Key Benefits:
Rules laying down rules for the management and use of water systems (Water rules)
The Secretary of State for Transport and the Minister for Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment,
Having regard to Article 7.5, first and fourth paragraph, of the Water Law and the Article 2.3, second paragraph , 3.1, first and second members , 3.3 , 3.4, third and seventh member , 4.13 , 4.18 , 6.2 , 6.7, 1st Member , 6.11, first and third members , 6.12, second paragraph, part f, and third member , 6.13, second paragraph , 6.15, second and third members , 6.16, second paragraph , 6.17 , 6.19 , 6.21, 1st Member , 6.22, third member , and 6.23, first paragraph, of the Water Decision ;
Decisions:
For the purposes of this arrangement:
Decision: Water Decision ;
Minister: Minister for Infrastructure and the Environment;
SPF: Seasonal Performance Factor, which displays the yield of a forest dementia system expressed as the system delivered heat and cold per year in MWh, divided by the measured or calculated energy consumption of the system. System per year in MWh.
As categories of companies or business activities as referred to in Article 2.3 of the Decision shall be designated the holdings and business activities listed in Annex I This scheme.
For the purposes of this paragraph:
water quality management: carrying out and enforcing compliance with or pursuant to the Act with respect to discharge as intended Article 6.1 or 7.1 of the Act the contamination or degradation of the soil or bank of a surface water body;
Water quantity management: execute and enforce at or under the Law rules laid down in respect of the peilation or water for the extraction or removal of water from surface water bodies;
Water-management management: Management of surface water bodies, other than water quality management or water quantity management.
1 The water quality management of the Article 3.1 of the Decision The surface water bodies and their waters referred to therein lies with the State in so far as they are situated within the limits specified on the map in Annex II This scheme.
2 The water quantity management of the in Article 3.1 of the Decision The surface water bodies and their waters referred to therein lies with the State in so far as they are situated within the limits specified on the map in Annex III This scheme.
3 The water state management of the in Article 3.1 of the Decision The surface water bodies and their waters referred to therein lies with the State in so far as they are situated within the limits specified on the map in Annex IV This scheme.
The water state management of water waters depends, as far as they are located within the limits as indicated on the map in Annex IV in this arrangement, in the case of the non-sovereign state body mentioned in the legend of the card.
1 If drier uderegions as intended Article 3.3 (b) of the Decision designated areas, which as such are bounded on the map in Annex II This scheme.
2 To the drier uc areas referred to in paragraph 1, do not belong to:
a. the inside the in Annex II surface water bodies covered by this Arrangement, which shall include drier areas;
b. The works of art that are part of those surface water bodies.
1 By way of derogation from Article 3.2 the boundary of the surface water body North Sea on the sea side is formed by the boundaries of the Dutch Exclusive Economic Zone and the boundaries of Dutch territorial waters.
2 By way of derogation from Article 3.2 the boundary of the surface water bodies North Sea and the Wadden Sea on the land side shall be formed by the dune base, provided that they do not pass into other surface water bodies in management with the Kingdom. If no duinfoot is present, the boundaries of these surface water bodies are formed by the outer ruinline of the primary watershed. The area between the dune foot and the boundaries as indicated on the cards in the Annex II , III and IV This scheme is managed by the State.
3 By way of derogation from the first and second paragraphs, the boundaries of the North Sea and Wadden Sea surface water bodies are formed by the on-the-deck water bodies in the North Sea. Annex II , III , and IV the limits laid down in this Arrangement.
4 The management of the North Sea, Wadden Sea, Eems and Dollard in the areas designated on the maps in the United States. Annex II , III and IV The State of the Netherlands, provided that the State of the Netherlands has powers under the Ems-Dollard Treaty, is based on the scheme.
1 The following parts of and the inlying works of art within the surface water body Wadden Sea on Terschelling are not in control with the Empire:
a. the former West Terschelling State port, including the wall along the Willem Barentszkade, the Dellewal and Green Strand glooiingen, the Westhavendam, Head of P, the Oosthavendam, the caden, the losquay Dellewal, the storage area, the wooden scaffolding and of the Plate, with the exception of the laying establishment for the ferry service of Terschelling to Harlingen and the above mentioned dams;
b. Within the municipality of Terschelling, seven transit routes with associated works and facilities and the parking lot at the transit point 18 (Oosterend).
2 The dam walls and laying devices of the spring dam on Schiermonnikoog and the areas of the road, which are in lease with the ferry company, with the exception of the road body on the spring dam, and the hares and taluds thereof, are part of the surface water body Wadden Sea and are in management with the Empire.
3 The following parts of and the inlying works of art within the surface water body Wadden Sea at Harlingen are not in control with the Empire:
a. the former rijkshavenworks te Harlingen, consisting of the Voorhaven, the Willemshaven and the Nieuwe Willemshaven;
(b) works of art belonging to those ports, namely port dams, roads, caden, watershed, scaffolding and compass and all other works belonging to the port, with the exception of the cantonneal stay near the fishing exit, the laying-off facility for the ferry services of Harlingen to Terschelling and Vlieland, the pier on the Zuiderhavendam and the floating jetty in the vairport with the corresponding stabbings.
4 The following parts of and the inlying works of art within the surface water body of the Wadden Sea, Ameland are not in control with the Empire:
a. the ferry dam at Nes Ameland, with the exception of the laying-up for the ferry service of Nes Ameland to Holbecame including the reserve berth on the east side of the ferry dam;
b. the loosening in the Ballumerbend;
c. the cycle path through the dunes running from the south side of the Hollumerbos to the Oerderduinen;
d. Within the municipality of Ameland, 36 transport routes, together with related works and facilities.
By way of derogation from Article 3.2 , is the delimitation of the management area of the Kingdom for water quality management, water quantity management and water-management in the surface water body Border loophole equal to the land border between the Netherlands and Belgium.
By way of derogation from Article 3.2 The second paragraph is the water quantity management, provided that it is not the subject of the Kingdom of the Kingdom of the Kingdom of the Kingdom of the European Union.
1 The data referred to in Article 3.4, second paragraph, part a, of the decision , shall be provided no later than 22 June 2014, on 22 June 2015 and thereafter every 6 years after those times.
2 The results referred to in Article 3.4, second paragraph, subparagraph (b) of the Decision , shall be provided no later than 22 June 2013 and thereafter every 6 years.
3 The data referred to in Article 3.4, second paragraph, (c) of the Decision , shall be provided no later than 22 June 2012 and thereafter every 6 years.
4 The website, intended in Article 3.4, third paragraph, of the Decision , is the KRW portal http://krw.ncqi.nl.
5 For the provision of the data and results, Article 3.4, second paragraph, of the Decision , use is made of the Annex V forms included in this Arrangement.
A regional water plan includes an overview of the condition class per dust and quality element of each body of water covered by the plan, determined over the previous plan period according to the monitoring program, intended Article 13, first paragraph, of the Decision on Quality Requirements and Monitoring Water 2009 .
As organisations and consultation structures as defined in the Article 4.4, second paragraph , and 4.15, second paragraph, of the Decision shall be designated:
a. the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, referred to in the Agreement on the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (Trb), established in Copenhagen on 12 September 1964. 1968, 43),
b. The Water and North Sea Overlaying, intended in Article 1 (a) of the Decision on consultations on traffic and water resources 2004 ,
c. Product for Fish and Fish Products (product Vis), intended in Article 1, 1st paragraph, of the Incomposition Act Product for Fish and Fish Products , and
d. the North Sea Regional Advisory Council referred to in Article 2 (c) of Decision No 2004, 2004 /585/EC of the Council of the European Union of 19 July establishing Regional Advisory Councils in the framework of the Common Fisheries Policy (PbEU L 256/17).
(Reserved)
In a licence under Article 6.2 of the Act if it is issued for the placing into a surface water body of one or more substances belonging to List I of Annex I to this Regulation, it shall be laid down for a period of not more than ten years. Directive 2006 /11/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union of 15 February 2006 on pollution caused by certain dangerous substances discharged into the aquatic environment of the Community (PbEU L 64), for which limit values are applied have been established in:
a. Directive No 82 /176/EEC Council of 22 March 1982 on limit values and quality objectives for mercury discharges by the chlor-alkali electrolysis industry (PbEG L 81),
b. Directive 83 /513/EEC the Council of 26 September 1983 on limit values and quality objectives for cadmium discharges (PbEG L 291);
c. Directive No 84 /156/EEC Council of 8 March 1984 on limit values and quality objectives for mercury discharges from sectors other than the chlor-alkali electrolysis industry (PbEG L 74);
ed. Directive No 84 /491/EEC the Council of 9 October 1984 on limit values and quality objectives for discharges of hexachlorocyclohexane (PbEG L 274); or
e. Directive No 86 /280/EEC of the Council of 12 June 1986 on limit values and quality objectives for discharges of certain substances listed in List I of the Annex to Annex I to the Commission Directive 76 /464/EEC dangerous substances which fall within the Community (PbEG L 181).
The competent authority shall be responsible for four years after a licence as referred to in Article 6.1 has been granted, and subsequently at least every four years, whether that licence is still sufficient, in view of developments in the field of technical possibilities for environmental protection and developments in respect of the quality of the environment. environment.
Article 6.10a, first paragraph, of the Decision shall not apply to the removal of groundwater for the purpose of:
a. A spring-bemaling or a teething, if the amount of groundwater to be excluded is less than 100 m 3 per hour and in total no more than 100.000 m 3 ;
b. bereaching, irrigation or swearing, if the amount of groundwater to be excluded is less than 60 m 3 per hour;
(c) operations other than those referred to in (a) or (b) if the amount of groundwater to be excluded is less than 10 m 3 per hour.
1 In case of a notification of the removal of groundwater referred to in Article 6.11, first paragraph, of the Decision , the data is mentioned in Article 6.27 provided.
2 Where a notification referred to in the first paragraph relates to the extraction of groundwater for the purpose of a forest dementia system as referred to in paragraph 1, Article 6.4, first paragraph, part b, of the Act , are also the data, mentioned in Article 6.29 -That's right.
3 Upon a notification of the infiltration of water as intended Article 6.11, first paragraph, of the Decision the data is mentioned in Article 6.28 provided.
1 The one that infiltrates water measures the quality of the water to infiltrate by taking representative samples and analyzing the water. Annex VII parameters set out in this Arrangement with the frequency set out in that Annex.
2 The analysis of the samples shall be carried out in accordance with Annex 4 of the Drinking Water Scheme .
For the purposes of this paragraph:
fairway: in the case of public traffic with ships of open standing.
1 As areas referred to in Article 6.16, second paragraph, of the Decision , are designated the areas that are on the cards in Annex IV they are included in this scheme.
2 Without prejudice to the first paragraph, the waters referred to in the first subparagraph shall be Article 3.2a also designated as areas referred to in Article 6.16, second paragraph, of the Decision .
The use, intended to be used in Art 6.15, first paragraph, of the Decision , it shall be carried out in such a way that:
a. the works created by the user are maintained in good condition;
b. of calamities or defects and other imperfections by the user immediately to be communicated to the Minister;
(c) the user shall take all measures necessary, in the interests of both smooth and safe traffic regulation, and in the interests of maintaining the relevant surface water body or work of art;
(d) the stability of oat structures shall not be endangered;
e. after the termination of temporary activities, the part of the surface water body or the corresponding work of art used, where it is reasonably possible, is returned to the original State;
f. remains accessible to the administrator and to emergency services during the activity or work of the surface water body or work of art;
g. any existing use at the location in question is reasonably affected as little as possible; and
h. The material and equipment used shall be disposed of in good time in such a way that flooding or flooding threatens to cause flooding.
The use, intended to be used in Art 6.15, first paragraph, of the Decision , where the fairways are concerned, without prejudice to the provisions of Article 6.8 , in such a way that:
a. The passage of shipping, both in width and in height, is not impeded;
b. The visibility lines for shipping are not hindered;
c. The vision lines for the operating and guidance objects are not hindered;
d. No discomfort to radar is caused;
e. does not cause a nuisance of illumination for the shipping traffic;
f. No open fire or fireworks above the fairway is lit; and
g. No work or parts of it, material or material from the damwand.
Article 6.12, second paragraph, introductory wording and part a, of the decision does not apply to channels.
1 Activities of minor importance as referred to in Article 6.12, second paragraph, subparagraph (f) of the Decision are:
a. For a period not exceeding six months, the installation and storage of construction works, building boards, equipment and equipment for the purpose of carrying out a work or maintenance in, on, above, over or under a surface water body or a corresponding work of art;
b. events lasting no longer than three months;
c. Placing of an internal or outflow device, provided that the current or outflow rate is not less than 0,3 m/s;
d. Placing a scaffolding, piety or supply, including its provisions, provided that they are located outside the fairway and are intended for non-business use, or by type and size comparable to the other Use;
e. placing of information boards, information columns, advertising boards, advertising columns, sports and playgrounds, memorials, art objects, flagpoles, garden and street furniture or similar objects in nature and extent, for which there is no or no limited foundation is required;
f. Off-terrain increments of less than 50 m 3 per cadastral plot;
g. Placing of fish nets or fishing nets;
h. performing maintenance and replacement of existing objects by objects of a similar nature and size and at the same location;
i. affixing of harings and recreational facilities, other than a construction work, at the mower field level;
j. Placing of cables and pipes provided that:
1 °. not transport intrinsically hazardous substances;
2 °. these do not lie, parallel or crossing, in the safety area of a primary or secondary watercourse, a work of art or a fairway, or
3 °. these are not constructed through bore, while crossing layers of different stiffness;
Investigations which do not take longer than six months, and
(l) other activities which, by nature, limited size or short duration to the discretion of the administrator, have no adverse impact on the management of water resources.
2 The provisions of the first paragraph, parts d, e and g shall not apply to channels.
1 Activities of minor importance as referred to in Article 6.13, second paragraph , in conjunction with Article 6.12, second paragraph, subparagraph (f) of the Decision are:
a. Placing construction signs and storing equipment and equipment for the purpose of carrying out a work or maintenance in, on, above, over or below the North Sea during the period from 1 April to 1 October;
b. events lasting no longer than three months;
c. Making sand banquets on the beach for non-permanent conversions provided they are up to 6 metres + NAP high and not wider than 25 metres inshore, measured at the top of the banquet from the thumb front with due regard to the in the second paragraph;
(d) establishing and maintaining non-permanent buildings in the period from 1 April to 1 October;
e. Moving of sand on the beach, other than those specified in part c, up to a maximum amount of 20m 3 by streaky meter; and
f. other activities which, by nature, limited size or short duration to the discretion of the administrator, have no adverse impact on the management of water resources.
2 Sandmovements as referred to in paragraph 1 (c) and (e) shall not be combined within one calendar year.
3 The activities referred to in paragraph 1 (a) to (e) shall be carried out in the zone between the duinft and the low-water line.
Activities of minor importance as referred to in Article 6.14, second paragraph , in conjunction with Article 6.12, second paragraph, subparagraph (f) of the Decision are:
activities which, by nature, limited size or short duration, in the opinion of the administrator, do not adversely affect the management of water resources.
The waters falling within the meaning of the Article 6.12, second paragraph, part (e) of the decision , are the streamlining parts of the waters, intended in Annex VIII This scheme.
1 The person who is going to carry out a work or an activity for which under Article 6.12 , 6.13 or 6.14 of the Decision no licence is required, please report this in writing at least four weeks prior to implementation to the Minister.
2 The following information shall be provided at the time of the notification:
a. The name, address, telephone number and e-mail address of the person intending to conduct the activity or work;
b. the time when the activity or work begins and the duration of the work;
c. the nature and extent of the activity or work; and
d. A location account with a scale of at least 1:10,000 indicating the location and location of the activity or work in relation to the environment and equipped with a north arrow.
3 The minister may request the person making a notification to provide further information on the activity or work to be carried out, in order to determine whether measures are to be taken.
4 The first paragraph shall not apply to the execution of maintenance or the construction or alteration or other other use, other than in accordance with function, of water status works to the extent that these activities are carried out by or because of the operator -
1 In respect of works or activities for which under Article 6.12 , 6.13 or 6.14 of the Decision no permit is required, can the minister with a view to protecting the interests that it ' s stated in Article 6.15 of the Decision and the 6.8 and 6.9 the aims of measures to be implemented shall lay down the measures to be taken in respect of
a. Location;
b. the depth of the work;
c. the height of the work;
d. the period of implementation;
e. the possibilities of moving the work related to high water, or
f. The water permeability of the work associated with water-bearing effects.
2 The measures to be taken in accordance with paragraph 1 shall not result in the activity or work being unable to proceed to a large or large extent, unless that activity, in the opinion of the administrator, is not admissible. has an impact on the water state work involved.
3 The first paragraph shall not apply to the execution of maintenance or to the construction or alteration or other other use, other than in accordance with function, of water works to the extent that these activities are carried out by or because of the manager -
1 In case of application of the Articles 6.16h, second and fourth paragraphs , and 6.16i, second paragraph, of the Decision the following texts shall be complied with, in respect of the non-public arrangements laid down in those articles:
a. IALA Recommendation O-139 (marking of artificial offshore constructions): Edition 2 of December 2013;
b. CAP 764 (policy and guidelines for wind turbines) issued by the UK Aviation Authority: edition 5 of June 2013;
c. IN 1010: edition EN 1010:2007 + C1:2008-Safety provisions for low voltage installations in October 2008, including correction and amending sheet A1:2011 + C1:2011 and A2:2014 amending sheet;
d. NEN-EN-IEC 61936-1: PUBLISHING-EN-IEC 61936-1:2010-Star power installations with more than 1 kV AC voltage-Part 1: General provisions of May 2014, including correction sheets C1: 2 0 1 1, C11:2011, C12:2012 and C13:2013 and amending sheet A1:2014;
e. NS-EN 50522: EDITIONS-EN 50522:2010-Arrange of power installations above 1 kV exchange voltage of November 2010;
f. IN 3840: EDITION NEN 3840:2011-ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS-High voltage of May 2011; and
g. NEN 3140: edition NEN 3140:2011-Operating of electrical installations-Laagvoltage of March 2011.
2 By way of derogation from the first paragraph, for wind farms for which a licence is granted on the basis of the Law management state waterworks or on the basis of Article 6.13 of the Decision have been granted the texts of the non-public law schemes as they were complied with in the granting of the authorisation.
1 It is forbidden to apply without a permit from the Minister as intended Article 6.5 of the Act more than 5000 m 3 Water per hour in, or more than 100 m 3 to extract water per hour from a surface water body in administration to the Kingdom, if:
a. The flow rate is greater than 0,3 m/s; or
(b) the act is carried out in conjunction with an activity for which it is based on the Article 6.2 of the Act a permit is required.
2 The first paragraph shall not apply to:
a. dredging operations and the application of dredging in a surface water body;
b. operations carried out by the administrator or by the administrator.
1 The person who brings water to or detracts from surface water bodies in management to the Empire, for which no permit is required under Article 6.16 , please report this in writing at least four weeks prior to implementation to the Minister if more than 5000 m is planned to be taken 3 Water per hour is inserted or more than 100 m 3 Water per hour is removed.
2 The following information shall be provided at the time of the notification:
a. The name, address, telephone number and e-mail address of the person intending to water in or extract water from surface water bodies in administration to the State;
b. the time of embarkation or removal of water and its duration;
c. The purpose, the flow rate and the extent of the insertion or removal of water; and
d. A location account with a scale of at least 1:10,000 indicating the location and location of the insertion or removal of water, which shall be equipped with a north arrow.
3 As regards the taking or withdrawal of water referred to in paragraph 1, the Minister may lay down detailed rules for the location and the period provided that they do not result in any failure to bring or withdraw water from water. Transit can be found.
4 The first to third paragraphs shall not apply to:
a. dredging operations and the application of dredging in a surface water body;
b. operations carried out by the administrator or by the administrator.
1 If an application for a water permit is not submitted by electronic means, use is made of a form established by Our Minister which is published on and can be downloaded from www.omgevingsloket.nl. It at the request of the applicant, make the form available to him.
2 An application for a water permit is done electronically using the electronic form available on the date of submission of the application through the nationwide provision, referred to in Article 7.6 of the Act. General provisions environmental law.
3 The competent authority shall be responsible for the management of the data entered in the part of the national provision at its disposal. Such management shall, in any event, include the granting and limitation of access to information on an application and for the care of the archive documents.
4 With regard to the processing of personal data in the national provision, the competent authority shall be responsible for the purposes of Article 1 (d) of the Personal Data Protection Act .
The application for a water permit shall state:
a. the name, address, residence and telephone number of the applicant, as well as the e-mail address of the applicant, if the application is filed with an electronic form;
b. The geographical indication of the location where the operation is carried out, by means of:
1 °. a situational account,
2 °. a card with a functional scale which is equipped with a north arrow and indicates the location of the location relative to the environment;
3 °. photographs, or
4 °; other appropriate means;
(c) a description of the nature, scope, reason and purpose of the proposed act;
d. a description of the nature and magnitude of the impact of the act, in so far as they are relevant for the assessment of the application;
e. the period for which authorisation is requested;
f. if the act is carried out by a claimant other than the applicant: his name, address, place of residence and telephone number, as well as his e-mail address;
g. if the application is submitted by an authorised representative: his name, address, place of residence and telephone number, as well as the email address of the authorised representative if the application is submitted with an electronic form.
1 Data and documents provided by electronic means at the time of application shall be provided in one of the following archive file formats:
a. photos: PNG and JPG;
b. scans: TIFF, JPG, PDF/A-1a, PDF/A-1b, and PDF 1.4;
c. officedocuments: PDF/A-1a and PDF 1.4;
d. drawings: PDF/X and PDF 1.4.
2 If the files are supplied electronically, they are marked as 'read-only' (read only).
In the application for authorisation as specified in Article 6.2 of the Act without prejudice to the provisions of Article 6.19 , the following information is provided:
a. A description of the discharge, indicating in any case the acidity (pH), temperature and flow rate, and indicating whether the discharge occurs continuously or continuously, with the regularity of discharges or partial discharges, the method of to which the discharge takes place and the activities from which the discharge originates;
b. Characterisation by the nature, composition, characteristics, quantity and origin of the substances;
(c) a description of the measures or arrangements that have been or are being taken to prevent or limit the discharge, with explanatory drawing, and the measures taken for that purpose in the case of permanent abandonment of the measures or arrangements for the discharge of activities;
d. a description of the nature and extent of the business activities;
e. a process diagram of the design and a description of the capacity of each installation in which processes take place that result or may lead to the putting into a surface water body of substances, indicating which of those substances to which and to what extent are released;
f. A sewage bill;
g. a description of the nature, composition, properties, quantity and location within the holding of the raw materials, excipients, intermediate products and final products which may be present within the holding, to reasonable expectation, to the extent that they can be reached in a surface water body;
h. a description of the measures or provisions relating to the prevention or reduction of the discharge of waste by the reuse, use or recovery of waste, or of making it suitable for the reuse or recovery of such waste;
i. an indication of the quantity and quality of the substances which may be reasonably achievable as a result of an unusual occurrence in a surface water body, and a description of the measures to be taken to ensure that such substances are used as far as possible to prevent or to limit;
j. a description of the manner in which the discharge is determined and recorded and the manner in which the discharge is reported;
k. an indication of the developments reasonably foreseeable for the applicant in respect of the discharge which may be relevant to the decision on the application, and
(l) a non-technical summary of the information referred to in this Article.
If the operation of an installation, from which the discharge for which the authorisation is requested takes place, may cause significant adverse effects on the environment in another Member State of the European Union, or Member States of the European Union, which may have significant adverse effects on the environment of the operation of an installation, shall provide the competent authority with a copy of the application with the supporting documents in the Member State of the European Union. on the date on which knowledge is notified in the Netherlands or at the time of the notification in the Netherlands the time at which the application is made available to the Netherlands with the corresponding documents.
In the application for authorisation as specified in Article 6.3 of the Act in the event of the dumping of dredging, without prejudice to the provisions of Article 6.19 , the following information is provided:
a. A description of the location of origin and the intended distribution site;
b. Characterisation by the nature, composition, characteristics and quantity of the substances;
c. a description of the research protocol and the research strategy as referred to in NEN 5720.
In the application for authorisation as specified in the Article 6.5, part c, of the Act to use a water state or an associated protection zone, without prejudice to the provisions of Article 6.19 , the following information is provided:
a. A description of the proposed act stating the manner in which the waterState work or the corresponding protection zone will be used;
b. An explanatory drawing showing the design and the dimensions of the work, or the alignment of the cable or the direction of the cable;
c. a drilling plan in case a water state work is crossed by a HDD bore, and
d. A stability calculation of the quay or watershed.
If an application as referred to in Article 6.24 relating to work in which a waterground is completely or partially removed, shall be provided, in addition to the information referred to in that Article, with the following information:
a. An indication of the quantity of material to be removed; and
b. An indication of the total amount of surface to be dredged in m 2 .
If an application as referred to in Article 6.24 relates to the use of a water state work in the Netherlands exclusive economic zone, the following information shall be provided:
a. A description of the consequences for legitimate use of the sea by third parties; and
b. A founding and incorporation plan, which covers work maintenance, safety safeguards, lighting measures, disaster prevention and mitigation measures, and the manner in which removal of the installation will be carried out. take place.
In the application for authorisation as specified in the Article 6.4, first paragraph , and 6.5, part b, of the Act for the removal of groundwater, without prejudice to the provisions of the Article 6.19 , the following information is provided:
a. The purpose for which the groundwater to be excluded is used;
b. The number of existing and new wells to be targeted;
c. a further location of the wells relative to the Rijkstriangle network;
d. the depth of the underside and the top of the filters of each well relative to the mower field and the N.A.P.;
e. the diameter and length of the filters in each well;
f. The pumping capacity in m 3 per hour and the ability to install in m 3 per hour per put;
g. The maximum quantities of water to be withdrawn per hour, per day, per month, per quarter and per year; and
h. a description of the measures or provisions that have been or are being taken to prevent or mitigate the negative effects of the withdrawal.
In the application for authorisation as specified in the Article 6.4, first paragraph , 6.5, part b, of the Act for infiltration of water, without prejudice to the provisions of Article 6.19 , the following information is provided:
a. The number of existing and new wells to be targeted;
b. a further location of the wells relative to the Rijkstriangle network;
c. the depth of the underside and the top of the filters of each well relative to the mower field and the N.A.P.;
d. The diameter and length of the filters in each well;
e. the pumping capacity in m 3 per hour;
f. The maximum infiltration amounts of water per hour, per day, per month, per quarter and per year;
g. the manner in which water is infiltrated;
h. the origin and composition of the water to be infiltrated; and
i. a description of the measures or provisions that have been or are being taken to prevent or mitigate the negative effects of the infiltration.
1 Where an application for a permit relates to the removal of groundwater or the placing of water in the soil for the purpose of a forest dementia system as referred to in Article 3 (2) (a) of the Article 6.4 (b) of the Act , without prejudice to the provisions of the Articles 6.27 and 6.28 , the following information is provided:
a. the capacitance of the pump with which the water is placed in the soil in m 3 per hour;
b. The maximum amounts of water to be put in the soil per hour, per day, per month, per quarter and per year;
c. the manner in which water is placed in the soil;
(d) the composition of the water to be brought into the soil;
e. An indication of the hydrological effects of the placing of water in the soil;
f. the minimum, average and maximum temperatures of the water to be brought into the soil;
g. The extent of the heat and cold need provided by the forest-demented system; and
h. the energy efficiency, expressed as the Seasonal Performance Factor (SPF), which will achieve the forest dementia system with the use of the construction work according to the destination for which the system is designed, as expressed in written form. statement from the installer.
2 In the provision of data referred to in paragraph 1 (h) on the energy efficiency of the supply of heat or cold to a construction work, the energy efficiency of the energy efficiency shall be determined according to the requirements of the Following formula:
The following definitions apply:
Qw : the amount of heat delivered to the construction work by the forest-dementia system per year in MWh;
Qk : the quantity of cold per year delivered to the construction work by the forest demented system in MWh;
E : the amount of electricity consumed by the forest-demented system per year in MWh;
G : The amount of gas consumed by the demented system of alcohol per year in MWh.
In the application for authorisation as specified in Article 6.5, introductory wording and part a, of the Act to the removal of water from or to water in a surface water body, without prejudice to the provisions of the Article 6.19 , the following information is provided:
a. An underpinning of the need to bring water into a surface water body;
b. A description and explanatory drawing of the in-and out-flow devices including an indication of the pumping capacity, the dimensions and location; and
c. An indication of the maximum quantities of water to be withdrawn or to be discharged in m 3 per hour, to be distinguished by periods.
For the purposes of this Chapter:
detection limit: lowest concentration of the component in the sample, the presence of which can still be determined with a certain reliability;
flow: Amount of waste water discharged during dinner time; moment flow rate: amount of effluent discharged for a moment of measurement; time-of-day: continuous 24-hour period over which an etmeal collection sample is compiled;
Calibrate: determination of the value of the deviations compared to an applicable standard;
Dry calibration: Calibration of a flowmeter simulating a flow of water by the flowmeter;
Wet calibration: Calibrate a flowmeter using a precise known amount of liquid to run through the flowmeter;
Measuring system closed: Measurement system that measures the flow rate in a closed pipe or in a closed pressure pipeline, with the waste water not in contact with the outside air;
Open measurement system: Measuring system in which the surface of the flowing waste water is in contact with the outside air.
1 The number of oxygen supply pollution units, VeO, is calculated by dividing the sum of the quantities of oxygen consumption, expressed in kilograms, carried out during each charging year, expressed in kilograms, by 54,8% of the total oxygen consumption. Kilogram.
2 The amount of oxygen consumption, expressed in kilograms, for a period of oxygen shall be calculated according to the following formula:
where:
Q = the flow rate in m 3 /etmal;
COD = the chemical oxygen consumption determined according to the Article 7.15 analytical requirements specified in mg/l;
NKj is the sum of ammonium nitrogen and organic nitrogen, determined in accordance with the analysis requirements set out in Article 7.15, in mg/l.
3 If the COD value for at least 25% is derived from biological non-degradable or non-degradable waste in the waste water, a correction shall be made by multiplying it by the break
where:
T is the percentage of COD obtained from bionon-biodegradable or non-biodegradable substances.
T is calculated at:
a. The discharge into a surface water body of oxygen-binding substances, from an establishment, in use in a province, a municipality, a waterscape or any other public body or the bringing of oxygen binding substances with biochemical agents oxygen consumption of no more than 20 mg/l from a holding space as specified in Article 7.1, first paragraph, of the Act , using the method of biochemical oxygen consumption after five days, according to the Article 7.15 analytical requirements specified in mg/l;
b. The discharge into a surface water body of oxygen-binding substances in cases other than those referred to in (a) by means of another satisfactory method of determination.
For the calculation of frequency of measurement, sampling and analysis as intended Article 7.5, first and second paragraph, of the Act The following formula shall be used:
where:
n = calculated number of days of measurement
tso = permissible static inaccuracy =
35 /e ^ 0,000175 *VeO, where Veo = contamination value with regard to oxygen consumption in a year of the substances discharged into surface bodies.
N = the number of days per year that substances are discharged into surface water bodies;
σ = spread rate in the measurements, expressed in relation to the average of the amounts of oxygen consumption of the exported substances at the times on which investigations have taken place during the charging year.
1 The measurement, sampling and analysis specified in Article 7.5, first paragraph, of the Act shall be such that:
a. The measured amount of waste water does not deviate by more than 5% from the actual amount of waste water;
(b) the sample obtained is representative of the total quantity of waste discharged into surface water bodies during the sampling period;
(c) the rules laid down in this arrangement or the rules laid down by the charging officer.
2 The tax officer shall:
a. may, where necessary to satisfy the provisions of paragraph 1 (a) and (b), of its own motion that flow measurement and sampling shall be by way of derogation from one or more of the rules laid down in this Arrangement and may be taken into account; specify further requirements in this regard;
(b) decides on the application of the charge, which makes it possible to satisfy the provisions of the first paragraph, parts a and b, and thus not to affect the results of the analysis, that of one or more of the items in the It may derogate from the rules laid down and may lay down detailed rules.
3 The decision of the tax authority, referred to in paragraph 2 (a), shall contain in each case:
(a) the provisions of this Arrangement which are derogated from;
(b) the prescribed derogations from the rules laid down in this Arrangement;
c. detailed regulations of the charging officer.
4 The decision of the tax officer on an application as referred to in paragraph 2 (b) shall, in any event, contain:
(a) the provisions of this system which may be derogated from;
(b) the permitted derogations from the rules laid down in this Regulation;
c. detailed regulations of the charging officer.
5 The charge officer may unify two or more of the decisions taken on the basis of paragraph 2, relating to the same holding or the same branch of business, in a single written form.
6 In its decision, the charging officer shall, in any case, lay down rules on:
a. the waste water flows and the substances to which the decision relates;
(b) the number of periods of measurement, sampling and analysis to be carried out in the year of charging, either each time of the number of periods, or one or more of the periods of such time;
c. the manner in which the results obtained on the foot of parts a and b are traced to the number of pollution units over a period specified therein, respectively, over the charging year;
d. The levy year or levy years, in respect of which that Decision applies.
The charge officer may change or expect changes in the quantity or capacity of the substances discharged into surface water bodies from a holding or part of the business:
(a) amend or revoke the acts referred to in the second and sixth paragraphs, in relation to the provisions of the first paragraph;
(b) amend the decision referred to in the second and sixth paragraphs if applying the calculation rule Article 7.4 leads to another number of etting, referred to the sixth paragraph, part b, than is included in that decision.
1 The flow rates and sampling provisions:
a. are in a good condition;
b. have been installed and maintained in accordance with the requirements of the supplier;
c. are cleaned regularly, and
d. Always be safely accessible.
2 The sampling facilities are accommodated in a lockable space or cabinet.
3 The charging agent shall notify the charging officer of the method of measurement of the flow and of sampling, together with a description of the apparatus to be used for the commencement of the levy year.
1 The flow rate is measured in the waste water flow rate.
2 By way of derogation from the first paragraph, the flow rate may be determined on the basis of the measurement of the quantity of water in the farm's water supply system or of the business lines. The amount of waste water used once daily shall not be greater than the amount of water administered over the same period.
1 In the case of open measurement systems, a measured pit or a measuring load shall be applied.
2 In the case of a measuring pit, the following shall apply:
a. instantaneous flow rates in the etcheting time, measured at a temperature of excess temperature of less than 0,05 metres, shall be less than 5 per cent of the measured flow;
b. instantaneous flow rates of less than 0,125 metres in the etcheting of less than 10% of the measured flow rate.
3 In the case of a measuring amount, the instantaneous flow rates shall be reduced, less than 16,4 per cent of the maximum instantaneous flow rate, less than 10% of the measured throughput.
4 The equipment for altitude measurement shall be calibrated at least once a year in the case of over-storthophthales of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 centimeters dry.
5 In the calibration report, for each excess height, a comparison is made between the measured amount of effluent during the calibration period, and the at relevant excess height using the feed off-line relationship. measurement device calculated amount of waste water over the period of calibration. Both the absolute and the percentage difference is indicated.
6 In the case of ultrasonic height measurement, the temperature measurement and temperature correction shall also be checked and corrected by derogation.
1 The instantaneous flow rates at once, less than 10% of the maximum possible instantaneous flow rate, amounts to less than 5% of the measured flow rate.
2 Measurement equipment for flow measurements in closed measurement systems shall be calibrated to dry at least once a year.
3 The dry calibration consists of at least:
a. Checking the measurement amplifier and recording and correcting anomalies in which the measuring amplifier is checked for linearity, amplification factor and zero point setting; and
b. outbuilding the flowmeter and checking the insides of the measuring tube on pollution where the pollution in the measuring tube is removed from it.
4 The measuring equipment shall be calibrated in inbuilt state at least once before 1 January 2014, and thereafter at least once every five years.
5 For flowmeters in mobile measuring equipment, the wet calibration takes place in inbuilt condition at an installation certified by the Netherlands Measuring Institute or a similar setting.
6 From a flowmeter, the most recent calibration report shall be submitted.
1 The sampling shall be carried out with the use of automatic sampling equipment.
2 The sampling interval shall be set in such a way as to obtain an etmeal aggregate sample consisting of at least 100 sample samples.
3 The volume per sub-sample shall be adjusted in such a way that the repeatability is not more than 5% of the volume set. In the case of vacuum sampling equipment, the volume per sub-sample shall be not less than 50 millilitres. In in-line sampling, the volume per sub-sample shall be a minimum of 20 millilitres and an etmeal aggregate sample consisting of at least 250 subsamples shall be obtained.
4 The sample collection vessel shall have such a content that the vessel does not overrun during the test period.
5 Both the sample collection vessel and other parts of the sampling equipment that come into contact with the waste water are made of easy to clean, inert material, which does not affect the analysis to be carried out. The sample collection vessel can be easily taken out and carried out as a bucket or as a barrel with a wide neck so that a sample shovel can be easily stir-fried and peeled. During the test time, the sample collection vessel is closed with a well-closing lid.
1 The suction point of an open measuring system shall be as close as possible downstream of the obstruction. On the suction point, the wastewater flows turbulent.
2 When vacuum sampling equipment is used, the suction tube shall be placed as short as possible and below a bulkhead. The suction tube is protected from freezing and direct sunlight. There shall be no nodding or superfluous curves in the suction tube. The suction point is located under the liquid surface.
3 The diameter of all the transflowed parts of the sampling equipment from the suction point to the point where the sample is delivered to the sample collection vessel shall not be less than 13 millimetres. If vacuum sampling equipment is used, the average suction rate shall be not less than 0,3 metres per second.
4 When drasting the sub sample to the sample collection vessel, the sample shall be prevented from aeration.
1 In the case of sampling using in-line sampling equipment, the sampling point shall not be either in a bend or a narrowing in the direction of the sampling. If the effluent to be sampled is discharged using a pump, the sampling point shall be on the press side of this pump.
2 When a closed measuring system is combined with vacuum sampling equipment, the suction point shall be located at the point where the closed pipe is located in an open discharge system or a branch has been taken from the closed direction, in a perched-flow buffervate from which the sampling is carried out. In that case, the flow rate of the waste water in the branch shall be at least equal to that in the main line.
1 The samples taken in the sample collection vessel shall be stored at a temperature above 0 °C and below or equal to 4 ° C.
2 Sampling supplies in contact with the waste water are made from simple to clean inert material which does not affect the analyses to be carried out later.
The samples from the sample collection sample were taken within one hour of the expiry of the test sample.
4 The samples shall be taken with a large sample of samples. The whole content of the sample collection vessel shall be stir-fried in such a way that all material which may be encumin is raised before being peeled. The sample spoon is rotated between the left and the right to alternate.
5 The sample lessons for analysis by the charging officer and for counter-analysis by the charging officer are to be filled and to be filled.
1 The samples from the sample collection sample shall be preserved up to the end of the retention period in accordance with the conditions laid down in Table A. If a sample is frozen or chemically preserved from the sample collection sample, this within 12 hours of the end of the meal. Any requirements relating to chemical preservation shall be applied in addition to the requirements relating to the preservation temperature during the retention period.
2 The pre-treatment of the sample for the purpose of the analysis, including the defrosting of frozen samples, shall be carried out in such a way as to ensure that the representativity of the sample is not disturbed.
3 A sample which is chemically preserved in one of the methods listed in Table A is not used for one of the methods of analysis set out in Table A for which no requirements in the field of the chemical have been applied on the basis of Table A. Preserving funds.
For analysis on the parameter/substance below
Ambient
Method of preservation
Maximum retention time
during transport
End-of-retention
| Biochemical oxygen consumption |
between 2 ° C and 8 ° C |
between 1 and 5 ° C |
Cool to the exclusion of light. |
1 day |
| <-18 ° C |
Freezing within 12 hours |
1 mnd (if BZV < = 50 mg/l) 6 mnd (if BZV > 50 mg/l) |
||
| chemical oxygen consumption |
between 2 ° C and 8 ° C |
between 1 and 5 ° C |
Refrigeration and acidifying with H2SO4 to pH < 2 |
6 months |
| <-18 ° C |
Freezing within 12 hours |
6 months |
||
| Sum of ammonium nitrogen and organic bound nitrogen |
between 2 ° C and 8 ° C |
between 1 and 5 ° C |
Refrigeration and acidifying with H2SO4 to pH < 2 |
1 month |
| <-18 ° C |
Freezing within 12 hours |
6 months |
1 The analyses shall be carried out in the representative sample obtained in the manner specified in this Chapter. The examination shall be carried out in the water as such, i.e. without the removal of any sedible or floatable component.
2 The analysis of the sample shall be carried out in accordance with the conditions set out in Table B.
3 The limits of detection set out in Table B shall be the concentrations of the relevant substances at least shown in the analysis.
Parameter/substance
Sealing according to standard sheet
Standard sheet measurement
Limit of detection
| Biochemical oxygen consumption |
NEN-EN 1899-1 |
1 mg/l |
|
| chemical oxygen consumption |
NEN-ISO 15705 or NEN 6633 |
5 mg/l |
|
| Sum of ammonium nitrogen and organic bound nitrogen |
NEN 6645 |
NEN 6604 or ISO 15923 |
0.5 mg/l |
| NEN 6646 |
|||
| NEN-EN-ISO 11732 |
|||
| NEN-EN 12260 |
EN-EN-ISO 12260, and for correction nitrite/nitrate: EN-ISO 13395, EN 6604 or ISO 15923-1 |
||
| NEN-ISO 5663 |
NEN 6604 or ISO 15923-1 |
||
| NEN-ISO 5663 |
|||
| NEN 6646 |
NEN 6646 |
||
| NEN 6604 or ISO 15923 |
4 If a concentration is reported as being less than the limit of detection, a concentration of half of the detection limit shall be maintained for the pollution charge attack.
5 The measurement according to normsheet NEN-ISO 15705 is applicable for undiluted samples with a level of oxygen consumption up to 1000 mg/l and chloride concentrations below 1000 mg/l.
6 By way of derogation from the limit of detection set out in Table B, the measurement according to normsheet NEN-ISO 15705 has a limit of detection of 6 mg/l for photometric detection at 600 nm and 15 mg/l for titrimetric detection (based on a single dose). single laboratory measurement) when cuvetes are used with a range of up to 1,000 mg/l.
1 Of a licence as referred to in Article 20 of the Implementing Regulation on water management which before the date of entry into force of Article 6.16 and 6.17 irrevocable, for transactions referred to in Article 6.17 (1), first paragraph, the requirements of that authorisation shall be deemed to be graduated in accordance with Article 6.17, third paragraph, to the extent that those rules fall within the scope of the provisions of that authorisation. power of the competent authority to lay down measures to be taken under that Article.
2 The first paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis to a licence as referred to in that paragraph, which shall, in accordance with Article 2.29 of the Act of Import Water Law has been granted and has become irrevocable.
This Regulation shall enter into force with effect from 22 December 2009, with the exception of Article 6.18, second, third and fourth members , which shall enter into force with effect from 10 October 2011.
This arrangement is cited as: 'Water regulation'.
This arrangement will be placed in the Official Journal, except for the Annex II , III , IV and IX which are made available for inspection to the Ministry of Transport and Water.
TheState Secretary
of Vertimes and Waterstate,J.C. Huizinga-Heringa
TheMinister
of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment,J.M. Cramer
1. Purge industry
2. Manufacture of products based on fruit and vegetables
3. Preparation and bottling of soft drinks
4. Processing of potatoes
5. Vreading industry
6. Brouwerijen
7. Preparation of alcohol and alcoholic beverages
8. Manufacture of feed from vegetable products
9. Manufacture of gelatine and glues on the basis of hides and skins
10. Mouteries
11. Fish processing industry
For the KRW reports, the taxes on surface water are divided into five categories:
1. point sources
2. diffuse sources
3. withdrawal
4. regulating water movements
5. morphological adjustments
The information related to point sources and diffuse sources is provided by the national emission registration.
Information about taxes in the categories of detractions, regulation water movements and morphological adjustments is completed by the water managers on the website Inventory Pressure/Load Surface Water Bodies. The data will be integrated with other KRW information on the WFD Portal in 2010. After integration, the available information will be stored in a different, more efficient manner. The format described below therefore has a limited validity.
54 types of tax are distinguished, divided into 3 main groups:
1. withdrawal
2. regulate water movement and morphological adjustment
3. other taxes
For each body of water from the management area of the water management system, all 54 types of loading shall indicate whether the relevant load is present and whether the presence is significant. Presence and significance is indicated by means of a check mark on the website. The administrator shall have the possibility to provide further explanations for each type of tax. By water body, the water operator shall complete the table below:
Number
Tax
Presence
Significant
Comments
| Withdrawal | ||||
| 1 |
For agriculture, forestry and fisheries (including irrigation) |
|||
| 2 |
For public (drink) water supply |
|||
| 3 |
For industries |
|||
| 4 |
For cooling water from power plants |
|||
| 5 |
For fish farms |
|||
| 6 |
For power generation (hydropower) |
|||
| 7 |
Mining and open groeves |
|||
| 8 |
For shipping (water level in channels) |
|||
| 9 |
By transfer (water supply waters) |
|||
| 10 |
Other large water-based withdrawal (s) |
|||
| Regulation water movement and morphological adjustment | ||||
| 11 |
Groundwater Complement |
|||
| 12 |
Dams for hydro-electric power plants |
|||
| 13 |
Reservoirs and propellants |
|||
| 14 |
High-water protection: dykes, dams, canals |
|||
| 15 |
Water transfer basins (water supply and/or water drainage) |
|||
| 16 |
Redirect peak drain |
|||
| 17 |
Sluis (also tiled): lowering water levels (pitch control) |
|||
| 18 |
Stuw: difference of water level < 30 cm: increase in water (for the control of peillation) |
|||
| 19 |
Stuw: difference of water position: increased water level (in control of the control) |
|||
| 20 |
Channelling or normalization of the watercourse |
|||
| 21 |
Loss of oyerones and flood plains |
|||
| 22 |
Defence, culverts, rectifier, kribben |
|||
| 23 |
Accelerated water drainage |
|||
| 24 |
Changes for fishing |
|||
| 25 |
Land infrastructure (road, bridge, etc.) |
|||
| 26 |
Delve and deepen (incl. Sanding) |
|||
| 27 |
Delve into estuaries and coastal zones (incl. Sanding) |
|||
| 28 |
Ports, shipyards, etc. |
|||
| 29 |
Land reclamation and empolation |
|||
| 30 |
Sand supplementation (safety) |
|||
| 31 |
Dams in tidal area (incl. safety/energy) |
|||
| 32 |
Barriers (non-or difficult (fish) passeable ground, studs, dams, etc.) |
|||
| 33 |
Dewatering (livestock oxidation and soil reduction) |
|||
| 34 |
sealing ' flood plains |
|||
| Other taxes | ||||
| 35 |
Stray filth |
|||
| 36 |
Dump untreated sewage/sludge into the sea |
|||
| 37 |
Intensive management and maintenance (incl. banks) |
|||
| 38 |
Recreation (water and shore) |
|||
| 39 |
Sport fishing |
|||
| 40 |
Professional fishing |
|||
| 41 |
Exotic animals/plants |
|||
| 42 |
Alien diseases |
|||
| 43 |
Climate change (sea level rise, temperature/drought, upper peak drain) |
|||
| 44 |
Contaminated water soil |
|||
| 45 |
Fisheries management |
|||
| 46 |
Oil and gas extraction (bottom drop) |
|||
| 47 |
Shell extraction or mussel seed |
|||
| 48 |
Wind energy (offshore) |
|||
| 49 |
Mineral extraction (sand, clay, gravel, etc) |
|||
| 50 |
Heat reading and heat-cold storage |
|||
| 51 |
Military training ground |
|||
| 52 |
Upstream supply (pre-tax foreign) |
|||
| 53 |
Other |
|||
| 54 |
Shipping |
|||
The Water Framework Directive requires the setting of targets for biological quality elements and some general physico-chemical parameters per body of water. The physico-chemical parameters concerned do not form part of the chemical status, but are supportive for achieving the good ecological state (GET) or the good ecological potential (GEP). The targets should in principle be met in 2015. In most cases, however, the formal possibilities offered by the KRW to achieve the targets in which the year 2027 is applied as a deadline are being invoked. The ecological objectives then relate to this final situation. In order to obtain a good picture of the ecological situation at the end of the plan period, the expected values of the qualitative elements are also to be reported in 2015. Finally, it also includes per quality element which is the current state of affairs. The principle of the WFD is that it should not deteriorate.
Information on ecological targets is introduced by the water managers in a central database through the KRW targets website (integrated into the KRW portal at the end of 2009)
The database contains values for biological and general physico-chemical parameters for the current situation and the situation in 2015. The current state has initially been completed as an assessment of the water manager, but has been replaced by the reported condition since July 2009 (surface water body size). The situation 2015 shall be completed by the water manager. This also applies to the values that mark the boundaries between different condition classes (good, moderate, inadequate, bad). If nothing is completed, national values shall be maintained according to the measures of natural bodies of water bodies or the defaultvalues of the latches and canals. The database provides the opportunity to also assign values at the level of sub-measures. However, this data is not mandatory and should be used mainly for the substantiation of juditions at the level of measures.
For the purpose of reporting the ecological targets, the following measures are distinguished (depending on the type of water body certain quality elements or parameters may be omitted):
No
Measure Bar
Unit
Encoding
| Biological Quality Elements | |||
| 7 |
Phytoplankton |
EKR |
FYTOPL |
| 19 |
Macrofauna |
EKR |
MAFAUNA |
| 33 |
Macrophytes |
EKR |
OVWFLORA |
| 80 |
Fish |
EKR |
FISH |
| Physico-chemical Parameters | |||
| 1 |
Chloride (summer average) |
mg Cl/l |
Cl |
| 2 |
Daylight saving (summer average) |
Meter |
MESSAGE |
| 38 |
Dissolved inorganic nitrogen (winter mean) |
Mg N/A |
DIN |
| 39 |
Temperature (maximum value) |
° C |
T |
| 40 |
Total phosphorus (summer average) |
mg P/l |
P |
| 41 |
Total nitrogen (summer average) |
mg N/l |
N |
| 85 |
Acidity (summer average) |
- |
pH |
| 86 |
Oxygen saturation (summer average) |
% |
O2 |
The basis for assessment of biological quality elements is the so-called ecological quality ratio (EKR). The EKR is the observed biological value divided by the reference biological value. The ratio obtained should be between 0 and 1 in principle, with a value in the near-1 ratio reflecting the very good condition. The ratio is graded in five classes, corresponding to the normative description of Figure 1. For the highly altered and artificial waters, the objective is the Good Ecological Potential (GEP). The assessment performed in a similar manner where the Maximum Ecological Potential (MEP) is derived from the reference condition.
Fig. 1-The 5 classes of the measuring bar of natural water types (left) and the 4 classes of the measuring bar of highly altered and artificial waters (right) with corresponding colour coding and normative description.
The physico-chemical parameters are also derived from measures. This does not use a ratio, but the scores are expressed in the usual units.
In the case of natural waters, the objective shall automatically be the Good Ecological Condition (GET) maintained in accordance with the relevant measures of natural waters. It shall be equal to 0,6 for the biological quality elements. For heavily changed waters, a value for the Maximum Ecological Potential (MEP) and the Good Ecological Potential (JEP) shall be completed by the Water Manager. The value is a score (dash) on the measure of the natural waters. For artificial waters (water types M1 through M10), the JEP values are preprinted. These come from the default custom-made devices for locks and canals. If you deviate from the default measures, then the values can be changed.
Status and type of body of water are known and reported according to the format 'surface water bodies' (the OWMSTAT and OWMTYPE fields). To determine the graduated and ecological targets, this state or type can be deviated from this state. The selected status and type combination determines the default values for the GET and the JEP, and it is also important for determining the condition of a body of water. Valid values for status and type are referenced to the domain tables published by IDSW (http://www.idsw.nl)
The status and type used to determine the size targets and targets are provided in the OWMDOEL table according to the following format:
Field Name
Type
Size
Description
Domain table
| OWMIDENT |
Text |
60 |
Body code |
|
| Target Status |
Text |
1 |
Status to determine the measures and targets |
http://www.idsw.nl/aquo/schemas/Aquo-domein_typekrwstatus.xsd |
| Target Type |
Text |
2 |
Water type for determining the measures and targets |
http://www.idsw.nl/aquo/schemas/Aquo-domein_typekrwtypologie.xsd |
The class boundaries and target 2015 are to be provided for the biological quality elements and the physico-chemical parameters in the table FEEL according to the following format:
Description
Mandatory
Type
Explanatory notes
Domain table
| OWMIDENT |
Yes |
Text |
Body code |
|
| Measure Bar |
Yes |
Numeric |
Measure number |
Measure (s) |
| GET |
conditionally 1 |
Text |
Good Ecological Status |
|
| MEP |
conditionally 1 |
Text |
Maximum Ecological Potential |
|
| GEP |
conditionally 1 |
Text |
Good Ecological Potential |
|
| Moderate |
Yes |
Text |
Class boundary for 'moderate' |
|
| Insufficient |
Yes |
Text |
Class boundary for 'insufficient' |
|
| Bad |
Yes |
Text |
Class boundary for 'bad' |
|
| Current |
optional |
Text |
Estimated current condition, as of July 2009 replaced by reported judgment according to format water body judgments |
|
| Target 2015 |
Yes |
Text |
Target range for the year 2015 |
1 For natural waters the GET is given, for artificial and heavily changed waters, the MEP and JEP are filled in.
All values for GET, MEP, GEP, Moderate, Insufficient, Bad, Current, and Target 2015 will be contributed as a number in the Unit of the UOM. For the estimation of the current state and the target range 2015, the lack of numerical values may be chosen for any of the following literal texts: 'good', 'moderate', 'inadequate', 'bad', 'fulfils' or 'does not comply'. The estimate of the current situation was used until July 2009, but it is no longer relevant as of July 2009. The current situation is then reported via the format of surface water bodies.
For the specification of a single number as a class boundary, it is interpreted as shown in the table below.
Measure Bar
Class boundary
| Phytoplankton |
Lower Limit |
| Macrofauna |
Lower Limit |
| Macrophytes |
Lower Limit |
| Fish |
Lower Limit |
| Chloride (summer average) |
Upper Limit |
| Daylight saving (summer average) |
Lower Limit |
| Dissolved inorganic nitrogen (nitrate, nitrite and ammonium) (winter average) |
Upper Limit |
| Temperature (maximum value) |
Upper Limit |
| Total phosphorus (summer average) |
Upper Limit |
| Total nitrogen (summer average) |
Upper Limit |
| Acidity (summer average) |
Lower Limit |
| Oxygen saturation (summer average) |
Lower Limit |
Class boundaries can be specified with the characters < =, <, >, or > = followed by a number.
A top and lower boundary is specified as two boundaries, connected to a minus sign.
A maximum of two sets of boundaries per class boundary can be specified. The sets should be separated by a/sign.
Some examples of class boundaries:
Measure Bar
Border
Meaning
| Fish |
0.6 |
Greater or equal to 0.6 |
| Phosphate |
0.6 |
Less than or equal to 0,6 mg/l |
| Acidity |
5,5-8,5 |
Between 5,5 and 8,5 |
| Acidity |
8.5-9,0/< 5,5 |
Between 8,5 and 9,0 or less than 5,5 |
| Acidity |
8,5-9 ,0/5, 0-5,5 |
Between 8,5 and 9,0, or between 5,0 and 5,5 |
| Acidity |
> = 9,0/< 5 |
Greater or equal to 9,0 or less than 5 |
| Chloride |
150 |
Less than or equal to 150 mg/l |
| Chloride |
<150/> 3000 |
Less than 150 or greater than 3000 |
For the KRW reports, the information related to groundwater bodies and judgements is exchanged in three tables:
• Table showing the geographical location and general features of the Ground Water Bodies (GWB)
• Table showing the Groundwater Quality judgments (GWBKWAL)
• Table with judgments relating to the quantitative status of the groundwater bodies (GWBKWAN)
The GWB table is represented as a planes in ESRI shapefile format, where a ground water body consists of one or more planes. The following attributes are associated with each plane:
Description
Mandatory
Type
Domain table
Explanatory notes
| GWBGIDENT |
Yes |
Text |
Unique code of the plane |
|
| GAFIDENT |
Yes |
Text |
GAF15EN |
Code of the (part) basin district in which the plane is located |
| GWBIDENT |
Yes |
Text |
Identification of the groundwater body |
|
| GwbNAME |
Yes |
Text |
Name of the groundwater body |
|
| GWBHORIZ |
Yes |
Numeric |
Horizon |
|
| GWBSUBST |
Yes |
Text |
GWSUBST |
Substrate |
| GWBOPPV |
Yes |
Numeric |
Area in m 2 |
|
| GWBOPME |
No |
Text |
Notes |
Unique code of the geometry. The code starts with 'NLGW' to indicate that it is a Dutch groundwater body. This is the primary key of the planes with ground water bodies.
The code of the sub-basin to which the groundwater body is located. For possible codes, reference is made to the domain table GAF15NL.
Identification of the groundwater body. The first 4 letters are always NLGW. A groundwater body can consist of multiple planes. In that case, all planes have the same GWBIDENT, but the GWBGIDENT may vary.
Example: the groundwater body with GWBIDENT = NLGW0016 (Duin Rhine-West) is made up of 7 flags with GWBGIDENT = NLGW001601 to NLGW001607. The 7 planes represent 7 separate dune areas.
Name of the groundwater body
Horizon of the groundwater body. In case of overlapping ground water bodies, GWBHORIZ is used to indicate the vertical position. GWBHORIZ = 1 is the undeepest, GWBHORIZ= 3 is the deepest level.
Substrate of the groundwater body. For possible choices, reference is made to the domain table GWSUBST.
Surface area of the groundwater body in square metres
Note on location, ground waterbody boundary
In the GWBKWAL table, judgments relating to the water quality of the groundwater bodies are given. Two judgments are given for each groundwater body: a judgement for deep groundwater (25 meters) and a judgement for shallow groundwater (10 meters). Divergges can be specified in the depth field in meters below mower field.
Description
Mandatory
Type
Domain table
Explanatory notes
| GWBIDENT |
Yes |
Text |
GWB |
Identification of the groundwater body |
| Depth |
Yes |
Text |
GWDEPTH |
deep classification |
| Deep _m |
Yes |
Numeric |
Measurement point depth (m) |
|
| OrdKwlYear |
Yes |
Numeric |
Year of assessment |
|
| Cl |
Yes |
Numeric |
Quantitative assessment of good chemical status for Cloride as a percentage |
|
| Ni |
Yes |
Numeric |
Quantitative assessment of good chemical status for Nickel as a percentage |
|
| Axis |
Yes |
Numeric |
Quantitative assessment of good chemical status for arsenic as a percentage |
|
| CD |
Yes |
Numeric |
Quantitative assessment of good chemical status for Cadmium as a percentage |
|
| Pb |
Yes |
Numeric |
Quantitative assessment of good chemical status for Lead as a percentage |
|
| Pto |
Yes |
Numeric |
Quantitative assessment of good chemical status for Fosphate total as a percentage |
|
| Nitrate |
Yes |
Numeric |
Quantitative assessment of good chemical status for nitrates as a percentage (Annex I GWD, status assessment procedure in Art 4 GWD) |
|
| Combats 01 |
Yes |
Numeric |
Quantitative assessment of good chemical status for pesticides as a percentage (Annex I GWD, status assessment procedure in Art 4 GWD) 0.1 µ g/l |
|
| Combats 05 |
Yes |
Numeric |
Quantitative assessment of good chemical status for pesticides as a percentage (Annex I GWD, status assessment procedure in Art 4 GWD) 0,5 µ g/l |
|
| OrdBestbattle |
Yes |
Text |
COMMON YELLOW |
Qualitative judgement of good chemical status for pesticides (Annex I GWD, status assessment procedure in Art 4 GWD) |
| OrdDrem |
Yes |
Text |
COMMON YELLOW |
Qualitative total judgment thresholds according to one out, think about principle, including judgment Arseen. |
| OrdKwlAlg |
Yes |
Text |
COMMON YELLOW |
Qualitative assessment of the general chemical situation (20% rule), including judgment Arseen. |
| OrdKwlIntr |
Yes |
Text |
COMMON YELLOW |
Qualitative assessment of salt intrusions and other intrusions. |
| OrdKwlAqua |
Yes |
Text |
COMMON YELLOW |
Qualitative judgement of the chemical and ecological status of surface water significantly departs due to the quality of the groundwater body. |
| OrdKwlTerr |
Yes |
Text |
COMMON YELLOW |
Qualitative assessment of whether there is significant damage to groundwater dependent terrestrial ecosystems due to the quality of the groundwater body. |
| OrdKwlRuww |
Yes |
Text |
COMMON YELLOW |
Qualitative assessment of compliance with the provisions of Article 7.3 of the WFD (quality of crude water in untracting wells). |
| UpTrend |
Yes |
Text |
GWTREND |
Is there a significant and persistent trend towards the relevant pollutants? |
| UpTrendType |
Yes |
Text |
DOMGWCOD |
If there is a significant and persistent trend towards which substance? |
| Earkwal |
Yes |
Text |
COMMON YELLOW |
Total judgment of the chemical status of groundwater including arsenic (one out, all out) |
In the GWBKWAN table, one rule is included with judgments per body water body. In addition to the overall assessment, an assessment of the impact on terrestrial ecosystems, the relationship with surface water and a balance assessment/completion assessment is also given.
Description
Mandatory
Type
Explanatory notes
Domain table
| GWBIDENT |
Yes |
Text |
Groundwater body identification |
|
| Year |
Yes |
Text |
Year of assessment |
|
| Balance |
Yes |
Text |
Assessment of disturbance balance ground water abstraction and retraction |
COMMON YELLOW |
| Anthropogenic |
Yes |
Text |
Judgement by anthropogenic influence on groundwater status for achieving environmental objectives (Art 4.) for associated surface waters |
COMMON YELLOW |
| Ecosystem |
Yes |
Text |
Judgement by anthropogenic influence on groundwater status on dependent terrestrial ecosystems |
COMMON YELLOW |
| Condition |
Yes |
Text |
Total assessment of the quantitative status of groundwater (one out, all out) |
COMMON YELLOW |
GWSUBST Domain Table
Domain table GWDEPTH
| Substrate | Depth |
| Dune |
Deep |
| Clay |
Shallow |
| Chalk |
Sources |
| Sand |
Domain Table GWOORDEEL
Domain table GWTREND
| Judgment | Trend |
| Good |
Yes |
| Unknown |
No |
| Insufficient |
Unknown |
The groundwater monitoring program includes locations for the monitoring of the quantity and locations for monitoring quality, chemistry. Within the quality component, a distinction is made between Condition Monitoring and Operational Monitoring.
In addition to a summary of the monitoring programme, information per groundwater monitoring site shall be provided by the provinces according to the following format.
The monitoring programme groundwater is derived from the surface water programme in terms of data structure and contains 3 tables:
1. MLCGWB, the main table showing the unique locations and attributes thereof
2. MLCGWB_DOEL, a table with the targets of monitoring by location
3. MLCGWB_PAR, a table with the parameters that are measured at a location
Table 1 and 2 are used for the maps and texts of the SGBP and electronic reporting to the EU. Table 3 is used only for electronic reporting.
Description
Mandatory
Type
Explanatory notes
| MLCIDENT |
Yes |
Text |
Location Unique Code (DN) |
| MLCNAAM |
Yes |
Text |
Name of the location |
| GWBIDENT |
Yes |
Text |
Ground water body where location is located |
| X |
Yes |
Numeric |
X coordinate |
| Y |
Yes |
Numeric |
Y coordinate |
| FILTER |
No |
Numeric |
Filter Number |
| MLCSOORT |
Yes |
Text |
Measurement location type: Condition and Trend, Operating or Both |
| MLCTYPE |
Yes |
Text |
Measurement Location Type: Quality, KwanEntity, or Both |
| CONSTRUCTION |
Yes |
Text |
Type of measurement station. Existing domains from DINO, code can be P for pitch tube, B for fire pit, W for well, L for agriculture tube |
| TOP_DEPTH |
Conditional |
Numeric |
Filter top under mower field (cm) |
| BOTTOM_DEPTH |
Conditional |
Numeric |
Bottom filter under mower field (cm) |
| DEPTH |
Conditional |
Numeric |
Depth under mower field (cm) |
| OWNER |
No |
Text |
Administrator of the location, in accordance with DINO description and encoding |
| MLCOPME |
No |
Text |
Explanatory notes |
| GAFIDENT |
Yes |
Text |
Code of the sub-basin |
| DRINKING Water |
Yes |
Yes/No |
Drinking water extraction |
The location identification must be unique. For the coding, 24 characters can be used, with the first two being reserved for an identification of the Netherlands ('NL ', 2 positions). For the remaining positions, they are free to choose. Two tracks are now being followed:
1. The code of the administrator (2 positions, see WBHCODE in the domain tables) followed by a free to choose identification (analogous to the identification of monitoring locations in the surface water monitoring program)
2. For the coupling with DINO, for identification use is made of the TNO number followed by the number of the filter.
A ground water monitoring location is thus actually a 3D location. Thus, on one x, y coordinate can occur multiple locations when multiple filters are staged for the WFD.
This is the name of the monitoring location. The name is free to choose and serves as recognition for the water manager.
The code of the groundwater body from which the monitoring site is located. For the list of encodings, reference is made to the table of groundwater bodies (GWB)
The coordinates of the monitoring site in the system of Rijkstriangle measurement. If multiple monitoring locations are defined with the same coordinate pairs (multiple filters in one extraction), a new, unique code should be given for each location.
Number of the filter. This field is not required. If the implementation in/next to DINO has been established this field will disappear.
The field MLCSOORT field indicates the type of measurement location: Condition and Trend, Operating or both. The allowed encodings refer to the domain table MLCSOORT in the attachments.
The location type is populated with MLCTYPE. Indicates whether it is a location in the Kwality/Kwantiteitsmeetnet. The allowed encodings refer to the domain table MLCTYPE in the attachments.
The name CONSTRUCTION refers to the EU reporting format indicating whether the location is a well (well) or 'spring' (source). In this field, the DINO encoding is used for the location type. For possible encodings, a reference is made to the domain table MLCDINO.
Top of the filter in cm down mower field. This field or the Depth field must be filled in. If the implementation in/next to DINO has been established this field will disappear.
Bottom side of the filter in cm down mower field. This field or the Depth field must be filled in. If the implementation in/next to DINO has been established this field will disappear.
The depth of the location in cm under the mower field.
Administrator of the location, in accordance with DINO description and encoding
Comments can be placed in this field
Code of the sub-basin in which the location is located. This is referenced in the domain table GAFIDENT with substream areas (GAF15).
Here indicate if the location is a winning process and the water is used for human consumption
Description
Mandatory
Type
Description
| MLCIDENT |
Yes |
Text |
Code of the monitoring site |
| MLCDOEL |
Yes |
Text |
Purpose of the monitoring site |
The MLCGWB_DOEL table lists the measurement targets by location. For each target, a separate line is included in the table. For possible measurement targets, reference is made to the domain table MLCDOEL.
MLCDOEL
Description
| GRENS |
Cross-border monitoring |
| PRICE QUALITY |
Drinking water quality |
| QUALITATI_REGION |
Quality Regional |
| QUANTIT_POTABLE |
Quantity of drinking water |
| KWANT_REGION |
Quantity regionally |
| VHR |
Natura 2000 sites |
| ERROR |
Salt water intrusion |
Description
Mandatory
Type
Explanatory notes
| MLCIDENT |
Yes |
Text |
Location Unique Code (DN) |
| DOMGWCOD |
Yes |
Text |
Measure parameter or quality element |
| MONFREQ |
Yes |
Numeric |
Monitoring frequency |
| MONCYCLE |
Yes |
Numeric |
Monitoring cycle |
| MLCSOORT |
Yes |
Text |
Type of monitoring network (TT or OM) |
The MLCGWB_PAR table indicates which parameters and/or quality elements are reported by location. Also, per quality element/parameter is indicated how often monitoring takes place and for which measurement grid, Condition and Trend or Operating, the parameter is measured.
Unique code of the monitoring site. Each monitoring location in the MLCGWB table also needs to be found in the MLCGWB_PAR table. That is, at least one parameter/quality element is reported for each location.
Code of the parameter or quality element to be reported. One rule shall be included for each parameter or quality element. For possible codes of parameters or quality elements, reference is made to the domain tables at www.idsw.nl. For the groundwater monitoring program, the specific encoding 'DEFAULT' can be used. For a location in the quantum measuring grid (MLCTYPE = 'KwanEntity '), this means that the rise height is measured, for a location in the quality measurement grid (MLCTYPE = 'Chemie'), 'DEFAULT' means that the following parameters are reported:
Code
Description
| O2 |
Oxygen content |
| pH |
pH |
| HINHD |
Conductivity |
| NO3 |
Nitrate |
| NH4 |
Ammonium |
| Cl |
Chloride |
| Ni |
Nickel |
| Axis |
Arsenic |
| CD |
Cadmium |
| Pb |
Lead |
| P |
Phosphate |
| IWSR12 |
Pesticides |
The monitor frequency in the number of measurements in one year. MONFREQ=12 means that it is measured 12 times in one year. MONCYCLUS= 6 means that one time per 6 years is reported.
Monitoring cycle in years. So every year the monitoring takes place (for example: one time per 6 year, MONCYCLE = 6; each year MONCYCLE = 1)
Type of measuring net to be included in this parameter. It can be selected from TT (Condition and Trens) or OM (Operationally), but not both. For a parameter in a TT measurement grid standard MONCYCLUS= 6 and for the OM measure, MONCYCLUS=1 applies.
For the realisation of the WFD targets established for ground and surface water bodies, measures shall be implemented. The measures with associated features such as size, own-initiative costs, costs and implementation period are included in a national database. The measures included in the Stroom Management Plan (SGBP) and the implementation of which is provided by 2015 shall be a result of a requirement.
Information about the measures is introduced by the water managers in the central database through the KRWmeasures website (from dec 2009 integrated into the KRW portal) The website contains a mandatory and an optional part. The mandatory part contains information needed to prepare SGBP and other national plans. The optional part is recognisable by a grey shading and can be used to store additional (non-compulsory) information that may be of interest in drawing up regional plans.
The measures to be included in the SGBP should always be linked to water bodies. In some cases, a single link can be used for this (cluster of water bodies or entire management area). In the first case, the relevant water body codes must be listed under 'Location'.
In Table 1, the Measures table is described from the national database. This table shall, by rule, contain all relevant information related to a WFD measure.
Order No
Field Name
Mandatory
Type
Description
Domain table
| 1 |
GAFIDENT |
Yes |
Text |
Sub-basin area code |
GAF15 |
| 2 |
WBHCODE |
Yes |
Numeric |
Water Manager Code |
WBH |
| 3 |
MATIDENT |
Yes |
Text |
Unique code of the measure |
|
| 4 |
MATNAME |
Yes |
Text |
Name of the measure |
|
| 5 |
MATCODE |
Yes |
Text |
Measure code |
MATSTD |
| 6 |
MATEENH |
Yes |
Text |
Unit of measure |
MATSTD |
| 7 |
MATOMV |
Yes |
Numeric |
Extent of the measure |
|
| 8 |
Explanatory notes |
No |
Memo |
Comments on the measure |
|
| 9 |
LocationType |
Yes |
Text |
Location type |
Locations |
| 10 |
Location |
Yes |
Text |
Name of the location |
(Depending on location type) |
| 11 |
Exporter |
Yes |
Text |
Exporter |
Execs |
| 12 |
Period |
Yes |
Text |
Period |
Periods |
| 13 |
Status |
No |
Text |
Status |
Status |
| 14 |
Document |
No |
Text |
Rear document |
Schedule |
| 15 |
Report |
Yes |
Yes/No |
Include in SGBP? |
|
| 16 |
Investment Costs |
Yes |
Numeric |
Investment costs |
|
| 17 |
Operating Costs |
Yes |
Numeric |
Operating costs |
|
| 18 |
Ground Number |
No |
Numeric |
Number of hectares of land acquisition |
|
| 19 |
Land Costs |
Yes |
Numeric |
Costs of land acquisition |
|
| 20 |
WB21 |
No |
Yes/No |
Is this a WB21 measure? |
|
| 21 |
Costs1 |
No |
Text |
First cost carrier |
Cost carriers |
| 22 |
CostPercent1 |
No |
Numeric |
Percentage of participation 1 P. Costholder |
|
| 23 |
Costs2 |
No |
Text |
Second cost carrier |
Cost carriers |
| 24 |
CostPercent2 |
No |
Numeric |
Rate of participation 2 P. Costholder |
|
| 25 |
Costdrager3 |
No |
Text |
Third-cost carrier |
Cost carriers |
| 26 |
CostPercent3 |
No |
Numeric |
Rate of participation 3 P. Costholder |
|
| 27 |
Theme |
No |
Text |
Water theme |
Theme Axis |
| 28 |
N2000 |
No |
Yes/No |
Is the measure in an N2000 area? |
|
| 29 |
N2000Name |
No |
Text |
Name of the N2000 area |
|
| 30 |
GWB |
No |
Yes/No |
Is the measure in a groundwater protection area? |
|
| 31 |
GWBName |
No |
Text |
Name of the groundwater protection zone |
|
| 32 |
Date |
No |
Date |
Date of last change |
Code of the sub-catchment area in which the measure is taken. This is referenced in the domain table GAFIDENT with substream areas (GAF15).
Code of the responsible water manager. For the codes, reference is made to the WBHCODE field in the domain table with water managers (WBH).
Unique code of the measure. It is recommended to encode the measure as is common for surface water bodies: The first four characters are reserved for an identification of the Netherlands (NL, 2 positions) and the administrator (2 positions, see WBHCODE in the domain tables). This is necessary to ensure that the code is unique at European level (by adding the country code NL) and is unique at national level (by adding a code for the water manager). The remaining characters are free to choose.
Name of the measure as specified by the water manager
Measure coding according to SGBP. This is referenced in the Code field in the domain table with standard measures (MATSTD).
Unit of measure. The units that are allowed are dependent on the measure encoding (MATCODE). This is referenced by the Unit in the Domain table with standard measures (MATSTD). This is important only for measures to be included in the GBP SGBP
Extent of the measure in question. This value must always be greater than zero
Detailed description of the measure
The type of location where the measure applies. For a list of possible locations, refer to the Locations domain table. Measures to be included in the SGBP should always be linked to one or more bodies of water
The location where the measure applies. The choices available depend on the location type. If the location type is chosen 'surface water body' then the location refers to the code of the surface water body (the OWMIDENT field from the table with water bodies). For a list of possible combinations of location and location type, reference is made to the attachments.
The Party responsible for the implementation of a measure. This reference is made to the Executors domain table.
Period of implementation of the measure in question. Measures to be included in the SGBP should be selected from the predefined periods. The 'unknown' option may not be used. This is referenced in the Time Boxes domain table
Status in which the measure is wrong in the present situation, distinguishing between: executed (already exists), in progress (currently being realised), budgeted (included in established implementation plans), planned (is included) In plans but not yet budgeting), concept (has been included in preliminary effects), new (not previously named, follows from area process) and unknown. For a complete list of possible statuses, reference is made to the domain table Status.
Name of the plan form in which the measure is to be taken. Examples include: WBP, BHP, BPRW, ground water plan, council decision.
It indicates whether the measure should be included in the SGBP. In principle, all proposed measures that contribute to KRW targets shall be checked.
Investment cost of the measure, including VAT and exclusive land acquisition.
Cost of management and maintenance (including VAT), calculated as an additional charge in relation to the current situation. Therefore, this may also be negative in case of a reduced effort.
Number of hectares to be acquired for the realisation of the measure
Costs of land acquisition (including VAT) related to the implementation of WFD measure
By means of tick marks are indicated whether the measure also makes a contribution to achieving WB21 targets.
Name of the party which accounts for (part of) the cost of the measure
Share of the total cost paid by the relevant cost carrier
Name of the water or policy theme to which the measure provides a contribution. Possible water themes are included in the Theme Domain table.
The following domain tables are applicable:
• MATSTD: standard measures with codes and units
• Location: possible locations where a measure can be associated
• Period: period of a measure
• Status: Status of a measure
• Exporter: the execution of a measure
• Cost carrier: the cost carrier of a measure
• Theme: water theme
Code
Category
Description
Unit
| BE01 |
Management measures |
performing active fish or shellfish management |
Units |
| BE02 |
Management measures |
actively carry out vegetative management (grafting, sowing, planting) |
Ha, km |
| BE03 |
Management measures |
running on water quality oriented maintenance/maaiAdmin (water & wet shore) |
Ha, km |
| BE04 |
Management measures |
Remove Eutrofe bagger |
m 3 , ha |
| BE05 |
Management measures |
Remove contaminated bagger (excl. eutrophic bagger) |
m 3 , ha |
| BE06 |
Management measures |
adjust vegetation to adjust by water |
Km, ha |
| BE07 |
Management measures |
Management of large-scale groundwater pollution |
Ha |
| BE08 |
Management measures |
other management measures |
pieces, km, ha |
| BR01 |
Source measures |
reduce emission of nutrients agriculture |
pieces, ha |
| BR02 |
Source measures |
reduce emissions of heavy metals and other micropollutants |
pieces, ha |
| BR03 |
Source measures |
reduce emission plant protection products agriculture |
pieces, ha |
| BR04 |
Source measures |
reduce emission shipping |
pieces, ha |
| BR05 |
Source measures |
reduce emission of emissions |
pieces, ha |
| BR06 |
Source measures |
reduce diffuse emission industry |
pieces, ha |
| BR07 |
Source measures |
Remediation of top-up oyant protection |
Km |
| BR08 |
Source measures |
reducing emissions building materials |
pieces, ha |
| BR09 |
Source measures |
reduce emission plant protection products city |
pieces, ha |
| BR10 |
Source measures |
other source measures |
pieces, ha |
| GGOR |
Other measures |
GGOR measures |
pieces, km, ha, m 3 |
| IM01 |
Emission measures |
reduce load RWZI nutrient |
Pieces |
| IM02 |
Emission measures |
reduce load RWZI-other substances |
Pieces |
| IM03 |
Emission measures |
Tackling overdumping mixed systems |
pieces, ha |
| IM04 |
Emission measures |
purge + detach paved surface |
Ha |
| IM05 |
Emission measures |
restoring leaky sewers |
pieces, km |
| IM06 |
Emission measures |
Unpurified discharges |
Pieces |
| IM07 |
Emission measures |
spray-free zones |
Km, ha |
| IM08 |
Emission measures |
Manure free zones |
Km, ha |
| IM09 |
Emission measures |
Sewerage swamp at lozings and/or innampoint |
Units |
| IM10 |
Emission measures |
Saning contaminated land soils |
pieces, m 3 |
| IM11 |
Emission measures |
decontamination landsoil and/or groundwater |
pieces, m 3 |
| IM12 |
Emission measures |
other emission reduction measures |
pieces, km, ha |
| IN01 |
Incorporation measures |
hold water in capillaries of the system |
Ha |
| IN02 |
Incorporation measures |
Diverting/separating water flows |
Pieces |
| IN03 |
Incorporation measures |
Flushing/changing |
Pieces |
| IN04 |
Incorporation measures |
enlarge (fast) running water/hermeothers, NVO < 3 m |
Km |
| IN05 |
Incorporation measures |
Widening (fast) running water/hermeothers, 3m < NVO < 10 m |
Km |
| IN06 |
Incorporation measures |
enlarge (fast) running water/hermeothers, NVO > 10 m |
Km |
| IN07 |
Incorporation measures |
broadening water gang/system slow running or stationary: NVO < 3 m |
Km |
| IN08 |
Incorporation measures |
broadening water gang/system slow running or stationary: 3m < NVO < 10 m |
Km |
| IN09 |
Incorporation measures |
broadening water gang/system slow running or stationary: NVO > 10 m |
Km |
| IN10 |
Incorporation measures |
widening watergang/system: connecting wetland or lowering skins |
Ha, km |
| IN11 |
Incorporation measures |
building side-geul/restore connection |
pieces, km |
| IN12 |
Incorporation measures |
deepwater gang/system (over dimensioning) |
Ha, m 3 |
| IN13 |
Incorporation measures |
Water gang/system veronediferal |
Ha, m 3 |
| IN14 |
Incorporation measures |
adjust target level |
pieces, ha |
| IN15 |
Incorporation measures |
Vispass making works of art |
Pieces |
| IN16 |
Incorporation measures |
Remove stub |
Pieces |
| IN17 |
Incorporation measures |
construction special areas for fish |
pieces, km |
| IN18 |
Incorporation measures |
construction special areas of flora and fauna |
Units |
| IN19 |
Incorporation measures |
Sewage swamp |
Units |
| IN20 |
Incorporation measures |
other measures to be introduced |
pieces, km, ha |
| RO01 |
RO-measures |
change agricultural function |
Units |
| RO02 |
RO-measures |
Restrict recreation |
Units |
| RO03 |
RO-measures |
restrict shipping |
Units |
| RO04 |
RO-measures |
change fishing |
Units |
| RO05 |
RO-measures |
change urban function |
Units |
| RO06 |
RO-measures |
Avoiding risky functions in groundwater protection areas |
Units |
| RO07 |
RO-measures |
reduce/move the ground water extraction |
Pieces |
| RO08 |
RO-measures |
Stoppage of small winnings (camping sites) |
Pieces |
| RO09 |
RO-measures |
Other RO measures |
pieces, ha |
| S01 |
Instrumental measures |
run survey |
Pieces |
| S02 |
Instrumental measures |
Provision of information |
Pieces |
| S03 |
Instrumental measures |
customizing/introducing (new) legislation |
Pieces |
| S04 |
Instrumental measures |
create new plan |
Pieces |
| S05 |
Instrumental measures |
Financial measures |
Pieces |
| S06 |
Instrumental measures |
other instrument measures |
Pieces |
| WB21 |
Other measures |
WB21 measures |
pieces, km, ha, m 3 |
Location
| Cluster of water bodies |
| Municipality |
| Groundwater protection area |
| Groundwater body |
| Natura 2000 area |
| Unknown |
| Surface water body |
| Other |
| Water management area |
Exporter
| Municipality |
| Industry |
| Agriculture |
| Unknown |
| Other |
| State |
| Rich |
| Rijkswaterstaat |
| Site Manager |
| Water |
Period
| 2000-2006 |
| 2007-2009 |
| 2010-2015 |
| 2015-2027 |
| 2016-2021 |
| 2016-2027 |
| 2022-2027 |
| Unknown |
Status
| Run |
| In Progress |
| Scheduled |
| Budgeted |
| Draft |
| New |
| Unknown |
Cost carriers
| Municipality |
| N/A |
| Unknown |
| Other |
| State |
| Rijkswaterstaat |
| Site Manager |
| Water |
Theme
| Pesticides |
| Surface Water Interaction |
| Point sources/soil contamination |
| Desiccation |
The term environmental objectives as it is used in the KRW area processes and the SGBP refers to the justification for the certification of bodies of water, the level of ecological and physico-chemical targets and the reason why the objectives are: may not be met in 2015 (= phasing). The WFD calls for a comprehensive rationale of these parts when deviating from the standard situation where for all the quality elements of a body of water the Good Ecological Condition (GET) is reached in 2015.
Information about the environmental objectives is introduced by the water managers in the central database through the KRWenvironmental objectives website (integrated into the KRW portal from Dec 2009)
Data relating to environmental objectives are divided into four groups:
1. General data relating to the body of water
2. Information on the justification for the status of the body of water
3. Information on the deviations from the height of the GEP
4. Information on the phasing out of the objectives
This section contains general information about the body of water, which is provided through various other sources.
• OWMIDENT Water Body Code
• OWMNAME Name of the water body
• OWMSTAT Status of the Water Body (N, S, K)
• OWMTYPE Type of water body (M, R, O)
• DOELTYPE Water type used to determine the measuring lats
The information on the body code, the name of the body of water, the water type, and the status comes from the water bodies data supplied via the WFD portal according to the format of surface water bodies. The information related to the water type used to determine the measures is additional to the format environmental objectives and is taken from the information provided from the KRWtargets website (from Dec 2009 onwards). Integrated into the WFD portal).
Water bodies where the achievement of a Good Environmental Condition (GET) is not possible for one or more quality elements may be strongly altered or created artificial status. The reasons for this should be justified. In the case of artificial water bodies, the standard is based on the justification for the water body being dug. A special feature is that the water body has been dug for the dewatering of high bogs or lowhens. If this applies, it shall be completed. In case there is another reason to notice the body of water as artificial, then this will be included in the Facultative Note bar. In the case of highly altered water bodies, more extensive justification is required:
This field refers to standard changes (hydromorphological) interventions for achieving the good ecological status not carried out in relation to significant negative effects on functions or the environment in broad terms. Sentence. This explains why it is not possible to use the functions covered by the mentioned water management functions in a different way, with considerably less environmental damage (KRW art 4.3b). When default denings are used, the document and location of the documents and the location of the document are specified. A brief description of the status recognition may also be given to substantiate the status.
It is indicated which hydromorphological interventions have been considered, but have been reduced in broad terms due to significant adverse effects on use functions or the environment (in accordance with WFD Article 4.3a). This part consists of three steps, which together give an impression of irreversible ingre (e) p (s) and its impact:
a. the intervention (measure)-aimed at hydromorphological recovery-which has been considered but not implemented (drop-down menu, see Annex 2));
b. The use function/environmental quality that would be affected by this procedure (drop-down menu, see Annex 2);
c. the mechanism on the basis of which there are negative effects on the function or environmental quality (drop-down menu, see Annex 2).
In case of operations (measures) which are not included in the drop-down menu, the choice of 'Anders' is selected here and is included in the optional explanation (including the use function/environmental aspect and mechanism of action) of the relevant surgery. For the standard combinations of irreversible interventions and utility/environmental quality, general justifications are set out in Annex 3.
This section indicates why it is not possible to use the functions, for which the part b. procedures mentioned in the body of water are intended to be operated in a different way with considerably less environmental damage (KRW art 4.3b: ' the useful purpose served by the changed nature of the water body can be achieved by means of: other, significantly more favourable to the environment '). A drop-down menu shall be used (see Annex 2). This part is further motivated by standard combination of intervention and utility/environmental quality (see Annex 3).
Information on the underpinnings of the status established prior to the implementation of the website KRWenvironmental objectives is set out in the 'format environmental objectives' (excel-sheets). Data that could not be transferred from it to the website are included in this part.
The status distraction is a step ahead of us, namely the appointment of the hydromorphological interventions that have taken place in the past, and now determine the current situation. These are purely informative and are formally listed in the Article 5 reporting. These procedures are also optionally included here.
The WFD argues that the GEP target should have a slight deviation from the Maximum Ecological Potential (MEP). In the Netherlands, for both biological and general physicochemical quality elements per (natural) water type values for a Good Ecological Condition (GET) are derived. These have been described in detail in 'References and measures for natural water types for the Water Framework Directive' (Van der Molen & Pot (editorial), 2007). For ditches and canals (artificial waters), for these quality elements, defaultvalues are derived and described in 'Description MEP and concept measures for ditches and channels for the Water Framework Directive' (Evers et al., 2007).
The number values for the quality elements are shown in this section; these are the data entered via the website KRWaimen.nl. In this case, only the quality elements with a number value deviating from the appropriate Good Ecological Condition (GET) or the national default value are displayed. The way the JEP is derived from the MEP is stated by quality element. In addition, a reference shall be made to background documents describing the underpinnings of the height of the JEP.
Information on the level of the JEP established prior to the implementation of the WFD Environmental Objectives is set out in the 'format environmental objectives' (excel-sheets). Data that could not be transferred from it to the website are included in this part.
There are several reasons why the good condition for a particular quality element cannot be reached in the first planning period. The phasing out is further explained below.
This section shall list the selected quality elements for which the GET or JEP will not be met by 2015. In addition, the group to which it belongs (biology or physical chemistry), the number values of GEP, and the expectation for 2015 are presented by quality element (which is the group to which it belongs).
This section lists the measures (with corresponding standard measures code) that will be implemented after 2015. The data are from the website KRWcustomcontrolen.nl.
For this part, the formal reason (natural circumstances, disproportionately expensive or technically unfeasible) is known as the reason for the phasing out (drop-down menu, see Annex 2). This reason is linked to a certain mechanism, which makes it impossible to meet the targets already in 2015 (drop-down menu, see Annex 2). This should be seen as a further specification of the formal grounds for reasons which the KRW provides. There is also the possibility of including a phasing out of the phasing out here. This option is mainly intended to describe additional mechanisms of action, which are not mentioned in the drop-down menu and/or to give further explanations on the phasing out. For the standard combinations of the grounds and mechanism, general justifications are set out in Annex 3.
Information on the phasing out of the phasing out of the WWenvironmental objectives website has been set out in the 'format environmental objectives' (excel-sheets). Data that could not be transferred from it to the website are included in this part.
Description
Mandatory
Type
Domain table
Explanatory notes
Table
Field
| 1 Water body | ||||||||
| 1a-General water body data | ||||||||
| Code |
No 1 |
Text |
OWM |
Unique code of the water body |
OWM |
OWMIDENT |
||
| Name |
No 1 |
Text |
OWM |
Name of the water body |
OWM |
OWMNAME |
||
| Status |
No 1 |
Text |
OWM |
Status of the water body |
OWM |
OWMSTAT |
||
| Type |
No 1 |
Text |
OWM |
Type of body of water |
OWM |
OWMTYPE |
||
|
|
|
Target Type |
No 1 |
Text |
Target Type |
Type of ecological measure, used for the derivation of ecological goals and class boundaries |
Target Type |
Type |
| 2 Statement of reasons | ||||||||
| 2a-Optional explanatory note and compulsory literature reference | ||||||||
| Literature Reference/explanatory notes |
Yes |
Text |
reference to document based on justification |
Link-Explanatory Notes-waterbodies |
Explanatory notes |
|||
| 2b-Significance of negative effects | ||||||||
| Measure |
Yes |
Text |
lut_schadesmeasures |
Hydromorphological intervention that is not performed because it has significant negative effects on use functions or environment in broad sense |
linkMechanisme_status |
Measure |
||
| utility function |
Yes |
Text |
lut_functions |
Use or environmental quality that is adversely affected by an intervention |
linkMechanisme_status |
Function |
||
| mechanism |
Yes |
Text |
lut_mechanisms |
Ways in which the adverse effects of an intervention work on a utility function or environmental quality |
linkMechanisme_status |
mechanism2 |
||
| Explanatory notes |
No |
Text |
Description of operation, use function and mechanism for situations not included in the standard domain tables |
linkMechanisme_status |
Text _otherwise |
|||
| 2c -Beroak's useful purpose with other means considered | ||||||||
| Alternative |
Yes |
Text |
lut_customize |
Reason why it is not possible to operate the functions in another way with significantly less damage to the environment |
link_customize |
customing_considered |
||
| 2d-Previously supplied information | ||||||||
| Information |
No |
Text |
Additional information on the underpinning of the status from format environmental objectives and/or hydromorphological procedures that have taken place in the past and will determine the current situation |
Link-Explanatory Notes-waterbodies |
explanation, type = status |
|||
| 3. Height JEP | ||||||||
| 3a-Depart MEP → GEP | ||||||||
| Measure Bar |
No 1 |
Text |
Measure (s) |
Quality Element Name |
linkHoogteGEP |
Measure Bar |
||
| JEP height |
No 1 |
Text |
Targets |
Number value of the height of the GEP |
linkHoogteGEP |
GEP |
||
| Derivation |
Yes |
Text |
Lutins |
Methodology used for MEP derivation GEP used |
linkHoogteGEP |
Derivation |
||
| Literature |
Yes |
Text |
Reference Literature Reference |
linkHoogteGEP |
Explanatory notes |
|||
| 3b-Previously supplied information | ||||||||
| Information |
No |
Text |
Additional information on the underpinnings of JEP from format environmental objectives |
Link-Explanatory Notes-waterbodies |
illustration, sort = gep |
|||
| 4 Phase | ||||||||
| 4a-Restricted quality elements | ||||||||
| Measure Bar |
No 1 |
Text |
Measure (s) |
Quality Element Name |
Targets |
Measure Bar |
||
| Group |
No 1 |
Text |
Groups |
Group to which the quality element belongs |
Targets |
Group |
||
| GEP |
No 1 |
Text |
Targets |
Number value of GEP according to KRWaimen.nl |
Targets |
GEP |
||
| Target 2015 |
No 1 |
Text |
Targets |
Number value or assessment of target 2015 according to KRWaimen.nl |
Targets |
Target 2015 |
||
| 4b-Measures after 2015 | ||||||||
| Name |
No 1 |
Text |
Measures |
Name of the measure |
Measures |
MATNAME |
||
| Code |
No 1 |
Text |
Measures |
Default custom control code |
Measures |
MATCODE |
||
| 4c-Motif |
||||||||
| Reasons |
Yes |
Text |
lutFasination |
Formal reason (according to KRW) why the targets will not be reached in 2015 |
linkMechanisme_fasering |
Reasons |
||
| mechanism |
Yes |
Text |
LutFastic Mechanisms |
Further specification of why targets will not be achieved in 2015 |
linkMechanisme_fasering |
mechanism2 |
||
| Explanatory notes |
Yes |
Memo |
Further specification in case no use is made of the standard trends from the domain table and/or explanatory notes on the phasing out |
linkMechanisme_fasering |
Text _otherwise |
|||
| 4d-Previously supplied information and reference | ||||||||
| Information |
No |
Text |
Additional information on the underpinning of the phasing out from format environmental objectives and/or literature reference |
Link-Explanatory Notes-waterbodies |
explanatory note, species = phasing |
|||
1 Inherits from other tables.
Identifier
Group
Measure Bar
Unit
domgwcod
| 80 |
BIO |
Fish |
EKR |
FISH |
| 33 |
BIO |
Macrophytes |
EKR |
OVWFLORA |
| 19 |
BIO |
Macrofauna |
EKR |
MAFAUNA |
| 7 |
BIO |
Phytoplankton |
EKR |
FYTOPL |
| 86 |
FCH |
Oxygen saturation (summer average) |
% |
O2 |
| 85 |
FCH |
Acidity (summer average) |
- |
pH |
| 41 |
FCH |
Total nitrogen (summer average) |
mg N/l |
N |
| 40 |
FCH |
Total phosphorus (summer average) |
mg P/l |
P |
| 39 |
FCH |
Temperature (maximum value) |
° C |
T |
| 38 |
FCH |
Dissolved inorganic nitrogen (nitrate, nitrite and ammonium) (winter average) |
mg N/l |
DIN |
| 2 |
FCH |
Daylight saving (summer average) |
Meter |
MESSAGE |
| 1 |
FCH |
Chloride (summer average) |
mg Cl/l |
Cl |
Identifier
Customize
| 2 |
yes, negative effects environment |
| 3 |
yes, technically unattainable |
| 4 |
yes, disproportionately high cost |
| 5 |
yes, no alternatives available |
| 6 |
No |
Identifier
Derivation
Species
| 1 |
low-effect measures envisaged and reduced |
very changed |
| 3 |
GEP is taken equal to MEP |
very changed |
| 4 |
measure intensity measure for MEP-> GEP |
very changed |
| 5 |
type of measures measuUy for MEP-> GEP |
very changed |
| 6 |
GEP fixed percentage below MEP |
very changed |
| 7 |
rural defaults |
very changed |
| 8 |
customsable custom |
very changed |
| 9 |
no derivation, GEP is equal to current taken |
very changed |
| 11 |
no derivation, countrywide numbers GET |
chemistry |
| 12 |
MEP fixed percentage above GEP |
very changed |
| 13 |
Regional diversion |
chemistry |
| 14 |
rural defaults for locks and channels |
Artificial |
| 15 |
Regional diversion |
Artificial |
| 16 |
no choice (remove choice) |
Artificial |
| 17 |
no choice (remove choice) |
chemistry |
| 18 |
no choice (remove choice) |
very changed |
| 19 |
not limiting, no derivation |
chemistry |
| 20 |
no derivation, countrywide numbers GET |
Artificial |
| 21 |
rural defaults for locks and channels |
chemistry |
Identifier
Mechanism
| 1 |
nal/historical load |
| 2 |
slow effects measures |
| 3 |
depreciation periods |
| 4 |
overloads |
| 5 |
Land acquisition |
| 6 |
Social support |
| 7 |
Synergy with other policy intentions |
| 8 |
Output capacity |
| 9 |
Otherwise |
Identifier
Reasons
| 1 |
natural conditions |
| 2 |
disproportionately costly |
| 3 |
technically unfeasible |
Identifier
Function
| 2 |
Archaeology |
| 3 |
Heritage |
| 4 |
geomorphology |
| 5 |
Industry |
| 6 |
Agriculture |
| 7 |
landscape |
| 8 |
Recreation |
| 9 |
Shipping |
| 10 |
Urban area |
| 11 |
Water management |
| 14 |
Nature |
| 15 |
infrastructure |
| 16 |
power supply |
| 17 |
drinking water supply |
Identifier
Measure
| 3 |
Link of beektrajects/construction side geul in agrarian area |
| 4 |
Adjust quays urban area |
| 5 |
Limit peak rundown in overruns agrarian area |
| 7 |
Restricted shipping in large channels |
| 9 |
Ducts watercourses in agricultural area |
| 10 |
Flexible gauge management in the waters of boebr; |
| 11 |
Handling natural water level in agricultural area |
| 12 |
Handling natural water level in urban area |
| 13 |
Land change in agricultural area |
| 14 |
Change in urban area |
| 18 |
Peeping change channels with professional shipping |
| 19 |
Peilalteration polder areas in agricultural area |
| 23 |
Increase DrainaBased in urban area |
| 24 |
Lock Remove |
| 25 |
Remove studs in intensive agricultural area |
| 28 |
Removal of studs in agricultural area |
| 29 |
Removing water conversions |
| 30 |
Other, see explanatory notes |
| 31 |
Peeping change watercourses in urban area |
| 32 |
Increase DrainaBased in agricultural area |
| 33 |
Remove studs in urban area |
| 34 |
Removal of dams, dikes, cribs, fixed layers, studs, locks, hydroelectric power stations and/or defence in Rijkswaters |
| 35 |
Unnormalization and/or channelling in Rijkswaters |
| 36 |
Increase inundation zone by dike diversion and restrict/prohibit use functions |
| 37 |
Unnatural control, decomposition and/or maintenance in the Rijkswaters end |
Identifier
Mechanism
| 1 |
loss-of-value |
| 2 |
decrease accessibility |
| 3 |
Area loss |
| 4 |
Lower water depth |
| 5 |
higher (ground) water level |
| 6 |
Higher chloride content |
| 9 |
lower (ground) water level |
| 10 |
lower or higher (ground) water level |
| 13 |
Negative effects alternatives |
| 14 |
Safety |
| 15 |
water nuisance |
| 17 |
night-end control |
| 18 |
Salinisation |
| 19 |
impairment provisions |
| 20 |
resupply function restriction |
| 21 |
increase natural state deviation |
| 22 |
Dry watercourses |
| 23 |
loss of cultural historical value |
| 24 |
drying teschade |
| 25 |
Loss of yield |
| 26 |
limitation of navigability |
Identifier
Status
| 1 |
Dug |
| 2 |
Dug after inpolation |
| 3 |
dug by vendeable layer peat |
| 4 |
Dug for dewatering high bogs |
Underpinning status of water bodies (WFD art. 4.3a and 4.3b)
Water bodies may be designated as artificial or strongly altered if necessary (hydromorphological) interventions for achieving the good ecological status have significant negative effects on a number of functions in particular Or the broad environment (WFD art 4.3a). For artificial bodies of water, it is sufficient to state that they have been constructed by man. For heavily changed bodies of water, a more extensive justification is requested, which is detailed below for various types of interventions. It is noted each time for which functions the negative effects of the interventions are significant, and why it is not possible to use the functions for which the said procedures have been carried out in the body of water, to be used in a different way with significantly less damage to the environment (KRW art 4.3b).
S1: Remove water conversions
S2: Flexible gauge management in the waters of the water
S3: Fully nature-friendly establishment of waters with water-housekeeping function
S4: Limits of shipping in large channels
S5: Peilchange channels with professional momentum
S6: Drop locks
S7: Remove studs in agrarian area
S8: Deming water corridors in agricultural area
S9: Renal change in agricultural area
S10: Increase Draina based in agricultural area
S11: Limits of peak rundown in overrun agricultural area
S12: Peilalteration in agricultural area
S13: Hanting natural water level in agricultural area
S14: Linking of beektrajects/construction ultras in agrarian area
S15: Remove studs in urban area
S16: Product change streams in urban area
S17: Increase DrainaBased in urban area
S18: Peilmodification watercourses in urban area
S19: Hanting natural water level in urban area
S20: Adjues cades urban area
S21: Natural establishment of cultural historical heritage
The removal of water conversions has almost always adverse effects on one or more use functions through the security mechanism. Because the area where damage occurs when removing the water conversion is generally many hectares, moving use functions can only be possible at disproportionately high costs.
The use of a more flexible management of the management of the water in the water can lead to higher water levels in (extreme) wet conditions, increasing the risk of flooding and water nuisance. A consequence of this is significant damage for both agriculture and the urban area. Because the area where damage occurs due to water nuisance generally amounts to many hectares, moving here is only possible at disproportionately high costs. The shipping industry is also asking for a highly regulated level. Both too low levels (e.g. minimum depth for navigability) and too high levels (due to sufficient height for pass-ability crossing infrastructures) result in the possibility of limited shipping in possibilities. Other transport of products is necessary if the shipping function is no longer able to be fulfilled. This has generally negative effects on the environment per balance.
The flow profile of primary and secondary waters and the fairway strip of sailing waters should remain free from plant growth because otherwise the water management and/or shipping function is impeded. If it is not possible to achieve sufficient drainage in wet periods, this increase in water and inundation results in negative consequences for agriculture and urban areas, for example. Also for the shipping industry has a limitation of the navigability of the fairway negative effects. Because the area where damage occurs due to water nuisance generally amounts to many hectares, moving here is only possible at disproportionately high costs. Other transport of products is necessary if the shipping function is no longer able to be fulfilled. This has generally negative effects on the environment per balance.
Professional shipping has an important economic function in the Netherlands, not only as a sector in itself, but also because many industries depend on the supply/disposal of raw materials or products by ship. Only a limited number of waters are equipped for this shipping function. Reducing shipping means that transport, in view of the economic importance, will have to take place in other ways and that there will be a loss of revenue for the sector itself. The alternatives (mostly transport by road), in relation to shipping, have a more negative impact on the environment and lead to more energy consumption. Therefore, limiting shipping because of these effects is considered to be harmful to the environment.
The water management in watercourses with a shipping function calls for a highly regulated level. Both too low levels (in relation to minimum depth for navigability) and too high levels (in relation to sufficient height for passability crossing infrastructure) result in the possibility of restricting shipping in possibilities. Other transport of products is necessary if the shipping function is no longer able to be fulfilled. This alternative will often involve road transport, which (due to high CO2 emissions) has significant negative effects on the environment. In addition, a change in transport on water to road transport leads to unacceptable economic consequences for the professional shipping industry and industry created by location choices and facilities as a loosening of water.
Locks have been built in the past to regulate the water level and flow rate in such a way that the passable for ships remains guaranteed. The removal of the lock has the effect of lowering the water level upstream of the work of art and reducing water depth. The possibilities for shipping are limited by this procedure. The alternatives (mostly transport by road), in relation to shipping, have a more negative impact on the environment and lead to more energy consumption. Therefore, limiting shipping because of these effects is considered to be harmful to the environment. The removal of locks also makes it no longer possible to respond to situations of prolonged drought or high disposal. Surface water and groundwater levels are reduced in a large part of the year, and extremely low levels are maintained for longer. The resulting loss of revenue for agriculture is not to be mitigated by proven adjustments in good agricultural practice. The only alternative is relocation. Given the limited area available for the relocation of the utility function, this can only be done at a disproportionately high cost.
The water management in the area with an agricultural function calls for a regulated groundwater level. A low ground water level is not desirable in areas with an agricultural function (reduced yields). The level of surface water is strongly determined by the groundwater level. This surface water level is regulated by studs. The removal of these studs resulting in a disturbance of groundwater is thus a result. Moreover, due to the absence of studs, no further action can be taken on situations of prolonged drought or high drainage. Groundwater levels are lower in large part of the year, and extremely low groundwater levels are holding on for longer. The resulting loss of revenue for agriculture is not to be mitigated by proven adjustments in good agricultural practice. The only alternative is relocation. Given the limited area available for the relocation of the utility function, this can only be done at a disproportionately high cost.
The water management in areas with an intensive agricultural function calls for a regulated groundwater level. In areas where there is an agricultural function, for example, the cultivation of crops that are optimally reproducing at a certain groundwater level, but also the realienable of parcels needed for good business operations. The use of watercourses has the effect of distorting the optimum water-housekeeping situation and the loss of revenue. In addition, the reduced possibilities for water drainage result in rainwater remaining on land locally on land. The resulting loss of revenue tends not to be mitigated by proven adjustments in good agricultural practice. Given the limited area available for relocation of the utility function in this area only at a disproportionately high cost
The remedying of streams aims to create more variety in the stroking pattern and substrate of streams. In order to achieve this and to offset any adverse effects on the water household, area should be released for the purpose of transferring the stream and possibly for possible inundations which will occur due to the change in the area. profile. This will result in a loss of land area for agriculture, which is only limited in the densely populated Netherlands and is available at relatively high cost. In addition, inundations due to water/sludge quality are deemed to be undesired in many places from environmental considerations. Customizing the use functions is only possible if landowners are compensated at an acceptable price, or job relocation is possible. Given the limited area available for the relocation of the agricultural function, this can only be done at a disproportionately high cost.
The water management in areas with an intensive agricultural function calls for a regulated groundwater level. In areas where there is an agricultural function, for example, the cultivation of crops that are optimally reproducing at a certain groundwater level, but also the realienable of parcels needed for good business operations. The use of water courses or the raising of the drainage base will result in the optimum water-housekeeping situation being disrupted and the loss of yield on the order. In addition, the reduced possibilities for water drainage result in rainwater remaining on land locally on land. The resulting loss of revenue tends not to be mitigated by proven adjustments in good agricultural practice. Given the limited area available for the relocation of the utility function, this can only be done at a disproportionately high cost.
The retention of water in the overruns of the water system by stowing and dipping water runs has a considerable impact on agriculture in this area. Due to these procedures, optimum water-housekeeping conditions are disrupted and yield loss occurs as a result of vernatting. In addition, the reduced possibilities for water drainage result in rainwater remaining on land locally on land. The resulting loss of revenue tends not to be mitigated by proven adjustments in good agricultural practice. Given the limited area available for the relocation of the utility function, this can only be done at a disproportionately high cost.
The water management in areas with an intensive agricultural function calls for a regulated groundwater level. In areas where there is an agricultural function, for example, the cultivation of crops that are optimally reproducing at a certain groundwater level, but also the realienable of parcels needed for good business operations. Adjusting the level has the effect of distorting the optimal water-housekeeping situation and making it possible to yield a yield of revenue. The resulting loss of revenue tends not to be mitigated by proven adjustments in good agricultural practice. In view of the limited available area for use of the use function only at a disproportionately high cost
The water management in areas with an intensive agricultural function calls for a regulated groundwater level. In areas where there is an agricultural function, for example, the cultivation of crops that are optimally reproducing at a certain groundwater level, but also the realienable of parcels needed for good business operations. A natural fluctuation of the level of the level has the effect of disrupting the optimal water-housekeeping situation and causing loss of return. The resulting loss of revenue tends not to be mitigated by proven adjustments in good agricultural practice. Given the limited area available for relocation of the utility function in this only possible at disproportionately high cost
As a result, the branches or the construction of ancillary machinery in the agricultural sector has the effect of clearing the area to be used in (intensive) agriculture for the benefit of sections/secondary areas. This will result in a loss of land for agriculture. Adjustment of the use functions is only possible if landowners are compensated at a reasonable price or job relocation is possible. Given the limited area available for the relocation of the agricultural function, this can only be done at a disproportionately high cost.
The water management in the area with an urban function calls for a regulated groundwater level. A low groundwater level is not desirable in areas with an urban function (decrease in stability foundations, for example, paalrot, quays). The level of surface water is strongly determined by the groundwater level. This surface water level is regulated by studs. The removal of these studs resulting in a disturbance of groundwater is thus a result. Moreover, due to the absence of studs, no further action can be taken on situations of prolonged drought or high drainage. Groundwater levels are lower in large part of the year, and extremely low groundwater levels are holding on for longer. Significant costs should be incurred for the recovery of the injury. The alternative of adapting the urban function can only be at disproportionately high costs.
The aim of the reins of streams is to create more variation in the flow pattern and substrate of streams. The procedure is accompanied by a significant space herd. In the cultivated area, it is often not possible to exclude this area from the urban environment. The area is generally already in use for functions such as living and working. The space herd of the change will cause the area to be lost for functions with a high usage value (inparticular living). In addition, the urban area has a cultural historical value which can be lost in the event of a change. Finally, various types of infrastructure, such as roads, cables, pipes and sewerage, will no longer operate without far-reaching compensatory measures. Customizing the utility function is only possible at very high cost.
Surface water peasantes have a direct impact on the groundwater level. In lower-lying areas with an urban function, a higher groundwater level is not desirable, as it may cause water nuisance in, for example, basements and creep spaces (unhealthy living environment). It is precisely in order to prevent this type of problem drainage has been established regularly in order to further regulate groundwater level. The increase or removal of these leads in almost all cases to the previously mentioned unwanted phenomena. Relocation of the urban function (living and working) is usually not an option. In view of the limited available area for adjustment of use function in this only possible at disproportionately high cost.
Surface water peasantes have a direct impact on the groundwater level. In lower-lying areas with an urban function, a higher groundwater level is not desirable, as this will cause water nuisance in e.g. cellars and creep spaces (unhealthy living environment). Too low ground water level is also unwelcome in the urban area in relation to the decrease in stability of foundations (e.g. paalrot) and quays. Relocation of the urban function (living and working) is generally not an option: given the limited area available to adjust the use function only at a disproportionate cost.
The water management in the urban area is bathed by a regulated groundwater level. Surface water peasantes have a direct impact on the groundwater level. In lower-lying areas with an urban function, a temporary higher groundwater level is not desirable, as this will cause water nuisance in e.g. cellars and creep spaces (unhealthy living environment). Too low ground water level is also unwelcome in the urban area in relation to the decrease in stability of foundations (e.g. paalrot) and quays. Relocation of the urban function (living and working) is generally not an option: given the limited area available to adjust the utility function in this area only at a disproportionately high cost.
Adjustment of quays into urban areas is usually accompanied by change in the space herd in cultivated area. It is often not possible to exclude this area from the urban environment because it is generally already in use for high-quality functions such as living and working which will partly be lost. In addition, the quays have a shipping function which makes use of it for the loading and unloading, loading and unloading. Various types of infrastructure, such as roads, cables and pipes, are in direct contact with the quays and, without far-reaching compensatory intervention, can no longer function if the quays are replaced by natural-friendly banks. In addition, the quays in the urban area often represent a cultural historical value that can be lost on adaptation. This value is generally not to be offset by other measures. Moving the use functions is only possible at very high cost.
Several watercourses have been unearthed or adapted in the past for the benefit of a specific function, for example, the transport of peat. In the meantime, this original feature is no longer in use, but forms the watercourses itself part of the cultural historical heritage. The complete natural setting (including natural-friendly shores everywhere, removal of studs and locks etc.) is at the expense of the original nature of the watercourse through which the cultural historical value is lost. This value is generally not to be offset by other measures. This is a reason for these waters to be able to refrain from a fully-based, nature-oriented device.
There are several reasons why the good condition for a particular quality element cannot be reached in the first planning period. These are further explained below.
F1: Natural circumstances-compliance, historical tax
F2: Natural circumstances-slow effects of measures
F3: Technical infeasible land acquisition
F4: Technically unattainable-social support
F5: Technical infeasible-synergy with other policy intentions
F6: Technical impracticable export capacity
F7: Disproportionate-depreciation periods
F8: Unproportionally expensive-too high
The water quality of surface water is adversely affected by the flush of nutrients through the groundwater. The high concentrations in groundwater are, among other things, the result of excessive taxation of fertilisers in the past. The tightening of manure policy and a more careful fertilisation in practice has the effect of decreasing the source of influence on groundwater, but the flow of soil-to surface water is a slow process. For this reason, the full impact of these measures will not yet be felt in 2015.
A significant part of the introduction measures are already being implemented in the first planning period. Research has shown that in many cases it can take a number of years before the ecosystem has fully adapted to a new situation, for example because it takes time for certain species to colonize new habitat. For these reasons, the effects of measures in the first planting period are not fully effective until the second planting period and no additional measures are taken during this plan period.
Because of its social standing, land acquisition almost always takes place on a voluntary basis. Implementation after 2015 is, in many cases, more advantageous, as it may counteract the imposition of land prices. Moreover, it is not likely that all the necessary land for resettlement is timely (= well before 2012), for there is also time for action to be taken. Opportunities to acquire land are often bound to certain events (land consolidation, company takeovers), which will not occur long in all locations within the next period. Such large-scale area processes also have a maturity exceeding the plan period as a result of legal procedures. This has as a consequence that phasing is needed.
The implementation of measures that have a significant impact on the environment should be well prepared. This means that several directly concerned parties must be properly informed of the manner in which they are implemented and their consequences. Such social involvement is particularly important in order to shape implementation in such a way that it can count on as much support as possible. A thorough preparation of a complex project takes many years to ensure that the measures cannot be implemented in the current planning period.
The implementation of measures for the achievement of WFD targets is usually not in itself, including other (water) declarations to be achieved. It is important that the performance is sought for synergy so that the same procedures are not carried out on several occasions after each other, excavations are carried out, etc. Other (water) declarations are not always the same. programming as the desired execution for the WFD. To avoid disproportionately high costs incurred in this plan period, it is chosen to implement the WFD measures in conjunction with other measures, as a result of which the combined measures will not be taken until the next Planning period can be completed.
The introduction measures represent a large part of the measures package. Both governments and executive organisations (contractors) are already implementing measures. The overall proposed package of WFD measures calls for a hefty acceleration of implementation when the whole package is realized for 2015. Preparation and execution questions specific knowledge and capacities, which is in a limited presence. It is therefore not possible to implement all the necessary measures in the initial planting period of the SGBP. For this reason, it is phased out.
Current functions are for an important part based on the current establishment. If this establishment is changed, it will have consequences for these functions. An efficient use of available resources justifies a spread of measures for the post-2015 period. Investments have already taken place in recent years which have not yet been written off in 2015. In the case of a stagnated implementation of measures, it may be associated with usual service cycles of the water operators. In addition, in such a way, 'work with work' can be created by combining work. Thus, it can be implemented entirely without disproportionate costs being incurred in this plan period.
The implementation of all measures to achieve good state/potential within the first planned period, is due to excessive financial constraints. In order to maintain the burden of load within a socially acceptable range, a phased implementation of the measures package in the post-2015 period shall be chosen. Pending the development of possible more cost-effective measures in the future and the adoption of additional measures at national and international level, the possibility of phasing out and now still being developed is still being developed. did not make the target reduction. This will be reviewed at the next provincial water plan/conversion plan (and SGBP).
For the WFD reports for surface water bodies and sub-basins, the storage of the data is chosen for the purpose of dividing the water into:
1. Waterparts: smallest stable part of water (or 'Smaller functionally independent piece of water with similar, homogeneous properties and relationships that distinguish it within a water.')
2. Water body: water body according to the KRW definition
3. Water area: water such as that known to the 'citizen' or 'one or more water parts which together form a watercourse or area which is popularly referred to as a single name.' Examples: Dommel, Waal, Eemmeer.
In the exchange formats it comes out as follows:
1. A dataset containing the watercuts (OWA). It also includes the name of the water area. The geometry (the lines and planes) is associated with the water parts, but is stored in a separate table. This makes it possible to store multiple geometries by water part, for example, a centreline and a plane of a river;
2. A dataset containing the water bodies (OWM).
In the future, the water area by IdsW in the Aquo standard is incorporated as a separate entity. Because this entity is not yet defined and because it is only about two fields, it is sufficient for the exchange formats to extend the water-sharing table. It is then the WGBIDENT and WGBNAME fields.
Figure 1. Relationship between water bodies, water parts and geometry. * In the new NEN3610 Basic model Geo information, the classes 'water' and 'waterpart' are included. The surface water bodies and surface water parts mentioned here are specializations of these NEN classes.
1. Water bodies and water areas are split up into watercuts on splits (nodes) and when the parts are physically apart. Other factors may also be grounds for making a further split into water parts;
2. For all water bodies (except coastal water), the centreline is always recorded. For coastal water, lakes (evt. with the exception of canals and ditches), transitional waters and any wide rivers shall also be provided with flat information;
3. The watercuts are mutually exclusive (where in reality they are also connected);
4. The water parts form a stable base. This means that coding and location will, in principle, change as little as possible over time.
5. The information is exchanged in Esri-shape format (the OWAG and GAF shapefiles) or dbf files (OWA water parts and OWM-the water body table);
6. For the encoding, the unique identification, no special characters are (ü, ã, &,% etc.) used. Only letters, numbers and underscores are allowed;
7. The name of the table is always built as follows: theme theme + indication area. Or in other words: base name table + area code. The area codes to be used are included in a domain table. For example, OWM_05 stands for the table with surface water bodies of Waterschap Regge and Dinkel. OWM_NLRNOO for surface water bodies of the Rhine-East sub-basin,
8. For each file exchanged, the meta information is available, as described under metadata (see www.idsw.nl);
9. Data shall be exchanged in RD (Rijksthrehoeks coordinates);
10. The scale level of the source data is 1:250,000 or greater (e.g. 1:50,000);
Element Details
Encoding/Field Name
Description
Type/Length
V/O/C 1
Domain
| Code/Area Water Body Unique ID |
OWMIDENT |
NL + code water manager (or 99 as more than one) + unique code. 2 |
String, 24 |
V |
Nvt. |
| Surface Water Body Name |
OWMNAME |
String, 100 |
V |
Nvt. |
|
| Status |
OWMSTAT |
N (natural), S (terk changed), K (unstModerate) |
String, 1 |
V |
Status |
| Current type and category |
OWMTYPE |
KRW typology |
String, 3 |
V |
KRW Typology |
| Type and category of reference/natural |
OWMTYPER |
The natural type/reference type/target image. |
String, 3 |
V |
KRW Typology |
| International typing |
OWMTYPINT |
Type according to international typing |
String, 24 |
O |
KRW domain still to be established |
| Sp. Area of catchment area |
OWMSGCAT |
The surface area of the superstream part of the oppw.body |
Nume riek, 6 |
V (not off-shore) |
Catchment area category. 3 |
| Protected area part of opp.waterbody? |
OWMBESCH |
String, 1 |
O |
J, N, O (ndisclosed) |
|
| Code (part) basin district) |
BORNID1 |
Code of the (part) basin district where water body is located. 4 |
String, 24 |
V |
a. MS, SC, RNWE, RNOO, RNNO, RNMI, EMNE, EMED |
| Level 1 Area Code |
BORNEN2 |
4 | String, 24 |
O |
b. |
| Level 2 Area Code |
BORNEN3 |
4 | String, 24 |
O |
c. |
| Level 3 Code Area Code |
BORNEN4 |
4 | String, 24 |
O |
|
| Year of recording |
OWMYEAR |
Year in which water body is determined |
Numeric, 4 |
V |
|
| Notes |
OWMOPME |
Notes |
String, 254 |
O |
1 V Duty/ O Ptional/ C Unditional
2 For the encoding, 24 characters can be used, however, the first four are reserved for an identification of the Netherlands (NL, 2 positions) and the administrator (2 positions, see WBHCODE in the domain tables). This is necessary to ensure that the code is unique at European level (by adding the country code NL) and is unique at national level (by adding a code for the water manager). Further arrangements may be made for the remaining positions within a river basin district or sub-basin, if appropriate.
3 The river basin size of a water body (size of the area watered down on a water body, superstrooms area) of a water is an essential feature of a water body and water part. The size can be shown as a class using the values below. Format size:
-10 km 2
-100 km-100 km 2
-500 km-500 km 2
-1000 500-1000 km 2
-2500 1000-2500 km 2
-10000-2500-10,000 km 2
-99999 > 10.000 km 2
4 The BORIS fields refer to the GAFIDENT, the code for the river basins or reporting units, from the GAF table. They are a foreign-key to the relevant table and must be able to identify the water body in which the water body is located. In GAFIDENT1, it is necessary to indicate in which of the 8 (part) river basin districts the water body is located: Maas (MS), Schelde (SC), Rhine-North (RNNO), Rhine-West (RNWE), Rhine-Centre (RNMI), Rhine-East (RNOO), Eems-Dollard (EMED) or Lower Eems (EMNE). The other IDES fields can be used for smaller sub-areas (e.g. RWSR areas) depending on whether a sub-area is required.
Data element
Encoding/Field Name
Description
Type/Length
V/O/C 1
Domain
| Code/unique identification Surface water part |
OWAIDENT |
NL + code water manager (or 99 as more than one) + unique code. Primary key. 2 |
String, 24 |
V |
N/A |
| Surface Water Part Name |
OMISNAME |
String, 100 |
V |
N/A |
|
| Water Body Code |
OWMIDENT |
Water body, part of which is part of, foreign key |
String, 24 |
V |
N/A |
| Water Manager Code |
WBHCODE |
String, 2 |
V |
water manager |
|
| Water code |
WGBIDENT |
Code of the water area where part of the water is part. 3 |
String, 24 |
O |
|
| Water Name |
WGBNAME |
Name of the water-area in which a part of the water is part. 3 |
String, 100 |
V |
|
| Water-rich area |
OWARN |
Water-rich area or plain water (0-default) |
Numeric, 1 |
V |
1 (water-rich area) or 0 |
| Surface Water Area |
OWAOPPVL |
Square metre |
Numerically, 12 |
V |
N/A |
| Length |
OWALENGT |
Meter-for the line-shaped water parts |
Numeric, 9,2 |
V (for line-shaped water parts) |
N/A |
| Sp. Area of catchment area 4 |
OWASGCAT |
The surface area of the superstream part of the water part |
Numerically, 6 |
O |
Water catchment area |
| Scale Indication |
OWANIVO |
Scale used by water manager (minimum 3 levels). |
String, 10 |
O |
N/A |
| Notes |
OWAOPME |
String, 254 |
O |
N/A |
|
| Year of recording |
OWAYAR |
Year in which water part is determined |
Numeric, 4 |
V |
1 Mandatory/Optional/Conditional.
2 For the encoding, 24 characters can be used, however the first four are reserved for an identification of the Netherlands (NL, 2 positions) and the administrator (2 positions). This is necessary to ensure that the code is unique at European level (by adding the country code NL) and is unique at national level (by adding a code for the water manager). Further arrangements may be made for the remaining positions within a river basin district or sub-basin, if appropriate.
3 The water area covers the commonly known names of the river/lake where the water part is part of. For example, 'Dommel', 'Amsterdam-Rijnchannel', 'Kagerpee'. Such a name is necessary because it will provide the understandable access to the data. Water bodies and water parts often have slightly different names. Water area is defined as: 'one or more water parts which together form a watercourse or area which is popularly referred to as one name.' At least the name of the water area should be given. In the Idsw standard, a separate entity 'water area' is included. However, for exchange, it is sufficient to include it in this table.
4 The river basin size of the water part (size of the area watered down on a water part of the superstrooms area) of a water is an essential characteristic of a water part. The size can be shown as a class using the values below. Format size:
-10 km 2
-100 km-100 km 2
-500 km-500 km 2
-1000 500-1000 km 2
-2500 1000-2500 km 2
-10000-2500-10,000 km 2
-99999 > 10.000 km 2
Data element
Encoding/Field Name
Description
Type/Length
V/O/C 1
Domain
| Geometry |
Geometry |
Line/plane |
V |
Nvt. |
|
| Code/unique Identification geometry |
OWAGIDENT |
Unique identification of the geometry |
String, 24 |
V |
Nvt. |
| Surface Water Part Identification |
OWAIDENT |
Identification of the water part where geometry is associated (foreign key) |
String, 24 |
V |
Nvt. |
| Flow direction drain |
OWAGSTRAF |
+ 1 or -1 (equal to or against digitization direction), only applicable to lines |
Numeric, 2 |
O |
Nvt. |
| Flow direction |
OWAGSTRAN |
-1 or + 1 (see OWDSTRAF) |
Numeric, 2 |
O |
Nvt. |
| Notes |
OWAGOPME |
Comments |
String, 254 |
O |
Nvt. |
1 Mandatory/Optional/Conditional.
The naming convention of the table shows the type of areas (e.g. Rwsr areas, reporting units) the file is going to be.
The purpose of the GAF table is to describe all the various levels of catchment areas. Different GAF tables can be used for one river basin district.
Data element
Encoding/Field Name
Explanatory notes
Type/Length
V/O/C 1
| Geometry |
Shape |
Polygon |
V |
|
| Code/Unique ID Participating catchment area |
GAFIDENT |
Code used by water manager. 2 |
String, 24 |
V |
| Hierarchical code |
GAFLIGIN |
Code of the off-supply area in which this GAF is located 3 |
String, 24 |
O |
| Name Of Exit/Supply Area |
GAME |
String, 100 |
O |
|
| Area Area |
GAFOPPVL |
Square Meters |
Numerically, 16 |
V |
| Type of sub-basin |
SPECIES |
4 See domain 'GAFSOORT' |
Numeric, 2 |
V |
| Year of recording |
GAFYAR |
Year in which GAF is determined |
Numeric, 4 |
V |
| Notes |
GAFOMSCH |
String, 254 |
O |
1 Mandatory/Optional/Conditional
2 The GAFIDENT must be a unique code. To make sure uniqueness is (der) it is desirable that the code of the (part) river basin district be also included. For the Maas, then all the encodings would start with MS and for Rhine-West with RNWE. This is not strictly necessary, but if applied, it does not need to be aligned outside its own (part) river basin district with respect to coding.
3 In GAFLIGIN, the code of the larger water catchment area of which the water catchment area is part of the water catchment area is to be completed.
4 In the GAFSOORT field, the type of area is indicated. The corresponding domain table (see www.idsw.nl) identifies the types of species that can be distinguished. This refers to species such as river basin district, rwsr area, drainage area.
The monitoring program reporting for both Condition Monitoring and Trend monitoring and operational monitoring is comprised of two parts:
1. Summary of the programme
2. Information by monitoring location
By monitoring program, these parts are reported. Per river basin district, there will eventually be one reporting for the Condition and Trend monitoring program and one for the operational monitoring program. This is elaborated in more detail below.
In the summary of a monitoring programme, the following information shall be included:
-Start date of the monitoring programme;
-Number of monitoring locations and measurement frequency per quality element and/or parameters (see table below);
-Number of water bodies subject to monitoring,
-Number and type of protected areas subject to monitoring,
-List of quality elements, priority substances and other significant substances, which are measured.
Category
River
More
Coastal water
Transitional water
Quality element
Number of locations
Freq
Number of locations
Freq
Number of locations
Freq
Number of locations
Freq
| Phytoplankton |
||||||||
| Phytobenthos |
||||||||
| Macrophytes (and Angia-spermen/Macroalgae) |
||||||||
| Macrofauna |
||||||||
| Fish |
||||||||
| Priority and 76 /464/EC substances 1 -parameter 1 -parameter 2 -etc. |
||||||||
| General physico-chemical parameters 1 -parameter 1 -parameter 2 -etc. |
||||||||
| Other pollutants 1 -parameter 1 -parameter 2 -etc. |
||||||||
| Hydrological regime 1 -parameter 1 -parameter 2 -etc. |
||||||||
| Morphology 1 -parameter 1 -parameter 2 -etc. |
||||||||
| River continuity 1 -parameter 1 -parameter 2 -etc. |
||||||||
| Tidal regime 1 -parameter 1 -parameter 2 -etc. |
1 If some parameters (substances, hydromorphological variables) or parameter groups are used for different frequencies, then these parameters can be specified separately.
By monitoring programme, the following information shall also be included as a general description (out of: Reporting sheets for reporting monitoring requirements, 31 August 2005):
-Brief explanation of the methodology/criteria used/are to select the locations;
-Brief explanation of the sampling and analytical method by quality element (including details of national or international standards used such as CEN or ISO);
-Brief explanation of methodology/criteria used to determine the monitoring frequency per quality element;
-Information on the degree of reliability and precision that can be expected from the results of monitoring;
-Summary of additional monitoring requirements for waters used for drinking water intake (Article 7 KRW);
-Summary of the methodology used to determine the reference conditions (for example, model-moderate, reference network, expert judgement, combination of possibilities;
-Optionally: reference/hyperlinks for reference to further information on the monitoring programme
The above information should be included, if different, by surface water category (river, lake, transitional water, coastal water).
The monitoring site shall be 'an indication of the place where the measurement is carried out'. This location is not necessarily equal to a measurement point (a physical point where a measurement or sample takes place). For example, for fish, a site is often an area. In other cases, a measurement site may include several measurement points. The intention is that in all cases a point (X, Y coordinate) is indicated for the location to be identified.
In the case of chemical monitoring, the location will often correspond to a measurement point. In the case of (for example) fishing, the X, y coordinate of the location will be a center of gravity (inside the water) of an area.
The following information shall be included per monitoring site:
| 1. |
X, Y coordinate |
|
| 2. |
Name |
Name of the location |
| 3. |
Identification (code) |
Unique code of the location |
| 4. |
Type of monitoring |
TenT, Operating or both |
| 5. |
Water body where location is located |
Body of water code |
| 6. |
Bodies of water for which the location is representative ( by quality element/parameter and per species! ) |
If the location for more water bodies is representative, it shall be indicated for the water bodies to which this applies. For each quality element, the relationship between the location and the water bodies for which it is representative may vary. This may also vary by type of monitoring. |
| 7. |
Quality elements and parameters measured at the location |
A code list (domain table) is prepared with possible values. The parameters measured may vary by type of monitoring |
| 8. |
Monitoring frequency ( by quality element/parameter and per type of monitoring ) |
|
| 9. |
Number of measurement points |
If the location contains more than one measurement point, the number of measurement points or whether it is a region or a lot shall be indicated. |
| 10. |
Protected area type where location is located |
Possible values: no protected area/drinking water/birds direction/habitat orientation/other (multiple types are possible) |
| 11. |
Year of start of monitoring |
|
| 12. |
End-year for monitoring |
If applicable |
| 13. |
Explanatory notes |
Further information on location (if relevant) |
| 14. |
Water Manager |
Code of the administrator of the monitoring site |
| 15. |
In case of operational monitoring: target of location |
1. Keep an eye in the eye; 2. Determine the effect of measures; |
| 16. |
On operational monitoring: location reasons: what taxes/pressures are the reason being measured here |
Tax list from guidelines monitoring |
In order to exchange the data effectively, it is necessary to have a single way of exchanging information. For the data per monitoring site, the set structure for exchange is described below. This structure has been transformed into an xml schema. This schedule is used for the exchange.
A number of tables are required in order to establish the information by monitoring location:
1. The base table with locations contains a record per location, which includes basic information such as 'name', 'x, y coordinate' and 'type of programme'. The other tables contain additional information;
2. A table that includes what is measured at what frequency at the location. This measurement frequency may be different for operational monitoring and for the use of TenT monitoring;
3. A table that shows the representativeness of the locations. It describes the bodies in which a location is representative of the location of the water. This may vary by parameter and per type of monitoring;
4. A table indicating the type of protected zones in which the site is located.
Figure 1. Relationships between the tables.
The name of the tables shall indicate the area in which monitoring is concerned. To that end, the [ area code] has always been included in the table name. For area code, one of the values is populated from the appropriate domain table of IDsW. For example, a table showing the monitoring sites of the Brabantse Delta water system (code 25) is MLC_25.
Data element
Encoding/Field Name
Type, length
Notes
| X Coordinate |
X |
Numeric, 11,5 |
|
| Y co-ordinate |
Y |
Numeric, 11,5 |
|
| Location Unique Code (DN) |
MLCIDENT |
String, 24 |
The code is always preceded by NL [ WBHCODE] _. For example: NL92_Ketelm |
| Name |
MLCNAAM |
String, 100 |
|
| Water body where location is located |
OWMIDENT |
String, 24 |
The water body from which the monitoring site is located |
| Type of measurement location |
MLCSOORT |
String, 24 |
TenT, Operating, TenTOperationally (both types) |
| Measurement Location Deployment Date |
MLCDATIN |
Date |
|
| Date End Measurement Location |
MLCDATOFF |
Date |
|
| Target measurement location |
MLCDOEL |
String, 24 |
(fill in for operational only monitoring:) monitoring condition, determining effect of measures, or both |
| Number of measurement points |
MPN_NUMBER |
Numeric, 4 |
0: real location (one measurement point) -1: location with area or w n: location with n number of measurement points |
| Explanatory notes |
MLCOPME |
String, 255 |
|
| Water Manager |
WBHCODE |
String, 2 |
According to IDsW code list |
This table shows the parameters that are measured by location, including the measurement frequency. Dust groups may also appear here (for example: 'priority substances with EU standard' or 'Rhine-relevant substances'), however, only if indeed all parameters of the dust group are measured here with the displayed frequency and cycle. Otherwise, specify what is measured per parameter.
Data element
Encoding/Field Name
Type, length
Notes
| Location Unique Code (Unique Code) key field |
MLCIDENT |
String, 24 |
|
| Parameter/Quality Element |
DOMGWCOD |
String, 12 |
Quality element or parameter measured at location, according to parameter list IDSW |
| Monitoring frequency (per parameter/disgust element), number/year |
MONFREQ |
Numerically, 6, 2 |
|
| Monitoring cycle |
MONCYCLE |
Numeric, 2 |
For the number of years the monitoring takes place (for example, one time per 6 years, then a 6 fill) |
| Type of measurement location |
MLCSOORT |
String, 24 |
If the location is used for both TenT and operational monitoring, then here indicate where the frequency applies (may vary by type of monitoring) |
This table can also identify by dust group (or group of quality elements) why it is measured, if the reason for all the parameters measured in the dust group is valid. If not all parameters of the dust group are measured at the location, then the dust group code may be used. The MLC_PAR table does show exactly which parameters are measured exactly.
Data element
Encoding/Field Name
Type, length
Notes
| Location Unique Code (Unique Code) key field |
MLCIDENT |
String, 24 |
|
| Parameter/Quality Element |
DOMGWCOD |
String, 12 |
Quality element or parameter measured at location, according to parameter list IDSW |
| Reason to Use Location |
MLCREDEN |
String, 50 |
List of domain table printing |
This table may also indicate the representativeness of each substance group or group of quality elements. If not all parameters of the dust group are measured at the location, then the dust group code may be used.
Data element
Encoding/Field Name
Type, length
Notes
| Location Unique Code (DN) |
MLCIDENT |
String, 24 |
|
| Parameter/Quality Element |
DOMGWCOD |
String, 12 |
Quality element or parameter measured at location, according to parameter list IDSW |
| Bodies of water for which the location is representative ( by quality element! ) |
OWMIDENT |
String, 24 |
|
| Type of measurement location |
MLCSOORT |
String, 24 |
If the location for both TenT and operational monitoring is used, indicate here for which the representativity applies (may vary by type of monitoring) |
Data element
Encoding/Field Name
Type, length
Notes
| Location Unique Code (DN) |
MLCIDENT |
String, 24 |
|
| Protected area type where location is located |
BESCH |
String, 24 |
VOG-Vogeldirectional Area HAB-Habitats Directive area CONS-Conception for human consumption ZWEM-Swemwater SHELL-SHELLFISH WATER |
At a location, several parameters can be measured. The MLC_PAR and MLC_OWM table shows which parameters are measured and for which water bodies that are representative. These tables should always be used for the individual parameters. Working with dust groups should not be allowed to work. The current list of domain values for the parameters and quality elements is too extensive to include here. The list is available at www.idsw.nl
A few new domain tables have been prepared for the exchange formats for monitoring sites. These are described below. For the 'water administrator' and 'area' domain, existing lists are already available. These are available at www.idsw.nl
Reason Code
Description Busy Lang
Pressure type
| Dredging |
dredging bulk (release of substances) |
Chemical |
| Pass load |
passing load (inlet area foreign) |
Chemical |
| RWZI |
RWZI |
Chemical |
| Industry |
Industrial discharges (including offschore) |
Chemical |
| Flood Rainwater |
Overdeposit/rain water outlet |
Chemical |
| Road water |
Rinsing polluted road water from traffic |
Chemical |
| Atmospheric Deposition |
atmospheric deposition |
Chemical |
| Dredging |
Dredging (release of substances) |
Chemical |
| Waterworks/Espoeling |
Dams, dikes, locks, studs and coastal defences (leaching of pollution) |
Chemical |
| Agriculture |
Discharges of agriculture (release of substances) |
Chemical |
| Water Soil Nalevering |
Water-soil contamination compliance |
Chemical |
| Shipping |
shipping (release of substances; anti-fouling; oil ed) |
Chemical |
| Construction materialsoploging |
Building materials loanout |
Chemical |
| Pre-tax |
Pre-tax |
Chemical |
| Military training ground |
military training ground (release substances) |
Chemical |
| Recreational Lozing |
recreation (discharge) |
Chemical |
| Shipping Toiletten |
Shipping (toilet discharge) |
Chemical |
| Mount-Flow Area |
flow areas mount |
Fyssian |
| Detach Flow Area |
Detach Flow Areas |
Fyssian |
| Dredging |
Dredging |
Fyssian |
| Dredging |
Dredging up? |
Fyssian |
| Decrease in soil |
Decrease in soil |
Fyssian |
| Artificial Distribution Distribution |
Artificial reallocation by redirection of high drains/grinding |
Fyssian |
| Standardisation Kanalisation |
Standardization/channalization (criben/unnatural profile) |
Fyssian |
| Poll Dynamics |
Peilmanagement/dynamics |
Fyssian |
| Drainage Dehydration |
Water supply/disposal (drainage/drownings) |
Fyssian |
| Water abstraction |
Water abstraction (for drinking water, process water, refrigeration and agriculture (cattle renunciation and beregening)) |
Fyssian |
| SalteKwel |
Salty kwel |
Fyssian |
| Touch Inundation Zones |
Deterioration of natural inundation zones |
Fyssian |
| WaterwerkenBarriere |
dams, dikes, locks, studs and coastal defences (barrier to fauna) |
Fyssian |
| Port |
Ports |
Fyssian |
| Hydroelectric power station |
Hydroelectric power station |
Fyssian |
| Administration EnMaintenance |
management & maintenance (impairment of natural wood stocks) |
Fyssian |
| Oeveration/Defence |
Oeverinrichting/defenses |
Fyssian |
| Raw material extraction |
Deland/sand extraction/mineral extraction |
Fyssian |
| Diver/Overkluizing |
diver/enclose |
Fyssian |
| Sand supplementation |
Sand supplementation |
Fyssian |
| Catching songbook |
Sand-catching |
Fyssian |
| ThermischeVerontrainee |
Thermal pollution (heat/cold storage) |
Fyssian |
| Professional shipping |
Professional shipping (sailing) |
Fyssian |
| Offshore |
offschore activities |
Fyssian |
| Recreational Concertation |
recreation (concerning) |
Fyssian |
| Recreational trade services |
Recreational card |
Fyssian |
| Fisheries Of The Soil |
(omwoeling soil) |
Fyssian |
| Stray filth |
Stray filth |
Fyssian |
| MilitairOefenterrein |
military training ground (acoussch; space use) |
Fyssian |
| Exogenous |
Presence of the |
Biological |
| Fishing Undraw |
fishing (withdrawal) |
Biological |
| Hydropower-central Vismortality |
Hydroelectric power plant (fish mortality) |
Biological |
| Sand supplementation |
Sand supplementation |
Biological |
| Shipping Introduction |
shipping (introduction exoten) |
Biological |
MCLSOORT
Description
| TT |
Condition & Trendmonitoring |
| TO |
Operational monitoring |
| TT_OM |
Condition & Trend and Operational Monitoring (may be used only in MLC table, not MLC_PAR and MLC_OWM) |
MCLDOEL
Description
| Condition |
To monitor the condition of water bodies identified as 'at risk'. |
| Effect |
the effect (and not the size!) of measures taken to improve the state of the situation. |
| Condition Effect |
Monitor both condition and effect of measures |
BESCH
Description
| VOG |
Bird Directive Area |
| HAB |
Habitat Directive area |
| CONS |
Withdrawal for human consumption |
| ZWEM |
Bathing water |
| SHELL |
Shellfish waters |
For the KRW reports, the judgments on the condition of surface water bodies are delivered in a set format, according to the xml schema published by IDsW.
The judgments can be determined by means of the test instrumentation of the Aquokit. The Aquokit consists of the chemical dessert module iBever, the ecological key module QBWHAT and the KRW Integration Module. The key instrumentation shall use the monitoring network configuration available on the WFD portal, the measures and targets and the key results provided by the water operator. The KRW Integration Module produces judgments by water body for the desired monitoring network and period in the required xml format.
The xml file contains judgments by water body, quality element, or parameter, and type of monitoring network. Each judgement is structured as follows:
Xml Element
(upload)Field Name
(download)Mandatory
Type
Domain table 1
Explanatory notes
| Identification |
n/a |
Yes |
Text |
Identification |
|
| hoortBijWater management area |
owmident |
Yes |
Text |
OWM 2 |
Body of water code |
| Reporting year |
reporting |
Yes |
Text |
Reporting year |
|
| quality ElementOfParameter |
domgwcod |
Yes |
Text |
parameter.xsd typequality-ement.xsd |
Code of the quality element or parameter |
| Quantity |
Quantity |
conditionally |
Text |
measid.xsd measinid/concept.xsd |
Quantity |
| Reprocessing Method |
Value |
No |
Text |
valueoperationmethode.xsd |
Value Operation |
| Value Determination Method |
Value bepa |
Yes |
Text |
Value determination method.xsd |
Valuation |
| data Start Time |
data data |
Yes |
Date |
Start time of period of assessment |
|
| data End Time |
Data sei |
Yes |
Date |
End time of period of assessment |
|
| numericValue |
keystroke |
Yes |
Numeric |
Key value |
|
| Condition |
tstd |
Yes |
Text |
typeclassified krwbiologisch.xsd typeclassification krwchemisch.xsd |
Condition |
| Remark |
opme |
No |
Text |
Note |
1 The domain tables can be found at http://www.idsw.nl/Aquo/schemas/
2 The domain table OWM can be found on the WFD-Portal.
When uploading the data to the WFD-Portal language, the xml format mentioned above will be used. When downloading, the data as a dBase table is returned. The column names in the dBase tables differ slightly from the names of the xml elements. Substantive differences are confined to the identification and body coding.
Identification (unique code) of the judgement. The identification is structured as follows:
the literal text 'NL.umam.' followed by the number of the water manager followed by a point followed by up to 25 letters and/or numbers. For example
NL.umam.33.1234. The identification will not be used in the dBase tables.
This field refers to the body of water where the judgment is to apply. The reference is formatted as follows: the literal text 'NL.umam.' followed by the code of the concerned water manager followed by a point and finally followed by the water body code from the table OWM (field OWMIDENT). Example for the water body IJssel: 'NL.umam.93.NL93_IJSSEL'. In the dBase tables, only the body code is shown (OWMIDENT field)
Year of reporting
The code of the relevant quality element or parameter. Valid values refer to the domain tables published by IDsW.
If the judgement concerns a chemical, this should be the parameter of the parameter. This is not necessary for biological quality elements. The allowed quantity is referenced to the IDsW domain tables.
The method that is used to edit the data. Possible methods include: MAX (maximum value), JGM (annual mean), P90 (90-percentile). This field is not required. For a complete list of allowed value editing methods, reference is made to the domain table.
The method that is used to determine the key value. Valid values refer to the Aquo domain table using methods (models) for value determination (valuebased method.xsd). The last characters of the value determination method indicate whether the judgement is the Condition and Trend measuring system (TT), the Operational Measuring network (OM), or a combined judgment (OM_TT).
For example, if used from the default trits iBever, QBWat and the WFD Integration Module for the operational monitoring network, the value Deterforage Method has the following format: 'other:iWSR; KRW; OM'.
Determines the period of time where measurement data is used to reach a judgement. The start time and end time are specified as the date of yyyy-mm-dd format.
Is the actual key value as a number, and is a result of selection, calculations, aggregation, and integration. This value is kept by the standard or standard to determine the judgement.
The final condition or judgment. For chemicals, the judgement is given as 'Voldoes' or 'Don't Complete', For the biological quality elements and physico-chemical parameters, the condition is given as 'Poor', 'Insufficient', 'Moderate', 'Good' or 'Very Good'.
Remarks (not mandatory), if any
Parameter
Abbreviation
Frequency
| Bacteria of the coligroup |
4 weeks |
|
| Color |
4 weeks |
|
| Floating dust |
SS |
4 weeks |
| Conductivity for electricity |
4 weeks |
|
| temperature |
T |
4 weeks |
| Acidity |
pH |
4 weeks |
| dissolved oxygen |
O2 |
4 weeks |
| Total organic carbon |
TOC |
4 weeks |
| Bicarbonate |
HCO3 |
4 weeks |
| Nitrite |
NO2 |
4 weeks |
| Nitrate |
NO3 |
4 weeks |
| Ammonium |
NH4 |
4 weeks |
| Total phosphate |
Total P |
4 weeks |
| Fluoride |
F |
3 monthly |
| Chloride |
Cl |
4 weeks |
| Sulphate |
SO4 |
3 monthly |
| Sodium |
After |
3 monthly |
| Iron |
Fe |
3 monthly |
| Mangled |
Mn |
3 monthly |
| Chromium |
Cr |
3 monthly |
| Lead |
Pb |
3 monthly |
| Copper |
Cu |
3 monthly |
| Zinc |
Zn |
3 monthly |
| Cadmium |
Ca |
3 monthly |
| Arsenic |
Axis |
3 monthly |
| Cyanide |
CN |
3 monthly |
| Mineral oils |
4 weeks |
|
| Adsorbable organically halogen |
AOX |
4 weeks |
| volatile organic bonded chlorine |
VOC |
4 weeks |
| Volatile aromatics |
4 weeks |
|
| Polycyclic aromatics |
PAK |
3 monthly |
| Phenols |
3 monthly |
