Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 523 in Riga, 9 June 2009 (pr. No 39 23) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers on 24 February 2009. Regulations No 200 "rules on the action programme" entrepreneurship and innovation "2.1.2.4. activity of Appendix" high added value "investment" issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds control law paragraph 10 of article 18 to make a Cabinet of 24 February 2009. Regulations No 200 "rules on the action programme" entrepreneurship and innovation "2.1.2.4. activity of Appendix" high added value "investment" (Latvian journal 2009, no. 41) the following amendments: 1. Express 4.2 subparagraph by the following: ' 4.2-2013 to attract private funding in the amount of business 45,115,331.21 lat development; ".
2. Make paragraph 8 by the following: ' 8. activities within the public funding available is 35,287,884.42 lats, including the European Regional Development Fund funding and the State budget $32,261,519.03 funding 3,026,365.39 lats. "
3. Make the following point 18.14.: "18.14. demolition of buildings and premises, renovation, restoration, construction areas provided for in home improvement (small architectural shapes and sculptures, lighting equipment, Visual information and home improvement installation according to the construction plan of the elements), greening, conditioning and reclamation costs;".
4. Supplement with 18.19.1 at the bottom of the following paragraph: "the cost of civil design 18.19.1;".
5. Make the following paragraph 23: "23. minimum total eligible cost amount per project is 3 000 000 lats. One project applicant group of persons the maximum amount of public funding is 3 000 000 lats. "
6. Express section 33.2.1. by the following: "credit inquiry: 33.2.1.33.2.1.1. granting the credit (if applicable) the project applicant or legal entity with which the applicant has entered into an intent to grant a loan or a comparable intent on participation (annex 2);
33.2.1.2. about the project applicant or such legal persons account balance (if applicable) with which the applicant has entered into the project intent to grant a loan or a comparable intent on participation (annex 3); ".
7. Add to subparagraph 33.2.1.1 of the rules with the following wording: "the 33.2.1.1 statement of the credit institution granting the credit (if applicable) and credit certificate of account balance (if applicable) shall be for an amount which shall not be less than the total cost of the project. If the applicant intends to obtain 66 of these regulations specified in advance, a statement submitted for the total cost of the project and the expense difference. The project at the date of the application, credit inquiries may not be earlier than 30 calendar days; ".
8. Express the point in that 33.2.4.: "33.2.4. annual accounts for the last three financial years closed, drawn up in accordance with the annual accounts Act. As determined by the law, the annual report must also submit a sworn auditor's report (copy) ".
9. Express 33.2.7, 33.2.8 and 33.2.9. below. following paragraph: "33.2.7. būvvald issued planning and architectural task (copy), if it is not developed and is presented by the būvvald construction of the technical design of the accepted stage (if the project application as eligible costs are included in the construction of buildings and premises and the reconstruction costs and will not be submitted to the 33.2.9 these rules. the documents referred to in paragraph 1 below);
33.2.8. būvvald construction of harmonious design stage of the project (copy) If a construction technical stage of the project is not accepted by the būvvald before the application of the project and if it is developed in accordance with the laws and regulations in the field of construction (where the application as eligible costs are included in the construction of buildings and premises and the reconstruction costs and will not be submitted to the 33.2.9 these rules. documents referred to);
33.2.9. būvvald's technical projects accepted draft (copy) If a construction technical stage of the project has been accepted prior to the application of the project (if the project application as eligible costs are included in the construction of buildings and premises and the reconstruction costs and will not be submitted to the 33.2.7 these rules and documents referred to in subparagraph 33.2.8.); ".
10. Express 33.2.18. subparagraph as follows: "33.2.18. sworn auditor's opinion on the draft of the applicant groups of persons for investments in research and development project in the sector of at least 2% of the last three financial years concluded net turnover (in the opinion of the need to control the applicant's project of a group of persons, companies and each company's research and development costs for the last three financial years closed) (if applicable);".
11. Supplement with 33.2.19. section as follows: "33.2.19. intent to grant a loan or a comparable intent on participation (copy), concluded between the applicant and the project legal person in accordance with this provision, the bottom point 33.2.1. (if applicable)."
12. Express the following subparagraphs 43.1.: "the Commission shall consist of 43.1. State agencies" the investment and development agency of Latvia "and the Ministry of economy's representatives;".
13. Express 48 as follows: "48. cooperation authority Manager, based on the assessment by the Commission, shall take a decision on the application for approval of a project if the project submission complies with the provisions of annex 5, paragraph 28 of this criterion. If the application does not meet this criterion, the head of the liaison body shall take a decision on the rejection of the application for the project. The decisions referred to in this paragraph, the liaison bodies shall be adopted by the driver within a month of submission of the draft selection round to an end. "
14. Make 51 the following: "51. Cooperation authority contained in the conditions shall not be longer than three weeks from the date when the decision on the project signed approval of the application with the condition."
15. To make 55 as follows: "55. Information on this provision in paragraph 50 that decision the conditions contained in the project applicant shall provide cooperation in evaluation. The liaison body within two weeks of receipt of the information evaluated by the project applicant information and to prepare an opinion on the compliance with the conditions laid down in that decision. "
16. Make 57 as follows: ' 57. maximum duration of the project is three years from the date on which the Office received the collaboration application for project implementation, if the principal applicant of the project supported activities undertaken by project to the application. If the applicant intends to initiate the actions to be supported after the conclusion of the contract for the project implementation, the maximum duration of the project is three years from the date of conclusion of the contract. "
17. Make the following section 60.2.: "project application submitted to 60.2. cooperation authority, before the beneficiary has just launched a project supported activities. If the project requires equipment, patents and licences, believes that the project assisted actions initiated when you sign a contract for the equipment, the acquisition of patents and licences, but doing the construction of buildings and premises, and reconstruction, with the opening of the activities supported the project refers to the construction started. If the beneficiary of the project supported activities carried out before the submission of the project submitted to the institution of cooperation, funding is not granted; ".
18. To supplement the provisions of the following paragraph in the bottom 60.6.: "60.6. checks out the project of cooperation in place of the authority is entitled to make, in accordance with the regulations on the structural funds of the European Union, when the application is submitted to the project of cooperation."
19. Make the following section 61.5.: "61.5. If 12 months from the date of conclusion of the contract for the project implementation, cooperation Office not submitted interim payment request at least 35% of the contracts for the implementation of a project in the specified total amount of public funding."
20. Supplement with 61.6. and 38.3. subparagraph by the following: "if 18 months 61.6. from the date of conclusion of the contract for the project implementation, cooperation Office not submitted interim payment request at least 50% of the contract for the implementation of a project in the specified total amount of public funding;
38.3. If within a period of 24 months from the date of conclusion of the contract for the project implementation, cooperation Office not submitted interim payment request at least 75% of the contract for the implementation of a project in the specified total amount of public funding. "
21. Make 66 as follows:

"66. During project implementation the beneficiaries can receive advance payment, not exceeding 35% of the amount of public funding. For receiving the advance payment and the payment of the advance payment received means open account beneficiary country. To receive advance payment, the beneficiary shall submit to the institution of cooperation bank guarantee for the amount of the advance and of the construction of the būvvald accept the technical design stage, where the eligible costs are included in the construction of buildings and premises, and reconstruction costs. Bank guarantee period is not less than 14 months from the date of conclusion of the contract for the project implementation. The beneficiary within 12 months from the date of conclusion of the contract shall be submitted to the authority of the cooperation request or requests for payment of the amount of the advance issued. "
22. Make 3 of annex 1 of the following: 23. Express new version of annex 5 (annex).
The Prime Minister, the children, family and integration Affairs v. Economic Minister Dombrovskis a. camphor Editorial Note: rules shall enter into force on the 20 June 2009.
 
The Ministry of Economic Affairs submitted the attachment Cabinet 9 June 2009. Regulations No 523 "annex 5 cabinet 24 February 2009. Regulations No 200 Project submission evaluation criteria for the operational programme name and number and the innovation priorities of the business name and number 2.1.
 Science and innovation event name and number 2.1.2.
 Innovation activities/apakšaktivitāt's name and number 2.1.2.4.
 High-value-added investment project selection the way open design competition authority Ministry of Economics 1. Criteria of quality evaluation system of notes points Min., 10 1.
A sector in which the project will be implemented according to the Organization for economic cooperation and development (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development – OECD) and Eurostat (Eurostat) of the administration of classification, is considered highly technological or project will be implemented in the design industry, or industry Criteria gives extra points 1.1.
The project will be implemented in one of these sectors (by NACE (UR1.1.red.)): production of 24 chemicals, chemical products and fibres;
29 machinery and equipment manufacture of machinery work;
30 office machinery and computer production;
31 electrical machinery and apparatus manufacturing;
32 radio, television and communication equipment and apparatus manufacture;
33 medical, precision and optical instruments, watches production;
34 cars, trailers and semi-trailers 35 manufacture of other transport equipment (except 21.8 ship and boatbuilding and repair) 20. Wood, wood and cork products, except furniture; straw and wicker manufacture of the products.
64.2 telecommunications services;
72 Computer and related activities;
73 research and development.
74.10 specialty design work, with the exception of indoor decorators activity (NACE Rev. 2). No 71.12 Engineering Design (NACE Rev. 2).
15 1.2.
The project will be implemented in other sectors, but the project applicant related group invests in research and development project in the sector of at least 2% of the turnover. This criteria is estimated averages for the last three financial years closed 10 1.3.
The project will be implemented in the sector, and other project related persons of the applicant group invests in research and development project in the sector of less than 2% of the turnover. This criteria is estimated averages for the last three financial years closed 0 2.
Project cost effectiveness. This criterion is assessed in the added value of the planned LVL per employee per year. Calculations use the data about the Department or for the modernization project has been submitted. Added value calculated using the following formula: (Department planned gross profit + unit employees scheduled gross salary)/planned unit staff will be used in the calculation of the indicators planned for the first full year after completion of the project if the rating is less than 10 points, the application is rejected for the project 2.1.
Added value computed LVL per employee per year, is at least LVL 34 000 25 2.2.
Added value computed LVL per employee per year, is a LVL 28 000-33 999 20 2.3.
Added value computed LVL per employee per year is LVL 22 000 – 999 15 27 2.4.
Added value computed LVL per employee per year is LVL 15 000-999 10 21 2.5.
Added value computed LVL per employee per year is LVL 8 000 – 999 5 2.6 14.
Added value computed LVL per employee per year, is less than LVL 8 000 0 3.
The export potential of the sector in which the project will be implemented, according to the Latvian Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia and the bank. Industries are classified according to the NACE Rev. 2 classification. This criterion is assessed in the data for the last full year. If the applicant's related party group export figures are higher than the industry's export performance, the criteria are evaluated in the project group of persons the applicant's export figures. If the applicant's related group of people take only economic activities in Latvia, the criteria taken into account in the assessment of the applicant's project data related in the annual report of the Group of persons. If the applicant is a group of persons performing economic activities also outside Latvia, Latvia is taken into account only the economic activity carried out in criterion gives additional points 3.1.
Industry or a related person of the applicant in the project group export more than 75% of the 20 produced 3.2.
Industry or a related person of the applicant in the project group exports 70%-75% produced 17 3.3.
Industry or a related person of the applicant in the project group, 65%-69% exports produced 13 3.4.
Industry or a related person of the applicant in the project group exported 60%-64% produced 10 3.5.
Industry or a related person of the applicant in the project group export 55%-59% 7 produced 3.6.
Industry or a related person of the applicant in the project group exports 50%-54% or of the applicant, the project produced exports the last closed financial year has produced at least LVL 1 000 000 3 3.7.
Industry or a related person of the applicant in the project group exported less than 50% of production 0 1.1. Quality criteria for horizontal priorities ranking system points 4.
Horizontal priority "for the balanced development of the territory" criteria gives extra points 4.1.
The project site is located in an assisted area in particular. On the place of implementation of the project shall be deemed to be the place where the project applicant produce their products or provide services to 10 4.2.
The project site is located outside the special assisted areas and outside Riga, Jūrmala and Riga District (Ādaži municipality, Babīte municipality, baldone, carnikava municipality district, Garkalne inčukalns municipality, municipality, municipality, Ķekava municipality, mālpils Mārupe Olaine municipality, the municipality of Ropaži, Salaspils district, saulkrasti municipality, municipality, municipality of Sigulda, stopiņi municipality and Krimulda municipality Krimulda territorial unit). On the place of implementation of the project shall be deemed to be the place where the project applicant produces its products or services 8 4.3.
The project site is located in Seaside, or Riga District (Ādaži municipality, Babīte municipality, baldone municipality, carnikava municipality, district, Garkalne inčukalns municipality, Ķekava municipality, a municipality in mālpils Mārupe Olaine municipality, in Ropaži district, Salaspils district, saulkrasti municipality, municipality, municipality of Sigulda, stopiņi municipality and Krimulda municipality Krimulda territorial unit). On the place of implementation of the project shall be deemed to be the place where the project applicant produces its products or services 4 4.4.
The project site is located On the project in Riga. location shall be deemed to be the place where the project applicant produces its products or services 0 5.
Horizontal priority "macroeconomic stability" private co-financing Criteria gives extra points 5.1.
The requested funding intensity has been reduced by 25 and several percentage points 15 5.2.
The requested funding intensity is reduced by 20-24 12 5.3 percentage points.
The requested funding intensity is reduced to 15-19 9 5.4 percentage points.
The requested funding intensity has been reduced by 10-15 percentage points 6 5.5.
The requested funding intensity is reduced by 5 to 9 percentage points 5.6 3.
The requested funding intensity is reduced by less than 5 percentage points 0 6.
Horizontal priority "equal opportunity" criteria gives extra points 6.1.
The project applicant will implement specific activities that promote gender equality, active ageing and the rights of persons with disabilities and respect for the fundamental principles has validated employee social portrait, t.sk. data broken down by gender, age and disability 5 6.2.

The project applicant will implement specific activities that promote gender equality, active ageing and persons with disabilities in compliance with the fundamental principles of law, but is not understood by the employee social portrait, t.sk. data broken down by gender, age and disability 4 6.3.
Project applicant has validated employee social portrait, t.sk. data broken down by gender, age and disability, but does not implement specific activities that promote gender equality, active ageing and persons with disabilities in compliance with the fundamental principles of law 3 6.4.
The project applicant will implement specific activities that promote gender equality, active ageing and persons with disabilities in compliance with the fundamental principles of law and there is no known portrait of employee social, t.sk. data broken down by gender, age and disability 0 7.
Horizontal priority "sustainable development" criterion gives extra points to 7.1.
The project is created, more energy-efficient technology, substantially reduce environmental impact, the project is implemented in the environment or in the area of eco-innovation technology 5 7.2.
The project is not created more energy-efficient technology, substantially reduce environmental impact, the project is not implemented or environmental technologies in the field of eco-innovation 0 8.
Horizontal priority "information sabiedīb" criterion gives additional points 8.1.
The project will build the IT solution or IT Service 5 8.2.
The project will not be built or IT Services IT solutions 0 2. eligibility criteria 2.1. project eligibility criteria ranking system Yes/No 9.
The cost of the project cost justification of validity and efficiency (must meet all conditions): 1) planned expenditure provides measurable results that occur physically: or is assessed to determine the solution to the problem of the positive impact of the project and the applicant's economic activity or the aim of the project is clearly defined and the selected solution;
2) eligible costs is necessary for the implementation of the project: evaluate whether the eligible costs of the project are required to achieve the objective pursued;
3) the eligible costs related to the implementation of the project: or is estimated eligible costs match the planned project activities;
4) expenditure planned is economically justified N 10.
The eligible cost of the project and the amount corresponds to the activity specific P 11.
The project will meet the timetable activity deadlines P 12.
Implementation of the project, the planned number of new jobs created is at least 1 work place to LVL 120 000 the amount of the financial contribution requested P 13.
The project is implemented in the aided sector.
Funding is allocated in the following sectors: 1) wholesale and retail trade;
2) financial intermediation;
3) business services (operations with real estate; vehicles, machinery and equipment, personal effects, household hardware and equipment leasing);
4) gambling and betting;
5) beer and alcoholic beverages;
6) tobacco products;
7) fisheries and aquaculture;
8) shipbuilding;
9) the coal industry;
10) the steel industry;
11) synthetic fibres;
12) in annex I to the Treaty establishing the European Community (the list referred to in paragraph 32 of the Treaty) of the agricultural products listed primary production. Funding is granted for agricultural product processing and marketing (with the exception of the Treaty establishing the European Community listed in annex I to the primary production of agricultural products and processed agricultural products, leading to the Treaty establishing the European Community listed in annex I agricultural products), products with the combined nomenclature (CN) codes 4502, 4503 and 4504 (Cork products), as well as the manufacture and marketing of products which imitate or substitute for milk and milk products as specified in the Council on 22 October 2007, Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (single CMO Regulation). The transport sector does not cover transport equipment (movable assets) for purchasing N 14.
If the applicant is a great trader, it provides the guarantee that the funding received will not be used to move production or infrastructure to provide services from another Member State of the European Union. The big operators are operators that meet the Commission's august 6, 2008, Regulation (EC) No 800/2008, which recognize certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of articles 87 and 88. (General block exemption regulation), paragraph 8 of article 2 the definition laid down in P 2.2. Project eligibility criteria applicant ranking system Yes/No 15.
The project applicant is a registered merchant in Latvia, it has not been declared bankrupt, is not in the process of reorganisation or liquidation or its operation has not been terminated or suspended N 16.
The project applicant is not in the State revenue service administered by the tax debt P 3. Administrative criteria ranking system Yes/No 17.
The project application has been drawn up according to the project submission form, you add all of the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activity of these documents, and they are designed according to the laws of the Republic of Latvia to the requirements document in the field of developing and designing P 18.
The project's original application, the attached documents and documents that have derivatives prepared, subject to the laws and regulations in the development and presentation of a document is the document legal force P 19.
Project application form is fully completed, P 20.
Where the application is filed on paper, the project submission is original with numbered pages P 21.
The project is not specified in the application for correction, deletion, addition, deletion, and aizkrāsojum P 22.
Project application used currency is the lats-LVL 23 P.
Project submission filed a submission deadline for the submission of projects N 24.
The cost of the project (the total eligible costs of the project, not the total project eligible costs and total cost of the project) project cost estimates are calculated arithmetic properly following the activity of the eligible costs laid down limits P 25.
The requested funding is calculated correctly and meets the specific activity approximately P 26.
The project application is filled in the Latvian language and text 27 P.
Where the application is filed on paper, the project application is submitted in two copies (one original and one copy) P 4. Funding criteria ranking system Yes/No 28.
If the application complies with article 23 Administrative and 9, 13 and 15, as well as eligibility criteria 2. quality criteria is received at least 10 points, then after the project submission ranking in priority order, starting with the most points earned, submission of the draft selection is enough activity within the available funding, the N observations.
1. N-negative rating (project submission rejected).
2. P-if the evaluation is negative, can make a decision on project approval with conditions (project shall ensure compliance with the criteria laid down at the time of the decision). "
Economic Minister a. camphor