Key Benefits:
Law of the execution of punishment mv. (sentencing law). |
| Date | LOL-2001-05-18-21 |
| Ministry of | The Justis and the Department of Emergency |
| Last modified | LO-2016-04-22-3 |
| Published | In 2001 booklet 6 |
| Istrontrecation | 01.03.2002 |
| Changing | LO-1958-12-12-7 |
| Announcement | |
| Card title | The StraffReview Act-strafl. |
See the milstrol. Section 13 jf SECTION 16. -Jof. former Criminal law : Criminal law 20 aug 1842 kep 2 and pledge 12 July 1848, 13 oct 1857, 6 June 1884 # 2. 26 June 1893 # 1, 31 May 1900 # 4, 12 des 1903 (Additional slat 26 March 1907 # 2. 21 March 1919 # 1, 24 March 1922 # 2. 11 aug 1924 # 2. 22 Feb 1929 # 2. 6 June 1933 # 5, 22 May 1953 # 3), 12 des 1958 # 7.
This law applies to the execution of prison sentence, criminal justice, detention, community imprisonment and detention of other reactions when it is specifically determined in law.
| 0 | Modified by law 21 des 2005 # 131 (ikr. 1 jan 2006 ifg. res. 21 des 2005 # 1580). |
Following the decision of criminal custody, convictions may be sentenced to unconditional prison sentence, conducting the punishment in a different state that Norway has signed agreement with.
The dome that is conducting punishment in another state after the first clause is to consider imprisoned in prison in Norway and should, with the precision following of the third clause, have the rights and duties as follows of this.
The Probation Service shall ensure that the sentencing that is conducting punishment in another state after the first clause is given the offer of health assistance that is peer-reviewed by the offer of sentencing would be claimed by sentencing in Norway. State health supervision leads supervision of criminal custody obligations after the determination here. The health care law applies accordingly. Patient and Human Rights Act Chapter 7 of complaint applies to criminal liability obligations after the determination here. The Probation Service shall be at the request of the State Health and County Health care and county information that these are finding necessary in order to carry out their tasks after the determination here. The information can be provided without the obstacle of secrecy.
The king can provide filler regulation and determine the exceptions from Section 4, 7, 8 first joints and 27 that are necessary for punishment to be carried out in a different state after the first clause.
| 0 | Added by law 19 June 2015 # 66. Enlifted by law 19 June 2015 # 66 (ikr. 1 sep 2020). |
The punishment is to be carried out in a way that takes into account the purpose of the punishment, which contratification new penalties, which are reassuring to society and as within these frames, they ensure the inmates satisfactory conditions.
The offer is to be provided for the restoratory process under the penalty review.
In custody of detention, the criminal custody shall lay conditions to the right to relieve the negative effects of isolation.
| 0 | Modified by law 20 June 2014 # 49 (ikr. 1 July 2014 ifg res. 20 June 2014 # 795). |
The review of the reaction should be safety-wise defensible. The content is to build on the measures the Department of Justice has at the disposal to promote the domfield of adaptes to society. The Probation Service shall lay conditions to the right that the convictions should be able to make a separate effort to counter new penalties actions.
Barns the right to togetherness with their parents should particularly weight-placed during the completion of the reaction.
The dome has activity-liked during the execution of punishment and criminal justice reactions. Activity duties can consist of work, community service, training, program, or other measures that are suitable to counter new crime. Under disease or disability, activity work can fall away.
Upon the completion of prison sentence, detention and criminal justice, a gradual transition from prison to full freedom and is given offer of participation in recreational activities.
| 0 | Modified by law 21 des 2005 # 131 (ikr. 1 jan 2006 ifg. res. 21 des 2005 # 1580). |
The Probation Service is going through cooperation with other public agencies adding to the right that convictions and inmates in custody will receive the services that the legislature gives them claims. The collaboration shall contribute to a interarranged effort to cover the convictions and stakes needs and further their adaptable to society.
| 0 | Capital added by law 17 des 2010 # 85 (ikr. 20 sep 2013 ifg res. 20 Sep 2013 # 1098), the headline changed by law 23 jan 2015 # 3. |
The Privacy Act applies to the filler rules stipulated in this chapter.
| 0 | Added by law 17 des 2010 # 85 (ikr. 20 sep 2013 ifg res. 20 Sep 2013 # 1098). |
With the processing manager, it means that by law or regulation, alone, or with others, determines the purpose of the treatment and what aids to use.
| 0 | Added by law 17 des 2010 # 85 (ikr. 20 sep 2013 ifg res. 20 Sep 2013 # 1098). |
The Probation Service can process personal information that is necessary to
| a) | planning, managing and conducting reactions and compulsive measures after the sentencing law Section 1, |
| b) | maintain calm and order and safeguard the safety of employees, inmates, convictions and society by the way, |
| c) | securing inmates and convictions satisfactory conditions during the execution and offer them a content that should help counter new crime, herder lay conditions to appropriate services from other agencies with aim to promote the stakes and domfield adaptes to society, |
| d) | ensure children's right to join with the parents under secure and safe conditions, |
| e) | notify the insult or dennes afterlatte, jf. Section 7 b, |
| f) | conducting personal examinations, jf. The penalty process law chapter 14. |
| 0 | Added by law 17 des 2010 # 85 (ikr. 20 sep 2013 ifg res. 20 Sep 2013 # 1098), modified by law 20 jan 2012 # 6 (ikr. 20 jan 2012 ifg res. 20 jan 2012 # 41). |
For purposes mentioned in Section 4c, criminal custody can process personal information about
| a) | convicted and inmates, |
| b) | relatives and others who have contact with or try to achieve contact with the conviction or inmates, |
| c) | people who have or seek to access prison areas, |
| d) | the field of convictions or inmate's children and the child's relatives or other caregivers, |
| e) | the defendant or defendant who underplaced the person examination. |
| 0 | Added by law 17 des 2010 # 85 (ikr. 20 sep 2013 ifg res. 20 Sep 2013 # 1098), modified by law 20 jan 2012 # 6 (ikr. 20 jan 2012 ifg res. 20 jan 2012 # 41). |
The king gives regulation about among other things
| a) | what legal basis that is haunting the treatment, |
| b) | purpose of the treatment, |
| c) | who is the processing manager, |
| d) | what information categories can be recorded, |
| e) | who in the Department of Corrections who have access to the information, |
| f) | the adhall to extradite the information, |
| g) | information alike, visibility, correction, cordon and deletion of information, |
| h) | information security and internal control. |
| 0 | Added by law 17 des 2010 # 85 (ikr. 20 sep 2013 ifg res. 20 Sep 2013 # 1098). |
| 0 | Capital added by law 23 jan 2015 # 3. |
The Probation Service can process personal information about the convictions and inmates of the Infoflow system if needed to
| a) | prevention and prevent escape when there is flight risk |
| b) | prevention and prevent impact from outside to assist escape |
| c) | prevention and prevent hostage-taking |
| d) | Prevention, prevent and combat organized crime, terror, violent extremism or other serious crime during the execution of custody, punishment and other criminal reactions or |
| e) | safeguard the safety of inmates or convictions or other people with special protection needs. |
In the assessment of whether it is necessary to process personal information in the Infoflow system, criminal custody should particularly put emphasis on the criminal relationship's species and how serious it is, the penalty length, criminal history, behavior under earlier sentencing, other penalties that are under investigation or sentencing, association with criminal networks, collaborates knowledge of the inmate or convicted and other conditions that give reason to assume the person will commit or co-appear to actions as mentioned in the first clause of the letter a to d.
Is the inmate or convicted registered in the Infoflow system, criminal custody can process personal information about their visitors, phone or letter contacts, family members, friends, acquaintances and others who have or seeking contact with it inmates or convictions or as the inmate or domished are seeking contact, when contact is created or desired to commit or co-appear to actions as mentioned in the first clause of the letter a to d.
Probation can also process personal information about other people, if necessary to address the safety of the persons themselves or to inmates or convictions in cases where there is particularly protection needs after the first clause letter e.
| 0 | Added by law 23 jan 2015 # 3. |
The treatment manager in criminal custody shall inform the recorded information about the person in the Infoflow system and that the information can be issued to the police and the prosecution of Section 4i.
The treatment managers may be unable to inform the registered if
| a) | it is necessary to safeguard the objectives of Section 4f first clause letter a to e |
| b) | it is necessary for consideration of national or public safety |
| c) | information has been received from the Police Security Service or |
| d) | the registered is not inmate or domorfield, and it is not created a separate case on the person in the Infoflow system. |
| 0 | Added by law 23 jan 2015 # 3. |
The registered asking for it shall be granted visibility into the information recorded about the person in the Infoflow system and the information that has been issued to the police and the prosecution.
The vision can be denied completely or partially if
| a) | it is necessary to safeguard the objectives of Section 4f first clause letter a to e |
| b) | it is necessary for consideration of national or public safety or |
| c) | The information has been received from the Police Security Service. |
If the motion of visibility is not taken to follow and there is the basis for the criminal custody to refrain from informing it registered after Section 4g else clause, a response should not be announced that there is a registration in the Infoflow system.
| 0 | Added by law 23 jan 2015 # 3. |
Is it necessary to safeguard the goals of Section 4f first clause the letters a to e or for the police to be able to conduct a risk assessment in association with the registered inmate or convicted, criminal custody can without the obstruction of secrecy information to the police and the prosecution.
| 0 | Added by law 23 jan 2015 # 3. |
The data protection shall by the petition from the registered or the one assuming to be registered, verify that the information about the person has been processed in accordance with the law and that the rules of information alike and visibility are followed. This does not apply to information that the criminal custody has received from the Police Security Service.
Has criminal custody or police decided exceptions from information duty after Section 4 g of other clause or police registry law Section 48, the response shall not be announced that there is a registration in the Infoflow system.
The Data Authority cannot give the injunction on disclosure of information that the criminal custody or police have except from the court of the court after Section 4h other clause or police registry law Section 49 fourth clause.
| 0 | Added by law 23 jan 2015 # 3. |
The king can provide regulations on
| a) | treatment liability |
| b) | type of information that can be processed |
| c) | information quality |
| d) | access |
| e) | cooperation with police |
| f) | induced by the creation and closure of case |
| g) | information alike |
| h) | visibility |
| in) | correction, cordon and deletion |
| j) | shopping duty at fault or missing |
| k) | retention and use of suspended information |
| l) | issue of information to the police |
| m) | case management rules |
| n) | complaint and complaint deadline |
| o) | supervision and |
| p) | information security and internal control. |
| 0 | Added by law 23 jan 2015 # 3. |
| 0 | The headline changed by law 7 March 2008 No. 5 (ikr. 1 July 2008 ifg res. 7 March 2008 No. 242). |
The Probation Service is the subject of the Probation Directorate, regional level and local level.
The Probation Board of Directorate is in charge of the professional and administrative management of the Department of Criminal Services. The leader is appointed by the King.
Regional level is led professional and administrative by a regional director. It can be determined that regional CEOs are attributed to the varian.
The king can give closer rules about criminal justice, organizing and the completion of prison sentence, detention criminal reactions, custody, community punishment and other reactions when it is specifically determined in law.
| 0 | Modified by laws 21 des 2005 # 131 (ikr. 1 jan 2006 ifg. res. 21 des 2005 # 1580), 28 Feb 2014 # 3. |
Decisions after this law are met by local level unless otherwise follows by other clauses.
Regional level hits decision in all cases after Section 11, Section 37 fourth clause and seventh clause third period, Section 38 third and fourth clause, Section 44 different joints and Section 58 other joints. When the conviction is idtender prison sentence of more than 10 years, idtenet a criminal justice or detention facility or inmate in department with particularly high security level after Section 10 different joints, hitting regional level also decision by Section 12 to 16, 20, 33, 35, 36 and 42 to 44.
In cases where the convictions are under the age of 18, it shall be sent copy of all decisions hit by local level to regional level.
| 0 | Modified by laws 21 des 2005 # 131 (ikr. 1 jan 2006 ifg. res. 21 des 2005 # 1580), 29 June 2007 # 84 (ikr. 1 aug 2008 ifg res. 13 June 2008 No. 586), 24 June 2011 # 34, 20 jan 2012 # 6 (ikr. 20 jan 2012 ifg res. 20 jan 2012 # 41). |
The Prevalence Act applies with the following exceptions :
| a) | Doshed, inmates or attributed to criminal custody cannot be the deputy for a person who is under penalty or inmate after this law. |
| b) | The case treatment can be oral when time-for-time reasons make it necessary. It also applies to the ordinance and the underdirection of the ordinance of the conviction or inmates. |
| c) | A party has no claim of visibility into a document that contains information that it of respect to another person must be deemed unadvisable that the party is given knowledge. The Parten also has no claim to be familiar with information in a document if visibility is unadvisable due to security concerns, or for consideration of criminal investigation of criminal conditions. |
| d) | The exception can be made exceptions from the duty of the duty of the Management Act Section 24 if the justification will reveal enlightenment that is excluding from the adhall to visibility of the letter c. |
| e) | The complaint deadline in cases after this law is 7 days. This does not apply to cases of reaction to fractures after Section 40 first and with sixth joints and Section 58 first joints. In such cases, the clawn deadline is 48 hours. |
| f) | Decision to promote the case for the court after Section 44 other clause, Section 58 other clauses or the penal code Section 39 first and other clause cannot be scratched. The same goes for the decision of the inauguration in prison after Section 11. |
| g) | The Probation Directorate and Regional Level can, although the friansts of the Management Act Section 35 third joints have been exceeded, of separate measures retaken by child authority to damage for convictions or inmates whose shonest reasons dictates it. |
| h) | Anyone attributed to or carrying out service or work for criminal custody has secrecy about what the person in connection with the service gets to know about conditions of importance for security in the prisons and in connection with the review of punishment outside the prisons. |
| in) | Tausheeled is not to the hurdle for criminal custody of information as mentioned in Section 16 seventh clause, Section 36 third clause, Section 40 last clause, Section 42 sixth and seventh clause and the Criminal Code Section 45 sixth clause, until the offended in the penalty case or dennes afterlatte. |
| 0 | Modified by laws 30 aug 2002 # 67 (ikr. 1 jan 2003 ifg res. 30 aug 2002 # 938), 29 June 2007 # 83 (ikr. 1 nov 2007 ifg. res. 12 oct 2007 # 1138), 17 des 2010 # 85 (ikr. 17 des 2010 ifg. res. 17 des 2010 # 1668), 14 June 2013 # 44, 28 Feb 2014 # 3, 9 May 2014 # 16 (ikr. 9 May 2014 ifg res. 9 May 2014 # 625), 19 June 2015 # 65 (ikr. 1 oct 2015). |
Before that information is provided as mentioned in the other clause, it shall be sought to achieve complicity or consent from that information directly applies.
Without the obstacle of privilege, the criminal custody has the right to obtain from :
| a. | The People's Registry ; details of the inmate's name, birth number, birthplace, residence, residence and citizenship. |
| b. | Assigned in Child Protective Services and Social Services ; information on the Children's Children and Family relationship that is necessary to ensure the envision of the child and the rest family during sentencing, on leave, at release and by transfer to others review shapes than prison with high level of security. |
| c. | Health personnel in the Health and Care Service ; information mentioned in letter b, as well as the information that is strictly necessary to avert danger of life and health for the inmate itself, other inmates and added. |
| d. | Tilbythere of access to electronic communications or communication service ; information about the contract-based secret phone number and other subscription information. |
The information is to be given without due stay. The region director decides who has the authority to overtake and receive information mentioned above.
| 0 | Added by law 29 June 2007 # 83 (ikr. 1 nov 2007 ifg. res. 12 oct 2007 # 1138), modified by laws 17 des 2010 # 85 (ikr. 17 des 2010 ifg. res. 17 des 2010 # 1668), 24 June 2011 # 30 (ikr. 1 jan 2012 ifg. res. 16 des 2011 # 1252), 14 June 2013 # 44. |
For rules of notification to the insult or dennes post-latte about crime-making decisions, see Section 16 seventh clause, Section 36 third clause, Section 40 last clause, Section 42 sixth and seventh clause and the Criminal Code Section 45 sixth clause.
| 0 | Added by law 7 March 2008 No. 5 (ikr. 1 July 2008 ifg res. 7 March 2008 No. 242), modified by laws 14 June 2013 # 44, 9 May 2014 # 16 (ikr. 9 May 2014 ifg res. 9 May 2014 # 625), 19 June 2015 # 65 (ikr. 1 oct 2015). |
In order to be attributed to criminal custody, special requirements can be set to the education. There must be nothing to delay on the vandle of the subject of criminal custody or to Workers performing work there as joints in the management cooperation. In order to verify whether the vandalism claim is met, the criminal custody shall require the outset of the exhaustive police reference. The exhaustive police reference can also be required for others performing work for criminal custody. At the assessment of people who mentioned in the previous period can carry out work for criminal custody, it shall be among other consideration of their association with the criminal custody, what tasks are performed and the scope and duration of these, and Moreover, who the person has contact with at the execution of the tasks.
An added may temporarily or lasting transfer to another operating unit in the criminal custody of the service of the service, if the service of the service dictates it.
| 0 | Modified by law 29 June 2007 # 83 (ikr. 1 nov 2007 ifg. res. 12 oct 2007 # 1138). |
In association with each region, there should be a probation officer as for closer rules to conduct supervision of prisons and freecare offices and with the treatment of the convicted and inmates.
Part Article| 0 | The headline changed by law 21 des 2005 # 131 (ikr. 1 jan 2006 ifg. res. 21 des 2005 # 1580). |
prison sentence, detention and criminal legal reactions can be carried out
| a) | in prison with high security level (closed prison), |
| b) | in prison with lower security level (open prison), |
| c) | in transition housing, |
| d) | outside prison with special conditions after Section 16, or |
| e) | as on parole with terms after Section 43 different joints. |
Ward in prison with high level of security can be facilitating for inmates with the shonest needs, herunder persons who are identya criminal or detention, or infixed with particularly high level of security.
Punishment can be performed at weekend stays in institution or hospital after Section 12 and 13.
Subsidiary prison sentence determined after the Criminal Code Section 55, can be carried out as fined service after Section 16 a
For sentencing under the age of 18, the personnel survey that has been made after the penalty process law Section 161 a, form the basis for selection of transparency and other decisions about the sentencing. A new person survey should be taken if it has gone more than one year from the personal examination of sentencing was committed, or if the child's personality, life conditions or future opportunities significantly changed.
Ikr 1 March 2002 with the exception of first clause letter c.
| 0 | Modified by laws 21 des 2005 # 131 (ikr. 1 jan 2006 ifg. res. 21 des 2005 # 1580), 20 jan 2012 No. 1 6 (ikr. 20 jan 2012 ifg res. 20 jan 2012 # 41), 24 June 2011 # 35 (ikr. 1 jan 2014 ifg. res. 29 Nov 2013 # 1363), 9 May 2014 # 16 (ikr. 9 May 2014 ifg res. 9 May 2014 # 625), 19 June 2015 # 65 (ikr. 1 oct 2015). |
When someone under the age of 18 to be placed in prison, the stay is to be facilitating after their needs ; units created specifically for inmates under the age of 18 should have a cross-course team to take care of the youngsters ' needs during sentencing and preparing time after release.
The Probation Service provides filler regulations on the requirements of prison that are used for inmates under the age of 18, requirements for employee education, as well as to the cross-circuit team's Assembly, function and workloads.
| 0 | Added by law 20 jan 2012 # 6 (ikr. 30 oct 2015 ifg. res. 30 oct 2015 # 1233). |
The Probation Service shall put convictions directly into prison with high security level unless otherwise determined with home in this law. Domenshed should as far as it is convenient possible and target service is inserted in the vicinity of the home site.
If special security reasons make it required, the domes can be inserted into the department with particularly high security level after Section 10 other clauses.
The dome of special needs, herdunder persons who are idrred a criminal justice or detention facility, should be inserted into the department facilitated for this after Section 10 other clauses.
The Probation Service shall assess whether the convictions can be directly inserted into prison with lower-level security if it is idtenable prison sentence for up to 2 years. Such incomes shall not be determined if the purpose of the punishment or security reasons speaks against it, or there is reason to assume that the conviction will evade the completion of the sentence. In honest cases, convictions can be inserted directly into prison with lower level of security when there is idtenable prison sentence of more than 2 years.
The Probation Service shall assess whether the convictions can be directly inserted into transition housing if it is ididled prison sentence of up to 1 year. Fourth clause other period applies to the equivalent.
Probation Service shall always consider indecisive convictions during 18 years in prison with lower security level or in transition housing.
| 0 | Modified by laws 21 des 2005 # 131 (ikr. 1 jan 2006 ifg. res. 21 des 2005 # 1580), 20 jan 2012 No. 1 6 (ikr. 20 jan 2012 ifg res. 20 jan 2012 # 41), 14 June 2013 # 44. |
The punishment can in very frank cases completely or partially be carried out at weekend stay in institution if your stay is needed to better dominate the ability of social and law, or other heavy-weighing reasons for it. The sentencing shall be able to be held back against their will and be obtained back at evasion, if necessary by coercion and with assistance from public authority. The Probation Service shall not cease such completion if security reasons speak against it or there is reason to assume that the conviction will evade the execution.
| 0 | Modified by law 15 June 2001 # 64 (ikr. 1 jan 2002). |
The Probation Service may decide that the punishment can be carried out at weekend accommodation in hospitals if treatment of disease makes it necessary, and the treatment cannot be given under ordinary execution of the penalty.
Probation Service can transfer inmates to another prison if
| a) | it is likely that inmates have committed or will commit a criminal act, |
| b) | There is reason to assume that inmates will avoid the completion of the |
| c) | This is necessary to prevent inmates, despite the behavior of behavioral conversation, continues to affect the environment in imprisoned in a particularly negative way, |
| d) | transfer is needed to maintain calm, order and security in the imprisoned, |
| e) | construction or staffing conditions or space shortage makes it necessary, |
| f) | when delicate conditions are present that make the transfer necessary of respect to a tisat or their service exercise or circumstances of the otherwise do it required, or |
| g) | it is necessary to avoid an unfortunate compound of inmates. |
The Probation Service can also transfer inmates to other prison if the transfer is taking place of the inmate's need in a appropriate manner.
Inmates who are conducting punishment in department with particularly high level of security can be transferred to other prison for prevention of calm, order and security in the department even if the terms of the first clause of the letters a to e are not met.
The dome that himself wishes it can be transferred to other prison if this is appropriate for the further penalty review.
The dome that is conducting detention or criminal justice in prison can be transferred to department facilitated for inmates with shonest needs, jf. Section 10 other joints, though the terms of the first clause of the letters a to g or other clause have not been met. The transfer must be required to prevent the breach of calm, order and security or to address the sentencing of the court.
The dome can temporarily be transferred to other prison in connection with the court hearing. In straight-up, the transfer of the court could be transmission in connection with the court of law also to happen from prison to police arrest. The training in police arrest should be as short as possible.
Domfelled as conducting punishment outside prison after Section 16 can be retaken to prison if it is likely that convictions have committed or will commit a criminal act, exemptions or break conditions and conditions for review of punishment outside prison.
Doshed should not be transferred to more restrictive prison than what is needed.
| 0 | Changed by law 29 June 2007 # 83 (ikr. 1 nov 2007 ifg. res. 12 oct 2007 # 1138), 14 June 2013 # 44. |
Inmates in department with particularly high level of security, or which are facilitated for inmates with special needs, can be transferred to prison with high security level if security reasons do not speak against it and there is no reason to assume inmates will evade the completion of the review. The same applies to people who after the mental health protection law Section 5-6 have been decided to transfer to the detention facility under the criminal custody of the consent of those consent. Probation Service shall consider inmates in department with particularly high security level of transmission to prison with high security level with no more than 6 months of space.
Inmates may, after having conducted a portion of the penalty, are transferred from prison with high security level to prison with lower security level. Inmates should not be transferred if the purpose of punishment or security reasons speaks against it, or there is reason to assume inmates will evade the execution. Probation Service shall consider transfer to prison with lower level of security when remaining one year to inmates can be released on trial.
Inmates can be transferred from prison with high or lower level of security to transition housing when a portion of the penalty has been implemented. Inmates should not be transferred if the purpose of punishment or security reasons speaks against it, or there is reason to assume inmates will evade the execution. The transfer must be expedient in order to promote a positive development and to counter new crime.
| 0 | Modified by law 15 June 2001 # 64 (ikr. 1 jan 2002). |
If it is appropriate to ensure a continued particularly positive development and counter new crime, criminal custody can transfer convictions to the execution of the penalty outside prison with the shonest terms when the half of the penalty time has been implemented. The Probation Service shall always consider whether the terms of transfer of convictions under the age of 18 to the execution of the penalty outside prison are met when the half of the penalty time has been implemented. Transfer shall not be determined if the purpose of the punishment or regard to a security-wise defensible review speaks against it.
If the id-left unconditional prison sentence or remaining time until expected release is up to 4 months, and it is appropriate to ensure a positive development and counter new crime, the penalty can be carried out outside prison when it set terms that the domes should be undergiven electronic control. The Probation Service shall always consider whether sentencing under the age of 18 years meets the terms of conducting the punishment outside of prison with electronic control. For sentencing under the age of 18, the arbitrary year does not apply to the id-term prison sentence or remaining time until expected release is up to 4 months. The Probation Service can provide regulation with filler regulations on the use of electronic control. The first clause third period applies to the equivalent.
It is a prerequisite for the execution of punishment outside of prison that the convictions shall have firm residence and be employed in terms of work, training or other measures. In addition, Domenshed is supposed to avoid using drugs, sedation funds, hormone preparates or other chemical substances that are not legally prescribed.
If it appears as necessary for a security-wise defensible of the punishment outside prison, the criminal custody shall determine the shonest terms. The Probation Service can be found among other determining that the convictions should
| a) | review processing, |
| b) | participate in program, |
| c) | take on the antabus or other prescribed drugs, |
| d) | compliance with the provisions of the whereabouts, or |
| e) | neglected to have relations with specific people. |
The Probation Service can unsettle terms, modify or determine new terms if it appears as necessary for consideration of a security-wise defensible review of the penalty.
The Probation Service shall verify that the convictions comply with the prerequisites and the provision of conditions. As clause of the control can measures after Section 56 is committed. By violation of terms or prerequisites, or if it is likely that the conviction has committed or will commit criminal action or avoidance of conduct, the provisions apply to prison in Section 14 sixth and the seventh clause.
If it is of significance for the victim of the criminal trial or dennes afterlatte to obtain knowledge of the time of review of punishment outside prison, criminal custody shall notify the insult or migrants in advance. The alert should also include information on terms set with home in Section 16 fourth clause letter d and e, if these terms directly apply to the insult or dennes afterlatte.
The dome and the insult are to be offered restoratory process. If those by appointment come forward to agreement to comply with the provision of whereabouts, or neglected to have relations with specific persons, the criminal custody shall take into account the agreement on determining the terms of the provision of the penalty outside jail. The Department of Probation does not need to take into account the agreement if it becomes unreasonable for the insult or conviction.
| 0 | Changed by law 29 June 2007 # 83 (ikr. 1 nov 2007 ifg. res. 12 oct 2007 # 1138), 29 June 2007 # 84 (ikr. 1 nov 2007 ifg. res. 12 oct 2007 # 1139, new clause ir. 1 aug 2008 ifg res. 13 June 2008 No. 586), 20 jan 2012 # 6 (ikr. 20 jan 2012 ifg res. 20 jan 2012 # 41), 24 May 2013 # 19, 28 Feb 2014 # 3, 9 May 2014 # 16 (ikr. 9 May 2014 ifg res. 9 May 2014 # 625), 20 June 2014 No. 49 (ikr. 1 July 2014 ifg res. 20 June 2014 # 795). |
If the person to conduct the subsidized prison sentence stipulled in judgment, parent or simplified parent, consent to it, the criminal custody may decide that the subsidised prison sentence shall be carried out at the wave service. The completion of the bucket service assumes that the botany has residence and stay in Norway in the pre-season. The Probation Service shall be requested to be requested by the consent of the summons to the atonement of the subsidized prison sentence.
If the terms of the bucket service are present, the criminal custody system determines a timetal for the bucket service from 2 to 180 hours and a review time from 20 days to 6 months.
The Probation Service will determine the closer content of the bucket service within those frames determined in sentence of fine or in the parent of the parent. Section 53 first and third clause, Section 54 first clause letter a to c and e, second and third joints, and Section 57 applies accordingly. The Probation Service shall control that botobvious compliance with prerequisites and conditions.
If the botimposed intentional or negligent break regulations given in or in co-hold of the third clause, the criminal custody shall point out the breach of botobvious, preparing the requirements in suitable manner and make bothlessly familiar with the consequences of repeated violations.
By repeated violations of terms or prerequisites, or if it is probable that botany has committed or will commit any criminal action or avoidance of conduct, the provisions apply to prison in Section 14 sixth and seventh joints. The Probation Service can disrupt the review.
The Ministry provides regulation with closer rules about the bucket service, herder among other determining of timetal, content, and review, and interruption.
| 0 | Added by law 24 June 2011 # 35 (ikr. 1 jan 2014 ifg. res. 29 Nov 2013 # 1363), modified by law 19 June 2015 # 65 (ikr. 1 oct 2015). |
As far as it is convenient, inmates are allowed to have access to communities during work, training, program, or other measures, and in his spare time. Probation Service may be able to end whole or partial exclusion from the community after the provisions of Section 29 other joints and Section 37, 38, 39, and 40 other clause d. Inmates should be in private at night if not health conditions or space shortages are to obstacle to it.
The community of inmates conducting punishment in department as mentioned in Section 10 other clause can completely or partly be limited by consideration of calm, order and security, or if the envision of inmates himself or other inmates say it, and it does not appear as an unsustainable intervention.
The Probation Service shall be adding to the right that inmates receive an activity offer during the day.
Doshed that is conducting punishment in prison, or outside prison after Section 12 and 13, can be confessions of day money. The Satses are determined by the Probation Directorate.
| 0 | Modified by law 28 feb 2014 # 3. |
Probation can give inmates permission to participate in work, training, program, or other measures outside prison if security reasons do not speak against it, and there is no reason to assume inmates will evade the completion of the penalty.
If it is of significance for the victim of the criminal trial or dennes afternate knowledge at the time of the exemption, the criminal custody shall notify the insult or dennes afterlatte in advance.
| 0 | Modified by law 29 June 2007 # 83 (ikr. 1 nov 2007 ifg. res. 12 oct 2007 # 1138). |
The Probation Service shall put the conditions appropriate for the inmates to receive offers of participation in activities in their free time, herunder the possibility of physical activity and cultural business.
Inmates are going to as far as it is possible to be allowed to stay in a freelance cancer every day.
Part Article SECTION 23. Religion and life visionThe Probation Service shall provide inmates with the opportunity to exercise religion and life vision.
Part Article SECTION 24 Reportage and interviewThe Probation Service can give permission to the report from prison. It can be set terms for the permit to ensure calm, order and security in prison.
Inmates have the right to let her interview and photograph. The Probation Service shall lay the conditions to the right of a practical review of this court. The Probation Service can determine the time and place of the interview for consideration of calm, order and security in the imprisoned. Police shall consent to interview of the detention of detention inmates who are illased restrictions after sentencing process law Section 186 other clauses.
The granted permission for the report after the first clause, or as interviews inmates, can be sworn to secrecy about information that concerns security conditions in prison. The one that intentional or negligent of the privilege is punishable by fines or with prison until 6 months. Attempts are punishable in the same way. The impact is not punishable.
| 0 | Modified by law 19 June 2015 # 65 (ikr. 1 oct 2015). |
If the inmates wish it, criminal custody should establish cooperation organs with the representative of inmates and added. If punishment is carried out in department as mentioned in Section 10 other clauses, such organs can be established if security reasons do not speak against it.
The collaboration organs have the purpose of adding appropriate for discussion of questions that have meaning for those of the inmate's daily life ; questions that concern a single inmate or tilted, or questions about the organization of security measures, cannot is discussed.
The Probation Service can out from the hands of the inquiry to calm, order and security give regulations on which items it are allowed to bring in or out of prison.
The states that are taken in or out of prison can be investigated after Section 27 and 28.
The Probation Service may temporarily hold back money or items that have been attempted to be introduced or performed in violation of the first clause. If the money or items are not seized after the sentencing process, Chapter 16, revoked after the Criminal Code Section 67, or held back on other grounds, they shall be later provided back at release or when a visitor leaves the prison. The Probation Service can be destroyed alcohol, other drugs and drugs mv.
| 0 | Modified by law 19 June 2015 # 65 (ikr. 1 oct 2015). |
Probation Service can on the prison area examine persons and items by using technical equipment or dog to prevent the taken of items that are not permitted. By positive readings, or when the person does not co-appear to the examination, the imprisoned person can reject the person. By the findings of items that are not permitted, the rules apply in Section 26 third clauses.
If the examination after the first clause gives positive readings, or criminal custody otherwise decides, a person can be searched if he or she consent. If the examination after the first clause gives positive readings, or else is reason to assume that a person is attempting to bring items that are not allowed into prison, a person can be held back by the added police arrive even if the person does not consent to the visor. By the findings of the object not permitted, the determination applies in the first clause and the third period equivalent.
Research after the first clause of the use of technical equipment or dog facing lawyer and public government representative, herunder diplomatic or consular representative, can only take place in department with particularly high security level. These people can only be dismissed after the first clause if they do not co-operation to the examination. By positive readings, control measures can be mentioned in Section 31 third clause, jf. sixth clause is committed.
Any can be required valid credentials to ensure the right identity.
Before the Department of Corrections gives permission to visit inmates, it can in advance be obtained information about the visitor's vandel.
By the use of the phone, the conversational identity can be investigated in advance.
Inmates can be photographed to ensure the right identity.
| 0 | Modified by law 24 June 2011 # 35. |
The Probation Service can examine inmates, their rooms and belongings to prevent the disorder or penalties of punishment. The survey can happen by the use of technical equipment or dog, visor, or by pat-down.
Part Article SECTION 29. Examination to uncover the use of the drug use mv.Probation Service may impose sentencing as conducting punishment after Section 10 first clause letter a, b, c and d to provide urine sample, discharge test or blood test or to co-appear to other investigations that can happen without danger or especially discomfort, to uncover use of drugs, sedation funds, hormone preparates or other chemical substances that are not legally prescribed. Blood test can only be taken by health personnel.
If it is likely that the convictions of the body hide the drugs, sedation funds, hormone preparates or other chemical substances that are not legally prescribed, criminal custody can be put in private with special toilet. Issues from doctor shall be obtained and taken into consideration by the assessment of whether to be placed in works. During the stay, the convictions shall have regular supervision of health personnel. If it is probable that the convictions of the body hide substances that are not legally prescribed, the criminal custody can also take advantage of the radiological examination to impose the drug. Henview to such examination is determined by doctor who is considering whether the use of radiation is warranted, jf. The straw delivery law Section 13.
If it is deliberating likely that an inmate in the body hides drugs, sedation funds, hormone preparates or other chemical substances that are not legally prescribed, the criminal custody can be made to be taken away from bodily examination or other measures to bring the fabric forward. Issues from doctor shall be obtained and taken into consideration by the assessment of whether to be placed in works. The grasp can only be performed by health personnel. Samfat from regional level is to be obtained in advance if this is convenient.
| 0 | Modified by law 29 June 2007 # 83 (ikr. 1 nov 2007 ifg. res. 12 oct 2007 # 1138). |
Inmates should be able to send and receive mail submission if not otherwise follows of this determination.
The Probation Service shall control mail submission to and from inmates in department with particularly high level of security before it is issued or submitted. Mail submission to and from inmates in prison with high level of security should be checked, but control can be exemptions if security reasons do not speak against it. Mail submission to and from inmates in prison with lower level of security and transitional housing shall be checked if it appears as necessary for security reasons.
Control of mail submission can happen at open and review of the submission before it is issued or submitted, and by examination as mentioned in Section 27 first clause. In the department with particularly high level of security, inmates can be placed to bring correspondence in a language they attributed to the master.
The Probation Service may refuse to extradite or submit mail submission to or from inmates if the submission contains information planning or review of criminal action, avoidance of the review or actions that will disrupt calm, order and security. Inmates should be made familiar with the part of the submission that without damage can be co-shared.
Record submission that the inmate has already received can be checked after third clause.
Record submission to or from attorney and public government representative, herunder diplomatic or consular representative, can be examined after Section 27 third clause. Control of review shall not take place. The transmission should always be opened in the presence of inmates.
The Probation Service can after further regulations give inmates permission for electronic communications with text, audio and image if security reasons or regard to a defensible resource Management does not speak against it. The provisions of other sixth joints apply to the equivalent.
| 0 | Changed by law 29 June 2007 # 83 (ikr. 1 nov 2007 ifg. res. 12 oct 2007 # 1138), 29 June 2007 # 84 (ikr. 1 nov 2007 ifg. res. 12 oct 2007 # 1139). |
Inmates shall be able to receive visits if nothing else follows of this determination.
The Probation Service shall control visits to the department with particularly high level of security. Visit in prison with high level of security should be checked, but control can be neglected if security reasons do not speak against it. Visit in prison with lower level of security and transition housing shall be checked if it appears as necessary for security reasons.
Control during visits can happen at the point of view of the added during the visit, at the transfer of call, by the use of glass wall or by ban physical contact between inmates and the visitor. If security reasons make it necessary to overhear the call, inmates and the visitor can be placed to bring the call on a language they attributed to the master. Additional control measures can be committed at the same time if needed. It shall not be committed stricter control measures than necessary.
Probation may refuse visits if there is reason to assume that the visit will be abused for planning or review of criminal action, avoidance of the review or actions that will be able to disrupt calm, order and security. If the visit is of great importance to inmates, and control is sufficient to avert that the visit is misused for purposes as mentioned in the first period of this clause, the visit should be checked and not denied.
Visitors can be examined after Section 27 first, second, fourth and fifth joints.
Attorney and public government representative, herunder diplomatic or consular representative, can be examined after Section 27 other to the fifth clause. Control during the visit by that conversation oversounds should not take place.
Visit should be done in visitors ' rooms. Imprisonable shall lay conditions to the right that visits of children can be performed in a gentle manner as a way. By violation of current visitor rules, the visit may be cancelled.
Inmates under the age of 18 may receive visits of close family who are taking a stay in close association until jailed for up to three days of the time if it is security-wise. The Probation Service provides regulation on the completion of, and financial contributions to, visits from the inmate's close family.
| 0 | Changed by law 29 June 2007 # 84 (ikr. 1 nov 2007 ifg. res. 12 oct 2007 # 1139), 20 jan 2012 # 6 (ikr. 30 oct 2015 ifg. res. 30 oct 2015 # 1233). |
Inmates should be able to phone calls if nothing else follows of this determination.
The Probation Service shall control the telephone call to and from inmates in department with particularly high level of security. Telephone call to and from inmates in prison with high level of security should be checked, but control can be exemptions if security reasons do not speak against it. Telephone call to and from inmates in prison with lower level of security and transition accommodation should be checked if it appears as necessary for security reasons.
Control of the phone call can happen by the call of the call wiretapped. The chat parties are due to be notified of the wiretapping. The parties can be placed to bring the conversation in a language they attributed to the master. Investigation of the conversational partner's identity can be done during the call.
Probation may refuse inmates to phone if there is reason to assume that the phone call will be abused for planning or review of criminal action, avoidance of the review or actions that will disrupt calm, order and security. If the phone call is of great importance to inmates, and control is sufficient to avert that the call be misused for purposes as mentioned in the first period of this clause, the call should be verified and not denied.
Phone calls can be recorded on tape if it is likely that inmates plan to evade the execution. The chat parties should be in advance notice that recordings will take place.
Telephone call to and from lawyer and public government representative, herding diplomatic or consular representative can be examined after Section 27 sixth clause prior to the call on the start of the call. The conversation cannot be wiretapped or taken up on tape.
| 0 | Modified by law 29 June 2007 # 84 (ikr. 1 nov 2007 ifg. res. 12 oct 2007 # 1139). |
If security reasons do not speak against it, criminal custody may give inmates leave of shorter time duration if very honest and weighty reasons speak for it, or when leave is deemed to be targeted by the further review of the penalty.
Inmates can first be given ordinary leave after a portion of the penalty has been implemented.
At the assessment of whether a leave is security-wise to it, out of the knowledge criminal custody has to inmates and inmate's behavior during the review, especially placed emphasis on whether it is reason to assume inmates will commit new Criminal action, avoidance of the review or break-down prerequisites and permision conditions determined after Section 36 first and other clauses.
The Probation Service can poruse inmates outside prison with the following of the added.
Part Article SECTION 35. PenaltyThe Probation Service may decide that the review of the penalty should be canceled if the field of health may indicate it, or when it for the incidentally, there is particularly heavy-weighing reasons that cannot be helped otherwise.
It is a prerequisite that inmates during leave and penalties do not commit new criminal act, remain at the specified address, comply with determining conditions after other clause and meetings back to imprisoned in unaffected state of the set time. Under leave, inmates also exempts to use drugs, sedation funds, hormone preparates or other chemical substances that are not legally prescribed.
The Probation Service shall determine the special conditions if it appears as necessary for a security-wise defensible review of the permission or the penal code. It can sometimes be determined that inmates should
| a) | seek out the authority or person, |
| b) | report to the police or criminal custody of the set time, |
| c) | take on the antabus or other prescribed drugs, |
| d) | make pure urine or discharge test before exit, |
| e) | obtained and brought back to the imprisoned by specific people, |
| f) | compliance with the provisions of whereabouts, |
| g) | neglected to have relations with specific people, or |
| h) | under the penal code of drug use, sedation funds, hormone preparates or other chemical substances that are not legally prescribed. The terms of the ban on the use of alcohol should only be neglected if it appears as security-wise unquestioned. |
If it is of significance for the insult in the criminal case or dennes afternate knowledge of the time of the permission or punishment, the criminal custody shall notify the insult or migrants in advance. The alert should also include information on terms set with home in Section 36 other clause letter f) and g), if these terms directly apply to the victim or dennes afterlatte.
The dome and the insult are to be offered restoratory process. If those by appointment come forward to agreement to comply with the provision of whereabouts, or neglected to have relations with specific persons, the criminal custody shall take into account the agreement on determining terms of leave or criminal charges. The Department of Probation does not need to take into account the agreement if it becomes unreasonable for the insult or conviction.
| 0 | Changed by law 29 June 2007 # 83 (ikr. 1 nov 2007 ifg. res. 12 oct 2007 # 1138), 14 June 2013 # 44, 20 June 2014 # 49 (ikr. 1 July 2014 ifg res. 20 June 2014 # 795). |
Probation Service may be able to stop an inmate entirely or partially be excluded from the community with other inmates if needed to
| a) | prevent inmates from continuing to influence the environment in imprisoned in a particularly negative way, |
| b) | prevent inmates from hurting themselves or practice violence or proputting threats to others, |
| c) | prevent significant material damage, |
| d) | prevent criminal acts, or |
| e) | maintain calm, order and security. |
For inmates under the age of 18, the provisions of the first clause shall be b to e equivalent, nonetheless so that exclusion can be determined only if it is strictly necessary and less invasive measures in vain have been attempted or evidently will be insufficient.
The Probation Service is to end partial exclusion if this is sufficient to prevent actions after the first clause of the letters a to e and other clause.
Hel or partial exclusion after the first, second or third clause shall not be maintained any longer than necessary, and the criminal custody shall continuously assess whether it is still grounds for the exclusion.
If whole exclusion from the community exceeds 14 days, the regional level should take the position of whether the inmate is still to be ruled out. If the exclusion overall exceeds 42 days, the grant is to be reported to the Probation Directorate. Message shall then be given to the Directorate with 14-day space. Excluding the first clause of the letters a to e can only extend beyond one year if inmates themselves wish it. Decision of the exclusion of person under the age of 18 shall be promptly reported to regional level. The Probation Service shall continuously assess whether it is the basis for maintaining the ceiling. If the exclusion exceeds 3 days, the case shall be passed regional level to new assessment. If the exclusion exceeds 5 days, it shall be sent to the Probation Directorate. [ Hel exclusion of inmates under the age of 18 can under any circumstances not exceed 7 days. ] 1
If partial exclusion from the community exceeds 30 days, the grant is to be reported to regional level. If partial exclusion from the community of an inmate under 18 years exceeds 7 days, the Probation Directorate shall take the position of whether the inmate is still to be ruled out. Message shall then be given to the Directorate of 7-day space.
Excluding is to be used with caution so that no one is inflicted on unnecessary damage or suffering. Inmates who are completely excluded from the community should be several times daily to be attributed to the added. Physician shall be notified of the exclusion without due stay. Inmates under 18 years should have continuous supervision.
The Probation Service may decide that all or individual inmates are completely excluded from the community if it is probable that an indefinite number of inmates committed or is about to commit acts as mentioned in the first clause, or if acute construction or staffing conditions make it necessary. Such exclusion can be maintained for up to 3 days. The Regionals level can extend the exclusion with up until 3 days if for honest reasons make it required. For inmates under the age of 18, the tenth clause applies.
The Probation Service may decide that an inmate should be excluded entirely or partly from the community if building or staffing conditions make it required, or if the inmate itself wishes it. For inmates under the age of 18, the tenth clause applies.
The Probation Service may decide that inmates under the age of 18 should be ruled out completely or partly if acute building or staffing conditions make it strictly necessary, or if inmates themselves wish it and it is deemed strictly necessary. Less invasive measures must in vain have been tried or be evidently insufficient. Decision of the exclusion of person under the age of 18 shall be promptly reported to regional level. Such exclusion can be maintained for up until 2 days. The Regionals level can extend the exclusion of until 2 days if for honest reasons make it required. In that case, it shall simultaneously be sent message to the Probation Directorate. Excluding is to be used with caution so that no one is inflicted on unnecessary damage or suffering. Inmates under 18 years should have continuous supervision. The Probation Service can provide further rules on the rule of exclusion of inmates under the age of 18, as well as on measures to relieve possible negative damage effects of such.
Section 17 other clauses should be used at exclusion from the community in departments as mentioned in Section 10 other clauses.
| 0 | Modified by laws 14 June 2013 # 44, 28 Feb 2014 # 3, 20 jan 2012 # 6 (ikr. 30 oct 2015 ifg. res. 30 oct 2015 # 1233, with the exception of fifth clause last statement) that changed by law 28 Feb 2014 No. 3, 22 apr 2016 # 3 (ikr. 22 apr 2016 ifg res. 22 apr 2016 # 407). Endres by law 20 jan 2012 # 6 (ikr. from the time the King decides, fifth clause last sentence). |
| 1 | This statement is not put ikr. |
Probation Service can apply safety cell, safety bed or other approved coercion to
| a) | avert serious attacks or damage to person, |
| b) | prevent the commit of serious threats or significant damage to property, |
| c) | prevent serious riots or unrest, |
| d) | prevent escape from prison, during transport or from destination, |
| e) | avert illegal trespassing in prison, or |
| f) | secure access to suspended or entrenched space. |
Probation shall only use compulsiveness if conditions make it strictly necessary, and less invasive measures in vain have been tried or obviously will be insufficient. Tivangfunds shall be used with caution so that no one is inflicted on unnecessary damage or suffering. Issues from doctor should barely be obtained and taken into consideration by the assessment of whether it should be determined use of safety cell or safety bed. The Probation Service shall continuously assess whether it is the basis for maintaining the ceiling.
For inmates under the age of 18, compulsiveness can only be used if it is forced, and less invasive measures in vain have been tried or evidently will be insufficient. Tivangfunds shall be used with caution so that no one is inflicted on unnecessary damage or suffering. Issues from doctor should barely be obtained and taken into consideration by the assessment of whether it should be determined use of safety cell or safety bed. Inmates under 18 years should have continuous supervision. The Probation Service shall continuously assess whether it is the basis for maintaining the ceiling.
The use of safety bed that exceeds 24 hours shall be reported to regional level that takes position on whether to be maintained. The question should be considered again after 24 hours. The intake is to be reported to the Probation Directorate when using security bed exceeds 3 days. For inmates under the age of 18, the use of security bed should be promptly reported to regional level, which take the position of whether to be maintained. The intake is to be reported to the Directorate when using security bed exceeds 24 hours.
The use of security cell that exceeds 3 24 hours shall be reported to regional level that takes position on whether to be maintained. The charge shall be reported to the Probation Directorate when the use of security cell exceeds 6 days. For inmates under the age of 18, the use of security cell that exceeds 24 hours is reported to regional level, which takes position on whether to be maintained. The intake shall be reported to the Directorate when using security cell exceeds 3 days.
| 0 | Modified by laws 28 Feb 2014 # 3, 20 jan 2012 # 6 (ikr. 30 oct 2015 ifg. res. 30 oct 2015 # 1233) who changed by law 28 Feb 2014 # 3. |
If it is likely that an inmate has committed action that could lead to reaction after Section 40 other clause of the letters c, d and e, the criminal custody hero or partially rule out the inmate from the community for up to 24 hours. Immediate exclusion from the community may not be applied to inmates under the age of 18.
| 0 | Modified by laws 21 des 2005 # 131 (ikr. 1 jan 2006 ifg. res. 21 des 2005 # 1580), 20 jan 2012 No. 1 6 (ikr. 30 oct 2015 ifg. res. 30 oct 2015 # 1233). |
The Probation Service may illagide reaction after this provision if inmates intentional or negligent have broken the rules of calm, order and discipline or conditions determined in or in the co-hold of this law. This includes violations committed during temporary absence from prison or during transport to and from prison. Reaction can also be determined to the one that has co-worked to break.
The following reactions can be used
| a) | written rebulation, |
| b) | loss of day money in a specific period of time, |
| c) | loss of beneficiary, |
| d) | exclusion from the leisure community or other activities in your spare time for a time period of up to 20 days for violations that are measured in the same reaction case, or |
| e) | loss of admission to leave for a period of time of up to four months. |
The dome that is conducting punishment outside of prison after Section 16 can, if not reentry to prison is determined after Section 14 fourth clause, given written rebuted. If convicted as a result of breakups or will be transferred to prison, reactions should only be determined if convicted of the court has eluded the completion of the penalty.
If inmates have committed multiple fractures, criminal custody should cease a joint reaction. Loss of a beneficiary can be determined as well as a reaction after other clause of the letters a, b, d and e. Alternatively, criminal custody may be able to stop loss of two benefications. Reaction should not be determined if inmates as a result of the breach are or will be transferred to more restrictive prison, unless inmates have eluded the completion of the breach.
The reaction can be made conditioned with a probation test for up to three months. If inmates in the trial time plead guilty to new break-up, the trial is canceled. In these case, the criminal custody of criminal custody is to end a new common reaction.
If health care or other honest reasons speak for it, a reaction can be canceled or completely or partially left-handed. If the completion of a suspended reaction has not been committed again within three months, the reaction has been issued.
The act of intentional or aggravated involuntary neglect to comply as mentioned in the penalty process Act Section 461 first clause, punishable by fines or imprisonment until 3 months. Prison penalty under 14 days can be idreamed The first period does not apply to the non-neglected attendance of the community punishment that is treated after the regulations of violation, jf. SECTION 58.
If it is of significance for the insult in the criminal case or dennes afternate knowledge that the sentencing of the court exempts the completion of prison sentence, detention, or criminal reactions, shall be criminal custody as soon as possible notify The insult or dennes post-latte about the avoidance.
| 0 | Modified by laws 21 des 2005 # 131 (ikr. 1 jan 2006 ifg. res. 21 des 2005 # 1580), 29 June 2007 # 83 (ikr. 1 nov 2007 ifg. res. 12 oct 2007 # 1138), 29 June 2007 # 84 (ikr. 1 nov 2007 ifg. res. 12 oct 2007 # 1139), 14 June 2013 # 44, 19 June 2015 # 65 (ikr. 1 oct 2015). Endres by law 20 jan 2012 # 6 (ikr. from the time the King decides). |
The Probation Service shall in good time prepare and contribute to the conditions being laid to the right of parole. This applies as far as possible also to inmates who are conducting shorter prison sentence. It shall in the necessary extent be made contact with public authorities, organizations or privacy persons who can provide assistance for orderly housing conditions, work, training or other measures that can contribute to a law-abiding life-form after release.
Protest custody can release convictions on probation when the person, co-calculated possible detention centre, has implemented two-thirds of the penalty and at least 60 days. If release on trial entails that the remaining penalty time will be less than 14 days, parole can only happen if heavy-headed reasons speak for it. The court sentenced abroad to prison for more than 21 years, and has been transferred to the transfer of punishment in Norway, could be released on parole after being jailed for at least 14 years.
Protest custody may be able to stop the convictions that are no longer imprisoned, but who fill the terms of release on trial after the first clause shall be released on trial without new inauguration.
If the half of the prison sentence and at least 60 days imprisonment are conducted, co-calculated detention centre, criminal custody can release convictions for trial if the sworl reasons indicate it.
If honest reasons speak for it, criminal custody may release sentencing shortly before the release of the release otherwise.
The Probation Service shall not be able to cease parole if the circumstances of a total assessment make release unadvisable. The Probation Service shall particularly lay emphasis on the conduct of the court's behavior during the execution of the penalty, and whether it is reason to assume that convictions will commit new penalties only in the trial.
If it is of significance for the insult in the criminal case or dennes afternate knowledge of the time of release, the criminal custody shall notify the insult or migrants in advance. Notice can also be given if the release changes residence during the course of the trial, and it is of significance for the insult or dennes afterlatte to gain knowledge of the change.
Notice after this paragrafen will also include information on terms set with home in Section 43 different clause letter d) and e), if these terms directly apply to the insult in the criminal case or dennes afterlatte.
The probation expires at the time the id-run prison sentence would be implemented in its entirety.
| 0 | Changed by law 29 June 2007 # 83 (ikr. 1 nov 2007 ifg. res. 12 oct 2007 # 1138), 14 June 2013 # 44. |
It is a prerequisite for parole that probation did not commit new criminal action in the trial time.
If it appears as necessary to conduct the parole in a security-wise way, the criminal custody shall set as conditions that the parole board of a time-imposed period shall meet for criminal custody in unaffected state. If it appears as necessary for a security-wise defensible, the criminal custody of the period of meeting shall determine that the probation officer should
| a) | compliance with the provision of residence, |
| b) | meeting in unaffected state of public authority, person or organization after criminal health screening, |
| c) | compliance with the provisions of treatment, |
| d) | comply with regulations on whereabouts, work or training, or |
| e) | neglected to have relations with specific people. |
If it appears as necessary for consideration of a security-wise justifiable review of the probation, determining terms in the period of meeting duty repeates, change or criminal custody may determine new terms as mentioned in other clause. On suspicion of violation of terms set with home in Section 43 can take action after Section 56 is committed.
The Probation Service can extend the period of meeting duty within the trial of the same terms as mentioned in the third clause.
The dome and the insult are to be offered restoratory process. If those by appointment come forward to agreement to comply with the provision of whereabouts, or neglected to have relations with specific persons, the criminal custody shall take into account the agreement on determining the terms of the parole board. The Department of Probation does not need to take into account the agreement if it becomes unreasonable for the insult or conviction.
| 0 | Modified by law 20 June 2014 # 49 (ikr. 1 July 2014 ifg res. 20 June 2014 # 795). |
If the probation of intentional or negligent conditions stipulations determined after Section 43 other clauses, the criminal custody may impose the probation officer to meet to call for the claim of the terms. During the call, the probation is supposed to be made familiar with the consequences of repeated arbitrary violations. If it appears as necessary to counter new breaches, criminal custody shall determine terms after Section 43 other clauses or new terms that the parole board should
| a) | neglected to use drugs, sedation funds, hormone preparates or other chemical substances that are not legally prescribed, or |
| b) | comply with the provisions of the meldduty of the police or criminal custody as well as the meeting duty after Section 43 other clauses. |
If the probation officer has been keeping hold-up call or set terms after the first clause, the regional level could bring the case in for the courthouse with the motion of reinstatement in prison for whole or partially consummated of the back penalty. The provisions of the resettlement of conviction on the death penalty after the Criminal Code Section 52 first clause letter a will be given the equivalent of the inquiry on cases of resettlement for the consummation of restitution after parole. Section 58 other clause different period applies to the equivalent.
If the probation fails to meet in-screen conversation after the first clause, the completion of the penalty can be canceled. The same goes for if the probation call has been implemented, again breaking terms. If regional level brings the case in for the courthouse after other clause, the review of the penalty from the time of the petition has been oversubmitted the court.
If the court on judgment decides that the parole board should be reinserted for whole consummation of the residual penalty, criminal custody may be rereleased on trial even though the minstages in Section 42 first joints are not met for the residual part.
Probation Service can request the police to cancel the parole board after sentencing process law Section 461 other clauses if necessary to commit reaction after the first clause.
| 0 | Modified by laws 30 aug 2002 # 67 (ikr. 1 jan 2003 ifg res. 30 aug 2002 # 938), 20 May 2005 # 28 (ikr. 1 jan 2006 ifg. res. 21 des 2005 # 1580), 17 des 2010 # 85 (ikr. 17 des 2010 ifg. res. 17 des 2010 # 1668), 14 June 2013 # 44, 19 June 2015 # 65 (ikr. 1 oct 2015). |
The term of the probation released a new criminal act in the trial of the trial, applies to the provisions of the resettlement of conviction on the death penalty following the Criminal Code Section 52 first clause letter b equivalent. It is nonetheless sufficient if charges are raised or the case will be desired within 6 months after the trial date went out.
If the probation has been charged with a punishing act that could lead to the reinstatement of the consummation of the penalty after the Criminal Code Section 52 first clause letter b, the completion of the penalty can be canceled.
| 0 | Modified by laws 20 May 2005 # 28 (ikr. 1 jan 2006 ifg. res. 21 des 2005 # 1580), 19 June 2015 # 65 (ikr. 1 oct 2015). |
The Probation Service may not impose inmates after this chapter other inductors in freedom than what is necessary to ensure the purpose of incarceration or to maintain calm, order and security in the imprisoned. The adverse effects of the incarceration shall be as wide as possible prevention.
Probation Service shall prioritize measures to relieve negative effects of isolation after sentencing process law Section 186 other clause and Section 186 a.
| 0 | Modified by law 28 June 2002 # 55 (ikr. 1 oct 2002 ifg. res. 28 June 2002 # 647). |
The Probation Service should place inmates in the vicinity of the home site when it is convenient. The same applies to the detention of inmates, with less regard to the investigation or the face of the face of the face of the face of the face.
The commodity population can be transferred to another prison or to police arrest after Section 14. Transfer to another prison can also happen when it is deemed mandated by investigations into consideration. The first clause other period applies to the equivalent of as far as it fits.
Vartsetsinmates cannot without their own consent be placed to share rooms with others, unless health care conditions or space considerations suggest it.
| 0 | Modified by law 29 June 2007 # 83 (ikr. 1 nov 2007 ifg. res. 12 oct 2007 # 1138). |
Inmates have as far as it is practical possible access to participate in work, training, program, or other measures. The Probation Service may not impose detention inmates to participate in such activities. They can still be placed to contribute to necessary sanitation and other domestic chores in prison.
Part Article SECTION 50. Adgoing to use your own moneyVartsetsinmates have the right to take advantage of their own money when it's unily with calm, order and security in the imprisoned. At participation in communities with other inmates, the right to use their own money can be restricted.
Part Article SECTION 51. Health ServiceVaretettsinmates have the opportunity to receive a visit from and let himself process by his own doctor or dentist if there is reasonable reason for it. The writing of medicines should happen in co-counsel with the prison health care service.
Part Article SECTION 52. Other provisionsMoreover, the provisions of this law apply as far as it is incompatible with decisions about restrictions or isolation after the sentencing process Act Section 186 and 186 a. Section 12, 15, 16, 20, 33, 35, 36 and 41 to 45 in the law here do not apply.
| 0 | Changed by laws 28 June 2002 # 55 (ikr. 1 oct 2002 ifg. res. 28 June 2002 # 647), 14 June 2013 # 44, 22 apr 2016 # 3 (ikr. 22 apr 2016 ifg res. 22 apr 2016 # 407). |
The idled hours of social life sentence after the Criminal Code Section 49 first clause a letter to go out on
| a) | Community service, |
| b) | program, or |
| c) | other measures that are suitable to counter new crime. |
The Probation Service is determining in each case the further content of the community punishment within those frames that the court has stipulates in the verdict. Has the Court set terms that the sentencing shall comply with the provisions of residence, whereabouts, work, training or treatment, the criminal custody shall determine the further content of the provisions. The Probation Service is going to put very emphasis on measures that could promote the ability of the domits ability to counter its criminal action pattern. The Probation Service shall also put emphasis on measures that may promote the ability of the domed ability to conduct the punishment in accordance with the provisions given in and in the co-hold of this Act.
The Probation Service shall change the content when it appears as necessary for consideration of a security-wise defensible review of the community punishment. The Probation Service can change the content if staffing conditions suggest it.
| 0 | Modified by law 19 June 2015 # 65 (ikr. 1 oct 2015). |
The conviction shall conduct the punishment after further screening from criminal custody. The domits shall
| a) | meeting of the set time and place, |
| b) | be uninfluenced by intoxicating or tranquilising funds by the promotion, |
| c) | provide information on its residence, the forestation basis and other conditions of significance for the completion of the penalty, |
| d) | comply with the terms that the court has determined after the Criminal Code Section 50, and |
| e) | remain in the country in the pre-run time unless the criminal custody of the Department of Justice is granted permission for something else. |
The conviction should not show a behavior that can
| a) | threaten the security of people participating during the execution, or |
| b) | affect the environment in a particularly negative way. |
The conviction shall not commit a new criminal act before the expiration of the pre-run times.
| 0 | Modified by laws 20 May 2005 # 28 (ikr. 1 jan 2006 ifg. res. 21 des 2005 # 1580), 19 June 2015 # 65 (ikr. 1 oct 2015). |
If it appears as necessary to counter a new criminal act aimed at someone's life, health or freedom, criminal custody may at any point during the pre-time ban ban the conviction of using intoxicating or sedation funds.
The Probation Service is to repor the ban when it no longer appears as necessary.
If the court has set terms after the Criminal Code Section 50 or criminal custody after Section 55 or Section 58 first joints have banned the conviction of using intoxicating or sedation, the criminal custody shall examine whether the arbitrary or prohibition is being honored. The survey could involve unreported visits to the home. When there is the threat of the threat, criminal custody may impose the convictions to provide urine sample, discharge test or blood test or to co-appear to any other examination that may happen without danger or particularly discomfort. Blood test can only be taken by health personnel.
Is there reason to assume that the conviction of the conviction affected by intoxicating or sedation, the criminal custody shall soon examine the relationship. The sentencing can be placed to make a urine sample, discharge test or blood test or to co-work to other investigations that can happen without danger or particularly discomfort. Blood test can only be taken by health personnel.
The roof that is part of examination after the first or second clause is not going to deductions in the id-run number of hours.
| 0 | Modified by laws 20 May 2005 # 28 (ikr. 1 jan 2006 ifg. res. 21 des 2005 # 1580), 19 June 2015 # 65 (ikr. 1 oct 2015). |
Probation Service may disrupt the review of the penalty if the sentencing health condition dictates it, or so for the otherwise, there are particularly heavy-weighing reasons that cannot be helped otherwise. When it appears as necessary for the cancellation to be security-wise, the criminal custody shall determine such terms for the cancellation as mentioned in Section 58 first clause.
If the convicted intentional or negligent violates regulations granted in or in co-hold of Section 54 first and second clause or Section 55, the criminal custody may impose the sentencing to call for the claim of the requirements. During the call, the sentencing shall be made known with the consequences of repeated violations. If it appears as necessary to counter new breaches, the criminal custody shall determine conditions that the sentencing shall
| a) | compliance with the provisions of whereabouts, |
| b) | neglected to have relations with specific people, |
| c) | neglected to use intoxicating or sedate funds, or |
| d) | comply with the provisions of the meldduty of the police or the criminal custody. |
If convicted after criminal custody talks or stipulation terms after the first clause, again breaks the requirements or terms determined after the first clause letter a to d, regional level should bring the case in for the court with petition that the subsidy prison sentence shall be fulfilled entirely or partly in the co-hold of the Criminal Code Section 52 first clause letter a. The same authority hits in such cases also decision on appeal to the team's right, consummation after sentencing process law Section 455 and delay of consummation beyond six months after sentencing process law Section 459.
If the sentencing fails to meet to screen-up call for the first clause, the criminal custody may disrupt the execution of the penalty. The same goes for if the sentencing, after the entry-screen call has been implemented, again violates the requirements. When regional level decides to bring the case in for the court, the review of the penalty from the time of the petition has been oversubmitted the court.
Probation Service can request the police to cancel the sentencing after sentencing process law Section 461 other clauses if needed to be committed to a reaction after the first clause.
| 0 | Modified by laws 30 aug 2002 # 67 (ikr. 1 jan 2003 ifg res. 30 aug 2002 # 938), 20 May 2005 # 28 (ikr. 1 jan 2006 ifg. res. 21 des 2005 # 1580), 13 apr 2007 # 14, 14 June 2013 # 44, 19 June 2015 # 65 (ikr. 1 oct 2015). |
The term the conviction of a new punishable act before the expiration of the pre-season, the prosecution could bring the case in for the court with the petition that the subsidized prison sentence shall be fulfilled completely or partly in the co-law of the Criminal Code Section 52 first clause letter b.
If the conviction has been charged with a criminal act that could lead to consummation of the subsidy prison sentence after the Criminal Code Section 52 first clause letter b, the completion of the penalty can be canceled. When the prosecution decides to bring the case in for the court, the review of the penalty from the time of the petition has been oversubmitted the court.
| 0 | Modified by laws 20 May 2005 # 28 (ikr. 1 jan 2006 ifg. res. 21 des 2005 # 1580), 19 June 2015 # 65 (ikr. 1 oct 2015). |
The law takes effect from the time the King decides. 1
From the same time, the prison law of the 12. December 1958. The regulations given in co-hold of the prison law and in the co-hold of the Criminal Code Section 28 b and Section 53 No. 6 shall still still apply, because as far as they are not in violation of this law, until they repunde or change by the King.
| 1 | From 1 March 2002 ifg. res. 22 Feb 2002 # 181, with the exception of Section 10 (1) letter c. |
