Key Benefits:
Law on consumer purchases (consumer purchase law). |
| Date | LAW-2002-06-21-34 |
| Ministry of | The Justis and the Department of Emergency |
| Last modified | LAW-2016-06-17-29 from 01.07.2016 |
| Published | In 2002 booklet 6 |
| Istrontrecation | 01.07.2002 |
| Changing | |
| Announcement | |
| Card title | Consumer purchase law forebrl. |
Jf. Promise 13 May 1988 # 27, 20 June 2014 # 27 (angrerett). Jf. EES deal Attachment XIX # 7e (dir 1999/44) about certain aspects of consumer purchases and associated guarantees.
The law applies to consumer purchases, if nothing else is set in law.
With consumer purchases, it means sales of things to a consumer when the seller or the seller's representative performs in the business of nutrition.
With consumer means a physical person who doesn't primarily act as a clause in nutrition.
Representative acting in nutritional business is solidarity responsible with the seller of dennes obligations unless the consumer is made explicitly aware that the representative is only acting as an intermediary and is not solidarity responsible with the the seller. The responsibility does not apply when the seller itself performs in nutrition.
The law applies prey to things as far as it fits.
The law applies to
| a) | order of things to be tiled (tiled crunch) |
| b) | delivery of water |
| c) | purchase of accounts receivable or rights |
| d) | deal with a web company about transmission of electrical energy. |
The law does not apply to
| a) | purchase of fixed property |
| b) | agreement on entry of building or other facilities on fixed property |
| c) | deal with a power provider about the delivery of electrical energy. Chapter 5 of the delay is still applicable at delayed startup of electric energy. |
| d) | deal that impose the party to deliver the thing, also carrying out a work or other service, if this constitutes the deliberating part of his or her obligations. |
| 0 | Modified by laws 30 June 2006 # 46 (ikr. 1 jan 2007 ifg res. 30 June 2006 # 873), 17 June 2016 # 29 (ikr. 1 July 2016 ifg. res. 17 June 2016 # 703). |
It cannot be agreements or be made current terms that are unstigma for the consumer than what follows by the law here.
It cannot be agreements that the court rules in a state outside of EPS should be applied to a purchase agreement that has close ties to the ELS state territory, if the consumer at this gets a worse protection than by law here.
If a party gives message in accordance with the law and sends it in a way that is justifiable by the conditions, and otherwise the sender may make the current that the message is issued in time, even if delay occurs or errors occur during the submission or the message does not reach the other party.
The thing is to be kept ready for retrieval at that place where the seller had its business place when the purchase was reached. If the purchase was reached without association with the seller's business place, the thing is to be delivered with the consumer.
If the seller has more than one business place, it is placed the business place for reason that has closest to the purchase, with respect to such conditions as the parties predicted at the time when the purchase was reached.
The parties can deal with another delivery place.
The Thing shall be delivered without unnecessary stay and the latest within 30 days after the purchase, if nothing else is agreed.
Is it agreed a time period for delivery, the seller has the right to choose the timing of the conditions does not show that the election is the consumer's.
Has the seller at fetch right to select the time of delivery, he or she in time give the consumer message if when the thing can be obtained.
| 0 | Modified by law 20 June 2014 # 27 (ikr. 20 June 2014 ifg res. 20 June 2014 # 776). |
Delivery happens when the thing is overtaken by the consumer.
Should the seller make sure that the thing is sent, duties he or she to make the agreements needed to get the thing transported to the destination in suitable manner and on normal terms for such transport.
Shouldn't the seller draw transport insurance for the thing, he or she reaches the consumer asks for it, give the information that the consumer needs to be able to draw insurance.
If the seller delivers the thing to a freight driver without it by marking, in transport document or otherwise clearly stated that it is going to the consumer, the seller must give the consumer such message that makes it clear what the consumer is to receive.
The seller does not have the duty to surrender the thing, hand-over document, or otherwise transfer the rability of the thing, without the purchase of the purchase at the same time. This still does not apply if the seller has given the consumer credit.
Should the seller send the thing to a different place, he or she may still not let be to send it, but the seller can prevent the consumer from getting the raw deal before the purchase of the purchase.
The seller carries the costs of the thing until it has been delivered. This paragrafen does not apply to costs that the delivery will be delayed as a result of the consumer's side.
When the thing is to be submitted to the consumer, it can be agreements that costs as follows by the submission shall be paid by the consumer as well as the purchase of the purchase.
Return as the thing gives before the agreed delivery time is the seller, when there was no reason to count on it would fall later. The pitching as the thing gives after the agreed delivery time falls to the consumer, when there was no reason to count on it would fall earlier.
The parties can deal with a different arrangement.
Buy by a stock includes the dividends that were not due before the purchase. The same is true for the right to draw new stocks when the court could not be enjoyed before the purchase.
Purchase of an interest-income settlement includes the interest rates incurred, but not due to the agreed delivery time. The fashion value of such interest shall be paid as the addition of the purchase of the purchase when not the migration has been sold as insecure.
The parties can deal with a different arrangement.
When the risk of the thing has been passed on the consumer, the consumer's duty does not fall to pay the malls away by that the thing then gets lost, be harmed or decreased as a result of an incident that does not depend on the seller.
The risk goes over to the consumer when the thing is delivered in accordance with Section 7. If the delivery time has come and the consumer fails to take over a thing that has been brought to his or her disposal, the consumer has yet the risk of loss or damage that is due to properties by the thing itself, such as decay.
Should the consumer pick up the thing in a different place than at the seller, the risk of when the delivery time is inside and the consumer is familiar with the fact that the thing is lined up to his or her disposal at the delivery site.
The risk does not pass on the consumer until it by marking, transport document or otherwise has been made clear that the thing is intended for the consumer.
At send Jew, the risk is over at the consumer when the consumer, or a third-person consumer has pointed out that is not the freight driver, physically has received the goods in his possession. The risk still goes over to the consumer when the goods are handed over to the freight driver, if it is the consumer who has given the freight driver the transport mission, and it was not the seller that offered this transport option. Other periods do not touch the consumer's rights to the freight driver.
Is a thing bought and delivered on probation or by the way with the right to back-delivery, the consumer has the risk of the thing until it again is taken over by the seller. This still does not apply when the consumer has the right to deliver the thing back after the antisettlement law or equivalent undo deadline after appointment of consumer purchases.
| 0 | Modified by law 20 June 2014 # 27 (ikr. 20 June 2014 ifg res. 20 June 2014 # 776). |
The deal should be in accordance with the requirements of species, quantity, quality, other properties and packaging that follow the agreement.
If it doesn't follow any other of the deal, the thing is going to
| a) | fit for the purposes of which the corresponding things are usually used for |
| b) | reply to what the consumer has reason to expect when purchasing such a thing when it comes to durability and other properties |
| c) | fit for a specific purpose that the seller was or had to be familiar with when the purchase was reached, if the seller has accepted this purpose or consumer otherwise has had reasonable grounds to build on the seller's sake knowledge and assessment |
| d) | have properties that the seller has shown to by putting forward a sample or model |
| e) | be packed in plain or other defensible manner needed to preserve and protect the thing |
| f) | be in accordance with the public ligretary requirements that are faced by the legislature or public ordinance of law on the time purchase is made, unless the consumer intends to anturn the thing in such a way that the claim is without meaning |
| g) | be free third person's right in the thing, such as property rights or litterone. Likewise, the thing should be free third-person claims to be right in the thing when this is disputed, except when the claim is clear undue. |
The thing has a shortage if
| a) | it is not in accordance with one or more of the requirements in Section 15 |
| b) | The seller at the purchase has neglected to illuminate conditions at the thing or its use as he or she should know, and as the consumer had reason to be reckoned with, if the avoidance may be believed to have seemed into the purchase |
| c) | it does not respond to information that the seller in its marketing or otherwise has given about the thing or its use, if the seller does not show that the information before the purchase is fixed in a clear way, or that they may not have inacted on the purchase |
| d) | necessary information on installation, assembly, use, and retention, and retention do not follow the thing. |
The first clause of the letter c applies to the equivalent of information any other than the seller has given on the bill's packaging, in the ad or other marketing on behalf of the seller or former sales manager.
The consumer cannot do current as a lack of something he or she knew or had to know about the purchase.
The consumer cannot do current as a lack of anything that has its cause in materials provided by the consumer. This still does not apply if the seller because of the material's unegalness should have discouraged the use of them.
Although the thing is sold "as it is" or with similar ordinary reservations, there is a shortage
| a) | when the thing is in worse condition than the consumer with fairness had reason to expect from the background of the reform, the purchase of the market size and conditions otherwise, or |
| b) | when there are conditions as mentioned in Section 16 first clause letter b or c. |
Selges used things at auction where the consumer has the opportunity to be present, applies to the rules in the first clause accordingly as far as they fit.
At the judgment of whether the thing has a shortage, it should the time when the risk goes over at the consumer, adding to reason, even though the lack of the lack first shows itself later.
If nothing else is proven, a lack of evidence should show within six months after the risk of risk, the foremodes to have existed at risk transition. This still does not apply if the assumption is incompatible with the commodity or the species of the species.
The seller also responds to a shortage that occurs later, if it is due to contract violations from his or her side.
| 0 | Modified by law 15 June 2007 # 36 (ikr. 1 jan 2008 ifg res. 15 June 2007 # 630). |
The seller can undertake to respond to errors by the thing that is not a lack of the rules of the law, and may then determine the requirements the consumer can make current as a result of the failure. The seller can also undertake to respond in greater extent to a shortage than by the rules of the law.
Has the seller by a guarantee as mentioned in the first period of first period committed to within a certain amount of time to respond completely or partly for the one's applicability or other properties without specifying in a clear way what errors by the thing the seller responds to and what requirements the consumer can make current as a result of the failure, there is a shortage if the thing does not respond to the seller's commitment. This still does not apply if the seller is probabilising that the failure is caused by accident incident, the wrong handling of the thing or other conditions on the consumer's side.
Has anyone but the seller given a guarantee as mentioned in the other clause, and it appears to the consumer as if given by the seller, has been a shortage of the rules of other clause. This still does not apply if the seller before the purchase informs the consumer that he or she is not bound by any warranty given by others.
A guarantee is legally binding for the warranty on the terms determined in the warranty declaration and in associated advertising, and it does not limit the consumer's rights by law here, jf. Section 3 first clause.
| 0 | Added by law 15 June 2007 # 36 (ikr. 1 jan 2008 ifg res. 15 June 2007 # 630). |
If the thing is not delivered or is delivered too late and this is not due to the consumer or relationship on the consumer's side (delay), the consumer can
| a) | keep the purchase of the mall back after Section 20 |
| b) | demand compliance after Section 21 |
| c) | demand for the rise after Section 23 |
| d) | demand replacement after Section 24 |
The Consumer's right to damages does not fall away by that he or she makes current other claims, or by that these cannot be made current.
If the seller is not in time fulfilling his duties otherwise after the purchase, the provisions apply for delay equivalent as far as they fit, still not Section 23 third and fourth joints. The parties can deal with another solution.
The consumer can hold the payment to cover claims as a result of the seller's delay, but not obviously more than what will provide reassuring security for the requirement.
Is the delivery time come without the thing being delivered, the consumer can still be determined to make the purchase and demand compliance.
This does not apply if there is an obstruction that the seller cannot overcome, or if a fulfillment will result in such a great disadvantage or cost to the seller that it stands in significantly misrelation to the consumer's interest in that the seller meets. Falling the difficulties away within reasonable time, the consumer may require compliance.
The consumer loses his right to demand compliance if he or she waits unreasonable long with promoting the claim.
If the seller asks whether the consumer will receive the delivery despite the delay or underrights the consumer that the thing will be delivered within a specified time, but the consumer does not respond within reasonable time after he or she has received the message, the The consumer does not raise if compliance occurs within the time specified.
Has the seller not delivered the thing in time in accordance with Section 6, the consumer should encourage the seller to deliver within a reasonable additional deadline for compliance. If the seller does not deliver within this additional deadline, the consumer can raise the agreement.
The first clause does not apply if the seller has refused to deliver the goods, if delivery within agreed time is crucial for the agreement of the agreement, or if the consumer prior to the introduction of the agreement has informed the seller that the delivery within or on a specific Time is crucial. Has the seller in such cases not delivered in time in accordance with Section 6, the consumer can immediately raise the agreement.
Is the thing delivered, the requirement of raising must be made current within reasonable time after the consumer learned of the delivery.
| 0 | Modified by law 20 June 2014 # 27 (ikr. 20 June 2014 ifg res. 20 June 2014 # 776). |
The consumer may demand damages for loss he or she suffers as a result of delay from the seller's side.
This still does not apply to such a long-term seller's allowance that the delay is due to obstruction beyond his or her control, which the seller not with the equitable might be expected to have taken into consideration at the appointment time or to avoid or overcome the consequences of.
The Beror delay of a third person to whom the seller has given in missions entirely or partly to fulfill the purchase, the seller is free of charge only if also the third person would be exempt after the rule in other clause. The same is true for whether the delay depends on a vendor that the seller has used, or on any other in previous sales sleet.
The freedom of responsibility applies as long as the obstacle is present. The falling obstacle away, the responsibility can be made current if the seller at the time of duties to fulfill, but does not do this.
The replacement is measured by the rules of Chapter 11.
The Hindres seller in fulfilling the purchase at the right time should the consumer be given message of the obstacle and its impact on the possibility of fulfilling. Does the consumer not receive such a message within reasonable time after the seller received or should have received knowledge of the obstacle, the consumer may require replacing losses that could have been avoided if he or she had received the message in time.
If there is a shortage and this is not due to the consumer or relationship on the consumer's side, the consumer can
| a) | hold the purchase of the purchase after Section 28 |
| b) | selecting between correction and redelivery in accordance with Section 29 and 30 |
| c) | demand price-off after Section 31 |
| d) | demand increase after Section 32 |
| e) | demand replacement after Section 33 |
The Consumer's right to damages does not fall away by that he or she makes current other claims, or by that these cannot be made current.
For other errors by the seller's compliance, the provisions of the regulations regarding lack as far as they fit. The parties can deal with another solution. The freedom of freedom nonetheless does not apply to installation obligations that are part of the sale agreement.
If there is a shortage of the thing, the consumer must within reasonable time after he or she discovered or should have discovered it, give the seller message that he or she will invoke the lack (advertising). This deadline for advertising can never be shorter than two months from the time when the consumer discovered the lack.
Reclamation must be later two years after the consumer took over the thing. If the thing or parts of it by regular use are meant to last significantly longer, the deadline is to advertise five years. This does not apply to as far the seller by the warranty or other agreement has claimed responsibility for missing for longer term. The Tempers after the first and second period also do not apply if there is a shortage after Section 15 other clause g.
Reclamation can instead be conveyed to the one that after agreement with the seller has claimed to relieve lack of relief.
If the consumer does not advertise in time, the right-tares the right to make the lack of current. This does not apply if the seller has been performing rough negligent or otherwise in violation of realty and good faith. The court to make the lack of current can also be tapires after the statute of limitations on the statute of limitations.
| 0 | Modified by law 15 June 2007 # 36. |
The consumer can hold the payment to cover claims as a result of the lack, but obviously not more than what will provide reassuring security for the requirement.
The consumer can choose between requiring the seller to ensure correction of the lack of the lack or delivers the equivalent of things (redelivery). This does not apply if review of the claim is impossible or volt of the seller unreasonable costs.
At the decision of whether the costs are unreasonable after the first clause, it should particularly be placed emphasis on the value of a flawed thing, the diversity of diversity and whether other belaments can be carried out without significantly disadvantage for the consumer.
Although the consumer does not require correction or resettlement by the law, the seller can offer correction or redelivery if this occurs without a stay. If the seller provides such correction or redelivery in accordance with the law, the consumer may not require price rejection or raising.
Abuse shall occur without charge and without significantly disadvantage for the consumer within reasonable time and without risk that the consumer is not allowed to cover their outlay of the seller.
The seller does not have the right to conduct more than two relief efforts for the same shortage, unless there are very clear reasons that allow further relief to be reasonable.
If the seller's relief will result in the consumer spending for more than a week will be cut off from using the thing, the consumer may demand to be asked a replacement object at the disposal of the seller's bill. This is still applicable only if the requirement is presented as reasonably seen in relation to the consumer's needs and the cost or disadvantage as the seller is incurred.
If there is no shortage, the seller may only require payment for investigations that have been necessary to determine whether there has been a shortage, and payment for repair of the thing, if the seller has made the consumer explicitly aware that he or she herself must cover such costs.
Part Article SECTION 31 PricingIf the lack of the lack of correction or the thing is redelivered in accordance with Section 29 to 30, the consumer may require an appropriate price-off so that the relationship between reduced and agreed price responds to the relationship between the dispute's value in lacking and contractual stand on delivery time.
If honest reasons speak for it, the price layer of the site can be equal to the diversity of the consumer.
The consumer cannot claim price-off by sale of used items at auction where he or she has the opportunity to be present.
Instead of price rejections after Section 31, the consumer can raise the agreement, except when the lack of importance is immaterial.
The consumer may demand damages for loss he or she suffers as a result of the thing has a lack.
Applies to the agreement with the online company about transmission of electrical energy (jf. Section 2 first clause letter d), the consumer may demand damages for losses as a result of the lack. This still does not apply as far the net company's allowance makes the lack of obstruction as mentioned in Section 24 other clauses. The rules otherwise in Section 24 apply accordingly.
The replacement is measured by the rules of Chapter 11.
| 0 | Modified by law 30 June 2006 # 46 (ikr. 1 jan 2007 ifg res. 30 June 2006 # 873). |
The seller's replacement liability for losses as a result of a shortage includes, besides damage to the sales itself, also damage to items that sales are used for representation of, or that have close and direct context of sales of sales.
For other product damage than those mentioned in the first clause, the consumer may demand damages unless the seller allowance that the loss is not due to failure or neglect on the seller's side.
When the seller pays damages for damage to other than the sales pitch themselves, the seller enters the consumer's any claims against the manufacturer after law 23. December 1988 # 104 about product response.
The consumer can make its diverse claim against the seller current against a former yrkesserigsleet for barely corresponding claims due to the lack of the lack of the seller or another who acquired the thing from the earlier clause.
Agreement in previous sales sleet as the cutting of the seller's or any other erverse requirement cannot be made current to the consumer's claims after the first clause of greater extent than what could be agreed between the consumer and the seller.
The advertising rules in Section 27 apply accordingly to the requirements following this paragrafen.
The consumer can on the same terms as in the first to third clause make their claim as a result of a lack of current against an occupational practitioner who by appointment with the seller or earlier clause has done work on the thing.
The consumer can also claim the current by the rules of law 13. May 1988 # Twenty-seven on purchase Section 84 first clause, if this gives the consumer greater rights than the following of the paragrafen here.
Previous sales of sales may not be able to counter the consumer with claims against the seller.
When an added or another person in previous sales of sales has given enlightenment as mentioned in Section 16 other clauses, he or she is of solidarity responsible with the seller for the loss the consumer suffers due to the information.
Are purchases made without the price following the agreement or by the information the seller has provided in ads, outset offer e.l., the consumer will pay the gang's price on the appointment of the same kind of thing sold under equivalent conditions, for barely the price is unreasonable. Is there no such gang's price, the consumer must pay what is reasonable under consideration of the species and goodness and conditions otherwise.
Should the purchase order be determined by numbers, targets or weight, adding to the amount at the time the risk of the thing goes over at the consumer. Is the price determined by weight, the price is drawn first by the packaging from.
The seller cannot in addition to the purchase of the purchase fee for the issuance and submission of the bill if not this clear follows of the agreement.
Doesn't pay the payment time of the deal, the consumer should pay when the seller demands it.
Unless otherwise agreed, the consumer does not have the obligation to pay the purchase of the purchase without the thing being handed over or brought to his or her disposal in accordance with the agreement and the law.
The consumer is not bound by a pre-agreement on duty to pay at a certain time regardless of whether the seller meets the right time.
Prior to the consumer paying, he or she has the right to examine the thing in normal manner, when this is not incompatible with the agreed procedure for delivery and payment of the purchase of the purchase.
The purchase of the purchase shall be paid on the seller's business place. If the seller has more than one business place, it is placed the business place for reason that has closest to the purchase, with respect to such conditions as the parties predicted at the time when the purchase was reached. If the seller does not have business place with association with the purchase, the seller's residence is placed to reason. If payment is to happen against the handover of the thing or a document, it shall be made at that point in which the handover occurs.
The seller responds for increased costs in connection with the payment caused by the business site's move after the purchase was reached.
The consumer shall
| a) | te such complicity as it is reasonable to expect from him or her for the seller to be able to fulfill the purchase, and |
| b) | take over the thing by retrieving or receiving it. |
Unordering the consumer the thing before delivery, the seller may not be able to maintain the purchase and demand payment. If nothing else follows the deal, the seller may instead claim damages for losses that are a result of the cancellation.
The parties can deal with a normal replacement by cancellation (cancellation fee). The normal replacement cannot be set higher than the replacement after Chapter 11 normal can be expected to make.
If it is not agreed to the cancellation fee, the replacement is measured by the rules in Chapter 11.
After the thing is delivered, the consumer is not exempt to pay the purchase of the purchase even if the thing is delivered back to the seller.
Payment duty abduction nonetheless
| a) | by the rise |
| b) | if the terms of the angris after the antigradental law are met, or |
| c) | if a right to back-delivery follows of the agreement, for example, by the fact that the thing is bought on trial (home loans, deposits). |
The consumer can switch the thing if the bouter one must be deemed agreed or follows by ordinary court rules.
If the consumer does not pay or meet their other duties by the agreement or the law, and this is not due to the seller or relationship on the seller's side, the seller can
| a) | demand compliance after Section 44 |
| b) | demand increase after Section 45 |
| c) | demand compensation and interest after Section 46 |
| d) | keep the performance back after Section 9. |
The seller's right to damages and interest does not fall away by that he or she makes current other claims, or by that these cannot be made current.
The seller can be able to maintain the purchase and demand that the consumer pay the purchase of the purchase. This still does not apply as long as the payment is prevented by the failure of the sametime capsule or the payment service or other conditions outside the consumer's control and that the consumer cannot overcome.
Is the thing yet to be delivered, the seller loses his right to demand compliance if he waits unreasonable long with promoting the claim.
Section 21 applies to the equivalent of the seller's right to demand the compliance of the consumer's duty to co-interact with the purchase (jf. SECTION 40).
The seller can raise the purchase due to delayed payment or other contract violations from the consumer's side if the consumer's contract violation is significantly. The seller cannot raise after the entire purchase of the entire purchase.
The purchase can also be lifted if the consumer does not pay the purchase of the purchase within a reasonable additional deadline for the fulfillment of the seller. While additional deadline runs, the seller may not raise, unless the consumer has said that he or she will not fulfill within the deadline.
Is the thing already taken over by the consumer, the seller can only raise if it has been taken reservations about it or the consumer rejects the thing.
The fee does not purchase the purchase of the fee in time, the seller may claim interest in the purchase of the purchase of the purchase after law 17. December 1976 # 100 on interest at delayed payment m.
The seller can also claim compensation for the loss he or she suffers as a result of the contract violation from the consumer's side. This still does not apply as far the consumer allowance that the contractual breach is caused by the failure of the safral or the tender or other obstruction beyond the consumer's control as he or she does not immediately be expected to have taken in consideration of the appointment time or to avoid or overcome the consequences of the rules otherwise in Section 24 third and fourth joints apply accordingly. The replacement is measured by the rules of Chapter 11.
The Hindres consumer in fulfilling the purchase at the right time should the seller be given message of the obstacle and its impact on the possibility of fulfilling. Does the seller not receive such a message within reasonable time after the consumer received or should have received knowledge of the obstacle, the seller may require replacing losses that could have been avoided if he or she had received the message in time.
Should the consumer decide the shape, target or other properties and this is not made to the agreed time or within reasonable time after the seller has encouraged it, the seller can even do so in accordance with what he or she must assume is the consumer's interest. This doesn't prevent the seller from making current other demands as he or she has.
The seller must enlighten the consumer whether the specifications he or she will use and give the consumer a reasonable deadline to change the specifications. Doesn't the consumer do this in time after getting the seller's message, the seller's specifications become binding.
The net company may cancel (close) the transfer of electrical energy if it has been significantly contracting from the consumer's side in an agreement as mentioned in Section 2 first clause letter d. Stengming may still not happen if
| a) | there is danger of life, health or significant thing damage, or |
| b) | The consumer has objections to the foundation of the shutdown, which is not clearly groundless. |
Before closure can happen, the online company should send the consumer a written notice of closure. The alert shall indicate
| a) | that closure will not happen if the consumer pays within four weeks the rain from the date the notice was submitted, |
| b) | that the consumer should take quick contact with the online company if closure can be compromised for life, health, or significant injury, or if the consumer has objections to the foundation of the shutdown, |
| c) | that the consumer can be imposed on covering necessary costs in connection with an quiesce and any re-opening of the consumer's facilities, |
| d) | that the consumer can contact the social service in the municipality of the consumer has fixed residence, to clarify whether social services in the labor and welfare management are giving the right to economic statnad to relieve the situation. |
If the social service within the deadline of other clause, the second period letter a has been in writing that it takes on the responsibility of fulfilling the consumer's commitment, the unclosure may not happen.
The website may require the consumer to cover necessary costs in connection with an quiesce and any re-opening of the consumer's facilities. Necessary costs associated with the outwork and submission of notice by other clauses can be required covered even if unquiesce cannot take place. The net company may not require covering its costs after the first and second period if it has performed in violation of the provisions of the first to third clause.
The provisions of Section 45 on the contractual violation of the consumer's side do not apply. The provisions of Section 55 if expected contract violations do not apply to the expected contract violation from the consumer's side.
| 0 | Added by law 30 June 2006 # 46 (ikr. 1 jan 2007 ifg res. 30 June 2006 # 873), modified by law 24 June 2011 # 30 (ikr. 1 jan 2012 ifg. res. 16 des 2011 # 1252). |
When the purchase is lifted, the party's duty falls to fulfill the purchase.
Is the purchase entirely or partially met from some of the pages, the received may be received. A party can still hold back what has been received, until the second gives back what he or she has received. Similarly, when the party has the requirements of damages or interest, and reassuring security is not being asked.
Should the seller be redelivering, the consumer can hold back what he or she has received, until redelivery happens.
The claim has no significance for the appointment terms of business secrets, about the resolution of disputes or about the rights of couples and duties as a result of the retaliation.
Heves the purchase, the consumer will be able to write the seller's return as he or she has had of the thing, and give reasonable satisfaction for significantly benefit he or she otherwise has had of it.
If the seller is due to pay the purchase of the mall back, the duties seller to pay interest after law 17. December 1976 # 100 about interest rates at delayed payment m.even from the day the consumer advertising the lack. If the consumer is required to be required for the usefulness of the item after the first clause, the seller still has to pay such interest from the day the seller received the payment.
The consumer can raise the purchase or demand redelivery only if the thing is delivered back in significantly the same condition and amount of which he or she received it. The consumer still does not lose the right to raise or demand redelivery if
| a) | the reason for which it is impossible to retrofit the thing in significantly the same condition and quantity, is the one's own taxable or other relationship that does not depend on the consumer |
| b) | the thing completely or partly has gone to shallow or forecast as a result of an act needed to investigate whether the thing has a shortage, or |
| c) | the thing completely or partly has been consumed or changed by the consumer under assuming use before he or she discovered or should have discovered the lack of cause for the rejection. |
The consumer also does not lose the right to raise the purchase or demand redelivery if he or she at the return of the return of the value-reduction device has had.
Replacement for contractual violations from the one-party side shall respond to the financial loss, herdments, price difference and lost profit, as the other party has been inflicted on the contract breach. This still applies only to loss as one with the equitable could have predicted as a possible following of the breach of the contract.
The replacement does not include
| a) | loss as a result of personal injury |
| b) | loss in the consumer's nutritional business. |
If the purchase is lifted and the consumer is conducting coverage, or the seller makes coverage sales in the defensible manner and within reasonable time after the retaliation, the purchase price and the price after the coverage transaction to reason when the price difference should be counted.
Is the purchase raised without the completion of coverage in accordance with the first clause, and it is the gang's price for the thing, the purchase price and the gang-see price of retaliation for reason when the price difference should be counted out.
As the gang's price is considered the price of the delivery site for things of the same kind or, if it doesn't apply to any gang's price there, in another place that with equitable equality can be made with this, nonetheless so that consideration is taken to the difference in transport costs.
A party that invoke contract violations from the second party's side shall at reasonable measures limit their loss. Forsshame this, he or she has to even carry the corresponding part of the loss.
The replacement can be set down if it will seem unreasonable for the responsible party out of the casualty's size relative to the loss that usually occurs in similar cases, and conditions otherwise.
For expected contract violations apply to the rules of law 13. May 1988 # 27 on purchase Section 61 and 62.
Coming one of the parties during insolvention, applies to the provisions of the coverage law chapter 7.
Includes the seller's contract violation only one part of it sold, applies to the rules of missing and delay in chapter 5 and 6 in the law for this part. The consumer can raise the purchase in its entirety when the contract break is significantly for the entire purchase.
May the seller after the conditions are believed to have ended its delivery even not everything has been delivered, the rules regarding missing.
Should the seller deliver after each, and there is contract violations by a single subdelivery, the consumer may raise for this provision by the rules about the rise of the rules.
Gives the contract break consumer good reason to count on that it will encore contract violations that will give retaliation right at later deliveries, he or she on this basis may raise for such deliveries if it happens within reasonable time.
If the consumer raises for a single delivery, he or she can simultaneously raise the purchase for earlier or later deliveries that due to the context between the deliveries will not be able to be used for purposes that the parties predicted on the appointment of the term.
Should the seller deliver after each and the consumer pay or co-interact in corresponding records, and there is contract violations from the consumer's side by a single delivery, the seller can raise for this provision by the rules of Section 45.
Giving the contract break the seller's good reason to count on it will encore contract violations that will give retaliation right at later deliveries, he or she on this basis may raise for such deliveries if it happens within reasonable time.
If the consumer does not retrieve or accept the thing in the right time or relationship otherwise on the consumer's side has co-led that it is not surrendered to him or her, the seller of the consumer's bill should leave such care for the thing that is reasonable after conditions, if the seller has the thing in its custody or by the way, can take care of it.
Will the consumer reject a thing that he or she has taken over, the consumer for the seller's bill should leave such care for the one that is reasonable after the conditions. Will the consumer reject a thing that has been sent to him or her and lined up to his or her disposal at the destination, should the consumer take care of it for the seller's bill, if the consumer can do this without paying the purchase of the purchase. at unreasonable cost or disadvantage. This still does not apply if the seller or someone on the seller's behalf can take care of the thing at the destination.
A party that duties to drag care for the thing can let a third-person prelast it by the rules of law 13. May 1988 # 27 on purchase Section 74. Section 75, 76, 77 and 78 in the same law about a couple's right to damages and recautions, about sale of or other outline over the thing and whether accounting and acceptance of dividend applies accordingly.
For agreements on the purchase of things between parties that have business or residence in various states outside of the EPS, the law applies to personal use for the buyer, the buyer's family or household, unless the seller before or on the appointment time neither knew or should have known that the thing was bought for any such purpose.
Part Article Section 61 a. (Raised by law 17 June 2016 # 29 (ikr. 1 July 2016 ifg. res. 17 June 2016 # 703).)The law applies from 1. July 2002.
The law applies only to agreements that end up after it is in effect.
Part Article SECTION 63. Changes in other lawsFrom the time the law takes effect, the following changes are made in other laws :---
Part Article
