Key Benefits:
Law of copyright to intellectual property of the (intellectual property) |
Date | LOL-1961-05-12-2 |
Ministry of | Ministry of Culture |
Last modified | LAW-2015 -06-19-73 from 01.07.2015, LAW-2015 -06-19-65 from 01.10.2015 |
Published | ISBN 82-504-113-9 |
Istrontrecation | |
Changing | |
Announcement | |
Card title | Respiration of the Spirit. |
Lovens title changed by laws 2 June 1995 # 27, 9 jan 1998 # 47 (card title added). -Jf. Promise 4 nov 1948 # 1 and 14 des 1956 # 4. Jf. EES deal Attachment XVII # 5, 8, 9a, 9c, 9e, 9f, 9g and 10. In note to the legislof Law, the EIS rules are shown only where these have led to changes in this one. Also other provisions of the law serve to the execution of the EES agreement. Jf, also the Bern Convention on the protection of literary and artistic works (the Parist caption of 1971), Space Convention 26 oct 1961 about the protection of executive artists, phonogrimmakers and broadcast enterprises, phonogramConvention 29 oct 1971 on protection of Phonogram manufactures against illegal copying of their phonograms, TRIPS agreement-Agreement on trade-related pages by immaterial rights (Appendix C to Agreement 15 apr 1994 on establishing the World Trade Organization), European agreement 22 June 1960 about the protection of television broadcasts and European Convention 11 May 1994 copyright and near-standing rights at satellite broadcasting. -Jof. former Regulation 7 jan 1741, laws 13 sep 1830, 20 aug 1842 kep. 22 Section 20, 12 oct 1857, 4 June 1866, 22 May 1875 Section 7-10, 8 June 1876, 4 July 1893 (auxiliary law 25 July 1910 # 5), 6 June 1930 # 17, 2 des 1955 No. 1 1, midl. law 10 June 1977 # 75, midl. law 8 June 1979 No. 40.
With intellectual understanding in this law literates, scientific or artistic works of any species and regardless of expression and expression form, so as
1) | writings of all kinds, |
2) | munoral lecture, |
3) | stage work, as well as dramatic and music dramatic as choreographic works and pantomimer, as well as the harvest, |
4) | music works, with or without text, |
5) | film works, |
6) | The photographic works, |
7) | paintings, drawings, graphics and similar imagery art, |
8) | sculpture of all kinds, |
9) | Building art, as well as drawings and models as the building itself, |
10) | Imaging tissue and artefacts of art crafts and art industry, as well as the image itself as the work itself, |
11) | maps, as well as drawings and graphic and plastic debilts of scientific or technical species, |
12) | computer programs, |
13) | translations and work of works mentioned in front of it. |
For photographic images that are not intellectual property of Section 43a.
0 | Modified by laws 15 June 1990 # 26, 23 June 1995 # 37-see its II (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572). |
As a representation of the specimen, the transfer also counts to the device that can render the work.
The Verket is made available to the public when
a) | copy of the work of the works of sale, rental, or loan or otherwise spread to the public, |
b) | copy of the works are shown publicly without the use of technical aids, or |
c) | The work is being conveyed publicly. |
As public, also, broadcasting or other transmission is also provided in wire or wireless to the general public, herunder when the work is brought to its disposal in such a way that the individual itself can choose time and place for access to the works.
0 | Modified by laws 23 June 1995 # 37-see its II (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
Has another right to change a kind of intellectual property or to make it accessible to the almeness, this must not happen in a way or in a context that is offensive to the copyright's literary, scientific or artistic stature or for self-art, or for the workshop's reputation or self-art.
Sin's right effets first and other clause, the copyright can not be waived, unless the use of the works for which it applies, is refined efloting species and scope.
Although the copyman has given valid consent to the use, he has, if the work is made available to the almeneness in such an offensive figure as mentioned in the other clause, the right to demand that it either not happen under his name or that it is indicated on county-making way that the preferred changes do not write off from him. This right, the copyright can not renounce.
Whoever translates or process a intellectual property or transfers it to a different literary or artistic form, has copyright the works in this figure, but cannot advise it in a way that does interventions in the copyright of the original works.
Unless otherwise agreed, it says the individual co-workers are free to announce their contributions differently.
Part Article SECTION 6. Are there two or more copymen to a kind of intellectual property without the individual's benefits to be separated as distinctive works, erenlisting the copyright of the works in communities.For the first public disclosure, the consent of all copymen, if not explicitly or stytieth has consented in advance. The same applies when there are questions about the publication of the work otherwise or in a different shape than previously. New public decision in the same way can, however, each of the copymen will be demanding or give consent to.
Any one of them can address the infringement of the copyright.
Is a work released without the author's name in accordance with the first clause, the publisher may or, if not he is named, the publisher act on the copyright's behalf until this one is named on a new release or by message to the person Department.
A intellectual property has been released when a reasonable number of copy of the work of the consent of the copyright has been brought in the trade, or otherwise spread among the almeneness.
0 | Modified by laws 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), 17 June 2005 # 97 (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630), 19 June 2015 # 73 (ikr. 1 July 2015 ifg. res. 19 June 2015 # 724). |
Spiritual works that are not produced specifically for use in documents as mentioned in the first clause and as it is quoted from or as rendered in particular attachments, are not retaken by this provision. The first clause also does not apply to lyric, music works or works of art.
0 | Modified by law 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569). |
The circuit patterns of integrated circuits are not subject to this law.
0 | Modified by laws 29 May 1970 # 33, 15 June 1990 # 27, 23 June 1995 # 37-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 14 March 2003 # 15 (ikr. 1 May 2003 ifg. res. 4 apr 2003 # 417). |
0 | The chapter given on new in its entirety by law 2 June 1995 # 27 The Kapitlet contained earlier Section 11 to 24, against now Section 11 to 38c. See the change of the III for transition regulations. The headline changed by law 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
When a work is rendered publicly in the co-hold of the provisions of this chapter, it can happen in the size and figure's eye-chain requires, but the character's character must not thereby change or be redialed. By rendering as mentioned, the source must always be indicated as good custom dictates.
0 | Former Section 24 Given new number and reformulated by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569). Former Section 11 stands now as Section 12. |
0 | The headline added by law 17 June 2005 # 97. |
a) | legal use of a work, or |
b) | a transmission in network of a middle clause on behalf of third parties, |
retaken such exemplary representation not by the energy court after Section 2, unless it has self-employed economic significance.
The provisions of the first clause do not apply to computer programs and databases.
0 | Added by law 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
The provisions of the first clause do not give the right to
a) | -post building art through entry of construction, |
b) | poring machine-readable copy of Computer Program, |
c) | poring machine-readable copy of databases in machine readable form, or |
d) | poring the specimen of works of art by photocopy, cast, print, or equivalent approach when the specimen can be perceived as original specimen. |
The provisions of the first clause do not give the right to let the representation carry out by foreign aid when it comes to :
a) | music works, |
b) | film works, |
c) | sculpture, imaging tissue and items of art crafts and art industry, or |
d) | artistic rendering of other works of art. |
Functional can without the obstacle of this provision let the representation of music and film works perform at foreign aid that does not co-work in ervertissue eye, when this is necessary because of the function of disability.
It is not permitted to portuits the basis of this paragraph on the basis of a rendering of the works in violation of Section 2, or on the basis of a specimen that has been subject to or is result of a circumvention of the verdown technical protection systems, unless such exemplary representation is necessary after Section 53a third clause second period.
0 | Former Section 11. Modified by laws 15 June 1990 # 26 and 4 des 1992 # 128 Modified and renumbered by law 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), and changed by law 16 apr 1999 number 19-see its II with transition rules, 17 June 2005 No. 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). Former Section 12 now stands as Section 29 |
0 | The headline changed by law 17 June 2005 # 97. |
The king can decide that schools and other teaching institutions freely be able to make recordings of broadcast broadcast for time-exploration use.
0 | New provision added by law 2 June 1995 # 27 Changed by Law 17 June 2005 # 97 (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). Former Section 13 now stands as Section 22 and Section 23 (1). |
0 | The headline added by law 17 June 2005 # 97. |
0 | New provision added in Section 13 by law 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III, renumbered at law 17 June 2005 # 97 (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
0 | The headline added by law 17 June 2005 # 97. |
The admissions that has been approved by the ministry may use in teaching business to make recordings as mentioned in the first clause, when it meets the terms of the appointment of the Section 36 first clause.
Exemir presented with home in the first and second clause can only be used within the teaching business as the resettlement of the agreement after Section 36.
The king provides regulations on retention and use of recordings after the first and second clause.
0 | New provision added in Section 13 by law 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630), modified by law 19 June 2015 # 73 (ikr. 1 July 2015 ifg. res. 19 June 2015 # 724). |
0 | The headline changed by law 17 June 2005 # 97. |
Exemir presented with home in the first clause can only be exploited within the business of the business being retaken by the agreement after Section 36.
0 | New provision added by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), modified by law 23 June 1995 # 37 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572). Previously Section 14 (1) has been repealifted, (2) now stands as Section 23 a (1). Modified by law 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
The king determines what institutions should have the right to make recordings as mentioned in the first clause, and provides regulation on the use and deletion of the footage.
0 | New provision added by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569). Earlier Section 15 stands now as Section 18. |
0 | The headline changed by law 17 June 2005 # 97. |
The king can give rules that archive, library, museums and teaching institutions using terminals in separate premises, can make works in the collections available to individuals when it occurs for research purposes or private study purposes.
0 | Modified by laws 3 June 1977 # 51, 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569). Previous clause replaced by current Section 13 (2). Modified by law 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
0 | The headline added by law 17 June 2005 # 97. |
0 | New provision added by law 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630), modified by law 19 June 2015 # 73 (ikr. 1 July 2015 ifg. res. 19 June 2015 # 724). |
0 | Added by law 19 June 2015 # 73 (ikr. 1 July 2015 ifg. res. 19 June 2015 # 724). |
The following institutions with general public benefit purposes are reauthored by the rules of use of the hittworks by Section 16c to 16e :
a) | publicly available library, educational institutions and museums, |
b) | archive, film, and audio wine institutions, and |
c) | The general broadcast enterprise. |
0 | Added by law 19 June 2015 # 73 (ikr. 1 July 2015 ifg. res. 19 June 2015 # 724). |
Literary works, audio recordings and filmmaking should be counted as hittworks if it is not possible to find rights gardens after an institution after Section 16b has been performing and documented a comprehensive search for Section 16e.
Where works or audio recordings mentioned in the first clause have multiple rights hagants and only some of them have been found after performing a comprehensive search, the work or audio recording is counted as the hittworks for the part of the rights belonging to the unknown rights hazing. Such works or audio recordings can only be used as hitteworks by Section 16d if the known rights hatters have given consent after Section 6.
If a rights holder is reporting for an institution as mentioned in Section 16b, the work or audio recording should no longer be considered the hittworks. Is the work of the works or audio recording taken in use as the hittworks by Section 16d, the use must cease. A rights holder of a work or audio recording that has been used as hittworks has claimed fair compensation of the one that has used the work or audio recording.
Verk or audio recordings that according to the legislature of a country in the EES area are considered to be the hittworks, shall also be considered hittworks in Norway.
0 | Added by law 19 June 2015 # 73 (ikr. 1 July 2015 ifg. res. 19 June 2015 # 724). |
Institution after Section 16b can for its general purpose :
a) | poring copy of the hittworks in the collections to digitize, index, cataloguing, preserve, restoration, or make available to the public by letter b, |
b) | make the hittworks in the collections available to the public in such a way that the individual itself can choose time and place for access to the works. |
The use of hittworks after the first clause can happen in which the following conditions are met :
a) | The Hittworks have ties to a country in the EES area by that the work was either published or was issued in radio or in television for the first time in a country in the EES area, or with rights havers consent was made available to the public in a country in the EES area of an institution after Section 16b, and there is no reason to believe that the rights holder would have the opposite use, |
b) | The institution is established in an EES country, |
c) | revenue from the use of the hittworks shall only cover expenses of exemplary representation and the available provision for the public of the hittworks by this paragraph, and |
d) | known rights hazing names given. |
For general public broadcasting enterprises, the rules apply only to the use of the hittworks in the form of audio recordings and film works in separate collections that the enterprise has produced or produced by others before 1. January 2003.
Institution after Section 16b can on the same terms as in the first and second clause use works that are part of a foundry following Section 16c with such association with an EDS country following by other clause letter a.
0 | Added by law 19 June 2015 # 73 (ikr. 1 July 2015 ifg. res. 19 June 2015 # 724). |
Before a literary works, audio recordings or filmmaking can get status as hittworks by Section 16c, it shall be carried out and documented a comprehensive search in good faith after rights hazing to the works or audio recording. Documentation of the search should be relayed to the National Library.
The comprehensive search is done in the sources that are relevant to the appropriate workshops.
The search is to be conducted in the land within the EES area where the work or audio recording was first released or issued. If the work or audio recording has not been released or issued, but has been made available to the public with rights havers the consent of an institution after Section 16b, it shall be sought in the EEconomic country where the institution is established.
For filmmaking where the manufacturer has its seat or residence in an EES country, the search is to be conducted in this country.
If there are signs that relevant information about proprietary rights are available in other countries than what is set forth by the first to the fourth clause, information sources from there should also be investigated.
The king can give closer rules about the completion and documentation of extensive search and use of hitherworks, herunder about search sources for works and relaying documentation to the National Library.
0 | Added by law 19 June 2015 # 73 (ikr. 1 July 2015 ifg. res. 19 June 2015 # 724). |
0 | The headline changed by law 17 June 2005 # 97. |
The provisions of the first clause do not give the right to copying copy of specimen that others have presented with particularly envision of use as there mentioned.
0 | Modified by laws 23 des 1988 # 101, 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), 23 June 1995 # 37 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 22 des 1995 # 83, 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
0 | The headline added by law 17 June 2005 # 97. |
0 | Previously Section 17 (2). Modified by laws 23 des 1988 # 101, 2 June 1995 # 27, 23 June 1995 # 37 and renumbered at law 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
0 | The headline added by law 17 June 2005 # 97. |
0 | New provision added as Section 17 (4) by law 2 June 1995 # 27, renumbered by law 17 June 2005 # 97 (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
The creator has demands for the settlement.
0 | Former Section 15. Modified by law 16 feb 1979 # 4. Modified and renumbered by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), modified by laws 23 June 1995 # 37 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 17 June 2005 # 97 (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). Earlier Section 18 stands now as Section 21. |
The provisions of the first clause provide, with the exception of construction and use items, not access to the outrent. Rather, does not provide the determination of the loan of the machine-readable copy of the computer program. Equestreed with rent is prey that are driven as organized business.
0 | Previously Section 21 and Section 23 (1). Modified by laws 23 des 1988 # 101, 15 June 1990 # 26 and 4 des 1992 # 126. Renumbered and modified by law 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), modified by laws 23 June 1995 # 37-see its II (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). Former Section 19 now stands as Section 25. |
0 | Previously Section 21 and 23. Modified by laws 20 des 1974 # 64 and 23 des 1988 # 101. Renumbered and modified by law 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), modified by laws 23 June 1995 # 37-see its II (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). Former Section 20 stands now as Section 30 and Section 31. |
Also otherwise, published works can be conveyed publicly :
a) | by events in which the performance of intellectual property is not the essential, if the belonging or spectators have access without charge, and the event also does not indirectly take place in the erverveye with, |
b) | by youth subpoenas that do not be arranged in the erverveye with. |
This paragraph does not apply to filmmaking, scenic progress of stage works or the performance of databases at ervervwise teaching. The Paragrafen also does not give the right to the future of the broadcasting. Within ervervwise teaching, it also does not give it the right to any other threaded or wireless transmission to the public. The entry to progress on teaching does not apply to the completion of the frame of organized concert business.
0 | Former Section 18. Modified and renumbered by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995), modified by legislation 23 June 1995 # 37, 16 apr 1999 # 19-see its II with transition rules, 17 June 2005 No. 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). Previously, 21 stands now as Section 19. |
0 | Previously Section 13 (1). Given new number by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995). Former Section 22 now stands as Section 26 and Section 33. |
0 | The headline changed by law 17 June 2005 # 97. |
With the same limitation, the public photographic works of the photographic work can also be rendered in critical or scientific representation of general educational character and in the additionally of the text of writings determined for use in training.
Offentligmade personal image in the form of photographic works can be rendered in the writing of biographical content.
The provisions of this paragraph do not give the right to rendering in machine-readable form, unless it applies to a non-ervervwise rendering after the first clause.
0 | Previously Section 13 (2) and Section 23 (2). Modified by law 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), 23 June 1995 # 37-see its II (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
Is a work of art or a photographic works published, or has the copyright overhauled copy of works as mentioned, the work can be co-taken in newspapers, magazine journals, by film and in broadcasting, provided the works of the background or otherwise plays a subordinate role in the context.
0 | Previously Section 14 (2) and Section 23 (1). Modified by laws 20 des 1974 # 64, 23 des 1988 # 101. Modified and renumbered by law 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III, modified by law 23 June 1995 # 37-see its II. Modified and renumbered by law 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
Art works and photographic works can also be taken away when the durable is set up on or by public space or flight route. This still does not apply when the work is clear is the main motive and rendering exploited ervervwise.
Construction can freely be decharged.
0 | Previously Section 23 (2) and (3). Modified and renumbered by law 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), modified by laws 23 June 1995 # 37-see its II (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
When a television company renders short excerpts from the events of great interest to the public in co-hold of Section 45a sixth clause, the company can render works that are part of the extract from the event.
0 | Former Section 19 Modified by law 23 des 1988 # 101. Reformulated with new number by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995). Former Section 25 now stands as Section 39 and Section 39 a. Modified by law 14 des 2012 # 91 (ikr. 1 jan 2013 ifg. res. 14 des 2012 No. 1 1245). |
0 | Previously Section 22 (1). Modified and given new number by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569). Previously Section 26 now stands as Section 39 b. |
The law is also not an obstacle to the works used in connection with the warrant, in investigation or as evidence of evidence.
0 | New provision added by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569). Former Section 27 lifted by law 4 March 1983 4 (sml. law 31 May 1918 Section 36). Modified by law 19 May 2006 # 16 (ikr. 1 jan 2009 ifg res. 17 oct 2008 No. 1 1118). |
0 | New provision added by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569). Former Section 28 now stands as Section 39 k. |
0 | Former Section 12. Reformulated and given new number by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995). Former Section 29 now stands as Section 39 l. |
At satellite broadcasting, the provisions of the first clause will not be Applicability unless the broadcast of the same broadcast enterprise at the same time is broadcast here in the realm of the Earth-bound web.
The provisions of the first clause do not apply to submission by thread. They do not apply to stage works and film works, nor for any other works if the copyright of the enterprise has closed the ban on broadcasting, or else is particularly reason to assume that he opposes the network's broadcasts.
0 | Previously Section 20 (2), changed and given new number by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569). Modified by laws 23 June 1995 # 37 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 22 des 1995 # 83, 17 June 2005 # 97 (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). Previously, 30 stands now as Section 39 a. |
The provisions of the first clause do not give the right to coincide film and audio by transmitting audio recordings to the film with less progress on the recording part of the film.
0 | Previously Section 20 (1). Modified and given new number by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569). Previously Section 31 is now part of Section 39 and Section 39 e. |
0 | The headline added by law 17 June 2005 # 97. |
a) | new broadcasting, or |
b) | transfer in such a way that the individual itself can select time and place for access to the works |
when the terms of the appointment of the appointment of Section 36 first clauses are met.
This paragraph applies only to works that were broadcast before 1. January 1997 and as a part of the broadcast enterprise's own productions. The Paragrafen does not apply if the copyman has defunct the ban on such use of the work of the network or so otherwise is particularly reason for assuming that he opposes such use.
0 | New provision added by law 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III-davorable Section 32 (original Section 22 (2)) became new Section 33 (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
0 | Previously Section 22 (2). Modified by law 23 des 1988 # 101. Modified and given number 32 by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569). Given new number by law 17 June 2005 # 97 (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
The copyright's exclusive to forwarding can only be practiced through organization approved by Section 38a.
Forwarding of works that were originally passed by wire, renot by this paragraph.
0 | Former Section 20 a -Added by law 21 June 1985 # 86. Modified and renumbered by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995), modified by law 19 June 2015 # 73 (ikr. 1 July 2015 ifg. res. 19 June 2015 # 724). |
0 | Former Section 51 Modified by law 21 June 1985 # 86. Modified and renumbered by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), modified by law 17 June 2005 # 97 (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). Former Section 35 stands now in modified figure as Section 39 c. Modified by laws 22 des 2006 # 103 (ikr. 1 jan 2007 ifg res. 22 des 2006 # 1534), 19 June 2015 # 73 (ikr. 1 July 2015 ifg. res. 19 June 2015 # 724). |
Avtalelisens can also be applicable in cases that are not rebounded by the paragracs mentioned in the first clause, when a user on a closer bounded area has reached agreement with organization as mentioned in Section 38a about the use of released works (general the appointment of the company). This still does not apply to the works where the copyright of either party in the agreement has closed the ban on the use of the works, or else is particularly reason to assume that he opposes the use of the works.
0 | New provision added by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995). Changed by laws 17 June 2005 # 97 (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630), 19 June 2015 # 73 (ikr. 1 July 2015 ifg. res. 19 June 2015 # 724). |
Regardless of the determination in the first clause, an outsider rights holder can be used after Section 36, demanding that no-charge for this to be paid to him. The requirement must be placed within three years after the expiration of the year utilization took place, and can only be corrected against the organization that in the co-hold of Section 36 has demanded no-charge. The company's size can each of the parties demand determined by rules that the King gives.
0 | New provision added by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995), modified by law 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
Are the parties in agreements after Section 13b, 14, 16a, 17b, 30, 32 and 34 agree on it, could dispute whether the interprets of the agreement in binding manner be decided by the rules given with home in Section 35.
Coming agreement with broadcast enterprises on admission of the enterprise's submissions for such use as the subject of Section 13b, 14 or 17b, not in condition, applies to the determination in the first and second period equivalent. At the dispute of the interpretation of such agreement, the determination in other clause is given the equivalent of the Applicability.
Coming deal after Section 13b not able after mediation after the first clause is implemented, each of the parties may require that permission to and terms for exemplary representation after Section 13b in binding manner is determined by the Board of the Board by the rules given with home in Section 35. The Nemndsdecision is given the same effect as deal after Section 36 first clause. The king can give closer rules about the Board's business and the treatment of such cases, herding about case management and conviction trial.
0 | New provision added by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995), modified on legislation 17 June 2005 # 97 (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630), 19 June 2015 # 73 (ikr. 1 July 2015 ifg. res. 19 June 2015 # 724). |
The king can further provide further provisions on control with organizations and funds that receive the satisfaction of further dispatch.
0 | New provision added by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995), modified on legislation 17 June 2005 # 97 (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630), 22 des 2006 # 103 (ikr. 1 jan 2007 ifg res. 22 des 2006 # 1534), 19 June 2015 # 73 (ikr. 1 July 2015 ifg. res. 19 June 2015 # 724). |
Organization as mentioned in Section 38a can, as long as the rights holder has not opposed it, as well as travel claims after this law of Section 55 and 56 facing the person who has made illegal use as mentioned in the first clause. Has the person who illegally took advantage of a piece of proposed organization's claims, the rights of rights can be claimed in the occasion of the same exploitation only be corrected against the organization, which then duties to eroge what the rights holder has claimed.
Organization as mentioned in Section 38a can, as long as the rights holder has not opposed it, invoking the provisions of Chapter 7a by illegal exploitation of works as mentioned in the first period of the paragrafen here.
0 | New provision added by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995), modified on legislation 17 June 2005 # 97 (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630), 31 May 2013 # 26 (ikr. 1 July 2013 ifg. res. 31 May 2013 # 560). |
0 | The headline added by law 22 des 2006 # 103 (ikr. 1 jan 2007 ifg res. 22 des 2006 # 1534). -Jof. EES deal Attachment XVII # 9c (Directive 2001 /84/F (the successor directive)). |
The court after the first clause does not apply to forward sales from private people to museums that are open to the public and do not run ververvwise unless it in the trade is participating a convei as mentioned in the first clause.
The tissue layer shall be calculated on the basis of the sale price without merit tax following the following rates :
a) | 5 pst. of the share of the sale price that does not exceed 50,000 euros, |
b) | 3 pst. of the share of the sale price that exceeds 50,000 euros, but did not exceed 200,000 euros, |
c) | 1 pst. of the share of the sale price that exceeds 200,000 euros, but did not exceed 350,000 euros, |
d) | 0.5 pst. of the share of the sale price exceeding 350,000 euros, but did not exceed 500,000 euros, and |
e) | 0.25 pst. of the share of the sale price exceeding 500,000 euros. |
The tissue layer shall be paid only when the sale price without merit tax exceeds 3.000 euros. The total settlement of a forward sale should not exceed 12.500 euros.
Selectors and service providers as mentioned in the first clause are solidarity responsible for paying the stalker welder team. The recording of them professionally in the art market is the buyer responsible for the payment.
Across the equality of the settlement, the settlement requirement must be made current through the uptake and dispatch organization approved by the ministry. When requirements on the settlement of the first clause are due to age after the rules of law 18. May 1979 No. 18 about the statute of accounts of the receivable, the settlement of the organization shall be used to cover the organization's costs of the uptake and dispatch of the followed suit layer, or to any other collective purpose set in the organization's ordinance.
It cannot be waived on the court after the first clause, nor can it be overpulled. Does not have the copyright heirs, should be the following-the copyright of the copyright, which is due after the copyright's death in all the organization that at all times has been approved after the sixth clause. Such funds should be used as mentioned in the sixth clause second period.
Salesman, buyer and broker as mentioned in the first clause shall within the sixth term for the acquisition of mervalue tax to the organization that at any time has been approved after the sixth clause, provide the information necessary to ensure payment of The follow-down team for the preceding year's sale. The mentioned organization may also require such information on the three last year's sales.
0 | Added by law 22 des 2006 # 103-see its III (ikr. 1 jan 2007 ifg res. 22 des 2006 # 1534). -Jof. EES deal Attachment XVII # 9c (Directive 2001 /84/F (the successor directive)). See law 4 nov 1948 # 1. |
0 | The chapter given on new in its entirety by law by law 2 June 1995 # 27 The Kapitlet contained earlier Section 25 to 39 c, versus now Section 39 to 39 m. See the change law part III for transition regulations. |
The assignment of specimen does not grasp the copyright of the copyright or any part of this one, though it is an original specimen that is being pulled over. The copyright of copyright does not grasp property rights to the manuscript or other copy that is issued in association with the takeover.
0 | Previously Section 25 (1) and Section 49 (1), changed and given new number by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995). Earlier Section 39 now stands in changed figure as Section 39 f. |
0 | Corresponds earlier Section 25 (2), reformulated and given new number by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995). |
The court also cannot be overdragged on without consent unless it goes into a business or business department and overdragged along with this one. The attraction is to be responsible for the agreement with the copyright to be met.
0 | Former Section 26, given new number by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995). |
The creator of the creator may demand that the erver's rainmaker, accounting and inventory, as well as attesations from the one who has exploited the work, faces the disposal of one of the copyman appointed state authority or registered auditor. The accountant shall illuminate the copyright of the wealth of the reckoning that has been made, and whether any irregularities by it, but by the way, he is sworn to secrecy about any other relationship that he is getting to know at the review.
The provisions of this paragraph cannot be waived to damage for the copyright.
0 | Added by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995). Sl. earlier Section 35. |
Although the energy has been overhauled, the copyright can, whether it is not met with any other deal, even the works or overdrag progress to others, if the erver of three years in a row has neglected to make use of the court.
The provisions of this paragraph do not apply to film works.
0 | Former Section 30, renumbered by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995). |
In the extent a settlement agreement provides the exclusive, the duties of the publisher to publish the work within reasonable time and ensure the deceleration in the customary manner. If the publisher has been released not to ensure that the specimen of the works is available to the public within reasonable time after this was claimed by the copyright, the copyman can say up the agreement and retain received fees.
Is not otherwise agreed, the publisher has the right to publish up to 3000 specimen of the works, but when the publication includes only music works, no more than 1,000 specimen, and when the publication includes only works of figurative art, no more than 200 copy.
When it has been more than one year after the publisher posed the works, or it has been passed more than one year since the copyright last made changes to the works, the copyright should if further specimen should be conveyed, is given the right to make changes as do not cause unsustainable expenses or change the character's character.
When it's been 15 years after the expiration of the year when the publisher first posed the works, the copyright has the right to take the works with in a release of his overall or chosen literary works. Such a release shall first be offered to the publisher or, if the copyright's works have been issued at various publishers, the one that can be considered as the main publisher.
The creator can claim damages for damage as a result of the breach. This still does not apply to the extent to the extent that the damage is caused by an obstruction that is beyond the publisher's control, and that the publisher did not reasonably be expected to have taken into consideration of the appointment time or to avoid or overcome the consequences of ; the cause of the injury to the third-party that the publisher has given in missions to fulfill the agreement, the publisher is free of charge only if also the third-person would have been exempt for liability following the provisions of this clause.
Will the publisher's obligations after the settlement agreement significantly defaulted, the copyright can raise the agreement, retain the fee and demand damages by the rules in the sixth clause for damage not covered by the fee.
Agreement as to damage for the copyright significantly deviates from what is determined in the second, sixth and seventh clause cannot be made current. Sin right after the fifth clause, the copyright can not be waived.
The provisions of this paragraph do not apply to the agreements of contributions to newspapers or magazine journals, or agreements for contributions to be used as illustration to works that are issued. The provisions of the second and third joints do not apply to agreements on contributions to samliver. The provisions of other clauses do not apply to agreements about translations.
0 | Added by law 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), modified by law 22 des 1995 # 83. Sl. earlier Section 31 to 38. |
Is not otherwise agreed, includes the attraction of the right to the recording of a work for the film's right to
a) | porboard copy of the film work, |
b) | make the film work available to the public through the spread of copy and by the completion of the |
c) | supply the film works with texts or translated speech. |
The provisions of other clauses do not apply
a) | already existing works, |
b) | film scripts and music works that are produced with the envision of the film's playing, or |
c) | The film's main regi. |
0 | Former Section 39. Modified and given new number by law 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569). |
0 | The headline changed by law 16 apr 1999 number 19. |
0 | New provision added by law 15 June 1990 # 26 as Section 39 a, changed at law 4 des 1992 number 128, renumbered by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995). |
The one that has the right to use a computer program can portable security examples in the extent necessary for the utilization of the program.
The one that has the right to use a copy of a computer program can, in connection with such reading, screening, transfer, or storage of the program that the user is entitled to perform, observing, examine or try out how The program works to determine the ideas and principles that lie to the cause of the individual parts of the program.
The one that has the right to use a database can conduct such actions as necessary for access to the database content and normal utilization of this one.
The provisions of second, third and fourth joints cannot be waived by appointment.
0 | Added by law 4 des 1992 number 128 as Section 39 b, renumbered by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995), modified by law 16 apr 1999 number 19-see its II with transition rules. |
a) | The actions are taken by a person who has the right to use a copy of a computer program, or on dennes behalf of a person who is permitted to it, |
b) | the information necessary to achieve functional interact has not previously been readily available to those in the letter a) mentioned people and |
c) | The actions are limited to the parts of the original program that are necessary to achieve functional interact. |
The information obtained by the Applicability of the provisions of the first clause must not
a) | -enjoyed for other purposes than to enable functional interact with the self-developed Computer Program, |
b) | are given further to others, except when this is necessary to enable functional interact with the independently developed computer program, or |
c) | recalls for development, representation or marketing of a computer program that significantly responds to the original in its design, or to any other act that violates the copyright of the program. |
The provisions of this paragraph cannot be waived by appointment.
0 | Added by law 4 des 1992 number 128 as Section 39 c, renumbered by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995). |
Is the portrait a photographic works, can copy of it in plain fashion shown as advertising for the copyright's photography business if the order does not downbed the ban.
Whether protection for the avarid they apply to the provisions of Section 45c even though the portrait is not photographic.
0 | Added by law 23 June 1995 # 37-see its II (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572). Smol. earlier Section 2 (4). |
Through testament, the copyright can, with binding effect also for spouse and life heirs, give regulations on the exercise of the copyright or leave to another to provide such regulations.
Is the copyright on inheritance from the copyright has passed over to several in association, required consent from all the heirs to the workshop's first public decision if they or the copyright did not explicitly consent or stytieth has consented. Upon questioning of the publication of the work otherwise or in any other form other than previously, it is still sufficient that it has been given consent from heirs that the rain after the inheritance of the inheritance constitutes a majority. New public decision in the same way can each of the heirs demand or give consent to. Any of the heirs can address the infringement of the copyright. This clause only applies to where not else follows provision of other clauses.
The violation of provision mentioned in the second clause or of the provisions of Section 3 and 11 other clauses can be incurred as well by the reliving spouse as of any of the copyman's relatives in the right up or down-ascending line, siblings, or of the appointed in co-hold of other clauses.
0 | Previously Section 26, changed and given number 39 j by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995), renumbered by law 23 June 1995 # 37 (ikr. 30 June 1995), modified by law 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
The same is true about manuscript or equivalent specimen, records, shapes e.l. who are designed to serve as a means by representation of a specific work of art, and about works of art that are not outset, bidding for sale or otherwise approved to public policy.
0 | Former Section 29, changed and given number 39 k by law 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), renumbered by law 23 June 1995 # 37 (ikr. 30 June 1995), modified by law 22 des 1995 # 83. |
0 | The headline added by law 9 jan 1998 # 4. |
The provisions of this paragraph cannot be waived by appointment.
0 | Added by law 9 jan 1998 # 4-see its II with transition rules. |
0 | Modified by laws 23 June 1995 # 37-see its II (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 13 June 2014 # 22-see its II (ikr. 1 July 2014 ifg res. 13 June 2014 # 722). |
If the copyman during this period of time is named in accordance with Section 7, or if disclosed that he is dead before the work was released, the protective time is determined Section 40.
0 | Modified by law 23 June 1995 # 37-see its II number 2 e (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572). |
0 | Added by law 23 June 1995 # 37-see its II number 2 f (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572). |
a) | make lasting or temporary recording of the completion, |
b) | portable lasting or temporary specimen of a recording of the introduction, and |
c) | make the introduction or footage of it available to the public. For public record of audio recordings, however, the provisions of Section 45b, unless the introduction happen in such a way that the individual itself can select time and place for access to the recording. |
Vernet after this provision lasts 50 years after the expiration of the year the completion took place. If a film is issued or released in the period of time mentioned in the first period of the clause here, the Guard lasts 50 years after the expiration of that year recording the first time released or released. If an audio recording is issued or released within the period of time mentioned in the first period of the clause here, the Guard lasts 70 years after the expiration of that year recording the first time released or released.
When the specimen of a recording that renders an executive artist's performance of a work of artist's consent has been sold within the European Economic Area, the specimen can be spread further than at the outset. The same applies when the artist within this area has overhauled the copy of the public audio recording or film that renders such progress.
When nothing else is agreed, a deal involves the recording of the film of an executive artist's performance, also the right to rent out the copy of the film.
The provisions of Section 2, 3, 6 to 8, 11 to 17, 17b, 18, 21, 25, 28, 32, 33 to 39c, 39k to 39m and 50 apply accordingly.
0 | Modified by laws 21 June 1985 # 86, 23 des 1988 # 101 (ikr. 1 jan 1989, but the extension of the protective time from 25 to 50 years did not apply when the protective time after the older rules had been run out before 1 jan 1989), 9 June 1989 No. 31 (ikr. 1 jan 1990), 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), 23 June 1995 # 37-see its II giving the new protective time of 50 years Applicability also for advances as the protective time after older rules were run out for (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 22 des 1995 # 83, 9 jan 1998 # 4 (see if transition rules note to Section 39 m), 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630), 13 June 2014 # 22-see its II (ikr. 1 July 2014 ifg res. 13 June 2014 # 722). |
a) | offers an adequate number of copy of the audio recording for sale, and |
b) | is setting the audio recording at your disposal in such a way that the public itself can choose time and place for access to the recording. |
The executive artist must notify the tiermaker that he will take advantage of the retaliation court after the paragrafen here. If the user does not perform the actions as mentioned in the first clause a and b within one year after receiving notice, the agreement can be lifted.
If more executive artists co-work on an audio recording, everyone will have to agree on that if the deal is to be lifted. When more people have co-worked on an audio recording, if an executive artist requests it, give details of who has the rights to the recording.
If an agreement is lifted after this provision, the rights of the grant cease to be made after Section 45 and Section 45b to the audio recording that the agreement applies.
It cannot be waived on the right to raise the agreement after the paragrafen here.
0 | Added by law 13 June 2014 # 22-see its II (ikr. 1 July 2014 ifg res. 13 June 2014 # 722). |
For each audio recording, the overall annual accessory layer shall respond to 20 percent of the grant's revenue from the exemplary representation and the availability of audio recording of the year ahead of the year that the recompense shall be paid for. Earnings from rental, compensation for exemplary representation for private use after Section 12 first clauses and resettlement for public production after Section 45b is not included in the calculation of the settlement.
Across the equality, the settlement must be made current through an uptake and dispatch organization approved by the ministry and representing an essential part of executive artists who co-work on audio recordings used in Norway. The Ministry of Justice can in regulation give closer rules about the approval of the uptake and dispatch organization and managing the arrangement.
Following the request of a executive artist or approved the uptake and dispatch organization, an added audio recording shall release any enlightenment necessary to ensure that the annual additional welding layer is paid.
It cannot be waived on the right to additional welding layers after the paragrafen here.
0 | Added by law 13 June 2014 # 22-see its II (ikr. 1 July 2014 ifg res. 13 June 2014 # 722). |
0 | Added by law 13 June 2014 # 22-see its II (ikr. 1 July 2014 ifg res. 13 June 2014 # 722). |
The Energy after the first clause applies to the equivalent of repeated and systematic specimens or avarisation for the public of immaterial parts of work as mentioned, if this constitutes actions that damage the normal utilization of the work or unreasonable aside puts the speaker's legitimate interests.
The energy of a work as mentioned in the first clause lasts 15 years after the expiration of the year work was presented. If the work during this period of time, the goods were released for 15 years after the expiration of the year work the first time was made public.
Is work as mentioned in front of, completely or for any copyright, can also be made current.
The provisions of Section 2 second to fourth clause, 6 to 8, 11a to 22, 25, 28, 30 to 38b and 3th fourth and fifth joints apply accordingly.
Agreement that extends the future of the speaker's right after the first clause of a released work cannot be made current.
0 | Modified by laws 3 June 1977 # 51, 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), 16 apr 1999 # 19-see its II with transition rules (ikr. 16 apr 1999), 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630), 22 des 2006 # 102 (ikr. 1 jan 2007 ifg res. 22 des 2006 # 1533). |
The energy of a photographic image lasts in the photographer's lifetime and 15 years after the expiration of his death years, but still at least 50 years from the expiration of the year image was made. Have two or more energy together, running the safety of the conservation of the expiration of the death year for the long-awaited living.
The provisions of Section 2 second to fourth clause, 3, 6 to 9, 11 to 21, 23 to 28, 30 to 39f and 39j to 39l, applies to photographic images in the same extent as they apply to the photographic works.
Is a photograph object of copyright, also this can be made current.
0 | Added by law 23 June 1995 # 37-see its II-which repeath the former law of the right to photograph of 17 June 1960 1 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), modified by laws 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630), 22 des 2006 # 102 (ikr. 1 jan 2007 ifg res. 22 des 2006 # 1533). |
In any case where the press or broadcasting gang press release from news agency, newspaper, magazine or broadcasting, the source shall be specified as good press custom requires.
Vernet after this provision lasts 50 years after the expiration of the year recording took place. If a film during the period mentioned in the first period of the clause here, issued or released, the Guard lasts 50 years after the expiration of that year recording the first time released or released. If an audio recording during the period mentioned in the first period of the clause here issued, the Guard lasts 70 years after the expiration of that year recording the first time released. For audio recordings not issued, but in the same amount of time otherwise released, the Guard lasts 70 years after the expiration of that year the recording first went public.
When the copy of an audio recording or film with the reality's consent has been sold within the European Economic Area, the specimen can be spread further than at the outset. The same applies when the user-to-person within this area has overhauled the copy of the public audio recording or film.
The provisions of Section 2, 7, 8, 11a to 17, 17b, 18, 21, 25, 28, and 31 to 38b apply accordingly.
0 | Modified by laws 20 des 1974 # 64, 21 June 1985 # 86, 23 des 1988 # 101 (ikr. 1 jan 1989, but the extension of the protective time from 25 to 50 years did not apply when the protective time after the older rules had been run out before 1 jan 1989), 2 June 1995 No. 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), 23 June 1995 # The 37-see its II-here is given the elongated protective time also for footage and film that the protective time was run out for after the older rules (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630), 13 June 2014 # 22-see its II (ikr. 1 July 2014 ifg res. 13 June 2014 # 722). |
a) | be taken on the device that can render it, |
b) | be sent wirelessly or forwarded to the public by thread, or |
c) | in the other way in the ervertissue eye with is made available to the public. |
Is a dispatch taken up on the device mentioned in the first clause, it must not without the broadcasting enterprises ' consent transfer to another device before 50 years have been passed after the expiration of the year the first deployment took place.
Broadcast submission can on terms determined by the King, transferred directly within a business or other business through radio or television receiver.
The provisions of Section 7, 8, 11a to 13a, 15, 16, 21 first clause, 22, 25, 28, 31, 33, 35 and 38 first to third joints apply accordingly.
Without the obstacle of this determination, a television company established within the European Economic Society of its general news broadcasts, no-charge, free-charge excerpts from events of great interest to the public as a other remote vision companies have exclusive rights to send from. Short excerpts from such event should not be longer than the news purpose dictates, and may not exceed 90 seconds. Abstracts can only be rendered as long as the event has news interest. The dragon's source is supposed to be indicated unless for practical reasons is impossible, and the original sendor character must not be changed or recalls. After the television company has sent excerpts in broadcast broadcast, the company can make the same news broadcast that the extract is made in, available as audio-visual order service.
0 | Added by law 21 June 1985 # 86, modified by laws 23 des 1988 # 101 (ikr. 1 jan 1989, but the extension of the protective time from 25 to 50 years did not apply when the protective time after the older rules had been run out before 1 jan 1989), 2 June 1995 No. 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), 23 June 1995 # The 37-see its II-here is given the elongated protective time also for recordings that the protective time had been running out for after the older rules (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630), 14 des 2012 No. 1 91 (ikr. 1 jan 2013 ifg. res. 14 des 2012 No. 1 1245), 19 June 2015 # 73 (ikr. 1 July 2015 ifg. res. 19 June 2015 # 724). |
So, well, the reality of the recording that the executive artists whose performance is rendered has demands on the settlement. Have two or more artists interact at the completion, they must make the satisfaction requirement current in communities. Across the equality of the settlement, the settlement requirement must be made current through the uptake and dispatch organization approved by the Ministry of Security. The king can give closer rules on the creation and distribution of the settlement. The tissue team size shall be determined regardless of tax duty after Section 3 of law 14. December 1956 # 4 about Tax on Public Production of executive art-erred achievement mv.
Rights hazing who are not a member of organization approved after other clauses, however, must even provide claims for the settlement of the organization. The requirement must be conveyed within three years after the expiration of the year recording was conveyed. Vederlayer for forwarding can no matter be distributed by the principles of Section 37.
The provisions of Section 3, 21, 22 and 25, jf. Section 11, and Section 39k fourth joints, have corresponding Applicability.
What is determined in this paragraph does not apply to audio film. For public incomes of audio recordings that are not the privacy of the intellectual property, law applies 14. December 1956 # 4 about Tax on Public Production of executive art-erred achievement mv.
Vederlaspequally after this paragraph applies for 70 years after the expiration of the year recording the first time was released or released.
0 | Added by law 9 June 1989 # 31 (ikr. 1 jan 1990), modified by laws 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), 23 June 1995 # 37 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 22 des 1995 # 83, 23 June 2000 # 52-jf. its III (ikr. 1 July 2001 ifg res. 15 June 2001 No. 661), 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630), 22 des 2006 # 103 (ikr. 1 jan 2007 ifg res. 22 des 2006 # 1534), 13 June 2014 No. 22-see its II (ikr. 1 July 2014 ifg res. 13 June 2014 # 722). |
a) | The rejection has featured and public interest, |
b) | The cancellation of the person is less important than the main content of the image, |
c) | The picture renders the gatherings, the census, and in freeluft or relationship or events that have public interest, |
d) | The copy of the cancellation of the usual way is viewed as advertising for the photographer's business and the image they do not downsize the ban, or |
e) | The image is used as reacted in Section 23 third clause or Section 27 other clauses. |
The vernet applies in the image of the deceased's lifetime and 15 years after the expiration of his death years.
0 | Added by law 23 June 1995 # 37 who lifted the former law on the right to photograph of 17 June 1960 1 Section 15 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), modified by law 22 des 2006 # 102 (ikr. 1 jan 2007 ifg res. 22 des 2006 # 1533). |
The copyright's name or brand does not have to in any event on the subject of a eftermade specimen that it can be confused with the original.
Without regard to whether the conservation time is the expiration or unable to the ministry, when the copyright is dead, ban that a intellectual property is made available to the almeneness in such a way or in such context as mentioned in the first clause. That ban, the ministry can also downturn the petition from an ancestor who lives, if the work is not conservation here in the realm.
The provisions of Section 3, first clause, get equivalent to the Applicability, although the copyright's protective time is the expiration or the works are without protection here in the realm.
The holder of original specimen that without any reasonable reason prevents the copyman from making use of his right efact Section 2, can by judgment on the court to give the copyright such access to the specimen that the court finds reasonable. The court is hitting its decision under consideration of all the bedridden circumstances, and can make the copyright's access to the specimen depending on security, or quiet other terms.
Case mentioned in the second clause can only be raised by the copyright personally with the consent of the person ministry.
0 | Modified by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569). |
Skiftes co-owning while the copyman lives, the copyright shall be held outside the shift.
0 | Raised by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995). Watch now Section 35. Added again by law 19 June 2009 # 103 (ikr. 28 des 2009 ifg res. 19 June 2009 # 672), modified by law 13 June 2014 # 22-see its II (ikr. 1 July 2014 ifg res. 13 June 2014 # 722). |
0 | Capital added by law 17 June 2005 # 97 (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
0 | The headline added by law 17 June 2005 # 97. |
It is further forbidden to :
a) | sell, rent out or otherwise distribute, |
b) | produce or impose for distribution to the public, |
c) | advertising sales or rental of, |
d) | beset for ervervpurpose, or |
e) | offer services in association with |
devices, products or components that are provided with the purpose to circumvent effective technical protection systems, or that have only limited nutritionally benefit for other than such purposes, or as in essence has been developed to enable or simplify such circumvention.
The provisions of this paragraph shall not be of the obstacle to research in cryptology. The provisions of the first clause should also not be of the obstacle to private user's acquisition of legally acquired works on it as in general sense perceived as relevant playoff equipment. For technical devices for the protection of a computer program, instead of which is determined in Section 53c.
The provisions of the first clause should not be to the obstacle for exemplary representation after Section 16.
0 | Added by law 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630), modified by law 22 des 2006 # 103 (ikr. 1 jan 2007 ifg res. 22 des 2006 # 1534). |
0 | The headline added by law 17 June 2005 # 97. |
If the rights gardens after motion from the provisions above do not provide access as mentioned in the first clause, he may be filed for motion from the entitlement of the entitlements to provide such information or other assistance necessary to enable use of the work in accordance with the purpose. Motion to the Board created by the ministry by rules that the King gives. Nemanda can in addition to the injunction as mentioned, determine that entitled regulations without the obstacle of Section 53a can bypass projected technical protection systems if the rights holder does not comply with the due date of the board.
The example of works that fall under the law of the release of the public order of the public will be made by 9. June 1989 No. 32, shall still always be governed with the necessary information that the circumvention of technical protection systems for legal exemplary representation is possible.
The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to where the privacy of the agreed terms of transfer faces at the disposal of the public in such a way that the individual itself can choose time and place for access to the works.
The provisions of this paragraph do not apply to computer program. The king may determine that certain institutions within the abm sector will automatically be provided necessary information that the circumvention of technical protection systems for legal exemplary representation should be possible.
0 | Added by law 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
0 | The headline added by law 17 June 2005 # 97. |
0 | Former Section 54a, added at law 4 des 1992 number 128 (ikr. 1 jan 1994). Applies to computer programs produced, but not actions taken or rights acquired before this time. Omnumbered by law 17 June 2005 # 97 (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
0 | The headline added by law 17 June 2005 # 97. |
a) | removing or changing electronic rights information as the rights holder has the feyed of a warded and either part of a specimen or forward in connection with the works being made available to the public, or |
b) | introducing a specimen for dispersal, resetting or otherwise make a warded of the public where electronic rights information has been removed or changed in violation of the letter a |
if the action in the letter a or b anchors, enables, easing or hides an infringement of copyright.
0 | Added by law 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
0 | The headline added by law 17 June 2005 # 97. |
0 | Added by law 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
a) | to overthree regulations given to the protection of the copyright in or in co-hold of 1. and 2. Chapter, the provisions of Section 39j or Section 41a, or ban closed after Section 35 or Section 48, or regulations issued by the copyman after Section 39k other clauses, |
b) | to overthree regulations given in or in co-hold of 5. Chapter and Chapter 6a, Section 445c, 46, 47 or 48 last clause, |
c) | introducing the specimen of intellectual property or of works and recordings as mentioned in Section 42, 43, 443a, 45 and 45a in intent to make them available to the public, when the specimens are presented outside the realm under such conditions that an equivalent representation here in The realm would be in violation of the law, or |
d) | to provide or otherwise make available to the public works or recordings mentioned in Section 42, 43, 4a, 45 or 45a, when the specimens are represented in violation of these regulations or reintroduced in violation of the letter c in the paragrafen here, |
e) | introducing the copy of recordings as mentioned in Section 45 in the intention to make them accessible to the public in the erverveye, when the reality does not have consented to the entry and copy of the same recording with the consent of the reality of the grant of the realm of the realm. The Ministry of Justice can in regulations make exceptions from this determination for the acquisition of copy from closer to specific countries. |
By violation of the determination of Section 12 fourth clause, the first clause applies in the paractment here nonetheless only if the act is intentional.
Is violation as mentioned in the first and second clause intentional, and has been particularly display conditions, the penalty is fines or imprisonment until three years. At the assessment of whether particularly display conditions are present, it shall first and foremost be placed emphasis on the damage that has been inflicted on courts and others, the gain that the legislator has had and the extent of the violation of the violation of the offence.
Attempts of intentional violation as mentioned in the first to third clause can be punished equally with the consummation violation.
The act of which intentional or negligent fails to provide information as mentioned in Section 38c eighth clause first period or fail to inflict those in Section 52 mentioned information on a work that he overstated the pressure of, punishable by fines.
The violation of third clause jf. The fourth clause of the public. The violation of the remaining provisions of the paractment here is not on charges of the public unless it is being desired by an organization, jf. The seventh clause, or exists mandated by public consideration.
Is this law violated that a work has been used in a manner mentioned in Section 13b, 14, 16a, 17b, 30, 32 and 34, can be required also by the organization that could make a deal after Section 36, as long as the insult did not oppose it.
0 | Modified by laws 21 June 1985 # 86, 23 des 1988 # 101, 11 June 1993 # 91, 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), 23 June 1995 # 37-see its II (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 22 des 1995 # 83, 9 jan 1998 # 4, 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630), 22 des 2006 # 103 (ikr. 1 jan 2007 ifg res. 22 des 2006 # 1534), 19 June 2015 # 65 (ikr. 1 oct 2015). |
Although the perpetrator has acted in good faith, the offended regardless of the damage may require the net profit by the illegal act.
The provisions of this paragraph cannot be applied to the one that portues or co-works to the representation of specimen in violation of Section 12 fourth clause, unless the act is intentional.
0 | Modified by laws 23 des 1988 # 101, 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), 9 jan 1998 # 4, 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
Instead of the acquisition or transfer, the insult may require that the item completely or partially be destroyed or be made out-of-line to illegal representation or use. However, if significant financial or artistic values would be lost, the court may still court the circumstances allow for the appearance to be made available for the almeneness against damages or satisfaction to the insult.
The provisions of this paragraph cannot be applied to the person who in good faith has acquired copy of the works for private use, unless it relates to the cast of sculpture. They also do not apply to construction, but the insult may efface circumstances require change, damages or satisfaction. Moreover, the provisions do not apply to those in Section 44 mentioned press releases.
0 | Capital added by law 31 May 2013 # 26 (ikr. 1 July 2013 ifg. res. 31 May 2013 # 560). |
0 | The headline added by law 31 May 2013 # 26 (ikr. 1 July 2013 ifg. res. 31 May 2013 # 560). |
Rights havers the treatment of personal information regarding infringement of copyright or other rights by this law is excluding from the context of the context of the accounting law Section 33 when the treatment is required to determine, do current or defend a court requirement.
By the way, the Privacy Act applies to the treatment of such information.
0 | Added by law 31 May 2013 # 26 (ikr. 1 July 2013 ifg. res. 31 May 2013 # 560). |
If it is truer that the copyright or other rights of this law be violated, the court can without the obstruction of privilege after the compatibility of Section 2-9, after insistence from rights holder, impose a offering of electronic communications services to extradite information that identifies the holder of the subscription that has been used at the offence.
Before the court hits the decision in the case, the Post and Telex of the Post shall consent to the consent of the offering of the grant from the privilege of the Code of Dec. 2-9. The rights holder shall submit such request to the Board of Health and to put the Regulations's statement forward for the court. The agreement co-shared the parties. The vision can only refuse consent when it can delay the state or public interests of harm or appear unreasonable to the person who has the claims of secrecy.
In order for the motion to be taken to follow, the court must find that the ruthlessly as speeches for extradition must be heavier than the regard to the privilege of privilege. Upon assessment, the court will be deluded to the subscriber against the rights of rights in accessing the information, seen hen to the body's grosness, scope and damage effects. After such a vevining, the court of ruling can decide that the information should be issued even if consent is denied, or that the information should not be issued even if consent has been granted.
The petition on the issue of the issue of issue of information is placed in the process write to the Oslo courthouse. Only the provider of electronic communications services shall be specified and processed as the counterpart at such desired declarations. The TvistelAct Section 28-5 first joints apply to the equivalent of the case after the paragrafen here. The other provisions of the dispute chapter 28 do not apply.
The information shall not be issued until the decision is final. At issue of the information, the provider shall simultaneously give message of the extradition to the court. The rights holder shall give the subscriber message of the extradition when it has been one month since the information was issued. Copy of the message is sent simultaneously to the court. If very honest reasons suggest, the court in the individual case may determine a second deadline for when the subscriber is to be issued notice of the issue of extradition. The public should not be made familiar with the matter until the earliest one month after the information is issued and the subscriber is informed of the provision, or more than six months have passed since the case ended.
For the treatment of personal information received in the co-hold of this determination applies to the Privacy Act.
0 | Added by law 31 May 2013 # 26 (ikr. 1 July 2013 ifg. res. 31 May 2013 # 560). |
0 | The headline added by law 31 May 2013 # 26 (ikr. 1 July 2013 ifg. res. 31 May 2013 # 560). |
The Court may be filed for motion from a proprietary service provider offering information community service as mentioned in the ecommerce Act Section 1 second clause b, preventing or difficulties access to website where it in large scope is made available material that clearly violates copyright or other rights by this law.
In order for the motion to be taken to follow, the ruthiness of the public must be spoken for that the injunction is given, weighing heavier than the disadvantages of the injunction will result. Upon assessment, the court is to stray the interests that suggest that access to the website is prevented or difficulties against other interests that are enriched by such an injunction, herunder the interests of the injunction against and the holder of the website, and the envision of the information and freedom of speech. It shall also be taken into account the possibility of alternative and less invasive measures.
The king can in regulation give regulations on what cuts can be given to prevent or difficulties access to website.
0 | Added by law 31 May 2013 # 26 (ikr. 1 July 2013 ifg. res. 31 May 2013 # 560). |
The petition is provided in the process write to the Oslo courthouse. The petition must indicate all service providers as the injunction should include as the counterpart. In addition, the holder of the website that the petition applies is indicated as the counterpart. In the petition, it shall be accounted for for the reasons it builds on. Documents that invoke and as the plaintiff are in possession of, shall follow with the motion.
0 | Added by law 31 May 2013 # 26 (ikr. 1 July 2013 ifg. res. 31 May 2013 # 560). |
If the court of its own measures shall reject the case, it immediately hits the decision on it. Can the error be corrected, the plaintiff shall obtain a due date to correct it. The error is not fixed, the case shall be dismissed.
If it is judged on the basis of the case-induced position in the motion, not allowed to take it to follow, it can be rejected immediately.
If there is no basis for rejecting or rejecting the motion after the first or second clause, the petition shall be lecturers for all service providers and the holder of the website as it correctes. These shall be given the opportunity to comment before the case is settled. If the holder of the website is unknown or has unknown address, the matter can be decided without the fact that the person has had the opportunity to comment.
The court decides whether the case should be decided on the basis of written treatment or whether the parties should be called to munral negotiations. Should it be held at the time of the munral negotiations, all parties should be called to these, jf. Section 56d. In cases mentioned in the third clause third period, the munral negotiations can be held without the holder of the website called.
If there is danger of stay, the court can make a decision about the injunction without the motion of the petition for the opposing parties.
0 | Added by law 31 May 2013 # 26 (ikr. 1 July 2013 ifg. res. 31 May 2013 # 560). |
The petition is decided by ruling. The decision shall mention the parties.
The Tas petition to follow, shall the court in the ruling indicate what measures the service yaders should commit to the aftermath of the injunction and within which due measures shall be committed. The court can decide that the injunction should have limited duration. When the motion is decided without the holder of the website or the service of the servants have had the opportunity to comment, jf. Section 56e third-clause third period and Section 56e fifth clause, the court can run as conditions for the Commencement of the injunction that the rights holder is running security for possible damages to the sued. The court can decide that the safety standoff should have limited duration. Arrest the plaintiff to silence security, the court shall determine a due date for quiet security. The injunction does not come into effect until security is lined.
The Tvangsconsummation Act Section 3-4 applies to the corresponding in cases of the injunction after this chapter. Security that the plaintiff has lined for possible damages to the lawsuit could be released when it has been passed more than three months after the lawsuit received the subdirection that the injunction has been dropped or repeated without the claim of compensation for the court.
When the court has decided the injunction of the procedure in Section 56e third period or Section 56e fifth clause shall be sued that has the right to file for subsequent negotiations after Section 556g, enlightenment on this.
0 | Added by law 31 May 2013 # 26 (ikr. 1 July 2013 ifg. res. 31 May 2013 # 560). |
When the court has issued the injunction on measures to prevent or difficulties access to a website without the holder of the website has had the opportunity to comment, jf. Section 56e third paragraph third period, the holder of the website may require subsequent negotiations on the injunction. The same applies to all of the sued when the court has decided the injunction of Section 56e fifth clause.
All parties, jf. Section 56d, shall have the occasion to comment on a motion for subsequent negotiations. The rules of Section 56e third paragraph third period and fourth joints apply accordingly to subsequent negotiations.
After subsequent negotiations have been conducted, the court hits the court by ruling new decision where it completely or partially confirms, is changing or repeaving its initial decision.
The one that has the occasion to demand subsequent negotiations cannot impose the court's decision. When the injunction has been decided without the holder of the website has had the opportunity to comment, jf. Section 56e third-paragraph third period, the holder of the website may require subsequent negotiations even if the decision is on-on. If an appeal is not settled when the holder requires subsequent negotiations, the treatment of the appeal shall be stopped. The appeal and decisions of the appeal regarding the case of the case, falls away if the courthouse hits new realibility after subsequent negotiations.
The courthouse's decision struck on the basis of subsequent negotiations can be incurred.
0 | Added by law 31 May 2013 # 26 (ikr. 1 July 2013 ifg. res. 31 May 2013 # 560). |
An injunction to prevent or more difficult access to website is carried out by the rules of forced consummation Chapter 13 V. The plaintiff can file for execution when the deadline to commit measures has run out, jf. Section 56f second clause first period. If the plaintiff is required to ask security after Section 56f second paragraph third period, the case applicant cannot be reviewed until security is lined.
0 | Added by law 31 May 2013 # 26 (ikr. 1 July 2013 ifg. res. 31 May 2013 # 560). |
If there is presented new evidence or there has been changed conditions that allowance that the basis of the injunction is no longer present, the court should on motion from a sued or other with legal interest repeals the injunction.
The petition is provided for the Oslo courthouse. The statute of the parent is for the parties. The provisions of Section 56e third paragraph third period and fourth joints apply accordingly.
The decision is met by ruling. The chain that is repeasing an injunction does not affect until it is judicial.
0 | Added by law 31 May 2013 # 26 (ikr. 1 July 2013 ifg. res. 31 May 2013 # 560). |
An injunction to prevent or difficulty make access to website falls away without reporation :
a) | when a set time of the injunction has been run out, |
b) | when the plaintiff is given a due date to quiet security, and the deadline overmet, or |
c) | when the plaintiff is waived his right after the injunction. |
Deadline as mentioned in the first clause of the letter b can on the petition extensions. Prevention can only be given if the petition comes in within the expiration of the deadline. Prevention can by the same rules be given on new.
Any one of those sued may require the court to make the decision that the injunction has fallen away after the first clause. The provisions of Section 56i second and third joints apply accordingly.
0 | Added by law 31 May 2013 # 26 (ikr. 1 July 2013 ifg. res. 31 May 2013 # 560). |
In case of filing for the injunction, a service provider can only be illegated for the case of plaintik charges after the tweeting Act 20 in the appeal where the service provider has anked. By the way, the provisions of the case costs apply in the Chapter Act of the chapter 20.
0 | Added by law 31 May 2013 # 26 (ikr. 1 July 2013 ifg. res. 31 May 2013 # 560). |
If an injunction to prevent or difficulties access to website has been repeals or abduction, and it turns out that there was no basis for the plaintiff's petition when the injunction was decided, duties the plaintiff to replace the damage sued has lidt as According to the injunction and by the steps that have been necessary to avert the injunction or to get it lifted.
Demand for damages after this paragrafen can be made current for the Oslo courthouse in case of reporation or the abduction of the injunction, or by ordinary lawsuits.
0 | Added by law 31 May 2013 # 26 (ikr. 1 July 2013 ifg. res. 31 May 2013 # 560). |
The TvistelAct Chapter 1 to 3, Section 4-1 and 4-7, Section 9-6, Chapter 11 to 15, Chapter 16 except Section 16-2, 16-10 and Section 16-15 to 16-19, Chapter 19 except Section 19-12 and Section 19-13 first and second clause and chapter 20 to 31 applies Equivalent in cases of cuts as far as they fit and nothing else follows by Section 56c to 56m in the law here.
0 | Added by law 31 May 2013 # 26 (ikr. 1 July 2013 ifg. res. 31 May 2013 # 560). |
a) | intellectual property created by the Norwegian citizen or by person who is settled here in the realm, |
b) | intellectual property that has been released the first time here in the realm or is released at the same time here and in a different country, |
c) | film works and television works if the manufacturer has its main seat or is settled here in the realm, |
d) | construction that is listed here in the realm, |
e) | The works of art and photographic works that are enjoined in buildings or fixed facilities here in the realm. |
At the same time, the release as mentioned in the first clause of the letter b is considered to have taken place when the work is issued here in the realm within 30 days after the first publication.
As a manufacturer after the determination in the first clause of the letter c is deemed when not otherwise lit, it whose name is normally indicated on the copy of the film works.
The provisions of Section 38c are given the Applicability of the intellectual property created by the Norwegian citizen or by person who is settled here in the realm.
The provisions of Section 46 to 48 apply without those in the preceding clause determined preconceptions.
The ruling in Section 41a gets the Applicability of the intellectual property made available to the public by Norwegian citizen or person who is settled here in the realm, or by company that has Norwegian rule and seat here in the realm.
0 | Modified by laws 20 des 1974 # 64, 23 June 1995 # 37-see its II (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 22 des 2006 # 103 (ikr. 1 jan 2007 ifg res. 22 des 2006 # 1534). |
a) | Norwegian citizen or person who is settled here in the realm, |
b) | company that has Norwegian rule and seat here in the realm. |
The provisions of Section 42 and in Section 45a also apply to the advances and broadcast broadcasts that take place in Norway. The provisions of the spread right in Section 42 and 45 apply to audio and film footage done in Norway. The provisions of Section 45 about the right to exemplary representation apply to the benefit of any audio and film recording. The provisions of Section 43 apply to work produced by someone who is a citizen of or settled in or have seat in a country within the European Economic Area. The provisions of Section 44 apply to press releases received in Norway. The provisions of Section 43a apply for photographic images that the first time have been released here in the realm or made by someone who is a citizen of or settled in or have seat in a country within the European Economic Area. The same applies to photographs inserted in buildings or fixed facilities in a country within the mentioned area.
The provisions of Section 45c apply to the bilinnings of the person who are or have been settled here in the realm.
0 | Modified by laws 20 des 1974 # 64, 23 des 1988 # 101, 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), 23 June 1995 # 37-see its II (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 16 apr 1999 # 19-see its II with transition rules. |
0 | Added by law 2 June 1995 # 27 (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569). |
The king can further determine that the rules of law or partly apply to intellectual property rights and not issued works that such organization has the publication of the
The provisions have the equivalent of the Applicability of those in 5. The chapter of the capital is working.
For consideration of the agreement with foreign state, the King can further give particular regulations on agreements on the transfer of the right to the recording of works for film and television, herunder what works the rules should apply to.
0 | Modified by law 20 des 1974 number 64. |
The example lawful before the law of law can still be propagated to the public or appear publicly, nonetheless so that the provisions of the Section of Section 19, 42 and 45 and regulations in Section 19 on the loan of machine-readable copy of Computer program is also getting the Applicability also in these case.
0 | Modified by laws 23 des 1988 # 101, 2 June 1995 # 27-see its III (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 569), 23 June 1995 # 37-see its II (ikr. 30 June 1995 ifg res. 23 June 1995 # 572), 17 June 2005 # 97-see its III (ikr. 1 July 2005 ifg. res. 17 June 2005 # 630). |
At the same time, the law of intellectual property of the 6 June 1930.
References in other laws to the Law of Six. June 1930 or to Law of the author's right and artistic dish of 4. July 1893 with the change law of 25. July 1910 shall apply to the corresponding provisions of this law.