Advanced Search

Approve The New Legal Regime Of Competition, Revoking The Laws Nos. 18/2003, Of 11 June, And 39/2006 Of 25 August, And Proceeds To The Second Amendment To Law No. 2/99, Of 13 January

Original Language Title: Aprova o novo regime jurídico da concorrência, revogando as Leis n.ºs 18/2003, de 11 de junho, e 39/2006, de 25 de agosto, e procede à segunda alteração à Lei n.º 2/99, de 13 de janeiro

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

1

PROPOSED LAW NO. 45 /XII

Exhibition of Motives

Being objective of the Government, in compliance with your Program perfecting the system

portuguese normative in all domains that may affect the competition, has taken the

initiative to draw up the present proposal for a new Promotion and Defence Act of the

Competition, which will also meet the meeting of the commitments made

by Portugal in the framework of the Economic and Financial Assistance Program.

This complete reformulation of the Legal Competition Scheme is, therefore,

timely, necessary and adequate for four reasons: First of all because it is part of the

program of the present Government, second, because it aims to comply with constant measures of the

Economic and Financial Assistance Programme (PAEF), in third place, because

responds to the developments however verified in European Union law and jurisprudence

in matters of promotion and defence of competition and, finally, because it reflects the

experience and the balance sheet of activity developed in the field of defence and promotion of

competition, on the part of the Competition Authority and the Courts of Appeal

competent.

In the case of the commitments made by Portugal within the framework of the Programme of

Financial Assistance, the present proposal addresses the defined objectives, strengthen the

efficiency and application of the rules of the competition, according to the following 5 lines of

guidance.

First, simplify the law and introduce greater autonomy of the rules on the

application of competition procedures in relation to the rules of procedures

penal and administrative.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

2

The second guiding principle focuses on the rationalization of the conditions that determine

the opening of investigations, allowing the Competition Authority to assess the relevance

of the complaints received and, to introduce priorities in their performance.

Third, it seeks to harmonise more Portuguese legislation on the regulation

of the European Union on merger control of companies.

The fourth principle, promotes the guarantee of greater clarity and legal certainty in the application

of the Code of the Administrative Procedure to the control of concentrations.

And lastly, the present Proposal for Law seeks to increase equity, speed and

efficiency of the judicial remedy procedures of decisions of the Authority of the

Competition.

However, the changes introduced go beyond the objectives set out in the Programme of

Economic and Financial Assistance, safeguarding the specificities of the economy

portuguese, as well as the major misses of the sanctionatory legal apparatus

applicable, namely, the General Regime of the Against Ordinances.

The structure of the law now proposed does correspond to distinct chapters, the different areas

of acting from the Competition Authority-restrictive practices of competition; operations

of concentration of undertakings; studies, inspections and audits; public aid; and

regulation.

Within each of the chapters corresponding to the two main areas of acting of the

Competition Authority (restrictive practices of competition and operations of

concentration of companies), the standards applicable to substantive issues are met,

soon followed by their proceduran framework.

It thus gives fulfillment to the goal of greater procedural autonomy, and it ensures a

increasing efficiency and effectiveness in the application of the Act.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

3

It is worth noting, in particular, following the elements: recognition of the principle

of prioritisation, complemented with a new article on treatment of

complaints; the deadlines for procedures in the context of restrictive competition practices

aligned with the equivalent timelines provided for the process at the Commission level

European; the introduction of procedural mechanisms similar to those of the European Commission;

the test of appreciation of concentration operations; the sanctions for violation of the Articles

101. and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which were not

provided for in Law No. 18/2003; and the inclusion in the Act, of the applicable leniency regime only

to the most serious infractions of competition standards, in complete tuning with the praxis of

European Commission (Chapter VIII).

In short, the Government understands that this diploma proposal responds to the needs of the

Portuguese economy, which clearly needs a Competition Policy that is,

itself, inductive of the competitiveness of companies and the confidence of the various agents

economic. In reality, this legislative proposal vializes a policy of competition

that disseminates more competitive markets and thus contributes to growth

economic, increasing employment, strengthening the competitiveness of companies, and the

confidence of citizens in general and consumers.

Thus:

Under the terms of the paragraph d) of Article 197 (1) of the Constitution, the Government presents to the

Assembly of the Republic the following proposal for a law:

Article 1.

Object

This Law approves the New Legal Regime of Competition by repealing the Act

n ° 18/2003 of June 11 and the Law No. 39/2006 of August 25.

Article 2.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

4

Approval of the New Legal Competition Regime

It is approved in annex to this Act, of which it is an integral part, the New Legal Regime

of the Competition.

Article 3.

Amendment to Law No. 2/99 of January 13

Article 4 of Law No 2/99 of January 13, passes the following essay:

" Article 4.

[...]

1-[...].

2-[...].

3-[...].

4-The decisions of the Competition Authority relating to operations of

concentration of companies in which they participate in entities referred to in the

previous number are subject to prior opinion of the Regulatory Entity

for Social Communication, which should be negative when it is

demonstrably in cause the free expression and confrontation of the diverse

currents of opinion, being in this case binding on the Authority of the

Competition. "

Article 4.

Legislative developments

1-The provisions of the New Legal Regime of Competition, approved in annex to the

present law, must be reviewed in accordance with the evolution of the Legal Regime of the

Competition from the European Union.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

5

2-A Competition Authority is heard in advance of the adoption of measures

legislative amendments to amend the provisions of the New Legal Competition Scheme,

approved in annex to this Law, or the attributions and powers that are

conferred for promotion and advocacy of competition.

Article 5.

Legal references

The references to Law No. 18/2003 of June 11 and to Law No. 39/2006 of August 25,

consider themselves to be made to the corresponding standards of the New Legal Regime of the

Competition, approved in annex to this Law.

Article 6.

Transitional provisions

1-Until the installation of the Court of Competition, Regulation and Supervision, the standards of

competence provided for in Law No 18/2003 of June 11 shall apply to the appeal of

decisions rendered by the Competition Authority referred to in Articles 83, 84,

85. and 91 of the New Legal Regime of Competition, approved in attachment to the present

law, as well as the ministerial decision referred to in Article 91 of the same Regime.

2-Until the installation of the Court of Competition, Regulation and Supervision, the standards of

competence provided for in Law No 18/2003 of June 11 shall apply to the appeal of

decisions referred to in Articles 88 and 92 of the New Legal System of Competition,

approved in annex to this Law.

Article 7.

Abrogation standard

1-Without prejudice to the provisions of the preceding Article, the Act No 18/2003 of 11 of

June, amended by Decree-Law No. 219/2006 of November 2 by the Decree-Law

n. 18/2008 of January 29 and by the Laws 52/2008 of August 28 and 46/2011, of

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

6

June 24, which sets out the Legal Competition Regime.

2-It is repealed Law No. 39/2006 of August 25 laying down the legal regime of the

dispensation and the special attenuation of the fine in counterordinating processes by

infraction to national competition standards.

Article 8.

Application of the law in time

1-The New Legal Regime of Competition, which is approved in annex to this Act applies:

a) To the counterordinance processes whose enquiry is open after entry into

vigour of this diploma;

b) To the operations of concentration which are notified to the Authority of the

Competition after the entry into force of this diploma;

c) To the studies, inspections and audits whose achievement is deliberated by the

Authority of Competition after the entry into force of this degree;

d) To applications submitted to the Competition Authority after entry into

vigour of this diploma.

2-The Competition Authority's Regulation No 214/2006 published in the 2 th series of the

Journal of the Republic , No 225, November 22, 2006, remains in force, with the

necessary adaptations, until a new regulation on the subject matter is published,

pursuant to the provisions of Article 65 of the New Legal System of Competition,

approved in annex to this Law.

Article 9.

Entry into force

This Law shall come into force 45 days after its publication.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

7

Seen and approved in Council of Ministers of January 26, 2012

The Prime Minister

The Deputy Minister and Parliamentary Affairs

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

8

Attachment

(referred to in Article 2)

NEW LEGAL REGIME OF COMPETITION

CHAPTER I

Promotion and defence of competition

Article 1.

Object

This Law establishes the legal regime of the competition.

Article 2.

Scope of application

1-A This Law shall apply to all economic activities exerted, with character

permanent or occasional, in the private, public and co-operative sectors.

2-Subject to the international obligations of the Portuguese State, the present law is

applicable to the promotion and defence of competition, in particular to restrictive practices and

to the operations of concentration of companies taking place on national territory or that

in this have or may have effects.

Article 3.

Notion of company

1-It is considered company, for the purposes of this Law, any entity that exercises a

economic activity that consents to the supply of goods or services in a particular

market, regardless of its legal status and its way of

funding.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

9

2-It is considered to be a single company the set of companies that, although

legally distinct, constitute an economic unit or keep among themselves ties

of interdependence arising in particular:

a) From a majority stake in the capital;

b) From the detention of more than half of the votes awarded by the detention of

social participations;

c) From the possibility of designating more than half of the members of the organ of

administration or surveillance;

d) From the power to manage business respects.

Article 4.

Services of general economic interest

1-Public companies, business public entities and companies to which the

State has granted special or exclusive rights are covered by the

present law, without prejudice to the provisions of the following number.

2-Companies entrusted by law of the management of services of general economic interest or

that have the nature of legal monopoly shall be subject to the provisions of the present

diploma, to the extent that the application of these rules does not constitute an obstacle to the

compliance, in law or in fact, of the particular mission entrusted to them.

Article 5.

Authority of Competition

1-The respect for the rules for promotion and defence of competition is ensured by the

Competition Authority, which, to the effect, has the sanctionatory powers, of

supervision and regulation set out in this Law and in its statutes.

2-The sectoral regulatory authorities and the Competition Authority cooperate between

si in the application of the competition law, under the terms provided for in the law.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

10

3-With a view to facilitating the application of this Law, the Competition Authority may

celebrate cooperation protocols with the sectoral regulatory authorities.

4-Until April 30 of each year, and with reference to the last day of the previous year, the

Competition Authority prepares and sends the Government, which refers it to the Assembly of the

Republic, the report on the activities and exercise of the powers and competences of the

Authority of Competition, in particular with regard to its powers

sanctionaries, supervision and regulation, with the balance sheet and annual accounts of

management, after discussed and appreciated by the Board of the Authority of the

Competition and with the opinion of the Single Fiscal.

5-In the lack of dispatch of the Government members responsible for the areas of the Economy

and of the Finance, the report, the balance sheet and the accounts consider themselves to be approved decorated

90 days after the date of your receipt.

6-A The publication of the report, balance sheet and accounts is made in the Journal of the Republic on the deadline of 30

days after its approval and on the Electrophic page of the Competition Authority.

Article 6.

Priorities in the exercise of your mission

1-In the performance of its legal assignments, the Competition Authority is

guided by the criterion of the public interest of promotion and defence of competition,

may, on the basis of this criterion, assign different priority degrees in the treatment

of the issues that it is called to be analyzing.

2-A The Competition Authority exercises its sanctionatory powers whenever the

reasons of public interest in the pursuit and punishment of violations of defense norms

of the competition determine the opening of the counterordinance process in the case

concrete, taking into account, in particular, the priorities of the competition policy and the

elements of fact and law that are presented to it, as well as the gravity of the

possible infringement, the probability of being able to prove their existence and the extent of the

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

11

investigative steps necessary to perform, in the best conditions, the

monitoring mission of respect for Articles 8, 10 and 11 of this Law and by the

articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

3-During the last quarter of each year, the Competition Authority publites in the

its electro-page the priorities of the competition policy for the following year,

without any sectoral reference with regard to the exercise of its powers

sanctionaries.

Article 7.

Processing of complaints

1-A Competition Authority carries out the registration of all the complaints which it

are transmitted, proceeding to the opening of the process of counterordinance or

supervision if the elements referred to in the complaint so determine, in the terms of the

previous article.

2-Where the Competition Authority considers, on the basis of the information of

which provides, that there are no bastant grounds to follow up on us

terms of the previous article, it shall inform the complainant of the denunciation of the respective reasons and

set a deadline, not less than 10 working days, for this to present, in writing,

his observations.

3-A Competition Authority is not obliged to take any account of any

other written submissions received after the expiry of the period referred to in the number

previous.

4-If the author of the complaint submits his / her observations within the time limit established

by the Competition Authority, and these do not lead to a change in the

assessment of the same, the Competition Authority declares the complaint without

grounds valid or not deserving of priority treatment, upon decision

express, of which it is up to appeal to the Court of Competition, Regulation and

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

12

Supervision.

5-If the complainant does not submit his or her observations within the prescribed time

by the Competition Authority, the complaint is filed.

6-A Competition Authority proceeds to the filing of the complaints which do not

give rise to the process.

CHAPTER II

Restrictive practices of competition

SECTION I

Types of restrictive practices

Article 8.

Agreements, concerted practices and decisions of associations of companies

1-Agreements between companies, concerted practices between companies and the

decisions of associations of companies, which have per object or as an effect to prevent,

distort or constrict in a sensitive manner the competition in whole or in part of the market

national, particularly those consisting of:

a) Set, in a direct or indirect way, the prices of purchase or sale, or

any other conditions of transaction;

b) Limit or control production, distribution, technical development or

the investments;

c) Redepart the markets or sources of supply;

d) Apply, relatively to trading partners, unequal conditions in the case of

equivalent benefits, by placing them, by that fact, at a disadvantage in the

competition;

e) Subordinate the conclusion of contracts to acceptance, by the others

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

13

countermeasures, of supplementary benefits which, by their nature or in agreement

with commercial uses, have no connection to the object of these contracts.

2-Except in cases where they are deemed to be justified, in the terms of the following article, they are

nulls the agreements between undertakings and the decisions of associations of prohibited undertakings

by the previous number.

Article 9.

Justification of agreements, concerted practices and

decisions of company associations

1-There can be considered as justified the agreements between companies, the concerted practices

between companies and the decisions of associations of companies referred to in the previous article

that contribute to improving the production or distribution of goods or services or

to promote technical or economic development since, cumulatively:

a) They reserve the users of these goods or services a fair share of the

benefit from it resulting;

b) Do not impose on the companies concerned any restrictions that are not

indispensable to achieve these goals;

c) Do not give these companies the possibility of eliminating competition in a

substantial part of the market for the goods or services in question.

2-Compete to companies or associations of companies that invoicate the benefit of the

justification to make the proof of filling the conditions laid down in the number

previous.

3-Are deemed to be justified the agreements between companies, the concerted practices between

companies and the decisions of associations of companies prohibited by the previous article that,

although it does not affect trade between the Member States, they fill the remaining

requirements for the application of a regulation adopted pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 3 of the

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

14

article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

4-A Competition Authority may withdraw the benefit referred to in the preceding paragraph if

check that, in a given case, a covered practice produces effects

incompatible with the provisions of paragraph 1.

Article 10.

Abuse of a dominant position

1-An abusive exploitation, by one or more undertakings, of a position is prohibited

dominant in the national market or in a substantial part of this.

2-Can be considered abusive, namely:

a) Impose, in a direct or indirect way, purchase or other selling prices or other

non-equitable transaction conditions;

b) Limiting production, distribution or technical development at injury

of consumers;

c) Apply, relatively to trading partners, unequal conditions in the case of

equivalent benefits, by placing them, by that fact, at a disadvantage in the

competition;

d) Subordinate the conclusion of contracts to acceptance, by the others

countermeasures, of supplementary benefits which, by their nature or in agreement

with commercial uses, have no connection to the object of such contracts;

e) Refuse access to a network or other essential infrastructure per se

controlled, against appropriate remuneration, to any other company, since

that, without such access, this one cannot, for reasons of fact or legal, operate

as a competitor of the company in a dominant position in the upstream market

or downstream, unless the latter demonstrates that, on operational grounds

or others, such access is impossible in conditions of reasonableness.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

15

Article 11.

Abuse of economic dependence

1-It is prohibited, in so far as it is susceptible to affect the functioning of the market or

the structure of the competition, the abusive exploitation, by one or more companies, of the

state of economic dependence in which it is found with respect to them any

supplier or customer company, for not having equivalent alternative.

2-Can be considered as abuse, among others, the following cases:

a) The adoption of any of the behaviors provided for in points a) a d) of the n.

2 of the previous article;

b) The unjustified, total or partial ruture of an established business relationship,

taking into consideration previous business relations, the recognized uses

in the branch of economic activity and the established contractual conditions.

3-For the purposes of paragraph 1, it is understood that a company does not have an alternative

equivalent when:

a) The supply of the good or service in question, namely the service of

distribution, is ensured by a restricted number of companies; and

b) The company cannot obtain identical conditions from other partners

commercial within a reasonable time.

SECTION II

Sanctionatory process concerning restrictive practices

Article 12.

Standards applicable

1-Cases by infringement of the provisions of Articles 8, 10 and 11 shall be governed by the

provided for in this Law and, secondarily, by the general regime of the illicit of mere

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

16

social ordering, approved by the Decree-Law No. 433/82 of October 27.

2-The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall also apply, with the necessary adaptations,

to proceedings by infraction to Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning

of the European Union instituted by the Competition Authority, or in which this is

call to intervene, under the competences conferred on it by the g ) from the

n Article 6 (1) of the Statutes of the Competition Authority, approved by the

Decree-Law No. 10/2003 of January 18.

Article 13.

General rules on deadlines

1-In the lack of special provision, it is 10 working days the deadline to be required for any

act or diligence, be argued nullity, deduced incidents or exercised

any other procedural powers.

2-In the setting of the deadlines which, under the law, depend on the decision of the Authority of the

Competition, will be considered the criteria of the time reasonably necessary for

elaboration of the observations or communications to be submitted, as well as the urgency in the

practice of the act.

3-The deadlines set legally or by decision of the Competition Authority may

be extended, for one time and for equal period, upon application

reasoned, submitted before the expiry of the term.

4-A Competition Authority refuses to extend deadline whenever it understands,

fundamentedly, that the requirement has meant merely dilatory.

Article 14.

Provision of information

1-Where the Competition Authority requests, in writing, documents and other

information to companies or any other persons, whether natural or collective, the request

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

17

shall be instructed with the following elements:

a) The legal basis, the quality in which the recipient is requested to

transmit information and the purpose of the request;

b) The deadline for the supply of the documents or for the communication of the

information;

c) The mention that companies must identify, in a reasoned manner, the

information that they consider confidential, on the grounds of business secrets,

joining, in that case, a non-confidential copy of the documents that

contain such information, expunged from them;

d) The indication that the failure to comply with the application constitutes counterordinance, in the

terms of the point h) of Article 67 (1).

2-The information and documents requested by the Competition Authority must be

provided within not less than 10 working days, or not less than 5 working days for

concrete requests for simple response, unless, by reasoned decision, is fixed

different deadline.

3-To the documents submitted voluntarily by the vised by the procedure, by the

denouncing or by any third party applies the provisions of paragraph c ) of paragraph 1.

Article 15.

Notifications

1-The notifications are made by registered letter, addressed to the registered office or

domicile of the recipient, or personally, if necessary, through the entities

police officers.

2-When the recipient has no registered office or domicile in Portugal, the notification is

held at the branch, agency or representation in Portugal or, if they do not exist, in the

registered office or domicile abroad.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

18

3-A notification of cautionary measure, of note of ilicitude, of a filing decision,

with or without imposition of conditions, of sentencing decision in procedure of

transaction and decision with admoestation or that applies fine and too much sanctions, or

that respects the practice of personal act, is always directed at the targeted.

4-Where the visage is not found or refuses to receive the notification to which if

refers to the preceding paragraph, it is deemed to be notified by advertisement published in a

of the newspapers of greatest national circulation, with summary indication of the imputation which

is made.

5-The notifications are also made to the lawyer or defender, when constituted or

appointed, without prejudice to being similarly made to the target in the cases provided for

in paragraph 3.

6-A postal notification is presumed to be made on the third and the seventh working day following that of the

registration in the cases of paragraph 1 and the second part of paragraph 2, respectively.

7-In the case provided for in paragraph 5, the deadline for the practice of procedural act subsequent to the

notification is due to the working day following the date of the notification that was made

in last place.

8-A lack of comparison of the target-endorsed by the act for which it has been notified

in the terms of this Article shall not preclude the counterordinance process from following the

your terms.

Article 16.

Opening of the survey

1-A Competition Authority proceeds from the opening of inquiry by prohibited practices

by Articles 8, 10 and 11 of this Law or by Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty

on the Functioning of the European Union, officiously or in the wake of

denunciation, respecting the provisions of Article 6 of this Law.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

19

2-Within the scope of the investigation, the Competition Authority promotes the representations of

research necessary for the determination of the existence of a restrictive practice of the

competition and its agents, as well as to the collection of proof.

3-All public entities, specifically the services of direct administration,

indirect or autonomous of the State, as well as the administrative authorities

independent, have a duty to participate in the Competition Authority the facts of

who take notice, susceptible to being skilled as restrictive practices

of the competition.

4-Any person, singular or collective, who has news of a restrictive practice may

report it to the Competition Authority, as long as it presents complaint using for

the effect the form approved by the Competition Authority and advertised in its

electro page.

Article 17.

Powers of surveyor, search and seizure

1-In the exercise of sanctionatory powers, the Competition Authority, through the

your organs or employees, may, specifically:

a) Interrogate the company and too many people involved, personally or through

legal representative, as well as to ask them for documents and other elements of

information that understands convenient or necessary for the clarification of the

facts;

b) Inquire about any other persons, personally or through representatives

legal, whose statements consider pertinent, as well as solicit them

documents and other elements of information;

c) Proceeding, in the premises, land or means of transport of undertakings or of

associations of companies, the search, examination, collection and seizure of extracts from the

writing and too much documentation, regardless of your support, whenever

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

20

such representations shall show themselves necessary for the obtaining of proof;

d) Proceed to sealing the premises of the premises of companies and associations of

companies in which they find themselves or are susceptible to finding elements

of the writing or too much documentation, as well as of the supporting supports,

including computers and other electrolytic storage equipment

of data, during the period and to the extent strictly necessary to the realization

of the representations referred to in the preceding paragraph;

e) Apply for any services from the Public Administration, including the entities

police officers, the collaboration that is shown to be necessary to the cabal performance of their

functions.

2-The representations provided for in points c) and d) of the previous number depend on the decision of the

competent judicial authority.

3-A authorization referred to in the preceding paragraph is requested in advance by the Authority of the

Competition, in a reasoned application, owing the order to be delivered in the

deadline of 48 hours.

4-Employs who, abroad, proceed to the representations provided for in the 4 a) a c) from the

n. 1 must be carriers:

a) In the cases of the items a) and b) , of credential issued by the Authority of the

Competition, from which it will build the purpose of the due diligence;

b) In the cases of the paragraph c) , of the credential referred to in the preceding paragraph and of the order

provided for in paragraph 3, which is, at that time, notified to the target.

5-A notification referred to in paragraph 5-A b) of the previous number is carried out in the person of the

legal representative or, in the absence of the same, in that of any collaborator of the company

or association of companies that find themselves present.

6-In the realization of the representations provided for in points c) and d) of paragraph 1, the Authority of

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

21

Competition can make you follow up with the police entities.

7-Not meeting in the premises the legal representative of the target, workers or

other collaborators, or there is refusal of the notification, the same is effected by

duplicate fixation of the term of the due diligence, in visible place of the premises.

8-Of the representations provided for in points a) a d) of paragraph 1 is drawn up auto, which is notified

to the visors.

9-A lack of comparisons of the people called upon to give statements along the

Competition Authority shall not prevent the proceedings from pursuing its terms.

Article 18.

Home search

1-Existing founded suspicion that there are, in the domicile of partners, of members of

organs of administration and of employees and collaborators of companies or

associations of companies, evidence of serious breach of Articles 8 or 10 of the present

law or of articles 101 or 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the Union

European, can be carried out search domiciliary, which must be authorized, by dispatch,

by the judge of instruction, the application of the Competition Authority.

2-The application must mention the seriousness of the infraction investigated, the relevance of the

means of proof sought, the participation of the company or association of companies

involved and the reasonableness of the suspicion that the evidence is guarded at home

for which authorisation is sought.

3-The judge of instruction may order the Competition Authority to provide

information on the elements that are necessary for the control of the

proportionality of the required due diligence.

4-The dispatch is to be delivered within 48 hours, identifying the object and the

purpose of the due diligence, setting the date on which this has started and indicating the

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

22

possibility of judicial challenge.

5-The domicile search applies to the provisions of the b) of paragraph 4 and in paragraphs 5 a to 8 of the article

17., with the necessary adaptations.

6-A The search home inhabited or in a closed dependency can only be ordered or

authorized by the judge of instruction and carried out between 7 and 21 pm, under penalty of

nullity.

7-Addressing search in attorney's office or in doctor's office, this is

held, under penalty of nullity, in the presence of the investigating judge, which warns

beforehand the President of the local council of the Order of Lawyers or of the Order

of the Physicians, so that the same, or one of your delegate, may be present.

8-The standards provided for in this Article apply, with the necessary adaptations, to

searches to be carried out in other places, including vehicles, of associates, members of organs of

administration and employees or collaborators of companies or associations of

companies.

Article 19.

Seizure

1-The seizures of documents, regardless of their nature or their support,

are authorised, ordered or validated by dispatching of the judicial authority.

2-A Competition Authority may make apprehensions in the course of searches or

when there is urgency or danger in the delay.

3-The seizures made by the Competition Authority not beforehand

authorized or ordered are subject to validation by the judicial authority, at the time

maximum of 72 hours.

4-To the seizure of documents operated in office of attorney or in office

physician is correspondingly applicable to the provisions of paragraphs 7 and 8 of the previous article.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

23

5-In cases referred to in the preceding paragraph is not permitted, under penalty of nullity, the

seizure of documents covered by the professional secret, or covered by

secret medical professional, unless they themselves constitute object or element of the

infringement.

6-A seizure in banks or other credit institutions of covered documents

by bank secrecy is carried out by the investigating judge, when he has founded reasons

to believe that they are related to an offence and reveal themselves of great

interest for the discovery of the truth or for the proof, even if they do not belong to the

toured.

7-The investigating judge can examine any bank documentation for discovery

of the objects to be seized in the terms of the previous number.

8-The examination is made personally by the judge of instruction, coadjuvated, when necessary,

by the police entities and qualified technicians of the Competition Authority,

staying connected by duty of secrecy with respect to all that they have

has become aware of and has no interest in the proof

Article 20.

Territorial competence

It is competent to authorize the representations provided for in points c) and d) of Article 17 (1)

and in articles 18 and 19 the Public Prosecutor's Office or, where expressly provided for, the judge of

instruction, both from the area of the Competition Authority's headquarters.

Article 21.

Transaction procedure in the survey

1-In the course of the investigation, the Competition Authority may set deadline, not less

to 10 working days, so that the target-endorsed by the survey manifests itself in writing.

of participating in talks, with a view to the eventual proposal submission of

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

24

transaction.

2-In the course of the investigation, the enquiry endorsed by the inquiry may manifest, by application

written directed at the Competition Authority, its intention to initiate talks,

with a view to the eventual submission of transaction proposal.

3-The target of the enquiry participating in the transaction talks shall be

informed by the Competition Authority, 10 working days prior to start of the same,

of the facts that are charged to you, of the means of proof that allow the imputation of the

sanctions and the legal measure of the fine.

4-The information referred to in the preceding paragraph, as well as any others that are

provided by the Competition Authority in the course of the talks, are

confidential, without prejudice to the Competition Authority expressly

authorize its disclosure to the target of the inquiry.

5-A Competition Authority may, at any time, by decision not susceptible

of appeal, end the talks, in respect of one or more targeted by the

survey, if it considers that they do not allow to achieve procedural gains.

6-Completed the talks, the Fixed Competition Authority, not less than

10 working days, for the purpose of the enquiry to present, in writing, your proposal of

transaction.

7-A transaction proposal submitted by the target should reflect the result of the

talks and acknowledge their responsibility in the infraction in question, and may not

be, by this one, unilaterally revoked.

8-Received the transaction proposal, the Competition Authority proceeds to its

assessment, verifying compliance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph, and

reject it by non-susceptible decision of appeal, if it considers it unfounded, or accepting it,

proceeding to the elaboration and notification of the transaction minuta containing the

identification of the target, the summary description of the imputed facts, the mention of the

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

25

violated legal provisions and the indication of the terms of the transaction, including the sanctions

concretely applied, mentioning the percentage of reduction of the fine.

9-The target endorsed by the procedure confirms, in writing, within not less than 10 working days

after the notification, that the minuta of transaction reflects the content of its proposals.

10-In case the targeted by the process does not manifest its agreement, in the terms of the number

previous, the process of counterordinance continues its terms, by staying without effect

the minuta of transaction referred to in paragraph 8.

11-A transaction proposal submitted pursuant to paragraph 7 is deemed to be repealed,

the period referred to in paragraph 9 without a demonstration of concordance of the visage by the

process, and it cannot be used as evidence against any target in the

transaction procedure.

12-A transaction minuta convoluted in definitive condemnatory decision, with the

confirmation of the target by the procedure, pursuant to paragraph 9, and the payment of the fine

applied, and the facts may not be appreciated again as the counterordinance for the

effects of this Law.

13-The facts confessed by the visage for the proceedings in the sentencing decision to which if

refers to the preceding paragraph may not be judicially challenged for the purpose of

recourse under Rule 83.

14-A reduction of the fine under Article 77 in the follow-up to the presentation of a

applied for the purpose is summed up to the reduction of the fine that takes place on the terms

of this article.

15-For the purposes of the provisions of Article 24 (1), the Competition Authority grants

access to the transaction proposals submitted pursuant to this article, no

being of them allowed any reproduction, except if authorized by the author.

16-Not granted third party access to the transaction proposals presented in the

terms of this article, except if authorized by the author.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

26

Article 22.

Archiving upon imposition of conditions in the survey

1-A Competition Authority may accept commitments proposed by the target that

are susceptible to eliminate the effects on competition arising from the practices

in cause, filing the process upon imposition of conditions intended for

ensure compliance with the proposed commitments.

2-A Competition Authority, where it considers it appropriate, notifies the target by the

inquiry of a preliminary assessment of the facts, giving you the opportunity to

present suspenceable commitments to eliminate the effects on competition

arising from the practices in question.

3-A Competition Authority or those targeted by the survey may decide to interrupt

the talks at any time, continuing the process of counterordinating the

your terms.

4-Prior to the approval of a filing decision upon imposition of

conditions, the Competition Authority publishes on its electro-page and in two

of the newspapers of greater national circulation, at the expense of the target survey, summary

of the process, identifying the said person, as well as the essential content of the

proposed commitments, setting deadline not less than 20 working days for the

presentation of comments by interested third parties.

5-A The decision identifies the one targeted by the survey, the facts that are attributed to it, the object

of the investigation, the objections expressed, the conditions imposed by the Authority of the

Competition, the obligations of the target of the survey relating to the compliance of the

conditions and the manner of their surveillance.

6-A filing decision upon acceptance of commitments and the imposition of

conditions under this article does not conclude by the existence of an infraction to the

present law, but makes it mandatory for recipients to comply with the

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

27

commitments made.

7-Without prejudice to the sanctions that should be applied, the Competition Authority

may, within 2 years, reopen the process that has been filed with conditions,

whenever:

a) A substantial change of the de facto situation has occurred in which the decision

has founded;

b) The conditions are not met;

c) The filing decision has been founded on false information, inaccurate

or incomplete.

8-Compete to the Competition Authority check the fulfilment of the conditions.

9-A The verification of the fulfilment of the conditions prevents the reopening of the proceedings, in the

terms of paragraph 7.

Article 23.

Decision of the survey

1-The survey shall be closed, where possible, within a maximum of 18 months to

count of the opening order of the process.

2-Where it is found not to be possible to meet the deadline referred to in the number

previous, the Council of the Competition Authority gives notice to the target by the

process from that circumstance and the period necessary for the completion of the investigation.

3-Terminated the survey, the Competition Authority decides:

a) Initiate the instruction, through notification of note of ilicitude to the target,

where it concludes, on the basis of the investigations carried out, that there is a

reasonable possibility to come to be handed a damning decision;

b) Proceed to the filing of the case, when the investigations carried out do not

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

28

allow to conclude by the reasonable possibility of a decision to come to be delivered

condensation;

c) Putting an end to the process, by sentencing decision, in transaction procedure;

d) Proceeding to the archiving of the procedure by imposing conditions, in the

terms set out in the previous article.

4-Should the investigation have been originated by complaint, the Competition Authority,

when you consider, on the basis of the information available to you, that there is no such

reasonable possibility to come to be handed down the sentencing decision, informs the

denouncing of respect for reasons and fixed term limit, not less than 10 working days,

for this to present, in writing, his observations.

5-If the whistleblower presents his / her observations within the time limit set and the

Competition Authority to consider that the same do not reveal, direct or

indirectly, a reasonable possibility to come to be handed a decision

condensation, the process is shelved.

6-A The decision to file the file is notified to the target and, if it exists, to the

denouncing.

Article 24.

Statement of the process

1-In the notification of the note of ilicitude referred to in point (s) a) of paragraph 1 of the previous article,

the Competition Authority fixed to the target by the reasonable time process, not

less than 20 working days, so that you will comment in writing on the issues that

may be interested in the decision of the case, as well as on the evidence produced, and

so that it requires the complementary representations of proof that it considers convenient.

2-In the pronunciation in writing referred to in the preceding paragraph, the target-vised

may require that it be complemented by an oral hearing.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

29

3-A Competition Authority may refuse, through reasoned decision, to

fulfillment of the complementary evidence required when the same

are manifestly irrelevant or have a dilatory aim.

4-A Competition Authority may carry out complementary representations of proof,

specifically those laid down in Article 17 (1), even after the pronunciation of the

targeted by the process referred to in paragraph 1 of this article and of the realization of the

oral hearing.

5-A Competition Authority notifies the target of the process of the joining to the proceedings

of the probatory elements ascertained in the terms of the preceding number, fixing it

reasonable time, not less than 10 working days, to pronounce.

6-Where the probatory elements ascertained as a result of representations

supplementary evidence to substantially change the facts initially charged

to the one targeted by the process or its qualification, the Competition Authority issues

new note of ilicitude, applying the provisions of the n. ºs 1 and 2.

7-A Competition Authority adopts, under its powers of regulation,

Guidelines on procedural research and tramway.

Article 25.

Oral hearing

1-A The hearing referred to in paragraph 2 of the preceding Article shall be held before the Authority of the

Competition, in the presence of the applicant, being admitted to participate in persons,

singular or collective, which the same understands to be able to clarify concrete aspements of the

your written pronunciation.

2-Being several of the applicants, the respect hearings are held separately.

3-In your written pronunciation, the applicant identifies the issues you want to see

enlightened at the oral hearing.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

30

4-In oral hearing, the applicant, directly or through the persons referred to in paragraph 1,

presents its clarifications, being admitted to the joining of documents.

5-A Competition Authority may formulate questions to those present.

6-A hearing is recorded and the recording autured by term.

7-From the holding of the hearing, as well as from the documents together, is dishwasher term, signed

by all the gifts.

8-From the term referred to in the preceding paragraph, of the documents and the recording are extracted

copies, which are sent to the applicant and notified to the remaining vises by the

process, haventhem.

Article 26.

Transaction procedure in the statement

1-In the pronunciation to which Article 24 (1) is referred to, the target vised may

submit a transaction proposal, with the confession of the facts and the recognition

of your responsibility in the infraction in question, and may not by this be unilaterally

revoked.

2-A submission of transaction proposal, pursuant to the preceding paragraph, suspending the

term of Article 24 (1), for the period fixed by the Competition Authority,

may not exceed 30 working days.

3-Received the transaction proposal, the Competition Authority proceeds to its

assessment, and may reject it, by decision not susceptible to appeal, if it considers it

unfounded, or accept it, proceeding to notification of the minuta of transaction containing the

indication of the terms of transaction, including the concretely applied sanctions and the

percentage of the reduction of the fine.

4-A Competition Authority gives the target to the process a time limit not less than 10

working days for this to proceed to the written confirmation that the transaction minuta

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

31

notified under the terms of the preceding paragraph reflects the content of its transaction proposal.

5-In case the targeted by the process does not proceed to the confirmation of the transaction proposal, in the

terms of the previous number, the process of counterordinance follows its terms,

by becoming without effect the decision referred to in paragraph 3.

6-A transaction proposal submitted pursuant to paragraph 1 is deemed to be repealed,

the period referred to in paragraph 4 without a demonstration of concordance of the visage by the

process, and it cannot be used as proof element against any target

by the transaction procedure.

7-A transaction minuta convoluted in definitive condemnatory decision with the

confirmation by the target by the procedure, pursuant to paragraph 4, and the payment of the fine

applied, and the facts may not be appreciated again as the counterordinance to

effects of this Law.

8-The facts confessed by the visage for the proceedings in the sentencing decision to which if

refers to the preceding paragraph shall not be judicially challenged, for the purposes of

feature.

9-A reduction of the fine under Article 77 in the follow-up to the presentation of a

application of the target for the procedure to the effect is summed up to the reduction of the fine that has

place under the terms of this article.

10-For the purposes of the provisions of Article 23 (1), the Competition Authority grants

access to the transaction proposals submitted pursuant to this article, no

being of them allowed any reproduction, except if authorized by the author.

11-Not granted third party access to the transaction proposals presented in the

terms of this article, except if authorized by the author.

Article 27.

Archiving upon imposition of conditions on the instruction

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

32

In the course of the instruction, the Competition Authority may file the case,

upon imposition of conditions, applying the provisions of Article 22.

Article 28.

Completion of the statement

1-A instruction must be completed, where possible, within a maximum of 12 months

count of the notification of the note of ilicitude.

2-Where it is found not to be possible to meet the deadline referred to in the number

previous, the Council of the Competition Authority gives notice to the target by the

process of this circumstance and the period required for the completion of the instruction.

3-Completed the instruction, the Competition Authority adopts, on the basis of the report of the

instructor service, a final decision, in which you can:

a) Declare the existence of a restrictive practice of competition and, being the case

of this, consider it justified, under the terms and conditions laid down in Article 9;

b) Provide conviction in transaction procedure, pursuant to Rule 26;

c) Order the filing of the proceedings upon imposition of conditions, in the

terms of the previous article;

d) Order the filing of the process without conditions.

4-The decisions referred to in the first part of the paragraph a) of paragraph 3 may be accompanied by

of admoestation or of the application of the fines and too much penalties provided for in Articles 67,

70., 71 and, being the case, of the imposition of measures of conduct or character

structural that are indispensable to the cessation of the restrictive practice of competition or

of its effects.

5-The structural character measures referred to in the preceding paragraph can only be

imposed when there is no such measure of conduct as equally effective or,

existing, the same is more onerous for the targeted by the process than the measures of

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

33

structural character.

Article 29.

Business secrets

1-In the instruction of proceedings, the Competition Authority acauctions the legitimate interest

of the companies, associations of companies or other entities in the non-disclosure of their

business secrets, without prejudice to the provisions of paragraph 3 of the following article.

2-After the realization of the representations provided for in points c ) and d ) of Article 17 (1), the

Competition Authority grants the target for the duration of the case, not less than 10

working days, to identify, in a reasoned manner, the information collected that

consider confidential by reason of business secrecy, by putting together, in that case, a

non-confidential copy of the documents containing such information, expunged

of the same.

3-Whenever the Competition Authority intends to join the process documents

that contain information susceptible to being classified as business secrets,

grants to the company, association of companies or other entity to which the same if

refer to the opportunity to speak out, in the terms of the preceding paragraph.

4-If, in response to the solicitation provided for in paragraphs 2 and 3 or in Article 14, the Company,

association of companies or other entity does not identify the information it considers

confidential, do not substantiate such identification or otherwise provide non-confidential copy

of the documents containing them, expunged from them, the information

consider themselves to be non-confidential.

5-If the Competition Authority does not agree with the classification of the information

as a business secret, in the terms in the previous number, informs the company,

association of companies or other entity of which it does not agree in whole or in part

with the request for confidentiality.

Article 30.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

34

Proof

1-Constitud object of the evidence all the legally relevant facts for the

demonstration of the existence or non-existence of the infraction, the punibility or not

punishability of the target by the process, the determination of the applicable sanction and the measure of the

cofine.

2-The evidence that is not prohibited by law shall be admissible.

3-Without prejudice to the warranty of the rights of the defence of the target by the procedure, the Authority

of the Competition may use as means of proof for the demonstration of a

infraction to the standards of competition provided for in this Law or in Union law

European, the information classified as confidential, by reason of secrets of

business, under the paragraph c) of Article 14 (1) and (3) and paragraphs 2 and 3 of the

previous article.

4-Unless the law dispends differently, the proof is appreciated under the rules of the

experience and the free conviction of the Competition Authority.

5-A information and documentation obtained within the framework of supervision or in proceedings

sanctionals of the Competition Authority can be used as a means of

evidence in an ongoing sanctionatory process or to be established, as long as the companies

are made clear in advance of the possibility of such use in the applications of

information that is directed and in the representations made by the Authority of the

Competition.

Article 31.

Publicity of the process and secret of justice

1-The process is public, ressaving the exceptions provided for in the law.

2-A Competition Authority may determine that the process is subject to secrecy

of justice until the final decision, when it considers that advertising harms interests

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

35

of the investigation.

3-A Competition Authority may, officiously or upon application of the

targeted by the process, determine the subjection of the process the secret of justice up to the

final decision, when to understand that the rights of that justify it.

4-In the event that the case has been subject to secrecy of justice, the Authority of

Competition may, officiously or upon application of the vised by the process,

determine your surveying at any time in the process, considering the

interests referred to in the preceding paragraphs.

5-Without prejudice to the requests of the judicial authorities, the Competition Authority

may give knowledge to third parties of the content of act or document in secret

of justice, if this does not puser the investigation and appear convenient to the

clarification of the truth.

Article 32.

Access to the process

1-The visage by the process may, upon application, consult the process and of it

obtain, at the expense of their, extracts, copies or certificates, save the provisions of the number

next.

2-A Competition Authority may, up to the notification of the note of ilicitude, veer to the

targeted by the process access to the process, should this have been subject to secret of

justice under the terms of paragraph 2 of the preceding article, and when to consider that such access may

harm the investigation.

3-Any person, singular or collective, who demonstrates legitimate interest in the consultation of the

process may require it, as well as that it be provided to you, at your own expense, copy,

excerpt or certificate of the same, save the provisions of the previous article.

4-Access to the documents referred to in Rule 30 (3) is given only to the lawyer

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

36

or to the external economic advisor and strictly for the purposes of the exercise of defence

in accordance with Article 24 (1) and the judicial challenge of the decision of the Authority

of the Competition in which the said elements have been used as a means of

proof, not being allowed for their reproduction, in whole or in part by any means, nor the

its use for any other purpose.

Article 33.

Precautionary measures

1-Whenever carried out investigations indict that the practice that is the object of the process

is on the verge of causing injury, serious and irreparable or difficult repair for the

competition, may the Competition Authority, at any time in the process,

order to pre-emptively order the immediate suspension of the said restrictive practice or

any other interim measures necessary for the immediate repose of the competition

or indispensable to the useful effect of the decision to be delivered at the end of the procedure.

2-The measures provided for in this article may be adopted by the Competition Authority

officiously or the requirement of any interested and vigorous up to their

revocation, for a period not exceeding 90 days, unless extension, duly

grounded, by equal periods, and the decision of the survey to be handed down in the

maximum term of 180 days.

3-A The adoption of the measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall be preceded by hearing of the visors, except if

such a puser at serious risk the goal or the effectiveness of it, in which case they are heard

after enacted.

4-Whenever a market is concerned that is the object of sectoral regulation, the

Competition Authority requests the prior opinion of the respective authority

regulator, which, wanting, has the maximum time limit of 5 working days to issue it.

5-In the event of an urgency, the Competition Authority can officiously determine the

provisional measures that show indispensable for re-establishment or

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

37

maintenance of an effective competition, being the interested ears after the

decision.

6-In the case provided for in the preceding paragraph, when it is in market cause that is

object of sectoral regulation, the opinion of the respected regulator is requested

by the Competition Authority prior to the decision that orders interim measures.

Article 34.

Articulation with sectoral regulatory authorities in the framework of restrictive practices

of competition

1-Whenever the Competition Authority takes notice, in the terms provided for

in Article 16, of facts occurring in a field subjected to sectoral regulation and

susceptible to being skilled as restrictive practices, gives immediate knowledge of the

same to the relevant sectoral regulatory authority on the grounds of matter, to which

this is pronounced, within a time limit set by the Competition Authority.

2-Whenever they are concerned with restrictive practices with an incidence in a market that is

object of sectoral regulation, the adoption of a decision by the Authority of the

Competition pursuant to Article 28 (1) is preceded, save in the cases of

filing without conditions, from prior opinion of the respecting regulatory authority

sector, which will be issued within a time limit set by the Competition Authority.

3-Where, in the context of the respective attributions and without prejudice to the provisions of paragraph 3

of Article 16, a sectoral regulatory authority to appreciate, officiously or at the request

of regulated entities, issues that could set up a violation of the provisions of the

present law, gives immediate knowledge to the Competition Authority, by joining

information of the essential elements.

4-Before the adoption of final decision, the sectoral regulatory authority gives knowledge of the

project from the same to the Competition Authority, for this to address the deadline

that is fixed to him.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

38

5-In the cases provided for in the preceding paragraphs, the Competition Authority may, by

reasoned decision, suspend its decision to institute an investigation or continue the

process, by the time frame it considers appropriate.

CHAPTER III

Merger operations of companies

SECTION I

Operations subject to control

Article 35.

Concentration of companies

1-There is an understanding that there is a concentration of companies, for the purposes of this Law, when

whether to check a lasting change of control over all or part of a

or more companies, as a result:

a) From the merger of two or more companies or parts of companies previously

independent;

b) Of the acquisition, direct or indirect, of the control of the whole or parts of the

social capital or elements of the asset of one or several other companies,

by one or more companies or by one or more people who already detain the

control of at least one company.

2-A The creation of a joint venture constitutes a concentration of companies, in aceway

of the paragraph b) from the previous number, provided that the joint venture performs in a manner

lasting the functions of an autonomous economic entity.

3-For the purposes of the provisions of the preceding paragraphs, the control stems from any act,

regardless of the form that this takes, which entails the possibility of exercising,

with lasting character, in isolation or in tandem, and taking into account the

circumstances of fact or law, a determining influence on the activity of

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

39

a company, namely:

a) The acquisition of all or part of the social capital;

b) The acquisition of rights of ownership, use or fruition over the whole

or part of the assets of a company;

c) The acquisition of rights or conclusion of contracts that confirm an influence

determinant in the composition or deliberations or decisions of the organs of

a company.

4-It is not havibe as a concentration of companies:

a) The acquisition of stakes or assets by the insolvency administrator in the

scope of an insolvency proceedings;

b) The acquisition of shareholdings with merit-bearing functions;

c) The acquisition of shareholdings by credit institutions, financial companies

or insurance companies in companies with distinct object from the object of any

one of these three types of companies, with merely temporary character and to

resale effects, provided that such an acquisition is not carried out on a basis

lasting, do not exercise the voting rights inherent in such shareholdings with

the objective of determining the competitive behavior of the said companies

or that they will only exercise such voting rights with the aim of preparing the

total or partial disposal of the said companies or their asset or the disposal

of these holdings, and as long as such divestance occurs within 1 year of

of the date of the acquisition, and the deadline may be extended by the Authority of the

Competition if the acquirers show that the disposal in question was not

possible, by reason served, at the time referred to.

Article 36.

Prior notification

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

40

1-The concentration operations of companies are subject to prior notification when

they fulfil one of the following conditions:

a) As a result of its realization if it acquiess, create or reinforce an equal quota

or more than 50% in the national market of determined good or service, or

in a substantial part of this;

b) As a result of its realization if it acquiess, create or reinforce an equal quota

or more than 30% and less than 50% in the national market of determined well

or service, or in a substantial part of this, provided that the turnover

performed individually in Portugal, in the last exercise, for at least

two of the companies participating in the concentration is higher than

EUR 5 million, net of the taxes with these directly related;

c) The ensemble of the companies participating in the concentration has carried out in

Portugal, in the last financial year, a turnover of more than 100 million

of euros, net of the taxes with this directly related, as long as the

business volume carried out individually in Portugal by, at least

two of these companies, be more than 5 million euros.

2-The operations of concentration covered by this Act shall be notified to the

Competition Authority after the conclusion of the agreement and before it was held, being

case of this, after the date of the release of the preliminary announcement of a public offer of

acquisition or exchange, or the disclosure of announcement of acquisition of a stake of

control in company issuer of shares admitted to trading on market

regulated, or still, in the case of a concentration operation that results from

procedure for the formation of public contract, after the final award and

before realized.

3-In cases referred to in the final part of the preceding paragraph, the contracting authority

shall regulate, in the programme of the procedure for the formation of public contract, the

articulation of that procedure with the regime of control of operations of

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

41

concentration enshrined in this Law.

4-When companies participating in a merger demonetisate

together with the Competition Authority a serious intention to conclude an agreement or, in the

case of a public takeover bid or exchange, the public intention to carry out such

offer, provided that the planned agreement or offer results in an operation of

concentration, the same may be the object of voluntary notification to the Authority of the

Competition, in a phase prior to that of the constitution of the obligation laid down in the number

previous.

5-Projected concentration operations may be the object of prior evaluation by the

Authority of Competition, second procedure established by the same.

Article 37.

Set of operations

1-Two or more concentration operations that are carried out in a period of 2 years

between the same natural or collective persons, and which individually considered

are not subject to prior notification, are considered to be a single operation of

concentration subject to prior notification, when the set of the operations reaches the

business volume values set out in paragraph 1 of the preceding article.

2-A The concentration operation referred to in the preceding paragraph shall be notified to the

Competition Authority after the conclusion of the agreement for the realization of the latter

operation and before this was carried out.

3-The concentration operations referred to in paragraph 1, which individually considered

are not subject to prior notification and have already been carried out, do not apply the

provisions of Article 39 (4) and (I) f) of Article 67 (1).

Article 38.

Market share and turnover

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

42

1-For the calculation of the market share and turnover of each company in

cause in the concentration, provided for in Article 36 (1), shall be taken into account,

cumulatively, the volume of business:

a) Of the company concerned in the concentration, pursuant to Rule 35;

b) Of the company in which this has directly or indirectly:

i) From a majority stake in the capital;

ii) From more than half the votes;

iii) From the possibility of designating more than half of the members of the organ of

administration or surveillance;

iv) Of the power to manage the respective business;

c) Of the companies that they have in the company concerned, either in isolation or together,

of the rights or powers listed in the preceding paragraph;

d) Of the companies in which any of the companies referred to in the preceding paragraph

has the rights or powers listed in the paragraph b) ;

e) Of the undertakings in which several companies referred to in points a) a d) have in

set, among them or with third-party companies, of the rights or powers

listed in the letter b) .

2-In the case of one or several companies participating in the merger

jointly have, among them or with third-party companies, rights or powers

listed in the letter b) of the previous number, in the calculation of the turnover of

each of the companies concerned in the operation of concentration, matters:

a) Do not take into account the volume of business resulting from the sale of

products or the provision of services carried out between the joint venture and each

one of the companies concerned in the operation of concentration or any other

company linked to these in the acetion of the points b) a e) of the previous number;

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

43

b) Take into account the volume of business resulting from the sale of products

and the provision of services carried out between the joint venture and any other

company third, which will be imputed to each of the companies concerned in the

concentration operation, in the part corresponding to its division in parts

equal by all the companies that control the joint venture.

3-The volume of business referred to in the previous figures comprises the values

of the products sold and the services provided to companies and consumers in the

Portuguese territory, net of taxes directly related to the volume of

business, but does not include the transactions effected between the companies referred to in paragraph 1.

4-By way of derogation from the provisions of paragraph 1, if the concentration consists of the

acquisition of elements of the asset of one or more companies, the turnover to be had

in consideration regarding the transferor is only the relative to the plots that are object

of the transaction.

5-The turnover is replaced:

a) In the case of credit institutions and financial companies, by the sum of the

following items of income, as defined in the applicable law:

i) Interest and similar income;

ii) Revenue from securities:

The Income from shares and other securities of variable income;

The Income from holdings;

The Income from parts of the capital in affiliated companies;

iii) Commissions received;

iv) Net profit from financial transactions;

v) Other operating income.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

44

b) In the case of insurance companies, by the value of the gross written premiums paid

by residents in Portugal, which include all amounts received and the

receive under the insurance contracts effected by those companies or by

your account, including the premiums yielded to the reinsurers, with the exception of the

taxes or fees collected on the basis of the amount of premiums or their

total volume.

Article 39.

Suspension of the concentration

1-It is prohibited to carry out a concentration subject to prior notification

before notified or, having it been, before a decision by the Competition Authority,

express or tacit, of non-opposition.

2-The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall be without prejudice to the realization of a public offer of

purchase or exchange that has been notified to the Competition Authority under

of Article 36, provided that the purchaser does not exercise the voting rights inherent in the

participations in cause or the exercice only with a view to protecting the full value of the

your investment on the basis of derogation granted in the terms of the following number.

3-A Competition Authority may, upon a reasoned request from the companies in

cause, presented before or after the notification, grant a waiver to the

fulfillment of the obligations laid down in the previous figures, weighted the

consequences of the suspension of the operation or exercise of the voting rights for the

companies in question and the negative effects of the derogation for the competition, and may,

if necessary, follow up with the derogation of conditions or obligations intended for

ensure effective competition.

4-Without prejudice to the penalty provided for in the paragraph f) of Article 67 (1), after the notification

of a concentration operation carried out in violation of paragraph 1 and prior to the adoption of

a decision by the Competition Authority:

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

45

a) Persons, natural or collective, who have acquired the control shall suspend

immediately their voting rights, staying the governing body

thank you not to practice acts that do not reengage with the normal management of the

society and by staying barred from divesture of holdings or parts of the asset

social of the acquired company;

b) The Competition Authority may, upon a reasoned request from the

persons, natural or collective who have acquired the control and weighted the

consequences of that measure for the competition, derogate from the obligation of the (

previous, and may, if necessary, accompany the derogation of conditions or of

obligations aimed at ensuring effective competition;

c) The Competition Authority may adopt the measures referred to in paragraph 4

of Article 55.

5-From the dewound or dismissation of the application for derogation referred to in paragraph 3 and to

point ( b) of paragraph 4 is up to complain, not being admitted to appeal.

6-Legal business that violating the provisions of paragraph 1 is ineffective.

Article 40.

Assessment of concentration operations

1-Concentration operations, notified in accordance with the provisions of Article 36,

are appreciated with the aim of determining their effects on the structure of the

competition, taking into account the need to preserve and develop, in the interest

of intermediate and final consumers, effective competition in the national market or

in a substantial part of this, without prejudice to the provisions of paragraph 5.

2-In the assessment referred to in the preceding paragraph shall be taken into account, in particular, the

following factors:

a) The structure of the relevant markets and the existence or non-competition by

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

46

part of companies established in those markets or in distinct markets;

b) The position of the companies concerned in the relevant markets and their power

economic and financial, in comparison with those of its principal

competitors;

c) The potential competition and the existence, of law or in fact, of barriers to

entry into the market;

d) The possibilities of choice of suppliers, customers and users;

e) The access of the different companies to the sources of supply and to the markets of

runoff;

f) The structure of existing distribution networks;

g) The evolution of supply and demand for the products and services in question;

h) The existence of special or exclusive rights conferred by law or resulting

of the nature of the transacted products or of the services provided;

i) The control of essential infrastructure by the companies concerned and the

possibility of access to these infrastructures offered to companies

competitors;

j) The evolution of technical and economic progress that does not constitute an obstacle

to the competition, provided that the concentration of the merger directly withdraws

efficiency gains that benefit consumers;

3-Are authorized the concentrations of companies that are not susceptible to create

significant barriers to effective competition in the national market or in a part

substantial of this.

4-Unauthorized concentrations of companies that are susceptible to create

significant barriers to effective competition in the national market or in a part

substantial of this, in particular if the barriers result from the creation or reinforcement of

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

47

a dominant position.

5-It is assumed that the decision authorising a concentration of undertakings covers

similarly the restrictions directly related to their achievement and to the same

necessary.

6-In the cases provided for in Article 35 (2), if the creation of the joint venture has by

object or as effect the coordination of competitive behavior of companies

that remain independent, in addition to the purpose of the joint venture, such

coordination is appreciated in the terms provided for in Articles 8 and 9.

SECTION II

Merger control procedure

Article 41.

Standards applicable

The procedure in control of merger control of undertakings shall govern-

if by the provisions of this section and, secondarily, by the Code of Procedure

Administrative.

Article 42.

Surveyment and provision of information

1-In the exercise of its powers of supervision, the Competition Authority may

proceed to the respondent of any persons, whether natural or collective, directly or

through legal representatives, whose statements consider pertinent.

2-A Competition Authority may request documents and other information to

companies or any other persons, whether natural or collective, and shall the request be

instructed with the following elements:

a) The legal basis and the purpose of the application;

b) The deadline for the supply of the documents or for the communication of the

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

48

information;

c) The mention that companies or any other natural persons or

collectives must identify, in a reasoned manner, attentive the regime

applicable procedural, the information that they consider confidential in the access

legally determined to the administrative information, by joining, in that case, a

copy of the documents containing such information, expunged from the

same;

d) The indication that the default of the application constitutes counterordinance

punishable under the terms of the ( i) of Article 67 (1).

3-The provisions of the c ) of the previous number applies to all documents

submitted voluntarily by the companies or any other persons, singular

or collectives.

4-A information concerning the internal life of companies can be considered, by the

Authority of Competition, confidential in access to administrative information

when the company demonstrates that the knowledge of that information by the interested

or by third parties causes him serious injury.

5-A Competition Authority may still consider confidential information

on the internal life of companies which does not release to the conclusion of the procedure,

as well as information whose confidentiality is warranted on grounds of interest

public.

Article 43.

Notification of operation

1-A prior notification of business concentration operations is presented to the

Authority of Competition:

a) Jointly by the parties intervening in a merger, in the creation of a

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

49

joint venture or in the acquisition of joint control over all or

part of one or several companies;

b) Individually, for the part that acquires sole control of all or

of part of one or several companies.

2-Joint notifications are presented by common representative, with powers

to send and receive documents on behalf of all notifying parties.

3-A notification is submitted on form approved by regulation of the

Competition Authority and contains all information and documents in the same

required.

4-In the case of merger transactions which, in a preliminary assessment, do not suscitem

significant barriers to competition, in accordance with criteria to be established by the

Competition Authority, the notification is submitted by form

simplified approved by regulation of the Competition Authority.

Article 44.

Production of effects of the notification

1-Without prejudice to the provisions of the following numbers, the notification produces effect on the date

where it has been submitted to the Competition Authority, pursuant to the

regulation referred to in the previous article, accompanied by the proof of payment

of the rate provided for in Article 93.

2-Whenever the information or documents set out in the notification are

incomplete or revelate inexact, taking into account the elements that should be

transmitted, pursuant to paragraphs 3 and 4 of the preceding Article, the Authority of the

Competition invites the notifying, in writing and within 7 working days, to be completed

or correct the notification within the period set by it, producing the notification effect,

in this case, on the date of the receiving of the information or documents by the Authority of the

Competition.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

50

3-Mediant reasoned application submitted by the notifier, may the Authority

of the Competition dismissing the presentation of certain information or

documents, if they do not prove essential, at that time, so that they will start

instruction of the procedure.

4-A dispensation of information or documents to which the number is referred

previous it does not harm your request until the adoption of a decision.

Article 45.

Desistance and resignation

The notifier may, at all times, give up the procedure or any of the applications

formulated, as well as renouning their rights or legally protected interests,

save in the cases provided for in the law.

Article 46.

Intervention in the procedure

1-Are admitted to intervene in the administrative procedure of merger control

the holders of subjective rights or legally protected interests that may be

affected by the operation of concentration and to submit to the Authority of the

Competition comments in which they express in an express and grounded manner

position as to the realization of the operation.

2-For the purposes of the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the Competition Authority, on the deadline

of 5 working days, counted from the date on which the notification produces effects, promotes the

publication of the essential elements of the concentration operation in two of the papers

of greater national circulation, at the expense of the notifier, set term, not less than 10

working days, for the submission of observations.

3-A non-submission of observations within the prescribed period extinguish the right to intervene in the

prior hearing provided for in Article 53 (1), save if the Competition Authority

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

51

to consider that such an intervention is relevant to the instruction of the procedure and not

undermines the adoption of an express decision within the legally fixed time frame.

Article 47.

Right to information

1-Have a right to obtain information contained in the administrative control procedure

of concentrations, as provided for in the Code of Administrative Procedure and

in the following number, persons, singular or collective, with direct interest in the same

or that they demonstrate legitimate interest in the said information.

2-Between the expiry of the period for the submission of submissions to which the article

previous and the beginning of the hearing provided for in Article 53, the persons, natural or

collectives, referred to in the previous number, with the exception of the notifier, are only entitled

to be informed about the march of the procedure.

Article 48.

Instruction of the procedure

1-A Competition Authority concludes the instruction of the procedure by the deadline of 30

working days counted from the date of production of effects of the notification.

2-A Competition Authority may authorise the introduction of substantial changes to the

notification submitted, upon reasoned request from the notifier, running from

new the deadline provided in the preceding paragraph for the completion of the instruction, counted from the

prescription of the changes.

3-If, in the course of the instruction, it is necessary to disclose the provision of information or

additional documents or the correction of those that were provided, the Authority of the

Competition communicates such a fact to the notifier, fixing it reasonable time to provide

the elements in question or proceed to the indispensable corrections.

4-A communication provided for in the preceding paragraph suspending the time limit referred to in paragraph 1, with

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

52

effects from the first working day following that of the sending respects, ending the

suspension on the day of the payout, by the Competition Authority, of the elements

requested, accompanied by the purged copy of the confidential elements, to which

refers to point c) of Article 42 (2).

5-In the course of the instruction, the Competition Authority may ask for any

other entities, public or private, the information that it considers to be convenient for

the decision of the case, which are transmitted on the deadlines by that fixed.

6-Without prejudice to the provisions of the paragraph i) of Art. 67 (1), the information obtained in

moment later in the course of the deadline set in the preceding paragraph may still be

considered by the Competition Authority, when this does not compromise the adoption

of a decision within the legally prescribed time limit for the completion of the procedure.

Article 49.

Decision

1-Until the expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 1 of the preceding article, the Authority of the

Competition decides:

a) Not to be found the operation covered by the procedure of control of

concentrations;

b) Do not object to the concentration of companies, when you consider that the operation, such

how it was notified, or following changes made by the notifier,

is not susceptible to creating significant barriers to effective competition in the

national market or in a substantial part of this;

c) Initiate an in-depth investigation, when you consider that the operation

in cause raises serious doubts, in the light of the elements collected, and in attention

to the criteria set out in Article 40, as to its compatibility with the

criterion set out in Article 40 (3), being susceptible to creating barriers

significant to the effective competition in the national market or in a part

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

53

substantial of this.

2-The decisions taken by the Competition Authority under the terms of the b ) from the

previous paragraph may be accompanied by the imposition of conditions or obligations

intended to ensure compliance with commitments made by the notifier with

seen to ensure the maintenance of effective competition.

3-The legal business carried out in disregard of the conditions to which the

previous number are void, without prejudice to the provisions of paragraph a ) of Article 56 (1)

and in the letter g ) of Article 67 (1).

4-A The absence of a decision within the period referred to in paragraph 1 of the previous article is worth as

decision not to oppose the concentration of companies.

Article 50.

Appointments

1-A notifying you may, at all time, make commitments to ensure the

maintenance of effective competition.

2-A The submission of commitments referred to in the preceding paragraph shall determine the

suspension of the deadline for the adoption of a decision for the period of 20 working days,

starting suspension on the first business day following the submission of commitments

and ending on the day of communication to the notifier of the decision of acceptance or refusal

of the same.

3-A Competition Authority may, during the suspension of the period provided for in the number

previous, request, pursuant to Article 48 (3 a) to 6, the information that

consider necessary to assess whether the presented commitments are sufficient and

appropriate to ensure the maintenance of effective competition or any other

which are required to be necessary for the instruction of the procedure.

4-A Competition Authority refuses appointments whenever it considers that the

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

54

your presentation has merely dilatory character or that the conditions or obligations to

taking on are insufficient or inadequate to hinder the barriers to competition that

could result from the concentration of companies, or uncertain enforceability.

5-From the refusal to which the preceding paragraph is referred to be up to the complaint, not being admitted

feature.

Article 51.

In-depth research

1-Within the maximum period of 90 working days counted from the date of production of effects of

notification referred to in Article 44, the Competition Authority shall carry out the

additional research representations that you consider necessary.

2-The research referred to in the preceding paragraph shall apply to the provisions of the n. 2 a to 6 of the

article 48.

3-The time limit referred to in paragraph 1 may be extended by the Competition Authority,

at the request of the notifier or with your agreement, up to a maximum of 20 working days.

Article 52.

Decision after in-depth investigation

1-Until the expiry of the period set out in paragraph 1 of the preceding Article, the Authority of the

Competition decides:

a) Do not object to the concentration of companies, when you consider that the operation, such

how it was notified, or following changes made by the notifier,

is not susceptible to creating significant barriers to effective competition in the

national market or in a substantial part of this;

b) Prohibit the concentration of companies, when it considers that the operation, such

how it was notified, or following changes made by the notifier,

is susceptible to creating significant barriers to effective competition in the market

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

55

national or in a substantial part of this.

2-Should the concentration have already been carried out, the Competition Authority, in the decision to

prohibition referred to in point (s) b ) of the preceding paragraph, orders appropriate measures to the

restoration of effective competition, notably the separation of companies or

of the pooled assets, including the reversal of the operation, or the cessation of control.

3-To the decision referred to in para. a ) of paragraph 1 applies, with due adaptations, the provisions of

in Article 49 (2) and (50) and Article 50.

4-The legal business carried out in disrespect of the b ) of paragraph 1 or of paragraph 2 are

nulls, without prejudice to the provisions of the paragraph f ) of Article 67 (1).

5-A The absence of a decision within the period referred to in paragraph 1 of the previous article is worth as

decision not to opposition to the realization of the concentration.

Article 53.

Previous hearing

1-The decisions referred to in Articles 49 and 52 are taken upon hearing

prior notification of the notifier and those concerned identified in Article 46 (1).

2-Decisions under Article 52 are antecedents of a prior hearing which will have

place within the maximum period of 75 working days counted from the date of production of

effects of the notification referred to in Article 44.

3-In the absence of any interested persons who have expressed against the achievement of the

operation, the Competition Authority can dismiss the prior hearing whenever

intend to adopt a non-opposition decision without imposition of conditions.

4-A The holding of the prior hearing suspends the counting of the time limits referred to in paragraph 1 of the

articles 48 and 51.

Article 54.

Articulation with sectoral regulatory authorities within the framework of the control of

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

56

concentrations

1-Where a concentration of companies has an incidence in a market that is

object of sector regulation, the Competition Authority, before taking a

decision that puts an end to the procedure, requests that the regulatory authority to regulate

issue opinion on the notified operation, setting a reasonable time frame for that purpose.

2-The deadline for the adoption of a decision putting an end to the procedure suspending itself

when the opinion to be issued is binding.

3-A suspension provided for in the preceding paragraph starts on the first working day following that of the

dispatch of the request to appear and ends on the day of its receiving by the Authority of the

Competition or finite the deadline set by the Competition Authority on the terms

of paragraph 1.

4-A non-issuance of binding opinion within the time limit set out in nº1 of the present

article does not prevent the Competition Authority from making a decision that puts an end

to the procedure.

5-The provisions of paragraph 1 shall be without prejudice to the exercise by the sectoral regulatory authorities

of the powers that, in the frame of their specific assignments, be legally

conferred with respect to the concentration in question.

Article 55.

Officiating procedure

1-Without prejudice to the provisions of the paragraph f) of Article 67 (1) and (1) b) of Article 71,

are the object of officiating procedure of merger control the operations of

whose realization the Competition Authority takes notice, occurred less

of 5 years, and which, in default of the provisions of the law, have not been the object of

prior notification.

2-The officiating procedure starts with the communication of the Competition Authority

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

57

to natural or collective persons in a situation of default so that, within a time limit

reasonable, proceed to notification of the concentration in the terms set out in the

present law.

3-The officiating procedure shall be completed in the time limits provided for in Articles 48 and

51., counted from the date of production of the effects of the submission of the notification.

4-A Competition Authority may adopt at all time the measures that prove to be

necessary and appropriate to restore, as far as possible, the situation that existed

prior to the concentration of companies, namely the separation of companies or the

pooled assets, including the reversal of the operation, or the cessation of control.

Article 56.

Revocation of decisions

1-Without prejudice to the application of the corresponding penalties and invalidities in the

law, decisions of the Competition Authority can be revoked when the

concentration:

a) Has been carried out in disrespect of a decision of non-opposition with

conditions or obligations;

b) Has been authorized on the basis of false or inaccurate information concerning

essential circumstances for the decision, provided by the companies concerned in the

concentration.

2-The decisions provided for in the preceding paragraph shall be repealed by the Authority of the

Competition, by officiating administrative procedure, which observes the

formalities foreseen for the practice of the act to be revoked.

3-Without prejudice to the revocation of the decision, the Competition Authority may adopt the

all the time the measures referred to in paragraph 4 of the previous article.

SECTION III

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

58

Sanctionatory process relating to concentrations

Article 57.

Opening of inquiry

In the context of merger control of companies, the Competition Authority

carries out the opening of inquiry, respecting the provisions of Article 6:

a) In case of realization of a concentration of companies before it has been

object of a non-opposition decision, in violation of Articles 36 and 37, of the

n. 1 and of the a) of Art. 39 (4), or that there is prohibited by decision

adopted under the paragraph b) of Article 52 (1); and

b) In the event of a disrespect of conditions, obligations or measures imposed on

companies by the Competition Authority, under the terms set out in paragraph 3 and in the

points b) and c) of Article 39 (4), in Article 49 (2), in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the

article 52, in Article 55 (4) and in Article 56 (3);

c) In the event of non-provision of information or provision of information

false, inaccurate or incomplete, in response to the request of the Authority of the

Competition, in the use of the supervisory powers;

d) In case of non-collaboration with the Competition Authority or obstruction

to the exercise of the powers provided for in Article 42.

Article 58.

Applicable regime

1-The processes referred to in the preceding Article shall be governed by the provisions of the present

section and in Articles 14, 15, 17 to 27 and 29 to 34 and, with due adaptations, in the

n. paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of Article 16 and in Article 28 of this Law.

2-The proceedings of this section are governed by, secondarily, by the general regime of the illicit of

mere social ordering, approved by the Decree-Law No. 433/82 of October 27.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

59

CHAPTER IV

Studies, inspections and audits

Article 59.

Standards applicable

The procedure in respect of studies, inspections and audits is governed by, secondarily,

by the Code of Administrative Procedure.

Article 60.

Market studies and surveys by economic sectors and by types of agreements

1-A Competition Authority may carry out market studies and surveys by

economic sectors and by types of agreements that prove necessary to:

a) The supervision and monitoring of markets;

b) The verification of circumstances that indict distortions or restrictions of

competition.

2-A The conclusion of the studies is published on the Electrophic page of the Authority of the

Competition, and may be preceded by public consultation to be promoted by the Authority

of the Competition.

3-In cases where the market studies and surveys referred to in paragraph 1 say

respect to economic sectors regulated by sectoral regulatory authorities, their

conclusion must be preceded by request for non-binding opinion to the respect

sectoral regulatory authority, fixing the Competition Authority a deadline

reasonable for that purpose.

4-A non-issuance of non-binding opinion within the time limit set out in the number

previous, does not preclude the Competition Authority from completing the market study and

enquiry to which the request to appear concerns.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

60

5-A Competition Authority may ask companies or associations of companies

or to any other persons or entities all the information you consider

relevant from the juscompetitive point of view, applying the provisions of Article 42,

with the necessary adaptations.

Article 61.

Recommendations

1-When the Competition Authority concludes by the existence of circumstances or

conduits that affect competition in the markets or economic sectors analyzed,

shall, in the report of completion of market studies, sector survey or by

type of agreement, or in the report of inspections and audits:

a) Identify what the circumstances of the market or conduct of companies or

associations of companies that affect the competition, and to what extent;

b) Indicate which measures of behavioral or structural character you consider

appropriate to your prevention, removal or compensation.

2-Whenever the study and the respective report incidify about a market subjected to

sector regulation, the Competition Authority should give notice to the

sectoral regulatory authorities of the circumstances or pipelines affecting the

competition and the possible measures to correct the situation.

3-A Competition Authority may recommend the adoption of measures of character

behaviourmental or structural appropriate to the reposition or guarantee of competition in the

market, in the following terms:

a) When it deals with markets object of sectoral regulation, and the circumstances

identified in para. a) of the previous number result from it, the Authority

of the Competition may present to the Government and regulatory authorities

sector the recommendations it understands appropriate;

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

61

b) In the remaining cases, the Competition Authority may recommend to the

Government and other entities the adoption of the behavioral character measures

or structural referred to.

4-A Competition Authority monitors compliance with the recommendations by you

formulated under the preceding paragraph, and may request the addresseable entities

the information you understand pertinent to its implementation.

Article 62.

Inspections and audits

1-Checking of circumstances that indict distortions or restrictions of competition, the

Competition Authority may carry out the necessary inspections and audits of the

identification of its causes.

2-In carrying out inspections and audits, the Competition Authority acts accordingly

with the powers set out in the following article, after obtaining the assentiment of the

entity targeted, in the exercise of the duty of collaboration.

3-A Competition Authority effectuates inspections and audits punctually or in

execution of previously approved inspections plans.

4-If, as a result of inspections or audits, the Competition Authority is deteeing

situations that affect the competition in the markets concerned, is correspondingly

applicable the provisions of the previous article.

Article 63.

Powers on inspection and auditing

1-A Competition Authority may perform inspections and audits of any

companies or associations of companies.

2-Inspective actions and audits to be promoted by the Competition Authority are

notified to companies and associations of companies with the minimum advance notice of 10

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

62

working days regarding your achievement.

3-The officials and other persons mandated by the Competition Authority for

do an inspection and audit can:

a) Aceder to all the facilities, land and means of transport of the companies or

associations of companies;

b) Inspect the books and other records relating to the company or association of

companies, regardless of their support;

c) Obtain, by any form, copies or extracts of the controlled documents;

d) Request any legal representative, worker or collaborator of the company

or of the association of companies clarifications on facts or documents

related to the object and purpose of the inspection and audit and record its

answers.

4-The legal representatives of the company or association of companies, as well as the

workers and collaborators are required to provide all necessary collaboration

so that the officials and the other persons mandated by the Authority of the

Competition may exercise the powers provided for in the preceding paragraph.

5-The officials and persons mandated by the Competition Authority for

an inspection and audit must be holders of credential, from which it appears

purpose of the due diligence.

CHAPTER V

Public aid

Article 64.

Public aid

1-The aid to companies granted by the State or any other public non-

must constrain, distort or affect competitively, in whole or in

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

63

substantial part of the national market.

2-A Competition Authority may analyse any aid or project of aid and

formulate to the Government or any other public the recommendations that it understands

necessary to eliminate the negative effects on competition.

3-A Competition Authority monitors the implementation of the recommendations formulated,

may ask any entities for information regarding their implementation.

4-A Competition Authority releases the recommendations it formulates on its page

electro.

CHAPTER VI

Regulation

Article 65.

Procedure for regulation

1-Prior to the issuance of any regulation with external effectiveness, the Authority of

Competition proceeds to the disclosure of the respective project on its electro-page, to

purposes of public discussion, for period not less than 30 working days.

2-In the preambular report of the regulations provided for in the preceding paragraph, the Authority

of the Competition substantiates its options, specifically with reference to the

opinions expressed during the period of public discussion.

3-The regulations of the Competition Authority with external effectiveness are published

in the 2 th grade of the Journal of the Republic.

CHAPTER VII

Infractions and sanctions

Article 66.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

64

Qualification

Without prejudice to the criminal liability and administrative measures to which there is

place, the infractions to the standards laid down in this Law and in the right of the European Union whose

observance is ensured by the Competition Authority constitute counterordinance

punishable in the terms of the provisions of this Chapter.

Article 67.

Counterorders

1-Constituent counterordinate punishable with fine:

a) The violation of the provisions of Articles 8, 10 and 11;

b) The violation of the provisions of Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the

Operation of the European Union;

c) Failure to comply with the conditions referred to in subparagraph c) of the Article 1 (1)

28.

d) Failure to comply with measures imposed in accordance with Article 28 (2);

e) The disrespect of decision that enacts precautionary measures, in the terms provided for

in Article 33;

f) The realization of operation of concentration of companies before it was the object

of a non-opposition decision, in violation of Articles 36 and 37, of paragraph 1 and

of the paragraph a) of Art. 39 (4), or that hajam was prohibited by decision

adopted under the paragraph b ) of Article 52 (1);

g) The disrespect of conditions, obligations or measures imposed on companies by the

Competition Authority under the terms set out in paragraph 3 and in the paragraphs b ) and c)

of Article 39 (4), in Article 49 (2), in Article 52 (2) and (3), in the

n Article 55 (4), and in Article 56 (3);

h) The non-provision or provision of false, inaccurate or incomplete information,

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

65

in response at the request of the Competition Authority, in the use of its powers

sanctionaries;

i) The non-provision or provision of false, inaccurate or incomplete information,

in response at the request of the Competition Authority, in the use of the powers of

supervision and in the context of carrying out studies, inspections and audits;

j) Non-collaboration with the Competition Authority or obstruction of the

exercise of the powers provided for in Articles 17 to 19, 42, and 63 and 63;

l) The unjustified lack of comparisons of whistleblower, witness or expert, in

process due diligence so that it has been regularly notified.

2-If the counterordinance consists of non-compliance with a legal duty or an order

emanating from the Competition Authority, the application of the fine does not discharge the offender

of the compliance of the same, should this still be possible.

3-A negligence is punishable.

Article 68.

Determination of the measure of the fine

1-In the determination of the measure of the fine referred to in the preceding article, the Authority of the

Competition may consider, inter alia, the following criteria:

a) The severity of the infraction for the affection of effective competition in the

national market;

b) The nature and size of the market affected by the infraction;

c) The duration of the infraction;

d) The degree of participation of the target by the process in the infraction;

e) The advantages that there is a benefit of the one targeted by the process as a result

of the infraction, when the same are identified;

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

66

f) The behaviour of the one targeted by the process in the elimination of practices

restrictive and in the repair of the damage caused to the competition;

g) The economic situation of the target by the process;

h) The counterordinational antecedents of the one targeted by the infringement procedure to the

rules of competition;

i) The collaboration provided to the Competition Authority until the end of the

procedure.

2-In the case of the counterordinations referred to in points a ) a g ) of paragraph 1 of the previous article, the

coima determined in accordance with paragraph 1 may not exceed 10% of turnover

performed in the exercise immediately prior to the final sentencing decision delivered

by the Competition Authority, by each of the infringing companies or, in the case of

association of companies, of the aggregate turnover of the associated companies.

3-In the case of the counterordinations referred to in points h ) a j) of paragraph 1 of the previous article, the

coima determined in accordance with paragraph 1 may not exceed 1% of turnover

performed in the exercise immediately prior to the decision by each of the companies

infrasatoras or, in the case of association of companies, of the aggregate turnover of the

associated companies.

4-In the case of the counterordinations referred to in points a) a g) of paragraph 1 of the previous article, the

coima applicable to natural persons, may not exceed 10% of the remuneration

annual earned by the exercise of its duties at the infratora company, in the last year

complete in which the prohibited practice has been verified.

5-In the remuneration provided for in the preceding paragraph, they shall include, in particular, ordered,

salaries, salaries, gratuities, percentages, commissions, stakes, subsidies

or premiums, presence passwords, emoluments and ancillary remunerations, yet

periodicals, fixed or variable, of a contractual nature or not, as well as benefits

ancillary, as defined for the purposes of taxation of income, which are

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

67

self-injured due to the provision of work or in connection with this and constitute for the

respect to the beneficiary an economic advantage.

6-In the case of the counterordinations referred to in points h ) a j) of paragraph 1 of the previous article, the

Authority of Competition may apply to natural persons, a fine of 10 a to 50

units of account.

7-In the case of the counterordinance referred to in point (s) l ) of paragraph 1 of the previous article, the

Competition Authority may apply to the whistleblower, the witness and the expert

a fine of 2 a to 10 units of account.

8-A Competition Authority adopts, under its powers of regulation,

guidelines containing the methodology to be used for the application of the fines, from

agreement with the criteria set out in this Law.

Article 69.

Dispensation or reduction of the fine

The Competition Authority may grant dispensation or reduction of the fine that would be

applied in accordance with the previous article, pursuant to this Law.

Article 70.

Ancillary sanctions

1-In case the seriousness of the infraction and the fault of the offender justifies it, the Authority of

Competition may determine the application, at the same time as the fine, of the following

ancillary sanctions:

a) Publication in the Journal of the Republic and in one of the most circulating newspapers

national, regional or local, depending on the relevant geographical market, the

expensing of the offender, from excerpt of the sentencing decision, or at least from the

decision-making part of the conviction decision handed down in the framework of a case

instituted under this Act, after the transit on trial;

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

68

b) Deprivation of the right to participate in contract formation procedures

whose object covers typical benefits of the contracts of endeavors, of

granting of public works, public service concession, leasing or

purchase of mobile goods or purchase of services or still in

procedures for the allocation of licences or alvarás, provided that the

practice that constitutes counterordinate punishable with fine if it has verified

during or because of the relevant procedure.

2-A penalty provided for in the paragraph b ) of the previous number has the maximum duration of two years,

Counted from the sentencing decision, after the transit on trial.

Article 71.

Compulsory financial penalties

Without prejudice to the provisions of Articles 68 and 69, the Competition Authority may

decide, when this is warranted, to apply a compulsory pecuniary penalty, in an amount

not more than 5% of the daily average turnover in the year immediately preceding the

decision, by day of delay, from the date of the notification, in the following cases:

a) Non-acatation of decision of the Competition Authority imposing a

sanction or order the adoption of determined measures;

b) Lack of notification of a concentration subject to notification

prior to the terms of Articles 36 and 37.

Article 72.

Responsibility

1-By the practice of the counterordinances provided for in this Law, they may be held liable

natural persons, collective persons, regardless of the regularity of their

constitution, societies and associations without legal personality.

2-Collective persons and the riding entities referred to in the preceding paragraph

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

69

respond by the counterordinations provided for in this Law, when committed:

a) On your behalf and in the collective interest by people who occupy them a

leading position; or

b) By whom atue under the authority of the persons referred to in the preceding paragraph

virtue of a violation of the surveillance or control duties that they

incumbent.

3-Understand that they occupy a position of leadership the person's organs and representatives

collective and who in it has the authority to exercise control of their activity.

4-A The merger, fission and processing do not determine the extinction of the responsibility of the

collective person or equiped entity, responding by the practice of the counterordinance:

a) In the case of merger, the collective person or equiped entity incorporated from

other or the result of the operation;

b) In the case of spin-off, the collective persons or equipared entities that result from the

operation or to benefit from heritage incorporations of the society

cinded;

c) In the case of processing, the collective persons or equipared entities that

result from the operation.

5-In the case of extinction of the collective person or the equating entity, by the fines in which the

same is doomed to answer the former assets of this one that have been awarded

in sharing.

6-The holders of the governing body of the collective persons and equipared entities,

as well as those responsible for the direction or surveillance of areas of activity in which

is practiced some counterordinance, incur the sanction commenced in paragraph 4 of the

article 70, when they act in the terms described in paragraph a) of paragraph 2 or when,

knowing or owing to know the practice of the infraction, do not adopt the measures

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

70

suitable to terminate you immediately, unless more serious sanction

kayba by force of another legal provision.

7-A The responsibility of the collective persons and equiparted entities does not exclude the

individual responsibility of any natural persons, nor depends on the

accountability of these, in cases of breach of collaboration duties.

8-The companies whose representatives, at the time of the infraction, were members of the organs

directives of an association of companies that are the subject of a fine or of a

compulsory pecuniary penalty, in the terms set out in the paragraphs a) a g) of paragraph 1 of the

Article 67, in Article 68 (2) and in the previous article, are jointly and severally liable

by the payment of the fine, except if, in writing, they have laundered their opposition to the

decision constituting the infraction or of which the same resulted.

Article 73.

Prescription

1-The counterordinance procedure extinguishes itself by prescription at the time, counted in the

terms of Article 119 of the Criminal Code, of:

a) 3 years, in the cases provided for in points h ) a l) of Article 67 (1);

b) 5 years, in the remaining cases.

2-The limitation period of the sanctions is 5 years from the day on which it becomes

definitive or which transits on trial the decision that determined its application, save

in the cases provided for in paragraphs 3, 6 and 7 of Article 68, which is 3 years.

3-A The prescription of the procedure by counterordinate interrupts with the constitution

of a visage or with the notification to this of any act of the Competition Authority

that personally affects you, producing the interruption effects since the notification of the act to

any of those targeted by the process.

4-A The prescription of the procedure by counterordinance suspends:

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

71

a) For the period of time in which the Competition Authority's decision is

object of judicial appeal;

b) From the dispatch of the case to the Public Prosecutor's Office and until its return to the

Competition Authority, under the terms set out in Article 40 of the scheme

general of the illicit of mere social ordering.

5-In cases where the Competition Authority has initiated a process of

counterordinance by infraction to Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the

Functioning of the European Union, the limitation period suspending itself when the

Competition Authority, having been aware that a national authority

of competition from another member state has initiated, by the same facts, to a

process by infringement of the same articles of the Treaty, notify the target by the

process of the decision to suspend the proceedings under Article 13 (1) of the

Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, of the Council, of December 16, 2002.

6-In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, the suspension ends on the date on which the

Competition Authority to take notice of the decision handed down in that

process.

7-A The suspension of the procedure shall not exceed 3 years.

8-A The prescription of the procedure always takes place when they have elapsed 5 or 7 years

and means, respectively in the cases of the sub-paragraphs a ) or b) of paragraph 1, ressaved the time of

suspension.

CHAPTER VIII

Dispensation or reduction of the fine in counterordinate proceedings by infringement of the

rules of competition

SECTION I

General provisions

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

72

Article 74.

Objective scope

The dispensation or the special reduction of fines are granted in the framework of proceedings of

counterordinance that have per object agreements or concerted practices between two or

more competing companies prohibited by Article 8 of this Law and, if applicable, by the

article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which aim to coordinate

their competitive behaviours in the market or influence competitive variables

relevant, inter alia, by setting purchase or sales prices or other

transaction conditions, allocation of production or sales quotas, apportionment of

markets, including concertation in auctions and public tenders, restriction of

imports or exports or anti-competitive actions against other competitors.

Article 75.

Subjective scope

They may benefit from dispensation or reduction of the fine:

a) The undertakings, in the acetment of Article 3 (1);

b) The holders of the board of directors of the collective persons and entities

equistops, as well as those responsible for the direction or surveillance of areas of

activity in which some counterordinance is practiced, responsible in the

terms of the provisions of Article 72 (6).

SECTION II

Requirements

Article 76.

Dispensation of the fine

1-A Competition Authority grants dispensation of the applicable fine, under the terms of the

provisions of Article 69, to the Company to reveal its participation in an alleged agreement or

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

73

concerted practice, provided that this company is the first to provide information and

elements of evidence that, in the understanding of the Competition Authority, enable it to:

a) Substantiate the application for the realization of search and seizure representations in the

terms of the point c) of Article 17 (1) and Articles 18 and 19 and, in the

timing of the delivery of the information, the Competition Authority does not

still possess sufficient elements to carry out such due diligence; or

b) Check the existence of an infraction provided for in Article 74, provided that in that

moment, the Competition Authority does not yet possess elements of

enough proof about the infraction.

2-A Competition Authority grants the dispensation of the fine, in the terms of the number

previous, provided that the company cumulatively complies with the following conditions:

a) Coopere fully and continuously with the Competition Authority since the

moment of the submission of the application for dispensation or reduction of the fine, being

the company obliged, in particular, to:

i) Provide all the information and the evidence you have or will have in your

possession or under its control;

ii) Respond promptly to any request for information that may

contribute to the determination of the facts;

iii) Abstain from the practice of any acts that may hinder the investigation,

particularly the destruction, falsification or dissimulation of information

or evidence related to the infraction;

iv) Abstaining from revealing the existence or content of the presentation, or of the intention

of submission, of the application for dispensation, unless written permission of the

Authority of Competition.

b) Put an end to your participation in the infraction, up to the time you provide the

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

74

Competition Authority the information and the evidence referred to in point (s)

a) , except as far as is reasonably necessary, in the understanding of the

Competition Authority, to preserve the effectiveness of research;

c) Have not exercised coation over the remaining companies to participate in the

infraction.

3-The information and evidence referred to in the preceding paragraphs shall contain particulars

complete and precise about the agreement or concerted practice and the companies involved,

including the objectives, activities and functioning, the product or service in question, the

geographical scope, duration and specific information on dates, locations, content and

participants in contacts made and all relevant explanations presented in

support of the application.

Article 77.

Reduction of the fine

1-A Competition Authority grants a reduction of the fine that would be applied, in the

terms of the provisions of Article 69, to companies which, by not meeting the conditions

set out in paragraph 1 of the previous article, cumulatively comply with the following

conditions:

a) Provide information and evidence about an infraction referred to in Article 74, which

present significant additional value by reference to the information and evidence

already in the possession of the Competition Authority;

b) The conditions laid down in the paragraphs are verified a) and b) of paragraph 2 and of paragraph 3

of the previous article.

2-A Competition Authority determines the level of the reduction of the fine of the following

shape:

a) To the first company that provides information and proof of additional value

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

75

significant is granted a reduction of 30 a to 50%;

b) To the second company that provides information and proof of additional value

significant is granted a reduction of 20 a to 30%;

c) To the following companies that provide information and evidence of additional value

significant is granted a reduction by 20%.

3-In the determination of the reduction of the fine, the Competition Authority considers the

order by which the information and proofs that fill in the

requirements set out in paragraph a) of paragraph 1 and the respective significant additional value for the

investigation and proof of the infraction.

4-If the request of any of the visages is filed after the notification referred to in

point ( a) of Article 23 (1), the levels referred to in paragraph 2 are reduced by half.

Article 78.

Holders

1-If they cooperate fully and continuously with the Competition Authority, on the terms

of the provisions of the paragraph a) of Article 76 (2), the holders of the body of administration,

as well as those responsible for the direction or surveillance of areas of activity in which

is practiced some infraction provided for in Article 74 benefit, concerning the fine

which would be applied to them, pursuant to the provisions of Article 72 (6) of the dispensation or

reduction of the fine, regardless of whether they have personally required such benefits.

2-The persons referred to in the preceding paragraph who submit application for individual

benefit, with due adaptations, of the provisions of articles 76 and 77.

SECTION III

Procedure and decision

Article 79.

Procedure

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

76

The administrative procedure relating to the tramping of the application for dispensation or reduction

of the fine is established by regulation to be approved by the Competition Authority, in the

terms of Article 65.

Article 80.

Confidential documentation

1-A Competition Authority classifies as confidential the application for dispensation or

reduction of the fine, as well as all documents and information submitted for

effects of dispensing or reduction of the fine.

2-For the purposes of the provisions of Article 24 (1), the Competition Authority grants

to the visage by the process access to the application for dispensation or reduction of the fine, to the

documents and the information referred to in the preceding paragraph, not being permitted

any reproduction, except if authorized by the applicant.

3-The access of third parties to the applications, documents and information submitted by the

applicant, for the purposes of the dispensation or reduction of the fine, lacks permission from this.

4-When touted by the process will not be granted access to copies of your oral statements

and to third parties will be vetted access to the same

Article 81.

Decision on the application for dispensation or reduction of the fine

1-The application for dispensation or reduction of the fine is appreciated in the decision of the Authority of the

Competition as referred to in point a) of Article 28 (1).

2-A dispensation or reduction of the fine focuses on the amount that would be applied in the terms

of Article 68.

3-In the determination of the fine that is applied, it is not taken into account the criterion

provided for in paragraph i) of Article 68 (1).

CHAPTER IX

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

77

Judicial resources

SECTION I

Counterordinational processes

Article 82.

Procedural regime

Unless provision is made in a devious sense of this Law, they apply to the interposition, to the tramway

and to the judgment of the resources provided for in this section of the following articles and,

subsidally, the general regime of the illicit of mere social ordering.

Article 83.

Appeal, competent court and the effects of the appeal

1-It is up to the appeal of decisions rendered by the Competition Authority whose

irrecorribility is not expressly provided for in this Law.

2-It is not permissible to appeal decisions of mere expediency and decisions of

archiving, with or without imposition of conditions.

3-Of the decisions rendered by the Competition Authority rests with the Tribunal

of Competition, Regulation and Supervision.

4-The appeal has merely devolutive effect, except with respect to decisions that

implement measures of structural character determined in accordance with Article 28 (2),

whose effect is suspensive.

5-In the case of decisions that apply fines or other penalties provided for in the Act, the target

may require, when interacting with the appeal, that the same has suspensive effect when the

execution of the decision causes it to cause considerable injury and offers to provide collateral in

replacement, by giving the assignment of that effect conditional on the effective provision of

caution within the time limit set by the court.

Article 84.

Appeal of interlocutory decisions

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

78

1-Intersted appeal of an interlocutory decision of the Competition Authority, the

application is referred to the Public Prosecutor's Office within 20 working days, with

indication of the number of proceedings in the organically administrative phase.

2-The application is accompanied by any elements or information that the

Competition Authority considers relevant to the decision of the appeal, and may

be together allegations.

3-Form a single judicial process the resources of interlocutory decisions of the

Competition Authority handed down in the same process in the phase organically

administrative.

Article 85.

Appeal of cautionary measures

To the interlapping appeals of decisions of the Competition Authority, handed down in the same

process in the organically administrative phase, which enacts precautionary measures, in the

the terms of Article 33, the provisions of the preceding Article shall apply.

Article 86.

Appeal of the final decision

1-Notification of final sentencing decision delivered by the Competition Authority, the

touted by the process may appeal to judicial remedy, within 30 working days, no

extendable.

2-Interposed appeal of the final sentencing decision, the Competition Authority

referred the autos to the Public Prosecutor's Office, within 30 working days, non-extensions,

may bring together claims and other elements or information that it considers relevant

for the decision of the cause, as well as offer means of proof, without prejudice to the provisions of

in Article 70 of the general regime of the illicit mere social ordinance.

3-There have been resources of decisions of the Competition Authority, pursuant to the

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

79

articles 84 and 85, the appeal of the final decision is processed in the autos of the single or the

first interposed feature.

4-The appeals of decisions of the Competition Authority rendered in a case,

subsequent to the final decision of the same, Article 84 (3) applies.

5-A Competition Authority, the Public Prosecutor's Office or the target-vised

oppose that the court decides by order, without a trial hearing.

6-A dismissals of the prosecution by the prosecutor's office depends on the concordance of the

Authority of Competition.

7-The court notifies the Competition Authority of the sentence, as well as of all the

dispatches that are not from mere expedient.

8-If there is place the trial hearing, the court decides on the basis of the evidence

held at the hearing, as well as in the evidence produced at the administrative stage of the

process of counterordinance.

9-A Competition Authority has legitimacy to appeal autonomously from the

decisions that are not mere expedient.

Article 87.

Control by the competent Court

1-The Court of Competition, Regulation and Supervision knows with full jurisdiction of the

intersted resources of the decisions in which it has been fixed by the Authority of the

Competition a fine or a compulsory penalty payment penalty, and may reduce or

increase the fine or periodic penalty payment penalty.

2-The decisions of the Competition Authority that apply sanctions mention the

arranged in the final part of the preceding paragraph.

Article 88.

Appeal of the court decision

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

80

1-Of the judgments and dispatches of the Court of Competition, Regulation and Supervision rests

appeal to the Court of competent Relation, which decides in the last instance.

2-Have legitimacy to appeal:

a) The Public Prosecutor's Office and, autonomously, the Competition Authority, of

any sentences and dispatches that are not of mere expedient, including

those verwithout on nullities and other prior or incidental questions, or about

the application of precautionary measures;

b) The vised by the process.

3-To the resources provided for in this article the provisions of Article 84 (3) shall apply.

article 85 and in Article 86 (3) and 4, with the necessary adaptations.

Article 89.

Disclosure of decisions

1-A Competition Authority has a duty to publish on its electronical page a

non-confidential version of the decisions to be taken under the points of c) and d) of paragraph 1 of the

article 23, Article 28 (1), Article 49 (1) and Article 52 (1) thereof,

referring to whether the same are pending judicial appeal.

2-A Competition Authority may publish on its electronical page the version no

confidential of decisions rendered in accordance with the terms of the ( h) a l) of the Article 1 (1)

67., referring to whether the same are pending judicial remedy.

3-A Competition Authority must still publish on its page Electrophic decisions

appeals court proceedings in accordance with Article 83 (1) and paragraph 1 of the article

88.

4-A The Competition Authority may also publish, on its electronical page, the

judicial decisions of appeals instituted in accordance with Article 91 (1) and para. 1

is 3 of Article 92.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

81

SECTION II

Administrative procedures

Article 90.

Procedural regime

To the interposition, the tramway and the judgment of the resources referred to in this section is

applicable the provisions of the following articles and, secondarily, the scheme for the imputation

litigation of administrative acts, defined in the Code of Procedure in the Courts

Administrative.

Article 91.

Competent court and effects of the appeal

1-Of decisions of the Competition Authority handed down in procedures

administrative as referred to in this Law, as well as of the ministerial decision provided for

in Article 34 of the Statutes of the Competition Authority, approved by the Decree-

Law No. 10/2003 of January 18, it is up to the Court of Competition,

Regulation and Supervision, to be tramped as special administrative action.

2-The resource provided for in the preceding paragraph has merely devolutive effect, unless it is

is assigned, exclusive or cumulatively with other interim measures, the effect

suspensive by way of the decrement of interim measures.

Article 92.

Appeal of judicial decisions

1-Of the decisions rendered by the Court of Competition, Regulation and Supervision, in the

administrative actions referred to in this section, it shall be up to the Court of the

Competent relationship.

2-If the resource provided for in the preceding paragraph only respects matters of law, it is

interposed directly to the Supreme Court of Justice.

CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

82

3-Of the decision of the Court of the competent Relation rests with, limited to the matter of

right, to the Supreme Court of Justice.

4-The resources provided for in this article have merely devolutive effect.

CHAPTER X

Fees

Article 93.

Fees

1-Are subject to the payment of a fee:

a) The assessment of concentration operations of companies, subject to obligation to

prior notification, pursuant to the provisions of Article 36;

b) The assessment of concentrations referred to in paragraph 4 of the article

36.

c) The issuance of copies and certificates;

d) Any other acts that set up a provision of services, on the part of

Authority of Competition, to private entities.

2-The fees are fixed, settled and charged under the terms set out in regulation of the

Authority of Competition.