Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 675 Riga, 30 June 2009 (pr. No 45 52. §) rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" Appendix. "support activity 3.4.3.3 cultural monuments for preservation of cultural monuments private and their socio-economic potential of effective use" issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures implemented by the operational programme infrastructure and services "services" Appendix 3.4. Qualitative environmental priorities "life and economic activity" jai UR3.4.3.pas contributes the "cultural impact" 3.4.3.3. socio-economic activity "support cultural monuments for cultural tour of monument owners in the conservation and the socio-economic potential, efficient in Muggle artifacts "(hereinafter referred to as the activity);
1.2. the European regional development fund, the project assessment criteria application (hereinafter referred to as the project application evaluation criteria);
1.3. the requirements of the European regional development fund project applicant (hereinafter referred to as project applicant);
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements;
1.5. the responsible bodies and authorities functional cooperation in the form of subordination. 2. The purpose of the activity is to ensure the preservation of cultural monuments, public access and use of socio-economic, located to private property and provide important public functions. 3. the implementation of the activity is detected in the project application selection. Open the project application selection organized by the responsible authority in one round for the entire activity of the financing available through the submission of the project notice submission. If the project application deadlines does not apply for project submissions for funding available in all activities, the responsible authority shall organise submission of projects for submission to the second round for the remaining funding. 4. the activities to be co-financed by the European regional development fund. The overall activity within the available funding is not less than 3 999 999 lats, of which the European regional development fund is 1 999 999 dollars and private funds not less than 2 000 000 lats. 5. activities available within the European Regional Development Fund funding per project is up to 1 999 999 dollars, and not less than 250 000 lats. The European regional development fund, the intensity of the odd provides 50% of the total eligible costs. 6. the implementation of the activity provided by the responsible authority and the liaison body. The responsible authority is the Ministry of culture (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authority), the authority is the Central Finance and Contracting Agency (hereinafter referred to as cooperation body). 7. the responsible authority shall: 7.1 ensure activity implementation, monitoring and control, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down the Riga vispā provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Council Regulation No 1083/2006), 1 and article 93, paragraph 2, of the implementation of the principle of the MES level; aktivit
7.2. ensure the project application selection and evaluation, including the development of the project application for the evaluation of the Commission's rules;
7.3. ensure project submission Evaluation Commission;
7.4. the development of the project application form filling methodology and provide information about the project applicant project application preparation;
7.5. development object action plan development methodology;
7.6. a decision on project approval, transmit the application to the conditions of authorisations requested or rejection and inform the applicant of the project (if the project is approved, the application shall also inform the liaison body);
7.7. accumulate data on project submissions under the laws and regulations of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system design and use;
4.8. coordinate with the liaison body of the standard agreement for the implementation of the project;
7.9. the amendments to the contract if the amendments concern the period of implementation, expected results, changes to the total amount of eligible costs or in their division over the years;
7.10. analyse the activity implementation problems and make proposals to the managing authority for the improvement of the implementation of the activity;
7.11. provide the public with information and provides publicity on matters related to the activity, according to the legislation on the disclosure of information related to European Union funds projects and published in high and visual identity requirements. 8. cooperation authority: ensures activities 8.1. implementation, monitoring and control, including Council Regulation No 1083/2006 and article 93, paragraph 2, of the enforcement principle project level;
8.2. develop a standard contract for the implementation of the project;
8.3. the contract with the European regional development fund, the beneficiary (hereinafter referred to as the beneficiary) on the implementation of the project;
8.4. the procurement for the project according to the pre-verification regulations on European structural funds and the cohesion fund the project before the purchase;
8.5. develop consumables beneficiaries of public procurement;
8.6. the beneficiary shall provide information on the implementation of the projects and compliance with the provisions of the Treaty;
8.7. analyse implementation problems and make proposals to the managing authority for the improvement of the implementation of the project;
5.5. check payment submitted by the beneficiaries of funding requests, approve the amount of the eligible expenditure, prepare payment orders, as well as the declarations of expenditure shall be prepared and sent to the managing authority for the examination;
8.9. assess project risks, draw up an annual plan of inspections of the implementation of the project and take these checks;
8.10. the laws in order to accumulate the European Union structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system data for projects, with the exception of this rule 7.7. data referred to in subparagraph;
8.11. the responsible authority shall cooperate with the public. 9. The Liaison Office has functional authority. II. Requirements for the project the applicant 10. activities within the project application can be submitted to a legal or natural person registered in the commercial register, the property of which is a cultural monument. 11. requirements for the project applicant: 11.1. this Court has not been declared bankrupt (including banks in the process of rehabilitation arises or the legal protection process), its economic activity is not terminated or in accordance with the commercial information that is not in the process of liquidation (if applicable);
11.2. it provided false information to the liaison body in connection with the implementation of projects co-financed by the structural funds;
11.3. it is not in the interest of a person committed a crime that hit the Republic of Latvia or the European Union's financial interests, and it does not have adequate means to influence forced;
11.4. this funding is not received or intended to receive funding for the same eligible costs of other activities in the framework of local, State, the professional reģi or funds of the European Union;
11.5. it is adhered to the conditions of funding under the RUS matīv provisions which govern national budgetary allocations for the Fund of the European Union for the implementation of projects co-financed, and payment and order the preparation of declarations of expenditure. 12. activities within the project applicant can submit only one project submission. III. eligible and ineligible activities, eligible and non-eligible costs 13. Project activities to be supported are the private cultural and heritage conservation and restoration of objects, which are renewable objects widespread availability to the public. 14. activities within the support only activities directly related to the project activities and are proportionate and reasonable. 15. funding is not granted to operations for which the beneficiary paid for prior to the conclusion of the contract for the project implementation, with the exception of those rules 16.1.1. referred cases. 16. activities within the eligible costs are the following: 16.1. direct eligible costs: 16.1.1. project preparation costs (except in the form of costs) incurred after 1 January 2009, – no more than 10 percent of the total direct eligible costs carried out pursuant to public procurement laws and regulatory requirements, including the costs associated with the project technical documentation and technical feasibility;
16.1.2. the preparation of such projects, the costs of which shall not exceed 10 percent of the project's eligible direct costs: the cost of engineering studies 16.1.2.1.;
16.1.2.2. site survey costs;
16.1.2.3. heritage research costs;
16.1.2.4. heritage inventory cost;
16.1.3. the project monitoring costs: costs of building 16.1.3.1.;
16.1.3.2. autoruzraudzīb costs;
16.1.3.3. archaeological supervision costs;

16.1.4. buildings and premises repair, restoration and preservation costs, consistent with the laws and cultural monuments;
16.1.5. the cultural monument in adjacent areas of home improvement and landscaping costs, if the territory included in the cultural monument protection zone;
16.1.6. value added tax, directly linked to the project, co-financed the project applicant cannot recover fully or partially according to the tax laws governing;
16.2. indirect eligible costs – expenses not provided for the implementation of the project shall not exceed five percent of the total direct project cost cināmaj relati (contingencies if required, you can use the project associated with the direct eligible costs). 17. activities are not eligible costs associated with the information and publicity measures lag for the implementation of a project. 18. activities within the following costs are not eligible: 18.1. administrative costs;
18.2. interest payments on money transfers, the beams, the loss of the money exchange and other costs that are not identified as eligible;
18.3. customs duties and levies, value added tax, except that rule 16.1.6. referred to;
18.4. fines, penalties, interest on arrears, fines and court costs of ING;
18.5. real estate purchase or rental costs;
18.6. the costs relating to lease transactions;
11.6. the costs incurred before the contract was signed on the project real infrastructure, except in these rules 16.1.1. referred cases. IV. submission of the project selection and project submission notification submission 19. Competent Authority notice of project application submitted at least one month before the opening of the project application selection launch: 19.1. newspaper "Gazette";
19.2. the responsible authority's homepage on the internet (URwww.km.gov.lv). 20. The provisions referred to in paragraph 19 of the statement indicates: 20.1. activities;
20.2. the purpose of the activity;
20.3. the project submission making a start and end date;
20.4. the project application submission procedures;
20.5. planned information measures;
20.6. the submission of the question;
20.7. to receive more information. 21. To apply for funding, the applicant is responsible for the project authority shall submit the application Yes: 21.1. the project application form (annex 1);
21.2. the following additional documents: 21.2.1. a copy of the Statute (if the applicant is a society or establish you);
21.2.2. a value added tax payer's copy of the registration certificate, if the applicant is a project of value added tax-taxable person;
21.2.3. The State revenue service certificate, which certifies that the applicant does not have tax arrears (statement of the project at the date of the application shall not be earlier than 30 calendar days), the consent of the applicant or the letter (the original of the letter is submitted separately, not attached to the application in the project), in which the project applicant authorizes the authority to require the State revenue service certificate of that project, the applicant is not a tax (a tax debt) (annex 2);
21.2.4. the institution or person the certificate after the project is awarded the credit of authorisations requested transmit or other financial resources (if such is provided to attract). The certificate to be granted funding in conjunction with the project applicant funds covers the first year of implementation of the project planned spending. If the credit or other financial resources shall be provided by the institution or person who is not a credit institution, State or local government, or a State or local government authority, in addition to such bodies or persons shall submit the annual accounts for the preceding year or any other document attesting to the availability of funds in the amount specified in the certificate;
21.2.5. būvvald object approved full technical project copy (if applicable);
21.2.6. būvvald object approved technical projects, a copy of the zero cycle (if applicable);
21.2.7. project sketch copy (if applicable);
21.2.8. būvvald issued planning and architectural task copy (if applicable);
21.2.9. all owners or operators of utilities issued copies of technical regulations (if applicable);
21.2.10. paraksttiesīg personal proof that up to the specified period of the authority responsible for the project, the applicant will submit the approved būvvald full technical project of the object (if applicable);
21.2.11. developed documentation on construction of purchase (if the relati cinām);
21.2.12. According to Latvian et seq of the LBN 501-06 būvizmaks from say the arrangements developed in construction cost estimates, based on a copy of contracts with third parties, or the expected construction cost estimate, pointing and separating all labour and materials cost positions that are included in the project and eligible non-eligible costs (if applicable);
21.2.13. project applicant questionnaire-application of value added tax to the project, if a project's eligible costs is included in the value added tax (questionnaire prepared in accordance with the laws and regulations on the application of value added tax to the European Union within the framework of the projects co-financed by the structural funds); Br > 21.2.14. environmental monitoring national Office a copy of the decision on the environmental impact assessment procedure or a copy of the opinion on the environmental impact assessment final report (if applicable);
21.2.15. national cultural monuments protection inspection, a copy of the opinion, stating that the proposed project meets the cultural monuments protection requirements (if applicable);
21.2.16. the national cultural monuments protection inspection a copy of the certificate of activity within the renewable status of cultural monuments or the consent of the applicant letter (the original of the letter is submitted separately, not attached to the application in the project), in which the project applicant authorizes the authority to require the national cultural monuments protection inspection certificate of activity within the renewable status of cultural monuments (annex 3) (if applicable);
21.2.17. in the land registry registered the project ownership of the applicant a copy of the document certifying the property that made the investment. If the property is not registered in the land registry, the national land service certificate (original) for property belonging to the applicant and consists of projects, as well as asset tracking copy of a card on the property, where the investment, or the consent of the applicant a letter (the original of the letter is submitted separately, not attached to the application in the project), in which the project applicant authorizes the authority to require the State land service of the statement of the property belonging to the applicant and consists of projects, as well as asset tracking copy of a card on the property where do investment (annex 4);
21.2.18. existing object, a copy of the action plan (action plan developed under the responsible authorities develop methodology of object action plan). 22. the original of the application of the project presented in accordance with those regulations on the development of the UK and design. 23. the project applicant project application can be submitted to the responsible authority: 23.1. paper form, submitting personally responsible body or by sending by registered mail;
23.2. the electronic document by submitting personally responsible body, sent by registered mail or by sending to the authority electronic mail address. 24. If the project application submitted in paper form, it shall be submitted in triplicate (original and a copy of the identical electronic copy of the electronic medium) with relevant references. Each project submitted a copy of the application caurauklot, numbered, with table of contents, on the back of the last page of the thread ends are glued, stamped with the seal of the applicant and the project on the labels provide information on the number of pages in the document, proof of the correctness of the content of the document, the document author's name, signature, date and place of preparation of the document. The consent of the applicant for the project (if applicable) of the letter submitted separately, do not caurauklot in the application of the draft, according to these rules 2, 3 and 4. 25. If the project application submitted to an electronic document, sign it with a secure electronic signature, add time stamp and are presented according to the legislation on the circulation of electronic documents. 26. If the project application submitted personally or sent by registered mail shall be placed in an envelope or box, specify the following information: the recipient of the information society: cultural 26.1. Ministry k.Valdemara Iela 11, Riga, LV-1364;
26.2. the name of the activity;
26.3. the project the name and address of the applicant;
26.4. the name of the project;

26.5. "not to be opened before the start of the assessment". 27. If the project application submitted to an electronic document, sent to the responsible authorities in electronic mailing address, electronic mail notice under "subject" indicates that provision of the information referred to in paragraph 26. 28. the competent authority shall register the project submitted the application it receives for the period of the day. Proof of receipt of the application, the project authority in charge of the project to the applicant personally immediately or within five working days after the application deadline shall be sent by mail or electronic ex change electronic document signed with a secure electronic signature according to the regulations on electronic document design. V. Project submission evaluation and decision-making activities in the framework of 29 projects submitted to the evaluation of the application of this project provides the Evaluation Commission of the application (hereinafter referred to as the Commission). Panelists included representatives from the Ministry of culture and its subordinated institutions – national cultural monument protection Inspectorate. The Commission operates under regulations approved by the responsible authority. 30. Commission meetings as observers without the right to vote can participate in the managing authorities and the liaison body. 31. the project compliance with administrative applications, eligibility and funding criteria assessed by the "Yes" and "no"-meets-does not meet. Application of project compliance with quality criteria assessed by giving a certain number of points. 32. If the project is not in the application information to assess the eligibility of a project providing a set of one or more of the evaluation criteria, as well as if this information is not legible or not submitted to the Latvian language, believes that the project submission does not meet the relevant criteria, or criteria given lower ratings. 33. the criteria of evaluation order: 33.1. the Commission first assessed the project's compliance with this provision of the application of annex 5, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 33 criteria referred to in the paragraph. If the application does not meet any of these criteria, the evaluation of the application of the project according to the rest of the project submission evaluation criteria do not continue;
33.2. If the application complies with the provisions of annex 5, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 33 criteria listed in project submissions valued Cates responded to this provision of the annex 5, 12, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of those criteria. If the application does not meet any of these criteria, the evaluation of the application of the project according to the rest of the project submission evaluation criteria do not continue;
33.3. If the application complies with the provisions of annex 5, 12, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of these criteria, the project submissions valued under the provisions listed in annex 5 of the quality criteria. If the project application to the assessment of compliance with the quality criteria receive less than 37 points, the project submission evaluation according to the rest of the project submission evaluation criteria do not continue;
33.4. If application of the project assessment in compliance with the quality criteria has received 37 points or more, project submissions valued under the rules of the event, referred to in annex 5, funding criteria. If the application does not meet any of the criteria for the award of funding, project submission evaluation according to the rest of the project submission evaluation criteria do not continue;
33.5. If the application complies with the provisions referred to in annex 5, funding criteria, project submissions valued under the provisions of annex 5, 11, 15, 16, 18, 23, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34 and 35. criteria referred to in paragraph 1. 34. the decision on the approval of the project application is accepted, if the application is received at least 37 points assessment of compliance with the quality of the project and the horizontal priorities, criteria and evaluated with "Yes" on the project's conformity and compliance project applicant eligibility criteria, criteria and tratīv by admin in funding criteria. 35. If multiple project submissions receive the same number of points, the hand gives the project the application with the higher cost of return indicators. If after evaluation of the application of projects according to the indicators of return on the cost assessment is equal, preference shall be given to the project by providing a gum with a lower requested the European regional development fund and the intensity as a result of the implementation of the project updated and saved object has public-interest building, in which, in accordance with the laws and regulations on cultural conservation and protection of monuments of culture and to organise national measures. 36. The decision on the application of the project approval may include conditions which must be satisfied the project applicant to enter into a contract for the implementation of a project: 36.1. submit further clarification;
36.2. ensure compliance with the application of the draft provisions of annex 5, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34 and 35 above, administrative kritēr ERS;
22.6. to ensure compliance with the application of the draft provisions of annex 5, 11, 15, 16, 18 and 23, paragraph eligibility criteria;
22.6. to clarify the application of the project costs, including the application of the project construction cost estimate or project funding sources, financing of the project plan or a summary of the project budget, in the case of the arithmetic calculation errors;
22.7. to clarify the existing object action plan;
22.7. to clarify the commencement of project implementation time and time schedule or cost planning in the distribution over the years. 37. draft decision rejecting the application shall be adopted, if the application does not meet the following project submission evaluation criteria: 37.1. This provision of the annex 5, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 33 referred to administrative criteria;
23.1. these provisions of annex 5, 12, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 21 and 22. pun kt referred to the eligibility criteria;
37.3. these provisions of annex 5, paragraph 36 and 37 of the above funding criteria. 38. the decision on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection provided the responsible authority shall notify the applicant of the project within five working days after the decision. 39. If a decision on approval of the application by the project of cījum, off the conditions an applicant provides a project satisfies the authorities therefore, the prescribed period of not more than one month from the date of receipt of the decision. 40. the Commission examined the information submitted by the applicant for the project, and the responsible authority shall draw up an opinion on its conformity with the decision approving the project application, provided the conditions laid down. 41. If the applicant does not comply with the draft decision on the application for the approval of the project provided the conditions laid down or does not meet the deadline, the project application is considered to have been rejected. 42. Opinion on the decision the conditions contained in the responsible authority for the project the applicant sends two working days after the signing. Vi. conditions for implementing the project 43. The project site is the territory of the Republic of Latvia. 44. the competent authority, three years after the action programme ' infrastructure and services ' closing provides the revenue generated by the project, including the withholding of revenue recovery or that were not taken into account in the calculation of project available in the European regional development fund. 45. the project activities referred to in the application, the beneficiary be implemented within four years of the date of conclusion of the contract with the liaison body for the implementation of a project, but not later than 30 June 2015. 46. If the tender is not enacted before the conclusion of the contract with the liaison body for the implementation of the project, the beneficiary of the first tender issued not later than within three months after approval of the project application. If not the first tender issued within that period, the liaison body shall notify the competent authority. The responsible authority may decide on the termination of the contract. 47. funding is available to the recipient of the payment in advance no more than 35 percent of the total projects granted to the European regional development fund. 48. The beneficiary requires advance payment if the following conditions are met: 48.1. the beneficiary with the cooperation of the authority has entered into a contract for the implementation of the project;
48.2. the beneficiary submits a collaborative institution purchase plan;
48.3. the initiation of implementation of the project is opened in a separate account in the State Treasury, which make and receive all the projects related to the implementation of pay you;
30.1. the beneficiary submits a collaborative institution bank guarantee for the amount of the advance. 49. The beneficiary shall ensure that up-to-date information on the progress of the implementation of the project would be placed in the beneficiary's homepage on the internet (if applicable) not less frequently than once every three months. Prime Minister v. dombrovsky Minister for culture i. Thaler Ministry of culture submitted version of annex 1 of the Cabinet June 30, 2009. the Regulation No. 675






Culture Minister i. Thaler annex 2 Cabinet 30 June 2009 Regulations No 675 cultural Minister i. Thaler annex 3 Cabinet 30 June 2009 Regulations No 675 cultural Minister i. Thaler annex 4 Cabinet 30 June 2009 Regulations No 675 cultural Minister i. Thaler Ministry of culture submitted version of the annex 5 cabinet 30 June 2009 Regulations No 675 Project submission evaluation criteria project quality criteria quality criteria ranking system score 1. Construction Project readiness project application time: 1.1. added būvvald to the application of the project the full object approved the technical design, construction cost estimate developed procurement documentation; 1.2 project submission approved in būvvald object attached to the technical project the zero cycle, construction cost estimate developed procurement records, paraksttiesīg person proof that up to the specified period of the authority responsible for the project, the applicant will submit the approved būvvald full technical project of the object; 1.3. the application of the project added to the project design project, the estimated construction cost estimate, paraksttiesīg person proof that up to the specified period of the authority responsible for the project, the applicant will submit the approved būvvald full technical project of the object; 1.4 project submission is approved by būvvald added planning and architectural task relevant technical regulations issued by the authorities, paraksttiesīg person proof that up to the specified period of the authority responsible for the project, the applicant will submit the approved būvvald full technical project of the object; 1.5. the project is attached to the application criteria in the documents requested.
Criteria should receive at least 1 point. Developed and project 7 5 3 1 0 2 the application connected to a valid object, the action plan for the period from the date of completion of the project: 2.1 more than eight years; 2.2. inclusive of five to eight years; 2.3. for less than five years.
Criteria must be received at least 3 points 6 3 0 3. Project implementation (construction, supply, procurement and sales, the potential incidence of costs) evaluation: the project submission 3.1 made every possible risk assessment, developed action plans for all identified for the elimination or reduction of risks; 3.2. application of the project risks identified in part (construction, cost incidence), developed a plan of measures identified for the elimination or reduction of risks; 3.3. the project is not carried out in the application of risk assessment.
Criteria must be received at least 4 points 6 4 0 4. Object action plan publicity and information measures which planned activities: 4.1 internationally; 4.2. at national level; 4.3. regional level; 4.4. application of the project object in the publicity and information measures.
The criteria must receive at least 2 points in 6 4 2 0 5. Results of the project saved and restored cultural monument, which is: 5.1 a national protected monument of wooden architecture; 5.2. the national protected cultural monument; 5.3. local protected wooden architectural monument; 5.4. local protected cultural monument.
The criteria must receive at least 2 points 8 6 4 2 6 as a result of the renewed project and saved the object is public-interest construction: 6.1. under the law on cultural monuments conservation and protection functions can be established to hold cultural and national measures; 6.2. in accordance with the objects set out in the action plan may hold cultural functions and events of national importance; 6.3. the object is not intended to hold cultural and national measures.
Criteria must be received at least 3 points 6 3 0 7 intended to implement the project: 7.1 to two years including; 7.2. from two to three years including; 7.3. from three to four years; 7.4. for more than four years.
Criteria should receive at least 1 point criteria for horizontal 6 4 2 0 priority ranking system 8 point scale. the requested of the European regional development fund is: 8.1 to 40 percent; 8.2. interest of 40.01 to 45 percent; 8.3. of interest to 49.99 45.01 percent; 8.4. from 50 percent.
The criteria are not exclusive 5 3 1 0 9.  
The cost of return indicators (population administrative territory, which as a result of the implementation of the project have access to cultural and national measures against's investment (expressed in dollars), expressed as a percentage): 9.1 percent less than 0.7; 9.2. from 1.4 percent to 0.7 percent (inclusive); 9.3. more than 1.4 percent (inclusive).
The criteria are not exclusive application in project 4 2 0 10 specific activities provided for the principle of equal opportunities, in particular by improving accessibility for people with functional disabilities: 10.1. four or more specific actions for equal opportunities; 10.2. one to three specific actions for equal opportunities; 10.3. no specific action to ensure equal opportunities.
The criteria must receive at least 2 points 3 2 0 eligibility criteria eligibility criteria for project evaluation system Yes/No, or to be rejected 11. European regional development fund co-financing does not exceed the maximum amount of co-financing.

P 12. The aim of the project activities meet the objective-to ensure the conservation of culture at minekļ, public access and use of socio-economic, located in private property and provide important public functions.

13. application of the project n planned activities and expected results and indicators are clearly defined, reasonable and measurable, focused on project objectives and indicators of achievement of the target group's needs.

N 14. Object in which the investments are located in the property of the applicant for the project.

15. the application of the project n describes the project management, monitoring and quality assurance system.

16. submission of project p included costs comply with the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the activities of the implementation cost.

P 17. The beneficiary will provide the necessary resources for the implementation of the project.

N 18 project planned publicity and information measures meet the requirements of the laws that govern the publicity and information measures the European Union structural funds and the Cohesion Fund for the implementation of the projects financed.

19. the applicant Project p is committed to providing financing from its own resources project cost increases.

N 20. planned activities the project is not funded or co-financed by the and not from State and local government funds and other Union financial sources, and not overlap with activities financed from other funds of the European Union activities and other financial instruments.

21. in the application of n project as a result of the work of the heritage value of the object store (authenticity).

N the project eligibility criteria applicant ranking system Yes/No, or to be rejected for the 22 Project applicant is a natural or legal person holding a cultural monument.

N 23. the project applicant is not administered the State revenue service tax debt.

P administrative criteria ranking system Yes/No, or to be rejected in the 24 project application is filed within the time limit.

N 25. application is made in the draft text.

26. the application of the project n is made in the Latvian language.

27. the applicant Project n project submission is filed in one of the following ways: 27.1. by mail or in person in a sealed container (envelope or box); 27.2. electronic document signed with a secure electronic signature and add a time stamp.

N 28. original submissions for the project is caurauklot (cauršūt), and the project application pages are numbered (if applicable).

29. the project application p filed in two copies, one of which is orģināleksemplār, the other copy and have appropriate references (if applicable).

30. submission of project p copy matches the original submission of the project (if applicable).

31. the project application, p is drawn up according to the provisions of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of the activity.

32. the application of the project, p is fully completed, including the submission of the project includes all the provisions named in addition to the documents to be submitted.

P 33. project application is signed by the person under the paraksttiesīg laws and regulations.

34. in the application of the project n financial calculation is accurate and correct arithmetic developed.

P 35 application. project financial statement is made in local currency.

P funding criteria ranking system Yes/No * to be rejected or 36.

If the application is based on the 12, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 33, evaluation criteria, as well as the evaluation criteria 1 has received at least one point valuation criterion 2 has received at least three points, 3. evaluation criteria are received at least four points 4 and 5, in criteria of evaluation are received in each of at least two points, 6. evaluation criteria has received at least three points 7. evaluation criteria has received at least one point and 10. evaluation criteria is received at least two points, then the quality evaluation criteria the criteria overall rating is at least 37 points.

N 37.36 in the List with "Yes" the estimated project applications in order of priority, starting with the most points winning the project application, the application of the project has enough funds available in the activity.

N total 57 If the project application won less than 37 points, it is rejected.

* Be rejected – in the case of a negative evaluation of the project application is rejected; Reservation-negative assessment may take a decision on the approval of the project application with the condition.
Culture Minister i. Thaler