Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 833 in Riga in 2008 (7 October. No 72 14. §) rules on "operational programme human resources and employment" 1.5.1.1.2. apakšaktivitāt "Appendix of policy research" issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures implemented by the operational programme "human resources and employment ' priorities 1.5 of Appendix" administrative capacity "UR1.5.1.pas based on" better regulation "policy policy" 1.5.1.1. activities impact evaluation and policy research "1.5.1.1.2." the policy activity sub studies "(apakšaktivitāt);
1.2. the project of the European Social Fund (hereinafter the project) of the application evaluation criteria;
1.3. the requirements of the project applicant;
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements, the competent authorities and the authorities of functional cooperation in the form of subordination. 2. the purpose of the Apakšaktivitāt is to ensure that the development policy budgetary and financial policy, industry policy, business and services operations policy, regional policy, public administration policy, higher education, innovation, justice policy and social policy, based on the best evidence, through policy research and policy impact assessment in decision making. 3. target groups of the Apakšaktivitāt has direct regulatory authorities and municipalities. 4. the purpose of the Apakšaktivitāt achieved in implementing this provision, paragraph 20, and reached the following monitoring indicators: outcome indicator 4.1-implemented at national level to tackle major cross-sectoral policy studies-59 (value in 2009-12);
4.2. results indicators – policy planning document and number of acts whose development is based on the assessment of the impact of the policy or policy research results-18.5. Apakšaktivitāt is implemented to a project application selection. 6. during the implementation of the Apakšaktivitāt discovered the project application selection occurs at least three times. The first selection, announcing in 2008, the funding available is 1 000 000 lats. 7. the implementation of the Apakšaktivitāt period is from the date of entry into force of the provisions to 2014 through December 31. II. The responsible authority and the liaison body With the implementation of the 8 apakšaktivitāt sais wound responsible authorities implement the obligations and rights of the national registry (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authority). 9. With the implementation of the commitments of the wound apakšaktivitāt cooperation bodies implement the obligations and rights of society integration Fund secretariat (hereinafter referred to as cooperation body). 10. Cooperation authority has functional authority. 11. Apakšaktivitāt within the responsible authority: 11.1. participating in the agreement on the European Social Fund project (hereinafter referred to as the agreement) project;
11.2. the implementation of supervised apakšaktivitāt, ensure that there will be exceeded this rule 15, paragraph apakšaktivitāt for the implementation of the European Social Fund financing, and apply the n + 2 and n + 3 principle apakšaktivitāt level, implementation of the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 93. Article 1 and referred to in paragraph 2;
11.3. the managing authority and the rules laid down in paragraph 65 of the event "better regulation policy monitoring Committee proposals for improving the implementation of apakšaktivitāt;
11.4. use of European Union structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system for monitoring the implementation of the apakšaktivitāt;
11.5. requests from authorities and funding requested information necessary for the implementation of the apakšaktivitāt monitoring and control. 12. within the framework of cooperation of the Apakšaktivitāt authority: an open invitation projects 12.1. the application of these rules in the selection procedures specified in paragraph 26;
12.2. a project on the application of open selection project submission Evaluation Commission;
12.3. the development of the project application form filling methodology and project application assessment methodology;
12.4. provide information to the project applicant project application preparation;
5. assess the project submissions and decide on project approval or rejection of the application;
12.6. the accumulated data for project submissions and projects in the legislation of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system and the use of the prescribed order;
12.7. the development agreement and the conclusion of an agreement with the project beneficiaries;
12.8. provide information on the beneficiaries of the arrangement;
12.9. the funding requested procurement plan and submit it to the procurement monitoring Bureau;
12.10. the State budget provides funds for the preparation of the request the required information, as determined by budgeting related laws;
12.11. ensuring monitoring and project implementation monitoring, including audits of the project's location and apply the n + 2 and n + 3 principle on the project level, implementation of the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 above;
12.12. the beneficiary submitted progress reports and payment requests, approve the amount of the eligible expenditure, prepare payment orders and submit them to the payment authority, prepare expense claims and send them for verification to the managing authority;
12.13. the amendments to the project;
12.14. the preparation of the information to the authority responsible for the implementation of the apakšaktivitāt of the learning available funding;

12.15. provides information to the public and provide publicity for the project implementation. III. conditions for the provision of aid 13. applicant and its Project partner can be an industry Ministry, Minister with special responsibility for the Secretariat, the State Chancellery and the planning region. 14. One project applicant during the implementation of each of the apakšaktivitāt announced in the public the project application selection may submit more than one project submission. 15. Apakšaktivitāt within the framework of the European Social Fund financing is 85 percent and national finance 15 percent of the total eligible costs of the project totals. The total funding available in apakšaktivitāt is 3 000 000 lats, including European Social Fund funding 2 550 000 lats and State budget funding for 450 000 lats. 16. The State budget financing of regional planning projects are provided in accordance with the provisions on the criteria the national budget to local governments and grant planning regions in the European Union's structural and cohesion funds for the implementation of projects co-financed. 17. The minimum total eligible cost amount per project this is apakšaktivitāt 20 000 lats. The maximum total amount of the eligible cost per project in the apakšaktivitāt is 50 000 lats. 18. the project implementation period is between three and 12 months. 19. within the framework of funded Apakšaktivitāt project, which provides for the implementation of national and regional studies, the results of which the applicant intends to use the project policy planning and impact evaluation systems development, specific policies, policy planning document, legislative development or improvement. 20. The project is supported by the following: 20.1. project administration;
20.2. policy development requires the State and regional policy studies and policy impact assessment budgetary and financial policy, industry and services policy, enterprise policy, regional policy, public administration policy, higher education, innovation, justice and social policy;
20.3. information and publicity. 21. the project application costs are divided into two cost headings: 21.1. project administration costs by applying the Cabinet set a constant rate;
21.2. other costs – with the policy study and policy impact assessment-related costs if the policy study and policy impact assessment is organised on the basis of the company's agreement or service contract. 22. This rule 21.2. costs are referred to the project's eligible costs. This rule 21.1. incidence of costs referred to in point or imputability is determined in paragraph 74 of these rules in the order listed. 23. The value added tax payments to the project can be planned as the eligible costs, if the beneficiary of the value added tax amount not recoverable as input according to the legislation on taxes and fees. 24. in addition to the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 on the European Social Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1784/1999 of article 11 of the conditions of the second subparagraph shall not be considered eligible costs the following costs: 24.1. costs associated with the project application;
24.2. representation, sales and marketing expenses. 25. in the course of project implementation costs are considered eligible costs if they are: 25.1. encountered agreed period;
25.2. the need for the implementation of the project and is carried out under proper financial management, economy and efficiency;
25.3. made and listed in the beneficiary or the partners in the accounting records and are separate from the rest of the cost.
15.8. to be identified and to examine and certify the supporting documents for the payments to the original. IV. the application of the project 26. cooperation authority, in coordination with the responsible authority issued open European Social Fund project application selection, putting the information in the newspaper "Gazette" and its homepage on the internet (URwww.lsif.lv). The invitation shall: 26.1. the project submission deadline;
26.2. the project application selection of available funding;
26.3. the address of the Web site, which can be found in the following: 26.3.1. procedure for the submission of the application, the project of sending it by mail, in person or submit an electronic document;
26.3.2. project preparation of application materials to be used (these provisions and consumables project submission form to fill out). 27. If the advertised open project application selection is not concluded agreements on all the available amount of funding, the remaining part of the funding to the next round of project submissions. 28. the project applications shall be submitted to the institution of cooperation specified in the ad submission deadline, which may not be less than one month from the project submission selection notification days. Project application be rejected if it is received after the specified deadline. 29. the project application consists of the completed project submission form (annex 1) and its attachments: 29.1. project staff involved in the Administration's description of the life course (CV);
29.2. the mandate of supporting documents (if applicable). 30. the application of the project completed in Latvian language text. 31. the project of cooperation between the authorities submitted the application in one of the following ways: 31.1. paper form in five copies (original and four copies), presenting them in accordance with the regulations laid down in the document development and design requirements;
31.2. the electronic form of a document, preparing them according to the law on electronic document processing and XML file format. 32. the draft submitted in paper form application shall also be accompanied by the original project submission form electronic version (electronic media). The media noted the following: 32.1. apakšaktivitāt number;
32.2. the project name of the applicant;
32.3. the name of the project. 33. when submitting a project application in paper form, all documents (original and four copies of the electronic version) inserts a sealed envelope. On the envelope indicates the following: 33.1. "restricted access information";
33.2. the cooperation of the name and address of the authority;
33.3. the project the name and address of the applicant;

20.8. apakšaktivitāt number and name;
33.5. the name of the project. 34. the project application submitted with a cover letter requesting the project. The covering letter indicates the name of the applicant, the project, the number and name of the activity and the name of the project. 35. cooperation authority registers the project application to the date of receiving it, assign it a registration number and the project applicant or five working days by post proof of receipt of the application for the project. 36. the project application can be submitted personally, electronic document or send by mail, subject to the following conditions: 36.1. This provision referred to in paragraph 26 of the draft submission announcement submission of end date is the last day when the liaison body shall accept and register the project submissions, filed personally or an electronic document;
36.2. the application shall be accompanied, where the electronic document in the form of a project at the time of application is deemed to be the time when it is recorded cooperation bodies in electronic mail information system. The project application must be signed with a secure electronic signature and confirm with the time stamp before the project submission deadline for submission;
36.3. the application shall be accompanied, where the electronic document in the form of a project shall ensure that it is received no later than the cooperation body in this rule referred to in paragraph 26 of the draft submission specified advertisement deadlines;
36.4. If a dispute arises, the applicant must demonstrate that the project submission is sent to the application of the project before the deadline, but the cooperation body must examine the application and project cooperation in the establishment and registration of results must inform the applicant of the project. V. submission of the project evaluation and decision-making 37. Apakšaktivitāt project submitted within the application evaluation ensure cooperation institutions to set up a project application selection Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission), which operates under the authority of the cooperation developed and approved the Charter. 38. the Commission consists of representatives with voting rights included: 38.1. responsible authorities;
38.2. the liaison bodies;
38.3. the State Chancellery;
23.9. The strategic analysis Commission;
38.5. The Bank of Latvia;
24.0. The Ministry of the economy;
36.6. The Ministry of Justice;
24.1. The Ministry of finance. 39. the Commission observer status may include a representative of the managing authority. 40. The members of the Commission in the absence of his replacement by another authorized representative. Such authorisation shall be made in writing to the Commission in accordance with the procedure laid down in the Statute. 41. in order to assess the project submissions of technical compliance, project submissions valued under the following administrative evaluation criteria: 41.1. the project is filled into the application (if applicable);
41.2. the project proposal is completed in English;
41.3. the project application is completely filled;
25.7. these regulations has been submitted to the project application, the number of copies (one original and four corresponding certified copies (if applicable));
25.8. the original application is the project cauršūt (caurauklot) (if applicable);
25.8. the project proposal is prepared according to these provisions a specific project submission form;
25.9. the project application is signed by the applicant's institution of the project officer or authorized person;
41.8. project application is accompanied by all these rules, certain attachments: 41.8.1. project administration and implementation of the staff involved in the description of the life course (CV);
41.8.2. a mandate of supporting documents (if applicable). 42. in order to determine the applicant's project and the project's compliance with the application conditions defined in apakšaktivitāt, project submissions valued in accordance with the following criteria for the evaluation of conformity: 42.1. the applicant is a national project of direct administration or planning region;
26.2. the project applicant is responsible for policy development and implementation, which provides for the application in the study of the topic;
26.3. the project submission complies with the specific objective of ensuring the development policy budgetary and financial policy, industry and services policy, enterprise policy, regional policy, public administration policy, higher education, innovation, justice policy, social policy, based on the best evidence, through policy research and policy impact assessment in the decision-making process;
26.3. the project is expected to take in the application research in any of the following areas: budgetary and financial policy, industry and services policy, enterprise policy, regional policy, public administration policy, higher education, innovation, justice, politics, social policy;
26.4. the project submission does not overlap with another financial instrument supported similar activities do not duplicate the structural funds and other programmes of action, priorities, measures and activities. 43. in order to assess the project submissions identified the importance of problem solving and the ability of the applicant to the project to implement the project, as well as a specific priority in assisted project submissions that the application of the project would gain more support, project submissions valued according to the following quality evaluation criteria: 43.1. application of the justification of the project evaluation criteria: relevance of the project and 43.1.1. actuality (how the project will contribute to the policy area identified problem solving);
43.1.2. submission of the project's compliance with the European Union, national and regional policy planning documents;
43.2. the project evaluation criteria – capacity project administration experience of staff involved in the management of research;
43.3. specific quality criteria: 43.3.1. results of the research project, the applicant intends to use the policy planning and evaluation systems development, specific policy action, legislative development or improvement;
43.3.2. study on the subject is planned, which has no analogue;
43.3.3. the study results can be used in other sectoral ministries, other policies, the development of law and development. 44. the project submissions valued according to the following criteria: financial fitness

44.1. the project submission complies with all administrative and compliance evaluation criteria, and submission of the project justification, as well as for the implementation of the project on capacity assessment criteria it has received a total of at least 13 points;
44.2. the project submission has sufficient funds available in the selection of the apakšaktivitāt. 45. the project submission's compliance with this provision in paragraph 41 and 42 criteria assessed with "Yes" or "no" ("Yes", "no" – meets does not meet). 46. the project submission's compliance with this rule 43.1.1., 43.1.2. and 43.2. the criteria set out in point valued with a score from one to five, according to the following ratings: 1-very weak, 2-poor, 3-satisfactory, or neutral, 4-good, 5 – very good. The points obtained for compliance with this rule 43.1.1. the criteria set out in point are multiplied by a factor of 2.47. submission of project compliance with this rule 43.3. the criteria referred to in point scored with zero points or one point according to the following ratings: 0-the condition is not met, 1-condition is fulfilled. The points obtained for compliance with this provision and the bottom point 43.3.1.43.3.2., is multiplied by a factor of 2.48. submission of project compliance with that rule 44. criteria referred to in points scored with "Yes" or "no" ("Yes", "no" – meets does not meet). The project's compliance with this provision application 44.2. bottom above criterion determines the project submissions to rank in descending order according to the number of points awarded and initially provided each project submission this provision in paragraph 17 the maximum total amount of the eligible costs. If multiple project submissions are received the same number of points, priority shall be given to those submissions that receive the highest rating for compliance with this rule 43.1.1. and 43.3.1. criteria referred to in point. 49. the project application to the completeness of the corresponding application project: 49.1 justification evaluation criteria (this rule 43.1), if the total evaluation score of not less than nine points;
30.6. the project implementation capacity of the application evaluation criteria (this rule 43.2.) if the assessment points shall not be less than four points;
30.6. the application if the project meets the criteria of financial adequacy (this provision, paragraph 44). 50. If it is found that the project submission does not meet even one of these rules or 41.42. criteria referred to in paragraph 1 or that rule 49. point, the Commission suspended the application of the evaluation of the project and recommends the application of the project should be rejected. 51. In assessing the application of the project quality criteria, submit the project Mama is assigned a certain number of points overall, 80 percent of which is creating this rule 43.1 and 43.2.. criteria referred to in the rating and 20 percent – this rule 43.3. the bottom of the criteria referred to in paragraph 1. 52. on the basis of a Commission recommendation, the liaison body shall adopt one of the following decisions: 52.1. application for approval of project financing from the European Social Fund;
52.2. the rejection of the application for the project. 53. cooperation authority within five working days after the decision sends the decision to the project applicant. 54. the decision on the application for the approval of the project authority cooperation adds information about the conditions of the agreement and policy research analyst or policy impact assessment (hereinafter referred to as service provider), as well as the requirements laid down in the contract with the service provider to include a minimum of information. 55. draft decision rejecting the application authority of cooperation include information on project submission rejection reasons. If the application has been filed in paper form, the project applicant project application four copies. 56. If the applicant refuses to conclude a cooperation agreement, the authority shall inform the applicant of the project approval of the project, which received a rejection for failure to comply with this rule 44.2. the criteria referred to in point and won the highest number of points after this rule 52.1. projects referred to the applicants. 57. These regulations 41, 42, 43 and 44. projects referred to the evaluation criteria and the application of these provisions in the draft application evaluation system approved European Union funds and the Cohesion Fund to the operational programme monitoring Committee (annex 2). Vi. Project implementation conditions 58. Then the decision on the application of the project approval, project applicant public procurement regulatory laws in the order determined by the service provider. 59. following these rules referred to in paragraph 58 of the procurement procedure and the decision of the service provider project applicant within three working days, inform the liaison authority for project funding and implementing the planned time schedule, subject to these rules 17, 18 and 21 points in these conditions. The cooperation agreement with the authority concludes the beneficiary shall provide the Contracting Parties ' obligations and rights, as well as the procedure and conditions (including the financing conditions and payment arrangements) to be followed for the implementation of the project. 60. The beneficiary is responsible for the implementation of the project according to the approved project submission and provide a collaborative report on authority of implementation progress and financial implementation in accordance with the agreement. 61. the Funding recipient project implementation started only after the conclusion of the agreement. 62. the implementation of the project open separate accounts for the Treasury, from which is made and received all the payments related to the implementation of the project. 63. the draft amendments to be made according to the procedures laid down in the laws of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds. 64. The beneficiary shall ensure the implementation of the project related loading snapshot homepage on the internet (if applicable) not less frequently than once every three months. VII. monitoring the implementation of the Apakšaktivitāt 65. Apakšaktivitāt monitoring functions taken "better regulation policy Oversight Committee (hereinafter referred to as the measure of the Monitoring Committee). 66. the Monitoring Committee of the event has the following tasks: 66.1. consider responsible authorities, cooperation agencies and the beneficiaries of the information provided on the implementation of apakšaktivitāt;

66.2. the authorities responsible to examine proposals for the necessary amendments to the European Union's structural and cohesion funds programming documents and decide on their progress to the Monitoring Committee;
66.3. to give proposals on measures of "better regulation policy of the development of the monitoring process. 67. the Measures for the Monitoring Committee has the following rights: 67.1. to request and receive from the responsible authorities, cooperation authorities and funding requested information related to the implementation of apakšaktivitāt;
67.2. invite industry professionals and experts in an advisory capacity to measure participation in the meetings of the Monitoring Committee. 68. the measures Monitoring Committee chaired by the Director of the State Chancellery. Secretariat functions carried out by the responsible authority. 69. measures Monitoring Committee operates in accordance with the regulations. Charter of the open vote, approved by the majority of participating in at least two-thirds of the votes of the Monitoring Committee the measures eligible members. 70. the surveillance Measures Committee meeting at least once every quarter. 71. The event, the Monitoring Committee with voting rights included representatives of ministries and authorities involved in better regulation policy planning and implementation, as well as the national Office, the responsible authorities and representatives of the social partners. 72. the Measures for the meetings of the Monitoring Committee in an advisory capacity of the managing authority may participate in, collaborative, authority and the certifying authority, as well as the representatives of non-governmental organisations involved in better regulation policy planning and implementation. 73. the establishment of the Monitoring Committee of the event, on the basis of the institutions and bodies, the mandates approved by the Prime Minister. VIII. Closing questions 74. This rule 21.1. administrative costs referred to incidence or imputability and determined in accordance with the Cabinet decision on the administrative costs at constant rate. 75. the implementation of the projects that have been initiated before the Cabinet decision on the administrative costs at constant rate, fixed administrative costs rate applies from the moment of conclusion of the agreement. 76. paragraph 75 of these rules in compliance with the conditions referred to in the agenda the liaison body shall determine, by agreement with the beneficiary. Prime Minister i. Godmanis Minister with special responsibility for European Union financial management matters N. Brok annex 1 Cabinet on October 7, 2008. Regulations No 833 annex 1 PDF format, Minister with special responsibility for European Union financial management matters N. Brok annex 2 to Cabinet on October 7, 2008. Regulations No 833 Project submission evaluation criteria of the operational programme number and name 1. human resources and employment priority number and title 5. Administrative capacity measures the number and name 5.1. Better regulation policy and activity number the name 5.1.1. policy impact evaluation and policy research Apakšaktivitāt number and name 5.1.1.2. policy research project application selection type open project application selection responsible authority public registry of Apakšaktivitāt of the implementation is in two stages. The first phase of national administrative authorities responsible for specific policy development and implementation, and the planning region shall submit an application to study the topics. At the end of the study subject evaluation and selection is carried out a study of the procurement procedure for the determination of the offender. Certain conditions included in the procurement documentation and statement of work.  

1. quality criteria (point scale from 1 to 5:1-very weak, 2-poor, 3-satisfactory (neutral), 4-good, 5 very good) the scale points 1.1. justification for the application of the project evaluation criteria maximum 15 points 1. project importance and actuality (the extent to which the project will contribute to the implementation of the relevant policy challenges? identified) 5 x 2 2. Project's compliance with the European Union, national and regional policy planning documents for the implementation of the project 5 1.2. capacity assessment criteria the maximum 5 points 3. project administration the staff involved in the management of the study experience 5 1.3. Specific quality criteria (evaluated to 0, if the criterion is not satisfied, and by 1, if the criteria is met. The resulting score is multiplied by a factor of 2) a maximum of 5 points, 4. The results of the research project, the applicant intends to use the policy planning and evaluation systems development, specific policies, legislative development or improvement of 1 x 2 5. Study on the subject is planned, which has no analogue 1 x 2 6. Study the results obtained are used in other sectoral ministries or other policies, legislative development and perfecting 1 2. eligibility criteria Yes/No 7. the applicant is a national Project of the direct administration/planning region
Yes/No 8. Project applicant is responsible for policy development and implementation, which provides for the application of the study topic Yes/No 9. project application meets the stated purpose is to ensure that the development policy budgetary and financial policy, industry and services policy, enterprise policy, regional policy, public administration policy, higher education, innovation, justice policy, social policy, based on the best evidence, through policy research and policy impact assessments in decision-making 10. Yes/No project is designed to conduct research in one of these areas: budgetary and financial policy, industry and services policy, enterprise policy, regional policy, a policy of public administration, higher education and innovation, justice and social policy Yes/No 11. Project does not overlap with another financial instrument supported similar activities do not duplicate the structural funds/other operational programmes, priorities, measures and activities under Yes/No 3. evaluation criteria Yes/No 12. project application is filled in text (if applicable) Yes/No 13. project application is filled out in English Yes/No 14. project application is fully completed Yes/ No


15. it is submitted to the Cabinet of Ministers of 7 October 2008 rules no 833 "provisions for the operational programme" human resources and employment "1.5.1.1.2. apakšaktivitāt" Appendix of policy studies "' set the number of copies of the application project (original and four copies of the appropriate certified (if applicable)) (yes/no) 16. project application, the original is cauršūt (caurauklot) (if applicable) Yes/No 17 project submission is prepared according to the Cabinet of Ministers of 7 October 2008 No. 833" provisions of the rules on "operational programme human resources and employment" 1.5.1.1.2. apakšaktivitāt "Appendix of policy research" "the stated project application form Yes/No 18. request the project is signed by the applicant's institution of the project officer or authorized person Yes/No 19. project application is accompanied by all the Cabinet on October 7, 2008 rules "rules on no 833 operational programme" human resources and employment "1.5.1.1.2. apakšaktivitāt" Appendix of policy studies ' ' down attachments-project administration and implementation of staff involved in the life course (CV) and the description of the mandate of supporting documents (if applicable) Yes/No 4. Financial Fitness criteria Yes/No 20. the project submission complies with all administrative and compliance assessment the criteria and justification of the project application and assessment of project implementation capacity criteria it has received a total of at least 13 point Yes/No 21. project submission has sufficient funds available in the selection of apakšaktivitāt to Yes/No notes. 1. the parts 1.1 and 1.2 of the rating criteria, the proportion is 80% of the total project's assessment, the criteria of part 1.3 rating is 20% of the total project. 2. rejects the application of the project: 2.1 If criteria 1 and 2 ratings of less than nine points; 2.2. If criterion 3 rating is less than four points; 2.3. If 7-21. criteria of assessment is negative.
Minister with special responsibility for European Union financial management matters N. Brok