Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 667 in Riga on 18 august, 2008 (pr. No 59 12. §) rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" Appendix apakšaktivitāt "regional 3.5.1.2.2. waste management system development" Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines the order in which the activities of the programme ' infrastructure and services ' Appendix 3.5. priorities "environmental infrastructure and environmental friendly energy contributes" UR3.5.1.pas "environmental infrastructure" apakšaktivitāt "regional 3.5.1.2.2. waste management systems development" (hereinafter activity) the project submission evaluation criteria, the applicant and the project authority.
2. The purpose of the activity is to create a sustainable waste management system, providing waste disposal and treatment in human health and the environmentally sound waste management and municipal services available in urban areas and 100 percent in rural areas to 80 percent of the population.
3. activities implemented in the framework of projects co-financed by the Cohesion Fund of the European Union (hereinafter referred to as the Cohesion Fund) funds, merchant and local government funds. Activities available within the Cohesion Fund co-financing are 28 182 440 dollars, national funding – 4 973 372 lats.
4. activities at the waste management region, companies and institutions.
5. the competent authority is the Ministry of the environment. The responsible authority provides all its functions, including appropriate competency ensured that would not be exceeded in these regulations for the implementation of the activities of the Cohesion Fund funding, and monitor the available funding under the Cohesion Fund, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 93. Article 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the performance of the activities and project level, controlling the project financial plan.
6. implement a limited activity in the project application selection.
 
II. Project activities eligible, eligible and non-eligible costs of the activity within the 7 supported waste management waste management infrastructure services for improving the quality and availability of adequate regional waste management plans – in the landfill and landfill supportive infrastructure, to ensure that laws and regulations according to the waste disposal and reduce waste to landfill sites for disposal of waste production.
8. eligible costs directly related to the project under the Cohesion Fund (hereinafter the project) within the operations carried out. Subject to the conditions contained in the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) no 1084/2006 establishing a Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1164/94, the relevant costs are the following: 8.1 the costs associated with the project application and supporting the preparation of the dossier for submission to the responsible body : 8.1.1. technical feasibility, the related escalation and with the environmental impact assessment documentation related to development costs, but not more than two per cent of the project total eligible costs set out in the decision of approval of the project application and agreement for the civil implementation of the project (hereinafter referred to as the civil law contract);
8.1.2. the development of the construction and related costs of būvekspertīz, but no more than four per cent of the project total eligible costs set out in the decision on the application of the project approval and contract in civil law;
8.2. autoruzraudzīb costs, but not more than 0.5 per cent of the eligible costs of the works;
8.3. building costs but no more than three percent of the eligible costs of the works;
8.4. the cost of the works;
8.5. supply contract, including technological equipment, Assembly and tuning costs.
9. Non-eligible costs include the following: 9.1. technical feasibility, the related escalation and with the environmental impact assessment documentation, related development costs exceeding two percent of project total eligible costs laid down in the decision approving the project submission and civil agreement;
9.2. the development projects and related costs of būvekspertīz, exceeding the four percent of project total eligible costs laid down in the decision approving the project submission and civil agreement;
9.3. autoruzraudzīb costs in excess of 0.5% of the eligible costs of the works;
9.4. building costs, which exceed three percent of the eligible costs of the works.
10. the project cost does not include: 10.1 administrative or project management objectives in the inventory of durable equipment used (hardware and vehicles);
10.2. fees for accounting and audit services;
10.3. the fee for the legal, technical and financial advice provided on the project during its implementation;
10.4. the project management personnel involved in project management fees and administrative costs, as well as the beneficiary's current maintenance costs;
10.5. working capital and loan funds the cost of the acquisition, paid for the review of the design of the loan, reservation and service charges for financial transactions, interest on arrears, penalties and expenses of litigation;
10.6. real estate purchase costs;
10.7. the implementation of the project particularly the purchase or production of durable equipment (equipment, which are used in the construction process) cost of acquisition;
10.8. the purchase of second-hand equipment;
10.9. expenses, which does not provide the immediate purchase of equipment (such as leasing).
11. the total budget of the project comprises also financial reserve, which can be up to five percent of the project's total eligible costs. The financial reserve of the project uses this provision set out in point 8 of the eligible costs incurred prior to the use of financial reserves by appropriate amendments to the civil contract.
 
III. Requirements to the project the applicant 12. Project applicant is a public service provider, laws in the order is responsible for the operation of the landfill.
13. public service providers has entered into agreements with all municipal waste management authorities in the region piekritīgaj. The Treaty States: 13.1. service, municipal waste disposal landfill in question;
13.2. municipal waste-disposal requirements of the public service provider for the necessary technical equipment maintenance and renewal, to provide the services according to the specific service requirements;
13.3. for the duration of the contract;
13.4. municipal waste-disposal of the public service;
13.5. municipal waste-disposal public service provider assigned exclusive or special rights;
13.6. opportunity to receive reimbursement payments, investment in public services, infrastructure and payment of fees calculation, control and review the conditions, as well as the payment of fees and reimbursement of overpayment prevention conditions.
14. the merchant who submitted a project application, is registered in the commercial register, in order to carry out the disposal of municipal waste in landfills and provide municipal landfill operation after commissioning of the landfill.
15. the applicant shall analyze the project costs and benefits according to the provisions of annex 1.
16. On the financing of the cohesion fund cannot qualify if: the applicant's project 16.1. tax debt on the application for the first working day of the month;
16.2. the project applicant is in liquidation or insolvency proceedings.
 
IV. A call for submission of the project application Project 17 the selection advertised two project application selection rounds. The first project application selection issue a three-year period, the second-two year period: 17.1. first application round project available for funding from the Cohesion Fund is LVL 18 182 440;
17.2. the second application round of projects available for funding from the Cohesion Fund is at least 10 000 000 lats;
17.3. If the first application round of projects available for funding from the Cohesion Fund is used up, it directs the second project application selection round of financing.
18. the responsible authority shall send the invitation to submit a project application to the 12 and 14 of the provisions referred to in paragraph merchants. Invitation sent by mail or electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature, and the preparation of appropriate legislation on electronic document design): 18.1. first project application selection round – not later than two months after the entry into force of these regulations;

18.2. the second project application selection round-up to 15 December 2010.
19. the project application to the responsible authority within two months of the invitation is sent, the 12 and 14 of the provisions referred to in paragraph merchants.
20. If the first application round project invited potential project applicant does not submit the application deadline, the responsible authority shall send the invitation in 2010.
 
V. project application conditions and evaluation criteria maximum 21. Cohesion Fund aid intensity does not exceed 85 percent of the decision on the approval of the project application requirements eligible total costs of the project.
22. The minimum amount of funding activities within one project is not defined. One project total cost must not exceed 17 570 000 la you. Project activities within the applicant can implement one project if the Cohesion Fund co-financing does not exceed this provision 2. the amount specified in the annex.
23. the total ineligible Project costs must not be larger than 50 percent of the total cost of the project.
24. the project shall be submitted by the applicant within the time limit specified in the authority responsible for the application, prepared into Latvian language. Project application can be submitted to: 24.1. paper form – fill out a project application form (annex 3). The project application must be signed by the applicant's institution of the project manager or his authorised person. The applicant shall submit one project caurauklot project caurauklot the original and one copy of it (without attachments), as well as the electronic version of the application. The attached document page number;
24.2. electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature, and the preparation of appropriate legislation on electronic document design). If the application is submitted electronically: 24.2.1. it must be designed to DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format;
24.2.2. in addition to the deliverable documents must be developed and designed for the electronic circulation of documents regulatory laws and requirements.
25. the project applicant project application form Annex shall be accompanied by the following documents: 25.1. waste management technical-economic justification of the project (including additional documentation that explains or technical-economic justification articulates the project justification, if required);
25.2. the project's cartographic material in appropriate scale that provides information about the location of project activities in the project area and their impact on the environment; 25.3. they based works according to the laws and regulations on the procedures for the determination of the estimated contract price for public procurement;
25.4. local government certification that the project complies with the applicable municipal planning or detailed;
25.5. environmental monitoring national Office opinion on the environmental impact assessment of the final report or the decision on the environmental impact assessment procedure;
15.9. municipal waste management region authorities jurisdiction over contracts with public service provider for the public service of waste management – municipal solid waste disposal in the landfill in question – the provision of municipal waste management in the region (copies);
25.7. licence for public service (copy);
25.8. sealed copy of the credit agreement or in the copy of the document issued by the lending institution, which shows that the credit will be granted without guarantees, if credit is provided without guarantee of a municipality;
16.1. the decision of the local government: for guarantee if 25.9.1. project for the municipality of guarantee;
25.9.2. that the Government match funding recipient project submission prepared and incorporates the work and funding;
25.10. the project cash flow forecast, reflecting the project's funding movement during project implementation;
25.11. the planned indicative procurement project plan according to the law, planning documents of the European Union in the field of the structural funds and the Cohesion Fund.
26. project submissions valued at administrative, compliance, quality and funding criteria.
27. the project submission evaluation administrative criteria are as follows: 27.1. the project applicant is invited to submit a project application;
27.2. the project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified time limits;
27.3. the application of the project according to this provision and 24.1 24.2. bottom point.;
27.4. the project application is fully completed (annex 3);
17.1. the project attached to the application, all listed in the annex under paragraph 25 of these rules.
28. project eligibility criteria for the evaluation of the application are the following: 28.1. activities envisaged under the project to conform to the approved regional waste management plans;
28.2. the project, planned to resolve a technical-economic justification of the identified major problems;
28.3. the activities envisaged under the project comply with the creation of the infrastructure of the site;
28.4. the project submission complies with activities: objective under this 28.4.1. the provisions of paragraph 2;
28.4.2. eligible activities under paragraph 7 of these rules;
28.4.3. eligible costs under this provision, paragraph 8;
28.4.4. non-eligible costs under this provision, paragraph 9;
28.5. project project description in the application provides the information you need about action to be taken;
28.6. the time schedule of the project comply with the planned activities;
17.8. the project information provided in the submissions demonstrate that the project will provide the applicant the sustainability of project results;
17.9. the project identified in the application works and equipment supply indicators meet the project schedule and includes key jobs that characterized the proposed goals;
46.8. project cost-benefit analysis carried out in accordance with the provisions of annex 1;
28.10. project financial analysis confirms the financial stability of the project;
No 28.11. the requested funding support rate based on project cost-benefit analysis;
No 28.12. project budget includes costs are justified;
28.13. project cash flow forecast is justified;
28.14. the indicative project procurement plan is based;
28.15. project in the application reflect the implementation of the planned projects in the organisation chart and the planned human resources supports legislation in certain functions of the beneficiaries;
28.16. project planned in the publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the laws and regulations on the cohesion fund the project publicity and information measures;
28.17. the project applicant is a public service provider, laws in the order is responsible for the operation of a landfill site;
28.18. the public service has entered into agreements with all municipal waste management region piekritīgaj authorities;
28.19. the project applicant is not tax debt to the application for the first working day of the month;
28.20. project applicant is not in liquidation or insolvency proceedings;
No 28.21. the project has stated that the applicant will provide funding from its own resources, if the increase in the cost of the project;
28.22. the property of the applicant's project all assets in municipal waste landfill activity;
28.23. project applicant – merchant who registered in a commercial register, in order to carry out the disposal of municipal waste in a landfill has stated that after the commissioning of the landfill infrastructure project will be the property of the applicant in accordance with the conditions of the activity and the project applicant will provide public services planned crew of the landfill in the region;
28.24. project assessment of the financial situation of the applicant certifies the applicant's project financial stability after the implementation of the project.
29. project quality criteria for the evaluation of the application are the following: 29.1. project readiness stage (the number of points-two points must be obtained at least one;)
29.2. the planned implementation of the project (number of points – from zero to three points, must obtain at least one;)
29.3. the effectiveness of the implementation of the project in relation to direct waste management infrastructure improvement (points-three points, must obtain at least one;)
29.4. the project risk assessment, including assessing the potential cost increase (number of points – from zero to three points, must obtain at least one;)
29.5. the project in the application is analyzed for possible alternatives, and perform economic analysis of the project (number of points – from zero to three points, must obtain at least one;)
18.4. the waste management system-create the infra structure, including sustainable use of each evaluation (number of points – from zero to three points, must obtain at least one;)

18.5. the cost of return indicators – infrastructure planned lifetime (years) relative to the initial project total cost (in dollars) (the number of points – from one to three points, the benchmark gives extra points). Average cost of return indicators project application selection round for the calculation of the project submissions that meet the administrative and eligibility criteria. The average cost of return indicators is the cost of return indicators in relation to the amount of selection round of project submissions;
29.8. sorted waste, including biodegradable waste, disposal or processing support (number of points – from zero to five points, must obtain at least one;)
29.9. ensure the flow of waste that goes into landfill disposal and treatment of waste (the number of points-two points must be obtained at least one;)
29.10. project applicant's financial contribution to the project (number of points ranging from one to three points, the benchmark gives extra points).
30. submission of Project funding criteria are the following: 30.1. the project submission complies with the administrative, compliance and quality evaluation criteria, as well as quality evaluation criteria overall rating is at least eight points.
30.2. the listing of this rule 30.1. the bottom paragraph with "Yes" the estimated project applications in order of priority, starting with the most points winning the project application, the project application selection round application sufficient funding of the project.
 
Vi. application assessment and Project decision-making procedures 31. leader authority creates a limited application of the selection of projects project application Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission assessment) and confirm the rules (including the replacement of members of the Commission procedures and the absence of expertise). The Evaluation Commission is composed of the responsible authority, the Ministry of environment, local government and the Latvian Union of environmental non-governmental organization representatives, as well as a representative of the Managing Authority observer status. The observer shall draw up an opinion on the evaluation of the work of the Commission and submitted to the responsible authorities the driver in terms in which the evaluation the Commission shall prepare a draft opinion on the results of the evaluation of the application.
32. the responsible authority: 32.1. in the month following the entry into force of these regulations are developed and approved project application assessment methodology and application form filling project methodology;
32. in the month following the entry into force of these provisions on its homepage on the internet (www.vidm.gov.lv) the project limited application selection project application form (annex 3), project submission evaluation form (annex 4), the application form filling project methodology, the project application assessment methodology, the project required for the implementation of methodological materials and determine the standard procurement procedures;
32.3. the projects proposed recorded submissions, grants them an identification number and within two weeks the project applicant, be sent electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature) or by post, proof of receipt of the application for the project.
33. the project compliance with administrative applications, eligibility and funding criteria assessed with "Yes" or "no" ("Yes", "no" – meets does not meet). Application of project compliance with quality criteria assessed by giving a certain number of points. If the administrative application or eligibility criteria is not applicable to a specific project, applicant project application in respect of this criterion.
34. For compliance with these rules and 29.10. in paragraph 18.5. these criteria the project application can get extra points.
35. If the application is submitted to the responsible body within the time limit set in accordance with paragraph 24 of these rules or are not prepared for the Latvian language, the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application for the project.
36. evaluation the Commission shall assess the project submissions in the following order: 36.1. scored the first application project compliance with rules 27 and 28 of the criteria referred to in paragraph. If the assessment is in one of the following criteria is "no", the application is rejected and the project evaluation do not continue. If the application of these criteria the project evaluated with "Yes", the application of these provisions is valued at 29. criteria referred to in paragraph, giving a certain number of points;
36.2. the project submission complies with these provisions in paragraph 29 the criteria above and overall rating of at least eight points, project submissions valued at 30.1. these provisions referred to in the criteria and include project application priority list;
36.3. the project submission does not comply with the provisions referred to in paragraph 29 criteria and overall rating of less than eight points, the application is rejected and the project evaluation do not continue;
36.4. upon submission of a project for the establishment of a list of priority project submissions valued at 30.2. these provisions referred to in the criteria.
37. If two or more project applications have received the same amount of points, they ranked the project application priority list in the following order: 37.1. a project application with the highest rating for this rule 29.1. the bottom of the criteria referred to in paragraph 1;
37.2. the project application with the highest rating on these rules 29.2. bottom of the criteria referred to in paragraph 1;
37.3. the project application with the highest rating for this rule 29.3 bottom criteria referred to in paragraph 1. ';
37.4. a project application with the highest rating for this rule 18.5. below the criteria referred to in paragraph 1;
37.5. the project application with the highest rating for this rule 29.8. bottom of the criteria referred to in paragraph 1;
23.4. the Fund's application of the project with the highest rating of 29.9. these terms at the bottom of this criterion.
38. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the application for the approval of the project, if it complies with those rules 27, 28, 29 and 30 of the criteria referred to in paragraph and paragraph 29 of these rules, the criteria referred to in the overall rating of at least eight points.
39. The decision on the application of the project approval may include conditions that the project applicant must meet the deadline set in the decision, so that it could conclude civil contracts for the implementation of a project: 24.3. to clarify the details of the project the applicant (contact information and property) (annex 3);
24.4. refine the attached document under this provision, paragraph 25;
39.3. to clarify the changes in total amount and eligible costs the eligible costs under this provision, paragraph 8;
24.5. to clarify the changes in total amount of eligible costs and not eligible under paragraph 9 of these regulations;
24.5. to clarify the project time schedule according to the activities planned under this provision of paragraph 28.6;
24.6. to clarify the project cash flow forecast according to 28.13. these provisions;
24.7. to clarify the indicative project procurement plan under this provision 28.14.;
24.7. to clarify the application of the project reflect the planned introduction of the outline of the project and planned human resources security under this provision 28.15.;
24.8. specify information about publicity measures under this provision. 28.16.
40. This provision in the decision referred to in paragraph 39 of the conditions laid down in the project the applicant authorities met the prescribed period not exceeding two months from the date of receipt of the decision. The time-limits laid down in this decision cannot be extended.
41.20 working days following that rule 40. the expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission assessed valuation, as done in the decision on the application of the project approval with conditions, and the responsible authority shall draw up an opinion on the conditions contained in the decision.
42. If the applicant for the project conditions laid down in the decision is not complied with within the time limit set or the provisions referred to in paragraph 41 of the opinion is negative, the application shall be deemed to have been rejected. In the opinion of Justice controlled just like the decision, which contains the conditions for the control of this opinion is drawn up. The project specified in the application for funding, if the decision contains the conditions are not met, the next project diverted the application selection round.
43. a decision on project approval or rejection of the application to the competent authority within five working days after the decision by post or electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature).
 
VII. Procurement procedures and contracts closing 44. Procurement procedures shall take the beneficiaries of the Cohesion Fund (hereinafter referred to as the beneficiary).
45. the responsible authority in the month following the date of entry into force of the provisions of the Ministry of the environment website on the internet (www.vidm.gov.lv) publishes guidelines for procurement and procurement documents.
46. the first tender must be issued no later than three months from the date of approval of the application.
47. If the beneficiary does not comply with the procurement regulatory requirements or the laws that rule 46 of the conditions contained in, the cost of such contracts signed, considered as non-eligible costs of the project.
 
VIII. Payment conditions

48. The beneficiary based on legally binding contracts and accounting documents all the expenses that it has carried out.
49. the responsible authority civil contract within the time limits and in order to transfer an advance payment to the recipient of the funding. Advances and interim payments, as well as all project expenditure necessary means of funding the recipient opens an account in the Treasury. Beneficiaries, implementation of the project, all payments shall be made only from that account.
50. The beneficiary after the rules referred to in paragraph 49 of the account opening according to payment order fill in the Treasury of the specimen signatures card, certifying the person with authority to act for the account of the existing financial resources and a copy shall be submitted to the competent authority before payment of the draft.
51. On the end of the project in relation to the payment to the beneficiary is considered to be the date on which all procurement contracts of the project activities have been carried out and have been adopted pursuant to a purchase agreement and regulatory requirements in the area of construction (where the construction).
 
IX. conditions for the implementation of the project 52. The beneficiary all the project activities implemented within four years of the civil contract.
53. The beneficiary provides a snapshot into the homepage on the internet (if any) for the implementation of a project not less frequently than once every three months.
54. The beneficiary shall ensure that all payments under the contract for performance of the performers according to the purchase agreement deadlines, but not later than 90 days after final payment is received.
55. in the agreement the amendments not civil law by: 55.1. If the actual eligible costs not in relation to the project originally specified not eligible costs varies by less than 20 percent, below 50 percent of the total cost of the project;
55.2. If total project activity changes during the implementation of the project shall not exceed five percent of the approved projects in terms of money;
55.3. If changes in the project's procurement plan does not change the total amount of the purchase.
56. The beneficiary shall prepare reports and submit them to the responsible authority in the civil contract.
 
X. monitoring activities after the project beneficiary is 57. directly responsible for project implementation and maintenance of results for at least five years after the implementation of the project. The beneficiary for five years after the implementation of the project once a year in accordance with annex 5, the responsible authority shall provide information on: 57.1. the results achieved under the project in compliance with the objectives defined in the application;
57.2. project the project achieved the outcome and result indicators;
57.3. project results compliance with the environmental quality objectives and environmental legislation requirements;
57.4. waste management the adequacy of services planned;
57.5. in implementation of the project accumulated fixed asset owners;
57.6. implement service tariff policy compliance with planned;
57.7. the revenue resulting from the implementation of the project and the compliance with the planned;
57.8. public service status and changes;
57.9. public information activities about the project results and benefits to society.
58. those rules for the first time the form set out in annex 5 shall be submitted within one year of project implementation, and every year the civil agreement for the implementation of a project.
59. the responsible authority shall ensure that the storage and analysis of information on the objectives of the activity for at least five years after the implementation of all projects, if the civil agreement for the implementation of a project is not specified in the longer period.
The Prime Minister's site-traffic Minister a. Environment Minister Shlesers r. vējonis Editorial Note: the entry into force of the provisions with the September 18, 2008.
1. the annex to Cabinet of Ministers of 18 august 2008. Regulations No 667 instructions the cohesion fund the project cost-benefit analysis 1. Cohesion Fund projects to develop such cost-benefit analysis: section 1.1. financial analysis;
1.2. risk analysis;
1.3. analysis of alternatives;
1.4. sensitivity analysis.
2. analysis of Financial development under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds legislation governing certain macro economic indicators.
3. Financial analysis includes the following parts: 3.1 funding rate calculated in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, article 55 (the Cabinet of Ministers of 18 august 2008 No. 667 of the provisions of the "rules for the operational programme ' infrastructure and services ' 3.5.1.2.2. Appendix apakšaktivitāt" regional waste management system development "annex 3);
3.2. calculation of the tariff corresponding to the "polluter pays";
3.3. operating costs and benefit analysis. Analysis prepares cash flow forecasts in the form of a 30-year period. At the beginning of the reporting period is the year when all the site are taken into service;
3.4. fixed asset depreciation. The life of the asset is determined based on the analysis of the alternatives.
4. Operating expenses and benefits analysis include the following: 4.1 revenue from waste disposal services;
4.2. the costs associated with waste disposal services.
5. Operating costs and benefit analysis does not include the depreciation of fixed assets, payments for credit and credit related interest. It includes the calculation of the profit or loss and adds the operating expenses and benefits analysis for the same period.
6. Operating costs and benefit analysis shall include at least the following parts: 6.1. cost of investment and existing assets;
6.2. economic activity changes in revenue and expenditure at current prices, including the applicant's revenue from the project waste disposal services for the last three years;
6.3. financial sources;
6.4. credit and their analysis, the three-year period;
6.5. technical analysis of operation, service, consumer groups. Scope of services and the predicted changes in consumption;
6.6. the solvency of the population and the accounts receivable analysis;
6.7. the date of submission of the draft tariff, the tariff plan for the reporting period;
6.8. the project cash flow, which is positive for the planned projects during implementation.
7. Analyzing the costs and benefits, comply with the following conditions: 7.1 consumer price index inflation is applicable to such projects where a large proportion of the cost of wages;
7.2. the gross domestic product deflator applied mixed cost projects in different sectors. It is a suitable indicator to discount projected financial flows out of business;
7.3. gross fixed capital formation deflator is applicable to projects where a large proportion of the cost of investment in fixed capital formation.
8. when preparing a forecast of production and the amount of waste collected in the region, subject to the following conditions: 8. demographic forecast project period;
8.2. the amount of waste per capita;
8.3. the service population.
9. Preparing the waste Pro gnoz, subject to the following assumptions: 9.1. gross domestic product growth will cause increased amounts of such waste: 9.1.1 municipal waste will increase about 1/3 of the gross domestic product growth;
9.1.2. construction and industrial waste will increase about 1/6 of the gross domestic product growth;
9.2. the street cleaning, parks and garden waste would remain unchanged;
9.3. in accordance with the "national plan of waste management for 2006-2012." in 2013 the city will serve 100 percent and in rural areas, 80 percent of the population.
10. Alternative scenarios: 10.1. reflect the different technological solutions;
10.2. anticipates that the work is carried out in stages, and each stage is known.
11. Forecasting calculations without the project and of the project (macroeconomic assumptions, the possible income, maintenance expenses, cash flow): 11.1. inertia scenario (without project);
11.2. the investment scenario.
12. the financial assessment for the following indicators: 12.1. financial investment yield rate (FRR/C) and the net present value (FNPV/C);
12.2 the financial profitability of capital rate (FRR/K) and the net present value (FNPV/K), calculating and justifying funding sources (credit, equity, gifts);
12.3. benefit-cost ratio (B/C);
12.4 the payment ratio (DSCR).
13. sensitivity analysis of the project, subject to the conditions that affect primarily the implementation of projects (investment investment, running costs, the amount of funding from various sources, if one is provided, the discount rate).
14. the development of the project income, savings, loss and cost of the discounted cash flow (unlike financial analysis indicated benefits or costs attributable to all Latvian society). On this basis, cash flow, calculated economic internal rate of return (EIRR), economic net present value (ENPV) benefit cost ratio (B/C ratio).
15. Cost-benefit analysis the results of the cohesion fund the project description submission 7.
Minister for the environment r. vējonis annex 2

The Cabinet of Ministers of 18 august 2008. Regulations No 667 Project application selection sequence I.  1. the project application selection round no PO box
Place the project under the cohesion fund the maximum funding (ls) 1.
Vidusdaugav municipal waste management region 7 500 280 2.
Liepājas municipal waste management region 2 700 000 3.
Ventspils municipal waste management region 2 810 160 4.
Ziemeļvidzem household waste management region 2 260 000 5.
The Riga municipal waste management region 2 912 000 total 18 182 440 II.  2. the project application selection round no PO box
Place the project under the cohesion fund the maximum funding (ls) 1.
Austrumlatgal household waste management region 1 950 000 2.
Dienvidlatgal household waste management region 2 150 000 3.
Malien municipal waste management region 2 050 000 4.
Seaside municipal waste management region 1 925 000 5.
Zemgale municipal waste management region 1 925 000 10 000 000 total Environment Minister r. vējonis Environment Ministry submitted the annex 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 18 august 2008. Regulations No 667 3. ZIP project submission form 259 kb's environmental Minister r. vējonis annex 4 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 18 august 2008. Regulations No 667 of the cohesion fund the project submission form for the evaluation of PO box
Assessment criteria 1. Quality criteria for rating points 1.
Project readiness stage: obtain at least 1 point 1.1.
prepare technical specifications for works contracts for the purchase of the tender in accordance with the governing law of purchase 1 1.2.
developed and provided for by the legislation of the order accepted the technical project the project planned for the purchase of 2 2 works contracts.
The planned duration of the project: to obtain at least 1 paragraph 2.1.
is greater than 4 years 0 2.2.
is 3 to 4 years 1 2.3.
It is from 2 to 3 years (inclusive) 2.4 2.
is less than 2 years 3 3.
The effectiveness of the implementation of the project in relation to direct waste management improvement of infrastructure: the need to have at least 1 paragraph 3.1.
autoruzraudzīb and building costs of more than 5 percent, but not more than 8 per cent of the eligible costs of the project 1 3.2.
autoruzraudzīb and building costs from 3 to 5 percent (inclusive) of the eligible costs of the project 2 3.3.
autoruzraudzīb and building costs amount to less than 3 percent of the eligible costs of the project 3 4.
The risk assessment of the implementation of the project, including the estimated potential cost increase: at least 1 To paragraph 4.1.
the project submission does not assess potential risks 0 4.2.
project risk assessment in the application are incomplete, the action plan identified risks are not developed or not developed completely 1 4.3.
application of the quality of the project assessed the risk action plan identified for the elimination or reduction of risk developed in incomplete 2 4.4.
project quality assessment in the application of the risk based plan developed to identify risks for the elimination or reduction of 3 5.
Project in the application is analyzed for possible alternatives, and perform economic analysis of the project: to obtain at least 1 paragraph 5.1.
alternative analysis has not been carried out and the project economic analysis 0 5.2.
analyze only one of the parameters (only the analysis of alternatives or only economic analysis) 1 5.3.
analysis of alternatives is conducted and the project economic analysis based on numerical calculations, and justify the proposed alternatives 2 5.4.
analysis of alternatives is conducted and the project economic analysis based on numerical calculations, and justify the proposed alternatives, and the chosen alternative is with the objektīvākaj costs 3 6.
Waste management system – the infrastructure to be created, including sustainable use of each assessment: get the at least 1 paragraph 6.1.
not rated planned system lifetime 0 6.2.
System lifetime is shorter than 7 years 1 3.9.
the system life time is from 7 to 17 years (inclusive) 2 6.4.
the system life time over 17 years 3 7.
The cost of return indicators (infrastructure planned lifetime (years) relative to the initial project, the total cost ($)). The average project application selection round of the score, which is calculated in project submissions that meet the administrative and eligibility criteria (cost of return indicators in relation to the amount of selection round of project submissions): criterion gives extra points to 7.1.
less than the cost of return indicators by 10 per cent (inclusive) and more 1 7.2.
equal, about 10 percent more or 10 percent less than the cost of return of the project assessment index 2 7.3.
greater than the cost of return indicators by 10 per cent (inclusive) and more 3 criteria 1.1 priorities horizontal rating points 8.
Sorted waste, t.sk. biodegradable waste, disposal or recycling (sorting line) (sustainable development): obtain at least 1 paragraph 8.1.
processing is not known whom 0 8.2.
processing investigator known to achieve agreed in writing (letter of intent) 1 8.3.
contracted for graded recycling 2 8.4.
contracts concluded for marketing, processing, processing some whom are carried out outside national territory 3 8.5.
contracts concluded for marketing, processing, processing known reviewer is carried out in the territory of the country 5 9.
Ensure the flow of waste that goes into landfill disposal and waste processing (sustainable development): obtain at least 1 paragraph 9.1.
contracted with the garbage collectors for unsorted waste disposal landfill in acceptance 1 9.2.
contracted with the garbage collectors for partially sorted waste disposal landfill 2 10 adoption.
Project applicant's additional financial contribution to the implementation of the project (macroeconomic stability): the criterion gives additional points 10.1.
less than 5 percent of the project's eligible costs 1 10.2.
from 5 to 10 percent (inclusive) of the project's eligible costs 10.3 2.
more than 10 percent of the eligible costs of the project 3 2. Eligibility 2.1. project eligibility criteria Yes/No 11.
Activities under the project to conform to the approved regional waste management plan N 12.
As a result of the implementation of the project is planned to solve the technical-economic justification of the identified major problems N 13.
The project activities meet landfill infrastructure activities N 14.
The project submission complies with the activity: 14.1.
purpose-to create a sustainable waste management system, providing waste disposal and treatment in human health and the environment and ensuring the safe way of municipal waste management services available in urban areas and 100 per cent in rural areas, 80 percent of the population N 14.2.
the eligible activities-landfill and landfill infrastructure elements create N 14.3.
eligible costs: P 14.3.1.
technical feasibility, the related escalation and with the environmental impact assessment documentation related to development costs, but not more than 2 percent of the total eligible costs of the project amount 14.3.2.
development of construction and related costs of būvekspertīz, but no more than 4 percent of the total eligible costs of the project amount 14.3.3.
autoruzraudzīb costs, but not more than 0.5 per cent of the eligible costs of the works 14.3.4.
building costs, but not more than 3 per cent of the eligible costs of the works 14.3.5.
14.3.6 the cost of the works.
supply contract costs, including costs of technological equipment, Assembly and tuning of 14.4.
not eligible costs 15 P.
Project project description in the application provides the information you need about action to be taken: N 15.1.
given the technical characteristics of the activities to 15.2.
planned monitoring indicators are clearly defined, measurable and consistent with the purpose of the activity 15.3.
provides actions for arrangement of project area 15.4.
given what economic benefits 15.5.
actions to provide qualitative and quantitative environmental benefits of 15.6.
actions to provide qualitative and quantitative contribution to the European Union and the Republic of Latvia on the implementation of the essential requirements of 15.7.
describe the principle of the "polluter pays", the project 16.
Time schedule of the project correspond to planned activities P 17.
The information provided in the submissions demonstrate that the project will provide the applicant the sustainability of project results: N 17.1.
have the appropriate institutional structure of 17.2.
are appropriate to the planned project results in operating the infrastructure built and maintenance costs 17.3.

It is planned according to the tariff policy that will provide the required operating and development costs (in the case of a loan-repayment of the loan also) 17.4.
is or will be available for staff to ensure the implementation of the project according to the fixed assets resulting from the operation of the 18.
The project specified in the application works and equipment supply indicators meet the project schedule and includes key jobs that characterized the proposed goals N 19.
Project cost-benefit analysis carried out by applying: N 19.1.
the real social discount rate or the appropriate nominal discount rate of 19.2.
the real financial discount rate or the appropriate nominal discount rate of 19.3.
the appropriate conversion factor scores 19.4.
According to the medium-term and long-term forecasts 20.
Project financial analysis confirms the financial stability of the project N 21.
The required cohesion fund co-financing aid intensity justified by cost-benefit analysis N 22.
Project costs included in the budget are based: N 22.1.
include all project costs required for the positions of 22.2.
are in accordance with the public procurement regulatory framework submitted by the prescribed procedures for the determination of the estimated contract price of the works developed in them to 22.3.
are proportionate and justified, clearly stated assumptions 22.4.
It is directly necessary for the implementation of the project of 22.5.
determined taking into account the expected market price at the time of project implementation on the basis of the data of the Central Statistical Bureau on the project at the date of application or the applicant's market research carried out 23.
Project cash flow forecast is based: P 23.1.
displays both the demand and the cost of funding forecast 23.2.
is adequate for planned timetable 23.3.
have appropriate procurement plan and contract specifics of 23.4.
has a corresponding financial plan of the project 14.6.
have the appropriate European Union funds projects in payment conditions 24.
The indicative project procurement plan is based: P 24.1.
covers all project activities and services and their cost of 24.2.
job distribution contracts are reasonable (according to the amount of work and specification) 24.3.
the introduction of the Treaty timetable is reasonable (not exceeding the maximum term of implementation of the project – 4 years, meet the requirements of the legislation in the field of public procurement on the procurement method) 24.4.
contract deadlines, including the procurement procedure shall comply with the regulations and the schedule of the project 25.
Reflected in the application of the project planned for the implementation of the project organisation chart and planned human resources supports specific legislation the beneficiary function: P 25.1.
Project administrative (e.g., procurement, contract administration, record keeping) control, 25.2.
project finance (for example, accounting and payments, financial planning) for the management of 25.3.
the technical project (such as the reconciliation of design and construction, work progress reports, and report preparation) management 26.
The project planned in the publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the laws and regulations on the cohesion fund the project publicity and information dissemination measures P 2.2. Project eligibility criteria of the applicant Yes/No/NA 27.
The project applicant is a public service provider, laws in the order is responsible for ensuring the operations of the landfill N 28.
The public service has entered into agreements with all municipal waste management authorities in the region piekritīgaj. The contract shall determine: N 28.1.
services-municipal waste disposal landfill in question 28.2.
municipal waste disposal requirements of the public service provider for the necessary technical equipment maintenance and renewal, to provide the services according to the specific service requirements of 28.3.
contract period 28.4.
disposal of municipal waste in the public service of the territory of 28.5.
municipal waste disposal public service provider assigned exclusive or special rights 28.6.
opportunity to receive reimbursement payments, investment in public services, infrastructure and payment of fees calculation, control and review the conditions, as well as the payment of fees and reimbursement of overpayment conditions 29.
The project applicant is not tax debt on the application of the first working day of the month N 30.
The project, the applicant is not in liquidation or insolvency process N 31.
The project has shown that the applicant will provide funding from its own resources, if the increase in the cost of the project N 32.
The property of the applicant's project all assets in municipal waste landfill activity N 33.
Project applicant: merchant who registered in a commercial register, in order to carry out the disposal of municipal waste in a landfill, has stated that after the commissioning of the landfill infrastructure project will be the property of the applicant in accordance with the conditions of the activity and the project applicant will provide public services planned landfill crew region N 34.
Project assessment of the financial situation of the applicant certifies the applicant's project financial stability after the implementation of the project N 3. Administrative criteria yes/no/NA 35.
The project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified N 36.
The project applicant is invited to submit a project application N 37.
Project application submitted for such application design requirements: N 37.1.
application has been prepared according to the application form for the activity 23.1.
the application is made in the Latvian language, 37.3.
the application is made in the text (where the application is submitted electronically) 37.4.
application signed by the authorised person 37.5.
filed one of the original draft and one copy, as well as the electronic version without attachments (if the application is submitted electronically) 23.4.
both the original and the copy of the project submitted to the caurauklot, the attached document pages numbered (if the application is submitted electronically) 37.7.
the project application was made under the electronic movement of documents regulatory laws and requirements (if the application is filed electronically): 37.7.1.
signed with a secure electronic signature 37.7.2.
developed in DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format 37.7.3.
In addition to the documents to be submitted is designed and presented according to the circulation of electronic documents regulatory requirements, regulations 38.
The project is fully completed application N 39.
The project attached to the application for all specified attachments: 24.3 P.
waste management project feasibility study (including additional documentation that explain or technical-economic justification articulates the project justification, if required) 24.4.
the project's cartographic material in appropriate scale that provides information about the location of project activities the project area and their impact on the environment, 39.3.
construction estimate, which is based in accordance with the statutory procedures for the determination of the estimated contract price in public procurement of 24.5.
Local Government certifying that the project complies with the applicable municipal planning or detailed to 24.5.
Environmental monitoring national Office opinion on the environmental impact assessment of the final report or the decision on the environmental impact assessment procedure, the non-application of 24.6.
municipal waste management regions government jurisdiction agreements with the public service provider for the public service of waste management – municipal solid waste disposal in the landfill in question – the provision of municipal waste management in the region (copies) 39.7.
the license for the public service (copy) 24.7.
a copy of the credit agreement concluded or lending institution issued a copy of a document certifying that the credit will be granted without guarantees, if credit is provided without guarantee of a municipality 24.8.
the municipal decision on the guarantee if the project foresees municipal guarantee 39.10.
municipal decision that the Government match funding recipient project submission prepared and incorporates the work and the amount of funding to 39.11.
project cash flow forecast, 39.12.
the indicative project procurement plan 4. Criteria for the award of funding to Yes/No 40.
The project submission complies with the administrative and eligibility evaluation criteria, and the criteria of the quality overall rating of at least 8 points N 41.
Listing the criteria referred to in paragraph 40, with "Yes" the estimated project submissions priority order (starting with the most points got a submission of the project), the project application selection round application is sufficient funding for the project N legend: 1. N-if the assessment is negative, the project submission is rejected.

2. P-a decision on project approval with conditions (project applicant must ensure compliance with the criteria, specifying the project submission within the time limit laid down in that decision).
3. NA (not applicable)-if the specified criteria are not attributable to the applicant of the project, the project is assessed on this criterion.
Minister for the environment r. vējonis annex 5 Cabinet on august 18, 2008 regulations no 667 follow-up project Environment Minister r. vējonis