Advanced Search

The Provisions On "operational Programme Human Resources And Employment" 1.5.3.1. Appendix Activity "professional Association Of Planning Regions, Cities And Counties"

Original Language Title: Noteikumi par darbības programmas "Cilvēkresursi un nodarbinātība" papildinājuma 1.5.3.1.aktivitāti "Speciālistu piesaiste plānošanas reģioniem, pilsētām un novadiem"

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 759 in Riga in 2008 on September 16th (Mon. No 66 26. §) rules on "operational programme human resources and employment" 1.5.3.1. Appendix activity "Professional Association of planning regions, cities and counties" issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds management the law 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines the order in which the activities of the programme "human resources and employment ' priorities 1.5 of Appendix" administrative capacity "UR1.5.3.pas" based planning regional and local administrative and development planning capacity building "1.5.3.1. activity" Professional Association of planning regions , cities and counties "(hereinafter referred to as the activity), determine the application of the evaluation criteria of the project, requirements for applicants, the project responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements, as well as the responsible authorities and cooperation agencies functional form of subordination. 2. The purpose of the activity is to enhance the planning region, city and County local administrative capacity, promoting effective public administration needs professional association planning regional and local government level (cities and counties). 3. Activities for the target groups are planning regions, municipalities and county municipalities. 4. the activity exercised limited project application selection. 5. the implementation of the activity is funded from national public funding and the European Social Fund. 6. the total funds available for the activity is 9 007 260 lats, including European Social Fund funding is late and 7 656 171 national public funding is $1 351 089. 7. European Social Fund funding intensity does not exceed the maximum allowable amount – no more than 85 percent of the total eligible costs. 8. national public funding is provided by the applicant of the project at least 15 percent of the project's total eligible costs. 9. the planning region as the State budget funded institution project funding is provided from the State budget funds, which do not fall within the specified State budget mērķdotācij the planning regions. 10. Project implementation duration 22 months and one specialist pay pay period not exceeding 18 months from the date of the agreement for the implementation of a project (hereinafter referred to as the agreement), but not longer than until 31 December 2014. II. Responsible authorities and cooperation authority for the implementation of the activity of 11 supports regional development and Municipal Affairs Ministry as responsible authority (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authority) and the State regional development agency as liaison body (hereinafter referred to as cooperation body). 12. the cooperation body is the functional supervision of the responsible authority. 13. the responsible authority: ensures activities 13.1. implementation, monitoring and control activities implementation problems are analysed and submitted to the managing authority and the European Union's structural funds and the Cohesion Fund Monitoring Committee, proposals for the improvement of the implementation of the activity;
13.2. ensure that there will be implementation of the activity exceeded the available funding from the European Social Fund, and monitors the available European Social Fund funding, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the enforcement of this principle in the activity level;
13.3. develop project application assessment and evaluation of the project application form filling methodology;
13.4. ensure information and publicity measures activity levels;
13.5. the use of European Union structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system for the surveillance of the activity;
13.6. evaluate collaborative decisions taken by the authorities of the alignment of the project amendment or rejection. 14. cooperation authority: ensures 14.1. associated with the activity of information and publicity measures, including project inform applicants of project submission form and fill in the selection criteria;
14.2. publish your website on the internet (www.vraa.gov.lv) all project application selection associated documentation;
14.3. sends the call for project submissions for a limited range of projects;
14.4. develop and coordinate with the responsible authority, the assessment of the Commission's Statute project application form filling methodology, procedures for the submission of projects provides a selection and evaluation, as well as a decision on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection of the condition;
14.5. creates a project application to the Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission assessment);
14.6. provides project application selection and evaluation;
14.7. Decides on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection of the condition and monitor the fulfilment of the conditions;
14.8. looking for the submission of requests for payment schedule;
9.3. developing a draft agreement and the conclusion of an agreement with the European Social Fund, the beneficiary (hereinafter referred to as the beneficiary) on the implementation of the project;
14.10. administers the State budget funds, verify beneficiary payment requests submitted, approved, eligible expenditure shall prepare payment orders and declarations of expenditure;
14.11. the review and approval of submitted project progress reports;
14.12. evaluate and decide on amendments to the project;
14.13. accumulates data about the projects the European Union structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system of law established;
14.14. ensure not to exceed this provision specified in point 6 available for the implementation of the activities of the European Social Fund funding, and monitor the available European Social Fund funding, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the implementation of the project;
14.15. ensure project monitoring and control, including checks in the project locations;

14.16. funding requested procurement plan and submit it to the procurement monitoring Bureau. III. Requirements to the project the applicant 15. After cooperation bodies call for project submissions is right: 15.1. the planning region;
15.2. the town of the Republic (Daugavpils, Jelgava, Jekabpils, Jurmala, Liepaja, Rezekne, Valmiera and Ventspils);
15.3. the Government established in accordance with the statutory local government administrative territorial divisions;
15.4. Cesis, Gulbene, Aizkraukle, Madona, Kuldīga, Saldus, Līvāni, smiltene, Talsi City municipality, if it shall submit an application in the first selection round. 16. the project is available to the applicant stable and sufficient financial resources to ensure project funding part of the project is expected to cover the applicant's side of the project, and the continuity of the implementation of the project. If the applicant is a financial stabilization process, it shall provide the written consent of the Minister of finance for the implementation of the project in accordance with the laws and regulations on financial stability and financial supervision of the municipal activities. 17. the project shall ensure the implementation of the project according to the project manager and the project management team capacity – project supervisor is higher education and at least one year work experience in project management, and project management team has a higher education and professional knowledge in the field. IV. compliance with the application of the project 18. Project submission complies with the objective to increase the activity of planning regions, cities and counties in the local administrative capacity, promoting effective public administration needs professional association planning regional and local government level (cities and counties). 19. The project's planned activities in the application do not overlap with the activities that are intended for other European Union fund activity. 20. The project's total eligible cost in the application of not less than: 20.1.64 770 lats – planning region;
20.2.17 570 lats – of the city (Daugavpils, Jelgava, Jekabpils, Jurmala, Liepaja, Rezekne, Valmiera, Ventspils);
20.3.21 593 lat – Government, established in accordance with the statutory local government administrative territorial divisions;
20.4.21 593 lat – Cēsis, Gulbene, Aizkraukle, Madona, Kuldīga, Saldus, Līvāni, smiltene, Talsi City municipality, if it shall submit an application in the first selection round. 21. in the application of the project eligible cost total not exceeding: 21.1. the planning region – 107 950 lats;
21.2. the Republican cities (Daugavpils, Jelgava, Jekabpils, Jurmala, Liepaja, Rezekne, Valmiera, Ventspils)-21 942 lat;
21.3. the Government established in accordance with the statutory local government administrative territorial breakdown – 86 374 lat;
21.4. Cesis, Gulbene, Aizkraukle, Madona, Kuldīga, Saldus, Līvāni, smiltene, Talsi City municipality, if it shall submit an application in the first selection round – 86 374 pounds. 22. the project is justified in the application and monitoring of the implementation of the project. 23. the project activities as defined in the application's focus on the achievement of the objective of the activity. 24. in the application of the project results, the planned indicators and impact results are clearly defined, measurable and contribute to the achievement of the objective of the activity. 25. the results of the project are planned for at least one monitoring indicator: 25.1. number of specialists attached to the planning regions, cities and counties;
25.2. the planning region and the number of municipalities which ensure administrative capacity building. 26. the application of the project planned activities are focused on the implementation of the horizontal priorities: 26.1. macroeconomic stability-Pro project co-financing from the applicant part is greater than the minimum;
26.2. the equal opportunities – the project provides direct or indirect positive impact on gender equality and active ageing, as well as the rights of persons with disabilities in compliance with the fundamental principles. 27. the project application shall be accompanied by the following supporting documents: 27.1. project management staff involved in the life of the descriptions (curriculum vitae);
27.2. the specialist job description (job description) and a description of life (curriculum vitae);
27.3. the written consent of the Minister of finance for the implementation of the project in accordance with the laws and regulations on financial stability and financial supervision authorities, if the applicant is a financial stabilization process. 28. the project applicant limited project selection can submit and receive funding from the European Social Fund one project. V. Eligible and non-eligible activities 29. Project has supported the needs of public administration specialists-Jurists, economists, financiers, staff specialist, Planner, information technology specialists, to ensure administrative capacity and the specific legislation of autonomous local government functions and competence of the planning region associated with development planning documents, marketing, monitoring and ensuring the rule of law in the construction process. 30. The project is not eligible: 30.1. which is not referred to in paragraph 29 of these rules;
30.2. focusing on the European Social Fund funding to loans granted to natural and legal persons;
30.3. not directed to the statutory authorities of autonomous functions and planning regions. Vi. Eligible and ineligible costs eligible costs is 31:31.1. direct costs: associated specialist salary 31.1.1., made of the employer State social security payments and other regulations laid down for the good of workers required payments to be made;
31.1.2. associated specialist jobs in equipment rental costs, which shall not exceed 10 per cent of the total direct eligible project costs;
31.2. indirect costs: 31.2.1. value added tax payments that are directly tied to a project if the beneficiary cannot be recovered, taking the statutory procedures;
31.2.2. the project activities directly related to the cost of the publicity measures. 32. the costs are eligible if they:

32.1. the provisions of paragraph 29 of the activities set out in the implementation and meet the sound financial management principles, especially the economic benefit and cost effectiveness;
32. Since the conclusion of the agreement;
32.3. the beneficiaries listed in the accounting registers, separated from the rest of the costs, identifiable, verifiable and documented with the original supporting documents;
32.4. the checks carried out in accordance with the laws and regulations in the field of public procurement and based on relevant documents. 33. non-eligible costs are: 33.1. costs that is not set out in paragraph 31 of these rules;
33.2. the administrative costs of the project;
33.3. the costs in excess of this provision in paragraph 21, the maximum total amount of the eligible cost;
20.8. costs incurred before or after the period determined in accordance with the agreement, including project preparation costs;
33.5. costs associated with the beneficiary entered into subcontracts for providing the services or carrying out the works, if the subcontract referred to increase the cost of the project;
20.9. payment for loan processing, design and booking, interest payments, penalties, charges for money transfers, commissions and losses due to currency exchange, penalties and late payment interest, and legal expenses;
20.9. health, life and accident insurance costs;
33.8. expenditure on the audit services;
21.1. a purchase document preparation costs;
33.10. real estate purchase or rental costs;
33.11. vehicle purchase, rental or lease payment;
33.12. contributions in kind, such as land, real property (in whole or in part), durable goods, raw materials and people carried out unpaid charity work;
33.13. Awards for study or training courses. 34. If a project arises in the course of the implementation of the non-eligible expenses shall be borne by the beneficiary of its budgetary means and accounted for in accordance with the agreement. VII. Project application submission the application 35. Project selection organized rounds: 21.8. the first selection round of cooperation within the framework of the authority no later than one month after the entry into force of these regulations shall be sent by registered mail call for project submissions this provision set out in point 15 a limited circle of beneficiaries by establishing a common project for the submission of the application. The deadline shall be no less than 30 working days;
35.2. second selection round of the liaison body shall issue until 30 September 2009 and sent by registered mail call for project submissions, determining a single project application deadlines. Period is not less than 30 working days. The second selection round of project submissions can be submitted to the planning regions, meaning city of the Republic, the county authorities, who submitted a project submission in the first round or the project submissions in the first selection round was not approved;
35.3. where these rules and the bottom paragraph 35.1 35.2. in certain selection in rounds until March 31, 2012 will not be learned all the funding available for the activity, the authority will hold a draft of the application of repeated selection under the procedures laid down in these rules, sending out invitations for a limited range of beneficiaries – the planning regions, urban municipalities, county municipalities, which receive the invitation did not submit project application in the previous round of project submissions or which was not approved in the previous selection they desire. For repeated selection set a single project application deadlines. Period is not less than 30 working days. 36. cooperation authority notice of limited project application selection started in the home page on the internet (URwww.vraa.gov.lv). VIII. evaluation of application projects 37. cooperation authority creates a project application to the Evaluation Commission. The Commission is made up of two regional development and local government Ministry representatives, one representative of the State Chancellery and three national regional development agencies. 38. the Chairman of the Commission is collaborating authority leader or head of the liaison bodies appointed official. 39. evaluation the Commission observer liaison body invited to participate the representatives of the managing authority. 40. the applicant fills in the project the project application form (annex 1), shall be drawn up in accordance with the regulations laid down in the document development and design requirements, and shall provide cooperation. 41. the project applicant, filling in an application form for the project, comply with the following conditions: 41.1. the project shall prepare and submit to the Latvian language in the text. If supporting documents are not issued in the Latvian language, the document shall be accompanied by certified translations of documents in accordance with the law;
41.2. application of the calculation of the project's financial data, use the currency – lats;
41.3. all the information points clearly and in detail to the application of the project to assess the application of the project evaluation criteria;
25.7. the project application is completed without deletions, deletions, aizkrāsojum, not specified amendments and additions;
25.8. the accompanying document shall accompany the application for the project the original or a notarized copy or copies to which is the appropriate authority for a copy of the proof of compliance with the original. 42. the project applicant project application submitted in paper form or electronic form in one original document: 42.1. lodges where the application in paper form, place it in a sealed container (envelope), the project application form with attachments completely fills, cauršuj (cauraukl), pages sanumur, add the identical electronic copy;
26.2. If the project application submitted in electronic form of a document, it shall be drawn up in accordance with electronic document circulation of the regulatory legislation, signed with a secure electronic signature and certify with a time stamp. 43. the project applicant project application submitted in person, by post or electronically: 43.1. application if sent by post, at the time of the project to be considered as the time when the project application is transferred to the mail (postmark). If in doubt, the applicant must demonstrate the fact that the post put the mail;
26.8. If the application is lodged by the project personally, at the time of the project considered cooperation bodies for project submission, stamp the specified arrival date;

43.3. If the project application submitted electronically, on the application of the project is to be considered as the time when the project application is sent via electronic mail or using the authorities held a special online form. 44. In the event of a dispute, the applicant must demonstrate that the project application has been submitted to the project submission deadline. If the cooperation Authority claims that the project submission is not received, the statement must be based. 45. the Commission assesses the application of the project in accordance with the administrative, compliance and quality criteria. 46. Administrative criteria: 46.1. the project application is filed: 46.1.1. by mail or in person in a sealed container (envelope or box);
46.1.2. electronic document, signed with a secure electronic signature and confirm with the time stamp;
46.2. the project submission filed within the time limit laid down;
46.3. the project application has been submitted in one original, if the project application submitted in paper form;
46.4. the original of the application for the project is cauršūt (caurauklot), where the application is submitted in paper form;
46.5. the original copy of the application, all project pages are numbered, if the application is submitted in paper form;
46.6. the project application has been added to the electronic version of the application if the project is submitted in paper form;
application of project financial 29.0 calculation is made in local currency;
29.1. the project application is fully completed and drawn up according to the project application form;
46.9. the applicant has signed the project and add a receipt that includes information about the project co-financing by the applicant;
46.10. application is made in the text of the project;
46.11. project submission prepared for the Latvian language;
46.12. project submissions includes all the accompanying documents provided;
46.13. If additional documents are not issued in Latvian language, the document is added to a certified translation into Latvian language of documents under the legal requirements;
project submission not 46.14. not specified corrections, erasures, paint you, deletion, addition, if the application be submitted in paper form. 47. eligibility criteria: 29.3. the project submission complies with the objective to increase the activity of planning regions, cities and counties in the local administrative capacity, promoting effective public administration needs professional association planning regional and local government level (cities and counties);
47.2. the project will attract professionals meet these rules referred to in paragraph 29 categories of professionals;
47.3. the project activities meet the requirements;
47.4. the project management team have the appropriate experience, enough project management capacity and professional expertise in the application of the project is justified, as it will ensure the implementation and monitoring of the project;
29.5. the application of the project eligible costs included in accordance with specified eligible costs;
29.6. the project costs are provided for in the application of appropriate project planned activities;
29.6. the application of the project are clearly defined target groups, planning regions, municipalities and county municipalities;
47.8. expected results in the application of the project, the indicators and the impact of the results are clearly defined, measurable and contribute to the achievement of the objective of the activity;
29.8. project budget includes costs are reasonable, justified, according to the current market prices and the need for the implementation of the project;
47.10. application the project financial statement is accurately and correctly arithmetic developed;
47.11. project financing of the European Union shall not exceed the allowable amount;
47.12. project implementation time does not exceed a specified maximum project duration;
47.13. project planned activities do not overlap with the activities financed by other structural funds of European Union activities and other financial instruments;
47.14. project total eligible costs shall not be less than: 47.14.1.64 770 lats – planning region;
47.14.2.17 570 lats – of the city (Daugavpils, Jēkabpils, Jelgava, Jurmala, Liepaja, Rezekne, Valmiera, Ventspils);
47.14.3.21 593 lat – Government, established in accordance with the statutory local government administrative and territorial divisions, Cesis, Gulbene, Aizkraukle, Madona, Kuldīga, Saldus, Līvāni, smiltene, Talsi City municipality;
47.15. project total eligible costs not more than: 47.15.1.107 950 lats – planning region;
47.15.2.21 942 lats – of the city (Daugavpils, Jēkabpils, Jelgava, Jurmala, Liepaja, Rezekne, Valmiera, Ventspils);
47.15.3.86 374 lats – Government, established in accordance with the statutory local government administrative and territorial divisions, Cesis, Gulbene, Aizkraukle, Madona, Kuldīga, Saldus, Līvāni, smiltene, Talsi City municipality;
47.16. administrative costs shall not exceed five percent of the total direct eligible project costs;
47.17. associated specialist jobs in equipment rental fee does not exceed 10 per cent of the total direct eligible project costs;
47.18. project applicant intends to implement publicity and information measures according to the law;
47.19. applicant activity within the project might be: 47.19.1. the planning region;
47.19.2. city of the Republic (Daugavpils, Jelgava, Jekabpils, Jurmala, Liepaja, Rezekne, Valmiera, Ventspils);
47.19.3. Government, established in accordance with the statutory local government administrative territorial divisions;
47.19.4. Washington, Gulbene, Aizkraukle, Madona, Kuldīga, Saldus, Līvāni, smiltene, Talsi municipality, if it submitted an application for the project in the first selection round;
66. the project the applicant meets the requirements. 48. Quality criteria: 48.1. the project will be linked to the provision set out in paragraph 29 of the autonomous municipal technicians or the planning function to ensure the competence of the regions: 48.1.1. development planning, land development planning, construction process ensuring the rule of law, local and regional planning documents development-four points;
48.1.2. social assistance and social care, education issues-two points;

48.1.3. other functions – the zero point;
48.2. the project will strengthen the administrative capacity: enhanced document developed 48.2.1. quality, availability of public services and the quality – three points;
48.2.2. improved quality of a document or public service availability and quality – two points;
48.2.3. is not specified for the associated professional impact on administrative capacity planning or local authorities in the region – zero point;
48.3. the project will attract professionals who have the appropriate qualifications and experience: 48.3.1. specialist shall have at least three years of work experience in the municipality or region planning in priority areas and higher education – four points;
48.3.2. Professional for at least one year of work experience in the municipality or region planning in priority areas and higher education – three points;
48.3.3. professional work experience is not a municipality or planning in priority areas for the region, but has a corresponding higher education – two points;
48.3.4. professional work experience is not a municipality or planning region priority areas and do not have adequate higher education – the zero point;
30.1. the project applicant will provide the project created jobs in conservation: 48.4.1.18 months after the end of the project – six points;
48.4.2. for 12 months after the end of project implementation – four points;
48.4.3. six months after the end of the project – two points;
48.4.4. less than six months after the end of the project – the zero point;
30.1. the project is justified in the application problem and solution to the problem: 48.5.1 and analyze the municipality or planning. in the region of the existing capacity of specialists, the development of the quality of the programming document, mutual linking and evaluating alternatives, based on the need of attracting professionals – four points;
48.5.2. based professional association, but does not look in the local professional capacity development drawn up by the quality of the programming document, mutual linking and not assessed alternatives – three points;
48.5.3. not justified the necessity of attracting specialist-zero point;
30.2. defined in the application of the project the aim of the project is reasonable, attainable, clearly defined the relationship between the objectives and planned activities: 48.6.1. the goal is reasonable, achievable, is clearly indicated and justified relationship with planned activities – three points;
48.6.2. the goal is reasonable, achievable, is indicated in connection with planned activities, but it is not properly justified – two points;
48.6.3. the goal is justified but not provided associations with planned activities-one point;
48.6.4. target is not justified, is not specified for associations with planned activities – the zero point;
30.3. the project will reflect the application how the project will affect the target group, planned activities are related to the target group needs, the project complies with the target group problem solving and clearly the demand for project results: 48.7.1. the impact of the project to reflect the target group, planned activities are related to the target group needs, the project complies with the target group problem solving and have a clear demand for the results of the project – three points;
48.7.2. reflect the impact of the project on the target group, planned activities are related to the target group needs, the project complies with the target group, problem solving, but not specified in the request for the results of the project – two points;
48.7.3. reflect the impact of the project on the target group, planned activities are associated with the target group's needs, but does not indicate that the project complies with the target group, problem solving, and are not specified in the request for the results of the project-one point;
48.7.4. does not reflect the project's impact on the target groups – the zero point;
30.3. the project activities are justified, proportionate with the expected timetable and ensure delivery: 48.8.1. project activities are justified, proportionate with the expected timetable and ensure results are defined and analyzed the potential project risks (assessed the likely incidence of costs and project risk management team) – four points;
48.8.2. the project activities are justified, proportionate with the expected timetable and ensure results are possible project risks (assessed the likely incidence of costs and project risk management team) – two points;
48.8.3. the project activities are justified, proportionate with the planned time schedule and ensure the achievement of results is not defined the possible project risks (not assessed the likely incidence of costs and project risk management team)-one point;
48.8.4. project activities is not justified and proportionate with the planned time schedule, zero point;
30.4. the project in the application reflect the results achieved in the project maintenance after completion of the project and project based financial and administrative sustainability: 48.9.1. the project will ensure the maintenance of the results achieved 18 months after completion of the project, the project is based on the financial and administrative sustainability – four points;
48.9.2. the project will ensure the maintenance of the results achieved in the 12 months after the completion of the project, the project is based in the financial or administrative sustainability – three points;
48.9.3. the project will ensure the maintenance of the results achieved, six months after the completion of the project, the project is based in the financial or administrative sustainability – two points;
48.9.4. the project will ensure the maintenance of the results achieved in less than six months after completion of the project, but does not justify the project's financial and administrative sustainability – the zero point;
48.10. project is direct or indirect positive effect on the horizontal priority of equal opportunities: 48.10.1., the project has a direct positive impact – two points;
48.10.2. the project has an immediate positive impact-one point;
48.10.3. project on this priority is neutral – zero point;
48.11. the impact of the project on the priority "macroeconomic stability". Project co-financing from the applicant part is greater than the minimum funding: more than 10 percent 48.11.1. – three points;
48.11.2. from 6 to 10 percent, two points;
48.11.3. less than 6 percent-one point;

48.11.4. no more (0% interest) – the zero point. 49. the submission of the project compliance with administrative and compliance evaluation criteria assessed with "Yes" or "no" – do not match. 50. The Evaluation Commission evaluation process, assessing compliance with these launch rules referred to in paragraph 46 of the administrative criteria. 51. Where the application does not comply with any of these terms, 46.2, 46.3 46.1...,.,., 46.4 29.0 29.0.,.,., 46.12 46.10 46.11. or 46.14. criteria referred to in the evaluation the Commission specific project applications of valuation do not continue. 52. the project submissions, which are in full compliance with all these rules, 46.2, 46.3 46.1...,.,., 46.4 29.0 29.0.,.,., 46.12 46.10 46.11. and 46.14. criteria referred to in (a) and fully or partially meet this rule 29.1 28.9.,.,., and 46.9 46.13. criteria referred to in point, valued in accordance with the eligibility criteria. 53. Where the application does not comply with this rule, 47.13.47.14 29.3.,.,., and 47.19 47.15. criteria referred to in the evaluation the Commission specific project applications of valuation do not continue. 54. project submissions that are in full compliance with all these rules, 47.13.47.14 29.3.,.,., and 47.19 47.15. criteria referred to in point and fully or partially meet this provision, 47.3, 47.2 47.4 47.5 47.6,.,.,.,., 47.8 29.8 29.6.,.,., 47.10 47.11 47.12 47.16.,.,.,., and 47.20 47.17 47.18. criteria referred to in point, valued according to the quality criteria. 55. the Commission's application of the project's compliance with the quality criteria assessed by giving a certain number of points. IX. Decision-making and publication of information 56. head of liaison bodies shall decide on the approval of the project application, if all the following conditions are met: 56.1. project submission complies with all the provisions of paragraph 46 and 47 of these criteria, 30.3. criteria referred to in subparagraph won at least one point, 29.9.,.,., 30.0 30.0 30.1 30.2 30.3, 30.4., and at the bottom of the criteria referred to in paragraph won each of at least two points, 30.1. criteria referred to in subparagraph won at least three points;
56.2. project quality criteria application evaluation won at least 18 points. 57. the head of the liaison bodies shall take a decision on the application for the approval of the project, stating that the draft of this provision the applicant within the time limit referred to in paragraph 65 should eliminate the deficiencies found, if: the application of the project 57.1. to specify the appropriate one of these rules 29.1 28.9.,.,., or 46.9 46.13. criteria referred to in subparagraph;
57.2. project submissions need to clarify, according to one of these rules, 47.3, 47.2 47.4 47.5 47.6,.,.,.,., 47.8 29.8 29.6.,.,., 47.10 47.11 47.12 47.16.,.,.,., or 47.18 47.17 47.20. criteria referred to in point. 58. These provisions 57. the condition laid down in paragraph 1 may include the following: 58.1. additional explanation of the submission;
58.2. commencement of project implementation time or cost design clarification by years;
58.3. the cost adjustment (reduction or exclusion, mean ensuring compliance with);
58.4. other steps to ensure the conformity of the project application, this provision, 29.1 28.9..,.,., 46.13 46.9 47.4., 29.6 29.6.,.,.,., 47.10 47.8 29.8., 47.16. and 47.18. criteria referred to in point. 59. where these rules 57 and 58. compliance with the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 has an impact on another of these rules, and 48 46 47. criteria referred to in paragraph 1, the conformity assessment liaison body decision on approval of the application, the project on condition accompanied by appropriate instructions. 60. head of liaison bodies shall take a decision on the project, if the rejection of the application: the application of the project not 60.1. one of the provisions laid down in point 51 administrative criteria;
60.2. the project submission does not match any of the rules set out in paragraph 53 of the eligibility criteria;
60.3. the project application to the quality criteria of assessment have not won at least 18 points;

60.4. the project the application of these provisions, the criteria referred to in subparagraph 30.3. has acquired at least on one point, 29.9.,.,., 30.0 30.0 30.1 30.2 30.3, 30.4., and the criterion referred to in subparagraph has not acquired at least two points in each, 30.1. criteria referred to in subparagraph has not won at least three points. 61. If necessary, the liaison body for the evaluation of the application of the draft legislation in order attract independent experts in the field of public procurement regulatory laws. 62. cooperation Authority coordinates the provision laid down in paragraph 57 of the supervision of compliance with the conditions. 63. The liaison body shall draw up an opinion on the conditions of the decision within five working days of receipt of the information on the fulfilment of the conditions. 64. Opinion on the conditions of the cooperation project, the authority shall send to the applicant, two working days after this rule 63. the expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 1. 65. the decision contained conditions shall not exceed 20 working days from the date of the decision. 66. If the applicant has not provided or only partially, provided a decision on the approval of the application, the project provided the conditions contained or not noticed this rule laid down in paragraph 65, the application shall be deemed to have been rejected. 63. These provisions referred to in the opinion of Justice control happens like the decision, which contains the conditions for the control of this opinion is drawn up. 67. cooperation authority within five working days of this rule 56, 57 and 60 of the decision set out in paragraph by registered mail sent to the project and the applicant shall inform the competent authority of the decision taken. 68. cooperation authority publishes information on the approved project submission in your own home page on the internet (URwww.vraa.gov.lv). X. conclusion of the agreement, payments and financing supervision of spending 69. cooperation authority within 30 working days of the submission of the project approval or by the rules referred to in paragraph 63 of the receipt of the opinion of the beneficiary of the financing agreements concluded with the law. 70. If the project is co-financed by the beneficiary of the credit, it means 30 working days after the conclusion of the cooperation agreement shall be submitted to the authority of the local government borrowing and guarantee control and monitoring Council opinion on granting of loans and credit guarantees. 71. the project the applicant within 15 working days after the rule laid down in paragraph 56 of the receipt of the decision or of these rules the decision referred to in paragraph 57 of the conditions included in the filed of cooperation authority for the submission of the request for payment schedule (annex 2). 72. Where the applicant within 30 working days after the decision on the application for the approval of the project did not appear to the authority to conclude agreements of cooperation, the cooperation agreement does not switch authority. 73. The beneficiary within five working days after the conclusion of the cooperation agreement shall be submitted for examination to the authority of the procurement plan (annex 3). 74. cooperation authority within three working days after purchase of the plan review submitted to the procurement monitoring Bureau. 75. the procurement plan filing obligation procurement monitoring Office, without prejudice to the beneficiary of the financing to launch a procurement procedure. 76. If the submission of the request for payment schedule changes occur, beneficiary cooperation authority within five working days, submit to the filing of the request for payment of an updated schedule. 77. The beneficiary provides account opening the Treasury project financial transfers. 78. the planning region in implementing the project of the Foundation of the European Union, payments shall be made from the regional development and local government Ministry's budget for the Fund of the European Union for the implementation of the project. 79. the cooperation agreement the authority within the time limits and procedures provided to the municipality in advance of not more than 20 percent of the total project funding. 80. cooperation authority, providing advance and interim payments to the beneficiary, compliance with the condition that the total may not exceed 90 percent of the project, the European social fund granted funding and the State budget allocations. 81. The beneficiaries of cooperation institution shall submit a request for payment with a copy of supporting documents, the expenditure and the progress report of the agreement within the time limits and procedures. 82. The provision laid down in paragraph 81 of document can be submitted in person, the cooperation body to send by post or in electronic form, a document designed to suit the electronic movement of the regulatory requirements of the laws, not more than once every quarter, if the conditions of the agreement unless otherwise specified. If the payment request, the documents are not submitted to the Latvian language, prepared in a certified document translation in the language of the country in accordance with laws and regulations. Check the original document, if required, is carried out at the place of implementation of the project. 83. cooperation authority within 30 working days of checks that the rules referred to in paragraph 81 of document, confirmed the request for payment of the amount of expenditure attributable to funding from the European Social Fund and meet the agreed conditions, requirements and prepare payment orders. If the liaison body in the request for payment of the discrepancy, it clarified the beneficiary within five working days. The liaison body adjusted payment request re-examined within the time as extended payment request for clarification, and prepares a payment order for submission to the Treasury. 84. The liaison body shall be reduced proportionately in the amount of funding allocated: 84.1. where the actual use of the funds is less than the agreement provides;
52.3. in the absence of agreement in the implementation of a the actions provided in the conditions, but the aim of the project is reached;
84.3. where no opposition to the use of the funds supporting documents;
84.4. If the payment request by the eligible costs are not proportionate and economically justified;

84.5. If the beneficiary has misled the authorities or the liaison body, giving false information. 85. cooperation of the authority shall be entitled to interim or final report of the evaluation, as well as by making a payment request from the beneficiary's additional information on the implementation of the project. 86. changes in its submission the request for payment may be made to the terms of the arrangement in the cases provided for. 87. cooperation authority to make payments to beneficiaries, controls the activity of acquiring funds amount to succumbing to the activity specific amounts being exceeded. 88. The beneficiary shall ensure that the eligible expenditure, which shall be repaid from the European Social Fund and national public funding means that the eligible expenditure borne by the beneficiaries, as well as the implementation of the project-related revenue, cash flow, assets and liabilities accounting records are identifiable, separate and verifiable. 89. cooperation authority shall fix a time limit for remedying the deficiencies found, if inconsistencies are detected in the use of funding granted. 90. If the prescribed period found shortcomings are not remedied, the beneficiary shall pay back unjustified expenses incurred. The liaison body shall provide information on identified inconsistencies in accordance with laws and regulations. 91. All changes to the project beneficiaries with liaison body. 92. changes affecting the project objectives, project timeline, project location, project budget, eligible costs, the results achieved and monitoring indicators, collaboration authority within 10 working days of coordinated with the responsible authority. 93. Informing the public about the implementation of the project, the beneficiary shall follow the order in which the management of the structural funds in the participating institutions provide structural and visual identity publicity requirements. 94. The beneficiary is directly responsible for the maintenance of the project's results for at least six months after the implementation of the project in accordance with the concluded agreement. The city or county government job created after the deadline shall be financed from the municipal budget. 95. the responsible authority, the authority and the beneficiary is maintained throughout the implementation of the project the original documents related to 2021 December 31, as well as the European Commission and the authorities of the Republic of Latvia access to this documentation. Prime Minister Godmanis. Regional development and local Government Minister, Health Minister i. Morris, regional development and local government Ministry's proposed version of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers on 16 September 2008. Regulations No 759 annex 1 PDF format, regional development and local Government Minister, Health Minister i. Morris annex 2 Cabinet of 16 September 2008. Regulations No 759 annex 2 PDF format, regional development and local Government Minister, Health Minister i. Morris annex 3 Cabinet 16.2008. Regulation No. 759/purchasing plan table 1 no PO box the name of the Fund 1. the responsible authority 2. Cooperation authority 3. Project Title 4. Project identification No.


5. the contract/agreement No.


6. conclusion of the contract/agreement date 7. Beneficiary registration No. 8.


9. Registered Office note. Do not fill in the 3, 4, 5 and 6 lines, if the procurement covered by the Cabinet of Ministers of 26 June 2007 No. 419 the provisions of "the order in which the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds", paragraph 30. table 2 no the expected contract priekšmets1 PO box līgumcena2 purchase procedūra3 purchase procedure, the period of notification 1.



2.3.



 

Officer (name) phone fax e-mail Paraksts4 printed name Date (dd/mm/yyyy) Z.v. 4 notes. 1 goods, services and works to be carried out for which expected to close on the purchase contract. 2 the planned amount of the contract, taking into account all procurement contracts. 3 planned procurement procedures under the public procurement law or of the law "on procurement for public service needs". 4 the document properties in the "signature", "date" and "stamp" does not fill in, if the electronic document has been prepared according to the law on electronic document design.
Regional development and local Government Minister, Health Minister Morris I.