Advanced Search

Act (1974:191) For Security Companies

Original Language Title: Lag (1974:191) om bevakningsföretag

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
section 1 With security companies referred to in this law, the

Professional undertakes on behalf of others



1. monitor real estate, construction, certain activities, public

event or anything else like that,



2. monitor the individual for his or her protection, or



3. monitoring banknotes, coins or other property in connection with

transport.



The law does not apply to surveillance carried out by governmental or

municipal authority. It does not apply to surveillance carried out

of the individual, if he only fulfills missions with the support of

an order given to him by an authority under the

a provision of the law. Law (2006:517).



section 2 of the security company must not engage in activities referred to in

Article 1, first paragraph without authorization under this Act

(authorisation).



The prescribed training of staff responsible for carrying out the

monitoring service may be made only after authorisation under

This law. Companies without security companies engaged in

such training called training companies. Law (2006:517).



2 a of the New designation 16 § by law (2009:311).



section 3 Authorisation may be granted only if it can be assumed that

activities



1. will be carried out in a proper and judicious manner

and otherwise in accordance with good practice in the industry,



2. will not get one from the public point of view inappropriate

orientation, and



3. will comply with the requirements of the business of the

kind the company must carry out.



At trial referred to in the first subparagraph shall in particular be taken into account

the company has an adequate organization and planning of

their activities.



Authorization is also required that the company has appointed a

person as Director of operations. Law (2006:517).



3 a of the decision on the authorisation shall specify the

or the nature of the activities which the authorization relates.

Law (2006:517).



3 b/expires U: 2016-04-15/

A single person who occasionally conducts

investigation activities or training in Sweden have, without

obstacle of section 3, the authorisation of the operation if he or

She



1. have submitted a complete notification,



2. comply with the conditions for the authorisation of temporary

activities are subject to regulations that have been issued

under this Act, and



3. has been informed in writing that the conditions

According to 1 and 2 are fulfilled.



What is now required by law, however, only the



1. jurisdiction to conduct investigation activities or

training in another State within the European economic

area or Switzerland, or



2. for at least two years out of the last ten years has been

such activities in the other State, if the profession is not

regulated there.



The Government may provide for exemptions from the requirement

that a person should have been notified within the meaning of the first subparagraph 3

for obtaining authorisation. Law (2009:311).



3 b/entry into force: 04/15/2016

A single person who occasionally conducts surveillance activities or training in Sweden, despite section 3, the authorisation of activities if he or she



1. have submitted a complete notification,



2. comply with the conditions for temporary mobility imposed by law (2016:145) on the recognition of professional qualifications and the regulations issued in connection with the Act, and



3. has been advised in writing of the conditions under 1 and 2 are fulfilled.



The Government, with the support of Chapter 8. section 7 of the Constitution provide for derogation from the requirement that a person must have been informed in accordance with the first paragraph 3 to have authorisation. Law (2016:146).



section 4 of the All staff of a licensed security company shall

be approved by the examination as to obedience to the law,

civic reliability and suitability for the rest of

employment in such companies. The same goes for the Superintendent

for operations, as well as members and alternate members of the

the watch company's Board. Law (2006:517).



4 a of/expires U: 2016-04-15/

The who in a professional security company

temporarily working in Sweden is, by way of derogation from paragraph 4, approved

for the work if he or she



1. have submitted a complete notification,



2. comply with the conditions of approval for the temporary

work that is subject to regulations that have been issued with

virtue of this Act, and



3. has been informed in writing that the conditions

According to 1 and 2 are fulfilled.



What is now required by law, however, only the



1. is authorized to work in the activities covered by

This law is in a State of the European economic

area or Switzerland, or



2. for at least two years out of the last ten years has worked in

such activities in the other State, if the profession is not

regulated there.



The Government may provide for exemptions from the requirement

that a person should have been notified within the meaning of the first subparagraph 3

in order to be approved. Law (2009:311).



4 a section/entry into force: 04/15/2016

The one of an authorized security companies working temporarily in Sweden is, despite paragraph 4, approved for the work if he or she



1. have submitted a complete notification,



2. comply with the conditions for temporary mobility imposed by law (2016:145) on the recognition of professional qualifications and the regulations issued in connection with the Act, and



3. has been advised in writing of the conditions under 1 and 2 are fulfilled.



The Government, with the support of Chapter 8. section 7 of the Constitution provide for derogation from the requirement that a person must have been informed in accordance with the first paragraph 3 in order to be approved.

Law (2016:146).



§ 4 b/entry into force: 04/15/2016

Provisions on the recognition of professional qualifications acquired or recognised in a State other than Sweden within the European economic area or Switzerland, see law (2016:145) on the recognition of professional qualifications and in the regulations issued in connection with the Act.

Law (2016:146).



section 5 questions about authorization be reviewed by the County Administrative Board.



The County Board shall seek the opinion of the police force before

the granting of an authorisation.



Government Announces rules on which County boards that

responsible for the information under this Act. Law (2014:582).



section 6 of the Examination referred to in paragraph 4 are made by the County Board.



An authorisation as referred to in paragraph 4 may be limited to a fixed period, if the

There are special reasons.



Questions about the approval in accordance with paragraph 4 (a) examined by the provincial government.

Law (2012:79).



section 7 of The approved for employment in the security company and has to

responsible for conducting the monitoring service (the guardians) have the protection referred to in

Chapter 17. section 5 of the Penal Code when he performs such service. Law (1989:148).



section 8 monitoring and Supervision of professional

training companies is exercised by the County Administrative Board. Other authorities

County Board must, on request, provide the assistance required

supervision.



At the County Administrative Board of supervision must in particular ensure that the

conditions for authorisation referred to in paragraph 3 is still

met. Law (2012:79).



section 9 Authorized monitoring and training companies,

leave the County Board with the information on the activities that the

requests for their supervision.



The companies before the end of March each year submit a

statement of the previous year's activities to the provincial government.



As provided for in the second subparagraph shall not apply to activities which

referred to in paragraph 3 (b). Law (2009:311).



section 10 of the County Administrative Board has the right to inspect the authorized monitoring and

training companies and to take advantage of all the documents relating to

corporate security activities or training of guardians.

The inspection shall be made as soon as there is a reason for it, however,

at least once every two years. Law (1989:148).



11 § Fails an authorized guard or educational enterprises

to provide information as referred to in paragraph 9, to submit

statement pursuant to section 9, second paragraph, or to provide access to

documents under section 10, the County Board shall submit to the penalty. Law (1989:148).



section 12 of the County Board may submit an authorized guard or

training companies to take the corrections and other measures

prompted by the oversight. The order may be subject to a penalty.

Law (1989:148).



section 13, An authorisation may be withdrawn if it no longer

conditions under this Act for authorization

or when there is particular reason to

the recall.



Instead of withdrawing the authorisation, the County Administrative Board

limit it to cover certain or some kind of

activities.



Questions concerning the withdrawal of authorisations be reviewed by the

the County Administrative Board that supervises the undertaking concerned.

When dealing with such a matter, the County Administrative Board to obtain

Police opinion. Such an opinion is needed, however,

not if the reason for the withdrawal is that the company has

been declared bankrupt or has itself requested that

authorisation shall be withdrawn.



A decision on the withdrawal of authorisation or a

restriction of the scope of the licence remaining valid immediately,

unless otherwise decreed. Law (2014:582).



13 a of an authorisation as referred to in paragraph 4 may be withdrawn when not in

longer is possible under this law for approval

or when there is particular reason to

the recall. Approval shall be withdrawn when the

the authorisation concerns has left his employment or his

Mission of a licensed security company and not in

three months have shown that he or she has received a new

employment or a new assignment at such companies.




If there are serious reasons, the County Administrative Board in place of the

to revoke an approval limit it to a certain

activity or to a particular area.



Questions about the withdrawal of approval are examined by the

the County Board has approved the examination relates or, if

the question concerns the Director of operations or a Member

or a Deputy member of the Board of Directors of the

the County Administrative Board that supervises the company.



A withdrawal decision of or restriction on a

approval shall be effective immediately, unless otherwise decreed.

Law (2006:517).



section 13 (b) in the case of transactions referred to in section 3 (b) and section 4 applies

to the County Government, if it considers that there are grounds for

withdrawal of authorization or approval under 13 and

13 (a) sections, may declare that the person no longer has

authorisation and is approved. In the other case

the provisions of §§ 13 and 13A, mutatis mutandis, to such

activity. Law (2012:79).



section 14 to a fine or imprisonment not exceeding six months convicted the

intentionally or negligently engaged in activities referred to in paragraph 1 of the

the first paragraph without authorization or provide false information in the case that

referred to in section 9. Law (1989:148).



section 15 of the County Administrative Board's decision in cases under this Act,

be appealed to the administrative court.



The police authority may appeal against decisions of the County Administrative Board in

cases for authorization.



Leave to appeal is required for an appeal to the administrative court.

Law (2014:582).



paragraph 16 of the Government or the authority, as the Government determines

may announce further provisions on the authorisation and

approval, as well as on the conditions for the activities covered

of this law. Law (2009:311).



Transitional provisions



1989:148



1. this law shall enter into force on 1 July 1989.



2. Other than authorized security company which at its entry into force

carrying out the prescribed training of security guards, provided

application for authorization of such activities is made before 1 October

in 1989, continue the operation until the application has been finally been heard.

Rejected application may, in special circumstances, still be allowed to

the operation may continue for a certain transitional period.



3. A licensed security company that at the time of entry into force is engaged in

activities for the coverage of the individual for his/her protection or

the prescribed training of guardians do not need authorization of this

activities subject to the prior to the entry into force has been given

known to the supervisory authority.



4. in the case of an appeal and the subordination of decisions

granted prior to the entry into force for older provisions.



1995:34



This law shall enter into force on 1 april 1995. Decision given

before the entry into force in accordance with the provisions of the older appeal.



2006:517



1. this law shall enter into force on 1 July 2006. The provision in paragraph 4 of the

on the approval of the Deputy members shall be applied

until 1 July 2007.



2. A decision on the authorisation which has been granted in accordance with the elderly

provisions apply to the far end of June 2007. If a

guarding or training company that has been granted

authorisation under older rules before the end of June

2007 brings an application to operate according to the

new rules, also for older authorization decisions

Thereafter, until the issue of new authorisation

final has been decided.