Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 881 Riga 2008 October 21 (pr. No 75 63. §) rules on "operational programme human resources and employment ' 1.1.2.1.1. in Appendix apakšaktivitāt" support for Masters programmes "Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures implemented by the operational programme" human resources and employment ' priorities "of Appendix 1.1. Higher education and science" UR1.1.2.pas "contributes to the higher education development" activities "support 1.1.2.1. doctoral and Masters programmes" apakšaktivitāt "support 1.1.2.1.1. master degree programmes" (hereinafter referred to as the activity);
1.2. the requirements for the project of the European Social Fund (hereinafter the project) to the applicant;
1.3. the application of the project evaluation criteria;
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements, as well as the responsible authorities and cooperation agencies functional form of subordination. 2. The purpose of the activity is to increase high-quality – master's degree of vuš-specialist teams count, especially in science, math, teh noloģij, information engineering, health care, environmental sciences and creative industries, which are able to plan, create and implement the production of high technology products, services and products with high added value, thus contributing to the economy, creative industries and the development of education on the basis of innovation. 3. the purpose of the activity reaches the implementation of this rule 6, paragraph activities and promoting the achievement of such surveillance indicators: outcome indicators 3.1-2500 majors, which received the support of the European Social Fund in the Studio;
3.2. outcome indicators: 3.2.1. at least 80 percent of the European Social Fund support received the majors got a master's degree to august 31, 2015.
3.2.2. European Social Fund support for studies in the masters before fucking in doctoral institutions received 50 percent of the total PhD graduate student population. 4. Activities for the target groups are major, higher education institutions and academic staff. Academic staff within the meaning of these provisions is the indirect target group. 5. Higher education institution within the meaning of these rules is public or private individuals founded and the University established in the Republic of Latvia, irrespective of its legal status. 6. Project activities have assisted in securing major mērķstipendij, enrolled in a Masters degree program in one of the following priorities: 6.1. education thematic group: 6.1.1. in science, math and information technology;
6.1.2. the engineering, manufacturing and construction;
6.1.3. Agriculture;
6.2. thematic area: 6.2.1. health care;
6.2.2. environmental protection;
6.2.3. transport services;
6.2.4. art (interdisciplinary studies). 7. These rules that mērķstipendij is the financial support granted to major masters degree in learning and abstraction. 8. activities within the responsible authority provides the Ministry of education and Science (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authority). Responsible authority: ensures application 8.1. project selection and evaluation: 8.1.1. establish project application form and evaluation the evaluation of a project providing a gum and the project application form of evaluation methodologies;
8.1.2. create a project application to the Evaluation Commission;
8.1.3. develop and approve project submissions for evaluation of the Commission's rules;
8.1.4. send a limited range of applicant projects call for project submissions;
8.1.5. assess the project submissions and decides on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection of the condition, as well as assess the decision on approval of the application, the project provided the conditions are met;
8.2. data on project submissions to accumulate in the laws of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system and the use of the prescribed order;
8.3. subject to the provisions referred to in paragraph 77 of the draft amendment;
8.4. the planning and implementation of information activities for the implementation of the activity;
8.5. ensure that these rules are not exceeded, paragraph 11, of the available funding, for the implementation and monitoring of the activity of the available European Social Fund funding, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the enforcement of this principle in the activity level. 9. the cooperation des institutions function supports the national education development agency (hereinafter referred to as cooperation body). The liaison body: 9.1. within 10 working days of the entry into force of these provisions establish a Standart contract agreement and the project for the implementation of the project and submit it to the authority responsible for the coordination;
9.2. the switch with the beneficiary of the financing agreement or the agreement on the implementation of the project according to the beneficiary's legal status and says the project from requirements for recipients of funding under these terms and regulations that govern the European Union's structural and cohesion funds, implementation, and monitoring of implementation;
9.3. provides project monitoring and control, including checks at the place of implementation of the project and monitor the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the implementation of the project;
9.4. the Ministry of education and science provides information on State budget planning for project implementation;
9.5. funding requested procurement plan and submit it to the procurement monitoring Bureau;
9.6. prepares and submits the information to the authority responsible for the implementation of the activity and the activity of learning available funding, at the request of the responsible authority provides information on individual projects;
9.7. prepare activities payment projections and submit it to the payment authority, the managing authority and the responsible authority;
9.8. checks and confirms the payment beneficiary requested must prepare and Declaration of expenditure;
9.9. provide information about the recipient of the funding agreement or contract enforcement and compliance requirements;
9.10. the draft amendments to the regulations pursuant to the 76. the requirements referred to in paragraph 1;
9.11. the accumulated data on project implementation legislation of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system and the use of prescribed compensation for loving;
9.12. plans and implements public awareness measures on the conclusion of an agreement or contract with the beneficiary. 10. the cooperation body is the functional supervision of the responsible authority. 11. activities implemented in the framework of projects co-financed by the European Social Fund and the State budget. Activity total public funding available is $9150556, consisting of the European Social Fund co-financing 7804604 lats and national public financial volume 1345952 lats. 12. The maximum co-financing from the European Social Fund has about 85 percent of the total eligible cost of the project. The implementation of the project of national public funding for 15 percent of the project's total eligible cost provided from the State budget funds regardless of the beneficiary's legal status. 13. the activities implemented in the project application to the limited selection in a way that the responsible authority organises two rounds. 14. the first activity the project application selection round of the total public funding available is 7350000. The second round is organised for active high within the remaining funding. II. Requirements for the project the applicant 15. Project applicants may be higher education institutions that implement one or more masters of this rule 6 education referred to in the thematic groups or thematic areas. 16. If the applicant is a private institution of higher education founded, in addition to the provisions in point 15 requirements meet the following conditions: 16.1. it does not have administered the State revenue service tax debt;

16.2. that is not declared bankrupt, being wound up in the grant and its financial st operation is not paused or stopped. 17. the project applicant project can be implemented in cooperation with other higher education institutions, research institutes or companies (hereinafter referred to as cooperation partner). The applicant and the project partner of the cooperation agreement concluded between masters courses. 18. the project minimum total eligible cost is lats, maximum 17570 eligible cost total is $4919628. 19. The project, subject to the provisions referred to in paragraph 18 of the total eligible cost of the project limits, the higher education institution of the amount of funding available is calculated using the following formula: Fi = M x A x T x 0.27 that Fi-available funding higher education institution (ls);
0.27-factor, calculated in the light of the first submission round of projects available for funding and higher education institutions total 2007/2008 academic year undergraduate majors count these rules referred to in point 6 priority areas, and provides financial support for tendering procedures;
M – number of major higher education institutions concerned in priority education in thematic groups and thematic areas in the 2007/2008 academic year;
A – financial support for one major month (ls);
T – the maximum duration of the financial aid months one maģ a trant. 20. the applicant may submit a draft project submissions for less funding than calculated in the institution of higher education in accordance with the provisions referred to in point 19 of the formula. III. Project preparation and submission of the application 21. the responsible authority shall, not later than 40 working days from the entry into force of this provision sends a call for project applications (hereinafter referred to as the notice) the first application round project. The second application round project to the responsible authority shall send the invitation no later than 31 December 2010. The invitation sent to the applicant, the Pro Ject which comply with the provisions referred to in point 15. 22. The invitation shall: 22.1. the relevant round of funding available, the project would jam the minimum and maximum total amount of the eligible costs and the higher education institution calculates the available funding conditions according to paragraph 19 of these rules in these requirements.
22.2. the project submission deadline, which is not shorter than 20 working days from the date of dispatch of the invitation;
22.3. the application of the project site and order;
22.4. the website which published the application to be used for the preparation of project documents;
22.5. any other information that the responsible authority considers appropriate. 23. the project applicant project application submitted, subject to the following requirements: 23.1. single project application selection round may submit one project submission;
23.2. the project application form a completed project application form (annex 1) and the following annexes: 23.2.1. This provision of the Charter, paragraph 63, or a project that was developed in accordance with the provisions laid down in paragraph 64 of the requirements;
23.2.2. these provisions referred to in paragraph 66 of the draft treaty concluded by the beneficiary and major and drawn up in accordance with this provision, paragraph 66;
23.2.3. applicant and project partners signed a protocol of intent on the project within the planned cooperation Masters courses;
23.2.4. This provision referred to in paragraph 17 of the draft cooperation agreement on cooperation in the masters, showing affiliate obligations and rights, as well as the planned payment arrangements;
23.2.5. the project financing plan drawn up by the applicant project public authorities (annex 2);
23.2.6. project applicant questionnaire-application of value added tax in accordance with the laws and regulations on the procedures for issuing and verifying the information on the application of value added tax to the European Union within the framework of the projects co-financed by the structural funds and take a decision on the inclusion of value added tax to the project-related costs;
23.3. the project application to the institution of the applicant, the signature of the project manager or his authorized person, and the project is added to the application. 24. the applicant shall present the draft project submissions, subject to the following requirements: 24.1. project submission prepared into Latvian language and complete all the project submission form section;
24.2. the project submission complies with a copy of the original copy of the application for the project;
24.3. the project application and copies the original is cauršūt (caurauklot), pages numbered and all documents presented under the laws and regulations on the development and design of a document;
15.2. the project submission form section, subsection and call it must project the applicant do not change and do not delete;
15.2. the project submission form section fill ensure mutual consistency of the information provided, describing the project up-to-date by identifying the problem and its solution, linking it with the project goals, planned project activities, the expected results, the selected target group, the project's implementing rules and cost planning;
24.6. the project achieved the outcome indicators and outcome indicators in the distribution plan by year (according to the rules of annex 1 of the bottom paragraph 2.12. classification of the year);
24.7. ensure compliance with the contents of the application of the draft of this provision in paragraph 36 of the eligibility criteria and the provisions referred to in paragraph 37 of the quality criteria;
15.4. the necessary costs of the project plan in full, in these rules 52, 53, 54, 56, 57 and 58 of the costs referred to in paragraph 1, and about restrictions, giving the project the expected costs and ensuring compliance with project objectives, planned activities and anticipated results. The European Social Fund co-financing project planning application only the eligible cost of the project. 25. the project applicant project application to the responsible body can go into to provide: 25.1. paper form in triplicate (one original copy marked "original" and two copies marked "copy") by adding identical fill the project submission form electronic version electronic media, government authorities added this provision below. referred to 23.2.5 financing plan, the electronic version of the electronic media,-all documents placed in a package and seal;
25.2. the electronic document, signed with a secure electronic signature with time-stamp and certified according to the laws and regulations on electronic document design. 26. paragraph 21 of these rules with the invitation in the specified project to the application date is the last day when the project applicant project application may be made personally or by sending by electronic mail: 26.1. If the application is lodged by the project by post, on the date of submission shall be considered in the specified postmark date of dispatch;
26.2. If the application is submitted electronically, the filing shall be deemed to be the time when it is sent by electronic mail or using the authorities held a special online form. In the event of a dispute, the applicant can demonstrate that the project application is sent before the actual submission deadline. If the responsible authority submits that the application is received, it justifies this claim;

16.3. If the project application submitted personally, about the horse shall be deemed to be submitted by the responsible authority of the stamp in the specified date and time. 27. the competent authority shall register the project application submitted to it on the date of receipt. Proof of receipt of the application, the project authority in charge of the project to the applicant personally immediately or within 10 working days from the application date shall send by mail or electronically to the electronic form of a document, signed with a secure electronic signature according to the regulations on electronic document design. IV. evaluation of the application of Project 28. project and project submissions valued in the following order, according to the rules referred to in paragraph 35 the administrative criteria, mentioned in paragraph 36 the eligibility criteria referred to in paragraph 37 of the quality criteria referred to in paragraph 38 and funding criteria. 29. activities within the project application submitted for evaluation, the project provides the evaluation by the Commission of the application (hereinafter referred to as the Commission). Panelists include the Ministry of education and science and the higher education Council. 30. the meetings of the Commission as observers may participate in the managing authorities and the liaison body. The Commission may invite one or more experts (without voting rights). 31. the launching of the Commission, Commission members, experts and observers signed a declaration that the Commission obtained during the meetings of the information and the content of the document does not give third parties disappear. The members of the Commission and experts sign a declaration that they were not in violation of laws and regulations that govern the European Union's structural and cohesion funds, implementation, and monitoring of implementation, and to comply with the limits laid down in the European Union in the management of the Fund to the person involved, and not the circumstances that it could be argued that they are interested in a specific project in the project submitted by the applicant for the approval or rejection of the application. 32. The Commission shall determine the responsible authorities approved the Statute of the Commission. 33. The assessment shall be carried out pursuant to these provisions, the responsible authorities develop and approve the submission of the project evaluation procedures and laws and regulations that govern the European Union's structural and cohesion funds, implementation, and monitoring of implementation, as well as through the application of the project assessment and project appraisal form the gum cold filling methodology. 34. the project submission compliance administrative criteria, eligibility criteria and funding criteria are valued with a score of "Yes" or "no" ("Yes", "no" – meets does not meet). Application of project compliance with quality criteria assessed by giving a certain number of points. 35. Administrative criteria (project design and submission of the application, the eligibility criteria) are the following: 21.8. the applicant is invited to the project to submit a project application to the limited application of the project selection;
35.2. the project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the time limit laid down;
35.3. the project is drawn up into the application;
35.4. the project proposal is prepared for the Latvian language;
22.1. the project proposal is prepared according to the rules referred to in paragraph 23.2. project submission form, and all form sections are completed;
35.6. the project application has been submitted according to the requirements – in paper form (filed the required number of copies of the application for the project, the original and copies of the application are cauršūt (caurauklot)) or electronic form, a document signed with a secure electronic signature and confirm with the time stamp according to the regulations on electronic document design;
22.2. the project application is signed by the project head of the institution to the applicant or his authorised person;
22.2. the project application is accompanied by all these rules 23.2. annexes referred to;
22.3. the period of project implementation and cost allocation over the years correspond to the provisions referred to in paragraph 74 of the project implementation period;
35.10. project requested co-financing from the European Social Fund and the total eligible costs indicated in lats;
35.11. the project required in the application of the European Social Fund līdzfinan volume not exceeding the provision referred to in paragraph 12 of the allowable amount of co-financing;
35.12. project submissions requested in total eligible cost of which is not less than that referred to in paragraph 18 of the rules of the minimum amount of eligible costs and do not exceed this provision referred to in paragraph 18, the maximum amount of the eligible cost;
35.13. application of the project eligible costs breakdown of the years indicated full, in the arithmetic right and meet the budget totals listed in the summary;
69.35. the application of the project eligible cost position meets this rule 52 and 58 points in eligible costs;
35.15. project planned in the application costs do not exceed that rule 54, 56 and 57 of these cost restrictions. 36. The eligibility criteria (projects of the applicant and project eligibility criteria application) are the following: 36.1. the project applicant is this provision referred to in paragraph 15 of the institution;
36.2. the aim of the project complies with this provision in paragraph 2 of this activity objective;
36.3. the project assisted actions comply with the provisions referred to in point 6 of the eligible actions;
36.4. the project application is defined in the problem addressed and justified the chosen target group needs;
22.7. the submission of the project and the planned activities provide the problem and define target groups needs are met;
22.7. the project activities are clearly defined, proportionate with the planned time schedule for implementation and ensure the planned results;
22.8. the application of the project results and the planned figures are accurately defined and measurable (reachable results are specified in units with specific values);
22.9. the expected results for the project and their indicators contribute to the rules referred to in paragraph 3 of the outcome indicator;
22.9. the project application describes the project management, implementation, and monitoring system and the required resources (in the number of staff involved, qualifications and responsibilities, the available material and technical base), and they are appropriate to the needs of the project;
36.10. project application is justified, as it will ensure the sustainability of the results achieved and maintenance after completion of the project;
36.11. project costs indicated in the application corresponds to the implementation period of the project Pro, they are necessary and reasonable to achieve project results and the implementation of the planned activities;
36.12. project planned in the publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the European Union's structural funds, the Cohesion Fund and project implementation in the publicity requirements. 37. quality criteria (specific horizontal priorities and eligibility criteria) are as follows: 37.1. higher education institutions in the capacity of masters of the priority programmes – the student number full time masters Pro in particular in the priority education programmes in the areas of thematic groups and the 2007/2008 academic year: 37.1.1. more than 550 (five points);
37.1.2. from 401 to 550 (four points);
from 201 to 400 37.1.3. (three points);
37.1.4. from 61 up to 200 (two points);
37.1.5. from 1 to 60 (one point);
37.1.6. no (0);
37.2. higher education institutions academic staff potential masters programmes-Professor and Associate Professor number 2007/2008 academic year: 37.2.1. more than 150 (five points);
37.2.2. from 101 to 150 (four points);
37.2.3. from 61 to 100 (three points);
37.2.4. from 31 to 60 (two points);
37.2.5. from 1 to 30 (one point);
37.2.6. no (0);
37.3. higher education institutions implement the Masters program effectiveness – master's degree acquired in relation to the number of master's study programmes imatrikulēt persons (expressed as a percentage): more than 80 percent of 37.3.1. (five points);
37.3.2. from 60 to 80 per cent (three points);
37.3.3. less than 60 percent (one point);
37.4. European Social Fund aid effectiveness-planned master's degree acquired in relation to the number of planned European Social Fund, the number of beneficiaries of the Masters courses (expressed as a percentage): more than 97 percent 37.4.1. (five points);
37.4.2. from 97 to 90 percent (three points);
37.4.3. from 90 to 80 percent (one point);
37.4.4. less than 80 percent (0);
37.5. the project application demonstrates Association (complementary positive effect) by the European regional development fund investment in higher education programs and science infrastructure upgrades: 37.5.1. are complementary impact (two points);
37.5.2. no complementary effect (0);
23.4. the project application it is intended that the project takes place in cooperation with other higher education institutions or research institutes Masters programmes:

37.6.1. project applicant already has developed and operates a cooperative mechanism, which provides for research managers to attract the looking at you in the field of leading scientists or academic staff, including from other scientific institutes or foreign universities or commercial companies, and are provided for the continuation of existing cooperation in the implementation of the project (five points);
37.6.2. the project is designed to attract the application of one or more scientific or commercial Institute, and is expected to conclude a cooperation agreement, with the intention of demonstrating it (three points);
37.6.3. the project is designed to attract the application of one or more institutions of higher education, and they are expected to conclude a cooperation agreement, with the intention of demonstrating it (one point);
37.6.4. project information is specified in the application for the planned cooperation (0);
37.7. higher education institutions in the implementation of international cooperation that characterizes the following forms of cooperation: international cooperation agreements, international projects, academic staff exchange, student exchange: 37.7.1. institution of higher education implemented three or four of these forms of cooperation (three points);
37.7.2. higher education institutions are pursuing two of the above forms of cooperation (two points);
37.7.3. higher education institutions shall implement one of the following forms of cooperation (one point);
37.7.4. institution of higher education is not one of the above forms of cooperation (0 points);
23.5. the competitiveness of higher education institutions in the international academic environment, characterized by the following indicators: the basic associated foreign academic staff, foreign student association, graduate programmes in foreign languages: 37.8.1. higher education institution fulfils all three of those international competitiveness indicators (three points);
37.8.2. higher education institution fulfils two of the listed international competitiveness indicators (two points);
37.8.3. higher education institution performs one of the following indicators of international competitiveness (one point);
37.8.4. institution of higher education is not one of the mentioned international competitiveness indicators (0);
23.5. the project's contribution to higher education institutions or institutions innovative capacity building: 37.9.1. project facilitates technology transfer and commercialization capabilities in relation to the promotion of several higher education institutions (three points);
37.9.2. the project promotes technology transfer and commercialization capabilities increase, in respect of certain directions of study (two points);
37.9.3. the project promotes technology transfer and commercialization capabilities in the promotion of individual study programs (one point);
37.10. project risk assessment (possible sadār dzinājum costs, inadequate academic staff, insufficient student to study the number of reflektant people, the lack of academic or scientific capacity, student reduction and other risks): 37.10.1 in the application's project assess potential risks, developed the same plan all identified measures for the elimination or reduction of risks (three points);
37.10.2. project risks identified in the application in part, action plan identified for the elimination or reduction of risk developed a stub (two points);
37.10.3. project risks identified in the application in part, is not developed in the action plan identified risks (one point);
37.10.4. project application is not examined potential risks (0);
37.11. project applicant's regional allocation: 37.11.1., Zemgale, Vidzeme or Latgale planning region (four points);
37.11.2. planning region (one point);
37.12. project provides for measures that contribute to the basic principle of equal opportunities (gender equality, active aging and disabled people): 37.12.1. the measures intended to promote observance of the three basic principles (five points);
37.12.2. the measures intended to promote observance of the fundamental principles of two (three points);
37.12.3. the measures intended to promote observance of the fundamental principles of the single (one point);
37.12.4, and for measures to promote respect for the fundamental principles of equal opportunities (0);
37.13. projected effects of the project on information society: 37.13.1 horizontal priority. the project involves support for master's study information techno loģij, as well as to increase the number of graduate degree in information technology courses (two points);
37.13.2. project support master's studies in the field of information technology, a master's degree without increasing the number of graduate information technology courses (one point);
37.13.3. the project is not intended for support to master's studies in the field of information technology (0). 38. Funding criteria are the following: 38.1. the project submission complies with these rules, 35.2, 35.3 21.8...,.,., 35.4 35.5 36.1 36.2 35.12.,.,.,., and 22.6 22.9. referred to the assessment criteria 23.1, 23.2, 37.6.. and evaluation referred to in paragraph 37.12 criteria each has received at least one point, 37.10. evaluation criteria referred to in subparagraph has received at least two points and quality criteria that at least 14 standings points;
38.2. the listing of this rule 38.1. paragraph below this criterion relevant project applications in order of priority, starting with the most points winning the project submissions, the submission of the project has enough activity selection round of the available funding. V. decision on approval of the project application, approval with conditions or disapproval of acceptance and notification 39. the responsible authority shall take a decision to approve the project application, if all these rules 35, 36 and 38 of the project referred to in paragraph submission evaluation criteria have been assessed with "Yes". 40. the responsible authority shall take a decision to reject or not to underestimate the further application of the project if: 24.9. individuals founded higher education institution does not comply with this rule 16.2. the requirements referred to in subparagraph;
40.2. the project submission does not comply with any of these terms, 35.2, 35.3 21.8...,.,., 35.4 35.5 36.1 36.2 35.12.,.,.,., or 22.9 22.6. criteria referred to in paragraph 1 below;
assessment of compliance with 40.3. any of these rules, 37.4, 23.4 23.1..., 37.12. quality criteria referred to by less than one point or in compliance with this rating rule 37.10. the quality criteria referred to received less than two points;
25.1. the project submission does not meet the funding referred to in paragraph 38 of the award criteria. 41. the responsible authority shall, in deciding on the application of the definition of project implementation, may include conditions which must be fulfilled in order to project the applicant would be able to conclude an agreement or contract for the implementation of the project: the project of updating the application 41.1. in accordance with this provision, 35.7 35.6.,.,., 35.10 22.2 22.3.,.,., 35.13 69.35 35.11.,.,., 35.15 22.6 22.7 22.8 22.7.,.,.,.,., 36.10 22.9 36.11. or the referred to 36.12. evaluation criteria;
41.2. clarification of the costs, in the case of the arithmetic calculation errors, provided that such rules are not exceeded, 56 and 57 54. paragraph cost limit;
41.3. the project submission to the higher education institution required a reduction in the amount of volume of funds according to the rules referred to in point 19 of the calculation formula.
25.7. clarification of project costs broken down by year;
25.8. individuals founded the institution of higher education shall ensure compliance with this provision 16.1. the requirements referred to in subparagraph;
25.8. other specific legal authority to make reasonable efforts, which have focused on an agreement or contract for the implementation of a project. 42. the responsible authority shall within five working days after the date of adoption of the decision: sent to the applicant of the project-42.1. the decision on the application of the project around the Stipe of authorisations requested or project submission, or the rejection of an application for the approval of the project;
26.2. cooperation authority-the decision on the application of the project around the Stipe of authorisations requested and approved by two certified copies of the project or project submission, presented in the form of electronic documents signed with secure electronic signatures, and confirm with the time stamp according to the regulations on electronic document design;

26.3. the Ministry, which is subordinated to the institutional head of the project, had the decision on the application for the project-approval copy and pursuant to the provisions of point 6.1 of annex 1 and annex 2 to the project of the information submitted by the applicant. 43. If the application is approved, the applicant of the project within the time limit set in the decision, which does not exceed 30 working days from the date of entry into force of the decision, shall ensure the fulfilment of the conditions and submitted to the responsible body for evaluation information on the fulfilment of the conditions. Decision within the time limit set in the information about the conditions of the project, the applicant may submit a maximum of two times. 44. the responsible authority shall be 20 working days after the deadline set in the decision, assessed the information provided by the applicant of the project and draw up an opinion on the decisions contained in the conditions (opinion). In the opinion of Justice control is done just like the decision, which contains the conditions to control this opinion is drawn up. 45. If the applicant shall ensure the fulfilment of the conditions contained in the time limit laid down in the decision and the opinion of the responsible authority is positive, responsible authority within five working days from the date of signing the opinion sent: 45.1. the project applicant, opinion;
45.2. cooperation authority – a decision on project approval with the opinion of the sacījum, and two copies of the approved project or project submission, presented in the form of electronic documents signed with secure electronic signatures, and confirm with the time stamp according to the regulations on electronic document design;
45.3. the Ministry, which is subordinated to the institutional head, the project had a decision on project approval, with no copy of opinion of sacījum and according to the rules of annex 1 of the bottom point 6.1 and annex 2 to the project of the information submitted by the applicant. 46. If the applicant does not provide the draft decision contained in the conditions or does not provide the time limit laid down in the decision, the responsible authority opinion is negative and the project application is considered to have been rejected. The responsible authority within five working days from the date of signing the opinion sends the draft opinions to the applicant. 47. If the application is approved, the liaison body with financial volume of the requested switch arrangement or agreement for the implementation of the project in accordance with the laws that determine the order in which the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions from secure programming documents for the preparation and implementation of these funds. 48. cooperation authority within five working days from the date of the agreement for the implementation of a project, be informed in writing of the agreement concluded by the Ministry, which is subordinated to the institutional beneficiaries. 49. cooperation authority of the beneficiary who is not a public authority transferred to the advance payment of the agreement on the implementation of the project within the time limits and procedures in that 20 percent of the total eligible cost of the project. 50.20 working days of receipt of the decision on rejection of the application or project that rule 46 cases referred to the project by submitting a stuffy nose is entitled to request the competent authority of regulatory laws in order to issue the project submitted by the two submit copies of ma. Vi. Eligible and ineligible costs 51. Project costs broken down into eligible and ineligible costs. 52. The eligible costs the following cost plan positions: 52.1. indirect costs not directly associated with the project activities to be implemented: 52.1.1. project submissions and supporting documentation prepared this NASA cost;
52.1.2. administrative costs of the project;
52.1.3. public information and publicity costs;
52.2. the direct costs that are directly associated with the project activities to be implemented and the resulting pointer, or mērķstipendij costs;
52.3. unforeseen costs. 53. This provision 52.1.2. cost plan referred to as the individual cost of each position, and their incidence or imputability, and this provision shall be determined in paragraph 82. This heading may include costs the following costs: 53.1. the cost of remuneration project administration work, including the national employers ' compulsory social insurance contributions, if the person involved in the administration of the project is registered as a business income tax payer;
53.2. communication costs (postage, telecommunications, internet services);
53.3. Office supplies and inventory costs (value of up to 50 Lats per unit), excluding the cost of purchase of furniture;
53.4. space rental costs, if it is necessary for the administration of the project to rent space outside of the legal beneficiaries addresses;
13. project management for information technology equipment (hardware, software, Office printer) rental costs. 54. This provision 52.1.1. referred to in the heading of costs includes the project application and supporting the preparation of the documentation attached to the person (on the company's contract) or the cost of the service, including State social security payments, if the Enterprise contract person involved is not registered as a commercial activity of the taxable income. The total of these costs can be up to five percent of that rule 52.2. the bottom paragraph of total costs, up to a maximum of 5000 lats. 55. This rule 52.2. mērķstipendij referred to the 300 Lats per month 6. these provisions grant the above major 10 months of the year. The total duration of the granting of the mērķstipendij one major for the masters degree in learning and abstraction do not exceed 20 months within a period of three years. 56. This provision 52.1.3. States in the odd position of costs gives one percent of that rule 52.2. the bottom point down payment amounts. 57. This rule 52.3. the cost referred to in heading does not exceed one percent of that rule 52.2. the costs referred to in paragraph 1, the bottom and can be used for this rule 52.2. States to cover the costs. 58. the non-recoverable value added tax payments are eligible. 59. Financing from the European Social Fund or the national budget funds not eligible costs: 59.1. not specified in this provision, paragraph 52 and 58;
59.2. these provisions do not match 54, 56 and 57. above the limit of costs;
59.3. haven't encountered the implementation of project activities (excluding this provision cost referred to in subparagraph 52.1.1.) or payments made later than one month after the expiry of the implementation of the project;
59.4. is not justified by the cost of supporting documents or do not meet the reasonable financial management, in particular value for money and cost effectiveness, or the laws incurred by non-compliance. VII. Project implementation conditions 60. Mērķstipendij can be assigned to the major who study full time studies funded by the national budget or charge study places in some of the provisions referred to in paragraph 6 of the priority axes. 61. Major at mērķstipendij and can not get a reward: 61.1. operational programme human resources and employment ' '' you added the activity '' 1.1.1.2. attracting human resources in science '' projects;
61.2. action programme ' entrepreneurship and innovation ' '' you added the activity '' 2.1.1.1. Support Science and research ' at the bottom of the activity '' 2.1.2.1.1. Competency Centers '' or the '' New apakšaktivitāt 2.1.2.2.1. product and technology development '' projects. 62. a major Mērķstipendij can be assigned only one Masters programmes of learning and one master's degree. 63. a major Mērķstipendij is granted by tender, in accordance with the requested funding to develop and approve regulations. 64.63. These provisions referred to in paragraph shall include at least the following provisions: 64.1. requirements for majors to be eligible for the mērķstipendij;
64.2. major application procedures;
64.3. tendering procedures;
64.4. mērķstipendij allocation of the agenda of the Commission;
64.5. decision on granting the mērķstipendij and challenging the equestrian order;
64.6. disclosure of the results of the tender procedure;
64.7. mērķstipendij granting of treaty between higher education institutions and the major closures;
64.8. mērķstipendij costs;
64.9. major responsibility. 65. The beneficiary establishes one or more mērķstipendij award Commission, which includes institutions of higher education administration, academic staff and student representatives of the administration. The Commission may include external experts in the industry. 66. not later than 40 working days after the results of the competition for the approval of the beneficiary with the major contracts in writing mērķstipendij. The contract shall contain at least the following provisions: 66.1. higher education institutions of the obligation to provide major support for the masters degree in learning and abstraction;

66.2. major obligation of the masters degree in learning and abstraction, provided that obligations are due three years after imatrikulācij;
66.3. extension of the conditions;
66.4. disputes and the resolution of disputes;
41.3. the procedure for the exchange of information. 67. the recipient of the Funding Agreement with the majors on the mērķstipendij Award for the year. 68. Mērķstipendij costs are attributable to the next calendar month after the approval of the results of the competition, but not earlier than after the decision of the authority responsible for the approval of the project application. Mērķstipendij starts to pay after this provision referred to in paragraph 66 of the conclusion of the contract. 69. If major stops the studios, the beneficiary, starting with the next month after the termination of the study, the cost of major mērķstipendij stops. 70. If the major higher education institutions within the established time limit successfully passed the necessary tests or have not acquired the academic semester credits for the number of stop mērķstipendij beneficiaries. 71. If the major studios has ceased or the beneficiary has ended the major costs of mērķstipendij, mērķstipendij awarded the tender for the next major, who obtained a higher mark. 72. the study break, if it does not exceed one academic year, major may qualify for mērķstipendij these rules referred to in paragraph 63 of the tender. 73. If a major mērķstipendij is received after you have ended the study, he released the funding recipient received unduly objective scholarship in full for this period. The beneficiary is entitled to withhold amounts unduly paid mērķstipendij payments from next, where they are made. 74. Funding recipient project implementation commenced not later than two months after an agreement or contract for the implementation of a project and implement the project a maximum 84 months up to august 31, 2015. The project site is the territory of the Republic of Latvia. 75. The beneficiary shall ensure the implementation of the project related loading snapshot on your website (if applicable) not less frequently than once every three months. 76. the draft amendments shall be consistent with the laws that determine the order in which the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds, except for those referred to in paragraph 77. 77. The draft amendments to coordinate with the responsible authority, if the changes are related to: 77.1. project objectives;
77.2. change of the beneficiary;
77.3. project start and end date;
77.4. project outcomes and results attainable indicators;
77.5. total cost of the project;
77.6. redistribution costs not provided for. 78. The beneficiary, without making amendments to the project, you can make the project cost redistribution this provision set out in paragraph 58 cost position, not to exceed 10 percent of the cost of the position of the transferable total cost. 79. The beneficiary shall provide the authority with a request for payment, accompanied by an explanation of the rules referred to in paragraph 78 of the transmission costs. If this explanation is not filed, the cooperation body cost reallocation may be considered unreasonable, not taking it into account in considering the reallocation of costs or not to have occurred. 80. The beneficiaries up to 31 December 2011 provides funding for learning no less than 60 percent of the total eligible cost of the project. 81. If the beneficiary fails to fulfil the request set out in the draft outcome indicators or indicators results by year or does not provide funding for learning this rule 80, paragraph and laid down deadlines, or do not comply with the agreement or the agreement on the implementation of the project obligations, the authority shall inform the competent authority. In this case, the responsible authority shall have the right to propose the project funding reduction or cessation. VIII. Closing questions 82.53. These provisions referred to in paragraph 1, the administrative cost incidence or imputability, as well as the amount of costs determined in accordance with the Cabinet decision on the administrative costs at constant rate. 83. the implementation of the projects that have been initiated before these rules laid down in paragraph 82, that the administrative costs of the rate constant, not variable administrative costs rate shall apply from the date of agreement or the agreement on the implementation of the project. 84. This provision of the conditions referred to in paragraph 83 of the implementation of the cooperation agreement shall be included in the document body or in the contract for the implementation of a project. Prime Minister i. Godmanis, Minister of education and science t. koķe Ministry education and science presented in annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers on October 21 2008. Regulation No. 881 of the education and Science Minister t. koķe annex 2 Cabinet October 21 2008. Regulation No. 881 of the education and Science Minister t. koķe