The Provisions On "operational Programme Infrastructure And Services" 3.4.1.5.2. Apakšaktivitāt "appendix Waterworks Structures Reconstruction Of Flood Risks And Threat Reduction"

Original Language Title: Noteikumi par darbības programmas "Infrastruktūra un pakalpojumi" papildinājuma 3.4.1.5.2.apakšaktivitāti "Hidrotehnisko būvju rekonstrukcija plūdu draudu risku novēršanai un samazināšanai"

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$20 per month, or Get a Day Pass for only USD$4.99.
Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No 773 Riga, 14 July 2009 (pr. No 48 31) the provisions for the operational programme ' infrastructure and services ' 3.4.1.5.2. apakšaktivitāt ' Appendix Waterworks structures reconstruction of flood risks and threat reduction "Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines the order in which the activities of the programme ' infrastructure and services ' Appendix 3.4. Qualitative environmental priorities" life and economic activity "contributes" UR3.4.1.pas environment "3.4.1.5. activity" risk reduction "at the bottom" 3.4.1.5.2. activity Waterworks structures reconstruction of flood risk prevention and risk reduction "(hereinafter referred to as activity), project assessment criteria application, project requirements, the applicant authority and liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements, as well as the responsible authorities and cooperation agencies functional form of subordination.
2. The purpose of the activity is to reduce the risk of flooding in areas that meet the flood risk assessment and management of the national program of the first flood risk or emergency scenario 1 c criterion.
3. activities implemented in the framework of projects co-financed by the European regional development fund. Activity within the available public funds are 4134140 dollars, including the European regional development fund co-financing-3514020 lat and the State budget and local government funding – 620120.
4. activities in the implementation of the responsible authority is the Ministry of the environment (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authority). The responsible authority has the following functions: 4.1 provide the European Regional Development Fund (hereinafter the project), in assessing the application, project submissions by the European Regional Development Fund for funding;
4.2. to provide information on the project applicant project application preparation;
4.3. during the two months following the entry into force of these regulations to publish the Ministry of environment Web site shopping guideline and procurement documents;
4.4. to participate in the development of the arrangement for the implementation of a project (hereinafter referred to as the agreement);
4.5. information activities for planning activities and public information, Ministry of the environment Web site, including activities within the projects approved;
4.6. to ensure that these regulations are not exceeded in certain activities available for the implementation of the European regional development fund co-financing and monitoring available in the European regional development fund co-financing, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the performance of the activities and project level by controlling the project financial plan.
5. the cooperation body is the Central Finance and contracting agency. The cooperation body is the functional authority. The cooperation body has the following functions: 5.1 develop and enter into an agreement with the European regional development fund co-financing beneficiary (beneficiaries);
5.2. to examine the funding requested procurement plan and submit it to the procurement monitoring Bureau;
5.3. European regional development fund and the State budget of co-financing funding planning and use of funds in accordance with the terms of the agreement concluded with the beneficiary;
5.4. to consider and approve the financing requested progress reports submitted and verified payment requests, approve the payment requests included attributable expenditure amounts, prepare payment orders and submit them to the paying authority;
5.5. to prepare the statement of expenditure and to present its leading body;
5.6. to prepare the European regional development fund and the payment forecasts to submit its payment authority and the managing body;
5.7. to provide information on the authority responsible for the implementation of the activities available in the European regional development fund co-financing;
5.8. ensure accumulation of information about projects and its transfer to the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system;
5.9. to plan and implement information and publicity measures on the project level, including to provide funding to the recipient of the opinion on the agreement conditions and project locations to monitor the provision of publicity measures, laid down in the Commission of 8 December 2006, Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund , The European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, and the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund;
5.10. the conclusion of the agreement to publish on its website information on the projects;
5.11. to provide the supervision and control of the activity, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the implementation of the project, as well as to assess the risks and prepare a draft annual plan of inspections in the project locations in cooperation with the responsible authority to carry out inspections project locations;
5.12. to consider amendments to the agreement, to take a decision on the approval or rejection of amendments and match them with the responsible authority, if the amendment includes changes: project monitoring indicators 5.12.1.;
5.12.2. the project activities, providing for the inclusion of new activities or the activities of the project changes in financial terms exceeded 20 percent of the total cost of the project;
5.12.3. the project will cost more than 20 percent of the total cost of the project.
6. Activity implemented an open project selection application form.
II. Project activities eligible, eligible and non-eligible costs of the activity within the 7 support structures of existing waterworks reconstruction of flood-threatened areas.

8. eligible costs directly linked to project activities. Subject to the conditions contained in the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1783/1999, the following costs apply : 8.1. project preparation costs-project feasibility, its escalation and the environmental impact assessment documentation related to development costs, as well as the technical project, development of construction and related costs of būvekspertīz, but no more than six percent of the total estimated eligible project costs;
8.2. autoruzraudzīb and building costs, but not more than four percent of the eligible costs of the works;
8.3. the cost of the works;
8.4. the contract of supply costs, including costs of technological equipment, Assembly and adjustment.
9. the total budget of the project comprises also financial contingency reserve, which can be up to five percent of the project's total eligible costs. The financial reserve of the project uses this rule 8, paragraph direct eligible costs incurred prior to the use of financial reserves by appropriate amendments to the arrangement.
10. costs may not be considered eligible, if the project at the date of application of the shipbuilding is accepted and the goods have been signed and acceptance.
11. Non-eligible costs are as follows: 11.1. project preparation costs-project feasibility, its escalation and the environmental impact assessment documentation related to development costs, technical design, development of construction and related costs of būvekspertīz, exceeding six percent of the total estimated eligible project costs;
11.2. autoruzraudzīb and building costs, which exceed four percent of the eligible costs of the works.
12. non-eligible costs of the project can not be greater than 10 percent of the project's total eligible costs. State budget institution not eligible costs of the project does not plan from the State budget.
13. the project submission does not include the following costs: 13.1 administrative or project management objectives of durable equipment used (hardware and vehicles);
13.2. fees for accounting and audit services;
13.3. the fee for the legal, technical and financial advice provided on the project during its implementation;
13.4. project management the remuneration of the staff and administrative expenditure of the project, the beneficiary's current maintenance costs, as well as publicity costs if they exceed the minimum requirements set by the laws and regulations of the European Union fund co-financed project publicity and visual identity requirements;
13.5. working capital and loan funds the cost of the acquisition, paid for the review of the design of the loan, reservation and service charges for financial transactions, interest on arrears, penalties and expenses of litigation;
8.5. real estate purchase costs;
8.5. the implementation of the project particularly the purchase or production of durable equipment (equipment, which are used in the construction process) cost of acquisition;
13.8. the purchase of second-hand equipment;
13.9. expenses, which does not provide the immediate purchase of equipment, such as leasing.
III. Requirements to the project the applicant 14. applicant of the project can be local authorities and governmental institutions in accordance with the laws and regulations in the field of civil protection provides a flood measures.
15. the project for the implementation of the project, the applicant does not constitute a partnership.
IV. Project application selection 16. Project application selection issued two selection rounds according to the respective selection round available for the European regional development fund co-financing funds: 16.1. the first application round project for the European regional development fund co-financing are 1 757 010 lats;
16.2. the second project application selection round for the European regional development fund co-financing are 1 757 010 lats;
16.3. If the first application round of projects available for the European regional development fund co-financing is not granted or used, it directs the second project application selection round of financing.
17. the responsible authority for the project submission application (hereinafter referred to as the notice) issued: 17.1. first project application selection round – not later than two months after the entry into force of these regulations;
17.2. the second project application selection round-up for March 1, 2011.
18. The notification shall specify the project application selection round of the funding available, the start date and end date. The responsible authority shall issue notice: 18.1. newspaper "Gazette";
18.2. The Ministry of environment Web site.
19. This provision is projects referred to in paragraph 14 the applicant project application (annex 1) submitted to the responsible body within three months of the submission of open project selection round of the tender. The competent authority may extend the application of the project for a period of time up to two months, posting an announcement on the project submission deadline extension for your Web site and newspaper "journal": 19.1. If the European Union fund Monitoring Committee decided on changes to the project evaluation criteria applications;
19.2. If upon notification of project applications submitted to these regulations is amended.
V. submission of the project application to the maximum 20 European regional development fund, the aid intensity shall not exceed 85 percent of the total eligible costs.
21. the minimum eligible costs activity within one project is 70 280 dollars, the maximum eligible costs per project-1 405 608 lats.
22. project number one project application to the applicant, for the European regional development fund co-financing and activities, both the project application selection round framework, it is not limited.
23. the project applicant project application is dealt with in accordance with the provisions of annex 2 of the 34, 35, 36 and 37, 38, 39 or 40, 41, 42, 43.

24. the project applicant project application form in the annex to these provisions is added to annex 2 in paragraph 45 above.
Vi. Project application evaluation and decision-making 25. the responsible authority shall create an open project application selection by the European regional development fund project submission Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission assessment) and approved its Statute. The Evaluation Commission is made up of responsible authorities, Ministry of the environment, municipal Union of Latvia, as well as representatives of associations and foundations whose operational objective related to environmental issues. Evaluation of the managing authority and the Commission, the cooperation body is the observer.
26. the responsible authority: 26.1. in the month following the entry into force of these regulations are developed and approved a project application selection project application assessment methodology and application form filling project methodology;
26.2. in the month following the entry into force of these provisions place the Environment Ministry's website revealed the project application selection project application form (annex 1), project submission evaluation form (annex 2), the project application and assessment methodology for the implementation of the project the necessary methodological material (procurement guidelines and procurement documents);
26.3. the projects proposed recorded submissions, grants them an identification number and within two weeks after receipt of the project application to the applicant, be sent electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature) or by post, proof of receipt of the application for the project. If the application is submitted in person, the responsible authority shall on receipt of the application for the project (including the registration number) immediately after receipt of the application.
27. project submissions valued under the administrative, compliance and quality criteria (annex 2).
28. the project on application of administrative compliance and eligibility criteria is assessed by "Yes" or "no" ("Yes", "no" – meets does not meet). If the administrative application or eligibility criteria is not applicable to a specific project, applicant project application in respect of this criterion.
29. the project submission's compliance with the quality criteria assessed by giving a certain number of points: application of the project assessment 29.1. According to annex 2 of these rules 1, 2, 3, and 5. the above criteria should receive at least one point, according to paragraph 4 and 6 this criterion, at least two points.
29.2. the application of the project's compliance with this provision 2.7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the draft criteria referred to in the application may receive additional points.
30. evaluation the Commission shall assess the project submissions in the following order: 30.1. first project submissions valued in conformity with this provision of the Annex 33.2, 35 and 36 referred to administrative criteria. If the assessment is in one of the following criteria is "no", the application is rejected and the project evaluation do not continue;
30.2. If the application of these rules 30.1. in the criteria referred to in (a) evaluates to "Yes", the application is assessed according to annex 2 of these rules 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 37, 40, 41, 42, 43 and 44. criteria referred to in paragraph 1. If the assessment is in one of the following criteria is "no", the application is rejected and the project evaluation do not continue;
30.3. If the application of these rules 30.2. in the criteria referred to in (a) evaluates to "Yes", the application of these provisions adequately valued in annex 2 of the 15, 16, 18, 26, 27, 28, 38, 39 and 45. criteria referred to in paragraph 1 and quality criteria in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 29. If the application does not meet the quality evaluation criteria according to that rule 29.1. subparagraph, the application shall be rejected and the project evaluation do not continue.
31. If two or more project applications have received the same amount of points, they ranked the project application priority list in the following order: 31.1. application of the project that received the highest rating this provision of the annex 2 criteria referred to in paragraph 1;
31.2. the submission of the project that received the highest rating this provision of the annex 2 criteria referred to in paragraph 2;
31.3. the application of the project that received the highest rating this provision 2. criteria referred to in paragraph 8;
19.5. the submission of the project that received the highest rating this provision 2. criteria referred to in paragraph 6;
31.5. the application of the project that received the highest rating this provision 2. criteria referred to in paragraph 9.
32. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the application for approval of a project if: 32.1 it meets these provisions. 2. listed in the annex to the administrative, compliance and quality criteria;
32.2. the estimated project listing submissions priority order (starting with the most points got a submission of the project), the project application selection round is available on the financing for the project.
33. the decision on the application of the project approval may include conditions that the project applicant must meet the deadline set in the decision, so that it could conclude an agreement: 33.1. to clarify the details of the project the applicant (contact information and properties) (annex 1);
33.2. to clarify the documents submitted pursuant to annex 2 of these provisions in paragraph 45 of this criterion;
33.3. specify all the documents presented under this provision 2.38 and 39 of the annex, the criteria referred to in paragraph;
20.8. to clarify changes in the total amount of eligible costs and eligible costs under this provision in paragraph 10 and 11;
20.8. to clarify the changes in total amount of eligible costs and eligible costs under this provision in paragraph 13 and 14;
20.9. to clarify the project time schedule according to the planned project activity (annex 18);
20.9. to clarify the cash flow forecast (2.26;)
to specify the project's application 21.0. the planned implementation of the project and projected human resource support (2.27;)
21.1. to clarify information on publicity measures (annex 2, paragraph 28).
34. paragraph 33 of these rules in the conditions laid down in the draft decision, the applicant shall make the responsible authorities within the time limits of no more than two months after receipt of the relevant decision. Decision deadlines cannot be extended.

35. The Evaluation Commission 20 working days after the decision on approval of the application, the project on condition the expiry of valued, as done in the said decision, and to the responsible authority shall draw up an opinion on the conditions contained in the decision.
36. If the applicant in the decision of approval of the application, the project provided the conditions laid down are not met or are not met within the time limit laid down in that decision, the responsible authority opinion is negative and the project application is considered to have been rejected.
37. the decision on the application of the project approval, approval with conditions or disapproval of a responsible authority within five working days after the decision has been forwarded to the project the applicant by post or in electronic form of a document (signed with a secure electronic signature).
VII. the implementation of the project 38. Beneficiary: 38.1. ensure all project for the procurement procedure. The first procurement procedure shall, within three months of the conclusion of the agreement;
38.2. all project activities implemented within three years after the conclusion of the agreement;
23.8. at least once every three months to ensure current information into your Web site (if any) for the project implementation process;
23.9. ensure the preparation and submission of the report of the authority in accordance with the cooperation agreement.
39. If the beneficiary is not the national budget authority, after the conclusion of the cooperation agreement of the authority including the beneficiary's account in advance payment of 20% from the European regional development fund co-financing and Government funding.
40. the amendments to the arrangement shall not be made if not actual 24.9.: eligible costs in relation to the project originally specified not eligible costs varies by less than 20 percent;
40.2. If the physical indicators of the project changes during the implementation of the project shall not exceed five percent of the approved amount of the projects monetised;
40.3. If changes in the project's procurement plan does not change the total amount of the purchase.
41. If the beneficiary does not comply with the regulations governing the procurement requirements, the costs arising from the conclusion of contracts, are considered non-eligible costs of the project.
VIII. monitoring activities after project implementation 42. The beneficiary is responsible for the implementation and results of the project is maintained for at least five years following the last payment on the project.
43. The beneficiary of five years following the last payment once a year in accordance with the provisions of annex 3 provides information on the responsible authority: 43.1. the results achieved under the project in compliance with project objectives defined in the application;
43.2. the framework of the project the project achieved the outcome and result indicators;
43.3. the asset owner's legal status;
43.4. public information activities about the project results and benefits to society.
44. The beneficiary of these rules referred to in annex 3 form for the first time submitted to the responsible body within one year of the last receipt of payment for the project, and every year in accordance with the agreement.
45. the competent authority for at least five years following the last payment for the project (if the agreement specifies a longer period) to ensure information accumulation and analysis of the achievement of the objectives of the activity.
Prime Minister Dombrovskis v. Minister of environment r. vējonis Editorial Note: the entry into force of the provisions by 24 July 2009.
Annex 1 and 3 ZIP 367kb Ministry of environment filed version of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 14 July 2009. Regulations No 773 Environment Minister r. vējonis, Ministry of the environment submitted to the annex 2 Cabinet 14 July 2009. Regulations No 773 of the European regional development fund project for the evaluation of the application form.
Assessment criteria 1. Quality criteria for rating points 1.
Project readiness stage: obtain at least 1 point 1.1.
the applicant has not prepared a draft technical specifications of the tender for the procurement of the works in accordance with the governing law of purchase and is not designed, developed and provided for by the legislation of the order accepted the technical project on at least one project for the planned procurement of construction works 0 1.2.
prepare the technical specification of the tender for the procurement of the works in accordance with the governing law of purchase 1 1.3.
developed and provided for by the legislation of the order accepted the technical project on at least one project for the planned procurement of 2 1.4 works.
developed and provided for by the legislation of the order accepted technical project all planned construction project procurement 3 2.
The planned duration of the project: to obtain at least 1 paragraph 2.1.
is greater than 4 years 0 2.2.
is 3 to 4 years 1 2.3.
It is from 2 to 3 years (not including) 1.5 2.
is less than 2 years 3 3.
The effectiveness of the implementation of the project: to obtain at least 1 paragraph 3.1.
autoruzraudzīb and Superintendence of the eligible cost amount greater than 3.5 percent of project submission planned total eligible costs 0 3.2.
autoruzraudzīb and Superintendence of the eligible cost amount is between 3 and 3.5 percent of project submission planned total eligible costs 1 3.3.
autoruzraudzīb and Superintendence of the eligible cost amount is from 2.5 to 3 percent (not including) from the project submission planned total eligible costs 2 3.4.
autoruzraudzīb and Superintendence of the eligible cost amount is less than 2.5 per cent of the project planned in the application the total eligible costs 3 4.
The risk assessment of the implementation of the project, including the estimated potential cost increase: to be at least 2 paragraphs 4.1.
the project is not carried out in the application of risk assessment 0 4.2.
project risk assessment in the application was made, the plan of measures to prevent the risk identified is not developed or not developed completely 1 4.3.
the project is carried out in the application of qualitative risk assessment, the risk identified in the plan of measures for the elimination or reduction of incompletely developed 2 4.4.
the project is carried out in the application of qualitative risk assessment, develop a reasoned plan of measures identified for the elimination or reduction of risks 3 5.
Project submission is analyzed for possible alternatives (financial, technological, technical solution):


must obtain at least 1 paragraph 5.1.
alternative analysis has not been carried out 0 5.2.
analysis of alternatives performed for only one of the parameters 1 5.3.
an alternative analysis is carried out based on numeric calculations and justify the proposed alternatives 2 5.4.
an alternative analysis is carried out based on numeric calculations and justify the proposed alternatives, and the chosen alternative is with the objektīvākaj costs 3 6.
Sustainable infrastructure compensated use assessment: to be at least 2 paragraphs 6.1.
no assessment of the infrastructure compensated lifetime 0 6.2.
the infrastructure Ministry compensated time is less than 5 years 1 3.9.
infrastructure compensated life of 5 to 10 years 2 6.4.
compensated infrastructures life greater than 10 years 3 7.
The cost of return indicators (infrastructure planned lifetime (years) relative to the project's original cost): note. The average project application selection round costs of return indicators calculation for project submissions that meet the administrative and eligibility criteria – cost of return indicators in relation to the amount of selection round of project submissions.

criterion gives bonus points 7.1.
less than the project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference is more than 10 percent 1 7.2.
equal to the average of the project application selection round of cost indicators of return, or about 10 percent, or more than 10 percent less than the 2 7.3.
greater than the average project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference is more than 10 percent in 3 8.
The project will eliminate the threat of flooding for residents: the criterion gives bonus points 8.1.
up to 500 inhabitants (not including) 1 8.2.
population from 500 to 2000 (not including) 2 8.3.
population from 2000 to 5000 (not including) 4 8.4.
the population of 5000 to 10000 (not including) 8.5 6.
population from 10000 to 50000 8 8.6.
population greater than 50 000 10 9.
The project will prevent flood threat of cultural and economic objects: 9.1.
operating the pollutant agents and contaminated sites: note. According to the law "on pollution" defined categories of pollutant activities (project submissions will receive an assessment of 9.1.1 9.1.2. criteria or assessment is cumulative with 9.1.3. or 9.14. and 9.1.5. criteria of assessment) criteria gives bonus points 9.1.1.
1 pollutant activities in category B operator 2 9.1.2.
2 and more polluting activities of category B operator 3 9.1.3.
1 category A polluting operations analyst 4 9.1.4.
2 and more polluting activities of category A agents 6 9.1.5.
contaminated sites established in the contaminated and potentially contaminated sites database 3 9.2.
infrastructure objects: points, total criterion gives bonus points 9.2.1.
Bridge 2 9.2.2.
highways, urban highways 2 9.2.3.
Railway 2 9.2.4.
power supply system 2 9.3.
heritage objects: a note. According to the Republic of Latvia laws and cultural monuments protection criterion gives bonus points 9.3.1.
local 1 9.3.2.
2 regional meanings 9.3.3.
National 3 10.
The impact of the project on the role of national agricultural areas: a note. According to the Republic of Latvia laws and agricultural areas use criterion gives bonus points 10.1.
the project will not affect the national interest in agricultural areas 0 10.2.
the project will prevent flood threat to the national interest in the agricultural area 3 1.1. Criteria on horizontal priorities Assessment points 11.
Project applicant's additional financial contribution to the project (macroeconomic stability): the criterion gives bonus points 11.1.
less than 5 percent of the project's eligible costs 1 11.2.
from 5 to 10 percent of the eligible costs of the project 2 11.3.
more than 10 percent of the eligible costs of the project 3 12.
The impact of the project on special protected natural areas (sustainable development): the criterion gives bonus points 12.1.
the project does not affect specially protected natural territories 0 12.2.
the project will eliminate the threat of flooding especially protected natural areas 3 2. Eligibility 2.1. project eligibility criteria Yes/No/NA 13.
The project submission complies with the purpose of the activity – to reduce the risk of flooding in areas that meet the flood risk assessment and management of the national program of the first flood risk or exceptional case criterion 1 c note. 1 c – flood risk in the town that threatened more flooding causes combination N 14.
The project submission complies with activities eligible activities-reconstruction of existing waterworks structures flood protection of areas at risk N 15.
The project submission complies with activities eligible costs P 16.
The project submission complies with activities not eligible costs P 17.
Application of the project project description provide necessary information on the action N 17.1.
given the technical characteristics of the activities to 17.2.
planned monitoring indicators are clearly defined and measurable, and they meet the purpose of the activity 17.3.
provides a location for operations within the territory of 17.4 implementation.
given what economic benefits 17.5.
actions to provide qualitative and quantitative environmental benefits 10.9.
actions to provide qualitative and quantitative contribution of the European Union and the Republic of Latvia legislation the implementation of flood prevention in the field of 18.
Time schedule of the project comply with the planned project activities P 19.
The information provided in the submissions demonstrate that the project will provide the applicant the sustainability of project results: N 19.1.
are appropriate to the planned project value resulting maintenance costs 19.2.
is or will be available for staff to ensure the project results in the maintenance of the value of 20.
The project specified in the application works and equipment supply indicators meet the project schedule and includes key jobs that characterized the proposed goals N 21.

Requested by the European regional development fund co-financing aid intensity does not exceed 85 percent of the project's eligible costs N 22.
The requested State budget financing of aid intensity laid down in accordance with the regulations on the implementation of the activity N 23.
The project's eligible costs not exceeding 1 405 608 N 24 lats.
The project's eligible costs not less than 70 280 N 25 lats.
The project budget includes cost: N 25.1.
include all project costs required for the position of 25.2.
is under construction for the 25.3.
meet the projected market prices 25.4.
are proportionate and justified, clearly stated the assumptions for the calculation of the cost of 26.
Project cash flow forecast: P 26.1.
displays both the demand and the cost of funding forecast 26.2.
meet the planned timetable 26.3.
comply with the financial plan of the project 27.
The project planned in the application project implementation and human resources ensure planned legislation in certain functions of the beneficiaries: 27.1 P.
Project administrative (e.g., procurement, contract administration, record keeping) control, 27.2.
financial (for example, accounting and payments, financial planning) control 17.0.
technical (for example, reconciliation in design and construction, work progress reports, and report preparation) control 28.
The project planned in the publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the laws and regulations on the European Regional Development Fund funded project publicity and information dissemination measures P 2.2. Project eligibility criteria of the applicant Yes/No 29.
The project applicant is municipality or public authority who, on the basis of the Republic of Latvia regulatory enactments, provides flood measures N 30.
Project applicant has stated that compensated infrastructure is owned by the applicant for the project N 31.
The project applicant is not tax debt on the application of the first working day of the month N 32.
Project applicant has stated that it has documents proving that the applicant has the right to carry out the works concerned, which within the framework of the project for the construction works N 3. Administrative criteria yes/no/NA 33.
The project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified N 34.
Project submission has been prepared according to the application form for the activity N 35.
Project submission prepared for the Latvian language N 36.
Project submission prepared into N 37.
Project submission signed by the authorised person N 38.
Filed one project submission of an original and three copies, as well as the electronic version of that annex contains only the cost benefit analysis (where the application is filed in paper form), P 39.
Both the project the original and the copy of the application submitted to the caurauklot, of the attached document pages numbered (if the application is filed in paper form) P 40.
The project application was made under the electronic movement of documents regulatory laws and requirements (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N 41.
Project application signed with a secure electronic signature (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N 42.
Project submission developed in DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N 43.
The project application has been developed and presented in the annex pursuant to the electronic circulation of documents regulatory requirements in laws (where the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N 44.
Project application form completed in all its sections N 45.
The project attached to the application for all specified attachments: P 45.1.
project feasibility study (some old aizsargdambj stages of the technically and economically justified a new phase of infrastructure construction) 45.2.
the project's cartographic material is appropriate, which provide information about the location of project activities in the project area and their impact on the natural attractions in the surrounding area 45.3.
According to the Latvian legislation in the field of construction, prepared and approved the technical design of the reconstruction of the structure or inženieraizsardzīb technical specifications for the procurement of the works tender 28.2.
construction estimate 45.5.
the municipal decision on project funding assurance 45.6.
the municipality where the planned works, proof that the project complies with the applicable municipal planning or detailed to 28.4.
Environmental monitoring national Office opinion on the environmental impact assessment of the final report or the decision on the environmental impact assessment procedure, the non-application of 45.8.
project cash flow forecast for the legend: 1) N-negative rating in case the application is rejected for the project;
2) P – a decision on project approval with conditions (project applicant must ensure compliance with the criteria, making updates in the application of the project, the time limit laid down in the decision);
3) NA (not applicable)-if the specified criteria are not attributable to the applicant of the project, the project is assessed on this criterion.
Minister for the environment r. vējonis annex 3 Cabinet 14 July 2009. Regulations No 773 Minister of environment r. vējonis

Related Laws