Key Benefits:
May 12, 2010 (State 1 Er February 2016)
The Swiss Federal Council,
Having regard to the Chemical Products Act of 15 December 2000 (LChim) 1 , given art. 148 A , para. 3, 158, para. 2, 159 A , 160, para. 3-5, 161, 164, 168 and 177 of the Agriculture Act of 29 April 1998 (LAgr) 2 , given art. 17 of the Law of 21 March 2003 on Genetic Engineering (LGG) 3 , given art. 29, 29 D , para. 4, and 30 B , para. 1 and 2, let. A, of the Act of 7 October 1983 on the Protection of the Environment (LPE) 4 , having regard to the Federal Act of 6 October 1995 on Technical Barriers to Trade (LETC) 5 ,
Stops:
1 The purpose of this order is to ensure that phytosanitary products are suitable for the intended use and that they are used in accordance with the requirements, they have no unacceptable side effects on the health of the human being and Animals and the environment. It also aims to ensure a high level of protection of human and animal health and the environment and to improve agricultural production.
2 It regulates, for plant protection products in their commercial form:
3 It lays down the applicable rules:
4 The provisions of this Ordinance are based on the precautionary principle in order to prevent active substances or products placed on the market from affecting human and animal health or the environment.
1 This order shall apply to products in the form in which they are delivered to the user, consisting of active substances, safeners or synergists or containing (phytosanitary products), and intended for use in one of the uses Following:
2 It applies to substances, including organisms (macro-and micro-organisms), carrying out general or specific action on harmful organisms or on plants, parts of plants or plant products (active substances).
3 It applies to:
4 It does not apply to phytosanitary products in transit or intended exclusively for export.
1 For the purposes of this order:
2 In order to properly interpret Regulation (EC) N O 1107/2009 8 To which this order refers, the following equivalencies shall be taken into account:
Expression in Regulation (EC) N O 1107/2009 |
Expression in this Order |
|
|
|
Bewilligung |
|
|
|
Putting into circulation |
|
Phytosanitary product |
1 Introduced by c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
2 New content according to c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
3 R (CE) n O 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 Dec. 2008 on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67 /548/EEC and 1999 /45/EC and amending R (EC) n O 1907/2006, OJ L353, 31 Dec. 2008, p. 1, as last amended by R (EC) n O 286/2011, OJ L 83, 30.3.2011, p. 1.
4 Directive 2009 /128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 Oct. 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the use of pesticides compatible with sustainable development, in OJ L 309, 24 Nov 2009, p. 71.
5 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
6 RS 813.112.1
7 EPPO standards for the efficacy evaluation of plant protection products, European and mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation , 3 Rd Edition, Paris.
8 R (CE) n O 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 Oct. 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79 /117/EEC and 91 /414/EEC, OJ L 309, 24 Nov 2009, p.1.
1 In situations requiring prompt action, the Federal Office for Agriculture (OFAG) may, in agreement with the services concerned, prohibit the importation, placing into circulation and use of phytosanitary products which endanger Human and animal health or that pose a risk to the environment.
2 It may set maximum values for these plant protection products which must not be exceeded. The maximum values are based on international standard values, the maximum values in force in the exporting country or are scientifically based
3 It may fix which plant protection products are to be imported or put into circulation only accompanied by a declaration by the competent authorities of the exporting country or of an accredited service.
4 It sets out what indications the declaration should contain and whether documents should be attached to the statement.
5 Batches for which the documents referred to in para. 4 cannot be presented at the time of importation are turned back or destroyed if they present a risk.
1 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 25 May 2011, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2011 ( RO 2011 2401 ).
1 An active substance is approved in accordance with Annex 2, c. 1, if it is foreseeable, having regard to the current state of scientific and technical knowledge, that, having regard to the approval criteria set out in the c. 2 and 3 of this Annex, the phytosanitary products containing this active substance comply with the conditions laid down in paras. 3 to 5.
2 The primary purpose of the assessment of the active substance is to determine whether the approval criteria set out in the guidelines are met. 3.6.2 to 3.6.4 and 3.7 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) N O 1107/2009 1 If this is the case, the assessment will continue to determine whether the other approval criteria set out in the s are met. 2 and 3 of Annex 2.
3 Residues of plant protection products, resulting from an application in accordance with good plant protection practices and under realistic conditions of use, satisfy the following conditions:
4 Routine methods for measuring residues that are significant from the point of view of toxicology, ecotoxicology, the environment, or drinking water must exist. Analytical standards should be generally available.
5 A phytosanitary product, under conditions of application in accordance with good plant protection practices and under realistic conditions of use, satisfies the following conditions:
6 The requirements of paras. 3 to 5 are assessed according to uniform principles set out in s. 17, para. 5.
7 For the approval of an active substance, the provisions of paras. 1 to 5 shall be deemed to be complied with if it has been established that this is the case for one or more representative uses of at least one phytosanitary product containing this active substance.
8 As far as human health is concerned, no data collected in humans is used for a reduction in safety margins established on the basis of studies or tests carried out on animals.
9 In derogation from para. 1, where, on the basis of documented evidence included in the application, an active substance is required to control a serious plant health hazard which cannot be controlled by other means available, including methods not available This active substance may be approved for a limited period necessary to control this serious hazard, even if it does not meet the criteria set out in the c. 3.6.3, 3.6.4, 3.6.5 or 3.8.2 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) N O 1107/2009 3 Provided that the use of the active substance is the subject of risk mitigation measures in order to minimise the risks to man and the environment. For these substances, the maximum residue levels were established in accordance with the Ordinance of 26 June 1995 on Foreign Substances and Components (OSEC) 4 . This derogation does not apply to active substances which, under Regulation (EC) No O 1272/2008 5 , are or should be classified as category 1 carcinogens, category 2 non-threshold carcinogens, or category 1 toxic agents.
1 See note on art. 3, para. 2.
2 European Food Safety Agency , instituted by R (EC) n O 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down general principles and general requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures for Food safety, OJ L 31, 1 Er Fp. 2002, p. 1, last amended by R CE) n O 596/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009, OJ L 188, 18 Jul. 2009, p. 14.
3 See note on art. 3, para. 2
4 RS 817.021.23
5 See note on art. 3, let. D
1 The Federal Department of Economics, Training and Research (DEFR) 1 Enters a new active substance on the list of approved active substances (Annex 1) when it has been examined as part of an application for authorisation to release a phytosanitary product and meets the criteria referred to Art. 4. 2
2 For active substances, the OFAG may lay down the following conditions and restrictions: 3
3 If an active substance meets one or more of the additional criteria set out in Annex 2, c. 4, the DEFR is listed in Annex 1, Part E, as a substance for consideration of substitution. 4
4 Active substances identified as low-risk active substances under s. 22 of the EC/1107/2009 Regulation 5 Are designated as such in Schedule 1. OFAG may refer to other low-risk active substances:
1 The designation of the administrative unit has been adapted to 1 Er Jan 2013 under Art. 16 al. 3 of the O of 17 Nov 2004 on official publications ( RO 2004 4937 ). This mod has been taken into account. Throughout the text.
2 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
3 New content according to the c. I of the O of 25 May 2011, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2011 ( RO 2011 2401 ).
4 New content according to the c. I of O du 28 oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 ( RO 2015 4551 ).
5 See note on art. 3, para. 2.
1 The application for approval or amendment of the conditions for approval of an active substance shall be submitted to the approval service by the producer of the active substance and shall be accompanied by a summary record and a file Established pursuant to s. 7, para. 1 and 2, or a scientific justification for the non-disclosure of certain parts of these files; it must be demonstrated that the active substance meets the criteria for approval established in s. 4. A collective application may be made by an association of producers. Art. 16 is reserved.
2 At the time of application, the person concerned may request, pursuant to s. 52, that certain information, including certain parts of the file, that it physically separates, be treated confidentially.
3 When filing the application, the applicant shall, at the same time, attach a complete list of the tests and studies submitted pursuant to s. 7, para. 2, and a list of applications for the protection of reports under s. 46.
4 The approval service may require the applicant to provide in a defined computer form the list of test reports and studies submitted at the time of the application and the list of test reports and studies for which protection Reports under s. 46 is requested.
1 The summary folder includes the following items:
2 The complete file contains the full text of the various test reports and studies relating to all the information referred to in para. 1, let. B and c. It does not contain test reports or studies involving the voluntary administration of the active substance or the plant health product to human beings.
3 The OFAG can define the summary folder structure and the complete folder structure.
4 The data requirements referred to in paras. 1 and 2 shall include the conditions to be fulfilled by the active substances and the plant protection products set out in Annexes 5 and 6. The DEFR can adapt these annexes taking account of international requirements in this field, in particular those of the European Union (EU).
5 The author of the application attached to the file the scientific documentation accessible, validated by the scientific community and published in the last ten years preceding the date of submission of the file, concerning the side effects on the Health, the environment and non-target species of the active substance and its relevant metabolites.
1 R (CE) n O 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 Feb. 2005 concerning the maximum limits for residues of pesticides present in or on food and feed for animals of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91 /414/EEC, OJ L 70, 16 March 2005, P. 1, as last amended by Commission Directive 1097 /2009/EC of 16 November 2009, OJ L 309, 17.11.2009, p. 6
1 The approval service may review an approved active substance at any time. It takes into account the decision on the need to re-examine an active substance from new scientific and technical knowledge and control data, including when the review of authorisations under Art. 29, para. 1, evidence indicates that the fulfilment of the aims set out in the Ordinance of 28 October 1998 on the protection of waters (OWaters) 1 Cannot be reached by other means. The approval service shall also take account of EU decisions in this field.
2 If the approval service considers, in the light of new scientific and technical knowledge, that there is reason to believe that the substance no longer meets the criteria for approval under s. 4 or additional information required under s. 5, para. 2, let. F, have not been communicated, it shall inform the producer of the active substance and shall give the producer a time limit to allow it to submit its observations.
3 If the approval authority concludes that it is no longer satisfied with the approval criteria set out in s. 4 or additional information required under s. 5, para. 2, let. F, have not been communicated, it proposes to the DEFR to withdraw the approval of the active substance or to the OFAG to amend the conditions and restrictions referred to in s. 5, para. 2.
1 Active substances which enter the composition of one or more authorised plant protection products may be re-evaluated.
2 The DEFR, in agreement with the other departments concerned and after consultation with the interested parties, registers the active substances which need to be reassessed in Annex 10. It takes into account this effect of the EU's re-evaluation programme.
3 The holder of an authorization issued for a phytosanitary product containing an active substance listed in Annex 10 shall file a request for re-evaluation with the OFAG within three months from the date of registration Of the active substance in Annex 10. When the substance is re-evaluated in the EU, the deadline is six months.
4 This application must contain all documents that must be attached to the application for authorisation to release a phytosanitary product containing a new active substance. The considerations and decisions of the EU, insofar as they are available, must be attached to the request.
5 If the situation warrants, the OFAG may leave an additional period of up to six months to complete the file. Where the substance is re-evaluated in the EU, the additional time limit shall be twelve months.
6 Assessment services assess files in accordance with s. 24.
1 DEFR radiates an active substance from Schedule 1:
2 DEFR may desist from radiating an active substance from Schedule 1 when, for use, there is no alternative to the control of a pest and as long as there is no adverse effect on human health during use Comply with the requirements. The use of this substance is then limited to this use. Approval of the substances concerned is reviewed on a regular basis.
1 A basic substance is approved if:
2 With regard to the basic substances, the OFAG may, by analogy, fix the conditions and restrictions referred to in Art. 5, para. 2.
3 Macro-organisms that are considered exotic within the meaning of s. 3, para. 1, let. F, of the order of 10 September 2008 on the release into the environment 1 And microorganisms cannot be approved as core substances.
DEFR enters a new basic substance on the list of approved base substances (Schedule 1, Part D) when it has been reviewed and meets the criteria set out in s. 10 A .
1 Any person may apply for approval of a basic substance with the approval service.
2 It must include the following documents:
3 The approval service is seeking the advice of the evaluation services.
1 The approval service may at any time review an approved basic substance.
2 If it considers that there is reason to believe that the substance no longer meets the criteria set out in s. 10 A , it shall inform the circles concerned and give them a period of time to allow them to submit their observations.
DEFR radiates a basic substance from Schedule 1, Part D, when it no longer meets the criteria set out in s. 10 A .
1 A safener or synergist is approved if it meets the requirements of s. 4.
2 Art. 5 to 10 shall apply mutatis mutandis.
3 The DEFR may lay down, in Annexes 5 and 6, specific requirements relating to the file to be accompanied by a request for approval of a safener or a synergist.
The DEFR may establish a programme for the progressive review of synergists and safeners released prior to the date of entry into force of this Article. It takes into account this effect of the EU's re-evaluation programme.
Co-formulants that cannot be introduced into a phytosanitary product are listed in Annex 3 by the DEFR. It takes account of decisions on the subject of the European Union.
1 A phytosanitary product may be put into circulation only if it has been approved in accordance with this order.
1bis For the release of phytosanitary products whose development is based on the use of genetic resources or traditional knowledge associated with them, the provisions of the Nagoya Ordinance of 11 December 2015 1 Are reserved. 2
2 In derogation from para. 1, no registration is required in the following cases:
3 The registration is valid for a phytosanitary product:
1 RS 451.61
2 Introduced by ch. 7 of the annex to the O de Nagoya of 11 Dec. 2015, in force since 1 Er Feb 2016 ( RO 2016 277 ).
3 New content according to the c. 12 of annex 5 to the O of 9 May 2012 on contained use, in force since 1 Er June 2012 ( RO 2012 2777 ).
4 RS 814.912
5 RS 814.911
The types of registration for plant protection products are:
1 Introduced by c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
Only a person who has his domicile or head office, or a branch, in Switzerland or who is domiciled in a State with which Switzerland has entered into an agreement with which Switzerland has entered into an agreement may file an application for registration or be the holder of an authorisation. These requirements do not apply.
1 Subject to Art. 34, a phytosanitary product may only be authorized if, in accordance with the uniform principles set out in para. 5, it meets the following requirements:
2 The applicant is required to demonstrate compliance with the requirements set out in para. 1, let. A to h.
3 Compliance with the requirements listed in para. 1, let. B and d to h shall be carried out by official or officially recognised tests and analyses, under agricultural, phytosanitary and environmental conditions corresponding to the use of the phytosanitary product in question and representative of the Conditions of use.
4 The OFAG may, in respect of para. 1, let. F, define harmonised methods; it takes into account the methods adopted by the EU.
5 The uniform principles for the assessment and authorisation of plant protection products are set out in Annex 9; they specify the requirements referred to in par. 1. DEFR can adapt Annex 9.
6 The interaction between the active substance, safeners, synergists and co-formulants should be taken into account in the assessment of plant protection products.
7 A phytosanitary product is also permitted only:
8 Exceptions to the requirements set out in para. 7, let. C, can be made for seed treatment products and plant protection products used in the forest to treat cut wood.
9 Phytosanitary products consisting of genetically modified organisms or containing such organisms are only permitted if they meet the requirements of the ODE.
10 The OFAG may refuse to grant an authorization, or may attach such charges or conditions, if it appears that precautionary measures are applicable under s. 148 A LAgr.
11 The approval service may authorise, for a maximum of two years and with the exception of plant protection products which consist of pathogenic organisms or contain such organisms, a phytosanitary product, the substance of which Not yet listed in Schedule 1, if the product in question meets the requirements set out in par. 1, let. B to i, 5 and 9. It shall forward to the Federal Office of the Environment (OFEV) the relevant documents and the outcome of its examination for opinion.
1 The approval service shall decide on the application for authorisation by way of decision.
2 Authorization defines plants or plant products and non-agricultural areas (p. Ex. Railways, public areas, places of storage) on which the plant health product may be used and the purposes for such use.
3 The authorization sets out the requirements for the release and use of the phytosanitary product. These requirements shall include, at a minimum, the conditions of employment necessary to comply with the conditions and requirements referred to in Art. 5, para. 2.
4 The authorisation shall include a classification of the phytosanitary product according to Annex 1, parts 2 to 5 of Regulation (EC) No O 1272/2008 1 , which corresponds to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). 2
5 The decision, provided that the application is accepted, includes in particular the following indications:
6 The requirements referred to in para. 3 also includes, where applicable:
7 The authorisation applies to the holder mentioned in the decision and is not transferable.
1 See note on s. 3, para. 1, let. D.
2 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
The authorization is issued for ten years subject to s. 29.
1 At the request of the holder of the authorisation, the approval service may confirm the authorisation to release a phytosanitary product in Switzerland by establishing a certificate.
2 At the request of the holder of the authorisation, the approval service may confirm with an export certificate that a phytosanitary product intended for export is manufactured in Switzerland. In such cases, it shall consult the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) in advance, to the extent that the area of competence of the latter is affected.
1 Any applicant wishing to put a phytosanitary product in circulation is required to file an application for authorisation or amendment of an authorisation in person or through a representative to the approval service.
2 The request includes the following:
3 The following are attached to the application:
4 The other requirements to be met by the application package are set out in Annex 6.
5 Where a phytosanitary product contains active substances that are not yet listed in Schedule 1 or that the data relating to active substances, safeners or synergists are protected under s. 46, the documents listed in Schedule 5 must be filed.
6 The approval service may, on a case-by-case basis, impose additional requirements on the content of the dossier accompanying the application.
7 It may, in agreement with the evaluation services, waive the request for certain parts of the file, including certain studies, if the applicant can prove that these documents are not necessary for the assessment of the phytosanitary product.
8 If the application for authorisation relates to a phytosanitary product consisting of genetically modified organisms or containing such organisms, it must meet the additional requirements laid down in Art. 28 and 34, para. 2, ODE 2 .
8bis If the request for authorization is for a phytosanitary product consisting of, or contenting, a macro-organism, it must meet the requirements of the EPPO PM6/2 standard 3 . 4
9 Documents attached to the application must be filed:
10 At the time of application, the person concerned may request, pursuant to s. 52, that certain information, including certain parts of the file, that it physically separates, be treated confidentially. At the same time, it presents the complete list of studies submitted pursuant to Art. 7, para. 2, and a list of the reports of tests and studies for which applications for the protection of the reports have been submitted in accordance with Art. 46.
11 In the context of a request for access to information, the approval service shall determine the information to be kept confidential.
12 The applicant, if invited, shall provide samples of the phytosanitary product and the standards for the analysis of its ingredients.
13 The approval service may require the applicant to provide, in a defined computer form, the list of test reports and studies submitted at the time of the application, as well as the list of test reports and studies for which the application is submitted. Protection of reports under s. 46, is requested.
1 See note on Art. 7, para. 1, let. G.
2 RS 814.911
3 Standard PM6/2 as defined in OPDP EPPO Bulletin 40, pp. 335 to 344. Download: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, www.eppo.org > Standards > List of EPPO Standards > Safe use of Biological Controls (PM6) > "Import and release of non-indigenous biological control agents".
4 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
1 Applicants are exempt from providing the test and study reports referred to in s. 21, para. 3, where the certification service has the test and study reports in question and the applicants demonstrate that access was granted to them in accordance with s. 46 or the possible period of protection of the reports has expired.
2 However, the applicants to whom s. 1 applies to provide the following information:
1 The approval service examines whether the application is complete.
2 Where parts are missing or fail to meet the requirements, the approval service shall provide the applicant with an appropriate period of time to complete it. If the required indications are not provided within the time limit, the application shall be rejected.
3 The registration service transmits the application and the relevant documents to the evaluation services.
4 If the application relates to a phytosanitary product consisting of genetically modified organisms or containing such organisms, the approval service shall initiate the authorisation procedure taking into account the ODE 1 .
5 If it relates to a phytosanitary product which consists of non-genetically modified organisms, or contains such organisms, the publication, the consultation of non-confidential documents and the procedure shall be governed by Art. 42 and 43 ODE to the extent that organizations are not listed in Schedule 1.
1 The assessment services shall consider whether the conditions laid down in Art. 17 are completed and evaluate the documents in light of the criteria set out in Annex 9.
2 In the evaluation of an active substance, a synergist or a safener already approved in the EU, the approval service and evaluation services shall take into account the outcome of the EFSA evaluation, considerations and Decisions by the EU concerning the approval of these substances and the considerations and decisions of the Member States concerning the authorisation of plant protection products containing these substances, provided that these documents are presented to the Certification service or brought to its attention.
3 During the examination of the application, the approval service may conduct or cause tests and other investigations.
4 The assessment services shall communicate to the approval service the result of their assessment.
The approval service instructing the applicant to provide him with samples or additional information, including additional data and test results, where the examination of the file shows that these additional information are Necessary.
2 If the approval service requires that the file be completed, the time limits shall cease to run until the additional information has been filed.
The holder of the authorization shall keep, for at least ten years from the date of the last transfer of the phytosanitary product, a copy of all documents filed or to ensure that the documents deposited are available. Samples are retained for as long as their condition permits an assessment.
1 The authorization may be renewed.
2 The application for renewal of the authorisation must be filed with the approval service two years before the end of the period of validity of the authorisation. The requester provides the following information:
3 The information referred to in Art. 22, para. 2, let. A and b, shall be provided by each holder of an authorization upon renewal of the authorization.
4 The approval service shall examine whether the conditions for granting the authorisation are met. Where appropriate, it shall require additional information, including the results of additional tests or tests necessary for the assessment of the safety of the plant health product and its conformity with the intended use.
5 It shall refuse renewal when the conditions for grant are no longer fulfilled or the additional information is not provided on time.
6 It has the power to extend the authorisation pending the decision on renewal.
1 The approval service may re-examine an authorization at any time if certain elements suggest that one of the requirements set out in s. 17 is no longer respected. The approval service reviews an authorisation when it concludes that the goals set by the OWaters 1 Cannot be reached by other means.
2 Where the approval service intends to withdraw or amend an authorisation, it shall inform the holder and give it the opportunity to submit comments or additional information.
3 The approval service shall withdraw or amend the authorisation, as the case may be:
4 The approval service may re-examine at any time the plant protection products containing an active substance, safener or synergist for which the EU has set conditions or restrictions on approval or renewal Of approval. It may require holders of authorisations, the data necessary for the assessment of such conditions or restrictions, including relevant information relating to the active substance, safener or synergist, and set a time limit For delivery. It may amend or withdraw an authorisation or attach new charges directly on the basis of the available results of the approval or renewal procedure for the approval of the EU.
5 The approval service shall carry out the review referred to in para. 4 as a priority for substances for which the conditions and restrictions laid down by the EU at the time of approval concern the protection of groundwater.
1 An authorization may be withdrawn or amended at the request of the holder of the authorization.
2 Amendments may be granted only where it is found, in respect of such applications and in accordance with the procedure referred to in Art. 23 and 24, that the requirements set out in s. 17 are respected.
1 Where the approval service withdraws an authorisation or does not renew it and the reasons for withdrawal or non-renewal are not related to a potential dangerous effect deemed unacceptable, it may grant a time limit for the implementation of the Circulation of existing stocks.
2 The time limit shall not exceed twelve months for the release of the existing stocks of the phytosanitary products concerned.
3 In the event of withdrawal of the authorisation or non-renewal due to immediate concerns regarding human or animal health or the environment, the phytosanitary products concerned shall be immediately withdrawn from the market.
1 When all active substances contained in a phytosanitary product are low-risk active substances under s. 5, para. 4, this product is allowed as a low-risk pest control product provided that specific risk mitigation measures are not required as a result of the risk assessment. This phytosanitary product also meets the following conditions:
2 Any person seeking the authorization of a low-risk pest control product is required to demonstrate compliance with the requirements set out in para. 1 and attach to the application a complete file and a summary record for each point of the data requirements applicable to the active substance and the phytosanitary product. Art. 22 is reserved.
1 Seed may not be imported as a commercial commodity when treated with active substances not authorized in Switzerland for the intended use.
2 The approval service may grant derogations provided that the products concerned are authorised in the EU. It makes a general decision that is published in the Federal Worksheet. The validity of this decision is generally limited to one year.
3 In addition to the labelling requirements defined in Art. 17 of the order of 7 December 1998 on propagating material 1 , the label and the documents accompanying the treated seeds shall bear the following particulars:
1 RS 916.151
2 See note on s. 3, para. 1, let. D.
3 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
1 The evaluation services conduct a comparative assessment in the course of the review, in accordance with s. 8, an active substance approved as a substance for consideration for substitution or for review in accordance with s. 29, para. 4, of a phytosanitary product containing such a substance. The approval service shall withdraw or limit the authorisation of a phytosanitary product in a particular crop, where it is apparent from the comparative assessment weighing the risks and benefits, as described in Annex 4: 1
2 The evaluation services shall carry out a comparative assessment for any new request for authorisation for a phytosanitary product containing an active substance which has already been the subject of a comparative assessment in accordance with para. 1. The evaluation is not carried out for indications which have already been the subject of such an evaluation in this context. 2
3 The comparative assessment referred to in paras. 1 and 2 is not performed in the following cases:
4 When the approval authority decides to withdraw or amend an authorization under para. 3, the withdrawal or modification in question takes effect three years after the decision or at the end of the approval period for the substance for which substitution is being considered, when that period ends earlier.
5 Unless otherwise specified, all the provisions relating to the authorisations contained in this order shall apply.
6 The DEFR may adapt the procedure for the comparative assessment of a phytosanitary product set out in Annex 4 in order to take account of developments in this procedure at international level.
1 New content according to the c. I of O du 28 oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 ( RO 2015 4551 ).
2 New content according to the c. I of O du 28 oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 ( RO 2015 4551 ).
3 New content according to the c. I of O du 28 oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 ( RO 2015 4551 ).
1 Where the application for authorisation relates to a minor use, the approval service may waive compliance with the conditions laid down in Art. 17, para. 1, let. B to g, et al. 2 and 3, and to authorize the phytosanitary product:
2 The application shall indicate the conditions under which there is minor use and shall contain only the particulars referred to in Art. 21, para. 2, let. A to d. In the cases referred to in para. 1, let. A, it must also establish that the phytosanitary product is authorised in an EU Member State for the minor use concerned.
3 The approval service may refuse to grant authorisation if general knowledge suggests that the requirements of s. 17 are not fulfilled.
4 This Article does not apply to genetically modified organisms.
1 The approval service establishes a list of phytosanitary products registered abroad which correspond to the phytosanitary products authorised in Switzerland. Phytosanitary products on this list are considered to be registered.
2 A phytosanitary product registered abroad is listed on the list:
3 Proposals for inclusion in the list shall be submitted to the approval service. They shall be accompanied by the information referred to in section 3 of the safety data sheet referred to in Art. 20 of the Chemicals Ordinance of 5 June 2015 (OChim) 1 If necessary, the approval service may request additional information. 2
1 RS 813.11
2 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
1 The approval service examines whether the conditions are met. It relies on the data on the list of phytosanitary products in the country of origin. It takes into account further information when it is at its disposal.
2 It shall provide the holder of the authorization of the reference product with a period of 60 days to establish plausibly:
3 The registration service registers the phytosanitary product on the list by a decision of general application.
4 The decision is published in the Federal Worksheet, including:
5 The indications concerning the potential for use of the phytosanitary product and the charges related to this use are those of the authorised reference plant product in Switzerland. They shall be laid down in the employment notices issued by the approval service and published in accordance with Art. 45. They are automatically modified in the event of changes in the use or expense of using the reference product.
1 The approval service shall order the cancellation of a phytosanitary product from the list:
2 The approval service may radiate a phytosanitary product when the requirements set out in s. 36 are no longer satisfied.
3 Where the reasons for the cancellation are not related to a potential dangerous effect which is considered unacceptable, it may grant a time limit for the release of existing stocks which do not exceed twelve months.
1 Any person who imports a phytosanitary product from the list referred to in s. 36 shall communicate it to the competent authority within three months of the first release.
2 The content and form of the communication are set out in Art. 49 to 51 OChim 1 . 2
3 The obligation referred to in para. 1 does not apply to products imported by end users.
1 RS 813.11
2 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
1 The approval service may register phytosanitary products for limited and controlled use, in derogation from Sections 2 to 4, where such a measure seems necessary due to a phytosanitary hazard which cannot be controlled by Other means.
2 It may register a phytosanitary product when it considers that the conditions laid down in Art. 17, para. 1, let. E and i are satisfied, as well as the conditions set out in s. 17, para. 7, let. B, if it is an organization; at the time of the evaluation, it takes into account the facts and generally known data.
3 Phytosanitary products consisting of genetically modified organisms or containing such organisms may not be registered in accordance with the procedure referred to in para. 1.
4 The approval service makes a general decision that is published in the Federal Worksheet.
5 The approval shall be granted for a period of up to one year. It can be renewed.
6 The approval service shall inform the cantonal enforcement authority of the approvals granted for the control of emergency situations.
1 Phytosanitary products which contain only the basic substances listed in Annex 1, Part D, and which comply with the conditions and restrictions laid down therein may be put into circulation without authorisation.
2 The release of phytosanitary products which do not contain only basic substances shall be governed by Sections 2 to 6.
A person who manufactures or imports a phytosanitary product containing only approved basic substances shall communicate it to the approval service before the first release. The communication must contain the following:
1 New content according to the c. 4 of the annex to the O of 7 Nov 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 6103 ).
1 Experiments or tests carried out for the purpose of research or development involving the emission into the environment of a phytosanitary product not approved or involving the unauthorized use of a phytosanitary product shall not Take place only if the approval service has evaluated the available data and issued a permit to conduct tests. This permit may limit the quantities to be used and the areas to be treated, and impose additional conditions to prevent any adverse effects on human or animal health or any unacceptable adverse effects on the environment, In particular the need to prevent feed and food containing residues from entering the food chain unless a maximum value has already been set in the OSEC 1 .
2 An application is made to the approval service. It shall be accompanied by a file containing all the information available to assess the potential effects on human or animal health or the possible effects on the environment.
3 L' al. 2 shall not apply if the approval service has recognised the right of the person concerned to undertake certain experiments and tests and has determined the conditions under which such experiments and tests must be carried out.
4 In testing with genetically modified organisms or pathogenic organisms subject to the ODE authorization regime 2 , the authorisation procedure is governed by the ODE.
5 If it is intended to conduct tests for which macro-organisms are used, and for which the authorisation procedure is not governed by para. 4, the approval service consults the OFEV before any decision is taken.
1 RS 817.021.23
2 RS 814.911
1 Anyone who uses for research or development an unauthorized phytosanitary product must register:
2 Upon request, the registered information shall be made available to the approval service.
1 An authorized phytosanitary product for which a sales permission has been granted may be released under the name of the holder of the sales permission and under a trade name other than that of the authorized product. The sales permission is only valid for the applications mentioned in the authorization.
2 Permission to sell shall be granted if the holder of the authorisation has given his consent. It has a federal registration number.
3 It shall become moot as soon as the authorisation is extinguished or the authorisation holder withdraws his consent. The holder of the authorisation shall inform the approval service when he withdraws his agreement.
4 Requests for permission to sell are addressed to the approval service. The application must be accompanied, in particular, by the written consent of the holder of the authorisation.
1 The holder of an authorisation for a phytosanitary product shall immediately inform the approval service of any new information concerning the phytosanitary product, the active substance, its metabolites, a safener, a synergist Or a co-formulant contained in this product and signifying that the phytosanitary product no longer meets the criteria set out in s. 4 and the conditions laid down in Art. 17. It shall indicate, in particular, the potentially harmful effects of this phytosanitary product, or residues of an active substance, its metabolites, a safener, a synergist or a co-formulant contained in this product, on human health Or on groundwater, or their potentially unacceptable effects on plants or plant products or on the environment. To this end, the authorisation holder shall record and report all adverse reactions, in humans, in animals and in the environment, suspected of being linked to the use of the phytosanitary product. The obligation to notify includes the provision of relevant information on decisions or assessments of international organisations or public bodies that permit plant protection products or active substances in countries Third parties.
2 The notification shall include an assessment of whether and, if so, how the new information means that the phytosanitary product or active substance, its metabolites, a safener, a synergist or a co-formulant Meets the criteria set out in s. 4 or the conditions set out in s. 17.
3 The holder of an authorisation shall also inform the approval service of any change concerning the origin or composition of an active substance, a safener, a synergist or a plant health product.
4 The holder of an authorisation for a phytosanitary product shall each year communicate to the approval service any information available on a lack of effectiveness in relation to the expected results, the appearance of a resistance and any effect Unexpected plants, plant products or the environment.
5 It shall announce to the approval service any change involving a change in the classification and labelling of the phytosanitary product. 1
1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
1 For phytosanitary products authorised or withdrawn in accordance with this order, as well as for products for which a sales permit has been granted, the approval service shall provide electronic access to the public Information containing at least the following:
2 The information referred to in para. 1 must be easily accessible and updated at least every three months. They may not contain confidential information.
3 The approval service may publish, for these plant protection products, a summary sheet listing the possible applications and their specific properties. This record should not contain confidential data.
4 In collaboration with the federal agricultural research stations, the approval service shall inform the competent cantonal authorities as well as the agricultural sector concerned of the developments concerning the approvals, as well as the Characteristics and possible applications of plant protection products.
5 It publishes the list of plant protection products which contain only approved basic substances. It contains the information referred to in Art. 40 B . 3
1 New content according to the c. 4 of the annex to the O of 7 Nov 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 6103 ).
2 See note on s. 3, para. 1, let. D.
3 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
1 The reports of tests and studies shall enjoy the protection of the reports under the conditions laid down in this Article.
2 The protection shall apply to reports of tests and studies relating to the active substance, safener or synergist, adjuvants and the plant health product, as referred to in Art. 7, para. 2, where they are submitted by a person seeking an authorization (the first applicant), provided that it is established that these test and study reports were:
3 Where a report is protected, the approval service may not use it for the benefit of other applicants for the authorization of plant protection products, safeners or synergists and adjuvants, except in the cases provided for in para. 7 or art. 50.
4 The period of protection of the reports shall be ten years from the date of the first authorization of a phytosanitary product for the assessment of which this data was used, except in the cases provided for in para. 7 or art. 50. This period is extended to thirteen years for low-risk phytosanitary products.
5 This period is extended by three months for each extension of the authorization to a minor use, as defined in Art. 3, para. 1, let. X, except where the extension of the authorisation is based on an extrapolation, if applications for such authorisations are introduced by the holder of the authorisation not later than five years after the date of the first authorisation. In no case shall the total period of protection of reports exceed thirteen years. For low-risk phytosanitary products, the total period of protection of reports cannot in any case exceed 15 years.
6 L' al. 1 does not apply:
7 Protection of reports referred to in paras. 1 to 6 shall be granted only where the first applicant has claimed it for the reports of tests and studies concerning the active sub-constancy, safener or synergist, the adjuvant and the plant health product at the time of presentation of the And has provided, for each test or study report, the information referred to in s. 7, para. 1, let. F, and art. 21, para. 3, let. D, as well as confirmation that a period of protection of the reports has never been granted to the trial or study report or that a period that would have been granted has not expired.
1 The reports of tests and studies shall be protected for thirty months if they are necessary for the renewal or re-examination of an authorisation, except in the cases provided for in Art. 46, para. 6, or art. 50.
2 Where the holder of an authorisation is not in a position to provide the reports of tests and studies necessary for the renewal or re-examination of an authorisation and that data has been supplied by a third party, the authorisation may not be Extended to new uses for a period of 30 months.
3 The approval service may use the reports referred to in para. 1 to adapt the conditions of use of a product for which the test and study reports have not been provided. 1
1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
1 For each active substance, safener or synergist, the approval service shall draw up a list of the test reports and studies necessary for the first approval, the modification of the conditions of approval or the renewal of the Approval.
2 For each plant health product which it authorates, the approval service shall keep and make available to any interested party, upon request:
3 Lists provided for in paras. 1 and 2 indicate whether these test and study reports have been recognized in accordance with the principles of good laboratory practice or good experimental practice.
4 The approval service may require applicants to provide in a defined computer format the list of test reports and studies submitted at the time of application.
1 Before conducting tests on vertebrates for the filing of an application for authorisation, the applicant shall, in writing, request the approval service if the results of tests relating to the active substance or the preparation concerned are already Available.
2 When filing a prior application, the applicant must demonstrate that he or she intends to apply for an authorization.
1 If the approval service already has, through previous tests on vertebrates, sufficient knowledge of an active substance or on a preparation, it shall inform the applicant of the extent to which it may refrain from doing so. New tests for the granting of an authorisation.
2 Where such knowledge comes from data resulting from tests carried out on vertebrates by the author of the first application or, possibly, by the authors of subsequent applications and the duration of protection of such data is not Still matured (art. 46), the approval service shall proceed as follows:
3 The authors of the earlier applications may, within 30 days, oppose the immediate use of their data and request an adjournment.
4 If an adjournment request is not submitted, the approval authority shall order the use of the data by decision.
5 If a request for adjournment is submitted, the approval service shall adopt by decision:
6 At the request of the author of the new application, the approval service shall draw up a summary of the data from tests on vertebrates which are necessary for the establishment of the safety data sheet; Confidentiality set out in s. 52 are reserved.
1 The authors of earlier applications may request the author of the new application, a fair compensation for the use of the protected data which they have obtained following tests on vertebrates.
2 If the applicants fail to agree on the amount of the compensation within six months, the approval service shall fix that amount by decision at the request of either of the applicants. In doing so, it takes into account, inter alia:
3 The authors of the earlier applications may require the approval service to prohibit the release of the phytosanitary product until the author of the new application has paid them the required compensation.
1 Any person requesting that the information submitted pursuant to this order be treated in a confidential manner shall be required to provide verifiable evidence that the disclosure of such information could be detrimental Its commercial interests or the protection of its privacy and integrity.
2 The disclosure of the following information shall in principle be regarded as affecting the protection of the commercial interests or the privacy and integrity of the persons concerned:
3 The following information shall cease to be confidential once the phytosanitary product has been approved:
1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
2 RS 813.11
1 Phytosanitary products which consist of active preparations or active substances or which contain hazardous active substances shall be classified in accordance with Art. 18, para. 4.
2 Active substances which are dangerous substances and which are used in plant protection products must be classified according to the requirements of art. 6, para. 1, OChim 2 , which apply by analogy. 3
3 The holder of the authorisation within the meaning of this order shall be assimilated to the manufacturer within the meaning of the OChim. 4
1 New content according to the c. 4 of the annex to the O of 7 Nov 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 6103 ).
2 RS 813.11
3 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
4 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
1 Phytosanitary products and adjuvants that are likely to be mistaken for food, drink or feed must be packed in such a way as to minimize the likelihood of such actions.
2 Phytosanitary products and additives which are accessible to the general public and which are likely to be mistaken for foodstuffs, drinks or feedingstuffs must contain components that are intended to deter or prevent their Consumption.
3 Phytosanitary products must be packaged according to the requirements of the art. 8 OChim 1 , which shall apply by analogy; phytosanitary products within the meaning of this order shall be equivalent to dangerous substances and preparations within the meaning of the OChim. 2
4 Products intended for non-professional users must be formulated and packed in such a way as to facilitate dosing during use.
5 Phytosanitary products registered under s. 36 and put into circulation in Switzerland must be sold in their foreign packaging. 3
1 RS 813.11
2 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
3 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
1 It is prohibited to give false, misleading or incomplete information on a phytosanitary product or to ignore facts that may mislead purchasers as to the nature and composition or the potential for use A phytosanitary product.
2 Phytosanitary products shall be labelled according to the requirements of the art. 10, para. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6, OChim 1 , which shall apply by analogy, and Annexes 7 and 8 to this order; the holder of the authorisation within the meaning of this order shall be assimilated to the manufacturer within the meaning of the OChim. If the OChim and Annexes 7 and 8 provide for different labelling, the requirements of Annexes 7 and 8 shall prevail. 2
3 Any packaging of a plant health product shall be legibly and indelibly marked with the indications referred to in Annex 11. 3
3bis The labelling requirements laid down in the Ordinance of 25 August 1999 on the protection of workers from micro-organisms 4 Must be respected. 5
4 Phytosanitary products that are registered under s. 36 must be labelled in accordance with the relevant foreign provisions. The label shall also bear the following particulars:
5 Regarding the labelling referred to in para. 4, it is possible to use the instructions issued by the approval service.
6 Imported phytosanitary products may derogate from the labelling requirements prior to their first delivery to third parties in Switzerland.
7 The DEFR can adapt Annexes 7, 8 and 11, taking into account international requirements, in particular those of the EU. 6
1 RS 813.11
2 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
3 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
4 RS 832.321
5 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
6 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
The labels of plant protection products which contain only approved basic substances and which are put into circulation shall bear in a legible and indelible manner the following indications in a language in use in the Sales region:
1 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
2 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
3 RS 813.11
1 The indications referred to in Art. 55, para. 3, must be placed on the label of the phytosanitary product.
2 The indications referred to in Annex 11, c. 13, 14, 15 and 17 may appear on a package insert. 1
1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
1 The labelling must be in at least two official languages, one of which must be the one in use in the sales area.
2 The labelling of phytosanitary products that have been licensed under s. 36 must be in at least one official language in use in the sales department.
1 Phytosanitary products that are genetically modified organisms or contain such organisms must bear the label "produced from genetically modified X" on the label.
2 In agreement with the evaluation services participating in the approval procedure, the approval service may exceptionally grant a derogation from the obligation to declare where the phytosanitary product contains, independently of the The manufacturer's or importer's will, traces of authorized genetically modified organisms, at a rate of less than 0.1 % mass.
1 Safety data sheets must be established and submitted for plant protection products in accordance with Art. 19 to 22 OChim 1 ; it is not necessary to attach the exposure scenarios referred to in s. 20, para. 2, OChim to safety data sheets. The holder of the authorisation within the meaning of this order shall be assimilated to the manufacturer within the meaning of the OChim. 2
2 Safety data sheets may be provided in electronic form. Upon request, they must be submitted on paper. 3
3 Safety data sheets must be kept in accordance with s. 23 OChim. 4
1 RS 813.11
2 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
3 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
4 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
1 Unapproved phytosanitary products are not advertised. Any advertisement for a phytosanitary product must be accompanied by sentences " Use phytosanitary products carefully. Before you use it, read the label and product information." These sentences are easily legible and must be clearly distinguished from all advertising. The words "phytosanitary products" may be replaced by a more precise description of the type of product, such as fungicide, insecticide or herbicide.
2 Advertising may not contain potentially misleading information, in the form of texts or illustrations, on possible risks to human or animal health or the environment, such as the terms "low risk", "non toxic" Or "safe".
3 All advertising claims must be technically justified.
4 The advertisements contain no visual representation of potentially dangerous practices such as the mixing or application without adequate protective clothing, the use in the vicinity of foodstuffs, or the use by Or in the vicinity of children.
5 The promotional or promotional material draws attention to the appropriate warning phrases and symbols on the labelling.
1 Anyone who uses plant protection products or their waste must ensure that they do not have any side effects that are unacceptable to humans, animals and the environment.
2 Phytosanitary products must be used appropriately. They may only be used for the purposes for which they have been registered. This use includes the application of the principles of good plant protection practices and compliance with the requirements laid down in Art. 18 and mentioned on the label. Any person who uses a phytosanitary product containing only approved basic substances shall, in addition, comply with the conditions and restrictions referred to in Annex 1, Part D. 1
3 For the application, only equipment which allows for targeted and good practice of plant protection products can be used.
1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
1 Producers, suppliers, distributors, importers and exporters of plant health products maintain records of the phytosanitary products they produce, import, export, store, use or market for five At least. Professional users of plant protection products keep records of the phytosanitary products they use, containing the name of the phytosanitary product, the time of use, the dose used, the surface and the culture where the plant is used. Has been used for at least three years. Upon request, they shall communicate the information contained in these registers to the competent authority.
2 Licensees and persons who import the goods listed in s. 36 for resale shall communicate annually to the approval service all necessary data concerning the volume of sales of plant protection products.
3 The data referred to in para. 2 must be comparable to those required under international information systems, in particular those of the EU (Eurostat).
Phytosanitary products must be retained in accordance with ss. 57 and 62 OChim 2 .
1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
2 RS 813.11
1 Art. 58, 63 to 66 and 68 OChim 2 Apply by analogy to the furnishing of plant protection products.
2 In addition, art. 59 OChim applies by analogy to undertakings which put in place phytosanitary products.
3 Phytosanitary products whose labelling refers to one of the elements listed in Annex 5, c. 1.2, let. A or b, or c. 2.2, let. A or b, OChim 3 Cannot be delivered to private users.
Art. 67 Chim 2 Applies to the theft, loss or placing on the market by mistake of plant protection products.
1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
2 RS 813.11
The OFAG may make general use requirements such as formulae for the calculation of usable quantities, distances to be observed or the use of certain equipment.
If the potential hazardous effect of a phytosanitary product is deemed unacceptable by the approval service or an evaluation service and the approval is withdrawn, the approval service may prohibit the use of the product Plant. It publishes the prohibition of use in the Federal Leaf in the form of a decision of general application.
1 Phytosanitary products should not be used in the S2 and S zones H Protection of groundwater, if the product itself or its metabolites having a biological effect are liable to result in the provision of drinking water because of their mobility and poor degradability. 1
2 The approval service shall fix a relative load when the examination of the file shows that it is to be expected, in groundwater, that the maximum concentration for drinking water in the annex, c. 4, OSEC 2 Can be reached.
3 OFAG publishes and maintains a list of phytosanitary products that are prohibited from use in the S2 and S zones H Protection of groundwater. 3
4 The use of phytosanitary products for which the labelling refers to one of the elements listed in Annex 5, c. 1.1 or c. 1.2, let. A or b, or c. 2.1 or c. 2.2, let. A or b, OChim 4 Is prohibited in urban areas on such areas as parks, gardens, sports and recreation grounds, recreation courses and playgrounds, as well as close proximity to health facilities. The use of plant protection products on agricultural production surfaces within urbanised areas is not subject to this prohibition. 5
5 Derogations from the provisions of para. 4 may be granted by the competent cantonal authorities if there is no other means of control. In this case, adequate measures are taken to ensure the protection of the users of the areas concerned.
6 Annex 2.5 to the Chemicals Risk Reduction Order of 18 May 2005 (ORRChim) 6 Is applicable to other prohibitions and restrictions on the use of plant protection products.
7 Annex 2.5 ORRChim applies by analogy to plant protection products which do not consist of non-genetically modified organisms or contain genetically modified organisms.
1 New content according to the c. 4 of the annex to the O of 4 nov. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 ( RO 2015 4791 ).
2 RS 817.021.23
3 New content according to the c. 4 of the annex to the O of 4 nov. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 ( RO 2015 4791 ).
4 RS 813.11
5 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
6 RS 814.81
1 Phytosanitary products whose authorisation has been withdrawn may be used for up to one year after the expiry of the period prescribed in accordance with Art. 31.
2 Phytosanitary products that have been removed from the list referred to in s. 36 may be used no later than one year after the expiry of the period prescribed in accordance with Art. 38.
3 Art. 67 is reserved.
1 The OFAG is the registration service for phytosanitary products.
2 A Steering Committee shall be established for the approval service. It includes the Directors of the following Federal Offices:
3 The steering committee has the following tasks and competencies:
4 The Steering Committee shall take its decisions by mutual agreement.
1 The designation of the administrative unit has been adapted to 1 Er Jan 2014 pursuant to Art. 16 al. 3 of the O of 17 Nov 2004 on official publications ( RO 2004 4937 ). This mod has been taken into account. Throughout the text.
1 The evaluation services are:
2 OFAG, in collaboration with its agricultural research stations and the Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (NPF), ensures that the phytosanitary product:
3 The FVO has the following tasks:
4 The OFEV determines the labelling and classification of the phytosanitary product according to the threat it poses to the environment.
5 Before entering into Annex 1 an active substance contained in a phytosanitary product subject to authorisation or when an active substance is re-evaluated, the approval service shall, for the opinion of the Office, provide the relevant documents as well as The conclusions of the evaluation. The cooperation of the OFEV is governed by Art. 62 A And 62 B The Act of 21 March 1997 on the organisation of government and administration 2 .
6 If the phytosanitary product consists of genetically modified organisms or contains such organisms, the tasks of OFEV shall be governed by the ODE 3 .
7 The SECO evaluates phytosanitary products according to the health and safety requirements of users when the products are used for professional or commercial purposes. To this end, it is based on the toxicological assessment of the plant health product carried out by the FVO and on the exposure data, using recognised models where possible.
8 The evaluation services shall take account of the technical documents and other guidance documents adopted by the EU for the evaluation of plant protection products.
1 The approval service has the following tasks:
2 Before placing a phytosanitary product on the list referred to in s. 36 or the registration of a phytosanitary product in order to control an emergency under s. 40, the approval service shall require the opinion of the assessment services whose area of competence is concerned.
3 It shall direct and coordinate the procedure for the approval of plant protection products consisting of genetically modified organisms or containing such organisms, taking into account the ODE 1 If field tests are to be carried out for the issuance of the authorisation, the tests shall be carried out only if the requirements of the EDO are met.
4 It shall rule on the modification or withdrawal of an authorisation:
5 The evaluation services participating in the approval procedure shall regularly and regularly inform each other of facts and knowledge relating to the approval and use of plant protection products.
6 The approval service may, together with the cantonal implementing authorities, organise controls on the release or use of specific plant protection products.
The toxicological information centre is the Swiss Centre for Toxicological Information (CSIT).
1 The OFAG, after consulting the Swiss Accreditation Service (SAS), establishes the procedure for certifying the conformity of tests with the requirements on good experimental practice.
2 The OFAG, or the service designated by the OFAG, certifies on request the conformity of the tests. The fees of the applicant are set out in the order of 10 March 2006 on the emoluments of the State Secretariat for the Economy in the field of accreditation 1 .
The approval service may appeal to experts for the execution of this order.
1 Import of phytosanitary products on a professional or commercial basis requires a General Import Permit (MGI). This is issued by the approval service.
2 The PGI is issued to persons who have made the request in writing and who have their domicile, head office or branch in Switzerland, or who are nationals of a State with which Switzerland has concluded an agreement providing that the two countries Waive these requirements.
3 It is of unlimited duration, personal and non-transferable. In serious cases, in particular in cases of misuse, it may be withdrawn.
4 The person subject to the obligation to report must indicate the importer's GI number in the customs declaration.
5 The approval service shall inform the cantonal authorities of the holders of an ERP who have their domicile or have their headquarters in the territory of their canton.
At the request of the approval service, the customs offices shall verify that the phytosanitary products comply with the provisions on the importation of this order. For the rest, art. 83, para. 3, OChim 2 Is applicable.
1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ). Erratum of 17 Nov 2015 (RO 2015 4483).
2 RS 813.11
1 The cantons are responsible for monitoring the market for plant protection products and ensuring that plant protection products are used in accordance with the requirements. OFAG performs these tasks only in the alternative.
2 In particular, the cantons shall monitor compliance with:
3 They shall ensure that the prohibitions of use referred to in s. 67 are executed.
1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
1 If there are reasonable grounds to believe that a phytosanitary product put into circulation or intended for use does not comply with the provisions of the Act, the Act, the Act, the Act, this Order, or the implementing provisions of Such acts, the competent authority may seize the means of evidence, block or confiscate the goods or require the importer to re-export it.
2 Any person who holds evidence under s. 1 is required to produce them on request.
3 The authority labels the seized objects and puts them on a list. It provides the owner of the object with a copy of this list.
4 The authority that orders a measure under para. 1 shall arrange for the maintenance of the objects. It may give instructions to persons who have rights on these objects to this effect.
5 The authority may confiscate seized objects and the phytosanitary products concerned or authorize their export.
Art. 74 to 76 OChim 2 Apply by analogy to the transmission of data concerning plant protection products.
1 New content according to the c. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
2 RS 813.11
The approval service establishes interdisciplinary documentation on plant protection products, which includes, inter alia:
The order of 18 May 2005 on the release of plant protection products 1 Is repealed.
1 [ RO 2005 3035 4097 4479 5211, 2006 4851, 2007 821 hp. III 1469 Annex 4 c. 54 1843 4541 6291, 2008 2155 4377 Annex 5, c. 11,5271, 2009 401 Annex, c. 3 2845, 2010 2101]
1 The conditions for the registration of active substances in Schedule 1 under the old law shall apply after the entry into force of this order:
2 Authorisations issued before the entry into force of this Ordinance shall remain valid. They shall end no later than 31 July 2015, unless another date has been fixed in accordance with the provisions in force before the entry into force of this order.
3 Phytosanitary products that have been labelled and packaged in accordance with the law in force before 1 Er August 2005 can be used until July 31, 2011.
4 DEFR may extend the time limits set out in para. 1 when an extension of these deadlines has been decided in the EU.
5 Safeners and synergists already in circulation prior to the coming into force of this order shall be announced with the approval service within twelve months of the coming into force of this order.
6 Notwithstanding s. 17, para. 1, let a, a phytosanitary product containing a synergist or a safener already in circulation before the coming into force of this order may be authorized pending the outcome of the review procedure referred to in s. 12.
7 The provisions of Art. 48, para. 1 and 2 do not apply to the phytosanitary substances and products for which an application was filed prior to the coming into force of this order.
1 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
2 Council Directive 91 /414/EEC of 15 July. 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, OJ L 230, 19 August 1991, p. 1, as last amended by Council Directive 2009 /160/EC of 17 Dec. 2009, OJ L 338, 19 Dec. 2009, p. 83.
3 R (CE) n O 33/2008 of the Commission of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91 /414/EEC on a common procedure and an accelerated procedure for the evaluation of active substances in the work programme referred to in Art. 8, para. 2, of this Directive, but not included in Annex I, in the version of OJ L 15 of 18 January 2008, p. 5.
4 See note on art. 86, para. 1, let. B.
1 Phytosanitary products that have been labelled and packaged under the old right may:
2 Proposals for classification and labelling must be filed until 31 December 2014 with the approval service so that it can decide before the middle of 2017 of a new classification and labelling According to Regulation (EC) No O 1272/2008 2 , which corresponds to the GHS. If the approval service cannot decide on the new classification and labelling before mid-2017, it may extend the time limits set out in para. 1 for the product concerned.
1 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
2 See note on s. 3, para. 1, let. D.
3 Repealed by c. 4 of the annex to the O of 7 Nov 2012, with effect from 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 6103 ).
For plant protection products which, in accordance with Art. 86 A , para. 1, have been labelled and packaged according to the old right, security data sheets established under the old right may be submitted until May 31, 2018.
1 Introduced by ch. I of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
1 The application package for the registration of an active substance in Schedule 1 may be filed in accordance with the requirements of the former right by December 31, 2016.
2 The application package for authorisation to release a phytosanitary product may be filed in accordance with the requirements of the old right by 31 December 2016.
1 Introduced by ch. I of the O du DEFR of 28 Oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 ( RO 2015 4555 ).
(art. 5, 10, 10 B, 10 E , 17, 21, 23, 40 A , 55 A , 61, 72 and 86)
Common Name, Identification Number |
UICPA Name |
CAS No. |
No CIPAC |
Type of action taken/Specific conditions |
(S) -cis-Verbenol |
[S-(1a, 2a, 5a)] -4,6,6-trimethylbicyclo [3.1.1] - hept-3-en-2-ol |
18881-04-4 |
- |
Pheromone |
1-decanol |
Decan-1-ol |
112-30-1 |
831 |
Phytoregulator |
12 OH |
Dodecan-1-ol |
112-53-8 |
- |
Pheromone |
14 OH |
Tetradecan-1-ol |
112-72-1 |
- |
Pheromone |
1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) |
1-methylcyclopropene |
3100-04-7 |
767 |
Phytoregulator |
1-naphthyl acetic acid |
1-naphthylacetic acid |
86-87-3 |
313 |
Phytoregulator |
2 - (1-naphthyl) acetamide |
2 - (1-naphthyl) acetamide |
86-86-2 |
282 |
Phytoregulator |
2,4-D |
(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) acetic acid |
94-75-7 |
1 |
Herbicide |
6-benzyladenine |
N 6 -benzyladenine |
1214-39-7 |
- |
Phytoregulator |
Abamectin |
Avermectin B1 |
71751-41-2 |
495 |
Insecticide; acaricide |
Acequinocyl |
3-dodecyl-1,4-dihydro-1,4-dioxo-2-naphthyl acetate |
57960-19-7 |
760 |
Acaricide |
Acetamiprid |
(E) -N1-[(6-chloro-3-pyridyl) methyl] -N2-cyano-N1-methylacetamidine |
135410-20-7 |
649 |
Insecticide |
Acibenzolar-S-methyl |
S-methyl benzo [1,2, 3] thiadiazol-7-carbothioate |
135158-54-2 |
597 |
Natural defenses stimulator |
Acetic acid |
Acetic acid |
64-19-7 |
- |
Herbicide |
Benzoic acid |
Benzoate |
65-85-0 |
622 |
Disinfectant product |
A4 + A7 gibberellic acid |
(3S, 3aR, 4S, 4aR, 7R, 9aR, 9bR, 12S) -12-hydroxy-3-methyl-6-methylene-2-oxoperhydro-4a, 7-methano - (3,9b-propanoazuleno/9b, 3-propenoazuleno) [1,2 -b] furan-4-carboxylic acid |
468-44-0/510-75-8 |
307 |
Phytoregulator |
Sulphuric acid on clay soil |
Sulfuric acid |
10043-01-3 |
- |
Fungicide bactericide |
Fatty acids from C7 to C20 |
Insecticide, accaricide, herbicide, phytoregulator |
|||
(Hydroenlargonic acid) |
Nonanoic acid |
112-05-0 |
888 |
|
(Fatty acids in C7-C18) |
67701-09-1 |
889 |
||
(Caprylic acid) |
Octanoic acid |
124-07-2 |
887 |
|
(capric acid) |
Decanoic acid |
334-48-5 |
886 |
|
(Fatty acids from C7 to C20) |
891 |
|||
(oleic acid) |
Cis-octadec-9-enoic acid |
112-07-80 |
894 |
|
(and sodium and potassium salts of these acids) |
||||
Octanoic acid (as Na and Fe salts) |
Octanoic acid |
124-07-2 |
- |
Healing product |
Aclonifen |
2-chloro-6-nitro-3-phenoxyaniline |
74070-46-5 |
498 |
Herbicide |
Aldicarb |
2-methyl-2 - (methylthio) propionaldehyde O-methylcarbamoyloxime |
116-06-3 |
215 |
Nematicide; limited use in the control of crown nematode in sugar beet |
Alpha-Cypermethrin |
A racemate comprising (S) - a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (1R, 3R) -3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate and (R) - a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (1S, 3S) -3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate |
67375-30-8 |
454 |
Insecticide |
Alpha-Pinen |
2 ,6,6-Trimethylbicyclo [3.1.1] hept-2-en |
2437-95-8 |
- |
Pheromone |
Amidosulfuron |
1 - (4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl) -3-mesyl (methyl) sulfamoylurea |
120923-37-7 |
515 |
Herbicide |
Aminopyralide |
4-amino-3,6-dichloropyridine-2-carboxylic acid |
150114-71-9 |
771 |
Herbicide |
Amisulbrom |
3 - (3-Brom-6-fluor-2-methylindol-1-ylsulfonyl) - N, N-dimethyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-sulfonamid |
348635-87-0 |
789 |
Fungicide |
Asulam |
Methyl 4-aminophenylsulfonylcarbamate |
3337-71-1 |
240 |
Herbicide |
Azadirachtin A + B |
Dimethyl (2aR, 3S, 4S, 4aR, 5S, 7aS, 8S, 10R, 10aS, 10bR) -10-(acetyloxy) octahydro-3,5-dihydroxy-4-methyl-8 - [[(2E) -2-methyl-1-oxo-2-butenyl] oxy] -4-[(1aR, 2S, 3aS, 6aS, 7S, 7aS) -3a, 6a, 7, 7a-tetrahydro-6a-hydroxy-7a-methyl-2,7-methanofuro [2,3-b] oxireno [e] oxepin-1a (2H) - yl] -1H, 7H-naph Tho [1,8-bc: 4, 4a-c '] difuran-5,10a (8H) - dicarboxylate |
11141-17-6 |
627 (for Azad. A) |
Insecticide |
Azoxystrobin |
Methyl (E) -2-{2 [6 - (2-cyanophenoxy) pyrimidin-4-yloxy] phenyl} -3-methoxyacrylate |
131860-33-8 |
571 |
Fungicide |
Beflubutamid |
(RS) - N-benzyl-2 - (á, á, á, 4-tetrafluoro-m-tolyloxy) butyramide |
113614-08-7 |
662 |
Herbicide |
Benalaxyl |
Methyl N-phenylacetyl-N-2.6-xylyl-DL-alaninate |
71626-11-4 |
416 |
Fungicide |
Benalaxyl-M |
Methyl N - (phenylacetyl) -N-(2,6-xylyl) -D - alaninate |
98243-83-5 |
766 |
Fungicide |
Benoxacor |
(±) -4-dichloroacetyl-3,4-dihydro-3-methyl-2H-1,4-benzoxamine |
98730-04-2 |
- |
Herbicide "safener" |
Bentazone |
3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4 (3H) - one 2.2-dioxide |
25057-89-0 |
366 |
Herbicide |
Benthiavalicarb |
[(S) -1-{[(1R) -1-(6-fluoro-1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl) ethyl] carbamoyl} -2-methylpropyl] carbamic acid Variant : benthiavalicarb-isopropyl |
413615 -35-7 177406-68-7 |
744 744.204 |
Fungicide |
Beta-Cyfluthrin |
(1RS, 3RS; 1RS, 3SR) - 3 - (2,2-Dichlorvinyl) - 2,2-dimethylcyclopropancarboxylsäure (SR) - á-cyano - (4-fluor-3-phenoxy-phenyl) methylester |
68359-37-5 |
482 |
Seed disinfectant |
Potassium icarbonate |
Potassium hydrogencarbonate |
298-14-6 |
- |
Fungicide |
Bifenazate |
Isopropyl 3 - (4-methoxybiphenyl-3-yl) carbazate |
149877-41-8 |
736 |
Acaricide |
Bifenox |
Methyl 5 - (2,4-dichlorophenoxy) -2-nitrobenzoate |
42576-02-3 |
413 |
Herbicide |
Bifenthrin |
2-methylbiphenyl-3-ylmethyl (Z)-(1RS; 3RS) -3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate |
82657-04-3 |
415 |
Acaricide |
Bixafen |
N - (3 ', 4' - dichloro-5-fluoro [1,1 ' - biphenyl] -2-yl) -3-(difluoromethyl) -1-methyl - 1 H -pyrazole-4-carboxamide |
581809-46-3 |
819 |
Fungicide |
Boscalid |
2-Chloro-N - (4 ' - chlorobiphenyl-2-yl) nicotinamide |
188425-85-6 |
673 |
Fungicide |
Bromadiolone |
3 - [3 - (4-bromobiphenyl-4-yl) -3-hydroxy-1-phenylpropyl] -4-hydroxycoumarin |
28772-56-7 |
371 |
Rodenticide |
Bromoxynil |
3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile Variant : bromoxynil butyrate Variant : bromoxynil octanoate Variant :bromoxynil - potassium |
1689-84-5 3861-41-4 1689-99-2 2961-68-4 |
87 87.403 87.407 87.019 |
Herbicide |
Bromuconazole |
1 - [(2RS, 4RS: 2RS, 4SR) -4 - bromo-2 - (2,4-dichlorophenyl) tetrahydrofurfuryl] - 1H-1,2,4 -triazole |
116255-48-2 |
680 |
Fungicide |
Bupirimate |
5-butyl-2-ethylamino-6-methylpyrimidin-4-yl dimethylsulfamate |
41483-43-6 |
261 |
Fungicide |
Buprofezin |
(Z) - 2-tert-butylimino-3-isopropyl-5-phenyl-1,3,5-thiadiazinan-4-one |
953030-84-7 |
681 |
Insecticide |
Captan |
N - (trichloromethylthio) cyclohex-4-ene-1,2-dicarboximide |
133-06-2 |
40 |
Fungicide |
Carbendazim |
Methyl benzimidazol-2-ylcarbamate |
10605-21-7 |
263 |
Fungicide |
Carbetamide |
(R) -1-(ethylcarbamoyl) ethyl carbanilate |
16118-49-3 |
95 |
Herbicide |
Calcium Carbonate (chalk) |
Calcium carbonate |
471-34-1 |
- |
Game repellent |
Carboxin |
5.6-dihydro-2-methyl-1,4-oxathi-ine-3-carboxanilide |
5234-68-4 |
273 |
Fungicide |
Carfentrazone-ethyl |
Ethyl 2-chloro-3 - (2-chloro-4-fluoro-5 - [4 - (difluoromethyl) -4,5,dihydro-3-methyl-5 - oxo-1H 1,2,4 ,triazol-1-yl] phenyl) propanoate |
128639-02-1 |
587.202 |
Herbicide |
Chalcogran |
2-Ethyl-1,6-dioxaspiro [4, 4] nonan |
- |
Pheromone |
|
Chlorantraniliprole |
3-Bromo-N - [4-chloro-2-methyl-6 - (methylcarbamoyl) phenyl] - 1 - (3-chloropyridin-2-yl) - 1 H-pyrazole-5-carboxyamide |
500008-45-7 |
794 |
Insecticide |
Chloridazone |
5-amino-4-chloro-2-phenylpyridazin-3 (2H) - one |
1698-60-8 |
111 |
Herbicide |
Chlormequat |
Phytoregulator |
|||
(Chlormequat) |
2-chloroethyltrimethyl-ammonium |
7003-89-6 |
143 |
|
(Chlormequat chloride) |
2-chloroethyltrimethyl-ammonium chloride |
999-81-5 |
143.302 |
|
Chlorothalonil (TCPN) |
Tetrachloroisophthalonitrile |
1897-45-6 |
288 |
Fungicide |
Chlorotoluron |
3 - (3-chloro-p-tolyl) - 1,1-dimethylurea |
15545-48-9 |
217 |
Herbicide |
Chlorpropham (CPIC) |
Isopropyl 3-chlorocarbanilate |
101-21-3 |
43 |
Herbicide, phytoregulator |
Chlorpyrifos |
O, O-diethyl O-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl phosphorothioate |
2921-88-2 |
221 |
Insecticide |
Chlorpyrifos-methyl |
O, O-dimethyl O-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl phosphorothioate |
5598-13-0 |
486 |
Acaricide |
Clethodim |
(±) -2-[(E) -1-[(E) -3-chloroallyloxyimino] propyl] -5-[2 - (ethylthio) propyl] -3-hydroxycyclohex-2-enone |
99129-21-2 |
508 |
Herbicide |
Clodinafop-propargyl |
Prop-2-ynyl (R) -2-[4 - (5-chloro-3-fluoropyridin-2-yloxy) phenoxy] propionate |
105512-06-9 |
683.225 |
Herbicide |
Clofentezin |
3,6-bis (2-chlorophenyl) -1,2,4,5 - tetrazine |
74115-24-5 |
418 |
Acaricide |
Clomazone |
2 - (2-chlorobenzyl) -4,4-dimethyl-1,2-oxazolidin-3 - one |
81777-89-1 |
509 |
Herbicide |
Clopyralid |
3,6-dichloropyridine-2-carboxylic acid |
1702-17-6 |
455 |
Herbicide |
Cloquintocet-mexyl |
1-methylhexyl (5-chloroquinolin-8-yloxy) acetate |
99607-70-2 |
- |
Herbicide "safener" |
Clothianidin |
(E) -1-(2-chloro-1,3-thiazol-5-ylmethyl) -3-methyl - 2-nitroguanidine |
210880-92-5 |
738 |
Insecticide |
COS-OGA |
Linear Copolymer of á-1,4-D-galactopyranosyluronic acids and methylesterified galactopyranosyluronic acids (9 to 20 residues) with a linear copolymer of 2-amino-2-deoxy-D-binding-D-glucopyranose and 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-D-glucopyranose (5 to 10 residues) |
979 |
Fungicide |
|
Copper |
Copper Variant (as carbonate, alkaline): [ì - [carbonato (2−) - êO :êO']] dihydroxydicopper Variant (as hydroxide): copper (II) hydroxide Variant (as a chlorocalcium hydroxide) Variant (as powders by broillie Bordeaux): A mixture of calcium hydroxide and copper (II) sulfate Variant (as naphthenate): copper naphthenate Variant (as octanate): copper octanoate Variant (in the form of oxychloride): dicopper chloride trihydroxide Variant (as sulphate): copper (II) tetraoxosulfate Variant (tetracuum hexahydroxysulphate): cupric sulfate-tricupric hydroxide |
12002-03-8 12069-69-1 20427-59-2 8011-63-0 1338-02-9 20543-04-8 1332-40-7 7758-98-7 1333-22-8 |
44-44.305 44.604-44.407 44.602 44.306 - |
Fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide fungicide |
Cyazofamid |
4-chloro-2-cyano - N, N -dimethyl-5 - P -tolylimidazole-1-sulfonamide |
120116-88-3 |
653 |
Fungicide |
Cycloxydim |
(±) -2-[1 - (ethoxyimino) butyl] -3-hydroxy-5 - thian-3-ylcyclohex-2-enone |
101205-02-1 |
510 |
Herbicide |
Cyflufenamid |
(Z) -N-[á - (cyclopropylmethoxyimino) -2,3-difluoro-6-(trifluoromethyl) benzyl] -2-phenylacetamide |
180409-60-3 |
759 |
Fungicide |
Cymoxanil |
1 - (2-cyano-2-methoxyiminoacetyl) -3-ethylurea |
57966-95-7 |
419 |
Fungicide |
Cypermethrin |
(RS) - a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (1RS, 3RS; 1RS, 3SR) - 3 - (2,2-dichlorovinyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate |
52315-07-8 |
332 |
Insecticide |
High-cis cypermethrin |
(RS) - a-yano-3-phenoxybenzyl (1RS) - cis, trans (> 80 %: <20 %) -3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate |
52315-07-8 |
- |
Insecticide |
Cyproconazole |
(2RS, 3RS; 2RS, 3SR) -2-(4-chlorophenyl) -3 - cyclopropyl-1 - (1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl) butan-2-ol |
94361-06-5 |
600 |
Fungicide |
Cyprodinil |
4-cyclopropyl-6-methyl-N-phenylpyrimidin-2-amine |
121552-61-2 |
511 |
Fungicide |
Cyromazine |
N-cyclopropyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine |
66215-27-8 |
420 |
Insecticide, snail |
Daminozide |
N-dimethylaminosuccinamic acid |
1596-84-5 |
330 |
Phytoregulator |
Dazomet (DMTT) |
3,5-dimethyl-1,3,5-thiadiazinane-2-thione |
533-74-4 |
146 |
Nematicide, fungicide, herbicide, insecticide |
D-Carvon |
D-2-Methyl-5-isopropenyl-2-cyclohexene-1-on |
2244-16-8 |
602 |
Phytoregulator |
Deltamethrin |
(S) - a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (1R, 3R) -3-(2,2-dibromoinyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate |
52918-63-5 |
333 |
Insecticide |
Desmedipham |
Ethyl 3-phenylcarbamoyloxyphenylcarbamate |
13684-56-5 |
477 |
Herbicide |
Dicamba |
3.6-dichloro-o-anisic acid |
1918-00-9 |
85 |
Herbicide |
Dichlorprop-P |
(R) -2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) propionic acid |
15165-67-0 |
476 |
Herbicide |
Diethofencarb |
Isopropyl 3,4-diethoxycarbanilate |
87130-20-9 |
513 |
Fungicide |
Difenoconazole |
Cis, trans-3-chloro-4 - [4-methyl-2 - (1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl) -1,3-dioxolan-2-yl] phenyl 4-chlorophenyl ether |
119446-68-3 |
687 |
Fungicide |
Diflubenzuron |
1 - (4-chlorophenyl) -3-(2,6-difluorobenzoyl) urea |
35367-38-5 |
339 |
Insecticide |
Diflufenican |
2,4-difluoro-2 - (a, a, a-trifluoro-m-tolyloxy) nicotinanilide |
83164-33-4 |
462 |
Herbicide |
Dimethachlor |
2-chloro-N - (2-methoxyethyl) aceto-2.6-xylidide |
50563-36-5 |
688 |
Herbicide |
Dimethenamide P |
S-2-chloro-N - (2,4-dimethyl-3-thienyl) - N - (2-methoxy-1-methylethyl) - acetamide |
163515-14-8 |
638 |
Herbicide |
Dimethoate |
O, O-dimethyl S-methylcarbamoylmethyl phosphorodithioate |
60-51-5 |
59 |
Acaricide |
Dimethomorph |
(E, Z 4 - [3 - (4-chlorophenyl) -3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl) acryloyl] morpholine |
110488-70-5 |
483 |
Fungicide |
Diquat |
1 ,1-ethylene-2.2 'bipyridyldiylium |
2764-72-9 |
55 |
Herbicide |
Dithianon |
5.10-dihydro-5,10-dioxonaphtho [2,3-b] - 1,4-dithi-in-2,3-dicarbonitrile |
3347-22-6 |
153 |
Fungicide |
Diuron |
3 - (3,4-dichlorophenyl) -1,1-dimethylurea |
330-54-1 |
100 |
Herbicide |
Dodemorph |
4-cyclododecyl-2,6-dimethylmorpholine |
1593-77-7 |
300 |
Fungicide |
Dodine |
1-dodecylguanidinium acetate |
2439-10-3 |
101 |
Fungicide |
E2Z13-18 Ac |
E, Z-2.13 Octadecadien-1-yl acetate |
086252-74-6 |
- |
Pheromone |
E3Z13-18 Ac |
E, Z-3.13 Octadecadien-1-yl acetate |
053120-26-6 |
- |
Pheromone |
E7Z9-12 Ac |
(7E, 9Z) - dodeca-7,9-dien-1-yl acetate |
55774-32-8 |
- |
Pheromone |
E8-12 Ac |
(E) - dodec-8-en-1-yl acetate |
38363-29-0 |
- |
Pheromone |
E8E10-12 OH (Codlemone) |
(E, E) - dodeca-8.10-dien-1-ol |
33956-49-9 |
- |
Pheromone |
Emamectin benzoate |
4 "- deoxy-4"-(methylamino)-(4 " R) - avermectin B1 benzoate |
155569-91-8 |
791 |
Insecticide |
Epoxiconazole |
(2RS, 3SR) -1-[3 - (2-chlorophenyl) -2,3-epoxy-2-(4-fluorophenyl) propyl] -1H-1,2,4-triazole |
133855-98-8 |
609 |
Fungicide |
Decadienecarbixylic acid methyl ester |
Methyl ester of decadiene-carboxylic acid |
- |
Pheromone |
|
Ethephon |
2-Chloroethylphosphonic acid |
16672-87-0 |
373 |
Phytoregulator |
Ethofumesate |
(±) -2-ethoxy-2,3-dihydro-3,3-dimethylbenzofuran - 5-yl methanesufonate |
26225-79-6 |
233 |
Herbicide |
Etofenprox |
2 - (4-ethoxyphenyl) -2-methylpropyl 3-phenoxybenzyl ether |
80844-07-1 |
471 |
Insecticide |
Etoxazole |
( RS ) -5 - Tert -butyl-2-[2 - (2,6-difluorophenyl) - 4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazol-4-yl] phenetole |
153233-91-1 |
623 |
Acaricide |
Excerpt from prism |
- |
Fungicide bactericide |
||
Quassia Extract |
- |
Insecticide |
||
Famoxadone |
3-anilino-5-methyl-5 - (4-phenoxyphenyl) -1,3-oxazolidine-2,4-dione |
131807-57-3 |
594 |
Fungicide |
Ride of horns |
- |
- |
Game repellent |
|
Animal Body Farine |
- |
Game repellent |
||
Yellow mustard flour |
- |
Fungicide |
||
Fenamidone |
( S ) -1-anilino-4-methyl-2-methylthio-4-phenylimidazolin-5 - one |
161326-34-7 |
650 |
Fungicide |
Fenazaquin |
4-tert-butylphenethyl quinazolin-4-yl ether |
120928-09-8 |
693 |
Acarizide |
Fenbuconazole |
4 - (4-chlorophenyl) -2-phenyl-2-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl) butyronitrile |
114369-43-6 |
694 |
Fungicide |
Fenhexamid |
1-Methyl-cyclohexanecarboxyloic acid 2,3-dichloro-4-hydroxy-phenyl) - amide |
126833-17-8 |
603 |
Fungicide |
Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl |
(R) -2-[4 - (6-chloro-2-benzoxazol-2-yloxy) phenoxy] propionate |
71283-80-2 |
484.202 |
Herbicide |
Fenoxycarb |
Ethyl 2 - (4-phenoxyphenoxy) ethylcarbamate |
72490-01-8 |
425 |
Insecticide |
Fenpropidin |
(RS) - 1 - [3 - (4-tert-butylphenyl) - 2-methylpropyl] piperidine |
67306-00-7 |
520 |
Fungicide |
Fenpropimorph |
(±) - cis-4 - [3 - (4-tert-butylphenyl) - 2-methylpropyl] - 2,6-dimethylmorpholine |
67564-91-4 |
427 |
Fungicide |
Fenpyrazamine |
S-Allyl-5-amino-2,3-dihydro-2-isopropyl-3-oxo-4 - (o-tolyl) pyrazol-1-carbothioat |
473798-59-3 |
832 |
Fungicide |
Fenpyroximate |
Tert-butyl (E) - a - (1,3-dimethyl-5-phenoxypyrazol-4-ylmethyleneamino-oxy) - p-toluate |
111812-58-9 |
695 |
Acaricide |
Fipronil |
(±) - 5-amino-1 - (2.6-dichloro-a, a, a-trifluoro-p-tolyl) - 4-trifluoromethylsulfinylpyrazole-3-carbonitrile |
120068-37-3 |
581 |
Insecticide |
Flazasulfuron |
1 - (4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl) -3-(3-trifluoromethyl-2-pyridylsulfonyl) urea |
104040-78-0 |
595 |
Herbicide |
Flonicamide |
N-cyanomethyl-4 - (trifluoromethyl) nicotinamide |
158062-67-0 |
763 |
Insecticide |
Florasulam |
2,6,8-trifluoro-5-methoxy [1,2, 4] triazolo [1.5 - C ] pyrimidine-2-sulfonanilide |
145701-23-1 |
616 |
Herbicide |
Fluazifop-P-butyl |
Butyl - (R) -2-[4 - (5-trifluormethyl-2-pyridyloxy) phenoxy] propionat |
79241-46-6 |
467.205 |
Herbicide |
Fluazinam |
3-chloro-N - (3-chloro-5-trifluoromethyl-2-pyridyl) - a, a, a-trifluoro-2.6-dinitro-p-toluidine |
79622-59-6 |
521 |
Fungicide |
Fludioxonil |
4 - (2,2-difluoro-1,3-benzodioxol-4-yl) pyrrole-3-carbonitrile |
131341-86-1 |
522 |
Fungicide |
Flufenacet |
N - (4-fluoro-phenyl) - N-isopropyl-2 - (5-trifluoro-methyl - [1,3, 4] thiadiazol-2-yloxy) - acetamide |
142459-58-3 |
588 |
Herbicide |
Flumioxazin |
7-fluoro-6 - [(3,4,5,6-tetrahydro) phtalimido] -4-(2-propynyl) -1,4-benzoxazion-3 (2H) - one |
103361-09-7 |
578 |
Herbicide |
Fluopicolide |
2.6-dichloro-N - [3-chloro-5 - (trifluoromethyl) - 2-pyridylmethyl] benzamide |
239110-15-7 |
787 |
Fungicide |
Fluopyram |
N - {2 - [3-chloro-5 - (trifluoromethyl) - 2-pyridyl] ethyl} - á, á, á-trifluoro-o-toluamide |
658066-35-4 |
807 |
Fungicide |
Flutolanil |
á, á, á, - trifluoro-3 ' - isopropoxy-o-toluanilide |
66332-96-5 |
524 |
Fungicide |
Fluoxastrobin |
(E)-{2 - [6 - (2-chlorophenoxy) -5 - fluoropyrimidin-4-yloxy] phenyl} (5,6-dihydro-1,4,2-dioxazin-3-yl) methanone O-methyloxime |
361377-29-9 |
746 |
Fungicide |
Flupyrsulfuron-methyl-sodium |
Methyl 2 - (4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl) -6-trifluoromethylnicotinate monosodium salt |
144740-54-5 |
577.501 |
Herbicide |
Fluquinconazole |
3 - (2,4-dichlorophenyl) -6-fluoro-2-(1 H -1,2,4-triazol-1-yl) quinazolin-4 (3 H ) - one |
136426-54-5 |
474 |
Fungicide |
Flurochloridone |
(3RS, 4RS; 3RS, 4SR) -3-cloro-4-chloromethyl-1-(a, a, a-trifluoro - M -tolyl) -2-pyrrolidone |
61213-25-0 |
430 |
Herbicide |
Fluroxypyr |
4-amino-3,5-dichloro-6-fluoro-2-pyridyloxyacetic acid Variant : fluroxypyr-meptyl |
69377-81-7 81406-37-3 |
431 431.214 |
Herbicide |
Flusilazole |
Bis (4-fluorophenyl) (methyl) (1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl) silane |
85509-19-9 |
435 |
Fungicide |
Fluxapyroxad |
3 - (Difluormethyl) - 1-methyl-N - (3 ', 4', 5 ' - trifluorbiphenyl-2-yl) pyrazol-4-carboxamid |
907204-31-3 |
828 |
Fungicide |
Folpet |
N - (trichloromethylthio) phthalimide |
133-07-3 |
75 |
Fungicide |
Foramsulfurone |
1 - (4, 6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2yl) -3-(2-dimethylcarbamoyl-5-formamidophenylsulfonyl) urea |
173159-57-4 |
659 |
Herbicide |
Fosetyl |
Ethyl hydrogen phosphonate Variant : Aluminiumfosetyl (Fosetyl-Al) Aluminium-tris- (O-ethylphosphonat) |
15845-66-6 39148-24-8 |
384 384.013 |
Fungicide |
Fuberidazole |
2 - (2-furyl) benzimidazole |
3878-19-1 |
525 |
Fungicide |
Gibberellin A3 |
(3S, 3aS, 4S, 4aS, 7S, 9aR, 9bR, 12S) -7,12-dihydroxy-3-methyl-6-methylene-2-oxoperhydro-4a, 7-methano-9b, 3-propeno [1,2-b] furan-4-carboxylic acid |
77-06-5 |
- |
Phytoregulator |
Glufosinate |
4- [hydroxy (methyl) phosphinoyl] -DL-homoalanine |
51276-47-2 |
437 |
Herbicide |
Glyphosate |
N - (phosphonomethyl) glycine |
1071-83-6 |
284 |
Herbicide |
Glyphosate-trimesium |
N- (Phosphonomethyl) -glycin-trimethylsulfoniumsalz |
81591-81-3 |
284.114 |
Herbicide |
Wool grease |
- |
Game repellent |
||
Gras of sheep |
Game repellent |
|||
Haloxyfop (R) - methylester |
(R) -Methyl-2-[4 - (3-chloro-5 - (trifluoro-methyl) -2-pyridyloxy) - phenoxyl] - propionate |
72619-32-0 |
526.201 |
Herbicide |
Hexythiazox |
(4RS5RS) -5-(4-chlorophenyl) -N-cyclohexyl - 4-methyl-2-oxothiazolidine-3-carboxamide |
78587-05-0 |
439 |
Acaricide |
Aromatic oil |
- |
Game repellent |
||
Rapeseed oil |
Rapeseed oil |
68187-84-8 |
- |
Insecticide |
Eucalyptus oil |
- |
- |
- |
Insecticide |
Mint Oil |
Mint oil |
8008-79-5 |
908 |
Phytoregulator |
Paraffin oil |
8012-95-1, 64742-46-7, 72623-86-0, 8042-47-5, 97862-82-3 |
- |
Insecticide |
|
Refined Sesame Oil |
Fatty acid glycerol ester |
- |
Insecticide (synergist) |
|
Essential Oils |
- |
Game repellent |
||
Maleic Hydrazide |
6-hydroxy-2H-pyridazine-3-one |
123-33-1 |
310 |
Phytoregulator |
Calcium hydroxide (hydrated lime, lime) |
Ca (OH) 2 |
1305-62-0 |
- |
Healing product |
Hymexazol |
5-methylisoxazol-3-ol |
10004-44-1 |
528 |
Seed infecting |
Imazalil |
(±) -1-(b-allyloxy-2,4-dichlorophenylethyl) imidazole |
35554-44-0 |
335 |
Fungicide |
Imazamox |
(RS) -2-(4-isopropyl-4-methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl) -5 - methoxymethylnicotinic acid |
114311-32-9 |
619 |
Herbicide |
Imidacloprid |
1 - (6-chloro-3-pyridinylmethyl) -N - nitroimidazolidin-2-ylideneamine |
138261-41-3 |
582 |
Insecticide |
Indoxacarb |
(S) - methyl 7-chloro-2,5-dihydro-2 [[(methoxy-carbonyl) [4- (trifluoro-methoxy) phenyl] amino] carbonyl] -indeno [1,2-e] [1,3, 4] oxadiazine-4a (3H) - carboxylate |
173584-44-6 |
612 |
Insecticide |
Iodosulfuron |
Methyl 4-iodo-2 - [3 - (4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,2,5-triazin-2-yl) ureidosulfonyl] benzoate, sodium salt |
144550-36-7 |
634 |
Herbicide |
Ioxynil |
4-Hydroxy-3,5-di-iodobenzonitrile Variant : octanoate Variant : ioxynil butyrate Variant :ioxynil sodium |
1689-83-4 3861-47-0 2961-62-8 |
86 86.407 86.403 86.011 |
Herbicide |
Iprodione |
3 - (3,5-dichlorophenyl) -N - isopropyl-2,4-dioxoimidazolidine-1-carboxamide |
36734-19-7 |
278 |
Fungicide |
Iprovalicarb |
{2-Methyl-1 - [1 - (4-methylphenyl) - ethylcarbonyl] - propyl} - carbamic acid isopropyl ester |
140923-17-7 |
620 |
Fungicide |
Ipsdienol |
(S) -2-methyl-6-methyleneocta-2,7-dien-4-ol |
35628-00-3 |
- |
Pheromone |
Isoproturon |
3 - (4-isopropylphenyl) -1,1-dimethylurea |
34123-59-6 |
336 |
Herbicide |
Isoxadifen-ethyl |
Ethyl 5,5-diphenyl-2-isoxazoline-3-carboxylate |
163520-33-0 |
666.202 |
Herbicide "safener" |
Isoxaflutole |
5-cyclopropyl-1,2-oxazol-4-yl a, a, a-trifluoro-2-mesyl-p-tolyl ketone |
141112-29-0 |
575 |
Herbicide |
Japan Myths Oil |
- |
- |
- |
Insecticide |
Kaolin |
Kaolin (CA Name) |
1332-58-7 |
- |
Insecticide |
Kresoxim-methyl |
Methyl (E) -2-methoxyimino-[2 - (o-tolyloxymethyl) phenyl] acetate |
143390-89-0 |
568 |
Fungicide |
Lambda-Cyhalothrin |
(S) - a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (Z)-(1R, 3R) -3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate and (R) - a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (Z)-(1S, 3S) -3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate |
91465-08-6 |
463 |
Insecticide |
Laminarine |
(1-3) - 13-D-glucan |
9008-22-4 |
671 |
Natural defenses stimulator |
Lecithin |
L-a-Phosphatidyl choline |
8002-43-5 |
- |
Fungicide |
Lenacile |
3-cyclohexyl-1,5,6,7-tetrahydrocyclopentapyrimidine-2,4 (3H) - dione |
2164-08-1 |
163 |
Herbicide |
Limonen |
4-isopropenyl-1-metyhlcyclohexene |
5989-27-5 |
- |
Pheromone |
Linuron |
3 - (3,4-dichlorophenyl) -1-methoxy-1-methylurea |
330-55-2 |
76 |
Herbicide |
Lufenuron |
(RS) -1-[2,5-dichloro-4 - (1,1,2,3,3,3,3-hexafluoropropoxy) phenyl] -3-(2,6-difluorobenzoyl) urea |
103055-07-8 |
704 |
Acaricide |
Maltodextrin |
9050-36-6 |
801 |
Acaricide |
|
Mancozeb |
Manganese ethylenebis (dithiocarbamate) (polymeric) complex with zinc salt |
8018-01-7 |
34 |
Fungicide |
Mandipropamid |
(RS) -2-(4-chlorophenyl) -N-[3-methoxy-4 - (prop-2-ynyloxy) phenethyl] -2-(prop-2-ynyloxy) acetamide |
374726-62-2 |
783 |
Fungicide |
Maneb |
Manganese ethylenebis (ditiocarbamate) (polymeric) |
12427-38-2 |
61 |
Fungicide |
MCPA |
(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy) acetic acid |
94-74-6 |
2 |
Herbicide |
MCPB |
4 - (4-chloro-o-tolyloxy) butyric acid |
94-81-5 |
50 |
Herbicide |
Mecoprop-P |
(R) - 2 - (4-chloro-o-tolyloxy) propionic acid |
16484-77-8 |
475 |
Herbicide |
Mefenpyr-diethyl |
Diethyl (RS) -1-(2,4-dichlororphenyl) -5 - methyl-2-pyrazoline-3,5-dicarboxylate |
135590-91-9 |
651.229 |
Herbicide "safener" |
Mixtures of vegetable oils, natural resins and lipids |
- |
Game repellent |
||
Mepanipyrim |
N - (4-methyl-6-prop-1-ynylpyrimidin-2-yl) aniline |
110235-47-7 |
611 |
Fungicide |
Mepiquat |
1,1-dimethylpiperidinium Variant : Mepiquat-chloride |
15302-91-7 24307-26-4 |
440 440.302 |
Phytoregulator |
Mesosulfuron-methyl |
Methyl 2 - [3 - (4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl) ureidosulfonyl] -4-methanesulfonamidomethylbenzoate |
208465-21-8 |
663.201 |
Herbicide |
Mesotrione |
2 - (4-mesyl-2-nitrobenzoyl) cyclohexane-1,3-dione |
104206-82-8 |
625 |
Herbicide |
Metalaxyl-M |
Methyl N - (methocyacetyl) - N-2.6-xylyl-D-alaninate |
70630-17-0 |
580 |
Fungicide |
Metaldehyde |
R-2,c-4,c-6,c-8-tetramethyl-1,3,5,7-tetroxocane |
108-62-3 |
62 |
Molluscicide |
Metamitron |
4-amino-4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-6-phenyl-1,2,4-triazin-5-one |
41394-05-2 |
381 |
Herbicide |
Metazachlor |
2-chloro-N - (pyrazol-1-ylmethyl) acet-2.6-xylidide |
67129-08-2 |
411 |
Herbicide |
Metconazole |
(1RS, 5RS; 1RS, 5SR) -5-(4-chlorobenzyl) -2,2-dimethyl-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1ylmethyl) cyclopentanol |
125116-23-6 |
706 |
Fungicide |
Methiocarb (Mercaptodimethur) |
4-methylthio-3,5-xylyl methylcarbamate |
2032-65-7 |
165 |
Molluscicide, insecticide, acaricide |
Methomyl |
S-methyl N - (methylcarbamoyloxy) thioacetimidate |
16752-77-5 |
264 |
Acaricide |
Methoxyfenozide |
N -tert-butyl - N' - (3-methoxy-o-toluoyl) - 3,5-xylohydrazide |
161050-58-4 |
656 |
Insecticide |
Methylbutenol |
2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol |
115-18-4 |
- |
Pheromone |
Metiram |
Ethylenebis (dithiocarbamate) - poly (ethylenethiuram disulfide) |
9006-42-2 |
478 |
Fungicide |
Metosulam |
N - (2,6-dichloro-3-methylphenyl) -5,7-dimethoxy-[1,2, 4] triazolo [1,5-a] pyrimidine-2-sulphonamide |
139528-85-1 |
707 |
Herbicide |
Metrafenone |
3 '- bromo-2,3,4,6' - tetramethoxy-2 ', 6-dimethylbenzophenone |
220899-03-6 |
752 |
Fungicide |
Metribuzin |
4-amino-6-tert-butyl-4,5-dihydro-3-methylthio-1,2,4-triazin-5-one |
21087-64-9 |
283 |
Herbicide |
Metsulfuron-methyl |
Methyl-2 - [[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-zyl) - amino] carbonyl] amino] sulfonil] benzoate |
74223-64-6 |
441.201 |
Herbicide |
Milbémectin |
Mixture of 70 % (10E,14E,16E)-(1R,4S,5 'S,6R,6' R,8R,13R,20R,21R,24S) -6 '- ethyl-21 ,24-dihydroxy-5', 11 ,13 ,22-tetramethyl-(3,7,19-trioxatetracyclo [15.6.1.14 ,8.020, 24] pentacosa-10, 14, 16, 22-tetraene) -6-spiro-2 '-(tetrahydropyran) -2 - one and 30 % (10E,14E,16E)-(1R,4S,5 'S,6R,6' R,8R,13R,20R,21R,24S) -21 ,24-dihydroxy-5 ', 6', 11 ,13 ,22-pentamethyl-(3,7,19-trioxatetracyclo [15.6.1.14 ,8.020, 24] pentacosa-10, 14, 16, 22-tetraene) -6-spiro-2 '-(tetrahydropyran) -2 - one |
51596-10-2 (milbemycin A3) + 51596-11-3 (milbemycin A4) |
660 |
Acaricide, insecticide |
Myclobutanil |
2-p-chlorophenyl-2 - (1H-1,2,4-triazole-1-ylmethyl) hexanenitrile |
88671-89-0 |
442 |
Fungicide |
Napropamide |
(RS) -N, N-diethyl-2 - (1-naphthyloxy) propionamide |
15299-99-7 |
271 |
Herbicide |
Nicosulfuron |
2 - (4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl) -N, N-dimethylnicotinamide |
111991-09-4 |
709 |
Herbicide |
Potassium nitrate (saltp) |
KNO 3 |
7757-79-1 |
- |
Rodenticide |
Oleum foeniculi |
Fennel oil |
- |
Fungicide |
|
Orthophenylphenol |
[1,1 ' - biphenyl] -2-ol |
90-43-7 |
246 |
Disinfectant product |
Oryzalin |
3,5-dinitro-N4, N4-dipropylsulfanilamide |
19044-88-3 |
537 |
Herbicide |
Oxasulfuron |
Oxetan-3-yl 2 - [(4,6-dimethylpyridin-2-yl) - carbamoylsulfamoyl] - benzoate |
144651-06-9 |
626 |
Herbicide |
Oxychinolin |
8-Hydrochinolinsulfat |
148-24-3 |
- |
Fungicide |
Aluminum oxide |
Al 2 O 3 |
1344-28-1 |
- |
Fungicide |
Silicon oxide |
Silicon dioxide |
7631-86-9 |
- |
Fungicide |
Oxyfluorfen |
2-chloro-a, - a, - a-trifluoro-p-tolyl 3-ethoxy-4-nitrophenyl ether |
42874-03-3 |
538 |
Herbicide |
Paclobutrazol |
(2RS, 3RS) -1-(4-chlorophenyl) -4,4-dimethyl-2-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl) pentan-3-ol |
76738-62-0 |
445 |
Phytoregulator |
Penconazole |
1 - (2,4-dichloro-b-propylphenethyl) - 1H-1,2,4-triazole |
66246-88-6 |
446 |
Fungicide |
Pencycuron |
1 - (4-chlorobenzyl) -1-cyclopentyl-3-phenylurea |
66063-05-6 |
402 |
Seed infecting |
Pendimethaline |
N - (1-ethylpropyl) -2,6-dinitro-3,4-xylidine |
40487-42-1 |
357 |
Herbicide |
Penoxsulam |
3 - (2,2-difluoroethoxy) -N-(5,8-dimethoxy [1,2, 4] triazolo [1.5-c] pyrimidin-2-yl) - á, á, á-trifluorotoluene-2-sulfonamide |
219714-96-2 |
758 |
Herbicide |
Penthiopyrade |
(RS) -N-[2 - (1,3-Dimethylbutyl) -3-thienyl] -1 - methyl-3 - (trifluormethyl) pyrazol-4-carboxamid |
183675-82-3 |
824 |
Fungicide |
Pethoxamide |
2-chloro-N - (2-ethoxyethyl) - N - (2-methyl-1-phenylprop-1-enyl) acetamide |
106700-29-2 |
665 |
Herbicide |
Phenmedipham |
Methyl 3 - (3-methylcarbaniloyloxy) carbanilate |
13684-63-4 |
77 |
Herbicide |
Phosmet |
O, O-dimethyl S-phthalimidomethyl phosphorodithioate |
732-11-6 |
318 |
Acaricide |
Iron Phosphate III |
Ferric phosphate |
10045-86-0 |
- |
Molluscicide |
Potassium phosphonate |
KH2PO3 and K2HPO3 |
756 |
Fungicide |
|
Aluminum phosphide |
Phosphide aluminum |
20859-73-8 |
227 |
Rodenticide |
Calcium phosphide |
It 3 P 2 |
1305-99-3 |
505 |
Rodenticide |
Magnesium phosphide |
Trimagnesium diphosphide |
12057-74-8 |
228 |
Crop protection |
Picloram |
4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropyridine-2-carboxylic acid |
1918-02-1 |
174 |
Herbicide |
Picoxystrobin |
Methyl (E) -3-methoxy-2-[2 - (6-trifluoromethyl-2-pyridyloxymethyl) phenyl] acrylate |
117428-22-5 |
628 |
Fungicide |
Pinoxaden |
8 - (2.6-diethyl-p-tolyl) - 1,2,4,5-tetrahydro-7-oxo-7H-pyrazolo [1,2-d] [1,4, 5] oxadiazepin-9-yl 2,2-dimethylpropionate |
243973-20-8 |
776 |
Herbicide |
Piperonyl butoxid |
2 - (2-butoxyethoxy) ethyl 6-propypiperonyl ether |
51-03-6 |
33 |
Synergist |
Pirimicarb |
2-dimethylamino-5,6-dimethylpyrimidin-4-yl dimethylcarbamate |
23103-98-2 |
231 |
Insecticide |
Pirimiphos-methyl |
O, O-dimethyl O-2-diethylamino-6-methylpyrimidin-4-yl phosphorothioate |
29232-93-7 |
239 |
Acaricide |
Prochloraz |
N-propyl-N - [2 - (2,4,6-trichlorophenoxy) ethyl] imidazole-1-carboxamide |
67747-09-5 |
407 |
Fungicide |
Prohexadione-calcium |
3-oxido-5-oxo-4-propionylcyclohex-3-enecarboxylate |
127277-53-6 |
567.020 |
Phytoregulator |
Propamocarb |
Propyl 3 - (dimethylamino) propylcarbamate Variant : propamocarb hydrochloride |
24579-73-5 25606-41-1 |
399 399.601 |
Fungicide |
Propaquizafop |
2-isopropylideneamino-oxyethyl (R) -2-[4 - (6-chloroquinoxalin-2-yloxy) phenoxy] propionate |
111479-05-1 |
713 |
Herbicide |
Propiconazole |
(±) -1-[2 - (2,4-dichlorophenyl) -4-propyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-ylmethyl] -1H-1,2,4-triazole |
60207-90-1 |
408 |
Fungicide |
Propineb |
Polymeric zinc propylenebis (dithiocarbamate) |
12071-83-9 |
177 |
Fungicide |
Propoxycarbazone-sodium |
Methyl 2 - (4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-5-oxo-3-propoxy-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl) carboxamidosulfonylbenzoate, sodium salt |
181274-15-7 |
655.011 |
Herbicide |
Propyzamide |
3,5-dichloro-N - (1,1-dimethylpropynyl) benzamide |
23950-58-5 |
315 |
Herbicide |
Proquinazid |
6-iodo-2-propoxy-3-propylquinazolin-4 (3H) - one |
189278-12-4 |
764 |
Fungicide |
Prosulfocarb |
S-benzyl dipropylthiocarbamate |
52888-80-9 |
539 |
Herbicide |
Prosulfuron |
1 - (4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl) -3-[2 - (3,3,3-trifluoropropyl) - phenylsulfonyl] - urea |
94125-34-5 |
579 |
Herbicide |
Protein |
- |
Game repellent |
||
Prothioconazole |
(RS) -2-[2 - (1-chlorocyclopropyl) -3-(2-chlorophenyl) -2-hydroxypropyl] -2,4-dihydro-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione |
178928-70-6 |
745 |
Fungicide |
Pymetrozine |
(E) -4,5 - dihydro-6-methyl-4 - (3-pyridylmethyleneamino) -1,2,4-triazin-3 (2H) - one |
123312-89-0 |
593 |
Insecticide |
Pyraclostrobin |
Methyl N - (2 - {[1 - (4-chlorophenyl) -1H - pyrazol-3-yl] oxymethyl} phenyl) N-methoxy carbamate |
175013-18-0 |
657 |
Fungicide |
Pyraflufen-ethyl |
Ethyl 2-chloro-5 - (4-chloro-5-difluoromethoxy-1-methylpyrazol-3-yl) -4-fluorophenoxyacetate |
129630-17-7 |
605.202 |
Herbicide |
Pyrethrin |
(Z)-(S) -2-methyl-4-oxo-3-(penta-2,4-dienyl) cyclopent-2-enyl (1R, 3R) -2,2-dimethyl-3-(2-methylprop-1-enyl) cyclopropanecarboxylate |
121-21-1 |
32 |
Acaricide |
Pyridate |
6-chloro-3-phenylpyridazin-4-yl S-octyl thiocarbonate |
55512-33-9 |
447 |
Herbicide |
Pyrimethanil |
N - (4,6-dimethylpyrimidin-2-yl) aniline |
53112-28-0 |
714 |
Fungicide |
Pyroxsulam |
N - (5,7-dimethoxy [1,2, 4] triazolo [1,5-a] pyrimidin-2-yl) -2-methoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl) pyridine-3-sulfonamide |
422556-08-9 |
793 |
Herbicide |
Quinoclamine |
2-amino-3-chloro-1,4-naphthoquinone |
2797-51-5 |
648 |
Herbicide, algicide |
Quinoxyfen |
5,7-dichloro-4-quinolyl-4-fluorophenyl ether |
124495-18-7 |
566 |
Fungicide |
Quizalofop-P-ethyl |
Ethyl (R) -2-[4 - (6-chlorquinoxalin-2-yloxy) phenoxy] propionate |
100646-51-3 |
641.202 |
Herbicide |
Game repellent (basic material) |
- |
Game repellent |
||
Rimsulfuron |
1 - (4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl) -3-(etylsulfonyl-2-pyridylsulfonyl) urea |
122931-48-0 |
716 |
Herbicide |
Potassium Savon |
- |
Fungicide |
||
Mineral salts |
- |
Game repellent |
||
Metolachlor |
(S) - 2-chloro-N - (2-ethyl-6-methyl-phenyl) - N - (2methoxy-1-methyl-ethyl) - acetamide |
87392-12-9 |
607 |
Herbicide |
Sulphur |
Sulfur |
7704-34-9 |
18 |
Fungicide, acaricide |
Spinosad |
Mixture of spinosyn A and spinosyn D |
168316-95-8 |
636 |
Insecticide |
Spirodiclofen |
3 - (2,4-dichlorophenyl) -2-oxo-1-oxaspiro [4.5] dec-3-en-4-yl 2.2 dimethylbutyrate |
148477-71-8 |
737 |
Acaricide |
Spirotetramat |
Cis-4 - (ethoxycarbonyloxy) -8-methoxy-3-(2,5-xylyl) -1-azaspiro [4.5] dec-3-en-2-one |
203313-25-1 |
795 |
Insecticide |
Spiroxamine |
8-tert-butyl-1,4-dioxaspiro [4.5] decan-2-ylmethyl (ethyl) (propyl)amine |
118134-30-8 |
572 |
Fungicide |
Styrol-Butylacrylat-Copolymerisat |
- |
Game repellent |
||
Sulcotrione |
2 - (2-chloro-4-mesylbenzoyl) -1,3-cyclohexane-1,3 - dione |
99105-77-8 |
723 |
Herbicide |
Iron Sulfate II |
FeO 4 S X H2O |
13463-43-9 |
- |
Herbicide |
Sulfosulfuron |
1 - (4.6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl) - 3 - (2-ethylsulfonylimidazo [1,2-a] pyridin-3-yl-sulfonylurea |
141776-32-1 |
601 |
Herbicide |
Sulfuryl fluoride |
Sulphuryl fluoride |
002699-79-8 |
757 |
Insecticide |
Tebuconazole |
(RS) - 1-p-chlorophenyl-4,4-dimethyl-3 - (1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl) pentan-3-ol |
107534-96-3 |
494 |
Fungicide |
Tebufenozide |
N-tert-butyl-N - (4-ethylbenzoyl) - 3,5-dimethylbenzohydrazide |
112410-23-8 |
724 |
Insecticide |
Tebufenpyrad |
N - (4-tert-butylbenzyl) - 4-chloro-3-ethyl-1-methylpyrazole-5-carboxamide |
119168-77-3 |
725 |
Acaricide |
Teflubenzuron |
1 - (3,5-dichloro-2,4-difluorophenyl) -3-(2,6-difluorobenzoyl) urea |
83121-18-0 |
450 |
Insecticide |
Tefluthrin |
2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-methylbenzyl (Z)-(1RS, 3RS) -3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate |
79538-32-2 |
451 |
Insecticide |
Tembotrione |
2 - {2-chloro-4-mesyl-3 - [(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy) methyl] benzoyl} cyclohexane-1,3-dione |
335104-84-2 |
790 |
Herbizid |
Tepraloxydime |
2 - [1 - (3-chlor - (2E) - propenyloxyimino) propyl] -3-hydroxy-5-(tetrahydropyran-4-yl) cyclohex-2-enon |
149979-41-9 |
608 |
Herbicide |
Terbuthylazine |
N2-tert-butyl-6-chloro-N4-ethyl-1,3,5-triazine-2.4-diamine |
5915-41-3 |
234 |
Herbicide |
Thiabendazole |
2 - (thiazol-4-yl) benzimidazole |
148-79-8 |
323 |
Fungicide |
Thiacloprid |
N - {3 - [(6chloro-3-pyridinyl) methyl] -1,3-thiazolan-2-yliden} cyanamide |
111988-49-9 |
631 |
Insecticide |
Thiamethoxam |
( EZ ) -3-(2-chloro-1,3-thiazol-5-ylmethyl) -5 - methyl-1,3,5-oxadiazinan-4-ylidene (nitro) amine |
153719-23-4 |
637 |
Insecticide |
Thiencarbazone |
Methyl 4 - [(4,5-dihydro-3-methoxy-4-methyl-5-oxo-1 H-1,2,4-triazol-1 -yl) carbonylsulfamoyl] -5 - methylthiophene-3-carboxylate |
317815-83-1 |
797 |
Herbicide |
Thifensulfuron-methyl |
3 - (4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-ylcarbamoylsulamoyl) thiophen-2-carboxylic acid |
79277-27-3 |
452.201 |
Herbicide |
Thiophanate-methyl |
Dimethyl 4.4 - (o-phenylene) bis (3-thioallophanate) |
23564-05-8 |
262 |
Fungicide, healing product |
Thiram (TMTD) |
Disulfide tetramethylthiuram |
137-26-8 |
24 |
Fungicide |
Tolclofos-methyl |
O-2.6-dichloro-p-tolyl O, O-dimethyl phosphorothioate |
57018-04-9 |
479 |
Fungicide |
Tralkoxydim |
2 - [1 - (ethoxyimino) propyl] -3-hydroxy-5 - mesitylcyclohex-2-enone |
87820-88-0 |
544 |
Herbicide |
Triadimenol |
(1RS, 2RS; 1RS, 2SR) -1-(4-chlorophenoxy) -3,3-dimethyl-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl) butan-2-ol |
55219-65-3 |
398 |
Fungicide |
Triasulfuron |
1 - [2 - (2-chloroethoxy) phenylsulfonyl] -3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl) urea |
82097-50-5 |
480 |
Herbicide |
Triazoxide |
7-chloro-3-imidazol-1-yl-1,2,4-benzotriazine 1-oxide |
72459-58-6 |
729 |
Fungicide |
Tribenuron |
2 - [4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl (methyl) carbamoylsulfamoyl] benzoic acid |
106040-48-6 |
546 |
Herbicide |
Tribenuron-methyl |
Methyl ester of 2 - [4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl (methyl) carbamoylsulfamoyl] benzoic acid |
101200-48-0 |
546.201 |
Herbicide |
Triclopyr |
3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyloxyacetic acid |
55335-06-3 |
376 |
Herbicide |
Trifloxystrobin |
(E, E) - methoxyimino - {2 - [1 - (3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl) - ethylideneaminooxymethyl] - phenyl} - acetic acid methyl ester |
141517-21-7 |
617 |
Fungicide |
Triflumizole |
(E) - 4-chloro-a, a, a-trifluoro-N - (1-imidazol-1-yl-2-propoxyethylidene) - o-toluidine |
68694-11-1 |
730 |
Fungicide |
Triflusulfuron-methyl |
Methyl 2 - [4-dimethylamino-6 - (2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy) -1,3,5 - triazin-2-ylcarbamoylsulfamoyl] - m-toluic acid |
126535-15-7 |
731.201 |
Herbicide |
Trinexapac-ehyl |
Ethyl 4-cyclopropyl (hydroxy) methylene-3,5-dioxocyclohexanecarboxylate |
95266-40-3 |
732.202 |
Phytoregulator |
Triticonazole |
(±)-(E) -5 + (4-chlorobenzylidene) -2,2-dimethyl-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-methyl) cyclopentanol |
131983-72-7 |
652 |
Fungicide |
Tritosulfuron |
1 - (4-methoxy-6-trifluoromethyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl) -3-(2-trifluoromethylbenzenesulfonyl) urea |
142469-14-5 |
735 |
Herbicide |
Validate |
Methyl - N - (isopropoxycarbonyl) -L-valyl-(3 RS ) -3-(4-chlorphenyl) - â-alaninat |
283159-90-0 |
857 |
Fungicide |
Vinylcopolymers |
- |
Game repellent |
||
Vinylesterpolymers |
- |
Game repellent |
||
Winter Green Oil |
- |
Insecticide |
||
Z3Z13-18Ac |
(Z, Z) -3,13-octadecadienyl acetate |
53120-27-7 |
- |
Pheromone |
Z8-12 Ac |
(Z) - dodec-8-en-1-yl acetate |
28079-04-1 |
- |
Pheromone |
Z9-12 Ac |
(Z) - 9-en-1-yl acetate |
- |
Pheromone |
|
Z9-14Ac |
(Z) - tetradec-9-en-1-yl acetate |
16725-53-4 |
- |
Pheromone |
Z11-14 Ac |
(Z) - tetradec-11-en-1-yl acetate |
20711-10-8 |
- |
Pheromone |
Z11-14OH |
(Z) -11-Tetradecen-1-ol |
34010-15-6 |
Pheromone |
|
Zeta-Cypermethrin |
(S) - a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (1RS, 3RS; 1RS, 3SR) -3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl) -2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate (S); (1RS, 3RS)/(S); (1RS, 3SR) 45-55 to 55-45 resp. |
52315-07-8 |
733 |
Insecticide |
Ziram |
Zinc bis (dimethyldithiocarbamate) |
137-30-4 |
31 |
Fungicide |
Zoxamid |
3,5-Dichloro-N - (3-chloro-1-ethyl-1-methyl-2-oxopropyl) - p-toluamide |
156052-68-5 |
640 |
Fungicide |
Common Name, Identification Number |
Description |
Organization |
Type of action taken/Specific conditions |
Ampelomyces quisqualis |
Antagonist Mushroom |
Fungus |
Fungicide |
Aureobasidium pullulans |
Antagonist Mushroom |
Fungus |
Bactericide |
Bacillus firmus |
Pathogenic bacteria |
Bacterium |
Nematicide |
Bacillus subtilis |
Antagonistic Bacteria |
Bacteria |
Bactericide, fungicide |
Bacillus thuringiensis |
Enthomopathogenic bacteria |
Bacteria |
Insecticide |
Bacillus thuringiensis var. Aizawai |
Entomopathogenic bacteria |
Bacteria |
Insecticide |
Bacillus thuringiensis var. Israeliensis |
Enthomopathogenic bacteria |
Bacteria |
Insecticide |
Bacillus thuringiensis var. Kurstaki |
Enthomopathogenic bacteria |
Bacteria |
Insecticide |
Bacillus thuringiensis var. Tenebrionis |
Enthomopathogenic bacteria |
Bacteria |
Insecticide |
Beauveria bassiana |
Entomopathogenic fungus |
Fungus |
Insecticide |
Beauveria brongniartii |
Entomopathogenic fungus |
Fungus |
Insecticide |
Coniothyrium minitans |
Antagonist Mushroom |
Fungus |
Fungicide |
Gliocladium catenulatum |
Antagonist Mushroom |
Fungus |
Fungicide |
Metarhizium anisopliae |
Entomopathogenic fungus |
Fungus |
Insecticide |
Paecilomyces fumosoroseus |
Entomopathogenic fungus |
Fungus |
Insecticide |
Paecilomyces lilacinus |
Pathogenic fungus |
Fungus |
Nematicide |
Phlebia gigantea |
Antagonist Mushroom |
Fungus |
Fungicide |
Photorhabdus luminescens |
Enthomopathogenic bacteria |
Bacteria |
Insecticide |
Pseudomonas chlororaphis |
Antagonistic Bacteria |
Bacteria |
Seed disinfectant |
Pseudomonas sp. (DSMZ 13134) |
Antagonistic Bacteria |
Bacteria |
Fungicide |
Pelvic tordworm granulosis virus |
Entomopathogenic virus |
Viruses |
Insecticide |
Apple Carpocapse granulosis virus |
Entomopathogenic virus |
Viruses |
Insecticide |
Nuclear polyhedrosis virus Helicove R Pa armigera |
Entomopathogenic virus |
Viruses |
Insecticide |
Streptomyces griseoviridis |
Antagonistic Bacteria |
Bacteria |
Fungicide |
Verticillium lecanii |
Entomopathogenic fungus |
Fungus |
Insecticide |
Xenorhabdus bovienii |
Enthomopathogenic bacteria |
Bacteria |
Insecticide |
Common Name, Identification Number |
Description |
Organization |
Type of action taken/Specific conditions |
Adalia bipunctata |
Predator Coleoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Amblyseius barkeri (mackenziei) |
Predatory mites |
Mites |
Insecticide |
Amblyseius californicus |
Predatory mites |
Mites |
Insecticide |
Amblyseius degenerans |
Predatory mites |
Mites |
Insecticide |
Anisopteromalus |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Anthocoris nemoralis |
Predator times |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Aphelinus abdominalis |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Aphidius colemani |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Aphidius ervi |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Aphidius regimariae |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Aphidoletes aphidimyza |
Predator Diptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Chrysoperla carnea |
Predatory beetles |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri |
Predator Coleoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Dacnusa sibirica |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Diglyphus isaea |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Encarsia formosa |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Encyrtus lecaniorum |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Ephedrus cerasicola |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Eretmocerus eremicus |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Eretmocerus mundus |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Feltiella acarisuga |
Predatory midges |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Habrobracon hebetor |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora |
Entomoparasitic nematodes |
Nematodes |
Insecticide |
Heterorhabditis megidis |
Entomoparasitic nematodes |
Nematodes |
Insecticide |
Heterorhabditis sp. |
Entomoparasitic nematodes |
Nematodes |
Insecticide |
Hypoaspis aculeifer |
Predatory mites |
Mites |
Insecticide |
Lariophagus distinguished |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Leptomastidea abnormis |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Leptomastix dactylopii |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Macrolophus pigmaeus |
Predator times |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Metaphycus helvolus |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Microterys flavus |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Neoseiulus cucumeris (synonym: Amblyseius cucumeris) |
Predatory mites |
Mites |
Insecticide |
Orius insidiosus |
Predator times |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Orius laevigatus |
Predator times |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Uppercase Orius |
Predator times |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita |
Parasitic mollusc nematodes |
Nematodes |
Molluscicide |
Phytoseiulus persimilis |
Predatory mites |
Mites |
Insecticide |
Praon Volucre |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Pseudaphycus maculipennis |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Steinernema carpocapsae |
Entomoparasitic nematodes |
Nematodes |
Insecticide |
Steinernema carpocapsae all strain |
Entomoparasitic nematodes |
Nematodes |
Insecticide |
Steinernema feltiae |
Entomoparasitic nematodes |
Nematodes |
Insecticide |
Stratiolaelaps Scimitus |
Predatory mites |
Mites |
Insecticide |
Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Trichogramma cacoeciae |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Trichogramma evanescens |
Parasitic Hymenoptera |
Insects |
Insecticide |
Typhlodromips swirskii |
Predatory mites |
Mites |
Insecticide |
Common Name |
Specification |
Type of action taken/Conditions and restrictions |
Ortie Extract |
100 % gold extract |
Extraction: fermentation in the water then filtration |
White Sugar |
Foodstuff within the meaning of food law |
Use Only as Attractive for Mass Trapping |
Skimmed milk (lean milk) |
Foodstuff within the meaning of food law |
The skimmed milk used must have been heat treated according to a process referred to in s. 49, para. 1, of the order of the DFI of 23 November 2005 on hygiene (OHyg) 2 . |
Little milk |
Foodstuff within the meaning of food law |
The whey used must have been heat treated according to a process referred to in s. 49, para. 1, OHyg. |
Wine |
Foodstuff within the meaning of food law |
Use Only as Attractive for Mass Trapping |
Fruit Vinegar |
Foodstuff within the meaning of food law |
Use Only as Attractive for Mass Trapping |
Vinegar of wine |
Foodstuff within the meaning of food law |
Use Only as Attractive for Mass Trapping |
Common Name, Identification Number |
N O CASES |
1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) |
3100-04-7 |
Aclonifen |
74070-46-5 |
Bifenthrin |
82657-04-3 |
Bromadiolone |
28772-56-7 |
Bromuconazole |
116255-48-2 |
Carbendazim |
10605-21-7 |
Chlortoluron |
15545-48-9 |
Cyproconazole |
94361-06-5 |
Cyprodinil |
121552-61-2 |
Difenoconazole |
119446-68-3 |
Diflufenican |
83164-33-4 |
Dimethoate |
60-51-5 |
Diquat |
2764-72-9 |
Epoxiconazole |
133855-98-8 |
Etofenprox |
80844-07-1 |
Etoxazole |
153233-91-1 |
Famoxadone |
131807-57-3 |
Fipronil |
120068-37-3 |
Fludioxonil |
131341-86-1 |
Flufenacet |
142459-58-3 |
Flumioxazin |
103361-09-7 |
Fluopicolide |
239110-15-7 |
Fluquinconazole |
136426-54-5 |
Glufosinate |
51276-47-2 |
Haloxyfop (R) - methylester |
72619-32-0 |
Imazamox |
114311-32-9 |
Isoproturon |
34123-59-6 |
Copper Variant (as carbonate, alkaline): [ì - [carbonato (2−) - êO :êO']] dihydroxydicopper Variant (as hydroxide): copper (II) hydroxide Variant (as a chlorocalcium hydroxide) Variant (as powders by broillie Bordeaux): A mixture of calcium hydroxide and copper (II) sulfate Variant (as naphthenate): copper naphthenate Variant (as octanate): copper octanoate Variant (in the form of oxychloride): dicopper chloride trihydroxide Variant (as sulphate): copper (II) tetraoxosulfate Variant (tetracuum hexahydroxysulphate): cupric sulfate-tricupric hydroxide |
12002-03-8 12069-69-1 20427-59-2 8011-63-0 1338-02-9 20543-04-8 1332-40-7 7758-98-7 1333-22-8 |
Lambda-Cyhalothrin |
91465-08-6 |
Lenacile |
2164-08-1 |
Linuron |
330-55-2 |
Lufenuron |
103055-07-8 |
Metconazole |
125116-23-6 |
Methomyl |
16752-77-5 |
Metribuzin |
21087-64-9 |
Metsulfuron-methyl |
74223-64-6 |
Myclobutanil |
88671-89-0 |
Nicosulfuron |
111991-09-4 |
Oxyfluorfen |
42874-03-3 |
Paclobutrazol |
76738-62-0 |
Pendimethaline |
40487-42-1 |
Pirimicarb |
23103-98-2 |
Prochloraz |
67747-09-5 |
Propiconazole |
60207-90-1 |
Propoxycarbazone-sodium |
181274-15-7 |
Prosulfuron |
94125-34-5 |
Quinoxyfen |
124495-18-7 |
Sulcotrione |
99105-77-8 |
Tebuconazole |
107534-96-3 |
Tebufenpyrad |
119168-77-3 |
Tepraloxydime |
149979-41-9 |
Thiacloprid |
111988-49-9 |
Triasulfuron |
82097-50-5 |
Triazoxide |
72459-58-6 |
Ziram |
137-30-4 |
1 Update as per c. I al. 1 of the O du DEFR of 17 June 2011 ( RO 2011 2927 ), c. O of the O of 23 May 2012 (RO 2012 3451), c. I of the O du DEFR of 11 Dec. 2012 (RO 2013 249), 12 Nov 2014 (RO 2014 4215), c. II of the O of 20 May 2015 (RO 2015 1781), of 28 Oct. 2015 (RO 2015 4551) and c. II de l' O du DEFR du 28 oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 (RO) 2015 4555).
2 RS 817.024.1
(art. 4 and 5)
During the assessment and decision-making process, the approval service collaborates with the applicants, in order to resolve any matter relating to the case quickly, to determine at the outset any further explanation or supplement Necessary for the appropriate evaluation of the latter, including information to eliminate the need to restrict the approval, to amend any proposed condition of use of the plant health product, or Yet to change the nature or composition of the latter to ensure a Perfect compliance with the requirements of this order.
2. The assessment of the approval service shall be based on scientific principles and recommendations of experts.
1. Art. 4 shall be considered to be applied only if, in the light of the dossier submitted, authorisation is considered possible for at least one phytosanitary product containing the active substance concerned and for at least one representative use.
2. In principle, the approval of an active substance, safener or synergist is subject to the filing of a complete file.
In exceptional cases, approval of the active substance, safener or synergist may be granted, although some information has not yet been communicated. This provision applies to:
3. If necessary, approval may be subject to the conditions and restrictions referred to in s. 5. Where the approval service is of the opinion that the file filed is incomplete and the active substance could therefore be approved only with certain restrictions, it shall contact the applicant at the beginning of the procedure to obtain a Additional information that can be used to eliminate these restrictions.
The criteria for approval of an active substance shall correspond to those set out in Annex II, c. 3, of Regulation (EC) N O 1107/2009 1 .
An active substance is approved as a substance for substitution under s. 5 where one of the conditions laid down in Annex II, c. 4, of Regulation (EC) N O 1107/2009 2 Is populated.
An active substance is not considered to be an active substance at low risk if, in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) N O 1272/2008 3 , it is or must be classified in at least one of the following categories:
2. Furthermore, it is not considered to be an active substance at low risk:
(art. 13, 17 and 22)
(art. 7, para. 4, 10, para. 1, let. B, 11, 21, para. 5, and 52, para. 3, let. G and h)
1 The information must:
1bis For active substances containing nanomaterials within the meaning of s. 2, para. 2, let. Q, OChim 3 , the information must also include data on the composition of the nanomaterial, the shape of the particles and their average size and, where this information is available, the particle size distribution, the specific surface In volume, aggregation state, surface coating and surface functionalization.
2 Testing and testing shall be carried out in accordance with the principles set out in the Ordinance of 18 May 2005 on Good Laboratory Practice (OBPL) 4 , when they are intended to collect data on properties relevant to human and animal health or the environment and/or safety in these areas.
1 The conditions to be fulfilled by the application for authorisation of a phytosanitary product containing chemicals or micro-organisms correspond to those laid down in the Annex to the Regulation (EU) n O 283/2013 5 .
2 For phytosanitary products containing nanomaterials within the meaning of s. 2, para. 2, let. Q, OChim 6 , the information must also include data on the composition of the nanomaterial, the shape of the particles and their average size and, where this information is available, the particle size distribution, the specific surface In volume, aggregation state, surface coating and surface functionalization.
3 The following normative expressions or acts used in the Annex to the Regulation (EU) n O 283/2013 have the following equivalents:
Expression in the EU |
Equivalent in Switzerland |
European competent authorities (c. 1.6 and 1.7) |
Approval Service |
The competent authorities (c. 3.2.3) |
Approval Service |
Directive (EC) n O 2010 /63/EU (c. 1.10) |
Federal Act of 16 December 2005 on the Protection of Animals (PCPA) 7 |
Directive (EC) n O 2004 /10 (EC (c. 3.1) |
Good Laboratory Practice (OBPL) Order of 18 May 2005 8 |
Regulation (EC) n O 396/2005 (c. 1.11 let. (s) |
DFI Ordinance of 26 June 1995 on foreign substances and components in foodstuffs (OSEC) 9 |
1 The conditions to be fulfilled by the application files concerning the registration of a micro-organism in Annex 1 shall correspond to those laid down in Part B of the Annex to the Regulation (EU) n O 544/2011 10 .
2 The following expressions used in the Annex, Part B, of the Regulation (EU) n O 544/2011 have the following equivalents:
Expression in the EU |
Equivalent in Switzerland |
Commission and Member States (c. 1.2 and 1.4.1) |
Approval Service |
Competent authorities of the Member States (c. 9) |
Approval Service |
1 Update as per c. II al. 1 of the O of 23 May 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ), c. II of the O of 20 May 2015 (RO 2015 1781) and c. II de l' O du DEFR du 28 oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 (RO) 2015 4555).
2 RS 455
3 RS 813.11
4 RS 813.112.1
5 Regulation (EU) n O 283/2013 of the Commission of 1 Er March 2013 laying down data requirements for active substances in accordance with Regulation (EC) No O 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the placing of plant protection products on the market, OJ L 93, 3.4.2013, p. 1.
6 RS 813.11
7 RS 455
8 RS 813.112.1
9 RS 817.021.23
10 Cf. Note relative to c. 2, para. 1.
(art. 7, 11, 21 and 52)
1 The information must:
1bis For phytosanitary products containing nanomaterials within the meaning of s. 2, para. 2, let. Q, OChim 3 , the information must also include data on the composition of the nanomaterial, the shape of the particles and their average size and, where this information is available, the particle size distribution, the specific surface In volume, aggregation state, surface coating and surface functionalization.
2 Testing and testing shall be carried out in accordance with the principles set out in the OBPL 4 , when they are intended to collect data on properties relevant to human and animal health or the environment and/or safety in these areas.
3 The information requested must include the proposed classification and labelling of the phytosanitary product in accordance with the relevant guidelines.
4 In individual cases, it may be necessary to ask for products in the composition of the formulation certain information provided for in Annex II, Part A of Directive 91 /414/EEC 5 . Prior to any request for information concerning such a product, any information made available to the approval service shall be examined, in particular:
1 The conditions to be fulfilled by the application for authorisation of a phytosanitary product containing chemicals or micro-organisms correspond to those laid down in the Annex to the Regulation (EU) n O 284/2013 6 .
2 For phytosanitary products containing nanomaterials within the meaning of s. 2, para. 2, let. Q, OChim 7 , the information must also include data on the composition of the nanomaterial, the shape of the particles and their average size and, where this information is available, the particle size distribution, the specific surface In volume, aggregation state, surface coating and surface functionalization.
3 The following terms used in the Annex to the Regulation (EU) n O 284/2013, have the following equivalents:
Expression in the EU |
Equivalent in Switzerland |
The European competent authority (c. 1.6) |
Approval Service |
The competent authorities (c. 1.11, 2, 3.2, let. E, 3.3, 3.4.2) |
Approval Service |
The national authority concerned (c. 3.3) |
Approval Service |
In a Member State (c. 3.2, let. (g) |
In Switzerland |
Each Member State (c. 3.3) |
Switzerland |
Directive (EC) n O 2010 /63/EU (c. 1.8) |
Federal Act of 16 December 2005 on the Protection of Animals (PCPA) 8 |
Directive (EC) n O 2004 /10/EU (c. 3.1) |
Good Laboratory Practice (OBPL) Order of 18 May 2005 9 |
1 The conditions to be fulfilled by applications for authorisation of a phytosanitary product containing micro-organisms correspond to those laid down in Part B of the Annex to the Regulation (EU) n O 545/2011 10 .
2 The following expressions used in the Annex, Part B, of the Regulation (EU) n O 545/2011, have the following equivalents:
Expression in the EU |
Equivalent in Switzerland |
Competent authorities of the Member States (c. 11) |
Approval Service |
1 Update as per c. II al. 1 of the O of 23 May 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ), c. II of the O of 20 May 2015 (RO 2015 1781) and c. II de l' O du DEFR du 28 oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 (RO) 2015 4555)
2 RS 455
3 RS 813.11
4 RS 813.112.1
5 See note on art. 86, para. 1, let. A
6 Regulation (EU) n O 284/2013 of the Commission of 1 Er March 2013 laying down data requirements for plant protection products in accordance with Regulation (EC) No O 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the placing of plant protection products on the market, OJ L 93, 3.4.2013, p. 85.
7 RS 813.11
8 RS 455
9 RS 813.112.1
10 Cf. Note relative to c. 2, para. 1.
(art. 55)
1 Where the labelling according to the requirements of Art. 10 OChim 2 Is not sufficient to describe certain specific risks which may arise in the use of plant protection products, the specific risks to human health, animal health or the environment are reported by means of sentences Specific references in this Annex.
2 The provisions of this Annex are also used for plant protection products containing micro-organisms or viruses as active substances. The labelling of products containing these active substances must also comply with the provisions concerning the tests for skin and respiratory sensitisation in Part B, Annexes II and III to the Directive 91 /414/CEE 3 .
3 Since the phytosanitary products are only approved for a specific use, it is up to the approval service to decide whether the affixing of a particular sentence R (specific risks) or an S sentence (precautions to be taken) Is justified or not. In doing so, consideration is given to the use of the product, the type of preparation, packaging and other factors that may affect a foreseeable risk.
Code |
Specific Risks |
Criteria for applying standard sentences |
||
RSh 1 |
Toxic by eye contact |
The sentence should be used when an eye irritation test referred to in c. 7.1.5 of the Annex to Annex III, Part A of Directive 91 /414/EEC causes manifest signs of systemic toxicity in the test animals (e.g. Related to cholinesterase inhibition) or mortality that could be attributed to uptake of the active substance through the mucous membranes of the eye. The risk phrase should also be used when evidence of systemic toxicity in humans after eye contact is established. |
||
Eye protection should be specified in these cases, as indicated in the general provisions of Annex 8. |
||||
RSh 2 |
May cause photosensitization |
The sentence should be used when experimental systems or a properly established human exposure clearly demonstrate that the products have a photosensitizing effect. The sentence should also be used for products containing an active substance or a given component which has a photosensitizing effect in humans, if this photosensitizing element is present at a concentration of 1 % (w/w) or More. Individual protection measures should be specified in these cases, as indicated in the general provisions of Annex 8. |
||
RSh 3 |
The contact with the vapours can cause skin and eye burns; contact with liquid gas can cause frostbite |
The sentence should be used for phytosanitary products prepared in the form of liquefied gas, if applicable (e.g. Methyl bromide preparations). Individual protection measures should be specified in these cases, as indicated in the general provisions of Annex 8. The standard sentence should not be used in cases where the following hazard statements are applied:
|
||
1 Update as per c. II al. 1 of the O of 23 May 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ), c. 4 of the annex to the O of 7 Nov 2012 (RO 2012 6103) and c. II of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 (RO 2015 1781).
2 RS 813.11
3 See note on art. 86, para. 1, let. A
4 RO 2005 2721 , 2007 821, 2009 401,805, 2010 5223, 2011 5227, 2012 6103, 2013 201,3041, 2014 2073 3857
(art. 55)
The remarks made in the introduction to Annex 7 are applicable.
All plant protection products must be labelled with the following sentence, supplemented where appropriate by the text in square brackets:
1 The approval service may specify an appropriate personal protective equipment for users and prescribe specific elements of the equipment (combination, apron, gloves, sturdy footwear, rubber boots, protection of the Face, face shield, protective eyewear, hat, hood or gas mask of a specified type). These additional precautions to be taken apply in addition to the standard phrases provided by the OChim 2 .
2 It may also specify actions that require special protection equipment, such as mixing, loading or handling the undiluted product, applying or spraying the diluted product, handling materials Freshly treated, such as plants or soil, or access to freshly treated areas.
3 It may add specifications for technical controls, such as:
Code |
Specific provisions |
Criteria for applying standard sentences |
|
SPB 1 |
After contact with the skin, first remove the product with a dry cloth, then wash the skin thoroughly with water. |
The phrase should be used for plant protection products containing components liable to react violently with water, e.g. Cyanide salts or aluminum phosphide. |
|
SPB 2 |
Wash all protective equipment after use. |
The phrase is recommended when protective clothing is required to protect users. It is compulsory for all plant protection products whose labelling includes an element referred to in Annex 5, c. 1.1, let. A or c, c. 1.2, let. A or b, c. 2.1, let. A or c, or c. 2.2, let. A or b OChim. |
|
SPB 3 |
After the fumigation is triggered, do not inhale the smoke and leave the treated area immediately. |
The phrase may be used for plant protection products used for fumigation in cases where the wearing of a mask is not justified. |
|
SPO 4 |
The packaging must be opened outdoors in dry conditions. |
The sentence should be used for plant protection products containing active substances likely to react violently with water or moist air, e.g. Aluminum phosphide, or subject to spontaneous ignition, such as dithiocarbamates (alkyla-bis). The sentence can also be used for volatile products classified as:
The expert opinion must be taken into account in individual cases in order to assess whether the properties of the preparation and packaging are likely to present risks to the user. |
|
SPB 5 |
Fans [on/off] Or duration to be specified /to the drying of the spray] the treated areas/greenhouses before accessing them. |
The phrase can be used for plant protection products used in greenhouses or in other confined spaces, such as warehouses. |
|
Code |
Specific provisions |
Criteria for applying standard sentences |
|
SPe 1 |
To protect [groundwater/soil organisms], do not apply this product or any other product containing (specify sub S Tance or family of sub S (if applicable) More than (frequency to be specified) . |
The sentence should be used for phytosanitary products for which an assessment in accordance with the uniform principles demonstrates, for one or more of the designated uses, that measures to reduce the risks are necessary to avoid Accumulation in the soil, effects on earthworms or other organisms living in the soil, soil microflora and/or groundwater contamination. |
|
SPe 2 |
To protect [groundwater/aquatic organisms], do not apply this product on (soil type or in situ A (specify). |
The phrase can be used as a safe to reduce risk to prevent contamination of exposed groundwater or surface water (e.g. In association with soil type, topography or drained soils), if an assessment in accordance with the uniform principles demonstrates, for one or more of the designated uses, that measures to reduce the risks are necessary for Avoid unacceptable effects. |
|
SPe 3 |
To protect [aquatic organisms/non-target plants/non-target arthropods/insects], respect an untreated area of (di S Release to be specified) Relative to [the adjacent uncultivated area/water points]. |
The sentence should be used to protect non-target plants, non-target arthropods and/or aquatic organisms if an assessment in accordance with the uniform principles demonstrates, for one or more of the designated uses, that measures to Reducing risks are necessary to avoid unacceptable effects. |
|
SPe 4 |
To protect [aquatic organisms/non-target plants], do not apply on impermeable surfaces such as bitumen, concrete, cobblestones, [railway] and in any other situation where the risk of runoff is important. |
Depending on the type of use of the drug product, the approval service may use the phrase to prevent the risk of runoff and to protect aquatic organisms or non-target plants. |
|
SPe 5 |
To protect [wild birds/mammals], the phytosanitary product must be fully incorporated into the soil; ensure that the phytosanitary product is also incorporated at the end of the grooves. |
The phrase should be used for plant protection products such as pellets or pellets that must be incorporated into the soil to protect wild birds or mammals. |
|
SPe 6 |
To protect [birds/wild mammals], recover any phytosanitary products accidentally spilled. |
The phrase should be used for plant protection products such as pellets or pellets, to avoid their absorption by wild birds or mammals. It is recommended for all solid preparations used undiluted. |
|
SPe 7 |
Do not apply during the breeding period of birds. |
The sentence should be used when an assessment in accordance with the uniform principles demonstrates, for one or more of the designated uses, that such a measure to reduce the risk is necessary. |
|
SPe 8 |
Dangerous to bees. /To protect bees and other pollinating insects, do not apply during flowering. /Do not use in the presence of bees. /Remove or cover the hives during application and (specify period) After processing. /Do not apply when blossom weeds are present. /Remove the weeds before they bloom. /Do not apply before (ind I Mark the date) . |
The sentence shall be used in the case of plant protection products for which an assessment in accordance with the uniform principles demonstrates, for one or more of the designated uses, that measures to reduce the risks are necessary for Protect bees or other pollinating insects. Depending on the type of use of the phytosanitary product and other relevant national regulatory provisions, the approval service may choose the appropriate formulation to reduce the risk to bees and other insects Pollinators as well as their incubators. |
|
Code |
Specific provisions |
Criteria for applying standard sentences |
|
SPa 1 |
To avoid the development of resistances, do not apply this product or any other container (specify the substance or family of substances as the case may be) more than (number of applications or duration to be specified). |
The sentence should be used where such a restriction appears necessary to limit the risk of development of resistances. |
|
Code |
Specific provisions |
Criteria for applying standard sentences |
|
SPr 1 |
Bait should be arranged in such a way as to minimize the risk of ingestion by other animals. Secure baits so that they cannot be taken away by rodents. |
In order to ensure compliance by users, the sentence should be prominently displayed on the label in such a way as to prevent erroneous uses to the maximum extent possible. |
|
SPr 2 |
The treatment area must be marked during the processing period. The risk of poisoning (primary or secondary) by the anticoagulant, as well as its antidote, should be mentioned. |
The sentence should be prominently displayed on the label so as to prevent accidental poisoning to the greatest extent possible. |
|
SPr 3 |
Dead rodents should be removed daily from the treatment area throughout the treatment period. Do not throw them in rubbish bins or dumps. |
In order to prevent the secondary poisoning of animals, the sentence should be used for all rodenticides containing anticoagulants as active substances. |
|
1 Update as per c. II of the O of 20 May 2015, in force since 1 Er Jul. 2015 ( RO 2015 1781 ).
2 RS 813.11
3 RO 2005 2721 , 2007 821, 2009 401,805, 2010 5223, 2011 5227, 2012 6103, 2013 201,3041, 2014 2073 3857
(art. 17 and 24)
1 The principles set out in this Annex are intended to ensure that assessments and decisions on the authorisation of plant protection products, as far as chemical preparations are concerned, are translated into application Consistent with the requirements set out in s. 17 of this order by all assessment services and by the approval service and with all due rigour in the protection of human and animal health and the environment.
2 During the evaluation of applications and the granting of approvals, the evaluation services and the approval service:
3 Where the data and information provided are sufficient to enable the evaluation of one of the proposed uses to be carried out, the application shall be evaluated and a decision shall be taken for that use. In view of the justifications put forward and the clarifications provided at a later date, the approval service rejects applications whose deficiencies in the accompanying data prohibit full evaluation and any reliable decisions for the Less one of the proposed uses.
4 During the assessment and decision-making process, the registration service and the evaluation services concerned shall cooperate with the applicants in order to resolve promptly any matter relating to the dossier, to determine from the outset any further Necessary for the appropriate evaluation of the product, to change any proposed condition of use of the phytosanitary product or to modify the nature or composition of the product so as to ensure full compliance with the Requirements of this order. A complete technical file is a file that meets all the requirements of Schedules 5 and 6, c. 2.
1 Evaluation services shall evaluate the information referred to in Part A, para. 2, depending on the state of scientific and technical knowledge; in particular:
2 The evaluation services shall ensure that the assessments of applications actually relate to the concrete conditions of use proposed, in particular the purpose of the use, the dosage of the product, the mode, the frequency and the moment of its use. Application, and the nature and composition of the preparation. They shall also take into account all the normal conditions of use and the consequences thereof. Finally, evaluation services are based on the principles of integrated control whenever possible.
3 In assessing applications, assessment services take into account the agronomic, phytosanitary, environmental, including climatic characteristics of the areas of use.
4 In interpreting the evaluation results, the evaluation services shall take into account, where appropriate, the elements of uncertainty presented by the information obtained during the evaluation, in order to minimise the risk Of omission, or underestimation of significance, of adverse or adverse effects. As part of the decision-making process, they are looking for critical data or decision points, where the uncertainty element could lead to a misclassification of the risk presented. The first assessment is based on the best available data or estimates that reflect realistic conditions for the use of the phytosanitary product. It is followed by a new assessment, which takes into account the potential uncertainties of the critical data and a set of probable conditions of use and provides a realistic approach to the most unfavourable case, in order to determine If the first assessment could have been significantly different.
5 Where the specific principles set out in c. 9BI-2 provides for the use of calculation models in the assessment of a phytosanitary product, these models shall:
6 Where metabolites and degradation or reaction products are referred to in the specific principles, only products relevant to the proposed criterion should be taken into account.
Where the proposed use relates to the fight or protection against an orga-nism, the evaluation services shall examine the possibility that the organism may be harmful in the agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions, including The area of the proposed use.
Where the proposed use serves a purpose other than the fight or protection against an organism, the evaluation services appreciate, taking into account the agronomic, phytosanitary, environmental, including climatic conditions, The potential for major damage, loss or disadvantage in the proposed use area if the phytosanitary product was not used.
The evaluation services shall evaluate the data on the efficacy of the plant health product in accordance with Annex 6, c. 2, taking into account the degree of control or magnitude of the desired effect and the relevant experimental conditions such as:
1 Assessment services assess the suitability of the plant health product in a range of agronomic, phytosanitary, environmental, including climatic conditions, which may be present in the area of the proposed use, and In particular:
2 Where an appropriate reference product does not exist, the evaluation services shall evaluate the action of the plant health product in order to determine whether its application has long-lasting and specific benefits under agronomic conditions, Plant protection, environmental, including climate, of the proposed use area.
Where the product label requires or recommends the use of the product in combination with other phytosanitary products and/or adjuvants, the assessment services shall submit to the assessments provided for in the c. 2.1.1 to 2.1.4 the information provided concerning this mixture.
1 The assessment services assess the extent of adverse effects on the crop treated after the application of the plant health product according to the proposed conditions of use compared, where appropriate, with one or more reference products Appropriate if available and/or with no treatment.
2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:
3 This evaluation focuses on:
Where available data indicates that the active substance, metabolites or reaction and degradation products remain in non-negligible quantities in the soil and/or in the plant substances after the application of the product Under the proposed conditions of use, assessment services assess the extent of adverse effects on the following crops. This assessment shall be carried out in accordance with c. 2.2.1.
Where the product label requires the use of the product in combination with other phytosanitary products, or adjuvants, the assessment services shall submit to the assessment under c. 2.1.1. The information provided concerning the mixture.
1 Where the proposed use of the plant health product is to act on vertebrates, the evaluation services evaluate the mechanism that produces this action and the observed effects on the behaviour and health of the target animals; Sought is the elimination of the target animal, they evaluate the time it takes to cause death of the animal and the conditions in which death occurs.
2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:
1 Evaluation services shall assess the exposure of the operator to the active substance and/or the relevant toxicological elements of the plant health product which may occur under the proposed conditions of use, in particular the dosage, The mode of application and climatic conditions, preferably based on realistic data relating to the exposure and, if not available, using an appropriate and validated calculation model.
2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:
3 This assessment shall be carried out for each type of method and application equipment proposed for the use of the phytosanitary product, as well as for the different types and sizes of containers used, taking into account the mixing operations, Loading and application of the product, as well as routine cleaning and maintenance of the application equipment.
The evaluation services shall review information on the nature and characteristics of the proposed packaging, in particular with regard to the following aspects:
The evaluation services shall examine the nature and characteristics of the proposed protective equipment and clothing, in particular with regard to the following aspects:
1 Assessment services assess the possibility of exposure of other human beings (persons present or workers exposed after the application of the phytosanitary product) or animals to the active substance and/or other toxic elements of the Phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions of use.
2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:
The assessment services shall evaluate the toxicological data set out in Annex 5, c. 2, including:
Before assessing the residue levels observed during the tests or in products of animal origin, the evaluation services shall examine the following information:
The evaluation services assess, taking into account the appropriate statistical models, the residue levels observed during the tests carried out. The evaluation addresses each proposed use and takes into account the following:
The assessment services shall assess the residue levels observed in products of animal origin taking into account the information provided in Annex II, Part A, c. 8.4 of Directive 91 /414/EEC 1 And residues from other uses.
Assessment services shall appreciate the risk of exposure of consumers in the context of their diet and, where appropriate, their other exposure risks, by means of an appropriate calculation model. This assessment shall take into account, where appropriate, other sources of information, such as other authorised uses of plant protection products which contain the same active substance or produce the same residues.
Evaluation services shall, where appropriate, appreciate the risk of exposure of animals, taking into account the residue levels observed in treated plants or plant products intended for their feeding.
In assessing the fate and dissemination of the phytosanitary product in the environment, assessment services consider all elements of the environment, including flora and fauna. In particular:
1 Assessment services appreciate the possibility of the phytosanitary product reaching the ground under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they evaluate the speed and the pathways of degradation in the ground, mobility In the soil and the evolution of the total concentration (extractable and non-extractable 2 ) The active substance, metabolites, and degradation and reaction products that should occur in the soil of the proposed area of use following the application of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions.
2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:
1 Assessment services appreciate the possibility that the plant health product will come into contact with groundwater under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they evaluate, using a calculation model Appropriate and validated at Community level, the concentration of the active substance, the metabolites and the degradation and reaction products that should occur in the groundwater of the area of use envisaged after the application Of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions.
2 The member evaluation services are particularly supportive of their assessment of the results of mobility and persistence studies in the soil, as set out in Appendices 5 and 6.
3 This evaluation also takes into account the following information elements:
1 Assessment services appreciate the possibility that the plant health product will come into contact with surface waters under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they evaluate, using a calculation model Appropriate and validated at Community level, the foreseeable short-and long-term concentration of the active substance, metabolites and degradation and reaction products expected to occur in the surface waters of the area Intended use after the application of the phytosanitary product under the conditions Proposed.
2 The evaluation services specifically support their assessment of the results of mobility and persistence studies in the soil, as well as information on runoff and training, as provided for in Appendices 5 and 6, c. 2.
3 This evaluation also takes into account the following information elements:
1 Assessment services appreciate the possibility that the phytosanitary product will dissipate in the air under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they will make the best possible assessment, if necessary using a Appropriate and validated calculation model for the concentration of the active substance, metabolites, and degradation and reaction products that should occur in the air following the application of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions.
2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:
The evaluation services evaluate the processes of destruction or neutralization of the phytosanitary product and its packaging.
In calculating toxicity/exposure ratios, assessment services shall take into consideration toxicity to the most sensitive relevant organism used in the tests.
1 Assessment services appreciate the possibility of exposure of birds and other terrestrial vertebrates to the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they assess the extent of the risk in the short term And in the long term, and in particular for reproduction, to which these organisms may be exposed after the application of the product according to the proposed conditions of use.
2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:
3 The evaluation focuses on the following:
1 Assessment services appreciate the potential for exposure of aquatic organisms to the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they assess the magnitude of the short-and long-term risk To which these organisms may be exposed following the application of the product according to the proposed conditions of use.
2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:
3 The evaluation focuses on the following:
1 Evaluation services appreciate the potential for exposure of bees common to the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they assess the extent of the short-and long-term risk to which Common bees may be exposed after application of the product according to the proposed conditions of use.
2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:
3 The evaluation focuses on the following:
1 Evaluation services appreciate the possibility of exposure of useful arthropods other than the common bee to the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they evaluate the lethal action and The sublethal effects to which these organisms may be exposed, as well as the decrease in their activity, following the application of the product according to the proposed conditions of use.
2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:
1 Assessment services appreciate the possibility of exposure of earthworms and other macro-organisms from the non-subject to the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions of use; if this possibility is real, they evaluate the extent The short-and long-term risk to which these organisms may be exposed following the application of the product under the proposed conditions of use.
2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:
3 The evaluation focuses on the following:
1 Where the assessment provided for in c. 2.5.1.1. Does not preclude the possibility of contact between the phytosanitary product and the soil under the proposed conditions of use, the evaluation services assess the impact of the use on the microbial activity, and in particular on the Nitrogen and carbon mineralization processes in the soil.
2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:
The evaluation services assess the analytical methods proposed for post-approval monitoring and control.
1 The method shall establish the nature and quantity of the active substance (s) that enter the composition of the phytosanitary product and, if necessary, any impurity and any significant coformulant from a toxicological point of view, Ecotoxicological or environmental.
2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:
1 The method shall identify the residues of the active substance, metabolites and degradation or reaction products resulting from the permitted uses of the phytosanitary product which have a toxicological impact, Ecotoxicological or environmental.
2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:
Evaluation services assess the actual substance content of the phytosanitary product and its stability during storage.
1 Evaluation services assess the physical and chemical properties of the plant health product, including:
2 This evaluation is based on the following information elements:
When the proposed label requires or recommends the use of the product in combination with other phytosanitary or adjuvant products, the assessment services assess the physical and chemical compatibility of the products to be mixed.
1 If necessary, the approval service shall attach conditions or restrictions to the authorisations. The nature and severity of these measures must be determined by the nature and extent of the benefits and risks that can be expected and adapted to them.
2 The assessment services and the approval service shall ensure that decisions on the granting of authorisations take into account, where necessary, agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental burdens imposed in the areas of use Considered, including climatic conditions. These considerations may lead them to establish conditions and employment restrictions, or even to exclude certain areas of the national territory from the authorisation of employment.
3 Evaluation services ensure that the doses and the number of approved applications represent the minimum values necessary to achieve the desired effect, even when higher values do not result in unacceptable risks For human or animal health or for the environment. The authorised values must be determined according to the agronomic, phytosanitary, environmental, including climatic conditions, of the various areas for which authorisation is granted. However, the doses to be used and the number of applications should not produce any undesirable effects, such as the development of resistance.
4 Evaluation services shall ensure that decisions comply with the principles of integrated control where the product is intended to be used in situations involving such principles.
5 Based on data on a limited number of representative species, evaluation services must ensure that the application of phytosanitary products does not have a long-term impact on abundance and Diversity of non-target species.
6 The issuance of an authorization is subject to the satisfaction of all the requirements set out in c. 2 (specific principles). However:
7 Where an authorization has been granted on the basis of the requirements set out in this Annex, the approval service may, by virtue of the arts. 29 and 30 of this Order:
8 The evaluation services shall inform the holder of the authorisation of any measures referred to in para. 7, let. A and b, and invite them to provide any additional information necessary to define the potential action or hazards of the product under the new conditions of use.
Where the proposed uses include recommendations for control or protection against organisms which are not considered harmful on the basis of the experience and the scientific acquis in the agronomic conditions, No authorisation shall be granted for any of the following: plant health, environmental, including climatic, normal of the proposed areas of use or that the other effects sought are not deemed to be beneficial under those conditions. Uses in question.
The control, protection or other effects sought must have an intensity, uniformity and persistence of action equivalent to those offered by the use of appropriate reference products. If there is no suitable reference product, it is necessary to establish that the use of the phytosanitary product in the agronomic, phytosanitary, environmental, including climatic conditions of the proposed area of use is Certainly beneficial in terms of the intensity, uniformity and persistence of control, protection or other desired effects.
Where appropriate, the evolution of the yield obtained during the use of the product and the reduction of losses during storage must be comparable, quantitatively and/or qualitatively, to those resulting from the use of reference products Appropriate. If there is no suitable reference product, it is necessary to establish that the use of the phytosanitary product in the agronomic, phytosanitary, environmental, including climatic conditions of the proposed area of use is Certainly beneficial, quantitatively and/or qualitatively, in terms of the evolution of yield and the reduction of losses during storage.
The conclusions concerning the effectiveness of the preparation must be applicable to all areas of the assessment services in which it is to be authorised and to be submitted for all the proposed conditions of use, except where The proposed labelling specifies that the preparation should be used under specific and limited conditions (e.g. light infestations, specific soil types, specific crop conditions).
Where the label requires the use of the mixture with other specific or adjuvanted phytosanitary products, the mixture must achieve the desired effect and comply with the principles set out in the c. 2.1.1 to 2.1.4.
There must be no relevant phytotoxic effects on treated plants or plant products unless the label refers to employment restrictions.
At harvest time, yield must not be reduced due to phytotoxic effects that reduce it below the level that could be achieved without the use of the phytosanitary product, unless the reduction is compensated by others Benefits such as a qualitative improvement of treated plants or plant products.
There must be no unacceptable adverse effects on the quality of treated plants or plant products, with the exception of negative effects on processing when the label specifies that the preparation should not be applied to crops For processing.
There shall be no unacceptable adverse effects on treated plants or plant products used for propagation or reproduction, including viability, germination, rooting and establishment, except where The label specifies that the preparation should not be applied to plants or plant products intended for propagation or reproduction.
There should be no unacceptable impact on the following crops, except where the label specifies that certain plants are susceptible to the product and should not be grown after the crop is processed.
There should be no unacceptable impact on adjacent crops unless the label recommends that the preparation should not be applied when adjacent crops are particularly vulnerable.
Where the label requires the use of the mixture with other phytosanitary products or adjuvants, the mixture must comply with the principles set out in the c. 2.2.1 to 2.2.6.
The instructions proposed for the cleaning of the application equipment must be clear, effective and easily applicable and ensure the disposal of any residues of the phytosanitary product which may subsequently cause damage.
1 An authorisation for a plant health product intended to eliminate vertebrates shall be issued only:
2 In the case of repellent products, the desired effect must be achieved without unnecessary suffering being inflicted on the target animals.
1 Authorization is not granted if the level of exposure of the operator during the handling and application of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions of use (including dosage and mode of application) exceeds NAEO.
2 In addition, the granting of the authorisation is subject to compliance with the limit value established for the active substance and/or the toxic components of the product under the OSEC 4 .
Where the proposed conditions of use require the wearing of protective clothing or equipment, the authorisation shall be granted only if those articles are effective and in conformity with the relevant Community provisions, may be obtained Easily by the user and can be used under the conditions of application of the phytosanitary product, taking into account, in particular, climatic conditions.
Phytosanitary products which, because of certain properties or in the event of error of handling or use, may present high risks must be subject to specific restrictions, in particular concerning the dimensions of Packaging, type of formulation, distribution and mode and conditions of employment. In addition, phytosanitary products classified as highly toxic cannot be authorised for use by non-professional users.
Periods of waiting and reintroduction of safety and other precautions must be A Ntir that exposure of persons or workers exposed after the application of the phytosanitary product does not exceed the NAEO for its active substance or its toxicologically significant components or, where applicable, the values Limits for the said components in accordance with the provisions referred to in c. 2.4.1.1.
Periods of waiting and reintroduction of safety and other precautions must be defined so as not to have a negative impact on animals.
The waiting and reintroduction periods for safety and other precautions to ensure compliance with the NAEO and limit values must be realistic; special precautions must be taken when necessary.
The authorisations must ensure that the residues come from the quantities of the minimum phytosanitary product necessary for adequate treatment according to good agricultural practice, including the implementing rules (waiting periods, periods of Storage, pre-harvest intervals) reduce to a minimum the presence of residues at the time of harvest or slaughter or, where appropriate, after storage.
1 Where no maximum concentration exists, the assessment services establish a maximum interim concentration. The conclusions relating to the fixed levels must be applicable in all conditions to influence the remaining levels of residues in crops, such as schedule, dose, frequency and mode of application.
2 Based on the assessment of the potential content of residues in and on plant parts and edible plant products (established by the relevant evaluation units) and OSEC, the FVO establishes the maximum concentration of substances Active.
1 In the cases referred to in c. 2.4.2.2, para. 1 and 2, any application for authorization must be accompanied by a risk assessment based on the most adverse consumer exposure hypothesis, but based on good agricultural practice.
2 Given all official uses, the proposed use should not be allowed if the best possible estimate of consumer exposure is greater than the TDI.
Where the processing affects the nature of the residues, the establishment of a separate risk assessment under the conditions defined in the c. 2.4.2.3 may be required.
Where treated plants or plant products are intended for the feeding of animals, the residues present shall not adversely affect the health of the animals.
1 Authorisation shall not be granted where the active substance and, if significant from the toxicological, ecotoxicological or environmental point of view, the metabolites and degradation or reaction products resulting from the use of the Phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions:
2 However, authorisation may be granted if it is scientifically established that, under the relevant field conditions, the accumulation in the soil is insufficient to cause unacceptable residues in subsequent crops and There are no unacceptable phytotoxic effects on subsequent crops or unacceptable impacts on non-target species, in accordance with the requirements set out in this section. 2.5.1.2, 2.5.1.3, 2.5.1.4 and 2.5.2.
No authorisation shall be granted where the foreseeable concentration of the active substance or relevant metabolites and products of degradation or reaction in groundwater used as drinking water or intended to be used as drinking water Does not meet the requirements of Schedule 2, c. 22, OWaters 5 .
1 No authorization shall be granted if, after the use of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions, the foreseeable concentration of the active substance, relevant metabolites or relevant degradation or reaction products In surface waters:
2 Proposed instructions for use of the phytosanitary product, including the method of cleaning the application equipment, must minimize the likelihood of accidental contamination of surface waters.
No authorisation shall be granted if the concentration of the active substance in the atmosphere under the proposed conditions of use is such that the level of exposure acceptable or the limit values laid down for operators, workers or Persons present in c. 2.4.1 are exceeded.
No authorisation shall be granted in the event of potential exposure of birds and other non-subject terrestrial vertebrates if:
1 There is no authorization for potential exposure of aquatic organisms if:
2 However, authorisation may be granted if an appropriate risk assessment specifically establishes that the use of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions does not have an unacceptable impact on the survival of the species exposed Directly or indirectly (predators).
No authorisation shall be granted in the case of potential exposure of the common bees if the risk quotients of exposure of bees by contact or orally are greater than 50, unless an appropriate risk assessment establishes Specifically that the use of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions does not have an unacceptable impact on the larvae, the behaviour of the bees and the survival and development of the colony.
No use authorisation shall be granted in the event of potential exposure of useful arthropods other than the common bee if more than 30 % of the guinea pig organisms are affected by lethal and sublethal laboratory tests Unless an appropriate risk assessment specifically establishes that the use of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions does not have an unacceptable impact on the organisms in question. Any assertion of selectivity and any proposal for use in an integrated pest control system must be duly substantiated.
No authorization shall be granted in the case of potential exposure of earthworms if the acute/exposure ratio of worms is less than 10 or the long-term toxicity/exposure ratio less than 5, unless an appropriate assessment of the There is no concrete evidence that the use of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions is harmless to earthworms.
No authorization is granted for potential exposure of non-subject soil microorganisms if nitrogen or carbon mineralization tests performed in the laboratory reveal a change in these processes by more than 25 % after 100 Days, unless an appropriate risk assessment specifically establishes that the use of the phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions does not have an unacceptable impact on microbial activity, taking into account the ability to multiply Microorganisms.
The methods proposed must correspond to the state of the art. For per-put validation of the proposed analytical methods for the purposes of post-approval monitoring and control, the criteria referred to in the c. 2.6.1 and 2.6.2 shall be completed.
The method shall be used to identify and identify the active substance (s) and, if necessary, any impurity and any significant toxicological, ecotoxicological or environmental co-formulant.
1 The method should be used to identify and confirm the presence of significant toxicological, ecotoxicological, or environmental residues.
2 The average recovery rate must be between 70 % and 110 %, with a relative standard deviation of less than or equal to 20 %.
3 The repeatability must be less than the following values for residues in foodstuffs, the intermediate values being determined by interpolation from a log-logarithmic representation:
Residue content [mg/kg] |
Difference in [mg/kg] |
Difference in [%] |
0.01 |
0.005 |
50 |
0.1 |
0.025 |
25 |
1 |
0.125 |
12.5 |
> 1 |
12.5 |
|
4 The reproducibility must be less than the following values for residues in foodstuffs, the intermediate values being determined by interpolation from a log-logarithmic representation:
Residue content [mg/kg] |
Difference in [mg/kg] |
Difference in [%] |
0.01 |
0.01 |
100 |
0.1 |
0.05 |
50 |
1 |
0.25 |
25 |
> 1 |
25 |
|
5 In the case of analysis of residues in plants, plant products, foodstuffs, feed or products of animal origin treated, the sensitivity of the proposed methods must meet the following criteria, except where the Maximum residue content established or proposed is the limit of determination:
Maximum level of mg/kg |
Mg/kg determination limit |
> 0.5 |
0.1 |
0.5-0.05 |
0.1-0.02 |
< 0.05 |
Maximum Content ' 0.5 |
Where an appropriate FAO standard exists, this standard must be met.
Where there is no suitable FAO standard, the physical and chemical properties of the phytosanitary product must meet the following requirements:
Content declared in g/kg or g/l at 20ºC |
Tolerance |
|
Up to 25 |
± 15 % homogeneous formulation ± 25 % non-homogeneous formulation |
|
Above 25 to 100 |
± 10 % |
|
Above 100 to 250 |
± 6 % |
|
Above 250 to 500 |
± 5 % |
|
Above 500 |
± 25 g/kg; ± 25 g/l |
|
Where the proposed label requires or recommends to use the mixture with other phytosanitary and/or adjuvant products and contains guidance on the accounting of the preparation with other phytosanitary products with They are mixed, these products or adjuvants must be physically and chemically compatible in the mixture.
1 The principles set out in Part II of this Annex are intended to ensure that assessments and decisions on the authorization of plant protection products, provided that they are microbial phytosanitary products, are Reflect the application of the requirements set out in s. 17 of this order with a high level of protection of human or animal health and the environment.
2 When assessing applications for the granting of authorisations, assessment and approval services shall:
3 Any reference to the data in Annex 5, c. 3, in the specific principles relating to the assessment shall be deemed to relate to the data referred to in para. 2, let. B.
4 Where the data and information provided are sufficient to enable the evaluation of one of the proposed uses to be carried out, the application shall be evaluated and a decision shall be taken for that use. In view of the justifications put forward and any subsequent clarifications, the approval service rejects applications for the granting of authorisations for which missing data prevents completion of the full evaluation And make a reliable decision for at least one of the proposed uses.
5 During the assessment and decision-making process, the approval service and evaluation services work with the applicants to quickly resolve any matter related to the case, to determine from the outset any further study Necessary for the proper assessment of the product, to change any proposal for a condition of use of the plant health product or to modify the nature or composition of the product in such a way as to ensure full compliance with the Requirements of this Annex. The approval service shall normally adopt a reasoned decision within a period of twelve months from the availability of a complete technical file. A complete technical file is a file that meets all the requirements of Schedule 6, c. 3.
6 Judgments carried out by the competent evaluation services during the assessment and decision-making process must be based on scientific principles, preferably internationally recognised, as well as on the expert opinion.
7 A microbial pest product may contain viable and non-viable micro-organisms (including viruses) and formulants. It may also contain relevant metabolites/toxins produced during growth, growth medium residues and microbial contaminants. The microorganism, relevant metabolites/toxins and the phytosanitary product, as well as the residual growth medium and microbial contaminants present, must all be evaluated.
8 Evaluation services should take into account the guidance documents that have been communicated to the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health.
9 With regard to genetically modified micro-organisms, the ODE should be taken into account 6 The evaluation conducted under this order must be provided and considered.
10 Definitions and explanation of microbiology terms:
1 The objective of an evaluation is to identify and evaluate, on a scientific basis and until new results are obtained by experiments on a case-by-case basis, the potential adverse effects on human or animal health and to The environment for the use of a microbial pest control product. The evaluation is also conducted to identify the need for action to manage risks and to identify and recommend appropriate action.
2 Given the capacity of micro-organisms to replicate, there is a clear difference between the chemicals and the microorganisms used as plant protection products. Hazards are not necessarily the same as those presented by chemicals, in particular as regards the ability of micro-organisms to persist and multiply in different environments. In addition, micro-organisms consist of a wide range of different organisms with all their unique characteristics. These differences between the micro-organisms in the assessment should be taken into account.
3 Ideally, the micro-organism contained in the phytosanitary product should play the role of a cell plant working directly on the site where the target organism is harmful, therefore understanding the mode of action is a step Cruelty to the assessment process. The following information is considered:
4 On the basis of this information, metabolites may be considered as potentially relevant. Therefore, potential exposure to these metabolites should be assessed in order to determine their relevance.
1 Based on current scientific and technical knowledge, the evaluation services assess the information provided in accordance with the requirements of the ch. 3 of Annexes 5 and 6, and in particular:
2 The quality/methodology of the tests, where there are no standard test methods, shall be evaluated and the following characteristics, when available, should be analysed: relevance, representativeness, sensitivity, Specificity, reproducibility, interlaboratory validations, predictability.
3 In interpreting the results of evaluations, the evaluation services shall take into account, where appropriate, the potential uncertainties contained in the information obtained during the assessment, in order to minimise the risk of Non-detection of adverse effects or underestimation of their significance. As part of the decision-making process, the Member States are looking for the relevant data or decision-making elements, for which the element of uncertainty could lead to a misclassification of risk.
4 The first assessment is based on the best available data or estimates that reflect realistic conditions for the use of the phytosanitary product. It shall be followed by a new assessment, taking into account the potential uncertainties of the critical data and a series of probable conditions of use and providing a realistic approach to the most unfavourable case, in order to Whether the first assessment could have been significantly different.
5 Evaluation services evaluate each microbial pest product for which authorization is sought-the information assessed for the microorganism can be considered. The assessment services must take into account the fact that any co-formulant may have an impact on the characteristics of the plant health product in comparison with the microorganism.
6 When assessing applications and granting authorisations, the assessment and approval services shall take into account the specific conditions of use provided for, in particular the purpose of the use, the dosage of the phytosanitary product, the The mode, frequency and timing of its application, and the nature and composition of the phytosanitary product. They also take into account the principles of integrated pest management whenever possible.
7 Evaluation services take into account the agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions (including climate) in the areas of use.
8 Where the specific principles set out in section 9BII-2 provide for the use of calculation models in the assessment of a phytosanitary product, these models shall:
9 The data requirements specified in the c. 3 of Annexes 5 and 63 contain guidance on when and how certain information should be presented and the procedures to be followed for the preparation and evaluation of a file. These guidelines must be respected.
The evaluation services shall apply the following principles in the evaluation of the data and information provided in support of applications, without prejudice to the general principles laid down in Section 1.
1 The identity of the microorganism must be clearly established. Appropriate data should be provided in order to allow verification of the identity of the microorganism at the level of the strain contained in the phytosanitary product.
2 The identity of the microorganism is assessed at the strain level. When the microorganism is a genetically modified mutant or organism, the specific differences with other strains of the same species must be recorded. Data relating to the possible rest phases of the microorganism must be recorded.
3 The deposit of the strain with a collection of international reputable microorganisms must be verified.
The evaluation services assess the detailed quantitative and qualitative information provided on the composition of the plant health product, such as those concerning the micro-organism (see above), relevant metabolites/toxins, The residual growth medium, coformulants and microbial contaminants present.
The origin of the strain, where relevant, its natural habitat, including the indications on the natural population level, the life cycle and the possibilities of survival, colonization, reproduction and dispersal must be evaluated. The proliferation of indigenous micro-organisms is expected to stabilize after a brief period of growth and then to the natural base level.
1 The ability of microorganisms to adapt to the environment needs to be assessed. Evaluation services should take into account the following principles:
2 Therefore, the information concerning the genetic stability of the micro-organism in the environmental conditions of use and the information concerning the capacity of the micro-organism should be evaluated, where appropriate. Transfer of genetic material to other organisms and information relating to the stability of coded characters.
The mode of action of the micro-organism should be evaluated in as much detail as possible. The potential role of metabolites/toxins in the mode of action should be assessed and, where identified, the minimum effective concentration for all active metabolites/toxins should be established. Information on the mode of action can be a very useful tool for identifying potential risks. The elements to be considered in the evaluation are as follows:
In order to assess the possible effects on non-target organisms, information concerning the host specificity of the microorganism must be evaluated in the light of the characteristics and properties described in the letters a and b:
Many microorganisms produce antibiotic substances that cause normal interference in the microbial community. Resistance to antimicrobial agents of importance to human and veterinary medicine needs to be assessed. The possibility of gene transfer encoding resistance to antimicrobial agents must be evaluated.
Depending on the nature of the microorganism and the type of formulation, the technical properties of the phytosanitary product must be evaluated.
The shelf life and storage stability of the preparation must be evaluated in light of possible changes in the composition due to the growth of the micro-organism or micro-organisms, to the production of Metabolites/toxins, etc.
The evaluation services assess the physical and chemical properties of the plant health product and the maintenance of these characteristics after storage and take into account:
Where, in accordance with the indications on the proposed label, it is required or recommended to use the mixture with other phytosanitary or adjuvant products, and/or where the proposed label contains indications of The compatibility of the mixture with other plant protection products, these phytosanitary or adjuvants must be physically and chemically compatible in the mixture. Biological compatibility must also be demonstrated for mixtures, that is, it must be demonstrated that each plant product in the mixture reacts as intended and that there is no antagonism.
The quality assurance criteria proposed for the production of the microorganism must be evaluated. In the process control evaluation criteria, consideration should be given to good production practices, operational practices, workflow, cleaning habits, microbial monitoring, and Hygiene conditions, in order to guarantee a good quality of the micro-organism. The quality, stability, purity, etc. of the micro-organism must be treated in the quality control system.
Quality assurance criteria must be assessed. If the phytosanitary product contains metabolites/toxins produced during growth and residues from the growth medium, they should be evaluated. The potential for the presence of micro-organisms must be assessed.
Where the proposed use relates to the control or protection of an organism, the evaluation services shall assess the possibility that the organism may be harmful in the agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions (including Of the proposed area of use.
The assessment services shall evaluate, taking into account the agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions (including climate), the possibility of major damage, loss or disadvantage in the area of proposed use if the Phytosanitary product was not used.
The evaluation services shall evaluate the data on the effectiveness of the phytosanitary product referred to in Annex 6, c. 3, taking into account the degree of control or magnitude of the desired effect and the relevant experimental conditions such as:
1 The evaluation services assess the performance of the phytosanitary product in the series of agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions (including climatic conditions) likely to occur in the area of the proposed use. The impact on integrated pest management should be included in the evaluation. In particular, consideration should be given to:
2 Where an appropriate reference product does not exist, the evaluation services assess the performance of the phytosanitary product in order to determine whether its application has consistent and specific benefits under conditions Agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental (including climatic) areas of the proposed use.
The assessment services assess the extent of adverse effects on the crop treated after the application of the phytosanitary product according to the conditions likely to occur in the area of the proposed use, by comparison, the case With one or more appropriate reference products if available and/or with an untreated control.
1 Where, in accordance with the label of the phytosanitary product, it is appropriate to use it in combination with other plant protection products and/or adjuvants, the assessment services shall submit the information provided concerning this mixture to the Assessments referred to in points 2.4.3 to 2.4.5.
2 When, in accordance with the label of the phytosanitary product, it is recommended to use it in combination with other phytosanitary and/or adjuvant products, the assessment services appreciate the opportunity of the mixture and its conditions Of use.
Where available data indicates that the microorganism or relevant metabolites/toxins or significant reaction and degradation products of formulants remain in non-negligible amounts in the soil and/or in or on the Of plant substances after the application of the phytosanitary product according to the intended use conditions, the assessment services assess the extent of the adverse effects on the following crops.
Where the proposed use of the phytosanitary product is intended to have an effect on vertebrates, the evaluation services evaluate the mechanism which produces this action and the observed effects on the behaviour and health of the target animals; where The action sought is the elimination of the target animal, they evaluate the time necessary to cause the death of the animal and the conditions in which death occurs. This includes the following information:
Evaluation services shall evaluate the analytical methods proposed for post-registration monitoring and control of viable and non-viable components, both in formulation and as residues in or on crops Processed. Sufficient validation is required for pre-authorization methods and post-approval monitoring methods. The methods considered appropriate for post-authorisation monitoring should be clearly identified.
The evaluation services evaluate the analytical methods proposed to identify and quantify the non-viable components of toxicological, ecotoxicological or environmental significance resulting from the micro-organism and/or present. Impurities or coformulants (including, where appropriate, the resulting degradation and/or reaction products). This includes the following information:
The evaluation services evaluate the methods of analysis proposed to quantify and identify the specific strain concerned and in particular the methods distinguishing this strain from closely related strains. This includes the following information:
The evaluation services evaluate the proposed analytical methods for identifying and quantifying significant non-viable residues from the toxicological, ecotoxicological or environmental point of view of the micro-organism (including the case) Resulting degradation and/or reaction products).
This evaluation shall take into account the data on the analytical methods provided for in the c. 3 of Annexes 5 and 6, and the results of their evaluation. This includes the following information:
The evaluation services evaluate the methods proposed to identify the specific strain concerned and in particular the methods distinguishing this strain from closely related strains.
This evaluation shall take into account the data on the analytical methods provided for in the c. 3 of Annexes 5 and 6, and the results of their evaluation. This includes the following information:
The impact on human or animal health needs to be assessed. Evaluation services should take into account the following principles:
Evaluation services assess the exposure of operators to the micro-organism, and/or the relevant toxicological compounds of the plant health product (e.g. Their metabolites/toxins, residual growth medium, contaminants and co-formulants), which is likely to interfere with the intended use conditions (including, in particular, dose, mode of application, and conditions Climate). It is important to use realistic data on exposure levels, and if these are not available, an appropriate and validated calculation model should be used. When available, a harmonised European database on generic exposure to plant protection products should be used.
The evaluation services shall review information on the nature and characteristics of the proposed packaging, in particular with regard to the following aspects:
The evaluation services shall examine the nature and characteristics of the proposed protective equipment and clothing, in particular with regard to the following aspects:
Assessment services assess the possibility of exposure of other persons (persons present or workers exposed after the application of the phytosanitary product, such as the return of workers) or animals to the microorganism and/or Other toxic elements of the phytosanitary product, under the conditions of intended use. This assessment is based on the following information:
In the assessment, viable or non-viable residues should be treated separately. Viruses and viroids should be considered as viable residues as they are capable of transferring genetic material, although strictly sensu they are not alive.
1 Assessment services assess the possibility of exposure of persons or animals to non-viable residues and their degradation products through the food chain due to the possible presence of such residues in or on the parts Edible crops. This includes the following information:
2 The assessment services assess the toxicity of the non-viable residues and their degradation products, taking into account, in particular, the specific information provided in accordance with the c. 3 of Annexes 5 and 6.
3 Where non-viable residues or their degradation products are considered relevant from a toxicological point of view for humans and/or animals, and where exposure is not considered to be negligible, actual levels in or on the Edible parts of the treated crops shall be determined by taking into consideration:
1 Assessment services assess the possibility of exposure of people or animals to viable residues via the food chain due to the possible presence of such residues in or on edible parts of the treated crops. This includes the following information:
2 Evaluation services evaluate specific information on the capacity of viable residues to persist or develop in the host and the capacity of such residues to cause effects/reactions in the host. This includes the following information:
The different stages of development/life cycle of the micro-organism should be treated.
3 If viable residues are considered to be relevant from a toxicological point of view for humans and/or animals, and if exposure is not considered to be negligible, actual levels in/on edible parts of treated crops shall be Determined by taking into account:
1 The biocomplexity of ecosystems and interactions in the microbial communities concerned must be taken into account.
2 Information about origin and properties (e.g. Specificity) of the micro-organism and its residual metabolites/toxins, as well as the intended uses of the microorganism, form the basis for the assessment of fate and behaviour in the environment. It is important to consider the mode of action of the micro-organism.
3 An assessment is made of the fate and behaviour of any known relevant metabolite produced by the microorganism. The assessment shall be carried out for each compartment of the environment and is triggered on the basis of the criteria specified in Section 7 (iv) of Annex II B to Directive 91/414 7 .
4 In assessing the fate and behaviour of the phytosanitary product environment, assessment services consider all aspects of the environment, including biotas. The possibility of persistence and multiplication of micro-organisms must be assessed in all environmental compartments, unless it can be justified that specific micro-organisms will not reach a specific environment. The mobility of microorganisms and their residual metabolites/toxins must be considered.
1 Assessment services assess the potential for contamination of groundwater, surface water and drinking water under the proposed conditions of use of the phytosanitary product.
2 In the global assessment, the evaluation services pay particular attention to the potential adverse effects on human beings due to groundwater contamination when the active substance is applied in regions Knowledge of conditions of vulnerability, such as food-water production areas.
1 Assessment services assess the risk to the aquatic environment when the potential for exposure of aquatic organisms exists. A micro-organism can lead to risks by its potential to establish, by multiplication, in the environment and can therefore have a lasting or permanent impact on microbial communities or their predators.
2 This assessment is based on the following information:
The assessment services assess the possibility of exposure to the phytosanitary product of organisms in the atmosphere, under the conditions of intended use; if this possibility is real, they assess the risk to the atmosphere. The short or long-distance transport of the micro-organism into the atmosphere must be taken into account.
1 The evaluation services assess the possibility of exposure to the plant health product of organisms in the terrestrial environment, under the conditions of intended use; if this possibility is real, they assess the risk for the Terrestrial environment. A micro-organism can lead to risks by its potential to establish, by multiplication, in the environment and can therefore have a lasting or permanent impact on microbial communities or its predators.
2 This assessment is based on the following information:
1 Information on the ecology of the microorganism and its effects on the environment should be evaluated and, if possible, the exposure levels and the effects of its relevant metabolites/toxins. A global assessment, to assess the risks to the environment that the plant health product can cause, is necessary; it takes into account the normal levels of exposure to micro-organisms, both in the environment and in The body of organisms.
2 The evaluation services assess the possibility of exposure of non-target organisms under the intended conditions of use and, if this possibility is real, they assess the risk to the non-target organisations concerned.
3 Where appropriate, an assessment of infectivity and pathogenicity is required, unless it can be demonstrated that the non-target organisms will not be exposed.
4 In order to assess the possibility of exposure, account should also be taken of the following information:
Assessment services assess the potential for exposure and effects on terrestrial wildlife (non-domestic birds, mammals and other terrestrial vertebrates).
A micro-organism can present risks by its potential to infect and multiply host systems of the avian and mammalian species. It will be considered if the identified risks could be changed or not due to the formulation of the phytosanitary product, taking into account the following information on the micro-organism:
1 A phytosanitary product may result in toxic effects due to the action of toxins or co-formulants. In assessing such effects, the following information should be taken into account:
2 If mortality or signs of intoxication are observed in the tests, the assessment shall include a calculation of the toxicity/exposure ratios expressed on the basis of the quotient of the LD50 value and the predicted exposure expressed in milligrams per Kilogram of body weight.
Assessment services assess the potential for exposure and effects on aquatic organisms.
A micro-organism can present risks by its potential to infect and multiply aquatic organisms. It will be considered if the identified risks could be changed or not due to the formulation of the phytosanitary product, taking into account the following information on the micro-organism:
1 A phytosanitary product may result in toxic effects due to the action of toxins or co-formulants. In assessing such effects, the following information should be taken into account:
2 If mortality or signs of intoxication are observed in the tests, the assessment shall include a calculation of the toxicity/exposure ratios expressed on the basis of the quotient of the EC50 value and/or the NOEC value and the predicted exposure.
Evaluation services assess the potential for exposure and effects on bees.
A micro-organism can cause risks by its potential to infect bees and multiply. It will be considered if the identified risks could be changed or not due to the formulation of the phytosanitary product, taking into account the following information on the micro-organism:
1 A phytosanitary product may result in toxic effects due to the action of toxins or co-formulants. In assessing such effects, the following information should be taken into account:
2 If mortality or signs of intoxication are observed in the tests, the assessment shall include a calculation of the risk quotient expressed on the basis of the quotient of the dose in g/ha and the value LD50 in ìg/bee.
Assessment services assess the potential for exposure and effects on arthropods other than bees.
A micro-organism can present risks by its potential to infect and multiply arthropods other than bees. It will be considered if the identified risks could be changed or not due to the formulation of the phytosanitary product, taking into account the following information on the micro-organism:
1 A phytosanitary product may result in toxic effects due to the action of toxins or co-formulants. In assessing such effects, the following information should be taken into account:
2 If mortality or signs of intoxication are observed in the tests, the assessment shall include a calculation of the toxicity/exposure ratios expressed on the basis of the quotient of the TE50 value (effective rate) and the predicted exposure.
Assessment services assess the potential for exposure and effects on earthworms.
A micro-organism can present risks by its potential to infect worms and multiply. It will be considered if the identified risks could be changed or not due to the formulation of the phytosanitary product, taking into account the following information on the micro-organism:
1 A phytosanitary product may result in toxic effects due to the action of toxins or co-formulants. In assessing such effects, the following information should be taken into account:
2 If mortality or signs of intoxication are observed in the tests, the assessment shall include a calculation of the toxicity/exposure ratios based on the quotient of the LC50 value and the predicted exposure expressed in milligrams Kilogram of dry weight soil.
Assessment services assess the potential for exposure and effects on soil microorganisms.
1 A micro-organism can present risks by its potential to hinder the mineralization of nitrogen and carbon in the soil. It will be considered if the identified risks could be changed or not due to the formulation of the phytosanitary product, taking into account the following information on the micro-organism:
2 Experimental data are not normally required, particularly where it can be proved that a true risk assessment can be carried out on the basis of the information available.
Evaluation services assess the impact of exotic/non-native micro-organisms on non-target organisms and their predators after the use of the phytosanitary product in accordance with the expected conditions of use. Experimental data are not normally required, in particular where it can be demonstrated that an appropriate risk assessment can be carried out with the available information.
A phytosanitary product may result in toxic effects due to the action of toxins or co-formulants. In assessing such effects, the following information should be taken into account:
The approval service draws conclusions on the need for further information and/or testing and on the need for measures to mitigate risks. The evaluation services justify the proposals for classification and labelling of the plant health product.
1 Where appropriate, the approval service shall attach conditions or restrictions to the authorisations. The nature and severity of these conditions or restrictions must be determined by the nature and extent of the benefits and risks that can be expected and adapted to them.
2 The approval service shall ensure that decisions taken to grant authorisations take into account the agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions, including climatic conditions, in the areas of use envisaged. These considerations may lead to the establishment of conditions and restrictions of use, or even to the exclusion of certain areas from the authorisation.
3 The approval service shall ensure that the permitted quantities in terms of doses and number of approved applications represent the minimum values necessary to achieve the desired effect, even when higher values would not result in No unacceptable risks to human or animal health or to the environment. The authorised quantities must be modulated according to the agronomic, phytosanitary, environmental, including climatic conditions, of the various areas for which authorisation is granted and to be adapted to it. However, the doses to be used and the number of applications should not produce any undesirable effects, such as the development of resistance.
4 The approval service shall ensure that decisions comply with the principles of integrated pest management when the phytosanitary product is intended to be used in a situation involving such principles.
5 Based on data on a limited number of representative species, the approval service must ensure that the use of plant protection products does not have a long-term impact on abundance and Diversity of non-target species.
6 An authorisation shall be granted only if all the requirements set out in point 2.4 are met. However, where it is not fully satisfied with one or more specific requirements of the decision-making process referred to in point 2.4, authorisation shall be granted only if the advantages offered by the use of the phytosanitary product in the Conditions prevail over its possible adverse effects. Any limitations on the use of the phytosanitary product related to non-compliance with the requirements set out in section 2 must be indicated on the label. These benefits may include:
7 Where an authorisation is granted on the basis of the requirements set out in this Annex, the approval service may:
The approval service shall inform the applicants of any measure referred to in the paragraph. A or b and invites them to provide any additional information necessary to demonstrate the performance or potential risks of the product under the new conditions of use.
8 The approval service shall ensure, to the extent possible, that for all micro-organisms for which authorisation is envisaged, the applicant shall take into account all relevant knowledge and information of the publications in the Material that is available at the time of application.
9 If a microorganism has been genetically modified, authorization is granted only if it meets the requirements of the ODE.
10 Authorisation is not granted if relevant metabolites/toxins (i.e. those capable of affecting human health and/or the environment) that are known to be produced by the micro-organism and/or microbial contaminants are Present in the phytosanitary product, unless it can be demonstrated that the present quantity remains at an acceptable level, before and after the intended use.
11 The approval service shall ensure that adequate quality control measures are implemented in order to ensure the identity of the microorganism and the contents of the phytosanitary product. These quality control measures must include a Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) system 8 ) Or an equivalent system.
The specific principles shall apply without prejudice to the general principles set out in section 1.
For each authorisation granted, the approval service shall ensure that the microorganism concerned is deposited with a collection of international micro-organisms and has a corresponding deposit number. Each microorganism must be identified, designated by its species name and characterized at the level of the strain. Information must also indicate whether the microorganism is of a wild type or a spontaneous or induced mutant or genetically modified organism.
Sufficient information must be provided to estimate the minimum and maximum content of micro-organisms in the material used in the manufacture of plant protection products, as well as in the phytosanitary product. The content of other components and formulants of the phytosanitary product and micro-organisms resulting from the production process must, to the extent possible, be sufficiently defined. The approval service ensures that the level of the contaminant organisms is controlled at an acceptable level. In addition, the nature and physical condition of the plant health product should be clarified, preferably in accordance with the " Catalogue of the types of pesticide formulations and the international code system 9 .
No authorisation shall be granted if, at any stage in the development of the microplant product, it is clear that, on the basis of the development of resistance, or of a transfer of resistance, or of any other mechanism, it may Interference with the effectiveness of an antimicrobial agent used in human or animal medicine.
Authorisation shall not be granted, unless complete information is provided for continuous quality control of the mode of production, production process and phytosanitary product. In particular, it is important to consider any spontaneous modification of the essential characteristics of the microorganism as well as the presence or absence of contaminating organisms. The quality assurance criteria applicable to the production and the techniques used to guarantee a uniform phytosanitary product must, to the extent possible, be described and specified.
The authorisation shall not be granted where the proposed uses include recommendations for the fight or protection against organisms which are not considered harmful on the basis of the experience and the scientific acquis In the agronomic, phytosanitary, environmental, including climatic conditions, normal of the areas of use provided for, or where the other effects sought are not considered beneficial under those conditions.
The control, protection or other effects sought must have an intensity, consistency and duration of action equivalent to those offered by the use of appropriate reference products. If there is no suitable reference product, it must be established that the use of the phytosanitary product in the agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions, including climatic conditions, of the intended use area shall include a A specified benefit in terms of intensity, consistency and duration of control, protection or other desired effects.
Where appropriate, the evolution of the yield obtained during the use of the phytosanitary product and the reduction of losses during storage must be similar, quantitatively and/or qualitatively, to those resulting from the use of products Appropriate reference. If there is no suitable reference product, it must be established that the use of the phytosanitary product in the agronomic, phytosanitary and environmental conditions, including climatic conditions, of the intended use area shall include a Sustainable and determined, quantitatively and/or qualitatively, in terms of the evolution of yield and reduction of losses during storage.
The conclusions regarding the effectiveness of the preparation must be applicable to all regions and apply for all the conditions of use provided for, except where the proposed labelling specifies that the preparation must be used in Certain specific conditions (e.g. Light infestations, specific soil types, specific crop conditions).
Where the label provides that the preparation is to be used in combination with other specific plant or plant protection products, the mixture shall achieve the desired effect and comply with the principles set out in points 2.4.1.1 to 2.4.1.4.
When the label recommends using the mixture with other specific phytosanitary or adjuvants, the recommendations are accepted only if they are justified.
In the presence of evidence of the development of resistance to the phytosanitary product of pathogenic organisms, the approval service decides whether the management strategy of the resistance which has been submitted addresses this problem adequately and Sufficient.
Only phytosanitary products containing non-viable micro-organisms may be permitted to control vertebrate species. The desired effect on vertebrates against which the fight is fought must be obtained without suffering or unnecessary pain for these animals.
There can be no relevant phytotoxic effects on treated plants or plant products unless the intended label refers to appropriate employment restrictions.
At harvest time, yield must not be reduced due to phytotoxic effects that reduce it to below the level that could be achieved without the use of the phytosanitary product, unless the reduction is compensated by others Benefits such as a qualitative improvement of treated plants or plant products.
There can be no unacceptable adverse effects on the quality of treated plants or plant products, with the exception of adverse effects on processing, where the intended label specifies that the preparation should not be applied to the Crops for processing.
There can be no unacceptable adverse effects on treated plants or plant products used for propagation or reproduction, including effects on viability, germination, shoot, rooting, and establishment, except Where the intended label specifies that the preparation should not be applied to plants or plant products intended for propagation or reproduction.
There can be no unacceptable impact on the following crops, except where the intended label specifies that certain plants are susceptible to the product and should not be grown after the treated crop.
There can be no unacceptable impact on neighbouring crops, except where the intended label recommends not to apply the preparation when some neighbouring crops are particularly sensitive.
Where the intended label requires the use of the mixture with other plant protection products or adjuvants, the mixture shall meet the principles set out in 2.4.2.1 to 2.4.2.6.
The instructions for cleaning up the application equipment must be clear, effective, so that it can be readily applicable in order to ensure the elimination of any residual trace of the plant health product that is likely to cause Later damage.
The methods proposed should reflect the most recent techniques. Post-approval monitoring methods should include the use of reagents and equipment usually available.
The authorisation shall not be granted in the absence of an appropriate method of sufficient quality to identify and quantify the micro-organism and the non-viable components (e.g. Toxins, impurities and co-formulants) in the phytosanitary product. In the case of a phytosanitary product containing several micro-organisms, it is appropriate that the recommended methods identify and determine the content of each of them.
The authorisation shall not be granted in the absence of appropriate control methods and post-registration monitoring of viable and/or non-viable residues. Methods must be available for analysis:
The authorisation shall not be granted if it appears, on the basis of the information provided in the file, that the microorganism is pathogenic to humans or non-target animals under the conditions of intended use.
1 The authorisation shall not be granted if the micro-organism and/or the plant health product containing the microorganism could, under the recommended conditions of use, including a realistic approach to the most unfavourable case, colonise or cause Adverse effects on humans or animals.
2 When making decisions concerning the authorisation of the microbial pest product, the approval service shall take into account the possible effects on all human populations, namely professional, non-professional users and Other presentations directly or indirectly by the environment and work, and on animals.
1 All micro-organisms should be considered as potential sensitizers, unless it is established through relevant information that there is no risk of sensitization, taking into account also immunocompromised persons or Other sensitive people. It is therefore appropriate that the authorisations granted specify that appropriate protective clothing and gloves should be worn and that the plant health product containing the microorganism should not be inhaled. In addition, the conditions of intended use may require the use of additional articles in terms of clothing and protective equipment.
2 Where the conditions of use require the wearing of protective clothing or equipment, the authorization shall be granted only if those articles are effective, can be easily obtained by the user and can be used in the Conditions for the application of the plant health product, taking into account, in particular, climatic conditions.
The authorisation shall not be granted if it is established that the transfer of genetic material from the microorganism to other organisms is likely to have adverse effects on human or animal health, including resistance to substances Known therapeutics.
Phytosanitary products which, because of certain properties, or which, in the event of an error of handling or use, may present high risks, must be subject to specific restrictions concerning in particular the dimensions of Packaging, type of formulation, distribution, mode and conditions of employment. In addition, phytosanitary products classified as highly toxic may not be permitted for use by non-professional users.
The periods of waiting and re-entry and other precautions must be defined in such a way that there is no colonisation or detrimental effects on the persons present or workers exposed after the application of the product Plant.
Periods of waiting and re-entry and other precautions must be defined in such a way that there is no colonization or adverse effects on animals.
Periods of waiting and re-entry and other precautions to ensure that there is no colonization or harmful effects must be realistic; special precautions must be taken when necessary.
The conditions of the authorisation must comply with Directive 98 /24/EC 10 And Directive 2000 /54/EC 11 The experimental data and information provided with respect to the recognition of symptoms of infection or pathogenicity and the effectiveness of first aid and therapeutic measures should be examined. The conditions of the authorisation will also be in accordance with Directive 2004 /37/EC 12 The conditions of the authorisation must also be in conformity with Directive 89 /656/EEC 13 .
The authorisation shall not be granted in the absence of sufficient information on the plant protection products containing the microorganism, making it possible to ensure that there are no adverse effects on human and/or animal health arising from exposure to the Microorganism, residual traces and metabolites/toxins remaining in or on plants or plant products.
The authorisation shall not be granted if the viable residues and/or the non-viable residues present reflect the quantities of the minimum phytosanitary products necessary for adequate control according to good agricultural practices, including Application procedures (including pre-harvest periods of employment, or retention periods or storage periods) minimize the presence of residues and/or toxins at the time of harvest, slaughter or after storage.
Authorisation shall not be granted if available information indicates that harmful and unacceptable consequences for the environment may result from the fate and behaviour of the phytosanitary product in the environment.
Authorisation shall not be granted if the contamination of groundwater, surface waters or intended drinking water due to the use of a phytosanitary product under the proposed conditions of use may cause Interference with analytical systems used to control the quality of intended drinking water.
No authorization shall be granted where the concentration of the microorganism in groundwater used as drinking water or intended to be used for drinking water does not meet the requirements of Annex 2, c. 22, OWaters, unless it has been scientifically demonstrated that, under relevant field conditions, the lowest parameters or concentrations are not violated or exceeded.
1 The authorisation shall not be granted if the contamination of the surface waters provided for by the use of the plant health product under the proposed conditions of use:
2 Proposed instructions for use of the phytosanitary product, including the method of cleaning the application equipment, must minimize the likelihood of accidental contamination of surface waters.
Permission is not granted if it is established that the transfer of genetic material from the microorganism to other organisms is likely to result in unacceptable environmental impacts.
The authorisation shall not be granted in the absence of sufficient information on the potential persistence/competitiveness of the micro-organism and relevant secondary metabolites/toxins in or on culture, in environmental conditions Existing at and after the intended use.
Authorization is not granted if the micro-organism and/or its potential relevant metabolites/toxins can be expected to persist in the environment at concentrations considerably higher than at the natural levels, in Taking into account repeated applications over time, unless a sound risk assessment indicates that the risks arising from the concentrations of the accumulation tray are acceptable.
The approval service shall ensure that the information available is sufficient to allow for the adoption of a decision on whether or not there may be unacceptable impacts on non-target species (flora and Fauna), due to the exposure to the phytosanitary product containing the microorganism as a result of its intended use.
The approval service pays particular attention to the possible effects on useful organisms used for biological control and those that play an important role in an integrated pest management system Harmful.
Permission is not granted in the event of potential exposure of birds and other non-target terrestrial vertebrates if:
There is no authorization for potential exposure of aquatic organisms if:
No authorisation shall be granted in the case of potential exposure of bees if:
No authorization is granted in the event of potential exposure of arthropods other than bees if:
No authorisation shall be granted in the event of potential exposure of earthworms if the organism is pathogenic to earthworms or in the event of toxic effects due to the components of the plant health product, such as metabolites/toxins The acute toxicity/exposure ratio is less than 10 or the long-term toxicity/exposure ratio is less than 5 unless an appropriate risk assessment specifically establishes in the field conditions the populations of Worms are not at risk after the use of the phytosanitary product in the Conditions.
No authorization is granted for potential exposure of non-target soil microorganisms if nitrogen or carbon mineralization tests carried out in the laboratory reveal a change in these processes by more than 25 % after A hundred days unless an appropriate risk assessment specifically establishes that, in the field conditions, the use of the phytosanitary product under the prescribed conditions will not have an unacceptable impact on microbial activity, Given the ability to multiply micro-organisms.
1 See note on art. 86, para. 1, let. A
2 Non-extractable residues in plants and soils are defined as chemical species from pesticides used in accordance with good agricultural practice, which cannot be extracted by methods that do not Significantly alter the chemical nature of the tailings. These non-extractable residues are considered to exclude all fragments by metabolic transformation into natural products.
3 Manual on Development and Use of FAO Specifications for Plant Protection Products. Fifth Edition, prepared by the Group on Specifications of the FAO panel of experts on Pesticide Specifications, Registration Requirements and Application Standards and Prior Informed Consent, January 1999.
4 RS 817.021.23
5 RS 814.201
6 RS 814.911
7 See note on art. 86, para. 1, let a
8 FAO & WHO. 2003. Recommended international codex of practice. General principles of food hygiene, CAC/RCP 1-1969, Rev. 4-2003, including "Annex on Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) System and Guidelines for its Application"
9 International Technical Monograph CropLife No. 2, 5 E Publishing, 2002
10 Council Directive 98 /24/EC of 7 April 1998 on the protection of the health and safety of workers against risks linked to chemical agents in the workplace, OJ L 131, 5.5.1998, p. 11; last amended by Directive 2007 /30/EC, OJ L 165, 27.6.2007, p. 21.
11 Directive 2000 /54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18. 2000 on the protection of workers against the risks associated with exposure to biological agents at work in OJ L 262, 17.10.2000, p. 21.
12 Directive 2004 /37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the protection of workers against risks arising from exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at work in the version of OJ L 204, 4.8.2007, p. 28.
13 Council Directive 89 /656/EEC of 30 November 1989 concerning minimum safety and health requirements for the use by workers of the work of personal protective equipment, OJ L 393, 30.12.1989, p. 18; last amended by Directive 2007 /30/EC, OJ L 165, 27.6.2007, p. 21.
(art. 9 and 10)
Common Name, Identification Number |
UICPA Name |
N O CASES |
Enrolment in this Annex |
Type of action taken/Specific conditions |
Carbendazim |
Methyl benzimidazol-2-ylcarbamate |
10605-21-7 |
1.01.2016 |
Fungicide |
Ioxynil |
4-Hydroxy-3,5-di-iodobenzonitrile Variant : octanoate Variant : ioxynil butyrate Variant :ioxynil sodium |
1689-83-4 3861-47-0 2961-62-8 |
1.01.2016 |
Herbicide |
Tepraloxydim |
2 - [1 - (3-chlor - (2E) - propenyloxyimino) propyl] -3 - hydroxy-5 - (tetrahydropyran-4-yl) cyclohex-2-enon |
149979-41-9 |
1.01.2016 |
Herbicide |
1 Update as per c. I of the O du DEFR of 17 June 2011 ( RO 2011 2927 ), of Dec 11. 2012 (RO 2013 249), 12 Nov 2014 (RO 2014 4215) and c. II de l' O du DEFR du 28 oct. 2015, in force since 1 Er Jan 2016 (RO) 2015 4555).
(art. 55 and 56)
Any package of plant health product shall be legibly and indelibly marked as follows:
1 Introduced by c. II al. 2 of the O of 23 May 2012, in force since 1 Er Dec. 2012 ( RO 2012 3451 ).
2 The IUPAC nomenclature rules can be consulted with the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry under www.iupac.org