Regulations on the national policy guidelines for protected waterways Date FOR-1994-11-10-1001 Ministry of local government and the Ministry of modernisation Published 1994 1792 08.01.1995 Avd in the entry into force last modified the Change applies to Norway Pursuant LAW-1985-06-14-77-section 17-1 cf. LAW-2008-06-27-71-section 6-2, LAW-2008-06-27-71-section 34-2.

Announced short title regulations on guidelines for protected waterways Chapter overview: 1. scope of the Policy lines 2. Factual scope 3. National objectives for the management of protected waterways 4. Guidelines for water resources belt 5. Responsibility for following up the supplementary comments to national policy guidelines for protected waterways Attachment 1. Municipal planning schedule 2. Criteria for the determination of water dragenes conservation value-protection plan for waterways Appendix 3. Examples of intervention that may damage the protective values in waterways Appendix 4. Examples of laws outside of the PBL where RPR can apply, cf. the directional lines clause 2 and 5 legal authority: Provided by URkgl.res. november 10, 1994 with the legal authority in the planning and building law of 14. June 1985 No.. 77 section 17-1, the first paragraph. Promoted by the Ministry of the environment (now the Ministry of local government and modernization).

1. The direction lines to their scope these guidelines apply protected waterways, which are the rivers or sections of rivers that are covered by the Parliamentary decision of:-6. April 1973, about the protection plan for waterways,-30. October 1980, on the protection plan II for the waterways,-19. June 1986, about protection plan III for the waterways,-1. April 1993, about protection plan IV for the waterways.

This privacy policy applies to the following parts of the individual protective object bounded as follows:-water resources belt, IE. the main rivers, tributaries, larger streams, lakes and ponds and a range of up to 100 meters width along the sides of these,-other parts of the catchment area as it is professionally documented that have significance for water preservation dragets.

2. Substantive scope of municipalities and county municipalities Affected municipalities and county municipalities to add guidelines for planning for planning and building law, (cf. § 17-1, 1. paragraph).
The guidelines should also be added to reason by the treatment of individual cases in relation to the plans adopted in accordance with the guidelines, and they should be included in the assessment of individual cases in relation to other plans.
Municipal and County agencies should also take into account the guidelines in its other management activities within the framework planning and building law and the competent sector law provides. 
State Government authorities subjects subjects to add State guidelines to reason by his participation to planning and individual case management for planning and building law.
They should use the guidelines in its other management activities within the framework the competent sector law provides.

3. National objectives for the management of protected waterways The national objectives for the management of the protected inland waters is given by the Standing Committee on management of the safety plans for the waterways. in P. S. Nr. 10 (1980-81).
In order to achieve the goals, it must especially be added weight on to provide a basis to: a. avoid intervention that reduces the value of the landscape image, nature conservation, outdoor recreation, game, fish, cultural heritage and cultural environment, b. secure the reference value in the most untouched rivers, c. ensure and develop open air life value, especially in areas close to population concentrations, d. ensure the value associated with the instances/areas in the protected waters of the dragenes drainage basin as it is professionally documented that have significance for water preservation dragets , e. ensure the water resources close value for the sites ' agriculture and herding against dismantling where these interests was part of the Foundation for the protection of the decision.

4. guidelines for water resources water resources belt or belt refinement and management should be differentiated by registered protected values and area State. It is recommended that this is happening in connection with the work of local government plan's area. An aid in that regard is to share water resources into the belt classes. The purpose of a section of the administrative classes is to bring out the different criteria for the interest in the various trade-offs section of water resources the belt. Sets three classes that used is recommended. Municipalities can also define other classes adapted to local conditions. 
Class 1 Description: water resources belt in and by cities and towns, which have or can have great importance for the outdoors.
Management: intervention that is to the detriment of educational values, open air life values, including fishing and framkommelighet in and along the water's string, or experience values, should be avoided. 
Class 2 Description: water resources belt with moderate intervention in the water the string, and how close the sites consists of land use, forestry areas and farmland with scattered houses.
Management: the main features of the landscape must be searched maintained. Intervention that changes the conditions of the vegetation along the water's edge the string and in the areas that are perceived as part of the water resources nature, should be avoided. Intervention that individually or in total involves changes of a certain importance in the water the string, should be avoided. Habitats for endangered plant and animal species and smaller areas with large protective values should be given particular protection. 
Class 3 Description: water resources that is little belt affected by modern human activity, and therefore has great adventure value and scientific value.
Management: it is very important to preserve nature's touch of being little affected by modern human activity. All forms of reorganization of areas in water resources the belt should be avoided. Water quality and natural water flow must be searched, and all maintained the forms of intervention that reduces water value must be searched dragets avoided.

5. Responsibility for following up the responsibility to follow up on these guidelines in relation to the plan to the authorities in the municipalities and county municipalities is given the following authorities: a. Ministry of the environment has overall responsibility for general guidance, development and follow-up in relation to these guidelines. Responsibility shall be exercised in close cooperation with other affected ministries.

b. environmental protection Ministry and the industry and Energy Ministry's underlying agencies will:-make sure to increase the level of knowledge about the protection of the values associated with the protected waterways,-making the information about the effects of intervention in and by the water courses.

c. the County, county councils, Sami cultural heritage protection and State authorities have responsibility for the subject to provide information about the protection of values associated with the protected rivers and to see to it that the municipalities follow these guidelines.

State authorities have responsibility for the subjects to accommodate the guidelines in its other fund management business as far as possible.

Complementary comments on national policy guidelines for protected waterways Background rivers are important elements in Norwegian nature. No other Nations in Europe can refer to similar variation in water resources nature. At the same time has water and waterways at all times been important localization factor for settlement and habitation. Large parts of the country's cultural heritage and cultural environments are therefore in water resources close areas. Many of these have direct relation to the rivers and shows that the exploitation of hydro-electric power has long traditions.
Beyond in our century, especially in the post-war period, however, the power development represented ever-greater intervention in the rivers. Because of the great conflicts with protective and outdoor life interests, was the question of a national plan for the development and protection of water courses taken up by Parliament already in the 1960s.
Today, the result is that four safety plans for waterways has been adopted by Parliament. In addition, we have compiled plan for waterways, which indicates the priority of current development projects.
In the various stages of the planning work have the criteria for the determination of water dragenes conservation value been something different. It is made for this in the closer track schedule 2.
Throughout the protection plan work, it has been specified that waterways that are protected against power development also needs to be treated with caution when it comes to other types of intervention.
Examples of intervention that may damage the protective values in waterways is road construction, earthworks, water withdrawals, forbygning/Beach coverings, flood control trying, channeling, building/construction and pollution. A fuller list of intervention is provided in Appendix 3. There also "suggests what purpose the disturbance are meant to serve and some damage effects of such intervention.
The list in Appendix 3 are intended as a preliminary information and guidance, and it is not complete, either when it comes to inngreps types or possible adverse effects on the conservation values. The list also does not constitute something completely the basis for interest trade-off in specific cases. It will eventually be worked out further details about the possible effects on inland waters at different intervention.

To the certain points in the guidelines to the PT 1, directional lines to their scope The protection decision the Storting has made as a rule applies to the entire watercourse within the boundaries of the catchment area. Moreover, the Standing Committee on protection plan decision as a rule limited to protection against power development. In connection with protective measures the Storting has given a general appeal that an applicant to avoid action in water protection plan that reduces their protective value. (Cf. URSt.prp. Nr. 89 (1984-85) and P. S. Nr. 243 (1985-86)).
Even though the whole catchment area is protected against power development, the RPR for protected waterways just provided to have impact on the planning and operations in areas that have significance for water preservation dragets, jf. clause 3. This will first say the water resources that are defined in belt guidelines and which is specifically treated in the direction the lines section 4. In addition, the guidelines in other parts of the catchment area as it is professionally documented that have significance for water preservation dragets. This is about areas with significant values related to Zoology, Botany, geology, cultural history, landscape picture or outdoor activities (cf. the otherwise the comments to section 3 below).

Only water resources the belt is covered by the class section that is featured in the direction the lines section 4. Moreover, it is clear that the access after PBL to determine complementary provisions in the municipal plan is more limited when the distance from the water the string is more than 100 meters. The opportunity to follow up the RPR will therefore be different in the areas that the guidelines include.
The parts of the catchment area as it is professionally documented that affect water safety, dragets value as mentioned be areas with significant values related to Zoology, Botany, geology, cultural history, landscape picture or outdoor activities. The knowledge of this type of conservation values may be different for the various protective objects. It is assumed that one as otherwise in the municipality scheduling adds because the knowledge that at any given time is available.

With clause 2, factual scope of application development plans municipalities have as it primary responsibility authority plan for the development of land use in and by the protected waterways and to add the guidelines for planning. How this can be followed up are described in annex 1.
The County will add the guidelines in the County plans.
The guidelines will be binding for the municipal and County planning within the scope, cf. section 17-1, which determines that the guidelines established by the first paragraph should be added to the reason for the planning according to the law. It means a duty for the municipalities to use the guidelines in its planning, but so that there is room for different plan customizations. National policy guidelines does not imply in itself any direct binding to the citizens. It will say that there are plans that are legally binding, and not the policy itself.
Since the RPR is one of the channels of policy dissemination for the cross-sectoral planning, are the guidelines one of the necessary means to make municipalities and county municipalities to know they they have to take into account in the planning. State trade bodies under section 9-3 participants in the plan processes are obliged to follow up the guidelines, cf. § § 20-5 and 27-2, about their role as a consultation organ with vendor dispute opportunity. 
Individual cases in relation to the plans after PBL By the dispensation after PBL section 7 from the plans that build on the RPR, the national policy guidelines had to be included in the opinions of whether special reasons exist. This is because part of the RPR public considerations that lie behind a plan. This is also necessary to avoid that the plans that are prepared in line with the guidelines, in after time can uthules through exemptions or decisions in complaints where such parent not to be taken into account. It does not mean that national policy guidelines in such cases necessarily is going to be crucial to the outcome, but that they must be included in the assessment and is given weight.
What is said here to add weight to the guidelines, the first and foremost importance in relation to decisions that apply to the areas where there are plans that build on the RPR. The guidelines may, however, be relevant to take into account in the assessment point of view in other individual cases in relation to the plan. 
Individual cases also RPR abides primarily towards planning and single case management in relation to the plans. But the guidelines may also have a bearing on decisions after PBL by the way and other legislation.
Whether or not the guidelines can be attributed to weight the exercise under the discretion provided for by decisions adopted after PBL, however, and other laws, will initially depend on an interpretation of the law. By this interpretation, one will have to take into consideration that one of the purposes of PBL is to arrive at coherent decisions regarding the use and protection of resources and development, see the PBL § 2.
Environmental purposes can be safeguarded by using various means, and the fact that certain considerations must be said to be hovedhensyn by the practice of one law, or is especially prepared for this, does not exclude that the same considerations are relevant by the practice of other laws.
National policy guidelines, as the expression of the parent environment interests, in this perspective will often be relevant considerations when decisions affecting the nature and resource basis. Examples of provisions where this might be applicable are listed in Appendix 4.

With clause 3, national objectives for the management of protected waterways the Storting's decision on protection plan in the rested on four key conditions, where the fourth reads: "Other interventions in the secured areas that can reduce their value for conservation and outdoor purposes and science must be searched avoided". This is continued in later military plans, jf. e.g. P. S. Nr. 10 (1980-81), where it is called: "the Committee will stress that the safety plan's intentions is achieved, however, it is important that it not be made other measures that can intervene in the protected waterways and reducing those sites ' preservation."
The Storting's decision does not provide further guidelines for the protection of the protected waterways against other intervention than power development, but in decisions is an intention to make sure that the protected values associated with the watercourse is not being destroyed.
Decisions on the protection of inland waters intends to preserve a representative sample of Norwegian water resources nature for posterity. The academic reasons for the policy varies from inland waters to the waterways. It is therefore necessary with a differentiated management by location and environment State. In the Mellquistutvalgets suggestions to the protection plan IV (NOU 1991:12A) it was added significant weight on this.
Points 3a-e provides a basis for managing the various waterways and parts of the rivers different by location and environment State. They make up a total overview of what underlies that waterways are protected, and all the points will not be as appropriate for all protected objects.
In the guidelines include the concept of landscape image (cf. clause 3a) both the natural landscape and cultural landscape.
With the concept of water reference value dragets (cf. section 3b) refers to the River as a measuring stick dragets value for changes caused by the nature of the intervention and the influences of various kinds in other comparable waterways.
Waterways that means a lot to many people, because they are located in or near cities and towns, has been given priority in the protection plan work. The primary objective for these areas are the preservation of the Foundation for an active outdoor life and facilitating without greater damage to the natural and cultural heritage values (cf. section 3 c).
A rationale for the protection of waterways have been special botanical, Zoological, geological or historical occurrences in or by water or elsewhere in the string the catchment area. Also instances/areas of particular importance for landscape image, or for outdoor activities will make up parts of the river preservation dragets. It is a goal to give these areas particularly good protection (cf. section 3d). For the various protective objects can the knowledge of this type of conservation values be very different. By the practice of the guidelines you have to deal with the knowledge that at any given time.
Any damage to valuable or potentially valuable areas for farming or herding has been attributed to weight in determining the individual water resources protective value (cf. section 3e).
The national policy guidelines for protected waterways should be construed as any obstacle to that the municipalities that want it can do more to ensure the protection of values than the guidelines add up to.

With clause 4, guidelines for water resources in the belt area there will be lines to their PT 1 set up a water resources belt that includes the protected object's main rivers, tributaries, larger streams, lakes and ponds (also called water the string) and a range of up to 100 meters width along the sides of these (measured in the horizontal plane from the average flood water levels). The guidelines indicate that water resources should be appraised and belt are divided into classes from the registered protection of values and area State in connection with the work of the municipality, the plan's area. It's just water resources belt that is covered by the class section. But of course there may be conditions also outside the the defined water resources the belt that have significance for water preservation dragets. The municipality should, therefore, take into account in the planning of local government areas in the river catchments dragets with significant values related to Zoology, Botany, geology, cultural history, landscape picture or outdoor activities that affect the water preservation dragets.
A key instrument to protect the near areas of the waterways is PBL section 20-4, the second paragraph letter a) and f). The provisions give access to to establish a wide area up to 100 metres along the waterways with either ban or zoning requirements before it will be implemented further specified measures.
In many places it will be natural to give the area a smaller extent than 100 meters, because the areas are already used to the road, railway, or village. The site should not include more than what is naturally belong together with the waterway, including cultural relics and valuable cultural landscape. Within the water resources the belt, it is desirable that the waterway will develop in the most natural show. Further out from the water the string than the 100 meters, is the access to determine complementary municipality plan provisions more limited. Here, thus the ability to provide supplementary provisions to the LNF-areas after PBL section 20-4, the second paragraph letter a) and f) not be present.

The protected water resources objects are very different when it comes to size, design, location and content of professional qualities. Such differences can also be found on the various routes within one and the same waterways. In order to achieve the aim of the conservation plan to secure the variation in Norwegian water resources nature, it is necessary to manage the various waterways or sections of water courses differently, but in such a way that the qualities that are valuable in that area are taken care of. The idea of such a differentiated management, which is featured in the NOU 1991:12A and URSt.prp. Nr. 118 (1991-92) protection plan IV for waterways, provides the basis for the class section that is included in the RPR.
The basis of a differentiated management of the world heritage rivers is added by the preparation and revision of the municipality the plan's area section. It will highlight and ease the differentiated management if the municipality plan map shows the management class that some water resources section belongs to. This will be an aid to arrive at which of the PBL's area to use provisions. The section on the management classes is done to bring out the different criteria for the trade-off in different types of water resources section. Class section will follow the requirements of the planning process in PBL, which it. added great weight on consultation, interaction and information. Section of management classes will be determined by the municipality in close cooperation with the County and State trade authorities.
Section of management classes with recommended management should not be confused with the section on land-use categories with the corresponding provisions after the Bpl policy.
In annex 1 are given closer guidance in how the guidelines can be promoted in the municipal planning.
The provisions associated with PBL's land-use categories through the municipal plan, should also be a guideline for the State-owned business in the area.

With clause 5, responsibility for following up the overall responsibility for the management of the world heritage rivers are according to the current legislation divided between the Ministry of environment and the Ministry of industry and energy.
Knowledge of safety values in the protected water is very different, and it is necessary for certain water resources that person to carry out research on different fields. The responsibility to increase the level of knowledge and of the progress in this work attributed to the Directorate of nature management, the Norwegian water resources and energy works and cultural heritage.
The same agencies also have responsibility for preparing information material that describes the injuries that can be applied to inland waters and their near areas by various forms of intervention. This will help ensure that the outlines are made on a real and more comprehensive Foundation.
After PBL section 9-3, the first and the second paragraph, the State subjects bodies the duty to help municipalities in the planning work. The contents of the guidelines means that the County will get a special duty to give information about the conservation values within the game, fish, nature conservation, outdoor recreation, pollution and agriculture. Similarly, the reindeer husbandry Office in charge of providing information about the conservation values associated with reindeer herding. In the same way get the County and Sami cultural heritage protection a particular obligation to give information about cultural heritage and culture environments that have significance for the world heritage rivers (PBL section 12-3, last paragraph).
The County and the county should also see to it that the municipalities follow up the guidelines. In practice, this will happen through statements to the municipal plans and dispensasjons cases and through the objections to the plans as contrary to national objectives.

Appendix 1. Municipal planning The national objectives for the management of the world heritage rivers can be promoted in municipal planning Water Use as follows: string and protection of the water the string be scheduled after PBL section 20-4, the first paragraph No. 5 ("Areas for special use or the protection of the sea and waterways, including the habitation-, fishing-, aquaculture-, nature-and outdoor areas separately or in combination with one or more of the above mentioned usage categories").
Water the string should be in the municipality area is laid out the plan's part to:-open air area in the areas of class 1-open-air and natural area in combination in the areas of class 2-natural area in the areas of class 3.

The area along the string in water Areas water resources the belt along the water that do not, the string båndlegges should be added to the agricultural, nature and recreation area in the municipality, the plan's area part, PBL section 20-4, the first paragraph number 2.
Depending on the protected values and area State, should build and construction measures in water resources the belt either be banned, jf. PBL section 20-4, the second paragraph e) and f), or only be allowed if the measure is included in the regulatory plan or site plan, cf. PBL section 20-4, the second paragraph a).

Ribbon leggings areas Areas in water resources the belt that has especially great value for nature conservation, cultural heritage conservation or outdoor activities and that can only be safeguarded through regulation (PBL § 25, first paragraph, 6), in the municipality, the plan's area part båndlegges for regulation to these purposes, cf. PBL section 20-4, first paragraph, 4.

Other areas in the catchment area with special values Areas in river catchments dragets with significant values related to Zoology, Botany, geology, cultural history, landscape image, or the outdoor life, and which has importance for water preservation dragets, should be laid out as the Ministry of agriculture, nature and recreation area in the municipality, the plan's area part, PBL section 20-4, first paragraph, 2, jf. also section 20-4, the second paragraph, c) about the location and scope of the scattered houses.
The following are some of the points above closer elaborated. 
LNF-areas and agricultural Parish plan's area part does not provide the ability to manage all kinds of business. It be in this context especially on the intervention that is related to agriculture. In the municipality the plan's area part can agricultural-, nature-and outdoor areas (LNF-areas) only posted that combined land-use purposes. Moreover, it is not permitted to give supplementary regulations with binding legal effect in the LNF-the site for buildings that are related to the stedbunden industry (section 20-4, second paragraph, LITRA c). Neither provisions on 100-metre belt along the inland waters (section 20-4, second paragraph, LITRA a and f) as authorizing countermeasures will bans and facilities that have a direct relation to the traditional agricultural activities.
This means that the LNF-areas do not regulate the physical measures that have the context of the common agricultural activities, including agricultural buildings, agriculture,/skogbruksveger, lots of outlets for household use, etc., however, will build and construction measures that are not part of the stedbunden industry, basically be in conflict with the plan and thus prohibited.
Business that has the context of agriculture, nature and outdoor activities governed by sector legislation, including the land law, the forestry law, the law for conservation of nature and outdoor law. In most cases, there will be no conflict between the Ministry of agriculture, nature and outdoor interests.
Agricultural authorities locally (the municipality) and at the county level (the County and County agricultural Board) can through guided service help to reduce the conflict between the commercial practices of and cherish interests related to the waterways. Agriculture also has instruments that can help to ensure the protection of values related to the waterways. For example, the terms associated with the transfer of land and cultural landscape additions prevent channeling and the Creek closing and ensure the safeguarding of the border zones. Forestry law also assumes that the consideration given to the natural environment and outdoor recreation. Environmental considerations are incorporated in the regulations for the subsidy to the various forestry measures, and forestry authorities may refuse or set conditions for the allocation of grants. In addition, it may be appropriate for the forestry authorities to consider the use of forestry law § 17 b. This provision gives the opportunity to fix the regulations about forest management and forestry in areas that are of special value for nature conservation and outdoor recreation. "Regulations on the planning and approval of forest roads" to ensure that the planning and approval of forest roads be taken special consideration to specific values in the water resources the belt that is documented in connection with the protection of the decision. 
Ribbon leggings areas to achieve the desired protection of smaller areas that are particularly important for nature protection, cultural heritage protection or outdoor activities, areas for regulation båndlegges later. 
The relationship to the armed forces as both a builder and real estate Fund Manager is subject to the same Defense law and regulations such as the community at large. When it comes to the armed forces ' operational activities, the assumption is made that the national policy guidelines for protected waterways does not cause in reformed opportunities to engage in such business. With the operating business is meant all military operations in peacetime that are necessary to plan, prepare and conduct:-monitoring of land-, sea-and luftterritoriet, the Defense plans, including field fortifications, plant for installations and warfare agents,-contingency measures, including emergency exercises with military forces, support to civil society and the police that requires the insertion of forces,-clean military operations in specific situations, including search and rescue service.

Regular exercises are not covered by the above points, but it is assumed that military operations page is set with the corresponding civil business that had to be allowed. 
The relationship to the drinking water supply Water outlet to the drinking water supply, including water to drink, food purposes and hygienic use, will result in that the water flow in the below lying part of the waterway will be reduced, as well as that it will be able to be required with the damming of the magazine. The construction of new, large plants may involve significant changes of the water source.

To ensure drinking water sources from pollution, it is often added restrictions (klausulering) on the land use of the catchment area. This to minimize the risk of contamination and to prevent unwanted use of the catchment area. Such restrictions can limit the area the use with respect to eg. agricultural purposes, outdoor recreation or storage of chemical substances.
RPR will have meaning primarily in connection with the plans for the construction of new water supply system or significant rearmament, Bonn of older facilities.
Water supply will be a theme in planning assessment municipality, and it is reasonable that this topic be given high priority in relation to other interests in that regard. By the practice of the guidelines it should be added to the reason that the protected inland waters can be exploited to the drinking water supply if there is good, alternative drinking water sources and if intervention in such a context do not reduce the protection values significantly. In rivers where such exploitation is current, the organized utilization of outdoor recreation purposes if necessary, had to give way.

Appendix 2. Criteria for the determination of water dragenes conservation value-protection plan for waterways-in protection plan in it was especially emphasized to ensure watercourses with large landscape and outdoor life values, but also the value of game, fish and nature protection were included in the review.

-inland waters protection in the protection plan II was pretty much picked out according to the same criteria as the rivers in the protection plan in, but archaeology, water quality and reindeer husbandry was considered as well. The Knowledge Foundation of the waterways in the protection plan II was also better than for rivers in the protection plan.

-protection plan III was based on a much broader knowledge than the previous stages in the protection plan work. The values and the interests that were added to the reason for the assessment can be divided into the following main categories: nature protection, cultural heritage protection, game, fish, outdoor activities, water quality, agriculture and reindeer husbandry.

-protection plan IV was based on the same values and interests protection plan III, but it was placed great emphasis on getting with the types of waterways (bre waterways and coastal waterways) and geographical areas that were poorly covered by previous plans.

Appendix 3. Examples of intervention that may damage the protective values in waterways Type intervention Purposes Possible damage to cherish values Road construction forestry, removal of border vegetation, road traffic amendments, walking obstacle to fish, difficult access, damage to cultural heritage sites/environments, increased forurensningsfare earthworks in and production of Landscape change, damage to the sand and gravel near the river fish and bottom species, intervention in elvas natural processes, lowers the river and water levels in the nearby ponds and hook Water drinking water lakes outlet , Tørrlegging/reduced water flow, fish farming, increased pollution, degraded soil irrigation conditions for aquatic plants and animals, reduced adventure value Forbygning/avoid erosion and narrower and deeper River, prevents Beach cladding River breach gravel supply, prevents new formation of vegetation on the opposite bank and its natural processes, changed the arts composition, increasing downstream flood-and erosjonsfare flood control trying Prevent flood damage Eliminates flood mark forest, visually unfortunate, remove kantskog, increasing downstream flood-and erosjonsfare Innvinning removal of Channeling by kantskog , increased surface area power speed, reduces biodiversity, visually unfortunate construction, domestic, industry Reduces nature areas, reduced biodiversity, increased forurensingsfare, damage to cultural heritage sites/communities power lines Power transport Visually unfortunate, damage to the bird, damage to cultural environments Ground levelling Streamline Increased pollution, change agriculture landscape new farmland food production, Increased runoff, reduced pasture biodiversity, preventing the habitation, damage to cultural monuments and cultural environment the Creek close to streamline the biodiversity , agriculture, reduced self cleansing, reduce erosion, damage to the Visual unfortunate cultural monuments and cultural environment Logging extraction of timber removal of kantskog, reduced biodiversity, damage to cultural monuments and cultural environment Trenching production of changes the natural growth conditions, wood increases the erosjonsfaren, reduce the biodiversity, change the natural water flow fish farming production of Danger for the spread of juveniles and diseases and parasites to wild fish, food fish changed water flow, preventing the fish's free time , increased pollution, genetic intervention, visually unfortunate Pollution waterways that reduced the use value, forrykket for the emission balance, resipient arts reduced biodiversity Appendix 4. Examples of laws outside of the PBL where RPR can apply, cf. the directional lines clause 2 and 5-the law on rivers of 15. March 1940 No. 3, § § 8, 17, 18, 104, 105, 106 and 108.

-Jordlova of 18. March 1955 No. 2, sections 53, 54 and 55.

-Vegloven of 21. June 1963 No. 23, § 12, the second paragraph, and regulations for remediation and treatment of plans for national and County Road 10. July 1980 no. 2, sections 4, 6 and 7.

-the law on forestry and forest protection of 21. in May 1965, § § 16 fourth paragraph, fourth paragraph 17, 17a, 17b, 19 and 21.

-the concession law of 31. May 1974 No. 19, § 2.

-the mountain law of 6. June 1975 No. 31, section 3, second paragraph and section 12, first paragraph.

-law on engine habitation in outlying areas and waterways of 10. June 1977 Nr. 82, § 1.

-the law on trade of 9. June 1978 No. 49, section 12, first paragraph.

-law on the Earth shift o. a. of the 21. December 1979 No. 77, § § 29 and 41.

-the law on protection against pollution and garbage, of 13. March 1981 No. 6, sections 11 and 16.

-law on the game of 29. May 1981 No. 38, section 7.

-the law on health care in the municipalities of 19. November 1982 No. 66, § § 1-2 and 4a-1.

-law on the farming of fish, shellfish, etc., of 14. June 1985 No.. 68, section 5, subsection PT 3.

-law on the salmon fish and freshwater fish etc. of 15. May 1992 Nr. 47, section 7.