IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 67.2 OF THE POPULATION REGULATION AND TERRITORIAL DEMARCATION OF LOCAL ENTITIES, APPROVED BY ROYAL DECREE 1690/1986 OF 11 JULY, THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS, TOGETHER WITH THE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR TERRITORIAL COOPERATION, IT HAS DECIDED TO ISSUE THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS TO REGULATE THE OPERATIONS OF RECTIFICATION OF THE MUNICIPAL REGISTER OF INHABITANTS OF 1 JANUARY 1990.

I. REFERENCE DATE AND CONTENT OF THE STANDARD RECTIFICATION

IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 81 (1) OF THE SAID POPULATION REGULATION AND TERRITORIAL DEMARCATION OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITIES, THE ANNUAL CORRECTION OF THE MUNICIPAL REGISTER OF INHABITANTS WITH REFERENCE TO THE POPULATION MUST BE CARRIED OUT. 1 JANUARY 1990.

THIS RECTIFICATION WILL BE CARRIED OUT TAKING INTO ACCOUNT ALL THE ALTERATIONS PRODUCED IN THE RESIDENT POPULATION AS A RESULT OF THE UPS AND DOWNS THAT HAVE TAKEN PLACE DUE TO NATURAL POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND CHANGES IN THE POPULATION. RESIDENCE, AS WELL AS THE CHANGES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED IN THE COURSE OF THE YEAR 1989.

II. RULES FOR THE COMPLETION OF FORMS

IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 81.2 OF THE POPULATION REGULATION, THE STANDARD RECTIFICATION SHALL BE REFLECTED, NUMERICALLY, IN THE OFFICIAL PRINTED MODELS APPROVED BY THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS, EN COLLABORATION WITH THE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR TERRITORIAL COOPERATION.

THESE FORMS ARE AS FOLLOWS:

1. HIGH RESIDENTS IN EACH OF THE SECTIONS OF THE MUNICIPALITY (MOD. A. A.) (SEE ANNEX I.)

IN THIS FORM, THEY SHALL BE ENTERED, USING A LINE FOR EACH SECTION, THE HIGHS THAT HAVE BEEN PRODUCED IN EACH OF THE SECTIONS OF THE MUNICIPALITY, WITH AN INDICATION OF THEIR DISTRIBUTION BY SEX AND BY REASON OF THE HIGH, AND DISTINGUISHING AMONG THE HIGH IN THE SECTION THAT ARE, IN TURN, HIGH IN THE MUNICIPALITY (COLUMNS 3 TO 9), AND THE HIGH IN THE SECTION THAT ARE NOT HIGH MUNICIPAL TO CORRESPOND TO CHANGES OF DOMICILE WITHIN THE MUNICIPALITY (COLUMNS 10, 11 AND 12).

ADDING THE CORRESPONDING DATA TO EACH OF THE SECTIONS, THE MUNICIPAL TOTAL WILL BE OBTAINED AT THE LAST LINE OF THE TABLE.

IN THE CASE THAT ALL THE SECTIONS OF THE MUNICIPALITY CANNOT BE RELATED IN A SINGLE FORM DUE TO LACK OF SPACE, THE NUMBER OF THEM WILL BE USED, NOT FORGETTING TO NUMBER THEM CORRELATIVE IN THE SHEET NUMBER ........ THE UPPER RIGHT MARGIN OF THE SAME.

2. LOW RESIDENTS IN EACH OF THE SECTIONS OF THE MUNICIPALITY (MOD. A. B.) (SEE ANNEX II.)

IN THIS FORM, THE CASUALTIES THAT HAVE OCCURRED IN EACH OF THE SECTIONS OF THE MUNICIPALITY WILL BE REFLECTED, FOLLOWING IN THEIR COMPLETION SIMILAR CRITERIA TO THOSE EXPOSED IN THE MODEL R. A. OF HIGH.

NOTE THAT THE SUM OF COLUMNS 10, 11, AND 12 MUST MATCH THE SUM OF THE SAME COLUMNS IN THE R. A. MODEL FOR THE MUNICIPAL TOTAL.

3. MUNICIPAL GENERAL NUMERICAL SUMMARY (MOD. R. G. M.) (SEE ANNEX III.)

THIS MODEL, SUMMARY OF THE ABOVE, CONSISTS OF THREE TABLES:

1. IN THE FIRST ONE, THE POPULATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY ' S RIGHT WILL BE COLLECTED AS OF 1 JANUARY 1989, THE DATE OF THE LAST REGISTRATION, THE UPS AND DOWNS PRODUCED DURING THE YEAR 1989 AND THE FIGURES CORRESPONDING TO THE POPULATION OF THE RIGHT AT 1 JANUARY OF THE YEAR. 1990, WHICH IS OBTAINED FROM THE ABOVE FIGURES, ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING EXPRESSION:

POPULATION OF LAW AS OF 1 JANUARY 1990 = POPULATION OF LAW AS OF 1 JANUARY 1989 + HIGH-LOW.

THE HIGHS AND LOWS PRODUCED DURING THE YEAR 1989 ARE OBTAINED AS THE SUM OF COLUMNS 3, 4 AND 5 OF THE MODELS R. A. AND R. B., RESPECTIVELY.

2. THE SECOND TABLE IS THE SUMMARY OF THE HIGH AND LOW FOR CAUSE, DATA THAT IS OBTAINED BY MOVING THE TOTALS OF THE CORRESPONDING COLUMNS OF THE PRINTED R. A. AND R.

BIRTHS BY BIRTH AND DEATH LEAVE ARE OBTAINED FROM THE TOTALS IN COLUMN 6 OF THE MODELS R. A. AND R. B., THE HIGH AND LOW BY CHANGE OF RESIDENCE OF THE TOTALS OF COLUMNS 7 AND 8 OF THE PRINTED REFERENCE, AND THE HIGH DEFAULT OR LOW FOR UNDUE REGISTRATION OF THE TOTALS IN COLUMN 9 OF THE SAME.

3. THE THIRD TABLE SHOWS THE ALTERATIONS PRODUCED BY CHANGES OF DOMICILE BETWEEN SECTIONS OF THE MUNICIPALITY, FIGURES THAT ARE OBTAINED FROM THE TOTALS OF COLUMNS 10, 11 AND 12 OF THOSE PRINTED.

IF THE MUNICIPALITY HAS SUFFERED VARIATION BY MERGER, SEGREGATION, ETC., IT MUST APPEAR IN THE POPULATION OF LAW (IN THE LAST CORRECTION) OF TABLE 1 OF THE MODEL R. G. THE POPULATION CORRESPONDING TO THE NEW MUNICIPALITY IN THAT DATE, AND SHALL BE RECORDED IN THAT FORM, IN FOOTNOTE:

A) IN THE CASE OF SEGREGATION, THE MUNICIPALITY OF WHICH IS SEGREGATED. (THE MUNICIPALITY OF WHICH A NOTE INDICATIVE OF SUCH SEGREGATION HAS BEEN SEGREGATED SHALL ALSO BE INCLUDED.)

B) IN CASE OF MERGER, MUNICIPALITY OR MERGED MUNICIPALITIES.

IN THE MODEL R. G. M. WILL BE DILIGENT, AFTER ITS CLOSURE, A CERTIFICATION OF THE SECRETARY OF THE CITY COUNCIL, WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR, IN WHICH IT WILL BE STATED THAT THE NUMERICAL SUMMARY TO WHICH THE CERTIFICATION REFERS IS REFLECTION OF THE ALTERATIONS PRODUCED FROM 1 JANUARY 1989 TO 1 JANUARY 1990 IN THE MUNICIPAL REGISTER OF INHABITANTS, AS A RESULT OF THE APPROPRIATE RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR ' S OFFICE AND REGISTERED IN THE CORRESPONDING BOOK.

THIS DOCUMENTATION CORRESPONDING TO THE RECTIFICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A CERTIFICATION OF THE SECRETARY OF THE CITY COUNCIL, WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR, IN WHICH IT IS STATED THAT THE PRESENT RECTIFICATION OF THE REGISTER HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL ' S PLENARY SESSION, SPECIFYING THE DATE OF THE SESSION, AND THE FACT THAT IT WAS EXPOSED TO THE PUBLIC WITHIN 15 DAYS, WITHOUT ANY COMPLAINTS BEING MADE DURING THE PERIOD, OR THAT, IN THE CASE OF THAT THERE HAVE BEEN, THE SAME HAVE BEEN RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. (THE CERTIFICATION MODEL IS SET OUT IN ANNEX IV TO THESE INSTRUCTIONS.)

THE MUNICIPALITIES THAT HAVE MECHANIZED THE MUNICIPAL REGISTER MAY SUBMIT THE DOCUMENTATION CORRESPONDING TO THE RECTIFICATION OF A COMPUTER OUTPUT FORM, RESPECTING THE CONCEPTS REQUESTED IN EACH OF THE MODELS OF THE PRINT.

III. DATE OF REFERRAL OF THE REGISTRATION TO THE PROVINCIAL STATISTICAL OFFICES

THE MUNICIPALITIES MUST FORWARD TO THE PROVINCIAL DELEGATIONS OF THE NATIONAL STATISTICAL INSTITUTE THE DOCUMENTATION CORRESPONDING TO THE STANDARD RECTIFICATION REFERRED TO ON 1 JANUARY 1990 (I.E. THE CERTIFICATION, PLUS THE THREE MODELS OF PRINT A. A., R. B. AND R. G. M.) BEFORE 31 MARCH 1990.

MADRID, 16 JANUARY 1990. THE PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL STATISTICAL INSTITUTE, JOSÉ QUEVEDO QUEVEDO. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF TERRITORIAL COOPERATION, ADOLFO HERNÁNDEZ LAFUENTE.

(ANNEXES I, II, III, AND IV OMITTED)