Solidarity And Management Of Migration Flows Framework Programme 2007-2013 Of The European Integration Of Third-Country Nationals In Project Selection And Fund Technical Assistance Activities For The Implementation Of The

Original Language Title: Solidaritātes un migrācijas plūsmu pārvaldīšanas pamatprogrammas 2007.–2013.gadam Eiropas Trešo valstu valstspiederīgo integrācijas fonda projektu atlases un tehniskās palīdzības aktivitātes īstenošanas kārtība

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$20 per month, or Get a Day Pass for only USD$4.99.
Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 884 in Riga in 2008 (28 October. No 76 57) solidarity and management of migration flows framework programme 2007-2013 of the European integration of third-country nationals Fund project selection and the technical assistance for the implementation of the activity issued under Cabinet installations Act article 31, first paragraph, point 3 i. General questions 1. determines the solidarity and management of migration flows framework programme 2007-2013 (hereinafter referred to as the program) creates its European third country nationals Integration Fund (2007-2013) (hereinafter referred to as the Fund) project selection and the technical assistance activities implemented by the equestrian order. 2. the Fund supported the organisation of the selection of projects for the Fund provides special task Minister for society integration Affairs Secretariat, which is the managing authority of the Fund (hereinafter referred to as the managing authority). 3. a decision on the application of projects of the Fund (hereinafter referred to as the head of the project agreement) approval or rejection of the application, on the basis of a draft evaluation results, adopt the managing authority. 4. within the framework of the Fund assisted projects are selected in two ways: 4.1. organizing an open design competition (hereinafter referred to as the open competition) when the project submission applicants (project applicant) happens to equal competition for project approval and funding submissions;
4.2. organising a more limited selection (limited selection) when the previously known range of applicant projects limited, which invite project submissions. In this case, all projects approved and funded applications that meet the project application administration, quality and specific criteria. 5. Select the type of project and potential funding recipients each activity determine the annual programme Fund (hereinafter referred to as the programme). 6. the application shall be submitted to the project of the foundation year programme Pro gramm in the priorities and eligible activities, subject to the annual deadlines set in the programme of measures for implementation of the project and making payments. 7. the project applicant is directly responsible for project preparation, management, implementation and results of the project. 8. the project is available to the applicant stable and sufficient financial resources to ensure the continuity of the implementation of the project and to ensure the implementation of the project the necessary human capacity. 9. the funding of the Fund may not qualify the applicant for which the project itself or the officer or other person who acts on behalf of the applicant, the project has established professional misconduct and there is the entry into force of the judgment of the Court of Justice or the Prosecutor's statement as punishment, with which it has been found guilty of offences in connection with their professional activities. 10. the funding of the Fund may not qualify the project applicant, who or which the designated officer, or other person acting on behalf of the applicant, the project by a judgment which has the force of res judicata or the Prosecutor's statement as punishment has been found guilty of fraud, bribery, commercial bribery or fraud, the result of which affected the Republic of Latvia or the European Union's financial interests, and a criminal record is not deleted or removed. 11. the applicant may submit a draft project submissions, alone or in combination with one or more partners. Cooperation partner of the Republic of Latvia may be direct or in direct public administration, derived public persona, other public or private-law legal person. 12. A partner may participate in the project both as a direct partner, directly involved in the implementation of the project, both as a financial partner that participates in the financing of the project. The applicant and the project partners define the relationship between a written agreement of the parties ' responsibilities in the implementation of the project, the amount of investment and the implementation of the project and the materials used, the benefits of ownership. 13. In order to qualify for funding, a project of the Foundation the applicant fills in and signs the receipt by the applicant of the project (annex 1). 14. the applicant and the project partner shall be completed and signed the certificate of partnership (annex 2), if the project involves partnerships. 15. If it is found that the project applicant knowingly provided false information to the managing authority has the right to suspend the application of further progress of the project, as well as it can apply to the law enforcement bodies. 16. Project selection process is the following: 16.1. open or restricted invitation to tender for the selection of the appropriate call forwarding;
16.2. the project application preparation and submission;
16.3. the project application, evaluation and decision-making;
16.4. the civil law contract or the conclusion of the agreement for the implementation of the project of the Foundation (hereinafter referred to as grant agreement). II. The open invitation to tender or call for a limited selection of shipping 17. the managing authority for each programme prepared the tender put mu (hereinafter referred to as the regulations). Charter in the year prior to the continuity of the activities, and support for, the maximum term of implementation of the project, the project type of the selection of the activity, project, date for submission of the application and the location, contact information, for questions concerning the selection of projects, as well as other information which the managing authority considers necessary. 18. the managing authority shall encourage potential beneficiaries to submit project applications to the project submission deadline of submission: 18.1. organizing a public tender, the managing authority shall issue an open tender by placing an advert in the newspaper "Gazette" (hereinafter ads) and its homepage on the internet;
18.2. organizing a limited selection, the managing authority shall send the prospective recipient of funding call for project submissions (call) and place the information on their own website on the internet. 19. project closing date for submission of application is: 19.1. organizing a public tender, the two months of open invitation to tender;

19.2 arranging a limited selection for one month from the date of dispatch of the invitation. 20. the managing authority shall publish on its homepage on the internet at these rules, regulations, methodological instructions for completion of the project application, as well as the grant to the draft Treaty. Advertisement or invitation shall include an indication of the publication of these documents. 21. All interested parties have the right to get more information about the project in the preparation of submissions. Questions about the preparation of the submission of the project sent to the managing authority to the e-mail address or postal address specified in the Charter. 22. If the managing authority not later than 10 working days before the draft for mu of the deadline receives a letter of the person concerned with the issue of projects, preparation of the application within five working days after receipt of the letter, prepare a written response and send it electronically or by mail to the interested party to the specified address. If the question is received in electronic form, the managing authority shall send a reply to the person concerned by electronic means. 23. The response to the questions would be available to all interested parties, the managing authority shall publish on its website over the internet, without giving the author of the question. III. Project preparation and submission of the application, the project submission is 24. document that the applicant project description project prepared in detail. To apply for membership of the open competition or limited selection, project application submitted to the managing authority. 25. One project applicant may submit an unlimited number of projects providing the tubers, if he would be able to execute and deliver the requirements laid down in these provisions. 26. it is prohibited to submit one application for the same project on the various activities of the programme of the year. One project application can be directed to multiple activities. In this case, the funding allocated separately for each activity. 27. the project, the applicant may withdraw the application of the project at any time up to the grant agreement. 28. the project submission prepared Latvian language, filling into the project application form the information required (annex 3). 29. the project application consists of the following sections: 29.1.;
29.2. details of applicant projects;
29.3. the cooperation partners in the basic data;
29.4. information about the project;
29.5. the project implementation body;
18.4. the project costs and funding sources. 30. the project applications shall be accompanied by the following documents: 30.1. detailed cost estimates;
30.2. the justification of the purchase (subcontracting) totals exceeding the threshold;
30.3. the draft declaration of the applicant;
18.9. the project applicant, certified project requesting a copy of the registration certificate;
5. the project applicant, certified by the applicant authority of the project Charter or the Statute of the institution;
30.6. The State revenue service certificate, which certifies that the applicant is not in the tax debt (issued not earlier than one month prior to the application of the project) or the consent of the applicant letter, the applicant authorises the project managing authority to request from the State revenue service certificate of tax payment;
19.1. the institution or person the certificate of approval of the project by the financial resources allocated for the implementation of the project (if the project is intended for third-party funding);
19.1. the project management involved in life (CV) and the work task and the required qualifications;
19.2. the long-term lease of land or buildings (attaching to the ground book on time, starting from the initiation of the implementation of the project to completion, and for the next 10 years), certified copy (if the project is rent land or buildings);
30.10. applicant and project partners signed declaration of partnership (if the project involves the building of a partnership);
30.11. partners, certified partners of the copy of the registration certificate (if the project involves the building of a partnership);
30.12. State revenue service certificate, which certifies that the partner is not a tax debt (if it participates in project financing or intended that it will carry out the project expenditure) (issued not earlier than one month prior to the application of the project), or partner's consent letter, project partner the power to request the managing authority of the State revenue service certificate of tax payment (if the project involves partnerships with partners registered and operating in the Republic of Latvia). 31. The provision referred to in paragraph 29 of the application section of the project cauršuj (via cord) and submit two originals. 30. These provisions referred to in paragraph 2 shall be submitted in one copy in the document. 32. the project submission complies with the requirements of the law on the development and design of a document. Project submissions by stamping and signing, signature decrypts, as well as the number of pages and the caurauklošan (cauršūšan) date. 33. the project application be submitted in one or more sealed and stamped envelopes or boxes. If the envelopes or boxes, it is more sanumur. 34. By submitting the application, the project on the envelope or box specifies the following information: 34.1. distribution – managing authority, "address";
21.3. the inscription "European integration of third-country nationals in the Foundation's annual program";
21.3. the full project name and address of the applicant;
21.4. the name of the project;
34.5. "not to be opened before the start of the assessment". 35. the project application shall be accompanied by an electronic version on CD (CD), which specifies the following information: 21.8. "European integration of third-country nationals in the Foundation's annual program";
35.2. full name of applicant projects;

35.3. the name of the project. 36. the project applicant or his authorised person project application (or its updates and additions according to managing authorities require you to) the managing authority shall be submitted personally or sent by post. 37. If the application is submitted in person, on the date of filing of the application is considered a leading authority in the specified log the date and time of receipt. 38. If the application is submitted to the project through his mail to the application shall be deemed to be the postmark shows the date of shipment. 39. the project application may be made in electronic form if the document has been drawn up according to the law on electronic document design. The project application must be signed with a secure electronic signature and confirm with the time stamp of acceptance before the project submission deadline. 40. where the application is submitted to the project by sending an e-mail or using the authority under the special online form in the electronic form of the document at the time it is seen as the time when it is sent. 41. If the application is filed in electronic form of the document, then do not apply these rules of 31, 32, 33, 34 and 35 points. 42. project submissions will not be accepted after the project submission deadline for adoption. 43. In preparing the project applicant project application, the following shall be taken into account: 43.1. the project complies with the Fund for multiannual and annual programmes;
43.2. the project performance indicators are achievable in the course of the execution of the project;
43.3. in application of the project financial calculations are made in dollars;
43.4. project has only repaid the direct eligible costs;
43.5. costs associated with the development of the application of the project shall not be regarded as direct eligible costs;
27.1. the project, the applicant may submit the application for the project, which exceeds the annual budget of the programme activities in the amount of the project, the applicant undertakes to cover the part that exceeds the Foundation's annual program activities in the amount of their partner, or other associated co-financing financial means;
27.2. the project included in the application and complete all sections of the application, the project provides a more complete information, or indicates that the section is not applicable. 44. In preparing the draft budget estimate and financing plan, the project, the applicant shall take into account the following conditions: 44.1. developing project funding plan, the Fund (75%) and national co-financing from the national budget (25%) of the proportion of the direct eligible costs, as well as the anticipated project revenue generated and other parties ' investment in the financing of the project;
44.2. derogations from this rule 44.1. bottom point proportions are set in compliance with the conditions of the Fund (annex 4);
44.3. the project financing plan showing income is balanced with the budget estimate presented in planned expenditure. The project should not generate a profit for the beneficiary and partner;
27.6. the project budget estimate shall include all direct eligible costs (project implementation and administration costs) and indirect eligible costs in accordance with the provisions of annex 4;
27.7. administration costs must not exceed 10% of the total direct eligible project costs;
27.7. If the project budget estimates are provided for the cost of compliance with the conditions of the Fund is not identified as the direct eligible costs, those costs only may be used for project co-financing from the applicant attached, and it reflects the project's financing plan;
27.8. the project budget estimate of eligible costs must be actual, reasonable and conform to the nature and purpose of the project;
27.8. the project applicant is directly responsible for the correct arithmetic calculation of costs;
44.9. If provided for in the financing plan for the project co-financing, the project shall provide the exact amount required of the managing authority. 45. when preparing project plans and procurement for the implementation of the project plan, project calendar, the applicant shall take into account the following conditions: 45.1. project activities must be implemented and payments must be made within the Statute;
45.2. the applicant may provide the project project implementation deadline earlier than provided for in the Statute;
45.3. the project the applicant made the time to carry out the procurement procedure, as well as take into account the risks for possible appeals;
28.2. the project procurement (subcontractors) amount may not exceed 40% of the direct eligible costs, excluding particularly justified cases approved by the managing authority. If the project procurement (subcontractors) amount is greater than 40% of the direct eligible costs of the project, the applicant shall provide reasons for the managing authority in accordance with the provisions laid down in annex 3 of the application form;
28.3. the project applicant is aware that the expenditure may be found not to be adequate, if the regulations are not complied with in the implementation of the project;
45.6. the project applicant is aware that the expenditure made without respecting the procurement of the Republic of Latvia regulatory legislation may be found to be appropriate. 46. in drawing up the list of the documents accompanying the application for the project, in accordance with the provisions of this annex takes into account the nature of the project and the applicant's legal status. IV. submission of the project evaluation and decision 47. the managing authority shall register the project submissions received the order of their submission and: 29.3. If declared open competition, to present the project submission deadline of the stores don't open. The managing authority shall submit the draft must open and move the evaluation on the working day following the submission of the project application;
47.2. If a limited selection, organized – the managing authority must submit a project open and move the evaluation immediately after receipt. 48. the project submissions valued at not more than six months of calendar from the project submission deadline. 49. the project submissions valued according to the following criteria: 30.5. administrative criteria (annex 5): 49.1.1. the project applicant or his authorised person-seedling of cold draft has submitted personally, sent by post or submitted in electronic form in accordance with the laws and regulations on electronic document design;
49.1.2. project application is filed within the time limit laid down;

49.1.3. the project applicant or partner (if applicable) of the Republic of Latvia in direct or in direct public administration, derived public persona, other public authority, private-law legal person or an international intergovernmental organisation that runs the Fund;
49.1.4. the project applicant or partner (if applicable) is solvent, including not on the reorganisation or winding-up proceedings;
49.1.5. the project applicant or partner (if applicable) is not tax debt;
49.1.6. project application is filed within two cauršūto (cauraukloto) original copies (one project submission, in addition to the original accompanying documents have been added), together with the electronic version on CD-ROM (CD) or the project application is filed in electronic form in accordance with the laws and regulations on electronic document design;
49.1.7. application of original projects submitted to correspond with each other and the electronic version of the application CD (CD) (except in addition to the attached document) (if applicable);
49.1.8. projects submitted the original application is appropriate-looking (if applicable);
49.1.9. project submissions, the applicant's receipt of the project and the project partnership certificate (if applicable) are signed by officers;
49.1.10. application is made in the text of the project;
49.1.11. project application pages are numbered (except in addition to the attached document);
49.1.12. project submission prepared for the Latvian language;
49.1.13. the project is attached to the application and all attachments are completely filled and submitted all the required accompanying documents;
49.1.14. the project application has been prepared according to the project application form (fill project and are included in the project application to apply for all sections);
49.1.15. the requested funding and national funds co-financing is calculated correctly and is respected in the arithmetic of the proportion of funding;
49.1.16. project financial calculations made in dollars and is accurately and correctly to mean detailed;
49.1.17. project budget is balanced (total eligible cost is equal to the total of income);
49.1.18. project budget costs correspond to the classification of the eligible cost;
49.1.19. project indirect eligible costs does not exceed 20% of the total direct eligible project costs or, if the project is approved the limited selection procedures, project procurement (contracts below) exceeds 40% of the project total direct eligible costs of the project the indirect eligible costs ratio does not exceed 10% of the total direct eligible project costs;
49.1.20. the project does not cover the eligible cost of the project is designed to attract financing of the applicant (if applicable);
49.1.21. project procurement plan contains references to event numbers, cost codes, as well as the budget estimates of the project are appropriate measures specified in the application and budget estimates;
49.1.22. project procurement plan is selected the correct procurement in relation to the subject matter of the procurement;
49.1.23. project procurement plan is chosen correct procurement method in relation to the procurement and the estimated contract price;
49.1.24. project procurement plan, depending on the legal status of the applicant, the project meets the public procurement laws and regulatory requirements;
49.1.25. where the application of the planned purchases of more than 40% of the project total direct eligible costs, made the justification;
49.1.26. project implementation calendar the purchase plan method the appropriate procurement procedures;
49.1.27. project timelines for the implementation given in the application do not exceed the annual programs Fund implementation period;
49.1.28. the project is respected in the application of the Fund for the implementation of the measures by the territorial ambit;
30.6. the quality criteria (annex 6): 49.2.1. Description of the project is clearly defined in the project's General and project specific objective;
49.2.2. the project's compliance with the Fund's objectives, priorities and eligible activities.
49.2.3. project eligibility activities to the activities supported by the Fund;
49.2.4. project application based on the chosen target group needs and provides a description of the target group;
49.2.5. the project has been defined and justified in the application problem;
49.2.6. Description of the project has clearly shown the reciprocal linking between projects in the existing situation, the identified challenges, objectives and planned results of the project;
49.2.7. the project activities are clearly defined, with the planned implementation of a reasonable time schedule and ensure the quality of the project results (including taking into account the potential project risks/conditions);
49.2.8. the attainment of indicators indicators provide a clear picture (there are clearly defined and measurable) results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results is multiplikatīv effect and displayed their sustainability);
49.2.9. Description of the project is clearly displayed in administering the staff competence, experience and professional qualifications;
49.2.10. Description of the project is or will be available for the required facilities;
49.2.11. Description of the project clearly states how the project will be carried out monitoring (including the quality and satisfaction of the selected target system adequacy evaluation/compliance);
49.2.12. project maturity improvements underway or prepare the fucking work;
49.2.13. planned activities the project publicity and information dissemination of the horse has sufficient and proper;
49.2.14. project budget costs for the implementation of the project is proportionate and appropriate to the current market prices;
49.2.15. objectives have been selected for the cost-effective options/solutions (value for money-the cost-result);
49.2.16. project budget is detailed, clearly divided into headings and traceable;
49.2.17. for the implementation of the project to ensure the project applicant or partner (if applicable) own funds in addition to the funding ineligible costs;
30.6. specific criteria (annex 7): 49.3.1. the Fund's priorities, the implementation of the project solves the current problem for the integration of third-country nationals;

49.3.2. policy guidelines for the inclusion of the common vision of the project, the compatibility and not overlapping with other similar projects;
49.3.3. suggested a solution to the problem of efficiency;
49.3.4. sustainability of the project;
49.3.5. users of the project's results or the final beneficiaries, target group needs a degree;
49.3.6. the project involves good practice or a new takeover approach. 50. If the application complies with this rule 49.1. referred to administrative criteria, the managing authority driven it for further evaluation to determine compliance with these terms and the bottom 30.6 30.6. quality referred to in point and specific criteria. 51. the project application is considered inappropriate administrative criteria and rejected immediately, not judging, if it does not meet even one of the 49.1.1 of these rules, 49.1.3., 49.1.4., 49.1.2. and 49.1.5. above bottom administrative criteria. 52. the project submissions that have not been rejected in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 51, are rated below according to these rules, 49.1.7., 49.1.6., 49.1.9., 49.1.8., 49.1.11., 49.1.10., 49.1.13., 49.1.12., 49.1.15., 49.1.14., 49.1.17., 49.1.16., 49.1.19., 49.1.18., 49.1.21., 49.1.20., 49.1.23., 49.1.22., 49.1.25., 49.1.24., 49.1.27. and 49.1.26.49.1.28. Administrative referred to local criteria. 53. Where the application does not comply with the provisions of 15 or more 52 administrative criteria listed in, it is considered inappropriate administrative criteria, it is rejected and not evaluated further. 54. Where the application does not comply with any of the provisions referred to in paragraph 52 of the administrative criteria, subject to the provisions of paragraph 53 of these conditions, the managing authority shall make a request in writing to the applicant of the project to refine the project submission, or submit additional information to the managing authority within the time limits of not less than 10 working days, send a request by mail or electronically to the project specified by the applicant's legal address or electronic mail address. 55. Where the applicant is the managing authority shall submit within the time specified in the project application or need more information, project submissions valued under this provision again 52 administrative criteria listed in. 56. Where the applicant is the managing authority is not made within the time limit specified in the project application or you need more information or submission of the project evaluated repeatedly does not meet any of the rules referred to in paragraph 52 of the administrative criteria, project submission is considered inappropriate administrative criteria, it is rejected and not evaluated further. 57. If the submitted project submission complies with these rules referred to in point 52 administrative criteria, the managing authority driven it for further evaluation pursuant to this provision and the bottom 30.6 30.6. quality referred to in point and specific criteria. 58. the managing authority within 10 working days of the completion of the assessment, decide on administrative criteria inadequate project cold rejection of the gum and shall inform the applicant of the project. 59. After the submission of the draft assessment according to this provision, the bottom paragraph 30.6. the quality criteria referred to in the managing authority shall submit applications to the Fund Management Committee under this provision valuation 30.6. referred to specific criteria. 60. The total number of points obtained by the project for the application of this provision totaling 30.6. the quality criteria referred to in point scoring with 30.6. these terms at the bottom of this specific criteria. If the application specified in accordance with the request of the managing authority, the total number of points earned will not change. 61. the managing authority after the project submission evaluation under this provision and 30.6 30.6. referred to the criteria of quality and specific project proposals compiled list that sorts them in order of priority according to the rules referred to in paragraph 60 of the evaluation process resulting in the total number of points. 62. the managing authority within 10 working days of the completion of the screening decision and inform the applicant of the project: the project application 62.1. rejection, if the ratings generated by the total number of points is up to 40 percent of the maximum possible number of points;
62.2. on approval of the application, the project on condition assessment in the total number of points is from 41 to 74 per cent of the maximum possible number of points;
the project application of 38.7. approval if the resulting copies as_well_as an external assessment score of at least 75 percent of the maximum possible score. 63. This rule 62.2. and 38.7. decision referred to in paragraph below may include the following: 39.2. the project indicated in the project application to the financing plan clarification;
39.3. the application of the project in the project budget estimates clarification;

63.3. clarification of the application of the project if it does not comply with these rules, 49.2.4., 49.2.3., 49.2.6., 49.2.5., 49.2.9., 49.2.7., 49.2.11., 49.2.10., 49.2.14., 49.2.13. and 49.2.15.49.2.16. quality criteria referred to in that provision or 49.3.2.49.3.5. bottom and referred to specific criteria. 64. The adoption of this provision and 38.7 38.6. the decision referred to in the draft submissions confirmed that the relevant activity has got the largest number of points. 65. If after evaluation of the application of the project results in any of the activities eligible for funding for the implementation of the project requires a smaller amount of activity allocated financial resources for the management of the Fund Committee may decide to reallocate the remaining amount in other activities of the project submitted for financing application. 66. If, after approval of the project application in the framework of the annual programme remains broken in the financial resources of the Fund, the managing authority may organise additional public tender for allocating the funds said. 67. If the project application in the activity has got the same number of points, priority shall be given to the project application, which won the largest number of points according to the rules mentioned in paragraph 30.6. bottom more the most rigorous criteria. If specific criteria are equal, priority is given to the project application, which won the largest number of points according to the rules mentioned in paragraph 30.6. bottom quality criteria. If quality criteria are equal, the final decision shall be taken by the Steering Committee. 68. If the application is approved, the managing authority offers project applicant to conclude a grant agreement. 69. If the application is approved on condition that the managing authority will strive to project the applicant infor need clarification in the gum project providing a managing authority within the time limits of not less than 10 working days. 70. Where the applicant for the managing authority to date: 70.1. submitted to the managing authority to clarify the application of the project, the grant agreement will not be concluded;
70.2. submit project application specified, the managing authority shall ensure that the condition is met and if the valuation is then established that: clarification required 70.2.1. have not been taken or not taken in full, the grant agreement will not be concluded;
70.2.2. necessary clarifications have been made in full, the managing authority offers project applicant to conclude a grant agreement. 71. the managing authority within 10 working days after the assessment informs the applicant of the project for this rule 70.2. the bottom point of that situation. 72. If the tender winner refuses to conclude a grant agreement, the managing authority offers to conclude grant agreements the project applicant who has received the next highest number of points in the respective activity. V. Grant contract closing 73. After conclusion of the contract of grant open competition winner or a limited selection of the applicants is considered to be the beneficiary of the financing. 74. Grant Agreement annex approved project is added in the application (with the exception of accompanying documents). 75. the grant agreement Concluded the acceptable amendments, if their purpose is to specify the conditions of implementation of the project. 76. If during the implementation of the project requires changes to the project, they coordinated with the managing authority. The beneficiary shall provide the managing body of the draft amendments and the reasons for the changes required. 77. the changes in the project are permitted if: 77.1. in accordance with the instructions of the European Commission need to make amendments to the project;
77.2. changes in laws and regulations relating to the implementation of the project;
77.3. information contained in the project no longer corresponds to the situation;
77.4. the managing authority shall support or require changes to the project. 78. the managing authority 20 working days evaluate beneficiary grant agreement provided by the draft amendments and the reasons and inform of the decision taken. 79. the managing authority shall terminate a limited tender or selection without closing the grant agreement, in the following cases: 79.1. all submissions submitted projects have been recognized as inadequate project evaluation criteria and have been rejected if these provisions are not complied with the above requirements;
79.2. for objective reasons (force majeure circumstances, the lack of financial resources, the specific conditions in the country, which preclude project), why not the managing authority may enter into a grant agreement with the winner of the open competition or limited selection of applicants. Vi. Procedures for implementing technical assistance activities 80. Fund technical assistance activities implemented by the following funds, participating in the control and supervision of public administration authorities (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authorities): 80.1. the managing authority;
80.2. the audit authority;

49.9. certification authority. 81. the Fund's technical assistance activities in the projects selected for the limited selection. 82. the Fund's technical assistance activities for the maximum available funding for the Foundation, as well as its distribution between the responsible authorities indicate the year of the Foundation programme. 83. The technical assistance activities for the implementation of the related costs shall be borne by the 100 percent financing from the Fund. 84. the Fund supported the technical assistance activities, as well as direct eligible costs are defined in compliance with the conditions of the Fund. 85. in order to ensure the managing authorities of the technical assistance project of the bags, sagat approval and implementation, as well as proper separation of these functions, the managing authority shall issue internal legislation. This normative act on technical assistance in the preparation and implementation of the project the responsible departments or officials. 86. in order to ensure the implementation of technical assistance activities, the managing authority shall send the call for technical assistance projects of the Foundation of the application (hereinafter referred to as the technical aid project application) of these regulations and section 80.2.49.9. said institutions and the rules referred to in paragraph 85 of the unit or official (hereinafter technical assistance project by the applicant). 87. The provisions of chapter III conditions relating to the preparation of the application projects are also applicable in respect of the technical assistance project submissions, with the exception of this rule 44.1. the conditions referred to in paragraph. 88. the managing authority shall ensure that the technical assistance project application under the administrative evaluation criteria. 89. If the application does not meet any of the emergency, the administrative fall of the managing authority in writing to request a technical assistance project in the Jamie submitted to clarify technical assistance project submissions or submit additional information to the managing authority within the time limits of not less than 10 darbd of Albania, by sending a request by post to the applicant of the project of technical assistance in the legal address. 90. If the original or reprint submitted technical assistance project submission complies with the administrative criteria, the managing authority for further evaluation to guide the quality criteria. 91. the managing authority within 10 working days of the completion of the screening decision and inform the applicant of the project of technical assistance: 91.1. concerning technical assistance project for the approval of the application, provided that the evaluation process resulting in the total number of points is up to 74 percent of the maximum possible number of points;
91.2. concerning technical assistance project approval submissions, if the evaluation process resulting in a total score of at least 75 percent of the maximum possible score. 92. This rule 91 decision referred to in paragraph may include the following conditions: 57.2. technical assistance project in the specified project applications financed you plan clarification;
92.2. application of technical assistance project in the project budget estimates clarification;
92.3. technical assistance project submission clarification if it does not comply with these rules, 49.2.4., 49.2.3., 49.2.6., 49.2.5., 49.2.9., 49.2.7., 49.2.11., 49.2.10., 49.2.14., 49.2.13. and 49.2.15.. 49.2.16 are assured in the referred test criteria. 93. If the technical aid project application is approved on condition that the managing authority shall inform the applicant of the project of technical assistance on the need to make adjustments to the project of technical assistance in managing the application within the time limits of not less than 10 working days. 94. After the adoption of the decision on technical assistance project application approval or a technical assistance project for the approval of the application, provided the relevant conditions are fulfilled by the managing authority with the Fund's beneficiaries of technical assistance agreement concluded (or internal regulations issued by the managing authority in relation to technical assistance project) on technical assistance for the implementation of the project. 95. This provision of the agreement referred to in paragraph 94 of the switch (or issues internal normative acts) for the whole period of implementation of the Fund of the programme. Each year, from 2009 until 1 September, a technical assistance project, the applicant submitted to the managing authority the purpose of technical assistance project or its respective sections for the next calendar year planned measures. 96. the managing authority 20 working days this rule 95, paragraph updated technical assistance project or its relevant section under the administrative inspection and quality criteria in accordance with the provisions of the arrangements referred to in chapter VI and presented as agreed (or internal legislation) amendments, as well as inform the technical assistance project of the applicant of the decision taken. 97. Additional changes to the technical assistance project is permissible according to this provision, 77.1 77.2 77.3 77.4, and in those conditions. Prime Minister i. Godmanis special task Minister for society integration O. Kastēn annex 1. The Cabinet of Ministers of 28 October 2008 the Regulation No 884 Projects statement by the applicant no p.k. certify that: Yes, no, N/A1 1. Project implementation will not be tolerated discrimination based on gender, race, ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, sexual orientation, age and will be provided equal opportunities for different groups in society 2. Am familiar with all of the Fund's financing conditions , including the deadlines for implementation and compliance with the conditions of the Fund, and in the course of the implementation of the project will follow them. The requested funding amount is calculated without mistakes, and during the implementation of the project it will be necessary to clarify or correct 3. submission and Project documents, the information provided is true 4. The project will be implemented in the public interest, and it does not generate profits 5. Project applicant institution for at least eight years after the completion of the project will be stored with all the Fund's project-related documentation and information (if necessary, you can show them) as well as the agreement with Latvia and the representatives of the bodies of the European Union controls and audits before approving a project, the project during and after the last receipt of payment 6.

Will run all of the Fund's funding requirements for expenditure made before the grant agreement with the managing authority, attributed the Foundation of the project the applicant 7. ietvaros2 body is not declared insolvent (including not in the bailout process and not in the process of liquidation), its operation is suspended or interrupted or not initiate proceedings for its winding up, insolvency or bankrotu3 8. There is no valid judgment or the Prosecutor's statement as punishment , with which I have been guilty of fraud, bribery, commercial bribery or fraud, which affected the Republic of Latvia or the European Union's financial interests, or a criminal record is deleted or removed 9. No professional misconduct and does not exist in the entry into force of the judgment of the Court of Justice or the Prosecutor's statement as punishment, with which I have been guilty of offences in connection with their professional activities I have deliberately Not 10 provided a false or distorted information as well I have not concealed the information related to the project 11. Am not punishable with criminal or administrative actions on the project evaluation process involved 12 institutions of the applicant for the project are available for stable and adequate financial and other resources, to determine the extent of your project to ensure financing for the implementation of the project, as well as continuity and implementation within the time provided for the project by the applicant 13 institutions can provide the required for the implementation of the project the number of people who have the appropriate skills, knowledge and experience of the applicant institution 14 Projects submitted in the same application for funding of the project from various financial sources, that is, it does not claim to receive double funding for the same project, as well as fund the priorities to be implemented is not already implemented or launched their implementation from others funds 15. applicant institution Project in full has paid taxes and other State and local government payments at specified minimum 16. applicant's Project Authority is directly responsible for the preparation of the draft implementation and management, as well as on the results of the project. The applicant is not a mediator of the project 17. Project stalls were deserted before the real estate project implementation has never been purchased with the aid of the European Community funding, and project the applicant institution or partner institution (if the project involves the building of a partnership) in the course of implementing the project leased real estate fund will be used in accordance with compliance regulations 18. Project the applicant institution is responsible for the conduct of the procurement procedure and documentation 19. Will provide public information on the European Union's contribution to the Fund in the implementation of the project the project the applicant 20 institution at the request of the managing authority will submit the required additional information and documentation 21. Lead institution in the project application submitted in electronic version on CD-ROM (CD) in full compliance with the project application submitted the original 22. I hereby certify, that the _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (project applicant institution) will provide funding of $ _____ ____ about the project "____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___" (project name) where the application will be apstiprināts4 notes. 1 indicates the appropriate ("Yes", "no" meet-does not meet, "n/a" means not applicable). 2 apply, if the expenses made before the grant date of conclusion of the contract with the managing authority. 3 does not apply to direct or pastarpinātaj for national regulatory authorities. 4 apply if the project the applicant intends to participate in the project with its own funding (in accordance with the financing plan of the project 2.1.).   I know if will be found to have knowingly or negligently provide false information, I will be denied the opportunity to receive Fund support, and managing authority or delegated authority can apply to the law enforcement institutions.
Project Manager of the applicant institution name ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ post _____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ signature _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ URZ.v.* date and place _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ note the document properties in the "signature", "date" and "filling" if Z.v. electronic document is drawn up according to the law on electronic document design.
Special task Minister for society integration O. Kastēn in annex 2 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 28 October 2008 the Regulation No 884 project partnership certificate (if the project involves the building of partnership) no PO box to ensure a successful implementation of the project, the project applicant and partner agree to the following principles of good partnership practice: Yes, no, N/A1 1. Project implementation will not be tolerated discrimination based on gender, race, ethnic origin, religion or belief , disability, sexual orientation, age and will be provided equal opportunities for different groups in society Before 2 to the application for the project lead partner institution has read and understand the application of the project my role in the project implementation partner 3 empowers the project applicant to sign a grant agreement with the managing authority and to represent it in all project-related transactions in Project 4 the applicant must consult regularly with partners and provide complete information on the implementation of the project 5.
If the expenditure is made, the project partners the applicant stores all partners to fund the project-related documents, certified copies for at least eight years after the year in the end of the implementation period of the project the applicant 6 would partner the project drawn up by the applicant a copy of the draft report before the 7 Project proposals for significant changes to the project (for example, the changes associated with activity or partners) reach agreements with partners. If such agreement cannot be reached, the applicant shall inform the managing authority and submit appropriate proposals for necessary changes 8.

Partner and project applicant shall reach a written agreement on cooperation in the implementation of the project. One of the conditions is that the partner at least eight years after the completion of the project will be stored in your body with the Fund's project-related documentation and information (if necessary, be able to produce), as well as the agreement with the Republic of Latvia or the representatives of the institutions of the European Union controls and audits before approving a project, the project during implementation and after completion of the project 9.
If the expenditure is made a partner and where the application will be approved for co-financing from the Fund's financial resources, partner funding guarantees amounting to: $ _____ (that is, _____% of the total eligible project izmaksām2) notes. 1 indicates the appropriate ("Yes", "no" meet-does not meet, "n/a" means not applicable). 2 apply if the project the applicant intends to participate in the project with its own funding (in accordance with the financing plan for the project of 2.2). Partner has read the Managing Authority submitted the project submission and agrees with the contents. Project applicant: partner: the requesting authority of the project manager's name, the head of the institution partners name, post title signature * signature * URZ.v.* URZ.v.* date and place of the date and place of note. the document properties in the "signature", "date" and "filling" if Z.v. electronic document is drawn up according to the law on electronic document design.
Special task Minister for society integration O. Kastēn in annex 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 28 October 2008 the Regulation No 884 annex 3 in PDF format special task Minister for society integration O. Kastēn in annex 4 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 28 October 2008 the Regulation No 884 fund eligibility requirements conditions i. 1. 1. Guiding principles for the expenditure to be eligible, they must be: (a) for the purposes of the Fund); b) according to the activities that are listed in the Foundation for a European Parliament and Council decisions (hereinafter referred to as the core document); c) corresponding to the multiannual and annual programmes or to apply emergency measures if they form attractive annual relati program amendments; (d) reasonable and appropriate) the principles of sound financial management, in particular in relation to value for money and cost-effectiveness; e) incurred by the beneficiary or a partner who works in the Republic of Latvia, except in the case of international intergovernmental organizations dealing with the same objectives laid down in the Basic Act. The rules on the eligibility of expenditure, and the beneficiary shall apply mutatis mutandis also partner; (f)) related to the target groups defined in the Basic Act; (g)) incurred in accordance with the grant agreement, special conditions. 2. If the implementation of multi-annual projects for which financial aid is granted for a period of up to three years, the Fund's eligibility requirements apply only to that part of the project financed within the program of the year. 3. the Fund supported projects cannot be financed by other Community funds. The Fund supported projects can be co-financed from public or private funds.

I.2. The project budget Budget 1 must be balanced, i.e., the total cost must be equal to the total amount of income. 2. the cost of the project are divided into: (a) apply in the project in direct) costs directly related to the implementation of the project; (b) indirect) project eligible costs which are not directly related to the specific project; c) ineligible costs of the project.

I.3. Income and profit-making condition 1. projects supported by the Fund must be non-profit projects. If income (income sources of funding), including revenue (revenue generated by the project), at the conclusion of the project exceed the costs (in fact the corresponding expenditure), the investment of the Fund shall be reduced accordingly in the project. All sources of income of the project must be registered in the beneficiary's accounts, and they must be identifiable and verifiable. 2. project income shall consist of financial contributions, which are assigned to the project from the Fund, funds, public or private, including the contribution of the beneficiaries, as well as the project proceeds, the project obtained by this annex I referred to in section 4 eligibility period from sales, rentals, services, registration fees, or other similar income. 3. the Foundation and the national investment funds from the State budget, through the application of the principle of non-profit, calculated from the "total eligible costs" subtracting "investment" of third parties (beneficiaries and partner investments) and "own proceeds" of the project. The Fund's investment is obtained by multiplying the above difference by 75%, respectively, of the national funding contribution from the national budget is 25%.

I.4. Eligibility period of the project costs must be incurred and the payments to be made (the exception is the depreciation write-downs) after 1 January of the year referred to in the financing decision, which approved the annual programme of the Republic of Latvia. Eligibility period is up to N1 + 1 December 31, which means that the project expenses must be incurred before that date. Payments can be made also by N1 + 1 December 31. An exception to this Annex i. section 4 that eligibility period is: (a)) assisted projects relating to the 2007 program eligibility period is N + 2 (can be considered as appropriate from the Fund only if they are actually carried out, the earliest on January 1 of the year specified in the financing decision approving the annual programme. Operations financed by the Fund shall not be completed before the commencement of eligibility); b) technical assistance to the Republic of Latvia. Note the. N1-Fund annual program started the year.

I. expenditure accounts 5.

1. expenditure must correspond to the beneficiary of the payments made. They must be financial (cash) in the form of the transaction, excluding the depreciation write-down charges. 2. the costs must be justified by official invoices. If this is not possible, the expenditure is justified by accounting documents or supporting documents (those are the equivalent of proof). 3. the costs must be identifiable and verifiable. They must be: (a) specified in the requested funding) accounting documents; (b)) made in accordance with the Republic of Latvia the applicable accounting standards and the beneficiary's accounting practices; (c)), in accordance with the declared requirements applicable tax and social legislation. 4. Where appropriate, the beneficiaries are obliged to keep records of the certified copy of the affiliate income and expenditure to the appropriate project. 5. Accounting data storage and processing must be in line with the laws and regulations in the field of data protection. 6. The beneficiary shall ensure a separate analytical accounting, computerized financial transactions incurred in connection with the Fund's project implementation activities. 7. The beneficiary and its partners provide information storage on the project's technical and financial progress that is necessary for the provision of relevant news. Information accumulates the beneficiary and its partners records and accounting records, including electronic media.

I.6. Territorial scope 1. Expenses are attributable to those beneficiaries or partners who operate and are registered in the Republic of Latvia, with the exception of the international intergovernmental organization dealing with the objectives defined in the Basic Act. 2. Third-country partners costs do not apply. 3. the relevant actions of the Fund must be consistent with this Annex i. section 1 point 1 "e" in subparagraph defined beneficiaries. 4. the Master article 4 and 5 of the operations expenditure must be incurred in the territory of the Republic of Latvia, except those relating to measures of third-country nationals in the country of origin is made before removal and give them the opportunity to learn integration requires knowledge and skills, such as vocational training, the dissemination of information material, versatile patterns of civil courses and language teaching. 5. project partners, registered and operating in third countries, can participate in the project without the cost, thus the following partners expenses not attributable. The above does not apply to international intergovernmental organizations.

II. categories of eligible costs (II). 1. Direct eligible costs eligible costs are direct costs directly related to project implementation, and they include the project budget calculation.

II.1.1. Staff costs 1.1.1. General provisions 1. Personnel costs is attributable only to those persons who have a significant role in the implementation of the project, the project manager and other staff members involved in the project, such as project planning, implementation of measures (or monitoring). Costs for other beneficiaries of staff members, which is just a support function (for example, the head of the institution, the accounting officer, caterer (procurement officer), HR, computer technician, Administrative Assistant, Secretary), not eligible as direct eligible costs, and they are considered indirect eligible costs. 2. Staff costs detailed in the description of the calculation of costs, stating the functions, number and name. If the names of those not yet known or is unable to detect it, provide guidance as to the professional and technical qualifications, which will put relevant given the project's functions or tasks. 3. Project staff costs – awarded salaries, social security contributions and other costs-remuneration is applicable, if they do not exceed the usual remuneration the beneficiaries of scheme the average made the mess. Where appropriate, you can specify the employer's contributions paid, often excluding bonuses, incentive payments or profit-sharing schemes. The fees, taxes or charges (salaries applicable in particular direct taxes and social security payments) related to projects financed by the Fund shall be considered eligible only if they are actually applied to the direct recipient of the funding.

1.1.2. The specific conditions relating to the structure of the national staff costs the structure of personnel costs, implementing the project, considered as eligible direct costs only in the following cases: 1. The beneficiary person are accepted for work on a contractual basis, to implement the project. 2. the beneficiary by permanently employed for an indeterminate period of time, perform with the implementation of specific project-related tasks as overtime or with the decision of the organisation to perform the tasks that are specifically linked to implementation of the project and not part of his (her) daily job responsibilities, and the organization is recruiting another person to replace that person and his (her) daily job responsibilities.

II.1.2. Travel and subsistence costs

1. Travel and subsistence costs are eligible costs limited to: (a) the requested funding) for staff members, the costs of which are defined as eligible under this annex II.1.1. section; (b) requested funding) for staff members who only in certain justified cases according this annex II.1.1. section perform support functions. 2. Travel costs are eligible on the basis of actual costs. Expense reimbursement rate is determined on the basis of the cheapest form of public transport and flights are permitted only if the trip is longer than 800 km (return) or destination of geographic characteristics justifies the choice of the route. Boarding tickets should be retained. If you use a personal car, refundable expenses shall be calculated on the basis of the cost of public transport or distance travelled, or the beneficiary of the commonly-used terms. 3. Maintenance costs are attributed on the basis of the actual cost or daily allowance. If the organ has its own day of amortisation rates (subsistence money), they shall apply subject to the Republic of Latvia the maximum rate in accordance with the law and practice. The residence includes a local cash transport (including trips by taxi), accommodation, meals, local telephone and other additional costs.

II. Equipment costs 1.3 1.3.1. General provisions 1. costs for the purchase of equipment is eligible only if it is essential to implement the draft horse. 2. the equipment must have the technical characteristics necessary for the project and comply with applicable norms and standards. 3. The cost of purchase of equipment are applied on the basis of the acquired asset depreciation write-downs, rent or lease cost. 4. the costs of day-to-day administrative equipment (for example, print device, laptop computer, copier, phone, cable) is not the direct eligible costs, and they are considered indirect eligible costs. 5. the choice between leasing, rental or purchase of should always be based on the cheapest option (the beneficiary must keep the documents that justify the selected option is the least expensive). If rental or lease is not possible, the short-term nature of the project or the rapid fall in the value of the equipment, the purchase is allowed and depreciation write-downs expenditure may be considered eligible, based on the regulations on depreciation write-downs.

1.3.2. The lease and rental expenses in connection with the lease or rent eligible for funding pursuant to the lease or rental period in relation to the objectives of the project.

1.3.3. Purchases 1. If the equipment is purchased before implementation of the project or its implementation, is only applicable depreciation write-downs it spending part, which corresponds to the period of use of the equipment and the amount of actual utilization project needs. 2. the costs relating to equipment purchased prior to the start of the project, but used for project purposes, are eligible on the basis of depreciation write-downs. However, these costs are not eligible where the equipment was purchased through European Community subsidies. 3. equipment acquisition cost correspond to normal market prices, and the value of the corresponding object calculates depreciation according to the funding recipient, the applicable tax and accounting rules.

1.3.4. the individual items with a value of less than EUR 1000, the entire amount of purchase are eligible costs if equipment purchased for implementation of the project for the first three months.

II. Real Estate 1.4 1.4.1. General provisions 1. Cost real estate for lease are eligible costs. 2. If real property is leased, it must have the technical characteristics necessary for the project and comply with applicable norms and standards.

1.4.2. The lease financing for real estate rental may receive, understand if there is a link between the rental and the objectives of the project and the following conditions are met: (a)) real estate is acquired through the European Community subsidies; (b)) in the real property can only be used for the purposes of the project. Otherwise, the deal is only part of the cost is in proportion to the needs of the project.

II. 1.5. Auxiliary materials and General Services 1. Consumables supplies and other general costs are eligible if they are identifiable and directly necessary for the implementation of the project. 2. Office supplies delivery costs, as well as all kinds of detailed administrative consumables delivery costs, representation costs and the costs of General Services (e.g. telephone, internet, mail, Office cleaning, utilities, insurance, staff training and recruitment costs) is not a direct eligible costs. They include indirect eligible costs according to this annex, section II.2.

II. 1.6. Subcontracting (procurement) 1. The beneficiary must be able to implement project activities themselves, so the beneficiary may not subcontract the project implementation. Subcontracting opportunities should be limited and shall not exceed 40% of the direct eligible costs, excluding the project the applicant specifically justified cases, the prior consent of the managing authority. 2. The Fund may not get such subcontracts: a) General management of the project task subcontracted; b) subcontracting which increase the cost of the project, but does not cause disproportionate additional value; c) subcontracts with intermediaries or consultants, paying down a percentage of the total cost of the project, unless the direct beneficiaries of this type of payment is not justified on the basis of the work carried out, or the actual value of the services. 3. for all sub-contracting beneficiaries shall stipulate that the subcontractor undertakes audit and control authorities provide all the necessary information on subcontracting activities.

II.1.7 costs directly resulting from the conditions relating to the financing of the European Union the costs necessary to comply with European Union funding requirements (such as costs related to publicity, transparency, evaluation of projects, independent audit, bank guarantees, translation costs) are the direct eligible costs (such costs include the costs of Administration).

II.1.8 expert services

Fees for legal advice, notarial services or technical and financial experts ' fees are direct eligible costs.

II. 1.9. specific costs associated with the target groups not applicable.

II. Emergency measures 1.10 is not applicable.

II.2. indirect eligible costs 1. indirect eligible costs is the expenditure category, which does not correspond exactly to the project-specific costs. A fixed interest rate of the total direct eligible cost amount can be attributed to the project as an indirect eligible costs if: (a)) indirect eligible costs are minimal; b) indirect eligible costs are provided for in the budget for the planned project; c) indirect eligible costs do not include costs that are included in any other budget heading; d) indirect eligible costs are not funded from other sources. Organisations from the European Union budget and (or) Member States receive subsidies for running, can't project budget plan to include indirect eligible costs; e) project indirect eligible costs must not exceed 20% of the total direct eligible project costs, on the other hand, if the project is approved, a limited selection of projects or project (subcontracting) total purchase exceeds 40% of the direct eligible costs of the project the indirect eligible costs ratio decreases to 10%. 2. Indirect eligible costs may include the following expenses: (a) staff costs) are not eligible as direct costs in accordance with this annex II.1.1. subsection 1 of section 1.1.1; (b)) Administration and management costs, for example, the section II.1.5 paragraph 2 these costs; (c) fees and fees for the) banking services (except for a bank guarantee in accordance with this annex, section II.1.7); d) real estate depreciation and maintenance costs associated with the day-to-day administrative activities; e) all costs associated with the project, but which does not apply to this annex II section 1.

III. Not apply the cost of nurses Not eligible are the following: (a) value added tax), unless the beneficiary can show that he is unable to recover it; (b)) return on capital, debt and debt service charges, debit interest, foreign exchange commissions and losses due to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, savings loss or possible future liabilities, interest payments, dubious debts, fines, financial penalties, litigation costs and excessive or reckless expenditure; (c)) the representation costs relating only to the project. Is allowed for reasonable representation costs for measures justified by the type of project, for example, the cost of the closing event of the project or project coordination group meetings; d) costs declared by the beneficiary and which relate to another project or work programme receiving a subsidy from the European Community; e) land acquisition; f) staff costs for officials involved in project implementation, doing tasks that are part of their everyday job duties; g) contributions in kind.

IV. Costs covered by assigned income in substantiated cases for the national co-financing considered such costs to the public sector base employee: 1. The beneficiary and the partners ' contribution in co-financing of the project can take the work carried out by these bodies and workers involved in the project, officials or employees. In such cases, the costs in accordance with this annex II.1.1. section not apply not as direct, not also as indirect personnel costs, but as costs relating to assigned revenue. 2. Such investments may not exceed 50% of the national co-financing contribution. In this case, the following conditions apply: (a)) public servants or employees tasks are related to the implementation of the project and the resulting from the legislative public authorities intended tasks; b) officials, entrusted with implementing a project, are posted with the decision of the competent authority; c) this may be audited by the value of the investment, and it should not exceed the national authorities accounts the actual cost of detection.

V. technical assistance

1. Subject to the restrictions laid down in the basic act of each Fund (article for technical assistance at the initiative of the Member States), each year the program is in accordance with the following technical assistance measures: (a)) expenditure associated with the preparation, selection, appraisal, management and monitoring (including computer equipment and consumables); b) expenditure associated with the action or project audits and spot checks; c) expenditure associated with the action or project evaluation; d) expenses related to information dissemination and transparency in respect of activities; e) acquisition, installation and maintenance of computer systems related to funds management, monitoring and evaluation; (f) expenditure monitoring Committee) and for the organisation of meetings of the Subcommittee in relation to the implementation of the operations to be carried out. These expenses can also be experts and other participants in these committees, including participants from third countries, where their presence is essential for the effective implementation of the action; g) expenditure on salaries including social security contributions is eligible only in respect of: – civil servants or other public officials with the official decision of the competent authority at the time designated to carry out the tasks referred to in points "a", "b", "c", "d", "e" and "f" section; – other employees employed by this point "a", "b", "c", "d", "e" and "f" in the above tasks; -posting or the conditions of employment shall not exceed the last date of eligibility for expenditure fixed in the decision approving the technical assistance. 2. within the framework of technical assistance may finance expenditure incurred by the managing authority, delegated authority, audit authority, certification authority. 3. technical assistance related activities and the payments to be made after 1 January of the year referred to in the financing decision, which approved the annual programme of the Member State. Eligibility period is up to N1 + 2 by the end of June, or up to any later date that corresponds to the implementation of the annual programme of the final report submission deadline. 4. all public procurement to be conducted in accordance with the public procurement law. 5. Technical assistance measures can be implemented in one Fund, together with technical assistance measures or all the funds. In this case, it only costs used for the implementation of the joint action concerning this Fund, may be eligible for funding, the Fund and the Member States shall ensure that: (a) the common measures) part financed from the Fund's reasonable and verifiable manner; (b)) does not cost double financing. 6. Rule 44.1. proportions in the exception is the technical assistance activities of the introduction of the related costs shall be borne by the 100 percent financing from the Fund. Note the. N1-Fund annual program started the year.


Special task Minister for society integration O. Kastēn in annex 5 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 28 October 2008 the Regulation No 884 project submission evaluation criteria no PO box administrative criteria yes no i. project submission and eligibility of the applicant's project 1.1. Project applicant or his authorised person project application submitted personally, sent by post or submitted in electronic form in accordance with the laws and regulations on electronic document design 1.2. project application is filed within the time limit set 1.3. project applicant or partner (if applicable) of the Republic of Latvia direct or in direct public administration, derived public persona, other public authority, private-law legal person or an international intergovernmental organisation that runs the Fund area 1.4. Project applicant or partner (if applicable) is solvent, including not in rehabilitation or liquidation process 1.5. the project applicant or partner (if applicable) is not tax debt II. formal application for project eligibility 2.1. Project application is submitted in two originals in the cauršūto (cauraukloto) (one project application is added to the original accompanying documents) with electronic version CD (CD), or a project application is filed in electronic form in accordance with the laws and regulations on electronic document design 2.2. Projects submitted the original request to correspond with each other and the electronic version of the application CD (CD) (except in addition to the attached document) (if applicable) 2.3. Projects submitted the original application is appropriate-looking (if applicable) 2.4. project submissions, the applicant's receipt of the project and the project partnership certificate (if applicable) have signed the responsible application of project 2.5. drawn into the project application 2.6 pages are numbered (except in addition to the attached document)


2.7. the project submission prepared for the Latvian language III. Project application content compliance 3.1 Project submission is added to and completely filled in all the annexes and submitted all the required accompanying documents 3.2. Project application has been prepared according to the project application form (fill project and are included in the project application of all applicable sections) 3.3 the requested funding and national funds co-financing is calculated correctly and are satisfied the mean funding ratio of 3.4. project financial calculations made in dollars and is accurately and correctly arithmetic developed 3.5 project budget is balanced ( total eligible cost is equal to the total of income) 3.6 the project budgeted costs correspond to the classification of the eligible cost 3.7. project indirect eligible costs does not exceed 20% of the total direct eligible project costs or, if the project is approved the limited selection procedures, project procurement (subcontractors) amount is greater than 40% of the direct eligible costs of the project the indirect eligible costs ratio does not exceed 10% of the project total direct eligible costs of the project not the 3.8 costs is provided by the applicant of a project linked to the financing (if applicable) 3.9.

Project procurement plan contains references to event numbers, cost codes, as well as the budget estimates of the project are appropriate measures specified in the application and budget positions 3.10. Project procurement plan is selected the correct procurement in relation to the subject matter of the procurement project procurement plan 3.11 has chosen the correct procurement method in relation to the procurement and the estimated contract price 3.12. project procurement plan, depending on the legal status of the applicant, the project meets the public procurement laws and regulatory requirements, 3.13.
If the application of the project planned purchases of more than 40% of the total direct eligible project cost justification, made for the implementation of the project of 3.14 calendar the purchase plan method the appropriate procurement time 3.15. Project timelines for the implementation given in the application do not exceed the annual programs Fund implementation period of the project submission 3.16 is respected in the implementation of the Fund in the territorial scope of the special task Minister for society integration O. Kastēn 6. attachment of the Cabinet of Ministers of 28 October 2008 the Regulation No 884 project quality criteria of the application, no PO box
Criteria for the assessment of compliance of the project i. 1.1. Description of the project is clearly defined in the project's General and project specific objective 1.2 0-5 project's compliance with the Fund's objectives, priorities and eligible activities 0-5 1.3. Project eligibility activities to the activities supported by the Fund types 0-5 P II. Rationale of the project 2.1. project application based on the chosen target group needs and provides a description of the target groups (for example , split by gender, age, disability, ethnic origin) 0-5 P 2.2. project application is defined and reasonable problem 0-5 P 2.3. Description of the project has clearly shown the reciprocal linking between projects in the existing situation, the identified challenges, objectives and planned results of the project 0-5 P 2.4. project activities are clearly defined, with the planned implementation of a reasonable time schedule and ensure the quality of the project results (including taking into account the possible risks/project implementation prerequisites) 0-5 P 2.5. Achievement Indicators indicators provide a clear picture (there are clearly defined and measurable) results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results is multiplikatīv effect and displayed their sustainability) 0-5 P III. Project implementation capacity 3.1. Description of the project is clearly displayed in administering the staff competence, experience and professional qualifications of the 0-3 P 3.2 project description is available or the required facilities 0-3 P 3.3. project description clearly states the How will the monitoring of project implementation (including the quality and satisfaction of the selected target system adequacy evaluation/compliance) 0-3 P 3.4 degree of readiness of the project improves or undertaken preparatory work undertaken in the 0-3 3.5. Planned activities the project publicity and dissemination of information are sufficient and appropriate 0-3 P IV. Project budget, cost justification and effectiveness 4.1 project budgeted cost for the project is appropriate and current market prices 0-5 P 4.2. Objectives have been selected for the cost-effective options/solutions ( value for money-the cost-result) 0-5 P 4.3. Project budget is detailed, clearly divided over the line and follow 4.4 0-5 P to ensure the implementation of the project the project applicant or partner (if applicable) own funds in addition to the funding not eligible to cover 0-5 maximum score 75 notes. 1. for each quality criterion a certain number of points according to the following ratings: 1. If the maximum number of points is "5", the criteria to be judged with points from 0 to 5 according to the following assessment: "0" – does not meet the criteria, "1" – very low compliance, "2" for low compliance, "3", "4 partial compliance"-almost complete, with "5"-full compliance; 1.2. If the maximum number of points is "3", the criteria to be judged with points from 0 to 3, according to the following ratings: "0" – does not meet the criteria, "1" – very low compliance, "2" for partial match, "3", a complete match. 2. where the application of P-the information provided does not meet the relevant criteria for evaluation of the project, it is made more precise.
Special task Minister for society integration O. Kastēn in annex 7 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 28 October 2008 the Regulation No application-specific Project 884 criteria no PO box criteria rating 1. priorities of the Fund to the implementation of the project solves topical integration of third-country nationals in the field of 0-5 2. policy guidelines for the inclusion of the common vision of the project, the compatibility and not overlapping with other similar projects 0-5 P 3. Proposed solution efficiency 0-5 4. project sustainability 0-5.5 user or project results final beneficiaries range to meet the needs of the target group level 0-5 P 6. Project good practice acquisitions or new approaches to the use of the 0-5 maximum points 30 notes. 1. for each specific criterion a certain number of points from 0 to 5 in accordance with the following: "0" – does not meet the criteria, "1" – very low compliance, "2" for low compliance, "3", "4 partial compliance"-almost the complete match, "5", a complete match. 2. where the application of P-the information provided does not meet the relevant criteria for evaluation of the project, it is made more precise.
Special task Minister for society integration in Kastēn O.

Related Laws