Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 882 in 2008 October 21 (pr. No 75 64. §) rules on "operational programme human resources and employment ' 1.1.2.1.2. apakšaktivitāt Appendix" support for doctoral programmes "Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures implemented by the operational programme" human resources and employment ' priorities "of Appendix 1.1. Higher education and science" UR1.1.2.pas "contributes to the higher education development" activities "support 1.1.2.1. doctoral and Masters programmes" apakšaktivitāt "support 1.1.2.1.2. doctoral programmes" (apakšaktivitāt);
1.2. the requirements for the project of the European Social Fund (hereinafter the project) to the applicant;
1.3. the application of the project evaluation criteria;
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements, as well as the responsible authorities and cooperation agencies functional form of subordination. 2. the purpose of the Apakšaktivitāt is in all thematic groups of education to increase the number of specialist tertiary qualifications (doctorate degree) and able to plan, create and implement the production of high technology products as well as products and services with high added value in promoting economic development on the basis of innovation. 3. the purpose of the Apakšaktivitāt achieved in implementing this rule 6, paragraph activities and promoting the achievement of such surveillance indicators: outcome indicators 3.1-1600 doctoral candidates who have received the support of the European Social Fund in the Studio;
3.2. result indicators: 3.2.1.80 per cent of the total PhD doctoral student population in 2007/2008 academic year has received the support of the European Social Fund in the doctoral studies;
3.2.2. at least 50 percent European Social Fund support for the doctoral candidates have received up to august 31, 2015 has got a doctorate degree. 4. the purpose of the group is Apakšaktivitāt PhD, academic staff in higher education institutions. 5. Higher education institution within the meaning of these rules is public or private individuals founded and the University established in the Republic of Latvia, irrespective of its legal status. 6. Project activities have assisted mērķstipendij of doctoral education in all the thematic groups. 7. These rules that mērķstipendij is the financial support granted to doctoral PhD program learning and doctoral degree. 8. Apakšaktivitāt within the implemented projects co-financed from the European Social Fund and the State budget. Apakšaktivitāt total available for public funding is $40459138, consisting of the European Social Fund co-financing 34363636 lats and national public funds 6095502 lats. 9. Maximum co-financing from the European Social Fund has about 85 percent of the total eligible cost of the project. The implementation of the project of national public funding for 15 percent of the project's total eligible cost provided from the State budget funds regardless of the beneficiary's legal status. 10. Apakšaktivitāt implement the project application to the limited selection. The project application selection responsible authority organises two rounds. 11. Apakšaktivitāt the first application round project provides total public funding is 35200000. The second round is organised within the framework of the apakšaktivitāt the remaining funding. 12. Apakšaktivitāt responsible authorities within the functions provided by the Ministry of education and Science (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authority). Responsible authority: ensures project 12.1. selection and evaluation of application: 12.1.1. develop project appraisal form submissions and the submission of a project evaluation and project appraisal form filling application methodology;
12.1.2. creates a project application to the Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission);
12.1.3. developed and approved the Statute of the Commission;
12.1.4. send the limited range of the project call for project submissions;
12.1.5. assess the project submissions and decides on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection of the condition, as well as assess the decision on approval of the application, the project provided the conditions are met;
12.2. the accumulated data on project submissions under the laws and regulations of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system design and use;
12.3. subject to this provision as referred to in paragraph 87 of the draft amendment;
12.4. the plan and implementation of information activities for the implementation of apakšaktivitāt;
5. ensure that there will be exceeded this rule 8, paragraph apakšaktivitāt of the available funding, and monitor the implementation of the European Social Fund in available funding, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 listed in the implementation of the principle of the apakšaktivitāt level. 13. cooperation authority provides public education development agency (hereinafter referred to as cooperation body). The liaison body: 13.1. within 10 working days after the date of entry into force of the provisions of the draft agreement on the development of the project and the project for the implementation of the project in accordance with these rules and regulations that govern the European Union's structural and cohesion funds, implementation, and monitoring of implementation, and shall submit it to the authority responsible for the coordination;
13.2. the switch with the beneficiary of the financing according to its legal status agreement or contract for the implementation of a project and determine the requirements for the implementation of the project beneficiaries;
13.3. ensure project monitoring and control, including checks at the place of implementation of the project and monitor the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the implementation of the project;
13.4. submit to the Ministry of education and science of the national budget planning for project implementation;
13.5. the funding requested procurement plan and submit it to the procurement monitoring Bureau;
13.6. draw up and submit to the body responsible for the implementation of apakšaktivitāt and apakšaktivitāt in the funding available for learning, by the responsible authority provides information on individual projects;
8.5. preparing forecasts of payment and submit it to the paying authority;
13.8. European Social Fund demand forecasts for the current and the following year and shall submit it to the leading authority and the responsible authority;
13.9. checks and confirms the beneficiary's payment request and prepare the Declaration of expenditure;
13.10. provide information about the recipient of the funding agreement or contract enforcement requirements and their enforcement;
13.11. the draft amendments under this rule 86 and 87, paragraph;
13.12. accumulating data on the implementation of the project according to the laws of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system design and use;
13.13. plans and implements public awareness measures on the conclusion of an agreement or contract with the beneficiary. 14. the cooperation body is the functional supervision of the responsible authority. II. Requirements for the project the applicant 15. Project applicant may be higher education institutions that implement one or more doctoral programs in any education thematic group. 16. If the applicant is a private institution of higher education founded, in addition to the provisions of paragraph 15 of these conditions meet the following requirements: 16.1. taxation and State it does not have a social security payment of debts;
16.2. it has not declared a position of maksātn, being wound up and its economic activity is not paused or stopped. 17. the project applicant project can be implemented in cooperation with other higher education institutions, scientific institutions or companies (hereinafter referred to as partners), a co-operation agreement for the doctoral programme. 18. the project minimum total eligible cost is $21084, the maximum eligible cost total is 17570100. 19. The project, subject to the provisions referred to in paragraph 18 of the total eligible cost of the project limits, the higher education institution of the amount of funding available is calculated using the following formula: F = 0.43 x D x T x (A1 + A2)/2, where F-higher education institution of the available funding in local currency;

0.43-factor, calculated in the light of the first submission round of projects available for funding and higher education institutions, the total number of PhD student 2007/2008 academic year, and provides financial support for tendering procedures;
D – number of PhDs in the relevant higher education institution in the 2007/2008 academic year;
T – the maximum duration of financial support in the years one doctoral student;
A1 – the maximum amount of financial support for one 1 or 2 course for doctoral candidates in the year in dollars, calculated by adding those provisions to one rate 1 or 2 year doctoral student in mērķstipendij costs, Dr. foreman's annual remuneration for the work of one of the three, including the employer's national compulsory social insurance contributions, and one PhD student per year planned PhD quality support measures;
A2-the maximum amount of financial support for one course or 3 PhD degree applicants per year in dollars, calculated by adding those provisions to one of the PhD course or 3 degree applicant in mērķstipendij annual cost, Dr. foreman's annual remuneration for the work of one of the three, including the employer's national compulsory social insurance contributions, and one PhD student per year planned PhD quality support activity costs. 20. the applicant may submit a draft project submissions for less funding than calculated in the institution of higher education in accordance with the provisions referred to in point 19 of the formula. III. Project preparation and submission of the application 21. the responsible authority shall, not later than 40 working days from the date of entry into force of the provisions sent to the call for submission of projects (hereinafter referred to as the notice) the first application round project. The second application round project to the responsible authority shall send the invitation no later than 31 December 2010. The invitation sent to the applicant that the project complies with this provision in point 15. 22. The invitation shall: 22.1. the relevant round of funding available for the project, the allowable minimum and maximum total amount of the eligible costs and the higher education institution calculates the available funding conditions according to this provision, paragraph 19;
22.2. the project submission deadline, which is not shorter than 20 working days from the date of dispatch of the invitation;
22.3. the application of the project site and order;
22.4. the website which published the application to be used for the preparation of project documents;
22.5. any other information that the responsible authority considers it necessary to specify in the call. 23. the project applicant project application submitted, subject to the following requirements: 23.1. single project application selection round allowed to submit one project submission;
23.2. the project application form a completed project application form (annex 1) and the following annexes: 23.2.1. This provision of the Charter, paragraph 69 or its project, drawn up in accordance with the provisions laid down in paragraph 70 of the requirements;
23.2.2. these provisions referred to in paragraph 72, the draft Treaty drawn up in accordance with this provision, paragraph 73;
23.2.3.60. these provisions referred to in the order in which the beneficiary intends to use PhD quality of aid funds or the project;
23.2.4. applicant and project partners signed a protocol of intent on the project within the planned cooperation between doctoral programmes;
23.2.5. the provisions referred to in paragraph 17 of the draft cooperation agreement on cooperation in doctoral programmes, specifying the responsibilities of partners and the rights, as well as the planned payment arrangements;
23.2.6. project applicant questionnaire-application of value added tax in accordance with the laws and regulations on the procedures for issuing and verifying the information on the application of value added tax to the European Union within the framework of the projects co-financed by the structural funds and take a decision on the inclusion of value added tax to the project-related costs;
23.2.7. project financing plan drawn up by the applicant of the project the national budgetary authorities in accordance with the classification of the expenditure of the budget in the economic category (where the applicant is a public body) (annex 2);
23.3. the project application to the institution of the applicant, the signature of the project manager or his authorized person, and the project is added to the application. 24. the applicant shall present the draft project submissions, subject to the following requirements: 24.1. project submission prepared into Latvian language and complete all the project submission form section;
24.2. the project of the copy of the application to fully comply with the original copy of the application for the project;
24.3. the original copy of the application for the project, and the copies are cauršūt (through auklot), pages numbered, and all documents are presented in a law on the development and design of a document in the order;
15.2. the project submission form section, subsection and their names do not change and do not delete;
15.2. the project submission form section fill ensure mutual consistency of the information provided, describing the project up-to-date by identifying the problem and its solution, linking it with the project goals, planned project activities, the expected results, the selected target group, the project's implementing rules and cost planning;
24.6. the project achieved the outcome indicators and outcome indicators in the distribution plan by year (according to the provisions of annex 1 of the year in point 2.12. classification);
24.7. ensure compliance with the contents of the application of the draft of this provision in paragraph 36 of the eligibility criteria and the provisions referred to in paragraph 37 of the quality criteria;
15.4. the necessary costs of the project plan in full, in that rule 52 and 64. costs referred to in paragraph 1, and about restrictions, giving the project the expected costs and ensuring compliance with project objectives, planned activities and anticipated results. The European Social Fund project in the application intends only the eligible cost of the project. 25. the project applicant project application can be submitted to the responsible authority: 25.1. paper form in triplicate (one original copy marked "original" and two copies marked "copy"), adding the electronic media in the identical project submission form and the electronic version of the State budget authorities – the project financing plan electronic version. All the documents placed in a package and seal;
25.2. the electronic document, signed with a secure electronic signature with time-stamp and certified according to the laws and regulations on electronic document design. 26. paragraph 22 of these rules with the invitation in the specified project to the application date is the last day when the project applicant project application may be made in person, by mail or electronically send: 26.1. If the application is sent by mail, on the date of submission shall be considered in the specified postmark date of dispatch;
26.2. If the application is submitted electronically, the filing shall be deemed to be the time when it is sent by electronic mail or using the authorities held a special online form. In the event of a dispute, the applicant can demonstrate that the project application is sent before the actual submission deadline. If the responsible authority submits that the application is received, it justifies this claim;

16.3. If the project application submitted personally, on the filing date shall be deemed the responsible authority specified in the date and time of receipt. 27. the responsible authority shall record the receipt of project submissions a day. Proof of receipt of the application, the project authority in charge of the project to the applicant personally immediately or within 10 working days from submission of the application the project expiry date, by post or in electronic form, electronic document signed with a secure electronic signature according to the regulations on electronic document design. IV. evaluation of the application of the project 28. project and project submissions valued under the first of these provisions referred to in paragraph 35 the administrative criteria referred to in paragraph 36 of the eligibility criteria referred to in paragraph 37 of the quality criteria referred to in paragraph 38 and funding criteria. 29. within the framework of the project presented Apakšaktivitāt submission of the assessment provided by the Commission. Panelists included representatives from the Ministry of education and science, the higher education Council and the Latvian Science Council. 30. the meetings of the Commission as observers may participate in the managing authorities, cooperation agencies and the Association of young scientists of Latvia. The Commission may invite one or more experts (non-voting). 31. When starting, the members of the Commission, experts and observers signed a declaration that the Commission obtained during the meetings of the information and the content of the document will not disclose to third parties. The members of the Commission and experts sign a declaration that they were not in violation of laws and regulations that govern the European Union's structural and cohesion funds, implementation, and monitoring of implementation, and to comply with the limits laid down in the European Union in the management of the Fund to the person involved, as well as there are no circumstances which would lead to believe that they are interested in a specific project in the project submitted by the applicant for the approval of the application. 32. The Commission shall determine the responsible authorities approved the Statute of the Commission. 33. project submissions valued pursuant to these provisions, the responsible authorities develop and approve project submissions and evaluation of laws and regulations that govern the European Union's structural and cohesion funds, implementation, and monitoring of implementation, as well as through the application of the project assessment and project evaluation forms filled out the application of the methodology. 34. the project submission compliance administrative criteria, eligibility criteria and funding criteria assessed by the "Yes" and "no" ("Yes", "no" – meets does not meet). Application of project compliance with quality criteria assessed by giving a certain number of points. 35. Administrative criteria (project design and submission of the application, the eligibility criteria) are the following: 21.8. the applicant is invited to the project to submit a project application to the limited application of the selection of projects;
35.2. the project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the time limit laid down;
35.3. the project is drawn up into the application;
35.4. the project proposal is prepared for the Latvian language;
22.1. the project proposal is prepared according to the rules referred to in paragraph 23.2. project submission form, and all form sections are completed;
35.6. the project proposal is submitted in paper form to the required application of the project the number of copies (one original and two copies), the original and the copy of the application is cauršūt (caurauklot) or in the electronic form of a document signed with a secure electronic signature and confirm with the time stamp according to the regulations on electronic document design;
22.2. the project application is signed by the project head of the institution to the applicant or his authorised person;
22.2. the project application is accompanied by all these rules 23.2. annexes referred to;
22.3. the period of project implementation and cost allocation over the years correspond to the provisions referred to in paragraph 84 of the project implementation period;
35.10. the project required in the application of the European Social Fund co-financing and the total eligible costs indicated in lats;
35.11. the project required in the application of the European Social Fund co-financing shall not exceed the provisions mentioned in paragraph 9 of the allowable co-financing;
35.12. project submissions requested in total eligible cost of which is not less than that referred to in paragraph 18 of the rules of the minimum amount of eligible costs and do not exceed this provision referred to in paragraph 18, the maximum amount of the eligible cost;
35.13. application of the project eligible costs over the years specified in full in the arithmetic right and meet the budget totals listed in the summary;
69.35. the application of the project eligible positions corresponds to 52. these provisions referred to in paragraph 64 and eligible costs;
35.15. project planned in the application costs do not exceed that rule 53, 61 and 62. referred to cost constraints. 36. The eligibility criteria (projects of the applicant and project eligibility criteria application) are the following: 36.1. the project applicant is this provision referred to in paragraph 15 of the institution;
36.2. the aim of the project comply with the rules referred to in paragraph 2, the purpose of the apakšaktivitāt;
36.3. the project supported activities meet the provisions referred to in paragraph 6 to the operation supported;
36.4. the project application is defined in the problem addressed and justified the chosen target group needs;
22.7. the submission of the project and the planned activities provide the problem and define target groups needs are met;
22.7. the project activities are clearly defined, proportionate with the planned time schedule for implementation and ensure the planned results;
22.8. the application of the project results and the planned figures are accurately defined and measurable (reachable results are specified in units with specific values);
22.9. the expected results for the project and their indicators contribute to this rule 3.1. outcome indicators referred to in subparagraph a;
22.9. the project application describes the project management, implementation, and monitoring system and the required resources (in the number of staff involved, qualifications and responsibilities, the facilities available) and they are appropriate to the needs of the project;
36.10. project application is justified, as it will ensure the sustainability of the results achieved and maintenance after completion of the project;
36.11. project costs indicated in the application corresponds to the period of project implementation, it is necessary and reasonable to achieve project results and the implementation of the planned activities;
36.12. project planned in the publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund projects in the implementation of the publicity requirements. 37. quality criteria (specific horizontal priorities and eligibility criteria) are as follows: 37.1. higher education institution capacity doctoral programmes-doctoral student number in the 2007/2008 academic year: 37.1.1. more than 210 student (five points);
37.1.2. from 151 to 210 undergraduate (four points);
37.1.3. from 91 to 150 undergraduate (three points);
37.1.4. from 31 to 90 student (two points);
37.1.5.1 to 30 undergraduate (one point);
37.1.6. no student (0);
37.2. higher education institutions academic staff potential doctoral programmes – Professor and Associate Professor number 2007/2008 academic year: more than 150 37.2.1. professors and associate professors (five points);
37.2.2. from 101 to 150 professors and associate professors (four points);
37.2.3. from 61 to 100 professors and associate professors (three points);
37.2.4. from 31 to 60 professors and associate professors (two points);
37.2.5.1 to 30 professors and associate professors (one point);
37.2.6. There are no professors and associate professors (0);
37.3. higher education institutions implement a doctoral programme efficiency – doctoral degree got in the 2006/2007 academic year to doctoral programs, the number of people in imatrikulēt in the 2003/2004 academic year (expressed as a percentage): more than 40 percent of 37.3.1. (five points);
37.3.2. from 20 to 40 percent (three points);
37.3.3. less than 20 percent (one point);
37.4. European Social Fund aid effectiveness-planned doctoral degree got the number against the planned European Social Fund, the number of beneficiaries of the doctoral programmes (expressed as a percentage): more than 75 percent 37.4.1. (five points);
37.4.2. from 60 to 75 percent (three points);
37.4.3.50 to 59 percent (one point);
37.4.4. less than 50 percent (0);
37.5. the project application demonstrates Association (complementary positive effect) by the European regional development fund investment in higher education programs and science infrastructure upgrades: 37.5.1. are complementary impact (two points);
37.5.2. no complementary effect (0);

23.4. the project application it is intended that the project takes place in cooperation with other institutions of higher education or scientific institutes in doctoral programmes: 37.6.1. project applicant already has developed and operates a cooperative mechanism, which provides for research managers to attract the leading research scientists or academic staff, including from other scientific institutes or foreign universities or commercial companies, and is intended for the continuation of cooperation in the implementation of the project (five points);
37.6.2. the project is designed to attract the application of one or more scientific Institute or company and is expected to conclude a cooperation agreement, with the intention of demonstrating it (three points);
37.6.3. the project is designed to attract the application of one or more higher education institutions and are intended to conclude a cooperation agreement, with the intention of demonstrating it (one point);
37.6.4. project information is specified in the application for the planned cooperation (0);
37.7. project application is intended for doctoral studies in the research part of the implement in cooperation with scientific institutions, scientific assessment of their potential – international publication quoted (anonymously reviewed scientific periodicals and internationally available databases cited, except for pašcitēšan, scientific publications) in the previous year: 37.7.1. doctoral studies research part intended to implement, in cooperation with scientific institutions, which is more than 0.5 publications to one full time equivalent of working scientists (three points);
37.7.2. doctoral studies research part intended to implement, in cooperation with scientific institutions, which is less than 0.5 publications to one full time equivalent of scientific workers (one point);
37.7.3. doctoral studies research part is not intended to implement, in cooperation with scientific institutions (0);
23.5. the higher education institutions in the implementation of international cooperation that characterizes the following forms of cooperation: international cooperation agreements, international projects, academic staff exchange, student exchange: 37.8.1. institution of higher education implemented three or four of these forms of cooperation (three points);
37.8.2. higher education institutions are pursuing two of the above forms of cooperation (two points);
37.8.3. higher education institutions shall implement one of the following forms of cooperation (one point);
37.8.4. institution of higher education is not one of the above forms of cooperation (1);
23.5. the competitiveness of higher education institutions in the international academic environment, characterized by the following indicators: the basic associated foreign academic staff, foreign student association, graduate programmes in foreign languages: 37.9.1. higher education institution fulfils all three of those international competitiveness indicators (three points);
37.9.2. higher education institution fulfils two of the listed international competitiveness indicators (two points);
37.9.3. higher education institution performs one of the following indicators of international competitiveness (one point);
37.9.4. institution of higher education is not one of the mentioned international competitiveness indicators (0);
37.10. the project's contribution to higher education institutions or institutions innovative capacity building: 37.10.1. project facilitates technology transfer and commercialization capabilities of raising a number of higher education institutions (three points);
37.10.2. the project promotes technology transfer and commercialization capabilities increases the individual field of study (two points);
37.10.3. the project promotes technology transfer and commercialization capabilities of raising individual study programs (one point);
37.11. project risks (cost, low incidence of academic personnel, scarce in doctoral study, the number of reflektant people, the lack of academic or scientific capacity, student reduction and other risks) evaluation: 37.11.1. project application is assessed potential risks, developed action plans for all identified for the elimination or reduction of risks (three points);
37.11.2. project risks identified in the application in part, action plan identified for the elimination or reduction of risk developed a stub (two points);
37.11.3. project risks identified in the application in part, is not developed in the action plan identified risks (one point);
37.11.4. project application is not examined potential risks (0);
37.12. project applicant's regional allocation: 37.12.1., Zemgale, Vidzeme or Latgale planning region (four points);
37.12.2. planning region (one point);
37.13. project provides for measures which contribute to the fundamental principle of equal opportunities (gender equality, active aging and disabled people): 37.13.1. the measures intended to promote observance of the three basic principles (five points);
37.13.2. the measures intended to promote observance of the fundamental principles of two (three points);
37.13.3. the measures intended to promote observance of the fundamental principles of the single (one point);
37.13.4. not for measures which promote equal opportunity of basic principles (0);
37.14. projected effects of the project on information society: 37.14.1 horizontal priority. the project involves support for doctoral studies in the field of information technology, as well as increase the doctoral degree got the information technology courses (two points);
37.14.2. the project involves support for doctoral studies in the field of information technology, without increasing the doctoral degree got the information technology courses (one point);
37.14.3. the project is not intended to support of doctoral studies in the field of information technology (0). 38. Funding criteria are the following: 38.1. the project submission complies with these rules, 35.2, 35.3 21.8...,.,., 35.4 35.5 36.1 36.2 35.12.,.,.,., and 22.6 22.9. referred to the assessment criteria 23.1, 23.2, 37.6.. and evaluation referred to in paragraph 37.13 criteria each have at least one point, 37.11. evaluation criteria referred to in subparagraph has received at least two points and quality criteria that at least 14 standings points;
38.2. the listing of this rule 38.1. paragraph below this criterion relevant project applications in order of priority, starting with the most points winning the project submissions, the submission of the project has enough apakšaktivitāt selection within the available funding. V. decision on approval of the project application, approval with conditions or disapproval 39. the responsible authority shall take a decision on the application for the approval of the project, if it complies with all the rules 35, 36 and 38 of the project referred to in paragraph submission evaluation criteria have been assessed with "Yes". 40. the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application of the project and not further assessed that: 24.9. individuals founded higher education institution does not comply with this rule 16.2. the requirements referred to in subparagraph;
40.2. the project submission does not comply with any of these terms, 35.2, 35.3 21.8...,.,., 35.4 35.5 36.1 36.2 35.12.,.,.,., or 22.9 22.6. criteria referred to in paragraph 1 below;
assessment of compliance with 40.3. This provision is referred to in paragraph 37.11 quality criteria for project submission received less than two points assessment of compliance or any of these rules, 37.4, 23.4 23.1..., or 37.13. referred to quality criteria received less than one point;
25.1. the project submission does not comply with the provisions referred to in paragraph 38 of the funding criteria. 41. the competent authority may decide to approve a project application with the condition. That decision may include conditions which must be fulfilled in order to project the applicant would be able to conclude an agreement or contract for the implementation of the project: the project of updating the application 41.1. in accordance with this provision, 35.7 35.6.,.,., 35.10 22.2 22.3.,.,., 35.13 69.35 35.11.,.,., 35.15 22.6 22.7 22.8 22.7.,.,.,.,., 36.10 22.9 36.11. or 36.12. criteria referred to in (a);
41.2. the project application to the institution of higher education, the reduction of the financial contribution requested under this provision the formula referred to in paragraph 19;
41.3. clarification of project costs broken down by year;
25.7. clarification of costs, in the case of the arithmetic calculation errors, provided that such rules 53, 61 and 62, paragraph cost limit is not exceeded;
25.8. individuals founded the institution of higher education shall ensure compliance with this provision 16.1. the requirements referred to in subparagraph;
25.8. other specific legal authority to justify action, which is focused on an agreement or contract for the implementation of a project. 42. the responsible authority shall within five working days after the date of adoption of the decision: send

42.1. the project for the applicant, the decision on the application of the project approval or rejection of the application, project, or project approval submissions;
26.2. cooperation authority-the decision on the application for the approval of the project and in the project approved by the two certified copies or project submission, presented in the form of electronic documents signed with secure electronic signatures, and confirm with the time stamp according to the regulations on electronic document design;
26.3. the Ministry, which is subordinated to the institutional head of the project – had established higher education institution, a decision on the approval of the project application (copy) and according to the rules of section 6.1 of annex 1 and annex 2 to the project of the information submitted by the applicant. 43. If the application is approved, the applicant of the project within the time limit set in the decision, which does not exceed 30 working days from the date of entry into force of the decision, shall ensure the fulfilment of the conditions and submitted to the responsible body for evaluation information on the fulfilment of the conditions. Decision within the time limit set in the information about the conditions of the project, the applicant may submit a maximum of two times. 44. the responsible authority shall be 20 working days after the deadline set in the decision, assessed the information provided by the applicant of the project and draw up an opinion on the decisions contained in the conditions (opinion). In the opinion of Justice control is done just like the decision, which contains the conditions to control this opinion is drawn up. 45. If the applicant shall ensure the fulfilment of the conditions contained in the time limit laid down in the decision and the opinion of the responsible authority is positive, responsible authority within five working days from the date of signing the opinion sent: 45.1. the project applicant, opinion;
45.2. cooperation authority – a decision on project approval, and two copies of the approved project or project submission, presented in the form of electronic documents signed with secure electronic signatures, and confirm with the time stamp according to the regulations on electronic document design;
45.3. the Ministry, which is subordinated to the institutional head of the project – had established higher education institution, a decision on the approval of the project application (copy) (copy) and according to the rules of annex 1 of the bottom point 6.1 and annex 2 to the project of the information submitted by the applicant. 46. If the applicant does not provide the draft decision contained in the conditions or not provide it within the time limit laid down in that decision, the responsible authority opinion is negative and the project application is considered to have been rejected. The responsible authority within five working days from the date of signing the opinion sends the draft opinions to the applicant. 47. If the application is approved, the liaison body with the beneficiary of the financing agreements or contracts concluded for the implementation of a project in accordance with the laws that determine the order in which the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds. 48. cooperation authority within five working days from the date of conclusion of the agreement in writing of the agreement concluded by the Ministry, which is subordinated to the institutional beneficiaries – founded the institution of higher education. 49. cooperation authority of the beneficiary who is not a public authority transferred advance payment arrangement or agreement for the implementation of the project within the time limits and procedures in that 20 percent of the total eligible cost of the project. 50.20 working days of receipt of the decision on rejection of the application or project that rule 46 of the draft in the cases referred to in the applicant's right to request the competent authority of regulatory laws in order to issue the project submitted by the two copies of the application. Vi. Eligible and ineligible costs 51. Project costs broken down into eligible and ineligible costs. 52. The eligible costs the following cost plan positions: 52.1. indirect costs not directly associated with the project activities to be implemented: 52.1.1. project submissions and supporting documentation preparation costs;
52.1.2. administrative costs of the project;
52.1.3. information and publicity;
52.2. the direct costs that are directly associated with the project activities to be implemented: 52.2.1. mērķstipendij costs;
52.2.2. the other costs of the project;
52.3. unforeseen costs. 53. This provision 52.1.1. cost referred to in the heading includes company costs the project supporting the gum and a head of the documentation, including State social security payments, if the Enterprise contract person involved is not registered as a commercial activity of the taxable income. The total of these costs can be up to five percent of that rule 52.2. the cost referred to in total, up to 10000 dollars. 54. This provision 52.2.1. referred to in heading mērķstipendij includes the costs for the following extent: PhD 54.1. course 1 and 2 doctoral candidates to no more than 600 dollars per month;
54.2.3rd year PhD student and applicant degree no more than 800 dollars a month. 55. The provisions referred to in paragraph 54 of the mērķstipendij PhD awarded to 11 months of the year. The total allocation for one doctoral student mērķstipendij not exceeding 44 months: doctoral programme learning-33 months, but the thesis preparation, to submit a public defense of the dissertation Council-11 months. 56. This provision 52.2.2. the cost referred to in heading covers the following costs: 56.1. the reward Dr. work managers for PhD work and employer State social security payments;
56.2. PhD quality support measures;
56.3. the remuneration and the employer's State social security payments 71. these provisions of the Commission referred to the Scientific Secretary and external industry experts;
56.4. implementation of the project of information system development and maintenance costs. 57. This rule 56.1. remuneration referred to Dr. foreman not exceeding 100 lats a month for one PhD work directing the national employers ' compulsory social insurance contributions. The consideration that their supervisor of doctor granted 11 months a year in funding requested in the order. 58. The project doctor Business Manager you can manage up to five PhD work. 59. The provisions referred to in paragraph 56.2 PhD quality support measures include travel costs, including doctoral student membership fee in scientific conferences and seminars. Quality support measures may also include guest lecturer for lecture reading, reward scholars for support for doctoral candidates work in scientific research and seminars cost PhD group new research techniques and use of learning in practice. 60. Phd quality support measures available in the project financing plan to calculate the per 1000 lats year, PhD, and used in accordance with the requested funding to develop and approve the agenda. Each doctoral student in that amount are eligible to use the travel expenses of the beneficiary within the time limit. 61. This provision 52.1.3. cost referred to in total not exceeding one percent of that rule 52.2. the costs referred to in point totals. 62. This rule 52.3. the cost referred to in heading does not exceed 0.5 percent from 52.2. referred to cost totals, and it uses that rule 52.2. the costs referred to in point. 63. This provision 52.1.2. costs referred to in the plan as a separate cost position. Their incidence or imputability, as well as these terms shall be determined in paragraph 92. This heading may include costs the following costs: the costs of remuneration 39.2 project administration work, including the national employers ' compulsory social insurance contributions, if the person involved in the administration of the project is registered as a business income tax payer;
39.3. communication costs (postage, telecommunications, internet services);
63.3. Office supplies and inventory (value up to 50 Lats per unit), except furniture;
63.4. space rental, if the project requires the Administration to rent space outside of the legal beneficiaries addresses;
63.5. project management for information technology equipment (hardware, software, Office printer) for rent. 64. the eligible costs recoverable value added tax payments are eligible. 65. Financing from the European Social Fund or the national budget do not apply and are not included in the application of the project costs: indicate the 65.1.52. these provisions or paragraph 64;
65.2. This provision does not match, 61 or 62 53. the costs referred to in paragraph about limits;

65.3. haven't encountered the implementation of project activities (excluding this provision cost referred to in subparagraph 52.1.1.) or carried out later than the month following the expiry of the implementation of the project;
65.4. not justified by cost of supporting documents or do not meet the reasonable financial management, in particular value for money and cost effectiveness, or the laws incurred by non-compliance. VII. Project implementation conditions 66. Mērķstipendij may be awarded to doctoral candidates enrolled in full or part time studies funded by the national budget or charge study places in any of the education thematic group. Part time studies of priority conferred PhD mērķstipendij, who works at the University, the academic posts in college or the Scientific Institute. 67. Mērķstipendij can be assigned to only one doctoral programme learning and doctoral degree. 68. the doctoral student at mērķstipendij and can not get a reward: 68.1. "operational programme human resources and employment" in the early stage of extra activity "human resources 1.1.1.2. linking science" projects;
68.2. operational programme "entrepreneurship and innovation" advanced in the early stage of activities support 2.1.1.1. "Science and research", at the bottom of the activity "2.1.2.1.1. Competence centres" or "new apakšaktivitāt 2.1.2.2.1. products and technologies development" projects. 69. Mērķstipendij-PhD awarded in a tendering procedure in accordance with the requested funding to develop and approve regulations. 70. This provision of the statute referred to in paragraph 69 shall include at least the following provisions: 70.1. requirements for doctoral candidates, in order to be eligible for mērķstipendij;
70.2. PhD application procedures;
70.3. tendering procedures;
70.4. mērķstipendij allocation of the agenda of the Commission;
70.5. mērķstipendij allocation decision-making and for appeal;
70.6. disclosure of tender procedures;
70.7. mērķstipendij award of contract arrangements between institutions of higher education and PhD;
70.8. mērķstipendij costs;
70.9. the doctoral student's responsibility. 71. The beneficiary creates mērķstipendij award Commission or Commission, which includes higher education institutions academic staff and Administration representatives. The Commission may include external experts in the industry. 72. No later than two months after the approval of the tender results for beneficiaries in writing in a contract with a PhD on mērķstipendij. 73. This provision in the agreement referred to in paragraph 72 shall contain at least the following provisions: 73.1. higher education institutions to provide support (including PhD quality support measures) PhD doctoral programs for learning and doctoral degree abstraction;
73.2. PhD, to take the doctoral program and obtain a doctoral degree, doctoral programme learning by providing for three years, not including study breaks, and thesis preparation and submission to the public defense of the dissertation Council one year;
73.3. the order in which the doctoral student is evaluated on the obligations, provided that the PhD studies and research results are evaluated not less than twice a year;
45.6. extension of the conditions;
73.5. disputes and the resolution of disputes;
73.6. procedure for the exchange of information. 74. the contract with the beneficiary of the grant of the three mērķstipendij for one year. 75. Mērķstipendij costs are attributable to the next calendar month after the approval of the results of the competition, but not earlier than after the decision of the authority responsible for the approval of the project application. Mērķstipendij starts to pay after this provision in paragraph 72, the conclusion of the contract. 76. This provision 54 mērķstipendij referred to in paragraph 1 and 2 of course paid to doctoral candidates each month 500 lats, 3rd year PhD and degree applicant paid 700 dollars each month. All remaining parts of mērķstipendij for a semester for doctoral candidates paid in the month following the previous semester's successful completion of the commitment and assessed. 77. to assess the implementation of commitments, doctoral student, according to the rules referred to in paragraph 73.3. the bottom order each semester funding recipient shall submit a written report about the work done in the previous semester. 78. The beneficiary shall ensure the evaluation report within 20 working days from the date of submission. If the assessment is positive, the beneficiary will be paid for the remaining part of the three mērķstipendij for the previous semester. If the assessment is negative, a doctoral student in the remaining part of the mērķstipendij does not receive the funding recipient and shall decide on the exclusion of the PhD project. 79. If a PhD doctoral degree obtained before 72. these provisions in the agreement referred to in paragraph deadline, he mērķstipendij about the rest period received no later than two months after the scientific degree of doctor. 80. If the PhD studies, stop funding recipients, starting with the next month after the termination of the study, the cost of the three mērķstipendij to stop and reward his doctoral supervisor. If the doctoral student shall submit a written report about the work done to study a semester break, and the assessment is positive, the beneficiaries are paid for mērķstipendij and PhD doctorate supervisor rewards for the relevant months to study a semester break. 81. If the PhD student has ended the study or is excluded from the project, the beneficiary of the tender award mērķstipendij for the next three, who won the highest rating. 82. following a study break doctoral student can be eligible for mērķstipendij this rule 69. tender referred to in paragraph 1. Mērķstipendij duration of receipt before the Studio break in this case is counted in the total of mērķstipendij at the time of receipt, subject to the provisions referred to in paragraph 55. 83. If the PhD student has received the mērķstipendij after you have ended the study, he released the funding recipient mērķstipendij unduly received in full for this period. The beneficiary is entitled to withhold amounts unduly paid mērķstipendij payments from next, where they are made. 84. the funding recipient project initiated by no later than two months after an agreement or contract for the project implementation, and implement the project a maximum 84 months up to august 31, 2015. 85. The beneficiary on its Web site at least once every three months puts up-to-date information on the implementation of the project. 86. the draft amendments shall be consistent with the laws that determine the order in which the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds, except for this provision 87. cases referred to in paragraph 1. 87. The draft amendments to coordinate with the responsible authority, if the changes are related to: 87.1. project objectives;
87.2. change of the beneficiary;
101.8. project start and end date;
87.4. project outcomes and results attainable indicators;
87.5. the total cost of the project;
unexpected costs 87.6. redistribution. 88. The beneficiary, without making amendments to the project, you can make the project cost reallocation: 88.1. between this provision and paragraph 52.1.3.52.2.2. the positions laid down in cost, not exceeding five percent of the cost of a transferable and subject to the provisions of paragraph 61 of the cost limit laid down;

88.2. these rules and bottom 52.1.3 52.2.2. the costs referred to in point position. 89. The beneficiary shall provide the authority with a request for payment, accompanied by an explanation of the rules referred to in paragraph 88 of the cost distribution. If this explanation is not submitted or is not justified, the cooperation body cost reallocation may be considered unreasonable, not taking it into account in considering the reallocation of costs or not to have occurred. 90. The beneficiaries up to 31 December 2011 provides funding for learning no less than 60 percent of the total eligible cost of the project. 91. If the beneficiary fails to fulfil the request set out in the draft outcome indicators or indicators results by year or does not provide funding for learning this rule 90, paragraph and laid down deadlines, or do not comply with the arrangement or agreement for the implementation of a project of cooperation obligations, the authority shall inform the competent authority. In this case, the responsible authority shall have the right to propose the project funding reduction or cessation. VIII. Closing questions 92.63. These provisions referred to in paragraph 1, the administrative cost incidence or imputability, as well as the amount determined in accordance with the Cabinet decision on the administrative costs at constant rate. 93. the implementation of the projects that have been initiated before these rules laid down in paragraph 92 that administrative costs at constant rate, fixed administrative costs rate shall apply from the date of agreement or the agreement on the implementation of the project. 94. This provision of the conditions referred to in paragraph 93 of the implementation of the cooperation agreement shall be included in the document body or in the contract for the implementation of a project. Prime Minister i. Godmanis, Minister of education and science t. koķe Ministry of education and science of the presented version of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 21 October 2008 a Regulation No 882 annex 1 PDF format, Minister of education and science t. koķe annex 2 Cabinet October 21 2008. Regulations No 882 annex 2 PDF format, Minister of education and science t. koķe