Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 1487 in Riga 2009 on 15 December (pr. No 88 88) rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" Appendix apakšaktivitāt "shared 3.5.1.2.3. waste management system development" Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines the order in which the activities of the programme ' infrastructure and services ' Appendix 3.5. priorities for environmental infrastructure and "green energy" UR3.5.1.pas based "infrastructure" of environmental protection activity "regional 3.5.1.2. waste management system development" apakšaktivitāt "shared 3.5.1.2.3. waste management system development" (hereinafter activity) the project submission evaluation criteria, applicant requirements project, the responsible authority and the liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements, as well as the responsible authorities and cooperation agencies functional form of subordination. 2. The purpose of the activity is to create a sustainable waste, including hazardous waste management system, supporting separate collection infrastructures to promote the recycling of materials. 3. activities implemented in the framework of projects co-financed by the Cohesion Fund of the European Union (hereinafter referred to as the Cohesion Fund). Activities available within the Cohesion Fund co-financing are 49055719 dollars, private funds – 49055719. 4. activities at the waste management region, economic operators and the authorities. 5. Activity implemented an open project selection application form. 6. activities supported under: 6.1 disposal of biodegradable waste reduction;
6.2. distributed collection of packaging waste in order to reduce the volume of waste for disposal;
6.3. the separation of hazardous waste from the total municipal waste landfilled waste streams;
6.4. hazardous waste collection systems development. 7. within the framework of the activity does not support waste recycling, as well as: 7.1 approved regional waste management plans not listed in separate waste collection, composting area, sorting area, sorting centre, as well as sorting and handling centres (stations);
7.2. If an existing distributed garbage collection, composting area, sorting area, sorting centres, sorting and handling Center (station), as well as household hazardous waste collection development;
7.3. acquisition of containers of municipal waste selective collection points;
7.4. waste collection vehicles and other vehicles of acquisition;
7.5. equipment and tools for production of biogas;
7.6. the acquisition of fixed assets which do not provide for regulations on waste collection and sorting requirements, waste collection and sorting as well as the requirements for biodegradable waste composting site installation and management. 8. activities within the responsible authority provides the Ministry of the environment (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authority). The responsible authority has the following functions: 8.1. to ensure the project under the Cohesion Fund (hereinafter the project), in assessing the application, project submissions for funding from the Cohesion Fund;
8.2. to provide information on the project applicant project application preparation;
8.3. to participate in the civil contract for the implementation of a project (hereinafter referred to as the civil agreement);
8.4. to plan a presentation about the activities and the implementation of public information, including activities within the projects approved;
8.5. to ensure that these rules not be exceeded within the specified activities available for the implementation of the Cohesion Fund co-financing and monitoring cohesion fund co-financing available for learning, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the performance of the activities and project level by controlling the project financial plan. 9. cooperation authority provides the Central Finance and contracts (hereinafter referred to as cooperation body). The cooperation body is the functional authority. Cooperation institution has the following functions: 9.1. develop and conclude civil contracts with beneficiaries of co-financing from the Cohesion Fund (hereinafter referred to as the beneficiary);
9.2. consider funding requested procurement plan and submit it to the procurement monitoring Bureau and responsible authority;
9.3. ensure the Cohesion Fund co-financing and the use of funds in accordance with the civil contract concluded with beneficiaries;
9.4. to consider and approve the financing requested progress reports submitted and verified payment requests, approve the payment requests included the expense amounts, prepare payment orders and submit them to the paying authority;
9.5. to prepare the statement of expenditure and to present its leading body;
9.6. prepare a cohesion fund payments forecasts and submit the payment authority and the managing body;
9.7. to provide information on the authority responsible for the implementation of the activities of the Cohesion Fund co-financing available for learning;
6.1. ensure accumulation of information about the projects and the transfer of such information to the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system;
9.9. to plan and implement information and publicity measures on the project level, including an opinion of the beneficiary of the civil contract conditions and project locations to monitor the provision of publicity measures, laid down in the Commission of 8 December 2006, Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund , The European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, and the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund. After the conclusion of the contract in civil law on its website (www.cfla.gov.lv) to publish information on the projects;
9.10. ensure the supervision and control of the activity, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the implementation of the project, as well as to assess project risk, to prepare each year a plan for verifying project locations and in cooperation with the responsible authority to carry out these checks;
9.11. assess civil contract amendments, to take a decision on the approval or rejection of amendments and match them with the responsible authority, if the amendment includes changes: project monitoring indicators 9.11.1.;
9.11.2. project activities, providing for the inclusion of new activities or the activities of the project changes in financial terms exceeded 20 percent of the total cost of the project;
9.11.3. project costs that exceed 20 percent of the total cost of the project. II. Requirements for the project and the conditions for grant of aid Projects the applicant has 10 Corporation that has contracted with local waste management services in the administrative territory or has an agreement with the recipient about the management of hazardous waste. 11. the applicant in the project under the Cohesion Fund co-financing per selection round may submit an unlimited number of project submissions. One project total cost must not exceed the relevant selection round the Cohesion Fund co-financing. 12. the project for the implementation of the project, the applicant does not constitute a partnership. 13. the applicant shall analyze the project costs and benefits according to the provisions of annex 1. 14. the Cohesion Fund provided the maximum aid intensity will not exceed 50 percent of the project's total eligible costs. 15. the total budget of the project consists of the eligible and non-eligible costs, as well as a financial reserve, which can be up to five percent of the project's total eligible costs. The financial reserve of the project use this rule set out in paragraph 16 of the eligible costs incurred for the use of financial reserves before making the relevant amendments to the civil contract. 16. the eligible costs shall be the following the initial investment of capital tangible assets, including autoruzraudzīb and building expenses: investment in fixed assets-16.1 distributed waste collection infrastructure: 16.1.1. share of municipal waste collection point creation in accordance with the Cabinet of Ministers approved the regional waste management plans. The minimum population for one distributed waste collection point – 400;
16.1.2. municipal waste-handling area of the creation in accordance with the Cabinet of Ministers approved the regional waste management plans.

16.1.3. the composting area created in accordance with the Cabinet of Ministers approved the regional waste management plans.
16.1.4. sorting center, sorting and handling Center (station) (including bulky waste) installing under the Cabinet of Ministers approved the regional waste management plans.
16.1.5. the household hazardous waste collection point installation in accordance with the statutory classification of hazardous waste;
16.2. the investment in fixed assets – hazardous waste collection and treatment facilities and equipment veterinary care practices. 17. The initial investment is eligible if: 17.1. they are used only for the purposes of the Corporation, which receives support;
17.2. This includes the Corporation's assets as long-term investments in depreciable and at least five years after the last of the project concerned the payment received shall remain the property of the Corporation and is not transferred to the use third parties;
17.3. they after the implementation of the project for at least five years remain in the region, which was planned and carried out activities for aid. 18. Non-eligible costs include the following: 18.1. the environmental impact assessment documentation related to development costs, development of construction and related costs of būvekspertīz, as well as the technical project development costs;
18.2. project preparation costs;
18.3. contracts of supply costs, excluding those costs, consisting of the depreciable fixed assets;
18.4. costs that have been identified as ineligible under the Council on 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) no 1084/2006 establishing a Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 article 3. 19. non-eligible costs of the project shall not be more than 50 percent of the project's total eligible costs. If the project is launched before the conclusion of the contract in civil law, the full cost of the project is irrelevant. 20. the project submission does not include the following costs: 20.1. project management personnel involved in project management fees and administrative costs, as well as the beneficiaries of the maintenance costs;
20.2. for administrative purposes, or project management for durable equipment used (hardware and vehicles);
20.3. fees for accounting and audit services;
20.4. the fee for the legal, technical and financial advice provided on the project during its implementation;
20.5. the revolving loan funds and the cost of the acquisition, paid for the review of the design of the loan, reservation and service charges for financial transactions, interest on arrears, penalties and expenses of litigation;
20.6. real estate purchase costs;
20.7. the implementation of the project particularly the purchase or production of durable equipment (equipment, which are used in the construction process) cost of acquisition;
12.9. the purchase of second-hand equipment;
20.9. expenses, which does not provide the immediate purchase of equipment, such as leasing;
20.10. the purchase of intangible assets (assets by the transfer of technology through the acquisition of patent rights, licences, know-how or unpatented technical knowledge);
20.11. cost of acquisition of the company. 21. On the Cohesion Fund co-financing project applicant can qualify if: 21.1. a corporation meets the ailing merchant status: 21.1.1. by a decision of the Court of Justice recognized as insolvent, including reorganisation or is in the process of legal protection, the economic activity of the applicant, the project has ended, or in accordance with the commercial register of the information available, it is in the process of liquidation;
21.1.2. its equity has dropped more than half, and more than a quarter of the equity has fallen in the last 12 months;
21.2. the Corporation's tax liability to the project application, the first working day of the month;
21.3. the Corporation that made the project application, there is no legislation in the relevant authorisation, the nature and extent of waste management;
21.4. the project applicant cannot provide funding from its own resources, if the increase in the cost of the project;
21.5. the property that will be carried, stored or will be in the initial investment is not the property of the applicant and of the project the project the applicant does not have a long-term lease (at least another five years after the last of the project concerned the payment received);
21.6. the project applicant is not entitled to carry out the works concerned, which works under the project;
21.7. the project the applicant has provided false information in connection with European Union structural funds co-financed projects implementation;
21.8. the project applicant has committed a crime that hit the Republic of Latvia or the European Union's financial interests, and the operator is applied to the forced influence;
13.6. the project applicant has received or anticipates receiving aid for the same eligible costs of other activities in the framework of local, regional, national or European Union funds;
21.10. the project the applicant has violated the conditions to be met to receive State aid to business. 22. the applicant launched the project to implement the project after the conclusion of the contract under civil law. III. Project application selection 23. project application selection issued three selection rounds according to the respective selection round available for cohesion fund co-financing funds: 23.1. the first application round project for the Cohesion Fund co-financing available is 16 351 900 lats;
23.2. the second project application selection round for the Cohesion Fund co-financing available is 16 351 900 lats;
23.3. the third project application selection round the cohesion fund available for co-financing of at least 16 351 919 lats;
14.5. If the first application round of projects available for the Cohesion Fund co-financing are not assigned or are not used, the remainder of the second redirect co-financing the project application selection round of financing, but the remainder of the second project application selection round of co-financing third project diverted the application selection round of financing. 24. the responsible authority for the project submission application (hereinafter referred to as the notice) issued: 24.1. the first application round project – not later than two months after the entry into force of these regulations;
24.2. the second project application selection round-until 1 July 2010;
24.3. the third project application selection round-up for March 1, 2011. 25. Notice of project application selection round of funding and available for the selection round of the start and end of the time limit. Notice the responsible authority shall issue: 25.1. newspaper "Gazette";
25.2. The Ministry of environment Web site – www.vidm.gov.lv. 26. the project application to the responsible body shall submit, within three months following submission of open project selection round of the tender. The competent authority may extend the notice period for the submission of the project application for a period of up to two months: 26.1. If the European Union fund Monitoring Committee decided on changes to the project evaluation criteria applications;
26.2. If, after notice to the notification (point 24 of these regulations) these regulations are amended. IV. Project application submission 27. applicant project application Project-project application form (annex 2) and attachments-pursuant to these rules shall be prepared 3.49, 50, 51 and 52, 54, 55 or 53., 56, 57 of the criteria specified in. 28. the project applicant project application form in the annex to these provisions is added to annex 3 paragraph 59 above. V. application assessment and Project decision-making 29. the responsible authority shall create an open project application selection the cohesion fund the project application for the evaluation of the Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Evaluation Commission) and approved its Statute. The Evaluation Commission is composed of the responsible authority, the Ministry of environment, local government and the Union of Latvian Environmental Protection Association or Foundation, as well as the representatives of the managing authority and the liaison body as an observer. 30. the responsible authority: 30.1. in the month following the entry into force of these regulations are developed and approved a project application selection project application assessment methodology and application form filling project methodology;
30.2. the month after the entry into force of the provisions inserted into the Ministry of the environment Web site (www.vidm.gov.lv) to open the project application selection project application form (annex 2), project submission evaluation form (annex 3), the project application and assessment methodology for the implementation of the project the necessary methodological materials;
30.3. during the two months following the entry into force of these regulations shall be published in the Ministry of environment Web site (www.vidm.gov.lv) procurement guidelines and procurement documents;

18.9. record project submissions and assigns them identification numbers. Proof of submission of the project, indicating the registration number, the responsible authority shall issue to the applicant personally project immediately or within two weeks after receipt of the application by post or electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature). 31. project submissions valued at administrative, compliance, quality and funding criteria (annex 3). 32. the project compliance with administrative applications, eligibility and funding criteria assessed with "Yes" or "no" ("Yes", "no" – meets does not meet). If the administrative application of the project, or funding criteria is not applicable to a specific project, applicant project application in respect of this criterion. 33. the project submission's compliance with the quality criteria assessed by giving a certain number of points: 33.1. If application of the project planned for the separate waste collection project infrastructure components, application for compliance with the provisions of this annex 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., in paragraph 8.1 or 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, or in or and 11. criteria referred to in paragraph 1 must be received at least one point (on each criterion);
33.2. If application of the project planned for the management of hazardous waste treatment infrastructure facilities and laboratories, on the application of the project compliance with this provision of the annex 3 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6, 9.1, 9.2 and 9.3. criteria referred to in subparagraph must receive at least one point (on each criterion);
33.3. If application of the project planned for the separate waste collection project infrastructure components, application for compliance with the provisions of annex 7, paragraph 3, and paragraph 8.2.6.8.3.6., 10., 12, 13, 14 and 15 of the draft criteria referred to in the application may receive additional points;
33.4. If application of the project planned for the management of hazardous waste treatment infrastructure facilities and laboratories, on the application of the project compliance with this provision in paragraph 7 of annex 3, paragraph 9.4., 10., 12, 13, 14 and 15 of the draft criteria referred to in the application may receive additional points. 34. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application of the project if it does not comply with the provisions of annex 3 47., 49 and 50. criteria referred to in point. 35. evaluation the Commission shall assess the project submissions in the following order: 21.8. first project submissions valued in compliance with the rules referred to in annex 3 of the administrative criteria, project application and project eligibility criteria eligibility criteria for the applicant. If the assessment is in one of the following criteria is "no", the application is rejected and the project evaluation do not continue. If the application of these criteria the project evaluates to "Yes", the application of the project evaluated compliance with quality criteria;
35.2. If the application complies with the project: these provisions 3.35.2.1.1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., in paragraph 8.1 or 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, or in or and 11. criteria referred to in paragraph 1 and if the project planned for the separate waste collection project infrastructure components, application of these provisions are valued at 3.60. criteria referred to in paragraph 1. If the application does not meet these criteria, the application is rejected and the project evaluation do not continue;
35.2.2. This provision of the annex 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6, and 9. criteria referred to in paragraph 1 and if the project planned for the management of hazardous waste treatment infrastructure facilities and laboratories, project submissions valued at this provision 3.61. criteria referred to in paragraph 1. If the application does not meet these criteria, the application is rejected and the project evaluation do not continue. 36. If two or more project applications have received the same amount of points, they ranked the project application priority list in the following order: 36.1. project application with the highest ratings of compliance with the provisions of this annex the criteria referred to in paragraph 1;
36.2. the project application with the highest ratings of compliance with the provisions of annex 3, paragraph 3 of the criteria;
36.3. the project application with the highest ratings of compliance with the provisions of annex 3, paragraph 6 of the criteria;
36.4. the project application with the highest ratings of compliance with the provisions of annex 3, paragraph 11 of the criterion;
22.7. a project application with the highest ratings of compliance with the provisions of annex 3, paragraph 13 of the criterion. 37. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the application for approval of a project if: 37.1 it meets this rule. 3. administrative criteria listed in the annex, the eligibility criteria of the project, the project applicant eligibility criteria and quality criteria;
37.2. it satisfies that rule 3.60.61, paragraph or criterion;
37.3. the estimated project listing submissions priority order (starting with the most points earned), with the project application selection round application sufficient funding of the project. 38. The decision on the application of the project approval may include conditions that the project applicant must meet the deadline set in the decision, to be able to conclude a civil contract for the implementation of the project: 38.1. specify information about the project the applicant (contact information and properties) (annex 2);
23.7. to clarify the documents presented (annex 3 of the criteria indicated in paragraph 59);
23.8. to clarify the changes in initial investment and it costs;
23.9. to clarify the eligible costs and the changes do not apply to costs;
38.5. specify the time frame of the project according to the planned project activities;
24.0. specify cash flow forecast (annex 3, paragraph 31, the specified criteria);
to specify the project's application 36.6. the planned implementation of the project and projected human resource security (paragraph 32 of the annex 3 of the specified criteria);
24.1. specify information about publicity measures (annex 3, paragraph 33 of the specified criteria). 39. This provision in the decision referred to in paragraph 36 of the conditions laid down in the implementation of the project the applicant authority in the prescribed time limit, which may not exceed two months from the date of receipt of the decision. The time-limits laid down in this decision cannot be extended. 40.20 working days after the rules referred to in paragraph 39 of the expiration of the evaluation the Commission shall evaluate fulfilment of the decision on the application for the approval of the project, and the responsible authority shall draw up an opinion on the conditions contained in the decision. 41. If the applicant for the project conditions laid down in the decision is not complied with or is not complied with within the time limit set, the opinion of the responsible authority is negative and the project application is considered to have been rejected. 42. the decision on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection provided the determining authority within five working days after the decision has been forwarded to the project the applicant by mail or electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature). Vi. Project implementation rules 43. recipient funding of all project activities must be implemented within four years of the civil contract. 44. The beneficiary shall ensure that all project procurement procedures intended for all project activities, planned by sending an invitation to at least three potential contract performers for each project activity. The first beneficiary of the procurement procedure shall, within three months following the date of conclusion of the contract under civil law. 45. If the beneficiary is running one of the sectors in which there is no support for, and qualify for the implementation of the project eligible sector, it ensures that during project implementation and five years after the implementation of the project eligible sector financial flows of the project would be separate from the other beneficiary of the financial industry. 46. The beneficiary not less frequently than once every three months to ensure current information into your Web site (if any) for the project implementation process. 47. the Civil contract amendments not made: 29.3. If the actual eligible costs not in relation to the project originally specified not eligible costs varies by less than 20 percent;
47.2. If physical indicators of the project shall not exceed five percent of the approved amount of the projects monetised during project implementation;
47.3. If changes in the project's procurement plan does not change the total amount of the purchase. 48. The beneficiary shall ensure the preparation and submission of the report of the Office of civil cooperation agreement. VII. activities after project implementation monitoring 49. The beneficiary is responsible for the implementation and results of the project is maintained for at least five years following the last payment on the project. 50. The beneficiary for five years after the implementation of the project once a year in accordance with the provisions of annex 4 provides information on the responsible authority: 50.1. the results achieved under the project in compliance with the objectives defined in the application;
50.2. the framework of the project the project achieved the outcome and result indicators;
50.3. the distributed garbage collection services and compliance with the planned;

50.4. the asset owner's and service provider's legal status;
50.5. the revenue resulting from the implementation of the project and the compliance with the planned;
50.6. public information activities to introduce the project results and benefits. 51. The first time that rule 4 set out in annex I the beneficiary shall provide the responsible authority within one year of the last receipt of payment for the project and shall provide annually further liability in accordance with the procedure laid down in the agreement. 52. the responsible authority shall ensure that the storage and analysis of information on the objectives of the activity for at least five years after the implementation of all projects in the framework of the activity, if the civil contract does not specify a longer period. Prime Minister Dombrovskis v. Minister of environment r. vējonis annex 1 Cabinet 15 December 2009. Regulations No 1487 instructions the cohesion fund the project cost-benefit analysis 1. Cohesion Fund projects to develop such cost-benefit analysis: section 1.1. financial analysis;
1.2. risk analysis;
1.3. analysis of alternatives.
2. Financial analysis is carried out using the European Union's structural and cohesion funds legislation governing certain macroeconomic indicators.
3. financial analysis includes the following sections: 3.1 the operating costs-benefit analysis;
3.2. fixed asset depreciation. The lifetime of the asset is determined based on the analysis of the alternatives;
3.3. the liquidity, solvency and debt ratios (DSCR) analysis;
3.4. loan repayment analysis, if the project is for the loan;
3.5. investment efficiency indicators (IRR and NPV) analysis.
4. Operating expenses and benefits analysis include the following: 4.1. income from separate waste collection services;
4.2. expenditure associated with the distributed garbage collection services.
5. Financial analysis is conducted on the basis of the discounted cash-flow forecasts for the period. At the beginning of the reporting period is the year when a decision on project approval. Reporting period: 5.1. is at least 50 percent of the project created a planned lifetime of the infrastructure or at least five years;
5.2. no longer than the project infrastructure created lifetime.
6. Operating costs and benefit analysis does not include the depreciation of fixed assets, payments for loans and related interest. It includes the calculation of the profit or loss and adds the operating expenses and benefits analysis on the financial analysis report period.
7. Operating expenses and benefit analysis shall include at least the following: 7.1 the cost of investment and existing assets;
7.2. economic activity changes of revenue and expenditure at current prices, including the applicant's project revenue from the waste management services for the past three years;
7.3. financial sources;
7.4. the existing and planned credit;
7.5. the technical analysis, the service consumer groups. Scope of services and the predicted changes in consumption;
7.6. the solvency of the population and the accounts receivable analysis;
7.7. the project cash flow, which is positive in all the years in regards to performance and overall life cycle of the project, or financial analysis to the end of the reporting period.
8. the financial analysis, the following conditions shall be satisfied: 8.1 consumer price index inflation is applicable to projects where a large proportion of the cost of wages;
8.2. the gross domestic product deflator is applicable to mixed type cost projects in different sectors. It is an appropriate indicator for the expected discounted financial flows from the business;
8.3. the total fixed capital formation deflator is applicable to projects where a large proportion of the cost of investment in fixed capital formation.
9. Financial analysis aims to demonstrate that the project will raise the value of a corporation – the NPV is positive, as well as the Corporation's operating financial results during the implementation of the project is not impaired. Predicting financial revenue, take note of one of the following indicators: 9.1 revenue made up directly the additional infrastructure;
9.2. the revenue made up the entire infrastructure for additional infrastructure.
10. financial analysis includes: 10.1. analysis of project infrastructure created if this annex is applied in section 9.1;
10.2. analysis of all projects owned by the applicant, if the infrastructure of this annex is applied in section 9.2.
11. when analyzing alternatives, at least one of the following: 11.1. financial security alternatives;
11.2. technology choice;
11.3. the possible technical solutions.
12. In assessing the risks analysis of the possible risks and develop a reasonable plan of measures identified for the elimination or reduction of risks. Minister for the environment r. vējonis Environment Ministry submitted version of annex 2 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 15 December 2009. Regulations No 1487 project submission form the Environment Minister r. vējonis annex 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 15 December 2009. Regulations No 1487 cohesion fund project application form of Evaluation Criteria evaluation criteria of quality Assessment 1 points 1. project maturity: obtain at least 1 paragraph 1.1. not ready technical specifications for the procurement of the works tender and construction regulations in accordance with the procedure laid down in the field of accepted technical project the project planned the construction procurement 0

1.2. preparation of technical specifications for the procurement of the works tender procurement according to the governing law of the 1 1.3. developed and legislation in the field of construction in accordance with the procedure laid down in the technical design accepted 2 1.4. technical project būvvald the 3 2. accepted the planned implementation of the project: to obtain at least 1 paragraph 2.1 is longer than 4 years 0 2.2 is from 3 to 4 years 1 2.3 is from 2 to 3 years (not including) 2 2.4 is shorter than 2 years 3 3. the effectiveness of the implementation of the project in relation to the direct waste management improvement of infrastructure: the need to have at least 1 paragraph 3.1. autoruzraudzīb and Superintendence of the eligible cost amount is higher than 3.5 percent of project submission planned total eligible costs 0 autoruzraudzīb and Superintendence of 3.2 eligible cost amount is between 3 and 3.5 percent of project submission planned total eligible costs 1 3.3. autoruzraudzīb and Superintendence of the eligible cost amount is from 2.5 to 3 percent (not including) from the project submission planned total eligible costs 2 autoruzraudzīb and Superintendence of 3.4 eligible cost amount is less about 2.5 per cent of the project planned in the application the total eligible costs of the project 3 4. risk assessments, including the estimated potential cost increase: at least 1 must be obtained in paragraph 4.1 is not made in the application of the draft risk assessment 0 4.2. project risk assessment in the application was made, the plan of measures to prevent the risk identified is not developed or not developed completely 1 4.3. application is made in the project risk assessment , the action plan identified for the elimination or reduction of risk developed in incomplete submission of the project 4.4 2 has carried out an evaluation of the potential risk, develop a reasoned plan of measures identified for the elimination or reduction of risks 3 5. analysed in the project application is possible alternatives (financial, technological, technical solution) and carried out an economic analysis of the project: to obtain at least 1 paragraph 5.1. analysis of alternatives has not been carried out and the project economic analysis 0 5.2 analysis performed for only one of the parameters (only the analysis of alternatives or only economic analysis) have made alternative 1 5.3 analysis and project economic analysis, based on numeric calculations and justify the selection of the proposed alternative 2 alternative is carried out 5.4 analysis and economic analysis of the project, based on the numerical calculations, and justify the proposed alternatives, and selected the alternative with the lowest cost 3 6. Waste Management to be an infrastructure assessment: the need to have at least 1 paragraph 6.1. lifetime of the infrastructure is less than 5 years 0 6.2. infrastructure service life is 5 to 10 years (not including) 1 6.3 infrastructure lifetime of 10 to 15 years 2 6.4. infrastructure lifetime is longer than the 15 years the cost of return 3 7. assessment index (separately collected waste (tonnes) relative to the initial project total costs): note. The average project application selection round costs of return indicators calculation for project submissions that meet the administrative and eligibility criteria – cost of return indicators in relation to the amount of selection round of project submissions: criterion gives additional points 7.1. project cost estimate of return is less than the project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference is more than 10 percent 1


7.2. the project cost estimate of return is equal to or greater than 10 percent, or about 10 percent less than the average of the project application selection round costs ROI Assessment index 2 7.3. project cost estimate of return is greater than the average project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference is more than 10 percent in 3 8. Distributed waste collection infrastructure components (project submission is evaluated If the corresponding component is planned): 8.1 the waste collection point shared (DAS) under the Cabinet of Ministers approved the regional waste management plan, to the 400 residents – 1 point: get the DAS at least 1 paragraph 8.1.1. project application is specified, the percentage of the population of the municipal waste management region will ensure services 0 8.1.2. DAS planned points provide services for less than 20 percent of the population of municipal waste management region 1 8.1.3. DAS planned points provide services from 20 to 40 percent of the population (not including) municipal waste management region territory 2 8.1.4. DAS planned points provide services from 40 to 60 percent of the population (not including) municipal waste management region 4 8.1.5. DAS planned points provide services from 60 to 80 percent of the population (not including) municipal waste management region 6 8.1.6. the planned DAS points provide services from 80 to 100 percent of the population of municipal waste management region 8 8.2. composting area in accordance with the Cabinet of Ministers approved the regional waste management plans : must be obtained at least 1 paragraph 8.2.1. project application is specified, any quantity of municipal waste management in the region during the year, the amount of biodegradable waste is planned to process the composting area 0 8.2.2. planned composting area will provide biodegradable municipal waste recycling, less than 25 percent of the amount of municipal waste management in the region during the year, the amount of biodegradable waste 1 8.2.3. planned area will provide composting the biodegradable municipal waste recycling 25 to 50 percent (not including) of the amount of municipal waste management region during the year, the amount of biodegradable waste 2 8.2.4. planned composting area will provide biodegradable municipal waste processing 50 to 75 percent (not including) of the amount of municipal waste management in the region during the year, the amount of biodegradable waste 4 8.2.5. planned composting area will provide biodegradable municipal waste processing 75 to 100 percent of the amount of municipal waste management in the region during the year, the amount of biodegradable waste 6 8.2.6. sign a contract or agreement whether the letter of intent with local governments or enterprises for waste acceptance criteria of the composting square 2 gives extra points 8.3. sorting and handling systems (including bulky waste) under the Cabinet of Ministers approved the regional waste management plans: obtain at least 1 paragraph 8.3.1. project application is specified, any quantity of municipal waste management in the region during the year, the recyclable waste generated in the processing and handling of sorting center 0 8.3.2. sorting and handling the planned Center will handle less than 25 percent of domestic waste management in the region during the year, the recyclable waste generated 1 8.3.3. sorting and handling the planned Center will handle 25 to 50 percent (not including) of municipal waste management in the region during the year, the recyclable waste 2 generated 8.3.4. sorting and handling the planned Center will handle 50 to 75 percent (not including) of municipal waste management in the region during the year generated recyclable waste 4 8.3.5. sorting and handling the planned Center will handle 75 to 100 percent of municipal waste management in the region during the year generated recyclable waste 6 8.3.6. contract signed or agreement or letter of intent with local governments or enterprises for waste sorting and handling the adoption Center 2 criteria gives extra points to 8.4 household hazardous waste collection point in accordance with the statutory classification of hazardous waste: 8.4.1. project application is specified, a household hazardous waste will be collected in the collection points must be obtained at least 1 0 point 8.4.2 provides 1 to 5 types (name), a household hazardous waste collection 1 8.4.3 provides 6 to 10 type (name), a household hazardous waste collection 2 8.4.4 provides 11 up to 14 types of (name), a household hazardous waste collection 3 8.4.5 provides more than 14 type (name), a household hazardous waste collection 4 9. Hazardous waste management infrastructure the medical institutions and laboratories (project submission is evaluated, if the planned infrastructure the medical institutions and laboratories): 9.1. hazardous waste point up the medical institutions or laboratories: obtain at least 1 paragraph 9.1.1. the project is not specified in the application what hazardous waste hazardous waste will be collected 0 points 9.1.2. hazardous waste (biological, chemical, municipal waste) sorting 1 9.1.3. hazardous waste (biological, chemical, municipal waste) sorting, storage 2 9.1.4. hazardous waste (organic, including 3 and 4 degrees of bio-agents, chemical, for domestic waste) sorting, storing the corresponding isolated and temperature conditions, neutralization 4 9.2. as a result of the implementation of the project intended to provide medical institutions create hazardous waste management : 9.2.1. as a result of the implementation of the project to ensure the management of hazardous waste treatment facilities, which serve residents total fewer than 200 000 inhabitants 0 to obtain at least 1 paragraph 9.2.2. as a result of the implementation of the project to ensure the management of hazardous waste treatment facilities, which serve the total number of the population is from 000 to 350 000 200 (not including) population of 1 9.2.3. as a result of the implementation of the project to ensure the management of hazardous waste treatment facilities where the total number of population served is from 350 000 to 2 500 000 inhabitants 9.2.4. as a result of the implementation of the project to ensure the management of hazardous waste treatment facilities, which serve the total number of the population of more than 3 500 000 population 9.3. as a result of the implementation of the project for the establishment of a shared management of hazardous waste for collection points and equip them: 9.3.1. as a result of the implementation of the project is not intended to create a shared management of hazardous waste for collection points and equipping them to be at least 0 1 paragraph 9.3.2. as a result of the implementation of the project for created to be distributed to the management of hazardous waste collection point for 1 project implementation 9.3.3. provides for the establishment of a shared management of hazardous waste for collection points and equipping them 2 9.4. hazardous waste operator shall ensure for hazardous waste management doctorate, ambulance, dental surgeries, veterinary clinics, laboratories and other institutions: 9.4.1. hazardous waste operator does not provide the management of hazardous waste, ambulance, doctoral dental surgeries, veterinary clinics, laboratories and other institutions 0 gives extra points criteria 9.4.2. hazardous waste operator shall ensure for hazardous waste management-doctorate , ambulance, dental surgeries, veterinary clinics, laboratories and other institutions 3 1.1. criteria for the assessment of horizontal priorities points 10. Project intended to raise awareness of waste sorting needs: the criterion gives additional points 10.1. information measures not provided for in the 0 10.2 for awareness of waste sorting needs relating to infrastructure, waste Sorted 5 11. including the biodegradable waste, disposal or processing support (sustainable development) : must be obtained at least 1 paragraph 11.1. disposal or recycling is not known whom, or the project is not intended to create a sorting line 0 11.2. marketing or processing operator known, reached a written agreement (letter of intent) 1 11.3. disposal or processing contracts concluded and investigator of marketing or processing, or some processing is performed outside the national territory 2


11.4. the disposal or processing contracts concluded, and the reviewer of marketing or processing, or some processing is carried out in the territory of the country shall not be processed 3 12. Ensure waste going into landfill disposal (sustainable development): the criterion gives additional points 12.1. not concluded with the operator of the landfill of non-recyclable waste disposal landfill in adoption 0 12.2 concluded with the operator of the landfill of non-recyclable waste disposal landfill acceptance 3 13. applicant's Project additional financial contribution to the implementation of the project (macroeconomic stability) : the criterion gives extra points to less than 5 percent of the 13.1 of the project's eligible costs 1 13.2. from 5 to 10 percent of the eligible costs of the project 2 13.3. more than 10 percent of the project's eligible costs project 3 14. area development index project at the date of the application (of the balanced development of the territory): the criterion gives additional points 14.1. the average area development index greater than + 1.6 1 14.2. the average area development index from-to + 2 1.6 0.57 14.3. the average area development index less than-0.57
3 15. After project implementation in the region created more jobs (of the balanced development of the territory): the criterion gives additional points 15.1. additional jobs not created 0 15.2. additional jobs created Riga planning region 1 9.5. additional jobs created in other regions, with the exception of planning in the planning of Riga region 2 2. Eligibility 2.1. submission of project eligibility criteria Yes/No/NA 16. activities envisaged under the project to conform to the approved regional waste management plan for the project N 17 actions comply with the laws and regulations on waste collection and sorting site types, requirements collection and sorting, as well as the biodegradable waste composting site installation and management of the project application 18. N corresponds to the purpose of the activity, setting up sustainable waste, including hazardous waste management system in support of the separate collection of waste infrastructure development to promote the recycling of materials N 19. submission of the project activities meet the eligible activities-waste management infrastructure, including separate waste collection point (including hazardous waste collection point up the medical institutions , laboratories and others), composting area, sorting and handling centres with waste reduction, waste management, improving the quality and availability of adequate regional waste management plans the project application to the N 20 corresponds to activities eligible costs P 21. submission of the project activity does not meet the eligible costs of the project application, P 22. project description provides the necessary information on the action to be taken: N 22.1. given the technical characteristics of the activities to be 22.2. planned monitoring indicators are clearly defined and measurable and they meet the purpose of the activity 22.3. given the arrangement of activities to the project area 22.4 of the activities to provide. economic benefits. activities to provide 22.5 qualitative and quantitative environmental benefits 22.6. the action to be taken to provide qualitative and quantitative contribution to the European Union and the Republic of Latvia on the implementation of the requirements of environmental protection and waste management area 14.1. described the principle of "the polluter pays", the project 23. project timetable corresponds to the planned project activities P 24. the information provided in the application stating the project applicant will ensure the sustainability of the project results: N 24.1. have the appropriate institutional structure is appropriate for a planned 24.2. as a result of the project built the infrastructure operating and maintenance costs of 24.3. appropriate tariffs are planned, which will provide the necessary operating and development costs (in the case of a loan-repayment of the loan also) 24.4. is or will be available for staff to ensure the implementation of the project according to the fixed assets resulting from the operation of the project submission contains 25 works (for example , composting area, separate waste collection points) meet the project schedule and includes key jobs that characterized the proposed project objectives N 26. Project cost-benefit analysis carried out by applying: N 26.1. real social discount rate or the appropriate nominal discount rate of 26.2. the real financial discount rate or the appropriate nominal discount rate of 26.3. the appropriate conversion factor scores 16.4. appropriate medium and long-term forecasts for 27. financial analysis of the project the results attest to the financial stability of the project N 28. Cohesion Fund financing requested the aid intensity based on project cost-benefit analysis N 29 project total cost does not exceed the activity project application selection within the Cohesion Fund co-financing available N 30. Project budget includes cost: 30.1. the project includes all N requires the heading of costs is under construction 30.2. the estimates are reasonable and justified 30.3., indicate clearly the assumptions for the calculation of the costs directly necessary 18.9. project 30.5. meet the projected market prices 31. project cash flow forecast : P 31.1. displays both the demand and the cost of funding forecast 31.2. meet the planned timetable 31.3. meet the project's financial plan of the project planned in the application 32. project implementation and human resources ensure planned legislation in certain functions of the beneficiaries: 32.1. administrative project P (for example, procurement, contract administration, record keeping) 20.0. projects in the financial management (for example, accounting and payments, financial planning) management of technical projects (32.3. example , in the design and construction of the reconciliation process, the progress reports, and report preparation) control project planned 33. publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the laws and regulations on the cohesion fund the project publicity and information dissemination measures P 2.2. Project eligibility criteria of the applicant Yes/No 34. Project applicant is a corporation, which has a contract with the municipal waste management services in the administrative territory or for which a contract with the consignee for the disposal of hazardous waste in N 35. Project the applicant does not have tax debt to the application the first working day of the month (the project has stated that the applicant has paid the taxes and other State and local government at minimum payments in full and within the time limits laws) N 36. A corporation is not in liquidation or insolvency proceedings (a project the applicant confirms that it has not been declared bankrupt, including not in the bailout process, and that the economic activity is not terminated or in accordance with the commercial register of the information available, it is not in the process of liquidation) N 37. Corporation that made the project application, the legislative agenda is set for the required permits issued by the nature and extent of the waste management N 38. financial situation of the applicant, the project's assessment confirms the Corporation's financial stability after the implementation of the project N 39. project has stated that the applicant will provide funding from its own resources, if the increase in the cost of the project N 40. applicant Project has stated that the project would result in the implementation of the infrastructure project will be the property of the applicant after the implementation of the project and in accordance with the conditions of the activity will be in the region When the planned activities support N 41. Project applicant has stated that the property that will be carried, stored or will be in the initial investment of the project is the property of the applicant or the applicant has long-term lease rights (at least another five years after the implementation of the project), and it is registered in the land register N 42. Project applicant has stated that it has the right to carry out the works concerned, which within the framework of the project for the construction works N 43. Project applicant has stated that is not supplied incorrect information in relation to the structural funds of the European Union for the implementation of projects co-financed Project applicant N 44. has stated that did not commit a criminal offence, which hit the Republic of Latvia or the European Union's financial interests, and the trader under criminal law is coercive influence N 45. the project has stated that the applicant has not received or intended to receive support for the same eligible costs of other activities in the framework of the local , regional, national or European Union funds N


46. the project the applicant has stated that it is noticed and not breach state aid to business conditions for receiving N 3. Administrative criteria yes/no/NA 47. a project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified N 48. project submissions prepared according to activity submission form for the submission of draft N 49. prepared for Latvian language N 50. submission of the project drawn up into N 51. project submission signed by the authorised person N 52. Filed one project submission of an original and three copies as well as the electronic version of that annex contains only the cost benefit analysis (where the application is filed in paper form) P 53. both the project the original and the copy of the application submitted to the caurauklot, of the attached document pages numbered (if the application is filed in paper form) P 54. project application is designed according to the electronic circulation of documents regulatory requirements in laws (where the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N 55. project application signed with a secure electronic signature (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N application of the project 56. developed in DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N 57. project application has been developed and presented in the annex pursuant to the electronic circulation of documents regulatory requirements in laws (where the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N 58. project application form filled in all sections of the project application N 59. Add all specified attachments: P 59.1. prepare technical specifications for the procurement of the works tender in accordance with procurement laws regulating 59.2. developed and legislation in order to harmonize the technical design or the accepted technical project būvvald 59.3. estimate of the works that the municipality 59.4. administrative territory of the planned infrastructure, proof that the project complies with the applicable municipal planning or detailed to 59.5. Environment monitoring national Office opinion on the environmental impact assessment of the final report or the decision on the environmental impact assessment procedure, the non-application of the agreement between the municipality of 59.6., and the Corporation for the service of waste management in the administrative territory of the copy or the contract with the recipient about the management of hazardous waste permit, a copy of the relevant waste 59.7. types and volume management copy copy of the credit agreement concluded 59.8. or lending institution issued a document certifying that the credit will be provided a copy of the project, 59.9. cash flow forecast 4. Criteria for the award of funding to Yes/No/NA 60. Selective waste collection infrastructure project application 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 8 and 11. quality criteria the overall rating is at least eight points N 61. Hazardous waste management infrastructure of medical institutions and laboratories project application 1. , 2., 3., 4., 5., 6, and 9. quality criteria the overall rating of at least 10 points N N – legend: If the rating is negative, the project's application rejected. P – a decision on project approval with conditions (project applicant must ensure compliance with the criteria, specifying the project submission within the time limit laid down in that decision). NA (not applicable)-if the specified criteria are not attributable to the applicant of the project, the project is assessed on this criterion.
Minister for the environment r. vējonis annex 4 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 15 December 2009. Regulations No 1487 follow-up project Environment Minister r. vējonis