The Law Of 19 May 1925 To Accelerate Judecaţilor

Original Language Title:  LEGE din 19 mai 1925 pentru accelerarea judecaţilor

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$20 per month, or Get a Day Pass for only USD$4.99.
The LAW of 19 May 1925 to accelerate judecaţilor published in PARLIAMENT ISSUING the OFFICIAL GAZETTE nr. 108 of 19 May 1925 unification of certain dispoziţiuni of civil and commercial procedure and competence of the courts.

Chapter I General Conditions for the application of article 1 filing actions in jndecata will include: a) the name, residence, domicile or pronouns, both of the appellant and of the paritului;

b legal) quality of listed parties in the process;

c) application and the value of, the complainant's estimation, when assessment is likely.

For immovable property it will look like Street and number, and in the absence, in the vicinity and County in which the property is situated or indicatiunea after land records if there are;

d Indicatiunea lămurită of all) the reasons of fact and law which is based upon request;

Indicatiunea e) which is evidence supports each end of request.

When the sample consists in acts, will join upon request as many copies, certified by the applicant in order to comply with the original, how many are additionally pariti a copy of each act for the Court.
If the acts are written in a foreign language or Latin letters, certified by an authority or competinte by a sworn translator by the tribunal.
When the complainant voeşte to prove the action or any of the heads of its request, by the interrogator or sworn paritului, will be required to this end appearance in person.
When will invoke evidence with witnesses, it will show the name, pronoun and witnesses.

Article 2 Application of the judgement will be made in as many copies as many pariti am, more than one copy for the Court, signed by the applicant or trustee. In the latter case, it will make the file a copy of the warrant.

Failure to comply with article 3 referred to in article dispoziţiunilor. 9 point till the end from d draws, including a declaration of invalidity of the request.
The applicant will not be able to serve before the first instance of other documents and evidence than those put forward in the application, unless the process from desbaterile will be coming along need noui proof administration, which the complainant was unable to provide for them and who process cannot be resolved.

Chapter paritului 2 Onboarding. -Counterclaim Article 4 President, immediately after receiving the application the judgment and notice of handing over duties, ordered to communicate your action paritului a copy, together with copies of your documents, with invitatiunea, in written not later than thirty days after delivery, under penalty of dela dela art. 3 and 7, to answer the plaintiff's action through a written welcome to will do so many copies and so many rows of children on how many claimants are acts, plus a signed copy of pariti and a row of copies of documents to the tribunal. Meet will have filed within this period, under the evidence, making the registry of the Tribunal in question. It shall not be communicated to the applicant than if it does not reside in the city of residence of the Tribunal; in this case the applicant together with the copy intended for copies of documents will be inserted into the envelope submitted for that purpose by the applicant and fired again with the address will be sent by post within 24 hours of the registry.
Attesting to the filing Office at postal envelope biuroul proof of handing over.
In urgent cases, declared the law, or by the President, the above could be reduced without can be less than eight days.
If paritul locueste abroad, the period of thirty days may be extended.

Article 5 Meet paritului will feature: a) All excepţiunile why oppose the action of the plaintiff;

b) answer to all the points of fact and law of the action;

c) all means and samples with who defend themselves against each end from ceeerea complying with the appellant in this regard, under penalty of dela art. 3, para. 2, prescripţiunilor under art. 1. e;

d) mention of the counterclaim, the warranty, or any other application which has the purpose of introducing an Amita in the process.

When paritul will not make this statement welcome the requests above will judge separately.

Article 6 When are many, they may respond pariti each separately through a greeting, or collectively, all or part of them, through a greeting.
Responding to one or some of the others advantage pariti measure of common interest.

Article 7 Paritul that did not meet the times filed a within, or, although it did, has not raised any evidence, loafer throughout the first instance the right to serve any evidence. In such a case he shall retain only the right to defend themselves, discussing in fact and in law the merits of plaintiff's contention and evidence.
When following the desbaterilor the complainant asked for and was accepted into a new article. 3, para. 2, paritul contraproba will be entitled to only upon that point and under condition of a same sitting in invoke.
Paritul who did meet will have the right, in addition to the proof required by this, or to support invoace and desbateri noui samples resulting from the provisions and under rigid conditions shown by art. 3, para. 2. In article 8 the counterclaim shall comply with all generally required by art. 1 and 2.
It can not be done than with the meeting and, in the case when paritul does not believe it necessary to make the defipt welcome for this.
The counterclaim shall be communicated in the cases and forms, generally referred to in art. 4 for test prep.
All penalties provided for in the above dispoziţiunile, as well as those under the cap. I, shall apply when a counterclaim is made.
Counterclaim has not been ' filed within the time limit mentioned above, will judge separately.

Chapter 3 Looks and desbateri § 1.
Preliminary meeting Article 9 after expiry of the greeting or in which the applicant had submitted, or paritul shall be entitled to request the President of the Court for a preliminary meeting on fixation, proving the payment of the subpoenas.
The President will fix the day and time, summoning the parties mentioning ordonand as the party or parties responsible for the interrogator and vow to fnfatiseze in person.
This term shall not be shorter than five days have elapsed after the one established for generations from the filing of the greeting.

Article 10 Preliminary Meeting is intended for: a) trying reconciliation of the parties;

b Receipt of recognitions) declaraţiunilor or renunciation, and pronouncing judgement based on them;

c) settlement of nullity and of all excepţiunilor relating to the stamp, incompetinta, litispendinta, connectedness, the lack of quality, final and any other excepţiuni;

d Discutiunea over the admissibility of evidence), local research, surveys, interviews, scripts and checks, oath, witnesses, etc., as well as the administration of those able to be carried out;

e) Discutiunea on the admissibility of the application in principle, the reconventionale call in warranty, the incorrect indication of their author or disjungerii, and f) Possibly fund the prosecution in State Court.

Article 11 oral Desbaterile of the preliminary hearing will be brief. They will only find what points of the action and welcome as they stayed in discutiunea.

Article 12 the plaintiff is obliged, under penalty of revocation in the first instance, to look at this preliminary oral meeting excepţiunile and samples to the who meeting was caused by paritului or counterclaim.
The same duty, under the same penalty, and paritul to control these oral presentations of the appellant.

Article 13, Recognition in whole or in part of the plaintiff's pretentiunilor will be made by the person or the fired again by the trustee or authorized specifically for it.
The same rule applies to the appellant for the full or partial waiver from his pretentiunile.
Recognitions or waivers shall be signed by the party who made them or her representative.

Article 14 When its change the action, the plaintiff shall fix another preliminary sitting out only if paritul agrees to judge in the same sitting.

Article 15 If the deadline for a preliminary meeting is only one of the parties, the Court, after examining all of the file and will listen to the oral concluziunile of the party, will rule may admit and excepţiunile, pretentiunile, samples, or relative to the background, even if you absent party will find compelling.

Article 16 in cases where judgment unto adjourn due to observe the terms of the parties, it will not be reopened until after the passage of three months from the day of the suspension.
If the reopening, after the expiry of the above parties will not present, then the judgment will be suspended again and will not be reopened until after six months from the day of the suspension.
The parties will, however, ask for the reopening of the trial and before these deadlines if they declare that they reconciled and will ask for a decision, or if it will pay himself by cancellation of coli timbrate or by filing the financial administration of a proportional fee noui a quarter of the value of the proportional fee what she paid for action; and in non-intreitul actions of the tax paid.

Article 17

If the judgment allowed the counterclaim of paritului to judge with the main action, the complainant will propose orally, in the same sitting, the excepţiunile and invoaca samples in combating them, because listening to the judgment obiectiunile paritului should be able to decide on their admissibility.

Article 18 If the applicant declares that to combat the demand to achieve the reconventionale paritului or understand to serve other acts which do not and they could purchase up to a preliminary meeting, judecatotorul, if found to be justified it will grant any foreclosure, one term, appreciated enough, within which the applicant is obliged to submit them to the registry of the Tribunal under the making of proof.
Paritul will also have the right to submit to the registry launtrul noui in the term above, for combating acts produced by the plaintiff in the rigid conditions of the preceding paragraph.
Both the applicant and take knowledge paritul dela files paperwork filed.
Plaintiff or paritul that will not be complied with dispoziţiunilor above, lose the right to use such acts more noui in the course of the Court.

Article 19 If the preliminary meeting was admitted a local inspection, witnesses or experts, the propunatoare is obliged that within five days to pay the admission dela summonses of witnesses proposed or appointed expert and deposit totdeodată amount fixed by the Court for inspection, transport expenses and compensation for witnesses, when they are not in the locality, or expert fees. All this under penalty of revocation to use these proofs throughout the Court.
If he accepted a local research she will perform prior to the deadline for prosecuting the Fund.
Also if she accepted the evidence of witnesses, they will be able to be heard and the judgment Fund before a judge delegate.
The expert appointed shall be obliged, under the penalties provided by law, to submit the report at least ten days before the deadline for dc judgment Fund and will need to be present at that term, to give explicatiunile what possibly will ask the Court or by the parties.
Fees submitted will be issued only after completion of the work by the expert and his presentation at the first appearance.

Article 20 membership of The judgment against the preliminary meeting there appeal than with the appeal Fund, both for the parties who have been the face, and for those who have lacked.

Article 21 Any party is entitled to require the appearance of the original documents.
Parties who serve the children acts according to art. 1, para. (e) and article 3. 4 and have deposited the originals from the registry, are obliged to bear upon them, under penalty of dela art. 3, para. II, both at the preliminary meeting and sitting for the judgment Fund.
Apart from exceptional cases, justice as apreciate well-founded, the parties will no longer be able to ask for a postponement in the first court, to produce original documents.

§ 2.
The judging process in article 22 and in a preliminary meeting on ' judging the Fund held, the Court shall fix the day and time for judging through sitting the preliminary conclusion that even.
The meeting fixed for prosecuting the Fund is intended for: a) administration samples reserved this meeting;

oral b desbaterilor the parties) and their concluziunilor Fund c) pronouncing judgement.

Article 23 When the Court upheld the parties any new evidence resulting from desbateri, according to art. 3, para. 2 and art. 7, paragraph 1. 2 and 3, will set a short term, according to the circumstances, Tomb, which that party is required to submit to file copies of the alleged acts, certified parts and grefii in keeping originals, unless the part having asuprasi the Act invoked, the Court will appreciate that your opponent or can take the knowledge of the product, act without delay.
When the sample intake consists of hearing of witnesses, the Party shall be obliged to submit their list within the time limit provided for in art. 19, complying with it in everything and the other dispoziţiuni provided for in the text.
The party will not comply with the above dispoziţiunilor is deprived of the right to use throughout this Court evidence.

Article 24 If the deadline for suing faces only one of the parties, the Court, after examining all of the file and will listen to the oral concluziunile of the party, will rule and can even pretentiunile concedes the party absent, if they will find compelling.

Article 25 If any one of the parties fails to appear, the dispoziţiunile will be applied to article 16.

Article 26 the judges have the right to put questions to the parties in order to discern points of the process was uncertain about.
It puts on its own initiative, on any matter in which desbaterea parties can lead to solutiunea and process orders in marginele dispoziţiunilor legal evidence, who can enlighten all measures.
Dispoziţiunile above shall also apply to the preliminary meeting.

Chapter 4 tertiilor at trial Participation § 1.
Calling in the application of Article 27 warranty call the warranty will be made with the greeting, in art. generally dela 1 and 2, and, when paritul does not believe it necessary to make the defipt welcome for this.
Application of the guarantee will be accompanied by a copy of the plaintiff's action, copies of the acts made by it, and the kids on paritului and greeting.
Meeting will be circulated in the cases and forms provided for in article after. 4. above.

Article 28 If the preliminary meeting was accepted as a warranty of the original request to judge with the main action, this application together with the summons will be communicated to chematului under warranty, which is required to submit to meet within 15 days of receipt, at the registry office, which from the Tribunal under making.
Meet chematului under warranty must be made in a form and generally set out to meet the paritului, under the same penalties. So will proceed and indication of the author.

Article 29 application by calling in collateral that won't have been filed within the time limit provided for in art. 27 will judge separately, according to their competence.

Article 30 When calling the warranty issue or part, a claim under warranty, will comply under this chapter dispoziţiunilor.
Penalties under the cap. I and II shall also apply in respect of the guarantee.

§ 2.
Article 31 intervention intervention Request, under the sanction provided for in art. 3, must meet all the required article ready 1 and 2.
When an application for intervention is home, it can not be done than during the first instance; When it is ancillary to, can be made throughout the trial.
Intervenientul must take the process in the State at the time of the intervention.

Article 32 Discutiunea admissibility in principle an application for intervention shall be made in even sitting in which it is introduced.

Article 33 after the acceptance in principle of the application of the main intervention, if one of the parties postpone the primary process to get the knowledge of intervention and the evidence adduced, the Court will be able to postpone the cause and fix at the same time, according to the circumstances, the time limit within which that party will have to formulate and submit meeting, according to art. 4 and 5, unless the part is able to invoace its evidence immediately.
The term may not be in any case less than 10 days.
Meet will communicate after forms and in the cases provided for in article 4. 4. above.
The intervention will proceeds as ancillary to above, but only after the part of the application process in which intervention is directed against.

Chapter 5 Article 34 Appeal Court Sentences in the first court ruling only on appeal.

Article 35 Application of appeal shall contain: (a) the name, pronouns), his domicile or residence of both the caller and of intimatului;

b) Showing the decision calling;

c actually) the reasons and the law which is based upon the appeal.

When the call was made before the communication of the decision, the caller will be able to submit reasons until day worldwide judgment, in any case not later than 15 days of the notification of the judgement;

d) Showing evidence that builds in support of this request, complying with the fully lit dispoziţiunilor dela. e, art. 1. Article 36 application for appeal shall be made in as many copies as many intimaţi are more of a copy, signed by the caller for the yard.
At your request we will join a legalized copy the sentence invoked.
Request for appeal will be filed under, making the registry of the Court that pronounced the sentence appealed.

Article 37 non-compliance referred to in article dispoziţiunilor. 35. a, b and c, except for the indication of the name intimatului, the nullity of the call.
The caller will not be able to serve before the Court of appeal of other samples than those relied upon by the application, except in the case provided for in article 10. 3, para. 2. Article 38, President of the Tribunal as soon as it receives the request for the appeal, ordered to communicate a copy of intimatului on the call, together with copies of documents, written with invitatiunea, within 20 days, under penalty of dela dela art. 40, para. 1 to respond to the call through a written test prep, which will take place in as many copies as many callers are, plus a signed copy of intimaţi for the Court, and that will be filed together with the children in so many times how many callers are, plus one row for the yard, inside this term, making proof, under the Tribunal's registry.

Meeting will be circulated in the cases and forms provided for in article after. 4. in the urgent Affairs declared by law, or by the President, the above could be reduced without can be less than eight days.
If intimatul locueste abroad, the time limit of twenty days may be extended.

Article 39 shall Meet all the requirements of intimatului from the rock art. 2. When are more intimaţi article 2(4) shall apply. 6. Article 40 Intimatul will not be able to serve the call than the samples cited in welcome, except in the case provided for in article 4. 7. If the sentence of the Tribunal will be reformed, following the presentation of evidence who fault the caller ' were presented at the first instance court, in this case, the caller will be deprived of the right to have their costs in the appeal, whether the party will ask for the antagonist.

Article 41 the term of appeal in civil and commercial matters is fifteen days.
This term in both cases flows from the presence of communication.

Article 42 When the first court ordered provisional execution, the interested party will be able to appeal before the communication, under article. 35. a and b by joining the certified copy of the judgement and the device will be able to ask for provisional suspension throughout the executiunii the Court of appeal.
Request for suspension shall be submitted to the Court or the Court of appeal, if the folder is located.
In the latter case, the caller is required as, after communication of the decision called, to comply with subparagraph (a). c and d dela art. 35. Also on the side that will not be achieved at the first provisional execution required a court will be able to ask in complying with the call dispoziţiunilor.

Article 43 Desbaterile and judgment will make the call according to dispoziţiunilor under Chapter III.
Deciziunile Court and the sentences of the courts as the courts of appeal are given without opposition.

Chapter 6 Dispoziţiuni common nominal Article 44 at the beginning of the call is to suppress hearing appeal courts and tribunals.
The parties may ask the Court to postpone the start of the meeting who are not processes able to be prosecuted and do not give place to discutiuni.

Article 45 Delaying processes by common agreement of the parties cannot be conceded only once in the course of a court.

Article 46 a party who was present at an appearance in person or through the procuratorul procurator, regardless of whether or not the law would have to take notice of the deadline, there will no longer be quoted throughout the Court even if the subsequent deadlines would lack, it is presumed to know the deadlines fixed and this is the case when he was called to the interrogator or oath.

Article 47 This part covers any defect in the Court in the proceedings.

Article 48 judges, will be able to reduce the expenses of stamp tax portarei, onorar an expert witness allowance, as well as any other expenses which the party has gain cause you will prove that you have made.
Advocatilor fees are left to the discretion of the Department which will take into account the importance of the process and the length of his. These fees will not be reduced in a case under the minimum charges drawn up by the permanent comisiunea advocatilor Union approved by the Ministry of Justice and published in the Official Gazette.

Article 49 legal Percentages will be calculated after discounting the National Bank augmented by 4% in civil and commercial matters 6%.

Article 50 All time limits laid down in the law of days ahead of themselves on days off, i.e. There is no day of reckoning when he started, nor the day when the term ends.

Article 51 V. expert witness and missing the first citation, the Court shall issue, on its own initiative, the mandate of remembrance.

Article 52 the term of appeal to the High Court of Cassation and justice in civil and commercial matters, is thirty days.
This term the decision or communication flows dela deciziunii what is attacking.
With the request of the Prosecutor General will be submitted and the reasons for breakage, since desvoltate.
Deciziunile High Court of Cassation are unopposed.

Chapter 7 final and transitory Dispoziţiuni Article 53 of Law front, in civil and commercial matters, contentious nature, before the courts as the first instance court and that the Court of appeal and of the appeal, as well as before the courts of appeal, proceedings, unified common law throughout the country.
It does not apply to: (a) for Materials) who through laws to set up a special procedure, except to the extent and under the previous procedures of this law is the common law through the completed dispoziţiunile.

Also time limits and appeals from those special procedures remain unchanged;

b) matter?;

c) In execuţiune subjects forcefully.

Article 54 Are subject to stamp taxes below specified the following requests and acts of procedure contained in the law of front: 1. Citatiunile, as well as the evidence and reports, or the awarding of certificates: a) to the courts. .. 10 lei.

b) at 20 Yards.

2. Meet the written paritului: a) to the courts. .. 5 lei.

b) at 20 Yards.

3. Proposals for the call to the interrogator: the courts.). 20 lei.

b) at 50 Yards.

4. The proposals of the witnesses: courts.). 5 lei.

b) at 20 Yards.

5. Requests for the reopening of the judecaţilor: a) to the courts. .. 5 lei.

b) at 20 Yards.

Stamp taxes which are imposed on the acts referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 will be charged by timbrate, sheets will be cancelled by the judge after the rules laid down in articles 81 and 82. below.
6. The decisions of delaying processes by common agreement of the parties: a) to the courts. .. 20 lei.

b) at 50 Yards.

Article 55 Court Applications started and procedure netimbrate or timbrate shall be valid only if the party who has held that in the interest of, or which have been fulfilled, or the opposite side, will justify before the first court appearance of stamp duties datorite after the law, or to fill in the gap.
Judgment, upon request of the interested party will incuviinta a single time limit for the payment of such fees; in the latter case, part will be grateful and to pay a fine equal to the indoitul value.
If neither this term the party concerned will not justify paying, judgment will pronounce the nullity of the application or of the procedure made without complying with the law on stamp duty.
In case when the nullity of the proceedings or application due to non-payment or proportional netimbrarii stamps ' was lifted, either ex officio or by the antagonist side, will apply the same rules to meet revenue and rights in any State of the process.
In case when the fees were paid by the party who does not owe them, judgment, upon request, will oblige them by ' conclusion or final decision on payment of their attire which was to be paid.
In all these cases the fixed stamp taxes due and any fines due to proportional representation may be charged either by Visa, either by deposition of iron-timbrate, which will cancel by writing to stamp the word "cancelled" and specifying the application for which was cancelled.
All at once it will pierce the paper in the middle of it by car or by hand.

Article 56 When one party will serve as proof to the Court of any act in which they paid the stamp taxes and registration, in accordance with the prescriptions of the law, the Court will retain and submit as soon as the Act concerned the tax authority has the right to establish that offence and to take the measures prescribed by law in which the offending party will be given to end a term. The day fixed part will be the outfit to justify the fulfilment of rights. If the infringer shall not be fixed this justification of payment or furnish proof that he has appealed against the report of irregularity, he will no longer be able to serve that act on that Court.

Article 57, which from the date of application of the present law shall repeal dispoziţiunile from civil and commercial procedures in force throughout the country, contrary to the above dispoziţiunilor.

Article 58 introduced untill Actions putting into force of the present law shall be judged the old procedure only where there are before the Court, the Court of appeal to be judging this law.
Also calls to be placed from the courts find, septemvrie 15, 1925 exclusively will judge the procedure under which they were entered.
Appeals against final judgements of courts data in competinţa courts of appeal of: Brasov, Cluj, Târgu-Mures, Timisoara and Oradea-Mare through laws of procedure in force in those constituencies, will continue to be judged by those Courts until the unification of the laws of procedure with regard to jurisdiction and remedies.

Article 59 Art. 27, 31, 33, 34, 39 and 40 of the law of 4 August 1921, regarding the courts from the jurisdiction of the district courts of appeal in Craiova, Bucharest, Galaţi, Iaşi and constant change in the sense that the competence of those courts rises up to the amount of five thousand lei in the first and last court, including capital and percentages reported and up to the amount of fifty thousand lei in the first court including capital and percentages reported.
The jurisdiction of courts in matters of guardianship rises up to the amount of one hundred thousand lei.
Other dispoziţiuni of the above mentioned texts remain unchanged.

Article 60

Art. 1 of the law of 9 July 1924 to establish the competence of the courts in Vienna Court of appeal, shall be amended in the sense that the competence of those courts rises up to the amount of five thousand lei in the first and last court, including capital and percentages reported and up to the amount of fifty thousand lei in the first court including capital and percentages reported. Jurisdiction of the courts of the aforesaid Court from circumscriptiunea up in matters of guardianship rises up to the amount of one hundred thousand lei.
Other dispoziţiuni the texts remain untouched up shown.

Article 61 of the law of 4 Dispoziţiunile August 1921, regarding the increase of the civilian judicial authorities competintei, change to the effect that courts in Vienna's Court of appeal in Chernivtsi competinţa will have to judge in the first and the last small business Court (bagatelare) up to the amount of 5 thousand lei, including capital and percentages reported and up to the amount of fifty thousand lei in the first court including capital and percentages reported.

Article 62 the sole article of the law of 4 August 1921 the judicial authorities jurisdiction district courts of appeal in Braşov, Cluj-Napoca, Timişoara, Oradea-Mare and Tg.-Mures is change to the effect that the competence of those courts shall be increased as follows: the amounts referred to in those paragraphs of article 11 from the top, which represents the Bill cited limits on the value of competinţa will be calculated in the future, multiplied by 5 , out of the amount indicated in article 10. civil procedure 476, para. Which shall be increased by the sum of five thousand lei, including capital and percentages reported.

Article 63 pending Lawsuits and tutelele to the courts and Caan to promulgation of the face, through dispoziţiunilor above, would become a matter for the courts, will continue to be judged by those courts.

Article 64 Decisions handed down by the judges in the last court in the very top art. 61 and 62 shall be subject to appeal to the courts concerned.
Appeals throughout the country will declare within a prescribed period and after the shapes provided for in art. 106 of the law courts of the old Kingdom.
The courts will judge the appeals in accordance with art. 107 and 108 from the said law.

Article 65 Shall repeal art. 40 of the law of the unification of the body of lawyers.
Applications pending before trial courts, flying the necontrasemnate Attorney, shall be declared valid.
Causes pending at the High Court of Cassation and justice, at the request of the party concerned, will house and will be sent to a new judgment in the background.

Article 66 the replenishment of the land books destroyed shall be made by the head of the Court in question, under the direction and supervision of Prime and Presidents Presidents of tribunals. The expenses that require reconstitution will be able to fly through the cotizatiunile stakeholders.
Cotizatiunile to be determined by regulation what shall be drawn up by the Ministry of Justice.

Article 67 of regulation will lay down rigid conditions and operating capacity of the persons who will be authorized to make the Office of translators, with due regard for the rights.

Article 68 copies of acts who, according to art. 1, para. e must be communicated to paritului along with the action, in case when the current procedures do not contain special dispoziţiuni in this regard, for those who lack dela home, will be returned to the registry along with the minutes of proceedings, finding the way of carrying out and for those with unknown domicile, whose citation is done through advertising, will remain on the record.

Article 69 All dispoziţiunile in the various laws on stamp, opposites dispoziţiunilor art. 54, 55 and 56 above, shall be repealed.

Article 70 of the Law face shall be implemented on the day 15 Septemvrie 1925, out of dispoziţiunile art. 44, 45, 47, 48, 49, 51, 55, 56 and 65, which applies to the promulgation date URei.* dela) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ * Note) this law known more as the Law on the accelerarei judecaţilor, was passed by the Senate on 15 March 1925 and Nadine Chamber 16 Nadine was published in 1925, Official Gazette No. 108 of 19 Nadine 1925. It modify important parts of civil and commercial procedure, shortening the time-limits for appeal, and appeal, and changing some articles of the law on stamp duty.


Related Laws