Article 1 of the decision of the authorities in Denmark, Finland,
Iceland or Norway shall be taken care of for the care or
treatment, after the production be extradited according to what is being said
in this law for the enforcement of the decision.
If handover is violations of specific provisions.
Specific provisions also exist in Council Regulation (EC) no
2201/2003 of 27 november 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the
recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and in matters
of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) no
1347/2000. Law (2011:1168).
section 2 of the Extradition may be granted only under conditions
that representation be based on decisions under the appropriate State
relating to temperance care or care of drug users,
child and youth care, care of the mentally ill, cares about the mentally
retarded or action against defaulting parents or
a public menace asocial,
to the person who is claimed to be extradited under the decision be taken or
remain on the establishment or residence on the site that specifically
assigned him and
that decision may be enforced in the State in which it is announced.
paragraph 3 of the Swedish citizen may be extradited only if he is domiciled in the
State in which the decision and the decision relating to care and it is most
appropriate to the care reconstitute him in that State.
section 4 of the request for extradition is made with police authorities.
Law (2014:637).
5 § Finds Police that the conditions for extradition are
met and that extradition should not be refused on other
as a result, the Police inform the decision on extradition.
Decides on extradition, the police authority shall not
promptly be sent to the Administrative Court for decision.
Law (2014:637).
6 § when the case is handled by the police, interrogation
held with the requested extradition, if his or her
hearing is of no relevance to the investigation. Are dealt with
the case of an Administrative Tribunal, the hearing
kept in the same condition. The question arises as to the
requested extradition after the notice of hearing or oral
negotiation, he or she is brought into the hearing or
the hearing.
Decision on extradition shall be granted without the requested
extradition has been informed of the case by the introduced
someone other than him or herself and had the opportunity to
comment on the law (2014:637).
7 repealed by Act (1973:132).
section 8 Can it reasonably be expected that the requested extradition
deviating or otherwise evading extradition, it may
authority to which the case is pending in notify him or
her ban without permission to leave the place of residence that is
the designated (travel ban) or decide that he or she should
disposed.
Notify the police authority decision pursuant to the first subparagraph before
the issue of extradition has been tried, it must refer to a travel ban
for a maximum of 10 days or care for a maximum of three
days. In the case referred to in paragraph 5, second subparagraph,
The police authority or administrative court shall decide on
travel bans or disposal of time to its
the Administrative Court ruled on the matter. If extradition is granted,
it decreed that the decision on travel bans or disposal
to apply for the time until the extradition decision
are enforced.
There are no longer grounds for a banning or
disposal, should the decision be immediately lifted.
Law (2014:637).
section 9 Is anyone wanted in Sweden on the occasion of the decision
can give rise to extradition under this Act,
The police inform him or her travel ban or
decide if he or she should be pending
request for extradition. Such a decision may be communicated only
If there is probable cause that a request for extradition
will be accepted and it could reasonably be expected that the
wanted to deviate, or otherwise have evaded
extradition. The authority requesting the call to
immediately be informed of the action taken.
Decision referred to in the first subparagraph shall immediately be lifted, when
There are no longer grounds for action or
request for extradition has not been received within five days
from the date on which the action was taken. Since the production has come
in, travel bans or disposal consist only of
This decision is notified under section 8. Law (2014:637).
paragraph 10 of the decision on extradition shall be notified without delay.
Is the one who cared for according to section 8 of the extradition is claimed, shall
administrative law, if not particularly obstacles encountered, notify
decision within five days from the date on which the documents received at the
the administrative court or, if the disposition occurred afterwards,
within the same period from the date of disposal.
Has the decision on extradition or if the measure referred to in paragraph 8 or 9
granted, the decision along with an urgent appeal referring
be notified to the who decision. Law (2009:781).
section 11 of the Police decision under this Act may be appealed
to the General Administrative Court. Leave to appeal is required at
appeal to the administrative court.
A decision on extradition under this Act must be appealed within
one week from the date of notification of the decision to the appellant. A
decision on travel bans or disposal may be
be appealed without limitation for some time. Law (2014:637).
section 12 a decision on travel bans or disposal case
immediately.
The police authority and the administrative court may, when there is
special reasons, order that its decision on extradition shall
immediately enforceable. The decision of the Court, the Chamber of extradition
immediately enforceable, unless the Court decides otherwise.
Law (2014:637).
section 13 if anyone should be disclosed under this Act shall, as a condition
be established that he or she may not be prosecuted or
punished for any other offence committed before extradition,
on the other hand does not get vidareöverlämnas or vidareutlämnas to a
State outside the Nordic region. It does not apply if the disclosed
have consented to the operation, or had the opportunity to leave the
receiving the Nordic state but not done so within 45 days
After his final discharge, or has returned there after
have left the country.
On the preparation of the receiving State may deviate in the Nordic
from the condition. If the request applies to prosecutions or
penalties for other offences committed prior to the transfer, the
Chapter 5. section 7 of the Act (2011:1165) on surrender from Sweden
According to a Nordic arrest warrant is applied. The trial should
also include whether a surrender for the deed could have been
granted under Chapter 2. 5 § 1 – 3 the same law. If the representation
applies further handover or re-extradition to a State
outside the Nordic countries, Chapter 6. section 8 of the Act (2003:1156) on
the surrender from Sweden according to the European arrest warrant
or section 24 of the Act (1957:668) on extradition for criminal offences apply.
The competent District Court for review under arresteringsorderlagen is
The Stockholm District Court. Law (2011:1168).
section 14 of the person extradited from the State referred to in paragraph 1 to such other State
may be brought by the Kingdom without special permission.
section 15 case or case concerning disclosure for enforcement of
decisions about care or treatment, the public counsel appointed
for that action relates, unless it must be assumed that the need for
assistance is lacking. Law (1996:1633).
Transitional provisions
1970:375
This law shall enter into force with respect to Denmark, Finland and Norway
on 1 January 1971, as well as in relation to Iceland the day Government
determines. Act (1974:911).
2011:1168
1. this law shall enter into force on the day the Government determines.
2. Older provisions apply to cases of extradition that have
initiated prior to the entry into force.