Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 615 in Riga august 4 2008 (pr. Nr. 55. §) rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" activity "Supplement 3.6.1.2. Riga City sustainable development" Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures for implementing the action programme ' infrastructure and services ' priorities 3.6 Appendix "Polycentric development" UR3.6.1.pas like Kuma "Support for sustainable development of the role of urban and 3.6.1.2." tivitāt "ak Riga City sustainable development" (hereinafter referred to as the activity);
1.2 project submission evaluation criteria;
1.3. requirements for project applicants;
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements, as well as the responsible authorities and cooperation agencies functional form of subordination. 2. The purpose of the activity is to provide the city of Riga degraded area revitalization (functional activation) under the integrated local development programme, thus contributing to the Latvian capital further preconditions for socio-economic growth. The meaning of these provisions has degraded site (terrain, building or building complex), which had previously been used or built up, but the moment is abandoned or is not fully used. It can be lowered or contaminated, deserted or inhabited or otherwise used in the area, which has a negative cumulative impact on the surrounding areas, the environment and the local population. Degraded areas efficient use is not start without a targeted intervention and considerable investments in its revitalization. 3. activities to target residents of Riga, Riga working individuals and companies, guests of Riga. 4. the activity exercised limited project application selection. 5. the implementation of the activity financed from national public funding provided by the project applicant, and the European regional development fund. 6. the total funds available for the activity is 8 268 281 lats, including the European regional development fund is LVL 7 028 040 and national public funding is 1 240 241 lats. 7. European regional development fund shall not exceed 85 Pro cents from project total eligible costs. 8. the applicant's Project funding is 15 percent of the project's total eligible costs. Applicant of the project from its own resources can fund more than a certain minimum amount. 9. in the framework of the activity can be implemented, which complies with European Social Fund support for the area, according to the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 34. 10. Project implementation duration does not exceed three years from the date of the agreement for the implementation of a project, but no longer than up to august 31, 2015. II. Responsible authorities and cooperation authority for the implementation of the activity of 11 supports regional development and Municipal Affairs Ministry as responsible authority and the Agency for regional development as a collaborative body. 12. the functions of the authority responsible: 12.1. provide activities for implementation, supervision and control, implementation of the activity and the application of evaluation criteria of the project design, to analyze the problems in the implementation of the activity and submit to body and managing the European Union's structural funds and the Cohesion Fund Monitoring Committee for the law on the improvement of the implementation of the activity;
12.2. to ensure that the activity is not exceeded the available for the implementation of the European regional development fund, and to monitor the available European regional development fund, including a learning Council on 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the enforcement of this principle in the activity level;
12.3. to develop and approve the project application form filling methodology;
12.4. to develop and approve internal written procedures for the evaluation of the application of the project – project application selection and evaluation procedures, the procedures shall take a decision on the application of the project approval, approval with conditions or disapproval, as well as submission evaluation and project submission form of evaluation methodologies and project submission Evaluation Commission rules;
12.5. provide information associated with the activity and publicity measures at the level of the activity, including informing the applicant of the project the project application and selection criteria;
12.6. creating a project application to the Evaluation Commission. The Commission shall act in accordance with the regional development and local Government Minister, approved the Commission's evaluation of the rules;
12.7. to send an invitation that specified in point 15 project applicant;
12.8. the use of European Union structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system for monitoring the activity and collect the data about the projects prescribed laws;
12.9. to ensure the application of the evaluation of projects;
12.10. to take a decision on the application for the approval of the project, in the definition of conditional approval or rejection, and to monitor the fulfilment of the conditions. 13. cooperation authority: 13.1. develop draft agreement for the implementation of the project;
13.2. to conclude the agreement on the implementation of the project;
13.3. to provide the statutory information the national budget for the preparation of the request;
13.4. to assess the agreement amendments aligning it with the responsible authority, the procedure laid down in laws and regulations, and making decisions on proposed amendments to the project;
13.5. to ensure the implementation of the project monitoring and control, as well as the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the gus on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the implementation of the project;
13.6. to check the beneficiary the procurement plan and submit it to the procurement monitoring Bureau;

13.7. to provide information to the authority responsible for the preparation of activities for the implementation of the learning available funding;
8.6. verify and match funding recipient project prepared a progress report;
13. in order to administer the State budget funds allocated to check the beneficiary submitted requests for payment, the eligible expenditure of the US compare amounts, prepare payment orders and declarations of expenditure;
13.10. examine the schedule for the submission of requests for payment;
13.11. to carry out random checks project locations, ensuring the technical nature of the content and functionality of the project site;
13.12. the activity related to the information and publicity measures for the project level;
13.13. the use of European Union structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system project surveillance and collect data on projects in the legislation. 14. the cooperation body is the functional supervision of the responsible authority. III. requirements for project applicants 15. Project applicant is municipality of Riga. 16. the project the applicant has stable and sufficient financial resources to ensure the project's financing, which is intended to cover the applicant's funds from the project, as well as the continuity of the implementation of the project. 17. the applicant is not in the project's financial stabilization process. 18. the project applicant in implementing the project, the law prescribed the necessary professionals attracted by the project management function provides šināšan. 19. the project shall ensure the implementation of the project according to the project manager and the project management team capacity – project supervisor is higher education and at least one year work experience in infrastructure project management, project management team have the higher education and professional knowledge in the field. IV. compliance with the application of the project 20. the applicant in the Project developing the project application, comply with the following conditions: 20.1. the project submission form and fill in the corresponding to prepare 1. the requirements set out in the annex, numbered each page of the application of the project;
20.2. the project application form the following is added to the original accompanying document, notarized copies or copies that have the appropriate authorities evidence of compliance with the original copy: 20.2.1. a feasibility study, including a cost-benefit analysis (annex 2);
20.2.2. certified tāmētāj certified construction cost estimate (annex 3), approved by the būvvald planning and architectural task, project paraksttiesīg of the applicant's personal assurances that the project applicant six months from project approval to submit the technical project approved by the būvvald, or the būvvald of technical projects and approved būvekspert-approved construction cost estimate;
20.2.3. one of the following documents or certified copies thereof, where, in accordance with the law "on environmental impact assessment" conditions in the project requires an environmental impact assessment for projects or technical regulations: 20.2.3.1. Environment monitoring national Office opinion on the environmental impact assessment of the final report or the impact on Natura 2000 sites evaluation report;
20.2.3.2. environmental monitoring national Office's decision on the environmental impact assessment or impact on Natura 2000 sites assessment procedures and not the national environmental service for the relevant regional environmental management technical regulations, if the project is carried out an initial environmental impact assessment, but should not be applied in the environmental impact assessment procedure, or impact on Natura 2000 sites assessment procedure;
20.2.3.3. National Environment services of the relevant regional environmental management technical regulations issued for projects which do not require environmental impact assessment;
20.2.4. the Municipal Council's decision for the statement of the integrated local development programme is approved, the municipality's integrated development program a copy of the electronic mass media;
20.2.5. local authorities a copy of the regulations, the application shall be accompanied, where the local authorities;
20.2.6. project management personnel involved in the life course descriptions (curriculum vitae);
20.2.7. extract from the minutes of the Coordination Council on the project's ideas further upstream of the European Regional Development Fund for funding;
20.2.8. project applicant questionnaire-application of value added tax, provided for in the laws and procedures and checks the information provided on the application of value added tax to the European Union within the framework of the projects co-financed by the structural funds and take a decision on the inclusion of value added tax to the project-related costs;
20.2.9. property rights supporting documentation about the infrastructure that is planned to make investments;
20.3. If no document accompanying the Latvian language, the application shall be accompanied by notarized document translation into Latvian language under the legal requirements;
20.4. the project's original application filed in person or sent by post, cauršuj (cauraukl);
20.5. the project submission prepared and submitted into and Latvian language without amendments not specified, deletions, aizkrāsojum, deletion or addition of rules;
20.6. the project application that is used in the calculation of currency is the lats;

20.7. all the information points clearly and in detail to the application of the project can be judged according to the project application evaluation criteria. 21. the project submission complies with the objective to ensure the activity of the city area revitalization of degraded under the integrated local development programme, thus contributing to the Latvian capital further preconditions for socio-economic growth. 22. application of the project planned activities do not overlap with the activities (Pro Ject or part thereof) that are intended for other European Union fund activity within the project, the applicant may be local. 23. the project provides an integrated approach to urban infrastructure development, creating a direct link with the approved integrated municipal development program, analyzing the impact of the project on the development of the sector and degraded areas impact on other areas of the city. 24. the project application based on the city's specific areas of degraded choice provides information on research relating to the investment needs of the šamīb city of degraded area and analysis on the socio-economic situation, including business environment, social security, public services, environmental perspectives, transport and traffic problems. 25. the project identified and justified in the application, as submitted the project complements other projects approved or planned projects that are funded or planned to be financed from other funds of the European Union activities or other financial instruments. 26. The project activities are planned in accordance with the provisions laid down in the legislation of autonomous local government functions, justified, proportionate with the planned time schedule and ensure the achievement of the objective. 27. the project cost in the application meet the project planned activities. 28. the project is defined in the application's target group-Riga, Riga city dwellers of working individuals and companies, as well as the Riga guests planned activities are geared to the needs of the target groups. 29. the project budgeted costs are reasonable and justified, appropriate for the intended period of project implementation, and the activities envisaged are calculated by taking into account the expected market price of a given project year. Application of the project financial statement is accurately and correctly arithmetically and does not exceed the permissible by the European regional development fund co-financing. 30. the project in the application of the European regional development fund eligible costs not exceeding 7 028 040 dollars. 31. The project's total eligible cost is less than 1 370 467 lats. 32. the project application based, and will ensure the implementation and monitoring of the project. 33. in the application of the project results, the planned indicators and impact results are clearly defined, measurable and contribute to the achievement of the objective of the activity. 34. the results of the projects planned are focused on at least one of the following scores: 34.1. urban renewal and revitalization, ensuring the promotion of sustainable development of the city and improving its attractiveness;
21.3. the community development, improving access to services and ensuring equal rights for all groups of the population;
21.3. the number of jobs save or create jobs. 35. developing project submissions, the applicant chooses projects in socio-economic terms, the best solution is to evaluate the European Union's structural funds and local government financial contributions to the development of the project feasibility study, including a cost-benefit analysis according to the basic structure defined in annex 2 and according to the methodology developed by the responsible authority. The project's economic rate of return is equal to or greater than the social discount rate, it is about 5.5 percent. The project's economic net present value greater than zero. 36. Generating projects revenue of the European regional development fund co-financing rate is calculated using the following formula: l = 0.85 x (C-N-A + I) where: G – European regional development fund co-financing;
C – the project's eligible costs.
N-net revenue generated by the project, the current value (the difference between revenue and expenses). Net revenue-project-related revenue and expenses for the maintenance of the net present value of the difference. Net revenue revenue is taken into account, which may arise from the provision of services, as well as of the revenue, which is directly related to the implementation of the project. Expenditure does not include the depreciation of fixed assets;
A-project total investment balance value-economic whole project life cycle the residual value of the investment project economic life cycle at the end of the last year. Project economic life cycle is the period of time in which the investments made for the project provides economic benefits. These activities project economic life cycle is 20 years after the first end-of-year project implementation;
I-discounted future investment at the project, not including the project's eligible costs. Further investments are planned and necessary investments in buildings and civil engineering necessary for project-related service delivery process. Discounting the cash flow of the project, the European regional development fund co-financing amount calculation uses 5.5 percent real discount rate. 37. Projects are designed for key holders, holders of the European Social Fund does not exceed 10 percent of the project's total eligible costs. 38. in the application of the project planned activities are focused on the implementation of the horizontal priorities: 38.1. macroeconomic stability – Pro Ject applicant funding part of the eligible cost of the project is larger than the minimum funding;
38.2. sustainable development: implementation of the project will contribute to the reduction of environmental pollution or deterioration, you have certain negative impact on the environment for the elimination or reduction;
23.8. equal opportunities – provides project-specific activities the principle of equal opportunities, particularly in improving accessibility for people with functional disabilities;
23.9. information society-project contributes to the development of the information society, providing for the establishment of the electronic services or improvement. V. Eligible and non-eligible activities 39. Project has supported the following activities:

24.3. in one or two areas of degraded urban renewal and community development, which is focused on the quality of appropriate infrastructure (e.g., social, cultural or recreational infrastructure), promoting the use of the infrastructure associated with public service accessibility and affordability, and comply with the regulations laid down in the municipal functions;
24.4. the European Social Fund support areas including training, social adjustment program development, research, employment and other activities that are not in conflict with the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 on the European Social Fund (repealing Regulation (EC) No 1784/1999). 40. The project is not eligible activities that: 24.9. This provision is not referred to in paragraph 39, not related to the purpose of the activity and is not eligible activities;
40.2. the aims of the European regional development fund, the financing of loans granted to natural and legal persons;
40.3. not associated with local autonomous functions and their enforcement;
40.4. related to the laws and established business support measures, any direct or indirect assistance to selected commercial companies that might create obstacles to competition, ensuring the benefits of specific companies or of certain goods or services. Vi. Eligible and ineligible costs 41. eligible costs are: 25.5. indirect costs of the project: 41.1.1. project activities directly related to the information and publicity measures;
41.1.2. unforeseen expenditure of not more than five percent of the amount of total eligible direct costs of the project amount. Application of project cost plan as one expense items, and project its previously unplanned spending to cover the costs under this provision, 41.2.3 41.2.2.,., 41.2.5., 41.2.6 41.2.4. and 41.2.7., in point prior coordination with the cooperation of the authority;
41.2. the direct cost of the project: 41.2.1. project preparation costs (except in the form of costs) incurred after October 24, 2006, the amount shall not exceed 10 per cent of the total direct eligible project costs, carried out pursuant to public procurement laws and regulatory requirements, including the costs associated with the project technical documentation, feasibility, document preparation according to the law "on environmental impact assessment";
41.2.2. construction, reconstruction and renovation, autoruzraudzīb and building costs;
41.2.3. access, transport, street traffic, reduce pollution of the environment and regional planning of costs;
41.2.4. energy efficiency measures;
41.2.5. water supply, sewerage, heating and sewage infrastructure reconstruction or installation tour costs;
41.2.6. electricity, gas and telecommunications connection provisioning costs;
41.2.7. project created the infrastructure development necessary stationary equipment (except production facilities) acquisition project intended for the provision of the services and actions-cost no more than 30 percent of the project's eligible direct costs;
41.2.8. value added tax payments directly related to the project, if the beneficiary cannot be recovered, subject to the statutory procedure. 42. If the combination is applied for eligible costs deemed project costs, corresponding to the European social fund eligible areas and not more than 10 per cent of the total direct eligible project costs as defined in the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 on the European Social Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1784/1999. Application of the combination of the operations financed must be necessary for the successful implementation of the European regional development fund co-financed activities, as well as the closely related. 43. the costs are eligible if they: 43.1.39. these regulations referred to in paragraph 1 for the implementation of the operation and meet sound financial management principles, in particular in the economic benefit and cost effectiveness;
43.2. carried out after an agreement on the implementation of the project (except for project preparation costs), and is paid to the interim or final report;
43.3. is posted for accounting and tax accounting registers, separated from the rest of the costs, identifiable, proven, and posted the requested funding, bookkeeping, certified with the original supporting documents;
43.4. is documented separately, if applied to the holders of the European Social Fund's principles;
43.5. carried out in accordance with the public procurement regulatory normat vajos in requirements. 44. non-eligible costs are: 44.1. project administration costs;
44.2. costs that exceed the amount of the eligible cost;
27.5. costs incurred prior to 24 October 2006;
27.6. costs not justified by supporting documents, which shall be set out in the agreement for the implementation of a project;
27.7. the supply of services, the supply of goods or the cost of conducting the work, if there is no suitable public procurement procedure according to the law;
27.7. the costs relating to the subcontracts concluded about the services you provide, the delivery of goods or performance of the work, if the subcontract for the increased cost of the project;
27.8. the health, life and accident insurance, as well as in the implementation of the project value insurance costs;
27.8. real estate purchase or rental costs;
27.9. the purchase of the vehicle;
44.10. costs related to leasing and rental transactions;
44.11. contributions in kind, such as land, real property (in whole or in part), durable goods, raw materials and people carried out unpaid charity work;

44.12. production equipment. 45. If the project occurs during non-eligible expenditure or pushes up costs, shall be borne by the beneficiary of its budgetary means and accounted for in accordance with the requirements laid down by the arrangement concerning the implementation of the project. Costs that are not related to the activities of the project may not be included in the project application. VII. Project application submission 46. Project application selection organized in one round of the call-the responsible authority until 31 December 2008 shall be sent by registered mail or electronic document in the form of the call for project submissions this provision set out in point 15 of the project applicant, identifying the project application submission period, of not less than 60 working days. 47. the responsible authority notice of limited project application selection started in the responsible authority's homepage on the internet (URwww.raplm.gov.lv). 48. the project to the responsible authority, the applicant shall submit one original application project: 29.9. paper form, by sending by mail, one of the project, the original of the application together with the identical electronic copy enclosed in a sealed container (envelope or box). On the application of the time considered to be the moment when the project application has been given to the post office. In the event of a dispute, the applicant shall demonstrate the project when the post put post;
48.2. the paper form, submitting personally, one of the original of the application of the project presented under the laws and regulations that govern the development and presentation of document requirements, together with the identical electronic copy enclosed in a sealed container (envelope or box). On the application of the time considered to be the moment when the representative of the authority responsible has done to the project application, check for the project;
48.3. the electronic document – prepared according to the laws and regulations governing the circulation of electronic documents. Project submission adds certain supporting documents. On the application of the time considered to be the time when project submissions sent by email or through the authorities held a special online form. In the event of a dispute, the applicant can demonstrate that the application sent to the project the project submission deadline. If the responsible authority submits that the application is received, so this claim justified. VIII. evaluation of project applications 49. Responsible Authority creates a project application for the evaluation of the Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Evaluation Commission). The Evaluation Commission is composed of three regional development and local government Ministry representatives and one by the Ministry of transport, Ministry of Economic Affairs, the Ministry of environment and the Ministry of finance representative. 50. evaluation in the Observer Commission responsible authority be invited to participate in the cooperation bodies, managing authorities and the European Commission. 51. the President of the Commission is the authorities a driver who is the voice of the Evaluation Commission members eligible status. 52. If necessary, the responsible authority for the project assessment application invite independent experts in the field of public procurement in the margin of the relevant regulatory acts. 53. the Commission received a submission of the project assessed under this provision, 54, 55, 56 and 57. criteria referred to in the paragraph. 54. Administrative criteria: 54.1. the project application is filed: 54.1.1. by mail or in person in a sealed container (envelope or box);
54.1.2. electronic document, signed with a secure electronic signature and confirm with the time stamp;
54.2. the project application is filed within the time limit laid down;
54.3. project applicant is invited to submit a project application;
54.4. the project application has been submitted in one original, if the project application submitted in paper form;
project application submitted 54.5. the original is cauršūt (caurauklot), where the application is submitted in paper form;
54.6. all project submissions, the original pages are numbered, if the application is submitted in paper form;
54.7. project application is added to the electronic version of the application, if submitted in paper form;
application of project finance 54.8 calculation is made in local currency;
project submission is 54.9. fully completed and drawn up according to the project application form;
54.10. applicant is signed by the project and add a receipt that includes information on project funding per applicant;
54.11. project submission prepared text;
54.12. project submission prepared for the Latvian language;
54.13. project submissions includes all the accompanying documents provided;
54.14. If additional documents are not issued in the Latvian language, accompanied by a certified translation into Latvian language of documents under the legal requirements;
project submission not 54.15. not specified corrections, erasures, aizkr, design, deletion, in addition, if the application is submitted in paper form. 55. eligibility criteria: 55.1. the project corresponds to the purpose of the activity is to ensure the city's revitalization of degraded areas in accordance with the integrated local development programme, thus contributing to the Latvian capital's future socio-economic preconditions for the formation of growth;
55.2. project application based on the current territory of the city, the choice of the degraded by surveys on investment need of degraded urban area and analyzing the socio-economic situation, including business environment, social security, public services, environmental perspective, transport and traffic problems, degraded areas impact on other areas of the city;
55.3. project planned activities are in accordance with the provisions laid down in the legislation of autonomous local government functions;
55.4. project activities are justified, proportionate with the planned time schedule and ensure the achievement of the objective;
55.5. project activities comply with the legal requirements;
57.5. in application of the project justified, as it will ensure the implementation and monitoring of the project;
55.7. included in the submission of the project eligible costs in accordance with specified eligible costs;
application of the project included 55.8. non-eligible costs in accordance with specified not eligible costs;
34.7. the project costs for the application have the appropriate project planned activities;

project submission is 55.10. a clearly defined target group – the city of Riga in Riga residents, individuals and companies working in Riga. Planned activities are focused on meeting the needs of target groups;
55.11. expected results in the application of the project, the value and impact of the results are clearly defined, measurable and contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the activity;
55.12. project management team has defined the tasks to be performed and the level of responsibility of each planned project activities and results to be achieved;
55.13. project budget includes costs are reasonable and justified, appropriate for the intended period of project implementation, and the activities envisaged are calculated by taking into account the projected market prices in the year of implementation of the project;
55.14. application of the project financial statement is accurately and correctly arithmetic developed;
55.15. European Union co-financing of the project does not exceed the permissible level;
project submission is 55.16. reflected as will ensure the maintenance of the results achieved in the project for at least five years after completion of the project;
project application in 55.17. (project or project) does not overlap with the activities (or part of the project) that are intended for other European Union fund activity within the project, the applicant can be a municipality;
55.18. eligible costs project total is less than $1 370 467;
the project application of 55.19. European regional development fund, the nurse apply cost does not exceed the maximum available to the municipality an amount-LVL 7 028 040;
project submission 55.20. European social fund holders shall not exceed 10 per cent of the total eligible project costs, if applicable;
55.21. project planned activities do not conflict with the support of the business regulatory laws;
supporting documentation project 55.22 preparation costs is made after 24 October 2006 and shall not exceed 10 per cent of the project total eligible costs;
55.23. administrative costs shall not exceed five percent of the total eligible direct project costs;
55.24. local degraded areas infrastructure development needed his equipment acquisition cost not exceeding 30 percent of the project total eligible costs;
55.25. local degraded areas greening costs odd gives 10 per cent of total eligible project costs;
55.26. unforeseen expenditure on the projects over five percent of the total eligible direct project costs;
55.27. municipality is designed and approved for the municipal development programme;
55.28. local government is planning to implement publicity and information measures according to the law;
55.29. project economic net present value (ENPV) is greater than zero;
the project's economic profitability 55.30. standards (ERR) is greater than the social discount rate (5.5%);
the project applicant is 55.31. Riga City municipality;
the project applicant is 55.32. stable and available financial resources. If the applicant intends to finance the project of the loan features, it adds credit and guarantee Council and letter of guarantee of the credit institution;
55.33. the applicant in the project's financial stabilization process. 56. Quality criteria: 56.1. project is intended for investment in infrastructure development in one or two cities degraded areas: 56.1.1. investment in infrastructure development in one or two cities degraded areas laid down in the laws and the quality requirements of adequate infrastructure (e.g., social, cultural, recreational infrastructure, as required), as well as with the use of the infrastructure related services – six points;
56.1.2. investment in infrastructure development in one or two cities degraded areas laid down in the laws and the quality requirements of adequate infrastructure (e.g., social, cultural, recreational infrastructure – according to demand) – four points;
56.1.3. investment in infrastructure development in one or two cities degraded areas provide for regional planning – two points;
56.1.4. not intended for investment in infrastructure in one or two areas of degraded urban renewal – the zero point;
56.2. project provides an integrated approach to urban infrastructure development, creating a direct link with the approved integrated municipal development program: 56.2.1. the project provides an integrated approach to urban infrastructure development, including interactions and effects provided outside the municipal territory, providing a direct link with the approved integrated municipal development programme, analysing the current situation, considering the variety of funding (public and private) Association mechanisms and providing solutions to complex problems, six points;
56.2.2. project has analysed the current situation and provide a link with the approved integrated municipal development programs, but not assessed various financing (public and private) Association mechanisms, providing a complex solution of the problem in part, – four points;
56.2.3. does not look at the current situation, not assessed various financing (public and private) Association mechanisms, providing a superficial solution, the zero point;
56.3. in the framework of the project the municipality will maintain existing and create new jobs: 56.3.1. will be stored, the existing and created at least six new jobs – four points;
56.3.2. will be stored, the existing and created from one to five for new jobs — two points;
56.3.3. will be provided jobs accessibility options-one point;
56.3.4. will not be saved in the existing and to create new jobs or not will be provided job opportunities-reach zero points;
56.4. project management team have the appropriate experience and project management capacity, professional and technical expertise: 56.4.1. the project manager shall have higher education (economics, finance or engineering) and at least three years work experience in project management, infrastructure project management team have the higher education experience in the implementation of infrastructure projects and professional knowledge for the area – three points;

56.4.2. the supervisor is higher education and from one to three years of work experience in the management of infrastructure projects, the project management team has a higher education and professional knowledge for the area, but no experience in the implementation of infrastructure projects — two points;
56.4.3. the project manager and the project management team have higher education, but there is no work experience in the implementation of infrastructure projects and work experience in the field in question-one point;
56.5. project application contains and how reasonable the project complements other projects approved or planned projects that are funded or planned to be financed from other funds of the European Union activities or other financial instruments: 56.5.1. project application contains and based additionality with more than one project or project submission – three points;
56.5.2. application of the project contains reasonable and additionality with one project or project submission – two points;
56.5.3. the project is not specified in the application and based additionality with projects or project submissions – the zero point;
56.6. the project in the application reflect the degree of readiness of the project implementation: 56.6.1. designed and added to the project application of transmit technical year būvvald project, approved cost estimate of construction (construction) and developed by the procurement documentation – four points;
56.6.2. the project application has been added to the construction cost estimate, approved by the planning būvvald and architectural task and paraksttiesīg person's statement that to responsible authorities indicated the deadline will be presented to the technical project approved by būvvald (construction) and developed technical specifications – two points;
56.6.3. not added any of these terms at the bottom of 56.6.1. and 56.6.2. the documents referred to in point-zero point;
56.7. the project has been the benefits-costs analysis and economic profitability of the project is at least 5.5 points, points are awarded according to the project's economic rate of return (ERR);
54.1. the project is to be implemented: one and a half year 56.8.1 to (including) – three points;
56.8.2. from one and a half to two and a half years (inclusive) – two points;
56.8.3. of two-and-a-half to three years (including)-one point;
56.8.4. for more than three years – the zero point;
56.9. impact on the priority project "macroeconomic stability". Pro Ject applicant funding part of the eligible cost of the project is larger than the minimum funding part: 56.9.1. more than 10 percent – three points;
56.9.2. of the six to 10 percent, two points;
56.9.3. up to six percent (not including)-one point;
the project provides 55.25. specific actions the principle of equal opportunities, in particular by improving accessibility for people with functional disabilities: 56.10.1. project for four and more specific actions needed at opportunities throughout – three points;
56.10.2. project for from one to three specific activities to ensure equal opportunities – two points;
56.10.3. the project does not foresee specific actions to ensure equal opportunities – the zero point;
56.11. as a result of the implementation of the project will contribute to the reduction of environmental pollution or deterioration are not specific negative impacts on the environment for the elimination or reduction of: 56.11.1. the project will contribute to the reduction of environmental pollution or deterioration are not specific negative impacts on the environment for the elimination or reduction of-two points;
56.11.2. as a result of the implementation of the project will contribute to the reduction of environmental pollution or deterioration, there is no specific negative impacts on the environment for the elimination or reduction of-zero point;
56.12. the project promotes the development of the information society, providing for the establishment of the electronic services or improvement: 56.12.1. project provides electronic services for the creation or improvement of two points;
56.12.2. project provides electronic services for the establishment or enhancement of zero point. 57. the Commission's application of the assessment of the conformity of the project administration and eligibility assessment criteria is assessed by "Yes" or "no" – do not match. 58. The Evaluation Commission begins the evaluation process, assessing the adequacy of the administrative application of the project the assessment criteria. 59. Where the application does not comply with any of these terms, 54.3 54.1 54.2.,.,.,., 54.4 54.7 54.8 13.,.,.,., 54.9 54.11, 54.12.54.15 54.13. or. at the bottom above the evaluation criteria, the Commission does not keep specific project applications of valuation. 60. the project submissions, which fully complies with all the rules in paragraph 59 that criteria and in part or in full compliance with this provision, and a 54.14 54.6.54.10. in these criteria, assessed in accordance with the eligibility criteria. 61. Where the application does not comply with any of these terms, 55.3, 55.17 55.1...,.,., 55.27 55.29 55.21, 55.30, or 55.31. in these 55.33 criteria, the Evaluation Commission does not keep specific project applications of valuation. 62. the project submissions, which fully complies with all the provisions of paragraph 61 of these criteria and in part or in full compliance with this provision, 55.4 55.5 55.2.,.,.,., 55.8 55.7 57.5.,.,., 34.7 55.10, 55.12, 55.13 55.11..., 55.14, 55.15 55.16.,.,.,., 55.18 55.19 55.20, 55.22.,.,., provision of 55.24 55.26, 55.28. in these and 55.32 criteria, assessed in accordance with the quality criteria. 63. the Commission's application of the project's compliance with the quality criteria assessed by giving a certain number of points. IX. Decision-making and publication of information 64. Manager responsible authority shall take a decision on the approval of the project application, if all the following conditions are met: 64.1. application of the project is in full compliance with all these rules 54 and 55 of the criteria referred to in paragraph;
64.2. the project submission this provision. criteria referred to in subparagraph 56.7 won at least 5.5 points, 56.2. criteria referred to in subparagraph, at least four points but, 56.4, 56.5 56.1..., 56.6 and 55.25. criterion referred to at least two points in each and 54.1. the criterion referred to in at least one point;
64.3. project assessment criteria for the quality of the application is 20.5 points or higher. 65. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the application for the approval of the project, provided:

65.1. the project application to the need to clarify the appropriate one of these rules, or 54.6.54.10.54.14. criteria referred to in (a);
65.2. the project application to the need to clarify the appropriate one of these rules, 55.4 55.5 55.2.,.,.,., 55.8 55.7 57.5.,.,., 34.7 55.10, 55.12, 55.13 55.11..., 55.14, 55.15 55.16.,.,.,., 55.18 55.19 55.20, 55.22.,.,., provision of 55.24 55.26 55.25.,.,., or 55.32 55.28. criteria referred to in point. 66. This provision, paragraph 65 condition can include: 66.1. additional explanation of the submission;
66.2. the commencement of project implementation time and time schedule or cost design clarification by years;
66.3. the cost-reduction or elimination of rectification, the compliance arithmetical;
66.4. other steps to ensure the conformity of the project application, this provision, 54.14 54.6.,.,., 55.4 55.10, 55.14, 55.15 55.11...,.,., 55.18 55.19 55.16., 55.26. and 55.28. criteria referred to in point. 67. If the rules referred to in paragraph 66 of the conditions affect any other provision, these 55.54 or 56. criteria referred to in conformity assessment, the responsible authority decision on the approval of the application, the project on condition accompanied by appropriate instructions. 68. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application of the project, unless at least one of the following conditions is fulfilled: 68.1. the project submission does not meet at least one of these rules 59. criteria referred to in paragraph 1;
68.2. the project submission does not meet at least one of these rules 61. criteria referred to in paragraph 1;
68.3. project application is acquired at least 20.5 points quality criteria;

68.4. project assessment of compliance with the application of this provision to 56.7 in this criterion has acquired at least 5.5 points, 56.2. these provisions referred to below the criteria, at least four points, this provision, 56.4, 56.5 56.1..., 56.6 and 55.25. criterion referred to at least two points in each, and this rule 54.1. criterion referred to at least one point. 69. the decision contained conditions shall not exceed 20 working days from the date of adoption of the decision. 70. the responsible authority shall coordinate the provision set out in paragraph 66 of the supervision of compliance with the conditions. The responsible authority shall, on the basis of the decision on the application for the approval of the project, drawing up an opinion on the decision the conditions contained within five working days of receipt of the information on the fulfilment of the conditions. 71. Where the applicant has not provided or only partially, provided a decision on the approval of the application, the project provided the conditions contained or not noticed this rule laid down in paragraph 69, the application shall be deemed to have been rejected. 72. the opinion about the fulfilment of the conditions by the competent authority shall send the draft to the applicant within two working days, following the rules laid down in paragraph 70. 73. This provision set out in paragraph 70 of the opinion justice control there is a like decision, which contains the conditions to control this opinion is drawn up. 74. the responsible authority shall within five working days of this provision, 65 and 68 64. decisions specified in point shall be sent by registered mail to the applicant and the project in writing inform the liaison authority of the decision taken. 75. the responsible authority shall ensure that information on the approved design submissions were published on its homepage on the internet (URwww.raplm.gov.lv). X. conclusion of the agreement, the implementation of the project, execution of payments and monitoring of the use of funding granted 76. Liaison body of 30 working days following this rule laid down in paragraph 64 of the decision or by the rules laid down in paragraph 70 of the receipt of the opinion, concluded with the beneficiary of the financing agreement for the implementation of the draft laws in the order, if there is available on the European regional development fund. 77. The beneficiary within five working days after the conclusion of the agreement shall be submitted to the liaison body of the procurement plan (annex 4). 78. The beneficiary within 15 working days after this provision set out in paragraph 64 of the decision or on the rules laid down in paragraph 70 of the opinion of the submitting institution for cooperation for the submission of the request for payment schedule (annex 5). The schedule for the submission of the request for payment shall include details of the project expenses. 79. where the submission of the request for payment schedule changes occur, beneficiary cooperation authority within five working days, submit to the filing of the request for payment of an updated schedule. 80. If the beneficiary within 30 working days of the rule laid down in paragraph 64 of the decision or by the rules laid down in paragraph 70 of the opinion of the authority has not come close to the cooperation agreement, cooperation agreement is not concluded and the authority shall inform the competent authority. 81. The beneficiary for the implementation of the activities envisaged in the project (with the exception of those rules specified in subparagraph 41.2.1. implementation of) started after the authorities concluded a cooperation agreement for the implementation of the project. 82. The beneficiary shall ensure the first purchase izslud in the definition of the competition not later than three months after the conclusion of the agreement. If the first tender is not enacted within that period, the liaison body shall decide on the termination of the agreement and inform the responsible authority. 83. The beneficiary provides account opening the Treasury project financial transfers. 84. cooperation authority within the time limits and procedures laid down by the agreement on the implementation of the project, provides funding for the requested advance payment, 20 percent of the project to the European regional development fund. 85. cooperation authority, providing advance and interim payments to the beneficiary, compliance with the condition that the total may not exceed 90 percent of the project to the European regional development fund. 86. The beneficiaries of cooperation institution shall submit a payment request with copies of supporting documents, the expenditure and the progress report deadlines and procedures set by the agreement on the implementation of the project. 87. This provision 86. documents specified in point cooperation institution may be submitted in person, by post or in electronic form of a document (looking under the electronic movement of documents regulatory laws), not more than once every quarter, where, under the agreement for the implementation of the project not otherwise specified. If the payment request, the documents are not submitted to the Latvian language, prepared in a certified document translation in the language of the country in accordance with laws and regulations. If necessary, the original documents verifying the implementation of the project site. 88. cooperation authority within 30 working days of checks that the rules set out in paragraph 86 of document compliance with the requirements laid down by the arrangement concerning the implementation of projects approved in the application for payment of the amount of eligible expenditure and payment orders prepared for submission to the Treasury. 89. If the cooperation authority finds that the need to clarify this provision 86. documents referred to in paragraph 1, the beneficiary within five working days shall ensure refinement. 90. The liaison body, this provision set out in paragraph 86 of the specified documents shall re-examine the time limit extended on payment request clarification, and prepares a payment order for submission to the Treasury. 91. The liaison body shall be reduced on a pro rata basis the amount of funding granted in the following cases: 91.1. If the actual financial leverage is lower than that provided for the implementation of a project agreement;
91.2. implementation of a submission of the project activities envisaged, but the aim of the project is reached;
91.3. where no opposition to the use of the funds supporting documents;
91.4. If the payment request by the eligible costs are not proportionate and economically justified;

56.9. If the beneficiary has misled the authorities or the liaison body, giving false information. 92. cooperation authority have the right to interim or statutory period, and also after the payment request from the beneficiary's additional information on the implementation of the project. 93. cooperation authority have the right to interim or statutory assessment call upon experts to verify the request for payment of the eligible cost specified in compliance and reasonableness. 94. cooperation authority to make payments to beneficiaries, controls the activity of acquiring funds amount to succumbing to the activity specific amounts being exceeded. 95. The beneficiary shall ensure that the eligible expenditure, which shall be repaid from the European regional development fund and the national public funding means that the eligible expenditure borne by the beneficiaries, as well as the implementation of the project-related revenue, cash flow, assets and liabilities accounting records are identifiable, separate and verifiable. 96. If the cooperation body finds discrepancies in the course of the implementation of the project, the funding recipient shall fix a time limit for correcting the discrepancy found. 97. Within the period of the discrepancy found is not correct, the beneficiary shall repay the expenses unduly made. The liaison body shall provide information on identified inconsistencies in accordance with vajiem. in normat 98. All changes affecting the implementation of the project, the beneficiary shall coordinate with the liaison body. 99. changes affecting the project objectives, this provision in principle prescribed in paragraph 12.2 of the execution, the project time schedule, place of implementation of the project, eligible costs, the results achieved and monitoring indicators, the liaison body not later than 10 working days in line with the responsible authority. 100. If the beneficiary uses the project loan, examine the cooperation provision 86. documents specified in point and confirms the payment request in the amount of the eligible expenditure. On account of the State budget borrowing repayments made to the liaison body shall prepare the municipality information that indicates the amount of the funds transferred and date. 101. The beneficiary is directly responsible for project implementation and maintenance of the project's results for at least five years after completion of the project. 102. The beneficiary shall ensure that the project will create infrastructure, or a part thereof is transferred or leased for use according to the laws and regulations in the area of public procurement. 103. The beneficiary all fixed installations, structures and other material values acquired or created the project for at least five years during the term of validity thereof at their expense, insure against loss or damage that may result from fire, storms, flood damage or unlawful conduct of third parties. 104. the responsible authority, the authority and the beneficiary of the European Commission and the authorities of the Republic of Latvia access to all project documents relating to the implementation of the originals. Prime Minister Godmanis. Regional development and local Government Minister e. Zalān of regional development and local government Ministry's proposed version of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 4 august 2008 the Regulation No 615 annex 1 PDF format, regional development and local Government Minister e. Zalān in annex 2 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 4 august 2008 the Regulation No 615 feasibility study and a cost-benefit analysis i. feasibility study feasibility 1 components : 1.1. existing situation assessment: 1.1.1. Description of the project area; 1.1.2. the socio-economic factors; 1.1.3. the technical aspects; 1.1.4. financial aspects; 1.1.5. institutional aspects; 1.1.6. environmental aspects; 1.2. the project strategy and alternative setting: 1.2.1. objectives, standards, criteria; 1.2.2. demand planning; 1.2.3. alternative development, analysis and benchmarking; 1.2.4. the cost-benefit analysis: 1.2.4.1. financial analysis; 1.2.4.2. socio-economic analysis; 1.2.4.3. risk and sensitivity analysis; 1.3. the chosen alternative (project) rationale: 1.3.1. technical aspects; 1.3.2. financial aspects; 1.3.3. environmental aspects; 1.3.4. institutional aspects; 1.4. other parts of the customer's discretion. II. Cost-benefit analysis of relevant macroeconomic assumptions price index changes table 1 year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2007-2013 average average 2014-2033 1. Consumer price inflation (%)
12.5 7.2 4.9 3.8 2.5 2.5 6.2 2.5 2. Gdp deflator (%)
3. Total 11.7 8.1 6.0 4.5 3.9 3.2 7.1 2.5 fixed capital formation deflator (%)
9.0 8.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.5 7.4 2.5 2. Consumer price index reflects the change in the consumer price basket of products and services contained in the price dynamics. Consumer price inflation is suitable for personal income and private consumption index. Consumer price index inflation is suitable for projects where a large proportion of the cost of wages. Cost-benefit analysis on the use mikrolīmen calculations for pay. 3. The gross domestic product deflator reflects average price changes in all sectors of the economy together. This indicator is often used in other macro economic indicators index and in many cases the calculations you can choose either the consumer price inflation rate, or the gross domestic product deflator. The gross domestic product deflator is suitable for mixed cost projects in different sectors, as well as it has the proper pointer to the expected discounted financial flows out of business. Cost-benefit analysis on the use mikrolīmen calculations for services. 4. Gross fixed capital formation deflator reflects the country the incidence of capital investment. This rate is applied to the indexing of investment projects. The total fixed capital formation deflator is suitable for those with high local cost share for investment in fixed capital investments (construction and the creation of the means of production). Cost-benefit analysis on the use mikrolīmen calculations for fixed capital formation (construction and capital goods). III. Cost-benefit analysis used in the medium-and long-term macroeconomic forecasts table 2 year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2009-2013 2014-2033


the annual average increase in annual average growth in gross domestic product (GDP) growth in comparable prices (%)
7.5 7.0 6.8 6.7 6.5 6.0 6.6 2.7 2. Gross domestic product (GDP) growth per capita comparable prices (%)
8.1 7.6 7.4 7.3 7.1 6.6 7.2 3.2 3. Employment growth (%)
1.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 – 0.8 4. Wage increase comparable prices (%)
4.9 6.1 6.7 6.9 6.4 5.9 6.4 3.6 IV. Discount rates table 3 1. Real social discount rate 5.5% 2. Real financial discount rate 5% 5. If the calculations do not apply inflation, cost-benefit analysis using real discount rates. 6. Where the calculation is applied to the inflation, the cost-benefit analysis using nominal discount rates.
Regional development and local Government Minister e. Zalān in annex 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 4 august 2008 the Regulation No 615, regional development and local Government Minister e. Zalān in annex 4 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 4 august 2008 the Regulation No 615 procurement plan table 1 no PO box the name of the Fund 1. the responsible authority 2. Cooperation authority 3. Project Title 4. Project identification No.


5. the contract/agreement No.


6. conclusion of the contract/agreement date 7. Beneficiary registration No. 8.


9. Registered Office note. Do not fill in the 3, 4, 5 and 6 lines, if the procurement covered by the Cabinet of Ministers of 26 June 2007 No. 419 the provisions of "the order in which the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds", paragraph 30. table 2 no the expected contract priekšmets1 PO box līgumcena2 purchase procedūra3 purchase procedure, the period of notification 1.



2.3.





Officer (name) phone fax e-mail Paraksts4 printed name Date (dd/mm/yyyy) vieta4 notes of the stamp. 1.1 goods and services and to do the works for which expected to close on the purchase contract. 2.2 the planned contract amount, taking into account all procurement contracts. 3.3 planned procurement procedures under the public procurement law or of the law "on procurement for public service needs". 4.4 document properties "signature", "date" and "stamp" does not fill in, if the electronic document has been prepared according to the law on electronic document design.
Regional development and local Government Minister e. Zalān in annex 5 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 4 august 2008 the Regulation No 615 payment request submission schedule agreement No.


Project title beneficiary agreement total advance requested LVL Periods2 apjoms1% planned to submit a request to the structural funds, 4 planned repayment par3 datums5 ERDF funding, government funding of LVL (grant local authorities), the beneficiary of the funding of LVL, LVL4, 5 in total in 2008, III quarter IV of 2008. quarter of 2009 I quarter II quarter 2009. of 2009, III quarter IV quarter of 2009 2010 I quarter II quarter 2010. the 2010 III quarter IV quarter 2010 I 2011 quarter 2011. year quarter II 2011 III quarter IV quarter 2011 2012 I quarter II quarter of 2012, 2012 III quarter IV quarter of 2012 … ….




Total: X notes. 1 advance payment not more than 20 percent of the project to the European regional development fund. 2 Period must be for the full period of the implementation of the project (from the beginning to the implementation of the project for the implementation of the project end date) for each month separately. If necessary, the table can be supplemented with additional lines. 3 planned structural fund funding amount by funding sources. 4 If the project is not funded from the appropriate funding source, the column must be specified "0.00". 5 the date when the beneficiary has planned to submit a request for payment (European regional development fund and/or public funding).



(position)

(signature) of the 200 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ the regional development and local Government Minister Zalān in the E.