On Amendments To Certain Legislative Acts Of The Russian Federation

Original Language Title: О внесении изменений в отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$20 per month, or Get a Day Pass for only USD$4.99.
RUSSIAN FEDERATION FEDERAL LAW on amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation State Duma Adopted July 3, 2009 years approved by the Federation Council July 7, 2009 year (as amended by the federal laws of 02.07.2013 N 188-FZ;
from arrival N 249-FZ; from 21.12.2013 N 379-FZ;
from 29.06.2015 N 210-FZ), Article 1 (repealed Federal Act from 21.12.2013 N 379-FZ) Article 2 amend the Federal law of December 8, 1995 N 193-FZ "on agricultural cooperation" (collection of laws of the Russian Federation, 1995, no. 50, art. 4870; 1999, N 8, art. 973; 2002, N 12, art. 1093; 2003, N 2, art. 167; N 24, art. 2248; 2006, N 45, art. 4635) as follows: 1) article 25 admit lapsed;
2) supplement article 30-1 to read as follows: "article 30-1. Appeal against the decision of the administration of the cooperative 1. The decision of the general meeting of members adopted in compliance with the requirements of this federal law, other normative legal acts of the Russian Federation, of the Charter of the cooperative and violating rights and (or) the legitimate interests of the Member of the cooperative may be declared void by a court, upon application by a member or associate member of the cooperative, not taking part in the vote or voted against the contested decision.
2. the decision of the Supervisory Board of the cooperative or cooperative Board taken in violation of this federal law, other normative legal acts of the Russian Federation, of the Charter of the cooperative and violating rights and (or) the legitimate interests of the Member or associate member of the cooperative may be declared void by a court, upon application by a member or associate member of the cooperative.
3. the Court, having regard to all the circumstances of the case are entitled to retain the contested decision organ of administration of the cooperative, if the violations are not essential and this decision has not caused losses to the cooperative or cooperative member, associate member of the cooperative who claim about recognition of the decision of administration of the cooperative to be invalid, or the emergence of other adverse consequences for them.
4. recognition of the decisions of the general meeting of the members of the cooperative, the decisions of the Supervisory Board of the cooperative or cooperative Board approving the transactions made by the cooperative, invalid in the case of an appeal against such decisions apart from challenging the transactions involved the cooperative does not entail recognition of such transactions.
5. A statement by a member of the co-op or Coop associate member on the recognition of the decision of the general meeting of members of the cooperative and (or) decisions of other bodies of administration of the cooperative to be invalid may be submitted to the Court within three months from the date when the Member or associate member of the co-op learned or should have learned of the decision, but in any case not later than within six months from the date of adoption of this decision. Provided for under this paragraph, the term of appeal decisions of the general meeting of the members of the cooperative and (or) decisions of other bodies of administration of the cooperative if it passes cannot be restored, except if a member or associate member of a cooperative has not filed the application influenced by violence or threats.
6. Violation of this federal law and other normative legal acts of the Russian Federation, admitted at the convening of the general meeting of members of the cooperative are assessed by the Court when considering a claim for the recognition of the relevant decision of the general meeting of members of the cooperative to be invalid.
7. The decision of the general meeting of the members of the cooperative adopted without necessary for deciding the votes of a majority of the members of the cooperative, as well as issues not included in the agenda of the general meeting of members of the cooperative, unless the cooperative members at the general meeting was attended by all the members of the cooperative, shall be null and void regardless of their appeal in a Court of law. ";
3) article 38 shall be amended with paragraph 8 to read as follows: "8. the cooperative Deal, done in violation of this article claims thereto, may be invalidated on the suit of the cooperative or a member or associate member.
The limitation period for a claim for recognition of cooperative deals invalid if it passes cannot be restored.
Court refuses to meet the requirements for recognition of a transaction effected in violation of this article claims to her invalid if one of the following circumstances: it is not proved that committing the transaction has resulted or is likely to cause losses to the cooperative or cooperative member, associate member of the cooperative, had such a claim, or the emergence of other adverse consequences for them;
at the time of the trial presented evidence of the subsequent approval of the transaction by the rules prescribed by this federal law;
If the trial proved that the other party to the transaction did not know and was not meant to know about her having committed in violation of the requirements provided for in this federal law thereto. ";
4) article 39: (a)) the name shall be amended as follows:

"Article 39. Documentation and reporting of the cooperative.
Provision of cooperative documents ";
b) supplement paragraphs 7 and 8 read as follows: "7. Production Cooperative is required to provide to its members and associate members access to his judicial acts over a dispute involving the creation of a production cooperative, its management or participation in it, including definitions of instituting the arbitral tribunal proceedings and the adoption of the statement of claim or statement about the change or the subject matter previously claimed the lawsuit.
8. on-demand production cooperative members and associate members must ensure that they have access to the documents, stipulated in points 5 and 7 of this article. Within seven days from the date of presentation of the production cooperative member or associate member of a production cooperative, these documents must be provided to cooperative production for consultation in the Board room of a production cooperative. Co-operative production cooperative at the request of a member or associate member of the production cooperative is obliged to provide them with copies of these documents. Fees charged for the provision of such cooperative production copies may not exceed the costs of their production. "
Article 3 to amend the Federal law of December 26, 1995, N 208-FZ "about joint-stock societies" (collection of laws of the Russian Federation, 1996, no. 1, p. 1; 2001, no. 33, art. 3423; 2002, N 12, art. 1093; 2004, N 11, art. 913; N 49, St. 4852; 2006, N 31, art. 3445; 2007, N 31, art. 4016; 2009, no. 23, art. 2770) as follows: 1) (lost effect-the Federal law dated 29.06.2015 g. N 210-FZ) 2) section 49: (a)) paragraph 7 shall be amended as follows: "7. a shareholder may appeal to the courts against the decision of the general meeting of shareholders in compliance with the requirements of this federal law, other normative legal acts of the Russian Federation, the Charter of the company, if he did not participate in the general shareholders ' meeting or voted against the adoption of such a decision and this decision violated his rights and (or) the legitimate interests. The Court, having regard to all the circumstances of the case are entitled to retain the contested decision if the shareholder vote could not affect the result of the voting irregularities were not significant and did not delay the decision damages the shareholder.
Statement on the annulment of the decision of the general meeting of shareholders may be filed with the Court within three months from the date on which the shareholder learned or should have learned of the decision and the circumstances are grounds for annulment. Provided for by this paragraph, the term for appeal against the decision of the general meeting of shareholders in the case of his passes cannot be restored, unless the shareholder has not filed the application influenced by violence or threats ".
b) supplement paragraphs 9 and 10 to read as follows: "9. recognition of the decisions of the general meeting of shareholders on approval of major transactions and transactions in which there is interest, null and void in the case of an appeal against such decisions apart from the challenge of transactions of society does not entail recognition of the relevant transactions.
10. the decisions of the general meeting of shareholders taken on issues not on the agenda of the general meeting of shareholders (except if it is attended by all the shareholders of the company), or in violation of the general meeting of shareholders in case of absence of quorum the general meeting of shareholders with or without necessary for decision of the majority of votes of the shareholders, shall be null and void regardless of their appeal in a Court of law. ";
3) second paragraph of paragraph 6 of article 53 shall be amended as follows: "in the case of adoption by the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board) of a company decision to refuse the inclusion of the proposed item in the agenda of the general shareholders ' meeting or a candidate in the list of candidates to be elected to the corresponding body of a company or, in the case of evasion of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board) of a company from making such a decision, the shareholder may apply to the Court with a demand for compulsion of the society to include the proposed item in the agenda of the general shareholders ' meeting or candidate the list of candidates to be elected to the corresponding body of the company. ";
4) in article 55: (a) the second paragraph of paragraph 7) shall be invalidated;
b) paragraph 8 shall be amended as follows: "8. If, within the prescribed period of this federal law, the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board) of a company not decided to convene an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders or the decision on refusal to accept the convening organ of society or persons requiring its convocation, may apply to the Court with a demand for compulsion of society to hold an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders";
in paragraphs 9 and supplement) 10 to read as follows:

"9. In the Court's decision on compulsion society to hold an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders shall specify the terms and procedure of the vote. Execution of the Court's decision rests on the plaintiff or on his request to the organ of society or any other person, subject to their consent. Such a body could not be Board of Directors (Supervisory Board) of a company. When the body of a company or a person who, in accordance with the decision of the Court holds an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders, has all of this federal law powers necessary for calling and holding the meeting. If the Court holds an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of the plaintiff, the expenditure for the preparation and holding of this meeting can be refunded according to the decision of the general meeting of shareholders at the company's expense.
10. In a society in which, in accordance with this federal law functions of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board) the general meeting of shareholders takes place, the rules provided for in paragraphs 7-9 of this article shall apply to any person or body of the company, as defined by the Charter of the company and to the competence of the relevant decision of the question of holding the stockholders meeting and approving his agenda. The rules provided by paragraphs 7-9 of this article shall also apply to the annual general meeting of shareholders, if it has not been convened and held within the period stipulated in paragraph 1 of article 47 of the present Federal law. ";
5) article 58 shall be amended with paragraph 5 to read as follows: "5. In the absence of the quorum to conduct on the basis of a court decision of the annual general meeting of shareholders not later than 60 days must be carried out the repeated shareholders ' general meeting with the same agenda. With this additional recourse to the Court is not required. The repeated shareholders ' general meeting shall be convened and conducted by a person or body specified in the Court decision, and, if the person or body did not convene the annual general meeting of shareholders within a certain period the Court decision, the shareholders ' meeting shall be convened and conducted by other persons or body applying suit in court, provided that the person or body specified in the Court decision.
In case of absence of quorum while holding on the basis of a court decision of an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders the repeated shareholders ' general meeting is not held. ";
6) in article 68, paragraph 5: a) supplemented by the following sentence: "the Court, having regard to all the circumstances of the case are entitled to retain the contested decision if the vote of the Member of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board) of a company could not influence the results of voting and breaches are not substantial.";
b) supplement paragraphs 6-8 to read as follows: "6. The shareholder shall have the right to appeal to the courts against the decision of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board), adopted in compliance with the requirements of this federal law, other normative legal acts of the Russian Federation, the Charter of the company, if the ruling violated the rights and/or legal interests of the company or the shareholder. The Court, having regard to all the circumstances of the case are entitled to retain the contested decision if it has not caused losses to society or to the shareholder or the emergence of other adverse consequences for them and breaches are not significant.
A statement by the shareholder of the appeal against the decision of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board) can be filed with the Court within three months from the date on which the shareholder learned or should have learned of the decision and the circumstances are grounds for annulment. Provided for by this paragraph, the term of appeal decisions of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board), if it passes cannot be restored, unless the shareholder has not filed the application influenced by violence or threats.
7. recognition of the decisions of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board) on the convening of the general meeting of shareholders to be invalid does not entail the invalidity of the decision of the general meeting of shareholders held on the basis of the decision on its convening has been invalidated. Violations of federal law and other normative legal acts of the Russian Federation, admitted at the convening of the general meeting of shareholders shall be assessed by the Court when considering action to appeal the relevant decision of the general meeting of shareholders.
Recognition of the decisions of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board) on approval of major transactions and transactions in which there is interest, null and void in the case of an appeal against such decisions apart from the challenge of transactions of society does not entail recognition of the relevant transactions.

8. decisions of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board), adopted in violation of the competence of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board), the quorum for a meeting of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board), if the presence of a quorum in accordance with this federal law is a prerequisite for the holding of such a meeting, or without the necessary for decision of the majority of votes of the members of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board), null and void regardless of their appeal in a Court of law. ";
7) article 70 shall be amended with paragraph 3 to read as follows: "3. recognition of the decisions of the company's collective executive body (Board, Directorate) in the case of an appeal against such a decision apart from challenging the transaction society effected under this decision null and void shall not entail recognition of the respective transaction null and void. To the conditions and the procedure for appeal against the decisions of the company's collective executive body (Board, Directorate) apply the provisions of paragraph 6 of article 68 of the present Federal law. ";
8) article 77 shall be amended with paragraph 4 as follows: "4. recognition of the decisions of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board), under paragraph 1 of this article, void does not entail recognition of the society's transactions committed costs, determined on the basis of the decision of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board), other transactions, decisions of other organs of society, editions of emissive securities of the society, to commit, adoption, placement of which in accordance with the requirements of this federal law, it is necessary to define the prices according to the rules established by this article shall be null and void.
Person, the rights and (or) whose legitimate interests have been violated by contacting the Court may combine the requirements for recognition of transactions of society, other organs of society, editions of emissive securities of the society, to commit, adoption, placement of which in accordance with the requirements of this federal law, it is necessary to define the prices according to the rules established by this article shall be invalid against the decision of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board), under paragraph 1 of this article. ";
9) para 6 of article 79 shall be amended as follows: "6. The big deal, done in violation of the requirements provided for in this federal law thereto, may be invalidated under a lawsuit filed by the company or its shareholders.
The limitation period for a claim for the recognition of a major transaction null and void in the event of his passes cannot be restored.
Court refuses to meet the requirements for recognition of a major transaction, perfect with a violation provided for in this federal law requirements and void if one of the following circumstances: a shareholder vote, the applicant with the claim about recognition of a major transaction, approval of which was adopted by the general meeting of shareholders, invalid, at least he took part in the vote on this issue, could not affect the outcome of the vote;
It has not been proved that committing the transaction has resulted or is likely to cause damages to the society or shareholder who claim, or the emergence of other adverse consequences for them;
at the time of the trial presented evidence of the subsequent approval of the transaction by the rules prescribed by this federal law;
If the trial proved that the other party to the transaction did not know and was not meant to know about her having committed in violation of the requirements provided for in this federal law thereto. ";
10) paragraph 1 of article 84 shall be amended as follows: "1. a transaction in which there is interest and that is made in violation of the requirements provided for in this federal law thereto, may be invalidated under a lawsuit filed by the company or its shareholders.
The limitation period for a claim for the recognition of transactions in which there is interest, invalid if it passes cannot be restored.
Court refuses to meet the requirements for recognition of a transaction in which there is interest and that is made in violation of the requirements provided for in this federal law to her invalid if one of the following circumstances: voting shareholder, is not interested in committing this transaction and the applicant with a lawsuit for recognition of this transaction, approval of which was adopted by the general meeting of shareholders, invalid, at least he took part in the voting on this issue could not affect the outcome of the vote;
It has not been proved that committing the transaction has resulted or is likely to cause damages to the society or to the shareholder having the relevant claim or the emergence of other adverse consequences for them;

at the time of the trial presented evidence of the subsequent approval of the transaction by the rules prescribed by this federal law, in the light of the information available at the time of the transaction at the time of its approval of the interest of persons referred to in paragraph 1 of article 81 of this federal law;
If the trial proved that the other party to the transaction did not know and was not meant to know about her having committed in violation of the requirements provided for in this federal law thereto. ";
11 paragraph 1 of article 89) shall be amended as follows: "1. the company is obliged to keep the following documents: the Treaty establishing the community;
articles of Association of the company and made changes and additions, which are registered in the prescribed manner, the decision on the establishment of the society, the State registration of the company;
documents confirming the company's right to the property on its balance sheet;
internal documents of the company;
regulations on the branch or representative office of the company;
annual reports;
accounting documents;
accounting documents;
protocols of general meetings of shareholders (shareholder that owns all the voting shares of the company), meetings of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board), internal audit Commission (internal auditor) of the company and the company's collective executive body (Board, Directorate);
ballot papers, as well as the power of Attorney (copies of powers of attorney) for participation in the general meeting of shareholders;
reports of independent appraisers;
lists of affiliated persons of the company;
lists of persons entitled to participate in the general meeting of shareholders and persons having the right to receive dividends, as well as other lists drawn up for the implementation of their rights as shareholders in accordance with the requirements of this federal law;
the conclusion of the internal audit Commission (internal auditor), external auditor, State and municipal financial control;
issue prospectus, quarterly reports of the issuer and other documents that contain information to be published or otherwise disclosed in accordance with this federal law and other federal laws;
notification of conclusion of shareholders agreements, to society, as well as lists of persons who have concluded such agreements;
judicial acts on disputes connected with the establishment of the society, its management or participation in it;
other documents stipulated by this federal law, the Charter of the company, internal documents of the company, resolutions of the general meeting of shareholders, Board of Directors (Supervisory Board), the managing bodies of the company, as well as documents stipulated by legal acts of the Russian Federation. ";
12) article 91 shall be amended with paragraph 3 to read as follows: "3. the company shall provide the shareholders of the company access to his judicial acts over a dispute involving the creation of a society, its management or participation in it, including definitions of instituting the arbitral tribunal proceedings and the adoption of the statement of claim or statement about the change or the subject matter previously claimed the lawsuit. Within three days from the date of presentation of the shareholder specified documents must be made available for consultation at the premises of the society, the executive body of the company. Request of the shareholder society is obliged to provide him with copies of these documents. The fee charged by the company for the provision of such copies may not exceed the costs of their production. "
Article 4 to amend the Federal law of April 22, 1996 N 39-FZ "on securities market" (collection of laws of the Russian Federation, 1996, no. 17, art. 1918; 2002, no. 52, art. 5141; 2005, N 25, article 2426; 2006, N 1, art. 5; N 2, art. 172; N 17, art. 1780; N 31, art. 3437; N 43, St. 4412; 2007, N 1, art. 45; 2009, N 7, art. 777; N 23, art. 2770) as follows: 1) article 26 shall be amended as follows: "article 26. Suspension of the issue of securities. Recognition release (additional issue) securities failed or invalid 1. Emission of securities may be suspended at any stage of the proceedings prior to the State registration of issue of the report on the outcome of the issue (additional issue) of securities or view a registering body of the notification of the outcome of the issue (additional issue) of securities upon detection of the registering body the following violations: violation by the issuer during the emission requirements of the legislation of the Russian Federation on securities;
the discovery of the documents on the basis of which was effected State registration of issue (additional issue) issue securities, false or misleading information.
The registration authority shall have the right to suspend the issuance of securities to resolve violations. During the term of placement of securities in such a case shall be suspended until the date of resumption. The resumption of the issuance is subject to a decision of the registering body.
The procedure of suspension and resumption of the issuance of securities is determined by the regulations of a federal body of executive power for the securities market.

2. Issue (additional issue) of securities may be declared invalid by the decision of the registering body.
The grounds for recognition of the issue (additional issue) of securities failed are: violation of the issuer in the course of securities issuance requirements of legislation of the Russian Federation, which could not be rectified otherwise than through the retirement of securities issue (additional issue) equity securities;
the discovery of the documents on the basis of which was effected State registration of issue (additional issue) issue securities, false or misleading and entailing substantial violation of rights and (or) the legitimate interests of investors or owners of securities of the issuer;
failure by the issuer to the registering body the report about results of issue (additional issue) of securities or the notification of results of release (additional issue) equity securities within the prescribed by this federal law deadline after expiration of their properties;
the registering body's refusal in State registration of the report on the outcome of the issue (additional issue) equity securities;
No under the decision on the issue (additional issue) of securities shares, entailing the recognition issue (additional issue) securities failed;
the idea that any emission of securities issue (additional issue) equity securities;
failure to comply with the requirements of the issuer of the registering body about correcting irregularities during securities violations of the legislation of the Russian Federation.
Issue (additional issue) of securities may be declared invalid prior to the State registration of the report on the outcome of the issue (additional issue) of securities or view a registering body of the notification of the outcome of the issue (additional issue) of securities.
3. Issue (additional issue) of securities may be invalidated on the basis of a court decision on the suit of the registering body and the authority responsible for the State registration of legal entities, as well as on the suit of the participant (shareholder) of the issuer or owner of securities of the issuer of the same species, category (type) as the emissive securities issue (additional issue).
The grounds for recognition of the issue (additional issue) of securities invalidated are: violation of the issuer in the course of securities issuance requirements of legislation of the Russian Federation, which could not be rectified otherwise than through the retirement of securities issue (additional issue) equity securities;
the discovery of the documents on the basis of which was effected State registration of issue (additional issue) of securities or a report on the outcome of the issue (additional issue) issue securities, either in the notification of results of release (additional issue) equity securities of inaccurate or misleading and entailing substantial violation of rights and (or) the legitimate interests of investors or owners of securities of the issuer information.
Rejection of demands for recognition of issue (additional issue) of securities invalidated shall not deprive a person of the right to present a claim for recovery from the issuer or other person damages caused as a result of the violations referred to in this paragraph, including the provision of false or misleading information.
4. From the moment of State registration of issue (additional issue) of securities and to report on the outcome of the State registration of issue (additional issue) of securities or pending the submission of the notification to the registration body on (additional issue) of securities statement in court demands for recognition of a decision on placing securities, approving the decision to issue (additional issue) of securities and other actions taken in connection with the implementation of the decisions of the securities issuer that decision of the registering body about the State registration of issue (additional issue) of securities invalidated only possible simultaneously with the application of the requirement of recognition of the relevant issue (additional issue) of securities invalidated.

From the moment of State registration of the report on the outcome of the issue (additional issue) of securities or from the moment of submission of the notification to the registration body on (additional issue) of securities statement in court claims for recognition of the solutions adopted by the issuer in connection with the implementation of issues of securities, transactions in securities placement process, the decisions of the registering body about the State registration of issue (additional issue) of securities or a report on the outcome of the issue (additional issue) of securities invalidated only possible simultaneously with the statement of the requirement of recognition of the relevant issue (additional issue) of securities invalidated.
The invalidity of individual transactions committed in the process of placing equity securities, does not entail recognition of the issue (additional issue) of securities invalidated.
5. The limitation period for the recognition of decisions taken by the issuer, the registering body and associated with the implementation of securities issuance, issue (additional issue) of securities, transactions occurring in the process of placing equity securities, void is three months from the moment of State registration of the report on the outcome of the issue (additional issue) of securities or from the moment of submission of the notification to the registration body on (additional issue) of securities. The specified term if it passes cannot be restored.
6. recognition of the issue (additional issue) securities as void or invalid shall entail cancellation of its registration, the retirement of securities of this issue (additional issue) of securities and return to owners of securities of such money or other property received by the issuer in their payment.
The order of retirement of securities and the return of the owners of those securities money or other property is set by the regulations of a federal body of executive power for the securities market.
All costs associated with the recognition of the issue (additional issue) securities failed or invalid and refunds credited to owners of the issuer.
7. the holders of securities, which had suffered losses in connection with the recognition of invalid or void release (additional issue) equity securities shall be entitled to claim damages from the issuer or the third party in the manner prescribed by the legislation of the Russian Federation. ";
2) part of the twelfth article 30 paragraph be supplemented as follows: "disputes associated with the creation of the issuer, its management or participation in it, including instituting arbitral tribunal proceedings and the adoption of the statement of claim, statement, about changing the grounds or a subject previously declared unenforceable, interim measures, about the denial of the claim, the claim to conclude a settlement agreement concerning the adoption of a judicial act that ends the proceedings before the Court of first instance arbitration. ";
3) Article 51: (a)) paragraph 3 shall be amended as follows: "3. With respect to issuers engaged in issue securities in violation of requirements of legislation of the Russian Federation on securities, the Federal Executive authority for the securities market: taking steps to halt the further placement of securities issued as a result of this issue;
publishes in mass media information about securities issues, carried out in violation of the provisions of the legislation of the Russian Federation on securities, and the grounds for the suspension of placing securities issued as a result of this issue;
shall notify, in writing, of the need to address violations and set a time of elimination of infringements;
forward checking on the facts of the Securities issue, carried out in violation of the provisions of the legislation of the Russian Federation on securities, procuratorial bodies if the actions of officials of the issuer signs of corpus delicti;
notifies in writing about allowing further deployment of securities by the issuer in case of elimination of violations of the requirements of the legislation of the Russian Federation on securities related to the issuance of securities;
makes a claim to the Court of arbitration on the recognition issue (additional issue) of securities invalidated on grounds provided for by article 26 hereof. ";
b) paragraph 5 shall be invalidated.
Article 5 to amend the Federal law from May 8, 1996 N 41-ФЗ "about production co-operatives" (collection of laws of the Russian Federation, 1996, no. 20, item 2321) as follows: 1) in the eighth indent of paragraph 1 of article 8, the words "the General Assembly of the members of the Board of the cooperative and cooperative" replaced by "bodies of administration of the cooperative";

2) supplement article 17-1 as follows: "article 17-1. Appeal against the decision of the administration of the cooperative 1. The decision of the general meeting of members adopted in compliance with the requirements of this federal law, other normative legal acts of the Russian Federation, of the Charter of the cooperative and violating rights and (or) the legitimate interests of the Member of the cooperative may be declared void by a court, upon application by a member of the cooperative, not who vote or who against the contested decision.
2. the decision of the Supervisory Board of the cooperative or cooperative Board taken in violation of this federal law, other normative legal acts of the Russian Federation, of the Charter of the cooperative and violating rights and (or) the legitimate interests of the Member of the cooperative may be declared void by a court, upon application by a member of the cooperative.
3. the Court, having regard to all the circumstances of the case are entitled to retain the contested decision organ of administration of the cooperative, if the violations are not essential and this decision has not caused losses to the cooperative or cooperative member who claim for annulment, or the emergence of other adverse consequences for them.
4. recognition of the decisions of the general meeting of the members of the cooperative, the decisions of the Supervisory Board of the cooperative or cooperative Board approving the transactions made by the cooperative, invalid in the case of an appeal against such decisions apart from challenging the transactions involved the cooperative does not entail recognition of such transactions.
5. A statement by a member of the cooperative, on the recognition of decisions of the general meeting of the members of the cooperative and (or) decisions of other bodies of administration of the cooperative to be invalid may be submitted to the Court within three months from the date on which the Member knew or should have known about the decision, but in any case not later than within six months from the date of adoption of this decision. Provided for under this paragraph, the term of appeal decisions of the general meeting of the members of the cooperative and (or) decisions of other bodies of administration of the cooperative if it passes cannot be restored, except if a member of a cooperative has not filed the application influenced by violence or threats.
6. Violation of this federal law and other normative legal acts of the Russian Federation, admitted at the convening of the general meeting of members of the cooperative are assessed by the Court when considering a claim for the recognition of the relevant decision of the general meeting of members of the cooperative to be invalid.
7. The decision of the general meeting of the members of the cooperative adopted without necessary for deciding the votes of a majority of the members of the cooperative, as well as issues not included in the agenda of the general meeting of members of the cooperative, unless the cooperative members at the general meeting was attended by all the members of the cooperative, shall be null and void regardless of their appeal in a Court of law. ";
3) in article 24: a) name shall be reworded as follows: "article 24. Accounting and reporting of the cooperative. Providing cooperative information ";
b), the word "Cooperative" were replaced by the words "1. Co-op ";
in supplement paragraph 2) as follows: "2. The cooperative members of the cooperative is required to provide access to his judicial acts over a dispute involving the creation of cooperative management or participation in it, including definitions of instituting the arbitral tribunal proceedings and the adoption of the statement of claim or statement about the change or the subject matter previously claimed the lawsuit. Within three days from the date of presentation of the respective cooperative member requirements, these documents must be provided by the cooperative for consultation in the room of the executive body. The cooperative at the request of a member of the cooperative is required to provide him with copies of these documents. The fee charged by the cooperative for provision of such copies may not exceed the costs of their production. "
Article 6 to amend the Federal law from February 8, 1998, N 14-ФЗ "About societies with limited liability" (collection of laws of the Russian Federation, 1998, no. 7, art. 785; 2009, N 1, art. 20) as follows: 1) in paragraph 3 of article 8 the word "conditions" should be replaced by the word "appropriate";
2) article 21:6) and supplemented by a paragraph along the following lines: "the authenticity of the signature on the statement of a company participant or the public renunciation of the use of the preemptive right to purchase a participation interest or a portion thereof in the Charter capital of a company must be certified by a notary;
b) paragraph 11 shall be amended as follows: ' 11. The deal, aimed at the disposal of a participation interest or a portion thereof in the Charter capital of a company is subject to notarization. Nonobservance of notarial form shall entail the invalidity of the transaction.

Notarization of this transaction is not required in cases of transfer of a participation interest to the company in the manner provided for in articles 23 and 26 of this federal law, the distribution of shares among the company participants and the sale of some or all company participants or to third parties in accordance with article 24 of this federal law, as well as when using the preemptive right to purchase by sending an offer for the sale of a participation interest or a portion thereof and its acceptance in accordance with paragraphs 5-7 of this article.
If the company participant who has signed a Treaty establishing the obligation when certain circumstances arise or the performance by the other party of the oncoming obligation transaction aimed at the disposal of a participation interest or a portion thereof in the Charter capital of the company, wrongfully refuses to certify a transaction aimed at the disposal of a participation interest or a portion thereof in the Charter capital of a company, the acquirer of the participation interest or the portion thereof, commits acts aimed at the execution of the Treaty, has the right to demand by judicial procedure transfer of a participation interest or a portion thereof in the Charter capital of a company. In this case, the decision of the arbitral tribunal on the transfer of the participation interest or the portion thereof in the Charter capital of a company is the basis for State registration made to the unified State Register of legal entities. ";
in paragraph 14): in the first paragraph, the words ", with the application of the relevant treaty or otherwise expressing the contents of unilateral transaction and confirming the base transition document the participation interest or the portion thereof" should be deleted;
in the third paragraph, the words "the Government of the Russian Federation" shall be replaced with the words "authorized by the Government of the Russian Federation Federal Executive Body";
g) in the first subparagraph of paragraph 15, the words ", with the application of the relevant treaty or expressing the contents of unilateral transaction and confirming the reason for moving the document or a portion thereof" should be deleted;
3) in paragraph 3 of article 22: (a)) in the first subparagraph, the words "the Government of the Russian Federation" shall be replaced with the words "authorized by the Government of the Russian Federation Federal Executive authority", add the following sentence: "entry in the unified State Register of legal entities of encumbrance with mortgage participation interest or a portion thereof in the Charter capital of a company is repaid on the basis of the joint statement of the pledgor and the pledgee or based on a court decision that has entered into force;
b) in paragraph two, the words "with the application a copy of the pledge agreement the participation interest or the portion thereof" should be deleted;
4) Article 23: (a) subparagraph 4 of paragraph 7) shall be supplemented with the words "court decisions on the transfer of the participation interest or the portion thereof to the society in accordance with paragraph 18 of article 21 hereof;"
b) in paragraph 8, the words "in the fifth paragraph, if the Charter provides for the right of the participant to withdraw from society and" were replaced by the words "in cases stipulated in points 2 and 6-1 of this article, if the" word "out of society, has the right to" were replaced by the words "which proceeded to company, shall";
5) second paragraph of article 31, paragraph 5-1, after the words "founder" add the words "or party";
6) in paragraph 2 of article 33:13) subparagraph (a) shall be supplemented with the words "or the Charter of society";
b) fifteenth paragraph worded as follows: "provided for in subparagraphs 2, 5-7, 11 and 12 of this paragraph, as well as other issues related in accordance with this federal law to the exclusive competence of company General participants meeting questions do not qualify for inclusion in the company's Charter to the competence of other bodies of management of the company.";
7) article 43: a) the second and third sentences of paragraph 1 should be deleted;
b) in paragraph 3: the second paragraph shall be invalidated;
supplemented by a paragraph reading as follows: "the Court, having regard to all the circumstances of the case are entitled to retain the contested decision if violations are not significant and the decision has not caused losses to society or the company participant or the emergence of other adverse consequences for them.";
Supplement 4 points)-6 to read as follows: "4. the statement by the company participant on the recognition of the decision of the general meeting of shareholders and (or) other decisions of company governing bodies null and void may be filed with the Court within two months from the date when the company participant learned or should have learned of the decision and the circumstances are grounds for annulment. Provided for by this paragraph, the term of appeal decisions of the general meeting of shareholders, the decisions of other bodies of management of the company in case it passes cannot be restored, except if the company participant has not filed the application influenced by violence or threats.

5. recognition of the decisions of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board) on the convening of the general meeting of shareholders to be invalid does not entail the invalidity of the decision of the general meeting of shareholders held on the basis of the decision on its convening has been invalidated. Violation of this federal law and other normative legal acts of the Russian Federation, admitted at the convening of the general meeting of shareholders shall be assessed by the Court when considering action to appeal the relevant decision of the general meeting of shareholders.
Recognition of the decisions of the general meeting of shareholders or the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board) on approval of major transactions and transactions in which there is interest, null and void in the case of an appeal against such decisions apart from the challenge of transactions of society does not entail recognition of the relevant transactions.
6. The decision of the general meeting of shareholders taken on issues not on the agenda of this meeting (except if the company's General participants ' meeting was attended by all members of society), or without the necessary for adopting a decision of the majority of the votes held by the company participants, do not have the force regardless of their appeal in a Court of law. ";
8) paragraph 5 of article 45 shall be reworded as follows: "5. a transaction in which there is interest and that is made in violation of this article claims thereto, may be invalidated under a lawsuit filed by the company or its participant.
The limitation period for a claim for the recognition of transactions in which there is interest, invalid if it passes cannot be restored.
Court refuses to meet the requirements for recognition of a transaction in which there is interest and that is made in violation of this article claims to her invalid if one of the following circumstances: voting participant, is not interested in the transaction and the applicant claim transaction, the decision to approve a company's General participants ' meeting, invalid, at least he took part in the voting on this issue could not affect the outcome of the vote;
It has not been proved that committing the transaction has resulted or is likely to cause damages to the society or the company participant having the relevant claim or the emergence of other adverse consequences for them;
at the time of the trial presented evidence of the subsequent approval of the transaction by the rules stipulated in this article, taking into account the information available at the time of the transaction at the time of its approval of the interest of persons referred to in paragraph 1 of this article;
If the trial proved that the other party to the transaction did not know and was not meant to know about her having committed in violation of this article requirements. ";
9) item 5 of article 46 shall be amended as follows: "5. The big deal made in violation of this article claims thereto, may be invalidated under a lawsuit filed by the company or its participant.
The limitation period for a claim for the recognition of a major transaction null and void in the event of his passes cannot be restored.
Court refuses to meet the requirements for recognition of a major transaction, perfect with a violation of this article claims to her invalid if one of the following circumstances: voting participant who has a claim on the recognition of a major transaction, the decision to approve a company's General participants ' meeting, invalid, at least he took part in the vote on this issue, could not affect the outcome of the vote;
It has not been proved that committing the transaction has resulted or is likely to cause damages to the society or the company participant having the relevant claim or the emergence of other adverse consequences for them;
at the time of the trial presented evidence of the subsequent approval of the transaction by the rules prescribed by this federal law;
If the trial proved that the other party to the transaction did not know and was not meant to know about her having committed in violation of this article requirements. ";
10) Article 50: a) name shall be supplemented with the words "and the provision of information society";
b) supplement paragraphs 3 and 4 as follows: "3. the company shall provide to the company participants access to his judicial acts over a dispute involving the creation of a society, its management or participation in it, including definitions of instituting the arbitral tribunal proceedings and the adoption of the statement of claim or statement about the change or the subject matter previously claimed the lawsuit.

4. the company on demand company participant is obliged to provide him access to the documents stipulated by paragraphs 1 and 3 of this article. Within three days from the date of presentation of a company participant, these documents must be provided to society for consultation in the premises of the executive body of the company. Society-on-demand company participant is obliged to provide him with copies of these documents. The fee charged by the company for the provision of such copies may not exceed the costs of their production. "
11) the first paragraph of article 51, paragraph 5 shall be amended as follows: "5. Reorganized society after entering into the unified State registry of legal persons of record about the beginning of the reorganization procedure twice once a month puts in the media, which published data on State registration of legal entities, the message about its reorganization. If the reorganization involves two or more societies, the reorganization is published on behalf of everyone involved in the reorganization of societies society, the latter accepted the decision about reorganization of a specific Treaty on the merger or the Treaty of accession. While lenders society no later than within thirty days from the date of the last publication of the reports of the reorganization of the company shall be entitled to demand in writing early performance of the obligation by the debtor, and in case of impossibility of early performance of the obligation-its cessation and reparation related losses. "
Article 7 the first paragraph of subparagraph 5 of paragraph 1 of article 333-25 of part two of the tax code of the Russian Federation (collection of laws of the Russian Federation, 2000, no. 32, p. 3340; 2004, no. 45, p. 4377; 2006, N 1, art. 12; 2007, no. 46, item. 5554) supplemented by the following sentence: "when calculating the size of the State fee for notarization, aimed at the disposal of a participation interest or a portion thereof in the Charter capital of a limited liability company, as well as transactions, establishing an obligation for the disposal of a participation interest or a portion thereof in the Charter capital of a company with limited liability is accepted contract amount specified by the parties, but not less than the nominal value of the participation interest or the portion thereof.".
Article 8 article 9 August 8, 2001 federal law N 129-ФЗ "about the State registration of legal entities and individual entrepreneurs" (collection of laws of the Russian Federation, 2001, no. 33, p. 3431; 2003, N 26, art. 2565; 2008, no. 30, art. 3616; 2009, N 1, art. 20) as follows: 1) in paragraph 1-1, the words "the Government of the Russian Federation" shall be replaced with the words "authorized by the Government of the Russian Federation Federal Executive Body";
2) in paragraph 1, the words "2-statement submitted to the registration authority verifies" were replaced by the words "Declaration, notice or message is submitted to a registering body approved by the Government of the Russian Federation by the authorized federal body of executive power, and checks";
3) item 1-4 complement paragraph along the following lines: "If specified in the first subparagraph of this paragraph a company participant, founder (participant) of the liquidated legal person of the company participant having proprietary rights on his property or mandatory law in respect of the liquidated legal entity, the legal successor of the reorganized legal person party societies are legal entities, such applicant may be the head of the Permanent Executive Body of such legal person or other person having the right without a power of attorney to act on behalf of such legal entity, as well as a natural person acting under a power of attorney. "
Article 9 to amend the code of the Russian Federation on administrative offences (collection of laws of the Russian Federation, 2002, N 1, p. 1; N 30, art. 3029; N 44, art. 4295; 2003, no. 27, art. 2700, 2708, 2717; N 46, art. 4434; N 50, art. 4847, 4855; 2004, N 31, art. 3229; N 34, art. 3529, 3533; 2005, N 1, art. 9, 13, 37, 40, 45; N 10, art. 763; N 13, art. 1075, 1077; N 19, art. 1752; N 27, art. 2719, 2721; N 30, art. 3104, 3124, 3131; N 50, art. 5247; N 52, art. 5574; 2006, N 1, art. 4, 10; N 10, art. 1067; N 12, art. 1234; N 17, art. 1776; N 18, art. 1907; N 19, art. 2066; N 23, art. 2380; N 31, art. 3420, 3433, 3438, 3452; (N) 45, St. 4641; N 50, art. 5279; N 52, art. 5498; 2007, N 1, art. 21, 29; N 16, art. 1825; N 26, art. 3089; N 30, art. 3755; N 31, art. 4007, 4008; N 41, art. 4845; N 43, St. 5084; N 46, art. 5553; 2008, N 18, art. 1941; N 20, art. 2251; N 30, art. 3604; N 49, St. 5745; N 52, art. 6235, 6236; 2009, N 7, art. 777; N 23, art. 2759, 2776) as follows: 1) Chapter 14 supplement section 14.36 the following lines: "Article 14.36. Failure to submit or late submission of documents on the dispute relating to the establishment of a legal entity, its management or participation in a failure to submit or late submission of documents on the dispute relating to the establishment of a legal entity, its management or participation in it, the participants (shareholders, members, founders) of a legal person if submission of such documents provided by law-is fined by administrative fine for officials in the amount of two thousand to five thousand rubles, or disqualification for a period of up to three years; for legal entities-from ten thousand to fifty thousand rubles. ";
2) article 17.14 Supplement part of 2-1 as follows:

"2-1. Failure to comply with the demands contained in the document to cancel the Executive with a personal account or custody account debtor and crediting to the account or custody account plaintiff securities subject to the availability of securities on the relevant account of the debtor issuer, independently working on keeping the register of owners of securities, a professional participant of the securities market, exercising the rights on securities owned by the debtor -is fined by administrative fine for legal entities in the amount of one third of the value of equity securities, exigible but not more than one half of the value of such securities. ";
3) Article 23.1: and) part 1 after digits "14.35," to complement the figures "14.36,", the words "part 2 of article 17.14" were replaced by the words "parts 2 and 2-1 article 17.14";
b) paragraph three of 3 digits after "14.31-14.33," to complement the figures "14.36,", the words "part 2 of article 17.14" were replaced by the words "parts 2 and 2-1 article 17.14";
4) in part 2 of article 28.3:) (repealed-Federal Act of arrival N 249-FZ) b) in paragraph 77, the words "part 2 of article 17.14" were replaced by the words "parts 2 and 2-1 article 17.14.
Article 10 to amend the Arbitration procedure of the Russian Federation (collection of laws of the Russian Federation, 2002, N 30, art. 3012; 2008, N 24, art. 2798; N 30, art. 3594) as follows: 1) in part 1 of article 33: a) paragraph 2 shall be amended as follows: "2) on disputes referred to in article 225-1 of this code;";
b) paragraph 4 shall be amended as follows: "4) for disputes arising from the activities of depositaries, related to the rights of the shares and other securities, and with the implementation of the envisaged by federal law other rights and duties";
in item 4-Supplement) 1 to read as follows: "4-1) for disputes arising from the activities of Crown corporations and their legal status, order management, creation, reorganization, liquidation, the organisation and powers of their organs, the responsibility of their bodies";
2) article 38 supplement part of 4-1 to read as follows: "4-1. The statement of claim or statement of dispute referred to in article 225-1 of the present Code shall be filed with the Arbitration Court at the location of the legal person referred to in article 225-1 of this code. ";
3) in the fifth subparagraph of article 40, the words "and other bodies" should be replaced by the words "other bodies and organisations, citizens";
4) article 46 shall be amended as follows: "article 46. Participation in the multiple plaintiffs or defendants 1. An action may be brought before the arbitral tribunal jointly by several claimants or more defendants (procedural complicity).
2. Procedural complicity allowed if: 1) the subject-matter of the dispute are general rights and (or) the duties of several plaintiffs or defendants;
2) right and (or) the duties of several plaintiffs or defendants have one base;
3) subject-matter of the dispute are similar rights and responsibilities.
3. Each of the plaintiffs or defendants in relation to the other side of the stands in the process yourself. Partners can entrust the case to one or more of them.
4. can the co-plaintiffs to intervene in the case before the adoption of the judicial act, which ends with a consideration of the merits of the case at the Arbitration Court of first instance.
5. If it is impossible to deal with the case without the participation of another person as a respondent, the Arbitration Court of first instance drew him to participate in the case as a defendant at the request of the parties or with the consent of the plaintiff.
6. If Federal law provides for mandatory participation in another entity as a defendant, as well as in cases arising out of administrative and other public legal relations, Arbitration Court of first instance, on his own initiative, draws him to participate in the case as a co-defendant.
7. a thirdparty applicant for intervention, about bringing a co-respondent or denial in this ruling. Determination to reject petitions to intervene, on the prosecution of co-defendant thirdparty applicant may be appealed by the person submitting the application, in a period not exceeding ten days from the date of its issuance, in the arbitration appeal court.
8. After the entry into force in the case, action initiated participation in the consideration of the case of co-defendant is carried out from the beginning. ";
5) part 2 of article 48 shall read as follows: "2. The replacement of its successor or on the refusal in the Court of Arbitration stated in the relevant judicial act, which can be appealed.";
6) part 4 of article 50 shall be reworded as follows: "4. The intervention of a third party who claims independent claims on the subject of the dispute, or the refusal of this ruling. Definition about refusal of intervention of a third party who claims independent claims on the subject of the dispute, may be appealed by the person submitting the application, in a period not exceeding ten days from the date of this determination, the Court of appeal. ";
7) Article 51 supplement part of the 3-1 as follows:

"3-1. Definition of the refusal of intervention of a third party, not declaring independent claims on the subject of the dispute, may be appealed by the person submitting the application, in a period not exceeding ten days from the date of this determination, the Court of appeal.";
8) article 53 shall be amended as follows: "article 53. Recourse to the protection of public interests, rights and lawful interests of other persons 1. In cases envisaged by federal law, State bodies, local self-government bodies and other bodies may apply to the Court of arbitration in the protection of the public interest.
2. In cases provided by the present code and other federal laws, organizations and citizens shall have the right to request the arbitral tribunal to protect the rights and lawful interests of other persons.
3. In the address must be specified, what is the violation of the public interest or the rights and (or) the legitimate interests of other persons, giving rise to recourse to the arbitral tribunal.
4. the authority addressed to the Arbitration Court in protection of public interests, organizations and citizens in protecting the rights and lawful interests of other persons shall enjoy procedural rights and bear the procedural obligation of the plaintiff.
5. the refusal of authorities, organizations and citizens specified in parts 1 and 2 of this article, from the claim does not deprive the plaintiff of the right to demand consideration of a case on the merits. ";
9) article 61: and) part 4 supplemented by the following sentence: "the powers of the representative may also be expressed in a statement submitted in court session, as indicated in the Protocol.";
b) complement the parts 6 and 7 as follows: "6. The power of attorney on behalf of the individual entrepreneur shall be signed and stamped with the seal or may be ascertained in accordance with part 7 of this article.
7. The power of attorney on behalf of the citizen may be notarized or otherwise prescribed by federal law. ";
10) paragraph 1 part 1 article 91, after the words "money" add the words "(including money that will flow to the bank account);
11) Article 93: and) part 1 shall be amended as follows: "1. the application about maintenance claim is carried out by the arbitration court handling the case or complaint on the definition on securing the claim or denial in ensuring action.";
b) Supplement 1-parts 1 and 2-1 to read: "1-1. Consideration of the application of the provision of the claim by the arbitration court handling the case, exercised by a single judge not later than the next day after receipt of an application to the Court without notice to the parties.
1-2. Consideration of the application of the provision of the claim by the Arbitration Court, considering a complaint to the definition on the provision or the refusal to provide the claim occurs simultaneously with the examination of a complaint concerning the rules of the relevant trial court, established by the present code. ";
12) article 98 shall be amended as follows: "article 98. Damages and compensation in connection with the claim 1. The defendant and other persons whose rights and (or) legal interests are violated the provision of the suit, after the entry into force of the Court decision of the arbitral tribunal to deny the claim has the right to demand from the person on the application which resulted in the adoption of provisional measures, damages in the order and in the amount provided for civil legislation or compensation.
2. The amount of compensation determined by the Court depending on the nature of the violation and other circumstances of the case, taking into account the requirements of reasonableness and fairness on disputes referred to in article 225-1 of this code, within the limits of from ten thousand to one million rubles, on other disputes from one thousand to one million dollars.
3. Claim for damages or compensation shall be presented in the Arbitration Court, the trial at which the interim measures were taken.
4. The rules established by this article shall be applied in cases of abandonment of a claim without examination on grounds provided for by paragraphs 1 and 2 of part 1 of article 148 of this code, as well as in cases of termination of proceedings on the grounds provided for in paragraphs 2-4 of part 1 of article 150 of this code. ";
13) Article 99: and) to supplement part of 3-1, to read: "3-1. Statement on ensuring the property interests in a dispute referred to in article 225-1 of the present Code shall be filed with the Arbitration Court at the location of the legal person referred to in article 225-1 of this code, and in case such dispute stems from the activities of the holder of the registry of securities owners, on the location of securities issuer. ";
b) part 10 the words "ensuring that property interests to suit aggrieved has the right to demand reimbursement from the applicant" should be replaced by the words "rights and (or) the legitimate interests are infringed upon securing property interests prior to the commencement of the action, shall be entitled to demand of their choice from the complainant damages or compensation in the manner provided for in article 98 of the present Code";

14) article 106 after the words "assistance" (representatives), add the words "the costs of the legal person corporate dispute notification if federal law establishes the obligation of such notification;
15) Article 119 shall be amended as follows: "article 119. The imposition of court fines 1. Court fines imposed by the Court of arbitration in cases stipulated by this code. The size of the court fine imposed on nationals, may not exceed two thousand five hundred roubles for officers-five thousand rubles, on organization-one hundred thousand rubles, unless otherwise provided for in this article.
2. The size of the court fine imposed by the Court of arbitration in the case provided for in part 4 of article 225-4 of this code, is five thousand rubles.
3. The size of the court fine imposed by the Court of arbitration in the case envisaged by article 225-10 part 6 of this code, the citizens, is two thousand five hundred roubles for persons carrying out the functions of the sole executive body or heads of collective executive body of the legal person, or five thousand rubles.
4. The size of the court fine imposed by the Court of arbitration in the case provided for in parts 2 and 3 of article 225-12 of this code, the citizens, is two thousand five hundred roubles for persons carrying out the functions of the sole executive body or heads of collective executive body of the legal person, or five thousand rubles, on organization, ten thousand rubles.
5. the arbitral tribunal shall have the right to impose the court fine for persons involved in the case, and other persons present in the courtroom for their contempt of the Arbitration Court. The court fine for contempt shall be imposed if the Act is not punishable.
6. court fines imposed by the arbitral tribunal to officials of State bodies, local authorities and other bodies, organizations, recovered from their personal funds.
7. judicial fines collected in federal budget income. ";
16) article 124 shall be reworded as follows: "article is 124. Change of the name of a person, change addresses during the proceedings 1. Persons participating in the case, the arbitral tribunal must inform about the change in its name. In the absence of such a communication, the person involved in the case, referred to in Court Act proceeding from the last known name for the arbitral tribunal to that person.
2. the persons involved in the case, the arbitral tribunal must inform about the change of address during the proceedings. In the absence of such messages are sent by the judicial acts copies last known address and the arbitral tribunal shall be deemed to have been delivered, even if the addressee at that address is no longer, or do not reside.
3. If the person involved in the case, the arbitral tribunal reported telephone and fax numbers, e-mail address, or similar information, it shall inform the arbitral tribunal of their change during the proceedings.
4. the arbitral tribunal indicates in the definition or change of the name of the trial protocol, persons involved in the case, his address, telephone and fax numbers, email addresses or similar information. ";
17) paragraph 2 of part 1 of article 129 shall be invalidated;
18) in article 130: (a)) Supplement part of 2-1 as follows: "2-1. Arbitration Court of the first instance court, finding that in its production, there are several related cases on the basis of the occurrence of the alleged claims and (or) evidence submitted, as well as in other cases, the risk of adopting contradictory judicial acts on its own initiative or at the request of the person involved in the case, brings these cases into a single production for their joint consideration. ";
b) in part 3, the words "if appropriate to separate consideration of requirements" were replaced by the words "If separate consideration of the requirements of the relevant objectives of efficient justice";
in) part 5 shall be amended as follows: "5. Joinder joinder, the allocation of requirements in separate proceedings or reject the Arbitration Court shall determine. A copy of the determination shall be sent to individuals involved in the matter. ";
g) supplement parts 6-9 to read as follows: "6. The cases in the production of the Arbitration Court of first instance, in the case of combining them into one production transferred to the judge, who used other judges took claim to the production of the arbitral tribunal.
7. Definition of Arbitration Court to reject petitions for joinder joinder, the allocation of requirements in separate proceedings may be appealed by the person submitting the application, in a period not exceeding ten days from the date of this determination, the Court of appeal.
8. After the joinder of trials or requirements in a separate production of the examination of the case is made from the outset.

9. If the arbitral tribunal when reviewing the case found that the production of another arbitration court case which are connected on the basis of their appearance and (or) evidence submitted with the requirements stated in the case before it, and there is a risk of conflicting judicial acts, the arbitral tribunal may suspend the proceedings on the case in accordance with paragraph 1 of part 1 of article 143 of this code. ";
19) article 131 shall be amended as follows: "article 131. Review on the statement of claim 1. The respondent shall send or submit to the Arbitration Court and the persons participating in the case, review the respondent's declaration stating objections to the charges against requirements for each argument, contained in the statement of claim.
2. In the cases and pursuant to procedure established by the present Code, other participants in the arbitral proceedings shall be entitled to send to the arbitral tribunal and other persons participating in the case review in writing on the statement of claim.
3. Review the statement of claim is sent to the Court of arbitration and the persons participating in the case, by registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt within a period of time provides an opportunity to review the withdrawal before the start of the trial. The dispatch of the revocation and the time-limit within which the persons participating in the case should submit feedback, can be specified in the definition on the adoption of the statement of claim to the Court of arbitration of the production.
4. If the period of time set by the Tribunal, the respondent does not submit a review on the claim, the arbitral tribunal may consider the case according to the evidence, or if it is impossible to examine the case without revoking the right to set a new deadline for its submission. In doing so, the arbitral tribunal may be attributed to the defendant legal expenses regardless of the outcome of the consideration of the case in accordance with part 2 of article 111 of this code.
5. In response to the statement of claim shall contain: 1) the name of the plaintiff, its location or, if the plaintiff is a citizen, his place of residence;
2 the respondent) the name of its location or, if the defendant is a citizen, his place of residence, date and place of birth, place of work or place and date of State registration as an individual entrepreneur;
3) objection to each argument regarding the merits of the stated requirements, with reference to the laws and other regulatory legal acts, as well as evidence justifying the objection;
4) list of attached to the documents.
6. In the recall may be indicated phone numbers, fax numbers, e-mail addresses, and other information necessary for the proper and timely consideration of the case.
7. The withdrawal of the writ enclosed documents which confirm the arguments and (or) objections to the claim, as well as the documents that confirm the dispatch of copies of reviews and the annexed documents to the claimant and other persons participating in the case.
8. Review the statement of claim shall be signed by the defendant or his representative. To recall, signed by the representative, attached power of attorney or other document confirming his authority to sign revocation. ";
20) article 132 supplement parts 5 and 6 to read as follows: "5. the arbitral tribunal of the first instance court, finding that in its production, there are several cases that meet the requirements of the initial conditions and counter claims, brings together on its own initiative or at the request of the person involved in the case, these cases into a single production for their joint consideration by the rules established in article 130 of the present code.
6. after the adoption of the counterclaim is made consideration of the case from the beginning. ";
21) Article 133 shall be amended as follows: "article 133. Task of preparing the case for trial 1. Tasks of the preparation of the case for trial are the determination of the nature of the disputed legal relationship and the applicable legislation, the circumstances of importance for the proper consideration of the case; resolution of the question of the composition of the persons involved in the case, and other participants in the arbitration process; assisting persons participating in the case, in view of the necessary evidence; conciliation of the parties.
2. preparing the case for trial is conducted by a judge sitting alone for each in the production of the first instance court of arbitration case in order to ensure its proper and timely review. ";
134) article 22 shall be amended as follows: "article 134. The term of preparation of cases for trial 1. The Arbitration Court of the first instance since the adoption of the Declaration to the manufacture shall determine the preparation of cases for trial and specifies the actions to be taken to commit persons participating in the case, and deadlines for performing these actions. To prepare the case for trial may be specified in the definition of acceptance of the Declaration.
2. preparing the case for trial takes place within a period to be fixed by the judge, taking into account the circumstances of the particular case and the need to commit the relevant proceedings and ends with the preliminary trial, if in accordance with the present Code provides otherwise. ';

23) article 148: a) in the first subparagraph, the word "Arbitration" should be replaced by "1. The arbitration ";
b) Supplement part of 2 to read as follows: "2. the arbitral tribunal leaves the claim without examination on other grounds stipulated by this code.";
24) part 2 of article 150 shall be supplemented with the words "and in other cases provided by the present Code";
25) Article 152 shall be amended as follows: "Article 152. Examination of the case and decide the matter is considered by the Arbitration Court of first instance within a period not exceeding three months from the date of receipt of an application to the Court of arbitration, including the period to prepare the case for trial and to decide on the case, unless this Code provides otherwise. ';
26) Article 188: and) part 3 shall be amended as follows: "3. the complaint in the definition of arbitration, Court of first instance may be appealed to the arbitration appellate court in a period not exceeding one month from the date of order, unless other definitions and term is not established by this code.";
b) complement parts 4-6 to read as follows: "4. the complaint in the definition of Arbitration Court of appellate instance may be submitted to arbitration, the Court of Cassation in a period not exceeding one month from the date of the determination, unless otherwise set this code.
5. complaint to the ruling of the Arbitration Court of appeal adopted on the results of consideration of an appeal on the definition of Arbitration Court of first instance may be appealed to the Arbitration Court of Cassation in a period not exceeding one month from the date of entry into force of this regulation, in accordance with the present code such a ruling may be appealed to the Arbitration Court of Cassation.
6. the complaint in the definition of Arbitration Court of Cassation may be filed within a period not exceeding one month from the date of the determination, in accordance with article 291 of this code. ";
27) complement the heads of 28-1 and 28-2 as follows: "chapter 28-1. CASES of CORPORATE DISPUTES Article 225-1. The case for corporate disputes Arbitration courts adjudicate on disputes relating to the establishment of a legal entity, its management or participation in a legal entity, which is a commercial organization, as well as in the non-commercial partnership Association (Union) of commercial organizations, a non-profit organization that brings together businesses and (or) individual entrepreneurs, a non-profit organization with an SRO status in accordance with the Federal data protection law (hereinafter referred to as the corporate disputes), including corporate disputes : 1) disputes related to the creation, reorganization and liquidation of a legal entity;
2) disputes relating to membership shares, shares in the share capital (aggregate) business companies and partnerships, shares of cooperative members, establishment of their burdens and the realization of the rights deriving therefrom, except for disputes arising from the activities of depositaries, related to the rights of the shares and other securities, disputes arising in connection with the section of the estate or the common property of the spouses, which includes promotions , the share in the authorized capital (aggregate) business companies and partnerships, shares of the members of cooperatives;
3) disputes involving claims of founders participants, members of the legal entity (hereinafter referred to as parties to a legal entity) for damages caused by a legal person, the invalidation of deals executed by a legal entity, and (or) the application of the consequences of the invalidity of such transactions;
4) disputes relating to the appointment or election, termination, suspension of powers and responsibility of persons who are or were part of authorities and control bodies of a legal person, as well as disputes arising from civil legal relationships between these entities and entity in connection with the implementation of the suspension, termination of powers of the above-mentioned persons;
5) disputes relating to the emission of securities, including challenging non-regulatory legal acts, decisions and actions (inactivity) of State bodies, local government bodies, other bodies, officials, decisions of the managing bodies of the issuer, to the challenging of transactions committed in the process of placing equity securities, reports (notifications) on the outcome of the issue (additional issue) equity securities;
6) disputes arising from the activities of the holders of the registry of securities owners related to the rights of the shares and other securities, with the Registrar of securities of other rights and responsibilities under federal law in connection with the placement and (or) treatment of securities;
7) disputes concerning the convening of a general meeting of members of the legal entity;
8) disputes concerning appeals against decisions of governing bodies of a legal person;
9) disputes arising from the activities of notaries witnessing deals with shares in the Charter capital of a limited liability company.
Article 225-2. The procedure for examining cases of corporate disputes

1. cases of corporate disputes dealt with by the arbitral tribunal on the General rules of the lawsuit provided by the present Code, with the characteristics specified in the present chapter.
2. In cases provided for in paragraph 5 of article 225-1 of the present code and the related challenge of non-legislative and legal acts, decisions and actions (inactivity) of State bodies, local government bodies, other bodies, officials also apply to features that are installed by the head 24 of this code.
Article 225-3. Requirements for the statement of claim, statement of corporate dispute 1. The statement of claim, statement of corporate dispute must comply with the requirements, under article 125 of this code. In the statement, the statement must also be specified: 1) State registration number of the legal person referred to in article 225-1 of this code;
2) contained in the unified State Register of legal entities address (location) of the legal person referred to in article 225-1 of this code.
2. the statement of claim, shall be enclosed with the documents referred to in article 126 of this code, as well as an extract from the unified State Register of legal entities or other document confirming the State registration of legal person and contains information about its address (location) and State registration number.
Article 225-4. Access to information about corporate dispute and the right to participate in the 1. Arbitration Court, hearing the case on corporate dispute puts on their official website on the Internet information on the adoption of the statement of claim, statement production, as well as the movement of the case on the dispute and judicial acts, including the intervention of new persons, about changing the grounds or a subject previously declared unenforceable, interim measures, about the denial of the claim, the claim to conclude a settlement agreement concerning the adoption of a judicial act, which ends the proceedings before the Court of arbitration.
2. Persons participating in case shall be informed by the arbitral tribunal seised by the rules established in article 121 of this code. The arbitral tribunal shall notify the legal person referred to in article 225-1 of this Code concerning the adoption of the statement of claim, statement of corporate dispute, about changing the basis or subject matter of a claim by sending this legal person copies of relevant court decisions to the address contained in the unified State Register of legal entities, not later than the next day after the date of the relevant court decisions.
3. In determining the adoption of the statement of claim, statement to the production of the arbitral tribunal may specify the obligation of legal persons specified in part 2 of this article shall notify the institution of the proceedings, the subject-matter and on the basis of a claimed in bankruptcy court requirements about the circumstances of the dispute participants in this legal entity, individuals within its control and monitoring bodies, as well as the holder of register of owners of securities of the entity and (or) the depositary exercising the rights on securities of the entity.
4. In case of failure to execute the duties under part 3 of this article, the person serving as the company's sole executive body or leading the collegial executive body of the legal person referred to in article 225-1 of this code, the Court of arbitration court fine may be imposed in accordance with the procedure and in the amounts established by Chapter 11 of this code.
5. a legal person referred to in article 225-1 of this code, shall have the right to acquaint themselves with the case materials on the dispute, make extracts from them, make copies, receive information about the movement of cases through any public communication.
Article 225-5. Reconciliation of corporate disputes 1. Corporate disputes can be resolved by the parties under the rules established by chapter 15 of the present Code, through the conclusion of an amicable agreement or other conciliation procedures, including with the assistance of the conciliator, unless otherwise stipulated in the Federal law.
2. the arbitral tribunal does not accept the plaintiff's refusal of the claim, the recognition of the claim by the respondent does not approve a settlement of the parties in cases where this runs counter to the law of or infringe the rights and (or) the legitimate interests of other persons, including legal persons specified in article 225-1 of this code.
Article 225-6. Interim measures of the arbitral tribunal for corporate disputes 1. Interim measures on corporate disputes shall be taken by the arbitral tribunal on the grounds provided for in article 90 of this code. While the adoption of interim measures should not result in actual impossibility to exercise the legal person referred to in article 225-1 of the present Code, activity or significantly impede the implementation of the activities as well as to the violation of the legal entity of the legislation of the Russian Federation.

2. interim measures in corporate disputes accepted by the Court of arbitration in the manner provided for in Chapter 8 of this code, with the characteristics specified in the present article.
3. Interim measures in corporate disputes may be, inter alia: 1) the seizure of shares, share in the authorized capital (aggregate) business companies and partnerships, shares of the members of cooperatives;
2) prohibition of the respondent and others to make transactions and other actions in respect of shares, shares in the share capital (aggregate) business companies and partnerships, shares of members of cooperatives;
3) prohibition of bodies of a legal person to make decisions or perform other actions on matters related to the subject matter of the dispute or directly associated with him;
4) prohibition of a legal person, its authorities or parties, as well as other persons to carry out the decisions adopted by the organs of the legal person;
5) the prohibition on the holder of register of owners of securities and/or depositary exercise recording for accounting or transfer of rights to shares and other securities, as well as perform other actions taken in connection with the placement and (or) treatment of securities.
4. The arbitral tribunal may be adopted by other interim measures, corporate disputes, including multiple security measures.
5. When the granting of counter-security its size is determined in accordance with paragraph 1 of article 94 of the present code.
6. If the demand of the plaintiff is exemplary character counter-security size is determined by the arbitral tribunal on the basis of the respondent's potential losses caused by the security measures, but for individuals may not be less than fifty thousand rubles for legal entities-one hundred thousand rubles.
7. In case when assessing the application for interim measures at the Court of arbitration the need arose to hear explanations of persons involved in the case, and the person who made the statement on the provision of the claim provided counter-security, referred to in paragraph 4 of this article, a judge may appoint a review statement on securing a claim at the court hearing to be held within a period not exceeding fifteen days from the date of receipt of such a statement in the Arbitration Court.
8. the Arbitration Court not later than the next day after receipt of an application about maintenance claim, the arbitral tribunal shall determine adoption of applications to the manufacture of the arbitral tribunal, which specifies the time and place of the court session. Such determination not later than the next day after the date of its issuance shall be sent to the persons participating in the case, in the manner prescribed by part 3 of article 121 of this code.
9. the decision about acceptance of declarations on ensuring the IAC production, the arbitral tribunal may also specify the obligation of applicant statement on securing the claim, notify the persons involved in the case, and the legal person referred to in article 225-1 of this code, the time and place of the examination of the application on securing the claim.
10. In case of failure of the duty to notify under part 9 of this article, the person who made the statement on securing the claim, the arbitral tribunal can be a court fine imposed in accordance with the procedure and in the amounts established by Chapter 11 of this code. If a statement on securing the claim requested a legal person the court fine is imposed on the person serving as the company's sole executive body or leading the collegial executive body of the legal person.
11. The arbitral tribunal may consider a statement on securing the claim in the absence of the persons referred to in paragraph 7 of this article, if by the beginning of the court session offers information about their notification of the time and place of the examination of the application on securing the claim, or if the person applying on securing the claim, submitted evidence that it had taken all the necessary measures for such notification.
Article 225-7. Cases of compulsion of the legal person to convene a general meeting of members 1. In cases envisaged by federal law, the bodies of a legal person or its participants shall have the right to request the Arbitration Court with the claim for compulsion of legal person to convene a general meeting of members.
2. The case for compulsion of legal person to convene a general meeting of members shall be dealt with in a period not exceeding one month from the date of receipt of the statement of claim in Arbitration Court, including on the preparation of a case for trial and a decision on the case.
3. The decision of the Arbitration Court of the juridical person's compulsion to convene a general meeting of members shall be immediately enforceable, unless other deadlines are not installed in the Court's decision.
4. The decision of the Arbitration Court of the juridical person's compulsion to convene a general meeting of members may be appealed to the appellate court of arbitration within ten days from the date of adoption of the decision.

5. the decision of the Arbitration Court of appellate instance according to the results of the appeal against the decision to force the legal person to convene a general meeting of members may be appealed to the Arbitration Court of Cassation within ten days from the date of adoption of the decision.
Article 225-8. Consideration of cases on disputes for damages caused by a legal person 1. In cases stipulated by the Federal law, members of the legal entity may apply to the Court of arbitration of the claim for damages caused by the legal person. Such members shall enjoy procedural rights and bear responsibilities of plaintiff, and proceedings also have the right to demand the enforcement of the decisions of the arbitral tribunal in favour of that legal person.
2. the decision on approval of requirements on the claim for damages is made in favor of the legal person in whose interests was sued. On the request of the person who has a claim for damages, the writ shall be sent for execution directly by the arbitral tribunal.
3. Legal costs associated with the consideration of the suit of the participants of the legal person for damages caused by a legal person, shall bear such parties in equal shares.
4. Reimbursement of legal costs is made according to the rules established by article 110 of the present code.
Article 225-9. Especially appealing the Arbitration Court definitions for corporate disputes 1. The definition of Arbitration Court handed down in cases of corporate disputes are appealed by the rules established in article 188 of this code. Complaints of such definitions, except for definitions of the cessation of production and abandonment of statements without consideration, are served in the appellate court of arbitration within ten days from the date of their issuance.
2. The filing of a claim for which are set out in part 1 of this article, the definition does not preclude consideration of the case by the Court of arbitration and the Commission of particular procedural actions in the case.
Chapter 28-2. CONSIDERATION OF CASES on the protection of the rights and lawful interests of a GROUP of PERSONS Article 225-10. The right to appeal to the Court of arbitration in the protection of rights and legal interests of a group of persons 1. Legal or physical entity which is a party to the legal relationship from which arose a dispute or claim shall be entitled to apply to a Court of arbitration to protect violated or disputed rights and lawful interests of other persons, are members of the same pravoonoshenija (hereinafter-the Group). To protect the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons may also apply to the organs, organizations and citizens in cases stipulated by the Federal law.
2. protection of the violated or disputed rights and lawful interests of a group of persons shall be considered by the Arbitration Court according to the rules established by this chapter, if on the day of treatment to the arbitral tribunal a person specified in part 1 of this article to request joined to not less than five persons.
3. adherence to the requirement of protecting the rights and lawful interests of a group of persons shall be by filing in writing the statements of a person or several persons are parties to legal relationships which arose from such a requirement.
Article 225-11. Affairs on the protection of the rights and lawful interests of a group of persons in the manner prescribed by this chapter may be considered case by: 1) corporate disputes;
2) disputes relating to the implementation of the activities of professional participants of the securities market;
3) other requirements under the conditions set out in article 225-10 of this code.
Article 225-12. The authority of the person who applied for the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons 1. Person who surrenders to the Arbitration Court in protection of rights and legal interests of a group of persons, acts without power of attorney on the basis set out in part 3 of article 225-10 of this code, the accession to the demand.
2. a person who surrenders to the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons, shall enjoy procedural rights and duties procedure bears the plaintiff. Such a person must conscientiously defend the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons.
3. the arbitral tribunal shall have the right to impose the court fine on the person who surrenders to the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons in the event of misuse their procedural rights or its failure to comply with their procedural obligations.
4. The authority of the person who applied for the rights and legitimate interests of groups of individuals, may be terminated by the Court of arbitration: 1) in the case of denial of the claim of the person;
2) at the request of a majority of persons adhering to the requirement of such a group, if there are serious grounds for termination of data authority, particularly the gross violation of his obligations or of his revealed inability for sensible management of affairs on the protection of the rights and lawful interests of a group of persons.
Article 225-13. Requirements for the statement of claim, statement, filed in defense of the rights and legitimate interests of groups of individuals

1. The statement of claim, statement, served to protect the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons, shall comply with the requirements set forth in article 125 of this code, as well as other requirements for the form and contents of an application to set this code for certain categories of cases. In the statement, the statement must also be specified: 1) the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons whose claim;
2) circle of persons involved in legal relation, from which arose a dispute or claim;
3) name of persons affiliated to the requirement, their location or, if a person acceded to the demand is a citizen, his place of residence, date and place of his birth, his place of work or place and date of its State registration as an individual entrepreneur.
2. the statement of claim, shall be enclosed with the documents referred to in article 126 of this code and other documents in accordance with the requirements of this code shall be established by the relevant declarations in certain categories of cases. The statement of claim, the statement also attached documents certifying adherence to the request of persons referred to in paragraph 3 of part 1 of this article, and they belong to a group of persons.
Article 225-14. Preparation of case on the protection of the rights and lawful interests of a group of persons for trial 1. When preparing a case on the protection of the rights and lawful interests of a group of persons for trial judge: 1) defines the nature of the disputed legal relationship and to apply legislation;
2) clarifies the requirements of the applicant in the protection of rights and legal interests of a group of persons, and the founding of these requirements;
3) will decide on the composition of the Group of persons and the possibility of establishing other persons that are members of the disputed legal relationship;
4) offers to provide evidence of a person's belonging to a group of persons;
5) performs other stipulated in article 135 of this code actions.
2. the definition of preparing the case for trial arbitral tribunal indicates the ability to deal with the case in accordance with the rules established by this chapter, and sets a time limit within which the applicant for the rights and legitimate interests of a group of individuals has to offer to others from this group to join the demand for the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons. In this definition, the Court of Arbitration also determines the period during which a person from this group can join the requirement to protect their rights and legitimate interests before the arbitral tribunal by delivering the accession to this requirement a person who applies to the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons.
3. Proposal for accession to the requirement for the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a group of individuals can be done in a public form, through the publication of reports in the media or in the form of reports by registered mail with advice of delivery or in any other form. Form, which must be made a proposal to accede to the request, the arbitral tribunal shall determine.
4. A proposal to accede to the demand for the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons must contain: 1) name and address of the defendant;
2) name of the applicant in the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons;
3 applicant) requirement to protect the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons;
4) name of the arbitration court handling the case;
5) term, which is set by the arbitral tribunal and during which other persons are members of the disputed legal relationship may accede to the demand for the protection of their rights and legitimate interests before the arbitral tribunal by delivering to the person seeking to protect the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons, of the instrument of accession;
6) different defined by arbitral tribunal information.
5. a person who surrenders to the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a group of people before the end of the preparation of the case for trial arbitral tribunal reports provided for in paragraph 3 of part 1 of article 225-13 of this code provides information about other persons, have acceded to this request and also presents documents confirming the accession of these persons to this requirement and that they belong to a group of persons.
Article 225-15. Replacement of the applicant in the protection of rights and legal interests of a group of persons 1. Replacement of the applicant in the protection of rights and legal interests of a group of persons is allowed in case of termination of his term of Office on grounds provided for by article 225-4 part 12 of this code.
2. in cases where the Arbitration Court applicant in protection of rights and legal interests of a group of persons, about the denial of the claim, the arbitral tribunal shall issue a ruling on adjournment of trial and sets a period not exceeding two months from the date of determination and within which should be the replacement of the said person by another person from this group.

3. In the determination of deposition of trial arbitral tribunal indicates the applicant's duty to protect the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons, to inform about the denial of the claim of persons adhering to the requirement of protecting the rights and lawful interests of a group of persons, and determines the shape of their notification, subject to the provisions set out in article 225-14 of this code. The notification must also indicate the need to replace the applicant in protecting the rights and legitimate interests of another person, group of persons, and information on the consequences provided by paragraph 7 of this article. Proof of notification of the denial of the claim shall be sent to the person requesting the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons to the Court of arbitration.
4. the Arbitration Court within the time limit prescribed in the definition of the Court should be presented evidence produced replacement applicant in protection of rights and legal interests of a group of persons.
5. the arbitral tribunal does not accept the refusal of the claim, if at the time of the expiry of the term set in the definition of the arbitral tribunal does not have information about the notification of persons adhering to the requirement of protecting the rights and lawful interests of a group of persons, and to replace the applicant in protection of rights and legal interests of a group of persons.
6. To terminate the proceedings in respect of a person seeking to protect the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons, and to replace it by another person, the arbitral tribunal shall determine.
7. If the person who surrenders to the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of individuals and groups the complainant about the denial of the claim, performs all necessary actions to notify persons that have acceded to the request for the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons, but the persons within the prescribed period the Court of arbitration will not replace such a person by another person, the Tribunal accepts the waiver of the claim and shall terminate the proceedings on the case about the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of groups of persons in order established in article 151 of the present code. Termination of proceedings concerning the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons does not preclude persons from this group the right to appeal to the Court of arbitration for the protection of their violated or disputed rights or legitimate interests in the manner prescribed by this code.
8. In the case of the majority of persons adhering to the requirement of protecting the rights and lawful interests of a group of persons, a petition to replace the person of the applicant in the protection of rights and legal interests of a group of people by another person on the basis specified in paragraph 2 of part 4 of article 225-12 of this code, such treatment should be the nomination of another person to replace the applicant in protection of rights and legal interests of a group of persons. If the bankruptcy court motion replaces the person who surrenders to the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of groups of individuals, and will make an appropriate determination.
Article 225-16. The procedure of protection of rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons 1. Affairs on the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of groups of persons considered by arbitration courts by the rules established by the present Code, with features provided by this chapter.
2. the case of the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of Group of persons shall be considered by the Court of arbitration within a period which should not exceed five months from the date of the determination, on the adoption of the statement of claim, statement to the production of the arbitral tribunal, including the period to prepare the case for trial and a decision on the case.
3. persons who acceded to the demand on the protection of the rights and lawful interests of a group of people can get acquainted with materials of proceedings, to make them withdraw statement copies thereof.
4. the arbitral tribunal leaves the claim or petition without consideration if after taking it to manufacture determines that such claim or such an application filed by a person not making the right to accede to the demand for the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons is in the production of the arbitral tribunal, in addition to the respondent and on the same subject. Specified person explains the right to accede to the demand for the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons in the manner prescribed by article 225-10 of this code.
5. the arbitral tribunal shall terminate the proceedings, if it determines that you have taken on the request for the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of individuals and groups entered into legal force of the decision of the Court of arbitration and statement of claim or an application filed by a person not making use of the right of accession to this requirement, in addition to the respondent and on the same subject.
Article 225-17. The decision of the Arbitration Court in the case concerning the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons 1. The decision of the Arbitration Court in the case concerning the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons was adopted by the rules established by Chapter 20 of this code.
2. the circumstances established by entered into legal force of the decision of the arbitral tribunal for the previously examined case on the protection of the rights and lawful interests of a group of persons not proved again when considering the other proceedings by the arbitral tribunal upon application by the party concerned of the same group to the same defendant.

3. In the resolution on approval of requirements for the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons, the arbitral tribunal may specify the obligation of the defendant to bring the decision to the attention of all the persons who are parties to legal relationships which arose from this requirement, established by the Court of arbitration of the term through mass media or other means. ";
28) in article 267 of the word "month" shall be replaced with the words "two months";
29) Article 272: a) part 2, the words "in part 3 of this article" should be replaced by the words "part 3 of article 39 of this code and part 3 of this article";
b) part 3 shall be amended as follows: "3. Appeals against the determination of the Arbitration Court of first instance, the appeal of which is stipulated in articles 46, 50, 51 and 130 of this code, as well as on the definition of return of writs and other impeding further movement of the case definitions shall be considered by the arbitration appellate court in a period not exceeding fifteen days from the date of receipt of such complaints to the arbitration appeal court.";
30) article 290 shall be reworded as follows: "article 290. Appeals the determination of the Arbitration Court of first instance and appeal 1. Appeals the determination of the Arbitration Court of first instance and appeal, filed by the rules established by this code, shall be considered by the Arbitration Court of Cassation in the manner prescribed by this chapter to review appeals from decisions and orders of the corresponding arbitral tribunal.
2. Appeals on the determination of the arbitral appellate court for the return of an appeal and on other cases movement impeding further determination shall be considered by the Arbitration Court of Cassation in a period not exceeding fifteen days from the date of receipt of such a complaint in Arbitration Court of Cassation.
Article 11 to amend the Federal law of October 2, 2007 year N 229-FZ "on enforcement proceedings" (collection of laws of the Russian Federation, 2007, no. 41, art. 4849; 2009, N 1, art. 14) as follows: 1) supplemented by article 8-1 as follows: "article 8-1. Compliance with the requirements of judicial acts as issuers and professional securities market participants 1. Executive document to cancel the account or custody account debtor and of acceptance to the account or custody account plaintiff securities (hereinafter referred to as the Executive securities to cancel the document) can be sent directly from the issuer of the debt-collector if he independently carries out activity on maintenance of register of holders of such securities, or the registry holder conducting maintenance of register of owners of securities on behalf of the issuer or to the depositary, who shall exercise the rights on securities of the debtor, provided that the plaintiff has available information on the debtor's securities accounts.
2. concurrently with the Executive securities to cancel the document the plaintiff submits a statement indicating the particulars referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of part 2 of article 8 hereof. Representative plaintiff submits a document certifying his or her authority, and information provided for in this article, about vzyskatele and about yourself.
3. Executive document to cancel the securities shall be enforceable by a person exercising the rights on securities of the debtor.
4. When transmitting the documents making up the system of keeping the register of owners of securities, securities transfer from personal account of the custody account or custody account to the personal account of a single depositary to another depositary unfulfilled or partially fulfilled Executive documents to cancel the securities transferred to the new person exercising the rights on securities of the debtor. ";
2) supplemented by article 73-1 as follows: "article 73-1. Features of foreclosing on the securities of the debtor 1. When the foreclosure of the property of the debtor-owner of registered securities, as well as securities to bearer issued with obligatory centralized storage or otherwise deposited with the depository on such securities arrest is effected in accordance with article 82 of this federal law.
2. Within three days from the date of receipt of the Executive document from plaintiff or the bailiff executing a person exercising the rights of the debtor in the securities, executes the contained in the Executive document demands to cancel the account or custody account debtor and crediting to the account or custody account plaintiff securities or makes a mark on the complete or partial non-performance of these requirements in connection with the absence at the debtor's securities accounts sufficient to meet the demands of the plaintiff.

3. Cancellation of securities from the account of a nominee in the system maintain the registry of securities owners in foreclosure on the property of a debtor that is a client of the depositary-nominee holder, without the cancellation of the relevant securities from Depo accounts of the debtor is not allowed. When you decommission a securities custody account with the debtor in the case of rights in such securities at the depository must be provided with simultaneous cancellation of the same number of securities of the same type, category, type with the custody account debtor and with nominal holder accounts in the system of keeping the register of owners of securities, and in case of impossibility of such simultaneous cancellation of emissive securities are debited in sequential order from the account debtor's Depot the depositary account nominal holder and each subsequent account of the depositary of a nominee until the nominee of the depositary account in the system of keeping the register of owners of securities.
4. In case of reasonable doubt as to the authenticity of Executive documents, obtained directly from the plaintiff (his representative), or doubt the veracity of the information submitted in accordance with paragraph 2 of article 8-1 of this federal law, a person exercising the rights on securities, to authenticate the Executive instrument or veracity may delay execution of Executive documents, but not more than seven days.
5. If the existing account or custody account debtor equity securities is insufficient for the execution of contained in Executive document requirements for the cancellation of securities, a person exercising the rights on securities, produces the cancellation available on accounts of debtor equity securities and continues to further performance as securities credited to the account or accounts of the execution debtor contained in Executive document demands to cancel the securities in full. About write-offs person exercising the rights on securities shall promptly inform the bailiff-performer or recoverer Executive document originated from the plaintiff.
6. A person exercising the rights on securities, finishes the execution of enforcement document in accordance with paragraph 10 of article 70 of the present Federal law.
7. Failure to comply with the recommendations contained in the Executive document requirements is grounds for an issuer of securities, professional securities market participant to administrative responsibility in accordance with part 2-1 article 17.14 code of the Russian Federation on administrative offences in accordance with article 114 of the present Federal law. ";
3) in the first subparagraph of part 5 of article 80, the words "referred to in article 73" should be replaced by "referred to in articles 73 and 73-1".
Article 12 amend the Federal law of December 1, 2007 year N 317-ФЗ "about the State Atomic Energy Corporation" Rosatom "(collection of laws of the Russian Federation, 2007, no. 49, St. 6078) as follows: 1) part 6 of article 8, after the words "appealed" to supplement the word "arbitration";
2) (repealed-Federal Law 02.07.2013 N 188-FZ) Article 13 to make the Federal law of December 30, 2008 year N 312-FZ "on amending the first part of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation" (collection of laws of the Russian Federation, 2009, N 1, art. 20) as follows: 1) item 28 of article 3 shall be invalidated;
2) in article 5: (a)) in part 2, the words "and the constituent treaties" should be deleted;
b) in part 5, the words "constituent treaties" should be replaced by the word "statutes", add the words "or has entered into force and arrived in the registering body at the moment of State registration of such changes the decisions of the Court concerning the ownership of shares in the Charter capital of a company".
Article 14 shall be declared null and void: 1) article 13 of the Federal law dated March 5, 1999 N 46-FZ "on protection of rights and legal interests of investors on the securities market" (collection of laws of the Russian Federation, 1999, no. 10, p. 1163);
2) paragraph of article 39, paragraph 1 1 August 7, 2001 federal law N 120-FZ "on amendments and additions to the Federal law" on joint stock companies "(collection of laws of the Russian Federation, 2001, no. 33, art. 3423);
3) item 32 article 1 December 28, 2002 Federal law N 185-ФЗ "about entry of changes and additions to the Federal law" on securities market "and on the amendments to the Federal law" on noncommercial organizations "(collection of laws of the Russian Federation, 2002, no. 52, art. 5141) amendment to paragraph 5 of article 51;
4 Article 16) 1 June 11, 2003 Federal law N 73-FZ "on amendments and additions to the Federal law" on agricultural cooperation "(collection of laws of the Russian Federation, 2003, N 24, art. 2248). Article 15

1. this federal law shall enter into force on the expiry of ninety days after the day of its official publication, with the exception of items 1-6 and the second subparagraph of paragraph "b" of article 6, paragraph 7, articles 7, 8 and 13 of the present Federal law.
2. Paragraphs 1-6 and the second paragraph of subparagraph b of paragraph 7 of article 6, article 8 and 13 of this federal law shall enter into force from the day of official publication of this federal law.
3. Article 7 of this federal law shall enter into force not earlier than on the expiry of one month from the day of its official publication.
4. From the date of entry into force of this federal law, federal laws and other regulatory legal acts acting on the territory of the Russian Federation, to bring them into compliance with this federal law applies to the extent that they do not contradict this federal law.
5. The cases in the manufacturing of arbitral tribunals and not considered prior to the date of entry into force of this federal law, from the date of entry into force of this federal law will be subject to review in accordance with the provisions established by the arbitration procedure code of the Russian Federation (as amended by this federal law).
6. cases which are assigned to the jurisdiction of the arbitration courts in accordance with the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (as amended by this federal law) rules and that are in the production of courts of general jurisdiction at the date of the entry into force of this federal law, shall be subject to review by the courts of general jurisdiction under the rules established by civil procedure legislation.
7. the courts of general jurisdiction denied making statements attributed to the jurisdiction of the arbitration the arbitration procedure code of the Russian Federation (as amended by this federal law) cases received before the date of entry into force of this federal law and not taken to the production by the courts of general jurisdiction at the date of the entry into force of this federal law, in connection with the nepodvedomstvennost'ju such cases to courts of general jurisdiction under paragraph 1 of article 134 of the code of civil procedure of the Russian Federation.
8. The cases in the manufacturing of arbitral tribunals and, in accordance with article 38 of the arbitration procedural code of the Russian Federation (as amended by this federal law) assigned to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Arbitration Court at the place of location of a legal entity shall be brought in the courts of arbitration in accordance with the rules on exclusive jurisdiction established by article 38 of the arbitration procedural code of the Russian Federation (as amended by this federal law), within thirty days from the date of entry into force of this federal law.
9. the provisions on the timing and modalities for their calculation under article 30-1 December 8, 1995 federal law N 193-FZ "on agricultural cooperation" (as amended by this federal law), paragraph 6 of article 53, paragraphs 5-8 of article 68, paragraph 3 of article 70, paragraph 6 of article 79, paragraph 1 of article 84 of the Federal law of December 26, 1995, N 208-FZ "about joint-stock societies" (as amended by this federal law) Article 26 April 22, 1996 federal law N 39-FZ "on securities market" (as amended by this federal law), article 17-1 May 8, 1996 federal law N 41-ФЗ "about production co-operatives" (as amended by this federal law), paragraphs 1, 3-6 of article 43, paragraph 5 of article 45 and article 46, paragraph 5 of the Federal law dated February 8, 1998, N 14-ФЗ "About societies with limited liability" (as amended by this federal law) apply to the requirements of the right to lodge which originated from the date of entry into force of this federal law. To which the right to bring before the date of entry into force of this federal law, those provisions shall apply, if the period between the day of the entry into force of this federal law and the expiry of the term provided for in effect prior to the date of entry into force of this federal law legislation exceeds the penalty stipulated in these provisions. In these cases, such time shall be calculated from the date of entry into force of this federal law.
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in Moscow, the Kremlin July 19, 2009 N 205-FZ

Related Laws