The Provisions On "operational Programme Infrastructure And Services" Appendix "airport Activity 3.3.1.4. Infrastructure Development"

Original Language Title: Noteikumi par darbības programmas "Infrastruktūra un pakalpojumi" papildinājuma 3.3.1.4.aktivitāti "Lidostu infrastruktūras attīstība"

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$20 per month, or Get a Day Pass for only USD$4.99.
Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 1476 in Riga 2009 on 15 December (pr. No 88 43. §) rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" Appendix "airport activity 3.3.1.4. infrastructure development" Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures for implementing the action programme ' infrastructure and services ' Appendix 3.3. priority "European transport network and the development of sustainable transport promotion" UR3.3.1.pas "contributes a large scale transport infrastructure improvement and development" activity "airport 3.3.1.4. infrastructure development" (hereinafter activity);
1.2. the responsible authority;
1.3. project submission evaluation criteria;
1.4. requirements the project applicant. 2. The purpose of the activity is safe, effective, growing traffic, according to the air transport infrastructure. 3. the activity exercised limited project application selection. 4. the overall activity of the Cohesion Fund financing available is 51 654 269 lats. National funding by project. 5. National funding of not less than 15 percent of the eligible costs of the project, and funding from the Cohesion Fund shall not exceed 85 percent of the project's total eligible costs. Business support project can detect lower funding from the Cohesion Fund to the maximum percentage to be applied. 6. the maximum amount of financing of the Cohesion Fund in the national airport project has 41 114 034 lats from the project total eligible costs, the maximum amount of financing regional airports project-3 513 411 million lats. II. The responsible authority and the applicant of the project activities within 7 authority does the traffic Ministry. Responsible authority: 7.1 implements its functions and competence ensure appropriate not to overrun the rule laid down in paragraph 4, the activities available for the implementation of the Cohesion Fund;
7.2. monitor the available funding under the Cohesion Fund, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the performance of the activities and project level, controlling the project financing plan. 8. within the framework of the project the applicant activity is national and regional airports. III. eligible activities of the project, eligible and non-eligible costs 9. Project activities have assisted the national airport and a regional airport passenger terminal reconstruction, expansion and new construction, aircraft, offshore construction, construction and reconstruction of infrastructure, energy and communications construction and reconstruction of the runway, aircraft, passenger, baggage and cargo service infrastructure, as well as airfield technical equipment acquisition and modernisation of the runway reconstruction and modernisation of air navigation system. 10. the eligible costs of the project are: 10.1. land acquisition if its value does not exceed 10 per cent of the eligible costs of the project;
10.2. Design and autoruzraudzīb;
10.3. installation and removal of the construction site;
10.4. the construction works;
10.5. Superintendence;
10.6. the inspection;
10.7. siding maintenance object during construction;
10.8. environmental compliance costs;
10.9. with fire protection and other safety requirements-related costs;
10.10. the main activity required for the acquisition and installation of equipment;
10.11. the infrastructure belonging to the inženiertīkl complex of construction works;
10.12. home improvement;
10.13. publicity measures, in so far as it provides for the European Union structural funds and the cohesion fund management regulatory acts;
10.14. expenditure for contingencies this provision 10.4., 10.11.10.12. referred to and expenses: not more than 10 per cent of the eligible costs of the project (including the possible incidence of compensation projects) projects whose total cost is at least 35 140 200 dollars, and a maximum of five percent of the project, whose total cost is less than 35 140 200 lats;
10.15. the value added tax, where the applicant cannot recover it according to the regulations of the tax policy. 11. in paragraph 10 of these rules, such costs are eligible: 11.1 from 24 October 2006, when the project is under the Finance Ministry's initial evaluation, the opinion not qualifying as a commercial support and project total eligible costs are at least 35 140 200 lats;
11.2. as from the date on which the responsible authority has taken a decision on the application for the approval of the project, if the project under the Ministry of finance, the opinion of the initial evaluation, not qualifying as a commercial support and project total eligible costs are less than 35 140 200 lats;
11.3. as from the date on which the responsible authority has taken a decision on the application for the approval of the project, if the project in accordance with the initial evaluation, the Ministry of Finance's opinion qualify as commercial support;
11.4. as from the date when the European Commission has adopted a decision on the compatibility of the project with the treaties establishing the European communities, if the project is in accordance with the initial evaluation, the Ministry of Finance's opinion qualify as commercial support, and about the need to notify the European Commission. 12. not eligible costs of the project are: 12.1. costs in excess of the approved project submission, the proposed amount of the eligible cost;
12.2. land acquisition when its value exceeds 10 per cent of the eligible costs of the project amount;
12.3. costs not justified by relevant source documents. 13. The project can include only the 10 and 11 of these regulations, paragraph. Project expenditure does not include administrative costs. 14. the implementation of the project of non-eligible costs shall be borne by the beneficiaries of their funds. IV. Project application selection to tender, project submission, and submission of the project application form 15. the responsible authority by sending a letter to invite the national airport and regional airports to submit these terms according to the project application. 16. The first application round project responsible body shall, no later than 30 March 2010. The first application round project within the responsible authority shall invite national airport to submit these terms according to the project application. 17. The second project application selection round of the responsible authority shall, no later than 30 December 2010. The second application round of projects within the responsible authority invite the regional airports to submit these terms appropriate project submissions. 18. If the first and second application round project has not learned all the funding available in the activity, the competent authority shall issue the third application round project on activity and invite the remaining funding for the national airport and regional airports to submit these terms appropriate project submissions. 19. the project applicant project application to the responsible body by the deadline, which is not less than five days from the date of dispatch of the invitation. 20. If the total cost of the project is at least 35 140 200 lats, project submissions prepared according to these provisions set out in annex 1 to the project submission form and the Commission of 8 December 2006, Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund, to annex XXI. 21. the total cost of the project is less than 35 140 200 lats, project submissions prepared according to this provision the project defined in annex 2 of the application form. 22. the project application submitted in person, by post or by electronic means. 23. the project submission in paper form shall be submitted in triplicate (one original and one copy) and adds the project application to the electronic version of data media (data media included documents formatted in MS Word, MS ExcelM format). 24. the project submissions electronically submitted in accordance with the legislation on electronic document design. Project application with secure electronic signature, certified by the stamp of the time before the draft submission closing date and sent to the electronic mail address inv_dep@sam.gov.lv. 25. the project applicant project application shall be accompanied by the following supporting documents: 25.1. the lender issued a document about the possibility to get a loan for the project, if a project is to be implemented on the borrowed funds;
25.2. such specialist descriptions of life (curriculum vitae): 25.2.1. civil engineer with at least three years experience in airport infrastructures in the field of construction or the construction of transport infrastructure;
25.2.2. Project Manager with at least three years of experience in the management of transport infrastructure projects;
25.2.3. accountant financiers with at least three years experience in financial accounting;

25.3. the technical-economic justification of the project cost-benefit analysis and risk estimates and sensitivity analysis calculations, and calculations supporting documents;
25.4. the initial evaluation, the Ministry of Finance's opinion under the regulatory control of commercial support of legislation;
25.5. the business register issued the registration certificate of the applicant for the project. V. Project application procedures and the criteria of evaluation 26. activities within the project submitted submissions judged responsible authorities established a project application to the Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission). Panelists include the Ministry of transport and representatives of the responsible authority. The composition of the Commission, approved by the responsible authorities. The representatives of the managing authority is the power to participate in the meetings of the Commission as observers without voting rights. 27. the Commission is governed by the head of the responsible authority's approved Charter. 28. the project submission compliance is assessed on the basis of those provisions set out in annex 3 of the draft application evaluation criteria. 29. the project submission's compliance with this provision of the annex 3 1 and 2 of the assessment criteria laid down in the scored with "Yes" () or "no" (no matches). Project compliance with this provision of the application, 3. in paragraph 3 of the annex to the assessment criteria laid down scored with "Yes" (match), "no" (non-compliant) or by giving a certain number of points. 30. to determine the total number of points that rule 3 of the annex in the criteria referred to in paragraph 3, the number of points earned in each criteria multiplied by the percentage of the proportion of the corresponding criteria. 31. the project submission's compliance with this provision in paragraph 4 of annex 3 to the evaluation criterion is assessed by "Yes" or "no" (match) "(non-compliant). Vi. Decision-making 32. the responsible authority for the project application is approved if it complies with all the rules referred to in annex 3 of the assessment criteria. 33. the project's responsible authority approves the application, if the application does not need to specify the corresponding to any of the provisions of annex 1 and referred to in paragraph 2, the evaluation criteria, which allow the application of the project approval with conditions. 34. the decision on the application of the project approval or approval with conditions, if the project is under the Finance Ministry's initial evaluation, the opinion qualifies as commercial support, which requires notification to the European Commission, the responsible authority shall specify the time limit for the entry into force of the decision determining that at this point the competent authorities referred to in this decision shall enter into force at the European Commission's decision on the compatibility of the project with the Treaty establishing the European Community. 35. the responsible authority shall reject the application for the project if it does not match any of the rules set out in annex 3 of the assessment criteria, which do not allow for the approval of the application, the project on condition. 36. the decision on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection provided the determining authority within five working days after the decision has been forwarded to the project applicant. 37. the decision on the application for the approval of the project provided the conditions contained in the project applicant 15 working days of notification of the decision. 38. Within five working days after the conditions for receipt of the supporting documents, the Commission shall evaluate compliance with the conditions contained in the decision and the responsible authority shall draw up the opinion. 39. Where the applicant has complied with the decision on the application for the approval of the project provided the conditions contained in the project application is considered and approved by the responsible authority within five working days after 38 of these rules. the expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 1 shall send to the applicant, project a positive opinion on the conditions contained in the decision. 40. If the decision contains conditions are not fulfilled, these provisions are not complied with within the time limit specified in paragraph 37 or 38 of these provisions the competent authorities referred to in the opinion is negative, the project application is considered to have been rejected and the responsible authority within five working days after 38 of these rules. the expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 1 shall send to the applicant a negative draft opinion. 41. the project the applicant within two weeks after the European Commission's decision on the compatibility of the project with the Treaty establishing the European Community submitted to the body responsible for making the decisions of the European Commission and in accordance with the law business lines support the control specified in the project application. The European Commission adopted a decision on the compatibility of the project with the Treaty establishing the European Community and project submissions do not have to specify the project applicant within two weeks after the European Commission's decision, the responsible authority shall be submitted to the European Commission decision and a declaration that the authority responsible for the project originally submitted an application with the European Commission approved the project for the application version. 42. If the European Commission, within the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 41 paragraph 1 provides for the submission of objections to the project, the responsible authority shall send to the applicant, the opposition to the project by setting a time-limit specified in the application for the project to the responsible authority. The applicant shall specify in the project the project submissions received objections and accordingly the competent authorities shall specify the deadline of the project submission. The responsible authority shall coordinate the project specified in the application and sent to the managing authority for reconciliation and for submission to the European Commission. VII. The project 43. Responsible authorities and funding requested in the contract concluded for the implementation of the project the responsible authority indicates the period of initiation of the procurement procedure, if the procurement procedure has been initiated in the past, as well as the preparation of request for payment and financing of the Fund of the European Union requested reimbursement. 44. The payment request can be made and expenses be repaid in dollars or the single European Union currency. 45. If the application of the project in accordance with the initial evaluation, the Ministry of Finance's opinion qualify as commercial support, the implementation of the project may be initiated by the competent authorities of the decision. Prime Minister v. dombrovsky traffic Minister k. Gerhards traffic Ministry submitted version of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 15 December 2009. Regulations No 1476 traffic Minister k. Gerhards traffic Ministry submitted version of annex 2 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 15 December 2009. Regulations No 1476 traffic Minister k. Gerhard annex 3 Cabinet 15 December 2009. Regulations No 1476 Project submission evaluation criteria 1. Administrative criteria evaluation system Criteria the impact on decision making (P * N **) Yes/No 1.1. the project submission complies with the laws and the documents set out the requirements for the preparation and presentation of the project application, P 1.2 is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified N 1.3. design application has been drawn up according to the project application form for submission of the project N 1.4 has added all these rules and submission of project documents indicated in P 1.5. application the project financing plan and budget summary has no arithmetic errors P 1.6. Project application is signed by the project paraksttiesīg of the applicant party or its authorized person (is added to the token identity document) N 2. Eligibility 2.1. Project eligibility criteria applicant ranking system yes/no notes 2.1.1. Project applicant is a national or a regional airport N 2.1.2. Project applicant is invited to submit a project application N 2.1.3. Project applicant has been declared bankrupt, is being wound up and the economic activity it is not paused or stopped N 2.1.4. The project applicant is not a tax and the State social insurance compulsory contribution receivable N 2.1.5. Project applicant has sufficient and stable financial resources to ensure that all project cash flows. If the applicant intends to co-finance a project from borrowed funds, is added to the document issued by the lender for the opportunity to get a loan for the project to the extent necessary for the implementation of the project the applicant N 2.1.6. is committed to providing funding for the project from its own resources in case of increase of the cost N 2.2 project eligibility criteria ranking system yes/no notes 2.2.1. project application describes the project management, implementation and monitoring of the scheme N 2.2.2. project application describes the implementation of the project required resources (in the number of staff assigned qualifications, duties and material technical base) P

2.2.3. Project management personnel have adequate experience and project management capacity, professional and technical expertise, project management staff composition will include at least the following professionals: 1) one civil engineer with at least three years experience in airport infrastructures in the field of construction or the construction of transport infrastructure; 2) one project manager with at least three years of experience in the management of transport infrastructure projects; 3) one accountant, financier with at least three years of experience in financial accounting P 2.2.4. Project has made a cost-benefit analysis N 2.2.5. Project cost-benefit analysis is used in real financial discount rate to 5 percent N 2.2.6. the project cost-benefit analysis is used in the social discount rate – 5.5 percent N 2.2.7. project economic net present value greater than zero (ENPV > 0) N 2.2.8. economic rate of return of the project norm is more than 5.5 percent (5.5%) ERR >   N 2.2.9. The project will be completed by 31 august 2015 N 2.2.10 project requested funding from the Cohesion Fund shall not exceed the amount set out in these provisions and funding from the Cohesion Fund, the percentage of the total amount is calculated and properly P 2.2.11. activities within the project, the applicant has not received funding (criteria apply to regional airports) N Project applicant 2.2.12 project application submitted under round one project submission (criteria apply to regional airports) N 2.2.13. the project corresponds to the purpose of the activity-secure , effective, growing traffic, according to the air transport infrastructure Is made of various N-2.2.14. project analysis and proposed a project solution that provides maximum passenger flow and cargo turnover N 2.2.15. Project budget includes costs correspond to the average of the projected market prices of construction project of the year and are required to achieve the project's results and the implementation of the planned activities of the project application, P 2.2.16. the planned monitoring indicators are clearly defined and measurable N 2.2.17. the project is not and has not been financed or co-financed from other European The Union's financial sources as well as State and local budget resources, the project planned activities do not overlap with activities financed from other funds of the European Union activities and of other financial instruments within N project planned 2.2.18. publicity and visual identity measures comply with the laws and regulations of the European Union fund publicity and visual identity assurance requirements the minimum requirements laid down P 2.2.19. Ensuring the sustainability of the project results – project implementation values resulting from the maintenance of at least 25 years after completion of the project N 2.2.20. Project is designed Matt N 2.2.21. the construction project will ensure the aviation legislation in compliance with the requirements of regular flight operations for N application contains the 2.2.22. project cost and amount of positions in these provisions meet the cost and volume P 2.2.23. project realization requires the land is the property of the applicant or of the project the project the applicant represents that the could provide the needed land acquisitions in its owned up to the beginning of the construction project will not qualify 2.2.24. N as commercial support or If a business qualifies as an aid project application has added to the evidence that the applicant for business of the project supports the control of regulatory laws in submitting a project application to the European Commission for a decision on the compatibility of the project with the Treaty establishing the European Community and do not start the project before the responsible authority decision on the approval of the project application or before the European Commission has adopted a decision on the project's compatibility with the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community , or added to the evidence that supports the control of business regulatory legislation in the order it is exempt from notification to the European Commission N 3. Criteria of quality evaluation system of notes or Yes/No in point 3.1. economic rate of return of the project norm points are awarded according to ERR. The proportion of 90% criteria 3.2 project implementation criteria of 10% less than 1 year 3.2.1 3.2.2.3 from 1 to 2 years 2 3.2.3. more than 2 years 1 3.3. Quality criteria for horizontal priorities 3.3.1. developing projects, will be taken into account in the construction of the Republic of Latvia regulatory legislation, the draft includes measures for promoting environmental accessibility for people with functional disabilities N 3.3.2. Project enhance flight safety and environmental pollution risk reduction N 4. the criterion for the award of the FINANCING system for rating notes Yes/ No 4.1. If the application meets the 1.2, 1.3, 1.6, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3.., 2.1.4, 2.1.5, 2.1.6, 2.2.1., 2.2.4, 2.2.5, 2.2.6., 2.2.7 2.2.8 2.2.9,.,.,.,., 2.2.11 2.2.12 2.2.14, 2.2.16 2.2.13.,.,.,., 2.2.19 2.2.20 2.2.17.,.,., 2.2.23 2.2.24 2.2.21., 3.3.1. and 3.3.2. valuation criteria laid down in point, as well as point 3.2 and 3.1 in the assessment criteria together received more than 505 points, then the project submissions, listing in order of priority, starting with the most points won the the project application, insufficient activity of N notes available funding. * If the criteria are not met, the responsible authority shall take a decision on the approval of the application, the project on condition. ** If the criteria are not met, the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application for the project.
Traffic Minister k. Gerhard

Related Laws