Advanced Search

Law (1981:1064) On Safety Control In Court

Original Language Title: Lag (1981:1064) om säkerhetskontroll i domstol

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
Prerequisites for safety control



paragraph 1 of the safeguards in court may be conducted if such

control is needed to limit the risk to it in a

Court facilities, or in other premises used for

Court hearing committed crimes that involve serious danger to

someone's life, health or freedom or for extensive

destruction of property. Law (2012:325).



Decision on safety control



section 2 of the Security control is decided by the Court of Justice's head or any

other legally qualified judges that he or she has delegated

the decision-making power to. Should safeguards be implemented with

reason of a particular negotiation, it may also be decided by the

the right.



Before security control are decided to be consulted

The police authorities and, if control is to be implemented with

reason of a particular hearing in criminal cases, with the Prosecutor.

Consultation need not be made if it is clear

unnecessary.



A decision on the security check shall be given

time, at the latest three months, or a particular negotiation. In

the decision shall specify the premises to which the control will be

cover. Law (2014:645).



The control's extent



section 3 a security check covers those who are called to

attend a hearing and other visitors to the premises

as the decision on the security check is for. Control includes

not, however, the Court's employees or jurors and others

appear in the premises concerned in the exercise of public service

or public office nor lawyers. If the

There are special reasons, pursuant to article 2 of the order

If the current security authority to exempt other people

from control or decide to people that would otherwise

be excluded shall be covered by this. Law (2012:325).



Implementation of control



section 4 of the security checks are carried out, after more detailed instructions

by the police, by a security guard under the guidance of a

police officer or by a police officer. Law (2014:645).



§ 5 At a security check to weapons and other objects

are intended to be used in the offence referred to in paragraph 1 of the

Search. For this purpose, a physical examination be carried out

and bags and other objects found in the premises

subject to security screening investigation.



Strip search and examination of the bags and other items

should be carried out with a metal detector or other similar

device or, if there are special reasons, on the other

way.



On physical examination or examination of bags and

other items to be carried out otherwise than by

metal detector or other similar device, the task

be carried out by a police officer or by a security guard who

The police authority has approved for such tasks.



Identity checks may be carried out only in order to determine

If a person claims not covered by

security check should be excluded from the control.

Law (2014:645).



section 6 of The who refuses to undergo a security check should not

access to the premises to which the control cover.



If someone is called to a hearing before the Court of Justice

refuses to undergo a security check, this must immediately

be notified to the Court. The Court shall then determine whether the person has

refused to undergo a security check should be excluded from this.

May the one who refuses to undergo a security check will be downloaded to

the Court, if he or she fails to appear, the Court may decide to

the person despite his refusal to undergo the control.

Law (2012:325).



section 7 is found at a security checkpoint some such objects

referred to in the first sentence of paragraph and put it

not seized in accordance with the provisions of the code of judicial procedure, shall

most of what the subject matter is encountered, asked to leave the

Let out for storage. Anyone who does not comply with such a

solicitation may be removed from the premises of the Court or the other

premises used for the court hearing, unless otherwise

follows from the second paragraph. Is the proprietor of a detected

subject unknown, it must be disposed of.



If someone is called to a hearing before the Court is not

following a request under the first subparagraph shall

be notified immediately to the Court. The Court must then determine whether the

who have refused to leave the object out access

but to leave it out.,

refused to surrender the item is downloaded to the Court, if

He or she fails to appear, the Court may decide that the subject-matter in spite of

the person's refusal to be disposed of for storage. Law (2012:325).



Special provisions regarding the storage of objects



section 8, items that have been left to the storage or disposed

According to this law shall be stored in a reliable manner. On

request a proof that an item has been submitted to the

storage or seized shall be issued. Object

be returned to those who have left it to the storage or

from what it seized when it leaves the premises

control cover. Law (2012:325).



Specific provisions on strip search



section 9 physical examination that is of more substantial basis should

be carried out in a remote location and, if possible, in the witness

presence.



A physical examination may be carried out or witnessed only by a

person of the same sex as the person who should be liable to search, if

the survey does not take place through the use of the metal detector

or other similar device or object that the

frisked brings. Law (2012:325).



Ban appeal



paragraph 10 of the decision of the Court of Justice under this law may not be appealed.