceptable effect on the environment.

2 With regard to the basic substances, the OFAG may, by analogy, fix the conditions and restrictions referred to in Art. 5, para. 2.

3 Macro-organisms that are considered exotic within the meaning of s. 3, para. 1, let. F, of the order of 10 September 2008 on the release into the environment 1 And microorganisms cannot be approved as core substances.


Art. 10 B List of core substances

DEFR enters a new basic substance on the list of approved base substances (Schedule 1, Part D) when it has been reviewed and meets the criteria set out in s. 10 A .

Art. 10 C Request

1 Any person may apply for approval of a basic substance with the approval service.

2 It must include the following documents:

A.
Where appropriate, assessments of the possible effects of the substance on human or animal health or on the environment, carried out in accordance with other legislation which does not govern plant health protection;
B.
Any other relevant information relating to its possible effects on human or animal health or the environment.

3 The approval service is seeking the advice of the evaluation services.

Art. 10 D Re-examination of the basic substances approved by the approval service

1 The approval service may at any time review an approved basic substance.

2 If it considers that there is reason to believe that the substance no longer meets the criteria set out in s. 10 A , it shall inform the circles concerned and give them a period of time to allow them to submit their observations.

Art. 10 E Radiation of a Core Substance

DEFR radiates a basic substance from Schedule 1, Part D, when it no longer meets the criteria set out in s. 10 A .

Section 2 Approval of safeners and synergists

Art. 11 Criteria and approval procedure

1 A safener or synergist is approved if it meets the requirements of s. 4.

2 Art. 5 to 10 shall apply mutatis mutandis.

3 The DEFR may lay down, in Annexes 5 and 6, specific requirements relating to the file to be accompanied by a request for approval of a safener or a synergist.

Art. 12 Phytoprotectors and synergists already in circulation

The DEFR may establish a programme for the progressive review of synergists and safeners released prior to the date of entry into force of this Article. It takes into account this effect of the EU's re-evaluation programme.

Section 3 Co-formulants

Art. 13

Co-formulants that cannot be introduced into a phytosanitary product are listed in Annex 3 by the DEFR. It takes account of decisions on the subject of the European Union.

Chapter 3 Phytosanitary products

Section 1 General provisions

Art. 14 Release approval

1 A phytosanitary product may be put into circulation only if it has been approved in accordance with this order.

1bis For the release of phytosanitary products whose development is based on the use of genetic resources or traditional knowledge associated with them, the provisions of the Nagoya Ordinance of 11 December 2015 1 Are reserved. 2

2 In derogation from para. 1, no registration is required in the following cases:

A. 3
Release and use of plant health products for research or development purposes, in accordance with Art. 41; if the phytosanitary products are organisms or contain organisms, the provisions of the Ordinance of 9 May 2012 on Confined Use (OUC) 4 And the order of 10 September 2008 on the release into the environment (ODE) 5 Are reserved;
B.
Production, storage or release of a phytosanitary product intended for use in a third country;

3 The registration is valid for a phytosanitary product:

A.
A specified composition;
B.
A specific trade name;
C.
Intended for specified purposes;
D.
A specified producer.

1 RS 451.61
2 Introduced by ch. 7 of the annex to the O de Nagoya of 11 Dec. 2015, in force since 1 Er Feb 2016 ( RO 2016 277 ).
3 New content according to the c. 12 of annex 5 to the O of 9 May 2012 on contained use, in force since 1 Er June 2012 ( RO 2012 2777 ).
4 RS 814.912
5 RS 814.911

Art. 15 Types of Approval

The types of registration for plant protection products are:

A.
Approval on the basis of authorisation procedure (authorisation) (Sections 2 to 4);
B.
Registration on a list of phytosanitary products approved by a foreign country which correspond to the phytosanitary products authorised in Switzerland (section 5);
C.
Registration to control an emergency situation (Section 6).
D. 1
Registration for plant protection products containing only approved basic substances (Section 6 A ).

1 Introduced by c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).

Art. 16 Home, head office or branch in Switzerland

Only a person who has his domicile or head office, or a branch, in Switzerland or who is domiciled in a State with which Switzerland has entered into an agreement with which Switzerland has entered into an agreement may file an application for registration or be the holder of an authorisation. These requirements do not apply.

Section 2 Authorisation of plant protection products

Art. 17 Conditions

1 Subject to Art. 34, a phytosanitary product may only be authorized if, in accordance with the uniform principles set out in para. 5, it meets the following requirements:

A.
Its active substances, safeners and synergists are approved;
B.
Its active substance, safener or synergist has a different origin, or has the same origin but has undergone a change in its method or place of manufacture:
1.
But the specification does not deviate significantly from the specification of the substance or safener or synergist approved under s. 5, and
2.
The said substance or phytoprotective or synergist does not have any harmful effects in the sense of s. 4, para. 3 and 5, due to its impurities, if it had been produced according to the manufacturing process indicated in the dossier supporting the approval;
C.
Co-formulants are not included in Annex 3;
D.
The formulation (technical) is such that the user's exposure or other risks are limited to the extent possible without compromising the operation of the product;
E.
In the current state of scientific and technical knowledge, it complies with the conditions laid down in Art. 4, para. 5;
F.
The nature and quantity of its active substances, safeners and synergists, and, where appropriate, the impurities and coformulants of toxicological, ecotoxicological or environmental significance can be determined using methods Appropriate;
G.
Residues resulting from authorised uses, relevant from a toxicological, ecotoxicological or environmental point of view, can be determined using appropriate methods of common use, with appropriate detection limits on Relevant samples;
H.
Its physical/chemical properties have been determined and considered acceptable for the proper use and storage of the product;
I.
For plants or plant products, where appropriate, to be used as feed or food crops, the maximum residue levels applicable to the agricultural products concerned by the use referred to in the authorisation have been Established or modified in accordance with OSEC 1 Or the order of 26 May 1999 on feed for animals 2 .

2 The applicant is required to demonstrate compliance with the requirements set out in para. 1, let. A to h.

3 Compliance with the requirements listed in para. 1, let. B and d to h shall be carried out by official or officially recognised tests and analyses, under agricultural, phytosanitary and environmental conditions corresponding to the use of the phytosanitary product in question and representative of the Conditions of use.

4 The OFAG may, in respect of para. 1, let. F, define harmonised methods; it takes into account the methods adopted by the EU.

5 The uniform principles for the assessment and authorisation of plant protection products are set out in Annex 9; they specify the requirements referred to in par. 1. DEFR can adapt Annex 9.

6 The interaction between the active substance, safeners, synergists and co-formulants should be taken into account in the assessment of plant protection products.

7 A phytosanitary product is also permitted only:

A.
If it does not contain organisms considered to be invasive alien organisms within the meaning of s. 3, let. H 3 Annex 2 to the ODE;
B.
The identity and biological characteristics of the micro-organisms and the macro-organisms contained therein are sufficiently known;
C.
If it does not contain a mixture of active substances to control different groups of harmful organisms such as insects, fungi or weeds.

8 Exceptions to the requirements set out in para. 7, let. C, can be made for seed treatment products and plant protection products used in the forest to treat cut wood.

9 Phytosanitary products consisting of genetically modified organisms or containing such organisms are only permitted if they meet the requirements of the ODE.

10 The OFAG may refuse to grant an authorization, or may attach such charges or conditions, if it appears that precautionary measures are applicable under s. 148 A LAgr.

11 The approval service may authorise, for a maximum of two years and with the exception of plant protection products which consist of pathogenic organisms or contain such organisms, a phytosanitary product, the substance of which Not yet listed in Schedule 1, if the product in question meets the requirements set out in par. 1, let. B to i, 5 and 9. It shall forward to the Federal Office of the Environment (OFEV) the relevant documents and the outcome of its examination for opinion.


Art. 18 Content of the authorization

1 The approval service shall decide on the application for authorisation by way of decision.

2 Authorization defines plants or plant products and non-agricultural areas (p. Ex. Railways, public areas, places of storage) on which the plant health product may be used and the purposes for such use.

3 The authorization sets out the requirements for the release and use of the phytosanitary product. These requirements shall include, at a minimum, the conditions of employment necessary to comply with the conditions and requirements referred to in Art. 5, para. 2.

4 The authorisation shall include a classification of the phytosanitary product according to Annex 1, parts 2 to 5 of Regulation (EC) No O 1272/2008 1 , which corresponds to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). 2

5 The decision, provided that the application is accepted, includes in particular the following indications:

A.
The home, head office or branch of the applicant;
B.
The trade name under which the phytosanitary product can be put into circulation;
C.
The name of each active substance and its quantity expressed in metric units and type of preparation;
D.
For micro-organisms and macro-organisms, the identity of each organism and its quantity expressed in appropriate units;
E.
The duration of validity of the authorization;
F.
The federal registration number.

6 The requirements referred to in para. 3 also includes, where applicable:

A.
The maximum dose per hectare for each use,
B.
The time to be met between the last use and the harvest;
C.
The maximum number of uses per year;
D.
Restrictions on the distribution and use of the plant health product in order to ensure the protection of the health of distributors, users, persons present on the premises, inhabitants, consumers or workers Concerned or the environment; such restrictions are indicated on the label;
E.
The designation of categories of users, such as professionals and non-professionals;
F.
The time between uses;
G.
The re-entry period.

7 The authorisation applies to the holder mentioned in the decision and is not transferable.


1 See note on s. 3, para. 1, let. D.
2 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).

Art. 19 Duration

The authorization is issued for ten years subject to s. 29.

Art. Certificates

1 At the request of the holder of the authorisation, the approval service may confirm the authorisation to release a phytosanitary product in Switzerland by establishing a certificate.

2 At the request of the holder of the authorisation, the approval service may confirm with an export certificate that a phytosanitary product intended for export is manufactured in Switzerland. In such cases, it shall consult the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) in advance, to the extent that the area of competence of the latter is affected.

Section 3 Procedure

Art. Application for Authorization or Amendment of an Authorization

1 Any applicant wishing to put a phytosanitary product in circulation is required to file an application for authorisation or amendment of an authorisation in person or through a representative to the approval service.

2 The request includes the following:

A.
The home, head office or branch of the applicant;
B.
The trade name under which it is intended to put the phytosani-taire in circulation;
C.
The place of manufacture, packaging or repackaging of the phytosanitary product;
D.
The name and address of the manufacturer of the plant health product and the active substances contained therein;
E.
A list of proposed uses;
F.
Where appropriate, a copy of any authorisation already granted to the phytosanitary product in an EU State;
G.
Where appropriate, a copy of any conclusion of an EU Member State which has evaluated the equivalence of active substances, safeners and synergists used.

3 The following are attached to the application:

A.
For the phytosanitary product concerned, a complete dossier and a summary dossier for each point of the data requirements applicable to the phytosanitary product;
B.
For each active substance, safener and synergist contained in the plant health product, a complete dossier and a summary dossier for each point of the data requirements applicable to the active substance, to the safener And the synergist;
C.
For each test or study involving the use of vertebrate animals, a justification of the measures taken to avoid animal testing and a repetition of tests on vertebrates;
D.
The reasons why the test and study reports submitted are necessary for a first authorization or for amendments to the conditions of the authorization;
E.
Where applicable, a copy of the application for a maximum residue limit referred to in s. 7 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 1 Or a justification for the non-disclosure of such information;
F.
Where appropriate, for the modification of an authorisation, an assessment of all the information communicated pursuant to Art. 7, para. 1, let. H;
G.
A labelling project.

4 The other requirements to be met by the application package are set out in Annex 6.

5 Where a phytosanitary product contains active substances that are not yet listed in Schedule 1 or that the data relating to active substances, safeners or synergists are protected under s. 46, the documents listed in Schedule 5 must be filed.

6 The approval service may, on a case-by-case basis, impose additional requirements on the content of the dossier accompanying the application.

7 It may, in agreement with the evaluation services, waive the request for certain parts of the file, including certain studies, if the applicant can prove that these documents are not necessary for the assessment of the phytosanitary product.

8 If the application for authorisation relates to a phytosanitary product consisting of genetically modified organisms or containing such organisms, it must meet the additional requirements laid down in Art. 28 and 34, para. 2, ODE 2 .

8bis If the request for authorization is for a phytosanitary product consisting of, or contenting, a macro-organism, it must meet the requirements of the EPPO PM6/2 standard 3 . 4

9 Documents attached to the application must be filed:

A.
On paper or on electronic media;
B.
In one of the official or English languages. If the application relates to a phytosanitary product consisting of pathogenic or genetically modified organisms or containing such organisms, at least one summary of the application must be provided in one of the official languages.

10 At the time of application, the person concerned may request, pursuant to s. 52, that certain information, including certain parts of the file, that it physically separates, be treated confidentially. At the same time, it presents the complete list of studies submitted pursuant to Art. 7, para. 2, and a list of the reports of tests and studies for which applications for the protection of the reports have been submitted in accordance with Art. 46.

11 In the context of a request for access to information, the approval service shall determine the information to be kept confidential.

12 The applicant, if invited, shall provide samples of the phytosanitary product and the standards for the analysis of its ingredients.

13 The approval service may require the applicant to provide, in a defined computer form, the list of test reports and studies submitted at the time of the application, as well as the list of test reports and studies for which the application is submitted. Protection of reports under s. 46, is requested.


1 See note on Art. 7, para. 1, let. G.
2 RS 814.911
3 Standard PM6/2 as defined in OPDP EPPO Bulletin 40, pp. 335 to 344. Download: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, www.eppo.org > Standards > List of EPPO Standards > Safe use of Biological Controls (PM6) > "Import and release of non-indigenous biological control agents".
4 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).

Art. Dispensing with regard to the presentation of studies

1 Applicants are exempt from providing the test and study reports referred to in s. 21, para. 3, where the certification service has the test and study reports in question and the applicants demonstrate that access was granted to them in accordance with s. 46 or the possible period of protection of the reports has expired.

2 However, the applicants to whom s. 1 applies to provide the following information:

A.
All data necessary for the identification of the phytosanitary product, including its complete composition, as well as a statement indicating that no co-formulants listed in Annex 3 are used;
B.
The information necessary to identify the active substance, safener or synergist, if approved, and to determine if the conditions of approval are met and are in accordance with s. 17, para. 1, let. B, if applicable;
C.
On request of the approval service, the data necessary to demonstrate that the phytosanitary product has effects comparable to those of the phytosanitary product for which they provide evidence of their access to the protected data.
Art. Review of file completeness and transmission of documents

1 The approval service examines whether the application is complete.

2 Where parts are missing or fail to meet the requirements, the approval service shall provide the applicant with an appropriate period of time to complete it. If the required indications are not provided within the time limit, the application shall be rejected.

3 The registration service transmits the application and the relevant documents to the evaluation services.

4 If the application relates to a phytosanitary product consisting of genetically modified organisms or containing such organisms, the approval service shall initiate the authorisation procedure taking into account the ODE 1 .

5 If it relates to a phytosanitary product which consists of non-genetically modified organisms, or contains such organisms, the publication, the consultation of non-confidential documents and the procedure shall be governed by Art. 42 and 43 ODE to the extent that organizations are not listed in Schedule 1.


Art. 24 Case Assessment

1 The assessment services shall consider whether the conditions laid down in Art. 17 are completed and evaluate the documents in light of the criteria set out in Annex 9.

2 In the evaluation of an active substance, a synergist or a safener already approved in the EU, the approval service and evaluation services shall take into account the outcome of the EFSA evaluation, considerations and Decisions by the EU concerning the approval of these substances and the considerations and decisions of the Member States concerning the authorisation of plant protection products containing these substances, provided that these documents are presented to the Certification service or brought to its attention.

3 During the examination of the application, the approval service may conduct or cause tests and other investigations.

4 The assessment services shall communicate to the approval service the result of their assessment.

Art. 25 Supplement

The approval service instructing the applicant to provide him with samples or additional information, including additional data and test results, where the examination of the file shows that these additional information are Necessary.

Art. 26 Delays

2 If the approval service requires that the file be completed, the time limits shall cease to run until the additional information has been filed.

Art. 27 Obligation to keep records

The holder of the authorization shall keep, for at least ten years from the date of the last transfer of the phytosanitary product, a copy of all documents filed or to ensure that the documents deposited are available. Samples are retained for as long as their condition permits an assessment.

Art. 28 Renewal

1 The authorization may be renewed.

2 The application for renewal of the authorisation must be filed with the approval service two years before the end of the period of validity of the authorisation. The requester provides the following information:

A.
A copy of the phytosanitary product authorization;
B.
Any new information that has become necessary due to changes in data requirements or criteria;
C.
Evidence that the new data submitted are based on data requirements or criteria that were not applicable at the time the phytosanitary product authorization was granted or are necessary to amend the data Approval conditions;
D.
Any information necessary to demonstrate that the phytosanitary product meets the requirements set out in the approval of the active substance, safener or synergist contained therein;
E.
A report on monitoring information, if the authorization was subject to monitoring.

3 The information referred to in Art. 22, para. 2, let. A and b, shall be provided by each holder of an authorization upon renewal of the authorization.

4 The approval service shall examine whether the conditions for granting the authorisation are met. Where appropriate, it shall require additional information, including the results of additional tests or tests necessary for the assessment of the safety of the plant health product and its conformity with the intended use.

5 It shall refuse renewal when the conditions for grant are no longer fulfilled or the additional information is not provided on time.

6 It has the power to extend the authorisation pending the decision on renewal.

Art. Removing or modifying an authorization

1 The approval service may re-examine an authorization at any time if certain elements suggest that one of the requirements set out in s. 17 is no longer respected. The approval service reviews an authorisation when it concludes that the goals set by the OWaters 1 Cannot be reached by other means.

2 Where the approval service intends to withdraw or amend an authorisation, it shall inform the holder and give it the opportunity to submit comments or additional information.

3 The approval service shall withdraw or amend the authorisation, as the case may be:

A.
Where the requirements under s. 17 are not or are no longer respected;
B.
Where false or misleading information has been provided on the facts supporting the authorization granted;
C.
Where a condition in the authorization is not met;
D.
When, given the evolution of scientific and technical knowledge, the mode of use and the quantities used can be modified;
E.
Where the holder of the authorization fails to comply with his or her obligations under this order;
F.
When the conditions for the implementation of the precautionary measures referred to in s. 148 A LAgr are completed.

4 The approval service may re-examine at any time the plant protection products containing an active substance, safener or synergist for which the EU has set conditions or restrictions on approval or renewal Of approval. It may require holders of authorisations, the data necessary for the assessment of such conditions or restrictions, including relevant information relating to the active substance, safener or synergist, and set a time limit For delivery. It may amend or withdraw an authorisation or attach new charges directly on the basis of the available results of the approval or renewal procedure for the approval of the EU.

5 The approval service shall carry out the review referred to in para. 4 as a priority for substances for which the conditions and restrictions laid down by the EU at the time of approval concern the protection of groundwater.


Art. Withdrawal or modification of an authorization at the request of the holder

1 An authorization may be withdrawn or amended at the request of the holder of the authorization.

2 Amendments may be granted only where it is found, in respect of such applications and in accordance with the procedure referred to in Art. 23 and 24, that the requirements set out in s. 17 are respected.

Art. Delay in case of withdrawal

1 Where the approval service withdraws an authorisation or does not renew it and the reasons for withdrawal or non-renewal are not related to a potential dangerous effect deemed unacceptable, it may grant a time limit for the implementation of the Circulation of existing stocks.

2 The time limit shall not exceed twelve months for the release of the existing stocks of the phytosanitary products concerned.

3 In the event of withdrawal of the authorisation or non-renewal due to immediate concerns regarding human or animal health or the environment, the phytosanitary products concerned shall be immediately withdrawn from the market.

Section 4 Special situations

Art. 32 Low-Risk Phytosanitary Products

1 When all active substances contained in a phytosanitary product are low-risk active substances under s. 5, para. 4, this product is allowed as a low-risk pest control product provided that specific risk mitigation measures are not required as a result of the risk assessment. This phytosanitary product also meets the following conditions:

A.
The active substances, safeners and synergists contained therein, have been approved under chap. 2;
B.
It does not contain a worrisome substance;
C.
It is effective enough;
D.
It does not cause unacceptable pain or suffering in vertebrates to be combed;
E.
It meets the requirements set out in s. 17, para. 1, let. B, c and f to i.

2 Any person seeking the authorization of a low-risk pest control product is required to demonstrate compliance with the requirements set out in para. 1 and attach to the application a complete file and a summary record for each point of the data requirements applicable to the active substance and the phytosanitary product. Art. 22 is reserved.

Art. 33 Processed seeds

1 Seed may not be imported as a commercial commodity when treated with active substances not authorized in Switzerland for the intended use.

2 The approval service may grant derogations provided that the products concerned are authorised in the EU. It makes a general decision that is published in the Federal Worksheet. The validity of this decision is generally limited to one year.

3 In addition to the labelling requirements defined in Art. 17 of the order of 7 December 1998 on propagating material 1 , the label and the documents accompanying the treated seeds shall bear the following particulars:

A.
The name of the phytosanitary product with which the seed was treated;
B.
The name of the active substances contained in the phytosanitary product;
C.
The standard sentences for the precautionary statements provided for in Annex IV, Part 2, of Regulation (EC) No O 1272/2008 2 ; and
D.
Where applicable, the risk mitigation measures set out in the phytosanitary product authorization. 3

1 RS 916.151
2 See note on s. 3, para. 1, let. D.
3 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).

Art. 34 Comparative assessment of plant protection products containing substances for substitution

1 The evaluation services conduct a comparative assessment in the course of the review, in accordance with s. 8, an active substance approved as a substance for consideration for substitution or for review in accordance with s. 29, para. 4, of a phytosanitary product containing such a substance. The approval service shall withdraw or limit the authorisation of a phytosanitary product in a particular crop, where it is apparent from the comparative assessment weighing the risks and benefits, as described in Annex 4: 1

A.
There is already, for the uses specified in the application, an authorized phytosanitary product or a non-chemical method of prevention or control that is significantly safer for human or animal health or the environment;
B.
Substitution by phytosanitary products or non-chemical methods of prevention or control referred to in the letter. Has no major economic or practical disadvantages and has comparable effects on the target organism;
C.
That the chemical diversity of active substances, where appropriate, or the methods and practices of crop management and prevention of pests are likely to reduce the occurrence of resistance in the organism as much as possible Target; and
D.
The impact on authorisations for minor uses is taken into account.

2 The evaluation services shall carry out a comparative assessment for any new request for authorisation for a phytosanitary product containing an active substance which has already been the subject of a comparative assessment in accordance with para. 1. The evaluation is not carried out for indications which have already been the subject of such an evaluation in this context. 2

3 The comparative assessment referred to in paras. 1 and 2 is not performed in the following cases:

A.
Minor uses;
B.
Uses with an insufficient number of active substances to allow an effective anti-resistance strategy. 3

4 When the approval authority decides to withdraw or amend an authorization under para. 3, the withdrawal or modification in question takes effect three years after the decision or at the end of the approval period for the substance for which substitution is being considered, when that period ends earlier.

5 Unless otherwise specified, all the provisions relating to the authorisations contained in this order shall apply.

6 The DEFR may adapt the procedure for the comparative assessment of a phytosanitary product set out in Annex 4 in order to take account of developments in this procedure at international level.


1 New content according to the c. I of O du 28 oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 ( RO 2015 4551 ).
2 New content according to the c. I of O du 28 oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 ( RO 2015 4551 ).
3 New content according to the c. I of O du 28 oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 ( RO 2015 4551 ).

Art. 35 Minor Use

1 Where the application for authorisation relates to a minor use, the approval service may waive compliance with the conditions laid down in Art. 17, para. 1, let. B to g, et al. 2 and 3, and to authorize the phytosanitary product:

A.
If authorised, for the minor uses considered, in an EU Member State in which the agronomic, climatic and environmental conditions are comparable; or
B.
If there is already an authorization in Switzerland for similar uses.

2 The application shall indicate the conditions under which there is minor use and shall contain only the particulars referred to in Art. 21, para. 2, let. A to d. In the cases referred to in para. 1, let. A, it must also establish that the phytosanitary product is authorised in an EU Member State for the minor use concerned.

3 The approval service may refuse to grant authorisation if general knowledge suggests that the requirements of s. 17 are not fulfilled.

4 This Article does not apply to genetically modified organisms.

Section 5 Approval of registration on a list of phytosanitary products approved by a foreign country which correspond to the phytosanitary products authorised in Switzerland

Art. 36 List of phytosanitary products

1 The approval service establishes a list of phytosanitary products registered abroad which correspond to the phytosanitary products authorised in Switzerland. Phytosanitary products on this list are considered to be registered.

2 A phytosanitary product registered abroad is listed on the list:

A.
Where it has decisive properties similar to a phytosanitary product authorised in Switzerland, in particular the same content of active substances and the same type of preparation;
B.
When it has been registered abroad on the basis of requirements equivalent to the Swiss conditions and the agronomic and environmental conditions relating to its use are comparable to those in Switzerland;
C.
When it does not consist of, or contains, pathogenic or genetically modified organisms;
D.
Where the holder of the authorization of the phytosanitary product authorised in Switzerland (reference product) has not been able to establish plausibly that the product is patented and, if so, that the product approved abroad has been put into Movement without the consent of the owner of the patent within the meaning of s. 27 B LAgr; and
E.
Where the holder of the authorisation of the phytosanitary product authorised in Switzerland, for which a report is protected within the meaning of Art. 46, could not plausibly establish that the product registered abroad was put into circulation without the consent of the representative or supplier abroad of the holder of the authorization.

3 Proposals for inclusion in the list shall be submitted to the approval service. They shall be accompanied by the information referred to in section 3 of the safety data sheet referred to in Art. 20 of the Chemicals Ordinance of 5 June 2015 (OChim) 1 If necessary, the approval service may request additional information. 2


1 RS 813.11
2 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).

Art. Procedure

1 The approval service examines whether the conditions are met. It relies on the data on the list of phytosanitary products in the country of origin. It takes into account further information when it is at its disposal.

2 It shall provide the holder of the authorization of the reference product with a period of 60 days to establish plausibly:

A.
The existence of a patent protecting the reference product;
B.
If that is the case, that the phytosanitary product registered abroad is put into circulation outside Canada without the consent of the owner of the patent within the meaning of s. 27 B LAgr; and
C.
When a report for that product is protected within the meaning of s. 46, that the product registered abroad is put into circulation without the consent of the representative or supplier outside Canada of the holder of the authorization.

3 The registration service registers the phytosanitary product on the list by a decision of general application.

4 The decision is published in the Federal Worksheet, including:

A.
The country of origin of the phytosanitary product;
B.
The trade name under which the phytosanitary product can be put into circulation;
C.
The name of the foreign authorization holder;
D.
Storage and disposal requirements;
E.
The precise designation of all active substances contained in the product and their contents, expressed in metric units;
F.
Type of preparation;
G.
The Federal Phytosanitary Product Licence Number;
H.
Where applicable, the approval number assigned in the country of origin.

5 The indications concerning the potential for use of the phytosanitary product and the charges related to this use are those of the authorised reference plant product in Switzerland. They shall be laid down in the employment notices issued by the approval service and published in accordance with Art. 45. They are automatically modified in the event of changes in the use or expense of using the reference product.

Art. 38 Deletion of list

1 The approval service shall order the cancellation of a phytosanitary product from the list:

A.
When it is no longer registered in the country of origin; or
B.
Where no phytosanitary products with similar determinative properties are allowed in Switzerland.

2 The approval service may radiate a phytosanitary product when the requirements set out in s. 36 are no longer satisfied.

3 Where the reasons for the cancellation are not related to a potential dangerous effect which is considered unacceptable, it may grant a time limit for the release of existing stocks which do not exceed twelve months.

Art. 39 Obligation to communicate

1 Any person who imports a phytosanitary product from the list referred to in s. 36 shall communicate it to the competent authority within three months of the first release.

2 The content and form of the communication are set out in Art. 49 to 51 OChim 1 . 2

3 The obligation referred to in para. 1 does not apply to products imported by end users.


1 RS 813.11
2 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).

Section 6 Approval in case of emergency

Art. 40

1 The approval service may register phytosanitary products for limited and controlled use, in derogation from Sections 2 to 4, where such a measure seems necessary due to a phytosanitary hazard which cannot be controlled by Other means.

2 It may register a phytosanitary product when it considers that the conditions laid down in Art. 17, para. 1, let. E and i are satisfied, as well as the conditions set out in s. 17, para. 7, let. B, if it is an organization; at the time of the evaluation, it takes into account the facts and generally known data.

3 Phytosanitary products consisting of genetically modified organisms or containing such organisms may not be registered in accordance with the procedure referred to in para. 1.

4 The approval service makes a general decision that is published in the Federal Worksheet.

5 The approval shall be granted for a period of up to one year. It can be renewed.

6 The approval service shall inform the cantonal enforcement authority of the approvals granted for the control of emergency situations.

Section 6 A 8 Registration for phytosanitary products containing only approved basic substances

Art. 40 A Circulation

1 Phytosanitary products which contain only the basic substances listed in Annex 1, Part D, and which comply with the conditions and restrictions laid down therein may be put into circulation without authorisation.

2 The release of phytosanitary products which do not contain only basic substances shall be governed by Sections 2 to 6.

Art. 40 B Obligation to communicate

A person who manufactures or imports a phytosanitary product containing only approved basic substances shall communicate it to the approval service before the first release. The communication must contain the following:

A.
The trade name;
B.
The name and address of the manufacturer or importer;
C.
The precise designation and quantity of all approved base substances;
D. 1
Where applicable, the particulars referred to in Art. 55 A , let. F.

1 New content according to the c. 4 of the annex to the O of 7 Nov 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 6103 ).

Section 7 Research and Development

Art. Experiments and trials for research or development purposes

1 Experiments or tests carried out for the purpose of research or development involving the emission into the environment of a phytosanitary product not approved or involving the unauthorized use of a phytosanitary product shall not Take place only if the approval service has evaluated the available data and issued a permit to conduct tests. This permit may limit the quantities to be used and the areas to be treated, and impose additional conditions to prevent any adverse effects on human or animal health or any unacceptable adverse effects on the environment, In particular the need to prevent feed and food containing residues from entering the food chain unless a maximum value has already been set in the OSEC 1 .

2 An application is made to the approval service. It shall be accompanied by a file containing all the information available to assess the potential effects on human or animal health or the possible effects on the environment.

3 L' al. 2 shall not apply if the approval service has recognised the right of the person concerned to undertake certain experiments and tests and has determined the conditions under which such experiments and tests must be carried out.

4 In testing with genetically modified organisms or pathogenic organisms subject to the ODE authorization regime 2 , the authorisation procedure is governed by the ODE.

5 If it is intended to conduct tests for which macro-organisms are used, and for which the authorisation procedure is not governed by para. 4, the approval service consults the OFEV before any decision is taken.


Art. Obligation to Register

1 Anyone who uses for research or development an unauthorized phytosanitary product must register:

A.
The identity and provenance of the phytosanitary product;
B.
Labelling particulars;
C.
Quantities delivered;
D.
The name and address of the person who received the phytosanitary product;
E.
All available information on possible effects on humans, animals and the environment;
F.
Indications concerning the type, location and timing of use.

2 Upon request, the registered information shall be made available to the approval service.

Section 8 Permission to sell

Art. 43

1 An authorized phytosanitary product for which a sales permission has been granted may be released under the name of the holder of the sales permission and under a trade name other than that of the authorized product. The sales permission is only valid for the applications mentioned in the authorization.

2 Permission to sell shall be granted if the holder of the authorisation has given his consent. It has a federal registration number.

3 It shall become moot as soon as the authorisation is extinguished or the authorisation holder withdraws his consent. The holder of the authorisation shall inform the approval service when he withdraws his agreement.

4 Requests for permission to sell are addressed to the approval service. The application must be accompanied, in particular, by the written consent of the holder of the authorisation.

Section 9 Information

Art. 44 Obligation of the holder of an authorisation

1 The holder of an authorisation for a phytosanitary product shall immediately inform the approval service of any new information concerning the phytosanitary product, the active substance, its metabolites, a safener, a synergist Or a co-formulant contained in this product and signifying that the phytosanitary product no longer meets the criteria set out in s. 4 and the conditions laid down in Art. 17. It shall indicate, in particular, the potentially harmful effects of this phytosanitary product, or residues of an active substance, its metabolites, a safener, a synergist or a co-formulant contained in this product, on human health Or on groundwater, or their potentially unacceptable effects on plants or plant products or on the environment. To this end, the authorisation holder shall record and report all adverse reactions, in humans, in animals and in the environment, suspected of being linked to the use of the phytosanitary product. The obligation to notify includes the provision of relevant information on decisions or assessments of international organisations or public bodies that permit plant protection products or active substances in countries Third parties.

2 The notification shall include an assessment of whether and, if so, how the new information means that the phytosanitary product or active substance, its metabolites, a safener, a synergist or a co-formulant Meets the criteria set out in s. 4 or the conditions set out in s. 17.

3 The holder of an authorisation shall also inform the approval service of any change concerning the origin or composition of an active substance, a safener, a synergist or a plant health product.

4 The holder of an authorisation for a phytosanitary product shall each year communicate to the approval service any information available on a lack of effectiveness in relation to the expected results, the appearance of a resistance and any effect Unexpected plants, plant products or the environment.

5 It shall announce to the approval service any change involving a change in the classification and labelling of the phytosanitary product. 1


1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).

Art. 45 Public Information

1 For phytosanitary products authorised or withdrawn in accordance with this order, as well as for products for which a sales permit has been granted, the approval service shall provide electronic access to the public Information containing at least the following:

A.
The name or name of the holder of the authorization and the approval number;
B.
The trade name of the product;
C.
Type of preparation;
D.
The name and quantity of each active substance, safener or synergist contained in the product;
E. 1
The relevant warning statement in accordance with the classification referred to in Annex I, Parts 2 to 5, the hazard statements referred to in Annex III and the hazard pictograms referred to in Annex V to Regulation (EC) No O 1272/2008 2 ;
F.
The use or uses for which the product is authorized;
G.
List of minor uses referred to in s. 35;
H.
The requirements for use under s. 18, para. 3 and 6.

2 The information referred to in para. 1 must be easily accessible and updated at least every three months. They may not contain confidential information.

3 The approval service may publish, for these plant protection products, a summary sheet listing the possible applications and their specific properties. This record should not contain confidential data.

4 In collaboration with the federal agricultural research stations, the approval service shall inform the competent cantonal authorities as well as the agricultural sector concerned of the developments concerning the approvals, as well as the Characteristics and possible applications of plant protection products.

5 It publishes the list of plant protection products which contain only approved basic substances. It contains the information referred to in Art. 40 B . 3


1 New content according to the c. 4 of the annex to the O of 7 Nov 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 6103 ).
2 See note on s. 3, para. 1, let. D.
3 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).

Chapter 4 Reports related to previous applications and duration of protection of reports

Art. Protecting reports

1 The reports of tests and studies shall enjoy the protection of the reports under the conditions laid down in this Article.

2 The protection shall apply to reports of tests and studies relating to the active substance, safener or synergist, adjuvants and the plant health product, as referred to in Art. 7, para. 2, where they are submitted by a person seeking an authorization (the first applicant), provided that it is established that these test and study reports were:

A.
Necessary for the authorization or amendment of an existing authorization, to permit the use of the product on another culture; and
B.
Recognised in accordance with the principles of good laboratory practice or good experimental practice.

3 Where a report is protected, the approval service may not use it for the benefit of other applicants for the authorization of plant protection products, safeners or synergists and adjuvants, except in the cases provided for in para. 7 or art. 50.

4 The period of protection of the reports shall be ten years from the date of the first authorization of a phytosanitary product for the assessment of which this data was used, except in the cases provided for in para. 7 or art. 50. This period is extended to thirteen years for low-risk phytosanitary products.

5 This period is extended by three months for each extension of the authorization to a minor use, as defined in Art. 3, para. 1, let. X, except where the extension of the authorisation is based on an extrapolation, if applications for such authorisations are introduced by the holder of the authorisation not later than five years after the date of the first authorisation. In no case shall the total period of protection of reports exceed thirteen years. For low-risk phytosanitary products, the total period of protection of reports cannot in any case exceed 15 years.

6 L' al. 1 does not apply:

A.
Reports of tests and studies for which the applicant has submitted a letter of access; or
B.
When a period of protection of the reports of the tests and studies concerned in relation to another phytosanitary product has expired.

7 Protection of reports referred to in paras. 1 to 6 shall be granted only where the first applicant has claimed it for the reports of tests and studies concerning the active sub-constancy, safener or synergist, the adjuvant and the plant health product at the time of presentation of the And has provided, for each test or study report, the information referred to in s. 7, para. 1, let. F, and art. 21, para. 3, let. D, as well as confirmation that a period of protection of the reports has never been granted to the trial or study report or that a period that would have been granted has not expired.

Art. Protection of reports in case of renewal or review

1 The reports of tests and studies shall be protected for thirty months if they are necessary for the renewal or re-examination of an authorisation, except in the cases provided for in Art. 46, para. 6, or art. 50.

2 Where the holder of an authorisation is not in a position to provide the reports of tests and studies necessary for the renewal or re-examination of an authorisation and that data has been supplied by a third party, the authorisation may not be Extended to new uses for a period of 30 months.

3 The approval service may use the reports referred to in para. 1 to adapt the conditions of use of a product for which the test and study reports have not been provided. 1


1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).

Art. 48 List of Test and Study Reports

1 For each active substance, safener or synergist, the approval service shall draw up a list of the test reports and studies necessary for the first approval, the modification of the conditions of approval or the renewal of the Approval.

2 For each plant health product which it authorates, the approval service shall keep and make available to any interested party, upon request:

A.
A list of the reports of tests and studies concerning the active substance, the safener, or the synergist, the adjuvant and the phytosanitary product deposited for the first authorisation, the amendment of the conditions of authorisation or the Renewal of the authorization; and
B.
A list of the test reports and studies for which the applicant has applied for protection under s. 46.

3 Lists provided for in paras. 1 and 2 indicate whether these test and study reports have been recognized in accordance with the principles of good laboratory practice or good experimental practice.

4 The approval service may require applicants to provide in a defined computer format the list of test reports and studies submitted at the time of application.

Art. Application prior to tests on vertebrates

1 Before conducting tests on vertebrates for the filing of an application for authorisation, the applicant shall, in writing, request the approval service if the results of tests relating to the active substance or the preparation concerned are already Available.

2 When filing a prior application, the applicant must demonstrate that he or she intends to apply for an authorization.

Art. 50 Use of data from previous tests on vertebrates

1 If the approval service already has, through previous tests on vertebrates, sufficient knowledge of an active substance or on a preparation, it shall inform the applicant of the extent to which it may refrain from doing so. New tests for the granting of an authorisation.

2 Where such knowledge comes from data resulting from tests carried out on vertebrates by the author of the first application or, possibly, by the authors of subsequent applications and the duration of protection of such data is not Still matured (art. 46), the approval service shall proceed as follows:

A.
It shall communicate to the authors of earlier applications whose data it intends to use in favour of the author of the new application:
1.
The data it intends to use,
2.
The address of the originator of the new application;
B.
It shall communicate to the author of the new application the address of the authors of the earlier applications.

3 The authors of the earlier applications may, within 30 days, oppose the immediate use of their data and request an adjournment.

4 If an adjournment request is not submitted, the approval authority shall order the use of the data by decision.

5 If a request for adjournment is submitted, the approval service shall adopt by decision:

A.
The data of the authors of the earlier applications to be used;
B.
A period of deferment, corresponding to the time that the author of the noun request would require to produce the data itself.

6 At the request of the author of the new application, the approval service shall draw up a summary of the data from tests on vertebrates which are necessary for the establishment of the safety data sheet; Confidentiality set out in s. 52 are reserved.

Art. Right of authors of claims prior to compensation for data from tests on vertebrates

1 The authors of earlier applications may request the author of the new application, a fair compensation for the use of the protected data which they have obtained following tests on vertebrates.

2 If the applicants fail to agree on the amount of the compensation within six months, the approval service shall fix that amount by decision at the request of either of the applicants. In doing so, it takes into account, inter alia:

A.
Expenditures related to the achievement of review results;
B.
The remaining term of protection for the data concerned;
C.
The number of requests filed in the interval.

3 The authors of the earlier applications may require the approval service to prohibit the release of the phytosanitary product until the author of the new application has paid them the required compensation.

Chapter 5 Business Secret and Manufacturing Secret

Art.

1 Any person requesting that the information submitted pursuant to this order be treated in a confidential manner shall be required to provide verifiable evidence that the disclosure of such information could be detrimental Its commercial interests or the protection of its privacy and integrity.

2 The disclosure of the following information shall in principle be regarded as affecting the protection of the commercial interests or the privacy and integrity of the persons concerned:

A.
The method of manufacture;
B.
The impurity specification of the active substance, with the exception of impurities that are considered to be of toxicological, ecotoxicological or environmental significance;
C.
The results of batches of the active substance comprising impurities;
D.
Methods for the analysis of impurities present in the manufactured active substance, except for the analytical methods of impurities considered to be of toxicological, ecotoxicological and environmental significance;
E.
The relationship between a producer or importer and the applicant or holder of the authorization;
F.
Information on the complete composition of a phytosanitary product;
G.
The name and address of persons conducting vertebrate tests;
H.
The content of the study and test reports.

3 The following information shall cease to be confidential once the phytosanitary product has been approved:

A.
The name and address of the authorization holder;
B.
The name of the active substance;
C.
The share of active substances in the preparation;
D. 1
The names of other substances that are considered to be hazardous under s. 3 OChim 2 Contributing to the classification of the phytosanitary product;
E.
The trade name of the phytosanitary product;
F.
The physico-chemical data contained in the safety data sheet for the preparation;
G.
The summary of the results of the tests required according to Annex 5 or 6 which are intended to establish the efficacy of the plant health product, the effects on humans, on animals and on the environment and, where appropriate, the properties favouring the Development of resistance;
H.
The analytical methods referred to in Annex 5, c. 4, or Annex 6, c. 5;
I.
The means by which the active substance is rendered and the preparation is harmless;
J.
Precautionary methods and measures to be taken to reduce risks in the use of the phytosanitary product, and in the event of fire or other hazards;
K.
The measures to be taken and the procedures to be followed in the event of an accidental spill or leak of the product;
L.
Indications concerning the first aid and the medical treatment to be applied in the case of bodily harm;
M.
Methods of removing the product and its packaging;
N.
The information contained in the safety data sheet.

1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
2 RS 813.11

Chapter 6 Classification, packaging, labelling safety data sheets and advertising

Art. 1 Classification

1 Phytosanitary products which consist of active preparations or active substances or which contain hazardous active substances shall be classified in accordance with Art. 18, para. 4.

2 Active substances which are dangerous substances and which are used in plant protection products must be classified according to the requirements of art. 6, para. 1, OChim 2 , which apply by analogy. 3

3 The holder of the authorisation within the meaning of this order shall be assimilated to the manufacturer within the meaning of the OChim. 4


1 New content according to the c. 4 of the annex to the O of 7 Nov 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 6103 ).
2 RS 813.11
3 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
4 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).

Art. Packaging and presentation

1 Phytosanitary products and adjuvants that are likely to be mistaken for food, drink or feed must be packed in such a way as to minimize the likelihood of such actions.

2 Phytosanitary products and additives which are accessible to the general public and which are likely to be mistaken for foodstuffs, drinks or feedingstuffs must contain components that are intended to deter or prevent their Consumption.

3 Phytosanitary products must be packaged according to the requirements of the art. 8 OChim 1 , which shall apply by analogy; phytosanitary products within the meaning of this order shall be equivalent to dangerous substances and preparations within the meaning of the OChim. 2

4 Products intended for non-professional users must be formulated and packed in such a way as to facilitate dosing during use.

5 Phytosanitary products registered under s. 36 and put into circulation in Switzerland must be sold in their foreign packaging. 3


1 RS 813.11
2 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
3 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).

Art. Labeling

1 It is prohibited to give false, misleading or incomplete information on a phytosanitary product or to ignore facts that may mislead purchasers as to the nature and composition or the potential for use A phytosanitary product.

2 Phytosanitary products shall be labelled according to the requirements of the art. 10, para. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6, OChim 1 , which shall apply by analogy, and Annexes 7 and 8 to this order; the holder of the authorisation within the meaning of this order shall be assimilated to the manufacturer within the meaning of the OChim. If the OChim and Annexes 7 and 8 provide for different labelling, the requirements of Annexes 7 and 8 shall prevail. 2

3 Any packaging of a plant health product shall be legibly and indelibly marked with the indications referred to in Annex 11. 3

3bis The labelling requirements laid down in the Ordinance of 25 August 1999 on the protection of workers from micro-organisms 4 Must be respected. 5

4 Phytosanitary products that are registered under s. 36 must be labelled in accordance with the relevant foreign provisions. The label shall also bear the following particulars:

A.
The uses of the plant health product as set out in the decision under s. 37 and the provisions governing storage and disposal;
B.
The federal registration number assigned;
C.
Volatile organic compound (VOC content) content;
D.
The importer's name and address.

5 Regarding the labelling referred to in para. 4, it is possible to use the instructions issued by the approval service.

6 Imported phytosanitary products may derogate from the labelling requirements prior to their first delivery to third parties in Switzerland.

7 The DEFR can adapt Annexes 7, 8 and 11, taking into account international requirements, in particular those of the EU. 6


1 RS 813.11
2 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
3 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
4 RS 832.321
5 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
6 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).

Art. A 1 Labelling of phytosanitary products containing only approved basic substances

The labels of plant protection products which contain only approved basic substances and which are put into circulation shall bear in a legible and indelible manner the following indications in a language in use in the Sales region:

A.
The trade name;
B.
The indication "Phytosanitary product consisting of basic substances (approved without evidence of efficacy or phytotoxicity to plants)";
C.
The name and address of the manufacturer or importer;
D.
The precise description of all the basic substances used in Annex 1, Part D;
E.
The net quantity of phytosanitary products, expressed as follows:
1.
In grams or kilograms for solid preparations,
2.
In grams, kilogram, millilitre or litre for gases,
3.
In millilitres or in litre for liquid preparations;
F. 2
Where applicable, the particulars in accordance with the provisions of Art. 10 OChim 3 Labelling of dangerous preparations;
G.
The scope of application;
H.
The way of employment;
I.
Where applicable, the conditions of use and the restrictions referred to in Annex 1, Part D;
J.
The expiry date, if the product is less than two years old.

1 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
2 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
3 RS 813.11

Art. 56 Location of indications

1 The indications referred to in Art. 55, para. 3, must be placed on the label of the phytosanitary product.

2 The indications referred to in Annex 11, c. 13, 14, 15 and 17 may appear on a package insert. 1


1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).

Art. 57 Language used for labelling

1 The labelling must be in at least two official languages, one of which must be the one in use in the sales area.

2 The labelling of phytosanitary products that have been licensed under s. 36 must be in at least one official language in use in the sales department.

Art. Declaration of Phytosanitary Products Containing or Containing Genetically Modified Organisms

1 Phytosanitary products that are genetically modified organisms or contain such organisms must bear the label "produced from genetically modified X" on the label.

2 In agreement with the evaluation services participating in the approval procedure, the approval service may exceptionally grant a derogation from the obligation to declare where the phytosanitary product contains, independently of the The manufacturer's or importer's will, traces of authorized genetically modified organisms, at a rate of less than 0.1 % mass.

Art. Security Data Sheet

1 Safety data sheets must be established and submitted for plant protection products in accordance with Art. 19 to 22 OChim 1 ; it is not necessary to attach the exposure scenarios referred to in s. 20, para. 2, OChim to safety data sheets. The holder of the authorisation within the meaning of this order shall be assimilated to the manufacturer within the meaning of the OChim. 2

2 Safety data sheets may be provided in electronic form. Upon request, they must be submitted on paper. 3

3 Safety data sheets must be kept in accordance with s. 23 OChim. 4


1 RS 813.11
2 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
3 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
4 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).

Art. 60 Advertising

1 Unapproved phytosanitary products are not advertised. Any advertisement for a phytosanitary product must be accompanied by sentences " Use phytosanitary products carefully. Before you use it, read the label and product information." These sentences are easily legible and must be clearly distinguished from all advertising. The words "phytosanitary products" may be replaced by a more precise description of the type of product, such as fungicide, insecticide or herbicide.

2 Advertising may not contain potentially misleading information, in the form of texts or illustrations, on possible risks to human or animal health or the environment, such as the terms "low risk", "non toxic" Or "safe".

3 All advertising claims must be technically justified.

4 The advertisements contain no visual representation of potentially dangerous practices such as the mixing or application without adequate protective clothing, the use in the vicinity of foodstuffs, or the use by Or in the vicinity of children.

5 The promotional or promotional material draws attention to the appropriate warning phrases and symbols on the labelling.

Chapter 7 Special provisions for the use and furnishing of plant protection products

Art. 61 Duty Due Diligence

1 Anyone who uses plant protection products or their waste must ensure that they do not have any side effects that are unacceptable to humans, animals and the environment.

2 Phytosanitary products must be used appropriately. They may only be used for the purposes for which they have been registered. This use includes the application of the principles of good plant protection practices and compliance with the requirements laid down in Art. 18 and mentioned on the label. Any person who uses a phytosanitary product containing only approved basic substances shall, in addition, comply with the conditions and restrictions referred to in Annex 1, Part D. 1

3 For the application, only equipment which allows for targeted and good practice of plant protection products can be used.


1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).

S. 62 Record Keeping

1 Producers, suppliers, distributors, importers and exporters of plant health products maintain records of the phytosanitary products they produce, import, export, store, use or market for five At least. Professional users of plant protection products keep records of the phytosanitary products they use, containing the name of the phytosanitary product, the time of use, the dose used, the surface and the culture where the plant is used. Has been used for at least three years. Upon request, they shall communicate the information contained in these registers to the competent authority.

2 Licensees and persons who import the goods listed in s. 36 for resale shall communicate annually to the approval service all necessary data concerning the volume of sales of plant protection products.

3 The data referred to in para. 2 must be comparable to those required under international information systems, in particular those of the EU (Eurostat).

S. 63 1 Conservation

Phytosanitary products must be retained in accordance with ss. 57 and 62 OChim 2 .


1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
2 RS 813.11

Art. 64 1 Discount

1 Art. 58, 63 to 66 and 68 OChim 2 Apply by analogy to the furnishing of plant protection products.

2 In addition, art. 59 OChim applies by analogy to undertakings which put in place phytosanitary products.

3 Phytosanitary products whose labelling refers to one of the elements listed in Annex 5, c. 1.2, let. A or b, or c. 2.2, let. A or b, OChim 3 Cannot be delivered to private users.


1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
2 RS 813.11
3 RS 813.11

Art. 1 Theft, Loss and Circulation by Error

Art. 67 Chim 2 Applies to the theft, loss or placing on the market by mistake of plant protection products.


1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
2 RS 813.11

Art. 66 General requirements for use

The OFAG may make general use requirements such as formulae for the calculation of usable quantities, distances to be observed or the use of certain equipment.

Art. 67 Prohibition of Use

If the potential hazardous effect of a phytosanitary product is deemed unacceptable by the approval service or an evaluation service and the approval is withdrawn, the approval service may prohibit the use of the product Plant. It publishes the prohibition of use in the Federal Leaf in the form of a decision of general application.

Art. 68 Usage Restriction

1 Phytosanitary products should not be used in the S2 and S zones H Protection of groundwater, if the product itself or its metabolites having a biological effect are liable to result in the provision of drinking water because of their mobility and poor degradability. 1

2 The approval service shall fix a relative load when the examination of the file shows that it is to be expected, in groundwater, that the maximum concentration for drinking water in the annex, c. 4, OSEC 2 Can be reached.

3 OFAG publishes and maintains a list of phytosanitary products that are prohibited from use in the S2 and S zones H Protection of groundwater. 3

4 The use of phytosanitary products for which the labelling refers to one of the elements listed in Annex 5, c. 1.1 or c. 1.2, let. A or b, or c. 2.1 or c. 2.2, let. A or b, OChim 4 Is prohibited in urban areas on such areas as parks, gardens, sports and recreation grounds, recreation courses and playgrounds, as well as close proximity to health facilities. The use of plant protection products on agricultural production surfaces within urbanised areas is not subject to this prohibition. 5

5 Derogations from the provisions of para. 4 may be granted by the competent cantonal authorities if there is no other means of control. In this case, adequate measures are taken to ensure the protection of the users of the areas concerned.

6 Annex 2.5 to the Chemicals Risk Reduction Order of 18 May 2005 (ORRChim) 6 Is applicable to other prohibitions and restrictions on the use of plant protection products.

7 Annex 2.5 ORRChim applies by analogy to plant protection products which do not consist of non-genetically modified organisms or contain genetically modified organisms.


1 New content according to the c. 4 of the annex to the O of 4 nov. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 ( RO 2015 4791 ).
2 RS 817.021.23
3 New content according to the c. 4 of the annex to the O of 4 nov. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 ( RO 2015 4791 ).
4 RS 813.11
5 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
6 RS 814.81

Art. 69 Use of plant protection products in the event of withdrawal of approval

1 Phytosanitary products whose authorisation has been withdrawn may be used for up to one year after the expiry of the period prescribed in accordance with Art. 31.

2 Phytosanitary products that have been removed from the list referred to in s. 36 may be used no later than one year after the expiry of the period prescribed in accordance with Art. 38.

3 Art. 67 is reserved.

Art. Obligation to Resume

1 A person who circulates phytosanitary products shall be obliged to resume the phytosanitary product which he has assigned to a user, if the user no longer wishes to use it, and to eliminate it in the rules.

2 Phytosanitary products sold in the retail trade must be taken up free of charge.

Chapter 8 Enforcement

Section 1 Confederation

Art. Certification Service and Steering Committee

1 The OFAG is the registration service for phytosanitary products.

2 A Steering Committee shall be established for the approval service. It includes the Directors of the following Federal Offices:

A.
Federal Office for Food Safety and Veterinary Affairs (FVO) 1 ;
B.
OFAG;
C.
OFEV
D.
SECO.

3 The steering committee has the following tasks and competencies:

A.
Defining the strategy of the approval service;
B.
It has a right of scrutiny in the organisation and calculation of the resources of the approval service.

4 The Steering Committee shall take its decisions by mutual agreement.


1 The designation of the administrative unit has been adapted to 1 Er Jan 2014 pursuant to Art. 16 al. 3 of the O of 17 Nov 2004 on official publications ( RO 2004 4937 ). This mod has been taken into account. Throughout the text.

Art. 72 Evaluation Services

1 The evaluation services are:

A.
OFAG;
B.
OSAV;
C.
OFEV;
D.
SECO.

2 OFAG, in collaboration with its agricultural research stations and the Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (NPF), ensures that the phytosanitary product:

A.
Is suitable for the intended use and does not produce unacceptable side effects on plants and crops when used in accordance with the requirements;
B.
Does not have unacceptable side effects on human and animal health or on the environment when used in accordance with the requirements.

3 The FVO has the following tasks:

A.
Ensures that a phytosanitary product, when used in accordance with the requirements, does not pose a risk to the health of the human being;
B.
It ensures that a phytosanitary product, when used in accordance with the requirements, has no unacceptable side effects, with regard to possible residues in or on foodstuffs;
C. 1
It determines the labelling and classification of the phytosanitary product according to the requirements of health protection.

4 The OFEV determines the labelling and classification of the phytosanitary product according to the threat it poses to the environment.

5 Before entering into Annex 1 an active substance contained in a phytosanitary product subject to authorisation or when an active substance is re-evaluated, the approval service shall, for the opinion of the Office, provide the relevant documents as well as The conclusions of the evaluation. The cooperation of the OFEV is governed by Art. 62 A And 62 B The Act of 21 March 1997 on the organisation of government and administration 2 .

6 If the phytosanitary product consists of genetically modified organisms or contains such organisms, the tasks of OFEV shall be governed by the ODE 3 .

7 The SECO evaluates phytosanitary products according to the health and safety requirements of users when the products are used for professional or commercial purposes. To this end, it is based on the toxicological assessment of the plant health product carried out by the FVO and on the exposure data, using recognised models where possible.

8 The evaluation services shall take account of the technical documents and other guidance documents adopted by the EU for the evaluation of plant protection products.


1 New content according to the c. I of O du 28 oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 ( RO 2015 4551 ).
2 RS 172.010
3 RS 814.911

Art. Certification service tasks and collaboration

1 The approval service has the following tasks:

A.
Coordinates the collaboration of evaluation services;
B.
It seeks the assessment and advice of the relevant evaluation services;
C.
It shall decide, after agreement with the evaluation services and to the extent that their field of competence is concerned, on applications for the authorisation of plant protection products.

2 Before placing a phytosanitary product on the list referred to in s. 36 or the registration of a phytosanitary product in order to control an emergency under s. 40, the approval service shall require the opinion of the assessment services whose area of competence is concerned.

3 It shall direct and coordinate the procedure for the approval of plant protection products consisting of genetically modified organisms or containing such organisms, taking into account the ODE 1 If field tests are to be carried out for the issuance of the authorisation, the tests shall be carried out only if the requirements of the EDO are met.

4 It shall rule on the modification or withdrawal of an authorisation:

A.
On its own initiative;
B.
On the request of an assessment service, provided that the reason for the request falls within its area of competence.

5 The evaluation services participating in the approval procedure shall regularly and regularly inform each other of facts and knowledge relating to the approval and use of plant protection products.

6 The approval service may, together with the cantonal implementing authorities, organise controls on the release or use of specific plant protection products.


S. 74 Toxicological Information Centre

The toxicological information centre is the Swiss Centre for Toxicological Information (CSIT).

Art. 75 Good Experimental Practice

1 The OFAG, after consulting the Swiss Accreditation Service (SAS), establishes the procedure for certifying the conformity of tests with the requirements on good experimental practice.

2 The OFAG, or the service designated by the OFAG, certifies on request the conformity of the tests. The fees of the applicant are set out in the order of 10 March 2006 on the emoluments of the State Secretariat for the Economy in the field of accreditation 1 .


Art. 76 Experts

The approval service may appeal to experts for the execution of this order.

Art. 77 Import and General Import Permit

1 Import of phytosanitary products on a professional or commercial basis requires a General Import Permit (MGI). This is issued by the approval service.

2 The PGI is issued to persons who have made the request in writing and who have their domicile, head office or branch in Switzerland, or who are nationals of a State with which Switzerland has concluded an agreement providing that the two countries Waive these requirements.

3 It is of unlimited duration, personal and non-transferable. In serious cases, in particular in cases of misuse, it may be withdrawn.

4 The person subject to the obligation to report must indicate the importer's GI number in the customs declaration.

5 The approval service shall inform the cantonal authorities of the holders of an ERP who have their domicile or have their headquarters in the territory of their canton.

S. 78 1 Customs office skills

At the request of the approval service, the customs offices shall verify that the phytosanitary products comply with the provisions on the importation of this order. For the rest, art. 83, para. 3, OChim 2 Is applicable.


1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ). Erratum of 17 Nov 2015 (RO 2015 4483).
2 RS 813.11

Art. Emoluments

The fees collected for the administrative acts covered by this order and the method of calculation shall be governed by the order of 7 December 1998 on emoluments received by the Federal Office for Agriculture 1 .


Section 2 Cantons

Art. 80

1 The cantons are responsible for monitoring the market for plant protection products and ensuring that plant protection products are used in accordance with the requirements. OFAG performs these tasks only in the alternative.

2 In particular, the cantons shall monitor compliance with:

A.
Decisions made under s. 18 and 37;
B.
Requirements concerning packaging, labelling, safety data sheet and advertising (Art. 54 to 60);
C. 1
Requirements concerning the duty of care (art. 61), conservation (art. 63), surrender (art. 64), theft, loss and error in circulation (art. 65), restrictions on use (art. 68) and the obligation to resume (art. 70).

3 They shall ensure that the prohibitions of use referred to in s. 67 are executed.


1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).

Section 3 Seizure and confiscation

Art.

1 If there are reasonable grounds to believe that a phytosanitary product put into circulation or intended for use does not comply with the provisions of the Act, the Act, the Act, the Act, this Order, or the implementing provisions of Such acts, the competent authority may seize the means of evidence, block or confiscate the goods or require the importer to re-export it.

2 Any person who holds evidence under s. 1 is required to produce them on request.

3 The authority labels the seized objects and puts them on a list. It provides the owner of the object with a copy of this list.

4 The authority that orders a measure under para. 1 shall arrange for the maintenance of the objects. It may give instructions to persons who have rights on these objects to this effect.

5 The authority may confiscate seized objects and the phytosanitary products concerned or authorize their export.

Section 4 Transmission of data and documentation

Art. 1 Data transmission

Art. 74 to 76 OChim 2 Apply by analogy to the transmission of data concerning plant protection products.


1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
2 RS 813.11

Art. 83 E. Documentation

The approval service establishes interdisciplinary documentation on plant protection products, which includes, inter alia:

A.
All documents filed in support of the application;
B.
All documents produced by the evaluation services that are relevant to the assessment;
C.
Conclusions of evaluations, including the statement of authorities and other decisions;
D.
All correspondence exchanged with the applicant;
E.
Files relating to legal aspects and procedures.

Chapter 9 Final provisions

Section 1 Repeal and amendment of the law in force

Art. 84 Repeal of the law in force

The order of 18 May 2005 on the release of plant protection products 1 Is repealed.


1 [ RO 2005 3035 4097 4479 5211, 2006 4851, 2007 821 hp. III 1469 Annex 4 c. 54 1843 4541 6291, 2008 2155 4377 Annex 5, c. 11,5271, 2009 401 Annex, c. 3 2845, 2010 2101]

Art. 85 Amendment of the law in force

... 1


1 The mod. Can be viewed at RO 2010 2331 .

Section 2 Transitional provisions

Art. 86 Transitional provisions for the entry into force of 1 Er July 2011 1

1 The conditions for the registration of active substances in Schedule 1 under the old law shall apply after the entry into force of this order:

A.
Applications for approval of active substances for which a decision has been adopted pursuant to s. 6, para. 3, of Directive 91/414 EEC 2 Before June 14, 2011;
B.
Requests for approval, review or re-evaluation of substances that are considered to be admissible in accordance with s. 16 of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 3 ;
C.
Requests for approval, review or re-evaluation of substances that are considered to be admissible in accordance with s. 6 of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 4 Before June 14, 2011.

2 Authorisations issued before the entry into force of this Ordinance shall remain valid. They shall end no later than 31 July 2015, unless another date has been fixed in accordance with the provisions in force before the entry into force of this order.

3 Phytosanitary products that have been labelled and packaged in accordance with the law in force before 1 Er August 2005 can be used until July 31, 2011.

4 DEFR may extend the time limits set out in para. 1 when an extension of these deadlines has been decided in the EU.

5 Safeners and synergists already in circulation prior to the coming into force of this order shall be announced with the approval service within twelve months of the coming into force of this order.

6 Notwithstanding s. 17, para. 1, let a, a phytosanitary product containing a synergist or a safener already in circulation before the coming into force of this order may be authorized pending the outcome of the review procedure referred to in s. 12.

7 The provisions of Art. 48, para. 1 and 2 do not apply to the phytosanitary substances and products for which an application was filed prior to the coming into force of this order.


1 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
2 Council Directive 91 /414/EEC of 15 July. 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, OJ L 230, 19 August 1991, p. 1, as last amended by Council Directive 2009 /160/EC of 17 Dec. 2009, OJ L 338, 19 Dec. 2009, p. 83.
3 R (CE) n O 33/2008 of the Commission of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91 /414/EEC on a common procedure and an accelerated procedure for the evaluation of active substances in the work programme referred to in Art. 8, para. 2, of this Directive, but not included in Annex I, in the version of OJ L 15 of 18 January 2008, p. 5.
4 See note on art. 86, para. 1, let. B.

Art. 86 A 1 Transitional provisions concerning the modification of 23 May 2012.

1 Phytosanitary products that have been labelled and packaged under the old right may:

A.
Be put into circulation until 31 May 2018;
B.
Be used until October 31, 2020.

2 Proposals for classification and labelling must be filed until 31 December 2014 with the approval service so that it can decide before the middle of 2017 of a new classification and labelling According to Regulation (EC) No O 1272/2008 2 , which corresponds to the GHS. If the approval service cannot decide on the new classification and labelling before mid-2017, it may extend the time limits set out in para. 1 for the product concerned.

3 ... 3


1 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
2 See note on s. 3, para. 1, let. D.
3 Repealed by c. 4 of the annex to the O of 7 Nov 2012, with effect from 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 6103 ).

Art. 86 B 1 Transitional provision relating to the amendment of 20 May 2015

For plant protection products which, in accordance with Art. 86 A , para. 1, have been labelled and packaged according to the old right, security data sheets established under the old right may be submitted until May 31, 2018.


1 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).

Art. 86 C 1 Transitional provisions relating to the modification of 28 October 2015

1 The application package for the registration of an active substance in Schedule 1 may be filed in accordance with the requirements of the former right by December 31, 2016.

2 The application package for authorisation to release a phytosanitary product may be filed in accordance with the requirements of the old right by 31 December 2016.


1 Introduced by ch. I of the O du DEFR of 28 Oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 ( RO 2015 4555 ).

Section 3 Entry into force

Art.

This order shall enter into force on 1 Er July 2011.

Annex 1 1

(art. 5, 10, 10 B, 10 E , 17, 21, 23, 40 A , 55 A , 61, 72 and 86)

Approved active substances whose incorporation is permitted in plant protection products

Part A: Chemical substances

Common Name, Identification Number

UICPA Name

CAS No.

No CIPAC

Type of action taken/Specific conditions

(S) -cis-Verbenol

[S-(1a, 2a, 5a)] -4,6,6-trimethylbicyclo [3.1.1] - hept-3-en-2-ol

18881-04-4

-

Pheromone

1-decanol

Decan-1-ol

112-30-1

831

Phytoregulator

12 OH

Dodecan-1-ol

112-53-8

-

Pheromone

14 OH

Tetradecan-1-ol

112-72-1

-

Pheromone

1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP)

1-methylcyclopropene

3100-04-7

767

Phytoregulator

1-naphthyl acetic acid

1-naphthylacetic acid

86-87-3

313

Phytoregulator

2 - (1-naphthyl) acetamide

2 - (1-naphthyl) acetamide

86-86-2

282

Phytoregulator

2,4-D

(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) acetic acid

94-75-7

1

Herbicide

6-benzyladenine

N 6 -benzyladenine

1214-39-7

-

Phytoregulator

Abamectin

Avermectin B1

71751-41-2

495

Insecticide; acaricide

Acequinocyl

3-dodecyl-1,4-dihydro-1,4-dioxo-2-naphthyl acetate

57960-19-7

760

Acaricide

Acetamiprid

(E) -N1-[(6-chloro-3-pyridyl) methyl] -N2-cyano-N1-methylacetamidine

135410-20-7

649

Insecticide

Acibenzolar-S-methyl

S-methyl benzo [1,2, 3] thiadiazol-7-carbothioate

135158-54-2

597

Natural defenses stimulator

Acetic acid

Acetic acid

64-19-7

-

Herbicide

Benzoic acid

Benzoate

65-85-0

622

Disinfectant product

A4 + A7 gibberellic acid

(3S, 3aR, 4S, 4aR, 7R, 9aR, 9bR, 12S) -12-hydroxy-3-methyl-6-methylene-2-oxoperhydro-4a, 7-methano - (3,9b-propanoazuleno/9b, 3-propenoazuleno) [1,2 -b] furan-4-carboxylic acid

468-44-0/510-75-8

307

Phytoregulator

Sulphuric acid on clay soil

Sulfuric acid

10043-01-3

-

Fungicide bactericide

Fatty acids from C7 to C20

Insecticide, accaricide, herbicide, phytoregulator

(Hydroenlargonic acid)

Nonanoic acid

112-05-0

888

(Fatty acids in C7-C18)

67701-09-1

889

(Caprylic acid)

Octanoic acid

124-07-2

887

(capric acid)

Decanoic acid

334-48-5

886

(Fatty acids from C7 to C20)

891

(oleic acid)

Cis-octadec-9-enoic acid

112-07-80

894

(and sodium and potassium salts of these acids)

Octanoic acid (as Na and Fe salts)

Octanoic acid

124-07-2

-

Healing product

Aclonifen

2-chloro-6-nitro-3-phenoxyaniline

74070-46-5

498

Herbicide

Aldicarb

2-methyl-2 - (methylthio) propionaldehyde O-methylcarbamoyloxime

116-06-3

215

Nematicide; limited use in the control of crown nematode in sugar beet

Alpha-Cypermethrin

A racemate comprising (S) - a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (1R, 3R) -3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate and (R) - a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (1S, 3S) -3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate

67375-30-8

454

Insecticide

Alpha-Pinen

2 ,6,6-Trimethylbicyclo [3.1.1] hept-2-en

2437-95-8

-

Pheromone

Amidosulfuron

1 - (4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl) -3-mesyl (methyl) sulfamoylurea

120923-37-7

515

Herbicide

Aminopyralide

4-amino-3,6-dichloropyridine-2-carboxylic acid

150114-71-9

771

Herbicide

Amisulbrom

3 - (3-Brom-6-fluor-2-methylindol-1-ylsulfonyl) - N, N-dimethyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-sulfonamid

348635-87-0

789

Fungicide

Asulam

Methyl 4-aminophenylsulfonylcarbamate

3337-71-1

240

Herbicide

Azadirachtin A + B

Dimethyl (2aR, 3S, 4S, 4aR, 5S, 7aS, 8S, 10R, 10aS, 10bR) -10-(acetyloxy) octahydro-3,5-dihydroxy-4-methyl-8 - [[(2E) -2-methyl-1-oxo-2-butenyl] oxy] -4-[(1aR, 2S, 3aS, 6aS, 7S, 7aS) -3a, 6a, 7, 7a-tetrahydro-6a-hydroxy-7a-methyl-2,7-methanofuro [2,3-b] oxireno [e] oxepin-1a (2H) - yl] -1H, 7H-naph Tho [1,8-bc: 4, 4a-c '] difuran-5,10a (8H) - dicarboxylate

11141-17-6

627 (for Azad. A)

Insecticide

Azoxystrobin

Methyl (E) -2-{2 [6 - (2-cyanophenoxy) pyrimidin-4-yloxy] phenyl} -3-methoxyacrylate

131860-33-8

571

Fungicide

Beflubutamid

(RS) - N-benzyl-2 - (á, á, á, 4-tetrafluoro-m-tolyloxy) butyramide

113614-08-7

662

Herbicide

Benalaxyl

Methyl N-phenylacetyl-N-2.6-xylyl-DL-alaninate

71626-11-4

416

Fungicide

Benalaxyl-M

Methyl N - (phenylacetyl) -N-(2,6-xylyl) -D - alaninate

98243-83-5

766

Fungicide

Benoxacor

(±) -4-dichloroacetyl-3,4-dihydro-3-methyl-2H-1,4-benzoxamine

98730-04-2

-

Herbicide "safener"

Bentazone

3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4 (3H) - one 2.2-dioxide

25057-89-0

366

Herbicide

Benthiavalicarb

[(S) -1-{[(1R) -1-(6-fluoro-1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl) ethyl] carbamoyl} -2-methylpropyl] carbamic acid Variant : benthiavalicarb-isopropyl

413615 -35-7 177406-68-7

744 744.204

Fungicide

Beta-Cyfluthrin

(1RS, 3RS; 1RS, 3SR) - 3 - (2,2-Dichlorvinyl) - 2,2-dimethylcyclopropancarboxylsäure (SR) - á-cyano - (4-fluor-3-phenoxy-phenyl) methylester

68359-37-5

482

Seed disinfectant

Potassium icarbonate

Potassium hydrogencarbonate

298-14-6

-

Fungicide

Bifenazate

Isopropyl 3 - (4-methoxybiphenyl-3-yl) carbazate

149877-41-8

736

Acaricide

Bifenox

Methyl 5 - (2,4-dichlorophenoxy) -2-nitrobenzoate

42576-02-3

413

Herbicide

Bifenthrin

2-methylbiphenyl-3-ylmethyl (Z)-(1RS; 3RS) -3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate

82657-04-3

415

Acaricide

Bixafen

N - (3 ', 4' - dichloro-5-fluoro [1,1 ' - biphenyl] -2-yl) -3-(difluoromethyl) -1-methyl - 1 H -pyrazole-4-carboxamide

581809-46-3

819

Fungicide

Boscalid

2-Chloro-N - (4 ' - chlorobiphenyl-2-yl) nicotinamide

188425-85-6

673

Fungicide

Bromadiolone

3 - [3 - (4-bromobiphenyl-4-yl) -3-hydroxy-1-phenylpropyl] -4-hydroxycoumarin

28772-56-7

371

Rodenticide

Bromoxynil

3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile Variant : bromoxynil butyrate Variant : bromoxynil octanoate Variant :bromoxynil - potassium

1689-84-5 3861-41-4 1689-99-2 2961-68-4

87 87.403 87.407 87.019

Herbicide

Bromuconazole

1 - [(2RS, 4RS: 2RS, 4SR) -4 - bromo-2 - (2,4-dichlorophenyl) tetrahydrofurfuryl] - 1H-1,2,4 -triazole

116255-48-2

680

Fungicide

Bupirimate

5-butyl-2-ethylamino-6-methylpyrimidin-4-yl dimethylsulfamate

41483-43-6

261

Fungicide

Buprofezin

(Z) - 2-tert-butylimino-3-isopropyl-5-phenyl-1,3,5-thiadiazinan-4-one

953030-84-7

681

Insecticide

Captan

N - (trichloromethylthio) cyclohex-4-ene-1,2-dicarboximide

133-06-2

40

Fungicide

Carbendazim

Methyl benzimidazol-2-ylcarbamate

10605-21-7

263

Fungicide

Carbetamide

(R) -1-(ethylcarbamoyl) ethyl carbanilate

16118-49-3

95

Herbicide

Calcium Carbonate (chalk)

Calcium carbonate

471-34-1

-

Game repellent

Carboxin

5.6-dihydro-2-methyl-1,4-oxathi-ine-3-carboxanilide

5234-68-4

273

Fungicide

Carfentrazone-ethyl

Ethyl 2-chloro-3 - (2-chloro-4-fluoro-5 - [4 - (difluoromethyl) -4,5,dihydro-3-methyl-5 - oxo-1H 1,2,4 ,triazol-1-yl] phenyl) propanoate

128639-02-1

587.202

Herbicide

Chalcogran

2-Ethyl-1,6-dioxaspiro [4, 4] nonan

-

Pheromone

Chlorantraniliprole

3-Bromo-N - [4-chloro-2-methyl-6 - (methylcarbamoyl) phenyl] - 1 - (3-chloropyridin-2-yl) - 1 H-pyrazole-5-carboxyamide

500008-45-7

794

Insecticide

Chloridazone

5-amino-4-chloro-2-phenylpyridazin-3 (2H) - one

1698-60-8

111

Herbicide

Chlormequat

Phytoregulator

(Chlormequat)

2-chloroethyltrimethyl-ammonium

7003-89-6

143

(Chlormequat chloride)

2-chloroethyltrimethyl-ammonium chloride

999-81-5

143.302

Chlorothalonil (TCPN)

Tetrachloroisophthalonitrile

1897-45-6

288

Fungicide

Chlorotoluron

3 - (3-chloro-p-tolyl) - 1,1-dimethylurea

15545-48-9

217

Herbicide

Chlorpropham (CPIC)

Isopropyl 3-chlorocarbanilate

101-21-3

43

Herbicide, phytoregulator

Chlorpyrifos

O, O-diethyl O-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl phosphorothioate

2921-88-2

221

Insecticide

Chlorpyrifos-methyl

O, O-dimethyl O-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl phosphorothioate

5598-13-0

486

Acaricide

Clethodim

(±) -2-[(E) -1-[(E) -3-chloroallyloxyimino] propyl] -5-[2 - (ethylthio) propyl] -3-hydroxycyclohex-2-enone

99129-21-2

508

Herbicide

Clodinafop-propargyl

Prop-2-ynyl (R) -2-[4 - (5-chloro-3-fluoropyridin-2-yloxy) phenoxy] propionate

105512-06-9

683.225

Herbicide

Clofentezin

3,6-bis (2-chlorophenyl) -1,2,4,5 - tetrazine

74115-24-5

418

Acaricide

Clomazone

2 - (2-chlorobenzyl) -4,4-dimethyl-1,2-oxazolidin-3 - one

81777-89-1

509

Herbicide

Clopyralid

3,6-dichloropyridine-2-carboxylic acid

1702-17-6

455

Herbicide

Cloquintocet-mexyl

1-methylhexyl (5-chloroquinolin-8-yloxy) acetate

99607-70-2

-

Herbicide "safener"

Clothianidin

(E) -1-(2-chloro-1,3-thiazol-5-ylmethyl) -3-methyl - 2-nitroguanidine

210880-92-5

738

Insecticide

COS-OGA

Linear Copolymer of á-1,4-D-galactopyranosyluronic acids and methylesterified galactopyranosyluronic acids (9 to 20 residues) with a linear copolymer of 2-amino-2-deoxy-D-binding-D-glucopyranose and 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-D-glucopyranose (5 to 10 residues)

979

Fungicide

Copper

Copper Variant (as carbonate, alkaline): [ì - [carbonato (2−) - êO :êO']] dihydroxydicopper Variant (as hydroxide): copper (II) hydroxide Variant (as a chlorocalcium hydroxide) Variant (as powders by broillie Bordeaux): A mixture of calcium hydroxide and copper (II) sulfate Variant (as naphthenate): copper naphthenate Variant (as octanate): copper octanoate Variant (in the form of oxychloride): dicopper chloride trihydroxide Variant (as sulphate): copper (II) tetraoxosulfate Variant (tetracuum hexahydroxysulphate): cupric sulfate-tricupric hydroxide

12002-03-8 12069-69-1 20427-59-2 8011-63-0 1338-02-9 20543-04-8 1332-40-7 7758-98-7 1333-22-8

44-44.305 44.604-44.407 44.602 44.306 -

Fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide

Cyazofamid

4-chloro-2-cyano - N, N -dimethyl-5 - P -tolylimidazole-1-sulfonamide

120116-88-3

653

Fungicide

Cycloxydim

(±) -2-[1 - (ethoxyimino) butyl] -3-hydroxy-5 - thian-3-ylcyclohex-2-enone

101205-02-1

510

Herbicide

Cyflufenamid

(Z) -N-[á - (cyclopropylmethoxyimino) -2,3-difluoro-6-(trifluoromethyl) benzyl] -2-phenylacetamide

180409-60-3

759

Fungicide

Cymoxanil

1 - (2-cyano-2-methoxyiminoacetyl) -3-ethylurea

57966-95-7

419

Fungicide

Cypermethrin

(RS) - a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (1RS, 3RS; 1RS, 3SR) - 3 - (2,2-dichlorovinyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate

52315-07-8

332

Insecticide

High-cis cypermethrin

(RS) - a-yano-3-phenoxybenzyl (1RS) - cis, trans (> 80 %: <20 %) -3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate

52315-07-8

-

Insecticide

Cyproconazole

(2RS, 3RS; 2RS, 3SR) -2-(4-chlorophenyl) -3 - cyclopropyl-1 - (1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl) butan-2-ol

94361-06-5

600

Fungicide

Cyprodinil

4-cyclopropyl-6-methyl-N-phenylpyrimidin-2-amine

121552-61-2

511

Fungicide

Cyromazine

N-cyclopropyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine

66215-27-8

420

Insecticide, snail

Daminozide

N-dimethylaminosuccinamic acid

1596-84-5

330

Phytoregulator

Dazomet (DMTT)

3,5-dimethyl-1,3,5-thiadiazinane-2-thione

533-74-4

146

Nematicide, fungicide, herbicide, insecticide

D-Carvon

D-2-Methyl-5-isopropenyl-2-cyclohexene-1-on

2244-16-8

602

Phytoregulator

Deltamethrin

(S) - a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (1R, 3R) -3-(2,2-dibromoinyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate

52918-63-5

333

Insecticide

Desmedipham

Ethyl 3-phenylcarbamoyloxyphenylcarbamate

13684-56-5

477

Herbicide

Dicamba

3.6-dichloro-o-anisic acid

1918-00-9

85

Herbicide

Dichlorprop-P

(R) -2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) propionic acid

15165-67-0

476

Herbicide

Diethofencarb

Isopropyl 3,4-diethoxycarbanilate

87130-20-9

513

Fungicide

Difenoconazole

Cis, trans-3-chloro-4 - [4-methyl-2 - (1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl) -1,3-dioxolan-2-yl] phenyl 4-chlorophenyl ether

119446-68-3

687

Fungicide

Diflubenzuron

1 - (4-chlorophenyl) -3-(2,6-difluorobenzoyl) urea

35367-38-5

339

Insecticide

Diflufenican

2,4-difluoro-2 - (a, a, a-trifluoro-m-tolyloxy) nicotinanilide

83164-33-4

462

Herbicide

Dimethachlor

2-chloro-N - (2-methoxyethyl) aceto-2.6-xylidide

50563-36-5

688

Herbicide

Dimethenamide P

S-2-chloro-N - (2,4-dimethyl-3-thienyl) - N - (2-methoxy-1-methylethyl) - acetamide

163515-14-8

638

Herbicide

Dimethoate

O, O-dimethyl S-methylcarbamoylmethyl phosphorodithioate

60-51-5

59

Acaricide

Dimethomorph

(E, Z 4 - [3 - (4-chlorophenyl) -3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl) acryloyl] morpholine

110488-70-5

483

Fungicide

Diquat

1 ,1-ethylene-2.2 'bipyridyldiylium

2764-72-9

55

Herbicide

Dithianon

5.10-dihydro-5,10-dioxonaphtho [2,3-b] - 1,4-dithi-in-2,3-dicarbonitrile

3347-22-6

153

Fungicide

Diuron

3 - (3,4-dichlorophenyl) -1,1-dimethylurea

330-54-1

100

Herbicide

Dodemorph

4-cyclododecyl-2,6-dimethylmorpholine

1593-77-7

300

Fungicide

Dodine

1-dodecylguanidinium acetate

2439-10-3

101

Fungicide

E2Z13-18 Ac

E, Z-2.13 Octadecadien-1-yl acetate

086252-74-6

-

Pheromone

E3Z13-18 Ac

E, Z-3.13 Octadecadien-1-yl acetate

053120-26-6

-

Pheromone

E7Z9-12 Ac

(7E, 9Z) - dodeca-7,9-dien-1-yl acetate

55774-32-8

-

Pheromone

E8-12 Ac

(E) - dodec-8-en-1-yl acetate

38363-29-0

-

Pheromone

E8E10-12 OH (Codlemone)

(E, E) - dodeca-8.10-dien-1-ol

33956-49-9

-

Pheromone

Emamectin benzoate

4 "- deoxy-4"-(methylamino)-(4 " R) - avermectin B1 benzoate

155569-91-8

791

Insecticide

Epoxiconazole

(2RS, 3SR) -1-[3 - (2-chlorophenyl) -2,3-epoxy-2-(4-fluorophenyl) propyl] -1H-1,2,4-triazole

133855-98-8

609

Fungicide

Decadienecarbixylic acid methyl ester

Methyl ester of decadiene-carboxylic acid

-

Pheromone

Ethephon

2-Chloroethylphosphonic acid

16672-87-0

373

Phytoregulator

Ethofumesate

(±) -2-ethoxy-2,3-dihydro-3,3-dimethylbenzofuran - 5-yl methanesufonate

26225-79-6

233

Herbicide

Etofenprox

2 - (4-ethoxyphenyl) -2-methylpropyl 3-phenoxybenzyl ether

80844-07-1

471

Insecticide

Etoxazole

( RS ) -5 - Tert -butyl-2-[2 - (2,6-difluorophenyl) - 4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazol-4-yl] phenetole

153233-91-1

623

Acaricide

Excerpt from prism

-

Fungicide bactericide

Quassia Extract

-

Insecticide

Famoxadone

3-anilino-5-methyl-5 - (4-phenoxyphenyl) -1,3-oxazolidine-2,4-dione

131807-57-3

594

Fungicide

Ride of horns

-

-

Game repellent

Animal Body Farine

-

Game repellent

Yellow mustard flour

-

Fungicide

Fenamidone

( S ) -1-anilino-4-methyl-2-methylthio-4-phenylimidazolin-5 - one

161326-34-7

650

Fungicide

Fenazaquin

4-tert-butylphenethyl quinazolin-4-yl ether

120928-09-8

693

Acarizide

Fenbuconazole

4 - (4-chlorophenyl) -2-phenyl-2-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl) butyronitrile

114369-43-6

694

Fungicide

Fenhexamid

1-Methyl-cyclohexanecarboxyloic acid 2,3-dichloro-4-hydroxy-phenyl) - amide

126833-17-8

603

Fungicide

Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl

(R) -2-[4 - (6-chloro-2-benzoxazol-2-yloxy) phenoxy] propionate

71283-80-2

484.202

Herbicide

Fenoxycarb

Ethyl 2 - (4-phenoxyphenoxy) ethylcarbamate

72490-01-8

425

Insecticide

Fenpropidin

(RS) - 1 - [3 - (4-tert-butylphenyl) - 2-methylpropyl] piperidine

67306-00-7

520

Fungicide

Fenpropimorph

(±) - cis-4 - [3 - (4-tert-butylphenyl) - 2-methylpropyl] - 2,6-dimethylmorpholine

67564-91-4

427

Fungicide

Fenpyrazamine

S-Allyl-5-amino-2,3-dihydro-2-isopropyl-3-oxo-4 - (o-tolyl) pyrazol-1-carbothioat

473798-59-3

832

Fungicide

Fenpyroximate

Tert-butyl (E) - a - (1,3-dimethyl-5-phenoxypyrazol-4-ylmethyleneamino-oxy) - p-toluate

111812-58-9

695

Acaricide

Fipronil

(±) - 5-amino-1 - (2.6-dichloro-a, a, a-trifluoro-p-tolyl) - 4-trifluoromethylsulfinylpyrazole-3-carbonitrile

120068-37-3

581

Insecticide

Flazasulfuron

1 - (4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl) -3-(3-trifluoromethyl-2-pyridylsulfonyl) urea

104040-78-0

595

Herbicide

Flonicamide

N-cyanomethyl-4 - (trifluoromethyl) nicotinamide

158062-67-0

763

Insecticide

Florasulam

2,6,8-trifluoro-5-methoxy [1,2, 4] triazolo [1.5 - C ] pyrimidine-2-sulfonanilide

145701-23-1

616

Herbicide

Fluazifop-P-butyl

Butyl - (R) -2-[4 - (5-trifluormethyl-2-pyridyloxy) phenoxy] propionat

79241-46-6

467.205

Herbicide

Fluazinam

3-chloro-N - (3-chloro-5-trifluoromethyl-2-pyridyl) - a, a, a-trifluoro-2.6-dinitro-p-toluidine

79622-59-6

521

Fungicide

Fludioxonil

4 - (2,2-difluoro-1,3-benzodioxol-4-yl) pyrrole-3-carbonitrile

131341-86-1

522

Fungicide

Flufenacet

N - (4-fluoro-phenyl) - N-isopropyl-2 - (5-trifluoro-methyl - [1,3, 4] thiadiazol-2-yloxy) - acetamide

142459-58-3

588

Herbicide

Flumioxazin

7-fluoro-6 - [(3,4,5,6-tetrahydro) phtalimido] -4-(2-propynyl) -1,4-benzoxazion-3 (2H) - one

103361-09-7

578

Herbicide

Fluopicolide

2.6-dichloro-N - [3-chloro-5 - (trifluoromethyl) - 2-pyridylmethyl] benzamide

239110-15-7

787

Fungicide

Fluopyram

N - {2 - [3-chloro-5 - (trifluoromethyl) - 2-pyridyl] ethyl} - á, á, á-trifluoro-o-toluamide

658066-35-4

807

Fungicide

Flutolanil

á, á, á, - trifluoro-3 ' - isopropoxy-o-toluanilide

66332-96-5

524

Fungicide

Fluoxastrobin

(E)-{2 - [6 - (2-chlorophenoxy) -5 - fluoropyrimidin-4-yloxy] phenyl} (5,6-dihydro-1,4,2-dioxazin-3-yl) methanone O-methyloxime

361377-29-9

746

Fungicide

Flupyrsulfuron-methyl-sodium

Methyl 2 - (4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl) -6-trifluoromethylnicotinate monosodium salt

144740-54-5

577.501

Herbicide

Fluquinconazole

3 - (2,4-dichlorophenyl) -6-fluoro-2-(1 H -1,2,4-triazol-1-yl) quinazolin-4 (3 H ) - one

136426-54-5

474

Fungicide

Flurochloridone

(3RS, 4RS; 3RS, 4SR) -3-cloro-4-chloromethyl-1-(a, a, a-trifluoro - M -tolyl) -2-pyrrolidone

61213-25-0

430

Herbicide

Fluroxypyr

4-amino-3,5-dichloro-6-fluoro-2-pyridyloxyacetic acid Variant : fluroxypyr-meptyl

69377-81-7 81406-37-3

431 431.214

Herbicide

Flusilazole

Bis (4-fluorophenyl) (methyl) (1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl) silane

85509-19-9

435

Fungicide

Fluxapyroxad

3 - (Difluormethyl) - 1-methyl-N - (3 ', 4', 5 ' - trifluorbiphenyl-2-yl) pyrazol-4-carboxamid

907204-31-3

828

Fungicide

Folpet

N - (trichloromethylthio) phthalimide

133-07-3

75

Fungicide

Foramsulfurone

1 - (4, 6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2yl) -3-(2-dimethylcarbamoyl-5-formamidophenylsulfonyl) urea

173159-57-4

659

Herbicide

Fosetyl

Ethyl hydrogen phosphonate Variant : Aluminiumfosetyl (Fosetyl-Al) Aluminium-tris- (O-ethylphosphonat)

15845-66-6 39148-24-8

384 384.013

Fungicide

Fuberidazole

2 - (2-furyl) benzimidazole

3878-19-1

525

Fungicide

Gibberellin A3

(3S, 3aS, 4S, 4aS, 7S, 9aR, 9bR, 12S) -7,12-dihydroxy-3-methyl-6-methylene-2-oxoperhydro-4a, 7-methano-9b, 3-propeno [1,2-b] furan-4-carboxylic acid

77-06-5

-

Phytoregulator

Glufosinate

4- [hydroxy (methyl) phosphinoyl] -DL-homoalanine

51276-47-2

437

Herbicide

Glyphosate

N - (phosphonomethyl) glycine

1071-83-6

284

Herbicide

Glyphosate-trimesium

N- (Phosphonomethyl) -glycin-trimethylsulfoniumsalz

81591-81-3

284.114

Herbicide

Wool grease

-

Game repellent

Gras of sheep

Game repellent

Haloxyfop (R) - methylester

(R) -Methyl-2-[4 - (3-chloro-5 - (trifluoro-methyl) -2-pyridyloxy) - phenoxyl] - propionate

72619-32-0

526.201

Herbicide

Hexythiazox

(4RS5RS) -5-(4-chlorophenyl) -N-cyclohexyl - 4-methyl-2-oxothiazolidine-3-carboxamide

78587-05-0

439

Acaricide

Aromatic oil

-

Game repellent

Rapeseed oil

Rapeseed oil

68187-84-8

-

Insecticide

Eucalyptus oil

-

-

-

Insecticide

Mint Oil

Mint oil

8008-79-5

908

Phytoregulator

Paraffin oil

8012-95-1, 64742-46-7, 72623-86-0, 8042-47-5, 97862-82-3

-

Insecticide

Refined Sesame Oil

Fatty acid glycerol ester

-

Insecticide (synergist)

Essential Oils

-

Game repellent

Maleic Hydrazide

6-hydroxy-2H-pyridazine-3-one

123-33-1

310

Phytoregulator

Calcium hydroxide (hydrated lime, lime)

Ca (OH) 2

1305-62-0

-

Healing product

Hymexazol

5-methylisoxazol-3-ol

10004-44-1

528

Seed infecting

Imazalil

(±) -1-(b-allyloxy-2,4-dichlorophenylethyl) imidazole

35554-44-0

335

Fungicide

Imazamox

(RS) -2-(4-isopropyl-4-methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl) -5 - methoxymethylnicotinic acid

114311-32-9

619

Herbicide

Imidacloprid

1 - (6-chloro-3-pyridinylmethyl) -N - nitroimidazolidin-2-ylideneamine

138261-41-3

582

Insecticide

Indoxacarb

(S) - methyl 7-chloro-2,5-dihydro-2 [[(methoxy-carbonyl) [4- (trifluoro-methoxy) phenyl] amino] carbonyl] -indeno [1,2-e] [1,3, 4] oxadiazine-4a (3H) - carboxylate

173584-44-6

612

Insecticide

Iodosulfuron

Methyl 4-iodo-2 - [3 - (4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,2,5-triazin-2-yl) ureidosulfonyl] benzoate, sodium salt

144550-36-7

634

Herbicide

Ioxynil

4-Hydroxy-3,5-di-iodobenzonitrile Variant : octanoate Variant : ioxynil butyrate Variant :ioxynil sodium

1689-83-4 3861-47-0 2961-62-8

86 86.407 86.403 86.011

Herbicide

Iprodione

3 - (3,5-dichlorophenyl) -N - isopropyl-2,4-dioxoimidazolidine-1-carboxamide

36734-19-7

278

Fungicide

Iprovalicarb

{2-Methyl-1 - [1 - (4-methylphenyl) - ethylcarbonyl] - propyl} - carbamic acid isopropyl ester

140923-17-7

620

Fungicide

Ipsdienol

(S) -2-methyl-6-methyleneocta-2,7-dien-4-ol

35628-00-3

-

Pheromone

Isoproturon

3 - (4-isopropylphenyl) -1,1-dimethylurea

34123-59-6

336

Herbicide

Isoxadifen-ethyl

Ethyl 5,5-diphenyl-2-isoxazoline-3-carboxylate

163520-33-0

666.202

Herbicide "safener"

Isoxaflutole

5-cyclopropyl-1,2-oxazol-4-yl a, a, a-trifluoro-2-mesyl-p-tolyl ketone

141112-29-0

575

Herbicide

Japan Myths Oil

-

-

-

Insecticide

Kaolin

Kaolin (CA Name)

1332-58-7

-

Insecticide

Kresoxim-methyl

Methyl (E) -2-methoxyimino-[2 - (o-tolyloxymethyl) phenyl] acetate

143390-89-0

568

Fungicide

Lambda-Cyhalothrin

(S) - a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (Z)-(1R, 3R) -3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate and (R) - a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (Z)-(1S, 3S) -3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate

91465-08-6

463

Insecticide

Laminarine

(1-3) - 13-D-glucan

9008-22-4

671

Natural defenses stimulator

Lecithin

L-a-Phosphatidyl choline

8002-43-5

-

Fungicide

Lenacile

3-cyclohexyl-1,5,6,7-tetrahydrocyclopentapyrimidine-2,4 (3H) - dione

2164-08-1

163

Herbicide

Limonen

4-isopropenyl-1-metyhlcyclohexene

5989-27-5

-

Pheromone

Linuron

3 - (3,4-dichlorophenyl) -1-methoxy-1-methylurea

330-55-2

76

Herbicide

Lufenuron

(RS) -1-[2,5-dichloro-4 - (1,1,2,3,3,3,3-hexafluoropropoxy) phenyl] -3-(2,6-difluorobenzoyl) urea

103055-07-8

704

Acaricide

Maltodextrin

9050-36-6

801

Acaricide

Mancozeb

Manganese ethylenebis (dithiocarbamate) (polymeric) complex with zinc salt

8018-01-7

34

Fungicide

Mandipropamid

(RS) -2-(4-chlorophenyl) -N-[3-methoxy-4 - (prop-2-ynyloxy) phenethyl] -2-(prop-2-ynyloxy) acetamide

374726-62-2

783

Fungicide

Maneb

Manganese ethylenebis (ditiocarbamate) (polymeric)

12427-38-2

61

Fungicide

MCPA

(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy) acetic acid

94-74-6

2

Herbicide

MCPB

4 - (4-chloro-o-tolyloxy) butyric acid

94-81-5

50

Herbicide

Mecoprop-P

(R) - 2 - (4-chloro-o-tolyloxy) propionic acid

16484-77-8

475

Herbicide

Mefenpyr-diethyl

Diethyl (RS) -1-(2,4-dichlororphenyl) -5 - methyl-2-pyrazoline-3,5-dicarboxylate

135590-91-9

651.229

Herbicide "safener"

Mixtures of vegetable oils, natural resins and lipids

-

Game repellent

Mepanipyrim

N - (4-methyl-6-prop-1-ynylpyrimidin-2-yl) aniline

110235-47-7

611

Fungicide

Mepiquat

1,1-dimethylpiperidinium Variant : Mepiquat-chloride

15302-91-7 24307-26-4

440 440.302

Phytoregulator

Mesosulfuron-methyl

Methyl 2 - [3 - (4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl) ureidosulfonyl] -4-methanesulfonamidomethylbenzoate

208465-21-8

663.201

Herbicide

Mesotrione

2 - (4-mesyl-2-nitrobenzoyl) cyclohexane-1,3-dione

104206-82-8

625

Herbicide

Metalaxyl-M

Methyl N - (methocyacetyl) - N-2.6-xylyl-D-alaninate

70630-17-0

580

Fungicide

Metaldehyde

R-2,c-4,c-6,c-8-tetramethyl-1,3,5,7-tetroxocane

108-62-3

62

Molluscicide

Metamitron

4-amino-4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-6-phenyl-1,2,4-triazin-5-one

41394-05-2

381

Herbicide

Metazachlor

2-chloro-N - (pyrazol-1-ylmethyl) acet-2.6-xylidide

67129-08-2

411

Herbicide

Metconazole

(1RS, 5RS; 1RS, 5SR) -5-(4-chlorobenzyl) -2,2-dimethyl-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1ylmethyl) cyclopentanol

125116-23-6

706

Fungicide

Methiocarb (Mercaptodimethur)

4-methylthio-3,5-xylyl methylcarbamate

2032-65-7

165

Molluscicide, insecticide, acaricide

Methomyl

S-methyl N - (methylcarbamoyloxy) thioacetimidate

16752-77-5

264

Acaricide

Methoxyfenozide

N -tert-butyl - N' - (3-methoxy-o-toluoyl) - 3,5-xylohydrazide

161050-58-4

656

Insecticide

Methylbutenol

2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol

115-18-4

-

Pheromone

Metiram

Ethylenebis (dithiocarbamate) - poly (ethylenethiuram disulfide)

9006-42-2

478

Fungicide

Metosulam

N - (2,6-dichloro-3-methylphenyl) -5,7-dimethoxy-[1,2, 4] triazolo [1,5-a] pyrimidine-2-sulphonamide

139528-85-1

707

Herbicide

Metrafenone

3 '- bromo-2,3,4,6' - tetramethoxy-2 ', 6-dimethylbenzophenone

220899-03-6

752

Fungicide

Metribuzin

4-amino-6-tert-butyl-4,5-dihydro-3-methylthio-1,2,4-triazin-5-one

21087-64-9

283

Herbicide

Metsulfuron-methyl

Methyl-2 - [[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-zyl) - amino] carbonyl] amino] sulfonil] benzoate

74223-64-6

441.201

Herbicide

Milbémectin

Mixture of 70 % (10E,14E,16E)-(1R,4S,5 'S,6R,6' R,8R,13R,20R,21R,24S) -6 '- ethyl-21 ,24-dihydroxy-5', 11 ,13 ,22-tetramethyl-(3,7,19-trioxatetracyclo [15.6.1.14 ,8.020, 24] pentacosa-10, 14, 16, 22-tetraene) -6-spiro-2 '-(tetrahydropyran) -2 - one and 30 % (10E,14E,16E)-(1R,4S,5 'S,6R,6' R,8R,13R,20R,21R,24S) -21 ,24-dihydroxy-5 ', 6', 11 ,13 ,22-pentamethyl-(3,7,19-trioxatetracyclo [15.6.1.14 ,8.020, 24] pentacosa-10, 14, 16, 22-tetraene) -6-spiro-2 '-(tetrahydropyran) -2 - one

51596-10-2 (milbemycin A3) + 51596-11-3 (milbemycin A4)

660

Acaricide, insecticide

Myclobutanil

2-p-chlorophenyl-2 - (1H-1,2,4-triazole-1-ylmethyl) hexanenitrile

88671-89-0

442

Fungicide

Napropamide

(RS) -N, N-diethyl-2 - (1-naphthyloxy) propionamide

15299-99-7

271

Herbicide

Nicosulfuron

2 - (4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl) -N, N-dimethylnicotinamide

111991-09-4

709

Herbicide

Potassium nitrate (saltp)

KNO 3

7757-79-1

-

Rodenticide

Oleum foeniculi

Fennel oil

-

Fungicide

Orthophenylphenol

[1,1 ' - biphenyl] -2-ol

90-43-7

246

Disinfectant product

Oryzalin

3,5-dinitro-N4, N4-dipropylsulfanilamide

19044-88-3

537

Herbicide

Oxasulfuron

Oxetan-3-yl 2 - [(4,6-dimethylpyridin-2-yl) - carbamoylsulfamoyl] - benzoate

144651-06-9

626

Herbicide

Oxychinolin

8-Hydrochinolinsulfat

148-24-3

-

Fungicide

Aluminum oxide

Al 2 O 3

1344-28-1

-

Fungicide

Silicon oxide

Silicon dioxide

7631-86-9

-

Fungicide

Oxyfluorfen

2-chloro-a, - a, - a-trifluoro-p-tolyl 3-ethoxy-4-nitrophenyl ether

42874-03-3

538

Herbicide

Paclobutrazol

(2RS, 3RS) -1-(4-chlorophenyl) -4,4-dimethyl-2-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl) pentan-3-ol

76738-62-0

445

Phytoregulator

Penconazole

1 - (2,4-dichloro-b-propylphenethyl) - 1H-1,2,4-triazole

66246-88-6

446

Fungicide

Pencycuron

1 - (4-chlorobenzyl) -1-cyclopentyl-3-phenylurea

66063-05-6

402

Seed infecting

Pendimethaline

N - (1-ethylpropyl) -2,6-dinitro-3,4-xylidine

40487-42-1

357

Herbicide

Penoxsulam

3 - (2,2-difluoroethoxy) -N-(5,8-dimethoxy [1,2, 4] triazolo [1.5-c] pyrimidin-2-yl) - á, á, á-trifluorotoluene-2-sulfonamide

219714-96-2

758

Herbicide

Penthiopyrade

(RS) -N-[2 - (1,3-Dimethylbutyl) -3-thienyl] -1 - methyl-3 - (trifluormethyl) pyrazol-4-carboxamid

183675-82-3

824

Fungicide

Pethoxamide

2-chloro-N - (2-ethoxyethyl) - N - (2-methyl-1-phenylprop-1-enyl) acetamide

106700-29-2

665

Herbicide

Phenmedipham

Methyl 3 - (3-methylcarbaniloyloxy) carbanilate

13684-63-4

77

Herbicide

Phosmet

O, O-dimethyl S-phthalimidomethyl phosphorodithioate

732-11-6

318

Acaricide

Iron Phosphate III

Ferric phosphate

10045-86-0

-

Molluscicide

Potassium phosphonate

KH2PO3 and K2HPO3

756

Fungicide

Aluminum phosphide

Phosphide aluminum

20859-73-8

227

Rodenticide

Calcium phosphide

It 3 P 2

1305-99-3

505

Rodenticide

Magnesium phosphide

Trimagnesium diphosphide

12057-74-8

228

Crop protection

Picloram

4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropyridine-2-carboxylic acid

1918-02-1

174

Herbicide

Picoxystrobin

Methyl (E) -3-methoxy-2-[2 - (6-trifluoromethyl-2-pyridyloxymethyl) phenyl] acrylate

117428-22-5

628

Fungicide

Pinoxaden

8 - (2.6-diethyl-p-tolyl) - 1,2,4,5-tetrahydro-7-oxo-7H-pyrazolo [1,2-d] [1,4, 5] oxadiazepin-9-yl 2,2-dimethylpropionate

243973-20-8

776

Herbicide

Piperonyl butoxid

2 - (2-butoxyethoxy) ethyl 6-propypiperonyl ether

51-03-6

33

Synergist

Pirimicarb

2-dimethylamino-5,6-dimethylpyrimidin-4-yl dimethylcarbamate

23103-98-2

231

Insecticide

Pirimiphos-methyl

O, O-dimethyl O-2-diethylamino-6-methylpyrimidin-4-yl phosphorothioate

29232-93-7

239

Acaricide

Prochloraz

N-propyl-N - [2 - (2,4,6-trichlorophenoxy) ethyl] imidazole-1-carboxamide

67747-09-5

407

Fungicide

Prohexadione-calcium

3-oxido-5-oxo-4-propionylcyclohex-3-enecarboxylate

127277-53-6

567.020

Phytoregulator

Propamocarb

Propyl 3 - (dimethylamino) propylcarbamate Variant : propamocarb hydrochloride

24579-73-5 25606-41-1

399 399.601

Fungicide

Propaquizafop

2-isopropylideneamino-oxyethyl (R) -2-[4 - (6-chloroquinoxalin-2-yloxy) phenoxy] propionate

111479-05-1

713

Herbicide

Propiconazole

(±) -1-[2 - (2,4-dichlorophenyl) -4-propyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-ylmethyl] -1H-1,2,4-triazole

60207-90-1

408

Fungicide

Propineb

Polymeric zinc propylenebis (dithiocarbamate)

12071-83-9

177

Fungicide

Propoxycarbazone-sodium

Methyl 2 - (4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-5-oxo-3-propoxy-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl) carboxamidosulfonylbenzoate, sodium salt

181274-15-7

655.011

Herbicide

Propyzamide

3,5-dichloro-N - (1,1-dimethylpropynyl) benzamide

23950-58-5

315

Herbicide

Proquinazid

6-iodo-2-propoxy-3-propylquinazolin-4 (3H) - one

189278-12-4

764

Fungicide

Prosulfocarb

S-benzyl dipropylthiocarbamate

52888-80-9

539

Herbicide

Prosulfuron

1 - (4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl) -3-[2 - (3,3,3-trifluoropropyl) - phenylsulfonyl] - urea

94125-34-5

579

Herbicide

Protein

-

Game repellent

Prothioconazole

(RS) -2-[2 - (1-chlorocyclopropyl) -3-(2-chlorophenyl) -2-hydroxypropyl] -2,4-dihydro-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione

178928-70-6

745

Fungicide

Pymetrozine

(E) -4,5 - dihydro-6-methyl-4 - (3-pyridylmethyleneamino) -1,2,4-triazin-3 (2H) - one

123312-89-0

593

Insecticide

Pyraclostrobin

Methyl N - (2 - {[1 - (4-chlorophenyl) -1H - pyrazol-3-yl] oxymethyl} phenyl) N-methoxy carbamate

175013-18-0

657

Fungicide

Pyraflufen-ethyl

Ethyl 2-chloro-5 - (4-chloro-5-difluoromethoxy-1-methylpyrazol-3-yl) -4-fluorophenoxyacetate

129630-17-7

605.202

Herbicide

Pyrethrin

(Z)-(S) -2-methyl-4-oxo-3-(penta-2,4-dienyl) cyclopent-2-enyl (1R, 3R) -2,2-dimethyl-3-(2-methylprop-1-enyl) cyclopropanecarboxylate

121-21-1

32

Acaricide

Pyridate

6-chloro-3-phenylpyridazin-4-yl S-octyl thiocarbonate

55512-33-9

447

Herbicide

Pyrimethanil

N - (4,6-dimethylpyrimidin-2-yl) aniline

53112-28-0

714

Fungicide

Pyroxsulam

N - (5,7-dimethoxy [1,2, 4] triazolo [1,5-a] pyrimidin-2-yl) -2-methoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl) pyridine-3-sulfonamide

422556-08-9

793

Herbicide

Quinoclamine

2-amino-3-chloro-1,4-naphthoquinone

2797-51-5

648

Herbicide, algicide

Quinoxyfen

5,7-dichloro-4-quinolyl-4-fluorophenyl ether

124495-18-7

566

Fungicide

Quizalofop-P-ethyl

Ethyl (R) -2-[4 - (6-chlorquinoxalin-2-yloxy) phenoxy] propionate

100646-51-3

641.202

Herbicide

Game repellent (basic material)

-

Game repellent

Rimsulfuron

1 - (4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl) -3-(etylsulfonyl-2-pyridylsulfonyl) urea

122931-48-0

716

Herbicide

Potassium Savon

-

Fungicide

Mineral salts

-

Game repellent

Metolachlor

(S) - 2-chloro-N - (2-ethyl-6-methyl-phenyl) - N - (2methoxy-1-methyl-ethyl) - acetamide

87392-12-9

607

Herbicide

Sulphur

Sulfur

7704-34-9

18

Fungicide, acaricide

Spinosad

Mixture of spinosyn A and spinosyn D

168316-95-8

636

Insecticide

Spirodiclofen

3 - (2,4-dichlorophenyl) -2-oxo-1-oxaspiro [4.5] dec-3-en-4-yl 2.2 dimethylbutyrate

148477-71-8

737

Acaricide

Spirotetramat

Cis-4 - (ethoxycarbonyloxy) -8-methoxy-3-(2,5-xylyl) -1-azaspiro [4.5] dec-3-en-2-one

203313-25-1

795

Insecticide

Spiroxamine

8-tert-butyl-1,4-dioxaspiro [4.5] decan-2-ylmethyl (ethyl) (propyl)amine

118134-30-8

572

Fungicide

Styrol-Butylacrylat-Copolymerisat

-

Game repellent

Sulcotrione

2 - (2-chloro-4-mesylbenzoyl) -1,3-cyclohexane-1,3 - dione

99105-77-8

723

Herbicide

Iron Sulfate II

FeO 4 S X H2O

13463-43-9

-

Herbicide

Sulfosulfuron

1 - (4.6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl) - 3 - (2-ethylsulfonylimidazo [1,2-a] pyridin-3-yl-sulfonylurea

141776-32-1

601

Herbicide

Sulfuryl fluoride

Sulphuryl fluoride

002699-79-8

757

Insecticide

Tebuconazole

(RS) - 1-p-chlorophenyl-4,4-dimethyl-3 - (1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl) pentan-3-ol

107534-96-3

494

Fungicide

Tebufenozide

N-tert-butyl-N - (4-ethylbenzoyl) - 3,5-dimethylbenzohydrazide

112410-23-8

724

Insecticide

Tebufenpyrad

N - (4-tert-butylbenzyl) - 4-chloro-3-ethyl-1-methylpyrazole-5-carboxamide

119168-77-3

725

Acaricide

Teflubenzuron

1 - (3,5-dichloro-2,4-difluorophenyl) -3-(2,6-difluorobenzoyl) urea

83121-18-0

450

Insecticide

Tefluthrin

2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-methylbenzyl (Z)-(1RS, 3RS) -3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate

79538-32-2

451

Insecticide

Tembotrione

2 - {2-chloro-4-mesyl-3 - [(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy) methyl] benzoyl} cyclohexane-1,3-dione

335104-84-2

790

Herbizid

Tepraloxydime

2 - [1 - (3-chlor - (2E) - propenyloxyimino) propyl] -3-hydroxy-5-(tetrahydropyran-4-yl) cyclohex-2-enon

149979-41-9

608

Herbicide

Terbuthylazine

N2-tert-butyl-6-chloro-N4-ethyl-1,3,5-triazine-2.4-diamine

5915-41-3

234

Herbicide

Thiabendazole

2 - (thiazol-4-yl) benzimidazole

148-79-8

323

Fungicide

Thiacloprid

N - {3 - [(6chloro-3-pyridinyl) methyl] -1,3-thiazolan-2-yliden} cyanamide

111988-49-9

631

Insecticide

Thiamethoxam

( EZ ) -3-(2-chloro-1,3-thiazol-5-ylmethyl) -5 - methyl-1,3,5-oxadiazinan-4-ylidene (nitro) amine

153719-23-4

637

Insecticide

Thiencarbazone

Methyl 4 - [(4,5-dihydro-3-methoxy-4-methyl-5-oxo-1 H-1,2,4-triazol-1 -yl) carbonylsulfamoyl] -5 - methylthiophene-3-carboxylate

317815-83-1

797

Herbicide

Thifensulfuron-methyl

3 - (4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-ylcarbamoylsulamoyl) thiophen-2-carboxylic acid

79277-27-3

452.201

Herbicide

Thiophanate-methyl

Dimethyl 4.4 - (o-phenylene) bis (3-thioallophanate)

23564-05-8

262

Fungicide, healing product

Thiram (TMTD)

Disulfide tetramethylthiuram

137-26-8

24

Fungicide

Tolclofos-methyl

O-2.6-dichloro-p-tolyl O, O-dimethyl phosphorothioate

57018-04-9

479

Fungicide

Tralkoxydim

2 - [1 - (ethoxyimino) propyl] -3-hydroxy-5 - mesitylcyclohex-2-enone

87820-88-0

544

Herbicide

Triadimenol

(1RS, 2RS; 1RS, 2SR) -1-(4-chlorophenoxy) -3,3-dimethyl-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl) butan-2-ol

55219-65-3

398

Fungicide

Triasulfuron

1 - [2 - (2-chloroethoxy) phenylsulfonyl] -3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl) urea

82097-50-5

480

Herbicide

Triazoxide

7-chloro-3-imidazol-1-yl-1,2,4-benzotriazine 1-oxide

72459-58-6

729

Fungicide

Tribenuron

2 - [4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl (methyl) carbamoylsulfamoyl] benzoic acid

106040-48-6

546

Herbicide

Tribenuron-methyl

Methyl ester of 2 - [4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl (methyl) carbamoylsulfamoyl] benzoic acid

101200-48-0

546.201

Herbicide

Triclopyr

3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyloxyacetic acid

55335-06-3

376

Herbicide

Trifloxystrobin

(E, E) - methoxyimino - {2 - [1 - (3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl) - ethylideneaminooxymethyl] - phenyl} - acetic acid methyl ester

141517-21-7

617

Fungicide

Triflumizole

(E) - 4-chloro-a, a, a-trifluoro-N - (1-imidazol-1-yl-2-propoxyethylidene) - o-toluidine

68694-11-1

730

Fungicide

Triflusulfuron-methyl

Methyl 2 - [4-dimethylamino-6 - (2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy) -1,3,5 - triazin-2-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl] - m-toluic acid

126535-15-7

731.201

Herbicide

Trinexapac-ehyl

Ethyl 4-cyclopropyl (hydroxy) methylene-3,5-dioxocyclohexanecarboxylate

95266-40-3

732.202

Phytoregulator

Triticonazole

(±)-(E) -5 + (4-chlorobenzylidene) -2,2-dimethyl-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-methyl) cyclopentanol

131983-72-7

652

Fungicide

Tritosulfuron

1 - (4-methoxy-6-trifluoromethyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl) -3-(2-trifluoromethylbenzenesulfonyl) urea

142469-14-5

735

Herbicide

Validate

Methyl - N - (isopropoxycarbonyl) -L-valyl-(3 RS ) -3-(4-chlorphenyl) - â-alaninat

283159-90-0

857

Fungicide

Vinylcopolymers

-

Game repellent

Vinylesterpolymers

-

Game repellent

Winter Green Oil

-

Insecticide

Z3Z13-18Ac

(Z, Z) -3,13-octadecadienyl acetate

53120-27-7

-

Pheromone

Z8-12 Ac

(Z) - dodec-8-en-1-yl acetate

28079-04-1

-

Pheromone

Z9-12 Ac

(Z) - 9-en-1-yl acetate

-

Pheromone

Z9-14Ac

(Z) - tetradec-9-en-1-yl acetate

16725-53-4

-

Pheromone

Z11-14 Ac

(Z) - tetradec-11-en-1-yl acetate

20711-10-8

-

Pheromone

Z11-14OH

(Z) -11-Tetradecen-1-ol

34010-15-6

Pheromone

Zeta-Cypermethrin

(S) - a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (1RS, 3RS; 1RS, 3SR) -3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate (S); (1RS, 3RS)/(S); (1RS, 3SR) 45-55 to 55-45 resp.

52315-07-8

733

Insecticide

Ziram

Zinc bis (dimethyldithiocarbamate)

137-30-4

31

Fungicide

Zoxamid

3,5-Dichloro-N - (3-chloro-1-ethyl-1-methyl-2-oxopropyl) - p-toluamide

156052-68-5

640

Fungicide

Part B: Micro-organisms

Common Name, Identification Number

Description

Organization

Type of action taken/Specific conditions

Ampelomyces quisqualis

Antagonist Mushroom

Fungus

Fungicide

Aureobasidium pullulans

Antagonist Mushroom

Fungus

Bactericide

Bacillus firmus

Pathogenic bacteria

Bacterium

Nematicide

Bacillus subtilis

Antagonistic Bacteria

Bacteria

Bactericide, fungicide

Bacillus thuringiensis

Enthomopathogenic bacteria

Bacteria

Insecticide

Bacillus thuringiensis var. Aizawai

Entomopathogenic bacteria

Bacteria

Insecticide

Bacillus thuringiensis var. Israeliensis

Enthomopathogenic bacteria

Bacteria

Insecticide

Bacillus thuringiensis var. Kurstaki

Enthomopathogenic bacteria

Bacteria

Insecticide

Bacillus thuringiensis var. Tenebrionis

Enthomopathogenic bacteria

Bacteria

Insecticide

Beauveria bassiana

Entomopathogenic fungus

Fungus

Insecticide

Beauveria brongniartii

Entomopathogenic fungus

Fungus

Insecticide

Coniothyrium minitans

Antagonist Mushroom

Fungus

Fungicide

Gliocladium catenulatum

Antagonist Mushroom

Fungus

Fungicide

Metarhizium anisopliae

Entomopathogenic fungus

Fungus

Insecticide

Paecilomyces fumosoroseus

Entomopathogenic fungus

Fungus

Insecticide

Paecilomyces lilacinus

Pathogenic fungus

Fungus

Nematicide

Phlebia gigantea

Antagonist Mushroom

Fungus

Fungicide

Photorhabdus luminescens

Enthomopathogenic bacteria

Bacteria

Insecticide

Pseudomonas chlororaphis

Antagonistic Bacteria

Bacteria

Seed disinfectant

Pseudomonas sp. (DSMZ 13134)

Antagonistic Bacteria

Bacteria

Fungicide

Pelvic tordworm granulosis virus

Entomopathogenic virus

Viruses

Insecticide

Apple Carpocapse granulosis virus

Entomopathogenic virus

Viruses

Insecticide

Nuclear polyhedrosis virus Helicove R Pa armigera

Entomopathogenic virus

Viruses

Insecticide

Streptomyces griseoviridis

Antagonistic Bacteria

Bacteria

Fungicide

Verticillium lecanii

Entomopathogenic fungus

Fungus

Insecticide

Xenorhabdus bovienii

Enthomopathogenic bacteria

Bacteria

Insecticide

Part C: Macro organizations

Common Name, Identification Number

Description

Organization

Type of action taken/Specific conditions

Adalia bipunctata

Predator Coleoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Amblyseius barkeri (mackenziei)

Predatory mites

Mites

Insecticide

Amblyseius californicus

Predatory mites

Mites

Insecticide

Amblyseius degenerans

Predatory mites

Mites

Insecticide

Anisopteromalus

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Anthocoris nemoralis

Predator times

Insects

Insecticide

Aphelinus abdominalis

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Aphidius colemani

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Aphidius ervi

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Aphidius regimariae

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Aphidoletes aphidimyza

Predator Diptera

Insects

Insecticide

Chrysoperla carnea

Predatory beetles

Insects

Insecticide

Cryptolaemus montrouzieri

Predator Coleoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Dacnusa sibirica

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Diglyphus isaea

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Encarsia formosa

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Encyrtus lecaniorum

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Ephedrus cerasicola

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Eretmocerus eremicus

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Eretmocerus mundus

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Feltiella acarisuga

Predatory midges

Insects

Insecticide

Habrobracon hebetor

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Heterorhabditis bacteriophora

Entomoparasitic nematodes

Nematodes

Insecticide

Heterorhabditis megidis

Entomoparasitic nematodes

Nematodes

Insecticide

Heterorhabditis sp.

Entomoparasitic nematodes

Nematodes

Insecticide

Hypoaspis aculeifer

Predatory mites

Mites

Insecticide

Lariophagus distinguished

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Leptomastidea abnormis

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Leptomastix dactylopii

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Macrolophus pigmaeus

Predator times

Insects

Insecticide

Metaphycus helvolus

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Microterys flavus

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Neoseiulus cucumeris

(synonym: Amblyseius cucumeris)

Predatory mites

Mites

Insecticide

Orius insidiosus

Predator times

Insects

Insecticide

Orius laevigatus

Predator times

Insects

Insecticide

Uppercase Orius

Predator times

Insects

Insecticide

Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita

Parasitic mollusc nematodes

Nematodes

Molluscicide

Phytoseiulus persimilis

Predatory mites

Mites

Insecticide

Praon Volucre

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Pseudaphycus maculipennis

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Steinernema carpocapsae

Entomoparasitic nematodes

Nematodes

Insecticide

Steinernema carpocapsae all strain

Entomoparasitic nematodes

Nematodes

Insecticide

Steinernema feltiae

Entomoparasitic nematodes

Nematodes

Insecticide

Stratiolaelaps Scimitus

Predatory mites

Mites

Insecticide

Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Trichogramma cacoeciae

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Trichogramma evanescens

Parasitic Hymenoptera

Insects

Insecticide

Typhlodromips swirskii

Predatory mites

Mites

Insecticide

Part D: Core substances

Common Name

Specification

Type of action taken/Conditions and restrictions

Ortie Extract

100 % gold extract

Extraction: fermentation in the water then filtration

White Sugar

Foodstuff within the meaning of food law

Use Only as Attractive for Mass Trapping

Skimmed milk (lean milk)

Foodstuff within the meaning of food law

The skimmed milk used must have been heat treated according to a process referred to in s. 49, para. 1, of the order of the DFI of 23 November 2005 on hygiene (OHyg) 2 .

Little milk

Foodstuff within the meaning of food law

The whey used must have been heat treated according to a process referred to in s. 49, para. 1, OHyg.

Wine

Foodstuff within the meaning of food law

Use Only as Attractive for Mass Trapping

Fruit Vinegar

Foodstuff within the meaning of food law

Use Only as Attractive for Mass Trapping

Vinegar of wine

Foodstuff within the meaning of food law

Use Only as Attractive for Mass Trapping

Part E: Substances being considered for substitution

Common Name, Identification Number

N O CASES

1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP)

3100-04-7

Aclonifen

74070-46-5

Bifenthrin

82657-04-3

Bromadiolone

28772-56-7

Bromuconazole

116255-48-2

Carbendazim

10605-21-7

Chlortoluron

15545-48-9

Cyproconazole

94361-06-5

Cyprodinil

121552-61-2

Difenoconazole

119446-68-3

Diflufenican

83164-33-4

Dimethoate

60-51-5

Diquat

2764-72-9

Epoxiconazole

133855-98-8

Etofenprox

80844-07-1

Etoxazole

153233-91-1

Famoxadone

131807-57-3

Fipronil

120068-37-3

Fludioxonil

131341-86-1

Flufenacet

142459-58-3

Flumioxazin

103361-09-7

Fluopicolide

239110-15-7

Fluquinconazole

136426-54-5

Glufosinate

51276-47-2

Haloxyfop (R) - methylester

72619-32-0

Imazamox

114311-32-9

Isoproturon

34123-59-6

Copper

Variant (as carbonate, alkaline): [ì - [carbonato (2−) - êO :êO']] dihydroxydicopper

Variant (as hydroxide): copper (II) hydroxide

Variant (as a chlorocalcium hydroxide)

Variant (as powders by broillie Bordeaux): A mixture of calcium hydroxide and copper (II) sulfate

Variant (as naphthenate): copper naphthenate

Variant (as octanate): copper octanoate

Variant (in the form of oxychloride): dicopper chloride trihydroxide

Variant (as sulphate): copper (II) tetraoxosulfate

Variant (tetracuum hexahydroxysulphate): cupric sulfate-tricupric hydroxide

12002-03-8

12069-69-1

20427-59-2

8011-63-0

1338-02-9

20543-04-8

1332-40-7

7758-98-7

1333-22-8

Lambda-Cyhalothrin

91465-08-6

Lenacile

2164-08-1

Linuron

330-55-2

Lufenuron

103055-07-8

Metconazole

125116-23-6

Methomyl

16752-77-5

Metribuzin

21087-64-9

Metsulfuron-methyl

74223-64-6

Myclobutanil

88671-89-0

Nicosulfuron

111991-09-4

Oxyfluorfen

42874-03-3

Paclobutrazol

76738-62-0

Pendimethaline

40487-42-1

Pirimicarb

23103-98-2

Prochloraz

67747-09-5

Propiconazole

60207-90-1

Propoxycarbazone-sodium

181274-15-7

Prosulfuron

94125-34-5

Quinoxyfen

124495-18-7

Sulcotrione

99105-77-8

Tebuconazole

107534-96-3

Tebufenpyrad

119168-77-3

Tepraloxydime

149979-41-9

Thiacloprid

111988-49-9

Triasulfuron

82097-50-5

Triazoxide

72459-58-6

Ziram

137-30-4


1 Update as per c. I al. 1 of the O du DEFR of 17 June 2011 ( RO 2011 2927 ), c. O of the O of 23 May 2012 (RO 2012 3451), c. I of the O du DEFR of 11 Dec. 2012 (RO 2013 249), 12 Nov 2014 (RO 2014 4215), c. II of the O of 20 May 2015 (RO 2015 1781), of 28 Oct. 2015 (RO 2015 4551) and c. II de l' O du DEFR du 28 oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 (RO) 2015 4555).
2 RS 817.024.1


State 1 Er February 2016

Annex 2

(art. 4 and 5)

Evaluation and criteria for the approval of active substances, safeners and synergists

1. Evaluation

During the assessment and decision-making process, the approval service collaborates with the applicants, in order to resolve any matter relating to the case quickly, to determine at the outset any further explanation or supplement Necessary for the appropriate evaluation of the latter, including information to eliminate the need to restrict the approval, to amend any proposed condition of use of the plant health product, or Yet to change the nature or composition of the latter to ensure a Perfect compliance with the requirements of this order.

2. The assessment of the approval service shall be based on scientific principles and recommendations of experts.

2. General Decision Criteria

1. Art. 4 shall be considered to be applied only if, in the light of the dossier submitted, authorisation is considered possible for at least one phytosanitary product containing the active substance concerned and for at least one representative use.

2. In principle, the approval of an active substance, safener or synergist is subject to the filing of a complete file.

In exceptional cases, approval of the active substance, safener or synergist may be granted, although some information has not yet been communicated. This provision applies to:

A.
Where the requirements for the relevant data have been modified or specified after the filing of the file; or
B.
Where such information is considered to be confirmatory in nature and as required to increase confidence in the decision.

3. If necessary, approval may be subject to the conditions and restrictions referred to in s. 5. Where the approval service is of the opinion that the file filed is incomplete and the active substance could therefore be approved only with certain restrictions, it shall contact the applicant at the beginning of the procedure to obtain a Additional information that can be used to eliminate these restrictions.

3. Criteria for approval of an active substance

The criteria for approval of an active substance shall correspond to those set out in Annex II, c. 3, of Regulation (EC) N O 1107/2009 1 .

4. Substance to be considered for substitution

An active substance is approved as a substance for substitution under s. 5 where one of the conditions laid down in Annex II, c. 4, of Regulation (EC) N O 1107/2009 2 Is populated.

5. Low-risk active substances

An active substance is not considered to be an active substance at low risk if, in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) N O 1272/2008 3 , it is or must be classified in at least one of the following categories:

A.
Carcinogenic;
B.
Mutagenic;
C.
Reproductive toxic;
D.
Sensitizing chemicals;
E.
Highly toxic or toxic;
F.
Explosive;
G.
Corrosive.

2. Furthermore, it is not considered to be an active substance at low risk:

A.
If it is persistent (half-life in the soil greater than 60 days);
B.
If the bioconcentration factor is greater than 100;
C.
It is considered to be an endocrine disruptor; or
D.
Whether it has neurotoxic or immunotoxic effects.

1 See note on art. 3, para. 2
2 See note on art. 3, para. 2
3 See note on art. 3, let. D


State 1 Er February 2016

Annex 3

(art. 13, 17 and 22)

List of co-formulants not able to enter the composition of plant protection products

The list of co-formulants which cannot be entered into the composition of plant protection products corresponds to the list set out in Annex III to Regulation (EC) N O 1107/2009 1 .


1 See note on art. 3, para. 2


State 1 Er February 2016

Annex 4

(art. 34)

Benchmarking

The procedure for the comparative assessment of a phytosanitary product containing a substance for substitution shall correspond to that laid down in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) N O 1107/2009 1 .


1 See note on art. 3, para. 2


State 1 Er February 2016

Annex 5 1

(art. 7, para. 4, 10, para. 1, let. B, 11, 21, para. 5, and 52, para. 3, let. G and h)

Requirements for application files for the registration of an active substance in Schedule 1

1. Introduction

1 The information must:

A.
Understand a technical file providing the information necessary to assess the foreseeable, immediate or longer-term risks that the substance may contain for man, animals and the environment and containing at least the results The studies described below;
B.
Where applicable, be collected in accordance with the most recent version of the guidelines referred to or described in this Annex; for studies initiated prior to the coming into force of this order, the information must be collected According to appropriate guidelines, validated at national or international level (p. Ex. OECD, EU, EPPO, CIPAC, SETAC), or, in their absence, to guidelines accepted by the competent authority;
C.
Understand, if the guidance is not appropriate or not described, or if a guidance document has been used other than those referred to in this Annex, a rationale for the guideline used that is acceptable for The competent authority; in particular where reference is made in this Annex to an EU method which is the transposition of a method developed by an international organisation (e.g. The OECD), the approval service may accept that the required information be collected in accordance with the latest version of this method if at the beginning of the studies the EU method has not been updated;
D.
Understand, if required by the approval service, a complete description of the guidelines used, unless referenced or described in this Annex, as well as a complete description of any variation As well as its justification, acceptable to the approval service;
E.
Include a complete and unbiased report of the studies conducted as well as their complete description or acceptable justification for the approval service:
1.
Where certain specific data or information which does not appear necessary because of the nature of the substance or the proposed uses is not provided, or
2.
Where it is not scientifically necessary or technically possible to provide information and data;
F.
Where applicable, have been collected in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Act of December 16, 2005 on the Protection of Animals (PCPA) 2 .

1bis For active substances containing nanomaterials within the meaning of s. 2, para. 2, let. Q, OChim 3 , the information must also include data on the composition of the nanomaterial, the shape of the particles and their average size and, where this information is available, the particle size distribution, the specific surface In volume, aggregation state, surface coating and surface functionalization.

2 Testing and testing shall be carried out in accordance with the principles set out in the Ordinance of 18 May 2005 on Good Laboratory Practice (OBPL) 4 , when they are intended to collect data on properties relevant to human and animal health or the environment and/or safety in these areas.

2. Chemicals

1 The conditions to be fulfilled by the application for authorisation of a phytosanitary product containing chemicals or micro-organisms correspond to those laid down in the Annex to the Regulation (EU) n O 283/2013 5 .

2 For phytosanitary products containing nanomaterials within the meaning of s. 2, para. 2, let. Q, OChim 6 , the information must also include data on the composition of the nanomaterial, the shape of the particles and their average size and, where this information is available, the particle size distribution, the specific surface In volume, aggregation state, surface coating and surface functionalization.

3 The following normative expressions or acts used in the Annex to the Regulation (EU) n O 283/2013 have the following equivalents:

Expression in the EU

Equivalent in Switzerland

European competent authorities (c. 1.6 and 1.7)

Approval Service

The competent authorities (c. 3.2.3)

Approval Service

Directive (EC) n O 2010 /63/EU (c. 1.10)

Federal Act of 16 December 2005 on the Protection of Animals (PCPA) 7

Directive (EC) n O 2004 /10 (EC (c. 3.1)

Good Laboratory Practice (OBPL) Order of 18 May 2005 8

Regulation (EC) n O 396/2005 (c. 1.11 let. (s)

DFI Ordinance of 26 June 1995 on foreign substances and components in foodstuffs (OSEC) 9

3. Micro-organisms

1 The conditions to be fulfilled by the application files concerning the registration of a micro-organism in Annex 1 shall correspond to those laid down in Part B of the Annex to the Regulation (EU) n O 544/2011 10 .

2 The following expressions used in the Annex, Part B, of the Regulation (EU) n O 544/2011 have the following equivalents:

Expression in the EU

Equivalent in Switzerland

Commission and Member States (c. 1.2 and 1.4.1)

Approval Service

Competent authorities of the Member States (c. 9)

Approval Service


1 Update as per c. II al. 1 of the O of 23 May 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ), c. II of the O of 20 May 2015 (RO 2015 1781) and c. II de l' O du DEFR du 28 oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 (RO) 2015 4555).
2 RS 455
3 RS 813.11
4 RS 813.112.1
5 Regulation (EU) n O 283/2013 of the Commission of 1 Er March 2013 laying down data requirements for active substances in accordance with Regulation (EC) No O 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the placing of plant protection products on the market, OJ L 93, 3.4.2013, p. 1.
6 RS 813.11
7 RS 455
8 RS 813.112.1
9 RS 817.021.23
10 Cf. Note relative to c. 2, para. 1.


State 1 Er February 2016

Annex 6 1

(art. 7, 11, 21 and 52)

Conditions to be completed by application files for the authorization of a phytosanitary product

1. Introduction

1 The information must:

A.
Understand a technical dossier that provides the information necessary to assess the efficacy and foreseeable, immediate or longer-term risks that the plant health product can contain for humans, animals and the environment, Containing at least the results of the studies described below;
B.
Where applicable, be collected in accordance with the most recent version of the guidelines referred to or described in this Annex; for studies initiated prior to the coming into force of this order, the information must be collected According to appropriate guidelines, validated at national or international level (p. Ex. OECD, EU EPPO, CIPAC, SETAC), or, in their absence, to guidelines accepted by the approval service;
C.
Understand, if the guidance document is not appropriate or is not described, or if a guidance document has been used other than those referred to in this Annex, a rationale for the guideline used that is acceptable to the Approval service; in particular where reference is made in this Annex to an EU method which is the transposition of a method developed by an international organisation (e.g. OECD), the competent authority may accept that The required information is collected in accordance with the most recent version of this method If at the beginning of the studies the EU method has not yet been updated;
D.
Understand, if required by the approval service, a complete description of the guidelines used, unless referenced or described in this Annex, as well as a complete description of any deviation and Justification, acceptable to the approval service, of this discrepancy;
E.
Include a complete and unbiased report of the studies conducted as well as their complete description or acceptable justification for the approval service:
1.
Where certain specific data or information which does not appear necessary because of the nature of the substance or the proposed uses is not provided, or
2.
Where it is not scientifically necessary or technically possible to provide information and data;
F.
Where applicable, have been collected in accordance with the provisions of the PCPA 2 .

1bis For phytosanitary products containing nanomaterials within the meaning of s. 2, para. 2, let. Q, OChim 3 , the information must also include data on the composition of the nanomaterial, the shape of the particles and their average size and, where this information is available, the particle size distribution, the specific surface In volume, aggregation state, surface coating and surface functionalization.

2 Testing and testing shall be carried out in accordance with the principles set out in the OBPL 4 , when they are intended to collect data on properties relevant to human and animal health or the environment and/or safety in these areas.

3 The information requested must include the proposed classification and labelling of the phytosanitary product in accordance with the relevant guidelines.

4 In individual cases, it may be necessary to ask for products in the composition of the formulation certain information provided for in Annex II, Part A of Directive 91 /414/EEC 5 . Prior to any request for information concerning such a product, any information made available to the approval service shall be examined, in particular:

A.
Where the use of the product is authorised in foodstuffs, raw materials for feed, medicines or cosmetics in accordance with Swiss legislation; or
B.
When a safety data sheet has been submitted for the product under consideration.

2. Phytosanitary products containing chemicals

1 The conditions to be fulfilled by the application for authorisation of a phytosanitary product containing chemicals or micro-organisms correspond to those laid down in the Annex to the Regulation (EU) n O 284/2013 6 .

2 For phytosanitary products containing nanomaterials within the meaning of s. 2, para. 2, let. Q, OChim 7 , the information must also include data on the composition of the nanomaterial, the shape of the particles and their average size and, where this information is available, the particle size distribution, the specific surface In volume, aggregation state, surface coating and surface functionalization.

3 The following terms used in the Annex to the Regulation (EU) n O 284/2013, have the following equivalents:

Expression in the EU

Equivalent in Switzerland

The European competent authority (c. 1.6)

Approval Service

The competent authorities (c. 1.11, 2, 3.2, let. E, 3.3, 3.4.2)

Approval Service

The national authority concerned (c. 3.3)

Approval Service

In a Member State (c. 3.2, let. (g)

In Switzerland

Each Member State (c. 3.3)

Switzerland

Directive (EC) n O 2010 /63/EU (c. 1.8)

Federal Act of 16 December 2005 on the Protection of Animals (PCPA) 8

Directive (EC) n O 2004 /10/EU (c. 3.1)

Good Laboratory Practice (OBPL) Order of 18 May 2005 9

3. Phytosanitary products containing micro-organisms

1 The conditions to be fulfilled by applications for authorisation of a phytosanitary product containing micro-organisms correspond to those laid down in Part B of the Annex to the Regulation (EU) n O 545/2011 10 .

2 The following expressions used in the Annex, Part B, of the Regulation (EU) n O 545/2011, have the following equivalents:

Expression in the EU

Equivalent in Switzerland

Competent authorities of the Member States (c. 11)

Approval Service


1 Update as per c. II al. 1 of the O of 23 May 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ), c. II of the O of 20 May 2015 (RO 2015 1781) and c. II de l' O du DEFR du 28 oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 (RO) 2015 4555)
2 RS 455
3 RS 813.11
4 RS 813.112.1
5 See note on art. 86, para. 1, let. A
6 Regulation (EU) n O 284/2013 of the Commission of 1 Er March 2013 laying down data requirements for plant protection products in accordance with Regulation (EC) No O 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the placing of plant protection products on the market, OJ L 93, 3.4.2013, p. 85.
7 RS 813.11
8 RS 455
9 RS 813.112.1
10 Cf. Note relative to c. 2, para. 1.


State 1 Er February 2016

Annex 7 1

(art. 55)

Typical phases indicating the specific risks to humans or the environment

Introduction

1 Where the labelling according to the requirements of Art. 10 OChim 2 Is not sufficient to describe certain specific risks which may arise in the use of plant protection products, the specific risks to human health, animal health or the environment are reported by means of sentences Specific references in this Annex.

2 The provisions of this Annex are also used for plant protection products containing micro-organisms or viruses as active substances. The labelling of products containing these active substances must also comply with the provisions concerning the tests for skin and respiratory sensitisation in Part B, Annexes II and III to the Directive 91 /414/CEE 3 .

3 Since the phytosanitary products are only approved for a specific use, it is up to the approval service to decide whether the affixing of a particular sentence R (specific risks) or an S sentence (precautions to be taken) Is justified or not. In doing so, consideration is given to the use of the product, the type of preparation, packaging and other factors that may affect a foreseeable risk.

Code

Specific Risks

Criteria for applying standard sentences

RSh 1

Toxic by eye contact

The sentence should be used when an eye irritation test referred to in c. 7.1.5 of the Annex to Annex III, Part A of Directive 91 /414/EEC causes manifest signs of systemic toxicity in the test animals (e.g. Related to cholinesterase inhibition) or mortality that could be attributed to uptake of the active substance through the mucous membranes of the eye. The risk phrase should also be used when evidence of systemic toxicity in humans after eye contact is established.

Eye protection should be specified in these cases, as indicated in the general provisions of Annex 8.

RSh 2

May cause photosensitization

The sentence should be used when experimental systems or a properly established human exposure clearly demonstrate that the products have a photosensitizing effect. The sentence should also be used for products containing an active substance or a given component which has a photosensitizing effect in humans, if this photosensitizing element is present at a concentration of 1 % (w/w) or More.

Individual protection measures should be specified in these cases, as indicated in the general provisions of Annex 8.

RSh 3

The contact with the vapours can cause skin and eye burns; contact with liquid gas can cause frostbite

The sentence should be used for phytosanitary products prepared in the form of liquefied gas, if applicable (e.g. Methyl bromide preparations).

Individual protection measures should be specified in these cases, as indicated in the general provisions of Annex 8.

The standard sentence should not be used in cases where the following hazard statements are applied:

-
R34 or R35 according to the Chemicals Ordinance of 18 May 2005 4 , or
-
H314 according to the technical requirements of Annex 2, c. 1, OChim.

1 Update as per c. II al. 1 of the O of 23 May 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ), c. 4 of the annex to the O of 7 Nov 2012 (RO 2012 6103) and c. II of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 (RO 2015 1781).
2 RS 813.11
3 See note on art. 86, para. 1, let. A
4 RO 2005 2721 , 2007 821, 2009 401,805, 2010 5223, 2011 5227, 2012 6103, 2013 201,3041, 2014 2073 3857


State 1 Er February 2016

Annex 8 1

(art. 55)

Typical phases indicating the precautions to be taken for the protection of man or the environment

Introduction

The remarks made in the introduction to Annex 7 are applicable.

1. General provisions

All plant protection products must be labelled with the following sentence, supplemented where appropriate by the text in square brackets:

SP 1
Do not pollute the water with the product or its packaging. [Do not clean application equipment near surface water. /Avoid contamination via water discharge systems from farmyards or roads].

2. Specific precautions to be taken

2.1 User Cautions (SPB)

1 The approval service may specify an appropriate personal protective equipment for users and prescribe specific elements of the equipment (combination, apron, gloves, sturdy footwear, rubber boots, protection of the Face, face shield, protective eyewear, hat, hood or gas mask of a specified type). These additional precautions to be taken apply in addition to the standard phrases provided by the OChim 2 .

2 It may also specify actions that require special protection equipment, such as mixing, loading or handling the undiluted product, applying or spraying the diluted product, handling materials Freshly treated, such as plants or soil, or access to freshly treated areas.

3 It may add specifications for technical controls, such as:

A.
Use a closed payment device to transfer the pesticide from the packaging of the product into the sprayer tank;
B.
The user must be in a closed cabin [for an air conditioning/filtr system A Air tion] When spraying;
C.
Technical controls may replace personal protective equipment if they provide an equal or greater degree of protection.

Code

Specific provisions

Criteria for applying standard sentences

SPB 1

After contact with the skin, first remove the product with a dry cloth, then wash the skin thoroughly with water.

The phrase should be used for plant protection products containing components liable to react violently with water, e.g. Cyanide salts or aluminum phosphide.

SPB 2

Wash all protective equipment after use.

The phrase is recommended when protective clothing is required to protect users. It is compulsory for all plant protection products whose labelling includes an element referred to in Annex 5, c. 1.1, let. A or c, c. 1.2, let. A or b, c. 2.1, let. A or c, or c. 2.2, let. A or b OChim.

SPB 3

After the fumigation is triggered, do not inhale the smoke and leave the treated area immediately.

The phrase may be used for plant protection products used for fumigation in cases where the wearing of a mask is not justified.

SPO 4

The packaging must be opened outdoors in dry conditions.

The sentence should be used for plant protection products containing active substances likely to react violently with water or moist air, e.g. Aluminum phosphide, or subject to spontaneous ignition, such as dithiocarbamates (alkyla-bis). The sentence can also be used for volatile products classified as:

-
R20, R23 or R26 in accordance with the Chemicals Ordinance of 18 May 2005 3 ; or
-
H330, H331 or H332 in accordance with the technical requirements of Annex 2, c. 1, OChim.

The expert opinion must be taken into account in individual cases in order to assess whether the properties of the preparation and packaging are likely to present risks to the user.

SPB 5

Fans [on/off] Or duration to be specified /to the drying of the spray] the treated areas/greenhouses before accessing them.

The phrase can be used for plant protection products used in greenhouses or in other confined spaces, such as warehouses.

2.2 Environmental Precautions (SPe)

Code

Specific provisions

Criteria for applying standard sentences

SPe 1

To protect [groundwater/soil organisms], do not apply this product or any other product containing (specify sub S Tance or family of sub S (if applicable) More than (frequency to be specified) .

The sentence should be used for phytosanitary products for which an assessment in accordance with the uniform principles demonstrates, for one or more of the designated uses, that measures to reduce the risks are necessary to avoid Accumulation in the soil, effects on earthworms or other organisms living in the soil, soil microflora and/or groundwater contamination.

SPe 2

To protect [groundwater/aquatic organisms], do not apply this product on (soil type or in situ A (specify).

The phrase can be used as a safe to reduce risk to prevent contamination of exposed groundwater or surface water (e.g. In association with soil type, topography or drained soils), if an assessment in accordance with the uniform principles demonstrates, for one or more of the designated uses, that measures to reduce the risks are necessary for Avoid unacceptable effects.

SPe 3

To protect [aquatic organisms/non-target plants/non-target arthropods/insects], respect an untreated area of (di S Release to be specified) Relative to [the adjacent uncultivated area/water points].

The sentence should be used to protect non-target plants, non-target arthropods and/or aquatic organisms if an assessment in accordance with the uniform principles demonstrates, for one or more of the designated uses, that measures to Reducing risks are necessary to avoid unacceptable effects.

SPe 4

To protect [aquatic organisms/non-target plants], do not apply on impermeable surfaces such as bitumen, concrete, cobblestones, [railway] and in any other situation where the risk of runoff is important.

Depending on the type of use of the drug product, the approval service may use the phrase to prevent the risk of runoff and to protect aquatic organisms or non-target plants.

SPe 5

To protect [wild birds/mammals], the phytosanitary product must be fully incorporated into the soil; ensure that the phytosanitary product is also incorporated at the end of the grooves.

The phrase should be used for plant protection products such as pellets or pellets that must be incorporated into the soil to protect wild birds or mammals.

SPe 6

To protect [birds/wild mammals], recover any phytosanitary products accidentally spilled.

The phrase should be used for plant protection products such as pellets or pellets, to avoid their absorption by wild birds or mammals. It is recommended for all solid preparations used undiluted.

SPe 7

Do not apply during the breeding period of birds.

The sentence should be used when an assessment in accordance with the uniform principles demonstrates, for one or more of the designated uses, that such a measure to reduce the risk is necessary.

SPe 8

Dangerous to bees. /To protect bees and other pollinating insects, do not apply during flowering. /Do not use in the presence of bees. /Remove or cover the hives during application and (specify period) After processing. /Do not apply when blossom weeds are present. /Remove the weeds before they bloom. /Do not apply before (ind I Mark the date) .

The sentence shall be used in the case of plant protection products for which an assessment in accordance with the uniform principles demonstrates, for one or more of the designated uses, that measures to reduce the risks are necessary for Protect bees or other pollinating insects. Depending on the type of use of the phytosanitary product and other relevant national regulatory provisions, the approval service may choose the appropriate formulation to reduce the risk to bees and other insects Pollinators as well as their incubators.

2.3 Precautions to be taken in good agricultural practice (SPa)

Code

Specific provisions

Criteria for applying standard sentences

SPa 1

To avoid the development of resistances, do not apply this product or any other container (specify the substance or family of substances as the case may be) more than (number of applications or duration to be specified).

The sentence should be used where such a restriction appears necessary to limit the risk of development of resistances.

2.4 Specific Precautions for Rodenticides (SPr)

Code

Specific provisions

Criteria for applying standard sentences

SPr 1

Bait should be arranged in such a way as to minimize the risk of ingestion by other animals. Secure baits so that they cannot be taken away by rodents.

In order to ensure compliance by users, the sentence should be prominently displayed on the label in such a way as to prevent erroneous uses to the maximum extent possible.

SPr 2

The treatment area must be marked during the processing period. The risk of poisoning (primary or secondary) by the anticoagulant, as well as its antidote, should be mentioned.

The sentence should be prominently displayed on the label so as to prevent accidental poisoning to the greatest extent possible.

SPr 3

Dead rodents should be removed daily from the treatment area throughout the treatment period. Do not throw them in rubbish bins or dumps.

In order to prevent the secondary poisoning of animals, the sentence should be used for all rodenticides containing anticoagulants as active substances.


1 Update as per c. II of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
2 RS 813.11
3 RO 2005 2721 , 2007 821, 2009 401,805, 2010 5223, 2011 5227, 2012 6103, 2013 201,3041, 2014 2073 3857


State 1 Er February 2016

Annex 9

(art. 17 and 24)

Part 1: Uniform principles for the assessment and authorisation of chemical protection products

9AI
Introduction
9BI
Evaluation
9BI-1
General Principles
9BI-2
Specific Principles
9BI-2.1
Effectiveness
9BI-2.2
Impact on plants or plant products
9BI-2.3
Impact on vertebrates to be combed
9BI-2.4
Impact on human or animal health
9BI-2.5
Environmental impact
9BI-2.6
Analysis methods
9BI-2.7
Physical and chemical properties
9CI
Decision-making
9CI-1
General Principles
9CI-2
Specific Principles
9CI-2.1
Effectiveness
9CI-2.2
Impact on plants or plant products
9CI-2.3
Impact on vertebrates to be combed
9CI-2.4
Impact on human or animal health
9CI-2.5
Environmental impact
9CI-2.6
Analysis methods
9CI-2.7
Physical and chemical properties

9AI Introduction

1 The principles set out in this Annex are intended to ensure that assessments and decisions on the authorisation of plant protection products, as far as chemical preparations are concerned, are translated into application Consistent with the requirements set out in s. 17 of this order by all assessment services and by the approval service and with all due rigour in the protection of human and animal health and the environment.

2 During the evaluation of applications and the granting of approvals, the evaluation services and the approval service:

A.
Ensure that the record provided meets the requirements of Schedules 5 and 6, c. 2;
B.
Ensure that the data provided is acceptable in terms of quantity, quality, logic and reliability and sufficient to permit proper assessment of the record;
C.
Appreciate, where appropriate, the elements put forward by the applicant to justify the non-disclosure of certain data;
D.
Take into account the data in Annex 5, c. 2, concerning the active substance contained in the plant health product which have been communicated for the insertion of the active substance in question in Annex 1, as well as the results of the evaluation of those data;
E.
Consider other elements of technical or scientific information that are reasonably available to them and which relate to the performance of the plant health product or the potential adverse effects of the product And its components or residues.

3 Where the data and information provided are sufficient to enable the evaluation of one of the proposed uses to be carried out, the application shall be evaluated and a decision shall be taken for that use. In view of the justifications put forward and the clarifications provided at a later date, the approval service rejects applications whose deficiencies in the accompanying data prohibit full evaluation and any reliable decisions for the Less one of the proposed uses.

4 During the assessment and decision-making process, the registration service and the evaluation services concerned shall cooperate with the applicants in order to resolve promptly any matter relating to the dossier, to determine from the outset any further Necessary for the appropriate evaluation of the product, to change any proposed condition of use of the phytosanitary product or to modify the nature or composition of the product so as to ensure full compliance with the Requirements of this order. A complete technical file is a file that meets all the requirements of Schedules 5 and 6, c. 2.

9BI Evaluation

9BI-1 General Principles

1 Evaluation services shall evaluate the information referred to in Part A, para. 2, depending on the state of scientific and technical knowledge; in particular:

A.
Appreciate the efficacy and phytotoxicity of the phytosanitary product for each use that is the subject of an application for authorization, and
B.
Identify and assess the hazards it presents and appreciate the risks it may pose to humans, animals or the environment.

2 The evaluation services shall ensure that the assessments of applications actually relate to the concrete conditions of use proposed, in particular the purpose of the use, the dosage of the product, the mode, the frequency and the moment of its use. Application, and the nature and composition of the preparation. They shall also take into account all the normal conditions of use and the consequences thereof. Finally, evaluation services are based on the principles of integrated control whenever possible.

3 In assessing applications, assessment services take into account the agronomic, phytosanitary, environmental, including climatic characteristics of the areas of use.

4 In interpreting the evaluation results, the evaluation services shall take into account, where appropriate, the elements of uncertainty presented by the information obtained during the evaluation, in order to minimise the risk Of omission, or underestimation of significance, of adverse or adverse effects. As part of the decision-making process, they are looking for critical data or decision points, where the uncertainty element could lead to a misclassification of the risk presented. The first assessment is based on the best available data or estimates that reflect realistic conditions for the use of the phytosanitary product. It is followed by a new assessment, which takes into account the potential uncertainties of the critical data and a set of probable conditions of use and provides a realistic approach to the most unfavourable case, in order to determine If the first assessment could have been significantly different.

5 Where the specific principles set out in c. 9BI-2 provides for the use of calculation models in the assessment of a phytosanitary product, these models shall:

A.
Provide the best possible estimate of all relevant processes, based on realistic assumptions and parameters;
B.
Be duly validated, the measures being carried out under appropriate conditions of use;
C.
Be suitable for the conditions observed in the area of use.

6 Where metabolites and degradation or reaction products are referred to in the specific principles, only products relevant to the proposed criterion should be taken into account.

9BI-2 Specific Principles

9BI-2.1 Effectiveness

9BI-2.1.1 Protection against an organization

Where the proposed use relates to the fight or protection against an orga-nism, the evaluation services shall examine the possibility that the organism may be harmful in the agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions, including The area of the proposed use.

9BI-2.1.2 Finality other than control of an organization

Where the proposed use serves a purpose other than the fight or protection against an organism, the evaluation services appreciate, taking into account the agronomic, phytosanitary, environmental, including climatic conditions, The potential for major damage, loss or disadvantage in the proposed use area if the phytosanitary product was not used.

9BI-2.1.3 Efficacy of Plant Health Product

The evaluation services shall evaluate the data on the efficacy of the plant health product in accordance with Annex 6, c. 2, taking into account the degree of control or magnitude of the desired effect and the relevant experimental conditions such as:

A.
The choice of crop or cultivar;
B.
Agronomic, environmental, and climatic conditions;
C.
The presence and density of the pest;
D.
The stage of development of the culture and organization;
E.
The amount of phytosanitary product used;
F.
The amount of adjuvant added, when this addition is required on the label;
G.
The frequency and timing of applications;
H.
The type of application equipment.

9BI-2.1.4 Suitability of Phytosanitary Product

1 Assessment services assess the suitability of the plant health product in a range of agronomic, phytosanitary, environmental, including climatic conditions, which may be present in the area of the proposed use, and In particular:

A.
The intensity, uniformity and persistence of the desired effect as a function of the dose by comparison with an appropriate reference product (s) and with the absence of treatment;
B.
Where applicable, the impact on yield or reduction of losses during storage, in quantitative and/or qualitative terms, by comparison with an appropriate reference product (s) and with the absence of treatment.

2 Where an appropriate reference product does not exist, the evaluation services shall evaluate the action of the plant health product in order to determine whether its application has long-lasting and specific benefits under agronomic conditions, Plant protection, environmental, including climate, of the proposed use area.

9BI-2.1.5 Mixing Use

Where the product label requires or recommends the use of the product in combination with other phytosanitary products and/or adjuvants, the assessment services shall submit to the assessments provided for in the c. 2.1.1 to 2.1.4 the information provided concerning this mixture.

9BI-2.2 Impact on plants or plant products

9BI-2.2.1 Extent of Adverse Effects

1 The assessment services assess the extent of adverse effects on the crop treated after the application of the plant health product according to the proposed conditions of use compared, where appropriate, with one or more reference products Appropriate if available and/or with no treatment.

2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:

A.
The efficacy data set out in Annex 6, c. 2;
B.
Other relevant information on the phytosanitary product, such as the nature of the preparation, dosage, mode of application, number and timing of applications;
C.
All relevant information on the active substance set out in Schedule 5, c. 2, including mode of action, vapour pressure, volatility and water solubility.

3 This evaluation focuses on:

A.
The nature, frequency, extent and duration of the phytotoxic effects observed, as well as the agronomic, phytosanitary, environmental, including climatic conditions affecting them;
B.
Differences in sensitivity to phytotoxic effects of the major cultivars;
C.
The fraction of the crop or plant products treated that have phytotoxic effects;
D.
The negative impact on the quantitative and/or qualitative performance of the crop or plant products processed;
E.
The negative impact on treated plants or plant products intended for propagation, in terms of viability, germination, rooting and implementation;
F.
For volatile products, the negative impact on neighbouring cultures.

9BI-2.2.2 Effects on the following crops

Where available data indicates that the active substance, metabolites or reaction and degradation products remain in non-negligible quantities in the soil and/or in the plant substances after the application of the product Under the proposed conditions of use, assessment services assess the extent of adverse effects on the following crops. This assessment shall be carried out in accordance with c. 2.2.1.

9BI-2.2.3 Use in a mixture

Where the product label requires the use of the product in combination with other phytosanitary products, or adjuvants, the assessment services shall submit to the assessment under c. 2.1.1. The information provided concerning the mixture.

9BI-2.3 Impact on Vertebrates to Combat

1 Where the proposed use of the plant health product is to act on vertebrates, the evaluation services evaluate the mechanism that produces this action and the observed effects on the behaviour and health of the target animals; Sought is the elimination of the target animal, they evaluate the time it takes to cause death of the animal and the conditions in which death occurs.

2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:

A.
All relevant information set out in Schedule 5, c. 2, and the results of their assessment, including toxicological and metabolic studies;
B.
All relevant information on the phytosanitary product set out in Schedule 6, c. 2, including toxicological studies and efficacy data.

9BI-2.4 Human or Animal Health Impact

9BI-2.4.1 Plant Health Product

9BI-2.4.1.1 Terms of use

1 Evaluation services shall assess the exposure of the operator to the active substance and/or the relevant toxicological elements of the plant health product which may occur under the proposed conditions of use, in particular the dosage, The mode of application and climatic conditions, preferably based on realistic data relating to the exposure and, if not available, using an appropriate and validated calculation model.

2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:

A.
Toxicological and metabolic studies as set out in Schedule 5, c. 2, and the results of their assessment, including the acceptable level of operator exposure (NAEO). The acceptable level of exposure of the operator is the maximum amount of active substance to which the operator can be exposed without affecting his or her health. It is expressed in milligrams of the chemical per kilogram of body weight of the operator. It is based on the highest level at which no adverse effects are observed in the tests in the most sensitive animal species or, if appropriate data are available, in humans;
B.
Other relevant information on active substances, such as physical and chemical properties;
C.
The toxicological studies set out in Annex 6, c. 2, including, where appropriate, dermal absorption studies;
D.
Other relevant information provided in Annex 6, c. 2 such as:
1.
The composition of the preparation,
2.
The nature of the preparation
3.
The dimensions, presentation and packaging type,
4.
The field of use and the nature of the culture or target,
5.
The method of application, including handling, loading and mixing of the product,
6.
The recommended exposure reduction measures,
7.
Recommended protective clothing,
8.
The maximum application dose,
9.
The minimum volume of spray application indicated on the label,
10.
The number and timing of applications.

3 This assessment shall be carried out for each type of method and application equipment proposed for the use of the phytosanitary product, as well as for the different types and sizes of containers used, taking into account the mixing operations, Loading and application of the product, as well as routine cleaning and maintenance of the application equipment.

9BI-2.4.1.2 Nature of the packaging

The evaluation services shall review information on the nature and characteristics of the proposed packaging, in particular with regard to the following aspects:

A.
The type of packaging;
B.
Its dimensions and capacity;
C.
Size of the opening;
D.
The type of closure
E.
Its robustness, sealing and resistance to normal conditions of transport and handling;
F.
Its resistance to the contents and the compatibility of the packaging with it.

9BI-2.4.1.3 Protective clothing

The evaluation services shall examine the nature and characteristics of the proposed protective equipment and clothing, in particular with regard to the following aspects:

A.
Availability and adequacy;
B.
Comfort, given the physical constraints and climatic conditions.

9BI-2.4.1.4 Persons Exposed

1 Assessment services assess the possibility of exposure of other human beings (persons present or workers exposed after the application of the phytosanitary product) or animals to the active substance and/or other toxic elements of the Phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions of use.

2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:

A.
Toxicological and metabolic studies of the active substance set out in Annex 5, c. 2, and the results of their assessment, including the acceptable level of exposure of the user;
B.
The toxicological studies set out in Annex 6, c. 2, including possible dermal absorption studies;
C.
Other relevant information on the phytosanitary product set out in Schedule 6, c. 2 such as:
1.
Periods of reintroduction, necessary waiting periods or other precautions to be taken to protect man and animals,
2.
The method of application, including spraying,
3.
The maximum application dose,
4.
The maximum application volume per spray,
5.
The composition of the preparation,
6.
Treatment residues on plants and plant products,
7.
Other activities resulting in worker exposure.

9BI-2.4.2 Residues

9BI-2.4.2.1 Evaluation of toxicological data

The assessment services shall evaluate the toxicological data set out in Annex 5, c. 2, including:

A.
Determination of an acceptable daily intake (ADI);
B.
Identification of metabolites and degradation and reaction products in treated plants or plant products;
C.
The behaviour of the residues of the active substance and its metabolites, from the date of application to harvest or, in the case of use after harvesting, up to the plant product outlet.

9BI-2.4.2.2 Testing of residues in products of animal origin

Before assessing the residue levels observed during the tests or in products of animal origin, the evaluation services shall examine the following information:

A.
The data relating to the proposed good agricultural practice, including the application data set out in Annex 6, c. 2, and the pre-harvest intervals for proposed uses or, in the case of post-harvest uses, retention periods or storage periods;
B.
Nature of the preparation;
C.
Analytical methods and the definition of residues.

9BI-2.4.2.3 Accounting for statistical models

The evaluation services assess, taking into account the appropriate statistical models, the residue levels observed during the tests carried out. The evaluation addresses each proposed use and takes into account the following:

A.
The proposed conditions of use for the phytosanitary product;
B.
Specific information on the presence of residues on or in processed plants or plant products, foodstuffs and feedingstuffs, as provided for in Annex 6, c. 2, as well as the distribution of residues between edible and inedible parts;
C.
Specific information on the presence of residues on or in processed plants or plant products, foodstuffs and feedingstuffs, as provided for in Annex 5, c. 2, and the results of their evaluation;
D.
Realistic possibilities for extrapolation of data between cultures.

9BI-2.4.2.4 Residues in products of animal origin

The assessment services shall assess the residue levels observed in products of animal origin taking into account the information provided in Annex II, Part A, c. 8.4 of Directive 91 /414/EEC 1 And residues from other uses.

9BI-2.4.2.5 Risk of consumer exposure as part of their diet

Assessment services shall appreciate the risk of exposure of consumers in the context of their diet and, where appropriate, their other exposure risks, by means of an appropriate calculation model. This assessment shall take into account, where appropriate, other sources of information, such as other authorised uses of plant protection products which contain the same active substance or produce the same residues.

9BI-2.4.2.6 Risk of exposure of animals

Evaluation services shall, where appropriate, appreciate the risk of exposure of animals, taking into account the residue levels observed in treated plants or plant products intended for their feeding.

9BI-2.5 Environmental Impact

9BI-2.5.1 Environmental Fate and Dissemination

In assessing the fate and dissemination of the phytosanitary product in the environment, assessment services consider all elements of the environment, including flora and fauna. In particular:

9BI-2.5.1.1 Fate and diffusion in soil

1 Assessment services appreciate the possibility of the phytosanitary product reaching the ground under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they evaluate the speed and the pathways of degradation in the ground, mobility In the soil and the evolution of the total concentration (extractable and non-extractable 2 ) The active substance, metabolites, and degradation and reaction products that should occur in the soil of the proposed area of use following the application of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions.

2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:

A.
Specific information on the fate and behaviour in the soil set out in Annex 5, c. 2, and the results of their evaluation;
B.
Other relevant information on the active substance, such as:
1.
Molecular weight,
2.
Water solubility,
3.
Octanol/water separation coefficient,
4.
The vapour pressure,
5.
Rate of volatilization,
6.
The dissociation constant,
7.
The rate of photodegradation and the identity of degradation products,
8.
Rate of hydrolysis as a function of pH and identity of degradation products;
C.
All information on the phytosanitary product set out in Schedule 6, c. 2, including those relating to soil diffusion and degradation;
D.
Where applicable, other uses authorised, in the proposed area of use, of plant protection products containing the same active substance or producing the same residues.

9BI-2.5.1.2 Fate and Diffusion in Groundwater

1 Assessment services appreciate the possibility that the plant health product will come into contact with groundwater under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they evaluate, using a calculation model Appropriate and validated at Community level, the concentration of the active substance, the metabolites and the degradation and reaction products that should occur in the groundwater of the area of use envisaged after the application Of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions.

2 The member evaluation services are particularly supportive of their assessment of the results of mobility and persistence studies in the soil, as set out in Appendices 5 and 6.

3 This evaluation also takes into account the following information elements:

A.
Specific information on the fate and behaviour of the soil and water set out in Schedule 5, c. 2, and the results of their evaluation;
B.
Other relevant information on the active substance, such as:
1.
Molecular weight,
2.
Water solubility,
3.
Octanol/water separation coefficient,
4.
The vapour pressure,
5.
Rate of volatilization,
6.
Hydrolysis as a function of pH and identity of degradation products
7.
The dissociation constant;
C.
All information on the phytosanitary product set out in Schedule 6, c. 2, including those relating to diffusion and degradation in soil and water;
D.
Where applicable, other uses authorised, in the proposed area of use, of plant protection products containing the same active substance or producing the same residues;
E.
Where applicable, available data on degradation, including transformation and adsorption into the saturated zone;
F.
Where applicable, data relating to the collection and treatment of drinking water in the proposed area of use;
G.
Where applicable, surveillance data relating to the presence or absence of the active substance or relevant metabolites and degradation and reaction products in groundwater resulting from use Prior to plant protection products containing the active substance or which gives rise to the same residues; these monitoring data shall be interpreted in a scientific and consistent manner.

9BI-2.5.1.3 Fate and diffusion in surface waters

1 Assessment services appreciate the possibility that the plant health product will come into contact with surface waters under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they evaluate, using a calculation model Appropriate and validated at Community level, the foreseeable short-and long-term concentration of the active substance, metabolites and degradation and reaction products expected to occur in the surface waters of the area Intended use after the application of the phytosanitary product under the conditions Proposed.

2 The evaluation services specifically support their assessment of the results of mobility and persistence studies in the soil, as well as information on runoff and training, as provided for in Appendices 5 and 6, c. 2.

3 This evaluation also takes into account the following information elements:

A.
Specific information on the fate and behaviour of the soil and water set out in Schedule 5, c. 2, and the results of their evaluation;
B.
Other relevant information on the active substance, such as:
1.
Molecular weight,
2.
Water solubility,
3.
Octanol/water separation coefficient,
4.
The vapour pressure,
5.
Rate of volatilization,
6.
Hydrolysis as a function of pH and identity of degradation products
7.
The dissociation constant;
C.
All information on the phytosanitary product set out in Schedule 6, c. 2, including those relating to diffusion and degradation in soil and water;
D.
Possible routes of exposure:
1.
Training,
2.
Runoff,
3.
Spray logs,
4.
Sewage discharge,
5.
Leaching,
6.
Deposition via the atmosphere;
E.
Where applicable, other uses authorised, in the proposed area of use, of plant protection products containing the same active substance or producing the same residues;
F.
Where applicable, data relating to the collection and treatment of drinking water in the proposed area of use.

9BI-2.5.1.4 Volatilization

1 Assessment services appreciate the possibility that the phytosanitary product will dissipate in the air under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they will make the best possible assessment, if necessary using a Appropriate and validated calculation model for the concentration of the active substance, metabolites, and degradation and reaction products that should occur in the air following the application of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions.

2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:

A.
Specific information on fate and behaviour in the soil, water and air as set out in Schedule 5, c. 2, and the results of their evaluation;
B.
Other relevant information on the active substance, such as:
1.
The vapour pressure,
2.
Water solubility,
3.
Hydrolysis as a function of pH and identity of degradation products
4.
Photochemical degradation in water and air and the identity of degradation products,
5.
Octanol/water separation coefficient;
C.
All information on the phytosanitary product set out in Schedule 6, c. 2, including those relating to air diffusion and degradation.

9BI-2.5.1.5 Destroying or Neutracting the Phytosanitary Product

The evaluation services evaluate the processes of destruction or neutralization of the phytosanitary product and its packaging.

9BI-2.5.2 Impact on non-target species

In calculating toxicity/exposure ratios, assessment services shall take into consideration toxicity to the most sensitive relevant organism used in the tests.

9BI-2.5.2.1 Risk to birds and other terrestrial vertebrates

1 Assessment services appreciate the possibility of exposure of birds and other terrestrial vertebrates to the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they assess the extent of the risk in the short term And in the long term, and in particular for reproduction, to which these organisms may be exposed after the application of the product according to the proposed conditions of use.

2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:

A.
Specific information relating to toxicological studies on mammals and the effects on birds and other non-subject terrestrial vertebrates, including reproduction, as well as other information Relevant to the active substance set out in Annex 5, c. 2, and the results of their evaluation;
B.
All information relating to the phytosanitary product provided for in Annex 6, c. 2, and in particular those relating to effects on birds and other non-subject terrestrial vertebrates;
C.
Where applicable, other uses authorised, in the proposed area of use, of plant protection products containing the same active substance or producing the same residues.

3 The evaluation focuses on the following:

A.
Fate and distribution, including persistence and bioconcentration, of the active substance, metabolites, and degradation and reaction products in the various components of the environment after the application of the product;
B.
The likely exposure of species likely to be exposed at the time of application or by the presence of residues, taking into account all routes of contamination, such as ingestion of treated food or food, predation on vertebrates Or invertebrates, contact with spray logs or treated vegetation;
C.
The calculation of the acute, short-term and, if necessary, long-term/exposure ratio. These ratios are the respective quotients of DL 50 , CL 50 Or concentration without observable effects (NOEC) expressed on the basis of the active substance and the exposure estimate expressed in mg/kg body weight.

9BI-2.5.2.2 Risk to Aquatic Organisms

1 Assessment services appreciate the potential for exposure of aquatic organisms to the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they assess the magnitude of the short-and long-term risk To which these organisms may be exposed following the application of the product according to the proposed conditions of use.

2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:

A.
The specific information relating to the effects on aquatic organisms as set out in Schedule 5, c. 2, and the results of their evaluation;
B.
Other relevant information on the active substance such as:
1.
Water solubility,
2.
Octanol/water separation coefficient,
3.
The vapour pressure,
4.
Rate of volatilization,
5.
KOC,
6.
Biodegradation in aquatic systems, in particular biodegradability of the product,
7.
The rate of photodegradation and the identity of degradation products,
8.
Rate of hydrolysis as a function of pH and identity of degradation products;
C.
All information on the phytosanitary product set out in Schedule 6, c. 2, including those related to effects on aquatic organisms;
D.
Where applicable, other uses authorised, in the proposed area of use, of plant protection products containing the same active substance or producing the same residues.

3 The evaluation focuses on the following:

A.
The fate and distribution of residues of the active substance, metabolites, and degradation and reaction products in water, sediments or fish;
B.
Calculation of the acute toxicity/exposure ratio for fish and daphnia. This ratio is the quotient of CL 50 Or CE 50 Acute and estimated short-term concentration in the environment;
C.
The calculation of the growth/exposure inhibition ratio for algae. This ratio is the CE quotient 50 And the estimation of short-term concentration in the environment;
D.
Calculation of the long-term toxicity/exposure ratio for fish and daphnia. This ratio is the NOEL quotient and the estimate of the long-term concentration in the environment;
E.
Where applicable, bioconcentration in fish and the possibility of exposure of fish predators, including humans.

9BI-2.5.2.3 Risk to Bees

1 Evaluation services appreciate the potential for exposure of bees common to the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they assess the extent of the short-and long-term risk to which Common bees may be exposed after application of the product according to the proposed conditions of use.

2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:

A.
Specific toxicity information for common bees as set out in Schedule 5, c. 2, and the results of their evaluation;
B.
Other relevant information on the active substance, such as:
1.
Water solubility,
2.
Octanol/water separation coefficient,
3.
The vapour pressure,
4.
The rate of photodegradation and the identity of degradation products,
5.
The mode of action (for example: action regulating insect growth);
C.
All information on the phytosanitary product set out in Schedule 6, c. 2, and in particular those relating to toxicity to common bees;
D.
Where applicable, other uses authorised, in the proposed area of use, of plant protection products containing the same active substance or producing the same residues.

3 The evaluation focuses on the following:

A.
The ratio of maximum application in grams of active substance per hectare to DL 50 By oral and contact in µ g active substance per bee (hazard quotients) and, if necessary, persistence of residues on or in treated plants;
B.
The effects on bee larvae, the behaviour of bees, and the survival and development of the colony after the use of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions.

9BI-2.5.2.4 Risks to Other Arthropods

1 Evaluation services appreciate the possibility of exposure of useful arthropods other than the common bee to the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they evaluate the lethal action and The sublethal effects to which these organisms may be exposed, as well as the decrease in their activity, following the application of the product according to the proposed conditions of use.

2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:

A.
Specific toxicity information for common bees and other useful arthropods that are provided for in Schedule 5, c. 2, and the results of their evaluation;
B.
Other relevant information on the active substance, such as:
1.
Water solubility,
2.
Octanol/water separation coefficient,
3.
The vapour pressure,
4.
The rate of photodegradation and the identity of degradation products,
5.
The mode of action (for example: action regulating insect growth);
C.
All information on the phytosanitary product set out in Schedule 6, c. 2 such as:
1.
Effects on useful arthropods other than bees,
2.
Toxicity to bees,
3.
The available data provided by primary biological screening,
4.
The maximum application dose,
5.
The maximum number and schedule of applications;
D.
Where applicable, other uses authorised, in the proposed area of use, of plant protection products containing the same active substance or producing the same residues.

9BI-2.5.2.5 Risks to earthworms

1 Assessment services appreciate the possibility of exposure of earthworms and other macro-organisms from the non-subject to the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they evaluate the extent The short-and long-term risk to which these organisms may be exposed following the application of the product under the proposed conditions of use.

2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:

A.
Specific information on the toxicity of the active substance for earthworms and other non-subject soil macro-organisms as set out in Schedule 5. Ch. 2, and the results of their evaluation;
B.
Other relevant information on the active substance, such as:
1.
Water solubility,
2.
Octanol/water separation coefficient,
3.
The adsorption Kd,
4.
The vapour pressure,
5.
Hydrolysis as a function of pH and identity of degradation products
6.
The rate of photodegradation and the identity of degradation products,
7.
The DT 50 And DT 90 For soil degradation;
C.
All information on the phytosanitary product set out in Schedule 6, c. 2, and in particular those relating to the effects on earthworms and other macro-organisms of the non-subject soil;
D.
Where applicable, other uses authorised, in the proposed area of use, of plant protection products containing the same active substance or producing the same residues.

3 The evaluation focuses on the following:

A.
Lethal and sublethal effects;
B.
The prediction of short-term and long-term concentration in the environment;
C.
Calculation of the acute toxicity/exposure ratio (defined as the quotient of the CL 50 And the prediction of initial concentration in the environment) and the long-term toxicity/exposure ratio (defined as the NOEC quotient and the long-term concentration forecast in the environment);
D.
Where applicable, the bioconcentration and persistence of residues in earthworms.

9BI-2.5.2.6 Risks to soil microbial activity

1 Where the assessment provided for in c. 2.5.1.1. Does not preclude the possibility of contact between the phytosanitary product and the soil under the proposed conditions of use, the evaluation services assess the impact of the use on the microbial activity, and in particular on the Nitrogen and carbon mineralization processes in the soil.

2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:

A.
The specific information relating to the active substance, including specific information concerning the effects on non-subject soil micro-organisms, as set out in Annex 5, c. 2, and the results of their evaluation;
B.
All information on the phytosanitary product set out in Schedule 6, c. 2, and in particular those relating to effects on non-subject soil micro-organisms;
C.
Where applicable, other uses authorised, in the proposed area of use, of plant protection products containing the same active substance or producing the same residues;
D.
Information available from primary biological screening.

9BI-2.6 Analytical Methods

The evaluation services assess the analytical methods proposed for post-approval monitoring and control.

9BI-2.6.1 Analysis of composition

1 The method shall establish the nature and quantity of the active substance (s) that enter the composition of the phytosanitary product and, if necessary, any impurity and any significant coformulant from a toxicological point of view, Ecotoxicological or environmental.

2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:

A.
Data relating to the methods of analysis provided for in Annex 5, c. 2, and the results of their evaluation;
B.
Data relating to the methods of analysis provided for in Annex 6, c. 2, including:
1.
The specificity and linearity of the proposed methods,
2.
The importance of interference,
3.
The accuracy of the proposed methods (intralaboratory repeatability and interlaboratory reproducibility);
C.
The limits of detection and determination of the proposed methods for impurities.

9BI-2.6.2 Analysis of Residues

1 The method shall identify the residues of the active substance, metabolites and degradation or reaction products resulting from the permitted uses of the phytosanitary product which have a toxicological impact, Ecotoxicological or environmental.

2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:

A.
Data relating to the methods of analysis provided for in Annex 5, c. 2, and the results of their evaluation;
B.
Data relating to the methods of analysis provided for in Annex 6, c. 2, including:
1.
The specificity of the proposed methods,
2.
The accuracy of the proposed methods (intralaboratory repeatability and interlaboratory reproducibility),
3.
The rate of recovery of the proposed methods at appropriate concentrations;
C.
Detection limits for the proposed methods;
D.
Limitations on the determination of proposed methods.

9BI-2.7 Physical and Chemical Properties

9BI-2.7.1 Real substance content and stability during storage

Evaluation services assess the actual substance content of the phytosanitary product and its stability during storage.

9BI-2.7.2 Physical and Chemical Properties of Phytosanitary Product

1 Evaluation services assess the physical and chemical properties of the plant health product, including:

A.
Where there is an adequate FAO standard, the physical and chemical properties referred to in this standard;
B.
Where there is no adequate FAO standard, all physical and chemical properties relevant to the formulation, as set out in the "Manual for the Development and Use of FAO Standards for Plant Protection Products" 3 .

2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:

A.
Data relating to the physical and chemical properties of the active substance set out in Annex 5, c. 2, and the results of their evaluation;
B.
Data on the physical and chemical properties of the phytosanitary product set out in Annex 6, c. 2.

9BI-2.7.3 Mixture

When the proposed label requires or recommends the use of the product in combination with other phytosanitary or adjuvant products, the assessment services assess the physical and chemical compatibility of the products to be mixed.

9CI Decision-Making Process

9CI-1 General Principles

1 If necessary, the approval service shall attach conditions or restrictions to the authorisations. The nature and severity of these measures must be determined by the nature and extent of the benefits and risks that can be expected and adapted to them.

2 The assessment services and the approval service shall ensure that decisions on the granting of authorisations take into account, where necessary, agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental burdens imposed in the areas of use Considered, including climatic conditions. These considerations may lead them to establish conditions and employment restrictions, or even to exclude certain areas of the national territory from the authorisation of employment.

3 Evaluation services ensure that the doses and the number of approved applications represent the minimum values necessary to achieve the desired effect, even when higher values do not result in unacceptable risks For human or animal health or for the environment. The authorised values must be determined according to the agronomic, phytosanitary, environmental, including climatic conditions, of the various areas for which authorisation is granted. However, the doses to be used and the number of applications should not produce any undesirable effects, such as the development of resistance.

4 Evaluation services shall ensure that decisions comply with the principles of integrated control where the product is intended to be used in situations involving such principles.

5 Based on data on a limited number of representative species, evaluation services must ensure that the application of phytosanitary products does not have a long-term impact on abundance and Diversity of non-target species.

6 The issuance of an authorization is subject to the satisfaction of all the requirements set out in c. 2 (specific principles). However:

A.
When one or more specific requirements of the decision-making process referred to in c. 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 or 2.7 are not fully complied with, the authorization is granted only if the benefits offered by the use of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions outweigh its possible adverse effects. Any limitations in the use of the product, related to non-compliance with some of the above requirements, must be stated on the label, and non-compliance with the requirements set out in c. 2.7 cannot compromise the good use of the product. These benefits may include:
1.
To promote and be compatible with integrated control measures and organic farming,
2.
Facilitate the development of strategies to minimize the risk of developing resistance,
3.
Respond to the need to further diversify the types of active substances or modes of biochemical action that can be used in the context of strategies for the prevention of accelerated soil degradation,
4.
Reduce the risk to operators and consumers;
5.
Reduce environmental contamination and mitigate the impact on non-target species;
B.
Where the limitations of current scientific and technological knowledge in the field of analysis do not fully satisfy the criteria set out in the c. 2.6, an authorisation shall be granted for a limited period if the methods proposed are justified as being adequate for the purposes concerned. In this case, a time limit shall be notified to the applicant for the development and presentation of analytical methods which meet the above criteria. The authorisation shall be re-examined on expiry of the period granted to the applicant.

7 Where an authorization has been granted on the basis of the requirements set out in this Annex, the approval service may, by virtue of the arts. 29 and 30 of this Order:

A.
Take, if possible, preferably in close cooperation with the holder of the authorisation, measures to improve the performance of the plant health product, and/or
B.
Identify, if possible, in close cooperation with the authorisation holder, measures to further reduce the risk of exposure after and during the use of the plant health product.

8 The evaluation services shall inform the holder of the authorisation of any measures referred to in para. 7, let. A and b, and invite them to provide any additional information necessary to define the potential action or hazards of the product under the new conditions of use.

9CI-2 Specific Principles

9CI-2.1 Effectiveness

9CI-2.1.1 Uses

Where the proposed uses include recommendations for control or protection against organisms which are not considered harmful on the basis of the experience and the scientific acquis in the agronomic conditions, No authorisation shall be granted for any of the following: plant health, environmental, including climatic, normal of the proposed areas of use or that the other effects sought are not deemed to be beneficial under those conditions. Uses in question.

9CI-2.1.2 Intensity and persistence of action

The control, protection or other effects sought must have an intensity, uniformity and persistence of action equivalent to those offered by the use of appropriate reference products. If there is no suitable reference product, it is necessary to establish that the use of the phytosanitary product in the agronomic, phytosanitary, environmental, including climatic conditions of the proposed area of use is Certainly beneficial in terms of the intensity, uniformity and persistence of control, protection or other desired effects.

9CI-2.1.3 Beneficial Effect of Plant Health Product

Where appropriate, the evolution of the yield obtained during the use of the product and the reduction of losses during storage must be comparable, quantitatively and/or qualitatively, to those resulting from the use of reference products Appropriate. If there is no suitable reference product, it is necessary to establish that the use of the phytosanitary product in the agronomic, phytosanitary, environmental, including climatic conditions of the proposed area of use is Certainly beneficial, quantitatively and/or qualitatively, in terms of the evolution of yield and the reduction of losses during storage.

9CI-2.1.4 Effectiveness of Preparation

The conclusions concerning the effectiveness of the preparation must be applicable to all areas of the assessment services in which it is to be authorised and to be submitted for all the proposed conditions of use, except where The proposed labelling specifies that the preparation should be used under specific and limited conditions (e.g. light infestations, specific soil types, specific crop conditions).

9CI-2.1.5 Mixture

Where the label requires the use of the mixture with other specific or adjuvanted phytosanitary products, the mixture must achieve the desired effect and comply with the principles set out in the c. 2.1.1 to 2.1.4.

9CI-2.2 Impact on Plant or Plant Products

9CI-2.2.1 Employment Restrictions

There must be no relevant phytotoxic effects on treated plants or plant products unless the label refers to employment restrictions.

9CI-2.2.2 Phytotoxic Effects

At harvest time, yield must not be reduced due to phytotoxic effects that reduce it below the level that could be achieved without the use of the phytosanitary product, unless the reduction is compensated by others Benefits such as a qualitative improvement of treated plants or plant products.

9CI-2.2.3 Impact on the quality of plants or plant products

There must be no unacceptable adverse effects on the quality of treated plants or plant products, with the exception of negative effects on processing when the label specifies that the preparation should not be applied to crops For processing.

9CI-2.2.4 Impact on plants used for propagation or reproduction

There shall be no unacceptable adverse effects on treated plants or plant products used for propagation or reproduction, including viability, germination, rooting and establishment, except where The label specifies that the preparation should not be applied to plants or plant products intended for propagation or reproduction.

9CI-2.2.5 Impact on the following crops

There should be no unacceptable impact on the following crops, except where the label specifies that certain plants are susceptible to the product and should not be grown after the crop is processed.

9CI-2.2.6 Impact on adjacent crops

There should be no unacceptable impact on adjacent crops unless the label recommends that the preparation should not be applied when adjacent crops are particularly vulnerable.

9CI-2.2.7 Blend Mixtures

Where the label requires the use of the mixture with other phytosanitary products or adjuvants, the mixture must comply with the principles set out in the c. 2.2.1 to 2.2.6.

9CI-2.2.8 Cleaning of Application Equipment

The instructions proposed for the cleaning of the application equipment must be clear, effective and easily applicable and ensure the disposal of any residues of the phytosanitary product which may subsequently cause damage.

9CI-2.3 Impact on Vertebrates to Combat

1 An authorisation for a plant health product intended to eliminate vertebrates shall be issued only:

A.
If the death occurs immediately, or
B.
If there is a gradual reduction in vital functions that are not accompanied by obvious signs of suffering.

2 In the case of repellent products, the desired effect must be achieved without unnecessary suffering being inflicted on the target animals.

9CI-2.4 Human or Animal Health Impact

9CI-2.4.1 Impact of Phytosanitary Product

9CI-2.4.1.1 Operator's Exposure

1 Authorization is not granted if the level of exposure of the operator during the handling and application of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions of use (including dosage and mode of application) exceeds NAEO.

2 In addition, the granting of the authorisation is subject to compliance with the limit value established for the active substance and/or the toxic components of the product under the OSEC 4 .

9CI-2.4.1.2 Clothing or Equipment for Protection

Where the proposed conditions of use require the wearing of protective clothing or equipment, the authorisation shall be granted only if those articles are effective and in conformity with the relevant Community provisions, may be obtained Easily by the user and can be used under the conditions of application of the phytosanitary product, taking into account, in particular, climatic conditions.

9CI-2.4.1.3 Restrictions

Phytosanitary products which, because of certain properties or in the event of error of handling or use, may present high risks must be subject to specific restrictions, in particular concerning the dimensions of Packaging, type of formulation, distribution and mode and conditions of employment. In addition, phytosanitary products classified as highly toxic cannot be authorised for use by non-professional users.

9CI-2.4.1.4 Precautions

Periods of waiting and reintroduction of safety and other precautions must be A Ntir that exposure of persons or workers exposed after the application of the phytosanitary product does not exceed the NAEO for its active substance or its toxicologically significant components or, where applicable, the values Limits for the said components in accordance with the provisions referred to in c. 2.4.1.1.

9CI-2.4.1.5 Waiting period for the protection of animals

Periods of waiting and reintroduction of safety and other precautions must be defined so as not to have a negative impact on animals.

9CI-2.4.1.6 Period of waiting to ensure compliance with NAEO

The waiting and reintroduction periods for safety and other precautions to ensure compliance with the NAEO and limit values must be realistic; special precautions must be taken when necessary.

9CI-2.4.2 Impact of Residues

9CI-2.4.2.1 Implementing rules

The authorisations must ensure that the residues come from the quantities of the minimum phytosanitary product necessary for adequate treatment according to good agricultural practice, including the implementing rules (waiting periods, periods of Storage, pre-harvest intervals) reduce to a minimum the presence of residues at the time of harvest or slaughter or, where appropriate, after storage.

9CI-2.4.2.2 Maximum Residue Concentration

1 Where no maximum concentration exists, the assessment services establish a maximum interim concentration. The conclusions relating to the fixed levels must be applicable in all conditions to influence the remaining levels of residues in crops, such as schedule, dose, frequency and mode of application.

2 Based on the assessment of the potential content of residues in and on plant parts and edible plant products (established by the relevant evaluation units) and OSEC, the FVO establishes the maximum concentration of substances Active.

9CI-2.4.2.3 DJA

1 In the cases referred to in c. 2.4.2.2, para. 1 and 2, any application for authorization must be accompanied by a risk assessment based on the most adverse consumer exposure hypothesis, but based on good agricultural practice.

2 Given all official uses, the proposed use should not be allowed if the best possible estimate of consumer exposure is greater than the TDI.

9CI-2.4.2.4 Transformation

Where the processing affects the nature of the residues, the establishment of a separate risk assessment under the conditions defined in the c. 2.4.2.3 may be required.

9CI-2.4.2.5 Animal nutrition

Where treated plants or plant products are intended for the feeding of animals, the residues present shall not adversely affect the health of the animals.

9CI-2.5 Environmental Impact

9CI-2.5.1 Environmental Sort and Behaviour

9CI-2.5.1.1 Fate and Behaviour in Soil

1 Authorisation shall not be granted where the active substance and, if significant from the toxicological, ecotoxicological or environmental point of view, the metabolites and degradation or reaction products resulting from the use of the Phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions:

A.
In field trials, remain in the soil for more than one year (DT 90 > 1 year and DT 50 > 3 months);
B.
In laboratory tests, form non-extractable residues in proportions greater than 70 % of the initial dose after one hundred days and have a rate of mineralization less than 5 % in one hundred days.

2 However, authorisation may be granted if it is scientifically established that, under the relevant field conditions, the accumulation in the soil is insufficient to cause unacceptable residues in subsequent crops and There are no unacceptable phytotoxic effects on subsequent crops or unacceptable impacts on non-target species, in accordance with the requirements set out in this section. 2.5.1.2, 2.5.1.3, 2.5.1.4 and 2.5.2.

9CI-2.5.1.2 Fate and Behaviour in Groundwater

No authorisation shall be granted where the foreseeable concentration of the active substance or relevant metabolites and products of degradation or reaction in groundwater used as drinking water or intended to be used as drinking water Does not meet the requirements of Schedule 2, c. 22, OWaters 5 .

9CI-2.5.1.3 Fate and behaviour in surface waters

1 No authorization shall be granted if, after the use of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions, the foreseeable concentration of the active substance, relevant metabolites or relevant degradation or reaction products In surface waters:

A.
Does not meet the requirements set out in Schedule 2, c. 22, OWaters when surface waters are used as drinking water or intended for the production of drinking water;
B.
Has an impact that is unacceptable on non-target species, in particular on animals, in accordance with the requirements laid down in point 2.5.2.

2 Proposed instructions for use of the phytosanitary product, including the method of cleaning the application equipment, must minimize the likelihood of accidental contamination of surface waters.

9CI-2.5.1.4 Concentration of Active Substance in the Atmosphere

No authorisation shall be granted if the concentration of the active substance in the atmosphere under the proposed conditions of use is such that the level of exposure acceptable or the limit values laid down for operators, workers or Persons present in c. 2.4.1 are exceeded.

9CI-2.5.2 Impact on non-target species

9CI-2.5.2.1 Risks to birds and other terrestrial vertebrates

No authorisation shall be granted in the event of potential exposure of birds and other non-subject terrestrial vertebrates if:

A.
The acute and short-term toxicity/exposure ratio for non-target birds and terrestrial vertebrates is less than 10 on the basis of the DL 50 Or the long-term toxicity/exposure ratio less than 5, unless an appropriate risk assessment specifically establishes the absence of unacceptable impact after the use of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions;
B.
The bioconcentration index (IBC, relative to fatty tissue) is greater than 1, unless an appropriate risk assessment specifically establishes the absence of unacceptable direct or indirect effects after the use of the phytosanitary product in The proposed conditions.

9CI-2.5.2.2 Risks to Aquatic Organisms

1 There is no authorization for potential exposure of aquatic organisms if:

A.
The toxicity/exposure ratio for fish and daphnia is less than 100 for acute exposure and 10 for long-term exposure;
B.
The inhibition ratio of algal/exposure growth is less than 10;
C.
The maximum IBC is greater than 1 000 for active substances that are easily biodegradable or 100 for those which are not, in the plant health products concerned.

2 However, authorisation may be granted if an appropriate risk assessment specifically establishes that the use of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions does not have an unacceptable impact on the survival of the species exposed Directly or indirectly (predators).

9CI-2.5.2.3 Risks to Common Bees

No authorisation shall be granted in the case of potential exposure of the common bees if the risk quotients of exposure of bees by contact or orally are greater than 50, unless an appropriate risk assessment establishes Specifically that the use of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions does not have an unacceptable impact on the larvae, the behaviour of the bees and the survival and development of the colony.

9CI-2.5.2.4 Risks to useful arthropods other than the common bee

No use authorisation shall be granted in the event of potential exposure of useful arthropods other than the common bee if more than 30 % of the guinea pig organisms are affected by lethal and sublethal laboratory tests Unless an appropriate risk assessment specifically establishes that the use of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions does not have an unacceptable impact on the organisms in question. Any assertion of selectivity and any proposal for use in an integrated pest control system must be duly substantiated.

9CI-2.5.2.5 Risks to earthworms

No authorization shall be granted in the case of potential exposure of earthworms if the acute/exposure ratio of worms is less than 10 or the long-term toxicity/exposure ratio less than 5, unless an appropriate assessment of the There is no concrete evidence that the use of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions is harmless to earthworms.

9CI-2.5.2.6 Risks to non-subject micro-organisms

No authorization is granted for potential exposure of non-subject soil microorganisms if nitrogen or carbon mineralization tests performed in the laboratory reveal a change in these processes by more than 25 % after 100 Days, unless an appropriate risk assessment specifically establishes that the use of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions does not have an unacceptable impact on microbial activity, taking into account the ability to multiply Microorganisms.

9CI-2.6 Analytical Methods

The methods proposed must correspond to the state of the art. For per-put validation of the proposed analytical methods for the purposes of post-approval monitoring and control, the criteria referred to in the c. 2.6.1 and 2.6.2 shall be completed.

9CI-2.6.1 Analysis of Composition

The method shall be used to identify and identify the active substance (s) and, if necessary, any impurity and any significant toxicological, ecotoxicological or environmental co-formulant.

9CI-2.6.2 Analysis of Residues

1 The method should be used to identify and confirm the presence of significant toxicological, ecotoxicological, or environmental residues.

2 The average recovery rate must be between 70 % and 110 %, with a relative standard deviation of less than or equal to 20 %.

3 The repeatability must be less than the following values for residues in foodstuffs, the intermediate values being determined by interpolation from a log-logarithmic representation:

Residue content [mg/kg]

Difference in [mg/kg]

Difference in [%]

0.01

0.005

50

0.1

0.025

25

1

0.125

12.5

> 1

12.5

4 The reproducibility must be less than the following values for residues in foodstuffs, the intermediate values being determined by interpolation from a log-logarithmic representation:

Residue content [mg/kg]

Difference in [mg/kg]

Difference in [%]

0.01

0.01

100

0.1

0.05

50

1

0.25

25

> 1

25

5 In the case of analysis of residues in plants, plant products, foodstuffs, feed or products of animal origin treated, the sensitivity of the proposed methods must meet the following criteria, except where the Maximum residue content established or proposed is the limit of determination:

Maximum level of mg/kg

Mg/kg determination limit

> 0.5

0.1

0.5-0.05

0.1-0.02

< 0.05

Maximum Content ' 0.5

9CI-2.7 Physical and Chemical Properties

9CI-2.7.1 When an appropriate FAO standard is available

Where an appropriate FAO standard exists, this standard must be met.

9CI-2.7.2 When no suitable FAO standard is available

Where there is no suitable FAO standard, the physical and chemical properties of the phytosanitary product must meet the following requirements:

A.
Chemical properties: The difference between the declared content and the actual content of the active substance of the phytosanitary product shall not exceed the following tolerances, for the duration of the product's storage:

Content declared in g/kg or g/l at 20ºC

Tolerance

Up to 25

± 15 % homogeneous formulation ± 25 % non-homogeneous formulation

Above 25 to 100

± 10 %

Above 100 to 250

± 6 %

Above 250 to 500

± 5 %

Above 500

± 25 g/kg; ± 25 g/l

B.
Physical properties: Phytosanitary product must meet the physical criteria (including stability during storage) defined for the appropriate formulation type in the "Manual for the development and use of FAO standards for plant protection products" .

9CI-2.7.3 Vat mixtures

Where the proposed label requires or recommends to use the mixture with other phytosanitary and/or adjuvant products and contains guidance on the accounting of the preparation with other phytosanitary products with They are mixed, these products or adjuvants must be physically and chemically compatible in the mixture.

Part 2: Uniform principles for the assessment and authorisation of plant protection products containing micro-organisms

9AII
Introduction
9BII
Evaluation
9BII-1
General Principles
9BII-2
Specific Principles
9BII-2.1
Identity
9BII-2.2
Biological, physical, chemical and technical properties
9BII-2.3
Additional information
9BII-2.4
Effectiveness
9BII-2.5
Methods of identification/detection and quantification
9BII-2.6
Impact on human or animal health
9BII-2.7
Environmental fate and behaviour
9BII-2.8
Effects on and exposure to non-target organisms
9BII-2.9
Conclusions and proposals
9CII
Decision-making
9CII-1
General Principles
9CII-2
Specific Principles
9CII-2.1
Identity
9CII-2.2
Biological and technical properties
9CII-2.3
Additional information
9CII-2-4
Effectiveness
9CII-2.5
Methods of identification/detection and quantification
9CII-2.6
Impact on human or animal health
9CII-2.7
Environmental fate and behaviour
9CII-2.8
Effects on non-target organisms

9AII Introduction

1 The principles set out in Part II of this Annex are intended to ensure that assessments and decisions on the authorization of plant protection products, provided that they are microbial phytosanitary products, are Reflect the application of the requirements set out in s. 17 of this order with a high level of protection of human or animal health and the environment.

2 When assessing applications for the granting of authorisations, assessment and approval services shall:

A.
Ensure that the records provided on microbial phytosanitary products comply with the requirements of Schedule 6, c. 3, no later than at the time of completion of the screening assessment;
B.
Ensure that the data provided is acceptable in terms of quantity, quality, consistency and reliability and sufficient to permit proper assessment of the record;
C.
Assess, where appropriate, the elements advanced by the applicant to justify the non-disclosure of certain data;
D.
Take into account the data in Annex 5, c. 3, concerning the active substance consisting of micro-organisms (including viruses) contained in the phytosanitary product which have been communicated for the registration of the microorganism concerned in Annex 1, as well as the results of The evaluation of these data;
E.
Consider other relevant technical or scientific information that is reasonably available to them and which relates to the performance of the plant health product or the potential adverse effects of the product Plant, its components or its metabolites/toxins.

3 Any reference to the data in Annex 5, c. 3, in the specific principles relating to the assessment shall be deemed to relate to the data referred to in para. 2, let. B.

4 Where the data and information provided are sufficient to enable the evaluation of one of the proposed uses to be carried out, the application shall be evaluated and a decision shall be taken for that use. In view of the justifications put forward and any subsequent clarifications, the approval service rejects applications for the granting of authorisations for which missing data prevents completion of the full evaluation And make a reliable decision for at least one of the proposed uses.

5 During the assessment and decision-making process, the approval service and evaluation services work with the applicants to quickly resolve any matter related to the case, to determine from the outset any further study Necessary for the proper assessment of the product, to change any proposal for a condition of use of the plant health product or to modify the nature or composition of the product in such a way as to ensure full compliance with the Requirements of this Annex. The approval service shall normally adopt a reasoned decision within a period of twelve months from the availability of a complete technical file. A complete technical file is a file that meets all the requirements of Schedule 6, c. 3.

6 Judgments carried out by the competent evaluation services during the assessment and decision-making process must be based on scientific principles, preferably internationally recognised, as well as on the expert opinion.

7 A microbial pest product may contain viable and non-viable micro-organisms (including viruses) and formulants. It may also contain relevant metabolites/toxins produced during growth, growth medium residues and microbial contaminants. The microorganism, relevant metabolites/toxins and the phytosanitary product, as well as the residual growth medium and microbial contaminants present, must all be evaluated.

8 Evaluation services should take into account the guidance documents that have been communicated to the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health.

9 With regard to genetically modified micro-organisms, the ODE should be taken into account 6 The evaluation conducted under this order must be provided and considered.

10 Definitions and explanation of microbiology terms:

A.
Antibiosis: a relationship between at least two species in which one species is harmful to the other (the noxious species producing toxins).
B.
Antigen: any substance which, after having been placed in contact with the appropriate cells, induces a state of sensitivity and/or immune response after a period of latency (days or weeks) and which reacts in a demonstrable manner with antibodies And/or immune cells of the subject sensitized in vivo or in vitro.
C.
Antimicrobial agents: antimicrobial agents or antimicrobials refer to natural, semi-synthetic or synthetic substances that have antimicrobial activity (either destroy microorganisms or prevent their growth), including:
1.
Antibiotics, which refer to substances produced by or from micro-organisms, and
2.
Anticoccidians, which refer to substances that are active against coccidia, single-celled protozoa.
D.
UFC: colony-forming unit (propagule); one or more cells that grow until they form a single visible colony.
E.
Colonization: Proliferation and persistence of a microorganism in an environment, such as external surfaces (skin) or internal body (intestine, lungs). For colonization, the microorganism must at least persist for longer than expected in a specific organ. The microorganism population may decrease, but at a slower rate than under normal conditions; it may be a constant population or a growing population. Colonization may be related to harmless and functional micro-organisms or pathogenic microorganisms. Potential impacts are not identified.
F.
Ecological niche: the unique environmental position occupied by a particular species, perceived in terms of the actual physical space occupied and the function assumed within the community or ecosystem.
G.
Host: man, animal) or a plant that hosts or feeds another organism (parasite).
H.
Host specificity: The range of different host species that can be colonized by a species or a microbial strain. A host-specific microorganism colonizes or has adverse effects on one or only a small number of different host species. A microorganism without host specificity may colonize or cause adverse effects on a large number of different host species.
I.
Infection: the introduction or entry of a pathogenic micro-organism into a sensitive host, whether or not it causes pathogenic effects or disease. The body must enter the body of the host, usually in the cells, and be able to reproduce to form new infectious units. The mere ingestion of a pathogen does not involve infection.
J.
Infectious: capable of transmitting infection.
K.
Infectivity: the characteristics of a microorganism that allow it to infect a sensitive host.
L.
Invasion: the entry of a microorganism into the host body (for example, effective penetration of the integument, epithelial cells of the intestine, etc.). "Penetration followed by colonization" is a property of pathogenic microorganisms.
M.
Multiplication: the ability of a microorganism to reproduce and increase in number during an infection.
N.
Mycotoxin: a fungal toxin.
O.
Non-viable micro-organism: a microorganism unable to reproduce by replication or transfer of genetic material.
P.
Non-viable residue: a residue unable to reproduce by replication or transfer of genetic material.
Q.
Pathogenicity: the ability of a micro-organism to cause illness and/or harm to the host. Many pathogens cause the disease through a combination of (i) toxicity and invasiveness or (ii) toxicity and colonization capacity. However, some invasive pathogens cause disease resulting from an abnormal reaction of the host defence system.
R.
Symbiosis: a type of interaction between organisms in which one organism lives in intimate association with another and that is beneficial to both organizations.
S.
A viable micro-organism: a microorganism capable of replication by replication or the transfer of genetic material.
T.
Viable residue: a residue capable of reproducing or transferring genetic material.
U.
Viroid: any category of infectious agents consisting of a small strand of RNA not associated with a protein. The RNA does not determine the protein code and is not translated; it is replicated by replication by the host cell enzymes. Viroids are known to cause serious plant diseases.
V.
Virulence: measure the ability of a micro-organism to cause a disease that is indicated by the severity of the disease produced. Measurement of dosage (size of inoculum) required to cause a specific degree of pathogenicity. It is measured experimentally by the mean lethal dose (LD50) or the average infectious dose (DI50).

9BII Evaluation

1 The objective of an evaluation is to identify and evaluate, on a scientific basis and until new results are obtained by experiments on a case-by-case basis, the potential adverse effects on human or animal health and to The environment for the use of a microbial pest control product. The evaluation is also conducted to identify the need for action to manage risks and to identify and recommend appropriate action.

2 Given the capacity of micro-organisms to replicate, there is a clear difference between the chemicals and the microorganisms used as plant protection products. Hazards are not necessarily the same as those presented by chemicals, in particular as regards the ability of micro-organisms to persist and multiply in different environments. In addition, micro-organisms consist of a wide range of different organisms with all their unique characteristics. These differences between the micro-organisms in the assessment should be taken into account.

3 Ideally, the micro-organism contained in the phytosanitary product should play the role of a cell plant working directly on the site where the target organism is harmful, therefore understanding the mode of action is a step Cruelty to the assessment process. The following information is considered:

A.
Toxicology studies;
B.
Biological properties of the micro-organism;
C.
Relatives of known plant, animal or human pathogens;
D.
The mode of action;
E.
Methods of analysis.

4 On the basis of this information, metabolites may be considered as potentially relevant. Therefore, potential exposure to these metabolites should be assessed in order to determine their relevance.

9BII-1 General principles

1 Based on current scientific and technical knowledge, the evaluation services assess the information provided in accordance with the requirements of the ch. 3 of Annexes 5 and 6, and in particular:

A.
Identify and assess the hazards and their significance and appreciate the likely risks to humans, animals and the environment, and
B.
They assess performance in terms of efficacy and phytotoxicity/pathogenicity of the phytosanitary product for each use that is the subject of an application for authorization.

2 The quality/methodology of the tests, where there are no standard test methods, shall be evaluated and the following characteristics, when available, should be analysed: relevance, representativeness, sensitivity, Specificity, reproducibility, interlaboratory validations, predictability.

3 In interpreting the results of evaluations, the evaluation services shall take into account, where appropriate, the potential uncertainties contained in the information obtained during the assessment, in order to minimise the risk of Non-detection of adverse effects or underestimation of their significance. As part of the decision-making process, the Member States are looking for the relevant data or decision-making elements, for which the element of uncertainty could lead to a misclassification of risk.

4 The first assessment is based on the best available data or estimates that reflect realistic conditions for the use of the phytosanitary product. It shall be followed by a new assessment, taking into account the potential uncertainties of the critical data and a series of probable conditions of use and providing a realistic approach to the most unfavourable case, in order to Whether the first assessment could have been significantly different.

5 Evaluation services evaluate each microbial pest product for which authorization is sought-the information assessed for the microorganism can be considered. The assessment services must take into account the fact that any co-formulant may have an impact on the characteristics of the plant health product in comparison with the microorganism.

6 When assessing applications and granting authorisations, the assessment and approval services shall take into account the specific conditions of use provided for, in particular the purpose of the use, the dosage of the phytosanitary product, the The mode, frequency and timing of its application, and the nature and composition of the phytosanitary product. They also take into account the principles of integrated pest management whenever possible.

7 Evaluation services take into account the agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions (including climate) in the areas of use.

8 Where the specific principles set out in section 9BII-2 provide for the use of calculation models in the assessment of a phytosanitary product, these models shall:

A.
Provide the best possible estimate of all relevant processes, taking into account realistic parameters and assumptions;
B.
Be subject to evaluation in accordance with point 1.3;
C.
Be duly validated, the measures being carried out under appropriate conditions of use for the use of the model;
D.
Correspond to the conditions in the area of use;
E.
Be supported by details of how the model calculates the estimates provided, as well as explanations of all inputs in the model and details of how they were obtained.

9 The data requirements specified in the c. 3 of Annexes 5 and 63 contain guidance on when and how certain information should be presented and the procedures to be followed for the preparation and evaluation of a file. These guidelines must be respected.

9BII-2 Specific principles

The evaluation services shall apply the following principles in the evaluation of the data and information provided in support of applications, without prejudice to the general principles laid down in Section 1.

9BII-2.1 Identity

9BII-2.1.1 Identity of the microorganism contained in the plant health product

1 The identity of the microorganism must be clearly established. Appropriate data should be provided in order to allow verification of the identity of the microorganism at the level of the strain contained in the phytosanitary product.

2 The identity of the microorganism is assessed at the strain level. When the microorganism is a genetically modified mutant or organism, the specific differences with other strains of the same species must be recorded. Data relating to the possible rest phases of the microorganism must be recorded.

3 The deposit of the strain with a collection of international reputable microorganisms must be verified.

9BII-2.1.2 Identity of Phytosanitary Product

The evaluation services assess the detailed quantitative and qualitative information provided on the composition of the plant health product, such as those concerning the micro-organism (see above), relevant metabolites/toxins, The residual growth medium, coformulants and microbial contaminants present.

9BII-2.2 Biological, Physical, Chemical and Technical Properties

9BII-2.2.1 Biological properties of the microorganism contained in the phytosanitary product

9BII-2.2.1.1 Origin of strain

The origin of the strain, where relevant, its natural habitat, including the indications on the natural population level, the life cycle and the possibilities of survival, colonization, reproduction and dispersal must be evaluated. The proliferation of indigenous micro-organisms is expected to stabilize after a brief period of growth and then to the natural base level.

9BII-2.2.1.2 Adaptability

1 The ability of microorganisms to adapt to the environment needs to be assessed. Evaluation services should take into account the following principles:

A.
Depending on the conditions (e.g. Availability of substrates for growth and metabolism), microorganisms may or may not express specific phenotypic traits;
B.
Microbial strains that are most suitable for the environment can survive better and multiply than unsuitable strains. The adapted strains benefit from a selective advantage and may constitute the majority in a population after a number of generations;
C.
Relatively rapid multiplication of micro-organisms results in an increased frequency of mutations. If a mutation promotes survival in the environment, the mutant strain may become dominant;
D.
Virus properties, in particular, can change rapidly, including virulence.

2 Therefore, the information concerning the genetic stability of the micro-organism in the environmental conditions of use and the information concerning the capacity of the micro-organism should be evaluated, where appropriate. Transfer of genetic material to other organisms and information relating to the stability of coded characters.

9BII-2.2.1.3 Mode of action

The mode of action of the micro-organism should be evaluated in as much detail as possible. The potential role of metabolites/toxins in the mode of action should be assessed and, where identified, the minimum effective concentration for all active metabolites/toxins should be established. Information on the mode of action can be a very useful tool for identifying potential risks. The elements to be considered in the evaluation are as follows:

A.
Antibiosis;
B.
Induction of plant resistance;
C.
Interference with virulence of a pathogenic target organism;
D.
Endophytic growth;
E.
Root colonization;
F.
Competition for ecological niche (e.g. Nutrients, habitats);
G.
Parasitism;
H.
Pathogenicity of invertebrates.

9BII-2.2.1.4 Effects on non-target organisms

In order to assess the possible effects on non-target organisms, information concerning the host specificity of the microorganism must be evaluated in the light of the characteristics and properties described in the letters a and b:

A.
The ability of a micro-organism to be pathogenic to non-target organisms (man, animals and other non-target organisms) must be assessed. Any relation to known plant, animal or human pathogens, which are species of the same genus as active micro-organisms and/or contaminants, should be evaluated.
B.
Pathogenicity and virulence are strongly related to the species (depending, in particular, on body temperature and physiological environment) and host conditions (p. Ex. Health status, immune status). Thus, the multiplication in the human body depends on the ability of the microorganism to develop at the body temperature of the host. Some micro-organisms can develop and be metabolically active only at temperatures well below or above human body temperature and therefore cannot be pathogenic to humans. However, the mode of entry of the microorganism into the host (oral, inhalation, polish/injury) may also be a decisive factor. Thus, a given microbial species can cause disease by entering through a lesion of the skin, but not by entering the oral route.

9BII-2.2.1.5 Evaluation of resistance

Many microorganisms produce antibiotic substances that cause normal interference in the microbial community. Resistance to antimicrobial agents of importance to human and veterinary medicine needs to be assessed. The possibility of gene transfer encoding resistance to antimicrobial agents must be evaluated.

9BII-2.2.2 Physical, Chemical and Technical Properties of Phytosanitary Product

9BII-2.2.2.1 Technical properties

Depending on the nature of the microorganism and the type of formulation, the technical properties of the phytosanitary product must be evaluated.

9BII-2.2.2.2 Storage and storage

The shelf life and storage stability of the preparation must be evaluated in light of possible changes in the composition due to the growth of the micro-organism or micro-organisms, to the production of Metabolites/toxins, etc.

9BII-2.2.2.3 Physical and Chemical Properties

The evaluation services assess the physical and chemical properties of the plant health product and the maintenance of these characteristics after storage and take into account:

A.
Where there is a suitable United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) standard, the physical and chemical properties referred to in this standard;
B.
Where there is no adequate FAO standard, all physical and chemical properties relevant to the formulation, which are included in the FAO and World Organization for the Development and Use of Standards Health (WHO) for pesticides.

9BII-2.2.2.4 Mixture

Where, in accordance with the indications on the proposed label, it is required or recommended to use the mixture with other phytosanitary or adjuvant products, and/or where the proposed label contains indications of The compatibility of the mixture with other plant protection products, these phytosanitary or adjuvants must be physically and chemically compatible in the mixture. Biological compatibility must also be demonstrated for mixtures, that is, it must be demonstrated that each plant product in the mixture reacts as intended and that there is no antagonism.

9BII-2.3 Further information

9BII-2.3.1 Quality control of the production of the micro-organism contained in the plant health product

The quality assurance criteria proposed for the production of the microorganism must be evaluated. In the process control evaluation criteria, consideration should be given to good production practices, operational practices, workflow, cleaning habits, microbial monitoring, and Hygiene conditions, in order to guarantee a good quality of the micro-organism. The quality, stability, purity, etc. of the micro-organism must be treated in the quality control system.

9BII-2.3.2 Quality Control of Phytosanitary Product

Quality assurance criteria must be assessed. If the phytosanitary product contains metabolites/toxins produced during growth and residues from the growth medium, they should be evaluated. The potential for the presence of micro-organisms must be assessed.

9BII-2.4 Effectiveness

9BII-2.4.1 Impact in Use Area

Where the proposed use relates to the control or protection of an organism, the evaluation services shall assess the possibility that the organism may be harmful in the agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions (including Of the proposed area of use.

9BII-2.4.2 Impact on non-use

The assessment services shall evaluate, taking into account the agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions (including climate), the possibility of major damage, loss or disadvantage in the area of proposed use if the Phytosanitary product was not used.

9BII-2.4.3 Efficiency

The evaluation services shall evaluate the data on the effectiveness of the phytosanitary product referred to in Annex 6, c. 3, taking into account the degree of control or magnitude of the desired effect and the relevant experimental conditions such as:

A.
The choice of crop or cultivar;
B.
Agronomic and environmental conditions (including climate), (if necessary for an acceptable efficiency, this data/information should also be provided for the period preceding and following the application);
C.
The presence and density of the pest;
D.
The stage of development of the culture and organization;
E.
The amount of microwell-used phytosanitary product;
F.
The amount of adjuvant added, when this addition is required on the label;
G.
The frequency and timing of applications;
H.
The type of application equipment;
I.
The need for specific cleaning measures for the application equipment.

9BII-2.4.4 Impact on Integrated Pest Management

1 The evaluation services assess the performance of the phytosanitary product in the series of agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions (including climatic conditions) likely to occur in the area of the proposed use. The impact on integrated pest management should be included in the evaluation. In particular, consideration should be given to:

A.
The intensity, uniformity and persistence of the desired effect as a function of the dose by comparison with an appropriate reference product (s), if any, and with an untreated control;
B.
Where applicable, the impact on performance or the reduction of losses during storage, in quantitative and/or qualitative terms, by comparison with an appropriate reference product (s), if any, and with an untreated control.

2 Where an appropriate reference product does not exist, the evaluation services assess the performance of the phytosanitary product in order to determine whether its application has consistent and specific benefits under conditions Agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental (including climatic) areas of the proposed use.

9BII-2.4.5 Impact on treated crops

The assessment services assess the extent of adverse effects on the crop treated after the application of the phytosanitary product according to the conditions likely to occur in the area of the proposed use, by comparison, the case With one or more appropriate reference products if available and/or with an untreated control.

A.
This assessment is based on the following information:
1.
Effectiveness data;
2.
Other relevant information on the plant health product, such as the nature of the product, the dose, the mode of application, the number and timing of applications, the incompatibility with other treatments of crops;
3.
All relevant information about the microorganism, including biological properties, such as mode of action, survival, host specificity.
B.
This assessment includes:
1.
The nature, frequency, extent and persistence of the observed phytotoxic/phytopathogenic effects, as well as the agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions (including climate) that influence them;
2.
Differences in sensitivity to phytotoxic/phytopathogenic effects between the major cultivars;
3.
The part of the crop or plant products treated with phytotoxic/phytopathogenic effects;
4.
The negative effect on the quantitative and/or qualitative performance of the treated crop or plant products;
5.
The negative effect on treated plants or plant products intended for propagation, in terms of viability, germination, growth, rooting and establishment;
6.
For the micro-organisms that are scattered, the negative effect on neighbouring cultures.

9BII-2.4.6 Mixtures

1 Where, in accordance with the label of the phytosanitary product, it is appropriate to use it in combination with other plant protection products and/or adjuvants, the assessment services shall submit the information provided concerning this mixture to the Assessments referred to in points 2.4.3 to 2.4.5.

2 When, in accordance with the label of the phytosanitary product, it is recommended to use it in combination with other phytosanitary and/or adjuvant products, the assessment services appreciate the opportunity of the mixture and its conditions Of use.

9BII-2.4.7 Impact on subsequent crops

Where available data indicates that the microorganism or relevant metabolites/toxins or significant reaction and degradation products of formulants remain in non-negligible amounts in the soil and/or in or on the Of plant substances after the application of the phytosanitary product according to the intended use conditions, the assessment services assess the extent of the adverse effects on the following crops.

9BII-2.4.8 Impact on vertebrates to be combed

Where the proposed use of the phytosanitary product is intended to have an effect on vertebrates, the evaluation services evaluate the mechanism which produces this action and the observed effects on the behaviour and health of the target animals; where The action sought is the elimination of the target animal, they evaluate the time necessary to cause the death of the animal and the conditions in which death occurs. This includes the following information:

A.
All relevant information provided for in Annex 5, c. 3 and the results of their assessment, including toxicology studies;
B.
All relevant information on the phytosanitary product provided for in Annex 6, c. 3, including toxicological studies and efficacy data.

9BII-2.5 Methods of identification/detection and quantification

Evaluation services shall evaluate the analytical methods proposed for post-registration monitoring and control of viable and non-viable components, both in formulation and as residues in or on crops Processed. Sufficient validation is required for pre-authorization methods and post-approval monitoring methods. The methods considered appropriate for post-authorisation monitoring should be clearly identified.

9BII-2.5.1 Methods of Phytosanitary Product Analysis

9BII-2.5.1.1 Non-Viable Components

The evaluation services evaluate the analytical methods proposed to identify and quantify the non-viable components of toxicological, ecotoxicological or environmental significance resulting from the micro-organism and/or present. Impurities or coformulants (including, where appropriate, the resulting degradation and/or reaction products). This includes the following information:

A.
The specificity and linearity of the proposed methods;
B.
The precision (repeatability) of the proposed methods;
C.
The importance of interference;
D.
The accuracy of the proposed methods at appropriate concentrations;
E.
The quantification limits of the proposed methods.

9BII-2.5.1.2 Viable Components

The evaluation services evaluate the methods of analysis proposed to quantify and identify the specific strain concerned and in particular the methods distinguishing this strain from closely related strains. This includes the following information:

A.
The specificity of the proposed methods;
B.
The precision (repeatability) of the proposed methods;
C.
The importance of interference;
D.
The ability to quantify proposed methods.

9BII-2.5.2 Analytical Methods for Residue Determination

9BII-2.5.2.1 Non-viable Residues

The evaluation services evaluate the proposed analytical methods for identifying and quantifying significant non-viable residues from the toxicological, ecotoxicological or environmental point of view of the micro-organism (including the case) Resulting degradation and/or reaction products).

This evaluation shall take into account the data on the analytical methods provided for in the c. 3 of Annexes 5 and 6, and the results of their evaluation. This includes the following information:

A.
The specificity and linearity of the proposed methods;
B.
The precision (repeatability) of the proposed methods;
C.
Reproducibility (independent laboratory validation) of the proposed methods;
D.
The importance of interference;
E.
The accuracy of the proposed methods at appropriate concentrations;
F.
The quantification limits of the proposed methods.

9BII-2.5.2.2 Viable Residues

The evaluation services evaluate the methods proposed to identify the specific strain concerned and in particular the methods distinguishing this strain from closely related strains.

This evaluation shall take into account the data on the analytical methods provided for in the c. 3 of Annexes 5 and 6, and the results of their evaluation. This includes the following information:

A.
The specificity of the proposed methods;
B.
The precision (repeatability) of the proposed methods;
C.
The importance of interference;
D.
The ability to quantify proposed methods.

9BII-2.6 Impact on human or animal health

The impact on human or animal health needs to be assessed. Evaluation services should take into account the following principles:

A.
Given the capacity of micro-organisms to replicate, there is a clear difference between chemicals and micro-organisms used as plant protection products. Hazards are not necessarily the same as those presented by chemicals, in particular as regards the ability of micro-organisms to persist and multiply in different environments;
B.
The pathogenicity of the microorganism to humans and animals (non-targets), the infectivity of the microorganism, its ability to form colonies, the toxicity of metabolites/toxins, and the toxicity of the residual growth medium, of the Contaminants and co-formulants, are important parameters in the assessment of the adverse effects of the phytosanitary product;
C.
Colonization, infectivity, and toxicity correspond to a complex set of interactions between micro-organisms, and hosts and parameters may not necessarily be resolved easily as independent parameters;
D.
By combining these parameters, the main aspects of the micro-organism that need to be evaluated are:
1.
The ability to persist and multiply in a host (sign of colonization or infectivity),
2.
Ability to produce adverse or non-adverse effects on the host, indicating infectivity, pathogenicity and/or toxicity.
E.
In addition, the complexity of biological problems should be taken into account in assessing the risks and risks posed by the use of these plant health products for humans and animals. An assessment of pathogenicity and infectivity is required, although potential exposure is considered low.
F.
For the purposes of risk assessment, acute toxicity studies should, when available, include at least two doses (e.g. A very high dose and a dose corresponding to exposure under practical conditions).

9BII-2.6.1 Effects on human or animal health resulting from the phytosanitary product

9BII-2.6.1.1 User Exposure

Evaluation services assess the exposure of operators to the micro-organism, and/or the relevant toxicological compounds of the plant health product (e.g. Their metabolites/toxins, residual growth medium, contaminants and co-formulants), which is likely to interfere with the intended use conditions (including, in particular, dose, mode of application, and conditions Climate). It is important to use realistic data on exposure levels, and if these are not available, an appropriate and validated calculation model should be used. When available, a harmonised European database on generic exposure to plant protection products should be used.

A.
This assessment is based on the following information:
1.
Medical data and studies related to toxicity, infectivity and pathogenicity set out in Schedule 5, c. 3, and the results of their evaluation. The first phase tests should allow for an evaluation of the microorganism, in terms of its ability to persist and develop in the host and its ability to cause effects/reactions in the host. Parameters indicating lack of ability to persist and multiply in a host and ability to produce adverse or adverse effects on the host include rapid and complete removal of the body, no activation of the immune system, or Histopathological changes and replication at temperatures well below or above the body temperature of a mammal. These parameters can, in some cases, be evaluated through the use of acute toxicity studies and existing data for humans, and can sometimes only be evaluated through the use of repeated administration studies.
The assessment based on the relevant parameters of the first phase tests shall result in an assessment of the possible effects in the context of occupational exposure, taking into account the intensity and duration of the exposure, including Exposure due to repeated use during practical use.
The toxicity of certain metabolites/toxins can be assessed only if it is shown that the tested animals are actually exposed to these metabolites/toxines;
2.
Other relevant information on the micro-organism, metabolites/toxins, residual growth medium, contaminants and coformulants in the phytosanitary product, such as their biological, physical and chemical properties (e.g. The survival of the microorganism at the body temperature of man and animals, the ecological niche, the behaviour of the microorganism and/or the metabolites/toxins during the application);
3.
Toxicological studies as set out in Annex 6, c. 3;
4.
Other relevant information provided for in Annex 6, c. 3, such as:
-
The composition of the preparation,
-
The nature of the preparation
-
The dimensions, presentation and packaging type,
-
The field of use and the nature of the culture or target,
-
The method of application, including the handling, loading and mixing of the phytosanitary product,
-
The recommended exposure reduction measures,
-
Recommended protective clothing,
-
The maximum application dose,
-
The minimum volume of spray application indicated on the label,
-
The number and timing of applications;
B.
On the basis of the information referred to in the paragraph, the following parameters should be defined for a single or repeated exposure of the operator following the intended use:
1.
Persistence or development of the microorganism in the host,
2.
Observed adverse effects,
3.
Observed or expected effects of contaminants (including micro-organisms contaminants),
4.
Observed or expected effects of relevant metabolites/toxins.
If there are indications of colonization in the host and/or if adverse effects, indicative of toxicity/infectivity, are observed, taking into account the type of exposure (i.e. acute or repeated exposure), additional tests are Recommended.
C.
This assessment shall be carried out for each type of method and application material proposed for the use of the plant health product, as well as for the different types and sizes of containers used, taking into account the mixing operations, The loading and application of the phytosanitary product, as well as routine cleaning and maintenance of the application equipment. Where appropriate, other permitted uses, within the intended use area, of the plant health product containing the same active substance or producing the same residues may also be taken into account. Account should be taken of the fact that if the micro-organism is to be replicated, the exposure assessment could be extremely hypothetical;
D.
The absence or presence of a potential colonization or effect for operators at the dose levels tested in accordance with c. 3 of Appendices 5 and 6 must be evaluated against the measured or estimated levels of human exposure. This risk assessment, preferably quantitative, must take into account, for example, the mode of action, the biological, physical and chemical properties of the micro-organism and the other substances in the formulation.

9BII-2.6.1.2 Packaging

The evaluation services shall review information on the nature and characteristics of the proposed packaging, in particular with regard to the following aspects:

A.
The mode of presentation;
B.
Its dimensions and capacity;
C.
Size of the opening;
D.
The type of closure
E.
Its robustness, sealing and resistance to normal conditions of transport and handling;
F.
Its resistance to content and its compatibility with it.

9BII-2.6.1.3 Equipment for protection

The evaluation services shall examine the nature and characteristics of the proposed protective equipment and clothing, in particular with regard to the following aspects:

A.
Availability and adequacy;
B.
Effectiveness;
C.
Comfort, taking into account physical constraints and climatic conditions;
D.
Resistance to and compatibility with the phytosanitary product.

9BII-2.6.1.4 Exposure of other persons

Assessment services assess the possibility of exposure of other persons (persons present or workers exposed after the application of the phytosanitary product, such as the return of workers) or animals to the microorganism and/or Other toxic elements of the phytosanitary product, under the conditions of intended use. This assessment is based on the following information:

A.
Medical data and studies related to toxicity, infectivity and pathogenicity in Schedule 5, c. 3, and the results of their evaluation. The first phase tests should allow for an assessment of the micro-organism in terms of its ability to persist and develop in the host and its ability to cause effects/reactions in the host. Parameters indicating lack of ability to persist and multiply in a host and ability to produce adverse or adverse effects on the host include rapid and complete removal of the body, no activation of the immune system, or Histopathological changes and inability to replicate at very lower or very high temperatures than the body temperature of a mammal. These parameters can, in some cases, be evaluated using acute toxicity studies and existing data for humans, and can sometimes only be evaluated using repeated administration studies.
The assessment based on the relevant parameters of the first phase tests shall result in an assessment of the possible effects in the context of occupational exposure, taking into account the intensity and duration of the exposure, including Exposure due to repeated use during practical use.
The toxicity of certain metabolites/toxins can be assessed only if it is shown that the tested animals are actually exposed to these metabolites/toxines;
B.
Other relevant information on the micro-organism, metabolites/toxins, residual growth medium, contaminants and coformulants in the phytosanitary product, such as their biological, physical and chemical properties (e.g. The survival of the microorganism at the body temperature of man and animals, the ecological niche, the behaviour of the microorganism and/or the metabolites/toxins during the application);
C.
Toxicological studies as set out in Annex 6, c. 3;
D.
Other relevant information concerning the phytosanitary product provided for in Annex 6, c. 3, such as:
1.
Post-treatment safety delays, necessary wait times or other precautions to be taken to protect humans and animals,
2.
The method of application, including spraying,
3.
The maximum application dose,
4.
The minimum volume of spray application,
5.
The composition of the preparation,
6.
Treatment residues on plants and plant products, taking into account the influence of factors such as temperature, ultraviolet radiation, pH and the presence of certain substances,
7.
Other activities resulting in worker exposure.

9BII-2.6.2 Human or Animal Health Effects from Residues

In the assessment, viable or non-viable residues should be treated separately. Viruses and viroids should be considered as viable residues as they are capable of transferring genetic material, although strictly sensu they are not alive.

9BII-2.6.2.1 Residues not viable

1 Assessment services assess the possibility of exposure of persons or animals to non-viable residues and their degradation products through the food chain due to the possible presence of such residues in or on the parts Edible crops. This includes the following information:

A.
The stage of development of the microorganism to which the non-viable residues are produced,
B.
The stages of development/life cycle of the micro-organism under typical environmental conditions; attention will be paid in particular to the assessment of the probability of survival and multiplication of the micro-organism in or on crops, Food or feed and, as a result, the probability of production of non-viable residues,
C.
Stability of relevant non-viable residues (including the effects of factors such as temperature, ultraviolet radiation, pH and the presence of certain substances),
D.
Any experimental studies showing whether or not relevant non-viable residues are transported in plants,
E.
Data on proposed good agricultural practices (including number and timing of applications, maximum application dose and minimum application volume per spray), pre-harvest periods of employment for Proposed uses or periods of retention or storage in the case of post-harvest uses and additional data relating to the application in accordance with Annex 6, c. 3,
F.
Where applicable, other permitted uses of plant protection products in the intended use area, i.e. uses of products containing the same residues, and
G.
The natural presence of non-viable residues on edible parts of plants from naturally occurring microorganisms.

2 The assessment services assess the toxicity of the non-viable residues and their degradation products, taking into account, in particular, the specific information provided in accordance with the c. 3 of Annexes 5 and 6.

3 Where non-viable residues or their degradation products are considered relevant from a toxicological point of view for humans and/or animals, and where exposure is not considered to be negligible, actual levels in or on the Edible parts of the treated crops shall be determined by taking into consideration:

A.
Methods for the analysis of non-viable residues
B.
The development curves of the microorganism under optimal conditions,
C.
The production/formation of non-viable residues at relevant times (e.g. At the foreseeable harvest time).

9BII-2.6.2.2 Viable Residues

1 Assessment services assess the possibility of exposure of people or animals to viable residues via the food chain due to the possible presence of such residues in or on edible parts of the treated crops. This includes the following information:

A.
The probability of survival, persistence and multiplication of the microorganism in or on crops, food or feed. The different stages of development/life cycle of the micro-organism should be treated,
B.
Information about its ecological niche,
C.
Information on fate and behaviour in different parts of the environment,
D.
The natural presence of the microorganism (and/or a related microorganism),
E.
Data on proposed good agricultural practices (including number and timing of applications, maximum application dose and minimum volume of spray application, pre-harvest periods of employment for Proposed uses or periods of retention or storage in the case of post-harvest uses) and supplementary data concerning the application in accordance with Annex 6, c. 3,
F.
Where applicable, other uses authorized, in the intended use area, of plant protection products containing the same micro-organism or producing the same residues.

2 Evaluation services evaluate specific information on the capacity of viable residues to persist or develop in the host and the capacity of such residues to cause effects/reactions in the host. This includes the following information:

A.
Medical data and studies related to toxicity, infectivity and pathogenicity set out in Schedule 5, c. 3, and the results of their assessment,
B.
Stages of development/life cycle of the micro-organism under typical environmental conditions (e.g. In or on the treated crop),
C.
The mode of action of the micro-organism,
D.
The biological properties of the microorganism (e.g. Host specificity).

The different stages of development/life cycle of the micro-organism should be treated.

3 If viable residues are considered to be relevant from a toxicological point of view for humans and/or animals, and if exposure is not considered to be negligible, actual levels in/on edible parts of treated crops shall be Determined by taking into account:

A.
Viable residue analysis methods,
B.
The development curves of the microorganism under optimal conditions,
C.
Opportunities for extrapolation of data between cultures.

9BII-2.7 Environmental fate and behaviour

1 The biocomplexity of ecosystems and interactions in the microbial communities concerned must be taken into account.

2 Information about origin and properties (e.g. Specificity) of the micro-organism and its residual metabolites/toxins, as well as the intended uses of the microorganism, form the basis for the assessment of fate and behaviour in the environment. It is important to consider the mode of action of the micro-organism.

3 An assessment is made of the fate and behaviour of any known relevant metabolite produced by the microorganism. The assessment shall be carried out for each compartment of the environment and is triggered on the basis of the criteria specified in Section 7 (iv) of Annex II B to Directive 91/414 7 .

4 In assessing the fate and behaviour of the phytosanitary product environment, assessment services consider all aspects of the environment, including biotas. The possibility of persistence and multiplication of micro-organisms must be assessed in all environmental compartments, unless it can be justified that specific micro-organisms will not reach a specific environment. The mobility of microorganisms and their residual metabolites/toxins must be considered.

9BII-2.7.1 Water Risk

1 Assessment services assess the potential for contamination of groundwater, surface water and drinking water under the proposed conditions of use of the phytosanitary product.

2 In the global assessment, the evaluation services pay particular attention to the potential adverse effects on human beings due to groundwater contamination when the active substance is applied in regions Knowledge of conditions of vulnerability, such as food-water production areas.

9BII-2.7.2 Aquatic Risk

1 Assessment services assess the risk to the aquatic environment when the potential for exposure of aquatic organisms exists. A micro-organism can lead to risks by its potential to establish, by multiplication, in the environment and can therefore have a lasting or permanent impact on microbial communities or their predators.

2 This assessment is based on the following information:

A.
The biological properties of the microorganism;
B.
The survival of the microorganism in the environment;
C.
Its ecological niche;
D.
The natural population level of a microorganism when it is indigenous;
E.
Information on fate and behaviour in different parts of the environment;
F.
Where appropriate, information on possible interference with analytical systems used to control the quality of drinking water;
G.
Where applicable, other uses authorised, in the proposed area of use, of plant protection products containing the same active substance or producing the same residues.

9BII-2.7.3 Atmospheric Risk

The assessment services assess the possibility of exposure to the phytosanitary product of organisms in the atmosphere, under the conditions of intended use; if this possibility is real, they assess the risk to the atmosphere. The short or long-distance transport of the micro-organism into the atmosphere must be taken into account.

9BII-2.7.4 Soil risk

1 The evaluation services assess the possibility of exposure to the plant health product of organisms in the terrestrial environment, under the conditions of intended use; if this possibility is real, they assess the risk for the Terrestrial environment. A micro-organism can lead to risks by its potential to establish, by multiplication, in the environment and can therefore have a lasting or permanent impact on microbial communities or its predators.

2 This assessment is based on the following information:

A.
The biological properties of the microorganism;
B.
The survival of the microorganism in the environment;
C.
Its ecological niche;
D.
The natural population level of a microorganism when it is indigenous;
E.
Information on fate and behaviour in different parts of the environment;
F.
Where applicable, other uses authorised, in the proposed area of use, of plant protection products containing the same active substance or producing the same residues.

9BII-2.8 Effects on non-target organisms and their exposure

1 Information on the ecology of the microorganism and its effects on the environment should be evaluated and, if possible, the exposure levels and the effects of its relevant metabolites/toxins. A global assessment, to assess the risks to the environment that the plant health product can cause, is necessary; it takes into account the normal levels of exposure to micro-organisms, both in the environment and in The body of organisms.

2 The evaluation services assess the possibility of exposure of non-target organisms under the intended conditions of use and, if this possibility is real, they assess the risk to the non-target organisations concerned.

3 Where appropriate, an assessment of infectivity and pathogenicity is required, unless it can be demonstrated that the non-target organisms will not be exposed.

4 In order to assess the possibility of exposure, account should also be taken of the following information:

A.
The survival of the microorganism in the respective media;
B.
Its ecological niche;
C.
The natural population level of a microorganism when it is indigenous;
D.
Information on fate and behaviour in different parts of the environment;
E.
Where applicable, other uses authorised, in the area of intended use, of plant protection products containing the same active substance or producing the same residues.

9BII-2.8.1 Impact on terrestrial wildlife

Assessment services assess the potential for exposure and effects on terrestrial wildlife (non-domestic birds, mammals and other terrestrial vertebrates).

9BII-2.8.1.1 Influence of formulation on identified risks

A micro-organism can present risks by its potential to infect and multiply host systems of the avian and mammalian species. It will be considered if the identified risks could be changed or not due to the formulation of the phytosanitary product, taking into account the following information on the micro-organism:

A.
Its mode of action;
B.
Other biological properties;
C.
Studies on mammalian toxicity, pathogenicity and infectivity;
D.
Studies on toxicity, pathogenicity and infectivity for the avian species.

9BII-2.8.1.2 Toxic effects due to action of toxins or co-formulants

1 A phytosanitary product may result in toxic effects due to the action of toxins or co-formulants. In assessing such effects, the following information should be taken into account:

A.
Mammalian toxicity studies;
B.
Toxicity studies for the avian species;
C.
Information about fate and behaviour in different parts of the environment.

2 If mortality or signs of intoxication are observed in the tests, the assessment shall include a calculation of the toxicity/exposure ratios expressed on the basis of the quotient of the LD50 value and the predicted exposure expressed in milligrams per Kilogram of body weight.

9BII-2.8.2 Impact on Aquatic Organisms

Assessment services assess the potential for exposure and effects on aquatic organisms.

9BII-2.8.2.1 Influence of formulation on identified risks

A micro-organism can present risks by its potential to infect and multiply aquatic organisms. It will be considered if the identified risks could be changed or not due to the formulation of the phytosanitary product, taking into account the following information on the micro-organism:

A.
Its mode of action;
B.
Other biological properties;
C.
Studies on toxicity, pathogenicity and infectivity.

9BII-2.8.2.2 Toxic effects due to action of toxins or co-formulants

1 A phytosanitary product may result in toxic effects due to the action of toxins or co-formulants. In assessing such effects, the following information should be taken into account:

A.
Toxicity studies for aquatic organisms;
B.
Information about fate and behaviour in different parts of the environment.

2 If mortality or signs of intoxication are observed in the tests, the assessment shall include a calculation of the toxicity/exposure ratios expressed on the basis of the quotient of the EC50 value and/or the NOEC value and the predicted exposure.

9BII-2.8.3 Impact on Bees

Evaluation services assess the potential for exposure and effects on bees.

9BII-2.8.3.1 Influence of formulation on identified risks

A micro-organism can cause risks by its potential to infect bees and multiply. It will be considered if the identified risks could be changed or not due to the formulation of the phytosanitary product, taking into account the following information on the micro-organism:

A.
Its mode of action,
B.
Other biological properties,
C.
Studies on toxicity, pathogenicity and infectivity.

9BII-2.8.3.2 Toxic effects due to action of toxins or co-formulants

1 A phytosanitary product may result in toxic effects due to the action of toxins or co-formulants. In assessing such effects, the following information should be taken into account:

A.
Toxicity studies for bees;
B.
Information about fate and behaviour in different parts of the environment.

2 If mortality or signs of intoxication are observed in the tests, the assessment shall include a calculation of the risk quotient expressed on the basis of the quotient of the dose in g/ha and the value LD50 in ìg/bee.

9BII-2.8.4 Impact on arthropods other than bees

Assessment services assess the potential for exposure and effects on arthropods other than bees.

9BII-2.8.4.1 Influence of formulation on identified risks

A micro-organism can present risks by its potential to infect and multiply arthropods other than bees. It will be considered if the identified risks could be changed or not due to the formulation of the phytosanitary product, taking into account the following information on the micro-organism:

A.
Its mode of action;
B.
Other biological properties;
C.
Studies on toxicity, pathogenicity and infectivity for common bees and other arthropods.

9BII-2.8.4.2 Toxic effects due to action of toxins or co-formulants

1 A phytosanitary product may result in toxic effects due to the action of toxins or co-formulants. In assessing such effects, the following information should be taken into account:

A.
Toxicity studies for arthropods;
B.
Information on fate and behaviour in different parts of the environment;
C.
Available data from a primary biological examination.

2 If mortality or signs of intoxication are observed in the tests, the assessment shall include a calculation of the toxicity/exposure ratios expressed on the basis of the quotient of the TE50 value (effective rate) and the predicted exposure.

9BII-2.8.5 Impact on earthworms

Assessment services assess the potential for exposure and effects on earthworms.

9BII-2.8.5.1 Influence of formulation on identified risks

A micro-organism can present risks by its potential to infect worms and multiply. It will be considered if the identified risks could be changed or not due to the formulation of the phytosanitary product, taking into account the following information on the micro-organism:

A.
Its mode of action;
B.
Other biological properties;
C.
Studies on toxicity, pathogenicity and infectivity for earthworms.

9BII-2.8.5.2 Toxic effects due to action of toxins or co-formulants

1 A phytosanitary product may result in toxic effects due to the action of toxins or co-formulants. In assessing such effects, the following information should be taken into account:

A.
Toxicity studies for earthworms;
B.
Information about fate and behaviour in different parts of the environment.

2 If mortality or signs of intoxication are observed in the tests, the assessment shall include a calculation of the toxicity/exposure ratios based on the quotient of the LC50 value and the predicted exposure expressed in milligrams Kilogram of dry weight soil.

9BII-2.8.6 Impact on soil micro-organisms

Assessment services assess the potential for exposure and effects on soil microorganisms.

9BII-2.8.6.1 Influence of formulation on identified risks

1 A micro-organism can present risks by its potential to hinder the mineralization of nitrogen and carbon in the soil. It will be considered if the identified risks could be changed or not due to the formulation of the phytosanitary product, taking into account the following information on the micro-organism:

A.
Its mode of action;
B.
Other biological properties.

2 Experimental data are not normally required, particularly where it can be proved that a true risk assessment can be carried out on the basis of the information available.

9BII-2.8.6.2 Effects of Exotic Organisms on Non-Target Organizations

Evaluation services assess the impact of exotic/non-native micro-organisms on non-target organisms and their predators after the use of the phytosanitary product in accordance with the expected conditions of use. Experimental data are not normally required, in particular where it can be demonstrated that an appropriate risk assessment can be carried out with the available information.

9BII-2.8.6.3 Toxic effects due to action of toxins or co-formulants

A phytosanitary product may result in toxic effects due to the action of toxins or co-formulants. In assessing such effects, the following information should be taken into account:

A.
Information on fate and behaviour in different parts of the environment;
B.
Available information from the primary biological examination.

9BII-2.9 Conclusions and proposals

The approval service draws conclusions on the need for further information and/or testing and on the need for measures to mitigate risks. The evaluation services justify the proposals for classification and labelling of the plant health product.

9CII Decision Making Process

9CII-1 General Principles

1 Where appropriate, the approval service shall attach conditions or restrictions to the authorisations. The nature and severity of these conditions or restrictions must be determined by the nature and extent of the benefits and risks that can be expected and adapted to them.

2 The approval service shall ensure that decisions taken to grant authorisations take into account the agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions, including climatic conditions, in the areas of use envisaged. These considerations may lead to the establishment of conditions and restrictions of use, or even to the exclusion of certain areas from the authorisation.

3 The approval service shall ensure that the permitted quantities in terms of doses and number of approved applications represent the minimum values necessary to achieve the desired effect, even when higher values would not result in No unacceptable risks to human or animal health or to the environment. The authorised quantities must be modulated according to the agronomic, phytosanitary, environmental, including climatic conditions, of the various areas for which authorisation is granted and to be adapted to it. However, the doses to be used and the number of applications should not produce any undesirable effects, such as the development of resistance.

4 The approval service shall ensure that decisions comply with the principles of integrated pest management when the phytosanitary product is intended to be used in a situation involving such principles.

5 Based on data on a limited number of representative species, the approval service must ensure that the use of plant protection products does not have a long-term impact on abundance and Diversity of non-target species.

6 An authorisation shall be granted only if all the requirements set out in point 2.4 are met. However, where it is not fully satisfied with one or more specific requirements of the decision-making process referred to in point 2.4, authorisation shall be granted only if the advantages offered by the use of the phytosanitary product in the Conditions prevail over its possible adverse effects. Any limitations on the use of the phytosanitary product related to non-compliance with the requirements set out in section 2 must be indicated on the label. These benefits may include:

A.
Promote and be compatible with integrated pest management and organic farming;
B.
Facilitate the development of strategies to minimize the risk of resistance development;
C.
Reduce the risk to operators and consumers;
D.
Reduce environmental contamination and mitigate the impact on non-target species.

7 Where an authorisation is granted on the basis of the requirements set out in this Annex, the approval service may:

A.
Identify, if possible, preferably in close cooperation with the applicant, measures to improve the performance of the phytosanitary product, and/or;
B.
Identify, if possible in close cooperation with the applicant, measures to further reduce the risk of exposure during and after the use of the plant health product.

The approval service shall inform the applicants of any measure referred to in the paragraph. A or b and invites them to provide any additional information necessary to demonstrate the performance or potential risks of the product under the new conditions of use.

8 The approval service shall ensure, to the extent possible, that for all micro-organisms for which authorisation is envisaged, the applicant shall take into account all relevant knowledge and information of the publications in the Material that is available at the time of application.

9 If a microorganism has been genetically modified, authorization is granted only if it meets the requirements of the ODE.

10 Authorisation is not granted if relevant metabolites/toxins (i.e. those capable of affecting human health and/or the environment) that are known to be produced by the micro-organism and/or microbial contaminants are Present in the phytosanitary product, unless it can be demonstrated that the present quantity remains at an acceptable level, before and after the intended use.

11 The approval service shall ensure that adequate quality control measures are implemented in order to ensure the identity of the microorganism and the contents of the phytosanitary product. These quality control measures must include a Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) system 8 ) Or an equivalent system.

9CII-2 Specific Principles

The specific principles shall apply without prejudice to the general principles set out in section 1.

CII-2.1 Identity

For each authorisation granted, the approval service shall ensure that the microorganism concerned is deposited with a collection of international micro-organisms and has a corresponding deposit number. Each microorganism must be identified, designated by its species name and characterized at the level of the strain. Information must also indicate whether the microorganism is of a wild type or a spontaneous or induced mutant or genetically modified organism.

9CII-2.2 Biological and Technical Properties

9CII-2.2.1 Minimum and maximum level of micro-organisms

Sufficient information must be provided to estimate the minimum and maximum content of micro-organisms in the material used in the manufacture of plant protection products, as well as in the phytosanitary product. The content of other components and formulants of the phytosanitary product and micro-organisms resulting from the production process must, to the extent possible, be sufficiently defined. The approval service ensures that the level of the contaminant organisms is controlled at an acceptable level. In addition, the nature and physical condition of the plant health product should be clarified, preferably in accordance with the " Catalogue of the types of pesticide formulations and the international code system 9 .

9CII-2.2.2 Resistant

No authorisation shall be granted if, at any stage in the development of the microplant product, it is clear that, on the basis of the development of resistance, or of a transfer of resistance, or of any other mechanism, it may Interference with the effectiveness of an antimicrobial agent used in human or animal medicine.

9CII-2.3 Further information

Authorisation shall not be granted, unless complete information is provided for continuous quality control of the mode of production, production process and phytosanitary product. In particular, it is important to consider any spontaneous modification of the essential characteristics of the microorganism as well as the presence or absence of contaminating organisms. The quality assurance criteria applicable to the production and the techniques used to guarantee a uniform phytosanitary product must, to the extent possible, be described and specified.

9CII-2.4 Effectiveness

9CII-2.4.1 Performance

9CII-2.4.1.1 Uses

The authorisation shall not be granted where the proposed uses include recommendations for the fight or protection against organisms which are not considered harmful on the basis of the experience and the scientific acquis In the agronomic, phytosanitary, environmental, including climatic conditions, normal of the areas of use provided for, or where the other effects sought are not considered beneficial under those conditions.

9CII-2.4.1.2 Intensity and persistence of action

The control, protection or other effects sought must have an intensity, consistency and duration of action equivalent to those offered by the use of appropriate reference products. If there is no suitable reference product, it must be established that the use of the phytosanitary product in the agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions, including climatic conditions, of the intended use area shall include a A specified benefit in terms of intensity, consistency and duration of control, protection or other desired effects.

9CII-2.4.1.3 Beneficial effect

Where appropriate, the evolution of the yield obtained during the use of the phytosanitary product and the reduction of losses during storage must be similar, quantitatively and/or qualitatively, to those resulting from the use of products Appropriate reference. If there is no suitable reference product, it must be established that the use of the phytosanitary product in the agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions, including climatic conditions, of the intended use area shall include a Sustainable and determined, quantitatively and/or qualitatively, in terms of the evolution of yield and reduction of losses during storage.

9CII-2.4.1.4 Effectiveness of preparation

The conclusions regarding the effectiveness of the preparation must be applicable to all regions and apply for all the conditions of use provided for, except where the proposed labelling specifies that the preparation must be used in Certain specific conditions (e.g. Light infestations, specific soil types, specific crop conditions).

9CII-2.4.1.5 Blend mixtures

Where the label provides that the preparation is to be used in combination with other specific plant or plant protection products, the mixture shall achieve the desired effect and comply with the principles set out in points 2.4.1.1 to 2.4.1.4.

When the label recommends using the mixture with other specific phytosanitary or adjuvants, the recommendations are accepted only if they are justified.

9CII-2.4.1.6 Resistant

In the presence of evidence of the development of resistance to the phytosanitary product of pathogenic organisms, the approval service decides whether the management strategy of the resistance which has been submitted addresses this problem adequately and Sufficient.

9CII-2.4.1.7 Control of vertebrate species

Only phytosanitary products containing non-viable micro-organisms may be permitted to control vertebrate species. The desired effect on vertebrates against which the fight is fought must be obtained without suffering or unnecessary pain for these animals.

9CII-2.4.2 Adverse Effects on Plants and Plant Products

9CII-2.4.2.1 Employment restrictions

There can be no relevant phytotoxic effects on treated plants or plant products unless the intended label refers to appropriate employment restrictions.

9CII-2.4.2.2 Phytotoxic effects

At harvest time, yield must not be reduced due to phytotoxic effects that reduce it to below the level that could be achieved without the use of the phytosanitary product, unless the reduction is compensated by others Benefits such as a qualitative improvement of treated plants or plant products.

9CII-2.4.2.3 Impact on the quality of plants or plant products

There can be no unacceptable adverse effects on the quality of treated plants or plant products, with the exception of adverse effects on processing, where the intended label specifies that the preparation should not be applied to the Crops for processing.

9CII-2.4.2.4 Impact on plants used for propagation or reproduction

There can be no unacceptable adverse effects on treated plants or plant products used for propagation or reproduction, including effects on viability, germination, shoot, rooting, and establishment, except Where the intended label specifies that the preparation should not be applied to plants or plant products intended for propagation or reproduction.

9CII-2.4.2.5 Impact on subsequent crops

There can be no unacceptable impact on the following crops, except where the intended label specifies that certain plants are susceptible to the product and should not be grown after the treated crop.

9CII-2.4.2.6 Impact on neighbouring cultures

There can be no unacceptable impact on neighbouring crops, except where the intended label recommends not to apply the preparation when some neighbouring crops are particularly sensitive.

9CII-2.4.2.7 Blend mixtures

Where the intended label requires the use of the mixture with other plant protection products or adjuvants, the mixture shall meet the principles set out in 2.4.2.1 to 2.4.2.6.

9CII-2.4.2.8 Cleaning up application equipment

The instructions for cleaning up the application equipment must be clear, effective, so that it can be readily applicable in order to ensure the elimination of any residual trace of the plant health product that is likely to cause Later damage.

9CII-2.5 Methods of identification/detection and quantification

The methods proposed should reflect the most recent techniques. Post-approval monitoring methods should include the use of reagents and equipment usually available.

9CII-2.5.1 Microorganism Analysis Method

The authorisation shall not be granted in the absence of an appropriate method of sufficient quality to identify and quantify the micro-organism and the non-viable components (e.g. Toxins, impurities and co-formulants) in the phytosanitary product. In the case of a phytosanitary product containing several micro-organisms, it is appropriate that the recommended methods identify and determine the content of each of them.

9CII-2.5.2 Residue Analysis Method

The authorisation shall not be granted in the absence of appropriate control methods and post-registration monitoring of viable and/or non-viable residues. Methods must be available for analysis:

A.
Plants, plant products, foodstuffs of plant or animal origin and feed if the presence of relevant residues is detected. Residues are considered relevant if a Maximum Residue Limit (MRL), a waiting period or re-entry after treatment or any other such precautions are required;
B.
The soil, air and/or body tissues if residues are found to be relevant from a toxicological, ecotoxicological or environmental perspective.

9CII-2.6 Human or Animal Health Impact

9CII-2.6.1 Human or Animal Health Effects of Phytosanitary Product

9CII-2.6.1.1 Pathogenic effect

The authorisation shall not be granted if it appears, on the basis of the information provided in the file, that the microorganism is pathogenic to humans or non-target animals under the conditions of intended use.

9CII-2.6.1.2 Impact on Man and Animal

1 The authorisation shall not be granted if the micro-organism and/or the plant health product containing the microorganism could, under the recommended conditions of use, including a realistic approach to the most unfavourable case, colonise or cause Adverse effects on humans or animals.

2 When making decisions concerning the authorisation of the microbial pest product, the approval service shall take into account the possible effects on all human populations, namely professional, non-professional users and Other presentations directly or indirectly by the environment and work, and on animals.

9CII-2.6.1.3 Sensitizer

1 All micro-organisms should be considered as potential sensitizers, unless it is established through relevant information that there is no risk of sensitization, taking into account also immunocompromised persons or Other sensitive people. It is therefore appropriate that the authorisations granted specify that appropriate protective clothing and gloves should be worn and that the plant health product containing the microorganism should not be inhaled. In addition, the conditions of intended use may require the use of additional articles in terms of clothing and protective equipment.

2 Where the conditions of use require the wearing of protective clothing or equipment, the authorization shall be granted only if those articles are effective, can be easily obtained by the user and can be used in the Conditions for the application of the plant health product, taking into account, in particular, climatic conditions.

9CII-2.6.1.4 Transfer of genetic material

The authorisation shall not be granted if it is established that the transfer of genetic material from the microorganism to other organisms is likely to have adverse effects on human or animal health, including resistance to substances Known therapeutics.

9CII-2.6.1.5 Other properties

Phytosanitary products which, because of certain properties, or which, in the event of an error of handling or use, may present high risks, must be subject to specific restrictions concerning in particular the dimensions of Packaging, type of formulation, distribution, mode and conditions of employment. In addition, phytosanitary products classified as highly toxic may not be permitted for use by non-professional users.

9CII-2.6.1.6 Persons Present or Exposed Workers

The periods of waiting and re-entry and other precautions must be defined in such a way that there is no colonisation or detrimental effects on the persons present or workers exposed after the application of the product Plant.

9CII-2.6.1.7 Security Periods of Wait and Re-Entry

Periods of waiting and re-entry and other precautions must be defined in such a way that there is no colonization or adverse effects on animals.

9CII-2.6.1.8 Special Precautions

Periods of waiting and re-entry and other precautions to ensure that there is no colonization or harmful effects must be realistic; special precautions must be taken when necessary.

9CII-2.6.1.9 Conditions of authorisation

The conditions of the authorisation must comply with Directive 98 /24/EC 10 And Directive 2000 /54/EC 11 The experimental data and information provided with respect to the recognition of symptoms of infection or pathogenicity and the effectiveness of first aid and therapeutic measures should be examined. The conditions of the authorisation will also be in accordance with Directive 2004 /37/EC 12 The conditions of the authorisation must also be in conformity with Directive 89 /656/EEC 13 .

9CII-2.6.2 Human or Animal Health Effects from Residues

CIS-2.6.2.1 Impact on human or animal health

The authorisation shall not be granted in the absence of sufficient information on the plant protection products containing the microorganism, making it possible to ensure that there are no adverse effects on human and/or animal health arising from exposure to the Microorganism, residual traces and metabolites/toxins remaining in or on plants or plant products.

9CII-2.6.2.2 Minimum Phytosanitary Product Quantities

The authorisation shall not be granted if the viable residues and/or the non-viable residues present reflect the quantities of the minimum phytosanitary products necessary for adequate control according to good agricultural practices, including Application procedures (including pre-harvest periods of employment, or retention periods or storage periods) minimize the presence of residues and/or toxins at the time of harvest, slaughter or after storage.

9CII-2.7 Environmental fate and behaviour

9CII-2.7.1 Environmental impact

Authorisation shall not be granted if available information indicates that harmful and unacceptable consequences for the environment may result from the fate and behaviour of the phytosanitary product in the environment.

9CII-2.7.2 Water Contamination

Authorisation shall not be granted if the contamination of groundwater, surface waters or intended drinking water due to the use of a phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions of use may cause Interference with analytical systems used to control the quality of intended drinking water.

9CII-2.7.3 Groundwater

No authorization shall be granted where the concentration of the microorganism in groundwater used as drinking water or intended to be used for drinking water does not meet the requirements of Annex 2, c. 22, OWaters, unless it has been scientifically demonstrated that, under relevant field conditions, the lowest parameters or concentrations are not violated or exceeded.

9CII-2.7.4 Surface water

1 The authorisation shall not be granted if the contamination of the surface waters provided for by the use of the plant health product under the proposed conditions of use:

A.
Does not meet the requirements set out in Schedule 2, c. 22, OWaters when surface water is used as drinking water or intended for the production of drinking water;
B.
Has an unacceptable impact on non-target species, including animals, in accordance with the relevant requirements under point 2.8.

2 Proposed instructions for use of the phytosanitary product, including the method of cleaning the application equipment, must minimize the likelihood of accidental contamination of surface waters.

9CII-2.7.5 Transfer of genetic material

Permission is not granted if it is established that the transfer of genetic material from the microorganism to other organisms is likely to result in unacceptable environmental impacts.

9CII-2.7.6 Persistence and competitiveness in culture

The authorisation shall not be granted in the absence of sufficient information on the potential persistence/competitiveness of the micro-organism and relevant secondary metabolites/toxins in or on culture, in environmental conditions Existing at and after the intended use.

9CII-2.7.7 Persistence in the Environment

Authorization is not granted if the micro-organism and/or its potential relevant metabolites/toxins can be expected to persist in the environment at concentrations considerably higher than at the natural levels, in Taking into account repeated applications over time, unless a sound risk assessment indicates that the risks arising from the concentrations of the accumulation tray are acceptable.

9CII-2.8 Effects on non-target organisms

The approval service shall ensure that the information available is sufficient to allow for the adoption of a decision on whether or not there may be unacceptable impacts on non-target species (flora and Fauna), due to the exposure to the phytosanitary product containing the microorganism as a result of its intended use.

The approval service pays particular attention to the possible effects on useful organisms used for biological control and those that play an important role in an integrated pest management system Harmful.

9CII-2.8.1 Risk for birds and other terrestrial vertebrates

Permission is not granted in the event of potential exposure of birds and other non-target terrestrial vertebrates if:

A.
The microorganism is pathogenic to birds and other non-target terrestrial vertebrates,
B.
In the case of toxic effects due to the components of the phytosanitary product, such as relevant metabolites/toxins, the toxicity/exposure ratio is less than 10 on the basis of the acute LD50 value or if the long-term toxicity/exposure ratio is Less than 5, unless an appropriate risk assessment clearly establishes that the use of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions of use will not, directly or indirectly, result in the use of the phytosanitary product; Unacceptable effects.

9CII-2.8.2 Risk to Aquatic Organisms

There is no authorization for potential exposure of aquatic organisms if:

A.
The organism is pathogenic to aquatic organisms;
B.
In the case of toxic effects due to the components of the phytosanitary product, such as relevant metabolites/toxins, the toxicity/exposure ratio is less than 100 in the case of acute toxicity (EC50) for daphnids and fish and 10 for Chronic/long-term toxicity to algae (EC50), daphnids (NOEC) and fish (NOEC), unless an appropriate risk assessment clearly establishes in the field conditions the use of the phytosanitary product in the Conditions will not, directly or indirectly, result in effects Unacceptable on the viability of exposed species.

9CII-2.8.3 Risk for Bees

No authorisation shall be granted in the case of potential exposure of bees if:

A.
The microorganism is pathogenic to bees;
B.
In the case of toxic effects due to the components of the plant health product, such as relevant metabolites/toxins, the risk quotients of exposure of bees by contact or orally are greater than 50, unless an appropriate assessment The risk does not concretely establish that in the field conditions there are no unacceptable effects on the larvae of common bees, the behaviour of the common bees or the survival and development of the colony after use of the Phytosanitary product under the conditions set out.

9CII-2.8.4 Risk for arthropods other than bees

No authorization is granted in the event of potential exposure of arthropods other than bees if:

A.
The microorganism is pathogenic for arthropods other than bees;
B.
In the case of toxic effects due to the components of the plant health product, such as relevant metabolites/toxins, unless an appropriate risk assessment specifically establishes that in the field conditions there are no effects Unacceptable on these organisms after the use of the phytosanitary product under the conditions laid down. Any assertion of selectivity and any proposed use within the framework of an integrated pest management system should be adequately supported by appropriate data.

9CII-2.8.5 Risk to earthworms

No authorisation shall be granted in the event of potential exposure of earthworms if the organism is pathogenic to earthworms or in the event of toxic effects due to the components of the plant health product, such as metabolites/toxins The acute toxicity/exposure ratio is less than 10 or the long-term toxicity/exposure ratio is less than 5 unless an appropriate risk assessment specifically establishes in the field conditions the populations of Worms are not at risk after the use of the phytosanitary product in the Conditions.

9CII-2.8.6 Risk for Microbial Activity

No authorization is granted for potential exposure of non-target soil microorganisms if nitrogen or carbon mineralization tests carried out in the laboratory reveal a change in these processes by more than 25 % after A hundred days unless an appropriate risk assessment specifically establishes that, in the field conditions, the use of the phytosanitary product under the prescribed conditions will not have an unacceptable impact on microbial activity, Given the ability to multiply micro-organisms.


1 See note on art. 86, para. 1, let. A
2 Non-extractable residues in plants and soils are defined as chemical species from pesticides used in accordance with good agricultural practice, which cannot be extracted by methods that do not Significantly alter the chemical nature of the tailings. These non-extractable residues are considered to exclude all fragments by metabolic transformation into natural products.
3 Manual on Development and Use of FAO Specifications for Plant Protection Products. Fifth Edition, prepared by the Group on Specifications of the FAO panel of experts on Pesticide Specifications, Registration Requirements and Application Standards and Prior Informed Consent, January 1999.
4 RS 817.021.23
5 RS 814.201
6 RS 814.911
7 See note on art. 86, para. 1, let a
8 FAO & WHO. 2003. Recommended international codex of practice. General principles of food hygiene, CAC/RCP 1-1969, Rev. 4-2003, including "Annex on Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) System and Guidelines for its Application"
9 International Technical Monograph CropLife No. 2, 5 E Publishing, 2002
10 Council Directive 98 /24/EC of 7 April 1998 on the protection of the health and safety of workers against risks linked to chemical agents in the workplace, OJ L 131, 5.5.1998, p. 11; last amended by Directive 2007 /30/EC, OJ L 165, 27.6.2007, p. 21.
11 Directive 2000 /54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18. 2000 on the protection of workers against the risks associated with exposure to biological agents at work in OJ L 262, 17.10.2000, p. 21.
12 Directive 2004 /37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the protection of workers against risks arising from exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at work in the version of OJ L 204, 4.8.2007, p. 28.
13 Council Directive 89 /656/EEC of 30 November 1989 concerning minimum safety and health requirements for the use by workers of the work of personal protective equipment, OJ L 393, 30.12.1989, p. 18; last amended by Directive 2007 /30/EC, OJ L 165, 27.6.2007, p. 21.


State 1 Er February 2016

Annex 10 1

(art. 9 and 10)

Approved Active Substances to be Reassessed

Part A: Chemical substances

Common Name, Identification Number

UICPA Name

N O CASES

Enrolment in this Annex

Type of action taken/Specific conditions

Carbendazim

Methyl benzimidazol-2-ylcarbamate

10605-21-7

1.01.2016

Fungicide

Ioxynil

4-Hydroxy-3,5-di-iodobenzonitrile

Variant : octanoate

Variant : ioxynil butyrate

Variant :ioxynil sodium

1689-83-4

3861-47-0

2961-62-8

1.01.2016

Herbicide

Tepraloxydim

2 - [1 - (3-chlor - (2E) - propenyloxyimino) propyl] -3 - hydroxy-5 - (tetrahydropyran-4-yl) cyclohex-2-enon

149979-41-9

1.01.2016

Herbicide

Part B: micro-organisms

Part C: macro-organisms


1 Update as per c. I of the O du DEFR of 17 June 2011 ( RO 2011 2927 ), of Dec 11. 2012 (RO 2013 249), 12 Nov 2014 (RO 2014 4215) and c. II de l' O du DEFR du 28 oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 (RO) 2015 4555).


State 1 Er February 2016

Annex 11 1

(art. 55 and 56)

Indications on the Packaging of Phytosanitary Products

Any package of plant health product shall be legibly and indelibly marked as follows:

1.
The trade name of the phytosanitary product;
3.
The name and address of the holder of the approval or sales authorisation, the registration number of the plant health product and, where applicable, the name and address of the persons responsible for the packaging and final labelling of the product Phytosanitary for marketing purposes;
3.
The name of each active substance, with a specific indication of the chemical form; the name must be the name set out in Annex 1 or, if the substance is not included, the common name of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO Common Name); Last does not exist, the active substance must be designated by its chemical identity according to the nomenclature of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC nomenclature) 2 ; if the active substance is a microorganism, it must be identified at the level of the strain, isolate or biotype, and if the active substance is a macro-organism, it must be identified by the name of the species and the culture.
4.
The concentration of each active substance expressed as follows:
4.1
For solid products, aerosols, volatile liquids (maximum boiling point 50 ° C) or viscous (lower limit 1 Pa. S to 20 ° C), as a percentage of weight and in grams per kilogram,
4.2.
For other liquid or gel formulations: as a percentage of weight and in grams per litre,
4.3
For gases: as a percentage of volume and weight,
4.4
For active substances which are micro-organisms or macro-organisms: in number of active units per unit of volume or weight, or in another unit of measure adapted to the organism considered, for example in colony-forming units (UFC) Per gram;
5.
The net quantity of phytosanitary products indicated:
5.1.
In grams or kilograms for solid preparations,
5.2.
In grams, kilogram, millilitre or litre for gases,
5.3.
In millilitres or in litre for liquid preparations;
6.
The lot number and date of manufacture of the preparation;
7.
First aid information;
8.
Where appropriate, information on the nature of the specific risks to human or animal health or the environment, by means of the standard sentences referred to in Annex 7;
9.
The precautions to be taken for the protection of human or animal health or the environment, by means of the standard sentences referred to in Annex 8;
10.
The type of action taken by the phytosanitary product, such as insecticide, growth regulator, herbicide or fungicide, and its mode of action;
11.
The type of preparation, for example, wetting powder or emulsifying concentrate;
12.
The uses for which the phytosanitary product is registered and the specific agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions in which the product may or should not be used;
13.
The following particulars contained in the authorization under s. 18, namely instructions, conditions and charges and dose by application, including the maximum dose per hectare per application and the maximum number of applications per year; the dose to be applied for each use shall be expressed in Metric units;
14.
Where applicable, the security interval to be respected for each use between the last application and:
14.1
Planting or planting of the crop to be protected,
14.2
The planting or planting of the following crops,
14.3
Human or animal access to the treated culture,
14.4
Harvest,
14.5
Use or consumption;
15.
Indications concerning, where appropriate, phytotoxicity, varietal tenderness and any other direct or indirect adverse side effects on plant products or products of plant origin, as well as the time limits to be observed between The application and planting or planting of the relevant crop or of the following and adjacent crops;
16.
The phrase " Read the attached instructions before employment " in the event that a notice is attached to the product in accordance with s. 56, para. 2;
17.
Instructions for storage under suitable conditions and for the safe disposal of the phytosanitary product and its packaging;
18.
The expiry date, where the phytosanitary product is less than two years old under conditions of conservation that are in accordance with the requirements;
19.
A ban on the reuse of product packaging;
20.
Hazard symbols, warnings, hazard indications and safety instructions resulting from the classification according to s. 18, para. 4;
21.
When the use of the product is limited to certain categories of users, the categories allowed to use it.

1 Introduced by c. II al. 2 of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
2 The IUPAC nomenclature rules can be consulted with the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry under www.iupac.org


State 1 Er February 2016