Conditions for refusal of access, etc.
1 § according to this law, a person is forbidden to have access
to and staying on fenced place mainly intended for
Sport when sports events held on the site of
a sports organization (banned). This also applies if
the public has access to the site.
Access order may not refer to anyone who is under the age of 15.
The law does not affect the right of the holding
the place to restrict access to this.
section 2 of A person can be banned if it because of
special circumstances there is a risk that he or she
will commit crimes during sporting events referred to in paragraph 1 of the
and the offence is liable to disturb the order or safety.
In determining whether there is such a risk, it should in particular
be taken into account if the person has previously committed such an offence under
or otherwise in connection with sporting events referred to in section 1.
Offence that the person has committed before the age of fifteen may not
be taken into account.
If the purpose of a refusal of access order can be met by a
less severe measure, the ban is not notified.
The access refusal order may only be notified of the reasons for the action
outweigh the infringement or otherwise which means action
for the individual. Law (2009:100).
paragraph 3 of the refusal of access order shall be valid for a certain period of time, up to three
year.
The access refusal order will take effect immediately, unless otherwise
is determined.
A refusal of access order may be extended by a maximum of one year at a time,
If the conditions of section 2 have been met. Law (2014:107).
4 § a refusal of access order shall be communicated to the prohibition relates.
The service must not be carried out in accordance with 34 to 38, and 47 to 51 of the
procedural law (2010:1932). Law (2010:1975).
paragraph 5 of the questions about the refusal of access order shall be dealt with promptly.
Case processing
section 6 of the public prosecutor examines questions about the refusal of access.
A question of access order included on the written request of
the sports organization that organizes sporting events
the ban referred to protect or of specialidrottsförbundet for
the current sporting activities in Swedish
Riksidrottsförbund.
A question about the refusal of access is also addressed on the notification of
Police authority. The Police Department is not a party in the case
that notice gave rise to. Law (2014:626).
section 7 questions about the refusal of access is being examined by the Prosecutor in the place
where the prohibition is intended to be wholly or mainly employed or
where the against which ban referred to apply is domiciled or
more lasting present. If the person is suspected of
crimes that have a bearing on the question of refusal of access, the
the issue is being examined even by prosecutors with jurisdiction to prosecute
for the crime.
In the case of prosecutors applied Chapter 7. the code of judicial procedure.
§ 8 the Prosecutor may have recourse to the assistance of the police for
investigation of questions about the refusal of access.
With regard to the investigation the following provisions in 23
Cape. the code of judicial procedure:
4 § of objectivity,
section 6 of the right to hold hearings,
section 7 if the subpoenas,
section 9 on the obligation to stay behind for questioning,
section 10 as to who may attend the interrogation,
section 11 of the opportunity to ask questions at the hearing, and
section 12 on the prohibition of unfair measures during interrogations.
For the purposes of Chapter 23. 4 and 11 of the code of judicial procedure to be
the provisions concerning the suspected instead refer to it against
the ban means apply. Law (2014:626).
8 AOF A police officer or other employee of the Police Department
may photograph a person who has or may reasonably be presumed to have
refusal of access under this Act for the purpose of the photograph will be
able to be added to the register in which the police may bring
According to the law (2015:51) on the register of access order at
sporting events. Law (2015:55).
section 9 Before a question concerning the refusal of access order is determined, the person is
party is informed of a task that has been added to the case
by someone other than party and have the opportunity to be heard
over it. The issue may be decided without the transmission, if
the measures are clearly unneeded.
Specialidrottsförbundet for the current sporting activities
in Sweden's Riksidrottsförbund is a party in a case concerning the
access order that has been raised on the notification of
Police authority.
The Prosecutor determines how the notification should occur.
Law (2014:626).
9 a § if the final solution of the problem relating to refusal of access
for special reasons cannot wait, the Prosecutor may decide to
access order will be valid until further notice pending
the issue will be settled definitively. Before such a ban is announced, will
the ban referred to apply to have the opportunity to be heard.
Refusal of access may, however, be communicated without the transmission, if
the decision cannot be postponed.
A refusal referred to in the first subparagraph may apply a maximum of
four weeks. Law (2009:100).
section 9 (b) interferes with any arrangement or compromise the security of
the context of a sporting event, and it can be assumed that a
access order under section 9(a) will be communicated to the
person, is he or she to forbid the police officer required
to go to a hearing to be held immediately afterwards, if
questioning cannot be maintained on the site or otherwise by weight
for the investigation that the prohibition referred to apply to come with
to the hearing. He or she refuses, without valid reason, the
the policeman take him or her to the hearing.
The interrogation is not obliged to remain for questioning
longer than six hours. Law (2009:100).
10 § when the Prosecutor determines a matter of refusal of access or
announces decision pursuant to § 9A, should the decision be in writing
and enter
1. the parties and the police authority if it has made the notification
According to paragraph 6,
2. where the refusal of access order shall be valid and, if so, ban
meaning and scope, as well as when it expires,
3. the reasons which have determined the outcome, including offences
invoked the risk assessment as well as the time and location of the
the crime,
4. the provisions are invoked,
5. What can result from breaking the ban, and
6. possibility to request a review under section 12 and
judicial review under section 13. Law (2014:626).
11 § At the Prosecutor's handling of cases concerning refusal of access
apply in General only the following provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act (1986:223):
4 and 5 sections on Government serviceskyldighet,
section 6 of the co-operation between authorities,
section 7 of the General requirements for the handling of cases,
section 8 of the interpretation,
section 9 of representatives and counsel,
section 14 of the oral procedure,
section 15 of the annotation of data;
20 the second sentence of paragraph 1 and 4 and the second subparagraph of
that reasoning may be omitted, and
section 26 of the correcting typos and the like.
section 12 of the Though that because of changing conditions, there is reason to
the Prosecutor may rescind or modify an access order that
decided by the Prosecutor or the Court. The Prosecutor may, however,
extend a ban only if it is requested by an applicant referred to
in section 6.
The first subparagraph shall not apply, if the ban is subject to
judicial review.
Judicial review
section 13 the District Court shall hear the Prosecutor's decision in the case of
refusal of access at the request of the decision concerns, if
the decision gone against him or her. Such a request should
be made in writing at the Office of the Prosecutor, who shall submit the matter
to the District Court. Includes case decisions on refusal of access
According to section 9 (a), the Prosecutor shall without delay provide case
to the District Court. Law (2009:100).
section 14 of the competent court is the District Court in which the Prosecutor has
examined the question of refusal to initiate proceedings in criminal cases
General.
section 15, the Court shall request the opinion of the Prosecutor, if there are no
is unnecessary.
section 16 of the Court may decide that a refusal of access order until
Furthermore, it shall not apply. If an access order is not
decided earlier, the Court may decide on such a ban
until the case is settled definitively.
section 17 of the Court is to hold a meeting, if a party so requests.
18 § When the District Court decides the matter, it consists of a legally qualified
judges and three lay judges. On the other hand orientation consists
District Court by a legally qualified judges.
At the vote apply the provisions of chapter 29.
the code of judicial procedure.
section 19 each Party shall bear their own costs, except in a
such cases referred to in chapter 18. section 6 of the code of judicial procedure.
20 § In the Court's handling of cases concerning refusal of access
apply otherwise Act (1996:242) about court cases. In question
If the request for examination under section 13 shall apply by way of derogation from the
the Act on the application.
section 21 When the Court is to rule on a decision in the case of
refusal of access and to which ban referred to apply is
suspected of crimes relevant to the examination of the question of
ban, the decision may be examined in proceedings relating to General prosecution concerning
the crime. In such cases, apply the provisions of
the trial in criminal cases.
Criminal liability
section 22 of the offender is convicted of a refusal of access order
violation of the refusal of access to a fine or imprisonment
a maximum of six months.
Transitional provisions
2010:1975
1. This law shall enter into force on 1 april 2011.
2. Older provisions apply where a document has been sent or
submitted by 1 april 2011.
