Amendments To The Cabinet Of Ministers As At 30 June 2008 Of The Regulation No 490 "rules On" Operational Programme Infrastructure And Services "apakšaktivitāt" Appendix 3.5.1.2.1. Regulatory Requirements Without The Corresponding Dumps "conditioning"

Original Language Title: Grozījumi Ministru kabineta 2008.gada 30.jūnija noteikumos Nr.490 "Noteikumi par darbības programmas "Infrastruktūra un pakalpojumi" papildinājuma 3.5.1.2.1.apakšaktivitāti "Normatīvo aktu prasībām neatbilstošo izgāztuvju rekultivācija""

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$20 per month, or Get a Day Pass for only USD$4.99.
Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 1010 Riga, 2009. on 8 September (pr. No 56 16) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers as at 30 June 2008 of the Regulation No 490 "rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "apakšaktivitāt" Appendix 3.5.1.2.1. Regulatory requirements without the corresponding dumps "conditioning" issued under the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management law, article 18, paragraph 10 do cabinet 30 June 2008 No. 490 of the rules "rules for the operational programme ' infrastructure and services ' at the bottom of the appendix to activity" 3.5.1.2.1. Regulatory requirements without the corresponding dumps "(Latvian conditioning journal , 2008, 110 no) the following amendments: 1. Express section 9.1 the following wording: "9.1 with the environmental impact assessment (if such is required) documentation associated development costs, development of construction and related costs of būvekspertīz, but no more than three percent of the Cohesion Fund project application planned total eligible costs".
2. Express 10.1. subparagraph by the following: "10.1. the environmental impact assessment (if one is needed) documentation associated development costs, development of construction and related costs of būvekspertīz, which exceeds the three per cent of the project under the cohesion fund the application scheduled for total eligible costs".
3. Supplement with 10.1 points as follows: "10.1 financial contingency reserve expenditure can be up to five percent of the Cohesion Fund project total eligible costs. The financial reserve of the project uses this rule 9.4 and 9.5. eligible costs referred to in point. Before the financial reserves the use of appropriate amendments to the agreement on the implementation of the project under the Cohesion Fund. "
4. Supplement with 7.4. bottom point as follows: "7.4. value added tax costs that the value added tax to the taxable person is entitled to deduct as input."
5. the title of chapter IV, Expressed as follows: "(IV). The cohesion fund the project application selection".
6. Make a point 15 as follows: "15. Cohesion Fund project application selection issued in two project application selection rounds. The first cohesion fund application round project announces a three-year period, the second-two year period: 15.1 the first cohesion fund project application selection round of available financing from the Cohesion Fund is LVL 6 351 235;
15.2. second cohesion fund project application selection round of available financing from the Cohesion Fund is at least 7 423 723 lats;
15.3. If the first cohesion fund project application selection round for the Cohesion Fund co-financing available is not used up, it directs the second cohesion fund project application selection round of financing;
15.4. If the second cohesion fund project application selection round for the Cohesion Fund co-financing available is not used, the competent authority may decide on the cohesion fund the project application selection, additional rounds of organizing. "
7. Make the introductory paragraph 16 as follows: "4. the responsible authority shall call for cohesion fund project submissions sent by mail or electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature, and the preparation of appropriate legislation on electronic document design) these rules referred to in annex 1 of the responsible authorities or local authorities that are responsible for the pollution,".
8. To express 17 as follows: ' 17. If the first cohesion fund project application selection round invited potential cohesion fund the cohesion fund the project applicant project application submitted to the responsible body within the time limit set or the responsible authority of the cohesion fund the project application, the invitation sent to the second cohesion fund project application selection round. If the second cohesion fund project application selection round invited potential cohesion fund the cohesion fund the project applicant project application submitted to the responsible body within the time limit set or the responsible authority for the project under the cohesion fund application, repeated an invitation to the second cohesion fund project application selection round forward within the next year. "
9. Delete paragraph 19.
10. Make a point 20 as follows: "20. Cohesion Fund project application to the responsible authority within two months of the invitation is sent, the rules referred to in annex 1 of the responsible authorities. The competent authority may extend the cohesion fund the project to the application period for a period of up to two months, a letter informing potential applicants for the project under the cohesion fund the Cohesion Fund for project submission deadline extension: 20.1. Fund of the European Union Monitoring Committee decided on changes to the cohesion fund the project submission evaluation criteria;
20.2. at the invitation of the ship is amended by these regulations. "
11. the title of chapter V be expressed as follows: "v. Cohesion Fund project application submission rules".
12. Express points 24 and 25 as follows: "24. The cohesion fund the cohesion fund the project applicant project application is dealt with in accordance with the provisions of annex 3 of the 27, 28, 29 and 30, 31, 32 or 33, 34. and 35. criteria referred to in paragraph 1 and to ensure the application of the cohesion fund projects in conformity with this provision of contents annex 3 quality referred to in the administrative, compliance and project criteria for the evaluation of the application.
25. The cohesion fund the cohesion fund the project applicant project application form in the annex to these provisions is added to annex 3 paragraph 37 documents listed. "
13. Delete the 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31.
14. Make the paragraph 32 as follows: "32. the responsible authority shall establish a restricted project application selection the cohesion fund the project application for the evaluation of the Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Evaluation Commission) and approved its Statute. The Evaluation Commission is made up of responsible authorities, Ministry of the environment, municipal Union of Latvia, as well as representatives of associations and foundations whose operational objective related to environmental issues. The managing body of the Commission evaluation have observer status without voting rights. "
15. Make the following paragraph in 33.3: "33.3. record submitted to the cohesion fund the project submissions, grants them an identification number and within two weeks after receipt of the application, the project applicant or transmitted electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature) or by post, proof of receipt of the application for the project. If the Cohesion Fund project application submitted in person, the responsible authority shall on receipt of the application of the project, indicating the registration number, immediately after receipt of the application for the project. "
16. Make 34, 35, 36 and 37 as follows: "34. Cohesion Fund project submissions valued at administrative, compliance and quality criteria (annex 3): 21.2. compliance with the administrative and eligibility criteria is assessed by" Yes "or" no "(" Yes "," no "– meets does not meet). If the cohesion fund the project the administrative application or eligibility criteria is not applicable to a specific project, applicant project application concerning these criteria not assessed;
21.3. in compliance with the quality criteria assessed by giving a certain number of points: 34.2.1. Cohesion Fund project application of assessment according to annex 3 of these rules 1 and 2 of this criterion should receive at least one point.
34.2.2. on the cohesion fund the project submission's compliance with this provision 3.3, 4, 5 and 6 of the criteria referred to in paragraph may receive additional points.
35. evaluation the Commission shall assess the project submissions in the following order: 21.8. scored the first cohesion fund project application, compliance with this provision 3.25, 26, 28 and 29 administrative criteria listed in. If the assessment is in one of the following criteria is "no", the cohesion fund the project application and assessment of the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application of the project;
35.2. If the cohesion fund projects in the application of this provision in the criteria referred to in paragraph 21.8. evaluates to "Yes", the cohesion fund the project submissions valued under the provisions of annex 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 24, 27, 30, 33, 34, 35 and 36. criteria referred to in paragraph 1. If the assessment is in one of the following criteria is "no", the cohesion fund the project application and assessment of the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application of the project;

35.3. If the cohesion fund projects in the application of this provision in the criteria referred to in paragraph 21.9. evaluates to "Yes", the cohesion fund the project submissions valued under the provisions of annex 12, 13, 15, 20, 21, 22, 31, 32 and 37 of the criteria referred to in paragraph and quality criteria in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 34.2.. If the application of the cohesion fund projects in any of these provisions 3.12, 13, 15, 20, 21, 22, 31, 32 and 37 of the criteria referred to in paragraph evaluated with "no" or cohesion fund projects, the assessment of the application does not meet the quality criteria according to this provision, paragraph 34.2.1. Cohesion Fund projects, the evaluation of the application do not continue and the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application for the project.
36. If two or more applications of the cohesion fund projects have got the same number of points, they ranked the project application priority list in the following order: 36.1. Cohesion Fund project application with the highest ranking according to annex 3 of this Regulation referred to in paragraph 1 criterion;
36.2. The Cohesion Fund project application with the highest ranking according to this provision, annex 3, paragraph 5 of the criterion;
36.3. The Cohesion Fund project application with the highest ranking according to the rules of annex 3, paragraph 4 of the criteria;
36.4. The Cohesion Fund project application with the highest ranking according to annex 3 of these regulations referred to in paragraph 2, the criterion;
22.7. The cohesion fund the project with the highest rated application under this provision of the annex 3 paragraph 3 this criterion;
22.7. The Cohesion Fund project application with the highest ranking according to the rules of annex 3, paragraph 6 of the criterion.
37. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the application of the cohesion fund projects for approval if the project application: 37.1. meets these rules referred to in annex 3 the administrative, compliance and quality criteria;
23.1. Cohesion Fund project application selection round is available on the financing for the project. "
17. Supplement with 37.1 points as follows: "the decision on 37.1 cohesion fund project application approval may include conditions that the project applicant must meet the deadline set in the decision, so that it could conclude an agreement on the implementation of the cohesion fund projects: 1. specify information 37.1 on cohesion fund projects applicant (contact information and properties) (annex 2);
37.1 2. refine the documents presented under this provision paragraph 37 of annex 3 of this criterion;
37.1 3. refine the documents presented under this provision of the annex 31 and 3.32. criteria referred to in paragraph 1;
37.1 4. to clarify the changes in total amount and eligible costs the eligible costs under this rule 9 and 10.1 points;
37.1 5. to clarify the changes in total amount of eligible costs and not eligible under this provision, paragraph 10;
37.1 6. refine the cohesion fund the project time schedule according to the planned project activities (3.15;)
37.1 7. fine-tune cash flow Pro gnoz (3.20;)
37.1 8. to clarify the application of the cohesion fund projects planned in the implementation of the project and planned human resources support (3.21;)
37.1 9. refine the planned publicity and information dissemination actions (annex 22). "
18. Make 38, 39, 40 and 41 the following: "38. evaluation the Commission 20 working days after the decision on approval of the application, the project on condition that date assess the fulfilment of the conditions contained in the decision. Responsible authority within two working days after the receipt of the assessment shall prepare and send to the cohesion fund the project to the applicant of the decision contained in the opinion of the condition.
39. If the cohesion fund projects, the applicant in the decision of approval of the application, the project provided the conditions laid down are not met or are not met within the time limit laid down in that decision, the responsible authority opinion is negative and the project application is considered to have been rejected.
40. the overall condition of the delivery time can not be longer than three months. Decision on approval of the application, the project on condition that date cannot be extended.
41. Decisions on cohesion fund projects for the approval of the application, approval or rejection provided the determining authority within five working days after the decision has been forwarded to the project the applicant by mail or electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature) "."
19. Make 47 by the following: "47. Intermediate payments, as well as all of the Cohesion Fund project expenditure necessary means of funding the recipient opens an account in the Treasury. The beneficiary in implementing cohesion fund projects, all payments shall be made only from that account. "
20. The deletion of chapter XI.
21. Make the new version of annex 1 (annex 1).
22. Put the new version 2 of the annex (annex 2).
23. Make the new version of annex 3 (annex 3).
Prime Minister Dombrovskis v. Minister of environment r. vējonis Editorial Note: regulations shall enter into force with 12 September 2009.
 
1. the annex to the Cabinet on 8 September 2009, the Regulation No 1010 "annex 1 Cabinet June 30, 2008. the Regulation No. 490 of the laws of non-compliant municipal landfills no PO box
Regional environmental administration (RVR) dump location (municipality) dumps the name register of contaminated sites of Latgale planning region 1.
Daugavpils-Daugavpils Demen 44508 RVP/830/PV 2.
Rezekne RVP cibla 68988-Zvirgzden/2956/PPV 3.
Rēzekne, Rezekne Ritiņ 78768 RVP/732/PPV Zemgale planning region 4.
Madona RVP Koknese Koknese 32608/2832/PPV 5.
Madona RVP Koknese Trying to/2816/PPV 32468 6.
Madona RVP jaunjelgava, 32808 Totēn/5283/PPV 7.
Madona RVP jaunjelgava young 32848/5282/PPV 8.
Madona RVP in jaunjelgava Putnukaln 32788/5288/PPV 9.
Madona RVP jaunjelgava callers 32868/5285/PPV 10.
Madona RVP jaunjelgava 32508/2820/PPV is Siliņkaln 11.
Madona Ramziņ/RVP skrīveri 32828 2,868/12 of the PPV.
Madona Āžukaln/RVP meadow of 32588 5286/PPV 13.
Madona RVP meadow in Rūcēnkaln/5280/PPV 32928 14.
Madona Strobuk are Not rare 32748 RVP/2859/PPV 15.
Madona RVP Not rare Sir, very clever 32708/2857/PPV 16.
Madona Mazdīč are Not rare 32668 RVP/5278/PPV 17.
Madona RVP vecumnieki, Medņ/2850/32628 VNPP 18.
Madona RVP vecumnieki strainers 32628/2849/PPV 19.
Madona RVP vecumnieki, Ziliņ/5290/32908 PPV 20.
Madona RVP vecumnieki-5291/Taurkaln/32908 PPV 21.
Daugavpils, Jēkabpils Prūsān 56548 RVP/844/PPV 22.
Jēkabpils, Daugavpils RVP 56668 Stareniek/850/PPV 23.
Daugavpils, Jēkabpils Escrow 56828 RVP/856/PPV 24.
Jēkabpils, Daugavpils RVP Bander 56528/1440/PPV is 25.
Daugavpils, Jēkabpils Sīpulān 56988 RVP/870/PPV 26.
Krustpils-Daugavpils RVP Polyak 56968/5358/PPV 27.
Daugavpils, Jēkabpils lower RVP Sman 56948/5306/PPV 28.
Daugavpils RVP Krustpils indeed 56948/5304/PPV 29.
Daugavpils RVP Krustpils to Dimzukaln/5305/PPV 56948 30.
Krustpils-Daugavpils RVP 56768/846/PPV Stimbināj 31.
Krustpils-Daugavpils RVP 56468/852/PPV Trošk 32.
Daugavpils RVP viesīte Spurs/5300/56357 PPV of 33.
Daugavpils RVP viesīte 56888 of Skos/1409/PPV 34.
Daugavpils RVP viesīte Salad is 5299/56808/PPV 35.
Daugavpils RVP Island Valley 56868/5298/PPV 36.
Daugavpils Plaušukaln/RVP islands of 2,133/37 56908 PPV.
Daugavpils RVP aknīste Pāvulān 1 56257/838/PPV 38.
Daugavpils RVP aknīste Shrieking 56448/1352/PV, 39.
Daugavpils RVP aknīste urban 56448/5338/PPV 40.
Daugavpils RVP aknīste Pocket 56628/5302/PPV Kurzeme region 41.
Baltimore Acorn 62748 Ma/RVP 1331/PPV 42.
Baltimore, MA Kauš, RVP 62468/1012/43 VNPP.
Baltimore, MA Grantiņ, RVP 62608/1004/44 VNPP.
Baltimore, MA Sermīt-62648 RVP/1364/45 VNPP.
Baltimore, MA Svill-62648 RVP/1365/46 VNPP.
Baltimore, MA Pūteļ, RVP/1328/47 62808 VNPP.
Baltimore, MA Priedīškaln of the RVP 62928/1165/48 VNPP.
Baltimore RVP Kuldīga blacksmiths 62608/1005/49 VNPP.
Kuldīga, Liepāja RVP 62608/988/Escrow VNPP 50.
Baltimore, MA Valāt, RVP/1166/62928 PPV 51.
Baltimore, MA Sviķ RVP (Padur) 62728/1385/PPV 52.
Baltimore, MA Fight career RVP (fight) PPV 53 62548/5378/.
Baltimore, MA Bigasāt, 62508 RVP/1343/54 VNPP.
Liepāja Furnish the Skrunda 62828 RVP/1251/PPV 55.
Baltimore RVP Skrunda 62788 corners/1415/PPV 56.
Baltimore RVP Skrunda Skrunda 62297/1445/57 VNPP.
Liepaja, Skrunda Harijs Vītoliņš 62688 RVP/1275/PPV 58.
Liepaja Bandzer 84708/RVP sweet in 1641/59 VNPP.
Liepāja, Saldus Pampāļ 84768 RVP/1469/VNPP 60.
Baltimore RVP sweet Krimpj (Alpine)/1468VNPP 84668 61.
Baltimore RVP sweet Godparent (forge) 84728/1466/62 VNPP.
Baltimore RVP sweet fever graves 84828/1431/63 VNPP.
Sweet Grieztpurv of Lewes RVP 84948/1433/64 VNPP.
Baltimore, in brocēni Vibster 84808 RVP/1511/PPV Vidzeme planning region 65.
Valmiera-burtnieki municipality Kulpj, RVP 96708/2132/PPV 66.
Lakewood Lakewood Beit-96648 RVP/2160/PV 67.
Valmiera RVP beverīna Oaks/3693/94848 PPV 68.
Valmiera, Celīš/RVP Valka 94928 5241/PPV 69.
Valmiera RVP smiltene

Kangarkaln/3137/PPV 94748 for 70.
Lakewood Putnukaln in smiltene 94708 RVP/5258/PPV 71.
Valmiera RVP smiltene in 94588/5318/Smiltiņsil PPV 72.
The post of the Valmiera RVP Kursen/2326/PPV 42788 73.
Valmiera, Veļķ/RVP vecpiebalga 42928 2508/PPV 74.
Valmiera RVP vecpiebalga 42928/2505/Alaukst of PPV 75.
Valmiera RVP priekuļi (Baudz) Piebaudz/5240/PV 76 42728.
Madona, Madona Vālēn 70688 RVP/3040/PPV 77.
Madona, Madona RVP Broken 78 70968/3068/PPV.
Madona RVP for 70628 Escrow Madona/3034/PV 79.
Madona-Madona RVP pearls/3047/70768 VNPP 80.
Madona-Madona RVP Linda 70428/3006/PPV 81.
Madona-Madona RVP hill people/3035/PPV 70708 82.
Madona-Madona Dubīt 70448 RVP/3013/PPV 83.
Madona, Madona Sūņ 70748 RVP/5 284/PPV 84.
Madona-Madona Ienāškalniņš RVP/3056/70868 PPV 85.
Madona-Madona Mālsal 70448 RVP/4401/PPV 86.
Madona-Madona silenieki 70868 RVP/3057/PPV 87.
Madona-Madona Jurup RVP/70868 3058/PPV 88.
Madona Sidrabiņ/RVP Eagles of 70928 5279/PPV 89.
Madona Eagles Andrup, RVP 70608/3030/PPV 90.
Madona Lempēn/RVP Eagles of 3023/91 70548 PPV.
Madona RVP varakļāni varakļāni 70948/3063/PPV 92.
Madona RVP varakļāni Vorz 70788/3052/PPV of Riga planning region 93.
Lielrīg RVP of Riga deglava Street 01944/675/PV 94.
Lielrīg RVP Auriņ of Lielvārde 74488/3665/95 are PPV.
The ogre of Lielrīg RVP Ķiļup/3638/PV 74808 96.
Lielrīg RVP of OGRE Pink/3671/97 of 74528 PPV.
Lakewood Grove in aloja 6448/RVP 5238/PPV legend.
RVP-regional environmental governance – who contaminated site contaminated site-potential PPV's-place is potentially VNPP polluted "Minister for the environment r. vējonis annex 2 PDF 270kb Ministry of environment filed version of the annex 2 to the Cabinet on 8 September 2009, the Regulation No 1010, Minister of environment r. vējonis Environment Ministry submitted the annex 3 of the Cabinet on 8 September 2009, the Regulation No 1010" annex 3 Cabinet June 30, 2008. the Regulation No. 490 of the cohesion fund the project submission form for the evaluation of PO box
Assessment criteria 1. Quality criteria for rating points 1.
Project readiness stage: obtain at least 1 point 1.1.
not prepared technical specifications for the procurement of the works tender and construction regulations in accordance with the procedure laid down in the field of accepted technical project the project planned the construction procurement 0 1.2.
prepare technical specification technical development procurement tender for the project in accordance with the governing law of purchase 1 1.3.
developed and legislation in the field of construction for the order accepted the technical design of the project planned procurement of 2 2 works.
The effectiveness of the implementation of the project in relation to the requirements of the laws and not the corresponding dumps conditioning: must obtain at least 1 paragraph 2.1.
development of construction and related costs of the eligible būvekspertīz amount greater than 2.5 per cent of the project planned in the application the total eligible costs 0 2.2.
construction development and related būvekspertīz the amount of the eligible cost up to 2.0 2.5 per cent of the project planned in the application the total eligible costs 1 2.3.
development of construction and related costs of the eligible būvekspertīz amount from 1.5 to 2.0 percent (not including) from the project submission planned total eligible costs 2 2.4.
construction development and related būvekspertīz the amount of the eligible costs of less than 1.5 per cent of the project planned in the application the total eligible costs 3 3.
Waste authorities, land owners (municipalities, private owners) an additional financial contribution to the project: the criterion gives additional points 3.1.
up to 5 percent of the project's eligible costs 1 3.2.
more than 5 percent of the eligible costs of the project 2 4.
The cost of return indicators (the amount of waste landfilled (tonnes) relative to the initial project, the total cost ($)). Note the. The average project application selection round costs of return indicators calculation for project submissions that meet the criteria of, compliance and administrative-cost of return indicators in relation to the amount of selection round of the project).

criterion gives additional points 4.1.
project cost estimate of return is less than the project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference is more than 20 percent 1 4.2.
project cost estimate of return is less than the project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference between 10 and 20 percent 2 4.3.
project cost estimate of return is equal to the average of the calculated or 10 percent (not including) it exceeds, or about 10 percent (not including) less than the project application selection round costs of return indicators 3 4.4.
project cost estimate of return is greater than the average project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and so the difference is between 10 and 20 percent 4 4.5.
project cost estimate of return is greater than the average project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference is more than 20 percent of the 5 criteria 1.1 priorities horizontal rating points 5.
Dump category after the hazard and potential for pollution (sustainable development) under the regulations to the Act, which define the installation of landfill landfill and dump management, closing and conditioning: criterion gives additional points 5.1.
Category I-dumps, which creates a potentially low risk 1 5.2.
Category II-dumps, which poses a potential risk to the average 2 5.3.
Category III – dumps which constitute a potentially high risk 3 6.
The project area development index project at the time of submission of the application (of the balanced development of the territory): the criterion gives additional points 6.1.
area development index is greater than + 0.3 1 6.2.
territorial development index is from-1.18 to + 0.3 2 6.3.
territorial development index is less than-1.18 3 2. Eligibility 2.1. project eligibility criteria Yes/No/NA 7.
The project will provide dumps the negative impacts on the quality of the environment (sustainable development) N 8.
The project will remove the threat of disease in the population N Yes/No 9.
The project's application relates to the municipal waste dumps, which included conditioning Cabinet 30 June 2008 No. 490 of the provisions of the "rules for the operational programme ' infrastructure and services ' 3.5.1.2.1. Appendix apakškativitāt" legislative requirements without the corresponding dumps "conditioning" annex 1 N 10.
Landfill of waste registered and potentially contaminated sites registry N iesārņot 11.
The project submission complies with activities eligible activities N 12.
The project submission complies with activities eligible costs: P 12.1.
with the environmental impact assessment (if such is required) documentation associated development costs, development of construction and related costs of būvekspertīz, but no more than 3 percent of the estimated total of the project application in the eligible costs, if such costs for 12.2.
autoruzraudzīb costs, but not more than 0.5 per cent of the eligible costs of the works, if such costs for 12.3.
building costs, but not more than 3 per cent of the eligible costs of the works, if such costs for 12.4.
the cost of the works and 12.5.
pēcrekultivācij monitoring equipment required for installation delivery costs, if such costs for 13.
The project submission complies with activities not eligible costs P 14.
Project project description in the application provides the information you need about action to be taken: N 14.1.
given the technical characteristics of the activities to 14.2.
expected results and outputs indicators correspond to the objective of the activity of 14.3.
provides a location for operations within the territory of the 14.4 project implementation.
actions to provide qualitative and quantitative contribution of the European Union and the Republic of Latvia, the law on environmental protection and waste management requirements in 9.0.
describe the principle of the "polluter pays", the project 15.
Time schedule of the project comply with the planned project activities P 16.
The information provided in the submissions demonstrate that the project will provide the applicant the sustainability of project results: N 10.0.
have the appropriate institutional structure of 16.2.
the rekultivēt is planned to dump the State of the environment monitoring 16.3.
is or will be available for staff to ensure the rekultivēt dump the State of the environment monitoring 17.
The project specified in the project application to the actual figures (rekultivējam the dump area) corresponds to the description of the project N 18.

The requested funding from the Cohesion Fund aid rate does not exceed 50 percent of total project eligible costs Government of Riga, and 85 percent the rest of the territory of Latvia authorities N 19.
The project budget includes cost: N 19.1.
include all project costs required for the position of 19.2.
is under construction for the 19.3.
indicate clearly the assumptions for the calculation of the cost of 19.4.
It is directly necessary for the implementation of the project of 19.5.
meet the projected market prices 20.
Project cash flow forecast: P 20.1.
displays both the demand and the cost of funding forecast 20.2.
meet the planned timetable 20.3.
comply with the financial plan of the project 21.
The project planned in the application and implementation of the project, the planned human resources provides the statutory functions of the beneficiaries: P 21.1.
project management (including procurement, contract administration, record keeping) 21.2.
project financial management (including accounting, verification and payment, financial planning) 21.3.
technical management of the project (including the reconciliation of design and construction, work progress reporting) 22.
The project planned in the publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the laws and regulations on the cohesion fund the project publicity and information measures.

2.2. Project applicant p eligibility criteria yes/no/NA 23.
Project applicant – municipality – no tax liability on the application of the first working day of the month.

N 24.
The project shall ensure that it has the right to carry out the works concerned, where the laws are not in appropriate waste dump: N 15.0.
the land is registered in the land registry as municipal property 24.2.
the site is denacionalizēt. With the land owner agreement on property use restrictions in place in the land for a period of not less than five years after completion of the project or for the time necessary to carry out the monitoring of the pēcrekultivācij 3. Administrative criteria yes/no/NA 25.
Project application submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified N 26.
The project, the applicant invited to submit a project application N 27.
Project submission has been prepared according to the activity the project submission form for N 28.
Project submission prepared for the Latvian language N 29.
Project submission prepared into N 30.
Project submission signed by the authorised person N 31.
Filed one project submission of an original and three copies, as well as the electronic version without attachments (if the application is submitted in the form of a paper document), P 32.
Both the project the original and the copy of the application submitted to the caurauklot, of the attached document pages numbered (if the application is submitted in the form of a paper document) P 33.
The project application and attachments are presented according to the circulation of electronic documents regulations regulatory requirements (where the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N 34.
Project application signed with a secure electronic signature (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N 35.
The project application and attachments are designed in DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N 36.
Project application form filled in all sections, 37 N.
Project application accompanied by all required attachments: 37.1 P.
construction estimate 37.2.
municipal financing decision, which specifically provided for eligible and non-eligible costs 37.3.
proof that the municipality dumping site in rekultivējam has been or is being used for municipal waste management (disposal) function of 37.4.
a copy of the document certifying the right of ownership of the land on which the rekultivējam landfill in 37.5.
with the site's owner, a copy of the agreement reached on the property use restrictions in place in the land for a period of not less than five years after completion of the project or for the time necessary for carrying out of monitoring of pēcrekultivācij 23.4.
project cash flow forecast for the legend: N-if the assessment is negative, the project application is rejected, the P-a decision on project approval with conditions (project applicant must ensure compliance with the criteria, specifying the project submission deadline of the decision), NA (not applicable), if the specified criteria are not attributable to the applicant of the project, the project is assessed for this criterion. "
Minister for the environment r. vējonis

Related Laws