Advanced Search

The Provisions On "operational Programme Human Resources And Employment" 1.5.1.1.1. Apakšaktivitāt "supplement To Aid In The Implementation Of Structural Reforms And The Strengthening Of The Analytical Capacity Of The Public Administration"

Original Language Title: Noteikumi par darbības programmas "Cilvēkresursi un nodarbinātība" papildinājuma 1.5.1.1.1.apakšaktivitāti "Atbalsts strukturālo reformu īstenošanai un analītisko spēju stiprināšanai valsts pārvaldē"

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 1358 in Riga 2009. on 24 November (pr. 84. § 49) provisions for the operational programme "human resources and employment" 1.5.1.1.1. apakšaktivitāt "Supplement to aid in the implementation of structural reforms and the strengthening of the analytical capacity of the public administration" Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures implemented by the operational programme "human resources and cause binātīb" addition 1.5. Administrative capacity priorities "youth UR1.5.1.pas" contributes greatly to the "better regulation" policy "Paul 1.5.1.1. activities will impact assessment and policy research" 1.5.1.1.1. "support activity sub structural reform implementation and analytical strengthening the capacity of public administration "(apakšaktivitāt);
1.2. the European Social Fund (hereinafter the project) submission evaluation criteria;
1.3. the requirements of the project applicant;
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competences and procedures of cooperation between those authorities, as well as the responsible authorities and cooperation agencies functional form of subordination. 2. the purpose of the Apakšaktivitāt is to ensure the implementation of structural reforms in public administration and strengthen the analytical ability of the economic growth in important policy areas as budgetary and financial policy, industry and services policy, business and public administration policy. Apakšaktivitāt achievable within the monitoring indicators are as follows: 2.1 indicators of outcome – public administration employees, representatives of local authorities, social partners and non-governmental organizations, the number of employees that have completed training on better regulation policy instruments, policy planning, and policy impact assessment, in 2013 is 6000;
2.2. results indicators – proportion of the laws that made an impact evaluation in 2013 is 30% of the total during the year the Government approved law number. 3. the purpose of the group is Apakšaktivitāt direct regulatory authorities, courts, County Planning regions and local authorities, social partners, associations and foundations. 4. the purpose of the Apakšaktivitāt achieved in implementing this provision, paragraph 18, and this rule laid down in paragraph 2, the monitoring indicators. 5. Apakšaktivitāt implement the project application to the limited selection. 6. during the implementation of the Apakšaktivitāt limited the project application selection shall take place no more than two times, subject to this provision in paragraph 25 above. 7. the implementation of the Apakšaktivitāt period is from the date of entry into force of rules of 31 December 2013. II. Responsible authorities and cooperation authority and competence 8. apakšaktivitāt implementation of the responsible authorities implement the obligations and rights of the Ministry of Finance (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authority). 9. With the implementation of the apakšaktivitāt the cooperation obligations and rights of the Authority implementing the functional supervision of the Ministry of Finance of the Central Finance and Contracting Agency (hereinafter referred to as cooperation body). 10. Apakšaktivitāt within the responsible authority: 10.1. participating in the agreement on the implementation of the project (hereinafter referred to as the agreement) project;
10.2. the implementation of supervised apakšaktivitāt, ensure that there will be exceeded this rule 14, paragraph apakšaktivitāt for the implementation of the European Social Fund financing, and apply the n + 2 and n + 3 principle apakšaktivitāt level, implementation of the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (hereinafter Regulation No 1083/2006) 93. Article 1 and referred to in paragraph 2;
10.3. provide proposals to the managing authority for the development of the apakšaktivitāt;
10.4. using the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system for monitoring the implementation of the apakšaktivitāt;
10.5. the cooperation requested from the institutions and the European Social Fund, the beneficiary (hereinafter called beneficiaries) information necessary for the implementation of the apakšaktivitāt monitoring and control. 11. within the framework of cooperation of the Apakšaktivitāt authority: 11.1. send a limited range of applicant projects call for project applications (hereinafter referred to as the notice);
11.2. a limited application of the selection of projects project application Evaluation Commission and develop a project application for the evaluation of the Commission's rules;
11.3. the project development application assessment methodology;
11.4. develop, approve and place on your website in the internet application of the project selection and evaluation procedures, as well as the application form for the evaluation of projects;
11.5. provides project information on the project to the applicant's application;
11.6. assess the project submissions and acceptance of the Board's decision on the application of the project approval, approval with conditions or disapproval;
7.3. the accumulated data for project submissions and projects according to the laws of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system design and use;
11.8. the development agreement and the conclusion of the project agreement with the beneficiary of the financing as well as provide information about the recipient of the funding agreement conditions;
7.4. review and submit to the procurement monitoring Bureau funding recipient's procurement plan;
11.10. provides budgeting laws regulating certain information in the national budget for the preparation of the request;
11.11. ensure project implementation monitoring and control, including checks in the project locations and apply the n + 2 and n + 3 principle on the project level, implementation of the Regulation No 1083/2006 and article 93, paragraph 2;
11.12. examine the funding recipient project submitted progress reports, requests for payment, the eligible expenditure of the approved amount, payment orders shall be prepared and submitted to the paying authority;
11.13. evaluate tenders submitted an amendment request and adopt a decision on the amendment of the approval or refusal to approve project amendments;
11.14. the preparation of the information required by the authority responsible for the implementation of the apakšaktivitāt available in European Social Fund funding;
11.15. provide the public with information and provides publicity for the project implementation. III. Support the conditions within the project 12 Apakšaktivitāt the applicant may be the Ministry of finance and the State Chancellery. 13. in implementation of the project may involve cooperation partners – direct administration and direct the national regulatory authorities. 14. the project is financed from the European Social Fund and State budget of the Republic of Latvia (hereinafter referred to as the State budget). Apakšaktivitāt within the framework of the European Social Fund financing is 85% of the total eligible costs of the project amount. The total funding available in apakšaktivitāt is 3 323 604 lats, including European Social Fund funding – 2 825 069 dollars, and State budget funds-498 535 lats. 15. Apakšaktivitāt combination available within the amount corresponding to the European regional development fund support areas, as provided for in Regulation No 1083/2006, article 34, paragraph 2 and to the following limitations, there are 282 506 Lati or apakšaktivitāt for the implementation of the 10% of planned European Social Fund financing. 16. Minimum total eligible cost amount per project in apakšaktivitāt is 900 000 lats. The maximum total amount of the eligible cost per project is $ this apakšaktivitāt 1 661 802. To this provision, paragraph 60 indirect cost rate constant determination of fee total clay eligible cost amount per project is $1 495 622. 17. during the implementation of the project must not exceed this provision laid down in paragraph 7. 18. The project assisted by the following: 18.1. project administration;
18.2. national and foreign consultants, experts and specialists ' attraction;
18.3. exchanges of experience, measures of national regulatory authorities in the population;
18.4. policy planning, implementation and impact evaluation tools and methods to be used in development and improvement;
18.5. the study, training, seminars and advice;
18.6. information systems design and development;
11.6. the functional audit and evaluation;
12.8. the introduction of a competence approach in public administration;
11.7. guidance, teaching and information material development, publishing and distribution;
18.10. the project information and publicity according to the laws of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds publicity and co-financed projects visual identity requirements. 19. One project applicant project apakšaktivitāt within the limited application of the selection in the first round may submit one project submission. 20. the application of the project eligible costs are divided into two groups: 20.1. the project direct costs: 20.1.1. consultants, experts and specialist remuneration;

20.1.2. State social security payments and other social guarantees, which is compulsory in accordance with external laws and regulations;
20.1.3. information systems requirements specifications;
20.1.4. information systems development, as well as the development of the existing information systems;
20.1.5. information systems acquisition;
20.1.6. information systems support activity costs (such as manuals, training);
20.1.7. seminars, consulting, studies and the organisation of and participation in training related costs;
20.1.8. mission expenses in Latvia and abroad;
20.1.9. information and publicity costs according to the regulations governing the structural funds of the European Union;
20.1.10. with the implementation of project activities of the associated costs;
20.1.11. contingencies, an amount not exceeding five facts from these provisions remain stable over 20.1.1, 20.1.2, 20.1.3...,.,., 20.1.6 20.1.5 20.1.4.,.,., 20.1.7 and 20.1.8 20.1.9 20.1.10. direct costs referred to in point totals. They use this rule, 20.1.2, 20.1.3 20.1.1...,.,., 20.1.6 20.1.5 20.1.4.,.,., 20.1.7 and 20.1.8 20.1.9 20.1.10. direct in point to cover eligible costs;
20.2. the costs for the project's administrative activity (indirect costs): 20.2.1. project control personnel costs (project manager's compensation costs);
20.2.2. workplace equipment costs (only allowed equipment rental);
20.2.3. transport costs (fuel costs, vehicle hire, purchase of transport services, the use of public transport);
20.2.4. space rental, room rental or management of premises;
20.2.5. utilities-heating, electricity, water supply;
20.2.6. Office supply costs;
20.2.7. internet and telecommunications costs;
20.2.8. business trip or travel costs;
20.3. This provision 20.1.5. referred to direct funding of eligible costs used in the combination. Project submissions for funding does not exceed the Warp: 20.3.1. The Ministry of finance – 232 506 lat;
20.3.2. State Chancellery – 50 000 lats. 21. The value added tax payments to the project plan as the eligible costs, if the beneficiary of the value added tax amount cannot be recovered under the tax issues regulatory laws. 22. project implementation costs considered eligible if they: 22.1. incurred after the entry into force of these regulations, except paragraph 58 of these rules, such costs;
22.2. the project required, designed for in the approved project submission and made pursuant to the principles of financial management, economy and efficiency;
22.3. made and posted in the beneficiary's book-keeping and separated from the rest of the cost.
22.4. potential to identify and verify and certify the payments documents supporting original. IV. Project application submission 23. cooperation authority, on the basis of the provisions of this paragraph 12, within five working days after the entry into force of these regulations shall send to the applicant, the project calls for project submissions. 24. The invitation shall: 24.1. project application submission deadline;
24.2. apakšaktivitāt the funding available;
15.1. the application for the project;
15.2. the address of the Web site, which can be found in the following: 24.4.1. project application procedure for sending it by mail, in person or submit an electronic document;
24.4.2. project for the preparation of the application usable material (those rules). 25. the limited application of the second selection authority shall organise cooperation only if the first selection of approved projects within the funding allocated is not fully mastered. 26. the project application submitted to the authority to call for cooperation in the specified due date. The submission period is not less than one month from the date of dispatch of the invitation. Project application be rejected if it is received after the specified deadline. 27. the project application consists of the completed project submission form (annex 1) and the following: 27.1. project administration and implementation of the persons engaged in the life course description (CV);
27.2. the cooperation of the partnership (if applicable). 28. the project of cooperation between the authorities submitted the application in one of the following ways: 28.1. paper form in two copies (one original and one copy)-to be drawn up in accordance with the laws and regulations on the development and design of a document;
28.2. the electronic document – drawn up according to the law on electronic document design (uses XML file formats). 29. the paper submitted the original application of the project the project is added to the electronic version of the application (electronic media). The media noted the following: 29.1. apakšaktivitāt number and name;
29.2. the project name of the applicant;
29.3. the name of the project. 30. If the project application submitted in paper form, all documents (originals, copies and an electronic version) inserts a sealed envelope. On the envelope indicates the following: 30.1. "restricted access information";
30.2. the cooperation of the name and address of the authority;
30.3. the project the name and address of the applicant;
18.9. apakšaktivitāt number and name;
5. the name of the project. 31. the project application submitted by the applicant together with the accompanying letter to the project. The covering letter indicates the name of the applicant, the project apakšaktivitāt's number and name, and project name. 32. cooperation authority registers the project submitted the application filing date and assign it a registration number. 33. The provision in paragraph 23 the invitation specified in the project application submission period end date is the last day when the liaison body shall accept and register the project submissions. Project application can be submitted personally, electronic document or send by post: 33.1 an application submitted for the project. If personally or sent by mail, the application of the project time is considered the date when the applicant has applied for the project or project submission is sent;
33.2. If the application is submitted by electronic means of the project document, the project time to the application shall be deemed to be the moment when it established cooperation bodies in electronic mail information system. The project application must be signed with a secure electronic signature and confirm with the time stamp before the project submission deadline for submission;
33.3. If the application is lodged by the project electronic document form or sent by post, the project shall ensure that it is submitted to the liaison authority no later than this provision in paragraph 23 the invitation specified in the project application deadlines;

33.4. If a dispute arises, the applicant must demonstrate that the application is submitted before the application deadline for the submission of projects, but the cooperation should be based on the authority that the application is not received or received after the project submission deadline. V. submission of the project evaluation and decision 34. Apakšaktivitāt project submitted within the application evaluation ensure cooperation bodies set up limited project application selection Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission), which operates under the authority of the cooperation developed and approved the Charter. 35. the Commission with voting rights included in the cooperation bodies, the Ministry of finance, and representatives of the State Chancellery. The Ministry of finance and the State Chancellery's representative does not participate in your body by the application of the project evaluation. 36. the Commission submitted to the project within the apakšaktivitāt application may call upon experts of the sector concerned (without voting rights). 37. the Commission observer status can be included in the authorities and the representatives of the managing authority. 38. The members of the Commission in the absence of his replacement by another authorized representative. Such authorisation shall be made in writing to the Commission in accordance with the procedure laid down in the Statute. 39. the launching of the Commission, Commission members, experts and observers signed a declaration that the Commission obtained during the meetings of the information and the content of the document will not disclose to third parties. The members of the Commission shall sign a declaration that there are no circumstances in which they might violate the European Union's structural and cohesion funds, implementation and monitoring of the implementation of the person involved in the law and the limits which it could be argued that they are interested in a specific project approval or rejection of the application. 40. the Commission may initiate the evaluation of the application of the project before the deadline specified in the call, if this paragraph 12 of the rules of the institution specified in the project applications already submitted. 41. the Commission project submissions valued under these rules laid down in the draft application evaluation criteria (annex 2). 42. The Commission launched the project submission evaluation after the compliance and administrative evaluation criteria (annex 2 to these regulations 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30). If any of the provisions of this annex 2.10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 26, 27, 28, 29 or 30, paragraph eligibility and administrative evaluation criteria is received the rating of "does not meet", the Commission suspended the application of the evaluation of the project and recommends the application of the project should be rejected. 43. The Commission continues to assess the project submissions for quality evaluation criteria (Appendix 2 of these provisions 1., 2., 3., 4., 5. and 6.), as well as valued the contribution of the project horizontal priorities (annex 2 to these regulations 7, 8 and 9). If any of the provisions of this annex 1, 5 or 6 above quality evaluation criteria received 0 points, the Commission suspended the application of the evaluation of the project and recommends the application of the project should be rejected. 44. after the submission of the project assessed the quality criteria and the project's contribution to the implementation of the horizontal priorities, Project assigns the application determine the total number of points. 45. the project application is considered appropriate and move for approval if the project application to the quality evaluation criteria (Appendix 2 of these rules 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) won at least nine points and compliance and administrative evaluation criteria (annex 2 to these regulations 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30) received a rating of "meet". 46. the Commission's application of the project approval Guide, if you need to clarify any of the administrative assessment criteria (annex 2 to these regulations, 22, 23, 24 or 25). 47. cooperation authority, on the basis of a recommendation from the Commission, shall decide on the approval of the project application for funding from the European Social Fund and national public funding, approval of the condition or the rejection of the application. 48. cooperation authority within five working days after the decision has been sent to the project applicant. 49. the project shall ensure the decision on approval of the application, the project provided the conditions contained within a period (not exceeding 30 working days). 50. the Commission within 10 working days of the decision on the project is evaluated on the approval of the application, provided the conditions are met and prepare the opinion. If the opinion is positive, the liaison body within two working days, inform the applicant of the project on the conclusion of the agreement. If the opinion is negative or the applicant has not provided by decision the conditions contained in these terms within the period referred to in paragraph 49, the project application is considered to have been rejected. In such a case the authority acts of cooperation this provision in paragraph 48 and 51. 51. the decision on rejection of the application of the project liaison body shall include details of the project and the reasons for rejection of the application, the project applicant project application, copy, if the application filed in paper form. Vi. Project implementation conditions 52. Following the adoption of the decision on the application for the approval of the project authority for cooperation with the beneficiary of the financing arrangement, which stipulates the obligations of the Contracting Parties and rights as well as the procedure and conditions (including the financing conditions and payment arrangements), which must be followed to ensure the implementation of the project. 53. The beneficiary is responsible for the implementation of the project according to the approved project submission and provide a collaborative report on authority of implementation progress and financial implementation in accordance with the agreement. 54. Payments and charges to the beneficiary opens a separate account in the State Treasury. 55. the draft amendments to be made according to the procedures laid down in the laws of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds. 56. The beneficiary shall ensure the implementation of the project related loading snapshot homepage on the internet (if applicable) not less frequently than once every three months. 57. The beneficiary shall ensure that a separate 20.3. bottom combination referred to cost accounting documentation. VII. concluding issues 58. If, in accordance with the Cabinet of Ministers of 19 May 2008 a Regulation No 347 "provisions for the operational programme" human resources and employment ' addition activity "public administration human resources planning and management system development" ' approved European Union funds during the implementation of the project activity and reschedule the project termination costs incurred during project implementation, should be considered eligible within the apakšaktivitāt. The beneficiary of a request for payment of eligible costs incurred during project implementation, submit such rules. 59. in paragraph 58 of these rules, such costs are eligible, provided that they are incurred by 30 January 2009. 60. For this rule 20.2. referred to indirect cost rate constant of the acting Cabinet. 61. This provision, paragraph 60 indirect cost rate constant determination of indirect costs do not intend. 62. After the indirect cost rate constant determination that rule 20.2. the costs referred to in the plan and under the indirect cost rate constant. 63. If the project is launched, before these rules referred to in paragraph 60, the indirect cost rate constant, not variable indirect cost rate shall apply from the date of entry into force of the provisions. 64. Be declared unenforceable in the Cabinet of Ministers of 19 May 2008, Regulation No 334 "provisions for the operational programme" human resources and employment "apakšaktivitāt" Appendix of policy making, implementation and impact of development "(Latvian journal, 2008, 79 no; 2009, 88 no). The Prime Minister's site-traffic Minister k. Gerhard Finance Minister – the Minister of welfare in place. the Ministry of finance submitted Augul version of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 24 November 2009. Regulations No 1358 – instead of the Minister of Finance Minister of welfare and the Ministry of finance submitted Augul version of annex 2 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 24 November 2009. Regulations No 1358 Project submission evaluation criteria action program name and number 1. human resources and employment priorities name and number 1.5. administrative capacity building event name and number 1.5.1. Better regulation policy, the name of the activity 1.5.1.1. a number of policy and impact evaluation and policy research, the name and number of the Apakšaktivitāt 1.5.1.1.1. support for the implementation of structural reforms and the strengthening of the analytical capacity of the public administration Project application selection type 1.5.1.1.1.

Limited PROJECT application selection responsible authority 1.5.1.1.1. Ministry of finance criteria scoring scale score quality criteria maximum points-15 points where the assessment of compliance with the criterion 1.1 – 1.6 received less than 9 points, project submissions rejected 1. The context of project activities the results obtained are used for the target group – direct administration, justice, planning and county authorities of the regions, the social partners, associations and Foundation – needs and support 1.1. the application for the project: the results will not be used for the target group needs and support – 0 points; 1.2. the application of the project results will be used to target group needs and support – 1 point; 1.3. the application of the project results will be used 2 target group needs and support – 2 points; 1.4. application of the project results will be used in 3 target group needs and support-3 points; 1.5. application of the project results will be used in 4 target group needs and support – 4 points; 1.6. application of the project results will be used in the 5 target group needs and support – 5 points.
0-5 If the assessment of compliance with criterion 1 received 0 points, the application rejects the implementation of project activities 2 results in the implementation of structural reforms and policies meet public administration development mērķiem1 and in the medium term and the long term: 2.1 the project activities meet the Government's medium-term development and long-term objectives-3 points; 2.2. the project activities meet the Government's medium-term development objectives – 2 points; 2.3. the project activities meet the Government's long-term development goals – 1 point; 2.4. project activities does not meet the Government's medium-term development and long-term objectives – 0 points.
0-3 is not exclusive Criteria 3. application of the project for public administration reform implementation according to the situation: socio 3.1. submission of the project for a new public administration reform – 2 points; 3.2. application of the project for the reform of public administration, the continuation of the implementation-1 point; 3.3. the project application is not intended for the public administration reform – 0 points.
0-2 is not the exclusive Criterion 4. Project partners involved: 4.1 project involved the choice of partners is based (specified in the planned cooperation model, partner role defined according to its competence and experience) – 2 points; 4.2. project partners are not involved in – 1 point; 4.3. project partners Association not reasonable and does not meet the competency partners-0 points.
0-2 is not the exclusive Criterion 5. risk assessments of the implementation of the project: 5.1 the project risks in the application is assessed, the action plan identified risks have been developed, including the implementation of the project has been carried out in the period of the financial implementation of the project, as well as the results of project activities and the monitoring of performance indicators risk analysis – 2 points; 5.2. application of the project risks are assessed, action plan identified risks not fully developed – 1 point; 5.3. application of the project not assessed potential risks or potential risks in the application considered incomplete and not designed to identify the risk prevention plan-0 points.
0-2 If the rating for compliance with criterion 5 received 0 points, project submissions rejected submission of the project 6. planned activities the cost effectiveness evaluation: 6.1 application of the project is estimated at planned cost effectiveness in achieving project results – 1 point; 6.2. the project application is not evaluated the planned cost effectiveness in achieving project results – 0 points.
0-1 If assessment of compliance with the criterion 6, received 0 points, the application is rejected, the contribution of the project horizontal priorities (HP) in the implementation of the maximum number of points-10 points 7. The impact of the project on HP "macroeconomic stability": 7.1 project has a direct positive impact – 2 points; 7.2. the project is indirect positive impact – 1 point; 7.3. the positive impact of the project – 0 points.
0-2 is not the exclusive Criterion 8. The impact of the project on "equal opportunity" HP: 8.1 project has a direct positive impact – 2 points; 8.2. the project has an immediate positive impact – 1 point; 8.3. the project has no positive impact – 0 points.
0-2 is not the exclusive Criterion 9. The impact of the project on the "information society" HP: 9.1. application of the project intended to develop or improve information systems, or improve the quality of services and electronic availability-6 points; 9.2. the application provided for in the project activities target groups training on information communication technology or intended to increase opportunities for the target group to participate in policy-making and policy implementation in the use of information communication technology solutions-3 points; 9.3. submission of project activities in the development of the information society – 0 points.
0-6 is not exclusive Criteria eligibility criteria-application on the merits of the project corresponds to the activity meets/does not meet-10. the project submission complies with 1.5.1.1.1. apakšaktivitāt's aim is to ensure the implementation of structural reforms in public administration and strengthen the analytical ability of the economic growth in important policy areas as budgetary and financial policy, industry and services, business policy and public administration policy.
 
11. in the application of the project n planned activities results achieved by project indicators contribute to the Cabinet of Ministers of 24 November 2009. Regulations No. 1358 "provisions for the operational programme" human resources and employment "at the bottom of the 1.5.1.1.1. Appendix activity" support for the implementation of structural reforms and the strengthening of the analytical capacity of the public administration "" specific monitoring indicator.
 
12. submission of the project n describes the project management, implementation and monitoring mechanisms for the implementation of the project and the required resources (human resources, qualifications, and responsibilities, the available material and technical base) and they are appropriate and sufficient for the needs of the project.
 
13. application of the project n planned publicity and infor distribution lag measures are appropriate laws, regulations of the ERS on the European Union's structural and cohesion funds publicity and funded projects visual identity requirements.
 
14. the application of the project n clear project objectives project activities and relationships.
 
15. in the application of the project n planned activities are justified, proportionate with the planned time schedule for the implementation of activities and planned results.
 
N 16. application project based on the chosen target group needs and identifies the challenges.
 
N 17. seeks to ensure the application of the project results is maintained for 5 years after completion of the project.
 
N administrative evaluation criteria meets/does not meet-18. the project applicant is invited to submit a project application to the limited application of project selection.
 
N 19. project proposal is submitted to the authorities of cooperation within the prescribed period.
 
N 20. has been prepared for submission of the draft text.
 
21. application of the project n is made in the Latvian language.
 
22. submission of draft n is drawn up according to the Cabinet of Ministers of 24 November 2009. Regulations No. 1358 "provisions for the operational programme" human resources and employment "at the bottom of the 1.5.1.1.1. Appendix activity" support for the implementation of structural reforms and the strengthening of the analytical capacity of the public administration "" specified for the project submission form section and all of the forms are filled.
 
P 23. project application is filed on paper, the required number of copies of the application for the project (the original and a copy of the application (if provided) is cauršūt (caurauklot), or electronic form, a document signed with a secure electronic signature law on electronic document design.
 
24. submission of project p is signed by the project head of the institution to the applicant or his authorised person.
 
25. the project application, p is attached to the Cabinet of Ministers of 24 November 2009. Regulations No. 1358 "provisions for the operational programme" human resources and employment "1.5.1.1.1. apakšaktivitāt" Supplement to aid in the implementation of structural reforms and the strengthening of the analytical capacity of the public administration "" attachments.
 
P 26. implementation of the project submission deadline of 31 December 2013.
 
27. in the application of the project n the requested total eligible cost exceeds LVL 1 661 802.
 
N 28.

Application of the project estimated eligible costs will not exceed a Cabinet of 24 November 2009. Regulations No. 1358 "provisions for the operational programme" human resources and employment "1.5.1.1.1. apakšaktivitāt" Supplement to aid in the implementation of structural reforms and the strengthening of the analytical capacity of the public administration "" in certain position about the eligible cost limits.
 
29. in the application of the project n requested the European Social Fund co-financing does not exceed 85% of the total eligible cost.
 
N 30. the application of the project eligible cost position corresponds to a Cabinet of 24 November 2009. Regulations No. 1358 "provisions for the operational programme" human resources and employment "1.5.1.1.1. apakšaktivitāt" Supplement to aid in the implementation of structural reforms and the strengthening of the analytical capacity of the public administration "" eligible costs laid down.
 
N project submissions valued with "Yes" and "no" in accordance with the administrative and eligibility criteria. Criteria that are assessed by "Yes" or "no", there are two rating: N-negative rating in case the project submissions rejected P-Can take a decision on the approval of the application, the project on condition that the applicant shall comply with the criteria laid down by the decision. 1-the target laid down in the national strategic reference framework 2007-2013 period.
The Minister of finance, Minister of welfare instead U have Augul.