The Provisions On "operational Programme Infrastructure And Services" Appendix 3.4.1.4. Activity "remediated"

Original Language Title: Noteikumi par darbības programmas "Infrastruktūra un pakalpojumi" papildinājuma 3.4.1.4.aktivitāti "Vēsturiski piesārņoto vietu sanācija"

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$20 per month, or Get a Day Pass for only USD$4.99.
Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 817 in Riga in 2008 (30 September. No 70 26. §) rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" Appendix 3.4.1.4. activity "remediated" Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines the order in which the activities of the programme ' infrastructure and services ' Appendix 3.4. Qualitative environmental priorities "life and economic activity in the" UR3.4.1.pas "environment" contributes 3.4.1.4. activity "remediated" (hereinafter activity) the project submission evaluation criteria, the applicant and the project authority. 2. The purpose of the activity is to make the soil, ground and surface water quality, restore and improve the quality of the environment contaminated sites, as well as to prevent the public health risk. 3. activities of projects co-financed by the European regional development fund. The available public funds consist of the European regional development fund co-financing lats and 34437396 the State budget funding to 14758884 lats. 4. activities at the municipality and residents near contaminated sites residents. 5. the competent authority is the Ministry of the environment. The responsible authority should carry out its functions (including appropriate competency ensured that would not be exceeded in these regulations for the implementation of the activity referred to the European Regional Development Fund), and monitors the available European regional development fund, including a learning Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 93. Article 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the performance of the activities and project level, controlling the project financial plan. 6. implement a limited activity in the project application selection. II. Project activities eligible, eligible and non-eligible costs of the activity within the 7 is supported in the following steps (if you make them, are not revenue): 7.1 sources of liquidation;
7.2. the rehabilitation of contaminated areas;
7.3. the reorganisation process in disposal of pollution removed. 8. the activities there under legislative requirements not applicable household waste dumps conditioning. 9. eligible costs directly related to the European regional development fund project (hereinafter the project) within the operations carried out. Subject to the conditions contained in the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund and of Regulation (EC) no 1183/1999 is applicable cancellation, such costs : 9.1. technical feasibility, the related escalation and with the environmental impact assessment documentation related to development costs, but not more than two per cent of the project total eligible costs laid down in the decision approving the project submission and agreement on the implementation of the project (hereinafter referred to as the agreement), or major projects – the European Commission decision on project approval;
9.2. the development projects and related costs of būvekspertīz, but no more than four per cent of the project total eligible costs set out in the decision on the application of the project approval and agreement document or-major projects-the European Commission decision on project approval;
9.3. autoruzraudzīb costs, but not more than 0.5 per cent of the eligible costs of the works;
9.4. building costs;
9.5. the cost of the works;
9.6. the supply contract costs, including costs of technological equipment, Assembly and installation;
9.7. the reorganisation project implementation related infrastructure construction and the dismantling of existing structures, impeding the implementation of the project. 10. If the applicant is a national regulatory authority, not eligible costs may not exceed 30 percent of a project's eligible costs. 11. Non-eligible costs are as follows: 11.1 technical feasibility, the related escalation and with the environmental impact assessment documentation, related development costs exceeding two percent of project total eligible costs laid down in the decision approving the project submission and agreement document or-major projects-the European Commission decision on project approval;
11.2. the development of the construction and related costs of būvekspertīz, exceeding the four percent of project total eligible costs laid down in the decision approving the project submission and agreement document or-major projects-the European Commission decision on project approval;
11.3. the autoruzraudzīb costs in excess of 0.5% of the eligible costs of the works;
11.4. If the applicant is a public body, the project management costs, which shall not exceed three per cent of the eligible costs of the project. 12. If the applicant is not a national institution, not budget eligible costs shall be borne by the beneficiary. 13. the project cost does not include: 13.1. project management costs, if the project was not financed from the national budget;
13.2. administrative or project management objectives of durable equipment used (hardware and vehicles);
13.3. fees for accounting and audit services;
13.4. the fee for the legal, technical and financial advice provided on the project during its implementation;
13.5. real estate purchase costs;
13.6. the purchase of second-hand equipment;
8.5. expenses, which does not provide the immediate purchase of equipment, including the leasing expenses;
13.8. the project specially made equipment (with the exception of monitoring pēcsanācij installing necessary equipment) and execution of necessary equipment purchase or rental costs;
13.9. the inadequate exploitation of the object of the dismantling costs that do not endanger the implementation of the project;
13.10. the operating expenses. 14. the total budget of the project comprises also financial reserve, which is up to five percent of the project's total eligible costs. The financial reserve of the project uses this rule referred to in paragraph 9 to cover eligible costs. Before the financial reserves the use of appropriate amendments to the agreement. III. Requirements to the project the applicant 15. Project applicant is municipality, State or municipal institution or agency, the special economic zones Office, which is responsible for historical contaminated sites remediation, if such a bailout is recognized as a priority in the national environmental policy plan, and in accordance with the contaminated and potentially contaminated sites registry data recognized as a class 1 contaminated sites. 16. At the European regional development fund shall not be eligible for funding in the following cases: If the land where 16.1. the territory historically contaminated sites, not the applicant's project, owned, held or controlled;
16.2. If the applicant has received or anticipates receiving national or European Union funding for the same eligible costs under other programs. 17. the project for the implementation of the project, the applicant does not constitute a partnership. IV. A call for submission of the project application to the project 18. promulgated two project selection application selection rounds according to the relevant period available under the European regional development fund co-financing funds. The first project application selection issue a three-year period, the European regional development fund co-financing rate is $22974663. The second project application selection issue a two-year period, the European regional development fund co-financing of at least $11462733. If the first submission round of projects available for the European regional development fund co-financing is not used, it is used in the project application in the second selection round of financing. 19. the responsible authority shall call for project submissions sent by mail or electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature, and the preparation of appropriate legislation on electronic document design) this provision mentioned in paragraph 15 of the project applicants: 19.1. the first application round project – not later than two months after the entry into force of these regulations;

19.2. the second project application selection round-up to 31 December 2010. 20. the project application to the responsible authority within two months of the invitation is sent, the provisions referred to in point 15 of the project applicants. If the first application round project invited potential project applicant does not submit the application within the time limit or the decision to reject the project, the responsible authority shall call for project submissions sent by 2010 31 December. V. submission of the project application conditions and evaluation criteria 21. Maximum intensity of aid from the European regional development fund does not exceed 70 percent of the project's total eligible costs. 30 percent of the eligible costs are financed from the State budget. 22. The minimum amount of funding per project is fixed. The European regional development fund co-financing for the project must not exceed the provisions mentioned in annex 1 the amount of co-financing for the project concerned. Project financial analysis carried out in accordance with the provisions of annex 2. 23. the project application, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Latvian language into the responsible body within a time limit which it shall specify one of the following forms: 23.1. paper form – fill out a project application form (annex 3). The project application must be signed by the applicant's institution of the project manager or his authorised person. Project applicant in paper form shall submit one original and the draft caurauklot one caurauklot it copies (without attachments), as well as the electronic version of the application (without attachments). The attached document page number;
23.2. electronically signed with a secure electronic signature, and the preparation of appropriate legislation on the circulation of electronic documents: 23.2.1. Design DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format;
23.2.2. additional supporting documents – prepared according to legislation on the circulation of electronic documents. 24. the project applicant project application form Annex shall be accompanied by the following documents: 24.1. contaminated areas use a summary of the plan;
24.2. the project's cartographic material, showing the location of project activities in the project area;
24.3. environmental monitoring national Office opinion on the final environmental impact report or the decision on the environmental impact assessment procedure;
15.2. the municipality's assurance that the project complies with the existing local authorities planning or detailed;
15.2. for pēcsanācij monitoring of the institution responsible for monitoring the performance of the proof of the law established;
24.6. the estimate of the works in accordance with the public procurement regulatory framework the statutory procedures for the determination of the estimated contract price;
15.3. the project cash flow forecast, reflecting the project's funding movement during project implementation;
15.4. the indicative project procurement plan, consistent with the laws of the European Union's structural funds and the Cohesion Fund for project management. 25. the project submission evaluation administrative criteria are as follows (annex 4): 25.1. the project applicant is invited to submit a project application;
25.2. the project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified time limits;
25.3. the project application has been submitted according to the project application design requirements in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 23;
25.4. the project application is fully completed (annex 3);
25.5. the project application is accompanied by all the required attachments according to paragraph 24 of these regulations (project application may specify). 26. project eligibility criteria for the evaluation of the application are the following (annex 4): 26.1. contaminant concentrations exceed certain critical thresholds;
26.2. the envisaged that the project will reduce the spread and impact of pollution on groundwater, river basin or the Baltic Sea water quality;
26.3. the project aims to implement a historically contaminated sites established the Latvian environment, geology and Meteorology Agency's contaminated and potentially contaminated sites registry;
26.4. the project is intended to implement the historically contaminated sites in accordance with registry data recognized as contaminated sites;
26.5. project intended to implement the historically contaminated site that can not apply the "polluter pays" principle, as the body responsible for the creation of pollution, the country no longer exists, nor is there a direct successor to the obligations and responsibilities;
16.5. the project submission complies with the purpose of the activity in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2;
16.6. the project submission complies with activities eligible activities in accordance with point 7 of these rules;
16.7. the project submission complies with the eligible costs of the activity in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 9 (you can specify the project's application);
26.9. the project submission complies with activities not eligible costs under this provision of paragraph 11 (you can specify the project's application);
26.10. project project description in the application provides the information you need about action to be taken;
26.11. the project in the time frame of the project submission complies with the planned activities (project application may specify);
26.12. the information provided in the application of the project shows that the project will provide the applicant the sustainability of project results;
26.13. the application referred to in the project works and equipment supply indicators meet the project schedule and include the construction phase, the objectives;
26.14. project financial analysis carried out in accordance with the provisions of annex 2;
26.15. the requested of the European regional development fund co-financing aid intensity does not exceed 70% of the project total eligible costs;
26.16. the project budgeted costs are justified;
26.17. the project cash flow forecast is based (the project application can specify);
26.18. the indicative project procurement plan is based (the project application can specify);
26.19. the project in the application reflect the implementation of the planned projects in the organisation chart and the planned human resources provides the funding legislation, the requested functions (application may specify the project);
26.20. the project planned in the publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the laws and regulations on the European Regional Development Fund funded project publicity and information dissemination measures (project application may specify);
26.21. the project applicant is the owner of the land or the person that is owned or held the land which territory the historically contaminated sites. 27. project quality criteria for the evaluation of the application are the following (annex 4): 27.1. the readiness project planned for commencement of activities (number of points obtained, from zero to three points, must obtain at least one;)
27.2. the project risk assessment, including to take account of the likely cost increase (the number of points obtained, from zero to three points, must obtain at least two points);
27.3. the project in the application is analyzed for possible alternatives, and perform economic analysis of the project (number of points obtained, from zero to three points, must obtain at least one;)
27.4. the sustainability of the investments – results and technology assessment. Further investments are valued (maintenance costs) that would be required to comply with the object in the environment after the implementation of the project (number of points obtained, from zero to five points, must obtain at least one;)
17.1. the analysis of the consequences, if the project is not implemented (number of points obtained, from zero to three points, must obtain at least one;)
17.1. project intended to focus on sustainable development technology (the number of points obtained, from one to three points, must obtain at least one;)
17.2. the rehabilitation of contaminated sites is important for the future development of the region in the context of (the number of points obtained, from one to three points, must obtain at least one point). 28. the project application to the funding criteria are the following (annex 4): 28.1. the project submission complies with the administrative, compliance and quality evaluation criteria, as well as the rules referred to in paragraph 27 of the quality criteria in the overall rating of at least eight points.

28.2. the project application selection round application is sufficient funding for the project after this rule 28.1. criteria referred to in subparagraph with "Yes" rated submissions of projects ranked in order of priority, starting with the most points winning the project submission. Vi. evaluation of the application and the draft decision 29 responsible authority Manager creates a limited application of the selection of projects under the European regional development fund project submission Evaluation Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Evaluation Commission), develop and approve its statute (including the replacement of members of the Commission procedures and the absence of expertise). The Evaluation Commission is composed of the responsible authority, the Ministry of environment, national environmental services and non-governmental environmental organization representatives, as well as a representative of the Managing Authority observer status. The observer shall draw up and submit to the responsible authorities the driver of opinion on the evaluation of the Commission's work in the period of the evaluation, the Commission shall prepare a draft opinion on the results of the evaluation of the application. 30. the responsible authority: 30.1. in the month following the entry into force of these regulations, establish and approve the project application to the limited selection of the project application and assessment methodology project application form filling methodology;
30.2. in the month following the entry into force of these provisions on its homepage on the internet (www.vidm.gov.lv) the project limited application selection project application form (annex 3), project submission evaluation form (annex 4), limited the application of the selection of projects project application assessment methodology and necessary for the implementation of the draft methodological materials;
30.3. the projects proposed recorded submissions, grants them an identification number and within two weeks the project applicant or transmitted electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature), or by post proof of receipt of the application for the project. 31. project submissions valued at administrative, project, application, compliance, quality and funding criteria. 32. the project submission's compliance with these rules in the project by providing administrative, compliance agreement and funding criteria assessed by the "Yes" and "no"-meets-does not meet. Project compliance with these rules of application referred to the project application to the quality criteria assessed by giving a certain number of points. If the application or the conformity evaluation criterion is not applicable to a specific project, applicant project application in respect of this criterion. 33. If the application is submitted to the responsible body within the time limit set in accordance with paragraph 23 of these rules or not prepared in Latvian language, the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application for the project. 34. evaluation the Commission shall assess the project submissions in the following order: 34.1. first project submissions valued in compliance with these regulations 25 and 26 the criteria referred to in the paragraph. If the rating is "no", the application is rejected for the project and compliance with these rules 27 and 28. criteria referred to in points scored;
21.3. If the conformity of the application of the draft rules 25 and 26 of the above criteria evaluates to "Yes", the application of the project evaluated compliance with this provision in paragraph 27 of these criteria, giving each project application determine the number of points;
3. If the application complies with the provisions of paragraph 27 of these criteria and the overall assessment of the criteria referred to at least eight points, valued project submission compliance rules 28.1. criterion referred to and included in the project application priority list;
21.4. If the application does not comply with the provisions referred to in paragraph 27 of the criteria and the overall assessment of the criteria referred to is not at least eight points, the application is rejected for the project and the compliance with the rules referred to in paragraph 28 of the criteria assessed;
34.5. the project application for the establishment of a list of priority projects worth application compliance with this provision, the bottom paragraph 28.2. criterion. 35. If two or more project applications have the same amount of points, the project application to the priority list, it ranked in the following order: 21.8. project application with the highest ranking according to 27.1. these terms at the bottom paragraph;
35.2. project application with the highest ranking according to this provision the bottom point 17.1.;
35.3. the project application with the highest ranking according to the rules below point 17.0;
35.4. a project application with the highest ranking according to the rules below point 17.2. 36. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the application for the approval of the project, if it complies with those rules 25, 26, 27 and 28 the criteria referred to in paragraph and paragraph 27 of these regulations, the criteria referred to in the overall rating of at least eight points. 37. the decision on the application of the project approval may include conditions that the project applicant must meet the deadline set in the decision, to be able to conclude an agreement on the implementation of the project: 37.1. specify information about the beneficiary of the financing (contacts and properties) (annex 3);
23.1. to clarify the documents submitted pursuant to paragraph 23 of these rules;
37.3. to clarify the changes in total amount and eligible costs the eligible costs under paragraph 9 of these regulations;
23.2. to clarify the changes in total amount of eligible costs and not eligible under this provision, paragraph 11;
37.5. specify the project time schedule according to the activities planned in accordance with the provisions of section 26.11.;
23.4. to clarify the cash flow forecast according to 26.17. these provisions;
37.7. clarify the indicative project procurement plan under this provision 26.18.;
to specify the project's application 23.5. the establishment of the planned project and the planned human resources security under this provision 26.19.;
23.5. specify information about publicity measures under this provision. 26.20. 38. the head of the authority responsible for major projects can take a decision on the conformity of the project the project submission application evaluation criteria and determine what application is not specified or incorrect information to be included in the application for the project to be prepared in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund , The European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, and the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund, the annex XXI. Decision on the application of the project in compliance with the large project application evaluation criteria may include such conditions that the project applicant must meet the time limit specified in the decision: 38.1. specify information about the beneficiary of the financing – contact information and property (annex 3);
23.7. to clarify the documents submitted pursuant to paragraph 24 of these rules;
23.8. to clarify changes in the total amount of eligible costs and eligible according to paragraph 9 of these regulations;
23.9. to clarify the changes in total amount of eligible costs and not eligible under this provision, paragraph 11;
38.5. specify the time frame of the project according to the activities planned in accordance with the provisions of section 26.11.;
24.0. specify cash flow forecast according to 26.17. these provisions;
24.0. the indicative project to clarify procurement plan under this provision 26.18.;
24.1. to clarify the application of the project included the establishment of the planned project and the planned human resources security under this provision 26.19.;

24.2. to clarify information on publicity measures under this provision. 26.20. 39. If the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the application of the project in compliance with the major project criteria for the evaluation of the application, the applicant of the project in cooperation with the responsible authority shall prepare and submit to the responsible authority of the managing body of the large project submission, in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund , The European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, and the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund, the annex XXI. 40. the decision on the approval of the project application, provided the applicant fulfilled the project authority within the time limit set, which may not exceed two months from the date of receipt of the decision. That decision laid down must not be extended. 41.20 working days after 37 and 38 of these rules. the expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission assessed the assessment decision on the project approval submissions, provided the conditions contained in performance and the responsible authority shall draw up an opinion on the conditions contained in the decision. 42. If the decision contains the conditions are not met or are not met according to the rules in paragraph 40, on expiry of the opinion of the responsible authority is negative and the project application is considered to have been rejected. In the opinion of Justice control is done just like the decision, which contains the conditions to control this opinion is drawn up. 43. the decision on the application of the project approval, the approval or rejection of a conditional or decision on the conformity of the project the project application submission evaluation criteria (for large projects) the responsible authority within five working days after the decision by post or electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature) to the project applicant. VII. Procurement procedure, the purchase contract and amendment of the first 44. procurement procedures shall, within three months following submission of the project's approval. If the estimated contract price: 44.1. is less about the public procurement regulatory laws laid down in the public procurement contract price limits, the procurement procedures carried out by the European regional development fund beneficiary (beneficiaries);
44.2. is equal to the public procurement regulatory laws laid down in the public procurement contract price limits or is larger than those of the procurement procedure, carry out the Ministry of the environment as a central purchasing body. 45. the responsible authority within two months after the entry into force of the Ministry of environment website (www.vidm.gov.lv) publishes guidelines for procurement and procurement documents. 46. The beneficiary before the procurement procedures document approval or change of the procurement procedure, they send the document or the document of the procurement procedure, draft amendments to the responsible authority for an opinion. The responsible authority shall give an opinion in accordance with the agreement for the implementation of the project. 47. If the purchase contract period required to amend it, the beneficiary of contracts and draft amendments to the amendment of the grounds of the need to send to the responsible authority for an opinion. The responsible authority shall give an opinion in accordance with the agreement for the implementation of the project. 48. If the beneficiary does not comply with the regulations governing the purchase or that rule 44, 45, 46 or 47. the requirements set out in costs incurred in accordance with the relevant procurement contracts concluded, considered not eligible cost of the project. VIII. Payment 49. The beneficiary with the accounting documents justifying all the expenditure is made. The accounts must comply with the requested funding agreements. 50. The beneficiary shall receive from the purchase contract artist Bill along with source documents (hereinafter – payment documents). Payment documents to the invoice register and indicate the date of receipt. 51. The beneficiary received a copy of the payment document, drawn up according to the documentation governing laws shall be submitted to the responsible body within three working days of their receipt. 52. the responsible authority shall have 20 days following the beneficiary's payment document submitted to ensure receipt of inspection, shall prepare and submit to the opinion of the recipient of the funding. The opinion shall state whether the payment documents comply with the decision on the application of the approval and the project agreement, the European Union and the Republic of Latvia laws and regulations on the European regional development fund project management as well as concluded supply or service contracts. 53. The beneficiary shall, in accordance with the conclusion of the agreement, the payment received verification documents for compliance with the actual service provided, the goods supplied or the extent of the works carried out in the purchase agreement and the requirements of the laws and 53.1. payment: purchase contract, if the contractor payment request is approved;
53.2. contracts in accordance with the procedure laid down in the contract of the contractor providing reasonable notice of refusal to approve a request for payment if the beneficiary has established loopholes in the payment documents or responsible authority is received a negative opinion. 54. where, in accordance with this rule 52 prepared the opinion states that the payment documents do not comply with the agreement, the European Union and the Republic of Latvia laws and regulations on the European regional development fund, the project management or does not meet the supplies or services concluded contracts, expenses, based on the proven payment documents for which an opinion has been drawn up, considered not eligible costs of the project. 55. in the opinion of the responsible authority shall submit a payment institution with each beneficiary's payment request. The responsible authority shall inform the institution responsible for payment of an official who is entitled to sign the provisions referred to in paragraph 52. 56. the responsible authority shall be 20 working days after receipt of the request for payment of the examination regulations set in the beneficiary's payment request and justification of expenses documents, approve the amount of the eligible expenditure and prepare the payment order for the reimbursement of expenses or for a loan repayment, or for transfer to State budget revenues. 57. For the final payment request preparation of project implementation is complete when all procurement contracts of the project activities have been carried out and accepted according to the purchase agreement. IX. implementation of the provisions of the project 58. Beneficiaries of all project activities implemented within four years after the conclusion of the agreement. 59. The beneficiary not less frequently than every three months, provides a snapshot of the project applicant insert home page on the internet about the project implementation process. 60. The beneficiary shall ensure that all draft charges provided for in the purchase contract performers in contracts within, but not later than 90 days after final payment is received. 61. The case consensus document, but the project requires amendments, the beneficiary shall submit a proposal to the responsible authority completed the form of amendments to the project submission (annex 5). 62. Agreement amendments shall not be made in the document, if you need to change: 62.1. the project financing plan, if it is related to the amendment of non-eligible costs;
62.2. physical characteristics of the project, if the change does not exceed five percent of the approved amount in money terms;
38.7. project specification, if it is related to the amendments to the project plan and the purchase will not change the total amount of the purchase. 63. The beneficiary shall ensure the preparation and submission of the report the body responsible under the covered agreement. X. monitoring activities after the project beneficiary is 64. directly responsible for project implementation and maintenance of results for at least five years after the implementation of the project. 65. The beneficiary for five years after the implementation of the project once a year in accordance with the provisions of annex 6 to the responsible authority gives information about: 65.1. the results achieved under the project in compliance with the objectives set out in the application;
65.2. the framework of the project the project achieved the outcome and result indicators;
65.3. compliance with the implementation of the project achieving environmental quality objectives;
65.4. the former contaminated sites further use according to planning;
65.5. the legal status of the territory;
65.6. pēcsanācij the results of the monitoring carried out in compliance with the planned decontamination project objectives;
65.7. pēcsanācij monitoring undertaken measures under the national environmental service requirements;

65.8. the measures taken to inform the public about the results and benefits of the project to the public. 66. The provision laid down in annex 6 of the form shall be submitted for the first time in a year after the implementation of the project and the future – once a year in the letter of agreement. 67. the competent authority for at least five years after the implementation of all activities to ensure information accumulation and analysis of the achievement of the objectives of the activity, if the agreement does not specify a longer period. Prime Minister i. Godmanis Environment Minister r. vējonis annex 1 Cabinet of 30 September 2008. Regulations No 817 Project application selection round-1. project application selection round no PO box project for the European regional development fund, the maximum funding (LVL) 1st inčukalns tar ponds remediation project 14 266 922 2. Olaine liquid hazardous waste dump, rehabilitation projects, 1st round 4 772 039 3. Shattering liquid hazardous waste dump "space" rehabilitation project together 22 974 663 2 3 935 702. the second project application selection round no PO box project for the European regional development fund, the maximum funding (LVL) 1st Olaine liquid hazardous waste dump, rehabilitation projects, round 2 393 570 2. Liepaja port channel treatment of war project 11 069 163 total 11 462 733 Environment Minister r. vējonis annex 2 Cabinet-September 30, 2008. the Regulation No. 817 European regional development fund, the project cost-benefit analysis 1. European regional development fund, the project is developing such a cost-benefit analysis of : 1.1. financial analysis;
1.2. economic analysis;
1.3. analysis of alternatives;
1.4. risk analysis;
1.5. sensitivity analysis.
2. analysis of Financial development under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds regulations governing certain macroeconomic indicators.
3. Financial analysis includes the following parts: 3.1. evaluation period;
3.2. the discount rate;
3.3. the total investment and the national capital efficiency;
3.4. sensitivity analysis.
4. Financial analysis is conducted on the basis of the diskontētaj cash flows for a period of 30 years, including investments in learning.
5. the evaluation used the following indicators: 5.1 financial investment yield rate (FRR/C) and the net present value (FNPV/C);
5.2. financial capital yield rate (FRR/K) and the net present value (FNPV/K): calculating and justifying funding sources (State budget, co-financing by the Fund of the European Union);
5.3. the benefit-cost ratio (B/C);
5.4. the payment of the debt ratio (DSCR).
6. the financial evaluation of the project results in revenue. In this case the European Union rate of aid from the Fund pursuant to EC Regulation No 1083/2006 55, assuming that the difference between investments in eligible activities to be covered from the State budget.
7. Economic analysis include the following: 7.1. qualitative and quantitative methods;
7.2. environmental quality criteria;
7.3. the benefits in money terms;
7.4. calculation of efficiency.
8. the project economic analysis evaluates the costs and benefits to society arising from the implementation of recovery projects. Performing economic analyses, the European Commission developed guidelines (working document).
9. Develop a project created by the loss of income, savings, and the cost of the discounted cash flow. Benefits or costs apply to all Latvian society. On this basis, cash flow, calculated economic internal rate of return (EIRR), economic net present value (ENPV) and the benefit-cost ratio (B/C ratio).
10. the analysis of alternatives includes the following parts: 10.1 the inertia scenario (investments do not invest);
10.2. the investment scenario.
11. The inertia scenario simulates the cash flow, for example, having regard to the contaminated areas monitoring costs, area security, prevention of possible emergency situations, natural resource taxes and penalties.
12. Investment scenario takes into account the capital costs of the restoration of the object, its current costs of maintenance, to ensure the implementation of the project within an acceptable level of risk, the potential income from further use of the adjacent territory. Investment scenario in the framework of the rehabilitation of the appearance of carrying out alternative options (for example, removal rate, methods, technologies, cost), as well as analyse the different use of the territory of perspective, looking at it from the point of view of potential revenue.
13. Risk analysis includes the following risk factors: 13.1. emergency prevention (e.g., leakage of dangerous substances, the fauna of the massive destruction, the origin of the epidemic);
13.2. the gradual spread of environmental pollution effects (e.g., surface, ground, soil, water, air pollution, as well as losses related to the health of the population from pollution problems).
14. determine the potential risks, classified and evaluated if no contaminated sites remediation, as well as if the project is implemented.
15. the sensitivity analyses of the project, subject to the key factors that affect the implementation of the project (for example, the amount of investment the investment, running costs, funding from a variety of sources, if one is provided, the discount rate).
16. Cost-benefit analysis describes the European regional development fund, the project submission part 7. Minister for the environment r. vējonis Environment Ministry submitted the annex 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers on 30 September 2008. Regulations No 817 annex 3 in PDF format Environment Minister r. vējonis annex 4 Cabinet-September 30, 2008. the Regulation No. 817 Project application form of valuation model no BC Assessment Criteria 1. Quality criteria for rating points 1. Readiness project planned for commencement of activities: it must be a minimum of 1 point 1.1.

the project is ready to start (a list of the works to be carried out is not prepared or not prepared qualitatively) 0 1.2.

the project is ready for the launch of the Earth (is prepared and based on the list of the works to be carried out, the purchase documentation not prepared) 1 1.3.

the project is ready for the launch of the medium (is ready and reasonable list of works to prepare the purchase documentation projects development) 1.4 2.

the project has a high readiness to start (developed the technical design of the works, prepared for the technical specifications of the procurement) 3 2. Implementation of the project, including risk assessment takes into account the potential cost increase: must be at least 2 to 2.1.

the project is not carried out in the application of risk assessment 0 2.2.

project risk assessment in the application was made, the plan of measures to prevent the risk identified is not developed or not developed completely 1 2.3.

the project is carried out in the application of qualitative risk assessment, the risk identified in the plan of measures for the elimination or reduction of incompletely developed 2 2.4.

the project is carried out in the application of qualitative risk assessment, develop a reasoned plan of measures identified for the elimination or reduction of risks 3 3. project in the application is analyzed for possible alternatives, and perform economic analysis of the project: to obtain at least 1 paragraph 3.1.

alternative analysis has not been carried out and the project economic analysis 0 3.2.

the analysis performed for only one of the parameters (only the analysis of alternatives or only economic analysis) 1 3.3.

analysis of alternatives is conducted and the project economic analysis based on numerical calculations, and justify the proposed alternatives 2 3.4.

analysis of alternatives is conducted and the project economic analysis based on numerical calculations, and justify the proposed alternatives, as well as the selected alternative is the lowest cost 3 4. investment of sustainability assessment-results and technology assessment. Subsequent investments (excluding maintenance costs) that would be required to comply with the object in the environment after the implementation of the project: to obtain at least 1 paragraph 4.1.

future cost estimates have been made 0 4.2.

subsequent costs 15 percent or more of the ways of the project's eligible expenditure 1 4.3.

subsequent costs in ways less than 15 percent of the eligible costs of the project amount 3 4.4.

not required 5 5. an analysis of the consequences if the project is not implemented: to obtain at least 1 paragraph 5.1.

effects analysis is not done 0 5.2.

risk assessment has been performed incompletely 1 5.3.

has made a qualitative risk assessment, information is not provided for the following financial assessment 2 5.4.

has made a qualitative assessment of possible long-term effects, which is justified by the competent authorities or organisations findings and studies that provide information about the financial implications of the evaluation criteria 1.1 on 3 horizontal priorities rating points 6. Project intended to focus on sustainable development technology that: obtain at least 1 paragraph 6.1.

limit the spread of the contamination, but does not eliminate the pollution source 1 6.2.

eliminate the source of contamination, but not providing range of pollution treatment 2 6.3.

eliminate the source of contamination and to provide a range of pollution treatment 3 7.

Contaminated sites remediation is an important region in the context of the further development (of the balanced development of the territory): obtain at least 1 paragraph 7.1.

minimize environmental pollution and threats to public health — areas not intended to enter into the economic circuit 1 7.2.

the territory's bailout provides its further exploitation of economic activities 2 7.3.

the rehabilitation of the territory of the continued use of the unlimited 3 2. Eligibility 2.1. project eligibility criteria Yes/No 8. Contaminant concentrations exceed certain critical thresholds N 9. Anticipated that the project will reduce the spread of the pollution and its effects on groundwater, river basin or the Baltic Sea water quality N 10. project intended to implement the historically contaminated sites established the Latvian environment, geology and Meteorology Agency's contaminated and potentially contaminated sites registry N 11. project intended to implement the historically contaminated site in accordance with registry data recognized as contaminated sites N 12. project intended to implement the historically contaminated site that can not apply the "polluter pays" principle, as the body responsible for the creation of pollution, the country no longer exists, nor is there a direct successor to the obligations and responsibilities of the project application to the N 13 corresponds to activities: 13.1.

purpose – to bring the soil, ground and surface water quality, restore and improve the quality of the environment contaminated sites, as well as prevent public health risk N 13.2.

eligible activities (pollution source liquidation; range remediation for contaminated remediation process removed; pollution disposal) N 13.3.

eligible costs P 13.4.

not eligible costs P 14. Project project description in the application provides the information you need about action to be taken: N 14.1.

given the technical characteristics of the activities to 14.2.

results and outcomes specified indicators, and they meet the objective of the activity of 14.3.

provides actions for arrangement of project area 14.4.

given what economic benefits 14.

actions to provide qualitative and quantitative environmental benefits of 14.6.

actions to provide qualitative and quantitative contribution of the European Union and the Republic of Latvia laws in compliance with the essential requirements 9.1.

Describes the polluter-pays principle grounds of non-compliance with the time schedule of the project 15 corresponds to the activities planned in the application 16 P provides information to demonstrate that the project will provide the applicant the sustainability of project results: N 10.0.

have the appropriate institutional structure of 16.2.

are appropriate to the planned monitoring costs pēcsanācij 16.3.

is or will be available for staff to ensure the monitoring of the pēcsanācij application Project contains 17 works and equipment supply indicators meet the project schedule and includes key jobs that characterized the proposed goals N 18. Project financial analysis carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of rules 19 N requested the European regional development fund co-financing aid intensity does not exceed 70 percent of a project's eligible costs N 20. Project budget includes costs are based : N 20.1.

include all project costs required for the positions of 20.2.

meet the works submitted them, developed in accordance with the public procurement regulatory framework the statutory procedures for the determination of the estimated contract price of 20.3.

are reasonable and justified, clearly stated assumptions 20.4.

It is directly necessary for the implementation of the project of 20.5.

determined taking into account the expected market price during project implementation, based on the data of the Central Statistical Bureau on the project at the date of application or the applicant's market research 21. project cash flow forecast is based: P 21.1.

displays both the demand and the cost of funding forecast 21.2.

meet the planned timetable 21.3.

meet the procurement plan and contract specifics of 21.4.

meet the project's financial plan, 21.5.

meets European Union fund project payment terms 22. the indicative project procurement plan is based: P 22.1.

covers all project activities and services, as well as their cost of 22.2.

the work distribution is based on the treaties (corresponding to the amount of work and specification) 22.3.

timetable of implementation of the contract is justified, comply with the public procurement regulatory laws in relation to the procurement method, 22.4.

contract deadlines, including the procurement procedure shall comply with the laws, regulations and project schedule project submission 23. reflected in the introduction of the planned project organisation chart and planned human resources provides the funding legislation, the requested features 23.1: P.

project management (e.g., procurement, contract administration, record keeping) 23.2.

the financial management of the project (for example, accounting and payments, financial planning) 23.3.

technical management of the project (for example, reconciliation in design and construction, work progress reports, and report preparation) project planned 24. publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the laws and regulations on the European Regional Development Fund funded project publicity and information dissemination measures P 2.2. Project eligibility criteria of the applicant Yes/No/NA 25. land owner or person that is owned or held the land which territory the historically contaminated site N 3. Administrative criteria yes/no/NA 26. a project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified term N 27. Project applicant is invited to submit a project application N application 28 project meets the following application design requirements: N 28.1.

application has been prepared according to the activity submission form to 28.2.

the application prepared for the Latvian language 28.3.

the application is made in the text (where the application is submitted electronically) 28.4.

application signed by the authorised person 28.5.

filed one of the original draft and one copy, as well as the electronic version without attachments (if the application is submitted electronically) 28.6.

original and copy of the project submitted to the caurauklot, the attached document pages numbered (if the application is submitted electronically) 28.7.

project submission has been prepared according to the circulation of electronic documents regulations regulatory requirements (where the application is filed electronically): 28.7.1.


signed with a secure electronic signature 28.7.2.


developed in DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format 28.7.3.


In addition to the documents to be submitted is designed and presented according to the circulation of electronic documents regulatory laws 29. project application is completely filled in application of the project 30 N is added to all specified attachments: P 30.1.

contaminated land-use plan summary of 30.2.

the graphical material of the project, showing the location of project activities the project area 30.3.

Environmental monitoring national Office opinion on the environmental impact assessment of the final report or the decision on the environmental impact assessment procedure, the non-application of 18.9.

authorities confirm that the project complies with the existing municipal territory planning or detailed to 30.5.

on the pēcsanācij of the institution responsible for the monitoring of the Declaration on the conduct of the monitoring regulations prescribed (financial and human resource support), 19.0.

estimate of the works developed in accordance with the public procurement regulatory framework the statutory procedures for the determination of the estimated contract price to 19.1.

project cash flow forecast of 19.1.

the indicative project procurement plan 4. Criteria for the award of funding to Yes/No 31. the project submission complies with the administrative, compliance and quality evaluation criteria, as well as quality criteria for overall rating is at least eight points to 32.31 N line up the criterion referred to in paragraph with "Yes" the estimated project submissions in the priority order (starting with the most points got a submission of the project), the project application selection round is sufficient funding for the implementation of the project N terms. N – If a negative rating, the application is rejected. P – a decision on project approval with conditions (project applicant must ensure compliance with the criteria, specifying the project submission within the time limit laid down in that decision). NA (not applicable) – criteria is not applicable to a specific project, applicant's project is not assessed in relation to these criteria.
Minister for the environment r. vējonis annex 5 cabinet 30 September 2008. Regulations No 817 Environment Minister r. vējonis annex 6 Cabinet 2008 30. Regulation No. 817-September Environment Minister r. vējonis

Related Laws